Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #537083 > unrolled thread

Trapping climate pollutant methane gas in porous carbon

Started bySam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com>
First post2015-12-02 21:20 -0600
Last post2015-12-03 14:35 -0600
Articles 3 — 3 participants

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics


Contents

  Trapping climate pollutant methane gas in porous carbon Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-02 21:20 -0600
    Re: Trapping climate pollutant methane gas in porous carbon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-12-03 03:47 +0000
    Re: Trapping climate pollutant methane gas in porous carbon gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> - 2015-12-03 14:35 -0600

#537083 — Trapping climate pollutant methane gas in porous carbon

FromSam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com>
Date2015-12-02 21:20 -0600
SubjectTrapping climate pollutant methane gas in porous carbon
Message-ID<8PydndQvLqFmKcLLnZ2dnUU7-IkAAAAA@giganews.com>
Trapping climate pollutant methane gas in porous carbon
> http://phys.org/news/2015-12-climate-pollutant-methane-gas-porous.html


> Activated carbon, which is a type of carbon material containing
> numerous nanopores, is often used to adsorb gases in the energy
> sector. The authors chose to use computational methods to study the
> influence of intermolecular interactions between different types of
> molecules - in this case, they simplified the approach by limiting it
> to methane and activated carbon - on adsorption. Their goal was to
> identify molecular interactions that could prevent such a process.
>
> First, they employed a standard simulation approach, which was dubbed
> grand canonical Monte Carlo simulations. Parallel to that, they used
> a simple lattice gas model coupled with equations describing the
> intermolecular interactions, otherwise referred to as classical
> density functional theory. They found that both approaches yielded
> qualitative agreement with previously published experimental data.
> However, the second approach yielded results more in line with
> experimental data for gases adsorbed into carbon materials when
> equations are amended through simple corrections pertaining to energy
> levels, rather than by corrections related to the difference in the
> size of the various molecules involved.
>

-- 

sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
community, and physics-related social issues.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#537088

Fromjimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
Date2015-12-03 03:47 +0000
Message-ID<fkq4jc-oh.ln1@mail.specsol.com>
In reply to#537083
Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote:
> Trapping climate pollutant methane gas in porous carbon
>> http://phys.org/news/2015-12-climate-pollutant-methane-gas-porous.html
> 
> 
>> Activated carbon, which is a type of carbon material containing
>> numerous nanopores, is often used to adsorb gases in the energy
>> sector. The authors chose to use computational methods to study the
>> influence of intermolecular interactions between different types of
>> molecules - in this case, they simplified the approach by limiting it
>> to methane and activated carbon - on adsorption. Their goal was to
>> identify molecular interactions that could prevent such a process.
>>
>> First, they employed a standard simulation approach, which was dubbed
>> grand canonical Monte Carlo simulations. Parallel to that, they used
>> a simple lattice gas model coupled with equations describing the
>> intermolecular interactions, otherwise referred to as classical
>> density functional theory. They found that both approaches yielded
>> qualitative agreement with previously published experimental data.
>> However, the second approach yielded results more in line with
>> experimental data for gases adsorbed into carbon materials when
>> equations are amended through simple corrections pertaining to energy
>> levels, rather than by corrections related to the difference in the
>> size of the various molecules involved.

Then burn the methane enriched carbon, hot damn.
 

-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#537201

Fromgilber34 <fafa@invalid.com>
Date2015-12-03 14:35 -0600
Message-ID<n3q934$9cp$1@speranza.aioe.org>
In reply to#537083
On 12/2/2015 9:20 PM, Sam Wormley wrote:
> Trapping climate pollutant methane gas in porous carbon
>> http://phys.org/news/2015-12-climate-pollutant-methane-gas-porous.html

>
>> Activated carbon, which is a type of carbon material containing
>> numerous nanopores, is often used to adsorb gases in the energy
>> sector. The authors chose to use computational methods to study the
>> influence of intermolecular interactions between different types of
>> molecules - in this case, they simplified the approach by limiting it
>> to methane and activated carbon - on adsorption. Their goal was to
>> identify molecular interactions that could prevent such a process.

did you know Activated Carbon = COAL with the volatils driven out ?

how do you ATTACH these chunks of roasted COAL onto COW BUTTS ?

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | sci.physics


csiph-web