Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #684526 > unrolled thread
| Started by | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-05-09 06:52 -0400 |
| Last post | 2018-05-09 15:49 -0400 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 278 — 21 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-09 06:52 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-05-09 07:57 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-09 09:17 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-05-09 09:29 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-09 10:10 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-05-10 07:55 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-10 08:55 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-05-10 19:35 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-11 08:13 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-05-12 13:44 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-12 18:57 +0000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-12 12:03 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-23 16:47 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-23 16:49 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-10 22:56 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-11 08:14 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-11 10:35 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> - 2018-05-11 10:59 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-11 10:25 -0500
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-11 08:48 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-11 11:02 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-11 20:45 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-11 23:01 -0500
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-12 09:33 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-12 09:31 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-11 19:47 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-11 19:09 -0500
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-12 09:33 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-14 23:59 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-15 09:24 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-05-15 07:03 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-15 11:43 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-15 20:12 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-16 00:34 +0000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-15 18:00 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-05-15 21:51 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-15 19:06 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-16 10:02 -0500
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-16 12:16 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-16 14:05 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-16 13:48 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-16 11:00 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-09 20:26 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-10 08:57 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-10 23:00 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-11 08:16 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-11 10:44 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-11 11:03 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-05-11 12:26 -0600
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-11 11:33 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-11 13:42 -0500
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-11 19:27 +0000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-11 12:30 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-11 19:32 +0000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-11 12:38 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-11 15:25 -0500
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-11 20:28 +0000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-11 13:39 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-11 20:26 +0000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-11 13:35 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-11 21:07 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-11 13:36 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-11 12:46 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-11 20:55 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-11 19:27 +0000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-11 19:48 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-11 23:27 -0500
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-12 09:35 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-15 00:00 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-15 09:24 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-15 11:47 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-15 14:47 -0500
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-15 21:13 +0000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-15 14:51 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-15 23:00 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-16 09:50 -0500
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-16 17:44 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-17 02:52 +0000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-16 20:02 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-16 20:33 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-16 20:35 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-17 00:29 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-17 11:38 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-16 20:37 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-17 17:16 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-15 20:00 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-16 00:35 +0000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-16 11:01 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-11 08:27 -0500
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-16 09:37 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-23 11:07 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-22 23:18 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-23 13:23 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-22 23:58 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-23 16:26 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-23 03:03 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-24 09:35 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-06-08 15:02 -0500
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-08 19:00 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-09 10:07 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Boris Mohar <borism_void_@sympatico.ca> - 2018-05-10 07:51 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-09 09:59 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-15 15:56 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-15 02:14 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-15 09:27 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-15 11:48 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-15 15:04 -0500
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-15 20:02 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-15 17:28 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-05-15 06:55 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-15 10:13 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-15 10:53 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-15 20:06 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-05-15 22:17 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-16 08:19 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-15 22:03 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-16 13:38 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-17 06:11 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-16 13:16 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-16 15:31 -0500
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-17 20:51 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-18 11:23 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-17 21:52 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-21 07:19 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-21 23:05 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-22 14:44 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-22 02:46 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-22 11:08 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-23 10:24 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-22 20:26 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-23 13:23 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-23 00:03 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-23 16:01 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-05-23 08:39 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-23 10:43 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-24 07:54 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-23 03:08 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-24 09:38 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-23 19:41 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-24 10:05 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-23 20:13 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-05-24 08:59 +0000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kdthrge@gmail.com - 2018-05-24 07:16 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Leo Sgouros <adravirgo@gmail.com> - 2018-05-24 07:26 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-24 12:02 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kdthrge@gmail.com - 2018-05-24 10:36 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kdthrge@gmail.com - 2018-05-24 12:29 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kdthrge@gmail.com - 2018-05-24 14:35 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-24 20:32 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Lofty Goat <rlwatkins@gmail.com> - 2018-05-24 19:56 -0500
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kdthrge@gmail.com - 2018-05-25 21:36 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kdthrge@gmail.com - 2018-05-25 23:34 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kdthrge@gmail.com - 2018-05-26 07:06 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Lofty Goat <rlwatkins@gmail.com> - 2018-05-26 12:48 -0500
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kdthrge@gmail.com - 2018-05-26 13:20 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kdthrge@gmail.com - 2018-05-27 12:30 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kdthrge@gmail.com - 2018-05-28 10:43 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kdthrge@gmail.com - 2018-05-28 14:03 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kdthrge@gmail.com - 2018-05-29 05:54 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kdthrge@gmail.com - 2018-06-06 16:56 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kdthrge@gmail.com - 2018-06-06 17:20 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kdthrge@gmail.com - 2018-06-06 19:36 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kdthrge@gmail.com - 2018-06-09 12:13 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kdthrge@gmail.com - 2018-06-09 18:28 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kdthrge@gmail.com - 2018-06-06 21:12 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kdthrge@gmail.com - 2018-06-07 06:13 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-06 16:56 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-23 20:09 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-24 10:55 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-23 23:03 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-17 20:50 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-18 11:20 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-17 21:27 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-18 11:45 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-17 22:31 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-18 14:07 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-18 00:50 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-18 15:20 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2018-05-18 15:42 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-18 03:40 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-21 07:28 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2018-05-18 15:28 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-18 15:33 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2018-05-18 15:48 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-05-20 21:58 +0000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-21 23:06 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-15 22:28 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-17 11:35 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-17 07:14 -0500
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-18 07:33 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-17 21:08 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-18 11:24 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-17 22:29 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-21 07:28 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-21 23:05 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-22 14:44 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-22 02:47 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-22 11:07 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-22 20:17 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-23 10:25 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-15 08:52 -0500
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-15 10:02 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-05-15 07:04 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-15 11:51 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-16 08:28 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-15 19:48 -0500
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-15 22:36 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-16 09:36 -0500
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-16 10:51 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-16 14:07 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-16 14:01 -0500
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-17 06:16 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-16 15:42 -0500
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-17 11:37 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-16 17:13 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-17 11:26 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-15 22:30 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-16 09:45 -0500
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-17 06:18 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-16 15:45 -0500
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-17 11:22 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-17 07:51 -0500
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-17 11:27 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-17 17:47 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-17 23:36 +0000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-18 09:39 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-17 20:55 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-05-17 18:12 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-18 11:24 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-17 16:41 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-05-17 20:06 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-17 20:20 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-18 01:37 +0000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-17 19:03 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-17 22:36 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-18 03:03 +0000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-17 20:09 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-05-17 23:25 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-18 09:56 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-17 17:55 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-05-17 21:01 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-17 18:02 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-05-17 21:09 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-17 17:29 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-17 20:53 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-18 11:25 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-17 22:30 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-18 14:08 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-18 00:42 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-18 15:22 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-18 03:31 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-18 07:06 -0500
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-18 11:49 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-18 13:25 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-18 19:40 +0000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-18 20:23 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-19 03:39 +0000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-18 18:41 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-19 03:40 +0000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-21 07:36 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-21 23:05 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-22 14:45 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-22 02:48 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-23 10:26 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-22 23:17 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-23 13:21 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-22 23:59 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-23 16:03 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-23 03:04 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-24 09:40 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-23 20:20 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-24 11:00 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-23 23:06 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-24 05:03 +0000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-24 01:59 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-24 01:57 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-09 09:33 -0500
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-09 15:49 -0400
Page 11 of 14 — ← Prev page 1 … 9 10 [11] 12 13 14 Next page →
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-15 08:52 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <pdeomf$11el$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #685531 |
On 5/15/2018 12:56 AM, Trevor Wilson wrote: > On 9/05/2018 11:59 PM, benj wrote: >> On 5/9/2018 6:52 AM, kensi wrote: >>> In 2013, atmospheric carbon dioxide broke 400 parts per million for >>> the first time in human history. Just a year later, atmospheric >>> carbon dioxide averaged that for an entire month. And now? >>> >>> https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2018/5/4/1762050/-The-last-time-atmospheric-carbon-dioxide-was-this-high-humans-didn-t-exist >>> >>> >> We hear you. Dinosaurs all died from heat stroke from all that CO2 >> Greenhousing their world. Somehow science doesn't agree with this >> fantasy. Since CO2 is a minor GHG it's level is obviously more or less >> irrelevant, both then and now. >> >> Water vapor is THE major GHG factor (50%) and clouds (also water) are >> another 25% and CO2 is NOT the remaining 25%. > > **Wrong, yappy lap-dog. You really should stop listening to your master, > Sergio. He is wrong and so are you. Obviously. name calling and emotional outbursts are simply ways to derail the subject. by doing this you are stating that you are an the end of your knowledge and way over your head, or your a libtard. remember CO2 is only 0.00039 part of the atmosphere the rest of is is not CO2 => 99.99961 % so the sun hardly hits any CO2 atoms. > > > Figure out how to tax the >> oceans and you got it, "Kanzi". Third world shitholes are counting on >> you. > > **Stop yapping, moron. > kansi nads sock now trevor, Bevis and Mr SpellitRight, and
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-15 10:02 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <pdepa2$12aq$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #685565 |
On 5/15/2018 9:52 AM, Sergio wrote: > kansi nads sock now trevor, Bevis and Mr SpellitRight, and Someone call the ambulance. Sergio's having a stroke! -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-15 07:04 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <ef3e3763-3906-4cec-83f3-f4632f771fd2@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #685570 |
On Tuesday, May 15, 2018 at 7:02:47 AM UTC-7, kensi wrote: > On 5/15/2018 9:52 AM, Sergio wrote: > > kansi nads sock now trevor, Bevis and Mr SpellitRight, and > > Someone call the ambulance. Sergio's having a stroke! Poor Sergio. Him so dumnb.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-15 11:51 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.3564cc1c7d26352b993a07@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #685570 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate! In article <pdepa2$12aq$2@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01 @gmail.nospam.invalid says... > > On 5/15/2018 9:52 AM, Sergio wrote: > > kansi nads sock now trevor, Bevis and Mr SpellitRight, and > > Someone call the ambulance. Sergio's having a stroke! I wish you'd give me a stroke or two. -- Checkmate ® Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Copyright © 2018 all rights reserved In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017 "There are many here among us, who feel that life is but a joke." "I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as kensi." -Nadegda Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-16 08:28 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <fm158hFnd3tU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #685565 |
On 15/05/2018 11:52 PM, Sergio wrote: > On 5/15/2018 12:56 AM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >> On 9/05/2018 11:59 PM, benj wrote: >>> On 5/9/2018 6:52 AM, kensi wrote: >>>> In 2013, atmospheric carbon dioxide broke 400 parts per million for >>>> the first time in human history. Just a year later, atmospheric >>>> carbon dioxide averaged that for an entire month. And now? >>>> >>>> https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2018/5/4/1762050/-The-last-time-atmospheric-carbon-dioxide-was-this-high-humans-didn-t-exist >>>> >>>> >>> We hear you. Dinosaurs all died from heat stroke from all that CO2 >>> Greenhousing their world. Somehow science doesn't agree with this >>> fantasy. Since CO2 is a minor GHG it's level is obviously more or less >>> irrelevant, both then and now. >>> >>> Water vapor is THE major GHG factor (50%) and clouds (also water) are >>> another 25% and CO2 is NOT the remaining 25%. >> >> **Wrong, yappy lap-dog. You really should stop listening to your master, >> Sergio. He is wrong and so are you. Obviously. > > name calling and emotional outbursts are simply ways to derail the > subject. > > by doing this you are stating that you are an the end of your knowledge > and way over your head, or your a libtard. > > > remember CO2 is only 0.00039 part of the atmosphere the rest of is > is not CO2 => 99.99961 % > so the sun hardly hits any CO2 atoms. **It's actually more like 410ppm right now and increasing rapidly. The Sun doesn't "hit CO2 atoms". Yikes! I made a grave error in assuming you had some scientific knowledge. I won't make that mistake again. I now realise what a monumental cretin you are. Points: * CO2 is not an "atom". CO2 is a MOLECULE. Here's a primer for you: https://whatis.techtarget.com/definition/molecule * The CO2 MOLECULE is highly resonant at several infra-red (IR) frequencies. The MOLECULE absorbs these frequencies and acquires kinetic energy, which causes the MOLECULE to vibrate at a higher energy level. This energy is transferred to other atmospheric MOLECULES, thus raising their energy. * Critically, the CO2 MOLECULE also absorbs energy that is re-radiated from the Earth's surface at night. This, in turn raises night-time temperatures. You appear to be labouring under the mistaken assumption that just because CO2 represents a small mass in the atmosphere, that it's effect is insignificant. You would, of course, be wrong. Just as you are wrong, in thinking that CO2 is an atom. I suggest that you study up on your basic science. > > >> >> >> Figure out how to tax the >>> oceans and you got it, "Kanzi". Third world shitholes are counting on >>> you. >> >> **Stop yapping, moron. >> > > kansi nads sock now trevor, Bevis and Mr SpellitRight, and > -- Trevor Wilson www.rageaudio.com.au
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-15 19:48 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <pdfv5k$165i$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #685657 |
On 5/15/2018 5:28 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote: > On 15/05/2018 11:52 PM, Sergio wrote: >> On 5/15/2018 12:56 AM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>> On 9/05/2018 11:59 PM, benj wrote: >>>> On 5/9/2018 6:52 AM, kensi wrote: >>>>> In 2013, atmospheric carbon dioxide broke 400 parts per million for >>>>> the first time in human history. Just a year later, atmospheric >>>>> carbon dioxide averaged that for an entire month. And now? >>>>> >>>>> https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2018/5/4/1762050/-The-last-time-atmospheric-carbon-dioxide-was-this-high-humans-didn-t-exist >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> We hear you. Dinosaurs all died from heat stroke from all that CO2 >>>> Greenhousing their world. Somehow science doesn't agree with this >>>> fantasy. Since CO2 is a minor GHG it's level is obviously more or less >>>> irrelevant, both then and now. >>>> >>>> Water vapor is THE major GHG factor (50%) and clouds (also water) are >>>> another 25% and CO2 is NOT the remaining 25%. >>> >>> **Wrong, yappy lap-dog. You really should stop listening to your master, >>> Sergio. He is wrong and so are you. Obviously. >> >> name calling and emotional outbursts are simply ways to derail the >> subject. >> >> by doing this you are stating that you are an the end of your knowledge >> and way over your head, or your a libtard. >> >> >> remember CO2 is only 0.00039 part of the atmosphere the rest of is >> is not CO2 => 99.99961 % >> so the sun hardly hits any CO2 atoms. > > **It's actually more like 410ppm right now and increasing rapidly. The > Sun doesn't "hit CO2 atoms". ha, knew you would catch that one, but others didnt. > Yikes! I made a grave error in assuming you > had some scientific knowledge. I won't make that mistake again. I now > realise what a monumental cretin you are. > Points: > > * CO2 is not an "atom". CO2 is a MOLECULE. Here's a primer for you: > https://whatis.techtarget.com/definition/molecule > * The CO2 MOLECULE is highly resonant at several infra-red (IR) > frequencies. The MOLECULE absorbs these frequencies and acquires kinetic > energy, which causes the MOLECULE to vibrate at a higher energy level. > This energy is transferred to other atmospheric MOLECULES, thus raising > their energy. > * Critically, the CO2 MOLECULE also absorbs energy that is re-radiated > from the Earth's surface at night. This, in turn raises night-time > temperatures. and the molecule has 2 main modes of vibrating, which affect IR bands > > You appear to be labouring under the mistaken assumption that just > because CO2 represents a small mass in the atmosphere, that it's effect > is insignificant. You would, of course, be wrong. Just as you are wrong, > in thinking that CO2 is an atom. I suggest that you study up on your > basic science. > >> >> >>> >>> >>> Figure out how to tax the >>>> oceans and you got it, "Kanzi". Third world shitholes are counting on >>>> you. >>> >>> **Stop yapping, moron. >>> >> >> kansi nads sock now trevor, Bevis and Mr SpellitRight, and >> > >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-15 22:36 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <8PMKC.174613$w94.55220@fx43.iad> |
| In reply to | #685695 |
On 5/15/2018 8:48 PM, Sergio wrote: > On 5/15/2018 5:28 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >> On 15/05/2018 11:52 PM, Sergio wrote: >>> On 5/15/2018 12:56 AM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>> On 9/05/2018 11:59 PM, benj wrote: >>>>> On 5/9/2018 6:52 AM, kensi wrote: >>>>>> In 2013, atmospheric carbon dioxide broke 400 parts per million for >>>>>> the first time in human history. Just a year later, atmospheric >>>>>> carbon dioxide averaged that for an entire month. And now? >>>>>> >>>>>> https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2018/5/4/1762050/-The-last-time-atmospheric-carbon-dioxide-was-this-high-humans-didn-t-exist >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> We hear you. Dinosaurs all died from heat stroke from all that CO2 >>>>> Greenhousing their world. Somehow science doesn't agree with this >>>>> fantasy. Since CO2 is a minor GHG it's level is obviously more or less >>>>> irrelevant, both then and now. >>>>> >>>>> Water vapor is THE major GHG factor (50%) and clouds (also water) are >>>>> another 25% and CO2 is NOT the remaining 25%. >>>> >>>> **Wrong, yappy lap-dog. You really should stop listening to your master, >>>> Sergio. He is wrong and so are you. Obviously. >>> >>> name calling and emotional outbursts are simply ways to derail the >>> subject. >>> >>> by doing this you are stating that you are an the end of your knowledge >>> and way over your head, or your a libtard. >>> >>> >>> remember CO2 is only 0.00039 part of the atmosphere the rest of is >>> is not CO2 => 99.99961 % >>> so the sun hardly hits any CO2 atoms. >> >> **It's actually more like 410ppm right now and increasing rapidly. The >> Sun doesn't "hit CO2 atoms". > > ha, knew you would catch that one, but others didnt. > >> Yikes! I made a grave error in assuming you >> had some scientific knowledge. I won't make that mistake again. I now >> realise what a monumental cretin you are. > > >> Points: >> >> * CO2 is not an "atom". CO2 is a MOLECULE. Here's a primer for you: >> https://whatis.techtarget.com/definition/molecule >> * The CO2 MOLECULE is highly resonant at several infra-red (IR) >> frequencies. The MOLECULE absorbs these frequencies and acquires kinetic >> energy, which causes the MOLECULE to vibrate at a higher energy level. >> This energy is transferred to other atmospheric MOLECULES, thus raising >> their energy. >> * Critically, the CO2 MOLECULE also absorbs energy that is re-radiated >> from the Earth's surface at night. This, in turn raises night-time >> temperatures. > > and the molecule has 2 main modes of vibrating, which affect IR bands Actually due to the recent discovery of both a linear and Triangular form of CO2, there are more modes and the warming situation is clearly "much worse than scientists thought!" Unless SOMETHING is done right now to block the triangular form (from fossil fuels) it could very well mean the extinction of all life on earth from the skyrocketing temperatures and all of Trevor's predictions will come to pass! Note all bands of "linear" CO2 are blocked by water vapor bands except for one and it's partially blocked allowing only one side through. Are the journalists here going to make me "prove" this is true? Trevor calls facts "yapping". As for Triangular CO2, who knows. Trevor's science could well be true and we are all doomed.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-16 09:36 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <pdhfmj$1j40$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #685717 |
On 5/15/2018 9:36 PM, benj wrote: > On 5/15/2018 8:48 PM, Sergio wrote: >> On 5/15/2018 5:28 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>> On 15/05/2018 11:52 PM, Sergio wrote: >>>> On 5/15/2018 12:56 AM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>>> On 9/05/2018 11:59 PM, benj wrote: >>>>>> On 5/9/2018 6:52 AM, kensi wrote: >>>>>>> In 2013, atmospheric carbon dioxide broke 400 parts per million for >>>>>>> the first time in human history. Just a year later, atmospheric >>>>>>> carbon dioxide averaged that for an entire month. And now? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2018/5/4/1762050/-The-last-time-atmospheric-carbon-dioxide-was-this-high-humans-didn-t-exist >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> We hear you. Dinosaurs all died from heat stroke from all that CO2 >>>>>> Greenhousing their world. Somehow science doesn't agree with this >>>>>> fantasy. Since CO2 is a minor GHG it's level is obviously more or >>>>>> less >>>>>> irrelevant, both then and now. >>>>>> >>>>>> Water vapor is THE major GHG factor (50%) and clouds (also water) are >>>>>> another 25% and CO2 is NOT the remaining 25%. >>>>> >>>>> **Wrong, yappy lap-dog. You really should stop listening to your >>>>> master, >>>>> Sergio. He is wrong and so are you. Obviously. >>>> >>>> name calling and emotional outbursts are simply ways to derail the >>>> subject. >>>> >>>> by doing this you are stating that you are an the end of your knowledge >>>> and way over your head, or your a libtard. >>>> >>>> >>>> remember CO2 is only 0.00039 part of the atmosphere the rest >>>> of is >>>> is not CO2 => 99.99961 % >>>> so the sun hardly hits any CO2 atoms. >>> >>> **It's actually more like 410ppm right now and increasing rapidly. The >>> Sun doesn't "hit CO2 atoms". >> >> ha, knew you would catch that one, but others didnt. >> >>> Yikes! I made a grave error in assuming you >>> had some scientific knowledge. I won't make that mistake again. I now >>> realise what a monumental cretin you are. >> >> >>> Points: >>> >>> * CO2 is not an "atom". CO2 is a MOLECULE. Here's a primer for you: >>> https://whatis.techtarget.com/definition/molecule >>> * The CO2 MOLECULE is highly resonant at several infra-red (IR) >>> frequencies. The MOLECULE absorbs these frequencies and acquires kinetic >>> energy, which causes the MOLECULE to vibrate at a higher energy level. >>> This energy is transferred to other atmospheric MOLECULES, thus raising >>> their energy. >>> * Critically, the CO2 MOLECULE also absorbs energy that is re-radiated >>> from the Earth's surface at night. This, in turn raises night-time >>> temperatures. >> >> and the molecule has 2 main modes of vibrating, which affect IR bands > > Actually due to the recent discovery of both a linear and Triangular > form of CO2, there are more modes and the warming situation is clearly > "much worse than scientists thought!" Unless SOMETHING is done right now > to block the triangular form (from fossil fuels) it could very well mean > the extinction of all life on earth from the skyrocketing temperatures > and all of Trevor's predictions will come to pass! > > Note all bands of "linear" CO2 are blocked by water vapor bands except > for one and it's partially blocked allowing only one side through. Are > the journalists here going to make me "prove" this is true? Trevor calls > facts "yapping". > > As for Triangular CO2, who knows. Trevor's science could well be true > and we are all doomed. Triangular CO2 is harder to exhale for some, the shape is different therefore it gets stuck inside some people, and their internal triangular CO2 levels go sky high. This can cause mental confusion, like huffing into a paper bag for too long.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-16 10:51 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <pdhggn$1k9t$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #685759 |
On 5/16/2018 10:36 AM, Sergio wrote: > mental confusion, like huffing into a paper bag for too long. Umm-hmm... -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-16 14:07 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <Hr_KC.164298$g%2.104441@fx17.iad> |
| In reply to | #685763 |
On 5/16/2018 10:51 AM, kensi wrote: > On 5/16/2018 10:36 AM, Sergio wrote: >> mental confusion, like huffing into a paper bag for too long. > > Umm-hmm... > A subject in which "Kanzi" clearly possesses a Ph.D. Hey, "Kanzi" what's in that paper bag? Hmmm?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-16 14:01 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <pdhv76$g1b$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #685788 |
On 5/16/2018 1:07 PM, benj wrote: > On 5/16/2018 10:51 AM, kensi wrote: >> On 5/16/2018 10:36 AM, Sergio wrote: >>> mental confusion, like huffing into a paper bag for too long. >> >> Umm-hmm... >> > A subject in which "Kanzi" clearly possesses a Ph.D. > Hey, "Kanzi" what's in that paper bag? Hmmm? "Umm-humm" means 'she's a huffin... in the bag? another old sock ?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-17 06:16 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <fm3hu3F92rqU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #685695 |
On 16/05/2018 10:48 AM, Sergio wrote: > On 5/15/2018 5:28 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >> On 15/05/2018 11:52 PM, Sergio wrote: >>> On 5/15/2018 12:56 AM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>> On 9/05/2018 11:59 PM, benj wrote: >>>>> On 5/9/2018 6:52 AM, kensi wrote: >>>>>> In 2013, atmospheric carbon dioxide broke 400 parts per million for >>>>>> the first time in human history. Just a year later, atmospheric >>>>>> carbon dioxide averaged that for an entire month. And now? >>>>>> >>>>>> https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2018/5/4/1762050/-The-last-time-atmospheric-carbon-dioxide-was-this-high-humans-didn-t-exist >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> We hear you. Dinosaurs all died from heat stroke from all that CO2 >>>>> Greenhousing their world. Somehow science doesn't agree with this >>>>> fantasy. Since CO2 is a minor GHG it's level is obviously more or less >>>>> irrelevant, both then and now. >>>>> >>>>> Water vapor is THE major GHG factor (50%) and clouds (also water) are >>>>> another 25% and CO2 is NOT the remaining 25%. >>>> >>>> **Wrong, yappy lap-dog. You really should stop listening to your master, >>>> Sergio. He is wrong and so are you. Obviously. >>> >>> name calling and emotional outbursts are simply ways to derail the >>> subject. >>> >>> by doing this you are stating that you are an the end of your knowledge >>> and way over your head, or your a libtard. >>> >>> >>> remember CO2 is only 0.00039 part of the atmosphere the rest of is >>> is not CO2 => 99.99961 % >>> so the sun hardly hits any CO2 atoms. >> >> **It's actually more like 410ppm right now and increasing rapidly. The >> Sun doesn't "hit CO2 atoms". > > ha, knew you would catch that one, but others didnt. **Uh-huh. Anything you say. I prefer the alternate explanation: You don't have a clue. You know very little about global warming, you've never read a single IPCC report and you're just a troll. > >> Yikes! I made a grave error in assuming you >> had some scientific knowledge. I won't make that mistake again. I now >> realise what a monumental cretin you are. > > >> Points: >> >> * CO2 is not an "atom". CO2 is a MOLECULE. Here's a primer for you: >> https://whatis.techtarget.com/definition/molecule >> * The CO2 MOLECULE is highly resonant at several infra-red (IR) >> frequencies. The MOLECULE absorbs these frequencies and acquires kinetic >> energy, which causes the MOLECULE to vibrate at a higher energy level. >> This energy is transferred to other atmospheric MOLECULES, thus raising >> their energy. >> * Critically, the CO2 MOLECULE also absorbs energy that is re-radiated >> from the Earth's surface at night. This, in turn raises night-time >> temperatures. > > and the molecule has 2 main modes of vibrating, which affect IR bands **It's good that I have been able to educate you about the construction of CO2. Now you recognise that it is, indeed, a molecule and not an atom. There may be some hope for your education after all. > >> >> You appear to be labouring under the mistaken assumption that just >> because CO2 represents a small mass in the atmosphere, that it's effect >> is insignificant. You would, of course, be wrong. Just as you are wrong, >> in thinking that CO2 is an atom. I suggest that you study up on your >> basic science. >> >>> >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Figure out how to tax the >>>>> oceans and you got it, "Kanzi". Third world shitholes are counting on >>>>> you. >>>> >>>> **Stop yapping, moron. >>>> >>> >>> kansi nads sock now trevor, Bevis and Mr SpellitRight, and >>> >> >> > -- Trevor Wilson www.rageaudio.com.au
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-16 15:42 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <pdi54i$r05$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #685805 |
On 5/16/2018 3:16 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote: > On 16/05/2018 10:48 AM, Sergio wrote: >> On 5/15/2018 5:28 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>> On 15/05/2018 11:52 PM, Sergio wrote: >>>> On 5/15/2018 12:56 AM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>>> On 9/05/2018 11:59 PM, benj wrote: >>>>>> On 5/9/2018 6:52 AM, kensi wrote: >>>>>>> In 2013, atmospheric carbon dioxide broke 400 parts per million for >>>>>>> the first time in human history. Just a year later, atmospheric >>>>>>> carbon dioxide averaged that for an entire month. And now? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2018/5/4/1762050/-The-last-time-atmospheric-carbon-dioxide-was-this-high-humans-didn-t-exist >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> We hear you. Dinosaurs all died from heat stroke from all that CO2 >>>>>> Greenhousing their world. Somehow science doesn't agree with this >>>>>> fantasy. Since CO2 is a minor GHG it's level is obviously more or >>>>>> less >>>>>> irrelevant, both then and now. >>>>>> >>>>>> Water vapor is THE major GHG factor (50%) and clouds (also water) are >>>>>> another 25% and CO2 is NOT the remaining 25%. >>>>> >>>>> **Wrong, yappy lap-dog. You really should stop listening to your >>>>> master, >>>>> Sergio. He is wrong and so are you. Obviously. >>>> >>>> name calling and emotional outbursts are simply ways to derail the >>>> subject. >>>> >>>> by doing this you are stating that you are an the end of your knowledge >>>> and way over your head, or your a libtard. >>>> >>>> >>>> remember CO2 is only 0.00039 part of the atmosphere the rest >>>> of is >>>> is not CO2 => 99.99961 % >>>> so the sun hardly hits any CO2 atoms. >>> >>> **It's actually more like 410ppm right now and increasing rapidly. The >>> Sun doesn't "hit CO2 atoms". >> >> ha, knew you would catch that one, but others didnt. > > **Uh-huh. Anything you say. I prefer the alternate explanation: > > You don't have a clue. You know very little about global warming, you've > never read a single IPCC report and you're just a troll. I posted IPCC "data" here to show you how "cooked" the data was, troll boy. > >> >>> Yikes! I made a grave error in assuming you >>> had some scientific knowledge. I won't make that mistake again. I now >>> realise what a monumental cretin you are. >> >> >>> Points: >>> >>> * CO2 is not an "atom". CO2 is a MOLECULE. Here's a primer for you: >>> https://whatis.techtarget.com/definition/molecule >>> * The CO2 MOLECULE is highly resonant at several infra-red (IR) >>> frequencies. The MOLECULE absorbs these frequencies and acquires kinetic >>> energy, which causes the MOLECULE to vibrate at a higher energy level. >>> This energy is transferred to other atmospheric MOLECULES, thus raising >>> their energy. >>> * Critically, the CO2 MOLECULE also absorbs energy that is re-radiated >>> from the Earth's surface at night. This, in turn raises night-time >>> temperatures. >> >> and the molecule has 2 main modes of vibrating, which affect IR bands > > **It's good that I have been able to educate you about the construction > of CO2. Now you recognise that it is, indeed, a molecule and not an > atom. There may be some hope for your education after all. ready to step up to the next level ? OK google " atmospheric absorption bands " It shows that Water dominates bigtime, if you have questions, just ask away http://keith.robertory.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Atmospheric_Absorption_Bands.jpg http://www.ice-age-ahead-iaa.ca/1/incoming_solar_irradiation1.jpg https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Antero_Ollila2/publication/274956207/figure/fig1/AS:294734485573635@1447281585078/THE-ABSORPTION-BAND-GRAPHS-OF-GH-GASES-IN-THE-ATMOSPHERE-IN-THE-AGA-CONDITIONS-2005-THE.png > >> <snip crap>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-17 11:37 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <fm44naFcs7tU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #685818 |
On 17/05/2018 6:42 AM, Sergio wrote: > On 5/16/2018 3:16 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >> On 16/05/2018 10:48 AM, Sergio wrote: >>> On 5/15/2018 5:28 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>> On 15/05/2018 11:52 PM, Sergio wrote: >>>>> On 5/15/2018 12:56 AM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>>>> On 9/05/2018 11:59 PM, benj wrote: >>>>>>> On 5/9/2018 6:52 AM, kensi wrote: >>>>>>>> In 2013, atmospheric carbon dioxide broke 400 parts per million for >>>>>>>> the first time in human history. Just a year later, atmospheric >>>>>>>> carbon dioxide averaged that for an entire month. And now? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2018/5/4/1762050/-The-last-time-atmospheric-carbon-dioxide-was-this-high-humans-didn-t-exist >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> We hear you. Dinosaurs all died from heat stroke from all that CO2 >>>>>>> Greenhousing their world. Somehow science doesn't agree with this >>>>>>> fantasy. Since CO2 is a minor GHG it's level is obviously more or >>>>>>> less >>>>>>> irrelevant, both then and now. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Water vapor is THE major GHG factor (50%) and clouds (also water) are >>>>>>> another 25% and CO2 is NOT the remaining 25%. >>>>>> >>>>>> **Wrong, yappy lap-dog. You really should stop listening to your >>>>>> master, >>>>>> Sergio. He is wrong and so are you. Obviously. >>>>> >>>>> name calling and emotional outbursts are simply ways to derail the >>>>> subject. >>>>> >>>>> by doing this you are stating that you are an the end of your knowledge >>>>> and way over your head, or your a libtard. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> remember CO2 is only 0.00039 part of the atmosphere the rest >>>>> of is >>>>> is not CO2 => 99.99961 % >>>>> so the sun hardly hits any CO2 atoms. >>>> >>>> **It's actually more like 410ppm right now and increasing rapidly. The >>>> Sun doesn't "hit CO2 atoms". >>> >>> ha, knew you would catch that one, but others didnt. >> >> **Uh-huh. Anything you say. I prefer the alternate explanation: >> >> You don't have a clue. You know very little about global warming, you've >> never read a single IPCC report and you're just a troll. > > I posted IPCC "data" here to show you how "cooked" the data was, troll > boy. **Must have missed it. Post again. > > >> >>> >>>> Yikes! I made a grave error in assuming you >>>> had some scientific knowledge. I won't make that mistake again. I now >>>> realise what a monumental cretin you are. >>> >>> >>>> Points: >>>> >>>> * CO2 is not an "atom". CO2 is a MOLECULE. Here's a primer for you: >>>> https://whatis.techtarget.com/definition/molecule >>>> * The CO2 MOLECULE is highly resonant at several infra-red (IR) >>>> frequencies. The MOLECULE absorbs these frequencies and acquires kinetic >>>> energy, which causes the MOLECULE to vibrate at a higher energy level. >>>> This energy is transferred to other atmospheric MOLECULES, thus raising >>>> their energy. >>>> * Critically, the CO2 MOLECULE also absorbs energy that is re-radiated >>>> from the Earth's surface at night. This, in turn raises night-time >>>> temperatures. >>> >>> and the molecule has 2 main modes of vibrating, which affect IR bands >> >> **It's good that I have been able to educate you about the construction >> of CO2. Now you recognise that it is, indeed, a molecule and not an >> atom. There may be some hope for your education after all. > > ready to step up to the next level ? OK > > google " atmospheric absorption bands " > > It shows that Water dominates bigtime, if you have questions, just ask away **Never been in dispute. However, the contribution of CO2 is NOT insignificant. -- Trevor Wilson www.rageaudio.com.au
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-16 17:13 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <4a1LC.155219$PE5.108184@fx37.iad> |
| In reply to | #685805 |
On 5/16/2018 4:16 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote: > On 16/05/2018 10:48 AM, Sergio wrote: >> On 5/15/2018 5:28 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>> On 15/05/2018 11:52 PM, Sergio wrote: >>>> On 5/15/2018 12:56 AM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>>> On 9/05/2018 11:59 PM, benj wrote: >>>>>> On 5/9/2018 6:52 AM, kensi wrote: >>>>>>> In 2013, atmospheric carbon dioxide broke 400 parts per million for >>>>>>> the first time in human history. Just a year later, atmospheric >>>>>>> carbon dioxide averaged that for an entire month. And now? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2018/5/4/1762050/-The-last-time-atmospheric-carbon-dioxide-was-this-high-humans-didn-t-exist >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> We hear you. Dinosaurs all died from heat stroke from all that CO2 >>>>>> Greenhousing their world. Somehow science doesn't agree with this >>>>>> fantasy. Since CO2 is a minor GHG it's level is obviously more or >>>>>> less >>>>>> irrelevant, both then and now. >>>>>> >>>>>> Water vapor is THE major GHG factor (50%) and clouds (also water) are >>>>>> another 25% and CO2 is NOT the remaining 25%. >>>>> >>>>> **Wrong, yappy lap-dog. You really should stop listening to your >>>>> master, >>>>> Sergio. He is wrong and so are you. Obviously. >>>> >>>> name calling and emotional outbursts are simply ways to derail the >>>> subject. >>>> >>>> by doing this you are stating that you are an the end of your knowledge >>>> and way over your head, or your a libtard. >>>> >>>> >>>> remember CO2 is only 0.00039 part of the atmosphere the rest >>>> of is >>>> is not CO2 => 99.99961 % >>>> so the sun hardly hits any CO2 atoms. >>> >>> **It's actually more like 410ppm right now and increasing rapidly. The >>> Sun doesn't "hit CO2 atoms". >> >> ha, knew you would catch that one, but others didnt. > > **Uh-huh. Anything you say. I prefer the alternate explanation: > > You don't have a clue. You know very little about global warming, you've > never read a single IPCC report and you're just a troll. IPCC report??!!!! Bwahahahahahaha! That's like saying you need to read a copy of the Democrat platform to learn about "climate change"!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-17 11:26 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <fm442hFcp4rU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #685830 |
On 17/05/2018 7:13 AM, benj wrote: > On 5/16/2018 4:16 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >> On 16/05/2018 10:48 AM, Sergio wrote: >>> On 5/15/2018 5:28 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>> On 15/05/2018 11:52 PM, Sergio wrote: >>>>> On 5/15/2018 12:56 AM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>>>> On 9/05/2018 11:59 PM, benj wrote: >>>>>>> On 5/9/2018 6:52 AM, kensi wrote: >>>>>>>> In 2013, atmospheric carbon dioxide broke 400 parts per million for >>>>>>>> the first time in human history. Just a year later, atmospheric >>>>>>>> carbon dioxide averaged that for an entire month. And now? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2018/5/4/1762050/-The-last-time-atmospheric-carbon-dioxide-was-this-high-humans-didn-t-exist >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> We hear you. Dinosaurs all died from heat stroke from all that CO2 >>>>>>> Greenhousing their world. Somehow science doesn't agree with this >>>>>>> fantasy. Since CO2 is a minor GHG it's level is obviously more or >>>>>>> less >>>>>>> irrelevant, both then and now. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Water vapor is THE major GHG factor (50%) and clouds (also water) >>>>>>> are >>>>>>> another 25% and CO2 is NOT the remaining 25%. >>>>>> >>>>>> **Wrong, yappy lap-dog. You really should stop listening to your >>>>>> master, >>>>>> Sergio. He is wrong and so are you. Obviously. >>>>> >>>>> name calling and emotional outbursts are simply ways to derail the >>>>> subject. >>>>> >>>>> by doing this you are stating that you are an the end of your >>>>> knowledge >>>>> and way over your head, or your a libtard. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> remember CO2 is only 0.00039 part of the atmosphere the rest >>>>> of is >>>>> is not CO2 => 99.99961 % >>>>> so the sun hardly hits any CO2 atoms. >>>> >>>> **It's actually more like 410ppm right now and increasing rapidly. The >>>> Sun doesn't "hit CO2 atoms". >>> >>> ha, knew you would catch that one, but others didnt. >> >> **Uh-huh. Anything you say. I prefer the alternate explanation: >> >> You don't have a clue. You know very little about global warming, >> you've never read a single IPCC report and you're just a troll. > > IPCC report??!!!! Bwahahahahahaha! **Yes, the IPCC report_S_. Have you read them? > > That's like saying you need to read a copy of the Democrat > platform to learn about "climate change"! **OK, so you don't regard the IPCC report_S_ as worthwhile. That suggests to me that you must have read them. Please give me a page by page dissertation on the faults you have found with the reports. Hell, I'll make it easy for you. Just stick to AR5. That's just one report of the many published by the IPCC. Or are you just accepting, like a yappy lap-dog, that everything Sergio tells you true? Let's see that critique of the IPCC AR5. I'll wait. I won't hold my breath. You'll just blather and dither and no respond. SOP. -- Trevor Wilson www.rageaudio.com.au
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-15 22:30 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <pdg8kv$l59$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #685657 |
"Trevor Wilson" <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> wrote in message news:fm158hFnd3tU1@mid.individual.net... > On 15/05/2018 11:52 PM, Sergio wrote: >> On 5/15/2018 12:56 AM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>> On 9/05/2018 11:59 PM, benj wrote: >>>> On 5/9/2018 6:52 AM, kensi wrote: >>>>> In 2013, atmospheric carbon dioxide broke 400 parts per million for >>>>> the first time in human history. Just a year later, atmospheric >>>>> carbon dioxide averaged that for an entire month. And now? >>>>> >>>>> https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2018/5/4/1762050/-The-last-time-atmospheric-carbon-dioxide-was-this-high-humans-didn-t-exist >>>>> >>>>> >>>> We hear you. Dinosaurs all died from heat stroke from all that CO2 >>>> Greenhousing their world. Somehow science doesn't agree with this >>>> fantasy. Since CO2 is a minor GHG it's level is obviously more or less >>>> irrelevant, both then and now. >>>> >>>> Water vapor is THE major GHG factor (50%) and clouds (also water) are >>>> another 25% and CO2 is NOT the remaining 25%. >>> >>> **Wrong, yappy lap-dog. You really should stop listening to your master, >>> Sergio. He is wrong and so are you. Obviously. >> >> name calling and emotional outbursts are simply ways to derail the >> subject. >> >> by doing this you are stating that you are an the end of your knowledge >> and way over your head, or your a libtard. >> >> >> remember CO2 is only 0.00039 part of the atmosphere the rest of is >> is not CO2 => 99.99961 % >> so the sun hardly hits any CO2 atoms. > > **It's actually more like 410ppm right now and increasing rapidly. The Sun > doesn't "hit CO2 atoms". Yikes! I made a grave error in assuming you had > some scientific knowledge. I won't make that mistake again. I now realise > what a monumental cretin you are. > > Points: > > * CO2 is not an "atom". CO2 is a MOLECULE. Here's a primer for you: Trevor has to pick nits because on the main topic he's sunk and his argument is in tatters.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-16 09:45 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <pdhg70$1ju4$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #685729 |
On 5/15/2018 9:30 PM, Scout wrote: > > > "Trevor Wilson" <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> wrote in message > news:fm158hFnd3tU1@mid.individual.net... >> On 15/05/2018 11:52 PM, Sergio wrote: >>> On 5/15/2018 12:56 AM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>> On 9/05/2018 11:59 PM, benj wrote: >>>>> On 5/9/2018 6:52 AM, kensi wrote: >>>>>> In 2013, atmospheric carbon dioxide broke 400 parts per million for >>>>>> the first time in human history. Just a year later, atmospheric >>>>>> carbon dioxide averaged that for an entire month. And now? >>>>>> >>>>>> https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2018/5/4/1762050/-The-last-time-atmospheric-carbon-dioxide-was-this-high-humans-didn-t-exist >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> We hear you. Dinosaurs all died from heat stroke from all that CO2 >>>>> Greenhousing their world. Somehow science doesn't agree with this >>>>> fantasy. Since CO2 is a minor GHG it's level is obviously more or less >>>>> irrelevant, both then and now. >>>>> >>>>> Water vapor is THE major GHG factor (50%) and clouds (also water) are >>>>> another 25% and CO2 is NOT the remaining 25%. >>>> >>>> **Wrong, yappy lap-dog. You really should stop listening to your >>>> master, >>>> Sergio. He is wrong and so are you. Obviously. >>> >>> name calling and emotional outbursts are simply ways to derail the >>> subject. >>> >>> by doing this you are stating that you are an the end of your knowledge >>> and way over your head, or your a libtard. >>> >>> >>> remember CO2 is only 0.00039 part of the atmosphere the rest of is >>> is not CO2 => 99.99961 % >>> so the sun hardly hits any CO2 atoms. >> >> **It's actually more like 410ppm right now and increasing rapidly. The >> Sun doesn't "hit CO2 atoms". Yikes! I made a grave error in assuming >> you had some scientific knowledge. I won't make that mistake again. I >> now realise what a monumental cretin you are. >> >> Points: >> >> * CO2 is not an "atom". CO2 is a MOLECULE. Here's a primer for you: > > Trevor has to pick nits because on the main topic he's sunk and his > argument is in tatters. > could try to drag him over to the spectra's in the infrared bands, and how water vapor is wide and dominates, and CO2 is narrow, where the real story is.... since he says CO2 is not an atom, but a molecule, which is composed of atoms, 3 atoms. he should have asked which atom would the light hit instead, the C or either of the two Os ?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-17 06:18 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <fm3i11F92rqU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #685729 |
On 16/05/2018 12:30 PM, Scout wrote: > > > "Trevor Wilson" <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> wrote in message > news:fm158hFnd3tU1@mid.individual.net... >> On 15/05/2018 11:52 PM, Sergio wrote: >>> On 5/15/2018 12:56 AM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>> On 9/05/2018 11:59 PM, benj wrote: >>>>> On 5/9/2018 6:52 AM, kensi wrote: >>>>>> In 2013, atmospheric carbon dioxide broke 400 parts per million for >>>>>> the first time in human history. Just a year later, atmospheric >>>>>> carbon dioxide averaged that for an entire month. And now? >>>>>> >>>>>> https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2018/5/4/1762050/-The-last-time-atmospheric-carbon-dioxide-was-this-high-humans-didn-t-exist >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> We hear you. Dinosaurs all died from heat stroke from all that CO2 >>>>> Greenhousing their world. Somehow science doesn't agree with this >>>>> fantasy. Since CO2 is a minor GHG it's level is obviously more or less >>>>> irrelevant, both then and now. >>>>> >>>>> Water vapor is THE major GHG factor (50%) and clouds (also water) are >>>>> another 25% and CO2 is NOT the remaining 25%. >>>> >>>> **Wrong, yappy lap-dog. You really should stop listening to your >>>> master, >>>> Sergio. He is wrong and so are you. Obviously. >>> >>> name calling and emotional outbursts are simply ways to derail the >>> subject. >>> >>> by doing this you are stating that you are an the end of your knowledge >>> and way over your head, or your a libtard. >>> >>> >>> remember CO2 is only 0.00039 part of the atmosphere the rest of is >>> is not CO2 => 99.99961 % >>> so the sun hardly hits any CO2 atoms. >> >> **It's actually more like 410ppm right now and increasing rapidly. The >> Sun doesn't "hit CO2 atoms". Yikes! I made a grave error in assuming >> you had some scientific knowledge. I won't make that mistake again. I >> now realise what a monumental cretin you are. >> >> Points: >> >> * CO2 is not an "atom". CO2 is a MOLECULE. Here's a primer for you: > > Trevor has to pick nits because on the main topic he's sunk and his > argument is in tatters. > > **It's hardly nit-picking. Sergio has demonstrated a sustained inability to understand basic science. Much like yourself, in fact. It is clear that you and he require some basic education, before we progress to more complex discussions. -- Trevor Wilson www.rageaudio.com.au
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-16 15:45 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <pdi59f$r05$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #685806 |
On 5/16/2018 3:18 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote: > On 16/05/2018 12:30 PM, Scout wrote: >> >> >> "Trevor Wilson" <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> wrote in message >> news:fm158hFnd3tU1@mid.individual.net... >>> On 15/05/2018 11:52 PM, Sergio wrote: >>>> On 5/15/2018 12:56 AM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>>> On 9/05/2018 11:59 PM, benj wrote: >>>>>> On 5/9/2018 6:52 AM, kensi wrote: >>>>>>> In 2013, atmospheric carbon dioxide broke 400 parts per million for >>>>>>> the first time in human history. Just a year later, atmospheric >>>>>>> carbon dioxide averaged that for an entire month. And now? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2018/5/4/1762050/-The-last-time-atmospheric-carbon-dioxide-was-this-high-humans-didn-t-exist >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> We hear you. Dinosaurs all died from heat stroke from all that CO2 >>>>>> Greenhousing their world. Somehow science doesn't agree with this >>>>>> fantasy. Since CO2 is a minor GHG it's level is obviously more or >>>>>> less >>>>>> irrelevant, both then and now. >>>>>> >>>>>> Water vapor is THE major GHG factor (50%) and clouds (also water) are >>>>>> another 25% and CO2 is NOT the remaining 25%. >>>>> >>>>> **Wrong, yappy lap-dog. You really should stop listening to your >>>>> master, >>>>> Sergio. He is wrong and so are you. Obviously. >>>> >>>> name calling and emotional outbursts are simply ways to derail the >>>> subject. >>>> >>>> by doing this you are stating that you are an the end of your knowledge >>>> and way over your head, or your a libtard. >>>> >>>> >>>> remember CO2 is only 0.00039 part of the atmosphere the rest of is >>>> is not CO2 => 99.99961 % >>>> so the sun hardly hits any CO2 atoms. >>> >>> **It's actually more like 410ppm right now and increasing rapidly. >>> The Sun doesn't "hit CO2 atoms". Yikes! I made a grave error in >>> assuming you had some scientific knowledge. I won't make that mistake >>> again. I now realise what a monumental cretin you are. >>> >>> Points: >>> >>> * CO2 is not an "atom". CO2 is a MOLECULE. Here's a primer for you: >> >> Trevor has to pick nits because on the main topic he's sunk and his >> argument is in tatters. >> >> > > **It's hardly nit-picking. Sergio has demonstrated a sustained inability > to understand basic science. Much like yourself, in fact. It is clear > that you and he require some basic education, before we progress to more > complex discussions. > so, if you are ready, what are the CO2 vibration modes ?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 11 of 14 — ← Prev page 1 … 9 10 [11] 12 13 14 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web