Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #684526 > unrolled thread
| Started by | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-05-09 06:52 -0400 |
| Last post | 2018-05-09 15:49 -0400 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 278 — 21 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-09 06:52 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-05-09 07:57 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-09 09:17 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-05-09 09:29 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-09 10:10 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-05-10 07:55 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-10 08:55 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-05-10 19:35 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-11 08:13 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-05-12 13:44 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-12 18:57 +0000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-12 12:03 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-23 16:47 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-23 16:49 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-10 22:56 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-11 08:14 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-11 10:35 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> - 2018-05-11 10:59 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-11 10:25 -0500
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-11 08:48 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-11 11:02 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-11 20:45 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-11 23:01 -0500
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-12 09:33 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-12 09:31 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-11 19:47 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-11 19:09 -0500
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-12 09:33 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-14 23:59 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-15 09:24 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-05-15 07:03 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-15 11:43 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-15 20:12 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-16 00:34 +0000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-15 18:00 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-05-15 21:51 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-15 19:06 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-16 10:02 -0500
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-16 12:16 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-16 14:05 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-16 13:48 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-16 11:00 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-09 20:26 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-10 08:57 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-10 23:00 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-11 08:16 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-11 10:44 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-11 11:03 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-05-11 12:26 -0600
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-11 11:33 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-11 13:42 -0500
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-11 19:27 +0000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-11 12:30 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-11 19:32 +0000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-11 12:38 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-11 15:25 -0500
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-11 20:28 +0000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-11 13:39 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-11 20:26 +0000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-11 13:35 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-11 21:07 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-11 13:36 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-11 12:46 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-11 20:55 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-11 19:27 +0000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-11 19:48 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-11 23:27 -0500
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-12 09:35 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-15 00:00 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-15 09:24 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-15 11:47 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-15 14:47 -0500
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-15 21:13 +0000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-15 14:51 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-15 23:00 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-16 09:50 -0500
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-16 17:44 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-17 02:52 +0000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-16 20:02 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-16 20:33 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-16 20:35 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-17 00:29 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-17 11:38 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-16 20:37 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-17 17:16 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-15 20:00 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-16 00:35 +0000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-16 11:01 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-11 08:27 -0500
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-16 09:37 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-23 11:07 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-22 23:18 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-23 13:23 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-22 23:58 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-23 16:26 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-23 03:03 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-24 09:35 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-06-08 15:02 -0500
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-08 19:00 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-09 10:07 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Boris Mohar <borism_void_@sympatico.ca> - 2018-05-10 07:51 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-09 09:59 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-15 15:56 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-15 02:14 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-15 09:27 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-15 11:48 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-15 15:04 -0500
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-15 20:02 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-15 17:28 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-05-15 06:55 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-15 10:13 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-15 10:53 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-15 20:06 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-05-15 22:17 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-16 08:19 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-15 22:03 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-16 13:38 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-17 06:11 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-16 13:16 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-16 15:31 -0500
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-17 20:51 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-18 11:23 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-17 21:52 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-21 07:19 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-21 23:05 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-22 14:44 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-22 02:46 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-22 11:08 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-23 10:24 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-22 20:26 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-23 13:23 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-23 00:03 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-23 16:01 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-05-23 08:39 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-23 10:43 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-24 07:54 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-23 03:08 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-24 09:38 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-23 19:41 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-24 10:05 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-23 20:13 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-05-24 08:59 +0000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kdthrge@gmail.com - 2018-05-24 07:16 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Leo Sgouros <adravirgo@gmail.com> - 2018-05-24 07:26 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-24 12:02 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kdthrge@gmail.com - 2018-05-24 10:36 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kdthrge@gmail.com - 2018-05-24 12:29 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kdthrge@gmail.com - 2018-05-24 14:35 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-24 20:32 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Lofty Goat <rlwatkins@gmail.com> - 2018-05-24 19:56 -0500
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kdthrge@gmail.com - 2018-05-25 21:36 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kdthrge@gmail.com - 2018-05-25 23:34 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kdthrge@gmail.com - 2018-05-26 07:06 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Lofty Goat <rlwatkins@gmail.com> - 2018-05-26 12:48 -0500
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kdthrge@gmail.com - 2018-05-26 13:20 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kdthrge@gmail.com - 2018-05-27 12:30 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kdthrge@gmail.com - 2018-05-28 10:43 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kdthrge@gmail.com - 2018-05-28 14:03 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kdthrge@gmail.com - 2018-05-29 05:54 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kdthrge@gmail.com - 2018-06-06 16:56 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kdthrge@gmail.com - 2018-06-06 17:20 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kdthrge@gmail.com - 2018-06-06 19:36 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kdthrge@gmail.com - 2018-06-09 12:13 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kdthrge@gmail.com - 2018-06-09 18:28 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kdthrge@gmail.com - 2018-06-06 21:12 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kdthrge@gmail.com - 2018-06-07 06:13 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-06 16:56 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-23 20:09 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-24 10:55 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-23 23:03 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-17 20:50 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-18 11:20 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-17 21:27 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-18 11:45 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-17 22:31 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-18 14:07 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-18 00:50 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-18 15:20 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2018-05-18 15:42 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-18 03:40 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-21 07:28 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2018-05-18 15:28 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-18 15:33 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2018-05-18 15:48 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-05-20 21:58 +0000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-21 23:06 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-15 22:28 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-17 11:35 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-17 07:14 -0500
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-18 07:33 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-17 21:08 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-18 11:24 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-17 22:29 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-21 07:28 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-21 23:05 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-22 14:44 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-22 02:47 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-22 11:07 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-22 20:17 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-23 10:25 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-15 08:52 -0500
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-15 10:02 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-05-15 07:04 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-15 11:51 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-16 08:28 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-15 19:48 -0500
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-15 22:36 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-16 09:36 -0500
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-16 10:51 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-16 14:07 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-16 14:01 -0500
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-17 06:16 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-16 15:42 -0500
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-17 11:37 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-16 17:13 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-17 11:26 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-15 22:30 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-16 09:45 -0500
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-17 06:18 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-16 15:45 -0500
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-17 11:22 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-17 07:51 -0500
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-17 11:27 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-17 17:47 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-17 23:36 +0000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-18 09:39 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-17 20:55 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-05-17 18:12 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-18 11:24 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-17 16:41 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-05-17 20:06 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-17 20:20 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-18 01:37 +0000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-17 19:03 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-17 22:36 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-18 03:03 +0000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-17 20:09 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-05-17 23:25 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-18 09:56 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-17 17:55 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-05-17 21:01 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-17 18:02 -0700
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-05-17 21:09 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-17 17:29 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-17 20:53 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-18 11:25 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-17 22:30 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-18 14:08 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-18 00:42 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-18 15:22 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-18 03:31 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-18 07:06 -0500
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-18 11:49 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-18 13:25 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-18 19:40 +0000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-18 20:23 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-19 03:39 +0000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-18 18:41 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-19 03:40 +0000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-21 07:36 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-21 23:05 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-22 14:45 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-22 02:48 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-23 10:26 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-22 23:17 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-23 13:21 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-22 23:59 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-23 16:03 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-23 03:04 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-24 09:40 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-23 20:20 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-24 11:00 +1000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-23 23:06 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-24 05:03 +0000
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-24 01:59 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-24 01:57 -0400
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-09 09:33 -0500
Re: The last time atmospheric carbon dioxide was this high humans didn't exist benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-09 15:49 -0400
Page 6 of 14 — ← Prev page 1 … 4 5 [6] 7 8 … 14 Next page →
| From | Boris Mohar <borism_void_@sympatico.ca> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-10 07:51 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <bhc8fdpj6l6i895gks7jheab13mgeta3va@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #684545 |
On Wed, 09 May 2018 07:57:49 -0400, Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> wrote: >On Wed, 9 May 2018 06:52:40 -0400, kensi wrote: > >>In 2013, atmospheric carbon dioxide broke 400 parts per million for the >>first time in human history. Just a year later, atmospheric carbon >>dioxide averaged that for an entire month. And now? > >... we found that breaking the 400 ppm "limit" wasn't a problem. > >No tipping point happened, the sky didn't fall, and we're still here. This is why: https://wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com/2018/04/clip_image0022.jpg https://wattsupwiththat.com/2018/04/09/climate-change-it-was-the-sun-all-along-so-say-the-bulgarians/ Regards, Boris Mohar Got Knock? - see: Viatrack Printed Circuit Designs (among other things) http://www.viatrack.ca void _-void-_ in the obvious place --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-09 09:59 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <79DIC.77453$pK.65633@fx13.iad> |
| In reply to | #684526 |
On 5/9/2018 6:52 AM, kensi wrote: > In 2013, atmospheric carbon dioxide broke 400 parts per million for the > first time in human history. Just a year later, atmospheric carbon > dioxide averaged that for an entire month. And now? > > https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2018/5/4/1762050/-The-last-time-atmospheric-carbon-dioxide-was-this-high-humans-didn-t-exist > > We hear you. Dinosaurs all died from heat stroke from all that CO2 Greenhousing their world. Somehow science doesn't agree with this fantasy. Since CO2 is a minor GHG it's level is obviously more or less irrelevant, both then and now. Water vapor is THE major GHG factor (50%) and clouds (also water) are another 25% and CO2 is NOT the remaining 25%. Figure out how to tax the oceans and you got it, "Kanzi". Third world shitholes are counting on you.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-15 15:56 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <flvb49Fai9hU7@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #684551 |
On 9/05/2018 11:59 PM, benj wrote: > On 5/9/2018 6:52 AM, kensi wrote: >> In 2013, atmospheric carbon dioxide broke 400 parts per million for >> the first time in human history. Just a year later, atmospheric carbon >> dioxide averaged that for an entire month. And now? >> >> https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2018/5/4/1762050/-The-last-time-atmospheric-carbon-dioxide-was-this-high-humans-didn-t-exist >> >> > We hear you. Dinosaurs all died from heat stroke from all that CO2 > Greenhousing their world. Somehow science doesn't agree with this > fantasy. Since CO2 is a minor GHG it's level is obviously more or less > irrelevant, both then and now. > > Water vapor is THE major GHG factor (50%) and clouds (also water) are > another 25% and CO2 is NOT the remaining 25%. **Wrong, yappy lap-dog. You really should stop listening to your master, Sergio. He is wrong and so are you. Obviously. Figure out how to tax the > oceans and you got it, "Kanzi". Third world shitholes are counting on you. **Stop yapping, moron. -- Trevor Wilson www.rageaudio.com.au
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-15 02:14 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <pdduol$grc$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #685531 |
"Trevor Wilson" <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> wrote in message news:flvb49Fai9hU7@mid.individual.net... > On 9/05/2018 11:59 PM, benj wrote: >> On 5/9/2018 6:52 AM, kensi wrote: >>> In 2013, atmospheric carbon dioxide broke 400 parts per million for the >>> first time in human history. Just a year later, atmospheric carbon >>> dioxide averaged that for an entire month. And now? >>> >>> https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2018/5/4/1762050/-The-last-time-atmospheric-carbon-dioxide-was-this-high-humans-didn-t-exist >>> >> We hear you. Dinosaurs all died from heat stroke from all that CO2 >> Greenhousing their world. Somehow science doesn't agree with this >> fantasy. Since CO2 is a minor GHG it's level is obviously more or less >> irrelevant, both then and now. >> >> Water vapor is THE major GHG factor (50%) and clouds (also water) are >> another 25% and CO2 is NOT the remaining 25%. > > **Wrong, yappy lap-dog. You really should stop listening to your master, > Sergio. He is wrong and so are you. Obviously. Actually he's right. "1. Water Vapor Water? Water?! Water! Yes, according to the IPCC, steam accounts for 36-70 percent of the greenhouse effect. Fog, haze and clouds are all water vapor, and steam is the other main byproduct of the combustion of fossil fuels. Worse still, warming causes a positive feedback loop as higher temperatures result in more water vapor, which results in higher temperatures, and so on and so on. Now the next time someone asks you about your carbon footprint, you can ask them about their steam footprint, and see if that patchouli-scented hippie knows the main cause behind the greenhouse effect." https://www.popsci.com/environment/article/2009-03/top-ten-greenhouse-gases#page-11 " Water Vapor makes up around 33 to 66 percent of all greenhouse gases in the atmosphere" https://helpsavenature.com/greenhouse-gases-list "List Of Greenhouse Gases While natural water vapor has the greatest impact on the greenhouse effect...." https://www.worldatlas.com/articles/list-of-greenhouse-gases.html
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-15 09:27 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <pden91$v21$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #685544 |
On 5/15/2018 2:14 AM, Scout wrote: > Fog, haze and clouds are all water vapor, *headdesk* *headdesk* *headdesk* *headdesk* *headdesk* *headdesk* *headdesk* *headdesk* . . . (Oh, and https://www.skepticalscience.com/Evaporating-the-water-vapor-argument.html) -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-15 11:48 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.3564cb6e726777e5993a04@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #685559 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate! In article <pden91$v21$1@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01 @gmail.nospam.invalid says... > > On 5/15/2018 2:14 AM, Scout wrote: > > Fog, haze and clouds are all water vapor, > > *headdesk* > *headdesk* > *headdesk* > *headdesk* > *headdesk* > *headdesk* > *headdesk* > *headdesk* > . > . > . > > (Oh, and > https://www.skepticalscience.com/Evaporating-the-water-vapor-argument.html) Might I suggest you start wearing a tard helmet? -- Checkmate ® Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Copyright © 2018 all rights reserved In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017 "There are many here among us, who feel that life is but a joke." "I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as kensi." -Nadegda Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-15 15:04 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <pdfega$ces$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #685609 |
On 5/15/2018 1:48 PM, Checkmate wrote: > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by > Checkmate! In article <pden91$v21$1@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01 > @gmail.nospam.invalid says... > > >> >> On 5/15/2018 2:14 AM, Scout wrote: >>> Fog, haze and clouds are all water vapor, >> >> *headdesk* >> *headdesk* >> *headdesk* >> *headdesk* >> *headdesk* >> *headdesk* >> *headdesk* >> *headdesk* >> . >> . >> . >> >> (Oh, and >> https://www.skepticalscience.com/Evaporating-the-water-vapor-argument.html) > > Might I suggest you start wearing a tard helmet? > Hey kensi pupa, “There’s nothing wrong with you that a little Prozac and a polo mallet can’t cure.” - Woody Allen
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-15 20:02 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <pdftg7$1p5$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #685559 |
"kensi" <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote in message news:pden91$v21$1@gioia.aioe.org... > On 5/15/2018 2:14 AM, Scout wrote: >> Fog, haze and clouds are all water vapor, > > *headdesk* > *headdesk* > *headdesk* > *headdesk* > *headdesk* > *headdesk* > *headdesk* > *headdesk* Somehow, I doubt your beating your head on the desk is going to make you any smarter or better educated, but by all means continue and let's see if I'm wrong.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-15 17:28 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <b9cjgs.n0d.17.2@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #685685 |
On 2018-05-15 5:02 PM, Scout wrote: > > > "kensi" <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote in message > news:pden91$v21$1@gioia.aioe.org... >> On 5/15/2018 2:14 AM, Scout wrote: >>> Fog, haze and clouds are all water vapor, >> >> *headdesk* >> *headdesk* >> *headdesk* >> *headdesk* >> *headdesk* >> *headdesk* >> *headdesk* >> *headdesk* > > Somehow, I doubt your beating your head on the desk is going to make you > any smarter or better educated, but by all means continue and let's see > if I'm wrong. its the head desk , you should want some
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-15 06:55 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <7049dac1-349a-4799-a50a-90a41cd6640f@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #685544 |
On Monday, May 14, 2018 at 11:29:44 PM UTC-7, Scout wrote: > >> Water vapor is THE major GHG factor (50%) and clouds (also water) are > >> another 25% and CO2 is NOT the remaining 25%. > > > > **Wrong, yappy lap-dog. You really should stop listening to your master, > > Sergio. He is wrong and so are you. Obviously. > > Actually he's right. > > "1. Water Vapor > > Water? Water?! Water! Yes, according to the IPCC, steam accounts for 36-70 > percent of the greenhouse effect. Earth's atmosphere is far to cool to support steam. Vapor, yes. Steam, no. Clear moist air does not contain steam. It containes liquid nanodroplets of liquid H2O. Not steam. Look at an H2O phase diagram.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-15 10:13 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <HWBKC.102495$wG5.76262@fx02.iad> |
| In reply to | #685544 |
On 5/15/2018 2:14 AM, Scout wrote: > > > "Trevor Wilson" <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> wrote in message > news:flvb49Fai9hU7@mid.individual.net... >> On 9/05/2018 11:59 PM, benj wrote: >>> On 5/9/2018 6:52 AM, kensi wrote: >>>> In 2013, atmospheric carbon dioxide broke 400 parts per million for >>>> the first time in human history. Just a year later, atmospheric >>>> carbon dioxide averaged that for an entire month. And now? >>>> >>>> https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2018/5/4/1762050/-The-last-time-atmospheric-carbon-dioxide-was-this-high-humans-didn-t-exist >>>> >>>> >>> We hear you. Dinosaurs all died from heat stroke from all that CO2 >>> Greenhousing their world. Somehow science doesn't agree with this >>> fantasy. Since CO2 is a minor GHG it's level is obviously more or >>> less irrelevant, both then and now. >>> >>> Water vapor is THE major GHG factor (50%) and clouds (also water) are >>> another 25% and CO2 is NOT the remaining 25%. >> >> **Wrong, yappy lap-dog. You really should stop listening to your >> master, Sergio. He is wrong and so are you. Obviously. > > Actually he's right. Of course I'm right because I'm quoting science while Trevor is smoking dope and running a scam. Forget popular press (they are idiot/liars too). Here is a peer-reviewed paper in a journal by NASA. http://meteo.lcd.lu/globalwarming/Schmidt/attribution_present_GH_effect_2010.pdf Money Quote from Abstract: "With a straightforward scheme for allocating overlaps, we find that water vapour is the dominant contributor (∼50% of the effect), followed by clouds (∼25%) and then CO2 with ∼20%. All other absorbers play only minor roles." Clearly Trevor is nothing but a lying propagandist just trying to get away with bluster and name-calling instead of science. He just PROVED how ignorant and dishonest he is above. So why would ANYONE waste their time listening to ANYTHING he has to say? Don't you have something more important to do with your time, like say take a dump? Trevor just gets slammed down again and again but he just keeps squealing as if nobody has seen what happened. Water vapor/clouds = 1 Climate change/Trevor = 0 ========== > "1. Water Vapor > > Water? Water?! Water! Yes, according to the IPCC, steam accounts for > 36-70 percent of the greenhouse effect. Fog, haze and clouds are all > water vapor, and steam is the other main byproduct of the combustion of > fossil fuels. Worse still, warming causes a positive feedback loop as > higher temperatures result in more water vapor, which results in higher > temperatures, and so on and so on. Now the next time someone asks you > about your carbon footprint, you can ask them about their steam > footprint, and see if that patchouli-scented hippie knows the main cause > behind the greenhouse effect." > > https://www.popsci.com/environment/article/2009-03/top-ten-greenhouse-gases#page-11 > > > " Water Vapor makes up around 33 to 66 percent of all greenhouse gases > in the atmosphere" > > https://helpsavenature.com/greenhouse-gases-list > > "List Of Greenhouse Gases > > While natural water vapor has the greatest impact on the greenhouse > effect...." > > https://www.worldatlas.com/articles/list-of-greenhouse-gases.html
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-15 10:53 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <pdes8i$18i0$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #685576 |
On 5/15/2018 10:13 AM, benj wrote: >>>> Water vapor > that water vapour > Water vapor >> "1. Water Vapor >> Water? Water?! Water! steam >> water vapor, and steam >> more water vapor >> steam >> " Water Vapor >> natural water vapor https://www.skepticalscience.com/Evaporating-the-water-vapor-argument.html https://www.skepticalscience.com/Evaporating-the-water-vapor-argument.html For the thousandth time, https://www.skepticalscience.com/Evaporating-the-water-vapor-argument.html ! -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-15 20:06 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <pdftg8$1p5$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #685582 |
"kensi" <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote in message news:pdes8i$18i0$1@gioia.aioe.org... > On 5/15/2018 10:13 AM, benj wrote: >>>>> Water vapor >> that water vapour >> Water vapor >>> "1. Water Vapor >>> Water? Water?! Water! steam >>> water vapor, and steam >>> more water vapor >>> steam >>> " Water Vapor >>> natural water vapor > > https://www.skepticalscience.com/Evaporating-the-water-vapor-argument.html > > https://www.skepticalscience.com/Evaporating-the-water-vapor-argument.html > > For the thousandth time, > > https://www.skepticalscience.com/Evaporating-the-water-vapor-argument.html Doesn’t alter or address the fact that H2O is the most plentiful greenhouse gas. Further, what your article fails to consider is that H2O is itself very nasty because has water vapor goes up, it causes more water vapor and thus is a greenhouse gas multiplier. Meanwhile CO2 still only constitutes about 0.0039% of the atmosphere and thus is largely insignificant next to H2O in causing global warming.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-15 22:17 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <pdg4c2$1cnh$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #685686 |
On 5/15/2018 8:06 PM, Scout wrote: > Meanwhile CO2 still only constitutes about 0.0039% of the atmosphere and > thus is largely insignificant next to H2O in causing global warming. A noted expert says that the pie chart shows that CO2 is, out of necessity to the life of earth, 3% of the air and cap and tax will destroy life cycle of earth with arbitrary reduction. -- Grizzly H.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-16 08:19 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <fm14ouFna6fU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #685544 |
On 15/05/2018 4:14 PM, Scout wrote: > > > "Trevor Wilson" <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> wrote in message > news:flvb49Fai9hU7@mid.individual.net... >> On 9/05/2018 11:59 PM, benj wrote: >>> On 5/9/2018 6:52 AM, kensi wrote: >>>> In 2013, atmospheric carbon dioxide broke 400 parts per million for >>>> the first time in human history. Just a year later, atmospheric >>>> carbon dioxide averaged that for an entire month. And now? >>>> >>>> https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2018/5/4/1762050/-The-last-time-atmospheric-carbon-dioxide-was-this-high-humans-didn-t-exist >>>> >>>> >>> We hear you. Dinosaurs all died from heat stroke from all that CO2 >>> Greenhousing their world. Somehow science doesn't agree with this >>> fantasy. Since CO2 is a minor GHG it's level is obviously more or >>> less irrelevant, both then and now. >>> >>> Water vapor is THE major GHG factor (50%) and clouds (also water) are >>> another 25% and CO2 is NOT the remaining 25%. >> >> **Wrong, yappy lap-dog. You really should stop listening to your >> master, Sergio. He is wrong and so are you. Obviously. > > Actually he's right. **No, he's dead wrong. As your own words confirm. The contribution of H2O varies significantly, depending on time and day. Moreover, both you and he are ignoring the elephant in the room. CO2, whilst a lesser contributor than H2O is NOT insignificant. The effect of CO2 ranges from 9% ~ 26%. > > "1. Water Vapor > > Water? Water?! Water! Yes, according to the IPCC, steam accounts for > 36-70 percent of the greenhouse effect. Fog, haze and clouds are all > water vapor, and steam is the other main byproduct of the combustion of > fossil fuels. Worse still, warming causes a positive feedback loop as > higher temperatures result in more water vapor, which results in higher > temperatures, and so on and so on. Now the next time someone asks you > about your carbon footprint, you can ask them about their steam > footprint, and see if that patchouli-scented hippie knows the main cause > behind the greenhouse effect." > > https://www.popsci.com/environment/article/2009-03/top-ten-greenhouse-gases#page-11 > > > " Water Vapor makes up around 33 to 66 percent of all greenhouse gases > in the atmosphere" > > https://helpsavenature.com/greenhouse-gases-list > > "List Of Greenhouse Gases > > While natural water vapor has the greatest impact on the greenhouse > effect...." > > https://www.worldatlas.com/articles/list-of-greenhouse-gases.html **Again, you and benj cannot ignore the significant effects of CO2, methane and the other GHGs. -- Trevor Wilson www.rageaudio.com.au
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-15 22:03 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <pdg4tc$2uk$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #685656 |
"Trevor Wilson" <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> wrote in message news:fm14ouFna6fU1@mid.individual.net... > On 15/05/2018 4:14 PM, Scout wrote: >> >> >> "Trevor Wilson" <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> wrote in message >> news:flvb49Fai9hU7@mid.individual.net... >>> On 9/05/2018 11:59 PM, benj wrote: >>>> On 5/9/2018 6:52 AM, kensi wrote: >>>>> In 2013, atmospheric carbon dioxide broke 400 parts per million for >>>>> the first time in human history. Just a year later, atmospheric carbon >>>>> dioxide averaged that for an entire month. And now? >>>>> >>>>> https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2018/5/4/1762050/-The-last-time-atmospheric-carbon-dioxide-was-this-high-humans-didn-t-exist >>>>> >>>> We hear you. Dinosaurs all died from heat stroke from all that CO2 >>>> Greenhousing their world. Somehow science doesn't agree with this >>>> fantasy. Since CO2 is a minor GHG it's level is obviously more or less >>>> irrelevant, both then and now. >>>> >>>> Water vapor is THE major GHG factor (50%) and clouds (also water) are >>>> another 25% and CO2 is NOT the remaining 25%. >>> >>> **Wrong, yappy lap-dog. You really should stop listening to your master, >>> Sergio. He is wrong and so are you. Obviously. >> >> Actually he's right. > > **No, he's dead wrong. As your own words confirm. The contribution of H2O > varies significantly, depending on time and day. Moreover, both you and he > are ignoring the elephant in the room. CO2, whilst a lesser contributor > than H2O is NOT insignificant. The effect of CO2 ranges from 9% ~ 26%. > >> >> "1. Water Vapor >> >> Water? Water?! Water! Yes, according to the IPCC, steam accounts for >> 36-70 percent of the greenhouse effect. Fog, haze and clouds are all >> water vapor, and steam is the other main byproduct of the combustion of >> fossil fuels. Worse still, warming causes a positive feedback loop as >> higher temperatures result in more water vapor, which results in higher >> temperatures, and so on and so on. Now the next time someone asks you >> about your carbon footprint, you can ask them about their steam >> footprint, and see if that patchouli-scented hippie knows the main cause >> behind the greenhouse effect." >> >> https://www.popsci.com/environment/article/2009-03/top-ten-greenhouse-gases#page-11 " >> Water Vapor makes up around 33 to 66 percent of all greenhouse gases in >> the atmosphere" >> >> https://helpsavenature.com/greenhouse-gases-list >> >> "List Of Greenhouse Gases >> >> While natural water vapor has the greatest impact on the greenhouse >> effect...." >> >> https://www.worldatlas.com/articles/list-of-greenhouse-gases.html > > **Again, you and benj cannot ignore the significant effects of CO2, > methane and the other GHGs. Sure, but the vast overwhelming majority in excess of 99% is naturally occurring. Which means you would have us believe that with a fraction of 1% input we are somehow altering the climate of an entire planet. Seems quite a stretch given that such global warming cycles have been well establish AND we are known to be in such a period of global warming and have been for some 12,000 years.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-16 13:38 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <j0_KC.52647$Qa1.34012@fx21.iad> |
| In reply to | #685715 |
On 5/15/2018 10:03 PM, Scout wrote: > > > "Trevor Wilson" <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> wrote in message > news:fm14ouFna6fU1@mid.individual.net... >> On 15/05/2018 4:14 PM, Scout wrote: >>> >>> >>> "Trevor Wilson" <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> wrote in message >>> news:flvb49Fai9hU7@mid.individual.net... >>>> On 9/05/2018 11:59 PM, benj wrote: >>>>> On 5/9/2018 6:52 AM, kensi wrote: >>>>>> In 2013, atmospheric carbon dioxide broke 400 parts per million >>>>>> for the first time in human history. Just a year later, >>>>>> atmospheric carbon dioxide averaged that for an entire month. And >>>>>> now? >>>>>> >>>>>> https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2018/5/4/1762050/-The-last-time-atmospheric-carbon-dioxide-was-this-high-humans-didn-t-exist >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> We hear you. Dinosaurs all died from heat stroke from all that CO2 >>>>> Greenhousing their world. Somehow science doesn't agree with this >>>>> fantasy. Since CO2 is a minor GHG it's level is obviously more or >>>>> less irrelevant, both then and now. >>>>> >>>>> Water vapor is THE major GHG factor (50%) and clouds (also water) >>>>> are another 25% and CO2 is NOT the remaining 25%. >>>> >>>> **Wrong, yappy lap-dog. You really should stop listening to your >>>> master, Sergio. He is wrong and so are you. Obviously. >>> >>> Actually he's right. >> >> **No, he's dead wrong. As your own words confirm. The contribution of >> H2O varies significantly, depending on time and day. Moreover, both >> you and he are ignoring the elephant in the room. CO2, whilst a lesser >> contributor than H2O is NOT insignificant. The effect of CO2 ranges >> from 9% ~ 26%. >> >>> >>> "1. Water Vapor >>> >>> Water? Water?! Water! Yes, according to the IPCC, steam accounts for >>> 36-70 percent of the greenhouse effect. Fog, haze and clouds are all >>> water vapor, and steam is the other main byproduct of the combustion >>> of fossil fuels. Worse still, warming causes a positive feedback loop >>> as higher temperatures result in more water vapor, which results in >>> higher temperatures, and so on and so on. Now the next time someone >>> asks you about your carbon footprint, you can ask them about their >>> steam footprint, and see if that patchouli-scented hippie knows the >>> main cause behind the greenhouse effect." >>> >>> https://www.popsci.com/environment/article/2009-03/top-ten-greenhouse-gases#page-11 >>> " Water Vapor makes up around 33 to 66 percent of all greenhouse >>> gases in the atmosphere" >>> >>> https://helpsavenature.com/greenhouse-gases-list >>> >>> "List Of Greenhouse Gases >>> >>> While natural water vapor has the greatest impact on the greenhouse >>> effect...." >>> >>> https://www.worldatlas.com/articles/list-of-greenhouse-gases.html >> >> **Again, you and benj cannot ignore the significant effects of CO2, >> methane and the other GHGs. Dishonest Trevor pretends he never saw the NASA paper outlining the effects of GHG. Money quote from ABstract: (AGAIN) "With a straightforward scheme for allocating overlaps, we find that water vapour is the dominant contributor (∼50% of the effect), followed by clouds (∼25%) and then CO2 with ∼20%. All other absorbers play only minor roles." Note that in Trevor's journalist fantasy world the word "minor" to him is taken to mean "significant"! One can't discuss anything reasonable with this kind of insanity. > Sure, but the vast overwhelming majority in excess of 99% is naturally > occurring. > > Which means you would have us believe that with a fraction of 1% input > we are somehow altering the climate of an entire planet. No problems for Trevor and other warmballers. All you need to do is start dropping jargon like "tipping point" and then anything is possible. > Seems quite a stretch given that such global warming cycles have been > well establish AND we are known to be in such a period of global warming > and have been for some 12,000 years. Can't tax natural processes. You need to blame people so you can tax them to "fix" the imaginary problem. Sweet scam, no?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-17 06:11 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <fm3hjqF90eoU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #685715 |
On 16/05/2018 12:03 PM, Scout wrote: > > > "Trevor Wilson" <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> wrote in message > news:fm14ouFna6fU1@mid.individual.net... >> On 15/05/2018 4:14 PM, Scout wrote: >>> >>> >>> "Trevor Wilson" <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> wrote in message >>> news:flvb49Fai9hU7@mid.individual.net... >>>> On 9/05/2018 11:59 PM, benj wrote: >>>>> On 5/9/2018 6:52 AM, kensi wrote: >>>>>> In 2013, atmospheric carbon dioxide broke 400 parts per million >>>>>> for the first time in human history. Just a year later, >>>>>> atmospheric carbon dioxide averaged that for an entire month. And >>>>>> now? >>>>>> >>>>>> https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2018/5/4/1762050/-The-last-time-atmospheric-carbon-dioxide-was-this-high-humans-didn-t-exist >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> We hear you. Dinosaurs all died from heat stroke from all that CO2 >>>>> Greenhousing their world. Somehow science doesn't agree with this >>>>> fantasy. Since CO2 is a minor GHG it's level is obviously more or >>>>> less irrelevant, both then and now. >>>>> >>>>> Water vapor is THE major GHG factor (50%) and clouds (also water) >>>>> are another 25% and CO2 is NOT the remaining 25%. >>>> >>>> **Wrong, yappy lap-dog. You really should stop listening to your >>>> master, Sergio. He is wrong and so are you. Obviously. >>> >>> Actually he's right. >> >> **No, he's dead wrong. As your own words confirm. The contribution of >> H2O varies significantly, depending on time and day. Moreover, both >> you and he are ignoring the elephant in the room. CO2, whilst a lesser >> contributor than H2O is NOT insignificant. The effect of CO2 ranges >> from 9% ~ 26%. >> >>> >>> "1. Water Vapor >>> >>> Water? Water?! Water! Yes, according to the IPCC, steam accounts for >>> 36-70 percent of the greenhouse effect. Fog, haze and clouds are all >>> water vapor, and steam is the other main byproduct of the combustion >>> of fossil fuels. Worse still, warming causes a positive feedback loop >>> as higher temperatures result in more water vapor, which results in >>> higher temperatures, and so on and so on. Now the next time someone >>> asks you about your carbon footprint, you can ask them about their >>> steam footprint, and see if that patchouli-scented hippie knows the >>> main cause behind the greenhouse effect." >>> >>> https://www.popsci.com/environment/article/2009-03/top-ten-greenhouse-gases#page-11 >>> " Water Vapor makes up around 33 to 66 percent of all greenhouse >>> gases in the atmosphere" >>> >>> https://helpsavenature.com/greenhouse-gases-list >>> >>> "List Of Greenhouse Gases >>> >>> While natural water vapor has the greatest impact on the greenhouse >>> effect...." >>> >>> https://www.worldatlas.com/articles/list-of-greenhouse-gases.html >> >> **Again, you and benj cannot ignore the significant effects of CO2, >> methane and the other GHGs. > > Sure, but the vast overwhelming majority in excess of 99% is naturally > occurring. **99%? You sure about that? Supply your supporting data. > > Which means you would have us believe that with a fraction of 1% input > we are somehow altering the climate of an entire planet. **Here are my calculations to support my case: H2O - Solar forcing factor - 36% ~ 72% CO2 - Solar forcing factor - 9% ~ 26% Methane - Solar forcing factor - 4% ~ 9% O3 - Solar forcing factor - 3% ~ 7% Over the past 150 years, humans have added approximately 43% of the available atmospheric CO2. Therefore, compared to natural CO2 sources, humans have contributed significantly more than your 1% claim. > > Seems quite a stretch given that such global warming cycles have been > well establish AND we are known to be in such a period of global warming > and have been for some 12,000 years. **Not quite. Up until the 19th century, this planet had a relatively benign climate, with only minor medium term variations in temperature: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geologic_temperature_record#/media/File:All_palaeotemps.svg -- Trevor Wilson www.rageaudio.com.au
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-16 13:16 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <b9ep34.clo.19.6@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #685803 |
On 2018-05-16 1:11 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote: > On 16/05/2018 12:03 PM, Scout wrote: >> >> >> "Trevor Wilson" <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> wrote in message >> news:fm14ouFna6fU1@mid.individual.net... >>> On 15/05/2018 4:14 PM, Scout wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> "Trevor Wilson" <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> wrote in message >>>> news:flvb49Fai9hU7@mid.individual.net... >>>>> On 9/05/2018 11:59 PM, benj wrote: >>>>>> On 5/9/2018 6:52 AM, kensi wrote: >>>>>>> In 2013, atmospheric carbon dioxide broke 400 parts per million >>>>>>> for the first time in human history. Just a year later, >>>>>>> atmospheric carbon dioxide averaged that for an entire month. And >>>>>>> now? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2018/5/4/1762050/-The-last-time-atmospheric-carbon-dioxide-was-this-high-humans-didn-t-exist >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> We hear you. Dinosaurs all died from heat stroke from all that CO2 >>>>>> Greenhousing their world. Somehow science doesn't agree with this >>>>>> fantasy. Since CO2 is a minor GHG it's level is obviously more or >>>>>> less irrelevant, both then and now. >>>>>> >>>>>> Water vapor is THE major GHG factor (50%) and clouds (also water) >>>>>> are another 25% and CO2 is NOT the remaining 25%. >>>>> >>>>> **Wrong, yappy lap-dog. You really should stop listening to your >>>>> master, Sergio. He is wrong and so are you. Obviously. >>>> >>>> Actually he's right. >>> >>> **No, he's dead wrong. As your own words confirm. The contribution of >>> H2O varies significantly, depending on time and day. Moreover, both >>> you and he are ignoring the elephant in the room. CO2, whilst a >>> lesser contributor than H2O is NOT insignificant. The effect of CO2 >>> ranges from 9% ~ 26%. >>> >>>> >>>> "1. Water Vapor >>>> >>>> Water? Water?! Water! Yes, according to the IPCC, steam accounts for >>>> 36-70 percent of the greenhouse effect. Fog, haze and clouds are all >>>> water vapor, and steam is the other main byproduct of the combustion >>>> of fossil fuels. Worse still, warming causes a positive feedback >>>> loop as higher temperatures result in more water vapor, which >>>> results in higher temperatures, and so on and so on. Now the next >>>> time someone asks you about your carbon footprint, you can ask them >>>> about their steam footprint, and see if that patchouli-scented >>>> hippie knows the main cause behind the greenhouse effect." >>>> >>>> https://www.popsci.com/environment/article/2009-03/top-ten-greenhouse-gases#page-11 >>>> " Water Vapor makes up around 33 to 66 percent of all greenhouse >>>> gases in the atmosphere" >>>> >>>> https://helpsavenature.com/greenhouse-gases-list >>>> >>>> "List Of Greenhouse Gases >>>> >>>> While natural water vapor has the greatest impact on the greenhouse >>>> effect...." >>>> >>>> https://www.worldatlas.com/articles/list-of-greenhouse-gases.html >>> >>> **Again, you and benj cannot ignore the significant effects of CO2, >>> methane and the other GHGs. >> >> Sure, but the vast overwhelming majority in excess of 99% is naturally >> occurring. > > **99%? You sure about that? > > Supply your supporting data. > >> >> Which means you would have us believe that with a fraction of 1% input >> we are somehow altering the climate of an entire planet. > > **Here are my calculations to support my case: > > H2O - Solar forcing factor - 36% ~ 72% > CO2 - Solar forcing factor - 9% ~ 26% > Methane - Solar forcing factor - 4% ~ 9% > O3 - Solar forcing factor - 3% ~ 7% > > Over the past 150 years, humans have added approximately 43% of the > available atmospheric CO2. > > Therefore, compared to natural CO2 sources, humans have contributed > significantly more than your 1% claim. > > >> >> Seems quite a stretch given that such global warming cycles have been >> well establish AND we are known to be in such a period of global >> warming and have been for some 12,000 years. > > **Not quite. Up until the 19th century, this planet had a relatively > benign climate, with only minor medium term variations in temperature: > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geologic_temperature_record#/media/File:All_palaeotemps.svg > > > did you expect free wine and cheese forever
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-16 15:31 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <pdi4fo$ppc$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #685803 |
On 5/16/2018 3:11 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote: > On 16/05/2018 12:03 PM, Scout wrote: >> >> >> "Trevor Wilson" <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> wrote in message >> news:fm14ouFna6fU1@mid.individual.net... >>> On 15/05/2018 4:14 PM, Scout wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> "Trevor Wilson" <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> wrote in message >>>> news:flvb49Fai9hU7@mid.individual.net... >>>>> On 9/05/2018 11:59 PM, benj wrote: >>>>>> On 5/9/2018 6:52 AM, kensi wrote: >>>>>>> In 2013, atmospheric carbon dioxide broke 400 parts per million >>>>>>> for the first time in human history. Just a year later, >>>>>>> atmospheric carbon dioxide averaged that for an entire month. And >>>>>>> now? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2018/5/4/1762050/-The-last-time-atmospheric-carbon-dioxide-was-this-high-humans-didn-t-exist >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> We hear you. Dinosaurs all died from heat stroke from all that CO2 >>>>>> Greenhousing their world. Somehow science doesn't agree with this >>>>>> fantasy. Since CO2 is a minor GHG it's level is obviously more or >>>>>> less irrelevant, both then and now. >>>>>> >>>>>> Water vapor is THE major GHG factor (50%) and clouds (also water) >>>>>> are another 25% and CO2 is NOT the remaining 25%. >>>>> >>>>> **Wrong, yappy lap-dog. You really should stop listening to your >>>>> master, Sergio. He is wrong and so are you. Obviously. >>>> >>>> Actually he's right. >>> >>> **No, he's dead wrong. As your own words confirm. The contribution of >>> H2O varies significantly, depending on time and day. Moreover, both >>> you and he are ignoring the elephant in the room. CO2, whilst a >>> lesser contributor than H2O is NOT insignificant. The effect of CO2 >>> ranges from 9% ~ 26%. >>> >>>> >>>> "1. Water Vapor >>>> >>>> Water? Water?! Water! Yes, according to the IPCC, steam accounts for >>>> 36-70 percent of the greenhouse effect. Fog, haze and clouds are all >>>> water vapor, and steam is the other main byproduct of the combustion >>>> of fossil fuels. Worse still, warming causes a positive feedback >>>> loop as higher temperatures result in more water vapor, which >>>> results in higher temperatures, and so on and so on. Now the next >>>> time someone asks you about your carbon footprint, you can ask them >>>> about their steam footprint, and see if that patchouli-scented >>>> hippie knows the main cause behind the greenhouse effect." >>>> >>>> https://www.popsci.com/environment/article/2009-03/top-ten-greenhouse-gases#page-11 >>>> " Water Vapor makes up around 33 to 66 percent of all greenhouse >>>> gases in the atmosphere" >>>> >>>> https://helpsavenature.com/greenhouse-gases-list >>>> >>>> "List Of Greenhouse Gases >>>> >>>> While natural water vapor has the greatest impact on the greenhouse >>>> effect...." >>>> >>>> https://www.worldatlas.com/articles/list-of-greenhouse-gases.html >>> >>> **Again, you and benj cannot ignore the significant effects of CO2, >>> methane and the other GHGs. >> >> Sure, but the vast overwhelming majority in excess of 99% is naturally >> occurring. > > **99%? You sure about that? > > Supply your supporting data. > >> >> Which means you would have us believe that with a fraction of 1% input >> we are somehow altering the climate of an entire planet. > > **Here are my calculations to support my case: > > H2O - Solar forcing factor - 36% ~ 72% > CO2 - Solar forcing factor - 9% ~ 26% > Methane - Solar forcing factor - 4% ~ 9% > O3 - Solar forcing factor - 3% ~ 7% cite ? or are you just making this stuff up ? > > Over the past 150 years, humans have added approximately 43% of the > available atmospheric CO2. Cite ? > > Therefore, compared to natural CO2 sources, humans have contributed > significantly more than your 1% claim. > > >> >> Seems quite a stretch given that such global warming cycles have been >> well establish AND we are known to be in such a period of global >> warming and have been for some 12,000 years. > > **Not quite. Up until the 19th century, this planet had a relatively > benign climate, with only minor medium term variations in temperature: > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geologic_temperature_record#/media/File:All_palaeotemps.svg > > your link shows Global Cooling is here this one says we are due for an ice age; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Vostok_Petit_data.svg
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 6 of 14 — ← Prev page 1 … 4 5 [6] 7 8 … 14 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web