Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #531300 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-11-09 02:20 +0000 |
| Last post | 2015-11-10 15:58 +0000 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 291 — 26 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-09 02:20 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-08 20:25 -0600
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-09 02:43 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-08 20:54 -0600
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 09:20 -0800
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 12:58 -0600
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 13:23 -0800
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. "Herp Derpington" <invali@example.com> - 2015-11-09 19:42 -0800
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-11-10 05:36 -0800
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-09 02:46 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 03:21 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-09 18:44 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 17:12 -0600
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-09 23:35 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 20:22 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-10 03:51 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-08 20:02 -0700
Circus Alert.. Don't take the bait Fabian Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-08 22:11 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-08 21:12 -0600
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-09 04:22 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-08 21:50 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-09 05:13 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-08 22:38 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2015-11-16 18:59 +0000
Plenty of non-idiots use Windows. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2015-11-08 21:30 -0800
Re: Plenty of non-idiots use Windows. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-09 06:18 +0000
Re: Plenty of non-idiots use Windows. Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-11-09 12:43 +0000
Re: Plenty of non-idiots use Windows. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-09 12:09 -0700
Re: Plenty of non-idiots use Windows. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-09 13:03 -0700
Re: Plenty of non-idiots use Windows. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-09 20:26 +0000
Re: Plenty of non-idiots use Windows. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-09 18:27 -0700
Re: Plenty of non-idiots use Windows. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-09 06:31 +0000
Fabian Russell is disabled. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2015-11-08 23:12 -0800
Re: Plenty of non-idiots use Windows. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-09 13:03 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 03:12 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-09 13:04 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-11-09 12:39 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-09 13:01 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 20:04 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-11-09 15:18 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-09 21:01 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-11-09 16:08 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-09 18:35 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-09 13:54 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-09 20:54 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 21:13 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-09 17:17 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-09 23:24 +0100
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-09 17:36 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-09 18:37 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-09 18:32 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-09 13:04 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-09 18:30 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-09 18:44 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-10 03:58 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-09 21:38 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-10 08:18 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-10 15:15 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-10 10:49 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-10 12:25 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-10 12:45 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-10 22:30 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-11-10 17:37 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-10 18:04 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-11 01:30 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-10 18:59 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-11 03:15 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-11 07:22 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-12 10:20 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-12 21:32 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-12 14:51 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-12 22:13 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-12 23:17 +0100
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-12 15:28 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-12 22:38 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-12 18:40 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-12 23:24 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-13 00:33 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-11-13 10:57 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-13 12:21 +0100
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-11-13 12:26 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-13 14:57 +0100
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-11-13 17:04 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-11-13 07:25 -0600
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-13 11:48 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-11-13 17:09 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-13 20:39 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-13 15:43 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-13 21:30 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-11-16 09:27 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-13 22:18 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-11-16 09:29 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-12 18:39 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-11-13 10:55 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-13 10:26 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-12 15:26 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-12 22:42 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-12 16:06 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-12 23:25 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-12 23:36 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-12 18:46 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-13 00:35 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-13 14:54 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-13 14:53 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-12 17:40 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-12 18:37 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-13 00:40 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-12 18:01 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-13 01:29 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-12 18:47 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-13 02:29 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-12 19:34 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-12 21:45 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-12 21:03 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-13 02:26 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-12 19:35 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-13 02:51 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-12 22:00 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-13 03:36 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-12 22:41 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-12 20:00 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-13 03:18 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-13 01:49 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-13 10:27 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-13 11:15 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-11-13 11:30 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-13 11:32 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-13 10:25 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-13 12:27 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-13 10:41 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-13 12:40 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-13 10:47 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-13 12:52 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-13 10:06 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-13 10:25 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-13 10:28 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-13 11:52 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-13 10:02 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-13 12:15 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-12 21:44 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-13 10:24 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-14 01:01 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-13 20:08 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-13 20:17 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-11-11 02:07 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-09 21:48 +0100
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-09 14:23 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 21:25 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-09 14:37 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-09 18:41 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-09 21:07 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-10 04:05 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-09 21:48 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-10 08:20 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-10 15:18 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-10 12:29 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-10 12:28 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-10 12:46 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-10 16:36 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-10 18:32 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-09 18:39 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-09 18:46 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-10 04:09 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-09 21:47 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-10 08:21 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-10 14:48 +0100
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-10 10:34 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-10 18:27 +0100
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-10 12:31 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-09 20:51 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 21:21 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-09 21:49 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-09 15:12 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-09 18:48 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-10 04:14 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-09 21:47 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-10 12:33 -0700
GhostScipt works well on Windows. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2015-11-09 16:09 -0800
Re: GhostScipt works well on Windows. Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-09 19:54 -0500
Re: GhostScipt works well on Windows. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-09 18:49 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-11-11 09:42 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-11 13:29 +0100
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-11-11 13:08 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-09 16:58 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-09 18:43 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-10 04:18 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-09 21:46 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-10 13:49 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-10 13:48 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-09 04:56 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-08 22:15 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-09 05:27 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-08 22:43 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> - 2015-11-08 22:16 -0600
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-09 04:26 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> - 2015-11-09 07:31 -0600
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-11-09 10:14 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-09 18:02 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-09 12:15 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-09 13:06 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-11-09 14:13 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-11-09 06:13 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-11-09 12:32 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-11-09 11:38 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-11-09 07:51 -0600
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-09 18:05 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-11-09 13:52 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 13:00 -0600
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-09 12:17 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-09 13:07 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-09 21:46 +0100
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-09 14:26 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-09 18:52 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-11-10 02:54 +0100
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-10 13:51 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-10 10:27 +0100
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-11-10 06:52 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-10 13:21 +0100
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-11-10 07:39 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-10 13:55 -0700
Are the FOSS community "suckers", Kreep? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-11-10 07:12 -0600
Re: Are the FOSS community "suckers", Kreep? Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-10 08:22 -0500
Re: Are the FOSS community "suckers", Kreep? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-11-11 09:27 -0600
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-10 13:58 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-11-10 22:01 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-10 23:15 +0100
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-10 16:38 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-11 00:45 +0100
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-11 14:15 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-10 18:10 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-11 10:05 +0100
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-11 11:20 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-11 13:27 +0100
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-12 10:36 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-12 22:58 +0100
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-12 15:15 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-11-11 06:15 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-10 16:37 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-10 09:31 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-10 13:55 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-10 13:54 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-09 21:14 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-09 18:53 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. dvus <dven1@adelphia.net> - 2015-11-10 18:00 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-10 16:39 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. dvus <dven1@adelphia.net> - 2015-11-11 18:00 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-11-11 20:02 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. dvus <dven1@adelphia.net> - 2015-11-12 09:22 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-12 11:43 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. dvus <dven1@adelphia.net> - 2015-11-12 18:07 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-11-13 07:35 -0600
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-13 14:58 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-13 14:57 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. dvus <dven1@adelphia.net> - 2015-11-14 07:30 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-14 12:18 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. dvus <dven1@adelphia.net> - 2015-11-14 22:09 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-14 20:12 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-15 03:31 +0000
To dvus. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-16 11:40 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. dvus <dven1@adelphia.net> - 2015-11-15 10:46 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-16 11:38 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. dvus <dven1@adelphia.net> - 2015-11-16 14:47 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-11-16 20:26 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-11-16 14:43 -0600
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-16 14:19 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-16 15:38 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-16 15:37 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. dvus <dven1@adelphia.net> - 2015-11-17 05:30 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-11-17 14:57 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. dvus <dven1@adelphia.net> - 2015-11-17 20:04 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-09 08:14 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 10:56 -0600
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 11:25 -0600
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 13:30 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 16:21 -0600
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 20:37 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. dvus <dven1@adelphia.net> - 2015-11-10 18:08 -0500
Fabian_Russell isn't all there. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2015-11-09 10:31 -0800
Re: Fabian_Russell isn't all there. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-09 19:15 +0000
Re: Fabian_Russell isn't all there. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 16:23 -0600
Re: Fabian_Russell isn't all there. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-09 22:35 +0000
Re: Fabian_Russell isn't all there. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 20:41 -0500
Re: Fabian_Russell isn't all there. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 20:39 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-09 18:40 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 17:05 -0600
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Apollyon <adravirgo@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 15:14 -0800
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 17:36 -0600
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-10 00:07 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-09 23:53 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-11-10 08:53 -0600
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-10 15:58 +0000
Page 6 of 15 — ← Prev page 1 … 4 5 [6] 7 8 … 15 Next page →
| From | Slimer <.m@nsn.s> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-12 18:46 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <n23890$lgb$6@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #532531 |
On 2015-11-12 6:25 PM, Fabian Russell wrote: > On Thu, 12 Nov 2015 16:06:25 -0700, GreyCloud wrote: > >>> >> Seeing that you claim you are not a nice guy, then why don't you just go >> and fuck off and leave cola. >> > > You are an insufferable, blowhard, turd-brained ass. > > If I ever encountered you on the streets, I'd whip your > cowardly blowhard ass into pieces, and leave you lying > with shit in your pants. Um, aren't you overreacting just a little? -- Slimer
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-13 00:35 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pan.2015.11.13.00.36.38@localhost.localdomain> |
| In reply to | #532550 |
On Thu, 12 Nov 2015 18:46:51 -0500, Slimer wrote: > > Um, aren't you overreacting just a little? > Do you see how that twit-wimp carries on? He's an air-head baboon. I believe that he has the beginnings of true dementia. They'd throw him out on his ass from anywhere.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-13 14:54 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <f5-dnThEx_WKwdvLnZ2dnUU7-VWdnZ2d@bresnan.com> |
| In reply to | #532570 |
On 11/12/15 17:35, Fabian Russell wrote: > On Thu, 12 Nov 2015 18:46:51 -0500, Slimer wrote: > >> >> Um, aren't you overreacting just a little? >> > > Do you see how that twit-wimp carries on? He's an air-head > baboon. I believe that he has the beginnings of true dementia. > They'd throw him out on his ass from anywhere. > > Then smile if you tasted a dick sweeter than mine. LOL!!! -- My problem is that I don't have enough middle fingers.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-13 14:53 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <f5-dnTlEx_VXxtvLnZ2dnUU7-VWdnZ2d@bresnan.com> |
| In reply to | #532531 |
On 11/12/15 16:25, Fabian Russell wrote: > On Thu, 12 Nov 2015 16:06:25 -0700, GreyCloud wrote: > >>> >> Seeing that you claim you are not a nice guy, then why don't you just go >> and fuck off and leave cola. >> > > You are an insufferable, blowhard, turd-brained ass. > > If I ever encountered you on the streets, I'd whip your > cowardly blowhard ass into pieces, and leave you lying > with shit in your pants. > > Ah, the ad hominem attacks. Boo-Hoo! Says the short guy with the little dick and big mouth. BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!! -- My problem is that I don't have enough middle fingers.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-12 17:40 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D26A7F91.63B16%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #532511 |
On 11/12/15, 3:42 PM, in article pan.2015.11.12.22.42.57@localhost.localdomain, "Fabian Russell" <root@localhost.localdomain> wrote: > On Thu, 12 Nov 2015 15:26:52 -0700, Snit wrote: > >> >> Also fewer abstractions which allow you to think in higher terms. >> > > I am so sick of your limited and shallow kind. I believe you that you are sick. > For one thing, who do you think creates the stuff that allows > you to utilize your cherished abstractions? > > Also, abstractions are NOT excluded from assembly language > programming. They just never leave the programmers head > to assume an independent symbolic form. > > You make me ill. I do not deny you are ill. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Slimer <.m@nsn.s> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-12 18:37 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <n237nq$lgb$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #532471 |
On 2015-11-12 4:32 PM, Fabian Russell wrote: > On Thu, 12 Nov 2015 10:20:34 -0700, Snit wrote: > >> >>> I have cut my teeth on assembly language. Once that fundamental stuff >>> gets into your blood it never gets out. >> >> How do you think this is relevant? >> > > It is relevant because the whole fscking world seemed to have fallen > madly in love with Object Oriented programming, and I happen to despise > OO with a raging passion. > > I have examined the issue deeply, and I can only conclude that OO > is so fscking popular because people no longer can comprehend > hardware. They are lost in the fogs of lofty OO abstractions and > cannot perceive the machine. > > But for me it is quite different. I BEGAN with hardware and assembly > language. I BEGAN with an intimate involvement with hardware. As > a result I can see nothing but the machine. Oh yes, I can understand > all the abstractions but, for me, such abstractions quickly fade into > nothing against the blazing image of the machine. > > When I encounter high level code of any kind, my mind cannot help > but to plunge immediately down into the assembly code that underlies > it all. Thus, as a consequence, I do not not especially favor > the creation of ever higher abstractions that serve only to > obliterate and not truly enlighten. > > It is, I suppose a sickness, but it is a sickness from which no > escape, or cure, is possible. All anyone needs to know is that coding directly in Assembly means that your code will take full advantage of the machine's power. No slowdowns, just full speed. -- Slimer
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-13 00:40 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pan.2015.11.13.00.41.05@localhost.localdomain> |
| In reply to | #532544 |
On Thu, 12 Nov 2015 18:37:41 -0500, Slimer wrote: > > All anyone needs to know is that coding directly in Assembly means that > your code will take full advantage of the machine's power. No slowdowns, > just full speed. > Yes. But also the problems of caching and pipelining can also be more readily addressed. Furthermore, the API is directly available as system calls and so writing very complex assembly code is not that intractable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-12 18:01 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D26A8471.63B2A%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #532544 |
On 11/12/15, 4:37 PM, in article n237nq$lgb$1@dont-email.me, "Slimer" <.m@nsn.s> wrote: > On 2015-11-12 4:32 PM, Fabian Russell wrote: >> On Thu, 12 Nov 2015 10:20:34 -0700, Snit wrote: >> >>> >>>> I have cut my teeth on assembly language. Once that fundamental stuff >>>> gets into your blood it never gets out. >>> >>> How do you think this is relevant? >>> >> >> It is relevant because the whole fscking world seemed to have fallen >> madly in love with Object Oriented programming, and I happen to despise >> OO with a raging passion. >> >> I have examined the issue deeply, and I can only conclude that OO >> is so fscking popular because people no longer can comprehend >> hardware. They are lost in the fogs of lofty OO abstractions and >> cannot perceive the machine. >> >> But for me it is quite different. I BEGAN with hardware and assembly >> language. I BEGAN with an intimate involvement with hardware. As >> a result I can see nothing but the machine. Oh yes, I can understand >> all the abstractions but, for me, such abstractions quickly fade into >> nothing against the blazing image of the machine. >> >> When I encounter high level code of any kind, my mind cannot help >> but to plunge immediately down into the assembly code that underlies >> it all. Thus, as a consequence, I do not not especially favor >> the creation of ever higher abstractions that serve only to >> obliterate and not truly enlighten. >> >> It is, I suppose a sickness, but it is a sickness from which no >> escape, or cure, is possible. > > All anyone needs to know is that coding directly in Assembly means that > your code will take full advantage of the machine's power. No slowdowns, > just full speed. Also will not take advantage of higher level abstractions. There is room for both. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-13 01:29 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <sfdhue00.rawf@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #532578 |
In comp.os.linux.advocacy Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 11/12/15, 4:37 PM, in article n237nq$lgb$1@dont-email.me, "Slimer" > <.m@nsn.s> wrote: > >> On 2015-11-12 4:32 PM, Fabian Russell wrote: >>> On Thu, 12 Nov 2015 10:20:34 -0700, Snit wrote: >>> >>>> >>>>> I have cut my teeth on assembly language. Once that fundamental stuff >>>>> gets into your blood it never gets out. >>>> >>>> How do you think this is relevant? >>>> >>> >>> It is relevant because the whole fscking world seemed to have fallen >>> madly in love with Object Oriented programming, and I happen to despise >>> OO with a raging passion. >>> >>> I have examined the issue deeply, and I can only conclude that OO >>> is so fscking popular because people no longer can comprehend >>> hardware. They are lost in the fogs of lofty OO abstractions and >>> cannot perceive the machine. >>> >>> But for me it is quite different. I BEGAN with hardware and assembly >>> language. I BEGAN with an intimate involvement with hardware. As >>> a result I can see nothing but the machine. Oh yes, I can understand >>> all the abstractions but, for me, such abstractions quickly fade into >>> nothing against the blazing image of the machine. >>> >>> When I encounter high level code of any kind, my mind cannot help >>> but to plunge immediately down into the assembly code that underlies >>> it all. Thus, as a consequence, I do not not especially favor >>> the creation of ever higher abstractions that serve only to >>> obliterate and not truly enlighten. >>> >>> It is, I suppose a sickness, but it is a sickness from which no >>> escape, or cure, is possible. >> >> All anyone needs to know is that coding directly in Assembly means that >> your code will take full advantage of the machine's power. No slowdowns, >> just full speed. > > Also will not take advantage of higher level abstractions. There is room for > both. > Why are you even participating in a discussion of programming topics? You have proved many times that you are completely clueless on that subject.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-12 18:47 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D26A8F25.63B5A%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #532584 |
On 11/12/15, 6:29 PM, in article sfdhue00.rawf@rooftop.invalid, "owl" <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > In comp.os.linux.advocacy Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> On 11/12/15, 4:37 PM, in article n237nq$lgb$1@dont-email.me, "Slimer" >> <.m@nsn.s> wrote: >> >>> On 2015-11-12 4:32 PM, Fabian Russell wrote: >>>> On Thu, 12 Nov 2015 10:20:34 -0700, Snit wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>>> I have cut my teeth on assembly language. Once that fundamental stuff >>>>>> gets into your blood it never gets out. >>>>> >>>>> How do you think this is relevant? >>>>> >>>> >>>> It is relevant because the whole fscking world seemed to have fallen >>>> madly in love with Object Oriented programming, and I happen to despise >>>> OO with a raging passion. >>>> >>>> I have examined the issue deeply, and I can only conclude that OO >>>> is so fscking popular because people no longer can comprehend >>>> hardware. They are lost in the fogs of lofty OO abstractions and >>>> cannot perceive the machine. >>>> >>>> But for me it is quite different. I BEGAN with hardware and assembly >>>> language. I BEGAN with an intimate involvement with hardware. As >>>> a result I can see nothing but the machine. Oh yes, I can understand >>>> all the abstractions but, for me, such abstractions quickly fade into >>>> nothing against the blazing image of the machine. >>>> >>>> When I encounter high level code of any kind, my mind cannot help >>>> but to plunge immediately down into the assembly code that underlies >>>> it all. Thus, as a consequence, I do not not especially favor >>>> the creation of ever higher abstractions that serve only to >>>> obliterate and not truly enlighten. >>>> >>>> It is, I suppose a sickness, but it is a sickness from which no >>>> escape, or cure, is possible. >>> >>> All anyone needs to know is that coding directly in Assembly means that >>> your code will take full advantage of the machine's power. No slowdowns, >>> just full speed. >> >> Also will not take advantage of higher level abstractions. There is room for >> both. >> > > Why are you even participating in a discussion of programming topics? > You have proved many times that you are completely clueless on that > subject. > I am open to when you think you have a point to make. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-13 02:29 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ffpfax23.4@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #532589 |
In comp.os.linux.advocacy Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 11/12/15, 6:29 PM, in article sfdhue00.rawf@rooftop.invalid, "owl" > <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > >> In comp.os.linux.advocacy Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> On 11/12/15, 4:37 PM, in article n237nq$lgb$1@dont-email.me, "Slimer" >>> <.m@nsn.s> wrote: >>> >>>> On 2015-11-12 4:32 PM, Fabian Russell wrote: >>>>> On Thu, 12 Nov 2015 10:20:34 -0700, Snit wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> I have cut my teeth on assembly language. Once that fundamental stuff >>>>>>> gets into your blood it never gets out. >>>>>> >>>>>> How do you think this is relevant? >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> It is relevant because the whole fscking world seemed to have fallen >>>>> madly in love with Object Oriented programming, and I happen to despise >>>>> OO with a raging passion. >>>>> >>>>> I have examined the issue deeply, and I can only conclude that OO >>>>> is so fscking popular because people no longer can comprehend >>>>> hardware. They are lost in the fogs of lofty OO abstractions and >>>>> cannot perceive the machine. >>>>> >>>>> But for me it is quite different. I BEGAN with hardware and assembly >>>>> language. I BEGAN with an intimate involvement with hardware. As >>>>> a result I can see nothing but the machine. Oh yes, I can understand >>>>> all the abstractions but, for me, such abstractions quickly fade into >>>>> nothing against the blazing image of the machine. >>>>> >>>>> When I encounter high level code of any kind, my mind cannot help >>>>> but to plunge immediately down into the assembly code that underlies >>>>> it all. Thus, as a consequence, I do not not especially favor >>>>> the creation of ever higher abstractions that serve only to >>>>> obliterate and not truly enlighten. >>>>> >>>>> It is, I suppose a sickness, but it is a sickness from which no >>>>> escape, or cure, is possible. >>>> >>>> All anyone needs to know is that coding directly in Assembly means that >>>> your code will take full advantage of the machine's power. No slowdowns, >>>> just full speed. >>> >>> Also will not take advantage of higher level abstractions. There is room for >>> both. >>> >> >> Why are you even participating in a discussion of programming topics? >> You have proved many times that you are completely clueless on that >> subject. >> > I am open to when you think you have a point to make. > OVERLOAD! Repeat mode on. (That didn't take long).
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-12 19:34 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D26A9A47.63B87%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #532615 |
On 11/12/15, 7:29 PM, in article ffpfax23.4@rooftop.invalid, "owl" <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >> I am open to when you think you have a point to make. >> > > OVERLOAD! Repeat mode on. > (That didn't take long). So you have no point. OK. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-12 21:45 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <5adgtsm5iu4i$.1cu5bbb3zwpvs.dlg@40tude.net> |
| In reply to | #532615 |
On Fri, 13 Nov 2015 02:29:05 +0000 (UTC), owl wrote: > In comp.os.linux.advocacy Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> On 11/12/15, 6:29 PM, in article sfdhue00.rawf@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >> >>> In comp.os.linux.advocacy Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>> On 11/12/15, 4:37 PM, in article n237nq$lgb$1@dont-email.me, "Slimer" >>>> <.m@nsn.s> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 2015-11-12 4:32 PM, Fabian Russell wrote: >>>>>> On Thu, 12 Nov 2015 10:20:34 -0700, Snit wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I have cut my teeth on assembly language. Once that fundamental stuff >>>>>>>> gets into your blood it never gets out. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> How do you think this is relevant? >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> It is relevant because the whole fscking world seemed to have fallen >>>>>> madly in love with Object Oriented programming, and I happen to despise >>>>>> OO with a raging passion. >>>>>> >>>>>> I have examined the issue deeply, and I can only conclude that OO >>>>>> is so fscking popular because people no longer can comprehend >>>>>> hardware. They are lost in the fogs of lofty OO abstractions and >>>>>> cannot perceive the machine. >>>>>> >>>>>> But for me it is quite different. I BEGAN with hardware and assembly >>>>>> language. I BEGAN with an intimate involvement with hardware. As >>>>>> a result I can see nothing but the machine. Oh yes, I can understand >>>>>> all the abstractions but, for me, such abstractions quickly fade into >>>>>> nothing against the blazing image of the machine. >>>>>> >>>>>> When I encounter high level code of any kind, my mind cannot help >>>>>> but to plunge immediately down into the assembly code that underlies >>>>>> it all. Thus, as a consequence, I do not not especially favor >>>>>> the creation of ever higher abstractions that serve only to >>>>>> obliterate and not truly enlighten. >>>>>> >>>>>> It is, I suppose a sickness, but it is a sickness from which no >>>>>> escape, or cure, is possible. >>>>> >>>>> All anyone needs to know is that coding directly in Assembly means that >>>>> your code will take full advantage of the machine's power. No slowdowns, >>>>> just full speed. >>>> >>>> Also will not take advantage of higher level abstractions. There is room for >>>> both. >>>> >>> >>> Why are you even participating in a discussion of programming topics? >>> You have proved many times that you are completely clueless on that >>> subject. >>> >> I am open to when you think you have a point to make. >> > > OVERLOAD! Repeat mode on. > (That didn't take long). He's pitched the tent and is firing up the circus! So predictable. -- You Ain't The Biggest Fish In The Crotch.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-12 21:03 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <9gidnsvi4f8i$.x9e67d5gxbw5.dlg@40tude.net> |
| In reply to | #532584 |
On Fri, 13 Nov 2015 01:29:06 +0000 (UTC), owl wrote: > In comp.os.linux.advocacy Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> On 11/12/15, 4:37 PM, in article n237nq$lgb$1@dont-email.me, "Slimer" >> <.m@nsn.s> wrote: >> >>> On 2015-11-12 4:32 PM, Fabian Russell wrote: >>>> On Thu, 12 Nov 2015 10:20:34 -0700, Snit wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>>> I have cut my teeth on assembly language. Once that fundamental stuff >>>>>> gets into your blood it never gets out. >>>>> >>>>> How do you think this is relevant? >>>>> >>>> >>>> It is relevant because the whole fscking world seemed to have fallen >>>> madly in love with Object Oriented programming, and I happen to despise >>>> OO with a raging passion. >>>> >>>> I have examined the issue deeply, and I can only conclude that OO >>>> is so fscking popular because people no longer can comprehend >>>> hardware. They are lost in the fogs of lofty OO abstractions and >>>> cannot perceive the machine. >>>> >>>> But for me it is quite different. I BEGAN with hardware and assembly >>>> language. I BEGAN with an intimate involvement with hardware. As >>>> a result I can see nothing but the machine. Oh yes, I can understand >>>> all the abstractions but, for me, such abstractions quickly fade into >>>> nothing against the blazing image of the machine. >>>> >>>> When I encounter high level code of any kind, my mind cannot help >>>> but to plunge immediately down into the assembly code that underlies >>>> it all. Thus, as a consequence, I do not not especially favor >>>> the creation of ever higher abstractions that serve only to >>>> obliterate and not truly enlighten. >>>> >>>> It is, I suppose a sickness, but it is a sickness from which no >>>> escape, or cure, is possible. >>> >>> All anyone needs to know is that coding directly in Assembly means that >>> your code will take full advantage of the machine's power. No slowdowns, >>> just full speed. >> >> Also will not take advantage of higher level abstractions. There is room for >> both. >> > > Why are you even participating in a discussion of programming topics? > You have proved many times that you are completely clueless on that > subject. For the same reason snit participates in literally 100 percent of the threads here. He craves attention and likes to disrupt things. You could start a thread about nuclear fission at the molecular level and he would invade it. Probably the only thread Michael Glasser, The Prescott Computer Guy will avoid is one related to him getting a job and supporting his family. -- You Ain't The Biggest Fish In The Crotch.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-13 02:26 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <fah30a.a3raf@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #532598 |
In comp.os.linux.advocacy Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> wrote: > On Fri, 13 Nov 2015 01:29:06 +0000 (UTC), owl wrote: > >> In comp.os.linux.advocacy Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> On 11/12/15, 4:37 PM, in article n237nq$lgb$1@dont-email.me, "Slimer" >>> <.m@nsn.s> wrote: >>> >>>> On 2015-11-12 4:32 PM, Fabian Russell wrote: >>>>> On Thu, 12 Nov 2015 10:20:34 -0700, Snit wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> I have cut my teeth on assembly language. Once that fundamental stuff >>>>>>> gets into your blood it never gets out. >>>>>> >>>>>> How do you think this is relevant? >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> It is relevant because the whole fscking world seemed to have fallen >>>>> madly in love with Object Oriented programming, and I happen to despise >>>>> OO with a raging passion. >>>>> >>>>> I have examined the issue deeply, and I can only conclude that OO >>>>> is so fscking popular because people no longer can comprehend >>>>> hardware. They are lost in the fogs of lofty OO abstractions and >>>>> cannot perceive the machine. >>>>> >>>>> But for me it is quite different. I BEGAN with hardware and assembly >>>>> language. I BEGAN with an intimate involvement with hardware. As >>>>> a result I can see nothing but the machine. Oh yes, I can understand >>>>> all the abstractions but, for me, such abstractions quickly fade into >>>>> nothing against the blazing image of the machine. >>>>> >>>>> When I encounter high level code of any kind, my mind cannot help >>>>> but to plunge immediately down into the assembly code that underlies >>>>> it all. Thus, as a consequence, I do not not especially favor >>>>> the creation of ever higher abstractions that serve only to >>>>> obliterate and not truly enlighten. >>>>> >>>>> It is, I suppose a sickness, but it is a sickness from which no >>>>> escape, or cure, is possible. >>>> >>>> All anyone needs to know is that coding directly in Assembly means that >>>> your code will take full advantage of the machine's power. No slowdowns, >>>> just full speed. >>> >>> Also will not take advantage of higher level abstractions. There is room for >>> both. >>> >> >> Why are you even participating in a discussion of programming topics? >> You have proved many times that you are completely clueless on that >> subject. > > For the same reason snit participates in literally 100 percent of the > threads here. > He craves attention and likes to disrupt things. > You could start a thread about nuclear fission at the molecular level and > he would invade it. > > Probably the only thread Michael Glasser, The Prescott Computer Guy will > avoid is one related to him getting a job and supporting his family. > Can you imagine what it's like having to live in Prescott AZ, and this Prescott Computer Guy is the only one you can turn to if you have computer problems? The guy's never there when you call because he's out trolling usenet 24/7.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-12 19:35 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D26A9A7C.63B89%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #532611 |
On 11/12/15, 7:26 PM, in article fah30a.a3raf@rooftop.invalid, "owl" <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > In comp.os.linux.advocacy Big Fish in a Small Crotch > <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> wrote: >> On Fri, 13 Nov 2015 01:29:06 +0000 (UTC), owl wrote: >> >>> In comp.os.linux.advocacy Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>> On 11/12/15, 4:37 PM, in article n237nq$lgb$1@dont-email.me, "Slimer" >>>> <.m@nsn.s> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 2015-11-12 4:32 PM, Fabian Russell wrote: >>>>>> On Thu, 12 Nov 2015 10:20:34 -0700, Snit wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I have cut my teeth on assembly language. Once that fundamental stuff >>>>>>>> gets into your blood it never gets out. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> How do you think this is relevant? >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> It is relevant because the whole fscking world seemed to have fallen >>>>>> madly in love with Object Oriented programming, and I happen to despise >>>>>> OO with a raging passion. >>>>>> >>>>>> I have examined the issue deeply, and I can only conclude that OO >>>>>> is so fscking popular because people no longer can comprehend >>>>>> hardware. They are lost in the fogs of lofty OO abstractions and >>>>>> cannot perceive the machine. >>>>>> >>>>>> But for me it is quite different. I BEGAN with hardware and assembly >>>>>> language. I BEGAN with an intimate involvement with hardware. As >>>>>> a result I can see nothing but the machine. Oh yes, I can understand >>>>>> all the abstractions but, for me, such abstractions quickly fade into >>>>>> nothing against the blazing image of the machine. >>>>>> >>>>>> When I encounter high level code of any kind, my mind cannot help >>>>>> but to plunge immediately down into the assembly code that underlies >>>>>> it all. Thus, as a consequence, I do not not especially favor >>>>>> the creation of ever higher abstractions that serve only to >>>>>> obliterate and not truly enlighten. >>>>>> >>>>>> It is, I suppose a sickness, but it is a sickness from which no >>>>>> escape, or cure, is possible. >>>>> >>>>> All anyone needs to know is that coding directly in Assembly means that >>>>> your code will take full advantage of the machine's power. No slowdowns, >>>>> just full speed. >>>> >>>> Also will not take advantage of higher level abstractions. There is room >>>> for >>>> both. >>>> >>> >>> Why are you even participating in a discussion of programming topics? >>> You have proved many times that you are completely clueless on that >>> subject. >> >> For the same reason snit participates in literally 100 percent of the >> threads here. >> He craves attention and likes to disrupt things. >> You could start a thread about nuclear fission at the molecular level and >> he would invade it. >> >> Probably the only thread Michael Glasser, The Prescott Computer Guy will >> avoid is one related to him getting a job and supporting his family. >> > > Can you imagine what it's like having to live in Prescott AZ, and this > Prescott Computer Guy is the only one you can turn to if you have > computer problems? The guy's never there when you call because he's > out trolling usenet 24/7. > Really: you could be a decent person if you work on improving yourself and not putting others down just to deal with your insecurity. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-13 02:51 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <adah93.afe@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #532619 |
In comp.os.linux.advocacy Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 11/12/15, 7:26 PM, in article fah30a.a3raf@rooftop.invalid, "owl" > <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > >> In comp.os.linux.advocacy Big Fish in a Small Crotch >> <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> wrote: >>> On Fri, 13 Nov 2015 01:29:06 +0000 (UTC), owl wrote: >>> >>>> In comp.os.linux.advocacy Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>> On 11/12/15, 4:37 PM, in article n237nq$lgb$1@dont-email.me, "Slimer" >>>>> <.m@nsn.s> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 2015-11-12 4:32 PM, Fabian Russell wrote: >>>>>>> On Thu, 12 Nov 2015 10:20:34 -0700, Snit wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I have cut my teeth on assembly language. Once that fundamental stuff >>>>>>>>> gets into your blood it never gets out. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> How do you think this is relevant? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> It is relevant because the whole fscking world seemed to have fallen >>>>>>> madly in love with Object Oriented programming, and I happen to despise >>>>>>> OO with a raging passion. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I have examined the issue deeply, and I can only conclude that OO >>>>>>> is so fscking popular because people no longer can comprehend >>>>>>> hardware. They are lost in the fogs of lofty OO abstractions and >>>>>>> cannot perceive the machine. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> But for me it is quite different. I BEGAN with hardware and assembly >>>>>>> language. I BEGAN with an intimate involvement with hardware. As >>>>>>> a result I can see nothing but the machine. Oh yes, I can understand >>>>>>> all the abstractions but, for me, such abstractions quickly fade into >>>>>>> nothing against the blazing image of the machine. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> When I encounter high level code of any kind, my mind cannot help >>>>>>> but to plunge immediately down into the assembly code that underlies >>>>>>> it all. Thus, as a consequence, I do not not especially favor >>>>>>> the creation of ever higher abstractions that serve only to >>>>>>> obliterate and not truly enlighten. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> It is, I suppose a sickness, but it is a sickness from which no >>>>>>> escape, or cure, is possible. >>>>>> >>>>>> All anyone needs to know is that coding directly in Assembly means that >>>>>> your code will take full advantage of the machine's power. No slowdowns, >>>>>> just full speed. >>>>> >>>>> Also will not take advantage of higher level abstractions. There is room >>>>> for >>>>> both. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Why are you even participating in a discussion of programming topics? >>>> You have proved many times that you are completely clueless on that >>>> subject. >>> >>> For the same reason snit participates in literally 100 percent of the >>> threads here. >>> He craves attention and likes to disrupt things. >>> You could start a thread about nuclear fission at the molecular level and >>> he would invade it. >>> >>> Probably the only thread Michael Glasser, The Prescott Computer Guy will >>> avoid is one related to him getting a job and supporting his family. >>> >> >> Can you imagine what it's like having to live in Prescott AZ, and this >> Prescott Computer Guy is the only one you can turn to if you have >> computer problems? The guy's never there when you call because he's >> out trolling usenet 24/7. >> > > Really: you could be a decent person if you work on improving yourself and > not putting others down just to deal with your insecurity. > http://i.imgur.com/H3torBM.gifv
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-12 22:00 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <3t38ep8z5l7w.p2n0zzm02pjb.dlg@40tude.net> |
| In reply to | #532623 |
On Fri, 13 Nov 2015 02:51:49 +0000 (UTC), owl wrote: > In comp.os.linux.advocacy Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> On 11/12/15, 7:26 PM, in article fah30a.a3raf@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >> >>> In comp.os.linux.advocacy Big Fish in a Small Crotch >>> <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> wrote: >>>> On Fri, 13 Nov 2015 01:29:06 +0000 (UTC), owl wrote: >>>> >>>>> In comp.os.linux.advocacy Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>> On 11/12/15, 4:37 PM, in article n237nq$lgb$1@dont-email.me, "Slimer" >>>>>> <.m@nsn.s> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 2015-11-12 4:32 PM, Fabian Russell wrote: >>>>>>>> On Thu, 12 Nov 2015 10:20:34 -0700, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I have cut my teeth on assembly language. Once that fundamental stuff >>>>>>>>>> gets into your blood it never gets out. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> How do you think this is relevant? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> It is relevant because the whole fscking world seemed to have fallen >>>>>>>> madly in love with Object Oriented programming, and I happen to despise >>>>>>>> OO with a raging passion. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I have examined the issue deeply, and I can only conclude that OO >>>>>>>> is so fscking popular because people no longer can comprehend >>>>>>>> hardware. They are lost in the fogs of lofty OO abstractions and >>>>>>>> cannot perceive the machine. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> But for me it is quite different. I BEGAN with hardware and assembly >>>>>>>> language. I BEGAN with an intimate involvement with hardware. As >>>>>>>> a result I can see nothing but the machine. Oh yes, I can understand >>>>>>>> all the abstractions but, for me, such abstractions quickly fade into >>>>>>>> nothing against the blazing image of the machine. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> When I encounter high level code of any kind, my mind cannot help >>>>>>>> but to plunge immediately down into the assembly code that underlies >>>>>>>> it all. Thus, as a consequence, I do not not especially favor >>>>>>>> the creation of ever higher abstractions that serve only to >>>>>>>> obliterate and not truly enlighten. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> It is, I suppose a sickness, but it is a sickness from which no >>>>>>>> escape, or cure, is possible. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> All anyone needs to know is that coding directly in Assembly means that >>>>>>> your code will take full advantage of the machine's power. No slowdowns, >>>>>>> just full speed. >>>>>> >>>>>> Also will not take advantage of higher level abstractions. There is room >>>>>> for >>>>>> both. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Why are you even participating in a discussion of programming topics? >>>>> You have proved many times that you are completely clueless on that >>>>> subject. >>>> >>>> For the same reason snit participates in literally 100 percent of the >>>> threads here. >>>> He craves attention and likes to disrupt things. >>>> You could start a thread about nuclear fission at the molecular level and >>>> he would invade it. >>>> >>>> Probably the only thread Michael Glasser, The Prescott Computer Guy will >>>> avoid is one related to him getting a job and supporting his family. >>>> >>> >>> Can you imagine what it's like having to live in Prescott AZ, and this >>> Prescott Computer Guy is the only one you can turn to if you have >>> computer problems? The guy's never there when you call because he's >>> out trolling usenet 24/7. >>> >> >> Really: you could be a decent person if you work on improving yourself and >> not putting others down just to deal with your insecurity. >> > http://i.imgur.com/H3torBM.gifv Great stuff! -- You Ain't The Biggest Fish In The Crotch.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-13 03:36 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <fheua0.0afe@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #532625 |
In comp.os.linux.advocacy Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> wrote: > On Fri, 13 Nov 2015 02:51:49 +0000 (UTC), owl wrote: > >> In comp.os.linux.advocacy Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> On 11/12/15, 7:26 PM, in article fah30a.a3raf@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>> >>>> In comp.os.linux.advocacy Big Fish in a Small Crotch >>>> <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> wrote: >>>>> On Fri, 13 Nov 2015 01:29:06 +0000 (UTC), owl wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> In comp.os.linux.advocacy Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>> On 11/12/15, 4:37 PM, in article n237nq$lgb$1@dont-email.me, "Slimer" >>>>>>> <.m@nsn.s> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 2015-11-12 4:32 PM, Fabian Russell wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Thu, 12 Nov 2015 10:20:34 -0700, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I have cut my teeth on assembly language. Once that fundamental stuff >>>>>>>>>>> gets into your blood it never gets out. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> How do you think this is relevant? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> It is relevant because the whole fscking world seemed to have fallen >>>>>>>>> madly in love with Object Oriented programming, and I happen to despise >>>>>>>>> OO with a raging passion. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I have examined the issue deeply, and I can only conclude that OO >>>>>>>>> is so fscking popular because people no longer can comprehend >>>>>>>>> hardware. They are lost in the fogs of lofty OO abstractions and >>>>>>>>> cannot perceive the machine. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> But for me it is quite different. I BEGAN with hardware and assembly >>>>>>>>> language. I BEGAN with an intimate involvement with hardware. As >>>>>>>>> a result I can see nothing but the machine. Oh yes, I can understand >>>>>>>>> all the abstractions but, for me, such abstractions quickly fade into >>>>>>>>> nothing against the blazing image of the machine. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> When I encounter high level code of any kind, my mind cannot help >>>>>>>>> but to plunge immediately down into the assembly code that underlies >>>>>>>>> it all. Thus, as a consequence, I do not not especially favor >>>>>>>>> the creation of ever higher abstractions that serve only to >>>>>>>>> obliterate and not truly enlighten. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> It is, I suppose a sickness, but it is a sickness from which no >>>>>>>>> escape, or cure, is possible. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> All anyone needs to know is that coding directly in Assembly means that >>>>>>>> your code will take full advantage of the machine's power. No slowdowns, >>>>>>>> just full speed. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Also will not take advantage of higher level abstractions. There is room >>>>>>> for >>>>>>> both. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Why are you even participating in a discussion of programming topics? >>>>>> You have proved many times that you are completely clueless on that >>>>>> subject. >>>>> >>>>> For the same reason snit participates in literally 100 percent of the >>>>> threads here. >>>>> He craves attention and likes to disrupt things. >>>>> You could start a thread about nuclear fission at the molecular level and >>>>> he would invade it. >>>>> >>>>> Probably the only thread Michael Glasser, The Prescott Computer Guy will >>>>> avoid is one related to him getting a job and supporting his family. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Can you imagine what it's like having to live in Prescott AZ, and this >>>> Prescott Computer Guy is the only one you can turn to if you have >>>> computer problems? The guy's never there when you call because he's >>>> out trolling usenet 24/7. >>>> >>> >>> Really: you could be a decent person if you work on improving yourself and >>> not putting others down just to deal with your insecurity. >>> >> http://i.imgur.com/H3torBM.gifv > > Great stuff! > A little something for our sci.physics friends: https://gifsound.com/?gifv=7XwlXrX&v=nP6xBFyA_aw&s=59 (not mine)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-12 22:41 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <186x2jm6g6rkz$.10uxonqco6po9.dlg@40tude.net> |
| In reply to | #532633 |
On Fri, 13 Nov 2015 03:36:14 +0000 (UTC), owl wrote: > In comp.os.linux.advocacy Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> wrote: >> On Fri, 13 Nov 2015 02:51:49 +0000 (UTC), owl wrote: >> >>> In comp.os.linux.advocacy Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>> On 11/12/15, 7:26 PM, in article fah30a.a3raf@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >>>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>>> >>>>> In comp.os.linux.advocacy Big Fish in a Small Crotch >>>>> <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> wrote: >>>>>> On Fri, 13 Nov 2015 01:29:06 +0000 (UTC), owl wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> In comp.os.linux.advocacy Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> On 11/12/15, 4:37 PM, in article n237nq$lgb$1@dont-email.me, "Slimer" >>>>>>>> <.m@nsn.s> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 2015-11-12 4:32 PM, Fabian Russell wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 12 Nov 2015 10:20:34 -0700, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I have cut my teeth on assembly language. Once that fundamental stuff >>>>>>>>>>>> gets into your blood it never gets out. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> How do you think this is relevant? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> It is relevant because the whole fscking world seemed to have fallen >>>>>>>>>> madly in love with Object Oriented programming, and I happen to despise >>>>>>>>>> OO with a raging passion. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I have examined the issue deeply, and I can only conclude that OO >>>>>>>>>> is so fscking popular because people no longer can comprehend >>>>>>>>>> hardware. They are lost in the fogs of lofty OO abstractions and >>>>>>>>>> cannot perceive the machine. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> But for me it is quite different. I BEGAN with hardware and assembly >>>>>>>>>> language. I BEGAN with an intimate involvement with hardware. As >>>>>>>>>> a result I can see nothing but the machine. Oh yes, I can understand >>>>>>>>>> all the abstractions but, for me, such abstractions quickly fade into >>>>>>>>>> nothing against the blazing image of the machine. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> When I encounter high level code of any kind, my mind cannot help >>>>>>>>>> but to plunge immediately down into the assembly code that underlies >>>>>>>>>> it all. Thus, as a consequence, I do not not especially favor >>>>>>>>>> the creation of ever higher abstractions that serve only to >>>>>>>>>> obliterate and not truly enlighten. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> It is, I suppose a sickness, but it is a sickness from which no >>>>>>>>>> escape, or cure, is possible. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> All anyone needs to know is that coding directly in Assembly means that >>>>>>>>> your code will take full advantage of the machine's power. No slowdowns, >>>>>>>>> just full speed. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Also will not take advantage of higher level abstractions. There is room >>>>>>>> for >>>>>>>> both. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Why are you even participating in a discussion of programming topics? >>>>>>> You have proved many times that you are completely clueless on that >>>>>>> subject. >>>>>> >>>>>> For the same reason snit participates in literally 100 percent of the >>>>>> threads here. >>>>>> He craves attention and likes to disrupt things. >>>>>> You could start a thread about nuclear fission at the molecular level and >>>>>> he would invade it. >>>>>> >>>>>> Probably the only thread Michael Glasser, The Prescott Computer Guy will >>>>>> avoid is one related to him getting a job and supporting his family. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Can you imagine what it's like having to live in Prescott AZ, and this >>>>> Prescott Computer Guy is the only one you can turn to if you have >>>>> computer problems? The guy's never there when you call because he's >>>>> out trolling usenet 24/7. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Really: you could be a decent person if you work on improving yourself and >>>> not putting others down just to deal with your insecurity. >>>> >>> http://i.imgur.com/H3torBM.gifv >> >> Great stuff! >> > > A little something for our sci.physics friends: > https://gifsound.com/?gifv=7XwlXrX&v=nP6xBFyA_aw&s=59 > (not mine) I saw that on FB ! Seriously funny. -- You Ain't The Biggest Fish In The Crotch.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 6 of 15 — ← Prev page 1 … 4 5 [6] 7 8 … 15 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web