Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #680176 > unrolled thread
| Started by | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-04-07 10:33 -0400 |
| Last post | 2018-04-11 10:46 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 191 — 28 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-07 10:33 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-07 09:48 -0500
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-07 11:23 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-07 10:33 -0500
" Repent, The End is Near, I personally guarantee it ! " -- K. Kensington. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-04-07 12:05 -0700
Re: " Repent, The End is Near, I personally guarantee it ! " -- K. Kensington. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-04-07 17:51 -0700
Re: " Repent, The End is Near, I personally guarantee it ! " -- K. Kensington. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-04-07 18:26 -0700
" Repent, The End is Near, I personally guarantee it ! " -- K. Kensington. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-04-07 20:40 -0700
Re: " Repent, The End is Near, I personally guarantee it ! " -- K. Kensington. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-04-07 20:52 -0700
Re: " Repent, The End is Near, I personally guarantee it ! " -- K. Kensington. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-04-07 21:00 -0700
Re: " Repent, The End is Near, I personally guarantee it ! " -- K. Kensington. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-04-08 04:05 +0000
Re: " Repent, The End is Near, I personally guarantee it ! " -- K. Kensington. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-04-07 21:07 -0700
Re: " Repent, The End is Near, I personally guarantee it ! " -- K. Kensington. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-04-07 21:06 -0700
Re: " Repent, The End is Near, I personally guarantee it ! " -- K. Kensington. Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-04-08 07:24 +0200
Re: " Repent, The End is Near, I personally guarantee it ! " -- K. Kensington. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-04-08 11:54 -0400
Re: " Repent, The End is Near, I personally guarantee it ! " -- K. Kensington. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-08 12:29 -0400
Re: " Repent, The End is Near, I personally guarantee it ! " -- K. Kensington. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-08 19:33 -0500
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-04-09 21:06 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-10 08:32 -0500
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-07 11:43 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-07 12:34 -0500
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-07 12:52 -0500
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-04-07 11:58 -0600
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-08 16:55 +1000
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-04-09 21:10 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-12 06:40 +1000
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-11 19:24 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-04-12 19:59 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-15 08:13 +1000
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-15 08:48 +1000
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-18 11:19 -0500
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-08 16:54 +1000
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-08 09:04 -0500
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-08 11:29 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-08 12:22 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-08 11:22 -0500
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-08 12:17 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-08 12:29 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-08 23:46 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-09 14:10 +1000
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-09 11:28 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-09 11:32 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-09 11:05 -0500
Air causes cancer. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-04-09 10:54 -0700
Re: Air causes cancer. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-09 17:29 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-09 13:12 -0600
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-09 14:29 -0500
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-09 13:33 -0600
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-09 16:44 -0500
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-04-11 23:45 +0000
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-04-12 16:46 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-12 15:03 -0600
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-04-12 20:11 -0700
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-04-14 11:11 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-14 09:18 -0600
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-04-14 21:31 -0700
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-04-15 12:50 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-12 10:12 +1000
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-04-12 20:06 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-15 00:48 -0500
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-15 18:03 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-16 08:58 +1000
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-16 02:00 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-16 19:11 +1000
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-16 09:57 -0500
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-16 13:01 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-17 07:17 +1000
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-16 21:44 -0500
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-17 14:08 +1000
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-17 11:35 -0500
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-04-17 17:55 +0100
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-18 06:00 +1000
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-04-17 22:40 +0000
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-18 09:15 +1000
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-17 20:03 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-17 19:32 -0500
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-04-18 01:36 +0000
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-04-17 18:46 -0700
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-17 22:36 -0500
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-18 11:01 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-18 11:33 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-18 11:21 -0500
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-18 10:59 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-04-18 16:02 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-04-18 23:47 +0000
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-04-18 18:49 -0500
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-04-19 18:52 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-04-19 23:39 +0000
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-04-19 16:45 -0700
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-04-19 16:57 -0700
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-04-20 12:25 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-16 08:34 +1000
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-16 09:59 -0500
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-16 13:09 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-16 13:17 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-16 11:29 -0600
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-04-16 19:13 +0000
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-16 13:20 -0600
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-16 14:33 -0500
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-16 17:11 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 "jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry' Shein's jew aliash)" <rjac@TheWor1d.com> - 2018-04-16 14:45 -0700
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 The Jews <jews@world-doomination.org> - 2018-04-16 17:11 -0700
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-04-17 01:34 +0000
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-16 13:04 -0500
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-16 17:07 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-16 16:59 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-04-16 22:31 +0000
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-04-16 15:46 -0700
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-16 20:50 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-16 21:46 -0500
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-17 05:52 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-04-17 21:14 -0700
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-18 12:47 -0500
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 "jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry' Shein's jew aliash)" <rjac@TheWor1d.com> - 2018-04-16 14:43 -0700
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 The Jews <jews@world-doomination.org> - 2018-04-16 17:13 -0700
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sick old pedo Andrew "Andrzej" Baron (aka "Ron Jacobson") <fsturluogh5@gmail.com> - 2018-04-18 08:27 +0000
Al Gore fangirl, "kensi", taps out. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-04-16 15:25 -0700
Re: Al Gore fangirl, "kensi", taps out. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-16 21:51 -0500
Re: Al Gore fangirl, "kensi", taps out. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-04-16 22:24 -0500
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-04-18 00:22 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-04-17 21:39 -0700
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-04-18 05:21 +0000
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-04-18 13:37 -0700
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-18 14:55 -0600
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-04-18 23:48 +0000
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-18 18:56 -0500
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-19 11:44 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-04-19 18:52 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-18 11:06 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-18 11:34 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-16 12:20 -0500
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-04-16 19:14 +0000
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-16 14:56 -0500
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-16 17:13 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-04-09 04:33 +0000
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-09 06:17 +1000
Does smoking cause cancer? (was: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988) Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-04-09 01:43 +0200
Re: Does smoking cause cancer? Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-09 09:57 +1000
Re: Does smoking cause cancer? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-04-09 02:02 +0200
Re: Does smoking cause cancer? Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-09 10:12 +1000
Re: Does smoking cause cancer? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-08 19:36 -0500
Re: Does smoking cause cancer? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-04-09 03:45 +0200
Re: Does smoking cause cancer? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-08 23:50 -0400
Re: Does smoking cause cancer? Lofty Goat <rlwatkins@gmail.com> - 2018-04-08 20:12 -0500
Re: Does smoking cause cancer? Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-09 11:40 +1000
Re: Does smoking cause cancer? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-08 23:56 -0400
Re: Does smoking cause cancer? Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-09 14:05 +1000
Re: Does smoking cause cancer? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-09 11:27 -0400
Re: Does smoking cause cancer? Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-10 07:36 +1000
Re: Does smoking cause cancer? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-09 17:01 -0500
Re: Does smoking cause cancer? Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-10 08:14 +1000
Re: Does smoking cause cancer? Lofty Goat <rlwatkins@gmail.com> - 2018-04-09 21:09 -0500
Re: Does smoking cause cancer? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-10 08:34 -0500
Re: Does smoking cause cancer? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-10 04:51 -0400
Re: Does smoking cause cancer? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-09 11:52 -0500
Re: Does smoking cause cancer? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-09 17:22 -0400
Re: Does smoking cause cancer? Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-10 07:36 +1000
Re: Does smoking cause cancer? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-09 17:13 -0500
Re: Does smoking cause cancer? Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-10 08:23 +1000
Re: Does smoking cause cancer? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-09 19:43 -0500
Re: Does smoking cause cancer? Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-10 11:02 +1000
Re: Does smoking cause cancer? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-10 04:58 -0400
Re: Does smoking cause cancer? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-10 04:40 -0400
Re: Does smoking cause cancer? Lofty Goat <rlwatkins@gmail.com> - 2018-04-09 21:08 -0500
Re: Does smoking cause cancer? Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-10 12:40 +1000
Ben Jacoby is neither funny nor informative, nothing good. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-04-09 19:54 -0700
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-08 19:34 -0500
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-09 10:52 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 "jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry' Shein's jew aliash)" <rjac@TheWor1d.com> - 2018-04-09 07:59 -0700
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 "Michael Ejercito" <mejercit@hotmail.com> - 2018-04-09 11:05 -0700
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-04-09 19:19 +0100
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-09 13:36 -0500
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-09 17:34 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-09 16:58 -0500
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 The Equalizer <coming4you@never.invalid.net> - 2018-04-09 22:58 +0000
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-04-09 17:39 -0700
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 @ "jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry' Shein's jew aliash)" <rjac@TheWor1d.com> - 2018-04-09 13:05 -0700
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 @ Sick old pedo Andrew "Andrzej" Baron (aka "Ron Jacobson") <fsturluogh5@gmail.com> - 2018-04-09 21:27 +0000
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 @ "Michael Ejercito" <mejercit@hotmail.com> - 2018-04-11 10:27 -0700
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Ser Gregor Clegane <sergregor@lannistermail.raven> - 2018-04-10 11:25 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-04-10 16:48 +0100
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-04-10 08:50 -0700
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-04-10 16:58 +0100
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-04-11 23:47 +0000
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-11 17:53 -0600
In some Turkish bazar, somewhere... Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-04-09 10:04 -0700
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-10 08:14 +1000
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-10 04:53 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-04-07 07:57 -0700
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-04-07 22:41 -0700
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-04-11 10:46 -0700
Page 2 of 10 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 … 10 Next page →
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-07 12:34 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <paavet$4mf$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #680185 |
On 4/7/2018 10:43 AM, benj wrote: > On 4/7/2018 10:48 AM, Sergio wrote: >> On 4/7/2018 9:33 AM, kensi wrote: >>> A 1988 Royal Dutch Shell report recently published online shows that the >>> company knew decades ago what the impact of climate change would be. ... >>> The report, titled “The Greenhouse Effect,” said the effects of climate >>> change would be notable by the late 20th Century and early 21st: >>> >>> https://globalnews.ca/news/4127757/shell-climate-change-report-1988/ >>> >> >> <yawn> it has been in elementary school textbooks since 1960's >> > Kensi and journalists lie as always. There could be no such report > because "climate change" is a term just recently invented by journalists > and other wormballers when the global temperature "hockey stick" stopped > going up. > > Expect some Royal Dutch Shell Vice president to sell out and appear all > over TV and legacy media telling how oil companies "always" knew selling > oil would end all life on the planet. Just as they did with cigarettes > where they got sell-out VPs to swear tobacco companies always knew their > products caused cancer. Lib agenda 101. BINGO !!! lawyer time !! What else in the long term lawyer horizon lawsuits ?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-07 12:52 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <pab0ha$6gu$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #680199 |
On 4/7/2018 12:34 PM, Sergio wrote: > On 4/7/2018 10:43 AM, benj wrote: >> On 4/7/2018 10:48 AM, Sergio wrote: >>> On 4/7/2018 9:33 AM, kensi wrote: >>>> A 1988 Royal Dutch Shell report recently published online shows that the >>>> company knew decades ago what the impact of climate change would be. ... >>>> The report, titled “The Greenhouse Effect,” said the effects of climate >>>> change would be notable by the late 20th Century and early 21st: >>>> >>>> https://globalnews.ca/news/4127757/shell-climate-change-report-1988/ >>>> >>> >>> <yawn> it has been in elementary school textbooks since 1960's >>> >> Kensi and journalists lie as always. There could be no such report >> because "climate change" is a term just recently invented by journalists >> and other wormballers when the global temperature "hockey stick" stopped >> going up. >> >> Expect some Royal Dutch Shell Vice president to sell out and appear all >> over TV and legacy media telling how oil companies "always" knew selling >> oil would end all life on the planet. Just as they did with cigarettes >> where they got sell-out VPs to swear tobacco companies always knew their >> products caused cancer. Lib agenda 101. > > BINGO !!! lawyer time !! > > What else in the long term lawyer horizon lawsuits ? > Democrates sues themselves, because they knew they are corrupt or should have known.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-07 11:58 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <AF7yC.24897$KZ2.17885@fx39.iad> |
| In reply to | #680185 |
On 4/7/2018 9:43 AM, benj wrote: > On 4/7/2018 10:48 AM, Sergio wrote: >> On 4/7/2018 9:33 AM, kensi wrote: >>> A 1988 Royal Dutch Shell report recently published online shows that the >>> company knew decades ago what the impact of climate change would be. ... >>> The report, titled “The Greenhouse Effect,” said the effects of climate >>> change would be notable by the late 20th Century and early 21st: >>> >>> https://globalnews.ca/news/4127757/shell-climate-change-report-1988/ >>> >> >> <yawn> it has been in elementary school textbooks since 1960's >> > Kensi and journalists lie as always. There could be no such report > because "climate change" is a term just recently invented by journalists > and other wormballers when the global temperature "hockey stick" stopped > going up. > > Expect some Royal Dutch Shell Vice president to sell out and appear all > over TV and legacy media telling how oil companies "always" knew selling > oil would end all life on the planet. Just as they did with cigarettes > where they got sell-out VPs to swear tobacco companies always knew their > products caused cancer. Lib agenda 101. How to be a prophet. 1. Make predictions on all possible outcomes. 2. When one comes true, point it out. 3. Ignore all the predictions that don't come true.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-08 16:55 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <fitsnfFh29bU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #680203 |
On 8/04/2018 3:58 AM, Just Wondering wrote: > On 4/7/2018 9:43 AM, benj wrote: >> On 4/7/2018 10:48 AM, Sergio wrote: >>> On 4/7/2018 9:33 AM, kensi wrote: >>>> A 1988 Royal Dutch Shell report recently published online shows that >>>> the >>>> company knew decades ago what the impact of climate change would be. >>>> ... >>>> The report, titled “The Greenhouse Effect,” said the effects of climate >>>> change would be notable by the late 20th Century and early 21st: >>>> >>>> https://globalnews.ca/news/4127757/shell-climate-change-report-1988/ >>>> >>> >>> <yawn> it has been in elementary school textbooks since 1960's >>> >> Kensi and journalists lie as always. There could be no such report >> because "climate change" is a term just recently invented by >> journalists and other wormballers when the global temperature "hockey >> stick" stopped going up. >> >> Expect some Royal Dutch Shell Vice president to sell out and appear >> all over TV and legacy media telling how oil companies "always" knew >> selling oil would end all life on the planet. Just as they did with >> cigarettes where they got sell-out VPs to swear tobacco companies >> always knew their products caused cancer. Lib agenda 101. > > How to be a prophet. > 1. Make predictions on all possible outcomes. > 2. When one comes true, point it out. > 3. Ignore all the predictions that don't come true. > **Except that ALL the climatologists have to been telling us that the planet is warming. Since the mid 19th century, in fact. -- Trevor Wilson www.rageaudio.com.au
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-09 21:10 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <pah4ev$euc$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #680299 |
"Trevor Wilson" <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> wrote in message news:fitsnfFh29bU2@mid.individual.net... > On 8/04/2018 3:58 AM, Just Wondering wrote: >> On 4/7/2018 9:43 AM, benj wrote: >>> On 4/7/2018 10:48 AM, Sergio wrote: >>>> On 4/7/2018 9:33 AM, kensi wrote: >>>>> A 1988 Royal Dutch Shell report recently published online shows that >>>>> the >>>>> company knew decades ago what the impact of climate change would be. >>>>> ... >>>>> The report, titled “The Greenhouse Effect,” said the effects of >>>>> climate >>>>> change would be notable by the late 20th Century and early 21st: >>>>> >>>>> https://globalnews.ca/news/4127757/shell-climate-change-report-1988/ >>>>> >>>> >>>> <yawn> it has been in elementary school textbooks since 1960's >>>> >>> Kensi and journalists lie as always. There could be no such report >>> because "climate change" is a term just recently invented by journalists >>> and other wormballers when the global temperature "hockey stick" stopped >>> going up. >>> >>> Expect some Royal Dutch Shell Vice president to sell out and appear all >>> over TV and legacy media telling how oil companies "always" knew selling >>> oil would end all life on the planet. Just as they did with cigarettes >>> where they got sell-out VPs to swear tobacco companies always knew their >>> products caused cancer. Lib agenda 101. >> >> How to be a prophet. >> 1. Make predictions on all possible outcomes. >> 2. When one comes true, point it out. >> 3. Ignore all the predictions that don't come true. >> > > **Except that ALL the climatologists have to been telling us that the > planet is warming. Since the mid 19th century, in fact. Odd, I recall during the 1960s & 1970s how there was global cooling and it was projected that the next Ice Age was just around the corner. Oh, but THOSE climatologists don't count in Jones' World.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-12 06:40 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <fj7a69FldkrU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #680551 |
On 10/04/2018 11:10 AM, Scout wrote: > > > "Trevor Wilson" <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> wrote in message > news:fitsnfFh29bU2@mid.individual.net... >> On 8/04/2018 3:58 AM, Just Wondering wrote: >>> On 4/7/2018 9:43 AM, benj wrote: >>>> On 4/7/2018 10:48 AM, Sergio wrote: >>>>> On 4/7/2018 9:33 AM, kensi wrote: >>>>>> A 1988 Royal Dutch Shell report recently published online shows >>>>>> that the >>>>>> company knew decades ago what the impact of climate change would >>>>>> be. ... >>>>>> The report, titled “The Greenhouse Effect,” said the effects of >>>>>> climate >>>>>> change would be notable by the late 20th Century and early 21st: >>>>>> >>>>>> https://globalnews.ca/news/4127757/shell-climate-change-report-1988/ >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> <yawn> it has been in elementary school textbooks since 1960's >>>>> >>>> Kensi and journalists lie as always. There could be no such report >>>> because "climate change" is a term just recently invented by >>>> journalists and other wormballers when the global temperature >>>> "hockey stick" stopped going up. >>>> >>>> Expect some Royal Dutch Shell Vice president to sell out and appear >>>> all over TV and legacy media telling how oil companies "always" knew >>>> selling oil would end all life on the planet. Just as they did with >>>> cigarettes where they got sell-out VPs to swear tobacco companies >>>> always knew their products caused cancer. Lib agenda 101. >>> >>> How to be a prophet. >>> 1. Make predictions on all possible outcomes. >>> 2. When one comes true, point it out. >>> 3. Ignore all the predictions that don't come true. >>> >> >> **Except that ALL the climatologists have to been telling us that the >> planet is warming. Since the mid 19th century, in fact. > > Odd, I recall during the 1960s & 1970s how there was global cooling and > it was projected that the next Ice Age was just around the corner. **Yeah, except that prediction was never made by any scientific journal on the planet. It was a NEWSWEEK article. All the scientific journals were busily publishing papers that related to the greenhouse effect and the probability that the planet would warm. I should remind you at this point, that Newsweek is not a scientific journal of note. > > Oh, but THOSE climatologists don't count in Jones' World. **The article was not written by a climatologist. -- Trevor Wilson www.rageaudio.com.au
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-11 19:24 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <cPwzC.1737$yK2.1688@fx16.iad> |
| In reply to | #680797 |
On 4/11/2018 4:40 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote: > On 10/04/2018 11:10 AM, Scout wrote: >> >> >> "Trevor Wilson" <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> wrote in message >> news:fitsnfFh29bU2@mid.individual.net... >>> On 8/04/2018 3:58 AM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>> On 4/7/2018 9:43 AM, benj wrote: >>>>> On 4/7/2018 10:48 AM, Sergio wrote: >>>>>> On 4/7/2018 9:33 AM, kensi wrote: >>>>>>> A 1988 Royal Dutch Shell report recently published online shows >>>>>>> that the >>>>>>> company knew decades ago what the impact of climate change would >>>>>>> be. ... >>>>>>> The report, titled “The Greenhouse Effect,” said the effects of >>>>>>> climate >>>>>>> change would be notable by the late 20th Century and early 21st: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> https://globalnews.ca/news/4127757/shell-climate-change-report-1988/ >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> <yawn> it has been in elementary school textbooks since 1960's >>>>>> >>>>> Kensi and journalists lie as always. There could be no such report >>>>> because "climate change" is a term just recently invented by >>>>> journalists and other wormballers when the global temperature >>>>> "hockey stick" stopped going up. >>>>> >>>>> Expect some Royal Dutch Shell Vice president to sell out and appear >>>>> all over TV and legacy media telling how oil companies "always" >>>>> knew selling oil would end all life on the planet. Just as they did >>>>> with cigarettes where they got sell-out VPs to swear tobacco >>>>> companies always knew their products caused cancer. Lib agenda 101. >>>> >>>> How to be a prophet. >>>> 1. Make predictions on all possible outcomes. >>>> 2. When one comes true, point it out. >>>> 3. Ignore all the predictions that don't come true. >>>> >>> >>> **Except that ALL the climatologists have to been telling us that the >>> planet is warming. Since the mid 19th century, in fact. >> >> Odd, I recall during the 1960s & 1970s how there was global cooling >> and it was projected that the next Ice Age was just around the corner. > > **Yeah, except that prediction was never made by any scientific journal > on the planet. It was a NEWSWEEK article. All the scientific journals > were busily publishing papers that related to the greenhouse effect and > the probability that the planet would warm. I should remind you at this > point, that Newsweek is not a scientific journal of note. Come on, Trevor, Newsweek is quoted by Dr. "kensi" as proof all the time. It doesn't get more educated than 'her'! >> >> Oh, but THOSE climatologists don't count in Jones' World. > > **The article was not written by a climatologist. ** So long as a climatologist is quoted...er I mean mentioned, it counts as science and proof. > >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-12 19:59 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <paotr9$cu3$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #680797 |
"Trevor Wilson" <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> wrote in message news:fj7a69FldkrU1@mid.individual.net... > On 10/04/2018 11:10 AM, Scout wrote: >> >> >> "Trevor Wilson" <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> wrote in message >> news:fitsnfFh29bU2@mid.individual.net... >>> On 8/04/2018 3:58 AM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>> On 4/7/2018 9:43 AM, benj wrote: >>>>> On 4/7/2018 10:48 AM, Sergio wrote: >>>>>> On 4/7/2018 9:33 AM, kensi wrote: >>>>>>> A 1988 Royal Dutch Shell report recently published online shows that >>>>>>> the >>>>>>> company knew decades ago what the impact of climate change would be. >>>>>>> ... >>>>>>> The report, titled “The Greenhouse Effect,” said the effects of >>>>>>> climate >>>>>>> change would be notable by the late 20th Century and early 21st: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> https://globalnews.ca/news/4127757/shell-climate-change-report-1988/ >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> <yawn> it has been in elementary school textbooks since 1960's >>>>>> >>>>> Kensi and journalists lie as always. There could be no such report >>>>> because "climate change" is a term just recently invented by >>>>> journalists and other wormballers when the global temperature "hockey >>>>> stick" stopped going up. >>>>> >>>>> Expect some Royal Dutch Shell Vice president to sell out and appear >>>>> all over TV and legacy media telling how oil companies "always" knew >>>>> selling oil would end all life on the planet. Just as they did with >>>>> cigarettes where they got sell-out VPs to swear tobacco companies >>>>> always knew their products caused cancer. Lib agenda 101. >>>> >>>> How to be a prophet. >>>> 1. Make predictions on all possible outcomes. >>>> 2. When one comes true, point it out. >>>> 3. Ignore all the predictions that don't come true. >>>> >>> >>> **Except that ALL the climatologists have to been telling us that the >>> planet is warming. Since the mid 19th century, in fact. >> >> Odd, I recall during the 1960s & 1970s how there was global cooling and >> it was projected that the next Ice Age was just around the corner. > > **Yeah, except that prediction was never made by any scientific journal on > the planet. It was a NEWSWEEK article. Cite your support for that claim.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-15 08:13 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <fjfcogFfea3U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #680893 |
On 13/04/2018 9:59 AM, Scout wrote: > > > "Trevor Wilson" <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> wrote in message > news:fj7a69FldkrU1@mid.individual.net... >> On 10/04/2018 11:10 AM, Scout wrote: >>> >>> >>> "Trevor Wilson" <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> wrote in message >>> news:fitsnfFh29bU2@mid.individual.net... >>>> On 8/04/2018 3:58 AM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>> On 4/7/2018 9:43 AM, benj wrote: >>>>>> On 4/7/2018 10:48 AM, Sergio wrote: >>>>>>> On 4/7/2018 9:33 AM, kensi wrote: >>>>>>>> A 1988 Royal Dutch Shell report recently published online shows >>>>>>>> that the >>>>>>>> company knew decades ago what the impact of climate change would >>>>>>>> be. ... >>>>>>>> The report, titled “The Greenhouse Effect,” said the effects of >>>>>>>> climate >>>>>>>> change would be notable by the late 20th Century and early 21st: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> https://globalnews.ca/news/4127757/shell-climate-change-report-1988/ >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> <yawn> it has been in elementary school textbooks since 1960's >>>>>>> >>>>>> Kensi and journalists lie as always. There could be no such report >>>>>> because "climate change" is a term just recently invented by >>>>>> journalists and other wormballers when the global temperature >>>>>> "hockey stick" stopped going up. >>>>>> >>>>>> Expect some Royal Dutch Shell Vice president to sell out and >>>>>> appear all over TV and legacy media telling how oil companies >>>>>> "always" knew selling oil would end all life on the planet. Just >>>>>> as they did with cigarettes where they got sell-out VPs to swear >>>>>> tobacco companies always knew their products caused cancer. Lib >>>>>> agenda 101. >>>>> >>>>> How to be a prophet. >>>>> 1. Make predictions on all possible outcomes. >>>>> 2. When one comes true, point it out. >>>>> 3. Ignore all the predictions that don't come true. >>>>> >>>> >>>> **Except that ALL the climatologists have to been telling us that >>>> the planet is warming. Since the mid 19th century, in fact. >>> >>> Odd, I recall during the 1960s & 1970s how there was global cooling >>> and it was projected that the next Ice Age was just around the corner. >> >> **Yeah, except that prediction was never made by any scientific >> journal on the planet. It was a NEWSWEEK article. > > Cite your support for that claim. **Are you serious? OK: https://longreads.com/2017/04/13/in-1975-newsweek-predicted-a-new-ice-age-were-still-living-with-the-consequences/ https://longreads.com/2017/04/13/in-1975-newsweek-predicted-a-new-ice-age-were-still-living-with-the-consequences/ See? This is the problem. The deniers hold fast to one, popular news story and claim it was the scientific consensus of the mid-1970s. It wasn't. Even back then, the vast majority of climate scientists were expressing concerns that AGW was a real threat to our civilisation. Nothing has altered, except predictions made have been shown to be remarkably accurate and we now have much more information to confirm the theory as the most valid one to explain the warming noted in the past 150 years. -- Trevor Wilson www.rageaudio.com.au
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-15 08:48 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <fjfeq4Ffr4oU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #681074 |
On 15/04/2018 8:13 AM, Trevor Wilson wrote: > On 13/04/2018 9:59 AM, Scout wrote: >> >> >> "Trevor Wilson" <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> wrote in message >> news:fj7a69FldkrU1@mid.individual.net... >>> On 10/04/2018 11:10 AM, Scout wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> "Trevor Wilson" <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> wrote in message >>>> news:fitsnfFh29bU2@mid.individual.net... >>>>> On 8/04/2018 3:58 AM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>> On 4/7/2018 9:43 AM, benj wrote: >>>>>>> On 4/7/2018 10:48 AM, Sergio wrote: >>>>>>>> On 4/7/2018 9:33 AM, kensi wrote: >>>>>>>>> A 1988 Royal Dutch Shell report recently published online shows >>>>>>>>> that the >>>>>>>>> company knew decades ago what the impact of climate change >>>>>>>>> would be. ... >>>>>>>>> The report, titled “The Greenhouse Effect,” said the effects of >>>>>>>>> climate >>>>>>>>> change would be notable by the late 20th Century and early 21st: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> https://globalnews.ca/news/4127757/shell-climate-change-report-1988/ >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> <yawn> it has been in elementary school textbooks since 1960's >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> Kensi and journalists lie as always. There could be no such >>>>>>> report because "climate change" is a term just recently invented >>>>>>> by journalists and other wormballers when the global temperature >>>>>>> "hockey stick" stopped going up. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Expect some Royal Dutch Shell Vice president to sell out and >>>>>>> appear all over TV and legacy media telling how oil companies >>>>>>> "always" knew selling oil would end all life on the planet. Just >>>>>>> as they did with cigarettes where they got sell-out VPs to swear >>>>>>> tobacco companies always knew their products caused cancer. Lib >>>>>>> agenda 101. >>>>>> >>>>>> How to be a prophet. >>>>>> 1. Make predictions on all possible outcomes. >>>>>> 2. When one comes true, point it out. >>>>>> 3. Ignore all the predictions that don't come true. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> **Except that ALL the climatologists have to been telling us that >>>>> the planet is warming. Since the mid 19th century, in fact. >>>> >>>> Odd, I recall during the 1960s & 1970s how there was global cooling >>>> and it was projected that the next Ice Age was just around the corner. >>> >>> **Yeah, except that prediction was never made by any scientific >>> journal on the planet. It was a NEWSWEEK article. >> >> Cite your support for that claim. > > **Are you serious? > > OK: > > https://longreads.com/2017/04/13/in-1975-newsweek-predicted-a-new-ice-age-were-still-living-with-the-consequences/ > **Oops. Duplicated cite. Here's the other one: http://www.newsweek.com/newsweek-rewind-debunking-global-cooling-252326 -- Trevor Wilson www.rageaudio.com.au
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-18 11:19 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <pb7r65$lh4$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #681079 |
On 4/14/2018 5:48 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote: > On 15/04/2018 8:13 AM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >> On 13/04/2018 9:59 AM, Scout wrote: >>> >>> >>> "Trevor Wilson" <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> wrote in message >>> news:fj7a69FldkrU1@mid.individual.net... >>>> On 10/04/2018 11:10 AM, Scout wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> "Trevor Wilson" <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> wrote in message >>>>> news:fitsnfFh29bU2@mid.individual.net... >>>>>> On 8/04/2018 3:58 AM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>> On 4/7/2018 9:43 AM, benj wrote: >>>>>>>> On 4/7/2018 10:48 AM, Sergio wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 4/7/2018 9:33 AM, kensi wrote: >>>>>>>>>> A 1988 Royal Dutch Shell report recently published online >>>>>>>>>> shows that the >>>>>>>>>> company knew decades ago what the impact of climate change >>>>>>>>>> would be. ... >>>>>>>>>> The report, titled “The Greenhouse Effect,” said the effects >>>>>>>>>> of climate >>>>>>>>>> change would be notable by the late 20th Century and early 21st: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> https://globalnews.ca/news/4127757/shell-climate-change-report-1988/ >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> <yawn> it has been in elementary school textbooks since 1960's >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Kensi and journalists lie as always. There could be no such >>>>>>>> report because "climate change" is a term just recently invented >>>>>>>> by journalists and other wormballers when the global temperature >>>>>>>> "hockey stick" stopped going up. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Expect some Royal Dutch Shell Vice president to sell out and >>>>>>>> appear all over TV and legacy media telling how oil companies >>>>>>>> "always" knew selling oil would end all life on the planet. Just >>>>>>>> as they did with cigarettes where they got sell-out VPs to swear >>>>>>>> tobacco companies always knew their products caused cancer. Lib >>>>>>>> agenda 101. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> How to be a prophet. >>>>>>> 1. Make predictions on all possible outcomes. >>>>>>> 2. When one comes true, point it out. >>>>>>> 3. Ignore all the predictions that don't come true. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> **Except that ALL the climatologists have to been telling us that >>>>>> the planet is warming. Since the mid 19th century, in fact. >>>>> >>>>> Odd, I recall during the 1960s & 1970s how there was global cooling >>>>> and it was projected that the next Ice Age was just around the corner. >>>> >>>> **Yeah, except that prediction was never made by any scientific >>>> journal on the planet. It was a NEWSWEEK article. >>> >>> Cite your support for that claim. >> >> **Are you serious? >> >> OK: >> >> https://longreads.com/2017/04/13/in-1975-newsweek-predicted-a-new-ice-age-were-still-living-with-the-consequences/ >> > > **Oops. Duplicated cite. Here's the other one: > > http://www.newsweek.com/newsweek-rewind-debunking-global-cooling-252326 > > > a quote from "newsweek" https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/newsweek/ Notes: Newsweek is an American weekly news magazine founded in 1933. Over the last few years its content has shifted more to the far left. If this trend continues this source may move to Left bias. (5/18/2016)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-08 16:54 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <fitslhFh29bU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #680185 |
On 8/04/2018 1:43 AM, benj wrote: > On 4/7/2018 10:48 AM, Sergio wrote: >> On 4/7/2018 9:33 AM, kensi wrote: >>> A 1988 Royal Dutch Shell report recently published online shows that the >>> company knew decades ago what the impact of climate change would be. ... >>> The report, titled “The Greenhouse Effect,” said the effects of climate >>> change would be notable by the late 20th Century and early 21st: >>> >>> https://globalnews.ca/news/4127757/shell-climate-change-report-1988/ >>> >> >> <yawn> it has been in elementary school textbooks since 1960's >> > Kensi and journalists lie as always. There could be no such report > because "climate change" is a term just recently invented by journalists > and other wormballers when the global temperature "hockey stick" stopped > going up. **No, my moronic friend. The first time most of us had heard of 'climate change, was back in 1988, when the IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) was formed. Prior to that, we just knew it as 'global warming'. The IPCC was formed to determine if there was climate change, which way it was headed and what, if anything, can be done, or should be done to deal with it. What is a "wormballer"? > > Expect some Royal Dutch Shell Vice president to sell out and appear all > over TV and legacy media telling how oil companies "always" knew selling > oil would end all life on the planet. **Like Exxon's hushed up reports? Just as they did with cigarettes > where they got sell-out VPs to swear tobacco companies always knew their > products caused cancer. Lib agenda 101. **Well, that's not how it went. The tobacco companies swore that their products did not harm humans. Some still do. -- Trevor Wilson www.rageaudio.com.au
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-08 09:04 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <pad7hp$1s28$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #680298 |
On 4/8/2018 1:54 AM, Trevor Wilson wrote: > On 8/04/2018 1:43 AM, benj wrote: >> On 4/7/2018 10:48 AM, Sergio wrote: >>> On 4/7/2018 9:33 AM, kensi wrote: >>>> A 1988 Royal Dutch Shell report recently published online shows that >>>> the >>>> company knew decades ago what the impact of climate change would be. >>>> ... >>>> The report, titled “The Greenhouse Effect,” said the effects of climate >>>> change would be notable by the late 20th Century and early 21st: >>>> >>>> https://globalnews.ca/news/4127757/shell-climate-change-report-1988/ >>>> >>> >>> <yawn> it has been in elementary school textbooks since 1960's >>> >> Kensi and journalists lie as always. There could be no such report >> because "climate change" is a term just recently invented by >> journalists and other wormballers when the global temperature "hockey >> stick" stopped going up. > > **No, my moronic friend. The first time most of us had heard of 'climate > change, was back in 1988, when the IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on > Climate Change) was formed. Prior to that, we just knew it as 'global > warming'. The IPCC was formed to determine if there was climate change, > which way it was headed and what, if anything, can be done, or should be > done to deal with it. > > What is a "wormballer"? google for it, we're spoonfeeding McGinn this week. > > >> >> Expect some Royal Dutch Shell Vice president to sell out and appear >> all over TV and legacy media telling how oil companies "always" knew >> selling oil would end all life on the planet. > > **Like Exxon's hushed up reports? > > > Just as they did with cigarettes >> where they got sell-out VPs to swear tobacco companies always knew >> their products caused cancer. Lib agenda 101. > > **Well, that's not how it went. The tobacco companies swore that their > products did not harm humans. Some still do. > >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-08 11:29 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <padcgi$5eh$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #680315 |
On 4/8/2018 10:04 AM, Sergio wrote: > On 4/8/2018 1:54 AM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >> What is a "wormballer"? > > google for it, All I get is gross results about the mating habits of annelids. Try again. -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-08 12:22 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <TkryC.18947$K%2.605@fx38.iad> |
| In reply to | #680321 |
On 4/8/2018 11:29 AM, kensi wrote: > On 4/8/2018 10:04 AM, Sergio wrote: >> On 4/8/2018 1:54 AM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>> What is a "wormballer"? >> >> google for it, > > All I get is gross results about the mating habits of annelids. > > Try again. > Come on, "kensi" just lay back and enjoy the "science"!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-08 11:22 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <padfkh$bc5$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #680321 |
On 4/8/2018 10:29 AM, kensi wrote:
> On 4/8/2018 10:04 AM, Sergio wrote:
>> On 4/8/2018 1:54 AM, Trevor Wilson wrote:
>>> What is a "wormballer"?
>>
>> google for it,
>
> All I get is gross results about the mating habits of annelids.
>
google got you in your 'google bubble'. clear cashe first
> Try again.
>
why are you kensi, spoon feeding Trevor ?
here are some more sippies;
https://www.facebook.com/public/Worm-Ball?_fb_noscript=1
https://www.teaparty.org/unreal-climate-alarmists-caught-red-handed-faking-sea-level-rise-humiliating-280382/
https://www.ctvnews.ca/sci-tech/worm-balls-baffle-park-rangers-in-texas-1.2406385
http://forums.canadiancontent.net/news/105671-climate-alarmist-calls-burning-down.html
https://pioneeringthesimplelife.org/2016/03/08/worm-ball-composting/
"Night of The Living Wormballer."
https://www.forbes.com/sites/peterferrara/2012/05/31/sorry-global-warming-alarmists-the-earth-is-cooling/#4f6ef8ac3de0
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-08 12:17 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <kgryC.2580$4W2.1651@fx25.iad> |
| In reply to | #680298 |
On 4/8/2018 2:54 AM, Trevor Wilson wrote: > On 8/04/2018 1:43 AM, benj wrote: >> On 4/7/2018 10:48 AM, Sergio wrote: >>> On 4/7/2018 9:33 AM, kensi wrote: >>>> A 1988 Royal Dutch Shell report recently published online shows that >>>> the >>>> company knew decades ago what the impact of climate change would be. >>>> ... >>>> The report, titled “The Greenhouse Effect,” said the effects of climate >>>> change would be notable by the late 20th Century and early 21st: >>>> >>>> https://globalnews.ca/news/4127757/shell-climate-change-report-1988/ >>>> >>> >>> <yawn> it has been in elementary school textbooks since 1960's >>> >> Kensi and journalists lie as always. There could be no such report >> because "climate change" is a term just recently invented by >> journalists and other wormballers when the global temperature "hockey >> stick" stopped going up. > > **No, my moronic friend. The first time most of us had heard of 'climate > change, was back in 1988, when the IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on > Climate Change) was formed. Prior to that, we just knew it as 'global > warming'. The IPCC was formed to determine if there was climate change, > which way it was headed and what, if anything, can be done, or should be > done to deal with it. Climate has been changing since was climate, but being used by you scammers as a propaganda term to cover up the sudden lack of "hockey stick" is new. I'll wait here while you "prove" you "won" by showing me how long the words "climate" and"change" have been in the dictionary. You really are a pathetic crook. > What is a "wormballer"? I love making you lib kooks dance! A misspelling ropes you in every time doesn't it? It must be sad to have a life where you total useful knowledge is spelling, grammar and how to tell lies. >> >> Expect some Royal Dutch Shell Vice president to sell out and appear >> all over TV and legacy media telling how oil companies "always" knew >> selling oil would end all life on the planet. > > **Like Exxon's hushed up reports? > Got a VP sold out yet to parade on TV? Worked for Tobacco and can work here, right? > > Just as they did with cigarettes >> where they got sell-out VPs to swear tobacco companies always knew >> their products caused cancer. Lib agenda 101. > > **Well, that's not how it went. The tobacco companies swore that their > products did not harm humans. Some still do. Still no proof cigarettes CAUSE cancer anymore than there is science that proves man-made CO2 causes global warming. Lies are all you know Trevor which is why it is a total waste of time trying to hold a sane conversation with you.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-08 12:29 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <padg0d$btg$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #680327 |
On 4/8/2018 12:17 PM, benj wrote: > Still no proof cigarettes CAUSE cancer anymore than there is science > that proves man-made CO2 causes global warming. Then you should smoke as many packs a day as you can afford, benj. *snicker* -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-08 23:46 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <umByC.16773$FZ2.13868@fx33.iad> |
| In reply to | #680332 |
On 4/8/2018 12:29 PM, kensi wrote: > On 4/8/2018 12:17 PM, benj wrote: >> Still no proof cigarettes CAUSE cancer anymore than there is science >> that proves man-made CO2 causes global warming. > > Then you should smoke as many packs a day as you can afford, benj. > > *snicker* > Gave up smoking years ago. You libs are always so violent wishing for people dead! You all need to be banned! If Tobacco "causes" cancer then why are there people 100 years old who smoked their whole life who don't have it. It's funny that science doesn't know what "causes" cancer but you libs and your fantasies do. A modulating factor? maybe. But like all combustion products sucking in a lot of them is not a good idea. But you scammers never say cut back on pollution, you all say cut back on CO2 which is of unproven effect. You libs always leave a wide swath of destruction everywhere your stupidity scorches the earth.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-09 14:10 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <fj07d3F2iaaU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #680404 |
On 9/04/2018 1:46 PM, benj wrote: > On 4/8/2018 12:29 PM, kensi wrote: >> On 4/8/2018 12:17 PM, benj wrote: >>> Still no proof cigarettes CAUSE cancer anymore than there is science >>> that proves man-made CO2 causes global warming. >> >> Then you should smoke as many packs a day as you can afford, benj. >> >> *snicker* >> > Gave up smoking years ago. You libs are always so violent wishing for > people dead! You all need to be banned! > > If Tobacco "causes" cancer then why are there people 100 years old who > smoked their whole life who don't have it. **Again: Tobacco does not "cause cancer". SMOKING tobacco products increases one's risk of acquiring a smoking related disease. That includes a variety of cancers. It's funny that science > doesn't know what "causes" cancer but you libs and your fantasies do. **Actually, science does know what causes SOME cancers. Science does not know what causes ALL cancers. > > A modulating factor? maybe. But like all combustion products sucking in > a lot of them is not a good idea. But you scammers never say cut back on > pollution, you all say cut back on CO2 which is of unproven effect. **Wrong. CO2 is a known greenhouse gas. You > libs always leave a wide swath of destruction everywhere your stupidity > scorches the earth. **There you go again: Displaying your stupidity for all to see. -- Trevor Wilson www.rageaudio.com.au
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 2 of 10 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 … 10 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web