Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #678885 > unrolled thread
| Started by | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-03-29 06:12 -0400 |
| Last post | 2018-03-29 18:33 -0500 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 187 — 14 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-03-29 06:12 -0400
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-03-29 08:55 -0500
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-03-29 10:03 -0400
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-03-29 11:11 -0500
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-03-29 13:51 -0400
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-03-29 13:56 -0500
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-03-30 05:40 +0000
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-03-30 09:04 -0500
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-03-30 08:25 -0600
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-03-30 11:53 -0400
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-01 07:30 +1000
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-03-31 19:46 -0400
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-01 10:08 +1000
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ð¶ç¬ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-03-31 19:26 -0500
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-03-31 20:56 -0400
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-01 11:27 +1000
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-03-31 22:00 -0400
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-01 14:57 +1000
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-01 00:41 -0500
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-01 17:31 +1000
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-01 11:46 -0500
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-02 10:37 +1000
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-01 22:11 -0500
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-02 00:03 -0400
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-02 05:27 -0400
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-02 09:25 -0500
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-04 07:12 +1000
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-03 20:10 -0500
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-04 13:18 +1000
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-03 23:12 -0500
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-04 14:39 +1000
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-04 08:40 -0400
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-04 08:15 -0400
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-04 08:04 -0400
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-04 08:02 -0600
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-02 00:01 -0400
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-02 09:25 -0500
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-02 05:16 -0400
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-02 09:26 -0500
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-02 19:38 -0400
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-01 12:39 -0400
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-02 11:22 +1000
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-02 18:29 -0400
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-03 12:07 +1000
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> - 2018-04-02 22:26 -0400
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-02 05:35 -0400
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-02 09:29 -0500
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-02 19:57 -0400
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-03 15:51 +1000
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-03 09:30 -0500
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-03 14:20 -0400
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-03 12:23 -0600
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-03 13:47 -0500
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-03 13:21 -0600
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-03 15:39 -0500
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-03 14:54 -0600
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-04-03 13:59 -0700
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-03 15:03 -0600
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-04-03 14:09 -0700
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-03 18:48 -0500
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-03 18:15 -0600
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-04-03 17:23 -0700
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-03 18:26 -0600
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-04-03 17:40 -0700
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-03 18:51 -0600
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-04-03 17:57 -0700
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-03 19:39 -0600
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-04-03 18:43 -0700
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-03 19:48 -0600
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-04-03 18:50 -0700
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-04 08:53 -0400
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-04 08:57 -0500
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-04 08:04 -0600
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-03 07:09 -0400
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-03 09:31 -0500
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-04-01 06:13 +0000
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ð¶ç¬ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-04-01 01:45 -0500
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-01 06:29 -0400
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-04-01 05:46 +0000
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-01 00:49 -0500
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ð¶ç¬ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-04-01 01:20 -0500
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-01 06:25 -0600
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-01 18:38 -0500
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-04-01 06:45 +0000
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ð¶ç¬ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-04-01 01:50 -0500
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-01 06:26 -0600
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-01 13:37 -0500
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-01 02:12 -0500
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ð¶ç¬ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-04-01 02:31 -0500
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-01 06:24 -0600
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-01 06:53 +1000
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-03-31 17:57 -0500
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ð¶ç¬ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-03-31 18:20 -0500
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-01 09:42 +1000
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-03-31 20:52 -0400
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-03-31 20:18 -0500
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-01 15:03 +1000
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-01 00:46 -0500
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-01 19:14 +1000
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-01 15:34 -0500
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-02 18:10 -0400
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-03 16:38 +1000
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-03 09:35 -0500
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-04 06:03 +1000
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-03 14:26 -0600
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-04 07:19 +1000
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-03 15:24 -0600
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-04 08:01 +1000
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-03 16:06 -0600
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-04 09:05 +1000
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-03 18:58 -0500
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-04 10:04 +1000
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-03 18:17 -0600
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-04 10:37 +1000
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-03 18:50 -0600
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-03 22:29 -0500
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-03 18:13 -0600
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-04 12:39 +1000
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-03 22:35 -0500
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-03 15:44 -0500
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-03 14:58 -0600
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-04 07:21 +1000
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-03 19:14 -0500
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-04 10:41 +1000
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-03 22:49 -0500
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-04 14:03 +1000
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-04 09:15 -0500
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-04 10:20 -0400
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-04 08:32 -0600
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-04 10:55 -0500
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-04-04 19:16 +0000
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-04 13:17 -0600
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-04 14:33 -0500
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-04 18:17 -0400
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2018-04-04 22:23 +0000
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-04 16:24 -0600
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-05 08:35 +1000
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-04 16:41 -0600
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-04 20:06 -0400
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-05 10:19 +1000
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-04 22:35 -0400
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-05 13:44 +1000
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-04 23:04 -0500
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-04 19:38 -0500
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-04 22:37 -0400
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-04 17:40 -0500
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-04 16:59 -0600
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-04 20:18 -0400
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-04-03 17:16 -0600
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-04 10:02 +1000
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-03 18:14 -0600
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-03 19:17 -0500
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-03-31 20:40 -0400
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-01 11:28 +1000
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-03-31 22:05 -0400
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2018-04-01 08:57 +0000
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ð¶ç¬ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-04-01 04:42 -0500
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-01 06:29 -0600
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2018-04-02 17:34 +0000
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-02 13:26 -0600
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-04-02 20:05 +0000
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-02 15:41 -0500
NOMINATIONS Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-04-04 19:17 +0000
Re: NOMINATIONS Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-04 13:20 -0600
Re: NOMINATIONS Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2018-04-04 22:26 +0000
Re: NOMINATIONS Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-04 16:36 -0600
Re: NOMINATIONS Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2018-04-04 22:46 +0000
Re: NOMINATIONS Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-04 17:02 -0600
Re: NOMINATIONS Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-04 18:25 -0400
Re: NOMINATIONS Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-04 16:33 -0600
Re: NOMINATIONS Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2018-04-04 22:47 +0000
Re: NOMINATIONS Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-04 17:03 -0600
Re: NOMINATIONS Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-04-04 23:52 +0000
Re: NOMINATIONS Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-04 17:55 -0600
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ð¶ç¬ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-03-31 23:14 -0500
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-03-31 20:23 -0500
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-03-31 18:28 -0700
China is winning the game (imperialism). Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-03-29 08:46 -0700
Re: China is winning the game (imperialism). Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-03-29 11:14 -0500
If your ambition is that low, you deserve it, right ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-03-29 09:26 -0700
Re: If your ambition is that low, you deserve it, right ? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-03-29 15:05 -0500
Re: If your ambition is that low, you deserve it, right ? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-03-29 18:00 -0400
Re: China is winning the game (imperialism). benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-03-29 13:53 -0400
Re: China is winning the game (imperialism). mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-03-29 14:32 -0400
Re: China is winning the game (imperialism). Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-03-29 13:34 -0700
Re: China is winning the game (imperialism). benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-03-29 17:54 -0400
Re: China is winning the game (imperialism). Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-03-29 18:33 -0500
Page 1 of 10 [1] 2 3 … 10 Next page →
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-03-29 06:12 -0400 |
| Subject | Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps |
| Message-ID | <p9ie6e$abq$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
Specialised species like the mountain hare, adapted to life at high altitudes, are particularly affected by climate change. If temperatures become too warm for the mountain hare, it only has limited options to move to cooler, higher elevations. https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/03/180313225546.htm -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-03-29 08:55 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <p9ira2$1308$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #678885 |
On 3/29/2018 5:12 AM, kensi wrote: > Specialised species like the mountain hare, adapted to life at high > altitudes, are particularly affected by climate change. If temperatures > become too warm for the mountain hare, it only has limited options to > move to cooler, higher elevations. > > https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/03/180313225546.htm > Dummy, the poor bunny survives in the summertime when the temperature is 80 degrees in the mountians. that is 35 degrees hotter than average for months. so, why cant he survive if the global average goes up 0.1 degree F over 100 years ?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-03-29 10:03 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <p9irmo$143c$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #678892 |
On 3/29/2018 9:55 AM, Sergio wrote: > so, why cant he survive if the global average goes up 0.1 degree F over > 100 years ? The global average has already gone up around 2 degrees F in just the past few decades, and the rise is accelerating. -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-03-29 11:11 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <p9j395$1job$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #678893 |
On 3/29/2018 9:03 AM, kensi wrote: > On 3/29/2018 9:55 AM, Sergio wrote: >> so, why cant he survive if the global average goes up 0.1 degree F over >> 100 years ? > > The global average has already gone up around 2 degrees F in just the > past few decades, and the rise is accelerating. > your info is wrong as you forgot the "pause". why did you snip the following out, instead of answering it ? (because, You can't handle the Truth) "Dummy, the poor bunny survives in the summertime when the temperature is 80 degrees in the mountains. that is 35 degrees hotter than average for months. " so how does fluffy get killed again by a 1 degree F rise ??
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-03-29 13:51 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <9I9vC.97230$6O6.3912@fx07.iad> |
| In reply to | #678893 |
On 3/29/2018 10:03 AM, kensi wrote: > On 3/29/2018 9:55 AM, Sergio wrote: >> so, why cant he survive if the global average goes up 0.1 degree F over >> 100 years ? > > The global average has already gone up around 2 degrees F in just the > past few decades, and the rise is accelerating. > Only if you fudge the data. And in any event, neither YOU nor any plant or animal could tell the difference in two rooms of 2 degree F in a few minutes let along in a few decades. Are you really this stupid? Do you really work in science or "journalism"?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-03-29 13:56 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <p9jct5$5um$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #678955 |
On 3/29/2018 12:51 PM, benj wrote: > On 3/29/2018 10:03 AM, kensi wrote: >> On 3/29/2018 9:55 AM, Sergio wrote: >>> so, why cant he survive if the global average goes up 0.1 degree F over >>> 100 years ? >> >> The global average has already gone up around 2 degrees F in just the >> past few decades, and the rise is accelerating. >> > Only if you fudge the data. > > And in any event, neither YOU nor any plant or animal could tell the > difference in two rooms of 2 degree F in a few minutes let along in a > few decades. Are you really this stupid? Do you really work in science > or "journalism"? Kensi Pupa did post equation a few days ago, but she may be member of "Forget Common Sense". think of it, if you could use a bunny to detect a 2 degree rise in temperature..... by # ear wiggles/second ? one could have their bunnyTemp in their house hoppin around, temperaturizing, and you can count the # of ear wiggles per second... but I bet the Bunnies are out of calibration, when+ how do you calibrate them ? does that calibration change with size? young to old? food they eat? amount of water they drink? or humidity in the air, or abount of time in the sun ? etc etc.... if all this sounds stupid to you, then why believe that outragous full of numbnuts shit article link kensi pupa posted?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-03-30 05:40 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <p9kik7$8jg$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #678989 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Thu, 29 Mar 2018 13:56:15 -0500, Sergio wrote: > why believe that outragous full of numbnuts shit article link kensi pupa > posted? If it's so "outragous[sic]" and impossible to believe, why do you froth so? Obviously, you fear kensi's message, which puts the lie to your k'lame that it's too silly to be believed. -- FNVWe Nadegda Fakey couldn't teach a monkey to eat a banana, much less answer a direct question posed to him. -- Fakey's Dogwhistle Holder
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-03-30 09:04 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <p9lg6l$1lpd$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #679102 |
On 3/30/2018 12:40 AM, Nadegda wrote: > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > On Thu, 29 Mar 2018 13:56:15 -0500, Sergio wrote: > >> why believe that outragous full of numbnuts shit article link kensi pupa >> posted? > > If it's so "outragous[sic]" and impossible to believe, why do you froth > so? Obviously, you fear kensi's message, which puts the lie to your k'lame > that it's too silly to be believed. > here is the common sense part you snipped off, because it is true, "think of it, if you could use a bunny to detect a 2 degree rise in temperature..... by # ear wiggles/second ? one could have their bunnyTemp in their house hoppin around, temperaturizing, and you can count the # of ear wiggles per second... but I bet the Bunnies are out of calibration, when+ how do you calibrate them ? does that calibration change with size? young to old? food they eat? amount of water they drink? or humidity in the air, or abount of time in the sun ? etc etc...." you,kensi think that a 0.1 F rise will kill bunnies, yet they live each year through a 90 degree F change. obviously, you, kensi, writer of article are stupid.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-03-30 08:25 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <65isbdd3lkb9ifphm9h2drfac827mbhreu@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #679102 |
On Fri, 30 Mar 2018 05:40:23 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >On Thu, 29 Mar 2018 13:56:15 -0500, Sergio wrote: > >> why believe that outragous full of numbnuts shit article link kensi pupa >> posted? > >If it's so "outragous[sic]" and impossible to believe, why do you froth >so? Obviously, you fear kensi's message, which puts the lie to your k'lame >that it's too silly to be believed. Same reason you snipped the part that smacked you so hard? -- MAUKGA
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-03-30 11:53 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <D3tvC.96154$mD2.34325@fx33.iad> |
| In reply to | #679102 |
On 3/30/2018 1:40 AM, Nadegda wrote: > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > On Thu, 29 Mar 2018 13:56:15 -0500, Sergio wrote: > >> why believe that outragous full of numbnuts shit article link kensi pupa >> posted? > > If it's so "outragous[sic]" and impossible to believe, why do you froth > so? Obviously, you fear kensi's message, which puts the lie to your k'lame > that it's too silly to be believed. > Telling you that you are an uneducated immature clown is hardly froth. It is simply fact and is strong evidence that your beliefs are are all nonsense. Your froth above shows you and "kensi" fear exposure of you lack of science knowledge and try to cover the fact with bluster. Nobody is fooled. Have a nice day. Big hint, Nads: Journalists are NOT scientists and know no science. You are obviously trying to be a journalist, right?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-01 07:30 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <fiad0kF5qqmU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #679133 |
On 31/03/2018 2:53 AM, benj wrote: > On 3/30/2018 1:40 AM, Nadegda wrote: >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >> On Thu, 29 Mar 2018 13:56:15 -0500, Sergio wrote: >> >>> why believe that outragous full of numbnuts shit article link kensi pupa >>> posted? >> >> If it's so "outragous[sic]" and impossible to believe, why do you froth >> so? Obviously, you fear kensi's message, which puts the lie to your >> k'lame >> that it's too silly to be believed. >> > Telling you that you are an uneducated immature clown is hardly froth. > It is simply fact and is strong evidence that your beliefs are are all > nonsense. Your froth above shows you and "kensi" fear exposure of you > lack of science knowledge and try to cover the fact with bluster. Nobody > is fooled. Have a nice day. **Pot, kettle, black you moron. > > Big hint, Nads: Journalists are NOT scientists and know no science. **Not necessarily. -- Trevor Wilson www.rageaudio.com.au
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-03-31 19:46 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <b5VvC.27159$DX7.14719@fx30.iad> |
| In reply to | #679278 |
On 3/31/2018 5:30 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote: > On 31/03/2018 2:53 AM, benj wrote: >> On 3/30/2018 1:40 AM, Nadegda wrote: >>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >>> On Thu, 29 Mar 2018 13:56:15 -0500, Sergio wrote: >>> >>>> why believe that outragous full of numbnuts shit article link kensi >>>> pupa >>>> posted? >>> >>> If it's so "outragous[sic]" and impossible to believe, why do you froth >>> so? Obviously, you fear kensi's message, which puts the lie to your >>> k'lame >>> that it's too silly to be believed. >>> >> Telling you that you are an uneducated immature clown is hardly froth. >> It is simply fact and is strong evidence that your beliefs are are all >> nonsense. Your froth above shows you and "kensi" fear exposure of you >> lack of science knowledge and try to cover the fact with bluster. >> Nobody is fooled. Have a nice day. > > **Pot, kettle, black you moron. Liberal "science": puerile name-calling. >> Big hint, Nads: Journalists are NOT scientists and know no science. > > **Not necessarily. True, I've just never seen one that did.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-01 10:08 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <fiam77F7n6jU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #679304 |
On 1/04/2018 9:46 AM, benj wrote: > On 3/31/2018 5:30 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >> On 31/03/2018 2:53 AM, benj wrote: >>> On 3/30/2018 1:40 AM, Nadegda wrote: >>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>>> melt! >>>> On Thu, 29 Mar 2018 13:56:15 -0500, Sergio wrote: >>>> >>>>> why believe that outragous full of numbnuts shit article link kensi >>>>> pupa >>>>> posted? >>>> >>>> If it's so "outragous[sic]" and impossible to believe, why do you froth >>>> so? Obviously, you fear kensi's message, which puts the lie to your >>>> k'lame >>>> that it's too silly to be believed. >>>> >>> Telling you that you are an uneducated immature clown is hardly >>> froth. It is simply fact and is strong evidence that your beliefs are >>> are all nonsense. Your froth above shows you and "kensi" fear >>> exposure of you lack of science knowledge and try to cover the fact >>> with bluster. Nobody is fooled. Have a nice day. >> >> **Pot, kettle, black you moron. > > Liberal "science": puerile name-calling. **Name calling? Nope. Just stating fact. You fail miserably to back any of your insane claims. You fail miserably to answer any of my questions and you fail miserably to respond to any of my points. You are a lying moron. > >>> Big hint, Nads: Journalists are NOT scientists and know no science. >> >> **Not necessarily. > > True, **There you go. That wasn't hard, was it? You finally admitted to one of your many lies. one down, about a million to go. I won't be holding my breath. -- Trevor Wilson www.rageaudio.com.au
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ð¶ç¬ <root@127.0.0.1> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-03-31 19:26 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <84KdnaSf4eC-ul3HnZ2dnUU7-QPNnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #679309 |
On Sun, 1 Apr 2018 10:08:04 +1000, LO AND BEHOLD; "Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au>" determined that the following was of great importance and subsequently decided to freely share it with us in <fiam77F7n6jU1@mid.individual.net>: >On 1/04/2018 9:46 AM, benj wrote: >>On 3/31/2018 5:30 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>On 31/03/2018 2:53 AM, benj wrote: >>>>On 3/30/2018 1:40 AM, Nadegda wrote: >>>>>Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >>>>>On Thu, 29 Mar 2018 13:56:15 -0500, Sergio wrote: >>>>>>why believe that outragous full of numbnuts shit article link kensi pupa >>>>>>posted? >>>>>If it's so "outragous[sic]" and impossible to believe, why do you froth >>>>>so? Obviously, you fear kensi's message, which puts the lie to your >>>>>k'lame that it's too silly to be believed. >>>>Telling you that you are an uneducated immature clown is hardly froth. >>>>It is simply fact and is strong evidence that your beliefs are are all >>>>nonsense. Your froth above shows you and "kensi" fear exposure of you >>>>lack of science knowledge and try to cover the fact with bluster. >>>>Nobody is fooled. Have a nice day. >>>**Pot, kettle, black you moron. >>Liberal "science": puerile name-calling. > >**Name calling? Nope. Just stating fact. You fail miserably to back any >of your insane claims. You fail miserably to answer any of my questions >and you fail miserably to respond to any of my points. You are a lying >moron. > >> >>>>Big hint, Nads: Journalists are NOT scientists and know no science. >>>**Not necessarily. >>True, > >**There you go. That wasn't hard, was it? You finally admitted to one of >your many lies. one down, about a million to go. I won't be holding my >breath. now you get to prove science wrong, here is some space: -- THIS SPACE FOR RENT https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iB6B8jGSdLA "Thanks to muzzies and their apologist-enablers like puppy whistle, this seems to be the new norm in the world. It's spreading like a cancer, and it's time we admit we're at war with pure evil. We need to put an end to this muzzie plague, or life on Earth is going to become pure hell everywhere. We need to get these people out of every civilized country, and there's only one way to do it. IOW, we have to become like them, with an emphasis on expediency over cruelty." - Checkmate (of alt.checkmate) "Pussy Willow has just proven that Trump's crackdown on previously unenforced immigration policies is working. We'll deal with the domestic terrorists as needed, but we don't need to be letting the muzzie terrorists get a foothold in our country too. One need only look at what they're doing in Europe right now to know we're doing the right thing by keeping them out, which is our right and our duty. - Checkmate (#1 pussy willow fan) - "You just made puppy whistle's sig line longer." - Janithor - "If I have a complaint about the (Southern Poverty) Law Center's description (of the alt-right movement), it is the phrase "heavy use of social media," which implies the alt-right is a real-world movement which uses a lot of social media. This is backwards: it is an online movement which occasionally appears in the real world. Where it gets punched." - Jason Rhode - "I think we should destroy every last fucking mosque in America." - "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> proves for us that white males are violent in Message-ID: <MPG.32c5bfefd18c9a698f0a8@news.altopia.com> - Golden Killfile, June 2005 KOTM, November 2006 Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006 Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006 Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007 Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006 Busted Urinal Award, April 2007 Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007 Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006 Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008 Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007 AUK Mascot, September 2007 Putting the Awards Out of Order to Screw With the OCD Fuckheads, March 2016
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-03-31 20:56 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <q7WvC.42650$2o3.22109@fx09.iad> |
| In reply to | #679309 |
On 3/31/2018 8:08 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote: > On 1/04/2018 9:46 AM, benj wrote: >> On 3/31/2018 5:30 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>> On 31/03/2018 2:53 AM, benj wrote: >>>> On 3/30/2018 1:40 AM, Nadegda wrote: >>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>>>> melt! >>>>> On Thu, 29 Mar 2018 13:56:15 -0500, Sergio wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> why believe that outragous full of numbnuts shit article link >>>>>> kensi pupa >>>>>> posted? >>>>> >>>>> If it's so "outragous[sic]" and impossible to believe, why do you >>>>> froth >>>>> so? Obviously, you fear kensi's message, which puts the lie to your >>>>> k'lame >>>>> that it's too silly to be believed. >>>>> >>>> Telling you that you are an uneducated immature clown is hardly >>>> froth. It is simply fact and is strong evidence that your beliefs >>>> are are all nonsense. Your froth above shows you and "kensi" fear >>>> exposure of you lack of science knowledge and try to cover the fact >>>> with bluster. Nobody is fooled. Have a nice day. >>> >>> **Pot, kettle, black you moron. >> >> Liberal "science": puerile name-calling. > > **Name calling? Nope. Just stating fact. You fail miserably to back any > of your insane claims. You fail miserably to answer any of my questions > and you fail miserably to respond to any of my points. You are a lying > moron. > >> >>>> Big hint, Nads: Journalists are NOT scientists and know no science. >>> >>> **Not necessarily. >> >> True, > > **There you go. That wasn't hard, was it? You finally admitted to one of > your many lies. one down, about a million to go. I won't be holding my > breath. > > Lib liars always accuse others of being the liars. I note that you provide no evidence of any journalist knowing any science. I can live with a single theoretical exception. I accept the truth that there ARE scientists who know science who have sold out for money, fame, employment etc. and purposely lie and distort facts for their handlers even though they know better. Is that you Trevor?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-01 11:27 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <fiaqshF8jjoU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #679324 |
On 1/04/2018 10:56 AM, benj wrote: > On 3/31/2018 8:08 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >> On 1/04/2018 9:46 AM, benj wrote: >>> On 3/31/2018 5:30 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>> On 31/03/2018 2:53 AM, benj wrote: >>>>> On 3/30/2018 1:40 AM, Nadegda wrote: >>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>>>>> melt! >>>>>> On Thu, 29 Mar 2018 13:56:15 -0500, Sergio wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> why believe that outragous full of numbnuts shit article link >>>>>>> kensi pupa >>>>>>> posted? >>>>>> >>>>>> If it's so "outragous[sic]" and impossible to believe, why do you >>>>>> froth >>>>>> so? Obviously, you fear kensi's message, which puts the lie to >>>>>> your k'lame >>>>>> that it's too silly to be believed. >>>>>> >>>>> Telling you that you are an uneducated immature clown is hardly >>>>> froth. It is simply fact and is strong evidence that your beliefs >>>>> are are all nonsense. Your froth above shows you and "kensi" fear >>>>> exposure of you lack of science knowledge and try to cover the fact >>>>> with bluster. Nobody is fooled. Have a nice day. >>>> >>>> **Pot, kettle, black you moron. >>> >>> Liberal "science": puerile name-calling. >> >> **Name calling? Nope. Just stating fact. You fail miserably to back >> any of your insane claims. You fail miserably to answer any of my >> questions and you fail miserably to respond to any of my points. You >> are a lying moron. >> >>> >>>>> Big hint, Nads: Journalists are NOT scientists and know no science. >>>> >>>> **Not necessarily. >>> >>> True, >> >> **There you go. That wasn't hard, was it? You finally admitted to one >> of your many lies. one down, about a million to go. I won't be holding >> my breath. >> >> > Lib liars always accuse others of being the liars. **Do they? Prove it. Prove that conservatives don't do exactly the same thing. Nonetheless, I called you a liar, because you ARE a liar. An ignorant one, at that. I note that you > provide no evidence of any journalist knowing any science. **You only need to ask: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natalie_Angier https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philip_Ball There are, of course, many more. We should not overlook the late, Steven Hawking, who authored a huge number of papers, articles and books: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephen_Hawking I can live > with a single theoretical exception. **Except, Mr Liar, it ain't theoretical. It's actual. > > I accept the truth that there ARE scientists who know science who have > sold out for money, fame, employment etc. **Sure. There's quite a few who have done that. I would argue that they are likely in the minority. and purposely lie and distort > facts for their handlers even though they know better. Is that you Trevor? **LOL! Let me remind you, Mr Liar, that I have posed a great many questions and comments to you. You have failed miserably to respond and/or answer. The obvious conclusion is that you know when you are beaten, so you just give up and scurry away. I've dealt with your kind before. Blowhards, with no real knowledge outside what they're fed by Fox. IOW: A moron. -- Trevor Wilson www.rageaudio.com.au
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-03-31 22:00 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <N2XvC.126618$mD2.37895@fx33.iad> |
| In reply to | #679329 |
On 3/31/2018 9:27 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote: > On 1/04/2018 10:56 AM, benj wrote: >> On 3/31/2018 8:08 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>> On 1/04/2018 9:46 AM, benj wrote: >>>> On 3/31/2018 5:30 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>>> On 31/03/2018 2:53 AM, benj wrote: >>>>>> On 3/30/2018 1:40 AM, Nadegda wrote: >>>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, >>>>>>> snowflakes, melt! >>>>>>> On Thu, 29 Mar 2018 13:56:15 -0500, Sergio wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> why believe that outragous full of numbnuts shit article link >>>>>>>> kensi pupa >>>>>>>> posted? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> If it's so "outragous[sic]" and impossible to believe, why do you >>>>>>> froth >>>>>>> so? Obviously, you fear kensi's message, which puts the lie to >>>>>>> your k'lame >>>>>>> that it's too silly to be believed. >>>>>>> >>>>>> Telling you that you are an uneducated immature clown is hardly >>>>>> froth. It is simply fact and is strong evidence that your beliefs >>>>>> are are all nonsense. Your froth above shows you and "kensi" fear >>>>>> exposure of you lack of science knowledge and try to cover the >>>>>> fact with bluster. Nobody is fooled. Have a nice day. >>>>> >>>>> **Pot, kettle, black you moron. >>>> >>>> Liberal "science": puerile name-calling. >>> >>> **Name calling? Nope. Just stating fact. You fail miserably to back >>> any of your insane claims. You fail miserably to answer any of my >>> questions and you fail miserably to respond to any of my points. You >>> are a lying moron. >>> >>>> >>>>>> Big hint, Nads: Journalists are NOT scientists and know no science. >>>>> >>>>> **Not necessarily. >>>> >>>> True, >>> >>> **There you go. That wasn't hard, was it? You finally admitted to one >>> of your many lies. one down, about a million to go. I won't be >>> holding my breath. >>> >>> >> Lib liars always accuse others of being the liars. > > **Do they? Prove it. Prove that conservatives don't do exactly the same > thing. Nonetheless, I called you a liar, because you ARE a liar. An > ignorant one, at that. I called YOU a liar because you are one. That's your job I think. > Â I note that you >> provide no evidence of any journalist knowing any science. > > **You only need to ask: > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natalie_Angier Pulitzer prize is proof of science knowledge? I don't think so. Anyway life sciences and medicine aren't real science. > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philip_Ball Getting Closer. I mean he was once "sort of: a physicist before he discovered he was liberal. I'd have to read his latest book on QM to see if his head is up his arse or not. Clearly he is not quite a Journalist though he regularly "contributes" to rags like NYT, Guardian and propaganda arms like BBC. Those are all negative evidence. > There are, of course, many more. We should not overlook the late, Steven > Hawking, who authored a huge number of papers, articles and books: > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephen_Hawking Can't you get the difference between journalist and writer? hey I have written books and articles on science. I'm not a journalist. > Â I can live >> with a single theoretical exception. > > **Except, Mr Liar, it ain't theoretical. It's actual. Except Mr. propagandist you have still not proved the premise wrong except by your fantasies and stretching meanings. >> >> I accept the truth that there ARE scientists who know science who have >> sold out for money, fame, employment etc. > > **Sure. There's quite a few who have done that. I would argue that they > are likely in the minority. Science is not done by majority vote no matter what you science deniers pretend. There is no such thing as the "settled science" you warmballers always pretend exists. > > Â and purposely lie and distort >> facts for their handlers even though they know better. Is that you >> Trevor? > > **LOL! Let me remind you, Mr Liar, that I have posed a great many > questions and comments to you. You have failed miserably to respond > and/or answer. The obvious conclusion is that you know when you are > beaten, so you just give up and scurry away. I have provided links to actual science an you keep pretending there is nothing and you heard nothing. So this: Stick your fingers in your ears and sing La LA LA LA LA! I CAN'T HEAR YOU! and that will "prove" I've never answered any of your so-called questions. I'm still waiting for your reply on the "Casualty of CO2 from 1940-1979 when CO2 went UP and Temperature went DOWN! Oh that's right YOU CAN'T HEAR ME! LA LA LA LA LA! > I've dealt with your kind before. Blowhards, with no real knowledge > outside what they're fed by Fox. IOW: A moron. I've dealt with 6th graders like you before too. In fact, years ago I actually was one! Calling people names really shows just how "mature" you folks in Oz are. Why should I waste my valuable time on kooks like you?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-01 14:57 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <fib75gFatg5U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #679334 |
On 1/04/2018 12:00 PM, benj wrote: > On 3/31/2018 9:27 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >> On 1/04/2018 10:56 AM, benj wrote: >>> On 3/31/2018 8:08 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>> On 1/04/2018 9:46 AM, benj wrote: >>>>> On 3/31/2018 5:30 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>>>> On 31/03/2018 2:53 AM, benj wrote: >>>>>>> On 3/30/2018 1:40 AM, Nadegda wrote: >>>>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, >>>>>>>> snowflakes, melt! >>>>>>>> On Thu, 29 Mar 2018 13:56:15 -0500, Sergio wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> why believe that outragous full of numbnuts shit article link >>>>>>>>> kensi pupa >>>>>>>>> posted? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> If it's so "outragous[sic]" and impossible to believe, why do >>>>>>>> you froth >>>>>>>> so? Obviously, you fear kensi's message, which puts the lie to >>>>>>>> your k'lame >>>>>>>> that it's too silly to be believed. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> Telling you that you are an uneducated immature clown is hardly >>>>>>> froth. It is simply fact and is strong evidence that your beliefs >>>>>>> are are all nonsense. Your froth above shows you and "kensi" fear >>>>>>> exposure of you lack of science knowledge and try to cover the >>>>>>> fact with bluster. Nobody is fooled. Have a nice day. >>>>>> >>>>>> **Pot, kettle, black you moron. >>>>> >>>>> Liberal "science": puerile name-calling. >>>> >>>> **Name calling? Nope. Just stating fact. You fail miserably to back >>>> any of your insane claims. You fail miserably to answer any of my >>>> questions and you fail miserably to respond to any of my points. You >>>> are a lying moron. >>>> >>>>> >>>>>>> Big hint, Nads: Journalists are NOT scientists and know no science. >>>>>> >>>>>> **Not necessarily. >>>>> >>>>> True, >>>> >>>> **There you go. That wasn't hard, was it? You finally admitted to >>>> one of your many lies. one down, about a million to go. I won't be >>>> holding my breath. >>>> >>>> >>> Lib liars always accuse others of being the liars. >> >> **Do they? Prove it. Prove that conservatives don't do exactly the >> same thing. Nonetheless, I called you a liar, because you ARE a liar. >> An ignorant one, at that. > > I called YOU a liar because you are one. **And yet, not once have you managed to prove that I have lied. I guess you lied about that as well. SOP. Lie about everything and hope for the best. Well, it won't cut it in the real world. That's your job I think. **Nope. You don't think. > >> Â Â I note that you >>> provide no evidence of any journalist knowing any science. >> >> **You only need to ask: >> >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natalie_Angier > > Pulitzer prize is proof of science knowledge? I don't think so. Anyway > life sciences and medicine aren't real science. **[SHAKES HEAD] There is no way you can deal with logic and reason. > >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philip_Ball > > Getting Closer. I mean he was once "sort of: a physicist before he > discovered he was liberal. I'd have to read his latest book on QM to see > if his head is up his arse or not. Clearly he is not quite a Journalist > though he regularly "contributes" to rags like NYT, Guardian and > propaganda arms like BBC. Those are all negative evidence. **Like I said: Scientist AND journalist. Thus I answered your request. In precisely the same way that you have failed to answer mine. You just scurry away. Every single time. > >> There are, of course, many more. We should not overlook the late, >> Steven Hawking, who authored a huge number of papers, articles and books: >> >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephen_Hawking > > Can't you get the difference between journalist and writer? **They can be regarded as the same thing. The term: 'journalist' is very broad. hey I have > written books and articles on science. I'm not a journalist. **You're nothing. > >> Â Â I can live >>> with a single theoretical exception. >> >> **Except, Mr Liar, it ain't theoretical. It's actual. > > Except Mr. propagandist you have still not proved the premise wrong > except by your fantasies and stretching meanings. **What premise would that be? That scientists can be journalists? I've given you three examples. There are many, many more. > >>> >>> I accept the truth that there ARE scientists who know science who >>> have sold out for money, fame, employment etc. >> >> **Sure. There's quite a few who have done that. I would argue that >> they are likely in the minority. > > Science is not done by majority vote no matter what you science deniers > pretend. There is no such thing as the "settled science" you warmballers > always pretend exists. **Yeah, there is. The link between increased CO2 levels and increased temperatures is both provably and theoretically solid. Hell, even Mythbusters proved it. > >> >> Â Â and purposely lie and distort >>> facts for their handlers even though they know better. Is that you >>> Trevor? >> >> **LOL! Let me remind you, Mr Liar, that I have posed a great many >> questions and comments to you. You have failed miserably to respond >> and/or answer. The obvious conclusion is that you know when you are >> beaten, so you just give up and scurry away. > > I have provided links to actual science an you keep pretending there is > nothing and you heard nothing. **You SAY you have provided links, but you actually failed to do so. (See the cut n copy at the end of this post) So this: Stick your fingers in your ears > and sing La LA LA LA LA! I CAN'T HEAR YOU! and that will "prove" I've > never answered any of your so-called questions. **I KNOW you have never answered my questions. You cannot. You lack the intellect and the knowledge to do so. I'm still waiting for > your reply on the "Casualty of CO2 from 1940-1979 when CO2 went UP and > Temperature went DOWN! **Asked and answered elsewhere, you boob: -- On 30/03/2018 10:30 AM, benj wrote: > On 3/29/2018 6:04 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >> On 28/03/2018 11:07 AM, benj wrote: >>> On 3/27/2018 7:28 PM, Nadegda wrote: >>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >>>> On Tue, 27 Mar 2018 23:40:43 +0100, Sn!pe wrote: >>>> >>>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 3/27/2018 8:15 AM, Wally W. wrote: >>>>>>> On Tue, 27 Mar 2018 07:50:07 -0400, kensi wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> <https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/climate-change-goes-firmly- >>>> in-the-loss-column-for-insurers/> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Do you post *anything* upbeat? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> Does "she" ever post anything that is true? >>>>> >>>>> No, HTH >>>> >>>> It took a while, but now we have you on the record making a firm statement >>>> that amounts to clinate change denial. >>> >>> Nonsense. Absolute lie. Lefties never do honesty. As I have said here MANY times, the ONE principle that absolutely EVERYONE in science agrees upon is "the certainty of change". It is you kooktards who think that you can stop the planet and keep change from happening. That makes YOU the 'science denier". >>> >>>> Which in turn pins down your politics as right-wing, something you've also >>>> tried to maintain deniability about. >>> >>> Right-wing schmite-wing. You are drooling again. What you accused me of was being a Trump supporter. This is FAR from the case. Blowhard sales types are not my favorite people though higher up than leftist commies like yourself. Didn't you get the memo about the fall of your utopian USSR? Your system is totally discredited by the largest social experiment in history. No wonder only North Korea and Democrats are the only ones left refusing to accept the data. >>> >>>> There's no bigger coward than one who will not go clearly on the record as >>>> believing what they believe, because it happens to be unpopular. >>> >>> I not only go on record I CONSISTENTLY back up my views with peer reviewed science that I regularly post in response to "kensi's" cut and paste journalist propaganda. >> >> **Liar. You NEVER post anything resembling science to any question or comment I make. Not once, not ever. > > The liar is YOU. **LOL. Let's see. Like al lefty Libs you don't do truth but DO do alling > other people names and slandering them to further you political scams. The ends justifies the means, right? And now you have shown that you and "kensi"/Nads are all part of the same big scamming family! You are as ready to lie for them as you are to lie for yourself. > > Here is a REPOST of GISS data I have posted many times? **NO repost. As usual, you lying sack of shit. Any idea what > GISS data is? **I know EXACTLY what it is. I also know what cherry-picked data is. Do you? Do you know who Dr. Hansen the godfather of global warming > is? **The so-called 'Godfather' of global warming was Joseph Fourier. After him, came Svante Arrhenius. Both men set the tone for global warming research way back in the NINETEENTH century! Which is information you would know, if you took the time to study the science. Do you recognize HIS data? **Well, since you failed (yet again) to present any data, no. Like I said: You NEVER present anything resembling science to back you idiotic claims. SOP. Do you notice that from 1940 - 1970 > these data showed Temperature going DOWN while CO2 went up? **Yes. And that has been explained to you in exquisite detail many, many times previously. Do you ever pay attention? It is due to aerosol pollution, caused by industry and motor vehicles. You may care to note (but you probably won't) that temperatures began to rise when governments around the world got serious about reducing aerosol pollution. Here's some science that you won't bother reading (nor understand): https://www.ucsusa.org/global-warming/science-and-impacts/science/aerosols-and-global-warming-faq.html#.Wr3OO39x1pg And you have > the absolute balls to say this proves that CO2 "causes" warming? **Idiot. The science is undeniable. How > ignorant are you anyway. **I assume that was a question. I am clearly a whole lot less ignorant that you. Why don't you show how much science you know > down in Oz and explain how radiative forcing made this happen? **Certainly. CO2 is resonant at a couple of infra-red frequencies. When infra-red (IR) hits those CO2 molecules, it causes them to vibrate (accumulate kinetic energy). More IR = more kinetic energy. The CO2 molecules are agitated sufficiently to transfer some of their energy to nearby molecules of atmospheric gases (nitrogen, oxygen, et al), thus raising the energy level of the entire system. Most critically, CO2 acts at night, when IR energy is re-radiated from the Earth's surface, thus nighttime temperatures are raised. > > You are all liars criminals and scammers trying to set up a fake tax to steal trillions of dollars. Shame on YOU. **I am not trying to set up any kind of tax. > >> Neither YOU nor "kensi" EVER respond to any >>> of it, >> >> >> **Pot, kettle, black, you lying sack of shit. You cannot put forward a cogent argument when I question you. You just scurry away. Like you will when you see this post. > > Liar. **You keep saying that, but you have failed to respond to my previous posts in this area. That make YOU the lying cunt. Not me. You simple babble on with your propaganda when I present you with > scientific data and then (see above) you lie and say I never did. **You failed to supply ANY scientific data. That makes YOU the lying cunt. Take > it easy on the drugs man, your fantasies are really getting strong. **Let me remind you: _I_ am not the one who failed to supply the data. You are. > >> instead simply resorting to immature name-calling and repeating >>> your lies over an over. As Sergio has pointed out, there has never been ONE equation coming out of you or your sock, "kensi". And that makes you a fraud. >> >> **Actually, it is YOU who is the fraud. Not only do you fail to respond, but you fail to admit when you have been shown to be wrong. > > You have not shown any of the science I CONSTANTLY present as wrong. **Lying does not make you correct. It just makes you a liar. YOU > simply lie and name-call and repeat your fear-mongering propaganda over and over. It's propaganda 101. Nothing new. Nothing of value either. > > So start with discussing how CO2 radiative forcing is adding energy yet temperatures are going down. This is a real "causality" trick! **Huh? Prove that temperatures are going down. > > We'll wait right here for your answer. **Telling a lie, then asking ME to prove your lie is not going to happen. -- Oh that's right YOU CAN'T HEAR ME! LA LA LA LA LA! > >> I've dealt with your kind before. Blowhards, with no real knowledge >> outside what they're fed by Fox. IOW: A moron. > > I've dealt with 6th graders like you before too. In fact, years ago I > actually was one! **I have news for you, dickhead: You still are. Calling people names really shows just how "mature" > you folks in Oz are. **I don't give a fuck what you think about Aussies. I just want you to admit that you don't know what the answers to my questions are. > > Why should I waste my valuable time on kooks like you? **No idea. Why do you? -- Trevor Wilson www.rageaudio.com.au
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-01 00:41 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <p9prge$5u5$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #679357 |
On 3/31/2018 11:57 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote: > On 1/04/2018 12:00 PM, benj wrote: >> On 3/31/2018 9:27 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>> On 1/04/2018 10:56 AM, benj wrote: >>>> On 3/31/2018 8:08 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>>> On 1/04/2018 9:46 AM, benj wrote: >>>>>> On 3/31/2018 5:30 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>>>>> On 31/03/2018 2:53 AM, benj wrote: >>>>>>>> On 3/30/2018 1:40 AM, Nadegda wrote: >>>>>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, >>>>>>>>> snowflakes, melt! >>>>>>>>> On Thu, 29 Mar 2018 13:56:15 -0500, Sergio wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> why believe that outragous full of numbnuts shit article link >>>>>>>>>> kensi pupa >>>>>>>>>> posted? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> If it's so "outragous[sic]" and impossible to believe, why do >>>>>>>>> you froth >>>>>>>>> so? Obviously, you fear kensi's message, which puts the lie to >>>>>>>>> your k'lame >>>>>>>>> that it's too silly to be believed. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Telling you that you are an uneducated immature clown is hardly >>>>>>>> froth. It is simply fact and is strong evidence that your >>>>>>>> beliefs are are all nonsense. Your froth above shows you and >>>>>>>> "kensi" fear exposure of you lack of science knowledge and try >>>>>>>> to cover the fact with bluster. Nobody is fooled. Have a nice day. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> **Pot, kettle, black you moron. >>>>>> >>>>>> Liberal "science": puerile name-calling. >>>>> >>>>> **Name calling? Nope. Just stating fact. You fail miserably to back >>>>> any of your insane claims. You fail miserably to answer any of my >>>>> questions and you fail miserably to respond to any of my points. >>>>> You are a lying moron. >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>> Big hint, Nads: Journalists are NOT scientists and know no science. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> **Not necessarily. >>>>>> >>>>>> True, >>>>> >>>>> **There you go. That wasn't hard, was it? You finally admitted to >>>>> one of your many lies. one down, about a million to go. I won't be >>>>> holding my breath. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> Lib liars always accuse others of being the liars. >>> >>> **Do they? Prove it. Prove that conservatives don't do exactly the >>> same thing. Nonetheless, I called you a liar, because you ARE a liar. >>> An ignorant one, at that. >> >> I called YOU a liar because you are one. > > **And yet, not once have you managed to prove that I have lied. I guess > you lied about that as well. SOP. Lie about everything and hope for the > best. Well, it won't cut it in the real world. > > >  That's your job I think. > > **Nope. You don't think. > >> >>>   I note that you >>>> provide no evidence of any journalist knowing any science. >>> >>> **You only need to ask: >>> >>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natalie_Angier >> >> Pulitzer prize is proof of science knowledge? I don't think so. Anyway >> life sciences and medicine aren't real science. > > **[SHAKES HEAD] There is no way you can deal with logic and reason. why shake your head on the internet ? is your hair wet ? > >> >>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philip_Ball >> >> Getting Closer. I mean he was once "sort of: a physicist before he >> discovered he was liberal. I'd have to read his latest book on QM to >> see if his head is up his arse or not. Clearly he is not quite a >> Journalist though he regularly "contributes" to rags like NYT, >> Guardian and propaganda arms like BBC. Those are all negative evidence. > > **Like I said: Scientist AND journalist. Thus I answered your request. > In precisely the same way that you have failed to answer mine. You just > scurry away. Every single time. > >> >>> There are, of course, many more. We should not overlook the late, >>> Steven Hawking, who authored a huge number of papers, articles and >>> books: >>> >>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephen_Hawking >> >> Can't you get the difference between journalist and writer? > > **They can be regarded as the same thing. The term: 'journalist' is very > broad. > wrong, they cannot be the same thing, they are two different words. > >  hey I have >> written books and articles on science. I'm not a journalist. > > **You're nothing. are you no thing? > >> >>>   I can live >>>> with a single theoretical exception. >>> >>> **Except, Mr Liar, it ain't theoretical. It's actual. >> >> Except Mr. propagandist you have still not proved the premise wrong >> except by your fantasies and stretching meanings. > > **What premise would that be? That scientists can be journalists? I've > given you three examples. There are many, many more. failed scientists can become journlists, but most hate it, > > >> >>>> >>>> I accept the truth that there ARE scientists who know science who >>>> have sold out for money, fame, employment etc. >>> >>> **Sure. There's quite a few who have done that. I would argue that >>> they are likely in the minority. >> >> Science is not done by majority vote no matter what you science >> deniers pretend. There is no such thing as the "settled science" you >> warmballers always pretend exists. > > **Yeah, there is. The link between increased CO2 levels and increased > temperatures is both provably and theoretically solid. Hell, even > Mythbusters proved it. Al Gore showed a graph where they are unrelated > > >> >>> >>>   and purposely lie and distort >>>> facts for their handlers even though they know better. Is that you >>>> Trevor? >>> >>> **LOL! Let me remind you, Mr Liar, that I have posed a great many >>> questions and comments to you. You have failed miserably to respond >>> and/or answer. The obvious conclusion is that you know when you are >>> beaten, so you just give up and scurry away. >> >> I have provided links to actual science an you keep pretending there >> is nothing and you heard nothing. > > > **You SAY you have provided links, but you actually failed to do so. > (See the cut n copy at the end of this post) > > >  So this: Stick your fingers in your ears >> and sing La LA LA LA LA! I CAN'T HEAR YOU! and that will "prove" I've >> never answered any of your so-called questions. > > **I KNOW you have never answered my questions. You cannot. You lack the > intellect and the knowledge to do so. > > >  I'm still waiting for >> your reply on the "Casualty of CO2 from 1940-1979 when CO2 went UP and >> Temperature went DOWN! > > **Asked and answered elsewhere, you boob: > > -- > On 30/03/2018 10:30 AM, benj wrote: >> On 3/29/2018 6:04 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>> On 28/03/2018 11:07 AM, benj wrote: >>>> On 3/27/2018 7:28 PM, Nadegda wrote: >>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, > melt! >>>>> On Tue, 27 Mar 2018 23:40:43 +0100, Sn!pe wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 3/27/2018 8:15 AM, Wally W. wrote: >>>>>>>> On Tue, 27 Mar 2018 07:50:07 -0400, kensi wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> > <https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/climate-change-goes-firmly- >>>>> in-the-loss-column-for-insurers/> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Do you post *anything* upbeat? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> Does "she" ever post anything that is true? >>>>>> >>>>>> No, HTH >>>>> >>>>> It took a while, but now we have you on the record making a firm > statement >>>>> that amounts to clinate change denial. >>>> >>>> Nonsense. Absolute lie. Lefties never do honesty. As I have said > here MANY times, the ONE principle that absolutely EVERYONE in science > agrees upon is "the certainty of change". It is you kooktards who think > that you can stop the planet and keep change from happening. That makes > YOU the 'science denier". >>>> >>>>> Which in turn pins down your politics as right-wing, something > you've also >>>>> tried to maintain deniability about. >>>> >>>> Right-wing schmite-wing. You are drooling again. What you accused me > of was being a Trump supporter. This is FAR from the case. Blowhard > sales types are not my favorite people though higher up than leftist > commies like yourself. Didn't you get the memo about the fall of your > utopian USSR? Your system is totally discredited by the largest social > experiment in history. No wonder only North Korea and Democrats are the > only ones left refusing to accept the data. >>>> >>>>> There's no bigger coward than one who will not go clearly on the > record as >>>>> believing what they believe, because it happens to be unpopular. >>>> >>>> I not only go on record I CONSISTENTLY back up my views with peer > reviewed science that I regularly post in response to "kensi's" cut and > paste journalist propaganda. >>> >>> **Liar. You NEVER post anything resembling science to any question or > comment I make. Not once, not ever. >> >> The liar is YOU. > > **LOL. Let's see. > >  Like al lefty Libs you don't do truth but DO do alling >> other people names and slandering them to further you political scams. > The ends justifies the means, right? And now you have shown that you and > "kensi"/Nads are all part of the same big scamming family! You are as > ready to lie for them as you are to lie for yourself. >> >> Here is a REPOST of GISS data I have posted many times? > > **NO repost. As usual, you lying sack of shit. > > >  Any idea what >> GISS data is? > > **I know EXACTLY what it is. I also know what cherry-picked data is. Do > you? > > >  Do you know who Dr. Hansen the godfather of global warming >> is? > > **The so-called 'Godfather' of global warming was Joseph Fourier. After > him, came Svante Arrhenius. Both men set the tone for global warming > research way back in the NINETEENTH century! Which is information you > would know, if you took the time to study the science. > > >  Do you recognize HIS data? > > **Well, since you failed (yet again) to present any data, no. Like I > said: You NEVER present anything resembling science to back you idiotic > claims. SOP. > > >  Do you notice that from 1940 - 1970 >> these data showed Temperature going DOWN while CO2 went up? > > **Yes. And that has been explained to you in exquisite detail many, many > times previously. Do you ever pay attention? It is due to aerosol > pollution, caused by industry and motor vehicles. You may care to note > (but you probably won't) that temperatures began to rise when > governments around the world got serious about reducing aerosol > pollution. Here's some science that you won't bother reading (nor > understand): aerosol polution stays near the ground, and disipates. > > https://www.ucsusa.org/global-warming/science-and-impacts/science/aerosols-and-global-warming-faq.html#.Wr3OO39x1pg > > > >  And you have >> the absolute balls to say this proves that CO2 "causes" warming? > > **Idiot. The science is undeniable. look at the data, it is sattilite data measuring surface temperatures, then highly averaged, ever see an error analysis of that muck ? > > >  How >> ignorant are you anyway. > > **I assume that was a question. I am clearly a whole lot less ignorant > that you. > tut tut. > >  Why don't you show how much science you know >> down in Oz and explain how radiative forcing made this happen? > > **Certainly. CO2 is resonant at a couple of infra-red frequencies. When > infra-red (IR) hits those CO2 molecules, it causes them to vibrate > (accumulate kinetic energy). More IR = more kinetic energy. The CO2 > molecules are agitated sufficiently to transfer some of their energy to > nearby molecules of atmospheric gases (nitrogen, oxygen, et al), thus > raising the energy level of the entire system. Most critically, CO2 acts > at night, when IR energy is re-radiated from the Earth's surface, thus > nighttime temperatures are raised. try calculating it, your absorbation bands are too narrow on CO2 to be meaningful. > > >> >> You are all liars criminals and scammers trying to set up a fake tax > to steal trillions of dollars. Shame on YOU. > > **I am not trying to set up any kind of tax. Carbon Market is the new stock market for trading carbon credits and futures, Wall street is pushing for it, about a 200B market to start. > > >> >>>  Neither YOU nor "kensi" EVER respond to any >>>> of it, >>> >>> >>> **Pot, kettle, black, you lying sack of shit. You cannot put forward > a cogent argument when I question you. You just scurry away. Like you > will when you see this post. >> >> Liar. > > **You keep saying that, but you have failed to respond to my previous > posts in this area. That make YOU the lying cunt. Not me. > > >  You simple babble on with your propaganda when I present you with >> scientific data and then (see above) you lie and say I never did. > > **You failed to supply ANY scientific data. That makes YOU the lying cunt. > > >  Take >> it easy on the drugs man, your fantasies are really getting strong. > > **Let me remind you: _I_ am not the one who failed to supply the data. > You are. > > >> >>>  instead simply resorting to immature name-calling and repeating >>>> your lies over an over. As Sergio has pointed out, there has never > been ONE equation coming out of you or your sock, "kensi". And that > makes you a fraud. >>> >>> **Actually, it is YOU who is the fraud. Not only do you fail to > respond, but you fail to admit when you have been shown to be wrong. >> >> You have not shown any of the science I CONSTANTLY present as wrong. > > **Lying does not make you correct. It just makes you a liar. > > >  YOU >> simply lie and name-call and repeat your fear-mongering propaganda > over and over. It's propaganda 101. Nothing new. Nothing of value either. >> >> So start with discussing how CO2 radiative forcing is adding energy > yet temperatures are going down. This is a real "causality" trick! > > **Huh? Prove that temperatures are going down. > > >> >> We'll wait right here for your answer. > > **Telling a lie, then asking ME to prove your lie is not going to happen. >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-01 17:31 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <fibg6pFco5kU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #679361 |
On 1/04/2018 3:41 PM, Sergio wrote: > On 3/31/2018 11:57 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >> On 1/04/2018 12:00 PM, benj wrote: >>> On 3/31/2018 9:27 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>> On 1/04/2018 10:56 AM, benj wrote: >>>>> On 3/31/2018 8:08 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>>>> On 1/04/2018 9:46 AM, benj wrote: >>>>>>> On 3/31/2018 5:30 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>>>>>> On 31/03/2018 2:53 AM, benj wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 3/30/2018 1:40 AM, Nadegda wrote: >>>>>>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, >>>>>>>>>> snowflakes, melt! >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 29 Mar 2018 13:56:15 -0500, Sergio wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> why believe that outragous full of numbnuts shit article link >>>>>>>>>>> kensi pupa >>>>>>>>>>> posted? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> If it's so "outragous[sic]" and impossible to believe, why do >>>>>>>>>> you froth >>>>>>>>>> so? Obviously, you fear kensi's message, which puts the lie to >>>>>>>>>> your k'lame >>>>>>>>>> that it's too silly to be believed. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Telling you that you are an uneducated immature clown is hardly >>>>>>>>> froth. It is simply fact and is strong evidence that your >>>>>>>>> beliefs are are all nonsense. Your froth above shows you and >>>>>>>>> "kensi" fear exposure of you lack of science knowledge and try >>>>>>>>> to cover the fact with bluster. Nobody is fooled. Have a nice day. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> **Pot, kettle, black you moron. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Liberal "science": puerile name-calling. >>>>>> >>>>>> **Name calling? Nope. Just stating fact. You fail miserably to back >>>>>> any of your insane claims. You fail miserably to answer any of my >>>>>> questions and you fail miserably to respond to any of my points. >>>>>> You are a lying moron. >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Big hint, Nads: Journalists are NOT scientists and know no science. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> **Not necessarily. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> True, >>>>>> >>>>>> **There you go. That wasn't hard, was it? You finally admitted to >>>>>> one of your many lies. one down, about a million to go. I won't be >>>>>> holding my breath. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> Lib liars always accuse others of being the liars. >>>> >>>> **Do they? Prove it. Prove that conservatives don't do exactly the >>>> same thing. Nonetheless, I called you a liar, because you ARE a liar. >>>> An ignorant one, at that. >>> >>> I called YOU a liar because you are one. >> >> **And yet, not once have you managed to prove that I have lied. I guess >> you lied about that as well. SOP. Lie about everything and hope for the >> best. Well, it won't cut it in the real world. >> >> >>  That's your job I think. >> >> **Nope. You don't think. >> >>> >>>>   I note that you >>>>> provide no evidence of any journalist knowing any science. >>>> >>>> **You only need to ask: >>>> >>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natalie_Angier >>> >>> Pulitzer prize is proof of science knowledge? I don't think so. Anyway >>> life sciences and medicine aren't real science. >> >> **[SHAKES HEAD] There is no way you can deal with logic and reason. > > why shake your head on the internet ? is your hair wet ? > >> >>> >>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philip_Ball >>> >>> Getting Closer. I mean he was once "sort of: a physicist before he >>> discovered he was liberal. I'd have to read his latest book on QM to >>> see if his head is up his arse or not. Clearly he is not quite a >>> Journalist though he regularly "contributes" to rags like NYT, >>> Guardian and propaganda arms like BBC. Those are all negative evidence. >> >> **Like I said: Scientist AND journalist. Thus I answered your request. >> In precisely the same way that you have failed to answer mine. You just >> scurry away. Every single time. >> >>> >>>> There are, of course, many more. We should not overlook the late, >>>> Steven Hawking, who authored a huge number of papers, articles and >>>> books: >>>> >>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephen_Hawking >>> >>> Can't you get the difference between journalist and writer? >> >> **They can be regarded as the same thing. The term: 'journalist' is very >> broad. >> > > wrong, they cannot be the same thing, they are two different words. **Really? You sure about that? http://www.thesaurus.com/browse/journalist?s=t > >> >>  hey I have >>> written books and articles on science. I'm not a journalist. >> >> **You're nothing. > > are you no thing? > >> >>> >>>>   I can live >>>>> with a single theoretical exception. >>>> >>>> **Except, Mr Liar, it ain't theoretical. It's actual. >>> >>> Except Mr. propagandist you have still not proved the premise wrong >>> except by your fantasies and stretching meanings. >> >> **What premise would that be? That scientists can be journalists? I've >> given you three examples. There are many, many more. > > failed scientists can become journlists, but most hate it, **Do they? Got some proof of that claim? > >> >> >>> >>>>> >>>>> I accept the truth that there ARE scientists who know science who >>>>> have sold out for money, fame, employment etc. >>>> >>>> **Sure. There's quite a few who have done that. I would argue that >>>> they are likely in the minority. >>> >>> Science is not done by majority vote no matter what you science >>> deniers pretend. There is no such thing as the "settled science" you >>> warmballers always pretend exists. >> >> **Yeah, there is. The link between increased CO2 levels and increased >> temperatures is both provably and theoretically solid. Hell, even >> Mythbusters proved it. > > Al Gore showed a graph where they are unrelated **Al Gore is a POLITICIAN, not a SCIENTIST. Please learn the difference. I am not interested in what a POLITICIAN has to say about SCIENCE. Please pay attention to the emphasis. You may quote politicians in the area of (you guessed it) POLITICS. When discussing matters of science, you quote (you guessed it again) SCIENTISTS. Let's not place in at the same level as benj. Keep it up and we'll be forced to do so. > >> >> >>> >>>> >>>>   and purposely lie and distort >>>>> facts for their handlers even though they know better. Is that you >>>>> Trevor? >>>> >>>> **LOL! Let me remind you, Mr Liar, that I have posed a great many >>>> questions and comments to you. You have failed miserably to respond >>>> and/or answer. The obvious conclusion is that you know when you are >>>> beaten, so you just give up and scurry away. >>> >>> I have provided links to actual science an you keep pretending there >>> is nothing and you heard nothing. >> >> >> **You SAY you have provided links, but you actually failed to do so. >> (See the cut n copy at the end of this post) >> >> >>  So this: Stick your fingers in your ears >>> and sing La LA LA LA LA! I CAN'T HEAR YOU! and that will "prove" I've >>> never answered any of your so-called questions. >> >> **I KNOW you have never answered my questions. You cannot. You lack the >> intellect and the knowledge to do so. >> >> >>  I'm still waiting for >>> your reply on the "Casualty of CO2 from 1940-1979 when CO2 went UP and >>> Temperature went DOWN! >> >> **Asked and answered elsewhere, you boob: >> >> -- >> On 30/03/2018 10:30 AM, benj wrote: >>> On 3/29/2018 6:04 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>> On 28/03/2018 11:07 AM, benj wrote: >>>>> On 3/27/2018 7:28 PM, Nadegda wrote: >>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >> melt! >>>>>> On Tue, 27 Mar 2018 23:40:43 +0100, Sn!pe wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 3/27/2018 8:15 AM, Wally W. wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Tue, 27 Mar 2018 07:50:07 -0400, kensi wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >> <https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/climate-change-goes-firmly- >>>>>> in-the-loss-column-for-insurers/> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Do you post *anything* upbeat? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Does "she" ever post anything that is true? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> No, HTH >>>>>> >>>>>> It took a while, but now we have you on the record making a firm >> statement >>>>>> that amounts to clinate change denial. >>>>> >>>>> Nonsense. Absolute lie. Lefties never do honesty. As I have said >> here MANY times, the ONE principle that absolutely EVERYONE in science >> agrees upon is "the certainty of change". It is you kooktards who think >> that you can stop the planet and keep change from happening. That makes >> YOU the 'science denier". >>>>> >>>>>> Which in turn pins down your politics as right-wing, something >> you've also >>>>>> tried to maintain deniability about. >>>>> >>>>> Right-wing schmite-wing. You are drooling again. What you accused me >> of was being a Trump supporter. This is FAR from the case. Blowhard >> sales types are not my favorite people though higher up than leftist >> commies like yourself. Didn't you get the memo about the fall of your >> utopian USSR? Your system is totally discredited by the largest social >> experiment in history. No wonder only North Korea and Democrats are the >> only ones left refusing to accept the data. >>>>> >>>>>> There's no bigger coward than one who will not go clearly on the >> record as >>>>>> believing what they believe, because it happens to be unpopular. >>>>> >>>>> I not only go on record I CONSISTENTLY back up my views with peer >> reviewed science that I regularly post in response to "kensi's" cut and >> paste journalist propaganda. >>>> >>>> **Liar. You NEVER post anything resembling science to any question or >> comment I make. Not once, not ever. >>> >>> The liar is YOU. >> >> **LOL. Let's see. >> >>  Like al lefty Libs you don't do truth but DO do alling >>> other people names and slandering them to further you political scams. >> The ends justifies the means, right? And now you have shown that you and >> "kensi"/Nads are all part of the same big scamming family! You are as >> ready to lie for them as you are to lie for yourself. >>> >>> Here is a REPOST of GISS data I have posted many times? >> >> **NO repost. As usual, you lying sack of shit. >> >> >>  Any idea what >>> GISS data is? >> >> **I know EXACTLY what it is. I also know what cherry-picked data is. Do >> you? >> >> >>  Do you know who Dr. Hansen the godfather of global warming >>> is? >> >> **The so-called 'Godfather' of global warming was Joseph Fourier. After >> him, came Svante Arrhenius. Both men set the tone for global warming >> research way back in the NINETEENTH century! Which is information you >> would know, if you took the time to study the science. >> >> >>  Do you recognize HIS data? >> >> **Well, since you failed (yet again) to present any data, no. Like I >> said: You NEVER present anything resembling science to back you idiotic >> claims. SOP. >> >> >>  Do you notice that from 1940 - 1970 >>> these data showed Temperature going DOWN while CO2 went up? >> >> **Yes. And that has been explained to you in exquisite detail many, many >> times previously. Do you ever pay attention? It is due to aerosol >> pollution, caused by industry and motor vehicles. You may care to note >> (but you probably won't) that temperatures began to rise when >> governments around the world got serious about reducing aerosol >> pollution. Here's some science that you won't bother reading (nor >> understand): > > aerosol polution stays near the ground, and disipates. **Does it? How about jet trails? Are they near the ground too? >> >> https://www.ucsusa.org/global-warming/science-and-impacts/science/aerosols-and-global-warming-faq.html#.Wr3OO39x1pg >> >> >> >>  And you have >>> the absolute balls to say this proves that CO2 "causes" warming? >> >> **Idiot. The science is undeniable. > > look at the data, it is sattilite data measuring surface temperatures, > then highly averaged, ever see an error analysis of that muck ? **When examining temperatures, it is appropriate to use all measurement criteria. That includes satellite data. However, satellite data has not been available for most of the period under discussion. > >> >> >>  How >>> ignorant are you anyway. >> >> **I assume that was a question. I am clearly a whole lot less ignorant >> that you. >> > > tut tut. **Again: I calls it the way I sees it. benj is spectacularly ignorant. He scurries away, when asked questions. > >> >>  Why don't you show how much science you know >>> down in Oz and explain how radiative forcing made this happen? >> >> **Certainly. CO2 is resonant at a couple of infra-red frequencies. When >> infra-red (IR) hits those CO2 molecules, it causes them to vibrate >> (accumulate kinetic energy). More IR = more kinetic energy. The CO2 >> molecules are agitated sufficiently to transfer some of their energy to >> nearby molecules of atmospheric gases (nitrogen, oxygen, et al), thus >> raising the energy level of the entire system. Most critically, CO2 acts >> at night, when IR energy is re-radiated from the Earth's surface, thus >> nighttime temperatures are raised. > > try calculating it, your absorbation bands are too narrow on CO2 to be > meaningful. **I HAVE calculated it. Many years ago. CO2 is resonant at three frequencies in the IR band. Two narrow peaks at around 2.5um and 4um and a much broader peak at around 15 ~ 20um. I suggest you choose another scientific reference, rather than Fox News. > >> >> >>> >>> You are all liars criminals and scammers trying to set up a fake tax >> to steal trillions of dollars. Shame on YOU. >> >> **I am not trying to set up any kind of tax. > > Carbon Market is the new stock market for trading carbon credits and > futures, Wall street is pushing for it, about a 200B market to start. **I am not trying to set up any kind of tax. > >> >> >>> >>>>   Neither YOU nor "kensi" EVER respond to any >>>>> of it, >>>> >>>> >>>> **Pot, kettle, black, you lying sack of shit. You cannot put forward >> a cogent argument when I question you. You just scurry away. Like you >> will when you see this post. >>> >>> Liar. >> >> **You keep saying that, but you have failed to respond to my previous >> posts in this area. That make YOU the lying cunt. Not me. >> >> >>  You simple babble on with your propaganda when I present you with >>> scientific data and then (see above) you lie and say I never did. >> >> **You failed to supply ANY scientific data. That makes YOU the lying cunt. >> >> >>  Take >>> it easy on the drugs man, your fantasies are really getting strong. >> >> **Let me remind you: _I_ am not the one who failed to supply the data. >> You are. >> >> >>> >>>>   instead simply resorting to immature name-calling and repeating >>>>> your lies over an over. As Sergio has pointed out, there has never >> been ONE equation coming out of you or your sock, "kensi". And that >> makes you a fraud. >>>> >>>> **Actually, it is YOU who is the fraud. Not only do you fail to >> respond, but you fail to admit when you have been shown to be wrong. >>> >>> You have not shown any of the science I CONSTANTLY present as wrong. >> >> **Lying does not make you correct. It just makes you a liar. >> >> >>  YOU >>> simply lie and name-call and repeat your fear-mongering propaganda >> over and over. It's propaganda 101. Nothing new. Nothing of value either. >>> >>> So start with discussing how CO2 radiative forcing is adding energy >> yet temperatures are going down. This is a real "causality" trick! >> >> **Huh? Prove that temperatures are going down. >> >> >>> >>> We'll wait right here for your answer. >> >> **Telling a lie, then asking ME to prove your lie is not going to happen. >> > -- Trevor Wilson www.rageaudio.com.au
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 1 of 10 [1] 2 3 … 10 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web