Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #555713 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-02-22 20:01 -0600 |
| Last post | 2016-02-23 20:22 +0000 |
| Articles | 2 on this page of 22 — 7 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
For meteorology Author James McGinn | What is water vapor? Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-22 20:01 -0600
Re: For meteorology Author James McGinn | What is water vapor? benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-22 22:01 -0500
Re: For meteorology Author James McGinn | What is water vapor? Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-22 21:07 -0600
Re: For meteorology Author James McGinn | What is water vapor? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-02-22 21:27 -0600
Re: For meteorology Author James McGinn | What is water vapor? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-22 20:11 -0800
Re: For meteorology Author James McGinn | What is water vapor? pnalsing@gmail.com - 2016-02-22 21:17 -0800
Re: For meteorology Author James McGinn | What is water vapor? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-22 21:58 -0800
Re: For meteorology Author James McGinn | What is water vapor? pnalsing@gmail.com - 2016-02-22 22:12 -0800
Re: For meteorology Author James McGinn | What is water vapor? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-22 22:15 -0800
Re: For meteorology Author James McGinn | What is water vapor? pnalsing@gmail.com - 2016-02-22 22:20 -0800
Re: For meteorology Author James McGinn | What is water vapor? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-23 11:47 -0800
Re: For meteorology Author James McGinn | What is water vapor? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-23 20:39 +0000
Re: For meteorology Author James McGinn | What is water vapor? pnalsing@gmail.com - 2016-02-23 17:07 -0800
Re: For meteorology Author James McGinn | What is water vapor? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-24 01:21 +0000
Re: For meteorology Author James McGinn | What is water vapor? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-23 07:31 +0000
Re: For meteorology Author James McGinn | What is water vapor? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-23 10:19 -0800
Re: For meteorology Author James McGinn | What is water vapor? noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-02-23 11:37 -0800
Re: For meteorology Author James McGinn | What is water vapor? noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-02-23 12:01 -0800
Re: For meteorology Author James McGinn | What is water vapor? noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-02-23 12:08 -0800
Re: For meteorology Author James McGinn | What is water vapor? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-23 12:16 -0800
Re: For meteorology Author James McGinn | What is water vapor? noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-02-23 17:12 -0800
Re: For meteorology Author James McGinn | What is water vapor? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-23 20:22 +0000
Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]
| From | noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-23 17:12 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <fd71b56e-d556-42d6-98b7-c62991718640@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #555978 |
so, is you money in a safer place > > also, the propogation of lightwaves is solely dependent > > upn the index of refraction (see Snells's laW > > > > > > > My money is safe. > > Yeah, so?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-23 20:22 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <flrupc-v6c.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #555911 |
James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tuesday, February 23, 2016 at 6:05:12 AM UTC-8, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> wrote: >> > On Monday, February 22, 2016 at 6:01:36 PM UTC-8, Sam Wormley wrote: >> >> For meteorology Author James McGinn | What is water vapor? >> >> > http://www.weatherquestions.com/What_is_water_vapor.htm >> >> >> >> >> >> > Water vapor is water in its gaseous state-instead >> > >> > All water vapor, even when it is clear, is liquid. All meteorologists >> > assume as is stated here. But they have never tested it. So their >> > opinion is worthless. >> >> How about all the physicists that have done the experiments? >> >> > There is zero gaseous H2O in earth's atmosphere. I will pay $100,000.00 in >> > US currency to anybody who can demonstrate otherwise. My money is safe. >> > Because it is impossible for H2O to be a gas below its boiling >> > temperature/pressure. Impossible! >> >> I would take you up on the bet but for two things: >> >> 1. Given your delusional state I doubt you could scrape up $100 cash, >> much less $100,000. >> >> 2. If someone did the experiments to prove it in front of you, and you >> watched intead of closing your eyes, sticking your fingers in your ears >> while going la la la la, you would have your delusions shattered and >> likely go catatonic making it impossible to collect. >> >> >> >> -- >> Jim Pennino > > My money is safe. All $3.29 of it. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web