Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #680176 > unrolled thread
| Started by | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-04-07 10:33 -0400 |
| Last post | 2018-04-11 10:46 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 191 — 28 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-07 10:33 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-07 09:48 -0500
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-07 11:23 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-07 10:33 -0500
" Repent, The End is Near, I personally guarantee it ! " -- K. Kensington. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-04-07 12:05 -0700
Re: " Repent, The End is Near, I personally guarantee it ! " -- K. Kensington. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-04-07 17:51 -0700
Re: " Repent, The End is Near, I personally guarantee it ! " -- K. Kensington. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-04-07 18:26 -0700
" Repent, The End is Near, I personally guarantee it ! " -- K. Kensington. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-04-07 20:40 -0700
Re: " Repent, The End is Near, I personally guarantee it ! " -- K. Kensington. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-04-07 20:52 -0700
Re: " Repent, The End is Near, I personally guarantee it ! " -- K. Kensington. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-04-07 21:00 -0700
Re: " Repent, The End is Near, I personally guarantee it ! " -- K. Kensington. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-04-08 04:05 +0000
Re: " Repent, The End is Near, I personally guarantee it ! " -- K. Kensington. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-04-07 21:07 -0700
Re: " Repent, The End is Near, I personally guarantee it ! " -- K. Kensington. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-04-07 21:06 -0700
Re: " Repent, The End is Near, I personally guarantee it ! " -- K. Kensington. Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-04-08 07:24 +0200
Re: " Repent, The End is Near, I personally guarantee it ! " -- K. Kensington. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-04-08 11:54 -0400
Re: " Repent, The End is Near, I personally guarantee it ! " -- K. Kensington. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-08 12:29 -0400
Re: " Repent, The End is Near, I personally guarantee it ! " -- K. Kensington. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-08 19:33 -0500
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-04-09 21:06 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-10 08:32 -0500
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-07 11:43 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-07 12:34 -0500
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-07 12:52 -0500
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-04-07 11:58 -0600
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-08 16:55 +1000
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-04-09 21:10 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-12 06:40 +1000
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-11 19:24 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-04-12 19:59 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-15 08:13 +1000
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-15 08:48 +1000
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-18 11:19 -0500
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-08 16:54 +1000
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-08 09:04 -0500
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-08 11:29 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-08 12:22 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-08 11:22 -0500
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-08 12:17 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-08 12:29 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-08 23:46 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-09 14:10 +1000
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-09 11:28 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-09 11:32 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-09 11:05 -0500
Air causes cancer. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-04-09 10:54 -0700
Re: Air causes cancer. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-09 17:29 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-09 13:12 -0600
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-09 14:29 -0500
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-09 13:33 -0600
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-09 16:44 -0500
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-04-11 23:45 +0000
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-04-12 16:46 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-12 15:03 -0600
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-04-12 20:11 -0700
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-04-14 11:11 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-14 09:18 -0600
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-04-14 21:31 -0700
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-04-15 12:50 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-12 10:12 +1000
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-04-12 20:06 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-15 00:48 -0500
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-15 18:03 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-16 08:58 +1000
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-16 02:00 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-16 19:11 +1000
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-16 09:57 -0500
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-16 13:01 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-17 07:17 +1000
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-16 21:44 -0500
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-17 14:08 +1000
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-17 11:35 -0500
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-04-17 17:55 +0100
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-18 06:00 +1000
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-04-17 22:40 +0000
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-18 09:15 +1000
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-17 20:03 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-17 19:32 -0500
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-04-18 01:36 +0000
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-04-17 18:46 -0700
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-17 22:36 -0500
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-18 11:01 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-18 11:33 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-18 11:21 -0500
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-18 10:59 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-04-18 16:02 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-04-18 23:47 +0000
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-04-18 18:49 -0500
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-04-19 18:52 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-04-19 23:39 +0000
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-04-19 16:45 -0700
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-04-19 16:57 -0700
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-04-20 12:25 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-16 08:34 +1000
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-16 09:59 -0500
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-16 13:09 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-16 13:17 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-16 11:29 -0600
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-04-16 19:13 +0000
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-16 13:20 -0600
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-16 14:33 -0500
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-16 17:11 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 "jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry' Shein's jew aliash)" <rjac@TheWor1d.com> - 2018-04-16 14:45 -0700
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 The Jews <jews@world-doomination.org> - 2018-04-16 17:11 -0700
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-04-17 01:34 +0000
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-16 13:04 -0500
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-16 17:07 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-16 16:59 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-04-16 22:31 +0000
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-04-16 15:46 -0700
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-16 20:50 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-16 21:46 -0500
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-17 05:52 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-04-17 21:14 -0700
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-18 12:47 -0500
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 "jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry' Shein's jew aliash)" <rjac@TheWor1d.com> - 2018-04-16 14:43 -0700
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 The Jews <jews@world-doomination.org> - 2018-04-16 17:13 -0700
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sick old pedo Andrew "Andrzej" Baron (aka "Ron Jacobson") <fsturluogh5@gmail.com> - 2018-04-18 08:27 +0000
Al Gore fangirl, "kensi", taps out. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-04-16 15:25 -0700
Re: Al Gore fangirl, "kensi", taps out. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-16 21:51 -0500
Re: Al Gore fangirl, "kensi", taps out. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-04-16 22:24 -0500
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-04-18 00:22 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-04-17 21:39 -0700
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-04-18 05:21 +0000
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-04-18 13:37 -0700
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-18 14:55 -0600
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-04-18 23:48 +0000
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-18 18:56 -0500
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-19 11:44 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-04-19 18:52 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-18 11:06 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-18 11:34 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-16 12:20 -0500
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-04-16 19:14 +0000
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-16 14:56 -0500
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-16 17:13 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-04-09 04:33 +0000
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-09 06:17 +1000
Does smoking cause cancer? (was: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988) Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-04-09 01:43 +0200
Re: Does smoking cause cancer? Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-09 09:57 +1000
Re: Does smoking cause cancer? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-04-09 02:02 +0200
Re: Does smoking cause cancer? Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-09 10:12 +1000
Re: Does smoking cause cancer? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-08 19:36 -0500
Re: Does smoking cause cancer? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-04-09 03:45 +0200
Re: Does smoking cause cancer? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-08 23:50 -0400
Re: Does smoking cause cancer? Lofty Goat <rlwatkins@gmail.com> - 2018-04-08 20:12 -0500
Re: Does smoking cause cancer? Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-09 11:40 +1000
Re: Does smoking cause cancer? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-08 23:56 -0400
Re: Does smoking cause cancer? Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-09 14:05 +1000
Re: Does smoking cause cancer? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-09 11:27 -0400
Re: Does smoking cause cancer? Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-10 07:36 +1000
Re: Does smoking cause cancer? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-09 17:01 -0500
Re: Does smoking cause cancer? Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-10 08:14 +1000
Re: Does smoking cause cancer? Lofty Goat <rlwatkins@gmail.com> - 2018-04-09 21:09 -0500
Re: Does smoking cause cancer? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-10 08:34 -0500
Re: Does smoking cause cancer? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-10 04:51 -0400
Re: Does smoking cause cancer? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-09 11:52 -0500
Re: Does smoking cause cancer? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-09 17:22 -0400
Re: Does smoking cause cancer? Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-10 07:36 +1000
Re: Does smoking cause cancer? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-09 17:13 -0500
Re: Does smoking cause cancer? Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-10 08:23 +1000
Re: Does smoking cause cancer? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-09 19:43 -0500
Re: Does smoking cause cancer? Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-10 11:02 +1000
Re: Does smoking cause cancer? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-10 04:58 -0400
Re: Does smoking cause cancer? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-10 04:40 -0400
Re: Does smoking cause cancer? Lofty Goat <rlwatkins@gmail.com> - 2018-04-09 21:08 -0500
Re: Does smoking cause cancer? Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-10 12:40 +1000
Ben Jacoby is neither funny nor informative, nothing good. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-04-09 19:54 -0700
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-08 19:34 -0500
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-09 10:52 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 "jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry' Shein's jew aliash)" <rjac@TheWor1d.com> - 2018-04-09 07:59 -0700
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 "Michael Ejercito" <mejercit@hotmail.com> - 2018-04-09 11:05 -0700
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-04-09 19:19 +0100
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-09 13:36 -0500
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-09 17:34 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-09 16:58 -0500
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 The Equalizer <coming4you@never.invalid.net> - 2018-04-09 22:58 +0000
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-04-09 17:39 -0700
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 @ "jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry' Shein's jew aliash)" <rjac@TheWor1d.com> - 2018-04-09 13:05 -0700
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 @ Sick old pedo Andrew "Andrzej" Baron (aka "Ron Jacobson") <fsturluogh5@gmail.com> - 2018-04-09 21:27 +0000
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 @ "Michael Ejercito" <mejercit@hotmail.com> - 2018-04-11 10:27 -0700
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Ser Gregor Clegane <sergregor@lannistermail.raven> - 2018-04-10 11:25 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-04-10 16:48 +0100
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-04-10 08:50 -0700
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-04-10 16:58 +0100
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-04-11 23:47 +0000
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-11 17:53 -0600
In some Turkish bazar, somewhere... Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-04-09 10:04 -0700
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-10 08:14 +1000
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-10 04:53 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-04-07 07:57 -0700
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-04-07 22:41 -0700
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-04-11 10:46 -0700
Page 5 of 10 — ← Prev page 1 … 3 4 [5] 6 7 … 10 Next page →
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-18 11:33 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <pb7og0$e30$3@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #681554 |
On 4/18/2018 11:01 AM, benj wrote: > I"m pretty sure that STD explains those characteristics in Nads, though. You take that back. -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-18 11:21 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <pb7ran$lh4$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #681561 |
On 4/18/2018 10:33 AM, kensi wrote:
> On 4/18/2018 11:01 AM, benj wrote:
>
>> I"m pretty sure that STD explains those characteristics in Nads, though.
>
> You take that back.
>
how/why would he take an STD back from Nads ?
Can 'she' just give it to him ?
and over the internet ??
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-18 10:59 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <U3JBC.23651$DS3.12100@fx42.iad> |
| In reply to | #681459 |
On 4/17/2018 8:32 PM, Sergio wrote: > On 4/17/2018 5:40 PM, Nadegda wrote: >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >> On Tue, 17 Apr 2018 11:35:09 -0500, Sergio wrote: >> >>> Sexual behavior that helps spread sexually transmitted diseases is >>> closely linked to cervical cancer in women. >> >> Wrong. A single, > > Wrong, what is a STD ? Sexually Transmuted Dieeze. > > specific STD, HPV, is -- and there's a vaccine against >> it. Get vaccinated and you can engage in whatever sexual behavior you like >> without fear of cervical cancer. >> >> But of course we should expect conservative fearmongering about sex from >> you. :P >> > > get with Trump, > > he has no fear of sex, > > just the germs. > 'm pretty sure with it comes to Nads and "kensi" that germs is a valid worry. Trump is the second smartest president we've ever had!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-18 16:02 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <0e1ddd57b1a6e0583sohubk7ee999eiehi@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #681437 |
On Tue, 17 Apr 2018 22:40:27 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >On Tue, 17 Apr 2018 11:35:09 -0500, Sergio wrote: > >> Sexual behavior that helps spread sexually transmitted diseases is >> closely linked to cervical cancer in women. > >Wrong. A single, specific STD, HPV, is -- and there's a vaccine against >it. Get vaccinated and you can engage in whatever sexual behavior you like >without fear of cervical cancer. I can engage in all the sex I want and not have to worry one iota about cervical cancer. LOL. More proof that women are inferior. >But of course we should expect conservative fearmongering about sex from >you. :P And sexual k0okmongering from you. Hee hee! -- Yours Truly, Gregory Hall "Tsk, tsk. No one appreciates his brilliance, poor fellow. (There might be a message in that for him.)"--Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries http://apprhondaleahkirkfries.blogspot.com/2014/05/rhonda-leah-kirk-fries-interview.html
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-18 23:47 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pb8ldn$120$5@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #681591 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Wed, 18 Apr 2018 16:02:36 -0400, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: > On Tue, 17 Apr 2018 22:40:27 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda > <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >>On Tue, 17 Apr 2018 11:35:09 -0500, Sergio wrote: >> >>> Sexual behavior that helps spread sexually transmitted diseases is >>> closely linked to cervical cancer in women. >> >>Wrong. A single, specific STD, HPV, is -- and there's a vaccine against >>it. Get vaccinated and you can engage in whatever sexual behavior you >>like without fear of cervical cancer. > > I can engage in all the sex I want and not have to worry one iota about > cervical cancer. LOL. More proof that women are inferior. It can also cause penile cancer, borscht-for-brains. I'd suggest you avoid sex with unvaccinated women, but in your case the whole issue is moot, isn't it? -- FNVWe Nadegda Fakey couldn't teach a monkey to eat a banana, much less answer a direct question posed to him. -- Fakey's Dogwhistle Holder
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-18 18:49 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <N4idnQtagKwMRErHnZ2dnUU7-XPNnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #681607 |
On Wed, 18 Apr 2018 23:47:03 -0000 (UTC), LO AND BEHOLD; "Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid>" determined that the following was of great importance and subsequently decided to freely share it with us in <pb8ldn$120$5@dont-email.me>: >Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >On Wed, 18 Apr 2018 16:02:36 -0400, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: > >>On Tue, 17 Apr 2018 22:40:27 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda >><nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >>>On Tue, 17 Apr 2018 11:35:09 -0500, Sergio wrote: >>>>Sexual behavior that helps spread sexually transmitted diseases is >>>>closely linked to cervical cancer in women. >>>Wrong. A single, specific STD, HPV, is -- and there's a vaccine against >>>it. Get vaccinated and you can engage in whatever sexual behavior you >>>like without fear of cervical cancer. >>I can engage in all the sex I want and not have to worry one iota about >>cervical cancer. LOL. More proof that women are inferior. > >It can also cause penile cancer, borscht-for-brains. I'd suggest you >avoid sex with unvaccinated women, but in your case the whole issue is >moot, isn't it? he wants to eliminate planned parenthood funding so that he can get dick cancer. -- THIS SPACE FOR RENT https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iB6B8jGSdLA "Thanks to muzzies and their apologist-enablers like puppy whistle, this seems to be the new norm in the world. It's spreading like a cancer, and it's time we admit we're at war with pure evil. We need to put an end to this muzzie plague, or life on Earth is going to become pure hell everywhere. We need to get these people out of every civilized country, and there's only one way to do it. IOW, we have to become like them, with an emphasis on expediency over cruelty." - Checkmate (of alt.checkmate) "Pussy Willow has just proven that Trump's crackdown on previously unenforced immigration policies is working. We'll deal with the domestic terrorists as needed, but we don't need to be letting the muzzie terrorists get a foothold in our country too. One need only look at what they're doing in Europe right now to know we're doing the right thing by keeping them out, which is our right and our duty. - Checkmate (#1 pussy willow fan) - "You just made puppy whistle's sig line longer." - Janithor - "If I have a complaint about the (Southern Poverty) Law Center's description (of the alt-right movement), it is the phrase "heavy use of social media," which implies the alt-right is a real-world movement which uses a lot of social media. This is backwards: it is an online movement which occasionally appears in the real world. Where it gets punched." - Jason Rhode - "I think we should destroy every last fucking mosque in America." - "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> proves for us that white males are violent in Message-ID: <MPG.32c5bfefd18c9a698f0a8@news.altopia.com> - Golden Killfile, June 2005 KOTM, November 2006 Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006 Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006 Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007 Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006 Busted Urinal Award, April 2007 Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007 Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006 Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008 Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007 AUK Mascot, September 2007 Putting the Awards Out of Order to Screw With the OCD Fuckheads, March 2016
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-19 18:52 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <na6iddp366n7ofcclbco24eeps38puhais@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #681607 |
On Wed, 18 Apr 2018 23:47:03 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >On Wed, 18 Apr 2018 16:02:36 -0400, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: >>On Tue, 17 Apr 2018 22:40:27 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >>>On Tue, 17 Apr 2018 11:35:09 -0500, Sergio wrote: >>> >>>> Sexual behavior that helps spread sexually transmitted diseases is >>>> closely linked to cervical cancer in women. >>> >>>Wrong. A single, specific STD, HPV, is -- and there's a vaccine against >>>it. Get vaccinated and you can engage in whatever sexual behavior you >>>like without fear of cervical cancer. >> >> I can engage in all the sex I want and not have to worry one iota about >> cervical cancer. LOL. More proof that women are inferior. > >It can also cause penile cancer, borscht-for-brains. I'd suggest you avoid >sex with unvaccinated women, but in your case the whole issue is moot, >isn't it? I suggest you STFU. Penis cancer is about as rare as rare can be so it's counterproductive for me to worry about it. Besides, I don't want sexual intercourse with an STD-riddled, old harridan like you. Kensi, otoh, with her sexy little fit body is another story. A wrap or two of duct tape around her sassy mouth would render her quite adequate as an object of my desire. <titter> -- Yours Truly, Gregory Hall "Tsk, tsk. No one appreciates his brilliance, poor fellow. (There might be a message in that for him.)"--Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries http://apprhondaleahkirkfries.blogspot.com/2014/05/rhonda-leah-kirk-fries-interview.html
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-19 23:39 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pbb9as$ipg$10@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #681684 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Thu, 19 Apr 2018 18:52:05 -0400, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: > On Wed, 18 Apr 2018 23:47:03 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda > <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >>On Wed, 18 Apr 2018 16:02:36 -0400, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: >>>On Tue, 17 Apr 2018 22:40:27 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda >>><nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >>>>On Tue, 17 Apr 2018 11:35:09 -0500, Sergio wrote: >>>> >>>>> Sexual behavior that helps spread sexually transmitted diseases is >>>>> closely linked to cervical cancer in women. >>>> >>>>Wrong. A single, specific STD, HPV, is -- and there's a vaccine >>>>against it. Get vaccinated and you can engage in whatever sexual >>>>behavior you like without fear of cervical cancer. >>> >>> I can engage in all the sex I want and not have to worry one iota >>> about cervical cancer. LOL. More proof that women are inferior. >> >>It can also cause penile cancer, borscht-for-brains. I'd suggest you >>avoid sex with unvaccinated women, but in your case the whole issue is >>moot, isn't it? > > I suggest you STFU. Penis cancer is about as rare as rare can be so it's > counterproductive for me to worry about it. > > Besides, I don't want sexual intercourse with an STD-riddled, old > harridan like you. Kensi, otoh, > with her sexy little fit body is another story. A wrap or two of duct > tape around her sassy mouth would render her quite adequate as an object > of my desire. > > <titter> Rape threat noted. -- FNVWe Nadegda Fakey couldn't teach a monkey to eat a banana, much less answer a direct question posed to him. -- Fakey's Dogwhistle Holder
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-19 16:45 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <b77v7n.7gs.17.5@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #681693 |
On 2018-04-19 4:39 PM, Nadegda wrote: > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > On Thu, 19 Apr 2018 18:52:05 -0400, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: > >> On Wed, 18 Apr 2018 23:47:03 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda >> <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >>> On Wed, 18 Apr 2018 16:02:36 -0400, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: >>>> On Tue, 17 Apr 2018 22:40:27 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda >>>> <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >>>>> On Tue, 17 Apr 2018 11:35:09 -0500, Sergio wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Sexual behavior that helps spread sexually transmitted diseases is >>>>>> closely linked to cervical cancer in women. >>>>> >>>>> Wrong. A single, specific STD, HPV, is -- and there's a vaccine >>>>> against it. Get vaccinated and you can engage in whatever sexual >>>>> behavior you like without fear of cervical cancer. >>>> >>>> I can engage in all the sex I want and not have to worry one iota >>>> about cervical cancer. LOL. More proof that women are inferior. >>> >>> It can also cause penile cancer, borscht-for-brains. I'd suggest you >>> avoid sex with unvaccinated women, but in your case the whole issue is >>> moot, isn't it? >> >> I suggest you STFU. Penis cancer is about as rare as rare can be so it's >> counterproductive for me to worry about it. >> >> Besides, I don't want sexual intercourse with an STD-riddled, old >> harridan like you. Kensi, otoh, >> with her sexy little fit body is another story. A wrap or two of duct >> tape around her sassy mouth would render her quite adequate as an object >> of my desire. >> >> <titter> > > Rape threat noted. > >> Si you soon, Snuh! >> > Bullshit. There will be an excuse soon coming from you. I'm already past Klamath Falls, biyatch. We'll see what's up.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-19 16:57 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.3542ccdcee2e486a9937a0@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #681684 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate! In article <na6iddp366n7ofcclbco24eeps38puhais@4ax.com>, greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... > > On Wed, 18 Apr 2018 23:47:03 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: > >On Wed, 18 Apr 2018 16:02:36 -0400, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: > >>On Tue, 17 Apr 2018 22:40:27 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: > >>>On Tue, 17 Apr 2018 11:35:09 -0500, Sergio wrote: > >>> > >>>> Sexual behavior that helps spread sexually transmitted diseases is > >>>> closely linked to cervical cancer in women. > >>> > >>>Wrong. A single, specific STD, HPV, is -- and there's a vaccine against > >>>it. Get vaccinated and you can engage in whatever sexual behavior you > >>>like without fear of cervical cancer. > >> > >> I can engage in all the sex I want and not have to worry one iota about > >> cervical cancer. LOL. More proof that women are inferior. > > > >It can also cause penile cancer, borscht-for-brains. I'd suggest you avoid > >sex with unvaccinated women, but in your case the whole issue is moot, > >isn't it? > > I suggest you STFU. Penis cancer is about as > rare as rare can be so it's counterproductive > for me to worry about it. > > Besides, I don't want sexual intercourse with an > STD-riddled, old harridan like you. Kensi, otoh, > with her sexy little fit body is another story. A > wrap or two of duct tape around her sassy mouth > would render her quite adequate as an object of > my desire. > > <titter> I take it you're not interested in getting a BJ from her then... -- Checkmate ® Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Copyright © 2018 all rights reserved In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017 "There are many here among us, who feel that life is but a joke."
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-20 12:25 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <a15kdd50ug4s3od1a4cdoaqis06t6aki29@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #681697 |
On Thu, 19 Apr 2018 16:57:55 -0700, Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> wrote: >In article <na6iddp366n7ofcclbco24eeps38puhais@4ax.com>, greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... >> On Wed, 18 Apr 2018 23:47:03 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >> >On Wed, 18 Apr 2018 16:02:36 -0400, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: >> >>On Tue, 17 Apr 2018 22:40:27 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >> >>>On Tue, 17 Apr 2018 11:35:09 -0500, Sergio wrote: >> >>> >> >>>> Sexual behavior that helps spread sexually transmitted diseases is >> >>>> closely linked to cervical cancer in women. >> >>> >> >>>Wrong. A single, specific STD, HPV, is -- and there's a vaccine against >> >>>it. Get vaccinated and you can engage in whatever sexual behavior you >> >>>like without fear of cervical cancer. >> >> >> >> I can engage in all the sex I want and not have to worry one iota about >> >> cervical cancer. LOL. More proof that women are inferior. >> > >> >It can also cause penile cancer, borscht-for-brains. I'd suggest you avoid >> >sex with unvaccinated women, but in your case the whole issue is moot, >> >isn't it? >> >> I suggest you STFU. Penis cancer is about as >> rare as rare can be so it's counterproductive >> for me to worry about it. >> >> Besides, I don't want sexual intercourse with an >> STD-riddled, old harridan like you. Kensi, otoh, >> with her sexy little fit body is another story. A >> wrap or two of duct tape around her sassy mouth >> would render her quite adequate as an object of >> my desire. >> >> <titter> > >I take it you're not interested in getting a BJ from her then... Not with those rotten teeth! -- Yours Truly, Gregory Hall "Tsk, tsk. No one appreciates his brilliance, poor fellow. (There might be a message in that for him.)"--Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries http://apprhondaleahkirkfries.blogspot.com/2014/05/rhonda-leah-kirk-fries-interview.html
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-16 08:34 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <fji2cmF37e9U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #680894 |
On 13/04/2018 10:06 AM, Scout wrote: > > > "Trevor Wilson" <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> wrote in message > news:fj7mk1FnuahU1@mid.individual.net... >> On 10/04/2018 2:05 AM, Sergio wrote: >>> On 4/8/2018 11:10 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>> On 9/04/2018 1:46 PM, benj wrote: >>>>> On 4/8/2018 12:29 PM, kensi wrote: >>>>>> On 4/8/2018 12:17 PM, benj wrote: >>>>>>> Still no proof cigarettes CAUSE cancer anymore than there is science >>>>>>> that proves man-made CO2 causes global warming. >>>>>> >>>>>> Then you should smoke as many packs a day as you can afford, benj. >>>>>> >>>>>> *snicker* >>>>>> >>>>> Gave up smoking years ago. You libs are always so violent wishing for >>>>> people dead! You all need to be banned! >>>>> >>>>> If Tobacco "causes" cancer then why are there people 100 years old who >>>>> smoked their whole life who don't have it. >>>> >>>> >>>> **Again: Tobacco does not "cause cancer". >>> >>> wrong. Tobacco companies were sued and lost because tobacco causes >>> cancer. >> >> **Wrong. Tobacco does not cause cancer. CONSUMPTION of tobacco can >> lead to an increase in the likelihood that a human may develop a >> tobacco related cancer or some other tobacco related disease. > > Exactly, there is no evidence of causality, you merely have a correlation. **Not quite. I was careful to state that tobacco (on it's own) does not cause cancer. However, CONSUMPTION of tobacco products increases the likelihood that a person will contract one of a number of diseases that are much rarer in the population that does not use tobacco products. For instance, in the US: * Smoking is responsible for 90% of all lung cancer deaths. * Smoking is responsible for 80% of all deaths from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. * Smoking is estimated to increase the risk of coronary heart disease by 2 to 4 times. * Smoking is estimated to increase the risk of stroke by 2 to 4 times. > > Might have nothing to due with tobacco at all but might be related to > another issue entirely,. **Sure, but the probability of acquiring a smoking related disease is much, MUCH greater if one smokes or uses other tobacco products (like chewing tobacco). Use of any tobacco products can increase the likelihood that one will acquire one of these diseases. -- Trevor Wilson www.rageaudio.com.au
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-16 09:59 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <pb2dnr$1ln$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #681162 |
On 4/15/2018 5:34 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote: > On 13/04/2018 10:06 AM, Scout wrote: >> >> >> "Trevor Wilson" <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> wrote in message >> news:fj7mk1FnuahU1@mid.individual.net... >>> On 10/04/2018 2:05 AM, Sergio wrote: >>>> On 4/8/2018 11:10 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>>> On 9/04/2018 1:46 PM, benj wrote: >>>>>> On 4/8/2018 12:29 PM, kensi wrote: >>>>>>> On 4/8/2018 12:17 PM, benj wrote: >>>>>>>> Still no proof cigarettes CAUSE cancer anymore than there is >>>>>>>> science >>>>>>>> that proves man-made CO2 causes global warming. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Then you should smoke as many packs a day as you can afford, benj. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> *snicker* >>>>>>> >>>>>> Gave up smoking years ago. You libs are always so violent wishing for >>>>>> people dead! You all need to be banned! >>>>>> >>>>>> If Tobacco "causes" cancer then why are there people 100 years old >>>>>> who >>>>>> smoked their whole life who don't have it. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> **Again: Tobacco does not "cause cancer". >>>> >>>> wrong. Tobacco companies were sued and lost because tobacco causes >>>> cancer. >>> >>> **Wrong. Tobacco does not cause cancer. CONSUMPTION of tobacco can >>> lead to an increase in the likelihood that a human may develop a >>> tobacco related cancer or some other tobacco related disease. >> >> Exactly, there is no evidence of causality, you merely have a >> correlation. > > **Not quite. I was careful to state that tobacco (on it's own) does not > cause cancer. However, CONSUMPTION of tobacco products increases the > likelihood that a person will contract one of a number of diseases that > are much rarer in the population that does not use tobacco products. For > instance, in the US: > > * Smoking is responsible for 90% of all lung cancer deaths. > * Smoking is responsible for 80% of all deaths from chronic obstructive > pulmonary disease. > * Smoking is estimated to increase the risk of coronary heart disease by > 2 to 4 times. > * Smoking is estimated to increase the risk of stroke by 2 to 4 times. > > >> >> Might have nothing to due with tobacco at all but might be related to >> another issue entirely,. > > > **Sure, but the probability of acquiring a smoking related disease is > much, MUCH greater if one smokes or uses other tobacco products (like > chewing tobacco). Use of any tobacco products can increase the > likelihood that one will acquire one of these diseases. > > "You have probably heard plenty of reasons not to smoke or use other tobacco products, but here is one more: The tobacco used to make these tobacco products contains small amounts of radionuclides. About 20 percent of all deaths in the United States are from tobacco use and diseases caused by smoking each year - that's around 440,000 people. Cigarettes kill more Americans than alcohol, car accidents, suicide, AIDS, homicide and illegal drugs combined. Tobacco plant. The sticky underside of tobacco leaves hold radionuclides that come from fertilizer. Toxic chemicals in tobacco smoke are the main reason cigarettes cause cancer, but radiation also plays a part. Cigarette smokers inhale radionuclides that build up over time in the lungs and other parts of the body. Smokers are not the only ones affected by the radiation in cigarettes. Nearby non-smokers inhale the radionuclides as well." https://www3.epa.gov/radtown/tobacco.html
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-16 13:09 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <BN4BC.5$IF4.1@fx14.iad> |
| In reply to | #681248 |
On 4/16/2018 10:59 AM, Sergio wrote: > On 4/15/2018 5:34 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >> On 13/04/2018 10:06 AM, Scout wrote: >>> >>> >>> "Trevor Wilson" <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> wrote in message >>> news:fj7mk1FnuahU1@mid.individual.net... >>>> On 10/04/2018 2:05 AM, Sergio wrote: >>>>> On 4/8/2018 11:10 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>>>> On 9/04/2018 1:46 PM, benj wrote: >>>>>>> On 4/8/2018 12:29 PM, kensi wrote: >>>>>>>> On 4/8/2018 12:17 PM, benj wrote: >>>>>>>>> Still no proof cigarettes CAUSE cancer anymore than there is >>>>>>>>> science >>>>>>>>> that proves man-made CO2 causes global warming. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Then you should smoke as many packs a day as you can afford, benj. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> *snicker* >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> Gave up smoking years ago. You libs are always so violent wishing for >>>>>>> people dead! You all need to be banned! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> If Tobacco "causes" cancer then why are there people 100 years old >>>>>>> who >>>>>>> smoked their whole life who don't have it. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> **Again: Tobacco does not "cause cancer". >>>>> >>>>> wrong. Tobacco companies were sued and lost because tobacco causes >>>>> cancer. >>>> >>>> **Wrong. Tobacco does not cause cancer. CONSUMPTION of tobacco can >>>> lead to an increase in the likelihood that a human may develop a >>>> tobacco related cancer or some other tobacco related disease. >>> >>> Exactly, there is no evidence of causality, you merely have a >>> correlation. >> >> **Not quite. I was careful to state that tobacco (on it's own) does not >> cause cancer. However, CONSUMPTION of tobacco products increases the >> likelihood that a person will contract one of a number of diseases that >> are much rarer in the population that does not use tobacco products. For >> instance, in the US: >> >> * Smoking is responsible for 90% of all lung cancer deaths. >> * Smoking is responsible for 80% of all deaths from chronic obstructive >> pulmonary disease. >> * Smoking is estimated to increase the risk of coronary heart disease by >> 2 to 4 times. >> * Smoking is estimated to increase the risk of stroke by 2 to 4 times. >> >> >>> >>> Might have nothing to due with tobacco at all but might be related to >>> another issue entirely,. >> >> >> **Sure, but the probability of acquiring a smoking related disease is >> much, MUCH greater if one smokes or uses other tobacco products (like >> chewing tobacco). Use of any tobacco products can increase the >> likelihood that one will acquire one of these diseases. >> >> > > "You have probably heard plenty of reasons not to smoke or use other > tobacco products, but here is one more: The tobacco used to make these > tobacco products contains small amounts of radionuclides. About 20 > percent of all deaths in the United States are from tobacco use and > diseases caused by smoking each year - that's around 440,000 people. > Cigarettes kill more Americans than alcohol, car accidents, suicide, > AIDS, homicide and illegal drugs combined. > Tobacco plant. > > The sticky underside of tobacco leaves hold radionuclides that come from > fertilizer. > > Toxic chemicals in tobacco smoke are the main reason cigarettes cause > cancer, but radiation also plays a part. Cigarette smokers inhale > radionuclides that build up over time in the lungs and other parts of > the body. Smokers are not the only ones affected by the radiation in > cigarettes. Nearby non-smokers inhale the radionuclides as well." > > https://www3.epa.gov/radtown/tobacco.html > Eeew! While killing 20% of the population (especially in Third World shitholes where people smoke like chimneys) is arguably not a bad thing, common sense tells us that a big increase in tobacco plant taxes can save the planet. Wait, if we consider the above science it is clear that FOOD causes cancer! That is settled science! The answer is clearly expanding the tobacco tax to a universal plant tax on all food. I love it when I get rolling. "kensi" and Nads may make be an honorary Lib yet!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-16 13:17 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <pb2lrk$gmq$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #681266 |
On 4/16/2018 1:09 PM, benj wrote: > Eeew! While killing 20% of the population (especially in Third World > shitholes where people smoke like chimneys) is arguably not a bad thing, Everyone talks about how awful and terrible Hitler was, but really, he's a piker compared to present-day conservatives, who regularly fantasize about the "ethnic cleansing" of 1.2 *billion* people. -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-16 11:29 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <3an9dd5b2fjam0j1eb00sufostsembr6k4@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #681268 |
On Mon, 16 Apr 2018 13:17:39 -0400, kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >On 4/16/2018 1:09 PM, benj wrote: >> Eeew! While killing 20% of the population (especially in Third World >> shitholes where people smoke like chimneys) is arguably not a bad thing, > >Everyone talks about how awful and terrible Hitler was, but really, he's >a piker compared to present-day conservatives, who regularly fantasize >about the "ethnic cleansing" of 1.2 *billion* people. Where di you get "ethnic" out of that racist?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-16 19:13 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pb2slk$ts$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #681277 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Mon, 16 Apr 2018 11:29:01 -0600, Skeeter wrote: > On Mon, 16 Apr 2018 13:17:39 -0400, kensi > <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: > >>On 4/16/2018 1:09 PM, benj wrote: >>> Eeew! While killing 20% of the population (especially in Third World >>> shitholes where people smoke like chimneys) is arguably not a bad >>> thing, >> >>Everyone talks about how awful and terrible Hitler was, but really, he's >>a piker compared to present-day conservatives, who regularly fantasize >>about the "ethnic cleansing" of 1.2 *billion* people. > > Where di you get "ethnic" out of that I can't claim to be able to read kensi's mind, but I'd be willing to put money on it having something to do with the benj kook's mention of "third- world shitholes"... -- FNVWe Nadegda Fakey couldn't teach a monkey to eat a banana, much less answer a direct question posed to him. -- Fakey's Dogwhistle Holder
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-16 13:20 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <5st9ddlm7fgl6b8h8dl1nohk7u1v74qlfa@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #681293 |
On Mon, 16 Apr 2018 19:13:57 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >On Mon, 16 Apr 2018 11:29:01 -0600, Skeeter wrote: > >> On Mon, 16 Apr 2018 13:17:39 -0400, kensi >> <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >> >>>On 4/16/2018 1:09 PM, benj wrote: >>>> Eeew! While killing 20% of the population (especially in Third World >>>> shitholes where people smoke like chimneys) is arguably not a bad >>>> thing, >>> >>>Everyone talks about how awful and terrible Hitler was, but really, he's >>>a piker compared to present-day conservatives, who regularly fantasize >>>about the "ethnic cleansing" of 1.2 *billion* people. >> >> Where di you get "ethnic" out of that > >I can't claim to be able to read kensi's mind, but I'd be willing to put >money on it having something to do with the benj kook's mention of "third- >world shitholes"... Chicago is a 3rd world shithole.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-16 14:33 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <pb2tpl$ug1$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #681298 |
On 4/16/2018 2:20 PM, Skeeter wrote: > On Mon, 16 Apr 2018 19:13:57 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda > <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: > >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >> On Mon, 16 Apr 2018 11:29:01 -0600, Skeeter wrote: >> >>> On Mon, 16 Apr 2018 13:17:39 -0400, kensi >>> <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >>> >>>> On 4/16/2018 1:09 PM, benj wrote: >>>>> Eeew! While killing 20% of the population (especially in Third World >>>>> shitholes where people smoke like chimneys) is arguably not a bad >>>>> thing, >>>> >>>> Everyone talks about how awful and terrible Hitler was, but really, he's >>>> a piker compared to present-day conservatives, who regularly fantasize >>>> about the "ethnic cleansing" of 1.2 *billion* people. >>> >>> Where di you get "ethnic" out of that >> >> I can't claim to be able to read kensi's mind, but I'd be willing to put >> money on it having something to do with the benj kook's mention of "third- >> world shitholes"... > > Chicago is a 3rd world shithole. > Damn stright! Queens, NY too. Baltimore, Cincinnati, and some of Philadelphia. and Trump said "3rd world shithole", so finally your fear of Trump is turned to respect, by quoting Trump.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-16 17:11 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <bk8BC.15303$xS3.3287@fx04.iad> |
| In reply to | #681293 |
On 4/16/2018 3:13 PM, Nadegda wrote: > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > On Mon, 16 Apr 2018 11:29:01 -0600, Skeeter wrote: > >> On Mon, 16 Apr 2018 13:17:39 -0400, kensi >> <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >> >>> On 4/16/2018 1:09 PM, benj wrote: >>>> Eeew! While killing 20% of the population (especially in Third World >>>> shitholes where people smoke like chimneys) is arguably not a bad >>>> thing, >>> >>> Everyone talks about how awful and terrible Hitler was, but really, he's >>> a piker compared to present-day conservatives, who regularly fantasize >>> about the "ethnic cleansing" of 1.2 *billion* people. >> >> Where di you get "ethnic" out of that > > I can't claim to be able to read kensi's mind, but I'd be willing to put > money on it having something to do with the benj kook's mention of "third- > world shitholes"... > If you had any education, Nads, or actual worldly experience, you'd know that "shitholes" is an economic-political term and has nothing to do with "ethnic" or "race". Not all shitholes are in Africa, you know.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 5 of 10 — ← Prev page 1 … 3 4 [5] 6 7 … 10 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web