Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #684526 > unrolled thread
| Started by | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-05-09 06:52 -0400 |
| Last post | 2018-05-09 15:49 -0400 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 278 — 21 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-09 06:52 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-05-09 07:57 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-09 09:17 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-05-09 09:29 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-09 10:10 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-05-10 07:55 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-10 08:55 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-05-10 19:35 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-11 08:13 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-05-12 13:44 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-12 18:57 +0000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-12 12:03 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-23 16:47 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-23 16:49 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-10 22:56 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-11 08:14 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-11 10:35 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> - 2018-05-11 10:59 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-11 10:25 -0500
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-11 08:48 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-11 11:02 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-11 20:45 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-11 23:01 -0500
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-12 09:33 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-12 09:31 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-11 19:47 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-11 19:09 -0500
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-12 09:33 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-14 23:59 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-15 09:24 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-05-15 07:03 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-15 11:43 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-15 20:12 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-16 00:34 +0000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-15 18:00 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-05-15 21:51 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-15 19:06 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-16 10:02 -0500
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-16 12:16 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-16 14:05 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-16 13:48 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-16 11:00 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-09 20:26 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-10 08:57 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-10 23:00 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-11 08:16 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-11 10:44 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-11 11:03 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-05-11 12:26 -0600
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-11 11:33 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-11 13:42 -0500
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-11 19:27 +0000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-11 12:30 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-11 19:32 +0000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-11 12:38 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-11 15:25 -0500
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-11 20:28 +0000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-11 13:39 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-11 20:26 +0000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-11 13:35 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-11 21:07 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-11 13:36 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-11 12:46 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-11 20:55 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-11 19:27 +0000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-11 19:48 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-11 23:27 -0500
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-12 09:35 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-15 00:00 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-15 09:24 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-15 11:47 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-15 14:47 -0500
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-15 21:13 +0000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-15 14:51 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-15 23:00 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-16 09:50 -0500
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-16 17:44 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-17 02:52 +0000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-16 20:02 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-16 20:33 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-16 20:35 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-17 00:29 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-17 11:38 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-16 20:37 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-17 17:16 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-15 20:00 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-16 00:35 +0000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-16 11:01 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-11 08:27 -0500
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-16 09:37 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-23 11:07 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-22 23:18 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-23 13:23 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-22 23:58 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-23 16:26 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-23 03:03 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-24 09:35 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-06-08 15:02 -0500
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-08 19:00 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-09 10:07 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Boris Mohar <borism_void_@sympatico.ca> - 2018-05-10 07:51 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-09 09:59 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-15 15:56 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-15 02:14 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-15 09:27 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-15 11:48 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-15 15:04 -0500
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-15 20:02 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-15 17:28 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-05-15 06:55 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-15 10:13 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-15 10:53 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-15 20:06 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-05-15 22:17 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-16 08:19 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-15 22:03 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-16 13:38 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-17 06:11 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-16 13:16 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-16 15:31 -0500
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-17 20:51 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-18 11:23 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-17 21:52 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-21 07:19 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-21 23:05 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-22 14:44 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-22 02:46 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-22 11:08 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-23 10:24 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-22 20:26 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-23 13:23 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-23 00:03 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-23 16:01 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-05-23 08:39 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-23 10:43 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-24 07:54 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-23 03:08 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-24 09:38 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-23 19:41 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-24 10:05 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-23 20:13 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-05-24 08:59 +0000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kdthrge@gmail.com - 2018-05-24 07:16 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Leo Sgouros <adravirgo@gmail.com> - 2018-05-24 07:26 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-24 12:02 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kdthrge@gmail.com - 2018-05-24 10:36 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kdthrge@gmail.com - 2018-05-24 12:29 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kdthrge@gmail.com - 2018-05-24 14:35 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-24 20:32 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Lofty Goat <rlwatkins@gmail.com> - 2018-05-24 19:56 -0500
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kdthrge@gmail.com - 2018-05-25 21:36 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kdthrge@gmail.com - 2018-05-25 23:34 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kdthrge@gmail.com - 2018-05-26 07:06 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Lofty Goat <rlwatkins@gmail.com> - 2018-05-26 12:48 -0500
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kdthrge@gmail.com - 2018-05-26 13:20 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kdthrge@gmail.com - 2018-05-27 12:30 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kdthrge@gmail.com - 2018-05-28 10:43 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kdthrge@gmail.com - 2018-05-28 14:03 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kdthrge@gmail.com - 2018-05-29 05:54 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kdthrge@gmail.com - 2018-06-06 16:56 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kdthrge@gmail.com - 2018-06-06 17:20 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kdthrge@gmail.com - 2018-06-06 19:36 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kdthrge@gmail.com - 2018-06-09 12:13 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kdthrge@gmail.com - 2018-06-09 18:28 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kdthrge@gmail.com - 2018-06-06 21:12 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kdthrge@gmail.com - 2018-06-07 06:13 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-06 16:56 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-23 20:09 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-24 10:55 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-23 23:03 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-17 20:50 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-18 11:20 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-17 21:27 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-18 11:45 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-17 22:31 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-18 14:07 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-18 00:50 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-18 15:20 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2018-05-18 15:42 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-18 03:40 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-21 07:28 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2018-05-18 15:28 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-18 15:33 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2018-05-18 15:48 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-05-20 21:58 +0000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-21 23:06 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-15 22:28 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-17 11:35 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-17 07:14 -0500
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-18 07:33 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-17 21:08 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-18 11:24 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-17 22:29 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-21 07:28 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-21 23:05 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-22 14:44 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-22 02:47 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-22 11:07 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-22 20:17 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-23 10:25 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-15 08:52 -0500
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-15 10:02 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-05-15 07:04 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-15 11:51 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-16 08:28 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-15 19:48 -0500
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-15 22:36 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-16 09:36 -0500
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-16 10:51 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-16 14:07 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-16 14:01 -0500
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-17 06:16 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-16 15:42 -0500
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-17 11:37 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-16 17:13 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-17 11:26 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-15 22:30 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-16 09:45 -0500
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-17 06:18 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-16 15:45 -0500
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-17 11:22 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-17 07:51 -0500
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-17 11:27 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-17 17:47 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-17 23:36 +0000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-18 09:39 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-17 20:55 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-05-17 18:12 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-18 11:24 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-17 16:41 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-05-17 20:06 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-17 20:20 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-18 01:37 +0000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-17 19:03 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-17 22:36 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-18 03:03 +0000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-17 20:09 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-05-17 23:25 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-18 09:56 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-17 17:55 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-05-17 21:01 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-17 18:02 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-05-17 21:09 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-17 17:29 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-17 20:53 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-18 11:25 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-17 22:30 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-18 14:08 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-18 00:42 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-18 15:22 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-18 03:31 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-18 07:06 -0500
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-18 11:49 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-18 13:25 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-18 19:40 +0000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-18 20:23 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-19 03:39 +0000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-18 18:41 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-19 03:40 +0000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-21 07:36 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-21 23:05 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-22 14:45 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-22 02:48 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-23 10:26 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-22 23:17 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-23 13:21 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-22 23:59 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-23 16:03 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-23 03:04 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-24 09:40 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-23 20:20 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-24 11:00 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-23 23:06 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-24 05:03 +0000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-24 01:59 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-24 01:57 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-09 09:33 -0500
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-09 15:49 -0400
Page 5 of 14 — ← Prev page 1 … 3 4 [5] 6 7 … 14 Next page →
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-16 20:35 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <b9firs.1lt.17.1@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #685891 |
On 2018-05-16 8:33 PM, Checkmate wrote: > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by > Checkmate! In article <b9fgtf.7nv.17.1@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com > says... > > >> >> On 2018-05-16 7:52 PM, Nadegda wrote: >>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >>> On Wed, 16 May 2018 17:44:46 -0700, Checkmate wrote: >>> >>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by >>>> Checkmate! In article <pdfihl$jvq$58@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 >>>> @gmail.invalid says... >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>>>> melt! On Tue, 15 May 2018 14:47:36 -0500, Sergio wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 5/15/2018 1:47 PM, Checkmate wrote: >>>>>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts >>>>>>> by Checkmate! In article <pden37$ta1$9@gioia.aioe.org>, >>>>>>> kkensington01 @gmail.nospam.invalid says... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 5/15/2018 12:00 AM, Scout wrote: >>>>>>>>> "kensi" <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote in message >>>>>>>>> news:pd6qjk$1r4s$4@gioia.aioe.org... >>>>>>>>>> "Today, Miami is flooding as if a hurricane went through it," >>>>>>>>>> Regalado tweeted just before noon. This is bad. We're only >>>>>>>>>> beginning to see the impacts of climate change in Miami, and >>>>>>>>>> flooding is already shutting the city down ... >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Which is an isolated event and which has regularly occurred within >>>>>>>>> Miami. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Which is it, k0Ok, an isolated event or one which has occurred more >>>>>>>> than once? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> It doesn't help that at least half of Florida is made of limestone, >>>>>>> and is dissolving from acidic freshwater anyway. >>>>>> >>>>>> poor kensi pupa, >>>>>> so worried about Miami and all the very rich people that live there. >>>>> >>>>> What starts in Miami will spread to affect other places, kooky. Not to >>>>> mention, once the Greenland ice sheet starts to go and sea level is >>>>> going up by 10cm/year or more, all that really expensive beachfront >>>>> property will suddenly be all that dirt-cheap beachfront property, and >>>>> will fill up with poor people who can't afford anywhere higher and >>>>> dryer... >>>> >>>> Yeahbut all the people who don't quite have beach front property now, >>>> will see their property values increase when they suddenly have beach >>>> front property... so there's "that". >>> >>> Except that that will also go from "beach front" to "flooding" in only a >>> few short years, as long as a high rate of sea level rise continues. >>> >> i'm 4,163 feet above sea level do you think i'll be ok > > I know where you can get an unoccupied bote real cheap... just in case. > i am not about to buy a floater off anyone
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-17 00:29 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.3566cf2915a3a086993a3e@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #685892 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate! In article <b9firs.1lt.17.1@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com says... > > On 2018-05-16 8:33 PM, Checkmate wrote: > > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by > > Checkmate! In article <b9fgtf.7nv.17.1@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com > > says... > > > > > >> > >> On 2018-05-16 7:52 PM, Nadegda wrote: > >>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > >>> On Wed, 16 May 2018 17:44:46 -0700, Checkmate wrote: > >>> > >>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by > >>>> Checkmate! In article <pdfihl$jvq$58@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 > >>>> @gmail.invalid says... > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, > >>>>> melt! On Tue, 15 May 2018 14:47:36 -0500, Sergio wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> On 5/15/2018 1:47 PM, Checkmate wrote: > >>>>>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts > >>>>>>> by Checkmate! In article <pden37$ta1$9@gioia.aioe.org>, > >>>>>>> kkensington01 @gmail.nospam.invalid says... > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> On 5/15/2018 12:00 AM, Scout wrote: > >>>>>>>>> "kensi" <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote in message > >>>>>>>>> news:pd6qjk$1r4s$4@gioia.aioe.org... > >>>>>>>>>> "Today, Miami is flooding as if a hurricane went through it," > >>>>>>>>>> Regalado tweeted just before noon. This is bad. We're only > >>>>>>>>>> beginning to see the impacts of climate change in Miami, and > >>>>>>>>>> flooding is already shutting the city down ... > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Which is an isolated event and which has regularly occurred within > >>>>>>>>> Miami. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Which is it, k0Ok, an isolated event or one which has occurred more > >>>>>>>> than once? > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> It doesn't help that at least half of Florida is made of limestone, > >>>>>>> and is dissolving from acidic freshwater anyway. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> poor kensi pupa, > >>>>>> so worried about Miami and all the very rich people that live there. > >>>>> > >>>>> What starts in Miami will spread to affect other places, kooky. Not to > >>>>> mention, once the Greenland ice sheet starts to go and sea level is > >>>>> going up by 10cm/year or more, all that really expensive beachfront > >>>>> property will suddenly be all that dirt-cheap beachfront property, and > >>>>> will fill up with poor people who can't afford anywhere higher and > >>>>> dryer... > >>>> > >>>> Yeahbut all the people who don't quite have beach front property now, > >>>> will see their property values increase when they suddenly have beach > >>>> front property... so there's "that". > >>> > >>> Except that that will also go from "beach front" to "flooding" in only a > >>> few short years, as long as a high rate of sea level rise continues. > >>> > >> i'm 4,163 feet above sea level do you think i'll be ok > > > > I know where you can get an unoccupied bote real cheap... just in case. > > > i am not about to buy a floater off anyone He's not there right now, he's on his farm. You could probably just take it. -- Checkmate ® Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Copyright © 2018 all rights reserved In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017 "There are many here among us, who feel that life is but a joke." "I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as kensi." -Nadegda Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-17 11:38 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <b9h7o4.7t9.17.2@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #685918 |
On 2018-05-17 12:29 AM, Checkmate wrote: > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by > Checkmate! In article <b9firs.1lt.17.1@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com > says... > > >> >> On 2018-05-16 8:33 PM, Checkmate wrote: >>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by >>> Checkmate! In article <b9fgtf.7nv.17.1@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com >>> says... >>> >>> >>>> >>>> On 2018-05-16 7:52 PM, Nadegda wrote: >>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >>>>> On Wed, 16 May 2018 17:44:46 -0700, Checkmate wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by >>>>>> Checkmate! In article <pdfihl$jvq$58@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 >>>>>> @gmail.invalid says... >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>>>>>> melt! On Tue, 15 May 2018 14:47:36 -0500, Sergio wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 5/15/2018 1:47 PM, Checkmate wrote: >>>>>>>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts >>>>>>>>> by Checkmate! In article <pden37$ta1$9@gioia.aioe.org>, >>>>>>>>> kkensington01 @gmail.nospam.invalid says... >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On 5/15/2018 12:00 AM, Scout wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> "kensi" <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>> news:pd6qjk$1r4s$4@gioia.aioe.org... >>>>>>>>>>>> "Today, Miami is flooding as if a hurricane went through it," >>>>>>>>>>>> Regalado tweeted just before noon. This is bad. We're only >>>>>>>>>>>> beginning to see the impacts of climate change in Miami, and >>>>>>>>>>>> flooding is already shutting the city down ... >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Which is an isolated event and which has regularly occurred within >>>>>>>>>>> Miami. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Which is it, k0Ok, an isolated event or one which has occurred more >>>>>>>>>> than once? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> It doesn't help that at least half of Florida is made of limestone, >>>>>>>>> and is dissolving from acidic freshwater anyway. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> poor kensi pupa, >>>>>>>> so worried about Miami and all the very rich people that live there. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> What starts in Miami will spread to affect other places, kooky. Not to >>>>>>> mention, once the Greenland ice sheet starts to go and sea level is >>>>>>> going up by 10cm/year or more, all that really expensive beachfront >>>>>>> property will suddenly be all that dirt-cheap beachfront property, and >>>>>>> will fill up with poor people who can't afford anywhere higher and >>>>>>> dryer... >>>>>> >>>>>> Yeahbut all the people who don't quite have beach front property now, >>>>>> will see their property values increase when they suddenly have beach >>>>>> front property... so there's "that". >>>>> >>>>> Except that that will also go from "beach front" to "flooding" in only a >>>>> few short years, as long as a high rate of sea level rise continues. >>>>> >>>> i'm 4,163 feet above sea level do you think i'll be ok >>> >>> I know where you can get an unoccupied bote real cheap... just in case. >>> >> i am not about to buy a floater off anyone > > He's not there right now, he's on his farm. You could probably just take > it. > yea but then crating it , getting it back up here
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-16 20:37 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.356698c6b62dd63a993a38@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #685887 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate! In article <pdiqpi$o01$3@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 @gmail.invalid says... > > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > On Wed, 16 May 2018 17:44:46 -0700, Checkmate wrote: > > > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by > > Checkmate! In article <pdfihl$jvq$58@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 > > @gmail.invalid says... > > > > > > > >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, > >> melt! On Tue, 15 May 2018 14:47:36 -0500, Sergio wrote: > >> > >> > On 5/15/2018 1:47 PM, Checkmate wrote: > >> >> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts > >> >> by Checkmate! In article <pden37$ta1$9@gioia.aioe.org>, > >> >> kkensington01 @gmail.nospam.invalid says... > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >>> On 5/15/2018 12:00 AM, Scout wrote: > >> >>>> "kensi" <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote in message > >> >>>> news:pd6qjk$1r4s$4@gioia.aioe.org... > >> >>>>> "Today, Miami is flooding as if a hurricane went through it," > >> >>>>> Regalado tweeted just before noon. This is bad. We're only > >> >>>>> beginning to see the impacts of climate change in Miami, and > >> >>>>> flooding is already shutting the city down ... > >> >>>> > >> >>>> Which is an isolated event and which has regularly occurred within > >> >>>> Miami. > >> >>> > >> >>> Which is it, k0Ok, an isolated event or one which has occurred more > >> >>> than once? > >> >> > >> >> It doesn't help that at least half of Florida is made of limestone, > >> >> and is dissolving from acidic freshwater anyway. > >> > > >> > poor kensi pupa, > >> > so worried about Miami and all the very rich people that live there. > >> > >> What starts in Miami will spread to affect other places, kooky. Not to > >> mention, once the Greenland ice sheet starts to go and sea level is > >> going up by 10cm/year or more, all that really expensive beachfront > >> property will suddenly be all that dirt-cheap beachfront property, and > >> will fill up with poor people who can't afford anywhere higher and > >> dryer... > > > > Yeahbut all the people who don't quite have beach front property now, > > will see their property values increase when they suddenly have beach > > front property... so there's "that". > > Except that that will also go from "beach front" to "flooding" in only a > few short years, as long as a high rate of sea level rise continues. Well, it's gotta stop somewhere. Get out your topo map and yer calculator and figure out where. All you armchair climatologists must be able to nail THAT down... -- Checkmate ® Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Copyright © 2018 all rights reserved In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017 "There are many here among us, who feel that life is but a joke." "I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as kensi." -Nadegda Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-17 17:16 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <GimLC.209306$DS3.203504@fx42.iad> |
| In reply to | #685887 |
On 5/16/2018 10:52 PM, Nadegda wrote: > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > On Wed, 16 May 2018 17:44:46 -0700, Checkmate wrote: > >> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by >> Checkmate! In article <pdfihl$jvq$58@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 >> @gmail.invalid says... >> >> >> >>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>> melt! On Tue, 15 May 2018 14:47:36 -0500, Sergio wrote: >>> >>>> On 5/15/2018 1:47 PM, Checkmate wrote: >>>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts >>>>> by Checkmate! In article <pden37$ta1$9@gioia.aioe.org>, >>>>> kkensington01 @gmail.nospam.invalid says... >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> On 5/15/2018 12:00 AM, Scout wrote: >>>>>>> "kensi" <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote in message >>>>>>> news:pd6qjk$1r4s$4@gioia.aioe.org... >>>>>>>> "Today, Miami is flooding as if a hurricane went through it," >>>>>>>> Regalado tweeted just before noon. This is bad. We're only >>>>>>>> beginning to see the impacts of climate change in Miami, and >>>>>>>> flooding is already shutting the city down ... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Which is an isolated event and which has regularly occurred within >>>>>>> Miami. >>>>>> >>>>>> Which is it, k0Ok, an isolated event or one which has occurred more >>>>>> than once? >>>>> >>>>> It doesn't help that at least half of Florida is made of limestone, >>>>> and is dissolving from acidic freshwater anyway. >>>> >>>> poor kensi pupa, >>>> so worried about Miami and all the very rich people that live there. >>> >>> What starts in Miami will spread to affect other places, kooky. Not to >>> mention, once the Greenland ice sheet starts to go and sea level is >>> going up by 10cm/year or more, all that really expensive beachfront >>> property will suddenly be all that dirt-cheap beachfront property, and >>> will fill up with poor people who can't afford anywhere higher and >>> dryer... >> >> Yeahbut all the people who don't quite have beach front property now, >> will see their property values increase when they suddenly have beach >> front property... so there's "that". > > Except that that will also go from "beach front" to "flooding" in only a > few short years, as long as a high rate of sea level rise continues. > She means so long as her imaginary high rate of rise continues. Ndas dreams of this bercause she isn't used to seeing a high rate of rise! Chortle. Rule #5
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-15 20:00 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <pdftg7$1p5$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #685558 |
"kensi" <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote in message news:pden37$ta1$9@gioia.aioe.org... > On 5/15/2018 12:00 AM, Scout wrote: >> "kensi" <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote in message >> news:pd6qjk$1r4s$4@gioia.aioe.org... >>> "Today, Miami is flooding as if a hurricane went through it," Regalado >>> tweeted just before noon. This is bad. We're only beginning to see the >>> impacts of climate change in Miami, and flooding is already shutting the >>> city down ... >> >> Which is an isolated event and which has regularly occurred within Miami. > > Which is it, k0Ok, an isolated event or one which has occurred more than > once? The terms aren't necessarily contradictory. Meanwhile, I note you have surrendered on the primary issue which is the claim that Miami is underwater.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-16 00:35 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pdfubk$jvq$64@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #685684 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Tue, 15 May 2018 20:00:36 -0400, Scout wrote: > "kensi" <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote in message > news:pden37$ta1$9@gioia.aioe.org... >> On 5/15/2018 12:00 AM, Scout wrote: >>> "kensi" <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote in message >>> news:pd6qjk$1r4s$4@gioia.aioe.org... >>>> "Today, Miami is flooding as if a hurricane went through it," >>>> Regalado tweeted just before noon. This is bad. We're only beginning >>>> to see the impacts of climate change in Miami, and flooding is >>>> already shutting the city down ... >>> >>> Which is an isolated event and which has regularly occurred within >>> Miami. >> >> Which is it, k0Ok, an isolated event or one which has occurred more >> than once? > > The terms aren't necessarily contradictory. Of course they are, kooktard. -- FNVWe Nadegda Fakey couldn't teach a monkey to eat a banana, much less answer a direct question posed to him. -- Fakey's Dogwhistle Holder
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-16 11:01 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.356611be4181b484993a19@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #685692 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate! In article <pdfubk$jvq$64@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 @gmail.invalid says... > > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > On Tue, 15 May 2018 20:00:36 -0400, Scout wrote: > > > "kensi" <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote in message > > news:pden37$ta1$9@gioia.aioe.org... > >> On 5/15/2018 12:00 AM, Scout wrote: > >>> "kensi" <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote in message > >>> news:pd6qjk$1r4s$4@gioia.aioe.org... > >>>> "Today, Miami is flooding as if a hurricane went through it," > >>>> Regalado tweeted just before noon. This is bad. We're only beginning > >>>> to see the impacts of climate change in Miami, and flooding is > >>>> already shutting the city down ... > >>> > >>> Which is an isolated event and which has regularly occurred within > >>> Miami. > >> > >> Which is it, k0Ok, an isolated event or one which has occurred more > >> than once? > > > > The terms aren't necessarily contradictory. > > Of course they are, kooktard. Too late, he already said they aren't. -- Checkmate ® Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Copyright © 2018 all rights reserved In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017 "There are many here among us, who feel that life is but a joke." "I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as kensi." -Nadegda Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-11 08:27 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <pd45od$1j2l$7@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #684867 |
On 5/10/2018 10:00 PM, Scout wrote: > > > "kensi" <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote in message > news:pd1fki$1644$3@gioia.aioe.org... >> On 5/9/2018 8:26 PM, Scout wrote: >>> >>> >>> "kensi" <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote in message >>> news:pcusd6$vnd$1@gioia.aioe.org... >>>> On 5/9/2018 7:57 AM, Wally W. wrote: >>>>> On Wed, 9 May 2018 06:52:40 -0400, kensi wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> In 2013, atmospheric carbon dioxide broke 400 parts per million >>>>>> for the >>>>>> first time in human history. Just a year later, atmospheric carbon >>>>>> dioxide averaged that for an entire month. And now? >>>>> >>>>> ... we found that breaking the 400 ppm "limit" wasn't a problem. >>>>> >>>>> No tipping point happened, the sky didn't fall, and we're still here. >>>> >>>> 400ppm doesn't result in *instant* catastrophe. But your grandkids >>>> are likely going to grow up without Manhattan as part of their >>>> world. Among other things. >>> >>> You say that like it would be a bad thing..... >>> >>> Meanwhile.....according to your side Miami is already suppose to be >>> underwater..... >>> >>> That didn't happen either. >> >> Oh, wait: >> >> http://www.miaminewtimes.com/news/miami-king-tides-flooding-city-like-a-hurricane-again-today-9725153 >> >> >> "Today, Miami is flooding as if a hurricane went through it," Regalado >> tweeted just before noon. This is bad. We're only beginning to see the >> impacts of climate change in Miami, and flooding is already shutting >> the city down ... > > And Miami is regularly subjected to flooding under such events for a > long time. > > But they didn't say Miami would occasionally flood, but that it would BE > UNDER WATER....as in 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, every week. > > That's not happened, and isn't even close to happening. > > So....as said it didn't happen as predicted. Indeed the prediction > wasn't even CLOSE to being accurate. > > <http://goo.gl/hdpXFC>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-16 09:37 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <fm19a7Fo3ltU3@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #684685 |
On 10/05/2018 10:26 AM, Scout wrote: > > > "kensi" <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote in message > news:pcusd6$vnd$1@gioia.aioe.org... >> On 5/9/2018 7:57 AM, Wally W. wrote: >>> On Wed, 9 May 2018 06:52:40 -0400, kensi wrote: >>> >>>> In 2013, atmospheric carbon dioxide broke 400 parts per million for the >>>> first time in human history. Just a year later, atmospheric carbon >>>> dioxide averaged that for an entire month. And now? >>> >>> ... we found that breaking the 400 ppm "limit" wasn't a problem. >>> >>> No tipping point happened, the sky didn't fall, and we're still here. >> >> 400ppm doesn't result in *instant* catastrophe. But your grandkids are >> likely going to grow up without Manhattan as part of their world. >> Among other things. > > You say that like it would be a bad thing..... > > Meanwhile.....according to your side Miami is already suppose to be > underwater..... **Really? Who stated that? > > That didn't happen either. **Of course not. It's another of your myths that you like to perpetuate. -- Trevor Wilson www.rageaudio.com.au
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-23 11:07 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <fmjt7eFs9h6U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #684685 |
On 10/05/2018 10:26 AM, Scout wrote: > > > "kensi" <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote in message news:pcusd6$vnd$1@gioia.aioe.org... >> On 5/9/2018 7:57 AM, Wally W. wrote: >>> On Wed, 9 May 2018 06:52:40 -0400, kensi wrote: >>> >>>> In 2013, atmospheric carbon dioxide broke 400 parts per million for the >>>> first time in human history. Just a year later, atmospheric carbon >>>> dioxide averaged that for an entire month. And now? >>> >>> ... we found that breaking the 400 ppm "limit" wasn't a problem. >>> >>> No tipping point happened, the sky didn't fall, and we're still here. >> >> 400ppm doesn't result in *instant* catastrophe. But your grandkids are likely going to grow up without Manhattan as part of their world. Among other things. > > You say that like it would be a bad thing..... > > Meanwhile.....according to your side Miami is already suppose to be underwater..... **Really? Who stated that? > > That didn't happen either. **Of course not. It's another of your myths that you like to perpetuate. -- Trevor Wilson www.rageaudio.com.au
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-22 23:18 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <pe2mjj$n30$5@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #686712 |
"Trevor Wilson" <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> wrote in message news:fmjt7eFs9h6U1@mid.individual.net... > On 10/05/2018 10:26 AM, Scout wrote: > > > > > > "kensi" <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote in message > news:pcusd6$vnd$1@gioia.aioe.org... > >> On 5/9/2018 7:57 AM, Wally W. wrote: > >>> On Wed, 9 May 2018 06:52:40 -0400, kensi wrote: > >>> > >>>> In 2013, atmospheric carbon dioxide broke 400 parts per million > for the > >>>> first time in human history. Just a year later, atmospheric carbon > >>>> dioxide averaged that for an entire month. And now? > >>> > >>> ... we found that breaking the 400 ppm "limit" wasn't a problem. > >>> > >>> No tipping point happened, the sky didn't fall, and we're still here. > >> > >> 400ppm doesn't result in *instant* catastrophe. But your grandkids > are likely going to grow up without Manhattan as part of their world. > Among other things. > > > > You say that like it would be a bad thing..... > > > > Meanwhile.....according to your side Miami is already suppose to be > underwater..... > > **Really? Who stated that? You’re really new to the whole climate change issue aren't you? For some of us, we've been hearing the ranting for well over 40 years now....and shit,....their predictions still haven't come true.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-23 13:23 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <fmk55aFtr6kU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #686722 |
On 23/05/2018 1:18 PM, Scout wrote: > > > "Trevor Wilson" <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> wrote in message > news:fmjt7eFs9h6U1@mid.individual.net... >> On 10/05/2018 10:26 AM, Scout wrote: >> > >> > >> > "kensi" <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote in message >> news:pcusd6$vnd$1@gioia.aioe.org... >> >> On 5/9/2018 7:57 AM, Wally W. wrote: >> >>> On Wed, 9 May 2018 06:52:40 -0400, kensi wrote: >> >>> >> >>>> In 2013, atmospheric carbon dioxide broke 400 parts per million >> for the >> >>>> first time in human history. Just a year later, atmospheric carbon >> >>>> dioxide averaged that for an entire month. And now? >> >>> >> >>> ... we found that breaking the 400 ppm "limit" wasn't a problem. >> >>> >> >>> No tipping point happened, the sky didn't fall, and we're still here. >> >> >> >> 400ppm doesn't result in *instant* catastrophe. But your grandkids >> are likely going to grow up without Manhattan as part of their world. >> Among other things. >> > >> > You say that like it would be a bad thing..... >> > >> > Meanwhile.....according to your side Miami is already suppose to be >> underwater..... >> >> **Really? Who stated that? > > You’re really new to the whole climate change issue aren't you? **It seems you didn't understand the question: Who stated it? > > For some of us, we've been hearing the ranting for well over 40 years > now....and shit,....their predictions still haven't come true. **Who made the claim? Or did you make the the whole story up? -- Trevor Wilson www.rageaudio.com.au
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-22 23:58 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <pe2qqv$bdg$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #686724 |
"Trevor Wilson" <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> wrote in message news:fmk55aFtr6kU2@mid.individual.net... > On 23/05/2018 1:18 PM, Scout wrote: >> >> >> "Trevor Wilson" <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> wrote in message >> news:fmjt7eFs9h6U1@mid.individual.net... >>> On 10/05/2018 10:26 AM, Scout wrote: >>> > >>> > >>> > "kensi" <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote in message >>> news:pcusd6$vnd$1@gioia.aioe.org... >>> >> On 5/9/2018 7:57 AM, Wally W. wrote: >>> >>> On Wed, 9 May 2018 06:52:40 -0400, kensi wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>> In 2013, atmospheric carbon dioxide broke 400 parts per million >>> for the >>> >>>> first time in human history. Just a year later, atmospheric carbon >>> >>>> dioxide averaged that for an entire month. And now? >>> >>> >>> >>> ... we found that breaking the 400 ppm "limit" wasn't a problem. >>> >>> >>> >>> No tipping point happened, the sky didn't fall, and we're still >>> >>> here. >>> >> >>> >> 400ppm doesn't result in *instant* catastrophe. But your grandkids >>> are likely going to grow up without Manhattan as part of their world. >>> Among other things. >>> > >>> > You say that like it would be a bad thing..... >>> > >>> > Meanwhile.....according to your side Miami is already suppose to be >>> underwater..... >>> >>> **Really? Who stated that? >> >> You’re really new to the whole climate change issue aren't you? > > **It seems you didn't understand the question: > > Who stated it? Excuse me, but do I look like your personal reference library? When you can back up your shit...then maybe I might deem it necessary to more with mine. Until then.....you're way behind on backing up your bullshit. Then when you 'do' you offer links that don't take you to where the support actually is, but you claim that it's buried in there somewhere, even though you seem utterly unable to find it yourself. >> For some of us, we've been hearing the ranting for well over 40 years >> now....and shit,....their predictions still haven't come true. > > **Who made the claim? > > Or did you make the the whole story up? Well, given how much you've backed up your claims.....do the same rules apply to you? If so, then I can simply say you made up the whole AGM and move on to something else.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-23 16:26 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <fmkftmF1hotU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #686731 |
On 23/05/2018 1:58 PM, Scout wrote: > > > "Trevor Wilson" <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> wrote in message > news:fmk55aFtr6kU2@mid.individual.net... >> On 23/05/2018 1:18 PM, Scout wrote: >>> >>> >>> "Trevor Wilson" <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> wrote in message >>> news:fmjt7eFs9h6U1@mid.individual.net... >>>> On 10/05/2018 10:26 AM, Scout wrote: >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > "kensi" <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote in message >>>> news:pcusd6$vnd$1@gioia.aioe.org... >>>> >> On 5/9/2018 7:57 AM, Wally W. wrote: >>>> >>> On Wed, 9 May 2018 06:52:40 -0400, kensi wrote: >>>> >>> >>>> >>>> In 2013, atmospheric carbon dioxide broke 400 parts per million >>>> for the >>>> >>>> first time in human history. Just a year later, atmospheric carbon >>>> >>>> dioxide averaged that for an entire month. And now? >>>> >>> >>>> >>> ... we found that breaking the 400 ppm "limit" wasn't a problem. >>>> >>> >>>> >>> No tipping point happened, the sky didn't fall, and we're still >>>> >>> here. >>>> >> >>>> >> 400ppm doesn't result in *instant* catastrophe. But your grandkids >>>> are likely going to grow up without Manhattan as part of their >>>> world. Among other things. >>>> > >>>> > You say that like it would be a bad thing..... >>>> > >>>> > Meanwhile.....according to your side Miami is already suppose to be >>>> underwater..... >>>> >>>> **Really? Who stated that? >>> >>> You’re really new to the whole climate change issue aren't you? >> >> **It seems you didn't understand the question: >> >> Who stated it? > > Excuse me, but do I look like your personal reference library? **YOU made the claim. YOU need to back your claim. Or admit it was bullshit. > > When you can back up your shit...then maybe I might deem it necessary to > more with mine. **I have backed my claims with evidence. You back yours with nothing. > > Until then.....you're way behind on backing up your bullshit. Then when > you 'do' you offer links that don't take you to where the support > actually is, but you claim that it's buried in there somewhere, even > though you seem utterly unable to find it yourself. **Read the cite, BEFORE you make a complete idiot of yourself. Clearly, you have failed to read it. > > >>> For some of us, we've been hearing the ranting for well over 40 years >>> now....and shit,....their predictions still haven't come true. >> >> **Who made the claim? >> >> Or did you make the the whole story up? > > Well, given how much you've backed up your claims.....do the same rules > apply to you? **So, who made the claim? Or did you make the whole story up? Or do you want to keep digging that hole. I can just keep asking you know. > > If so, then I can simply say you made up the whole AGM and move on to > something else. **You could, if you want to expose your ignorance. AGW theory is very well accepted by all climatologists and the vast majority of scientists on this planet. Who are you to dismiss it? What special knowledge do you possess, that you might challenge people who have spent their entire career studying AG_W_ theory? Do you have any knowledge of climate science? How about science in general? -- Trevor Wilson www.rageaudio.com.au
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-23 03:03 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <pe4sb5$k95$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #686759 |
"Trevor Wilson" <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> wrote in message news:fmkftmF1hotU1@mid.individual.net... > On 23/05/2018 1:58 PM, Scout wrote: >> >> >> "Trevor Wilson" <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> wrote in message >> news:fmk55aFtr6kU2@mid.individual.net... >>> On 23/05/2018 1:18 PM, Scout wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> "Trevor Wilson" <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> wrote in message >>>> news:fmjt7eFs9h6U1@mid.individual.net... >>>>> On 10/05/2018 10:26 AM, Scout wrote: >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > "kensi" <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote in message >>>>> news:pcusd6$vnd$1@gioia.aioe.org... >>>>> >> On 5/9/2018 7:57 AM, Wally W. wrote: >>>>> >>> On Wed, 9 May 2018 06:52:40 -0400, kensi wrote: >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>>> In 2013, atmospheric carbon dioxide broke 400 parts per million >>>>> for the >>>>> >>>> first time in human history. Just a year later, atmospheric >>>>> >>>> carbon >>>>> >>>> dioxide averaged that for an entire month. And now? >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> ... we found that breaking the 400 ppm "limit" wasn't a problem. >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> No tipping point happened, the sky didn't fall, and we're still >>>>> >>> here. >>>>> >> >>>>> >> 400ppm doesn't result in *instant* catastrophe. But your grandkids >>>>> are likely going to grow up without Manhattan as part of their world. >>>>> Among other things. >>>>> > >>>>> > You say that like it would be a bad thing..... >>>>> > >>>>> > Meanwhile.....according to your side Miami is already suppose to be >>>>> underwater..... >>>>> >>>>> **Really? Who stated that? >>>> >>>> You’re really new to the whole climate change issue aren't you? >>> >>> **It seems you didn't understand the question: >>> >>> Who stated it? >> >> Excuse me, but do I look like your personal reference library? > > **YOU made the claim. YOU need to back your claim. Or admit it was > bullshit. > >> >> When you can back up your shit...then maybe I might deem it necessary to >> more with mine. > > **I have backed my claims with evidence. You back yours with nothing. > >> >> Until then.....you're way behind on backing up your bullshit. Then when >> you 'do' you offer links that don't take you to where the support >> actually is, but you claim that it's buried in there somewhere, even >> though you seem utterly unable to find it yourself. > > **Read the cite, BEFORE you make a complete idiot of yourself. Clearly, > you have failed to read it. What you claim is in there isn't, and you can't show otherwise or you would have already done so. Heck, I bet you haven't even read your own cite.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-24 09:35 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <fmmc5fFeuloU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #686840 |
On 23/05/2018 5:03 PM, Scout wrote: > > > "Trevor Wilson" <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> wrote in message > news:fmkftmF1hotU1@mid.individual.net... >> On 23/05/2018 1:58 PM, Scout wrote: >>> >>> >>> "Trevor Wilson" <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> wrote in message >>> news:fmk55aFtr6kU2@mid.individual.net... >>>> On 23/05/2018 1:18 PM, Scout wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> "Trevor Wilson" <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> wrote in message >>>>> news:fmjt7eFs9h6U1@mid.individual.net... >>>>>> On 10/05/2018 10:26 AM, Scout wrote: >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > "kensi" <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote in message >>>>>> news:pcusd6$vnd$1@gioia.aioe.org... >>>>>> >> On 5/9/2018 7:57 AM, Wally W. wrote: >>>>>> >>> On Wed, 9 May 2018 06:52:40 -0400, kensi wrote: >>>>>> >>> >>>>>> >>>> In 2013, atmospheric carbon dioxide broke 400 parts per million >>>>>> for the >>>>>> >>>> first time in human history. Just a year later, atmospheric >>>>>> >>>> carbon >>>>>> >>>> dioxide averaged that for an entire month. And now? >>>>>> >>> >>>>>> >>> ... we found that breaking the 400 ppm "limit" wasn't a problem. >>>>>> >>> >>>>>> >>> No tipping point happened, the sky didn't fall, and we're >>>>>> still >>> here. >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> 400ppm doesn't result in *instant* catastrophe. But your grandkids >>>>>> are likely going to grow up without Manhattan as part of their >>>>>> world. Among other things. >>>>>> > >>>>>> > You say that like it would be a bad thing..... >>>>>> > >>>>>> > Meanwhile.....according to your side Miami is already suppose to be >>>>>> underwater..... >>>>>> >>>>>> **Really? Who stated that? >>>>> >>>>> You’re really new to the whole climate change issue aren't you? >>>> >>>> **It seems you didn't understand the question: >>>> >>>> Who stated it? >>> >>> Excuse me, but do I look like your personal reference library? >> >> **YOU made the claim. YOU need to back your claim. Or admit it was >> bullshit. >> >>> >>> When you can back up your shit...then maybe I might deem it necessary >>> to more with mine. >> >> **I have backed my claims with evidence. You back yours with nothing. >> >>> >>> Until then.....you're way behind on backing up your bullshit. Then >>> when you 'do' you offer links that don't take you to where the >>> support actually is, but you claim that it's buried in there >>> somewhere, even though you seem utterly unable to find it yourself. >> >> **Read the cite, BEFORE you make a complete idiot of yourself. >> Clearly, you have failed to read it. > > What you claim is in there isn't, and you can't show otherwise or you > would have already done so. **Already done. Read the cite. > > Heck, I bet you haven't even read your own cite. **You'd lose that bet. Read the cite. IN FULL. -- Trevor Wilson www.rageaudio.com.au
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-08 15:02 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <pfendg$ebj$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #686840 |
On 5/23/2018 2:03 AM, Scout wrote: > > > "Trevor Wilson" <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> wrote in message > news:fmkftmF1hotU1@mid.individual.net... >> On 23/05/2018 1:58 PM, Scout wrote: >>> >>> >>> "Trevor Wilson" <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> wrote in message >>> news:fmk55aFtr6kU2@mid.individual.net... >>>> On 23/05/2018 1:18 PM, Scout wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> "Trevor Wilson" <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> wrote in message >>>>> news:fmjt7eFs9h6U1@mid.individual.net... >>>>>> On 10/05/2018 10:26 AM, Scout wrote: >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > "kensi" <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote in message >>>>>> news:pcusd6$vnd$1@gioia.aioe.org... >>>>>> >> On 5/9/2018 7:57 AM, Wally W. wrote: >>>>>> >>> On Wed, 9 May 2018 06:52:40 -0400, kensi wrote: >>>>>> >>> >>>>>> >>>> In 2013, atmospheric carbon dioxide broke 400 parts per million >>>>>> for the >>>>>> >>>> first time in human history. Just a year later, atmospheric >>>>>> >>>> carbon >>>>>> >>>> dioxide averaged that for an entire month. And now? >>>>>> >>> >>>>>> >>> ... we found that breaking the 400 ppm "limit" wasn't a problem. >>>>>> >>> >>>>>> >>> No tipping point happened, the sky didn't fall, and we're >>>>>> still >>> here. >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> 400ppm doesn't result in *instant* catastrophe. But your grandkids >>>>>> are likely going to grow up without Manhattan as part of their >>>>>> world. Among other things. >>>>>> > >>>>>> > You say that like it would be a bad thing..... >>>>>> > >>>>>> > Meanwhile.....according to your side Miami is already suppose to be >>>>>> underwater..... >>>>>> >>>>>> **Really? Who stated that? >>>>> >>>>> You’re really new to the whole climate change issue aren't you? >>>> >>>> **It seems you didn't understand the question: >>>> >>>> Who stated it? >>> >>> Excuse me, but do I look like your personal reference library? >> >> **YOU made the claim. YOU need to back your claim. Or admit it was >> bullshit. >> >>> >>> When you can back up your shit...then maybe I might deem it necessary >>> to more with mine. >> >> **I have backed my claims with evidence. You back yours with nothing. >> >>> >>> Until then.....you're way behind on backing up your bullshit. Then >>> when you 'do' you offer links that don't take you to where the >>> support actually is, but you claim that it's buried in there >>> somewhere, even though you seem utterly unable to find it yourself. >> >> **Read the cite, BEFORE you make a complete idiot of yourself. >> Clearly, you have failed to read it. > > What you claim is in there isn't, and you can't show otherwise or you > would have already done so. > > Heck, I bet you haven't even read your own cite. > > Trevor is an idiot.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-08 19:00 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <1VDSC.137717$RI2.31809@fx26.iad> |
| In reply to | #689541 |
On 6/8/2018 4:02 PM, Sergio wrote: > On 5/23/2018 2:03 AM, Scout wrote: >> >> >> "Trevor Wilson" <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> wrote in message >> news:fmkftmF1hotU1@mid.individual.net... >>> On 23/05/2018 1:58 PM, Scout wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> "Trevor Wilson" <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> wrote in message >>>> news:fmk55aFtr6kU2@mid.individual.net... >>>>> On 23/05/2018 1:18 PM, Scout wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> "Trevor Wilson" <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> wrote in message >>>>>> news:fmjt7eFs9h6U1@mid.individual.net... >>>>>>> On 10/05/2018 10:26 AM, Scout wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> "kensi" <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote in message >>>>>>> news:pcusd6$vnd$1@gioia.aioe.org... >>>>>>>>> On 5/9/2018 7:57 AM, Wally W. wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 9 May 2018 06:52:40 -0400, kensi wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> In 2013, atmospheric carbon dioxide broke 400 parts per million >>>>>>> for the >>>>>>>>>>> first time in human history. Just a year later, atmospheric >>>>>>>>>>> carbon >>>>>>>>>>> dioxide averaged that for an entire month. And now? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> ... we found that breaking the 400 ppm "limit" wasn't a problem. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> No tipping point happened, the sky didn't fall, and we're >>>>>>> still >>> here. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> 400ppm doesn't result in *instant* catastrophe. But your grandkids >>>>>>> are likely going to grow up without Manhattan as part of their >>>>>>> world. Among other things. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You say that like it would be a bad thing..... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Meanwhile.....according to your side Miami is already suppose to be >>>>>>> underwater..... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> **Really? Who stated that? >>>>>> >>>>>> You’re really new to the whole climate change issue aren't you? >>>>> >>>>> **It seems you didn't understand the question: >>>>> >>>>> Who stated it? >>>> >>>> Excuse me, but do I look like your personal reference library? >>> >>> **YOU made the claim. YOU need to back your claim. Or admit it was >>> bullshit. >>> >>>> >>>> When you can back up your shit...then maybe I might deem it necessary >>>> to more with mine. >>> >>> **I have backed my claims with evidence. You back yours with nothing. >>> >>>> >>>> Until then.....you're way behind on backing up your bullshit. Then >>>> when you 'do' you offer links that don't take you to where the >>>> support actually is, but you claim that it's buried in there >>>> somewhere, even though you seem utterly unable to find it yourself. >>> >>> **Read the cite, BEFORE you make a complete idiot of yourself. >>> Clearly, you have failed to read it. >> >> What you claim is in there isn't, and you can't show otherwise or you >> would have already done so. >> >> Heck, I bet you haven't even read your own cite. >> >> > > Trevor is an idiot. That is what those of us who care about the planet call "settled science".
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-09 10:07 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <kgDIC.36447$p05.24966@fx28.iad> |
| In reply to | #684545 |
On 5/9/2018 7:57 AM, Wally W. wrote: > On Wed, 9 May 2018 06:52:40 -0400, kensi wrote: > >> In 2013, atmospheric carbon dioxide broke 400 parts per million for the >> first time in human history. Just a year later, atmospheric carbon >> dioxide averaged that for an entire month. And now? > > ... we found that breaking the 400 ppm "limit" wasn't a problem. > > No tipping point happened, the sky didn't fall, and we're still here. > LIbs just mouth words and pretend that this is some kind of proof. They have no idea what a tipping point actually is (positive feedback instability) and think by just saying the words "tipping point" it explains everything. I've asked for the details of their fantasies and there is nothing there. Not even two brain cells to rub together. Just crooks and kooks.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 5 of 14 — ← Prev page 1 … 3 4 [5] 6 7 … 14 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web