Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #694811 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-07-20 14:16 -0700 |
| Last post | 2018-07-20 17:30 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 61 — 9 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
Density of Photons ????? "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2018-07-20 14:16 -0700
Re: Density of Photons ????? "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2018-07-20 14:24 -0700
Re: Density of Photons ????? Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2018-07-20 14:31 -0700
Re: Density of Photons ????? "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2018-07-20 14:44 -0700
Re: Density of Photons ????? "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2018-07-20 14:58 -0700
Re: Density of Photons ????? mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-07-20 15:15 -0700
Re: Density of Photons ????? "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2018-07-21 09:38 -0700
Re: Density of Photons ????? Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2018-07-21 15:36 -0700
Re: Density of Photons ????? "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2018-07-21 17:42 -0700
Re: Density of Photons ????? "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2018-07-21 18:19 -0700
Re: Density of Photons ????? Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2018-07-22 15:26 -0700
Re: Density of Photons ????? poraty6@gmail.com - 2018-07-22 16:34 -0700
Re: Density of Photons ????? "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2018-07-23 13:44 -0700
Re: Density of Photons ????? mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-07-23 13:55 -0700
Re: Density of Photons ????? "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2018-07-23 16:03 -0700
Re: Density of Photons ????? poraty6@gmail.com - 2018-07-21 23:55 -0700
Re: Density of Photons ????? Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2018-07-20 16:00 -0700
Gravity is residual eXergy. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-07-20 21:56 -0700
Re: Gravity is residual eXergy. paulcardinale0@gmail.com - 2018-07-22 19:12 -0700
Re: Density of Photons ????? paulcardinale0@gmail.com - 2018-07-22 19:09 -0700
Re: Density of Photons ????? poraty6@gmail.com - 2018-07-23 00:12 -0700
Re: Density of Photons ????? Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2018-07-23 13:39 -0700
Re: Density of Photons ????? poraty6@gmail.com - 2018-07-23 18:13 -0700
Re: Density of Photons ????? "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2018-07-23 14:01 -0700
Re: Density of Photons ????? Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2018-07-23 14:54 -0700
Re: Density of Photons ????? "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2018-07-23 17:26 -0700
Re: Density of Photons ????? "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2018-07-23 21:06 -0700
Re: Density of Photons ????? poraty6@gmail.com - 2018-07-23 18:30 -0700
Re: Density of Photons ????? poraty6@gmail.com - 2018-07-23 23:05 -0700
Re: Density of Photons ????? Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2018-07-24 14:07 -0700
Re: Density of Photons ????? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-07-24 17:20 -0400
Re: Density of Photons ????? Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2018-07-24 14:57 -0700
Re: Density of Photons ????? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-07-25 01:57 +0000
Re: Density of Photons ????? "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2018-07-25 12:27 -0700
Re: Density of Photons ????? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-07-25 19:47 +0000
Re: Density of Photons ????? "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2018-07-25 15:40 -0700
Re: Density of Photons ????? "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2018-07-25 15:51 -0700
Re: Density of Photons ????? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-07-25 23:23 +0000
Re: Density of Photons ????? "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2018-07-25 14:52 -0700
Re: Density of Photons ????? poraty6@gmail.com - 2018-07-24 20:50 -0700
Re: Density of Photons ????? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-07-24 21:50 +0000
Re: Density of Photons ????? poraty6@gmail.com - 2018-07-24 16:35 -0700
Re: Density of Photons ????? mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-07-24 16:51 -0700
Re: Density of Photons ????? poraty6@gmail.com - 2018-07-24 20:56 -0700
Re: Density of Photons ????? mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-07-24 21:12 -0700
Re: Density of Photons ????? poraty6@gmail.com - 2018-07-25 02:00 -0700
Re: Density of Photons ????? mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-07-25 13:27 -0700
Re: Density of Photons ????? "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2018-07-24 19:17 -0700
Re: Density of Photons ????? mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-07-24 19:23 -0700
Re: Density of Photons ????? "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2018-07-24 20:19 -0700
Re: Density of Photons ????? "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2018-07-23 15:49 -0700
Re: Density of Photons ????? poraty6@gmail.com - 2018-07-23 18:30 -0700
Re: Density of Photons ????? paulcardinale0@gmail.com - 2018-07-26 10:09 -0700
Re: Density of Photons ????? "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2018-07-26 15:38 -0700
Re: Density of Photons ????? "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2018-07-26 16:22 -0700
Re: Density of Photons ????? poraty6@gmail.com - 2018-07-27 01:39 -0700
Re: Density of Photons ????? poraty6@gmail.com - 2018-07-27 01:41 -0700
Re: Density of Photons ????? poraty6@gmail.com - 2018-07-21 00:02 -0700
Re: Density of Photons ????? paulcardinale0@gmail.com - 2018-07-22 19:08 -0700
Re: Density of Photons ????? poraty6@gmail.com - 2018-07-20 17:24 -0700
Re: Density of Photons ????? mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-07-20 17:30 -0700
Page 2 of 4 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 Next page →
| From | poraty6@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-23 00:12 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <b697f31a-c753-468a-908a-cc292164a287@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #695131 |
On Monday, July 23, 2018 at 5:09:52 AM UTC+3, paulcar...@gmail.com wrote: > On Friday, July 20, 2018 at 2:44:34 PM UTC-7, reber G=emc^2 wrote: > > On Friday, July 20, 2018 at 2:31:28 PM UTC-7, Double-A wrote: > > > On Friday, July 20, 2018 at 2:16:42 PM UTC-7, reber G=emc^2 wrote: > > > > I believe it relates to its wave length.It goes well with my twin photon constructure.Bert > > > > > > > > > Density of photons? An interesting idea, because it implies that photons have mass! > > > > > > Double-A > > > > Mass they have AA.This is proven when gamma photons can kick electrons off a metal surface. > > No, stupid. That proves that photons have energy, not mass. ============================= idiot parrot !! ''have energy but no mass ''?1! E=hf h is Kilogram x meter ^2 times (scalar f)/second now Holly shit where do you see in the above any f en 'relativistic factor''????/!!!! or any f en zero multiplier ??!! == got it idiot parrot once and for all ??!!!! just open your mind and stop parroting like a parrot the photon has mass the only mass indeed extremely tiny but yet has mass !!! -- in another analysis I proved that the mass of the real **single** photon is about (sit still on your chair) approximately: expo -90 Kilogram !!!!! no one will ever be able to notice it or detect it !!but the **theoretically* it is important to realize it !! even if it is too small for our tools to detect it as a real single photon === TIA Y.Porat ================================= == copyright explanation Y.Porat =========================
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-23 13:39 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <e4ebef73-8019-4120-a47d-358fe610a37f@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #695138 |
On Monday, July 23, 2018 at 12:12:24 AM UTC-7, por...@gmail.com wrote: > On Monday, July 23, 2018 at 5:09:52 AM UTC+3, paulcar...@gmail.com wrote: > > On Friday, July 20, 2018 at 2:44:34 PM UTC-7, reber G=emc^2 wrote: > > > On Friday, July 20, 2018 at 2:31:28 PM UTC-7, Double-A wrote: > > > > On Friday, July 20, 2018 at 2:16:42 PM UTC-7, reber G=emc^2 wrote: > > > > > I believe it relates to its wave length.It goes well with my twin photon constructure.Bert > > > > > > > > > > > > Density of photons? An interesting idea, because it implies that photons have mass! > > > > > > > > Double-A > > > > > > Mass they have AA.This is proven when gamma photons can kick electrons off a metal surface. > > > > No, stupid. That proves that photons have energy, not mass. > > ============================= > idiot parrot !! > > ''have energy but no mass ''?1! > > E=hf > > h is > Kilogram x meter ^2 times (scalar f)/second > > now Holly shit > where do you see in the above > any f en 'relativistic factor''????/!!!! > or > any f en zero multiplier ??!! > == > got it idiot parrot once and for all ??!!!! > just open your mind > and stop parroting like a parrot > the photon has mass > the only mass > indeed extremely tiny but yet > has mass !!! > -- > in another analysis I proved that > the mass of the real **single** photon is > about > (sit still on your chair) > approximately: > > expo -90 Kilogram !!!!! > > no one will ever be able to notice it > or detect it !!but > the **theoretically* it is important to realize it !! > even if it is too small for our tools to detect it > as a real single photon > === > TIA > Y.Porat > ================================= > == > copyright explanation > Y.Porat > ========================= As Arthur Eddington put it so elegantly in his poem: "Oh leave the Wise our measures to collate One thing at least is certain, LIGHT has WEIGHT, One thing is certain, and the rest debate – Light-rays, when near the Sun, DO NOT GO STRAIGHT." - Arthur Eddington Double-A
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | poraty6@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-23 18:13 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <5cf2e90c-999d-4d39-9503-62f590755505@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #695213 |
On Monday, July 23, 2018 at 11:39:57 PM UTC+3, Double-A wrote: > On Monday, July 23, 2018 at 12:12:24 AM UTC-7, por...@gmail.com wrote: > > On Monday, July 23, 2018 at 5:09:52 AM UTC+3, paulcar...@gmail.com wrote: > > > On Friday, July 20, 2018 at 2:44:34 PM UTC-7, reber G=emc^2 wrote: > > > > On Friday, July 20, 2018 at 2:31:28 PM UTC-7, Double-A wrote: > > > > > On Friday, July 20, 2018 at 2:16:42 PM UTC-7, reber G=emc^2 wrote: > > > > > > I believe it relates to its wave length.It goes well with my twin photon constructure.Bert > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Density of photons? An interesting idea, because it implies that photons have mass! > > > > > > > > > > Double-A > > > > > > > > Mass they have AA.This is proven when gamma photons can kick electrons off a metal surface. > > > > > > No, stupid. That proves that photons have energy, not mass. > > > > ============================= > > idiot parrot !! > > > > ''have energy but no mass ''?1! > > > > E=hf > > > > h is > > Kilogram x meter ^2 times (scalar f)/second > > > > now Holly shit > > where do you see in the above > > any f en 'relativistic factor''????/!!!! > > or > > any f en zero multiplier ??!! > > == > > got it idiot parrot once and for all ??!!!! > > just open your mind > > and stop parroting like a parrot > > the photon has mass > > the only mass > > indeed extremely tiny but yet > > has mass !!! > > -- > > in another analysis I proved that > > the mass of the real **single** photon is > > about > > (sit still on your chair) > > approximately: > > > > expo -90 Kilogram !!!!! > > > > no one will ever be able to notice it > > or detect it !!but > > the **theoretically* it is important to realize it !! > > even if it is too small for our tools to detect it > > as a real single photon > > === > > TIA > > Y.Porat > > ================================= > > == > > copyright explanation > > Y.Porat > > ========================= > > > As Arthur Eddington put it so elegantly in his poem: > > "Oh leave the Wise our measures to collate > One thing at least is certain, LIGHT has WEIGHT, ======================================= >Bingo !! thank you A A even Edington that made that ''historic experiment understood that Light (the photon 0 has weight AND WHAT IS WEIGHT IF NOT MASS ??!! so once again Old '''Catto (Porat) Saied ===================================================== MASS ** IS THE CREATOR OF **ALL * FORCES *INCLUDING GRAVITY !! =================================================== if so the mass of earth- -is attracting the mass of light just as simple as that: not curvature and not schmervature of space !! ========== copyright Y.Porat ============================ ======================= One thing is certain, and the rest debate – > Light-rays, when near the Sun, DO NOT GO STRAIGHT." > > - Arthur Eddington > > Double-A
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-23 14:01 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <d5b497b4-ad18-4b27-a9e2-b86990a6dcae@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #695138 |
On Monday, July 23, 2018 at 12:12:24 AM UTC-7, por...@gmail.com wrote: > On Monday, July 23, 2018 at 5:09:52 AM UTC+3, paulcar...@gmail.com wrote: > > On Friday, July 20, 2018 at 2:44:34 PM UTC-7, reber G=emc^2 wrote: > > > On Friday, July 20, 2018 at 2:31:28 PM UTC-7, Double-A wrote: > > > > On Friday, July 20, 2018 at 2:16:42 PM UTC-7, reber G=emc^2 wrote: > > > > > I believe it relates to its wave length.It goes well with my twin photon constructure.Bert > > > > > > > > > > > > Density of photons? An interesting idea, because it implies that photons have mass! > > > > > > > > Double-A > > > > > > Mass they have AA.This is proven when gamma photons can kick electrons off a metal surface. > > > > No, stupid. That proves that photons have energy, not mass. > > ============================= > idiot parrot !! > > ''have energy but no mass ''?1! > > E=hf > > h is > Kilogram x meter ^2 times (scalar f)/second > > now Holly shit > where do you see in the above > any f en 'relativistic factor''????/!!!! > or > any f en zero multiplier ??!! > == > got it idiot parrot once and for all ??!!!! > just open your mind > and stop parroting like a parrot > the photon has mass > the only mass > indeed extremely tiny but yet > has mass !!! > -- > in another analysis I proved that > the mass of the real **single** photon is > about > (sit still on your chair) > approximately: > > expo -90 Kilogram !!!!! > > no one will ever be able to notice it > or detect it !!but > the **theoretically* it is important to realize it !! > even if it is too small for our tools to detect it > as a real single photon > === > TIA > Y.Porat > ================================= > == > copyright explanation > Y.Porat > ========================= Photons have mass that moves at c.That means they have weight.This has been proven and gave Einstein his Nobel.He deserved two more(SR + GR} Gravity gives all weight,and if it moves it curves.Nothing can go without a spin.Nothing can spin without a wobble.Neutrinos have the tiny wobble of all.Yes three of my best theories I have united into one.Its Nobel time.O Ya Bert
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-23 14:54 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <aee16b1b-7833-418a-9402-167c1eb53fc0@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #695221 |
On Monday, July 23, 2018 at 2:01:14 PM UTC-7, reber G=emc^2 wrote: > On Monday, July 23, 2018 at 12:12:24 AM UTC-7, por...@gmail.com wrote: > > On Monday, July 23, 2018 at 5:09:52 AM UTC+3, paulcar...@gmail.com wrote: > > > On Friday, July 20, 2018 at 2:44:34 PM UTC-7, reber G=emc^2 wrote: > > > > On Friday, July 20, 2018 at 2:31:28 PM UTC-7, Double-A wrote: > > > > > On Friday, July 20, 2018 at 2:16:42 PM UTC-7, reber G=emc^2 wrote: > > > > > > I believe it relates to its wave length.It goes well with my twin photon constructure.Bert > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Density of photons? An interesting idea, because it implies that photons have mass! > > > > > > > > > > Double-A > > > > > > > > Mass they have AA.This is proven when gamma photons can kick electrons off a metal surface. > > > > > > No, stupid. That proves that photons have energy, not mass. > > > > ============================= > > idiot parrot !! > > > > ''have energy but no mass ''?1! > > > > E=hf > > > > h is > > Kilogram x meter ^2 times (scalar f)/second > > > > now Holly shit > > where do you see in the above > > any f en 'relativistic factor''????/!!!! > > or > > any f en zero multiplier ??!! > > == > > got it idiot parrot once and for all ??!!!! > > just open your mind > > and stop parroting like a parrot > > the photon has mass > > the only mass > > indeed extremely tiny but yet > > has mass !!! > > -- > > in another analysis I proved that > > the mass of the real **single** photon is > > about > > (sit still on your chair) > > approximately: > > > > expo -90 Kilogram !!!!! > > > > no one will ever be able to notice it > > or detect it !!but > > the **theoretically* it is important to realize it !! > > even if it is too small for our tools to detect it > > as a real single photon > > === > > TIA > > Y.Porat > > ================================= > > == > > copyright explanation > > Y.Porat > > ========================= > > Photons have mass that moves at c.That means they have weight.This has been proven and gave Einstein his Nobel.He deserved two more(SR + GR} Gravity gives all weight,and if it moves it curves.Nothing can go without a spin.Nothing can spin without a wobble.Neutrinos have the tiny wobble of all.Yes three of my best theories I have united into one.Its Nobel time.O Ya Bert The fact that photons have mass also proves that they do not actually move at c. Nothing with mass can. c is an upper limit faster than which nothing can go. A photon goes as close to it as anything we know, except maybe neutrinos! Double-A
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-23 17:26 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <d0558b3b-f3e8-44d0-8c97-42ed00e59829@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #695242 |
On Monday, July 23, 2018 at 2:54:22 PM UTC-7, Double-A wrote: > On Monday, July 23, 2018 at 2:01:14 PM UTC-7, reber G=emc^2 wrote: > > On Monday, July 23, 2018 at 12:12:24 AM UTC-7, por...@gmail.com wrote: > > > On Monday, July 23, 2018 at 5:09:52 AM UTC+3, paulcar...@gmail.com wrote: > > > > On Friday, July 20, 2018 at 2:44:34 PM UTC-7, reber G=emc^2 wrote: > > > > > On Friday, July 20, 2018 at 2:31:28 PM UTC-7, Double-A wrote: > > > > > > On Friday, July 20, 2018 at 2:16:42 PM UTC-7, reber G=emc^2 wrote: > > > > > > > I believe it relates to its wave length.It goes well with my twin photon constructure.Bert > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Density of photons? An interesting idea, because it implies that photons have mass! > > > > > > > > > > > > Double-A > > > > > > > > > > Mass they have AA.This is proven when gamma photons can kick electrons off a metal surface. > > > > > > > > No, stupid. That proves that photons have energy, not mass. > > > > > > ============================= > > > idiot parrot !! > > > > > > ''have energy but no mass ''?1! > > > > > > E=hf > > > > > > h is > > > Kilogram x meter ^2 times (scalar f)/second > > > > > > now Holly shit > > > where do you see in the above > > > any f en 'relativistic factor''????/!!!! > > > or > > > any f en zero multiplier ??!! > > > == > > > got it idiot parrot once and for all ??!!!! > > > just open your mind > > > and stop parroting like a parrot > > > the photon has mass > > > the only mass > > > indeed extremely tiny but yet > > > has mass !!! > > > -- > > > in another analysis I proved that > > > the mass of the real **single** photon is > > > about > > > (sit still on your chair) > > > approximately: > > > > > > expo -90 Kilogram !!!!! > > > > > > no one will ever be able to notice it > > > or detect it !!but > > > the **theoretically* it is important to realize it !! > > > even if it is too small for our tools to detect it > > > as a real single photon > > > === > > > TIA > > > Y.Porat > > > ================================= > > > == > > > copyright explanation > > > Y.Porat > > > ========================= > > > > Photons have mass that moves at c.That means they have weight.This has been proven and gave Einstein his Nobel.He deserved two more(SR + GR} Gravity gives all weight,and if it moves it curves.Nothing can go without a spin.Nothing can spin without a wobble.Neutrinos have the tiny wobble of all.Yes three of my best theories I have united into one.Its Nobel time.O Ya Bert > > > The fact that photons have mass also proves that they do not actually move at c. Nothing with mass can. c is an upper limit faster than which nothing can go. A photon goes as close to it as anything we know, except maybe neutrinos! > > Double-A Well as you know I posted neutrinos are another type photon.It fits well .It is as close to being a point particle.It has the shortest wave,and yet going at c still gives it reality of weight when it does finally hit an electron,or proton,or neutron.Electrons fit well.Bert
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-23 21:06 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <pj68kt$fif$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #695288 |
"reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> gives reality that fits well with ------- Glazier's Dossier ------- e.g. <http://tinyurl.com/Swine-Glazier-s-Undertaker> and <http://tinyurl.com/Glazier-s-de-Minting> by <http://tinyurl.com/The-Chosen-Graveyard-Vandal> of <http://tinyurl.com/Swine-Glazier-s-REAL-intent>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | poraty6@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-23 18:30 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <6fae0753-54a7-439d-8f30-4cc664abd360@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #695242 |
On Tuesday, July 24, 2018 at 12:54:22 AM UTC+3, Double-A wrote: > On Monday, July 23, 2018 at 2:01:14 PM UTC-7, reber G=emc^2 wrote: > > On Monday, July 23, 2018 at 12:12:24 AM UTC-7, por...@gmail.com wrote: > > > On Monday, July 23, 2018 at 5:09:52 AM UTC+3, paulcar...@gmail.com wrote: > > > > On Friday, July 20, 2018 at 2:44:34 PM UTC-7, reber G=emc^2 wrote: > > > > > On Friday, July 20, 2018 at 2:31:28 PM UTC-7, Double-A wrote: > > > > > > On Friday, July 20, 2018 at 2:16:42 PM UTC-7, reber G=emc^2 wrote: > > > > > > > I believe it relates to its wave length.It goes well with my twin photon constructure.Bert > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Density of photons? An interesting idea, because it implies that photons have mass! > > > > > > > > > > > > Double-A > > > > > > > > > > Mass they have AA.This is proven when gamma photons can kick electrons off a metal surface. > > > > > > > > No, stupid. That proves that photons have energy, not mass. > > > > > > ============================= > > > idiot parrot !! > > > > > > ''have energy but no mass ''?1! > > > > > > E=hf > > > > > > h is > > > Kilogram x meter ^2 times (scalar f)/second > > > > > > now Holly shit > > > where do you see in the above > > > any f en 'relativistic factor''????/!!!! > > > or > > > any f en zero multiplier ??!! > > > == > > > got it idiot parrot once and for all ??!!!! > > > just open your mind > > > and stop parroting like a parrot > > > the photon has mass > > > the only mass > > > indeed extremely tiny but yet > > > has mass !!! > > > -- > > > in another analysis I proved that > > > the mass of the real **single** photon is > > > about > > > (sit still on your chair) > > > approximately: > > > > > > expo -90 Kilogram !!!!! > > > > > > no one will ever be able to notice it > > > or detect it !!but > > > the **theoretically* it is important to realize it !! > > > even if it is too small for our tools to detect it > > > as a real single photon > > > === > > > TIA > > > Y.Porat > > > ================================= > > > == > > > copyright explanation > > > Y.Porat > > > ========================= > > > > Photons have mass that moves at c.That means they have weight.This has been proven and gave Einstein his Nobel.He deserved two more(SR + GR} Gravity gives all weight,and if it moves it curves.Nothing can go without a spin.Nothing can spin without a wobble.Neutrinos have the tiny wobble of all.Yes three of my best theories I have united into one.Its Nobel time.O Ya Bert > > > The fact that photons have mass also proves that they do not actually move at c. Nothing with mass can. c is an upper limit faster than which nothing can go. A photon goes as close to it as anything we know, except maybe neutrinos! ===== yet I claim that photons are an exception to the rule that no mass can move at c !! since the mass of the single photon is about exp -90 Kilogram !! it does** can move at c !! see an old thread of mine in Google : ===================================== the mass of the real single photon !! ========================================= it is based on the fact that e=hf has mass while f is*** one second** defined while nature does not know 'one second' as the smallest/shortest time duration !!!!! THE **PLANK TIME** IS MUCH MUCH SHORTHER !!!! ============= old historic copyright Eng Yehiel Porat ============================= > > Double-A
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | poraty6@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-23 23:05 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <f7b56ebe-b186-4805-ad13-c9b2cd5af854@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #695242 |
On Tuesday, July 24, 2018 at 12:54:22 AM UTC+3, Double-A wrote: > On Monday, July 23, 2018 at 2:01:14 PM UTC-7, reber G=emc^2 wrote: > > On Monday, July 23, 2018 at 12:12:24 AM UTC-7, por...@gmail.com wrote: > > > On Monday, July 23, 2018 at 5:09:52 AM UTC+3, paulcar...@gmail.com wrote: > > > > On Friday, July 20, 2018 at 2:44:34 PM UTC-7, reber G=emc^2 wrote: > > > > > On Friday, July 20, 2018 at 2:31:28 PM UTC-7, Double-A wrote: > > > > > > On Friday, July 20, 2018 at 2:16:42 PM UTC-7, reber G=emc^2 wrote: > > > > > > > I believe it relates to its wave length.It goes well with my twin photon constructure.Bert > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Density of photons? An interesting idea, because it implies that photons have mass! > > > > > > > > > > > > Double-A > > > > > > > > > > Mass they have AA.This is proven when gamma photons can kick electrons off a metal surface. > > > > > > > > No, stupid. That proves that photons have energy, not mass. > > > > > > ============================= > > > idiot parrot !! > > > > > > ''have energy but no mass ''?1! > > > > > > E=hf > > > > > > h is > > > Kilogram x meter ^2 times (scalar f)/second > > > > > > now Holly shit > > > where do you see in the above > > > any f en 'relativistic factor''????/!!!! > > > or > > > any f en zero multiplier ??!! > > > == > > > got it idiot parrot once and for all ??!!!! > > > just open your mind > > > and stop parroting like a parrot > > > the photon has mass > > > the only mass > > > indeed extremely tiny but yet > > > has mass !!! > > > -- > > > in another analysis I proved that > > > the mass of the real **single** photon is > > > about > > > (sit still on your chair) > > > approximately: > > > > > > expo -90 Kilogram !!!!! > > > > > > no one will ever be able to notice it > > > or detect it !!but > > > the **theoretically* it is important to realize it !! > > > even if it is too small for our tools to detect it > > > as a real single photon > > > === > > > TIA > > > Y.Porat > > > ================================= > > > == > > > copyright explanation > > > Y.Porat > > > ========================= > > > > Photons have mass that moves at c.That means they have weight.This has been proven and gave Einstein his Nobel.He deserved two more(SR + GR} Gravity gives all weight,and if it moves it curves.Nothing can go without a spin.Nothing can spin without a wobble.Neutrinos have the tiny wobble of all.Yes three of my best theories I have united into one.Its Nobel time.O Ya Bert > > > The fact that photons have mass also proves that they do not actually move at c. Nothing with mass can. c is an upper limit faster than which nothing can go. A photon goes as close to it as anything we know, except maybe neutrinos! > > Double-A ============================= photons move at c !! even having mass the only mass thy are an exception to the rule do you know why because the mass of the real single photon is about (sit still on your chair ..) it is about exp -90 kilogram !!! not relativistic an not schmelativistic Kilogram !! nature does not know what is a second NATURE DOES KNOW!! WAHT IS THE PLABK TIME !!! as the shortest time (nature does know about PLANK TIME as the shortest time duration ) SO IF YOU TAKE INSTEAD hf/second ^2 with f as one second defined but plank time defined and divide it by c^2 to get its mass (E/c^2) you get photon ** mass**of a single photon (the only mass) about exp -90 Kilogram !!! =============================== historic old copyright 2 ===================================================== MASS IS THE CREATOR OF ALL FORCES INCLUDINGGRAVITY !! ====================================================== Eng Y.Porat (old Catto ).. ===============================
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-24 14:07 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <00c95fe7-1cdc-4949-bc4b-88a4d33830b7@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #695332 |
On Monday, July 23, 2018 at 11:05:27 PM UTC-7, por...@gmail.com wrote: > On Tuesday, July 24, 2018 at 12:54:22 AM UTC+3, Double-A wrote: > > On Monday, July 23, 2018 at 2:01:14 PM UTC-7, reber G=emc^2 wrote: > > > On Monday, July 23, 2018 at 12:12:24 AM UTC-7, por...@gmail.com wrote: > > > > On Monday, July 23, 2018 at 5:09:52 AM UTC+3, paulcar...@gmail.com wrote: > > > > > On Friday, July 20, 2018 at 2:44:34 PM UTC-7, reber G=emc^2 wrote: > > > > > > On Friday, July 20, 2018 at 2:31:28 PM UTC-7, Double-A wrote: > > > > > > > On Friday, July 20, 2018 at 2:16:42 PM UTC-7, reber G=emc^2 wrote: > > > > > > > > I believe it relates to its wave length.It goes well with my twin photon constructure.Bert > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Density of photons? An interesting idea, because it implies that photons have mass! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Double-A > > > > > > > > > > > > Mass they have AA.This is proven when gamma photons can kick electrons off a metal surface. > > > > > > > > > > No, stupid. That proves that photons have energy, not mass. > > > > > > > > ============================= > > > > idiot parrot !! > > > > > > > > ''have energy but no mass ''?1! > > > > > > > > E=hf > > > > > > > > h is > > > > Kilogram x meter ^2 times (scalar f)/second > > > > > > > > now Holly shit > > > > where do you see in the above > > > > any f en 'relativistic factor''????/!!!! > > > > or > > > > any f en zero multiplier ??!! > > > > == > > > > got it idiot parrot once and for all ??!!!! > > > > just open your mind > > > > and stop parroting like a parrot > > > > the photon has mass > > > > the only mass > > > > indeed extremely tiny but yet > > > > has mass !!! > > > > -- > > > > in another analysis I proved that > > > > the mass of the real **single** photon is > > > > about > > > > (sit still on your chair) > > > > approximately: > > > > > > > > expo -90 Kilogram !!!!! > > > > > > > > no one will ever be able to notice it > > > > or detect it !!but > > > > the **theoretically* it is important to realize it !! > > > > even if it is too small for our tools to detect it > > > > as a real single photon > > > > === > > > > TIA > > > > Y.Porat > > > > ================================= > > > > == > > > > copyright explanation > > > > Y.Porat > > > > ========================= > > > > > > Photons have mass that moves at c.That means they have weight.This has been proven and gave Einstein his Nobel.He deserved two more(SR + GR} Gravity gives all weight,and if it moves it curves.Nothing can go without a spin.Nothing can spin without a wobble.Neutrinos have the tiny wobble of all.Yes three of my best theories I have united into one.Its Nobel time.O Ya Bert > > > > > > The fact that photons have mass also proves that they do not actually move at c. Nothing with mass can. c is an upper limit faster than which nothing can go. A photon goes as close to it as anything we know, except maybe neutrinos! > > > > Double-A > ============================= > photons move at c !! even having mass the only mass > thy are an exception to the rule > do you know why > because the mass of the real single photon is about > (sit still on your chair ..) > it is > about > exp -90 kilogram !!! > > not relativistic an not schmelativistic > Kilogram !! > nature does not know what is a second > > NATURE DOES KNOW!! WAHT IS THE PLABK TIME !!! > as the shortest time > > (nature does know about PLANK TIME as the shortest time duration ) > SO > IF YOU TAKE INSTEAD hf/second ^2 with f as one second defined > but plank time defined and divide it by c^2 > to get its mass (E/c^2) > you get photon ** mass**of a single photon (the only mass) > > about exp -90 Kilogram !!! > =============================== > historic old copyright > 2 > ===================================================== > MASS IS THE CREATOR OF ALL FORCES INCLUDINGGRAVITY !! > ====================================================== > Eng > > Y.Porat (old Catto ).. > =============================== Why insist that the photon moves at c? It makes much more consistent theory to say that the photon merely gets very close to c, because its mass has gotten very small, since you do agree that the photon has mass. Scientific tests are not yet precise enough to prove it one way or the other. Double-A
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-24 17:20 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <pj857d$58r$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #695412 |
On 7/24/2018 5:07 PM, Double-A wrote: > On Monday, July 23, 2018 at 11:05:27 PM UTC-7, por...@gmail.com wrote: >> On Tuesday, July 24, 2018 at 12:54:22 AM UTC+3, Double-A wrote: >>> On Monday, July 23, 2018 at 2:01:14 PM UTC-7, reber G=emc^2 wrote: >>>> On Monday, July 23, 2018 at 12:12:24 AM UTC-7, por...@gmail.com wrote: >>>>> On Monday, July 23, 2018 at 5:09:52 AM UTC+3, paulcar...@gmail.com wrote: >>>>>> On Friday, July 20, 2018 at 2:44:34 PM UTC-7, reber G=emc^2 wrote: >>>>>>> On Friday, July 20, 2018 at 2:31:28 PM UTC-7, Double-A wrote: >>>>>>>> On Friday, July 20, 2018 at 2:16:42 PM UTC-7, reber G=emc^2 wrote: >>>>>>>>> I believe it relates to its wave length.It goes well with my twin photon constructure.Bert >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Density of photons? An interesting idea, because it implies that photons have mass! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Double-A >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Mass they have AA.This is proven when gamma photons can kick electrons off a metal surface. >>>>>> >>>>>> No, stupid. That proves that photons have energy, not mass. >>>>> >>>>> ============================= >>>>> idiot parrot !! >>>>> >>>>> ''have energy but no mass ''?1! >>>>> >>>>> E=hf >>>>> >>>>> h is >>>>> Kilogram x meter ^2 times (scalar f)/second >>>>> >>>>> now Holly shit >>>>> where do you see in the above >>>>> any f en 'relativistic factor''????/!!!! >>>>> or >>>>> any f en zero multiplier ??!! >>>>> == >>>>> got it idiot parrot once and for all ??!!!! >>>>> just open your mind >>>>> and stop parroting like a parrot >>>>> the photon has mass >>>>> the only mass >>>>> indeed extremely tiny but yet >>>>> has mass !!! >>>>> -- >>>>> in another analysis I proved that >>>>> the mass of the real **single** photon is >>>>> about >>>>> (sit still on your chair) >>>>> approximately: >>>>> >>>>> expo -90 Kilogram !!!!! >>>>> >>>>> no one will ever be able to notice it >>>>> or detect it !!but >>>>> the **theoretically* it is important to realize it !! >>>>> even if it is too small for our tools to detect it >>>>> as a real single photon >>>>> === >>>>> TIA >>>>> Y.Porat >>>>> ================================= >>>>> == >>>>> copyright explanation >>>>> Y.Porat >>>>> ========================= >>>> >>>> Photons have mass that moves at c.That means they have weight.This has been proven and gave Einstein his Nobel.He deserved two more(SR + GR} Gravity gives all weight,and if it moves it curves.Nothing can go without a spin.Nothing can spin without a wobble.Neutrinos have the tiny wobble of all.Yes three of my best theories I have united into one.Its Nobel time.O Ya Bert >>> >>> >>> The fact that photons have mass also proves that they do not actually move at c. Nothing with mass can. c is an upper limit faster than which nothing can go. A photon goes as close to it as anything we know, except maybe neutrinos! >>> >>> Double-A >> ============================= >> photons move at c !! even having mass the only mass >> thy are an exception to the rule >> do you know why >> because the mass of the real single photon is about >> (sit still on your chair ..) >> it is >> about >> exp -90 kilogram !!! >> >> not relativistic an not schmelativistic >> Kilogram !! >> nature does not know what is a second >> >> NATURE DOES KNOW!! WAHT IS THE PLABK TIME !!! >> as the shortest time >> >> (nature does know about PLANK TIME as the shortest time duration ) >> SO >> IF YOU TAKE INSTEAD hf/second ^2 with f as one second defined >> but plank time defined and divide it by c^2 >> to get its mass (E/c^2) >> you get photon ** mass**of a single photon (the only mass) >> >> about exp -90 Kilogram !!! >> =============================== >> historic old copyright >> 2 >> ===================================================== >> MASS IS THE CREATOR OF ALL FORCES INCLUDINGGRAVITY !! >> ====================================================== >> Eng >> >> Y.Porat (old Catto ).. >> =============================== > > > Why insist that the photon moves at c? It makes much more consistent theory to say that the photon merely gets very close to c, because its mass has gotten very small, since you do agree that the photon has mass. Scientific tests are not yet precise enough to prove it one way or the other. > > Double-A > Nonsense. We say photons move at c because that is the speed they move at in a vacuum. We are precise enough! Imperial thinking says that photons are waves and waves move through a medium (aether) with a fixed speed of propagation. c It's simple as that AA.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-24 14:57 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <dabc597d-4951-41b0-abdd-18b360a242f6@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #695414 |
On Tuesday, July 24, 2018 at 2:20:51 PM UTC-7, benj wrote: > On 7/24/2018 5:07 PM, Double-A wrote: > > On Monday, July 23, 2018 at 11:05:27 PM UTC-7, por...@gmail.com wrote: > >> On Tuesday, July 24, 2018 at 12:54:22 AM UTC+3, Double-A wrote: > >>> On Monday, July 23, 2018 at 2:01:14 PM UTC-7, reber G=emc^2 wrote: > >>>> On Monday, July 23, 2018 at 12:12:24 AM UTC-7, por...@gmail.com wrote: > >>>>> On Monday, July 23, 2018 at 5:09:52 AM UTC+3, paulcar...@gmail.com wrote: > >>>>>> On Friday, July 20, 2018 at 2:44:34 PM UTC-7, reber G=emc^2 wrote: > >>>>>>> On Friday, July 20, 2018 at 2:31:28 PM UTC-7, Double-A wrote: > >>>>>>>> On Friday, July 20, 2018 at 2:16:42 PM UTC-7, reber G=emc^2 wrote: > >>>>>>>>> I believe it relates to its wave length.It goes well with my twin photon constructure.Bert > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Density of photons? An interesting idea, because it implies that photons have mass! > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Double-A > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Mass they have AA.This is proven when gamma photons can kick electrons off a metal surface. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> No, stupid. That proves that photons have energy, not mass. > >>>>> > >>>>> ============================= > >>>>> idiot parrot !! > >>>>> > >>>>> ''have energy but no mass ''?1! > >>>>> > >>>>> E=hf > >>>>> > >>>>> h is > >>>>> Kilogram x meter ^2 times (scalar f)/second > >>>>> > >>>>> now Holly shit > >>>>> where do you see in the above > >>>>> any f en 'relativistic factor''????/!!!! > >>>>> or > >>>>> any f en zero multiplier ??!! > >>>>> == > >>>>> got it idiot parrot once and for all ??!!!! > >>>>> just open your mind > >>>>> and stop parroting like a parrot > >>>>> the photon has mass > >>>>> the only mass > >>>>> indeed extremely tiny but yet > >>>>> has mass !!! > >>>>> -- > >>>>> in another analysis I proved that > >>>>> the mass of the real **single** photon is > >>>>> about > >>>>> (sit still on your chair) > >>>>> approximately: > >>>>> > >>>>> expo -90 Kilogram !!!!! > >>>>> > >>>>> no one will ever be able to notice it > >>>>> or detect it !!but > >>>>> the **theoretically* it is important to realize it !! > >>>>> even if it is too small for our tools to detect it > >>>>> as a real single photon > >>>>> === > >>>>> TIA > >>>>> Y.Porat > >>>>> ================================= > >>>>> == > >>>>> copyright explanation > >>>>> Y.Porat > >>>>> ========================= > >>>> > >>>> Photons have mass that moves at c.That means they have weight.This has been proven and gave Einstein his Nobel.He deserved two more(SR + GR} Gravity gives all weight,and if it moves it curves.Nothing can go without a spin.Nothing can spin without a wobble.Neutrinos have the tiny wobble of all.Yes three of my best theories I have united into one.Its Nobel time.O Ya Bert > >>> > >>> > >>> The fact that photons have mass also proves that they do not actually move at c. Nothing with mass can. c is an upper limit faster than which nothing can go. A photon goes as close to it as anything we know, except maybe neutrinos! > >>> > >>> Double-A > >> ============================= > >> photons move at c !! even having mass the only mass > >> thy are an exception to the rule > >> do you know why > >> because the mass of the real single photon is about > >> (sit still on your chair ..) > >> it is > >> about > >> exp -90 kilogram !!! > >> > >> not relativistic an not schmelativistic > >> Kilogram !! > >> nature does not know what is a second > >> > >> NATURE DOES KNOW!! WAHT IS THE PLABK TIME !!! > >> as the shortest time > >> > >> (nature does know about PLANK TIME as the shortest time duration ) > >> SO > >> IF YOU TAKE INSTEAD hf/second ^2 with f as one second defined > >> but plank time defined and divide it by c^2 > >> to get its mass (E/c^2) > >> you get photon ** mass**of a single photon (the only mass) > >> > >> about exp -90 Kilogram !!! > >> =============================== > >> historic old copyright > >> 2 > >> ===================================================== > >> MASS IS THE CREATOR OF ALL FORCES INCLUDINGGRAVITY !! > >> ====================================================== > >> Eng > >> > >> Y.Porat (old Catto ).. > >> =============================== > > > > > > Why insist that the photon moves at c? It makes much more consistent theory to say that the photon merely gets very close to c, because its mass has gotten very small, since you do agree that the photon has mass. Scientific tests are not yet precise enough to prove it one way or the other. > > > > Double-A > > > Nonsense. We say photons move at c because that is the speed they move > at in a vacuum. We are precise enough! Imperial thinking says that > photons are waves and waves move through a medium (aether) with a fixed > speed of propagation. c It's simple as that AA. Funny thing is, there is no actual vacuum anywhere in the universe. Double-A
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-25 01:57 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <p12l2f-s6c.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #695421 |
Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> wrote: <snip old babble> > Funny thing is, there is no actual vacuum anywhere in the universe. > > Double-A Space is close enough to a vacuum for EMR to travel at c. Are you starting to lose it? -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-25 12:27 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <49303623-a666-41ac-9725-920810b7039b@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #695460 |
On Tuesday, July 24, 2018 at 7:01:10 PM UTC-7, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> wrote: > > <snip old babble> > > > > Funny thing is, there is no actual vacuum anywhere in the universe. > > > > Double-A > > Space is close enough to a vacuum for EMR to travel at c. > > Are you starting to lose it? > > -- > Jim Penninoo Its possible a neutrino has less mass than a photon and gets to A to B faster.It also has less of a curve too.Bert
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-25 19:47 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <nm0n2f-0ii.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #695551 |
reber G=emc^2 <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tuesday, July 24, 2018 at 7:01:10 PM UTC-7, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> wrote: >> >> <snip old babble> >> >> >> > Funny thing is, there is no actual vacuum anywhere in the universe. >> > >> > Double-A >> >> Space is close enough to a vacuum for EMR to travel at c. >> >> Are you starting to lose it? >> >> -- >> Jim Penninoo > > Its possible a neutrino has less mass than a photon and gets to A to B faster.It also has less of a curve too.Bert Senile babble. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-25 15:40 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <1c859556-7d6f-4f96-b4a0-2617c18ddcf6@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #695560 |
On Wednesday, July 25, 2018 at 1:01:05 PM UTC-7, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > reber G=emc^2 <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Tuesday, July 24, 2018 at 7:01:10 PM UTC-7, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > >> Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> wrote: > >> > >> <snip old babble> > >> > >> > >> > Funny thing is, there is no actual vacuum anywhere in the universe. > >> > > >> > Double-A > >> > >> Space is close enough to a vacuum for EMR to travel at c. > >> > >> Are you starting to lose it? > >> > >> -- > >> Jim Penninoo > > > > Its possible a neutrino has less mass than a photon and gets to A to B faster.It also has less of a curve too.Bert > > Senile babble. > > -- > Jim Pennino Not babble but stuff over your pointed head. Bert
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-25 15:51 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <pjauun$224$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #695597 |
"reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> wrote "babble stuff over Bert's pointed head" with which ALL that Glazier wants, is SwineBert doing this: (1) On 07Feb 2015 & on 08Feb2015, Face-Shitter Glazier wrote: Harlow Campbell HVAC, Mr.HVAC@gmail.com, & Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net & Jacoby Benj, <nobody@gmail.com>: "I'll be sitting on your faces to take a shit & say: "Open wide". <http://pbs.twimg.com/media/A8MGOU-CQAEaZw4.jpg> > (2) On 06Dec2014, when the Christian-Hater, JewPigBert Glazier said to "benj" <nobody@gmail.com>: "Reality is you always post under me for you are an ass kisser. For Christmas I'll shit on your kisser." <http://pbs.twimg.com/media/A8MGOU-CQAEaZw4.jpg> "Benj, you can thank me in advance". - TreBert. ... addinng > (3) On 03Aug2017: "benj, you eat shit and your shitty brain is coming out your ears." On 20Jul2018: Benj, my posts are way over your head.Reality is your head is up your ass.So fart it out before you get constipated.Bert > (4) On 25Mar2008, Graveyard Vandal Glazier wrote in: <https://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/3ffe7b2257cf8a9a> <https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/sci.physics/uYtpFTRnW4k/morPVyJ7_j8J> "Hanson, I will piss on your grave. And have a good laugh when it seeps down on your face". -- Bert > (5) On 24Jun2018 SwineBert Glazier said to Mark Earnest <gmearnest@att.net> "your nose is in a shit bucket all the time. Eat shit and you fit" -- Bert
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-25 23:23 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <fcdn2f-poj.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #695597 |
reber G=emc^2 <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wednesday, July 25, 2018 at 1:01:05 PM UTC-7, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> reber G=emc^2 <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> wrote: >> > On Tuesday, July 24, 2018 at 7:01:10 PM UTC-7, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> >> Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> <snip old babble> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Funny thing is, there is no actual vacuum anywhere in the universe. >> >> > >> >> > Double-A >> >> >> >> Space is close enough to a vacuum for EMR to travel at c. >> >> >> >> Are you starting to lose it? >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Jim Penninoo >> > >> > Its possible a neutrino has less mass than a photon and gets to A to B faster.It also has less of a curve too.Bert >> >> Senile babble. >> >> -- >> Jim Pennino > > Not babble but stuff over your pointed head. Bert Babble is being charitable. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-25 14:52 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <pjarfp$eji$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #695551 |
"reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> alias "Bert, for you there's now another Rhyme: Glazier, you are a STUPID Swine". Bert Read the previous post above
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | poraty6@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-24 20:50 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <e13f4e6a-85a3-4f61-b494-0b9765d79023@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #695421 |
On Wednesday, July 25, 2018 at 12:57:30 AM UTC+3, Double-A wrote: > On Tuesday, July 24, 2018 at 2:20:51 PM UTC-7, benj wrote: > > On 7/24/2018 5:07 PM, Double-A wrote: > > > On Monday, July 23, 2018 at 11:05:27 PM UTC-7, por...@gmail.com wrote: > > >> On Tuesday, July 24, 2018 at 12:54:22 AM UTC+3, Double-A wrote: > > >>> On Monday, July 23, 2018 at 2:01:14 PM UTC-7, reber G=emc^2 wrote: > > >>>> On Monday, July 23, 2018 at 12:12:24 AM UTC-7, por...@gmail.com wrote: > > >>>>> On Monday, July 23, 2018 at 5:09:52 AM UTC+3, paulcar...@gmail.com wrote: > > >>>>>> On Friday, July 20, 2018 at 2:44:34 PM UTC-7, reber G=emc^2 wrote: > > >>>>>>> On Friday, July 20, 2018 at 2:31:28 PM UTC-7, Double-A wrote: > > >>>>>>>> On Friday, July 20, 2018 at 2:16:42 PM UTC-7, reber G=emc^2 wrote: > > >>>>>>>>> I believe it relates to its wave length.It goes well with my twin photon constructure.Bert > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> Density of photons? An interesting idea, because it implies that photons have mass! > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> Double-A > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> Mass they have AA.This is proven when gamma photons can kick electrons off a metal surface. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> No, stupid. That proves that photons have energy, not mass. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> ============================= > > >>>>> idiot parrot !! > > >>>>> > > >>>>> ''have energy but no mass ''?1! > > >>>>> > > >>>>> E=hf > > >>>>> > > >>>>> h is > > >>>>> Kilogram x meter ^2 times (scalar f)/second > > >>>>> > > >>>>> now Holly shit > > >>>>> where do you see in the above > > >>>>> any f en 'relativistic factor''????/!!!! > > >>>>> or > > >>>>> any f en zero multiplier ??!! > > >>>>> == > > >>>>> got it idiot parrot once and for all ??!!!! > > >>>>> just open your mind > > >>>>> and stop parroting like a parrot > > >>>>> the photon has mass > > >>>>> the only mass > > >>>>> indeed extremely tiny but yet > > >>>>> has mass !!! > > >>>>> -- > > >>>>> in another analysis I proved that > > >>>>> the mass of the real **single** photon is > > >>>>> about > > >>>>> (sit still on your chair) > > >>>>> approximately: > > >>>>> > > >>>>> expo -90 Kilogram !!!!! > > >>>>> > > >>>>> no one will ever be able to notice it > > >>>>> or detect it !!but > > >>>>> the **theoretically* it is important to realize it !! > > >>>>> even if it is too small for our tools to detect it > > >>>>> as a real single photon > > >>>>> === > > >>>>> TIA > > >>>>> Y.Porat > > >>>>> ================================= > > >>>>> == > > >>>>> copyright explanation > > >>>>> Y.Porat > > >>>>> ========================= > > >>>> > > >>>> Photons have mass that moves at c.That means they have weight.This has been proven and gave Einstein his Nobel.He deserved two more(SR + GR} Gravity gives all weight,and if it moves it curves.Nothing can go without a spin.Nothing can spin without a wobble.Neutrinos have the tiny wobble of all.Yes three of my best theories I have united into one.Its Nobel time.O Ya Bert > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> The fact that photons have mass also proves that they do not actually move at c. Nothing with mass can. c is an upper limit faster than which nothing can go. A photon goes as close to it as anything we know, except maybe neutrinos! > > >>> > > >>> Double-A > > >> ============================= > > >> photons move at c !! even having mass the only mass > > >> thy are an exception to the rule > > >> do you know why > > >> because the mass of the real single photon is about > > >> (sit still on your chair ..) > > >> it is > > >> about > > >> exp -90 kilogram !!! > > >> > > >> not relativistic an not schmelativistic > > >> Kilogram !! > > >> nature does not know what is a second > > >> > > >> NATURE DOES KNOW!! WAHT IS THE PLABK TIME !!! > > >> as the shortest time > > >> > > >> (nature does know about PLANK TIME as the shortest time duration ) > > >> SO > > >> IF YOU TAKE INSTEAD hf/second ^2 with f as one second defined > > >> but plank time defined and divide it by c^2 > > >> to get its mass (E/c^2) > > >> you get photon ** mass**of a single photon (the only mass) > > >> > > >> about exp -90 Kilogram !!! > > >> =============================== > > >> historic old copyright > > >> 2 > > >> ===================================================== > > >> MASS IS THE CREATOR OF ALL FORCES INCLUDINGGRAVITY !! > > >> ====================================================== > > >> Eng > > >> > > >> Y.Porat (old Catto ).. > > >> =============================== > > > > > > > > > Why insist that the photon moves at c? It makes much more consistent theory to say that the photon merely gets very close to c, because its mass has gotten very small, since you do agree that the photon has mass. Scientific tests are not yet precise enough to prove it one way or the other. > > > > > > Double-A > > > > > Nonsense. We say photons move at c because that is the speed they move > > at in a vacuum. We are precise enough! Imperial thinking says that > > photons are waves and waves move through a medium (aether) with a fixed > > speed of propagation. c It's simple as that AA. > > > Funny thing is, there is no actual vacuum anywhere in the universe. > > Double-A ======================= right !!! yet more funny iss to think that thid vacuum IS CURVED '' AND EVEN MORE STUPID IS THAT THIS ENTITY THAT HAS NOTHING IN IT NORE ANY PHYSICS ENTITES (TOOLS) IS BECOMES 'OUT OF THE BLUE' == CURVED '' AND EVEN MORE STUPID THAT IT CAN CURVE THE MASSES WAY TO CHANGE THIER PATH OF MOVENTT !! btw sorry !! google has no spell checker for words with capital letters ..!!?? TIA Y. Porat =================
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 2 of 4 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web