Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #678885 > unrolled thread
| Started by | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-03-29 06:12 -0400 |
| Last post | 2018-03-29 18:33 -0500 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 187 — 14 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-03-29 06:12 -0400
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-03-29 08:55 -0500
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-03-29 10:03 -0400
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-03-29 11:11 -0500
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-03-29 13:51 -0400
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-03-29 13:56 -0500
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-03-30 05:40 +0000
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-03-30 09:04 -0500
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-03-30 08:25 -0600
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-03-30 11:53 -0400
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-01 07:30 +1000
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-03-31 19:46 -0400
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-01 10:08 +1000
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-03-31 19:26 -0500
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-03-31 20:56 -0400
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-01 11:27 +1000
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-03-31 22:00 -0400
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-01 14:57 +1000
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-01 00:41 -0500
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-01 17:31 +1000
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-01 11:46 -0500
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-02 10:37 +1000
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-01 22:11 -0500
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-02 00:03 -0400
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-02 05:27 -0400
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-02 09:25 -0500
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-04 07:12 +1000
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-03 20:10 -0500
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-04 13:18 +1000
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-03 23:12 -0500
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-04 14:39 +1000
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-04 08:40 -0400
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-04 08:15 -0400
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-04 08:04 -0400
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-04 08:02 -0600
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-02 00:01 -0400
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-02 09:25 -0500
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-02 05:16 -0400
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-02 09:26 -0500
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-02 19:38 -0400
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-01 12:39 -0400
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-02 11:22 +1000
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-02 18:29 -0400
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-03 12:07 +1000
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> - 2018-04-02 22:26 -0400
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-02 05:35 -0400
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-02 09:29 -0500
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-02 19:57 -0400
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-03 15:51 +1000
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-03 09:30 -0500
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-03 14:20 -0400
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-03 12:23 -0600
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-03 13:47 -0500
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-03 13:21 -0600
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-03 15:39 -0500
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-03 14:54 -0600
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-04-03 13:59 -0700
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-03 15:03 -0600
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-04-03 14:09 -0700
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-03 18:48 -0500
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-03 18:15 -0600
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-04-03 17:23 -0700
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-03 18:26 -0600
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-04-03 17:40 -0700
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-03 18:51 -0600
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-04-03 17:57 -0700
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-03 19:39 -0600
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-04-03 18:43 -0700
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-03 19:48 -0600
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-04-03 18:50 -0700
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-04 08:53 -0400
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-04 08:57 -0500
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-04 08:04 -0600
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-03 07:09 -0400
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-03 09:31 -0500
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-04-01 06:13 +0000
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-04-01 01:45 -0500
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-01 06:29 -0400
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-04-01 05:46 +0000
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-01 00:49 -0500
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-04-01 01:20 -0500
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-01 06:25 -0600
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-01 18:38 -0500
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-04-01 06:45 +0000
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-04-01 01:50 -0500
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-01 06:26 -0600
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-01 13:37 -0500
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-01 02:12 -0500
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-04-01 02:31 -0500
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-01 06:24 -0600
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-01 06:53 +1000
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-03-31 17:57 -0500
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-03-31 18:20 -0500
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-01 09:42 +1000
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-03-31 20:52 -0400
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-03-31 20:18 -0500
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-01 15:03 +1000
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-01 00:46 -0500
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-01 19:14 +1000
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-01 15:34 -0500
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-02 18:10 -0400
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-03 16:38 +1000
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-03 09:35 -0500
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-04 06:03 +1000
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-03 14:26 -0600
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-04 07:19 +1000
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-03 15:24 -0600
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-04 08:01 +1000
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-03 16:06 -0600
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-04 09:05 +1000
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-03 18:58 -0500
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-04 10:04 +1000
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-03 18:17 -0600
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-04 10:37 +1000
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-03 18:50 -0600
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-03 22:29 -0500
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-03 18:13 -0600
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-04 12:39 +1000
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-03 22:35 -0500
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-03 15:44 -0500
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-03 14:58 -0600
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-04 07:21 +1000
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-03 19:14 -0500
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-04 10:41 +1000
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-03 22:49 -0500
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-04 14:03 +1000
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-04 09:15 -0500
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-04 10:20 -0400
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-04 08:32 -0600
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-04 10:55 -0500
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-04-04 19:16 +0000
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-04 13:17 -0600
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-04 14:33 -0500
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-04 18:17 -0400
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2018-04-04 22:23 +0000
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-04 16:24 -0600
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-05 08:35 +1000
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-04 16:41 -0600
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-04 20:06 -0400
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-05 10:19 +1000
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-04 22:35 -0400
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-05 13:44 +1000
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-04 23:04 -0500
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-04 19:38 -0500
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-04 22:37 -0400
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-04 17:40 -0500
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-04 16:59 -0600
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-04 20:18 -0400
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-04-03 17:16 -0600
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-04 10:02 +1000
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-03 18:14 -0600
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-03 19:17 -0500
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-03-31 20:40 -0400
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-01 11:28 +1000
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-03-31 22:05 -0400
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2018-04-01 08:57 +0000
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-04-01 04:42 -0500
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-01 06:29 -0600
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2018-04-02 17:34 +0000
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-02 13:26 -0600
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-04-02 20:05 +0000
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-02 15:41 -0500
NOMINATIONS Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-04-04 19:17 +0000
Re: NOMINATIONS Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-04 13:20 -0600
Re: NOMINATIONS Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2018-04-04 22:26 +0000
Re: NOMINATIONS Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-04 16:36 -0600
Re: NOMINATIONS Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2018-04-04 22:46 +0000
Re: NOMINATIONS Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-04 17:02 -0600
Re: NOMINATIONS Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-04 18:25 -0400
Re: NOMINATIONS Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-04 16:33 -0600
Re: NOMINATIONS Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2018-04-04 22:47 +0000
Re: NOMINATIONS Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-04 17:03 -0600
Re: NOMINATIONS Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-04-04 23:52 +0000
Re: NOMINATIONS Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-04 17:55 -0600
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-03-31 23:14 -0500
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-03-31 20:23 -0500
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-03-31 18:28 -0700
China is winning the game (imperialism). Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-03-29 08:46 -0700
Re: China is winning the game (imperialism). Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-03-29 11:14 -0500
If your ambition is that low, you deserve it, right ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-03-29 09:26 -0700
Re: If your ambition is that low, you deserve it, right ? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-03-29 15:05 -0500
Re: If your ambition is that low, you deserve it, right ? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-03-29 18:00 -0400
Re: China is winning the game (imperialism). benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-03-29 13:53 -0400
Re: China is winning the game (imperialism). mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-03-29 14:32 -0400
Re: China is winning the game (imperialism). Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-03-29 13:34 -0700
Re: China is winning the game (imperialism). benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-03-29 17:54 -0400
Re: China is winning the game (imperialism). Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-03-29 18:33 -0500
Page 5 of 10 — ← Prev page 1 … 3 4 [5] 6 7 … 10 Next page →
| From | Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-01 01:20 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <RbGdnXgpDcy7513HnZ2dnUU7-f3NnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #679365 |
On Sun, 1 Apr 2018 00:49:33 -0500, LO AND BEHOLD; "Sergio <invalid@invalid.com>" determined that the following was of great importance and subsequently decided to freely share it with us in <p9pruk$65b$2@gioia.aioe.org>: >On 4/1/2018 12:46 AM, Nadegda wrote: >>Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >>On Sat, 31 Mar 2018 20:56:54 -0400, benj wrote: >>>On 3/31/2018 8:08 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>>On 1/04/2018 9:46 AM, benj wrote: >>>>>On 3/31/2018 5:30 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>>>>On 31/03/2018 2:53 AM, benj wrote: >>>>>>>On 3/30/2018 1:40 AM, Nadegda wrote: >>>>>>>>Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >>>>>>>>On Thu, 29 Mar 2018 13:56:15 -0500, Sergio wrote: >>>>>>>>>why believe that outragous full of numbnuts shit article link kensi pupa >>>>>>>>>posted? >>>>>>>>If it's so "outragous[sic]" and impossible to believe, why do you froth >>>>>>>>so? Obviously, you fear kensi's message, which puts the lie to your >>>>>>>>k'lame that it's too silly to be believed. >>>>>>>Telling you that you are an uneducated immature clown is hardly froth. >>>>>>>It is simply fact and is strong evidence that your beliefs are are all >>>>>>>nonsense. Your froth above shows you and "kensi" fear exposure of you >>>>>>>lack of science knowledge and try to cover the fact with bluster. >>>>>>>Nobody is fooled. Have a nice day. >>>>>>**Pot, kettle, black you moron. >>>>>Liberal "science": puerile name-calling. >>>>**Name calling? Nope. Just stating fact. You fail miserably to back any >>>>of your insane claims. You fail miserably to answer any of my questions >>>>and you fail miserably to respond to any of my points. You are a lying >>>>moron. >>>>>>>Big hint, Nads: Journalists are NOT scientists and know no science. >>>>>>**Not necessarily. >>>>>True, >>>>**There you go. That wasn't hard, was it? You finally admitted to one of >>>>your many lies. one down, about a million to go. I won't be holding my >>>>breath. >>>Lib liars always accuse others of being the liars. I note that you >>>provide no evidence of any journalist knowing any science. I can live >>>with a single theoretical exception. I accept the truth that there ARE >>>scientists who know science who have sold out for money, fame, >>>employment etc. and purposely lie and distort facts for their handlers >>>even though they know better. >>Yep; a lot of them work for the big oil companies. Perhaps you even know >>some of them? > >prove it, Nads pupa, > >http://www.populartechnology.net/2011/05/are-skeptical-scientists-funded >-by.html prove that you don't have the same killfile that gergles the klown trotted out a few days back. or better yet... you and he post at exactly the same time with the same timestamp and "prove" that you aren't the same person... bc that's a "very reasonable" test of "anything"? -- THIS SPACE FOR RENT https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iB6B8jGSdLA "Thanks to muzzies and their apologist-enablers like puppy whistle, this seems to be the new norm in the world. It's spreading like a cancer, and it's time we admit we're at war with pure evil. We need to put an end to this muzzie plague, or life on Earth is going to become pure hell everywhere. We need to get these people out of every civilized country, and there's only one way to do it. IOW, we have to become like them, with an emphasis on expediency over cruelty." - Checkmate (of alt.checkmate) "Pussy Willow has just proven that Trump's crackdown on previously unenforced immigration policies is working. We'll deal with the domestic terrorists as needed, but we don't need to be letting the muzzie terrorists get a foothold in our country too. One need only look at what they're doing in Europe right now to know we're doing the right thing by keeping them out, which is our right and our duty. - Checkmate (#1 pussy willow fan) - "You just made puppy whistle's sig line longer." - Janithor - "If I have a complaint about the (Southern Poverty) Law Center's description (of the alt-right movement), it is the phrase "heavy use of social media," which implies the alt-right is a real-world movement which uses a lot of social media. This is backwards: it is an online movement which occasionally appears in the real world. Where it gets punched." - Jason Rhode - "I think we should destroy every last fucking mosque in America." - "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> proves for us that white males are violent in Message-ID: <MPG.32c5bfefd18c9a698f0a8@news.altopia.com> - Golden Killfile, June 2005 KOTM, November 2006 Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006 Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006 Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007 Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006 Busted Urinal Award, April 2007 Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007 Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006 Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008 Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007 AUK Mascot, September 2007 Putting the Awards Out of Order to Screw With the OCD Fuckheads, March 2016
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-01 06:25 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <5tj1cd98705plq28k82unb20llhltm4ugp@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #679367 |
On Sun, 01 Apr 2018 01:20:22 -0500, Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ?? <root@127.0.0.1> wrote: >On Sun, 1 Apr 2018 00:49:33 -0500, LO AND BEHOLD; "Sergio ><invalid@invalid.com>" determined that the following was of great >importance and subsequently decided to freely share it with us in ><p9pruk$65b$2@gioia.aioe.org>: > >>On 4/1/2018 12:46 AM, Nadegda wrote: >>>Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >>>On Sat, 31 Mar 2018 20:56:54 -0400, benj wrote: >>>>On 3/31/2018 8:08 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>>>On 1/04/2018 9:46 AM, benj wrote: >>>>>>On 3/31/2018 5:30 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>>>>>On 31/03/2018 2:53 AM, benj wrote: >>>>>>>>On 3/30/2018 1:40 AM, Nadegda wrote: >>>>>>>>>Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >>>>>>>>>On Thu, 29 Mar 2018 13:56:15 -0500, Sergio wrote: >>>>>>>>>>why believe that outragous full of numbnuts shit article link kensi pupa >>>>>>>>>>posted? >>>>>>>>>If it's so "outragous[sic]" and impossible to believe, why do you froth >>>>>>>>>so? Obviously, you fear kensi's message, which puts the lie to your >>>>>>>>>k'lame that it's too silly to be believed. >>>>>>>>Telling you that you are an uneducated immature clown is hardly froth. >>>>>>>>It is simply fact and is strong evidence that your beliefs are are all >>>>>>>>nonsense. Your froth above shows you and "kensi" fear exposure of you >>>>>>>>lack of science knowledge and try to cover the fact with bluster. >>>>>>>>Nobody is fooled. Have a nice day. >>>>>>>**Pot, kettle, black you moron. >>>>>>Liberal "science": puerile name-calling. >>>>>**Name calling? Nope. Just stating fact. You fail miserably to back any >>>>>of your insane claims. You fail miserably to answer any of my questions >>>>>and you fail miserably to respond to any of my points. You are a lying >>>>>moron. >>>>>>>>Big hint, Nads: Journalists are NOT scientists and know no science. >>>>>>>**Not necessarily. >>>>>>True, >>>>>**There you go. That wasn't hard, was it? You finally admitted to one of >>>>>your many lies. one down, about a million to go. I won't be holding my >>>>>breath. >>>>Lib liars always accuse others of being the liars. I note that you >>>>provide no evidence of any journalist knowing any science. I can live >>>>with a single theoretical exception. I accept the truth that there ARE >>>>scientists who know science who have sold out for money, fame, >>>>employment etc. and purposely lie and distort facts for their handlers >>>>even though they know better. >>>Yep; a lot of them work for the big oil companies. Perhaps you even know >>>some of them? >> >>prove it, Nads pupa, >> >>http://www.populartechnology.net/2011/05/are-skeptical-scientists-funded >>-by.html > >prove that you don't have the same killfile that gergles the klown trotted out a few days back. > >or better yet... you and he post at exactly the same time with the same timestamp and "prove" that you aren't the same person... bc that's a "very reasonable" test of "anything"? paranoid much? -- MAUKGA
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-01 18:38 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <p9rqi8$17q6$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #679399 |
On 4/1/2018 7:25 AM, Skeeter wrote: > On Sun, 01 Apr 2018 01:20:22 -0500, Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy > Whistle Holder Emeritus ?? <root@127.0.0.1> wrote: > >> On Sun, 1 Apr 2018 00:49:33 -0500, LO AND BEHOLD; "Sergio >> <invalid@invalid.com>" determined that the following was of great >> importance and subsequently decided to freely share it with us in >> <p9pruk$65b$2@gioia.aioe.org>: >> >>> On 4/1/2018 12:46 AM, Nadegda wrote: >>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >>>> On Sat, 31 Mar 2018 20:56:54 -0400, benj wrote: >>>>> On 3/31/2018 8:08 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>>>> On 1/04/2018 9:46 AM, benj wrote: >>>>>>> On 3/31/2018 5:30 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>>>>>> On 31/03/2018 2:53 AM, benj wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 3/30/2018 1:40 AM, Nadegda wrote: >>>>>>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 29 Mar 2018 13:56:15 -0500, Sergio wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> why believe that outragous full of numbnuts shit article link kensi pupa >>>>>>>>>>> posted? >>>>>>>>>> If it's so "outragous[sic]" and impossible to believe, why do you froth >>>>>>>>>> so? Obviously, you fear kensi's message, which puts the lie to your >>>>>>>>>> k'lame that it's too silly to be believed. >>>>>>>>> Telling you that you are an uneducated immature clown is hardly froth. >>>>>>>>> It is simply fact and is strong evidence that your beliefs are are all >>>>>>>>> nonsense. Your froth above shows you and "kensi" fear exposure of you >>>>>>>>> lack of science knowledge and try to cover the fact with bluster. >>>>>>>>> Nobody is fooled. Have a nice day. >>>>>>>> **Pot, kettle, black you moron. >>>>>>> Liberal "science": puerile name-calling. >>>>>> **Name calling? Nope. Just stating fact. You fail miserably to back any >>>>>> of your insane claims. You fail miserably to answer any of my questions >>>>>> and you fail miserably to respond to any of my points. You are a lying >>>>>> moron. >>>>>>>>> Big hint, Nads: Journalists are NOT scientists and know no science. >>>>>>>> **Not necessarily. >>>>>>> True, >>>>>> **There you go. That wasn't hard, was it? You finally admitted to one of >>>>>> your many lies. one down, about a million to go. I won't be holding my >>>>>> breath. >>>>> Lib liars always accuse others of being the liars. I note that you >>>>> provide no evidence of any journalist knowing any science. I can live >>>>> with a single theoretical exception. I accept the truth that there ARE >>>>> scientists who know science who have sold out for money, fame, >>>>> employment etc. and purposely lie and distort facts for their handlers >>>>> even though they know better. >>>> Yep; a lot of them work for the big oil companies. Perhaps you even know >>>> some of them? >>> >>> prove it, Nads pupa, >>> >>> http://www.populartechnology.net/2011/05/are-skeptical-scientists-funded >>> -by.html >> >> prove that you don't have the same killfile that gergles the klown trotted out a few days back. >> >> or better yet... you and he post at exactly the same time with the same timestamp and "prove" that you aren't the same person... bc that's a "very reasonable" test of "anything"? > > > paranoid much? > timestamp is put on by the receivers computer, isn't it ?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-01 06:45 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <p9pv6s$10k$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #679365 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Sun, 01 Apr 2018 00:49:33 -0500, Sergio wrote: > On 4/1/2018 12:46 AM, Nadegda wrote: >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >> melt! >> On Sat, 31 Mar 2018 20:56:54 -0400, benj wrote: >> >>> On 3/31/2018 8:08 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>> On 1/04/2018 9:46 AM, benj wrote: >>>>> On 3/31/2018 5:30 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>>>> On 31/03/2018 2:53 AM, benj wrote: >>>>>>> On 3/30/2018 1:40 AM, Nadegda wrote: >>>>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, >>>>>>>> snowflakes, >>>>>>>> melt! >>>>>>>> On Thu, 29 Mar 2018 13:56:15 -0500, Sergio wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> why believe that outragous full of numbnuts shit article link >>>>>>>>> kensi pupa posted? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> If it's so "outragous[sic]" and impossible to believe, why do you >>>>>>>> froth so? Obviously, you fear kensi's message, which puts the lie >>>>>>>> to your k'lame that it's too silly to be believed. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> Telling you that you are an uneducated immature clown is hardly >>>>>>> froth. It is simply fact and is strong evidence that your beliefs >>>>>>> are are all nonsense. Your froth above shows you and "kensi" fear >>>>>>> exposure of you lack of science knowledge and try to cover the >>>>>>> fact with bluster. Nobody is fooled. Have a nice day. >>>>>> >>>>>> **Pot, kettle, black you moron. >>>>> >>>>> Liberal "science": puerile name-calling. >>>> >>>> **Name calling? Nope. Just stating fact. You fail miserably to back >>>> any of your insane claims. You fail miserably to answer any of my >>>> questions and you fail miserably to respond to any of my points. You >>>> are a lying moron. >>>> >>>> >>>>>>> Big hint, Nads: Journalists are NOT scientists and know no >>>>>>> science. >>>>>> >>>>>> **Not necessarily. >>>>> >>>>> True, >>>> >>>> **There you go. That wasn't hard, was it? You finally admitted to one >>>> of your many lies. one down, about a million to go. I won't be >>>> holding my breath. >>>> >>>> >>> Lib liars always accuse others of being the liars. I note that you >>> provide no evidence of any journalist knowing any science. I can live >>> with a single theoretical exception. >>> >>> I accept the truth that there ARE scientists who know science who have >>> sold out for money, fame, employment etc. and purposely lie and >>> distort facts for their handlers even though they know better. >> >> Yep; a lot of them work for the big oil companies. Perhaps you even >> know some of them? >> >> > prove it, Nads pupa, > > http://www.populartechnology.net/2011/05/are-skeptical-scientists-funded- by.html Notorious denier kookshite: https://whac-a-troll.blogspot.ca/2014/09/despite-claims-to-contrary.html http://www.carbonbrief.org/blog/2011/04/900-papers-part-two-using-our- paper-is-misleading http://rogerpielkejr.blogspot.com.au/2009/11/better-recheck-that-list.html ---------- After repeated communication with the authors of http:// www.populartechnology.net I have concluded that the content of the site is intentionally inaccurate and misleading. That list a paper on which I am a coauthor as "skeptical." Our paper supports the view that man-made climate change is a substantial danger to human health and the environment. The site refused to remove our paper(s) from their list after repeated written requests to do so. ---------- SPANKY-SPANKY! And from the horse's mouth, we have this bald-faced lie: "This site receives no funding of any kind" Erm, whut? Then how does it pay the bills? Obviously it gets money from some source. I believe that technically constitutes "funding". So: what's the source? Not disclosed, of course. The site's two authors refuse to disclose their surnames, probably because they're either fake or a quick LinkedIn lookup would find them at places like the Heritage Foundation, ExxonMobil, the RNC, and BP. So: anonymous authorship, totally opaque funding, and caught in at least two bald-faced lies (listing a pro climate change paper as anti climate change *and* claiming to have zero income while still magically, somehow, paying for bandwidth and hosting): every sort of credibility red flag, all at the same time. Go to skepticalscience's about page and you'll find the author's full name, a clear statement of their funding source and methods, and etc., by contrast. -- FNVWe Nadegda Fakey couldn't teach a monkey to eat a banana, much less answer a direct question posed to him. -- Fakey's Dogwhistle Holder
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-01 01:50 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <W4ydnS-kwqKsHF3HnZ2dnUU7-IXNnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #679369 |
On Sun, 1 Apr 2018 06:45:48 -0000 (UTC), LO AND BEHOLD; "Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid>" determined that the following was of great importance and subsequently decided to freely share it with us in <p9pv6s$10k$3@dont-email.me>: >Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >On Sun, 01 Apr 2018 00:49:33 -0500, Sergio wrote: > >>On 4/1/2018 12:46 AM, Nadegda wrote: >>>Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >>>On Sat, 31 Mar 2018 20:56:54 -0400, benj wrote: >>>>On 3/31/2018 8:08 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>>>On 1/04/2018 9:46 AM, benj wrote: >>>>>>On 3/31/2018 5:30 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>>>>>On 31/03/2018 2:53 AM, benj wrote: >>>>>>>>On 3/30/2018 1:40 AM, Nadegda wrote: >>>>>>>>>Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >>>>>>>>>On Thu, 29 Mar 2018 13:56:15 -0500, Sergio wrote: >>>>>>>>>>why believe that outragous full of numbnuts shit article link kensi pupa >>>>>>>>>>posted? >>>>>>>>>If it's so "outragous[sic]" and impossible to believe, why do you froth >>>>>>>>>so? Obviously, you fear kensi's message, which puts the lie to your >>>>>>>>>k'lame that it's too silly to be believed. >>>>>>>>Telling you that you are an uneducated immature clown is hardly froth. >>>>>>>>It is simply fact and is strong evidence that your beliefs are are all >>>>>>>>nonsense. Your froth above shows you and "kensi" fear exposure of you >>>>>>>>lack of science knowledge and try to cover the fact with bluster. >>>>>>>>Nobody is fooled. Have a nice day. >>>>>>>**Pot, kettle, black you moron. >>>>>>Liberal "science": puerile name-calling. >>>>>**Name calling? Nope. Just stating fact. You fail miserably to back any >>>>>of your insane claims. You fail miserably to answer any of my questions >>>>>and you fail miserably to respond to any of my points. You are a lying >>>>>moron. >>>>>>>>Big hint, Nads: Journalists are NOT scientists and know no science. >>>>>>>**Not necessarily. >>>>>>True, >>>>>**There you go. That wasn't hard, was it? You finally admitted to one of >>>>>your many lies. one down, about a million to go. I won't be holding my >>>>>breath. >>>>Lib liars always accuse others of being the liars. I note that you >>>>provide no evidence of any journalist knowing any science. I can live >>>>with a single theoretical exception. I accept the truth that there ARE >>>>scientists who know science who have sold out for money, fame, >>>>employment etc. and purposely lie and distort facts for their handlers >>>>even though they know better. >>>Yep; a lot of them work for the big oil companies. Perhaps you even know >>>some of them? >>prove it, Nads pupa, >>http://www.populartechnology.net/2011/05/are-skeptical-scientists-funde >>d- >by.html > >Notorious denier kookshite: > >https://whac-a-troll.blogspot.ca/2014/09/despite-claims-to-contrary.html > >http://www.carbonbrief.org/blog/2011/04/900-papers-part-two-using-our- >paper-is-misleading > >http://rogerpielkejr.blogspot.com.au/2009/11/better-recheck-that-list.ht >ml > >---------- After repeated communication with the authors of http:// >www.populartechnology.net I have concluded that the content of the site >is intentionally inaccurate and misleading. That list a paper on which >I am a coauthor as "skeptical." Our paper supports the view that >man-made climate change is a substantial danger to human health and the >environment. The site refused to remove our paper(s) from their list >after repeated written requests to do so. ---------- > >SPANKY-SPANKY! > >And from the horse's mouth, we have this bald-faced lie: > >"This site receives no funding of any kind" > >Erm, whut? Then how does it pay the bills? Obviously it gets money from >some source. I believe that technically constitutes "funding". So: >what's the source? Not disclosed, of course. > >The site's two authors refuse to disclose their surnames, probably >because they're either fake or a quick LinkedIn lookup would find them >at places like the Heritage Foundation, ExxonMobil, the RNC, and BP. > >So: anonymous authorship, totally opaque funding, and caught in at least >two bald-faced lies (listing a pro climate change paper as anti climate >change *and* claiming to have zero income while still magically, >somehow, paying for bandwidth and hosting): every sort of credibility >red flag, all at the same time. > >Go to skepticalscience's about page and you'll find the author's full >name, a clear statement of their funding source and methods, and etc., >by contrast. perhaps donald dumbfuck can condense it all down into a solution that he can inject instead of smoking meth? (or whatever it is lunatics do with their meth) -- THIS SPACE FOR RENT https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iB6B8jGSdLA "Thanks to muzzies and their apologist-enablers like puppy whistle, this seems to be the new norm in the world. It's spreading like a cancer, and it's time we admit we're at war with pure evil. We need to put an end to this muzzie plague, or life on Earth is going to become pure hell everywhere. We need to get these people out of every civilized country, and there's only one way to do it. IOW, we have to become like them, with an emphasis on expediency over cruelty." - Checkmate (of alt.checkmate) "Pussy Willow has just proven that Trump's crackdown on previously unenforced immigration policies is working. We'll deal with the domestic terrorists as needed, but we don't need to be letting the muzzie terrorists get a foothold in our country too. One need only look at what they're doing in Europe right now to know we're doing the right thing by keeping them out, which is our right and our duty. - Checkmate (#1 pussy willow fan) - "You just made puppy whistle's sig line longer." - Janithor - "If I have a complaint about the (Southern Poverty) Law Center's description (of the alt-right movement), it is the phrase "heavy use of social media," which implies the alt-right is a real-world movement which uses a lot of social media. This is backwards: it is an online movement which occasionally appears in the real world. Where it gets punched." - Jason Rhode - "I think we should destroy every last fucking mosque in America." - "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> proves for us that white males are violent in Message-ID: <MPG.32c5bfefd18c9a698f0a8@news.altopia.com> - Golden Killfile, June 2005 KOTM, November 2006 Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006 Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006 Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007 Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006 Busted Urinal Award, April 2007 Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007 Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006 Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008 Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007 AUK Mascot, September 2007 Putting the Awards Out of Order to Screw With the OCD Fuckheads, March 2016
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-01 06:26 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <huj1cd9rhshd79m008plcodklg1dvioaog@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #679370 |
On Sun, 01 Apr 2018 01:50:25 -0500, Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ?? <root@127.0.0.1> wrote: >On Sun, 1 Apr 2018 06:45:48 -0000 (UTC), LO AND BEHOLD; "Nadegda ><nad318b404@gmail.invalid>" determined that the following was of great >importance and subsequently decided to freely share it with us in ><p9pv6s$10k$3@dont-email.me>: > >>Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >>On Sun, 01 Apr 2018 00:49:33 -0500, Sergio wrote: >> >>>On 4/1/2018 12:46 AM, Nadegda wrote: >>>>Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >>>>On Sat, 31 Mar 2018 20:56:54 -0400, benj wrote: >>>>>On 3/31/2018 8:08 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>>>>On 1/04/2018 9:46 AM, benj wrote: >>>>>>>On 3/31/2018 5:30 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>>>>>>On 31/03/2018 2:53 AM, benj wrote: >>>>>>>>>On 3/30/2018 1:40 AM, Nadegda wrote: >>>>>>>>>>Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >>>>>>>>>>On Thu, 29 Mar 2018 13:56:15 -0500, Sergio wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>why believe that outragous full of numbnuts shit article link kensi pupa >>>>>>>>>>>posted? >>>>>>>>>>If it's so "outragous[sic]" and impossible to believe, why do you froth >>>>>>>>>>so? Obviously, you fear kensi's message, which puts the lie to your >>>>>>>>>>k'lame that it's too silly to be believed. >>>>>>>>>Telling you that you are an uneducated immature clown is hardly froth. >>>>>>>>>It is simply fact and is strong evidence that your beliefs are are all >>>>>>>>>nonsense. Your froth above shows you and "kensi" fear exposure of you >>>>>>>>>lack of science knowledge and try to cover the fact with bluster. >>>>>>>>>Nobody is fooled. Have a nice day. >>>>>>>>**Pot, kettle, black you moron. >>>>>>>Liberal "science": puerile name-calling. >>>>>>**Name calling? Nope. Just stating fact. You fail miserably to back any >>>>>>of your insane claims. You fail miserably to answer any of my questions >>>>>>and you fail miserably to respond to any of my points. You are a lying >>>>>>moron. >>>>>>>>>Big hint, Nads: Journalists are NOT scientists and know no science. >>>>>>>>**Not necessarily. >>>>>>>True, >>>>>>**There you go. That wasn't hard, was it? You finally admitted to one of >>>>>>your many lies. one down, about a million to go. I won't be holding my >>>>>>breath. >>>>>Lib liars always accuse others of being the liars. I note that you >>>>>provide no evidence of any journalist knowing any science. I can live >>>>>with a single theoretical exception. I accept the truth that there ARE >>>>>scientists who know science who have sold out for money, fame, >>>>>employment etc. and purposely lie and distort facts for their handlers >>>>>even though they know better. >>>>Yep; a lot of them work for the big oil companies. Perhaps you even know >>>>some of them? >>>prove it, Nads pupa, >>>http://www.populartechnology.net/2011/05/are-skeptical-scientists-funde >>>d- >>by.html >> >>Notorious denier kookshite: >> >>https://whac-a-troll.blogspot.ca/2014/09/despite-claims-to-contrary.html >> >>http://www.carbonbrief.org/blog/2011/04/900-papers-part-two-using-our- >>paper-is-misleading >> >>http://rogerpielkejr.blogspot.com.au/2009/11/better-recheck-that-list.ht >>ml >> >>---------- After repeated communication with the authors of http:// >>www.populartechnology.net I have concluded that the content of the site >>is intentionally inaccurate and misleading. That list a paper on which >>I am a coauthor as "skeptical." Our paper supports the view that >>man-made climate change is a substantial danger to human health and the >>environment. The site refused to remove our paper(s) from their list >>after repeated written requests to do so. ---------- >> >>SPANKY-SPANKY! >> >>And from the horse's mouth, we have this bald-faced lie: >> >>"This site receives no funding of any kind" >> >>Erm, whut? Then how does it pay the bills? Obviously it gets money from >>some source. I believe that technically constitutes "funding". So: >>what's the source? Not disclosed, of course. >> >>The site's two authors refuse to disclose their surnames, probably >>because they're either fake or a quick LinkedIn lookup would find them >>at places like the Heritage Foundation, ExxonMobil, the RNC, and BP. >> >>So: anonymous authorship, totally opaque funding, and caught in at least >>two bald-faced lies (listing a pro climate change paper as anti climate >>change *and* claiming to have zero income while still magically, >>somehow, paying for bandwidth and hosting): every sort of credibility >>red flag, all at the same time. >> >>Go to skepticalscience's about page and you'll find the author's full >>name, a clear statement of their funding source and methods, and etc., >>by contrast. > >perhaps donald dumbfuck can condense it all down into a solution that he can inject instead of smoking meth? (or whatever it is lunatics do with their meth) hey i know, since i don't know anything about the topic, let's drag Trumps name into it because we are still butthurt. -- MAUKGA
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-01 13:37 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <p9r8sv$c2s$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #679401 |
On 4/1/2018 7:26 AM, Skeeter wrote: > On Sun, 01 Apr 2018 01:50:25 -0500, Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy > Whistle Holder Emeritus ?? <root@127.0.0.1> wrote: > >> On Sun, 1 Apr 2018 06:45:48 -0000 (UTC), LO AND BEHOLD; "Nadegda >> <nad318b404@gmail.invalid>" determined that the following was of great >> importance and subsequently decided to freely share it with us in >> <p9pv6s$10k$3@dont-email.me>: >> >>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >>> On Sun, 01 Apr 2018 00:49:33 -0500, Sergio wrote: >>> >>>> On 4/1/2018 12:46 AM, Nadegda wrote: >>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >>>>> On Sat, 31 Mar 2018 20:56:54 -0400, benj wrote: >>>>>> On 3/31/2018 8:08 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>>>>> On 1/04/2018 9:46 AM, benj wrote: >>>>>>>> On 3/31/2018 5:30 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 31/03/2018 2:53 AM, benj wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 3/30/2018 1:40 AM, Nadegda wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 29 Mar 2018 13:56:15 -0500, Sergio wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> why believe that outragous full of numbnuts shit article link kensi pupa >>>>>>>>>>>> posted? >>>>>>>>>>> If it's so "outragous[sic]" and impossible to believe, why do you froth >>>>>>>>>>> so? Obviously, you fear kensi's message, which puts the lie to your >>>>>>>>>>> k'lame that it's too silly to be believed. >>>>>>>>>> Telling you that you are an uneducated immature clown is hardly froth. >>>>>>>>>> It is simply fact and is strong evidence that your beliefs are are all >>>>>>>>>> nonsense. Your froth above shows you and "kensi" fear exposure of you >>>>>>>>>> lack of science knowledge and try to cover the fact with bluster. >>>>>>>>>> Nobody is fooled. Have a nice day. >>>>>>>>> **Pot, kettle, black you moron. >>>>>>>> Liberal "science": puerile name-calling. >>>>>>> **Name calling? Nope. Just stating fact. You fail miserably to back any >>>>>>> of your insane claims. You fail miserably to answer any of my questions >>>>>>> and you fail miserably to respond to any of my points. You are a lying >>>>>>> moron. >>>>>>>>>> Big hint, Nads: Journalists are NOT scientists and know no science. >>>>>>>>> **Not necessarily. >>>>>>>> True, >>>>>>> **There you go. That wasn't hard, was it? You finally admitted to one of >>>>>>> your many lies. one down, about a million to go. I won't be holding my >>>>>>> breath. >>>>>> Lib liars always accuse others of being the liars. I note that you >>>>>> provide no evidence of any journalist knowing any science. I can live >>>>>> with a single theoretical exception. I accept the truth that there ARE >>>>>> scientists who know science who have sold out for money, fame, >>>>>> employment etc. and purposely lie and distort facts for their handlers >>>>>> even though they know better. >>>>> Yep; a lot of them work for the big oil companies. Perhaps you even know >>>>> some of them? >>>> prove it, Nads pupa, >>>> http://www.populartechnology.net/2011/05/are-skeptical-scientists-funde >>>> d- >>> by.html >>> >>> Notorious denier kookshite: >>> >>> https://whac-a-troll.blogspot.ca/2014/09/despite-claims-to-contrary.html >>> >>> http://www.carbonbrief.org/blog/2011/04/900-papers-part-two-using-our- >>> paper-is-misleading >>> >>> http://rogerpielkejr.blogspot.com.au/2009/11/better-recheck-that-list.ht >>> ml >>> >>> ---------- After repeated communication with the authors of http:// >>> www.populartechnology.net I have concluded that the content of the site >>> is intentionally inaccurate and misleading. That list a paper on which >>> I am a coauthor as "skeptical." Our paper supports the view that >>> man-made climate change is a substantial danger to human health and the >>> environment. The site refused to remove our paper(s) from their list >>> after repeated written requests to do so. ---------- >>> >>> SPANKY-SPANKY! >>> >>> And from the horse's mouth, we have this bald-faced lie: >>> >>> "This site receives no funding of any kind" >>> >>> Erm, whut? Then how does it pay the bills? Obviously it gets money from >>> some source. I believe that technically constitutes "funding". So: >>> what's the source? Not disclosed, of course. >>> >>> The site's two authors refuse to disclose their surnames, probably >>> because they're either fake or a quick LinkedIn lookup would find them >>> at places like the Heritage Foundation, ExxonMobil, the RNC, and BP. >>> >>> So: anonymous authorship, totally opaque funding, and caught in at least >>> two bald-faced lies (listing a pro climate change paper as anti climate >>> change *and* claiming to have zero income while still magically, >>> somehow, paying for bandwidth and hosting): every sort of credibility >>> red flag, all at the same time. >>> >>> Go to skepticalscience's about page and you'll find the author's full >>> name, a clear statement of their funding source and methods, and etc., >>> by contrast. >> >> perhaps donald dumbfuck can condense it all down into a solution that he can inject instead of smoking meth? (or whatever it is lunatics do with their meth) > > > hey i know, since i don't know anything about the topic, let's drag > Trumps name into it because we are still butthurt. > if Trump, gotta drag Alkie-Alzi-Hillary into discussion too, is she still in rehab ?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-01 02:12 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <p9q0oc$d42$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #679369 |
On 4/1/2018 1:45 AM, Nadegda wrote:
> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
> On Sun, 01 Apr 2018 00:49:33 -0500, Sergio wrote:
>
>> On 4/1/2018 12:46 AM, Nadegda wrote:
>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>>> melt!
>>> On Sat, 31 Mar 2018 20:56:54 -0400, benj wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 3/31/2018 8:08 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote:
>>>>> On 1/04/2018 9:46 AM, benj wrote:
>>>>>> On 3/31/2018 5:30 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote:
>>>>>>> On 31/03/2018 2:53 AM, benj wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 3/30/2018 1:40 AM, Nadegda wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt,
>>>>>>>>> snowflakes,
>>>>>>>>> melt!
>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 29 Mar 2018 13:56:15 -0500, Sergio wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> why believe that outragous full of numbnuts shit article link
>>>>>>>>>> kensi pupa posted?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> If it's so "outragous[sic]" and impossible to believe, why do you
>>>>>>>>> froth so? Obviously, you fear kensi's message, which puts the lie
>>>>>>>>> to your k'lame that it's too silly to be believed.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Telling you that you are an uneducated immature clown is hardly
>>>>>>>> froth. It is simply fact and is strong evidence that your beliefs
>>>>>>>> are are all nonsense. Your froth above shows you and "kensi" fear
>>>>>>>> exposure of you lack of science knowledge and try to cover the
>>>>>>>> fact with bluster. Nobody is fooled. Have a nice day.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> **Pot, kettle, black you moron.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Liberal "science": puerile name-calling.
>>>>>
>>>>> **Name calling? Nope. Just stating fact. You fail miserably to back
>>>>> any of your insane claims. You fail miserably to answer any of my
>>>>> questions and you fail miserably to respond to any of my points. You
>>>>> are a lying moron.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Big hint, Nads: Journalists are NOT scientists and know no
>>>>>>>> science.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> **Not necessarily.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> True,
>>>>>
>>>>> **There you go. That wasn't hard, was it? You finally admitted to one
>>>>> of your many lies. one down, about a million to go. I won't be
>>>>> holding my breath.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> Lib liars always accuse others of being the liars. I note that you
>>>> provide no evidence of any journalist knowing any science. I can live
>>>> with a single theoretical exception.
>>>>
>>>> I accept the truth that there ARE scientists who know science who have
>>>> sold out for money, fame, employment etc. and purposely lie and
>>>> distort facts for their handlers even though they know better.
>>>
>>> Yep; a lot of them work for the big oil companies. Perhaps you even
>>> know some of them?
>>>
>>>
>> prove it, Nads pupa,
>>
>> http://www.populartechnology.net/2011/05/are-skeptical-scientists-funded-
> by.html
>
> Notorious denier kookshite:
>
> https://whac-a-troll.blogspot.ca/2014/09/despite-claims-to-contrary.html
>
> http://www.carbonbrief.org/blog/2011/04/900-papers-part-two-using-our-
> paper-is-misleading
>
> http://rogerpielkejr.blogspot.com.au/2009/11/better-recheck-that-list.html
>
don't you have any FRESH links?
those are 4 to 9 years OLD and so stale, yuck!
its like walking into a dark theater with sticky floors.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-01 02:31 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <p_OdnbCPD_5OF13HnZ2dnUU7-fPNnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #679372 |
On Sun, 1 Apr 2018 02:12:12 -0500, LO AND BEHOLD; "Sergio <invalid@invalid.com>" determined that the following was of great importance and subsequently decided to freely share it with us in <p9q0oc$d42$1@gioia.aioe.org>: >On 4/1/2018 1:45 AM, Nadegda wrote: >>Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >>On Sun, 01 Apr 2018 00:49:33 -0500, Sergio wrote: >>>On 4/1/2018 12:46 AM, Nadegda wrote: >>>>Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >>>>On Sat, 31 Mar 2018 20:56:54 -0400, benj wrote: >>>>>On 3/31/2018 8:08 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>>>>On 1/04/2018 9:46 AM, benj wrote: >>>>>>>On 3/31/2018 5:30 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>>>>>>On 31/03/2018 2:53 AM, benj wrote: >>>>>>>>>On 3/30/2018 1:40 AM, Nadegda wrote: >>>>>>>>>>Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >>>>>>>>>>On Thu, 29 Mar 2018 13:56:15 -0500, Sergio wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>why believe that outragous full of numbnuts shit article link kensi pupa >>>>>>>>>>>posted? >>>>>>>>>>If it's so "outragous[sic]" and impossible to believe, why do you froth >>>>>>>>>>so? Obviously, you fear kensi's message, which puts the lie to your >>>>>>>>>>k'lame that it's too silly to be believed. >>>>>>>>>Telling you that you are an uneducated immature clown is hardly froth. >>>>>>>>>It is simply fact and is strong evidence that your beliefs are are all >>>>>>>>>nonsense. Your froth above shows you and "kensi" fear exposure of you >>>>>>>>>lack of science knowledge and try to cover the fact with bluster. >>>>>>>>>Nobody is fooled. Have a nice day. >>>>>>>>**Pot, kettle, black you moron. >>>>>>>Liberal "science": puerile name-calling. >>>>>>**Name calling? Nope. Just stating fact. You fail miserably to back any >>>>>>of your insane claims. You fail miserably to answer any of my questions >>>>>>and you fail miserably to respond to any of my points. You are a lying >>>>>>moron. >>>>>>>>>Big hint, Nads: Journalists are NOT scientists and know no science. >>>>>>>>**Not necessarily. >>>>>>>True, >>>>>>**There you go. That wasn't hard, was it? You finally admitted to one of >>>>>>your many lies. one down, about a million to go. I won't be holding my >>>>>>breath. >>>>>Lib liars always accuse others of being the liars. I note that you >>>>>provide no evidence of any journalist knowing any science. I can live >>>>>with a single theoretical exception. I accept the truth that there ARE >>>>>scientists who know science who have sold out for money, fame, >>>>>employment etc. and purposely lie and distort facts for their handlers >>>>>even though they know better. >>>>Yep; a lot of them work for the big oil companies. Perhaps you even know >>>>some of them? >>>prove it, Nads pupa, >>>http://www.populartechnology.net/2011/05/are-skeptical-scientists-funde >>>d- >>by.html Notorious denier kookshite: >>https://whac-a-troll.blogspot.ca/2014/09/despite-claims-to-contrary.htm >>l http://www.carbonbrief.org/blog/2011/04/900-papers-part-two-using-our- >>paper-is-misleading >>http://rogerpielkejr.blogspot.com.au/2009/11/better-recheck-that-list.h >>tml > > don't you have any FRESH links? > >those are 4 to 9 years OLD and so stale, yuck! > >its like walking into a dark theater with sticky floors. i post all kinds of fresh links, you just have to stop using the same exact killfile as gergles and you might see them. have you tried whinging a bunch about the content here not being up to your "standards"? (or were you just getting warmed up?) -- THIS SPACE FOR RENT https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iB6B8jGSdLA "Thanks to muzzies and their apologist-enablers like puppy whistle, this seems to be the new norm in the world. It's spreading like a cancer, and it's time we admit we're at war with pure evil. We need to put an end to this muzzie plague, or life on Earth is going to become pure hell everywhere. We need to get these people out of every civilized country, and there's only one way to do it. IOW, we have to become like them, with an emphasis on expediency over cruelty." - Checkmate (of alt.checkmate) "Pussy Willow has just proven that Trump's crackdown on previously unenforced immigration policies is working. We'll deal with the domestic terrorists as needed, but we don't need to be letting the muzzie terrorists get a foothold in our country too. One need only look at what they're doing in Europe right now to know we're doing the right thing by keeping them out, which is our right and our duty. - Checkmate (#1 pussy willow fan) - "You just made puppy whistle's sig line longer." - Janithor - "If I have a complaint about the (Southern Poverty) Law Center's description (of the alt-right movement), it is the phrase "heavy use of social media," which implies the alt-right is a real-world movement which uses a lot of social media. This is backwards: it is an online movement which occasionally appears in the real world. Where it gets punched." - Jason Rhode - "I think we should destroy every last fucking mosque in America." - "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> proves for us that white males are violent in Message-ID: <MPG.32c5bfefd18c9a698f0a8@news.altopia.com> - Golden Killfile, June 2005 KOTM, November 2006 Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006 Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006 Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007 Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006 Busted Urinal Award, April 2007 Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007 Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006 Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008 Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007 AUK Mascot, September 2007 Putting the Awards Out of Order to Screw With the OCD Fuckheads, March 2016
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-01 06:24 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <grj1cdhd81bv5cs3unomlg33d9gi1290ot@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #679363 |
On Sun, 1 Apr 2018 05:46:00 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >> I accept the truth that there ARE scientists who know science who have >> sold out for money, fame, employment etc. and purposely lie and distort >> facts for their handlers even though they know better. > >Yep; a lot of them work for the big oil companies. Perhaps you even know >some of them? Seeing as how you don't? -- MAUKGA
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-01 06:53 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <fiaaqaF5c1lU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #678955 |
On 30/03/2018 4:51 AM, benj wrote: > On 3/29/2018 10:03 AM, kensi wrote: >> On 3/29/2018 9:55 AM, Sergio wrote: >>> so, why cant he survive if the global average goes up 0.1 degree F over >>> 100 years ? >> >> The global average has already gone up around 2 degrees F in just the >> past few decades, and the rise is accelerating. >> > Only if you fudge the data. > > And in any event, neither YOU nor any plant or animal could tell the > difference in two rooms of 2 degree F in a few minutes let along in a > few decades. Are you really this stupid? Do you really work in science > or "journalism"? **I don't have to ask if YOU are this stupid. Everyone already knows that not only are you as dumb as a pile of rocks, but you can not, nor will not answer direct questions, when asked. You scurry away. I expect nothing less from you now. What does it matter if a human can or can not pick a temperature difference of a degree C or two? The fact is: The average temperatures on this planet are rising. Whilst humans may have some difficulty in picking the temperature change that small, many plants and animals can: https://oceanservice.noaa.gov/facts/coralreef-climate.html https://www.nature.com/articles/nature01333 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1046/j.1354-1013.2001.00467.x https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169534799017644 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00796.x https://www.osti.gov/biblio/379668 Now all these guys and many more have spent many years doing solid research on this matter. How much scientific research have YOU done? What are your qualifications WRT climate science that we should listen to any of your insane babbling? Then there's this: --- On 30/03/2018 10:30 AM, benj wrote: > On 3/29/2018 6:04 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >> On 28/03/2018 11:07 AM, benj wrote: >>> On 3/27/2018 7:28 PM, Nadegda wrote: >>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >>>> On Tue, 27 Mar 2018 23:40:43 +0100, Sn!pe wrote: >>>> >>>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 3/27/2018 8:15 AM, Wally W. wrote: >>>>>>> On Tue, 27 Mar 2018 07:50:07 -0400, kensi wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> <https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/climate-change-goes-firmly- >>>> in-the-loss-column-for-insurers/> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Do you post *anything* upbeat? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> Does "she" ever post anything that is true? >>>>> >>>>> No, HTH >>>> >>>> It took a while, but now we have you on the record making a firm statement >>>> that amounts to clinate change denial. >>> >>> Nonsense. Absolute lie. Lefties never do honesty. As I have said here MANY times, the ONE principle that absolutely EVERYONE in science agrees upon is "the certainty of change". It is you kooktards who think that you can stop the planet and keep change from happening. That makes YOU the 'science denier". >>> >>>> Which in turn pins down your politics as right-wing, something you've also >>>> tried to maintain deniability about. >>> >>> Right-wing schmite-wing. You are drooling again. What you accused me of was being a Trump supporter. This is FAR from the case. Blowhard sales types are not my favorite people though higher up than leftist commies like yourself. Didn't you get the memo about the fall of your utopian USSR? Your system is totally discredited by the largest social experiment in history. No wonder only North Korea and Democrats are the only ones left refusing to accept the data. >>> >>>> There's no bigger coward than one who will not go clearly on the record as >>>> believing what they believe, because it happens to be unpopular. >>> >>> I not only go on record I CONSISTENTLY back up my views with peer reviewed science that I regularly post in response to "kensi's" cut and paste journalist propaganda. >> >> **Liar. You NEVER post anything resembling science to any question or comment I make. Not once, not ever. > > The liar is YOU. **LOL. Let's see. Like al lefty Libs you don't do truth but DO do alling > other people names and slandering them to further you political scams. The ends justifies the means, right? And now you have shown that you and "kensi"/Nads are all part of the same big scamming family! You are as ready to lie for them as you are to lie for yourself. > > Here is a REPOST of GISS data I have posted many times? **NO repost. As usual, you lying sack of shit. Any idea what > GISS data is? **I know EXACTLY what it is. I also know what cherry-picked data is. Do you? Do you know who Dr. Hansen the godfather of global warming > is? **The so-called 'Godfather' of global warming was Joseph Fourier. After him, came Svante Arrhenius. Both men set the tone for global warming research way back in the NINETEENTH century! Which is information you would know, if you took the time to study the science. Do you recognize HIS data? **Well, since you failed (yet again) to present any data, no. Like I said: You NEVER present anything resembling science to back you idiotic claims. SOP. Do you notice that from 1940 - 1970 > these data showed Temperature going DOWN while CO2 went up? **Yes. And that has been explained to you in exquisite detail many, many times previously. Do you ever pay attention? It is due to aerosol pollution, caused by industry and motor vehicles. You may care to note (but you probably won't) that temperatures began to rise when governments around the world got serious about reducing aerosol pollution. Here's some science that you won't bother reading (nor understand): https://www.ucsusa.org/global-warming/science-and-impacts/science/aerosols-and-global-warming-faq.html#.Wr3OO39x1pg And you have > the absolute balls to say this proves that CO2 "causes" warming? **Idiot. The science is undeniable. How > ignorant are you anyway. **I assume that was a question. I am clearly a whole lot less ignorant that you. Why don't you show how much science you know > down in Oz and explain how radiative forcing made this happen? **Certainly. CO2 is resonant at a couple of infra-red frequencies. When infra-red (IR) hits those CO2 molecules, it causes them to vibrate (accumulate kinetic energy). More IR = more kinetic energy. The CO2 molecules are agitated sufficiently to transfer some of their energy to nearby molecules of atmospheric gases (nitrogen, oxygen, et al), thus raising the energy level of the entire system. Most critically, CO2 acts at night, when IR energy is re-radiated from the Earth's surface, thus nighttime temperatures are raised. > > You are all liars criminals and scammers trying to set up a fake tax to steal trillions of dollars. Shame on YOU. **I am not trying to set up any kind of tax. > >> Neither YOU nor "kensi" EVER respond to any >>> of it, >> >> >> **Pot, kettle, black, you lying sack of shit. You cannot put forward a cogent argument when I question you. You just scurry away. Like you will when you see this post. > > Liar. **You keep saying that, but you have failed to respond to my previous posts in this area. That make YOU the lying cunt. Not me. You simple babble on with your propaganda when I present you with > scientific data and then (see above) you lie and say I never did. **You failed to supply ANY scientific data. That makes YOU the lying cunt. Take > it easy on the drugs man, your fantasies are really getting strong. **Let me remind you: _I_ am not the one who failed to supply the data. You are. > >> instead simply resorting to immature name-calling and repeating >>> your lies over an over. As Sergio has pointed out, there has never been ONE equation coming out of you or your sock, "kensi". And that makes you a fraud. >> >> **Actually, it is YOU who is the fraud. Not only do you fail to respond, but you fail to admit when you have been shown to be wrong. > > You have not shown any of the science I CONSTANTLY present as wrong. **Lying does not make you correct. It just makes you a liar. YOU > simply lie and name-call and repeat your fear-mongering propaganda over and over. It's propaganda 101. Nothing new. Nothing of value either. > > So start with discussing how CO2 radiative forcing is adding energy yet temperatures are going down. This is a real "causality" trick! **Huh? Prove that temperatures are going down. > > We'll wait right here for your answer. **Telling a lie, then asking ME to prove your lie is not going to happen. --- You claim to post something which you don't, then fail to interpret the data. You're an idiot. -- Trevor Wilson www.rageaudio.com.au
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-03-31 17:57 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <p9p3qb$19i4$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #679275 |
On 3/31/2018 3:53 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote:
> On 30/03/2018 4:51 AM, benj wrote:
>> On 3/29/2018 10:03 AM, kensi wrote:
>>> On 3/29/2018 9:55 AM, Sergio wrote:
>>>> so, why cant he survive if the global average goes up 0.1 degree F over
>>>> 100 years ?
>>>
>>> The global average has already gone up around 2 degrees F in just the
>>> past few decades, and the rise is accelerating.
>>>
>> Only if you fudge the data.
>>
>> And in any event, neither YOU nor any plant or animal could tell the
>> difference in two rooms of 2 degree F in a few minutes let along in a
>> few decades. Are you really this stupid? Do you really work in science
>> or "journalism"?
>
> **I don't have to ask if YOU are this stupid. Everyone already knows
> that not only are you as dumb as a pile of rocks, but you can not, nor
> will not answer direct questions, when asked. You scurry away. I expect
> nothing less from you now.
>
> What does it matter if a human can or can not pick a temperature
> difference of a degree C or two? The fact is: The average temperatures
> on this planet are rising. Whilst humans may have some difficulty in
> picking the temperature change that small, many plants and animals can:
this is where you are wrong,
plants and animals are already adapted to temperature changing over the
year from about 32 degrees F in winter up to 95 degrees F in the summer.
a piddily little change caused by global warming average of 0.1 degree
F over a decade will not impact any living thing.
so all the articles that say "clams are dying due to global worming" are
bullshit.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-03-31 18:20 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <LPadnRaaht9Wil3HnZ2dnUU7-bPNnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #679292 |
On Sat, 31 Mar 2018 17:57:40 -0500, LO AND BEHOLD; "Sergio <invalid@invalid.com>" determined that the following was of great importance and subsequently decided to freely share it with us in <p9p3qb$19i4$1@gioia.aioe.org>: >On 3/31/2018 3:53 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>On 30/03/2018 4:51 AM, benj wrote: >>>On 3/29/2018 10:03 AM, kensi wrote: >>>>On 3/29/2018 9:55 AM, Sergio wrote: >>>>>so, why cant he survive if the global average goes up 0.1 degree F over >>>>>100 years ? >>>>The global average has already gone up around 2 degrees F in just the >>>>past few decades, and the rise is accelerating. >>>Only if you fudge the data. And in any event, neither YOU nor any plant >>>or animal could tell the difference in two rooms of 2 degree F in a few >>>minutes let along in a few decades. Are you really this stupid? Do you >>>really work in science or "journalism"? >>**I don't have to ask if YOU are this stupid. Everyone already knows >>that not only are you as dumb as a pile of rocks, but you can not, nor >>will not answer direct questions, when asked. You scurry away. I expect >>nothing less from you now. What does it matter if a human can or can not >>pick a temperature difference of a degree C or two? The fact is: The >>average temperatures on this planet are rising. Whilst humans may have >>some difficulty in picking the temperature change that small, many >>plants and animals can: > > this is where you are wrong, > >plants and animals are already adapted to temperature changing over the >year from about 32 degrees F in winter up to 95 degrees F in the >summer. > >a piddily little change caused by global warming average of 0.1 degree >F over a decade will not impact any living thing. > >so all the articles that say "clams are dying due to global worming" are >bullshit. your "experiment" excludes every other thing on earth except "plants and animals", for some reason. do you have a problem with some data that you are excluding? <snooker> -- THIS SPACE FOR RENT https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iB6B8jGSdLA "Thanks to muzzies and their apologist-enablers like puppy whistle, this seems to be the new norm in the world. It's spreading like a cancer, and it's time we admit we're at war with pure evil. We need to put an end to this muzzie plague, or life on Earth is going to become pure hell everywhere. We need to get these people out of every civilized country, and there's only one way to do it. IOW, we have to become like them, with an emphasis on expediency over cruelty." - Checkmate (of alt.checkmate) "Pussy Willow has just proven that Trump's crackdown on previously unenforced immigration policies is working. We'll deal with the domestic terrorists as needed, but we don't need to be letting the muzzie terrorists get a foothold in our country too. One need only look at what they're doing in Europe right now to know we're doing the right thing by keeping them out, which is our right and our duty. - Checkmate (#1 pussy willow fan) - "You just made puppy whistle's sig line longer." - Janithor - "If I have a complaint about the (Southern Poverty) Law Center's description (of the alt-right movement), it is the phrase "heavy use of social media," which implies the alt-right is a real-world movement which uses a lot of social media. This is backwards: it is an online movement which occasionally appears in the real world. Where it gets punched." - Jason Rhode - "I think we should destroy every last fucking mosque in America." - "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> proves for us that white males are violent in Message-ID: <MPG.32c5bfefd18c9a698f0a8@news.altopia.com> - Golden Killfile, June 2005 KOTM, November 2006 Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006 Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006 Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007 Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006 Busted Urinal Award, April 2007 Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007 Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006 Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008 Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007 AUK Mascot, September 2007 Putting the Awards Out of Order to Screw With the OCD Fuckheads, March 2016
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-01 09:42 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <fiakmmF7d11U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #679292 |
On 1/04/2018 8:57 AM, Sergio wrote: > On 3/31/2018 3:53 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >> On 30/03/2018 4:51 AM, benj wrote: >>> On 3/29/2018 10:03 AM, kensi wrote: >>>> On 3/29/2018 9:55 AM, Sergio wrote: >>>>> so, why cant he survive if the global average goes up 0.1 degree F over >>>>> 100 years ? >>>> >>>> The global average has already gone up around 2 degrees F in just the >>>> past few decades, and the rise is accelerating. >>>> >>> Only if you fudge the data. >>> >>> And in any event, neither YOU nor any plant or animal could tell the >>> difference in two rooms of 2 degree F in a few minutes let along in a >>> few decades. Are you really this stupid? Do you really work in science >>> or "journalism"? >> >> **I don't have to ask if YOU are this stupid. Everyone already knows >> that not only are you as dumb as a pile of rocks, but you can not, nor >> will not answer direct questions, when asked. You scurry away. I expect >> nothing less from you now. >> >> What does it matter if a human can or can not pick a temperature >> difference of a degree C or two? The fact is: The average temperatures >> on this planet are rising. Whilst humans may have some difficulty in >> picking the temperature change that small, many plants and animals can: > > > this is where you are wrong, > > plants and animals are already adapted to temperature changing over the > year from about 32 degrees F in winter up to 95 degrees F in the summer. **Another moron steps up to be demolished. Did you bother reading ANY of the cites? > > a piddily little change caused by global warming average of 0.1 degree > F over a decade will not impact any living thing. **And yet, it already does. > > so all the articles that say "clams are dying due to global worming" are > bullshit. **OK, you cite YOUR climate science credentials. This should be a laugh. -- Trevor Wilson www.rageaudio.com.au
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-03-31 20:52 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <03WvC.123704$Mu1.30255@fx43.iad> |
| In reply to | #679303 |
On 3/31/2018 7:42 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote: > On 1/04/2018 8:57 AM, Sergio wrote: >> On 3/31/2018 3:53 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>> On 30/03/2018 4:51 AM, benj wrote: >>>> On 3/29/2018 10:03 AM, kensi wrote: >>>>> On 3/29/2018 9:55 AM, Sergio wrote: >>>>>> so, why cant he survive if the global average goes up 0.1 degree F >>>>>> over >>>>>> 100 years ? >>>>> >>>>> The global average has already gone up around 2 degrees F in just the >>>>> past few decades, and the rise is accelerating. >>>>> >>>> Only if you fudge the data. >>>> >>>> And in any event, neither YOU nor any plant or animal could tell the >>>> difference in two rooms of 2 degree F in a few minutes let along in a >>>> few decades. Are you really this stupid? Do you really work in science >>>> or "journalism"? >>> >>> **I don't have to ask if YOU are this stupid. Everyone already knows >>> that not only are you as dumb as a pile of rocks, but you can not, nor >>> will not answer direct questions, when asked. You scurry away. I expect >>> nothing less from you now. >>> >>> What does it matter if a human can or can not pick a temperature >>> difference of a degree C or two? The fact is: The average temperatures >>> on this planet are rising. Whilst humans may have some difficulty in >>> picking the temperature change that small, many plants and animals can: >> >> >> this is where you are wrong, >> >> plants and animals are already adapted to temperature changing over the >> year from about 32 degrees F in winter up to 95 degrees F in the summer. > > **Another moron steps up to be demolished. Did you bother reading ANY of > the cites? > > > >> >> a piddily little change caused by global warming average of 0.1 degree >> F over a decade will not impact any living thing. > > **And yet, it already does. In Trevor's fantasies! >> so all the articles that say "clams are dying due to global worming" are >> bullshit. > > **OK, you cite YOUR climate science credentials. This should be a laugh. A credential war between Trevor and Sergio! This should be rich! Hey Sergio, the last "climate scientist expert" posting from OZ turned out to be a failed cartoonist and paid strategic writer! http://www.populartechnology.net/2012/03/truth-about-skeptical-science.html PS. The "failed cartoonist" now has been getting a degree in "climate propaganda". I kid you not!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-03-31 20:18 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <p9pc23$1jfn$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #679303 |
On 3/31/2018 6:42 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote:
> On 1/04/2018 8:57 AM, Sergio wrote:
>> On 3/31/2018 3:53 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote:
>>> On 30/03/2018 4:51 AM, benj wrote:
>>>> On 3/29/2018 10:03 AM, kensi wrote:
>>>>> On 3/29/2018 9:55 AM, Sergio wrote:
>>>>>> so, why cant he survive if the global average goes up 0.1 degree F
>>>>>> over
>>>>>> 100 years ?
>>>>>
>>>>> The global average has already gone up around 2 degrees F in just the
>>>>> past few decades, and the rise is accelerating.
>>>>>
>>>> Only if you fudge the data.
>>>>
>>>> And in any event, neither YOU nor any plant or animal could tell the
>>>> difference in two rooms of 2 degree F in a few minutes let along in a
>>>> few decades. Are you really this stupid? Do you really work in science
>>>> or "journalism"?
>>>
>>> **I don't have to ask if YOU are this stupid. Everyone already knows
>>> that not only are you as dumb as a pile of rocks, but you can not, nor
>>> will not answer direct questions, when asked. You scurry away. I expect
>>> nothing less from you now.
>>>
>>> What does it matter if a human can or can not pick a temperature
>>> difference of a degree C or two? The fact is: The average temperatures
>>> on this planet are rising. Whilst humans may have some difficulty in
>>> picking the temperature change that small, many plants and animals can:
>>
>>
>> this is where you are wrong,
>>
>> plants and animals are already adapted to temperature changing over the
>> year from about 32 degrees F in winter up to 95 degrees F in the summer.
>
> **Another moron steps up to be demolished. Did you bother reading ANY of
> the cites?
>
that is the point, the cites are bullshit. why ?
"plants and animals are already adapted to temperature changing over the
year from about 32 degrees F in winter up to 95 degrees F in the
summer. and golwball worming only changes 0.01 F per year."
>
>
>
>>
>> a piddily little change caused by global warming average of 0.1 degree
>> F over a decade will not impact any living thing.
>
> **And yet, it already does.
no, check your links again, it is conjecture, look for the *weasel
words*, if, may, impacts, could, might, increasing, less, dramatically,
changing, varied, warming, stress, more, more frequent, altered, ......
but there is no real facts or meat to support the conjecture,
take your first link, they say the ocean is more acidic, so where are
the measurements, ? how small of a change is it ? within measurement
error? where and when did they measure it? how many millions of
measurements did they take ? At what depths ?
that link want you to donate to FishWatch.
>
>>
>> so all the articles that say "clams are dying due to global worming" are
>> bullshit.
>
> **OK, you cite YOUR climate science credentials. This should be a laugh.
>
>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-01 15:03 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <fib7hiFb0fvU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #679327 |
On 1/04/2018 11:18 AM, Sergio wrote: > On 3/31/2018 6:42 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >> On 1/04/2018 8:57 AM, Sergio wrote: >>> On 3/31/2018 3:53 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>> On 30/03/2018 4:51 AM, benj wrote: >>>>> On 3/29/2018 10:03 AM, kensi wrote: >>>>>> On 3/29/2018 9:55 AM, Sergio wrote: >>>>>>> so, why cant he survive if the global average goes up 0.1 degree F >>>>>>> over >>>>>>> 100 years ? >>>>>> >>>>>> The global average has already gone up around 2 degrees F in just the >>>>>> past few decades, and the rise is accelerating. >>>>>> >>>>> Only if you fudge the data. >>>>> >>>>> And in any event, neither YOU nor any plant or animal could tell the >>>>> difference in two rooms of 2 degree F in a few minutes let along in a >>>>> few decades. Are you really this stupid? Do you really work in science >>>>> or "journalism"? >>>> >>>> **I don't have to ask if YOU are this stupid. Everyone already knows >>>> that not only are you as dumb as a pile of rocks, but you can not, nor >>>> will not answer direct questions, when asked. You scurry away. I expect >>>> nothing less from you now. >>>> >>>> What does it matter if a human can or can not pick a temperature >>>> difference of a degree C or two? The fact is: The average temperatures >>>> on this planet are rising. Whilst humans may have some difficulty in >>>> picking the temperature change that small, many plants and animals can: >>> >>> >>> this is where you are wrong, >>> >>> plants and animals are already adapted to temperature changing over the >>> year from about 32 degrees F in winter up to 95 degrees F in the summer. >> >> **Another moron steps up to be demolished. Did you bother reading ANY of >> the cites? >> > > that is the point, the cites are bullshit. why ? > > "plants and animals are already adapted to temperature changing over the > year from about 32 degrees F in winter up to 95 degrees F in the > summer. and golwball worming only changes 0.01 F per year." **What is "golwball worming"? >> > >> >> >>> >>> a piddily little change caused by global warming average of 0.1 degree >>> F over a decade will not impact any living thing. >> >> **And yet, it already does. > > no, check your links again, it is conjecture, look for the *weasel > words*, if, may, impacts, could, might, increasing, less, dramatically, > changing, varied, warming, stress, more, more frequent, altered, ...... **I already HAVE checked my links. I suggest you read them. > > but there is no real facts or meat to support the conjecture, > > take your first link, they say the ocean is more acidic, so where are > the measurements, ? **Ask and ye shall receive: https://www.pmel.noaa.gov/co2/story/Quality+of+pH+Measurements+in+the+NODC+Data+Archives https://www.csiro.au/en/Research/OandA/Areas/Coastal-management/Reef-capability/Future-Reef-2 https://www.nature.com/articles/nature04095 https://www.nature.com/articles/nature10295 how small of a change is it ? **See links. within measurement > error? **See links. where and when did they measure it? **See links. how many millions of > measurements did they take ? **See links. At what depths ? **See links. > > that link want you to donate to FishWatch. > > > >> >>> >>> so all the articles that say "clams are dying due to global worming" are >>> bullshit. >> >> **OK, you cite YOUR climate science credentials. This should be a laugh. **[Sounds of crickets] -- Trevor Wilson www.rageaudio.com.au
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-01 00:46 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <p9proh$65b$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #679358 |
On 4/1/2018 12:03 AM, Trevor Wilson wrote: > On 1/04/2018 11:18 AM, Sergio wrote: >> On 3/31/2018 6:42 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>> On 1/04/2018 8:57 AM, Sergio wrote: >>>> On 3/31/2018 3:53 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>>> On 30/03/2018 4:51 AM, benj wrote: >>>>>> On 3/29/2018 10:03 AM, kensi wrote: >>>>>>> On 3/29/2018 9:55 AM, Sergio wrote: >>>>>>>> so, why cant he survive if the global average goes up 0.1 degree F >>>>>>>> over >>>>>>>> 100 years ? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The global average has already gone up around 2 degrees F in just >>>>>>> the >>>>>>> past few decades, and the rise is accelerating. >>>>>>> >>>>>> Only if you fudge the data. >>>>>> >>>>>> And in any event, neither YOU nor any plant or animal could tell the >>>>>> difference in two rooms of 2 degree F in a few minutes let along in a >>>>>> few decades. Are you really this stupid? Do you really work in >>>>>> science >>>>>> or "journalism"? >>>>> >>>>> **I don't have to ask if YOU are this stupid. Everyone already knows >>>>> that not only are you as dumb as a pile of rocks, but you can not, nor >>>>> will not answer direct questions, when asked. You scurry away. I >>>>> expect >>>>> nothing less from you now. >>>>> >>>>> What does it matter if a human can or can not pick a temperature >>>>> difference of a degree C or two? The fact is: The average temperatures >>>>> on this planet are rising. Whilst humans may have some difficulty in >>>>> picking the temperature change that small, many plants and animals >>>>> can: >>>> >>>> >>>> this is where you are wrong, >>>> >>>> plants and animals are already adapted to temperature changing over the >>>> year from about 32 degrees F in winter up to 95 degrees F in the >>>> summer. >>> >>> **Another moron steps up to be demolished. Did you bother reading ANY of >>> the cites? >>> >> >> that is the point, the cites are bullshit. why ? >> >> "plants and animals are already adapted to temperature changing over the >> year from about 32 degrees F in winter up to 95 degrees F in the >> summer. and golwball worming only changes 0.01 F per year." > > **What is "golwball worming"? > >>> >> >>> >>> >>>> >>>> a piddily little change caused by global warming average of 0.1 degree >>>> F over a decade will not impact any living thing. >>> >>> **And yet, it already does. >> >> no, check your links again, it is conjecture, look for the *weasel >> words*, if, may, impacts, could, might, increasing, less, dramatically, >> changing, varied, warming, stress, more, more frequent, altered, ...... > > **I already HAVE checked my links. I suggest you read them. you did not read them, did you ? > >> >> but there is no real facts or meat to support the conjecture, >> >> take your first link, they say the ocean is more acidic, so where are >> the measurements, ? > > **Ask and ye shall receive: > > https://www.pmel.noaa.gov/co2/story/Quality+of+pH+Measurements+in+the+NODC+Data+Archives the big change is only 0.1 ph in 100 years, BUT in the article, "This data set is thus not at all well-suited to showing a change of 0.1 in pH over the last 100 years" so the article you are so proud of, says it is bogus. >> >> that link want you to donate to FishWatch. >> >> >> >>> >>>> >>>> so all the articles that say "clams are dying due to global worming" >>>> are >>>> bullshit. >>> >>> **OK, you cite YOUR climate science credentials. This should be a laugh. > > > **[Sounds of crickets] > >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-01 19:14 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <fibm76Fe2a3U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #679364 |
On 1/04/2018 3:46 PM, Sergio wrote: > On 4/1/2018 12:03 AM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >> On 1/04/2018 11:18 AM, Sergio wrote: >>> On 3/31/2018 6:42 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>> On 1/04/2018 8:57 AM, Sergio wrote: >>>>> On 3/31/2018 3:53 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>>>> On 30/03/2018 4:51 AM, benj wrote: >>>>>>> On 3/29/2018 10:03 AM, kensi wrote: >>>>>>>> On 3/29/2018 9:55 AM, Sergio wrote: >>>>>>>>> so, why cant he survive if the global average goes up 0.1 degree F >>>>>>>>> over >>>>>>>>> 100 years ? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The global average has already gone up around 2 degrees F in just >>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>> past few decades, and the rise is accelerating. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> Only if you fudge the data. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> And in any event, neither YOU nor any plant or animal could tell the >>>>>>> difference in two rooms of 2 degree F in a few minutes let along in a >>>>>>> few decades. Are you really this stupid? Do you really work in >>>>>>> science >>>>>>> or "journalism"? >>>>>> >>>>>> **I don't have to ask if YOU are this stupid. Everyone already knows >>>>>> that not only are you as dumb as a pile of rocks, but you can not, nor >>>>>> will not answer direct questions, when asked. You scurry away. I >>>>>> expect >>>>>> nothing less from you now. >>>>>> >>>>>> What does it matter if a human can or can not pick a temperature >>>>>> difference of a degree C or two? The fact is: The average temperatures >>>>>> on this planet are rising. Whilst humans may have some difficulty in >>>>>> picking the temperature change that small, many plants and animals >>>>>> can: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> this is where you are wrong, >>>>> >>>>> plants and animals are already adapted to temperature changing over the >>>>> year from about 32 degrees F in winter up to 95 degrees F in the >>>>> summer. >>>> >>>> **Another moron steps up to be demolished. Did you bother reading ANY of >>>> the cites? >>>> >>> >>> that is the point, the cites are bullshit. why ? >>> >>> "plants and animals are already adapted to temperature changing over the >>> year from about 32 degrees F in winter up to 95 degrees F in the >>> summer. and golwball worming only changes 0.01 F per year." >> >> **What is "golwball worming"? **What is "golwball worming"? >> >>>> >>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>> a piddily little change caused by global warming average of 0.1 degree >>>>> F over a decade will not impact any living thing. >>>> >>>> **And yet, it already does. >>> >>> no, check your links again, it is conjecture, look for the *weasel >>> words*, if, may, impacts, could, might, increasing, less, dramatically, >>> changing, varied, warming, stress, more, more frequent, altered, ...... >> >> **I already HAVE checked my links. I suggest you read them. > > you did not read them, did you ? **Yup. > >> >>> >>> but there is no real facts or meat to support the conjecture, >>> >>> take your first link, they say the ocean is more acidic, so where are >>> the measurements, ? >> >> **Ask and ye shall receive: >> >> https://www.pmel.noaa.gov/co2/story/Quality+of+pH+Measurements+in+the+NODC+Data+Archives > > the big change is only 0.1 ph in 100 years, BUT in the article, "This > data set is thus not at all well-suited to showing a change of 0.1 in pH > over the last 100 years" > > so the article you are so proud of, says it is bogus. **Well, no, it does not. In fact, had you taken the time to read the article, you might have noticed this graph: https://www.pmel.noaa.gov/co2/file/Hawaii+Carbon+Dioxide+Time-Series Kinda says it all. > > > > >>> >>> that link want you to donate to FishWatch. >>> >>> >>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>> so all the articles that say "clams are dying due to global worming" >>>>> are >>>>> bullshit. >>>> >>>> **OK, you cite YOUR climate science credentials. This should be a laugh. >> >> >> **[Sounds of crickets] **[More crickets] -- Trevor Wilson www.rageaudio.com.au
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-01 15:34 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <p9rfnu$o9s$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #679376 |
On 4/1/2018 4:14 AM, Trevor Wilson wrote: > On 1/04/2018 3:46 PM, Sergio wrote: >> On 4/1/2018 12:03 AM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>> On 1/04/2018 11:18 AM, Sergio wrote: >>>> On 3/31/2018 6:42 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>>> On 1/04/2018 8:57 AM, Sergio wrote: >>>>>> On 3/31/2018 3:53 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>>>>> On 30/03/2018 4:51 AM, benj wrote: >>>>>>>> On 3/29/2018 10:03 AM, kensi wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 3/29/2018 9:55 AM, Sergio wrote: >>>>>>>>>> so, why cant he survive if the global average goes up 0.1 >>>>>>>>>> degree F >>>>>>>>>> over >>>>>>>>>> 100 years ? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The global average has already gone up around 2 degrees F in just >>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>> past few decades, and the rise is accelerating. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Only if you fudge the data. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> And in any event, neither YOU nor any plant or animal could tell >>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>> difference in two rooms of 2 degree F in a few minutes let along >>>>>>>> in a >>>>>>>> few decades. Are you really this stupid? Do you really work in >>>>>>>> science >>>>>>>> or "journalism"? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> **I don't have to ask if YOU are this stupid. Everyone already knows >>>>>>> that not only are you as dumb as a pile of rocks, but you can >>>>>>> not, nor >>>>>>> will not answer direct questions, when asked. You scurry away. I >>>>>>> expect >>>>>>> nothing less from you now. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> What does it matter if a human can or can not pick a temperature >>>>>>> difference of a degree C or two? The fact is: The average >>>>>>> temperatures >>>>>>> on this planet are rising. Whilst humans may have some difficulty in >>>>>>> picking the temperature change that small, many plants and animals >>>>>>> can: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> this is where you are wrong, >>>>>> >>>>>> plants and animals are already adapted to temperature changing >>>>>> over the >>>>>> year from about 32 degrees F in winter up to 95 degrees F in the >>>>>> summer. >>>>> >>>>> **Another moron steps up to be demolished. Did you bother reading >>>>> ANY of >>>>> the cites? >>>>> >>>> >>>> that is the point, the cites are bullshit. why ? >>>> >>>> "plants and animals are already adapted to temperature changing over >>>> the >>>> year from about 32 degrees F in winter up to 95 degrees F in the >>>> summer. and golwball worming only changes 0.01 F per year." >>> >>> **What is "golwball worming"? > > **What is "golwball worming"? > > >>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> a piddily little change caused by global warming average of 0.1 >>>>>> degree >>>>>> F over a decade will not impact any living thing. >>>>> >>>>> **And yet, it already does. >>>> >>>> no, check your links again, it is conjecture, look for the *weasel >>>> words*, if, may, impacts, could, might, increasing, less, dramatically, >>>> changing, varied, warming, stress, more, more frequent, altered, ...... >>> >>> **I already HAVE checked my links. I suggest you read them. >> >> you did not read them, did you ? > > **Yup. > >> >>> >>>> >>>> but there is no real facts or meat to support the conjecture, >>>> >>>> take your first link, they say the ocean is more acidic, so where are >>>> the measurements, ? >>> >>> **Ask and ye shall receive: >>> >>> https://www.pmel.noaa.gov/co2/story/Quality+of+pH+Measurements+in+the+NODC+Data+Archives >>> >> >> the big change is only 0.1 ph in 100 years, BUT in the article, "This >> data set is thus not at all well-suited to showing a change of 0.1 in pH >> over the last 100 years" >> >> so the article you are so proud of, says it is bogus. > > > **Well, no, it does not. In fact, had you taken the time to read the > article, you might have noticed this graph: > > https://www.pmel.noaa.gov/co2/file/Hawaii+Carbon+Dioxide+Time-Series > > Kinda says it all. no, read the article, and also follow thei link to https://data.nodc.noaa.gov/woa/WOD13/DOC/wod13_intro.pdf#page=44 "For example, originator’s chemical concentration units reported in per mass units were converted to per volume units assuming a constant density of seawater equal to 1025 kg·m ( e.g. ,an arbitrary choice). " the study says itself, it is full of holes. > >> >> >> >> >>>> >>>> that link want you to donate to FishWatch. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> so all the articles that say "clams are dying due to global worming" >>>>>> are >>>>>> bullshit. >>>>> >>>>> **OK, you cite YOUR climate science credentials. This should be a >>>>> laugh. >>> >>> >>> **[Sounds of crickets] > > **[More crickets] > [sound of FishWatch, fishing for your green money]
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 5 of 10 — ← Prev page 1 … 3 4 [5] 6 7 … 10 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web