Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #686921 > unrolled thread

Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men.

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-05-24 09:38 -0700
    Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-24 09:47 -0700
      Michael Glasser's Marxism/Feminism. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-05-24 10:19 -0700
      Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-24 18:04 -0400
        Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-24 15:13 -0700
          Feminists suck on the BoobTube. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-05-24 20:28 -0700
        Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-24 18:28 -0400
          Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-24 15:45 -0700
          Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-25 07:39 -0500
        Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-25 07:55 -0500
          Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-25 09:17 -0400
            Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-25 08:57 -0500
              Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-25 11:13 -0400
                Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-25 12:15 -0500
                  Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-25 16:49 -0400
                    Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-25 14:23 -0700
                    Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-25 18:17 -0400
                      Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-05-26 07:43 -0400
                        Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-27 12:36 -0400
                          Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-27 09:44 -0700
                          Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-05-27 14:14 -0400
                        Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-29 07:12 -0500
                      Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-26 11:38 -0400
                        Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-26 08:45 -0700
                          Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-27 12:36 -0400
                            Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-27 09:44 -0700
                            Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-27 13:55 -0400
                    Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-30 15:03 -0500
                      Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-30 13:30 -0700
                      Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-31 13:24 -0500
                        Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-31 11:32 -0700
              Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-25 16:43 -0400
                Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-25 14:24 -0700
            Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-25 09:29 -0700
          Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-25 11:27 -0400
            Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-25 09:04 -0700
            Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-25 12:21 -0500
    Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2018-05-24 20:18 -0700
    Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Ser Gregor Clegane <sergregor@lannistermail.raven> - 2018-05-25 16:12 -0400
      Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-25 18:02 -0400
        Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-25 15:30 -0700
          Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-27 12:36 -0400
            Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-27 09:44 -0700
        Kids are the domain of the poor, uneducated and unfortunate. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-05-26 01:45 -0700
          Re: Kids are the domain of the poor, uneducated and unfortunate. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-26 11:32 -0400
            Re: Kids are the domain of the poor, uneducated and unfortunate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-26 08:43 -0700
              Re: Kids are the domain of the poor, uneducated and unfortunate. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 13:51 -0500
                Re: Kids are the domain of the poor, uneducated and unfortunate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-26 11:58 -0700
                  They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-05-26 16:51 -0700
                    Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-26 16:55 -0700
                    Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-26 20:40 -0400
                      Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-26 17:41 -0700
                        Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-26 21:16 -0400
                          Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-26 18:30 -0700
                          Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-29 07:35 -0500
                            Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-05-29 17:36 -0400
                              Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-30 07:39 -0500
                                Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-30 10:40 -0700
                                  Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-30 15:06 -0400
                                    Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-30 14:50 -0500
                                      Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-31 08:29 -0500
                                        Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-31 10:02 -0700
                                    Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-30 13:29 -0700
                      Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-26 20:50 -0400
                        Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-27 09:05 -0400
                          Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-27 06:57 -0700
                          Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-05-27 11:44 -0400
                            Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-27 12:15 -0400
                              Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-27 09:17 -0700
                            Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-27 12:33 -0400
                              Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-27 13:52 -0400
                                Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-27 11:02 -0700
                              Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-05-27 14:24 -0400
                                Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-28 08:13 -0400
                                  Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-28 09:49 -0400
                                    Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-29 07:51 -0500
                                  Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-05-28 14:49 -0400
                                    Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-28 16:14 -0400
                                    Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-29 07:29 -0500
                                      Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-05-29 17:40 -0400
                                        Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 15:01 +0200
                                          Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-05-30 09:14 -0400
                                        Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-30 07:57 -0500
                                          Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-30 05:59 +0200
                          Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-29 07:23 -0500
                            Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-29 07:57 -0700
              Re: Kids are the domain of the poor, uneducated and unfortunate. Ser Gregor Clegane <sergregor@lannistermail.raven> - 2018-05-27 12:36 -0400
                Re: Kids are the domain of the poor, uneducated and unfortunate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-27 09:43 -0700
        Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-26 11:35 -0400
          Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-26 08:45 -0700
          Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-27 12:36 -0400
            Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-27 13:54 -0400
              Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-27 11:01 -0700
              Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-05-31 21:34 +0000

Page 4 of 5 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5  Next page →

#687940 — Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath.

chrisv wrote:

>No one denies that idleness and dependance are "bad", "benj", but no
>amount of propaganda will convince me that it makes people "far more
>prone to racism and sexism".  It's absurd, made-up nonsense.

It's about as stupid as when the lying asshole "-hh" claimed that I
was dissatisfied with the success that I have had in my career.  

His evidence?  The "bitter" attitude that I display in cola.

Really?  What's the connection?  Are there no successful people who
are "bitter"?  Could there not be some other reason that I am
"bitter"?

I mean, only a *shameless* jackasshole, like -highhorse", would attack
with such idiocy.

P.S.  Watch for the lying asshole to assert that my bringing this up
again is yet more "evidence" to support his claim. That's the caliber
of his "logic".  Nope.  It's only yet another example of him being a
stupid lying asshole.  Like his Photoshop idiocy, and his anti-choice
idiocy.

-- 
"So are 348 different Linux choices a good thing?  I really doubt it."
-  lying asshole "-hh"

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#687959 — Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath.

On 5/31/18 6:29 AM, chrisv wrote:
> chrisv wrote:
> 
>> No one denies that idleness and dependance are "bad", "benj", but no
>> amount of propaganda will convince me that it makes people "far more
>> prone to racism and sexism".  It's absurd, made-up nonsense.
> 
> It's about as stupid as when the lying asshole "-hh" claimed that I
> was dissatisfied with the success that I have had in my career.
> 
> His evidence?  The "bitter" attitude that I display in cola.
> 
> Really?  What's the connection?  Are there no successful people who
> are "bitter"?  Could there not be some other reason that I am
> "bitter"?
> 
> I mean, only a *shameless* jackasshole, like -highhorse", would attack
> with such idiocy.
> 
> P.S.  Watch for the lying asshole to assert that my bringing this up
> again is yet more "evidence" to support his claim. That's the caliber
> of his "logic".  Nope.  It's only yet another example of him being a
> stupid lying asshole.  Like his Photoshop idiocy, and his anti-choice
> idiocy.
> 
   chrisv:
     -----
     That thing won't even acknowledge that virtual desktops are a very
     nice feature.  It claims that they require "too much configuration".

     You see, they require that you decide how to organize things on the
     desktops.

     In other words, in order to enjoy the benefit of a tool, you must
     actually use the tool.

     Sheesh.
     -----

You lied about my views there. Why?

-- 
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They 
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel 
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#687857 — Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath.

On 5/30/18 12:06 PM, benj wrote:
> On 5/30/2018 1:40 PM, Snit wrote:
>> On 5/30/18 5:39 AM, chrisv wrote:
>>> Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>>>
>>>> chrisv wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> benj wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Libs on the other hand never have those kind of productive jobs so 
>>>>>> they
>>>>>> are far more prone to racism and sexism though their bullshit usually
>>>>>> covers their crimes quite nicely.
>>>>>
>>>>> Jeezez, you are filthy.  "Libs" never have productive jobs, eh?
>>>>>
>>>>> Who do you hope to fool, which such obvious lying?
>>>>>
>>>>> You need not respond.  I won't read it.  I know that you will just
>>>>> lie.
>>>>>
>>>>>> (further lies snipped, unread)
>>>>
>>>> "benj" is a total dolt or a programmed bot.  You decide which.
>>>
>>> Total dolt.  Even if "libs" didn't have productive jobs, why would
>>> that make them "far more prone to racism and sexism"?
> 
> Start with name calling, that's always an ethical and honest debate on 
> the left, right? When you don't do anything productive and rely on your 
> "wits" (read bullshit) to get what you have, then you must use any trick 
> in the book to 'sell" your product. It's one of the rules of acquisition 
> that bullshit always has the highest mark-up.
> 
>>> You just don't see that kind of shameless lying, and brain-dead
>>> illogic, from the left.  It seems to always come from the right,
>>> especially the lies.
> 
> Standrd Left. They fantasy left ALWAYS accuses anyone who points out 
> their methods of using the very methods that they employ. A careful 
> examination of left statements vs those on the right show that the right 
> values honesty and integrity while the left mostly appreciates clever 
> lies and propaganda.
> 
>>> Their favorite attack is "You're a leftist because you're poor and
>>> want to leach off those who work!"  Note the obvious parallels to the
>>> Wintrolls' attacks against Free software advocates.
> 
> bullshit. Free software is given away by the people who created it. 
> (which is fine and a worthy contribution to human civilization) while 
> lefty libs like to steal what OTHER PEOPLE have created because 1. 
> Fantasy is the ONLY thing they have the ability to create. and 2. They 
> consider themselves smarter than everyone else hence better suited to 
> determine the best way the money of other people should be distributed.
> Simple as that.
> 
>> There are plenty of "advocates" who push bigotry (just as there are 
>> plenty who push back against it).
> 
> And then there is the left who PRETEND to push back against it while 
> cleverly hiding their own agenda of racism and bigotry. just ask Bill 
> Cosby what happens to you when you start pushing back against lib double 
> secret racism and bigotry.

You claim those who push back against bigotry are pretending. I will not 
speak for others, but *I* am not. I reject the rights push for special 
entitlements.

Keep in mind the main differences between liberal and conservative world 
views:

* Liberals: support equal rights and environmental protection, with a 
focus on investing in the future and building a stronger tie between 
hard work / productivity and financial reward.

Additionally, Liberals want evidence-based regulation and oversight to 
help ensure clean air and water, safe food, and human rights. This 
includes following the scientific evidence about climate change and food 
safety, and things like setting levels of lead and other harmful 
substances allowed, and even to wanting to do research to reduce the 
harm of tools such as cars and guns and swimming pools. This is a form 
of control, and conservatives are right to note that. And they are right 
to note that sometimes these measures are taken too far.

* Conservative: support special entitlements for whites, Christians, 
males, heterosexuals, and the wealthy, with a focus on redistributing 
wealth to the very richest in the nation with the idea that this will 
somehow help others.

Conservatives want regulation and oversight based on their own feelings 
and what they believe has historically existed (which is often 
incorrect), or even just based on their own religion. This includes 
controlling which consenting adults can marry each other, what a woman 
can do with her own body, and even insisting the government gets to 
define YOUR gender. They also work to create regulations on voting to 
limit who can vote, for if the people truly get a voice they know their 
ideas are less likely to be accepted. Liberals are right to call 
conservatives out on this also being a form of control and, I think, a 
less defensible one.



-- 
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They 
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel 
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#687268 — Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath.

On 5/26/2018 8:40 PM, Doomsdrzej wrote:
> On Sat, 26 May 2018 16:51:48 -0700 (Seattle), Jeff-Relf.Me  @. wrote:
> 
>>>>> [ Hillary would ] reduce income redistribution to the rich
>>>>
>>>> Are you saying somehow that the guv is
>>>> forcing poor folks to pay up to the rich?
>>>
>>> In direct and indirect ways... absolutely.
>>
>> Hillary and Mike hate men because they earn more, generally.
>>
>> They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath.
> 
> Men don't earn more and those "statistics" showing that women's pay is
> lower is complete and utter crap because they don't factor in the fact
> that women generally work fewer hours and and take more time off. For
> the same role, the pay is identical.
> 
Nads and "Kanzi" say: "Why tell the truth when a Lie will do?"

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#687325 — Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath.

On Sat, 26 May 2018 20:50:36 -0400, benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:

>On 5/26/2018 8:40 PM, Doomsdrzej wrote:
>> On Sat, 26 May 2018 16:51:48 -0700 (Seattle), Jeff-Relf.Me  @. wrote:
>> 
>>>>>> [ Hillary would ] reduce income redistribution to the rich
>>>>>
>>>>> Are you saying somehow that the guv is
>>>>> forcing poor folks to pay up to the rich?
>>>>
>>>> In direct and indirect ways... absolutely.
>>>
>>> Hillary and Mike hate men because they earn more, generally.
>>>
>>> They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath.
>> 
>> Men don't earn more and those "statistics" showing that women's pay is
>> lower is complete and utter crap because they don't factor in the fact
>> that women generally work fewer hours and and take more time off. For
>> the same role, the pay is identical.
>> 
>Nads and "Kanzi" say: "Why tell the truth when a Lie will do?"

I used to think differently, but the worst things to happen to
democracy are the decisions to give people who didn't own land the
right to vote and later women. Land owners SHOULD have a say in who
runs a place whether they own 2 square feet or 200,000 but if people
are on welfare, renting or doing nothing of worth, they shouldn't have
a say. If the land owner is a woman, she should have a vote too
because she has a lot to lose from incompetence but a woman who stays
at home and "takes care" of her nine children from seven different
fathers on the taxpayer's dime should sit down and shut the Hell up. 

The fact that so many useless idiots have a say in who runs the
country is the reason why we're now considering the "rights" of people
who consciously cut their own balls off to become a woman, why we
allowed two men who can't have children and don't care about religion
the right to marry and why we believe that white police officers are
senselessly shooting "innocent" blacks despite the fact that the
statistics and reality say otherwise. 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#687330 — Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath.

On 5/27/18 6:05 AM, Doomsdrzej wrote:
> On Sat, 26 May 2018 20:50:36 -0400, benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
> 
>> On 5/26/2018 8:40 PM, Doomsdrzej wrote:
>>> On Sat, 26 May 2018 16:51:48 -0700 (Seattle), Jeff-Relf.Me  @. wrote:
>>>
>>>>>>> [ Hillary would ] reduce income redistribution to the rich
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Are you saying somehow that the guv is
>>>>>> forcing poor folks to pay up to the rich?
>>>>>
>>>>> In direct and indirect ways... absolutely.
>>>>
>>>> Hillary and Mike hate men because they earn more, generally.
>>>>
>>>> They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath.
>>>
>>> Men don't earn more and those "statistics" showing that women's pay is
>>> lower is complete and utter crap because they don't factor in the fact
>>> that women generally work fewer hours and and take more time off. For
>>> the same role, the pay is identical.
>>>
>> Nads and "Kanzi" say: "Why tell the truth when a Lie will do?"
> 
> I used to think differently, but the worst things to happen to
> democracy are the decisions to give people who didn't own land the
> right to vote and later women. Land owners SHOULD have a say in who
> runs a place whether they own 2 square feet or 200,000 but if people
> are on welfare, renting or doing nothing of worth, they shouldn't have
> a say. If the land owner is a woman, she should have a vote too
> because she has a lot to lose from incompetence but a woman who stays
> at home and "takes care" of her nine children from seven different
> fathers on the taxpayer's dime should sit down and shut the Hell up.
> 
> The fact that so many useless idiots have a say in who runs the
> country is the reason why we're now considering the "rights" of people
> who consciously cut their own balls off to become a woman, why we
> allowed two men who can't have children and don't care about religion
> the right to marry and why we believe that white police officers are
> senselessly shooting "innocent" blacks despite the fact that the
> statistics and reality say otherwise.
> 
All men (people). It means something. Right now even with the poor 
having a vote they and the middle class have their income redistributed 
to the rich. Why would you want to push a system that increases such 
inequality?

-- 
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They 
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel 
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#687336 — Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath.

Doomsdrzej wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

> I used to think differently, but the worst things to happen to
> democracy are the decisions to give people who didn't own land the
> right to vote and later women. Land owners SHOULD have a say in who
> runs a place whether they own 2 square feet or 200,000 but if people
> are on welfare, renting or doing nothing of worth, they shouldn't have
> a say. If the land owner is a woman, she should have a vote too
> because she has a lot to lose from incompetence but a woman who stays
> at home and "takes care" of her nine children from seven different
> fathers on the taxpayer's dime should sit down and shut the Hell up. 

Oh. My. God.

-- 
Debian Hint #30: Documentation can be made available at http://localhost/
by installing the 'doc-base' and 'doc-central' packages and their
dependencies.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#687339 — Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath.

On Sun, 27 May 2018 11:44:40 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom
<OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote:

>Doomsdrzej wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>
>> I used to think differently, but the worst things to happen to
>> democracy are the decisions to give people who didn't own land the
>> right to vote and later women. Land owners SHOULD have a say in who
>> runs a place whether they own 2 square feet or 200,000 but if people
>> are on welfare, renting or doing nothing of worth, they shouldn't have
>> a say. If the land owner is a woman, she should have a vote too
>> because she has a lot to lose from incompetence but a woman who stays
>> at home and "takes care" of her nine children from seven different
>> fathers on the taxpayer's dime should sit down and shut the Hell up. 
>
>Oh. My. God.

Voting should be a privilege, not a right.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#687340 — Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath.

On 5/27/18 9:15 AM, Doomsdrzej wrote:
> On Sun, 27 May 2018 11:44:40 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom
> <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote:
> 
>> Doomsdrzej wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>>
>>> I used to think differently, but the worst things to happen to
>>> democracy are the decisions to give people who didn't own land the
>>> right to vote and later women. Land owners SHOULD have a say in who
>>> runs a place whether they own 2 square feet or 200,000 but if people
>>> are on welfare, renting or doing nothing of worth, they shouldn't have
>>> a say. If the land owner is a woman, she should have a vote too
>>> because she has a lot to lose from incompetence but a woman who stays
>>> at home and "takes care" of her nine children from seven different
>>> fathers on the taxpayer's dime should sit down and shut the Hell up.
>>
>> Oh. My. God.
> 
> Voting should be a privilege, not a right.
> 
This is a common view of Republicans and others on the right... hence 
why they push laws to make it harder to vote, esp. for the poor and the 
elderly and others they consider undesirable.

At least you admit it. I guess I commend you for that, even if your view 
is reprehensible.

Oh, and if you have to earn the right to vote, why not include a basic 
competency test of which YOU would surely fail? Oh. Because you would 
fail it. You want to deny OTHERS rights and have special entitlements 
for yourself.

-- 
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They 
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel 
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#687349 — Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath.

On 5/27/2018 11:44 AM, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
> Doomsdrzej wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
> 
>> I used to think differently, but the worst things to happen to
>> democracy are the decisions to give people who didn't own land the
>> right to vote and later women. Land owners SHOULD have a say in who
>> runs a place whether they own 2 square feet or 200,000 but if people
>> are on welfare, renting or doing nothing of worth, they shouldn't have
>> a say. If the land owner is a woman, she should have a vote too
>> because she has a lot to lose from incompetence but a woman who stays
>> at home and "takes care" of her nine children from seven different
>> fathers on the taxpayer's dime should sit down and shut the Hell up.
> 
> Oh. My. God.
> 
Truth slicing through the lib brain like a red-hot axe.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#687363 — Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath.

On Sun, 27 May 2018 12:33:33 -0400, benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:

>On 5/27/2018 11:44 AM, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>> Doomsdrzej wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>> 
>>> I used to think differently, but the worst things to happen to
>>> democracy are the decisions to give people who didn't own land the
>>> right to vote and later women. Land owners SHOULD have a say in who
>>> runs a place whether they own 2 square feet or 200,000 but if people
>>> are on welfare, renting or doing nothing of worth, they shouldn't have
>>> a say. If the land owner is a woman, she should have a vote too
>>> because she has a lot to lose from incompetence but a woman who stays
>>> at home and "takes care" of her nine children from seven different
>>> fathers on the taxpayer's dime should sit down and shut the Hell up.
>> 
>> Oh. My. God.
>> 
>Truth slicing through the lib brain like a red-hot axe.

Yeah, I didn't expect Chris to see things from my perspective. The
reality here is that democracies need to be in a situation where the
voters will elect people based on their qualifications and with a
logical desire to improve the area's economic and social conditions
rather than vote for whoever seems nicest from a purely emotional
point of view. Just look at how people voted between Trump and
HilLIARy for reference: Trump voters hated what Obama had done with
the place in eight years with the millions of jobs lost, the increased
crime and deteriorating education and simpye said "no more;" HilLIARy
voters chose her despite her obvious corruption because the
alternative was a "bad man" who didn't behave like a "gentleman" and
allowed women to walk all over him. Hell, the media coddling to these 
morons spent an inordinate amount of time and money trying to make him
look like a "mean" person because they knew they could manipulate
women that way. It failed to keep him out of the White House but it
definitely worked with women in general. 

Had land owners been the only ones voting, Trump wouldn't have lost a
single state. Even California would have been his as the people voting
against him in high numbers there don't own a thing.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#687367 — Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath.

On 5/27/18 10:52 AM, Doomsdrzej wrote:
> On Sun, 27 May 2018 12:33:33 -0400, benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
> 
>> On 5/27/2018 11:44 AM, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>>> Doomsdrzej wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>>>
>>>> I used to think differently, but the worst things to happen to
>>>> democracy are the decisions to give people who didn't own land the
>>>> right to vote and later women. Land owners SHOULD have a say in who
>>>> runs a place whether they own 2 square feet or 200,000 but if people
>>>> are on welfare, renting or doing nothing of worth, they shouldn't have
>>>> a say. If the land owner is a woman, she should have a vote too
>>>> because she has a lot to lose from incompetence but a woman who stays
>>>> at home and "takes care" of her nine children from seven different
>>>> fathers on the taxpayer's dime should sit down and shut the Hell up.
>>>
>>> Oh. My. God.
>>>
>> Truth slicing through the lib brain like a red-hot axe.
> 
> Yeah, I didn't expect Chris to see things from my perspective.

No reasonable person would give into your demands for special entitlements.

And apparently Ahlstrom does not either.

> The
> reality here is that democracies need to be in a situation where the
> voters will elect people based on their qualifications and with a
> logical desire to improve the area's economic and social conditions
> rather than vote for whoever seems nicest from a purely emotional
> point of view.

And yet here you are, backing Trump. Should we deny you the right to 
vote because you go against what you just said?

> Just look at how people voted between Trump and
> HilLIARy for reference: Trump voters hated what Obama had done with
> the place in eight years with the millions of jobs lost,

Jobs and the economy improved under Obama.

> the increased
> crime 

Crime decreased under Obama.

> and deteriorating education and simpye said "no more;" HilLIARy
> voters chose her despite her obvious corruption because the
> alternative was a "bad man" who didn't behave like a "gentleman" and
> allowed women to walk all over him. 

And was unqualified and bigoted and is working to harm America in many ways.

> Hell, the media coddling to these
> morons spent an inordinate amount of time and money trying to make him
> look like a "mean" person because they knew they could manipulate
> women that way. It failed to keep him out of the White House but it
> definitely worked with women in general.

The media did not force Trump to say and do what he did. And does.

> Had land owners been the only ones voting, Trump wouldn't have lost a
> single state. Even California would have been his as the people voting
> against him in high numbers there don't own a thing.

So this is about pushing your political views, not about what is doing 
what is right. Got it.


-- 
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They 
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel 
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#687369 — Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath.

benj wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

> On 5/27/2018 11:44 AM, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>> Doomsdrzej wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>> 
>>> I used to think differently, but the worst things to happen to
>>> democracy are the decisions to give people who didn't own land the
>>> right to vote and later women. Land owners SHOULD have a say in who
>>> runs a place whether they own 2 square feet or 200,000 but if people
>>> are on welfare, renting or doing nothing of worth, they shouldn't have
>>> a say. If the land owner is a woman, she should have a vote too
>>> because she has a lot to lose from incompetence but a woman who stays
>>> at home and "takes care" of her nine children from seven different
>>> fathers on the taxpayer's dime should sit down and shut the Hell up.
>> 
>> Oh. My. God.
>> 
> Truth slicing through the lib brain like a red-hot axe.

LOL at the "lib brain".  That's just "brain" to you, "benj".

I know plenty of "conservatives" who get doled out money
for not working, and somehow they can afford all the appurtenances
of the working man, such as 60" 4K TVs.

Not to mention the land-owning people who live on floodplains or near
the Mexican border and expect the government to pony up to protect them
from their freedom of choice.

Or the anti-government people in Montana who let their forests get logged
into kindling, yet don't want to pay the forestry service to manage them,
and then howl to the high heavens that the government should spend money to
protect them from the raging forest fires that result.

-- 
It is so very hard to be an
on-your-own-take-care-of-yourself-because-there-is-no-one-else-to-do-it-for-you
grown-up.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#687467 — Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath.

On 5/27/2018 2:24 PM, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
> benj wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
> 
>> On 5/27/2018 11:44 AM, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>>> Doomsdrzej wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>>>
>>>> I used to think differently, but the worst things to happen to
>>>> democracy are the decisions to give people who didn't own land the
>>>> right to vote and later women. Land owners SHOULD have a say in who
>>>> runs a place whether they own 2 square feet or 200,000 but if people
>>>> are on welfare, renting or doing nothing of worth, they shouldn't have
>>>> a say. If the land owner is a woman, she should have a vote too
>>>> because she has a lot to lose from incompetence but a woman who stays
>>>> at home and "takes care" of her nine children from seven different
>>>> fathers on the taxpayer's dime should sit down and shut the Hell up.
>>>
>>> Oh. My. God.
>>>
>> Truth slicing through the lib brain like a red-hot axe.
> 
> LOL at the "lib brain".  That's just "brain" to you, "benj".

Brain isn't exactly the right word is it? I mean a brain is a source of 
reason and logic which means that a "Lib brain" cannot exist. Let's call 
it the lib "fantasy generator".

> I know plenty of "conservatives" who get doled out money
> for not working, and somehow they can afford all the appurtenances
> of the working man, such as 60" 4K TVs.

Hey this is America. A person doesn't have to actually do any work to 
live a "better life". Libs prove it every day. It's why so many people 
(libs call them "immigrants") try to walk in here every day.

> Not to mention the land-owning people who live on floodplains or near
> the Mexican border and expect the government to pony up to protect them
> from their freedom of choice.

Or live in a bathtub below sea level in New Orleans, or on the beach in 
Florida or NJ, or on the side of an active volcano and then go on 
liberal TV blubbering their asses off about how they "lost everything" 
and want all the people smart enough to NOT live on the side of an 
active volcano or below sea level to pay for their horrible loss! And of 
course you libs all support this because you all CARE about other humans 
and their "suffering"!

> Or the anti-government people in Montana who let their forests get logged
> into kindling, yet don't want to pay the forestry service to manage them,
> and then howl to the high heavens that the government should spend money to
> protect them from the raging forest fires that result.

Wait a minute, wasn't it the anti-Sovie... er... I mean anti-government 
people in Montana that got thrown in jail because a fire they started 
got away and burned some government waste land? Oh wait. That was a 
different state. No matter. Everyone knows that people actually 
producing things and growing animals and crops are all ignorant and must 
be told by their betters, namely ass-sitting non-working liberals 
exactly what they can and cannot do (for their own good, natch).

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#687477 — Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath.

On Mon, 28 May 2018 08:13:19 -0400, benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:

>On 5/27/2018 2:24 PM, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>> benj wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>> 
>>> On 5/27/2018 11:44 AM, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>>>> Doomsdrzej wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>>>>
>>>>> I used to think differently, but the worst things to happen to
>>>>> democracy are the decisions to give people who didn't own land the
>>>>> right to vote and later women. Land owners SHOULD have a say in who
>>>>> runs a place whether they own 2 square feet or 200,000 but if people
>>>>> are on welfare, renting or doing nothing of worth, they shouldn't have
>>>>> a say. If the land owner is a woman, she should have a vote too
>>>>> because she has a lot to lose from incompetence but a woman who stays
>>>>> at home and "takes care" of her nine children from seven different
>>>>> fathers on the taxpayer's dime should sit down and shut the Hell up.
>>>>
>>>> Oh. My. God.
>>>>
>>> Truth slicing through the lib brain like a red-hot axe.
>> 
>> LOL at the "lib brain".  That's just "brain" to you, "benj".
>
>Brain isn't exactly the right word is it? I mean a brain is a source of 
>reason and logic which means that a "Lib brain" cannot exist. Let's call 
>it the lib "fantasy generator".

+1

>> I know plenty of "conservatives" who get doled out money
>> for not working, and somehow they can afford all the appurtenances
>> of the working man, such as 60" 4K TVs.
>
>Hey this is America. A person doesn't have to actually do any work to 
>live a "better life". Libs prove it every day. It's why so many people 
>(libs call them "immigrants") try to walk in here every day.

In Mexico and South America, they have to toil for hours just to be
able to feed their two children; in America, they can just sit on
their asses and eat beans as hard-working Americans pay for their
twelve children.

>> Not to mention the land-owning people who live on floodplains or near
>> the Mexican border and expect the government to pony up to protect them
>> from their freedom of choice.
>
>Or live in a bathtub below sea level in New Orleans, or on the beach in 
>Florida or NJ, or on the side of an active volcano and then go on 
>liberal TV blubbering their asses off about how they "lost everything" 
>and want all the people smart enough to NOT live on the side of an 
>active volcano or below sea level to pay for their horrible loss! And of 
>course you libs all support this because you all CARE about other humans 
>and their "suffering"!

And you'll all pay for those poor souls with increased taxes...
because you care, of course. If you're not down with the taxes, you're
a racist.

>> Or the anti-government people in Montana who let their forests get logged
>> into kindling, yet don't want to pay the forestry service to manage them,
>> and then howl to the high heavens that the government should spend money to
>> protect them from the raging forest fires that result.
>
>Wait a minute, wasn't it the anti-Sovie... er... I mean anti-government 
>people in Montana that got thrown in jail because a fire they started 
>got away and burned some government waste land? Oh wait. That was a 
>different state. No matter. Everyone knows that people actually 
>producing things and growing animals and crops are all ignorant and must 
>be told by their betters, namely ass-sitting non-working liberals 
>exactly what they can and cannot do (for their own good, natch).

+1

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#687633 — Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath.

Doomsdrzej wrote:

>In Mexico and South America, they have to toil for hours just to be
>able to feed their two children; in America, they can just sit on
>their asses and eat beans as hard-working Americans pay for their
>twelve children.

Well, that's a side-effect of living in a wealthy nation.  It's
obviously not ideal, but only simpletons believe that there are simple
solutions that will not bring-along terrible consequences.

-- 
"Many people using other Free licenses claim that the GPL is nothing
more than a badge of hate brought about by petty jealousy and a desire
to see professionals fail by Stallman and others."  -  "True Linux
advocate" Hadron Quark

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#687526 — Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath.

benj wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

>
>

Sorry, talking to you and Dooms is a waste of time.  "Lib this", "lib that".
Idiocy.

-- 
You're ugly and your mother dresses you funny.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#687536 — Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath.

Trigger warning: The following post may contain language and truth that 
Leftwing Libs may find emotionally negative and unpleasant.

On 5/28/2018 2:49 PM, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
> benj wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
> 
>>
>>
> 
> Sorry, talking to you and Dooms is a waste of time.  "Lib this", "lib that".
> Idiocy.

Funny the way libs always have to never tell the truth when a lie will do.

Case in point being my "copyrighted missive" (doubtless unread by any 
lib who would fear actually learning a few facts and truth) and the lie 
that I expect "royalties".

The truth easily seen on he very first page (which shows how lazy and 
dishonest Chris is) that states very clearly that it is published under 
the GNU General Public License which permits copies and even 
improvements with the only requirement being that credit be given to the 
original author (me). There are no "royalties" and there is active 
encouragement for distribution as widely as possible and even 
corrections and improvements be implemented by readers and new authors.

So Clearly lazy-ass Chris is like all libs, a dishonest liar and 
fraudster attempting to paint a fraudulent picture to deceive all his 
readers and the public to promote his insane political views and agenda.

Chris, get up off your lazy lib ass and actually READ what people have 
written instead of just making up drooling boiler plate shit as 
responses. You will be a better "feminist" for doing that.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#687628 — Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath.

Chris Ahlstrom wrote:

>benj wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>>
>>
>
>Sorry, talking to you and Dooms is a waste of time.  "Lib this", "lib that".
>Idiocy.

You're just afraid of the truth, man!   :-D

-- 
"People are not going to migrate to desktop Linux until the open
source community gets its act together."  -  some thing

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#687731 — Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath.

chrisv wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

> Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>
>>benj wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>>
>>Sorry, talking to you and Dooms is a waste of time.  "Lib this", "lib that".
>>Idiocy.
>
> You're just afraid of the truth, man!   :-D

The way those guys talk tells us more about them than anything about the way
the world is.

The world is a complex, imponderable thing, full of conflict and conflicting
ideas, each arbitrary group of a people itself a complex mix of the dumb and
the genius, the angry and the happy, the bitter and the sweet.  Those who
attach a broad label to anyone are likely to be simply, bigots.

Use your brains, people!

-- 
Q:	Why do ducks have big flat feet?
A:	To stamp out forest fires.
 
Q:	Why do elephants have big flat feet?
A:	To stamp out flaming ducks.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 4 of 5 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web