Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #687921 > unrolled thread
| Started by | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-05-31 02:37 -0400 |
| Last post | 2018-06-03 09:06 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 578 — 22 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
Chelsea Handler says here armed guards don't kill children! benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-31 02:37 -0400
Re:Chelsea Handler says here armed guards don't kill children! Libor Striz <poutnik4REMOVEnntp@CAPITALSgmail.com> - 2018-05-31 09:16 +0200
Re: Chelsea Handler says here armed guards don't kill children! benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-31 03:51 -0400
Slaughtering concert goers. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-31 05:22 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-31 12:06 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-31 10:02 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-31 15:49 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-05-31 20:12 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-31 17:20 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-31 16:37 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-31 19:57 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-31 17:12 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-31 21:38 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-31 21:32 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 02:42 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 07:54 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 20:22 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 17:36 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 23:07 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 20:31 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-02 01:47 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 23:11 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-08 07:15 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-01 08:50 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 09:09 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-01 22:53 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 23:13 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-01 23:39 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 00:16 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-02 11:29 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 11:43 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-02 14:33 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 16:58 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-05-31 19:49 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-05-31 17:51 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-31 21:26 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 02:39 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 07:57 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 20:13 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-01 03:21 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 07:46 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-01 08:12 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 08:27 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-01 11:59 -0700
Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄ Slaughtering concert goers. ❄ Snowflake ❄ Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-06-01 14:07 -0500
Re: ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-01 18:50 -0700
Re: ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 23:00 -0700
Re: ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-01 23:13 -0700
Re: ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 23:29 -0700
Re: ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-01 23:47 -0700
Re: ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 00:18 -0700
Re: ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-02 09:14 -0700
Re: ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 11:48 -0700
Re: ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-02 14:28 -0700
Re: ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 20:14 -0400
Re: ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 00:47 +0000
Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄ ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? ❄ Snowflake ❄ Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-06-02 08:15 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 12:30 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-01 17:09 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 17:37 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-01 18:00 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 18:14 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 23:11 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 20:34 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-02 01:09 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 22:48 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-02 04:53 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 10:11 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 00:12 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 23:09 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 20:32 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-02 00:47 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 22:05 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-02 01:31 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 23:01 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 20:39 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 18:16 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 23:14 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 20:35 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-02 01:19 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 22:40 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 21:26 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 19:11 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 23:15 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 20:36 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-02 01:32 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 23:03 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 20:34 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 20:32 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 20:26 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-01 18:01 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-01 08:08 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 07:40 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 21:35 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 19:15 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 23:53 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 21:09 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-02 01:51 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 23:12 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-02 04:54 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 22:00 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-02 05:06 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 22:09 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-02 01:54 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 23:13 -0700
The Supreme Court got it wrong. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-02 06:51 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 11:59 -0400
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 10:43 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 16:25 -0400
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 13:28 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 19:45 -0400
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 00:47 +0000
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-06-03 16:08 -0600
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 22:32 +0000
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-03 23:24 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 01:12 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-04 21:15 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 04:31 +0000
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 10:37 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-02 10:48 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 11:00 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-02 13:27 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 13:32 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-02 16:58 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 21:38 -0400
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 18:49 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-03 03:49 +0000
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 21:45 -0700
Permission to breath ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-02 19:10 -0700
Re: Permission to breath ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 19:13 -0700
Re: Permission to breath ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 20:07 -0700
Re: Permission to breath ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 20:10 -0700
Re: Permission to breath ? Earle Jones <earle.jones@comcast.net> - 2018-06-02 20:36 -0700
Re: Permission to breath ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 20:53 -0700
Re: Permission to breath ? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 23:33 -0400
Re: Permission to breath ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 20:42 -0700
Re: Permission to breath ? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-03 07:57 -0400
Re: Permission to breath ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 11:08 -0700
Re: Permission to breath ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 20:07 -0700
Clarity. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-03 08:52 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-03 03:46 +0000
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 21:53 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-02 22:59 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 23:19 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-03 09:10 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 00:31 -0400
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 06:12 +0000
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 18:26 -0400
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 16:37 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 23:10 -0400
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 20:54 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-06 22:19 -0500
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-06 20:58 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-07 00:24 -0400
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-07 05:43 +0000
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-08 07:17 +0000
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-08 00:21 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-09 16:07 +0000
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 09:30 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-10 01:32 +0000
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-09 18:34 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 20:50 -0700
"Natural Rights" aren't always wonderful. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-09 19:02 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 20:49 -0700
Depressed Losers, slaughtering consert goers, is "natural" ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-09 12:21 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 02:18 -0400
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 06:25 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 18:38 -0400
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 16:43 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 23:16 -0400
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 21:03 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 09:46 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-02 01:53 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 23:13 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-06-02 01:20 -0400
Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-02 06:27 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 10:14 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-02 10:38 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 10:57 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-02 13:27 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 13:29 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-02 16:57 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 00:47 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-02 18:25 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 18:53 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-02 19:29 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 20:09 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-02 21:02 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 21:32 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-03 07:59 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-03 04:02 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 11:03 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-03 11:12 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 11:38 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-03 11:53 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 12:04 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 12:16 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 12:26 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 12:33 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 12:38 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 12:44 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 13:14 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 13:17 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 13:21 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-03 16:40 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 16:47 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 16:57 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 17:00 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-03 17:05 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 17:13 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-03 18:31 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 18:40 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-04 03:44 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 08:39 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-04 17:37 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 15:54 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-03 04:01 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 11:02 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-03 11:13 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 11:39 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-03 11:54 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 12:05 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-03 16:41 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 16:48 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-03 17:07 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 17:14 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 17:17 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 17:21 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-06-03 20:11 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 21:20 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-03 18:31 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 18:43 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-04 03:45 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 08:40 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-04 12:03 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 00:04 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 12:05 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-04 00:47 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 01:11 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-04 21:13 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 04:31 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 18:04 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 16:21 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 20:37 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 18:05 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 23:30 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 21:03 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 17:11 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 00:02 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 00:02 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 04:19 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 17:59 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 15:05 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-05 15:10 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 16:24 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-05 16:27 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 18:44 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 17:00 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 21:42 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 19:12 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-04 17:27 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 15:47 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-04 23:47 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 04:19 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-04 23:51 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 06:11 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-05 07:19 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 08:06 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-05 09:37 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 16:51 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-05 13:18 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 14:50 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-05 16:33 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 17:09 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-05 17:32 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 18:04 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-05 22:35 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-06 15:05 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-05 18:06 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 18:10 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-05 18:48 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-06 07:48 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-06 15:05 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-06 15:27 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-06 16:30 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-06 08:55 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-06 15:32 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-06 16:33 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-06 15:34 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-06 19:03 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-06 17:54 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-06 17:51 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 18:06 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-05 20:45 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 18:15 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 16:33 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 21:41 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 19:11 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 18:09 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 16:24 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 21:17 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 18:50 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 18:08 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 16:23 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 21:01 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 18:10 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 23:32 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 21:06 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-08 05:15 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-08 06:41 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-08 07:49 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-08 07:22 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-08 21:11 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-08 21:30 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-08 21:54 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-08 22:06 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-08 22:42 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-08 22:50 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-04 23:07 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 04:31 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-31 21:25 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 02:37 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 07:57 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 21:51 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-01 08:00 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-01 06:26 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 21:28 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 19:12 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 23:27 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 21:07 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-02 01:44 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 23:09 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-06-03 16:19 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 22:32 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-06-03 21:23 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 20:31 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-06-03 22:09 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 21:14 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-06-03 23:48 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 22:47 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-06-04 13:44 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 13:10 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 13:19 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 23:53 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-06-04 13:57 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 13:22 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 00:30 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-06-04 02:48 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 00:58 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-04 22:19 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-04 20:56 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 04:26 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-04 23:45 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 04:19 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-04 21:30 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-04 01:30 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-06-04 14:00 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-04 22:45 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 04:19 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-04 23:39 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 06:11 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-05 07:48 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 06:15 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-05 15:20 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 14:55 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-05 20:34 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 18:52 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-05 22:57 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 20:47 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-07 15:09 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-07 16:52 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-07 20:14 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-08 06:41 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-08 08:29 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-08 08:20 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-08 07:16 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-08 06:25 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-08 08:30 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-04 21:32 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 00:34 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-06-04 14:07 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 13:27 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-06-04 17:07 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 16:18 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-04 16:46 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 17:04 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-08 07:15 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-04 22:13 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 20:16 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-04 23:41 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 06:11 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 04:19 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-06-05 02:29 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-05 07:50 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-05 07:41 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-06-05 10:38 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 10:01 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-05 12:55 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-05 07:58 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 08:11 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-05 11:56 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-06-05 14:58 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 12:17 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-05 13:02 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 14:45 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-05 14:51 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 14:56 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-05 15:02 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 18:47 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-05 15:51 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-06-05 22:44 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 17:04 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 23:04 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 20:49 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 18:45 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-05 15:50 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 17:05 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-05 17:11 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 17:20 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 22:42 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 20:46 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 21:46 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 19:15 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 21:45 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 19:13 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 23:36 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 21:07 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 17:01 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 22:55 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 20:47 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-08 21:08 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-08 21:29 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-08 22:02 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-08 22:07 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-08 22:44 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-08 22:52 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-09 02:13 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-08 23:20 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-09 06:22 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 15:16 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-09 08:28 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 15:50 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-09 09:23 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 09:51 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-09 10:29 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 10:35 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-09 20:16 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 21:08 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-10 14:33 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-10 14:54 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 14:56 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 15:25 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-10 17:04 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-10 17:02 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-06-09 13:42 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 14:32 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-06-09 16:24 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 15:34 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-06-09 17:31 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 16:42 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-09 23:47 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 16:57 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-09 18:59 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 20:53 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 16:36 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-09 12:22 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 09:32 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 10:07 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Horace <skinnydude@a1c.org> - 2018-06-09 13:22 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Horace <skinnydude@a1c.org> - 2018-06-09 13:31 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 10:35 -0700
Truth Avoidance. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-09 12:11 -0700
Re: Truth Avoidance. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 14:33 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-09 10:09 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-09 12:20 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 09:31 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-09 21:12 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 14:31 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Horace <skinnydude@a1c.org> - 2018-06-09 18:41 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-09 15:46 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 16:36 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-09 16:42 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 16:43 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-09 16:50 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 17:08 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-09 17:11 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 20:32 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-09 23:55 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-10 08:36 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 11:53 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 00:16 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 02:01 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 12:03 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-05 16:20 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-05 16:43 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-05 16:59 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 17:06 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-05 17:33 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 18:05 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-05 18:06 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 18:11 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-06 04:17 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-06 15:05 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-06 19:03 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-07 05:56 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-07 22:05 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 23:05 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 20:49 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-05 18:08 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 18:45 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 16:46 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-05 17:04 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 17:23 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-05 17:26 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 18:03 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 23:09 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 20:52 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-07 15:08 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-07 16:51 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-08 07:18 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-08 08:14 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-08 11:55 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 23:07 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 20:50 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-05 17:00 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 17:12 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-05 17:56 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 18:07 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-05 17:38 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-05 17:57 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 18:08 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-05 22:45 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-06 04:18 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-06 15:05 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-06 15:05 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-05 16:59 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-08 07:17 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 17:10 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-05 18:01 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 18:09 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-05 20:36 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 18:51 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-01 09:09 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 07:39 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-01 13:29 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 11:09 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-01 17:20 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 14:35 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-01 23:08 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 23:15 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-02 11:26 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 11:42 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-02 14:32 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 20:37 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 00:47 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 17:57 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-02 18:30 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 18:51 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-02 19:32 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 00:09 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-06-03 16:12 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 22:32 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 15:53 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-06-03 15:59 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 15:02 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-06-03 16:24 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 16:01 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-06-03 19:51 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 16:56 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-06-03 20:21 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 17:24 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-06-03 23:36 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-06-03 21:14 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 20:28 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-06-03 21:58 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 21:02 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-04 23:17 -0500
Re: Chelsea Handler says here armed guards don't kill children! Dave Zeeman <arougroutinette@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 09:06 -0700
Page 10 of 29 — ← Prev page 1 … 8 9 [10] 11 12 … 29 Next page →
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-02 13:29 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. |
| Message-ID | <fngd1sF8a4tU4@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #688320 |
On 6/2/18 1:27 PM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: > On Sat, 2 Jun 2018 10:57:54 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> > wrote: > >> On 6/2/18 10:38 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: >>> On Sat, 2 Jun 2018 10:14:41 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> On 6/2/18 6:27 AM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote: >>>>>> A well regulated Militia [ no comma ] >>>>>> being necessary to the security of a free State, ... >>>>> >>>>> Or, more clearly: " For The State's Militia, ... " >>>>> >>>>> Clearly, no "Militia" should include depressed gunmen >>>>> slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. >>>>> >>>> And when stating "no comma", keep in mind there were something like >>>> seven different versions of the second amendment with different commas >>>> and capitalization. >>> >>> Cool- how many of the say "The right of the state"???? >>> >> I do not think that phrase is in the constitution > > Correct. > Are you just looking for specific phrases or are you trying to get to a point? I suspect you are trying to say that since that phrase is not there this means the concept of what the states can do (what they have rights to do) is not there. Is that correct? If not did you have a broader point? -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-02 16:57 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. |
| Message-ID | <mlb6hddmrhtfk9tumrle8h9id6m0q94hin@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #688325 |
On Sat, 2 Jun 2018 13:29:48 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >On 6/2/18 1:27 PM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: >> On Sat, 2 Jun 2018 10:57:54 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >> wrote: >> >>> On 6/2/18 10:38 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: >>>> On Sat, 2 Jun 2018 10:14:41 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 6/2/18 6:27 AM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote: >>>>>>> A well regulated Militia [ no comma ] >>>>>>> being necessary to the security of a free State, ... >>>>>> >>>>>> Or, more clearly: " For The State's Militia, ... " >>>>>> >>>>>> Clearly, no "Militia" should include depressed gunmen >>>>>> slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. >>>>>> >>>>> And when stating "no comma", keep in mind there were something like >>>>> seven different versions of the second amendment with different commas >>>>> and capitalization. >>>> >>>> Cool- how many of the say "The right of the state"???? >>>> >>> I do not think that phrase is in the constitution >> >> Correct. >> >Are you just looking for specific phrases or are you trying to get to a >point? I suspect you are trying to say that since that phrase is not >there this means the concept of what the states can do (what they have >rights to do) is not there. Is that correct? If not did you have a >broader point? No, you're not even close. It's the people's right, not the militia's right, not the state's right, not the feds' right.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-03 00:47 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. |
| Message-ID | <fngs46Fb1d7U6@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #688365 |
Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> wrote: > On Sat, 2 Jun 2018 13:29:48 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> > wrote: > >> On 6/2/18 1:27 PM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: >>> On Sat, 2 Jun 2018 10:57:54 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> On 6/2/18 10:38 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: >>>>> On Sat, 2 Jun 2018 10:14:41 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 6/2/18 6:27 AM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote: >>>>>>>> A well regulated Militia [ no comma ] >>>>>>>> being necessary to the security of a free State, ... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Or, more clearly: " For The State's Militia, ... " >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Clearly, no "Militia" should include depressed gunmen >>>>>>> slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. >>>>>>> >>>>>> And when stating "no comma", keep in mind there were something like >>>>>> seven different versions of the second amendment with different commas >>>>>> and capitalization. >>>>> >>>>> Cool- how many of the say "The right of the state"???? >>>>> >>>> I do not think that phrase is in the constitution >>> >>> Correct. >>> >> Are you just looking for specific phrases or are you trying to get to a >> point? I suspect you are trying to say that since that phrase is not >> there this means the concept of what the states can do (what they have >> rights to do) is not there. Is that correct? If not did you have a >> broader point? > > No, you're not even close. > > It's the people's right, not the militia's right, not the state's > right, not the feds' right. > That is your unsupported opinion. Fair enough.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-02 18:25 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. |
| Message-ID | <pevgcs$uks$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #688378 |
In news:fngs46Fb1d7U6@mid.individual.net, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: > Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> wrote: >> On Sat, 2 Jun 2018 13:29:48 -0700, Snit >> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> On 6/2/18 1:27 PM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: >>>> On Sat, 2 Jun 2018 10:57:54 -0700, Snit >>>> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>> On 6/2/18 10:38 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: >>>>>> On Sat, 2 Jun 2018 10:14:41 -0700, Snit >>>>>> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>> On 6/2/18 6:27 AM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote: >>>>>>>>> A well regulated Militia [ no comma ] >>>>>>>>> being necessary to the security of a free State, ... >>>>>>>> Or, more clearly: " For The State's Militia, ... " >>>>>>>> Clearly, no "Militia" should include depressed gunmen >>>>>>>> slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. >>>>>>> And when stating "no comma", keep in mind there were something >>>>>>> like seven different versions of the second amendment with >>>>>>> different commas and capitalization. >>>>>> Cool- how many of the say "The right of the state"???? >>>>> I do not think that phrase is in the constitution >>>> Correct. >>> Are you just looking for specific phrases or are you trying to get >>> to a point? I suspect you are trying to say that since that phrase >>> is not there this means the concept of what the states can do (what >>> they have rights to do) is not there. Is that correct? If not did >>> you have a broader point? >> No, you're not even close. >> It's the people's right, not the militia's right, not the state's >> right, not the feds' right. > That is your unsupported opinion. Fair enough. It's supported by the Supreme Court of the United States of America. Now show us your hand. Oh, right. You already did.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-02 18:53 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. |
| Message-ID | <fngvvuFbk5tU8@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #688386 |
On 6/2/18 6:25 PM, max headroom wrote: > In news:fngs46Fb1d7U6@mid.individual.net, > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: > >> Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> wrote: >>> On Sat, 2 Jun 2018 13:29:48 -0700, Snit >>> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>> On 6/2/18 1:27 PM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: >>>>> On Sat, 2 Jun 2018 10:57:54 -0700, Snit >>>>> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>> On 6/2/18 10:38 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: >>>>>>> On Sat, 2 Jun 2018 10:14:41 -0700, Snit >>>>>>> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> On 6/2/18 6:27 AM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> A well regulated Militia [ no comma ] >>>>>>>>>> being necessary to the security of a free State, ... > >>>>>>>>> Or, more clearly: " For The State's Militia, ... " > >>>>>>>>> Clearly, no "Militia" should include depressed gunmen >>>>>>>>> slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. > >>>>>>>> And when stating "no comma", keep in mind there were something >>>>>>>> like seven different versions of the second amendment with >>>>>>>> different commas and capitalization. > >>>>>>> Cool- how many of the say "The right of the state"???? > >>>>>> I do not think that phrase is in the constitution > >>>>> Correct. > >>>> Are you just looking for specific phrases or are you trying to get >>>> to a point? I suspect you are trying to say that since that phrase >>>> is not there this means the concept of what the states can do (what >>>> they have rights to do) is not there. Is that correct? If not did >>>> you have a broader point? > >>> No, you're not even close. > >>> It's the people's right, not the militia's right, not the state's >>> right, not the feds' right. > >> That is your unsupported opinion. Fair enough. > > It's supported by the Supreme Court of the United States of America. Now show us your hand. > > Oh, right. You already did. > > Well, the SCOTUS also talked of limits, but the fact that they acted with judicial activism and went against the law as written has been covered. I am not denying it in any way. But nice try. :) -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-02 19:29 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. |
| Message-ID | <pevkbc$f79$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #688391 |
In news:fngvvuFbk5tU8@mid.individual.net, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: > On 6/2/18 6:25 PM, max headroom wrote: >> In news:fngs46Fb1d7U6@mid.individual.net, >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: >>> Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> wrote: >>>> It's the people's right, not the militia's right, not the state's >>>> right, not the feds' right. >>> That is your unsupported opinion. Fair enough. >> It's supported by the Supreme Court of the United States of America. >> Now show us your hand. >> Oh, right. You already did. > Well, the SCOTUS also talked of limits, but the fact that they acted > with judicial activism and went against the law as written... Bullshit. > ... has been covered. I am not denying it in any way. > But nice try. :) No, it wasn't. It's been tried before, and it's been beaten down before.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-02 20:09 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. |
| Message-ID | <fnh4fqFcb78U3@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #688398 |
On 6/2/18 7:29 PM, max headroom wrote: > In news:fngvvuFbk5tU8@mid.individual.net, > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: > >> On 6/2/18 6:25 PM, max headroom wrote: >>> In news:fngs46Fb1d7U6@mid.individual.net, >>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: >>>> Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> wrote: > >>>>> It's the people's right, not the militia's right, not the state's >>>>> right, not the feds' right. > >>>> That is your unsupported opinion. Fair enough. > >>> It's supported by the Supreme Court of the United States of America. >>> Now show us your hand. > >>> Oh, right. You already did. > >> Well, the SCOTUS also talked of limits, but the fact that they acted >> with judicial activism and went against the law as written... > > Bullshit. https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/antonin-scalia-was-wrong-about-the-meaning-of-bear-arms/2018/05/21/9243ac66-5d11-11e8-b2b8-08a538d9dbd6_story.html ----- A search of Brigham Young University’s new online Corpus of Founding Era American English, with more than 95,000 texts and 138 million words, yields 281 instances of the phrase “bear arms.” BYU’s Corpus of Early Modern English, with 40,000 texts and close to 1.3 billion words, shows 1,572 instances of the phrase. Subtracting about 350 duplicate matches, that leaves about 1,500 separate occurrences of “bear arms” in the 17th and 18th centuries, and only a handful don’t refer to war, soldiering or organized, armed action. These databases confirm that the natural meaning of “bear arms” in the framers’ day was military. But we shouldn’t need big data to tell us this. “Bear arms” has never worked comfortably with the language of personal self-defense, hunting or target practice. ----- Not really that complex. :) >> ... has been covered. I am not denying it in any way. > >> But nice try. :) > > No, it wasn't. It's been tried before, and it's been beaten down before. Even with the judicial activism of Heller, it was not as friendly to the NRA crowd as some like to push. It is about "the licensing requirement insofar as it prohibits carrying an unlicensed firearm in the home, and the trigger-lock requirement insofar as it prohibits the use of functional firearms in the home." It is about having a common handgun in your home, not about carrying one around, no less other arms. It even specifically speaks of acceptance of "limits the type of weapon to which the right applies to those used by the militia, i.e., those in common use for lawful purposes". It also notes that "the Second Amendment right is not unlimited" and specifically states "It is not a right to keep and carry any weapon whatsoever in any manner whatsoever and for whatever purpose" and that this does not mean we cannot have "laws forbidding the carrying of firearms in sensitive places such as schools and government buildings, or laws imposing conditions and qualifications on the commercial sale of arms" and it "finds support in the historical tradition of prohibiting the carrying of dangerous and unusual weapons". -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-02 21:02 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. |
| Message-ID | <pevpgv$1a0$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #688406 |
In news:fnh4fqFcb78U3@mid.individual.net, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: > On 6/2/18 7:29 PM, max headroom wrote: >> In news:fngvvuFbk5tU8@mid.individual.net, >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: >>> On 6/2/18 6:25 PM, max headroom wrote: >>>> In news:fngs46Fb1d7U6@mid.individual.net, >>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: >>>>> Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> wrote: >>>>>> It's the people's right, not the militia's right, not the state's >>>>>> right, not the feds' right. >>>>> That is your unsupported opinion. Fair enough. >>>> It's supported by the Supreme Court of the United States of >>>> America. Now show us your hand. >>>> Oh, right. You already did. >>> Well, the SCOTUS also talked of limits, but the fact that they acted >>> with judicial activism and went against the law as written... >> Bullshit. > https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/antonin-scalia-was-wrong-about-the-meaning-of-bear-arms/2018/05/21/9243ac66-5d11-11e8-b2b8-08a538d9dbd6_story.html <yawn> Again with the screed from the ignored academic with an ax to grind. >>> ... has been covered. I am not denying it in any way. >>> But nice try. :) >> No, it wasn't. It's been tried before, and it's been beaten down >> before. > Even with the judicial activism of Heller, it was not as friendly to the > NRA crowd as some like to push. It was a good start. After Trump appoints another justice or two, we can expand them. :)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-02 21:32 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. |
| Message-ID | <fnh9b2Fd558U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #688422 |
On 6/2/18 9:02 PM, max headroom wrote: > In news:fnh4fqFcb78U3@mid.individual.net, > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: > >> On 6/2/18 7:29 PM, max headroom wrote: >>> In news:fngvvuFbk5tU8@mid.individual.net, >>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: >>>> On 6/2/18 6:25 PM, max headroom wrote: >>>>> In news:fngs46Fb1d7U6@mid.individual.net, >>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: >>>>>> Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> wrote: > >>>>>>> It's the people's right, not the militia's right, not the state's >>>>>>> right, not the feds' right. > >>>>>> That is your unsupported opinion. Fair enough. > >>>>> It's supported by the Supreme Court of the United States of >>>>> America. Now show us your hand. > >>>>> Oh, right. You already did. > >>>> Well, the SCOTUS also talked of limits, but the fact that they acted >>>> with judicial activism and went against the law as written... > >>> Bullshit. > >> https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/antonin-scalia-was-wrong-about-the-meaning-of-bear-arms/2018/05/21/9243ac66-5d11-11e8-b2b8-08a538d9dbd6_story.html > > <yawn> Again with the screed from the ignored academic with an ax to grind. As long as you look at the actual meaning of the words and claim they are nothing but a "screed" there is no agreement. And I am OK with that. You can disagree. No harm in it. So, how is the weather in your neck of the woods? >>>> ... has been covered. I am not denying it in any way. > >>>> But nice try. :) > >>> No, it wasn't. It's been tried before, and it's been beaten down >>> before. > >> Even with the judicial activism of Heller, it was not as friendly to the >> NRA crowd as some like to push. > > It was a good start. After Trump appoints another justice or two, we can expand them. :) I do not think judicial activism is "a good start". -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-03 07:59 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. |
| Message-ID | <cLQQC.219874$go7.151732@fx08.iad> |
| In reply to | #688422 |
On 6/3/2018 12:02 AM, max headroom wrote: > In news:fnh4fqFcb78U3@mid.individual.net, > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: > >> On 6/2/18 7:29 PM, max headroom wrote: >>> In news:fngvvuFbk5tU8@mid.individual.net, >>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: >>>> On 6/2/18 6:25 PM, max headroom wrote: >>>>> In news:fngs46Fb1d7U6@mid.individual.net, >>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: >>>>>> Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> wrote: > >>>>>>> It's the people's right, not the militia's right, not the state's >>>>>>> right, not the feds' right. > >>>>>> That is your unsupported opinion. Fair enough. > >>>>> It's supported by the Supreme Court of the United States of >>>>> America. Now show us your hand. > >>>>> Oh, right. You already did. > >>>> Well, the SCOTUS also talked of limits, but the fact that they acted >>>> with judicial activism and went against the law as written... > >>> Bullshit. > >> https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/antonin-scalia-was-wrong-about-the-meaning-of-bear-arms/2018/05/21/9243ac66-5d11-11e8-b2b8-08a538d9dbd6_story.html > > <yawn> Again with the screed from the ignored academic with an ax to grind. > >>>> ... has been covered. I am not denying it in any way. > >>>> But nice try. :) > >>> No, it wasn't. It's been tried before, and it's been beaten down >>> before. > >> Even with the judicial activism of Heller, it was not as friendly to the >> NRA crowd as some like to push. > > It was a good start. After Trump appoints another justice or two, we can expand them. :) > > No Question. Gorsuch was what gun-grabbers like to term "a good first step"!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-03 04:02 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. |
| Message-ID | <3li7hd5vpe5pkt946gm3i6nvlk6q1q2o6i@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #688391 |
On Sat, 2 Jun 2018 18:53:02 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
wrote:
>On 6/2/18 6:25 PM, max headroom wrote:
>> In news:fngs46Fb1d7U6@mid.individual.net,
>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed:
>>
>>> Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> wrote:
>>>> On Sat, 2 Jun 2018 13:29:48 -0700, Snit
>>>> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>>>>> On 6/2/18 1:27 PM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
>>>>>> On Sat, 2 Jun 2018 10:57:54 -0700, Snit
>>>>>> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> On 6/2/18 10:38 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Sat, 2 Jun 2018 10:14:41 -0700, Snit
>>>>>>>> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 6/2/18 6:27 AM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote:
>>
>>>>>>>>>>> A well regulated Militia [ no comma ]
>>>>>>>>>>> being necessary to the security of a free State, ...
>>
>>>>>>>>>> Or, more clearly: " For The State's Militia, ... "
>>
>>>>>>>>>> Clearly, no "Militia" should include depressed gunmen
>>>>>>>>>> slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service.
>>
>>>>>>>>> And when stating "no comma", keep in mind there were something
>>>>>>>>> like seven different versions of the second amendment with
>>>>>>>>> different commas and capitalization.
>>
>>>>>>>> Cool- how many of the say "The right of the state"????
>>
>>>>>>> I do not think that phrase is in the constitution
>>
>>>>>> Correct.
>>
>>>>> Are you just looking for specific phrases or are you trying to get
>>>>> to a point? I suspect you are trying to say that since that phrase
>>>>> is not there this means the concept of what the states can do (what
>>>>> they have rights to do) is not there. Is that correct? If not did
>>>>> you have a broader point?
>>
>>>> No, you're not even close.
>>
>>>> It's the people's right, not the militia's right, not the state's
>>>> right, not the feds' right.
>>
>>> That is your unsupported opinion. Fair enough.
>>
>> It's supported by the Supreme Court of the United States of America. Now show us your hand.
>>
>> Oh, right. You already did.
==================================================
==================================================
================= WARNING! ========================
GOAL POST MOVES AHEAD!
================= WARNING! ========================
==================================================
==================================================
>Well, the SCOTUS also talked of limits,[..]
People's right. Got anything else?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-03 11:03 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. |
| Message-ID | <fnior9Fm0j7U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #688451 |
On 6/3/18 4:02 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: > On Sat, 2 Jun 2018 18:53:02 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> > wrote: > >> On 6/2/18 6:25 PM, max headroom wrote: >>> In news:fngs46Fb1d7U6@mid.individual.net, >>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: >>> >>>> Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> wrote: >>>>> On Sat, 2 Jun 2018 13:29:48 -0700, Snit >>>>> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>> On 6/2/18 1:27 PM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: >>>>>>> On Sat, 2 Jun 2018 10:57:54 -0700, Snit >>>>>>> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> On 6/2/18 10:38 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Sat, 2 Jun 2018 10:14:41 -0700, Snit >>>>>>>>> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 6/2/18 6:27 AM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote: >>> >>>>>>>>>>>> A well regulated Militia [ no comma ] >>>>>>>>>>>> being necessary to the security of a free State, ... >>> >>>>>>>>>>> Or, more clearly: " For The State's Militia, ... " >>> >>>>>>>>>>> Clearly, no "Militia" should include depressed gunmen >>>>>>>>>>> slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. >>> >>>>>>>>>> And when stating "no comma", keep in mind there were something >>>>>>>>>> like seven different versions of the second amendment with >>>>>>>>>> different commas and capitalization. >>> >>>>>>>>> Cool- how many of the say "The right of the state"???? >>> >>>>>>>> I do not think that phrase is in the constitution >>> >>>>>>> Correct. >>> >>>>>> Are you just looking for specific phrases or are you trying to get >>>>>> to a point? I suspect you are trying to say that since that phrase >>>>>> is not there this means the concept of what the states can do (what >>>>>> they have rights to do) is not there. Is that correct? If not did >>>>>> you have a broader point? >>> >>>>> No, you're not even close. >>> >>>>> It's the people's right, not the militia's right, not the state's >>>>> right, not the feds' right. >>> >>>> That is your unsupported opinion. Fair enough. >>> >>> It's supported by the Supreme Court of the United States of America. Now show us your hand. >>> >>> Oh, right. You already did. > > ================================================== > ================================================== > ================= WARNING! ======================== > GOAL POST MOVES AHEAD! > ================= WARNING! ======================== > ================================================== > ================================================== > > >> Well, the SCOTUS also talked of limits,[..] > > People's right. Got anything else? > Sure. Things such as the actual meaning of the words / phrases, the dislike of judicial activism, etc. Remember, my views are clear and easy to support: * The meaning / usage of "bear arms" (pretty much exclusively for "war, soldiering or organized, armed action". * Their were laws restricting firearms at the start of the country which were never, as far as I can find, challenged on second amendment grounds. This makes it a hard sale to say they were against the second amendment. * Most (though not all) relevant scholars have supported the states rights view. * We should not allow the NRA, a group that benefits from mass shootings and terrorism, to largely control our gun laws. * We clearly do have, have had, and should have, limits on arms... what one could call "infringements". * We should do more research on gun deaths and injuries, as we do with vehicles, pools, food, and pretty much everything else that is tied to death and injuries. * I back evidence-based policies. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-03 11:12 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. |
| Message-ID | <vob8hdlhutbhj3moifjl9rs7itkuqrq1nq@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #688488 |
On Sun, 3 Jun 2018 11:03:21 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >On 6/3/18 4:02 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: >> On Sat, 2 Jun 2018 18:53:02 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >> wrote: >> >>> On 6/2/18 6:25 PM, max headroom wrote: >>>> In news:fngs46Fb1d7U6@mid.individual.net, >>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: >>>> >>>>> Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> wrote: >>>>>> On Sat, 2 Jun 2018 13:29:48 -0700, Snit >>>>>> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>> On 6/2/18 1:27 PM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: >>>>>>>> On Sat, 2 Jun 2018 10:57:54 -0700, Snit >>>>>>>> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 6/2/18 10:38 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 2 Jun 2018 10:14:41 -0700, Snit >>>>>>>>>> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 6/2/18 6:27 AM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote: >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> A well regulated Militia [ no comma ] >>>>>>>>>>>>> being necessary to the security of a free State, ... >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Or, more clearly: " For The State's Militia, ... " >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Clearly, no "Militia" should include depressed gunmen >>>>>>>>>>>> slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. >>>> >>>>>>>>>>> And when stating "no comma", keep in mind there were something >>>>>>>>>>> like seven different versions of the second amendment with >>>>>>>>>>> different commas and capitalization. >>>> >>>>>>>>>> Cool- how many of the say "The right of the state"???? >>>> >>>>>>>>> I do not think that phrase is in the constitution >>>> >>>>>>>> Correct. >>>> >>>>>>> Are you just looking for specific phrases or are you trying to get >>>>>>> to a point? I suspect you are trying to say that since that phrase >>>>>>> is not there this means the concept of what the states can do (what >>>>>>> they have rights to do) is not there. Is that correct? If not did >>>>>>> you have a broader point? >>>> >>>>>> No, you're not even close. >>>> >>>>>> It's the people's right, not the militia's right, not the state's >>>>>> right, not the feds' right. >>>> >>>>> That is your unsupported opinion. Fair enough. >>>> >>>> It's supported by the Supreme Court of the United States of America. Now show us your hand. >>>> >>>> Oh, right. You already did. >> >> ================================================== >> ================================================== >> ================= WARNING! ======================== >> GOAL POST MOVES AHEAD! >> ================= WARNING! ======================== >> ================================================== >> ================================================== >> >> >>> Well, the SCOTUS also talked of limits,[..] >> >> People's right. Got anything else? >> >Sure. Things such as the actual meaning of the words / phrases, the >dislike of judicial activism, etc. > >Remember, my views are clear and easy to support: > >* The meaning / usage of "bear arms" (pretty much > exclusively for "war, soldiering or organized, armed > action". It certainly can mean that. >* Their were laws restricting firearms at the start of > the country which were never, as far as I can find, > challenged on second amendment grounds. This makes it > a hard sale to say they were against the second > amendment. Wrong. It ONLY means they were never challenged. >* Most (though not all) relevant scholars have supported > the states rights view. It says "right of the people," not the states. >* We should not allow the NRA, a group that benefits from > mass shootings and terrorism, to largely control our gun > laws. They don't. That's leftist fantasy. >* We clearly do have, have had, and should have, limits on > arms... what one could call "infringements". If you say so. >* We should do more research on gun deaths and injuries, as > we do with vehicles, pools, food, and pretty much everything > else that is tied to death and injuries. Nobody is against research. >* I back evidence-based policies. Good for you.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-03 11:38 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. |
| Message-ID | <fniqtjFm0j7U6@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #688490 |
On 6/3/18 11:12 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: ... >> Remember, my views are clear and easy to support: >> >> * The meaning / usage of "bear arms" (pretty much >> exclusively for "war, soldiering or organized, armed >> action". > > It certainly can mean that. And it is pretty much exclusively how it was used at the time of the founding. But you wish to twist the meaning to something else, even though the context of the militia is noted in the amendment itself! >> * Their were laws restricting firearms at the start of >> the country which were never, as far as I can find, >> challenged on second amendment grounds. This makes it >> a hard sale to say they were against the second >> amendment. > > Wrong. It ONLY means they were never challenged. Such laws were common. No reason to think they would not be challenged if they were seen as unconstitutional! >> * Most (though not all) relevant scholars have supported >> the states rights view. > > It says "right of the people," not the states. So you avoided my point there. OK. >> * We should not allow the NRA, a group that benefits from >> mass shootings and terrorism, to largely control our gun >> laws. > > They don't. That's leftist fantasy. They clearly and unambiguously do. After ever mass shootings their donations surge. >> * We clearly do have, have had, and should have, limits on >> arms... what one could call "infringements". > > If you say so. It is merely a fact. >> * We should do more research on gun deaths and injuries, as >> we do with vehicles, pools, food, and pretty much everything >> else that is tied to death and injuries. > Nobody is against research. <https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2595514> >> * I back evidence-based policies. > > Good for you. I wish more people joined me in that. Notice how my claims are all VERY easy to support. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-03 11:53 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. |
| Message-ID | <ctd8hd91qb82ra3b5np32mniuicp9rsn2e@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #688496 |
On Sun, 3 Jun 2018 11:38:43 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >On 6/3/18 11:12 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: >... >>> Remember, my views are clear and easy to support: >>> >>> * The meaning / usage of "bear arms" (pretty much >>> exclusively for "war, soldiering or organized, armed >>> action". >> >> It certainly can mean that. > >And it is pretty much exclusively But not 100%. So your argument is useless. > how it was used at the time of the >founding. But you wish to twist the meaning to something else, even >though the context of the militia is noted in the amendment itself! No meanings are twisted here, except by gun grabbing leftists. > >>> * Their were laws restricting firearms at the start of >>> the country which were never, as far as I can find, >>> challenged on second amendment grounds. This makes it >>> a hard sale to say they were against the second >>> amendment. >> >> Wrong. It ONLY means they were never challenged. > >Such laws were common. No reason to think they would not be challenged >if they were seen as unconstitutional! It ONLY means they were never challenged. If they existed at all. >>> * Most (though not all) relevant scholars have supported >>> the states rights view. >> >> It says "right of the people," not the states. > >So you avoided my point there. OK. As you keep avoiding mine. I understand-- hard to argue that ol' "right of the people" thing, ain't it? >>> * We should not allow the NRA, a group that benefits from >>> mass shootings and terrorism, to largely control our gun >>> laws. >> >> They don't. That's leftist fantasy. > >They clearly and unambiguously do. After ever mass shootings their >donations surge. Just your paranoid fantasies. >>> * We clearly do have, have had, and should have, limits on >>> arms... what one could call "infringements". >> >> If you say so. > >It is merely a fact. And it means nothing. >>> * We should do more research on gun deaths and injuries, as >>> we do with vehicles, pools, food, and pretty much everything >>> else that is tied to death and injuries. > >> Nobody is against research. > ><https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2595514> Nobody is against research. Most normal people know it shouldn't be done by the Center for DISEASE Control, since it's not a disease. >>> * I back evidence-based policies. >> >> Good for you. > >I wish more people joined me in that. Notice how my claims are all VERY >easy to support. Well, actually, they're not. Your "research" argument is a prime example of leftist lies and bullshit. Your "NRA Controls The Government" bullshit is a close second. etc etc etc. [yawn]
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-03 12:04 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. |
| Message-ID | <fnisddFm0j7U9@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #688498 |
On 6/3/18 11:53 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: > On Sun, 3 Jun 2018 11:38:43 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> > wrote: > >> On 6/3/18 11:12 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: >> ... >>>> Remember, my views are clear and easy to support: >>>> >>>> * The meaning / usage of "bear arms" (pretty much >>>> exclusively for "war, soldiering or organized, armed >>>> action". >>> >>> It certainly can mean that. >> >> And it is pretty much exclusively > > But not 100%. So your argument is useless. It is of great use to those who want to understand the meaning and not twist it. So, sure, of no use to you. I can see that. >> how it was used at the time of the >> founding. But you wish to twist the meaning to something else, even >> though the context of the militia is noted in the amendment itself! > > No meanings are twisted here, except by gun grabbing leftists. Who said anything about "gun grabbing"? Not I! Why do you move goal posts like that? >>>> * Their were laws restricting firearms at the start of >>>> the country which were never, as far as I can find, >>>> challenged on second amendment grounds. This makes it >>>> a hard sale to say they were against the second >>>> amendment. >>> >>> Wrong. It ONLY means they were never challenged. >> >> Such laws were common. No reason to think they would not be challenged >> if they were seen as unconstitutional! > > It ONLY means they were never challenged. If they existed at all. They did exist and, of course, there is value in knowing that but since it does not fit your bias you reject it. Notice how I do not reject data. It is not as though I ignore the 5:4 Heller decision and insist it is not the law of the land. While I do not like judicial activism I do not deny it exists or deny the impacts of it. >>>> * Most (though not all) relevant scholars have supported >>>> the states rights view. >>> >>> It says "right of the people," not the states. >> >> So you avoided my point there. OK. > > As you keep avoiding mine. I understand-- hard to argue that ol' > "right of the people" thing, ain't it? I have spoken of your twisting of the meaning... but this STILL is not relevant to the point. Again: * Most (though not all) relevant scholars have supported the states rights view. >>>> * We should not allow the NRA, a group that benefits from >>>> mass shootings and terrorism, to largely control our gun >>>> laws. >>> >>> They don't. That's leftist fantasy. >> >> They clearly and unambiguously do. After ever mass shootings their >> donations surge. > > Just your paranoid fantasies. See: you deny facts that do not fit your bias. That makes you incapable of having a reasoned conversation, at least on this topic. >>>> * We clearly do have, have had, and should have, limits on >>>> arms... what one could call "infringements". >>> >>> If you say so. >> >> It is merely a fact. > > And it means nothing. I think such reasonable and legal infringements do mean something. Interesting how you do not. Fair enough. >>>> * We should do more research on gun deaths and injuries, as >>>> we do with vehicles, pools, food, and pretty much everything >>>> else that is tied to death and injuries. >> >>> Nobody is against research. >> >> <https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2595514> > > Nobody is against research. Most normal people know it shouldn't be > done by the Center for DISEASE Control, since it's not a disease. Many of the things listed there are not diseases, nor was the research looked at limited to CDC funded research. Why push such a twist as you did there? >>>> * I back evidence-based policies. >>> >>> Good for you. >> >> I wish more people joined me in that. Notice how my claims are all VERY >> easy to support. > > Well, actually, they're not. Your "research" argument is a prime > example of leftist lies and bullshit. > > Your "NRA Controls The Government" bullshit is a close second. > > etc etc etc. > > [yawn] > I do not back your emotional-charged views but I support your right to present them. Fair enough. I prefer to stick to the evidence and supportable data. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-03 12:16 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. |
| Message-ID | <bau4aq.v7p.17.3@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #688500 |
On 2018-06-03 12:04 PM, Snit wrote: > On 6/3/18 11:53 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: >> On Sun, 3 Jun 2018 11:38:43 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >> wrote: >> >>> On 6/3/18 11:12 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: >>> ... >>>>> Remember, my views are clear and easy to support: >>>>> >>>>> * The meaning / usage of "bear arms" (pretty much >>>>> exclusively for "war, soldiering or organized, armed >>>>> action". >>>> >>>> It certainly can mean that. >>> >>> And it is pretty much exclusively >> >> But not 100%. So your argument is useless. > > It is of great use to those who want to understand the meaning and not > twist it. So, sure, of no use to you. I can see that. > >>> how it was used at the time of the >>> founding. But you wish to twist the meaning to something else, even >>> though the context of the militia is noted in the amendment itself! >> >> No meanings are twisted here, except by gun grabbing leftists. > > Who said anything about "gun grabbing"? Not I! > > Why do you move goal posts like that? > >>>>> * Their were laws restricting firearms at the start of >>>>> the country which were never, as far as I can find, >>>>> challenged on second amendment grounds. This makes it >>>>> a hard sale to say they were against the second >>>>> amendment. >>>> >>>> Wrong. It ONLY means they were never challenged. >>> >>> Such laws were common. No reason to think they would not be challenged >>> if they were seen as unconstitutional! >> >> It ONLY means they were never challenged. If they existed at all. > > They did exist and, of course, there is value in knowing that but since > it does not fit your bias you reject it. > > Notice how I do not reject data. It is not as though I ignore the 5:4 > Heller decision and insist it is not the law of the land. While I do not > like judicial activism I do not deny it exists or deny the impacts of it. > >>>>> * Most (though not all) relevant scholars have supported >>>>> the states rights view. >>>> >>>> It says "right of the people," not the states. >>> >>> So you avoided my point there. OK. >> >> As you keep avoiding mine. I understand-- hard to argue that ol' >> "right of the people" thing, ain't it? > > I have spoken of your twisting of the meaning... but this STILL is not > relevant to the point. Again: > > * Most (though not all) relevant scholars have supported > the states rights view. > >>>>> * We should not allow the NRA, a group that benefits from >>>>> mass shootings and terrorism, to largely control our gun >>>>> laws. >>>> >>>> They don't. That's leftist fantasy. >>> >>> They clearly and unambiguously do. After ever mass shootings their >>> donations surge. >> >> Just your paranoid fantasies. > > See: you deny facts that do not fit your bias. That makes you incapable > of having a reasoned conversation, at least on this topic. > >>>>> * We clearly do have, have had, and should have, limits on >>>>> arms... what one could call "infringements". >>>> >>>> If you say so. >>> >>> It is merely a fact. >> >> And it means nothing. > > I think such reasonable and legal infringements do mean something. > Interesting how you do not. Fair enough. > >>>>> * We should do more research on gun deaths and injuries, as >>>>> we do with vehicles, pools, food, and pretty much everything >>>>> else that is tied to death and injuries. >>> >>>> Nobody is against research. >>> >>> <https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2595514> >> >> Nobody is against research. Most normal people know it shouldn't be >> done by the Center for DISEASE Control, since it's not a disease. > > Many of the things listed there are not diseases, nor was the research > looked at limited to CDC funded research. Why push such a twist as you > did there? > >>>>> * I back evidence-based policies. >>>> >>>> Good for you. >>> >>> I wish more people joined me in that. Notice how my claims are all VERY >>> easy to support. >> >> Well, actually, they're not. Your "research" argument is a prime >> example of leftist lies and bullshit. >> >> Your "NRA Controls The Government" bullshit is a close second. >> >> etc etc etc. >> >> [yawn] >> > I do not back your emotional-charged views but I support your right to > present them. Fair enough. > > I prefer to stick to the evidence and supportable data. > none of this will raise your income
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-03 12:26 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. |
| Message-ID | <fnitn4Fm0isU11@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #688503 |
On 6/3/18 12:16 PM, % wrote: > On 2018-06-03 12:04 PM, Snit wrote: >> On 6/3/18 11:53 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: >>> On Sun, 3 Jun 2018 11:38:43 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> On 6/3/18 11:12 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: >>>> ... >>>>>> Remember, my views are clear and easy to support: >>>>>> >>>>>> * The meaning / usage of "bear arms" (pretty much >>>>>> exclusively for "war, soldiering or organized, armed >>>>>> action". >>>>> >>>>> It certainly can mean that. >>>> >>>> And it is pretty much exclusively >>> >>> But not 100%. So your argument is useless. >> >> It is of great use to those who want to understand the meaning and not >> twist it. So, sure, of no use to you. I can see that. >> >>>> how it was used at the time of the >>>> founding. But you wish to twist the meaning to something else, even >>>> though the context of the militia is noted in the amendment itself! >>> >>> No meanings are twisted here, except by gun grabbing leftists. >> >> Who said anything about "gun grabbing"? Not I! >> >> Why do you move goal posts like that? >> >>>>>> * Their were laws restricting firearms at the start of >>>>>> the country which were never, as far as I can find, >>>>>> challenged on second amendment grounds. This makes it >>>>>> a hard sale to say they were against the second >>>>>> amendment. >>>>> >>>>> Wrong. It ONLY means they were never challenged. >>>> >>>> Such laws were common. No reason to think they would not be challenged >>>> if they were seen as unconstitutional! >>> >>> It ONLY means they were never challenged. If they existed at all. >> >> They did exist and, of course, there is value in knowing that but >> since it does not fit your bias you reject it. >> >> Notice how I do not reject data. It is not as though I ignore the 5:4 >> Heller decision and insist it is not the law of the land. While I do >> not like judicial activism I do not deny it exists or deny the impacts >> of it. >> >>>>>> * Most (though not all) relevant scholars have supported >>>>>> the states rights view. >>>>> >>>>> It says "right of the people," not the states. >>>> >>>> So you avoided my point there. OK. >>> >>> As you keep avoiding mine. I understand-- hard to argue that ol' >>> "right of the people" thing, ain't it? >> >> I have spoken of your twisting of the meaning... but this STILL is not >> relevant to the point. Again: >> >> * Most (though not all) relevant scholars have supported >> the states rights view. >> >>>>>> * We should not allow the NRA, a group that benefits from >>>>>> mass shootings and terrorism, to largely control our gun >>>>>> laws. >>>>> >>>>> They don't. That's leftist fantasy. >>>> >>>> They clearly and unambiguously do. After ever mass shootings their >>>> donations surge. >>> >>> Just your paranoid fantasies. >> >> See: you deny facts that do not fit your bias. That makes you >> incapable of having a reasoned conversation, at least on this topic. >> >>>>>> * We clearly do have, have had, and should have, limits on >>>>>> arms... what one could call "infringements". >>>>> >>>>> If you say so. >>>> >>>> It is merely a fact. >>> >>> And it means nothing. >> >> I think such reasonable and legal infringements do mean something. >> Interesting how you do not. Fair enough. >> >>>>>> * We should do more research on gun deaths and injuries, as >>>>>> we do with vehicles, pools, food, and pretty much everything >>>>>> else that is tied to death and injuries. >>>> >>>>> Nobody is against research. >>>> >>>> <https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2595514> >>> >>> Nobody is against research. Most normal people know it shouldn't be >>> done by the Center for DISEASE Control, since it's not a disease. >> >> Many of the things listed there are not diseases, nor was the research >> looked at limited to CDC funded research. Why push such a twist as you >> did there? >> >>>>>> * I back evidence-based policies. >>>>> >>>>> Good for you. >>>> >>>> I wish more people joined me in that. Notice how my claims are all VERY >>>> easy to support. >>> >>> Well, actually, they're not. Your "research" argument is a prime >>> example of leftist lies and bullshit. >>> >>> Your "NRA Controls The Government" bullshit is a close second. >>> >>> etc etc etc. >>> >>> [yawn] >>> >> I do not back your emotional-charged views but I support your right to >> present them. Fair enough. >> >> I prefer to stick to the evidence and supportable data. >> > none of this will raise your income Actually sticking to evidence and supportable data helps my income. :) -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-03 12:33 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. |
| Message-ID | <bau5aq.v7p.17.15@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #688506 |
On 2018-06-03 12:26 PM, Snit wrote: > On 6/3/18 12:16 PM, % wrote: >> On 2018-06-03 12:04 PM, Snit wrote: >>> On 6/3/18 11:53 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: >>>> On Sun, 3 Jun 2018 11:38:43 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 6/3/18 11:12 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: >>>>> ... >>>>>>> Remember, my views are clear and easy to support: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> * The meaning / usage of "bear arms" (pretty much >>>>>>> exclusively for "war, soldiering or organized, armed >>>>>>> action". >>>>>> >>>>>> It certainly can mean that. >>>>> >>>>> And it is pretty much exclusively >>>> >>>> But not 100%. So your argument is useless. >>> >>> It is of great use to those who want to understand the meaning and >>> not twist it. So, sure, of no use to you. I can see that. >>> >>>>> how it was used at the time of the >>>>> founding. But you wish to twist the meaning to something else, even >>>>> though the context of the militia is noted in the amendment itself! >>>> >>>> No meanings are twisted here, except by gun grabbing leftists. >>> >>> Who said anything about "gun grabbing"? Not I! >>> >>> Why do you move goal posts like that? >>> >>>>>>> * Their were laws restricting firearms at the start of >>>>>>> the country which were never, as far as I can find, >>>>>>> challenged on second amendment grounds. This makes it >>>>>>> a hard sale to say they were against the second >>>>>>> amendment. >>>>>> >>>>>> Wrong. It ONLY means they were never challenged. >>>>> >>>>> Such laws were common. No reason to think they would not be challenged >>>>> if they were seen as unconstitutional! >>>> >>>> It ONLY means they were never challenged. If they existed at all. >>> >>> They did exist and, of course, there is value in knowing that but >>> since it does not fit your bias you reject it. >>> >>> Notice how I do not reject data. It is not as though I ignore the 5:4 >>> Heller decision and insist it is not the law of the land. While I do >>> not like judicial activism I do not deny it exists or deny the >>> impacts of it. >>> >>>>>>> * Most (though not all) relevant scholars have supported >>>>>>> the states rights view. >>>>>> >>>>>> It says "right of the people," not the states. >>>>> >>>>> So you avoided my point there. OK. >>>> >>>> As you keep avoiding mine. I understand-- hard to argue that ol' >>>> "right of the people" thing, ain't it? >>> >>> I have spoken of your twisting of the meaning... but this STILL is >>> not relevant to the point. Again: >>> >>> * Most (though not all) relevant scholars have supported >>> the states rights view. >>> >>>>>>> * We should not allow the NRA, a group that benefits from >>>>>>> mass shootings and terrorism, to largely control our gun >>>>>>> laws. >>>>>> >>>>>> They don't. That's leftist fantasy. >>>>> >>>>> They clearly and unambiguously do. After ever mass shootings their >>>>> donations surge. >>>> >>>> Just your paranoid fantasies. >>> >>> See: you deny facts that do not fit your bias. That makes you >>> incapable of having a reasoned conversation, at least on this topic. >>> >>>>>>> * We clearly do have, have had, and should have, limits on >>>>>>> arms... what one could call "infringements". >>>>>> >>>>>> If you say so. >>>>> >>>>> It is merely a fact. >>>> >>>> And it means nothing. >>> >>> I think such reasonable and legal infringements do mean something. >>> Interesting how you do not. Fair enough. >>> >>>>>>> * We should do more research on gun deaths and injuries, as >>>>>>> we do with vehicles, pools, food, and pretty much everything >>>>>>> else that is tied to death and injuries. >>>>> >>>>>> Nobody is against research. >>>>> >>>>> <https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2595514> >>>> >>>> Nobody is against research. Most normal people know it shouldn't be >>>> done by the Center for DISEASE Control, since it's not a disease. >>> >>> Many of the things listed there are not diseases, nor was the >>> research looked at limited to CDC funded research. Why push such a >>> twist as you did there? >>> >>>>>>> * I back evidence-based policies. >>>>>> >>>>>> Good for you. >>>>> >>>>> I wish more people joined me in that. Notice how my claims are all >>>>> VERY >>>>> easy to support. >>>> >>>> Well, actually, they're not. Your "research" argument is a prime >>>> example of leftist lies and bullshit. >>>> >>>> Your "NRA Controls The Government" bullshit is a close second. >>>> >>>> etc etc etc. >>>> >>>> [yawn] >>>> >>> I do not back your emotional-charged views but I support your right >>> to present them. Fair enough. >>> >>> I prefer to stick to the evidence and supportable data. >>> >> none of this will raise your income > > Actually sticking to evidence and supportable data helps my income. :) > no it does it just makes you look completely dominated by the person you're complaining about
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-03 12:38 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. |
| Message-ID | <fniud5Fm0isU16@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #688508 |
On 6/3/18 12:33 PM, % wrote: ... >>>> I prefer to stick to the evidence and supportable data. >>>> >>> none of this will raise your income >> >> Actually sticking to evidence and supportable data helps my income. :) >> > no it does it just makes you look completely dominated by the person > you're complaining about Who am I complaining about? I merely am noting some simple facts: * The meaning / usage of "bear arms" (pretty much exclusively for "war, soldiering or organized, armed action". * Their were laws restricting firearms at the start of the country which were never, as far as I can find, challenged on second amendment grounds. This makes it a hard sale to say they were against the second amendment. * Most (though not all) relevant scholars have supported the states rights view. * We should not allow the NRA, a group that benefits from mass shootings and terrorism, to largely control our gun laws. * We clearly do have, have had, and should have, limits on arms... what one could call "infringements". * We should do more research on gun deaths and injuries, as we do with vehicles, pools, food, and pretty much everything else that is tied to death and injuries. * I back evidence-based policies. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 10 of 29 — ← Prev page 1 … 8 9 [10] 11 12 … 29 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web