Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #686921 > unrolled thread

Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men.

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-05-24 09:38 -0700
    Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-24 09:47 -0700
      Michael Glasser's Marxism/Feminism. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-05-24 10:19 -0700
      Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-24 18:04 -0400
        Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-24 15:13 -0700
          Feminists suck on the BoobTube. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-05-24 20:28 -0700
        Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-24 18:28 -0400
          Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-24 15:45 -0700
          Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-25 07:39 -0500
        Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-25 07:55 -0500
          Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-25 09:17 -0400
            Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-25 08:57 -0500
              Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-25 11:13 -0400
                Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-25 12:15 -0500
                  Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-25 16:49 -0400
                    Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-25 14:23 -0700
                    Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-25 18:17 -0400
                      Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-05-26 07:43 -0400
                        Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-27 12:36 -0400
                          Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-27 09:44 -0700
                          Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-05-27 14:14 -0400
                        Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-29 07:12 -0500
                      Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-26 11:38 -0400
                        Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-26 08:45 -0700
                          Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-27 12:36 -0400
                            Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-27 09:44 -0700
                            Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-27 13:55 -0400
                    Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-30 15:03 -0500
                      Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-30 13:30 -0700
                      Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-31 13:24 -0500
                        Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-31 11:32 -0700
              Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-25 16:43 -0400
                Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-25 14:24 -0700
            Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-25 09:29 -0700
          Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-25 11:27 -0400
            Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-25 09:04 -0700
            Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-25 12:21 -0500
    Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2018-05-24 20:18 -0700
    Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Ser Gregor Clegane <sergregor@lannistermail.raven> - 2018-05-25 16:12 -0400
      Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-25 18:02 -0400
        Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-25 15:30 -0700
          Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-27 12:36 -0400
            Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-27 09:44 -0700
        Kids are the domain of the poor, uneducated and unfortunate. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-05-26 01:45 -0700
          Re: Kids are the domain of the poor, uneducated and unfortunate. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-26 11:32 -0400
            Re: Kids are the domain of the poor, uneducated and unfortunate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-26 08:43 -0700
              Re: Kids are the domain of the poor, uneducated and unfortunate. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 13:51 -0500
                Re: Kids are the domain of the poor, uneducated and unfortunate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-26 11:58 -0700
                  They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-05-26 16:51 -0700
                    Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-26 16:55 -0700
                    Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-26 20:40 -0400
                      Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-26 17:41 -0700
                        Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-26 21:16 -0400
                          Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-26 18:30 -0700
                          Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-29 07:35 -0500
                            Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-05-29 17:36 -0400
                              Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-30 07:39 -0500
                                Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-30 10:40 -0700
                                  Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-30 15:06 -0400
                                    Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-30 14:50 -0500
                                      Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-31 08:29 -0500
                                        Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-31 10:02 -0700
                                    Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-30 13:29 -0700
                      Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-26 20:50 -0400
                        Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-27 09:05 -0400
                          Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-27 06:57 -0700
                          Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-05-27 11:44 -0400
                            Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-27 12:15 -0400
                              Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-27 09:17 -0700
                            Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-27 12:33 -0400
                              Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-27 13:52 -0400
                                Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-27 11:02 -0700
                              Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-05-27 14:24 -0400
                                Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-28 08:13 -0400
                                  Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-28 09:49 -0400
                                    Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-29 07:51 -0500
                                  Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-05-28 14:49 -0400
                                    Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-28 16:14 -0400
                                    Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-29 07:29 -0500
                                      Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-05-29 17:40 -0400
                                        Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 15:01 +0200
                                          Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-05-30 09:14 -0400
                                        Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-30 07:57 -0500
                                          Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-30 05:59 +0200
                          Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-29 07:23 -0500
                            Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-29 07:57 -0700
              Re: Kids are the domain of the poor, uneducated and unfortunate. Ser Gregor Clegane <sergregor@lannistermail.raven> - 2018-05-27 12:36 -0400
                Re: Kids are the domain of the poor, uneducated and unfortunate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-27 09:43 -0700
        Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-26 11:35 -0400
          Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-26 08:45 -0700
          Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-27 12:36 -0400
            Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-27 13:54 -0400
              Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-27 11:01 -0700
              Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-05-31 21:34 +0000

Page 1 of 5  [1] 2 3 4 5  Next page →

#686921 — Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men.

Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men.

SovietTards ( Nepal, Cuba, Venezuela and North Korea )
solve this disparity by giving everyone the same wage;
and, as an added benefit, they get a stone age aesthetic
that's easy on the environment, Al Gore style.

Western Feminists point to BlueEyed Norway as their ideal;
and they project their _extreme_ racism onto others.
" I aint saying she's a gold digger, 
  but she aint messing with no broke nigger. " -- Kanye West

Who breeds more ? poor Muslims or rich Japanese ?
"Marriage & Kids" is the domain of the poor, uneducated and unfortunate.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#686925

On 5/24/18 9:38 AM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote:
> Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men.
> 
> SovietTards ( Nepal, Cuba, Venezuela and North Korea )
> solve this disparity by giving everyone the same wage;
> and, as an added benefit, they get a stone age aesthetic
> that's easy on the environment, Al Gore style.
> 
> Western Feminists point to BlueEyed Norway as their ideal;
> and they project their _extreme_ racism onto others.
> " I aint saying she's a gold digger,
>    but she aint messing with no broke nigger. " -- Kanye West
> 
> Who breeds more ? poor Muslims or rich Japanese ?
> "Marriage & Kids" is the domain of the poor, uneducated and unfortunate.
> 
There are good and bad things about Norway. Not sure why you focus on it 
so much.

-- 
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They 
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel 
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#686932 — Michael Glasser's Marxism/Feminism.

Michael Glasser replied ( to me ):
> > Western Feminists point to BlueEyed Norway as their ideal;
> > and they project their _extreme_ racism onto others.
> > " I aint saying she's a gold digger,
> >    but she aint messing with no broke nigger. " -- Kanye West
> > 
> > Who breeds more ? poor Muslims or rich Japanese ?
> > "Marriage & Kids" is the domain of the poor, uneducated and unfortunate.
> 
> Not sure why you focus on Norway so much.

If your Marxism/Feminism allowed it,
you'd see that I was talking about _your_ ideals, not mine.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#686961

On 5/24/2018 12:47 PM, Snit wrote:
> On 5/24/18 9:38 AM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote:
>> Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men.
>>
>> SovietTards ( Nepal, Cuba, Venezuela and North Korea )
>> solve this disparity by giving everyone the same wage;
>> and, as an added benefit, they get a stone age aesthetic
>> that's easy on the environment, Al Gore style.
>>
>> Western Feminists point to BlueEyed Norway as their ideal;
>> and they project their _extreme_ racism onto others.
>> " I aint saying she's a gold digger,
>>    but she aint messing with no broke nigger. " -- Kanye West
>>
>> Who breeds more ? poor Muslims or rich Japanese ?
>> "Marriage & Kids" is the domain of the poor, uneducated and unfortunate.
>>
> There are good and bad things about Norway. Not sure why you focus on it 
> so much.
> 
I can tell you why Rolf focuses on Norway. It is because all the 
feminist leftards use Norway as their rationalization that their failed 
social system which was thoroughly tested in the biggest social 
experiment the planet has ever seen and produced a world-wide massive 
failure is somehow still viable and not totally discredited (as it is 
with the rest of the thinking world).

The idea they still cling to that everyone should hand all their 
property and responsibilities over to an all-knowing government that 
will decide what is best for you and everyone else is so obviously 
flawed you wonder how they were able to sell it in the first place. That 
is a tribute to propaganda skilz of the liberal mouth.

But they didn't get the memo that their "utopia" crashed and burned. 
That only Cuba and North Korea are still true believers (and Cuba is 
having some doubts)  So they focus on the socialism of Norway to "prove" 
that their system somehow really wasn't a fail, but can rise again from 
the dead.

So the "feminist-socialists" point to Norway and the like who have not 
YET set up Gulags and re-education camps as part of their system as the 
future. Those of us who actually remember the past then must confront 
this propaganda to keep from repeating the past.

Simple as that. Right Rolf?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#686964

On 5/24/18 3:04 PM, benj wrote:
> On 5/24/2018 12:47 PM, Snit wrote:
>> On 5/24/18 9:38 AM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote:
>>> Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men.
>>>
>>> SovietTards ( Nepal, Cuba, Venezuela and North Korea )
>>> solve this disparity by giving everyone the same wage;
>>> and, as an added benefit, they get a stone age aesthetic
>>> that's easy on the environment, Al Gore style.
>>>
>>> Western Feminists point to BlueEyed Norway as their ideal;
>>> and they project their _extreme_ racism onto others.
>>> " I aint saying she's a gold digger,
>>>    but she aint messing with no broke nigger. " -- Kanye West
>>>
>>> Who breeds more ? poor Muslims or rich Japanese ?
>>> "Marriage & Kids" is the domain of the poor, uneducated and unfortunate.
>>>
>> There are good and bad things about Norway. Not sure why you focus on 
>> it so much.
>>
> I can tell you why Rolf focuses on Norway. It is because all

All?

> the 
> feminist leftards use Norway as their rationalization that their failed 
> social system which was thoroughly tested in the biggest social 
> experiment the planet has ever seen and produced a world-wide massive 
> failure is somehow still viable and not totally discredited (as it is 
> with the rest of the thinking world).

What?

> The idea they still cling to that everyone should hand all their 
> property and responsibilities over to an all-knowing government 

Have a quote of ANYONE saying that?

> that 
> will decide what is best for you and everyone else is so obviously 
> flawed you wonder how they were able to sell it in the first place.

You are the one trying to sell that straw man. Or woman.

> That 
> is a tribute to propaganda skilz of the liberal mouth.

Your straw man is?

> But they didn't get the memo that their "utopia" crashed and burned. 
> That only Cuba and North Korea are still true believers (and Cuba is 
> having some doubts)  So they focus on the socialism of Norway to "prove" 
> that their system somehow really wasn't a fail, but can rise again from 
> the dead.

Who is backing socialism? Maybe you mean Republicans who want to 
socialize the costs and risks of the rich? You know... the costs to ALL 
of us of using ancient stores of carbon or the cost of labor for Walmart 
and McDonald's and the like? But that is not the left so... what?

The right pushes FAR more socialism than the left.

> So the "feminist-socialists" point to Norway and the like who have not 
> YET set up Gulags and re-education camps as part of their system as the 
> future. Those of us who actually remember the past then must confront 
> this propaganda to keep from repeating the past.
> 
> Simple as that. Right Rolf?

LOL!


-- 
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They 
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel 
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#687001 — Feminists suck on the BoobTube.

Michael Glasser replied ( to Ben Wacoby ):
> > feminists use Norway as [ their ideal ]
> 
> All?

No, some of them, yourself included, have no ideal at all.
Which country is LeastBad ( for feminists ) ?  You can't say.

> > [ feminism, whenever tried, has failed ]
> 
> What?

You ignore everything that contradicts your feminist agenda,
as any HalfDecent salesman would.

> > [ feminists believe ] everyone should hand all their 
> > property and responsibilities over to an all-knowing government 
> 
> Have a quote of ANYONE saying that?

We don't need our brains because "smarter people" have it covered.
Post "hate speach", or use the wrong pronoun, and jail awaits you
( YouTube.COM/watch?v=IMBfT38xbhU ).

> > [it's] a tribute to propaganda skilz of the liberal mouth.

Feminists suck on the BoobTube.
YouTube, when used right, is more informative.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#686967

On Thu, 24 May 2018 18:04:12 -0400, benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:

>On 5/24/2018 12:47 PM, Snit wrote:
>> On 5/24/18 9:38 AM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote:
>>> Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men.
>>>
>>> SovietTards ( Nepal, Cuba, Venezuela and North Korea )
>>> solve this disparity by giving everyone the same wage;
>>> and, as an added benefit, they get a stone age aesthetic
>>> that's easy on the environment, Al Gore style.
>>>
>>> Western Feminists point to BlueEyed Norway as their ideal;
>>> and they project their _extreme_ racism onto others.
>>> " I aint saying she's a gold digger,
>>>    but she aint messing with no broke nigger. " -- Kanye West
>>>
>>> Who breeds more ? poor Muslims or rich Japanese ?
>>> "Marriage & Kids" is the domain of the poor, uneducated and unfortunate.
>>>
>> There are good and bad things about Norway. Not sure why you focus on it 
>> so much.
>> 
>I can tell you why Rolf focuses on Norway. It is because all the 
>feminist leftards use Norway as their rationalization that their failed 
>social system which was thoroughly tested in the biggest social 
>experiment the planet has ever seen and produced a world-wide massive 
>failure is somehow still viable and not totally discredited (as it is 
>with the rest of the thinking world).
>
>The idea they still cling to that everyone should hand all their 
>property and responsibilities over to an all-knowing government that 
>will decide what is best for you and everyone else is so obviously 
>flawed you wonder how they were able to sell it in the first place. That 
>is a tribute to propaganda skilz of the liberal mouth.
>
>But they didn't get the memo that their "utopia" crashed and burned. 
>That only Cuba and North Korea are still true believers (and Cuba is 
>having some doubts)  So they focus on the socialism of Norway to "prove" 
>that their system somehow really wasn't a fail, but can rise again from 
>the dead.
>
>So the "feminist-socialists" point to Norway and the like who have not 
>YET set up Gulags and re-education camps as part of their system as the 
>future. Those of us who actually remember the past then must confront 
>this propaganda to keep from repeating the past.
>
>Simple as that. Right Rolf?

I'll keep my post short as I always do and quickly demonstrate the
difference between socialism and capitalism using roads  here in
Quebec.

The 125 bridge is public. Every morning it is clogged with traffic and
in poor shape due to a lack of maintenance. Out of three lanes, you
can only escape serious damage to your car if you quickly and
carefully navigate the many potholes and get on  the left lane.  

The 25 bridge is available to the public but requires the user to pay
a toll every time he drives on it. It's $8 a pop if they don't know
who you are, but it does down to $3 if you register and put a
transponder on your windshield. It is never clogged (since it has a
fee attached to it) and in stunning shape since that money is used to
maintain it regularly. 

The 125 is socialism; the 25 is capitalism. Use the 125 if your time
is as worthless as Michael Glasser's existence is.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#686971

On 5/24/18 3:28 PM, Doomsdrzej wrote:
...
>> So the "feminist-socialists" point to Norway and the like who have not
>> YET set up Gulags and re-education camps as part of their system as the
>> future. Those of us who actually remember the past then must confront
>> this propaganda to keep from repeating the past.
>>
>> Simple as that. Right Rolf?
> 
> I'll keep my post short as I always do and quickly demonstrate the
> difference between socialism and capitalism using roads  here in
> Quebec.
> 
> The 125 bridge is public. Every morning it is clogged with traffic and
> in poor shape due to a lack of maintenance. Out of three lanes, you
> can only escape serious damage to your car if you quickly and
> carefully navigate the many potholes and get on  the left lane.

There are good and bad public roads where I live. Right now they are, if 
anything, putting TOO much effort into fixing the roads -- it is hard to 
drive around town without running into construction. I think they are 
trying to beat the summer tourist season, and I have heard they got rid 
of some of their own equipment and are able to do more by contracting 
out more.

> The 25 bridge is available to the public but requires the user to pay
> a toll every time he drives on it. It's $8 a pop if they don't know
> who you are, but it does down to $3 if you register and put a
> transponder on your windshield.

You save over 50% by being tracked. Yikes!

> It is never clogged (since it has a
> fee attached to it) and in stunning shape since that money is used to
> maintain it regularly.

Fewer people use it and it does not wear as much. Um, OK.

> The 125 is socialism; the 25 is capitalism. Use the 125 if your time
> is as worthless as Michael Glasser's existence is.

Your hand-picked examples actually failed to make your point... the 
"socialized" road can be used multiple times daily even by the poor and 
lower middle class. I mean, really, who wants to pay $16 a day to get to 
and from work (or be tracked). That is likely more than an hour of work 
a day LOST to just traveling. Maybe two hours for many when you include 
other costs (gas, car, etc.).

What a horrid system.


-- 
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They 
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel 
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#687029

Doomsdrzej wrote:

>I'll keep my post short as I always do and quickly demonstrate

... the idiocy of your propganda.

In every market, a "nicer experience" is available, if you're willing
to spend more.  First class or coach.  Neiman Marcus or WalMart.  This
is not a "capitalism vs socialism" issue.

-- 
"So, since when has linux made any cash?  All I see are linux
advocates sitting on street corners begging for money with their tin
cups out."  -  some piece of shit that calls itself "GreyCloud" 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#687030

benj wrote:

>I can tell you why Rolf focuses on Norway (snip lies)

I can tell you why right-wing propagandists focus on Cuba and North
Korea.  They hope to fool those who are too stupid to differentiate
between socialism and communist dictatorship.  

They lie that communst dictatorships are "socialist"utopias".  They
lie that socialism means "handing property and responsibilities over
to an all-knowing government that will decide what is best for you."
They want people to forget that there is a middle-ground, democratic
socialism.

-- 
'OF COURSE it is centrally regulated. Duh. Its called Government and
curriculum.  We realise you're a new FOSS "figurehead" but TRY to
think before making an arse of yourself AGAIN.'  -  "True Linux
advocate" Hadron Quark, claiming that schools and teachers should not
be allowed to deviate from the "standard" (Microsoft, of course)
software that is dicatated to them from centralized authorities

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#687031

On Fri, 25 May 2018 07:55:47 -0500, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid>
wrote:

>benj wrote:
>
>>I can tell you why Rolf focuses on Norway (snip lies)
>
>I can tell you why right-wing propagandists focus on Cuba and North
>Korea.  They hope to fool those who are too stupid to differentiate
>between socialism and communist dictatorship.  

<https://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/vladimir_lenin_136421>

>They lie that communst dictatorships are "socialist"utopias".  They
>lie that socialism means "handing property and responsibilities over
>to an all-knowing government that will decide what is best for you."
>They want people to forget that there is a middle-ground, democratic
>socialism.

And you lie about the fact that you have any understanding of
socialism's main objective.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#687036

Doomsdrzej wrote:

> chrisv wrote:
>>
>>I can tell you why right-wing propagandists focus on Cuba and North
>>Korea.  They hope to fool those who are too stupid to differentiate
>>between socialism and communist dictatorship.  
>
><https://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/vladimir_lenin_136421>
>
>>They lie that communst dictatorships are "socialist utopias".  They
>>lie that socialism means "handing property and responsibilities over
>>to an all-knowing government that will decide what is best for you."
>>They want people to forget that there is a middle-ground, democratic
>>socialism.
>
> (Ridiculous right-wing propaganda, hoping to fool the fools, snipped.)

It's people like you who are the extremists.  So, naturally, that's
what you accuse your "opponents" of being.

-- 
'Unlike the linux "advocates" where any person or any company that is
successful is hated and despised. Anyone who so much as "dares" to
charge for a service or product is labeled as a villian because
"everything must be free."'  -  trolling fsckwit "Ezekiel", lying
shamelessly

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#687044

On 5/25/2018 9:57 AM, chrisv wrote:
> Doomsdrzej wrote:
> 
>> chrisv wrote:
>>>
>>> I can tell you why right-wing propagandists focus on Cuba and North
>>> Korea.  They hope to fool those who are too stupid to differentiate
>>> between socialism and communist dictatorship.
>>
>> <https://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/vladimir_lenin_136421>
>>
>>> They lie that communst dictatorships are "socialist utopias".  They
>>> lie that socialism means "handing property and responsibilities over
>>> to an all-knowing government that will decide what is best for you."
>>> They want people to forget that there is a middle-ground, democratic
>>> socialism.
>>
>> (Ridiculous right-wing propaganda, hoping to fool the fools, snipped.)
> 
> It's people like you who are the extremists.  So, naturally, that's
> what you accuse your "opponents" of being.
> 
Naturally.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#687058

benj wrote:

> (snipped, unread)

I've no need for more right-wing lies, today, thanks.

-- 
"Assuming, of course, infinite resources an patience to systematically
go try them all to find that 'one' ... a needle in a haystack
paradigm."  -  lying asshole "-hh", lying shamelessly

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#687090

On Fri, 25 May 2018 12:15:34 -0500, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid>
wrote:

>benj wrote:
>
>> (snipped, unread)
>
>I've no need for more right-wing lies, today, thanks.

It's an attitude such as this one which guarantees that the left will
always remain in the dark about everything.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#687094

On 5/25/18 1:49 PM, Doomsdrzej wrote:
> On Fri, 25 May 2018 12:15:34 -0500, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid>
> wrote:
> 
>> benj wrote:
>>
>>> (snipped, unread)
>>
>> I've no need for more right-wing lies, today, thanks.
> 
> It's an attitude such as this one which guarantees that the left will
> always remain in the dark about everything.
> 
You listen to AND believe Alex Jones.

Care to re-think your last comment. :)

-- 
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They 
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel 
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#687110

On 5/25/2018 4:49 PM, Doomsdrzej wrote:
> On Fri, 25 May 2018 12:15:34 -0500, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid>
> wrote:
> 
>> benj wrote:
>>
>>> (snipped, unread)
>>
>> I've no need for more right-wing lies, today, thanks.
> 
> It's an attitude such as this one which guarantees that the left will
> always remain in the dark about everything.
> 

They know that which is why they are that way. It's so comfy to live in 
your own little fantasy world.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#687166

benj wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

> On 5/25/2018 4:49 PM, Doomsdrzej wrote:
>> On Fri, 25 May 2018 12:15:34 -0500, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid>
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> benj wrote:
>>>
>>>> (snipped, unread)
>>>
>>> I've no need for more right-wing lies, today, thanks.
>> 
>> It's an attitude such as this one which guarantees that the left will
>> always remain in the dark about everything.
>
> They know that which is why they are that way. It's so comfy to live in 
> your own little fantasy world.

The irony of you fellows is *palpable*.

-- 
Debian Hint #18: Quality control information about a package can be found
by going to http://packages.qa.debian.org/<package>; this page provides
links to the Maintainer's QA page, the BTS, news items for the package, and
information on which versions are available in which archives.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#687352

On Sat, 26 May 2018 07:43:50 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote:


>The irony of you fellows is *palpable*.

*You fellows* is so elitist, dude. It's your
bigotry that's palpable.

-- 

Yours Truly,
Gregory Hall

"Tsk, tsk. No one appreciates his brilliance, poor fellow. 
(There might be a message in that for him.)"--Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries

http://apprhondaleahkirkfries.blogspot.com/2014/05/rhonda-leah-kirk-fries-interview.html

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#687362

On 5/27/18 9:36 AM, Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq. wrote:
> On Sat, 26 May 2018 07:43:50 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote:
> 
> 
>> The irony of you fellows is *palpable*.
> 
> *You fellows* is so elitist, dude. It's your
> bigotry that's palpable.
> 

By all means show examples of his bigotry!

-- 
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They 
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel 
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 1 of 5  [1] 2 3 4 5  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web