Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #684993 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-05-11 18:37 -0500 |
| Last post | 2018-05-13 15:44 -0700 |
| Articles | 11 on this page of 91 — 10 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-11 18:37 -0500
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman pnalsing@gmail.com - 2018-05-11 17:21 -0700
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-11 21:47 -0400
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-11 21:53 -0400
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman pnalsing@gmail.com - 2018-05-11 19:17 -0700
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-05-12 09:32 -0700
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-05-12 09:39 -0700
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-11 21:30 -0400
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman pnalsing@gmail.com - 2018-05-11 18:45 -0700
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-11 22:03 -0400
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-12 12:03 +1000
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-12 14:47 -0400
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-13 07:24 +1000
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-12 19:44 -0400
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-13 19:08 +1000
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-13 12:28 -0400
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-05-13 12:45 -0400
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-13 12:23 -0500
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-14 04:28 +1000
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-05-13 14:34 -0400
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-14 05:13 +1000
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-05-13 15:31 -0400
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-14 05:47 +1000
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-13 16:25 -0500
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-14 07:58 +1000
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-13 17:10 -0500
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-14 08:23 +1000
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-13 17:31 -0500
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-05-13 17:48 -0400
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-14 08:32 +1000
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-05-13 18:37 -0400
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-14 08:44 +1000
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-05-15 11:32 -0700
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman "Shobe, Martin" <martin.shobe@yahoo.com> - 2018-05-13 20:36 -0500
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-14 11:50 -0400
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-14 13:59 -0500
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-14 18:13 -0400
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-14 17:18 -0500
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-14 04:26 +1000
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-05-13 14:30 -0400
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-14 04:35 +1000
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-05-13 14:56 -0400
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-14 05:10 +1000
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-05-13 15:27 -0400
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman pnalsing@gmail.com - 2018-05-13 12:48 -0700
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-14 06:01 +1000
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-14 12:07 -0400
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-05-13 17:49 -0400
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-14 05:50 +1000
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-13 16:39 -0500
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-14 08:29 +1000
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-13 18:26 -0500
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-05-13 16:46 -0700
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-13 20:04 -0500
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-05-15 07:18 -0700
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-05-15 10:47 -0700
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-15 14:37 -0400
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-15 13:58 -0500
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-14 10:04 +1000
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-13 19:58 -0500
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-14 11:01 +1000
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-13 20:09 -0500
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-17 07:57 +1000
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-16 20:18 -0500
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-17 12:19 +1000
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-17 12:20 -0500
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-05-13 21:33 -0400
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-05-13 17:54 -0400
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-14 08:00 +1000
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-14 12:03 -0400
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-14 12:00 -0400
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-15 09:11 +1000
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-14 11:37 -0400
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-15 09:28 +1000
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-05-14 22:27 -0400
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-05-15 10:45 -0700
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-05-15 11:31 -0700
Politians will take as much money from you as they possibly can. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-15 16:39 -0700
Re: Politians will take as much money from you as they possibly can. Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-16 09:45 +1000
Re: Politians will take as much money from you as they possibly can. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-05-15 19:36 -0700
Re: Politians will take as much money from you as they possibly can. Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-16 19:50 +1000
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-16 07:45 +1000
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-14 11:21 -0400
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Lofty Goat <rlwatkins@gmail.com> - 2018-05-12 11:10 -0500
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-12 11:53 -0500
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-05-12 10:39 -0700
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman pnalsing@gmail.com - 2018-05-12 14:14 -0700
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-12 19:09 -0500
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Lofty Goat <rlwatkins@gmail.com> - 2018-05-13 15:38 -0500
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-05-12 13:48 -0400
Re: Global warming is a big fat lie and the science behind it is fake: John Coleman Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-05-13 15:44 -0700
Page 5 of 5 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 [5]
| From | Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-16 19:50 +1000 |
| Subject | Re: Politians will take as much money from you as they possibly can. |
| Message-ID | <fm2d7pFo15U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #685716 |
On 16/05/2018 12:36 PM, James McGinn wrote: > On Tuesday, May 15, 2018 at 4:46:12 PM UTC-7, Trevor Wilson wrote: >> On 16/05/2018 9:39 AM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote: >>>> We can only control our own contribution of CO2. >>>> >>>> it doesn't take a climate scientist to realize that >>>> pushing a system into a positive feedback loop >>>> can lead to extreme behavior. >>>> >>>>> 2. Big-picture, is it harmful or helpful? >>>> >>>> 3. Is it worth the risk to wait for a clear answer before >>>> acting to deal with the potential damage >>> >>> We need Oxygen ( from plants ), and plants need CabonDiOxide. >>> >>> We'll die, someday, because that's how nature works. >>> >>> Politians will take as much money from you as they possibly can, >>> and _any_ excuse will do, truthy or not. >>> >> >> **"Politians" (sic) have a justifiably bad rap. Scientists don't. >> >> >> Ignore the "politians" (sic) and listen to the scientists (climatologists). >> >> -- >> Trevor Wilson >> www.rageaudio.com.au > > Climate scientists are politicians. They sure aren't scientists. > **Since you are not even a scientist's arsehole, you wouldn't know a scientist from a brick. -- Trevor Wilson www.rageaudio.com.au
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-16 07:45 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <fm12nvFms3iU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #685499 |
On 15/05/2018 12:27 PM, Wally W. wrote: > On Tue, 15 May 2018 09:28:58 +1000, Trevor Wilson wrote: > >> >> Do we simply define "excess" as ANY amount that man >>> creates whether it does anything or not? >> >> **Stupid question. It is now absolutely undeniable that CO2 is causing >> this planet to warm. Therefore, the excess CO2 is undesirable. > > non sequitur. > > Why "therefore?" > > You are assuming *any* warming is bad. > >> The ONLY >> question that is uncertain (though it is barely that, since confidence >> level runs at around 95%) is: Will temperatures rise uncontrollably, if >> nothing is done to stop CO2 emissions? > > "Uncontrollably?" **Yes, uncontrollably. > > First, our level of control is doubtful. **I believe a more correct term would be: 'Uncertain'. Since we can control CO2 emissions, then we can control how much CO2 enters the atmosphere. The uncertainty arises from two things: * The political will of every nation and person on the planet to address the problem. * IF the 'tipping point' has already been reached (as a minority of climatologists believe), then no amount of CO2 emissions reduction will do much at all. > > If by "uncontrollably" you mean without limit, the answer is obviously > "no" and it doesn't take a climate scientist to realize that a finite > system can't warm to an infinite temperature. **This particular planet has already seen very high CO2 levels and average temperatures that exceed the average over the past 1,000 years by more than 10 degrees C. A 10 degree C rise would be utterly catastrophic for the majority of humans on this planet. Our civilisation would be completely altered (in a bad way). > >> There is some debate over this question. And it is the ONLY question >> under any kind of debate among climatologists. Even the denier's poster >> boy, Lindzen, agrees that CO2 has warmed this planet. > > > <https://nofrakkingconsensus.com/2015/04/07/asking-the-wrong-question/> > The main issue is not: Is human-caused climate change occurring? > Repeatedly, Dyson tells us that “the fact that it exists is not a > question.” To ferociously insist – as politicians and activists do – > that man-made climate change is real is meaningless. That remark is > worthy of a child. It demonstrates no sophistication whatsoever. > > The crucial questions are, instead: > > 1. Is humanity’s effect on the climate large or small? **Given the nature of prior temperature swings, it is self-evident that man's influence on the climate is massive. At no time, in at least the past million years or so, has the average temperature of the planet risen so fast nor so far. In fact, the temperature rise is more than 100 times more rapid than at any time every recorded. I call that 'massive'. > 2. Big-picture, is it harmful or helpful? **Well, that is a complicated question, as different parts and populations will be affected in different ways. For instance: * Here in my own nation, Australia, global warming is rapidly destroying the sensitive Great Barrier Reef system. Tens of thousands of jobs are at risk. Fish nurseries are being destroyed, thus fish stocks are being depleted, costing yet more jobs. * Places like Bangladesh, NYC, London, Florida, So Cal and others will lose valuable real estate (and farming land, in the case of Bangladesh) due to even quite small amounts of sea level rise. Larger sea level rise (when the Greenland ice sheets melt) will lead to a 7 Metre sea level rise. This will spread the catastrophe to many more humans. * Places like Alaska, Greenland, Northern Canada, Northern China, Russia and other places may benefit (though Polar bear won't) with global warming. That said, although Greenland has seen increases in arable land over the past few decades, their climate has shifted in such a way that droughts have been experienced in Greenland for the first time in their recorded history. The benefits are uncertain, at best. https://www.npr.org/sections/thesalt/2016/11/17/502349923/climate-change-is-making-greenland-warmer-but-farmers-there-are-struggling -- Trevor Wilson www.rageaudio.com.au
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-14 11:21 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <YPhKC.40153$p05.13438@fx28.iad> |
| In reply to | #685225 |
On 5/13/2018 12:45 PM, Wally W. wrote: > On Sun, 13 May 2018 19:08:26 +1000, Trevor Wilson wrote: > >> **Fuck me, you're an idiot. CO2 is _a_ driver of warming. There are >> others. > > But CO2 is the poster child for "the cause." > > Why is that? > Haven't figured out how to tax the oceans yet! Watervapor and CLOUDS "THE" cause of any Greenhouse effects.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Lofty Goat <rlwatkins@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-12 11:10 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <6mudfdd99arvccpc9ir72o3sdo9mfvdhh0@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #684993 |
On Fri, 11 May 2018 18:37:28 -0500, Sergio wrote: > John Coleman, co-founder of the Weather Channel, shocked the world and > the scientific community when he claimed that there is little > scientific evidence to prove that global warming is real, and that the > whole thing has become nothing but a political tool that is not backed > by true scientific evidence.... He did, he did. He shocked us all. After all, we thought there weren't any cretins employed by the Weather Channel. It was a big surprise. Then again, twenty years ago I knew the co-founder of a software consultancy who knew nothing about IT. They did a lot of government work; his principal skill was bribery. So it goes. By the way, from the laudatory tone of your post one would think this guy was a friend of yours, yet in the same opening sentence you show him up as a hopelessly demented fuckwit. What gives there? Next thing you know, McGinn will be quoting him here. Oh, and hell is full and the dead are walking the earth. What else is new? -- Goat
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-12 11:53 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <pd767l$gud$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #685071 |
On 5/12/2018 11:10 AM, Lofty Goat wrote: > On Fri, 11 May 2018 18:37:28 -0500, Sergio wrote: > >> John Coleman, co-founder of the Weather Channel, shocked the world and >> the scientific community when he claimed that there is little >> scientific evidence to prove that global warming is real, and that the >> whole thing has become nothing but a political tool that is not backed >> by true scientific evidence.... > > He did, he did. He shocked us all. After all, we thought there weren't > any cretins employed by the Weather Channel. It was a big surprise. > > Then again, twenty years ago I knew the co-founder of a software > consultancy who knew nothing about IT. They did a lot of government > work; his principal skill was bribery. So it goes. I knew a guy like that, but he did not use any bribery, but he was a smooth talker, did the front end customer contact, and could talk customer into starting a test trial for a fixed amount of $, absolutily have to have guys like that. > > By the way, from the laudatory tone of your post one would think this > guy was a friend of yours, yet in the same opening sentence you show him > up as a hopelessly demented fuckwit. What gives there? the article is in a pro GW mag, and Coleman is anti-GW > > Next thing you know, McGinn will be quoting him here. Oh, and hell is > full and the dead are walking the earth. What else is new? McGinn, zug-zug.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-12 10:39 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <7df28458-27ac-4e23-9942-ffdda16c04fe@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #685071 |
On Saturday, May 12, 2018 at 9:10:02 AM UTC-7, Lofty Goat wrote: > On Fri, 11 May 2018 18:37:28 -0500, Sergio wrote: > > > John Coleman, co-founder of the Weather Channel, shocked the world and > > the scientific community when he claimed that there is little > > scientific evidence to prove that global warming is real, and that the > > whole thing has become nothing but a political tool that is not backed > > by true scientific evidence.... > > He did, he did. He shocked us all. After all, we thought there weren't > any cretins employed by the Weather Channel. It was a big surprise. > > Then again, twenty years ago I knew the co-founder of a software > consultancy who knew nothing about IT. They did a lot of government > work; his principal skill was bribery. So it goes. > > By the way, from the laudatory tone of your post one would think this > guy was a friend of yours, yet in the same opening sentence you show him > up as a hopelessly demented fuckwit. What gives there? > > Next thing you know, McGinn will be quoting him here. Oh, and hell is > full and the dead are walking the earth. What else is new? > > -- > Goat You simpletons think everything in science is binary. The reality is that there are many different flavors of scientific belief. Coleman is a meteorologist and so he was not a physicist and frankly--like all meteorologists--he does not have a physical understanding of the atmosphere. E As Sergio demonstrates vividly, you don't need to be smart to realize that global warming is just nonsense.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | pnalsing@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-12 14:14 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <0d00b79c-b10e-431d-ad2b-920a6d6bee30@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #685079 |
On Saturday, May 12, 2018 at 10:39:33 AM UTC-7, James McGinn wrote: > You simpletons think everything in science is binary. The reality is that there are many different flavors of scientific belief. Coleman is a meteorologist and so he was not a physicist and frankly--like all meteorologists--he does not have a physical understanding of the atmosphere. Coleman's degree was in journalism. He was a TV weatherman and was never a meteorologist. Just like YOU. Jim, he was not any kind of scientist.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-12 19:09 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <pd7vne$1sb6$3@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #685109 |
On 5/12/2018 4:14 PM, pnalsing@gmail.com wrote: > On Saturday, May 12, 2018 at 10:39:33 AM UTC-7, James McGinn wrote: > >> You simpletons think everything in science is binary. The reality is that there are many different flavors of scientific belief. Coleman is a meteorologist and so he was not a physicist and frankly--like all meteorologists--he does not have a physical understanding of the atmosphere. > > Coleman's degree was in journalism. He was a TV weatherman and was never a meteorologist. Just like YOU. Jim, he was not any kind of scientist. > Hey Jim, ever find your missing Cold Steam ? https://static.pexels.com/photos/45222/forest-fog-nature-winter-45222.jpeg
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Lofty Goat <rlwatkins@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-13 15:38 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <652ffdhj2rptvb5vbc8sohrudd64ejjn78@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #685079 |
On Sat, 12 May 2018 10:39:30 -0700 (PDT), James McGinn wrote: > You simpletons think.... Indeed, hell *is* full and the dead are walking the earth. Jim, at least some of us think. -- Goat
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-12 13:48 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <e4aefd9kctkdvji94ha9na101oo985q16t@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #685071 |
On Sat, 12 May 2018 11:10:14 -0500, Lofty Goat wrote: >On Fri, 11 May 2018 18:37:28 -0500, Sergio wrote: > >> John Coleman, co-founder of the Weather Channel, shocked the world and >> the scientific community when he claimed that there is little >> scientific evidence to prove that global warming is real, and that the >> whole thing has become nothing but a political tool that is not backed >> by true scientific evidence.... > >He did, he did. He shocked us all. It seems he didn't shock some back to reality ... > After all, we thought there weren't >any cretins employed by the Weather Channel. It was a big surprise. > >Then again, twenty years ago I knew the co-founder of a software >consultancy who knew nothing about IT. They did a lot of government >work; his principal skill was bribery. So it goes. > >By the way, from the laudatory tone of your post one would think this >guy was a friend of yours, yet in the same opening sentence you show him >up as a hopelessly demented fuckwit. What gives there? > >Next thing you know, McGinn will be quoting him here. Oh, and hell is >full and the dead are walking the earth. What else is new?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-13 15:44 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <0c0a8298-45fa-40f3-bcba-df780b1f55a0@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #684993 |
On Friday, May 11, 2018 at 7:37:49 PM UTC-4, Sergio wrote: > http://www.techtimes.com/articles/18641/20141025/global-warning-is-a-big-fat-lie-and-the-science-behind-it-is-fake-john-coleman.htm > > John Coleman, co-founder of the Weather Channel, shocked the world and > the scientific community when he claimed that there is little scientific > evidence to prove that global warming is real, and that the whole thing > has become nothing but a political tool that is not backed by true > scientific evidence. Ho hum. Old news. He first spoke out this way in 2007, so not much shock value.
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Page 5 of 5 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 [5]
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web