Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #685053 > unrolled thread
| Started by | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-05-12 08:57 -0400 |
| Last post | 2018-05-12 19:13 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 155 — 13 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-12 08:57 -0400
Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-05-12 13:55 -0400
Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-12 18:55 +0000
Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-12 12:03 -0700
Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-05-12 15:16 -0400
Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-05-13 15:52 -0700
Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-05-13 19:02 -0400
Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-05-13 19:13 -0400
Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-05-13 16:35 -0700
Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-05-13 20:06 -0400
Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-05-13 17:43 -0700
Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-13 21:01 -0500
Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Lofty Goat <rlwatkins@gmail.com> - 2018-05-14 20:53 -0500
Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-05-15 11:12 -0700
Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Lofty Goat <rlwatkins@gmail.com> - 2018-05-14 18:57 -0500
Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-05-14 22:40 -0400
Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-05-15 12:00 -0700
Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-05-15 21:59 -0400
Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-05-17 06:05 -0700
Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-05-20 13:13 -0400
Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-20 23:54 -0400
Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-05-21 09:08 -0400
Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-05-21 06:47 -0700
Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-26 09:11 +1000
Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-05-21 06:12 -0700
Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-05-22 00:27 -0400
Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-05-22 07:59 -0400
Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 06:29 -0700
Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-23 11:00 +1000
Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-23 11:17 +1000
Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 06:36 -0700
Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-25 11:11 -0400
Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-26 08:48 +1000
Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-26 08:51 +1000
Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-05-23 00:22 -0400
Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-23 14:31 +1000
Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-23 14:39 +1000
Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-05-23 00:50 -0400
Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-23 15:04 +1000
Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 06:22 -0700
Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-12 12:54 -0700
Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-12 12:58 -0700
Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-05-12 15:14 -0600
Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-12 19:12 -0400
Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-05-12 17:28 -0600
Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-12 16:35 -0700
Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-12 23:57 -0700
Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-13 10:48 -0500
Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-12 19:05 -0500
Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-13 10:30 -0400
Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-05-13 12:54 -0400
Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-13 10:19 -0700
Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-05-13 13:34 -0400
Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-13 10:40 -0700
Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-05-13 13:58 -0400
Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-13 11:09 -0700
Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-13 10:46 -0700
Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-13 19:54 +0000
Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-13 13:13 -0700
Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-05-13 17:58 -0400
Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-13 15:48 -0700
Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-05-13 18:55 -0400
Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-13 16:02 -0700
Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-14 00:43 +0000
Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-13 17:45 -0700
Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-05-13 21:30 -0400
Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-13 18:32 -0700
Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-05-13 21:36 -0400
Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-14 03:43 +0000
Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-13 12:53 -0700
Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-05-13 09:48 -0700
Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-13 08:56 +1000
Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-12 19:20 -0400
Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-12 16:25 -0700
Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-13 09:32 +1000
Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-12 19:02 -0500
Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-13 10:33 -0400
Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-13 12:32 -0400
Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-13 12:01 -0500
Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-13 19:57 +0000
Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-13 13:13 -0700
Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-14 11:24 -0400
Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-14 10:46 -0500
Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-13 12:58 -0700
Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-13 20:19 +0000
Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-13 13:21 -0700
Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-13 20:34 +0000
Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-13 13:45 -0700
Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-13 13:49 -0700
Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-13 13:47 -0700
Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-15 01:43 -0400
Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-15 14:35 -0500
Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-15 12:37 -0700
Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-15 20:19 -0400
Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-15 19:45 -0500
Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-05-12 21:03 -0400
Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-12 18:09 -0700
Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-13 01:19 +0000
Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-12 18:24 -0700
Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-12 21:29 -0400
Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-12 18:30 -0700
Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-13 01:58 +0000
Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-12 19:13 -0700
Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-13 11:54 -0400
Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-13 11:14 -0500
Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-13 20:01 +0000
Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-13 13:14 -0700
Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-13 19:59 +0000
Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-13 13:14 -0700
Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-13 13:25 -0700
Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-13 20:36 +0000
Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-13 13:46 -0700
Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-13 13:49 -0700
Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-05-13 16:19 -0700
Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-05-12 21:40 -0400
Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-13 02:01 +0000
Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-12 19:13 -0700
Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-05-12 22:41 -0400
Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-13 02:56 +0000
Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-05-13 01:42 -0400
Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-05-13 01:52 -0400
Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-13 10:37 -0400
Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-13 12:40 -0400
Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-13 10:42 -0500
Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-13 12:33 -0400
Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-13 12:12 -0400
Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-13 10:36 -0400
Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-05-13 12:17 -0400
Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-14 11:17 -0400
Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-15 15:17 -0500
Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-15 22:55 -0400
Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-15 20:19 -0700
Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-13 12:39 -0400
Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-13 12:11 -0400
Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-13 20:06 +0000
Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-13 13:15 -0700
Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-13 05:38 -0700
Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-13 10:37 -0400
Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-05-13 12:17 -0400
Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-13 12:35 -0400
Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-13 12:01 -0400
Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-12 22:06 -0500
Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-13 12:06 -0400
Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-13 11:57 -0400
Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-13 11:22 -0500
Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-14 11:19 -0400
Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-13 20:08 +0000
Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-13 13:15 -0700
Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-12 22:01 -0500
Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-13 03:12 +0000
Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-05-12 12:29 -0600
Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-12 19:05 -0400
Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-12 16:09 -0700
Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-05-12 21:42 -0400
Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-12 19:13 -0700
Page 4 of 8 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 Next page →
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-13 15:48 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <b974t1.2r6.19.2@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #685315 |
On 2018-05-13 2:58 PM, Wally W. wrote: > On Sun, 13 May 2018 19:54:19 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda wrote: > >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >> On Sun, 13 May 2018 12:54:46 -0400, Wally W. wrote: >> >>> On Sun, 13 May 2018 10:30:33 -0400, kensi wrote: >>> >>>> On 5/12/2018 7:12 PM, benj wrote: >>>>> How does Nads know there is no big ass asteroid? >>>> >>>> She doesn't, perhaps, but I do: >>> >>> No, you don't know that. >>> >>>> http://www.terradaily.com/reports/ >> Earth_Playing_Cosmic_Roulette_With_Asteroids.html >>>> >>>> We've more or less found all the dino-killer-sized ones. >>> >>> A statement of certainty for kensi: "more or less." >>> >>> There couldn't *possibly* be anything they missed, could there? >>> >>> If they "more or less found all the dino-killer-sized ones," then their >>> department can be closed and they can start looking for new jobs, right? >> >> If my understanding is correct, new ones could wander in from the outer >> solar system from time to time ... but if we are vigilant and spot them >> early, the minimum time before they could pose a threat would be measured >> in decades. >> >> Climate change posts a threat right now. Indeed, it has already killed >> people. > > So have the high utility rates driven by the implementation of greenie > brain farts. > rerun
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-13 18:55 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <2aghfdpcbki2q9hqb558ov4spqmf9tgqns@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #685327 |
On Sun, 13 May 2018 15:48:31 -0700, % wrote: >On 2018-05-13 2:58 PM, Wally W. wrote: >> On Sun, 13 May 2018 19:54:19 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda wrote: >> >>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >>> On Sun, 13 May 2018 12:54:46 -0400, Wally W. wrote: >>> >>>> On Sun, 13 May 2018 10:30:33 -0400, kensi wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 5/12/2018 7:12 PM, benj wrote: >>>>>> How does Nads know there is no big ass asteroid? >>>>> >>>>> She doesn't, perhaps, but I do: >>>> >>>> No, you don't know that. >>>> >>>>> http://www.terradaily.com/reports/ >>> Earth_Playing_Cosmic_Roulette_With_Asteroids.html >>>>> >>>>> We've more or less found all the dino-killer-sized ones. >>>> >>>> A statement of certainty for kensi: "more or less." >>>> >>>> There couldn't *possibly* be anything they missed, could there? >>>> >>>> If they "more or less found all the dino-killer-sized ones," then their >>>> department can be closed and they can start looking for new jobs, right? >>> >>> If my understanding is correct, new ones could wander in from the outer >>> solar system from time to time ... but if we are vigilant and spot them >>> early, the minimum time before they could pose a threat would be measured >>> in decades. >>> >>> Climate change posts a threat right now. Indeed, it has already killed >>> people. >> >> So have the high utility rates driven by the implementation of greenie >> brain farts. >> >rerun How much irony is there in someone repetitively spewing one-word "replies" to say "rerun?" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rerun_van_Pelt Rerun van Pelt is Linus' and Lucy's younger brother in Charles M. Schulz's comic strip Peanuts.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-13 16:02 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <b975mk.2r6.19.8@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #685329 |
On 2018-05-13 3:55 PM, Wally W. wrote: > On Sun, 13 May 2018 15:48:31 -0700, % wrote: > >> On 2018-05-13 2:58 PM, Wally W. wrote: >>> On Sun, 13 May 2018 19:54:19 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda wrote: >>> >>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >>>> On Sun, 13 May 2018 12:54:46 -0400, Wally W. wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Sun, 13 May 2018 10:30:33 -0400, kensi wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 5/12/2018 7:12 PM, benj wrote: >>>>>>> How does Nads know there is no big ass asteroid? >>>>>> >>>>>> She doesn't, perhaps, but I do: >>>>> >>>>> No, you don't know that. >>>>> >>>>>> http://www.terradaily.com/reports/ >>>> Earth_Playing_Cosmic_Roulette_With_Asteroids.html >>>>>> >>>>>> We've more or less found all the dino-killer-sized ones. >>>>> >>>>> A statement of certainty for kensi: "more or less." >>>>> >>>>> There couldn't *possibly* be anything they missed, could there? >>>>> >>>>> If they "more or less found all the dino-killer-sized ones," then their >>>>> department can be closed and they can start looking for new jobs, right? >>>> >>>> If my understanding is correct, new ones could wander in from the outer >>>> solar system from time to time ... but if we are vigilant and spot them >>>> early, the minimum time before they could pose a threat would be measured >>>> in decades. >>>> >>>> Climate change posts a threat right now. Indeed, it has already killed >>>> people. >>> >>> So have the high utility rates driven by the implementation of greenie >>> brain farts. >>> >> rerun > > How much irony is there in someone repetitively spewing one-word > "replies" to say "rerun?" > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rerun_van_Pelt > Rerun van Pelt is Linus' and Lucy's younger brother in Charles M. > Schulz's comic strip Peanuts. > the rerun wants to know why i rerun her reruns , its because its a rerun
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-14 00:43 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pdam3b$jvq$19@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #685315 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Sun, 13 May 2018 17:58:02 -0400, Wally W. wrote: > On Sun, 13 May 2018 19:54:19 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda wrote: > >>Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >>On Sun, 13 May 2018 12:54:46 -0400, Wally W. wrote: >> >>> On Sun, 13 May 2018 10:30:33 -0400, kensi wrote: >>> >>>>On 5/12/2018 7:12 PM, benj wrote: >>>>> How does Nads know there is no big ass asteroid? >>>> >>>>She doesn't, perhaps, but I do: >>> >>> No, you don't know that. >>> >>>>http://www.terradaily.com/reports/ >>Earth_Playing_Cosmic_Roulette_With_Asteroids.html >>>> >>>>We've more or less found all the dino-killer-sized ones. >>> >>> A statement of certainty for kensi: "more or less." >>> >>> There couldn't *possibly* be anything they missed, could there? >>> >>> If they "more or less found all the dino-killer-sized ones," then >>> their department can be closed and they can start looking for new >>> jobs, right? >> >>If my understanding is correct, new ones could wander in from the outer >>solar system from time to time ... but if we are vigilant and spot them >>early, the minimum time before they could pose a threat would be >>measured in decades. >> >>Climate change posts a threat right now. Indeed, it has already killed >>people. > > So have the high utility rates driven by the implementation of greenie > brain farts. [citation needed] -- FNVWe Nadegda Fakey couldn't teach a monkey to eat a banana, much less answer a direct question posed to him. -- Fakey's Dogwhistle Holder
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-13 17:45 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <b97boc.qqf.19.10@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #685349 |
On 2018-05-13 5:43 PM, Nadegda wrote: > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > On Sun, 13 May 2018 17:58:02 -0400, Wally W. wrote: > >> On Sun, 13 May 2018 19:54:19 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda wrote: >> >>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >>> On Sun, 13 May 2018 12:54:46 -0400, Wally W. wrote: >>> >>>> On Sun, 13 May 2018 10:30:33 -0400, kensi wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 5/12/2018 7:12 PM, benj wrote: >>>>>> How does Nads know there is no big ass asteroid? >>>>> >>>>> She doesn't, perhaps, but I do: >>>> >>>> No, you don't know that. >>>> >>>>> http://www.terradaily.com/reports/ >>> Earth_Playing_Cosmic_Roulette_With_Asteroids.html >>>>> >>>>> We've more or less found all the dino-killer-sized ones. >>>> >>>> A statement of certainty for kensi: "more or less." >>>> >>>> There couldn't *possibly* be anything they missed, could there? >>>> >>>> If they "more or less found all the dino-killer-sized ones," then >>>> their department can be closed and they can start looking for new >>>> jobs, right? >>> >>> If my understanding is correct, new ones could wander in from the outer >>> solar system from time to time ... but if we are vigilant and spot them >>> early, the minimum time before they could pose a threat would be >>> measured in decades. >>> >>> Climate change posts a threat right now. Indeed, it has already killed >>> people. >> >> So have the high utility rates driven by the implementation of greenie >> brain farts. > > [citation needed] > rerun
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-13 21:30 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <j7phfd1npbg32tllqhjn4hq1nq52f474al@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #685349 |
On Mon, 14 May 2018 00:43:23 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda wrote: >Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >On Sun, 13 May 2018 17:58:02 -0400, Wally W. wrote: > >> On Sun, 13 May 2018 19:54:19 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda wrote: >> >>>Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >>>On Sun, 13 May 2018 12:54:46 -0400, Wally W. wrote: >>> >>>> On Sun, 13 May 2018 10:30:33 -0400, kensi wrote: >>>> >>>>>On 5/12/2018 7:12 PM, benj wrote: >>>>>> How does Nads know there is no big ass asteroid? >>>>> >>>>>She doesn't, perhaps, but I do: >>>> >>>> No, you don't know that. >>>> >>>>>http://www.terradaily.com/reports/ >>>Earth_Playing_Cosmic_Roulette_With_Asteroids.html >>>>> >>>>>We've more or less found all the dino-killer-sized ones. >>>> >>>> A statement of certainty for kensi: "more or less." >>>> >>>> There couldn't *possibly* be anything they missed, could there? >>>> >>>> If they "more or less found all the dino-killer-sized ones," then >>>> their department can be closed and they can start looking for new >>>> jobs, right? >>> >>>If my understanding is correct, new ones could wander in from the outer >>>solar system from time to time ... but if we are vigilant and spot them >>>early, the minimum time before they could pose a threat would be >>>measured in decades. >>> >>>Climate change posts a threat right now. Indeed, it has already killed >>>people. >> >> So have the high utility rates driven by the implementation of greenie >> brain farts. > >[citation needed] <https://www.independent.co.uk/news/business/news/cold-weather-uk-winter-deaths-europe-polar-vortex-a8224276.html> Fuel poverty crisis: 3,000 Britons dying each year because they can't heat their homes, study shows <https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/fuel-poverty-killed-15000-people-last-winter-10217215.html> An estimated 15,000 people died unnecessarily between December and March because they were living in homes they couldn’t afford to heat, new figures show. <https://www.jrf.org.uk/sites/default/files/jrf/migrated/files/fuel-poverty-policy-summary.pdf> Energy price rises since 2003 have increased fuel poverty levels ... and now that you have more than one cite ...?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-13 18:32 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <b97egs.2ub.19.1@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #685359 |
On 2018-05-13 6:30 PM, Wally W. wrote: > On Mon, 14 May 2018 00:43:23 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda wrote: > >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >> On Sun, 13 May 2018 17:58:02 -0400, Wally W. wrote: >> >>> On Sun, 13 May 2018 19:54:19 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda wrote: >>> >>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >>>> On Sun, 13 May 2018 12:54:46 -0400, Wally W. wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Sun, 13 May 2018 10:30:33 -0400, kensi wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 5/12/2018 7:12 PM, benj wrote: >>>>>>> How does Nads know there is no big ass asteroid? >>>>>> >>>>>> She doesn't, perhaps, but I do: >>>>> >>>>> No, you don't know that. >>>>> >>>>>> http://www.terradaily.com/reports/ >>>> Earth_Playing_Cosmic_Roulette_With_Asteroids.html >>>>>> >>>>>> We've more or less found all the dino-killer-sized ones. >>>>> >>>>> A statement of certainty for kensi: "more or less." >>>>> >>>>> There couldn't *possibly* be anything they missed, could there? >>>>> >>>>> If they "more or less found all the dino-killer-sized ones," then >>>>> their department can be closed and they can start looking for new >>>>> jobs, right? >>>> >>>> If my understanding is correct, new ones could wander in from the outer >>>> solar system from time to time ... but if we are vigilant and spot them >>>> early, the minimum time before they could pose a threat would be >>>> measured in decades. >>>> >>>> Climate change posts a threat right now. Indeed, it has already killed >>>> people. >>> >>> So have the high utility rates driven by the implementation of greenie >>> brain farts. >> >> [citation needed] > > <https://www.independent.co.uk/news/business/news/cold-weather-uk-winter-deaths-europe-polar-vortex-a8224276.html> > Fuel poverty crisis: 3,000 Britons dying each year because they can't > heat their homes, study shows > > <https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/fuel-poverty-killed-15000-people-last-winter-10217215.html> > An estimated 15,000 people died unnecessarily between December and > March because they were living in homes they couldn’t afford to heat, > new figures show. > > <https://www.jrf.org.uk/sites/default/files/jrf/migrated/files/fuel-poverty-policy-summary.pdf> > Energy price rises since 2003 have increased fuel poverty levels > > ... and now that you have more than one cite ...? > are you going to blind me
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-13 21:36 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <otphfdlra9fti55cqvo00i3smehtr3e5ao@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #685360 |
On Sun, 13 May 2018 18:32:42 -0700, % wrote: >On 2018-05-13 6:30 PM, Wally W. wrote: >> On Mon, 14 May 2018 00:43:23 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda wrote: >> >>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >>> On Sun, 13 May 2018 17:58:02 -0400, Wally W. wrote: >>> >>>> On Sun, 13 May 2018 19:54:19 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda wrote: >>>> >>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >>>>> On Sun, 13 May 2018 12:54:46 -0400, Wally W. wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On Sun, 13 May 2018 10:30:33 -0400, kensi wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 5/12/2018 7:12 PM, benj wrote: >>>>>>>> How does Nads know there is no big ass asteroid? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> She doesn't, perhaps, but I do: >>>>>> >>>>>> No, you don't know that. >>>>>> >>>>>>> http://www.terradaily.com/reports/ >>>>> Earth_Playing_Cosmic_Roulette_With_Asteroids.html >>>>>>> >>>>>>> We've more or less found all the dino-killer-sized ones. >>>>>> >>>>>> A statement of certainty for kensi: "more or less." >>>>>> >>>>>> There couldn't *possibly* be anything they missed, could there? >>>>>> >>>>>> If they "more or less found all the dino-killer-sized ones," then >>>>>> their department can be closed and they can start looking for new >>>>>> jobs, right? >>>>> >>>>> If my understanding is correct, new ones could wander in from the outer >>>>> solar system from time to time ... but if we are vigilant and spot them >>>>> early, the minimum time before they could pose a threat would be >>>>> measured in decades. >>>>> >>>>> Climate change posts a threat right now. Indeed, it has already killed >>>>> people. >>>> >>>> So have the high utility rates driven by the implementation of greenie >>>> brain farts. >>> >>> [citation needed] >> >> <https://www.independent.co.uk/news/business/news/cold-weather-uk-winter-deaths-europe-polar-vortex-a8224276.html> >> Fuel poverty crisis: 3,000 Britons dying each year because they can't >> heat their homes, study shows >> >> <https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/fuel-poverty-killed-15000-people-last-winter-10217215.html> >> An estimated 15,000 people died unnecessarily between December and >> March because they were living in homes they couldn’t afford to heat, >> new figures show. >> >> <https://www.jrf.org.uk/sites/default/files/jrf/migrated/files/fuel-poverty-policy-summary.pdf> >> Energy price rises since 2003 have increased fuel poverty levels >> >> ... and now that you have more than one cite ...? >> >are you going to blind me What?! You asked for a cite. You got more than you asked for. Why did you ask for a cite? Now that you have at least one, it is your turn.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-14 03:43 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pdb0la$jvq$23@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #685359 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Sun, 13 May 2018 21:30:11 -0400, Wally W. wrote: > On Mon, 14 May 2018 00:43:23 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda wrote: > >>Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >>On Sun, 13 May 2018 17:58:02 -0400, Wally W. wrote: >> >>> On Sun, 13 May 2018 19:54:19 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda wrote: >>> >>>>Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>>>melt! >>>>On Sun, 13 May 2018 12:54:46 -0400, Wally W. wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Sun, 13 May 2018 10:30:33 -0400, kensi wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On 5/12/2018 7:12 PM, benj wrote: >>>>>>> How does Nads know there is no big ass asteroid? >>>>>> >>>>>>She doesn't, perhaps, but I do: >>>>> >>>>> No, you don't know that. >>>>> >>>>>>http://www.terradaily.com/reports/ >>>>Earth_Playing_Cosmic_Roulette_With_Asteroids.html >>>>>> >>>>>>We've more or less found all the dino-killer-sized ones. >>>>> >>>>> A statement of certainty for kensi: "more or less." >>>>> >>>>> There couldn't *possibly* be anything they missed, could there? >>>>> >>>>> If they "more or less found all the dino-killer-sized ones," then >>>>> their department can be closed and they can start looking for new >>>>> jobs, right? >>>> >>>>If my understanding is correct, new ones could wander in from the >>>>outer solar system from time to time ... but if we are vigilant and >>>>spot them early, the minimum time before they could pose a threat >>>>would be measured in decades. >>>> >>>>Climate change posts a threat right now. Indeed, it has already killed >>>>people. >>> >>> So have the high utility rates driven by the implementation of greenie >>> brain farts. >> >>[citation needed] > > <https://www.independent.co.uk/news/business/news/cold-weather-uk-winter- deaths-europe-polar-vortex-a8224276.html> > Fuel poverty crisis: 3,000 Britons dying each year because they can't > heat their homes, study shows > > <https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/fuel-poverty- killed-15000-people-last-winter-10217215.html> > An estimated 15,000 people died unnecessarily between December and March > because they were living in homes they couldnt afford to heat, > new figures show. > > <https://www.jrf.org.uk/sites/default/files/jrf/migrated/files/fuel- poverty-policy-summary.pdf> > Energy price rises since 2003 have increased fuel poverty levels > > ... and now that you have more than one cite ...? Sounds like a combination of high oil prices and neoliberalism eroding the safety net to me. Where's the link to renewable power? Oh, wait, there isn't one, because all three links are about oil prices rather than electricity rates. -- FNVWe Nadegda Fakey couldn't teach a monkey to eat a banana, much less answer a direct question posed to him. -- Fakey's Dogwhistle Holder
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-13 12:53 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.3562378b82b9bafc9939bc@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #685199 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate! In article <pd9i69$8qs$1@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01 @gmail.nospam.invalid says... > Subject: Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report > From: kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> > Newsgroups: sci.physics, talk.politics.guns, alt.checkmate > > On 5/12/2018 7:12 PM, benj wrote: > > How does Nads know there is no big ass asteroid? > > She doesn't, perhaps, but I do: > > http://www.terradaily.com/reports/Earth_Playing_Cosmic_Roulette_With_Asteroids.html > > We've more or less found all the dino-killer-sized ones. None poses a > near-term threat to Earth. There are a few in the kilometer range -- a > few times smaller and 1/100 or less the mass -- that we haven't found > and a few more that may at least pass close by some decades in the > future, but none known to be on a collision course. The major risk is a > Tunguska-sized or Chelyabinsk-sized object hitting either ocean or a > populated area. (As Tunguska itself demonstrated, one this size hitting > low-population-density land is not much of a threat.) > > The risks from climate change are also well-documented: sea-level rise, > floods, fires, supercharged storms, droughts affecting cities' water > supplies, disruptions to agriculture from droughts and other causes, > shifts in pest and disease ranges (mostly expansion to higher > latitudes), and lethal heat waves. And probably more. > "BLOBBITY-BLOBBITY-BLAH-BLAH-BLUH... Whining about it on Usenet every day is bound to gain traction eventually..." -- Checkmate ® Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Copyright © 2018 all rights reserved In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017 "There are many here among us, who feel that life is but a joke." "I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as kensi." -Nadegda Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-13 09:48 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <52f4cee3-80b7-43b0-99b8-f825a10e68b9@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #685092 |
On Saturday, May 12, 2018 at 11:55:40 AM UTC-7, Nadegda wrote: > Meanwhile, climate change is already causing damage. New > Orleans 2005. New York 2012. Houston, Florida, and Puerto Rico 2017. > Ongoing flooding issues in Miami. Massive wildfires in the west. Lethal > heat-waves in France. And on it goes ... This is direct evidence that people that believe in global warming are stupid.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-13 08:56 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <flp9pcFnv8U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #685083 |
On 13/05/2018 3:55 AM, Wally W. wrote: > On Sat, 12 May 2018 08:57:03 -0400, kensi wrote: > >> UN Climate Change today launched its first-ever Annual Report, > > Maybe it will also be its last? **Unlikely. > > >> laying >> out the key 2017 achievements and pointing to the future of the climate >> change process. "Climate Change is the single biggest threat to life, >> security and prosperity on Earth," > > That's deluded. **Well, no, it isn't. It's quite factual. > > It pales in comparison to the threat from a big ass asteroid. > **Perhaps. * When do you expect a "big ass asteroid" to hit? * What can we do to prevent a "big ass asteroid" from hitting Earth? * Given the possibility that a "big ass asteroid" may hit us sometime in the (unspecified) future, should we plan to find a way to deal with that eventuality? * Given the fact that global warming is occurring right now and it's effects are being felt right now, do you think we should deal with the problem now? * Do you think it is possible that we can (try to) deal with global warming and a "big ass asteroid" simultaneously? Or can 7.5 billion humans only deal with one problem at a time? BTW: NASA and other organisations already track "big ass asteroids" so we can prepare for such an event. -- Trevor Wilson www.rageaudio.com.au
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-12 19:20 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <wFKJC.36576$1a5.10650@fx09.iad> |
| In reply to | #685122 |
On 5/12/2018 6:56 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote: > On 13/05/2018 3:55 AM, Wally W. wrote: >> On Sat, 12 May 2018 08:57:03 -0400, kensi wrote: >> >>> UN Climate Change today launched its first-ever Annual Report, >> >> Maybe it will also be its last? > > **Unlikely. > >> >> >>> laying >>> out the key 2017 achievements and pointing to the future of the climate >>> change process. "Climate Change is the single biggest threat to life, >>> security and prosperity on Earth," >> >> That's deluded. > > **Well, no, it isn't. It's quite factual. > >> >> It pales in comparison to the threat from a big ass asteroid. >> > > **Perhaps. > * When do you expect a "big ass asteroid" to hit? > * What can we do to prevent a "big ass asteroid" from hitting Earth? > * Given the possibility that a "big ass asteroid" may hit us sometime in > the (unspecified) future, should we plan to find a way to deal with that > eventuality? > * Given the fact that global warming is occurring right now and it's > effects are being felt right now, do you think we should deal with the > problem now? > * Do you think it is possible that we can (try to) deal with global > warming and a "big ass asteroid" simultaneously? Or can 7.5 billion > humans only deal with one problem at a time? > > BTW: NASA and other organisations already track "big ass asteroids" so > we can prepare for such an event. > > Prepare? Oh yeah, I saw the movie. Just send our heroes and blow it up! Except of course that was lefty Hollywood Lib "science". If you blow it up the center of mass of the debris still hits the earth. Maybe all the "wind" from global warming will deflect it at the last minute (in Hollywood the "save" is always at the last minute). Basically all you really can do is put your head between your knees and kiss your ass goodbye.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-12 16:25 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <b94ime.38u.17.3@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #685131 |
On 2018-05-12 4:20 PM, benj wrote: > On 5/12/2018 6:56 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >> On 13/05/2018 3:55 AM, Wally W. wrote: >>> On Sat, 12 May 2018 08:57:03 -0400, kensi wrote: >>> >>>> UN Climate Change today launched its first-ever Annual Report, >>> >>> Maybe it will also be its last? >> >> **Unlikely. >> >>> >>> >>>> laying >>>> out the key 2017 achievements and pointing to the future of the climate >>>> change process. "Climate Change is the single biggest threat to life, >>>> security and prosperity on Earth," >>> >>> That's deluded. >> >> **Well, no, it isn't. It's quite factual. >> >>> >>> It pales in comparison to the threat from a big ass asteroid. >>> >> >> **Perhaps. >> * When do you expect a "big ass asteroid" to hit? >> * What can we do to prevent a "big ass asteroid" from hitting Earth? >> * Given the possibility that a "big ass asteroid" may hit us sometime >> in the (unspecified) future, should we plan to find a way to deal with >> that eventuality? >> * Given the fact that global warming is occurring right now and it's >> effects are being felt right now, do you think we should deal with the >> problem now? >> * Do you think it is possible that we can (try to) deal with global >> warming and a "big ass asteroid" simultaneously? Or can 7.5 billion >> humans only deal with one problem at a time? >> >> BTW: NASA and other organisations already track "big ass asteroids" so >> we can prepare for such an event. >> >> > Prepare? Oh yeah, I saw the movie. Just send our heroes and blow it up! > > Except of course that was lefty Hollywood Lib "science". If you blow it > up the center of mass of the debris still hits the earth. Maybe all the > "wind" from global warming will deflect it at the last minute (in > Hollywood the "save" is always at the last minute). > > Basically all you really can do is put your head between your knees and > kiss your ass goodbye. > > > my ass isn't between me knees
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-13 09:32 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <flpbslF15fsU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #685131 |
On 13/05/2018 9:20 AM, benj wrote: > On 5/12/2018 6:56 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >> On 13/05/2018 3:55 AM, Wally W. wrote: >>> On Sat, 12 May 2018 08:57:03 -0400, kensi wrote: >>> >>>> UN Climate Change today launched its first-ever Annual Report, >>> >>> Maybe it will also be its last? >> >> **Unlikely. >> >>> >>> >>>> laying >>>> out the key 2017 achievements and pointing to the future of the climate >>>> change process. "Climate Change is the single biggest threat to life, >>>> security and prosperity on Earth," >>> >>> That's deluded. >> >> **Well, no, it isn't. It's quite factual. >> >>> >>> It pales in comparison to the threat from a big ass asteroid. >>> >> >> **Perhaps. >> * When do you expect a "big ass asteroid" to hit? >> * What can we do to prevent a "big ass asteroid" from hitting Earth? >> * Given the possibility that a "big ass asteroid" may hit us sometime >> in the (unspecified) future, should we plan to find a way to deal with >> that eventuality? >> * Given the fact that global warming is occurring right now and it's >> effects are being felt right now, do you think we should deal with the >> problem now? >> * Do you think it is possible that we can (try to) deal with global >> warming and a "big ass asteroid" simultaneously? Or can 7.5 billion >> humans only deal with one problem at a time? >> >> BTW: NASA and other organisations already track "big ass asteroids" so >> we can prepare for such an event. >> >> > Prepare? Oh yeah, I saw the movie. Just send our heroes and blow it up! **Movies are not necessarily real life. The whole idea of tracking dangerous asteroids, is so that we may have a chance of dealing with the asteroid and/or it's ramifications. If, for instance, we have 10 years' warning of a "big ass asteroid", then it MAY be possible to nudge it into a different orbit. Maybe. > > Except of course that was lefty Hollywood Lib "science". If you blow it > up the center of mass of the debris still hits the earth. Maybe all the > "wind" from global warming will deflect it at the last minute (in > Hollywood the "save" is always at the last minute). > > Basically all you really can do is put your head between your knees and > kiss your ass goodbye. **Incorrect: https://www.nasa.gov/planetarydefense/faq -- Trevor Wilson www.rageaudio.com.au
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-12 19:02 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <pd7vbg$1sb6$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #685137 |
On 5/12/2018 6:32 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote: > On 13/05/2018 9:20 AM, benj wrote: >> On 5/12/2018 6:56 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>> On 13/05/2018 3:55 AM, Wally W. wrote: >>>> On Sat, 12 May 2018 08:57:03 -0400, kensi wrote: >>>> >>>>> UN Climate Change today launched its first-ever Annual Report, >>>> >>>> Maybe it will also be its last? >>> >>> **Unlikely. >>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> laying >>>>> out the key 2017 achievements and pointing to the future of the >>>>> climate >>>>> change process. "Climate Change is the single biggest threat to life, >>>>> security and prosperity on Earth," >>>> >>>> That's deluded. >>> >>> **Well, no, it isn't. It's quite factual. >>> >>>> >>>> It pales in comparison to the threat from a big ass asteroid. >>>> >>> >>> **Perhaps. >>> * When do you expect a "big ass asteroid" to hit? >>> * What can we do to prevent a "big ass asteroid" from hitting Earth? >>> * Given the possibility that a "big ass asteroid" may hit us sometime >>> in the (unspecified) future, should we plan to find a way to deal >>> with that eventuality? >>> * Given the fact that global warming is occurring right now and it's >>> effects are being felt right now, do you think we should deal with >>> the problem now? >>> * Do you think it is possible that we can (try to) deal with global >>> warming and a "big ass asteroid" simultaneously? Or can 7.5 billion >>> humans only deal with one problem at a time? >>> >>> BTW: NASA and other organisations already track "big ass asteroids" >>> so we can prepare for such an event. >>> >>> >> Prepare? Oh yeah, I saw the movie. Just send our heroes and blow it up! > > **Movies are not necessarily real life. The whole idea of tracking > dangerous asteroids, is so that we may have a chance of dealing with the > asteroid and/or it's ramifications. If, for instance, we have 10 years' > warning of a "big ass asteroid", then it MAY be possible to nudge it > into a different orbit. Maybe. nope. That movie sucked too. take a 10,000 # asteroid moving at 20,000 mph, What is the force needed to change its direction by x degrees ? how slowly must the force be applied so as not to tare apart the asteroid ? how do you aim and time a rocket thruster bolted to an asteroid when the asteroid is spinning in 1 or 2 axis ? when you know that, you can tell Bruce Willis to go fix it. from your nasa link; "Deflecting an asteroid that is on an impact course with Earth requires changing the velocity of the object by less than an inch per second years in advance of the predicted impact. The two most promising techniques that NASA is investigating are the kinetic impactor (hitting an asteroid with an object to slightly slow it down) and the gravity tractor (gravitationally tugging on an asteroid by station-keeping a large mass near it)." so who is going to put that fat ass tugger up there? Elon Musk can send 20,000 Teslas up in a bunch.... > >> >> Except of course that was lefty Hollywood Lib "science". If you blow >> it up the center of mass of the debris still hits the earth. Maybe all >> the "wind" from global warming will deflect it at the last minute (in >> Hollywood the "save" is always at the last minute). >> >> Basically all you really can do is put your head between your knees >> and kiss your ass goodbye. > > **Incorrect: > > https://www.nasa.gov/planetarydefense/faq > >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-13 10:33 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <pd9icf$94k$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #685141 |
On 5/12/2018 8:02 PM, Sergio wrote: > nope. That movie sucked too. > take a 10,000 # asteroid moving at 20,000 mph, > What is the force needed to change its direction by x degrees ? Try making actual sense, and then maybe I could calculate it. > how slowly must the force be applied so as not to tare apart the asteroid ? "Tare"? > how do you aim and time a rocket thruster bolted to an asteroid when the > asteroid is spinning Mount it at a pole. Or kill the spin. Or use a gravitational tractor, for which the spin is irrelevant. Or use a damn clock. If we can make a solar panel that turns to stay facing the sun we can do this. > in 1 or 2 axis ? *headdesk* *headdesk* *headdesk* You fail physics, and mathematics, forever. -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-13 12:32 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <vMZJC.137700$br4.74756@fx34.iad> |
| In reply to | #685200 |
On 5/13/2018 10:33 AM, kensi wrote: > On 5/12/2018 8:02 PM, Sergio wrote: >> nope. That movie sucked too. >> take a 10,000 # asteroid moving at 20,000 mph, >> What is the force needed to change its direction by x degrees ? > > Try making actual sense, and then maybe I could calculate it. > >> how slowly must the force be applied so as not to tare apart the >> asteroid ? > > "Tare"? Lefty Libs only do spelling and grammar, SErgio. They know nothing else. >> how do you aim and time a rocket thruster bolted to an asteroid when the >> asteroid is spinning > > Mount it at a pole. Or kill the spin. Or use a gravitational tractor, > for which the spin is irrelevant. Or use a damn clock. If we can make a > solar panel that turns to stay facing the sun we can do this. > >> in 1 or 2 axis ? > > *headdesk* > *headdesk* > *headdesk* > > You fail physics, and mathematics, forever. > Damn, Sergio! Don't you watch any TV or movies? Obviously Earth can be saved with the simple application of a "Tractor beam"! I've personally seen those green beams move asteroids MANY times! You sure don't know your science!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-13 12:01 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <pd9r10$ocm$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #685218 |
On 5/13/2018 11:32 AM, benj wrote: > On 5/13/2018 10:33 AM, kensi wrote: >> On 5/12/2018 8:02 PM, Sergio wrote: >>> nope. That movie sucked too. >>> take a 10,000 # asteroid moving at 20,000 mph, >>> What is the force needed to change its direction by x degrees ? >> >> Try making actual sense, and then maybe I could calculate it. >> >>> how slowly must the force be applied so as not to tare apart the >>> asteroid ? >> >> "Tare"? > > Lefty Libs only do spelling and grammar, SErgio. They know nothing else. I throw those in to aggravate the engrlish and other non-science teachers > >>> how do you aim and time a rocket thruster bolted to an asteroid when the >>> asteroid is spinning >> >> Mount it at a pole. Or kill the spin. Or use a gravitational tractor, >> for which the spin is irrelevant. Or use a damn clock. If we can make >> a solar panel that turns to stay facing the sun we can do this. >> >>> in 1 or 2 axis ? >> >> *headdesk* >> *headdesk* >> *headdesk* >> >> You fail physics, and mathematics, forever. >> > Damn, Sergio! Don't you watch any TV or movies? Obviously Earth can be > saved with the simple application of a "Tractor beam"! I've personally > seen those green beams move asteroids MANY times! You sure don't know > your science! HeY! Kalifornia just mandated, SOLAR PANELS ON EVERY HOUSE, so stupid. they should have done solar farms instead. Guess they did not want to pay for that, and now soak the homeowner to prop up Elon Musk. Solar mounting must be flat on the roof IAW Kaliforna laws. loose 50% of solar power because the panels do not track the sun, (a solar farm tracks the sun.) they loose another 50% because they only get morning sun or afternoon sun, and must be mounted with a poor angle to the sun, (not 90 degrees) so from the get go, Kalifornia has doomed their solar power industry, by only being able to collect only 25%. so they blew out their cost analysis, mounting on homes is far more expensive than a solar farm, and with the panels poorly orentated the cost is 4 times more. kensi pupa's *headdesk* is simply a way to change the subject, refer to emotional no think, rather than discuss the reality of system losses in Solar power, because 'she' can't, too girly?, dosen't know it, like McGinn discussing Water Vapor, almost.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-13 19:57 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pda5ah$jvq$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #685229 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Sun, 13 May 2018 12:01:20 -0500, Sergio wrote: > On 5/13/2018 11:32 AM, benj wrote: >> On 5/13/2018 10:33 AM, kensi wrote: >>> On 5/12/2018 8:02 PM, Sergio wrote: >>>> nope. That movie sucked too. >>>> take a 10,000 # asteroid moving at 20,000 mph, >>>> What is the force needed to change its direction by x degrees ? >>> >>> Try making actual sense, and then maybe I could calculate it. >>> >>>> how slowly must the force be applied so as not to tare apart the >>>> asteroid ? >>> >>> "Tare"? >> >> Lefty Libs only do spelling and grammar, SErgio. They know nothing >> else. > > I throw those in to aggravate the engrlish and other non-science > teachers > > >>>> how do you aim and time a rocket thruster bolted to an asteroid when >>>> the asteroid is spinning >>> >>> Mount it at a pole. Or kill the spin. Or use a gravitational tractor, >>> for which the spin is irrelevant. Or use a damn clock. If we can make >>> a solar panel that turns to stay facing the sun we can do this. >>> >>>> in 1 or 2 axis ? >>> >>> *headdesk* >>> *headdesk* >>> *headdesk* >>> >>> You fail physics, and mathematics, forever. >>> >> Damn, Sergio! Don't you watch any TV or movies? Obviously Earth can be >> saved with the simple application of a "Tractor beam"! I've personally >> seen those green beams move asteroids MANY times! You sure don't know >> your science! > > > HeY! Kalifornia just mandated, SOLAR PANELS ON EVERY HOUSE, so stupid. > > they should have done solar farms instead. > > Guess they did not want to pay for that, and now soak the homeowner to > prop up Elon Musk. > > Solar mounting must be flat on the roof IAW Kaliforna laws. > > loose 50% of solar power because the panels do not track the sun, (a > solar farm tracks the sun.) > > they loose another 50% because they only get morning sun or afternoon > sun, and must be mounted with a poor angle to the sun, (not 90 degrees) > > so from the get go, Kalifornia has doomed their solar power industry, by > only being able to collect only 25%. > > so they blew out their cost analysis, mounting on homes is far more > expensive than a solar farm, and with the panels poorly orentated the > cost is 4 times more. > > kensi pupa's *headdesk* is simply a way to change the subject, refer to > emotional no think, rather than discuss the reality of system losses in > Solar power, because 'she' can't, too girly?, dosen't know it, like > McGinn discussing Water Vapor, almost. No, kensi's *headdesk* is because you two kooks apparently think space is four-dimensional, despite having both spent enough years living in it to have learned semi-decent grade-school English. -- FNVWe Nadegda Fakey couldn't teach a monkey to eat a banana, much less answer a direct question posed to him. -- Fakey's Dogwhistle Holder
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 4 of 8 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web