Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #527775 > unrolled thread

Failing to account for climate change in mining land reclamation may cost billions

Started bySam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com>
First post2015-10-23 18:45 -0500
Last post2015-10-23 20:10 -0500
Articles 3 — 3 participants

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics


Contents

  Failing to account for climate change in mining land reclamation may cost billions Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-10-23 18:45 -0500
    Re: Failing to account for climate change in mining land reclamation may cost billions jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-10-24 00:37 +0000
    Re: Failing to account for climate change in mining land reclamation may cost billions gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> - 2015-10-23 20:10 -0500

#527775 — Failing to account for climate change in mining land reclamation may cost billions

FromSam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com>
Date2015-10-23 18:45 -0500
SubjectFailing to account for climate change in mining land reclamation may cost billions
Message-ID<maKdneq-i_E7W7fLnZ2dnUU7-RednZ2d@giganews.com>
Failing to account for climate change in mining land reclamation may 
cost billions
> http://phys.org/news/2015-10-account-climate-reclamation-billions.html


> Researchers at the University of Waterloo are warning that plans to
> reclaim mined land risk failure and could cost industry and
> government billions in future cleanup costs if they do not take into
> account the affects of climate change.
>
> In a paper published in the journal Nature Climate Change today,
> Professors Rebecca Rooney, Derek Robinson and Rich Petrone outline a
> six-step process to improve success rates for ecological reclamation
> projects and control mine closure costs; reconciling
> government-mandated mine closing procedures with long-term climate
> projections.



-- 

sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
community, and physics-related social issues.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#527800

Fromjimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
Date2015-10-24 00:37 +0000
Message-ID<ff0rfc-7k3.ln1@mail.specsol.com>
In reply to#527775
Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote:
> Failing to account for climate change in mining land reclamation may 
> cost billions

Or may be total nonsense, shit head.

Have you ever wondered what your life might have been like if you had
the competence to do more than just copy the words of others, spamming
piece of shit?


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#527808

Fromgilber34 <fafa@invalid.com>
Date2015-10-23 20:10 -0500
Message-ID<n0elqa$n1i$1@speranza.aioe.org>
In reply to#527775
On 10/23/2015 6:45 PM, Sam Wormley wrote:
> Failing to account for climate change in mining land reclamation may
> cost billions
>> http://phys.org/news/2015-10-account-climate-reclamation-billions.html


*SCREW phys.org* for giving solar panels to starving children in all 
continents, instead of food, housing, sanitation, and health.


[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | sci.physics


csiph-web