Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #523321 > unrolled thread

Flow batteries have potential for grid-scale electrical storage

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  Flow batteries have potential for grid-scale electrical storage Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-09-26 18:49 -0500
    Re: Flow batteries have potential for grid-scale electrical storage jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-27 00:33 +0000
    Re: Flow batteries have potential for grid-scale electrical storage jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-27 00:38 +0000
    Re: Flow batteries have potential for grid-scale electrical storage "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-09-27 10:02 -0700
      Re: Flow batteries have potential for grid-scale electrical storage "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-09-29 14:59 -0700
        Re: Flow batteries have potential for grid-scale electrical storage benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-09-29 18:31 -0400
          Re: Flow batteries have potential for grid-scale electrical storage "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-09-30 14:15 -0700
        Re: Flow batteries have potential for grid-scale electrical storage "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-10-01 13:17 -0700

#523321 — Flow batteries have potential for grid-scale electrical storage

Flow batteries have potential for grid-scale electrical storage
> http://arstechnica.com/science/2015/09/new-formula-makes-liquid-flow-batteries-organic/

> In the batteries that power your laptop and cellphone, the charge
> carrying material is an integral part of the physical structure,
> moving from one electrode to the other during charge and discharge
> cycles. When current isn't being input or extracted, the charge
> carriers stay where they are.
>
> But it doesn't have to be that way. There are alternatives, called
> flow batteries, where the charge carriers are in a liquid that flows
> past the electrodes (hence the name). While flow batteries have a
> much lower energy density than a lithium ion battery, they have a big
> advantage: the amount of electricity they can store is limited only
> by the size of the liquid storage tanks. The complicated and
> expensive parts of the system—the electrodes and membrane separating
> the two charge carriers—can be relatively compact and still handle a
> large amount of charge storage.
>
> But flow batteries are pretty bulky, so they haven't received the
> sort of attention that's been given to the hardware that can power
> our laptops. But that doesn't mean research isn't ongoing. This week,
> a team from Harvard described how a way of creating a flow battery
> out of very inexpensive chemicals.

-- 

sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
community, and physics-related social issues.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#523339

Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote:
> Flow batteries have potential for grid-scale electrical storage

This is the third cut and paste about the same breathless arm waving
press release all from the same original source, you cut and paste,
wortless piece of shit spammer.


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#523341

Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote:
> Flow batteries have potential for grid-scale electrical storage

Yes, spamming shit head, we got this arm waving speculation the first
time you cut and pasted an article about it, ass hat.


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#523453

On Saturday, September 26, 2015 at 4:49:54 PM UTC-7, Sam Wormley wrote:
> Flow batteries have potential for grid-scale electrical storage
> > http://arstechnica.com/science/2015/09/new-formula-makes-liquid-flow-batteries-organic/
> 
> > In the batteries that power your laptop and cellphone, the charge
> > carrying material is an integral part of the physical structure,
> > moving from one electrode to the other during charge and discharge
> > cycles. When current isn't being input or extracted, the charge
> > carriers stay where they are.
> >
> > But it doesn't have to be that way. There are alternatives, called
> > flow batteries, where the charge carriers are in a liquid that flows
> > past the electrodes (hence the name). While flow batteries have a
> > much lower energy density than a lithium ion battery, they have a big
> > advantage: the amount of electricity they can store is limited only
> > by the size of the liquid storage tanks. The complicated and
> > expensive parts of the system--the electrodes and membrane separating
> > the two charge carriers--can be relatively compact and still handle a
> > large amount of charge storage.
> >
> > But flow batteries are pretty bulky, so they haven't received the
> > sort of attention that's been given to the hardware that can power
> > our laptops. But that doesn't mean research isn't ongoing. This week,
> > a team from Harvard described how a way of creating a flow battery
> > out of very inexpensive chemicals.
> 
> -- 
> 
> sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
> to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
> community, and physics-related social issues.

Sam I have an invention how batteries can last longer and stay stronger.I tried it and it works 100%.I am clever O Ya  and modest too. Treb can take a bow.TreBert

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#523823

On Sunday, September 27, 2015 at 10:02:31 AM UTC-7, reber g=emc^2 wrote:
> On Saturday, September 26, 2015 at 4:49:54 PM UTC-7, Sam Wormley wrote:
> > Flow batteries have potential for grid-scale electrical storage
> > > http://arstechnica.com/science/2015/09/new-formula-makes-liquid-flow-batteries-organic/
> > 
> > > In the batteries that power your laptop and cellphone, the charge
> > > carrying material is an integral part of the physical structure,
> > > moving from one electrode to the other during charge and discharge
> > > cycles. When current isn't being input or extracted, the charge
> > > carriers stay where they are.
> > >
> > > But it doesn't have to be that way. There are alternatives, called
> > > flow batteries, where the charge carriers are in a liquid that flows
> > > past the electrodes (hence the name). While flow batteries have a
> > > much lower energy density than a lithium ion battery, they have a big
> > > advantage: the amount of electricity they can store is limited only
> > > by the size of the liquid storage tanks. The complicated and
> > > expensive parts of the system--the electrodes and membrane separating
> > > the two charge carriers--can be relatively compact and still handle a
> > > large amount of charge storage.
> > >
> > > But flow batteries are pretty bulky, so they haven't received the
> > > sort of attention that's been given to the hardware that can power
> > > our laptops. But that doesn't mean research isn't ongoing. This week,
> > > a team from Harvard described how a way of creating a flow battery
> > > out of very inexpensive chemicals.
> > 
> > -- 
> > 
> > sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
> > to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
> > community, and physics-related social issues.
> 
> Sam I have an invention how batteries can last longer and stay stronger.I tried it and it works 100%.I am clever O Ya  and modest too. Treb can take a bow.TreBert

Best to not use recharge batteries.It shits  TreBert

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#523830

On 09/29/2015 05:59 PM, reber g=emc^2 wrote:
> On Sunday, September 27, 2015 at 10:02:31 AM UTC-7, reber g=emc^2 wrote:
>> On Saturday, September 26, 2015 at 4:49:54 PM UTC-7, Sam Wormley wrote:
>>> Flow batteries have potential for grid-scale electrical storage
>>>> http://arstechnica.com/science/2015/09/new-formula-makes-liquid-flow-batteries-organic/
>>>
>>>> In the batteries that power your laptop and cellphone, the charge
>>>> carrying material is an integral part of the physical structure,
>>>> moving from one electrode to the other during charge and discharge
>>>> cycles. When current isn't being input or extracted, the charge
>>>> carriers stay where they are.
>>>>
>>>> But it doesn't have to be that way. There are alternatives, called
>>>> flow batteries, where the charge carriers are in a liquid that flows
>>>> past the electrodes (hence the name). While flow batteries have a
>>>> much lower energy density than a lithium ion battery, they have a big
>>>> advantage: the amount of electricity they can store is limited only
>>>> by the size of the liquid storage tanks. The complicated and
>>>> expensive parts of the system--the electrodes and membrane separating
>>>> the two charge carriers--can be relatively compact and still handle a
>>>> large amount of charge storage.
>>>>
>>>> But flow batteries are pretty bulky, so they haven't received the
>>>> sort of attention that's been given to the hardware that can power
>>>> our laptops. But that doesn't mean research isn't ongoing. This week,
>>>> a team from Harvard described how a way of creating a flow battery
>>>> out of very inexpensive chemicals.
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
>>> to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
>>> community, and physics-related social issues.
>>
>> Sam I have an invention how batteries can last longer and stay stronger.I tried it and it works 100%.I am clever O Ya  and modest too. Treb can take a bow.TreBert
>
> Best to not use recharge batteries.It shits  TreBert
>
Herb you senile old coot. You have nothing. Anyone can say they have 
invented something that works. I've invented perpetual motion. Oh ya!

Anything is possible when you are making it all up. Just ask "professor" 
Wormley.

-- 
         ___           ___           ___            ___
        /\  \         /\  \         /\__\          /\  \
       /::\  \       /::\  \       /::|  |         \:\  \
      /:/\:\  \     /:/\:\  \     /:|:|  |     ___ /::\__\
     /::\~\:\__\   /::\~\:\  \   /:/|:|  |__  /\  /:/\/__/
    /:/\:\ \:|__| /:/\:\ \:\__\ /:/ |:| /\__\ \:\/:/  /
    \:\~\:\/:/  / \:\~\:\ \/__/ \/__|:|/:/  /  \::/  /
     \:\ \::/  /   \:\ \:\__\       |:/:/  /    \/__/
      \:\/:/  /     \:\ \/__/       |::/  /
       \_:/__/       \:\__\         /:/  /
                      \/__/         \/__/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#524011

On Tuesday, September 29, 2015 at 3:31:44 PM UTC-7, benj wrote:
> On 09/29/2015 05:59 PM, reber g=emc^2 wrote:
> > On Sunday, September 27, 2015 at 10:02:31 AM UTC-7, reber g=emc^2 wrote:
> >> On Saturday, September 26, 2015 at 4:49:54 PM UTC-7, Sam Wormley wrote:
> >>> Flow batteries have potential for grid-scale electrical storage
> >>>> http://arstechnica.com/science/2015/09/new-formula-makes-liquid-flow-batteries-organic/
> >>>
> >>>> In the batteries that power your laptop and cellphone, the charge
> >>>> carrying material is an integral part of the physical structure,
> >>>> moving from one electrode to the other during charge and discharge
> >>>> cycles. When current isn't being input or extracted, the charge
> >>>> carriers stay where they are.
> >>>>
> >>>> But it doesn't have to be that way. There are alternatives, called
> >>>> flow batteries, where the charge carriers are in a liquid that flows
> >>>> past the electrodes (hence the name). While flow batteries have a
> >>>> much lower energy density than a lithium ion battery, they have a big
> >>>> advantage: the amount of electricity they can store is limited only
> >>>> by the size of the liquid storage tanks. The complicated and
> >>>> expensive parts of the system--the electrodes and membrane separating
> >>>> the two charge carriers--can be relatively compact and still handle a
> >>>> large amount of charge storage.
> >>>>
> >>>> But flow batteries are pretty bulky, so they haven't received the
> >>>> sort of attention that's been given to the hardware that can power
> >>>> our laptops. But that doesn't mean research isn't ongoing. This week,
> >>>> a team from Harvard described how a way of creating a flow battery
> >>>> out of very inexpensive chemicals.
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>>
> >>> sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
> >>> to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
> >>> community, and physics-related social issues.
> >>
> >> Sam I have an invention how batteries can last longer and stay stronger.I tried it and it works 100%.I am clever O Ya  and modest too. Treb can take a bow.TreBert
> >
> > Best to not use recharge batteries.It shits  TreBert
> >
> Herb you senile old coot. You have nothing. Anyone can say they have 
> invented something that works. I've invented perpetual motion. Oh ya!
> 
> Anything is possible when you are making it all up. Just ask "professor" 
> Wormley.
> 
> -- 
>          ___           ___           ___            ___
>         /\  \         /\  \         /\__\          /\  \
>        /::\  \       /::\  \       /::|  |         \:\  \
>       /:/\:\  \     /:/\:\  \     /:|:|  |     ___ /::\__\
>      /::\~\:\__\   /::\~\:\  \   /:/|:|  |__  /\  /:/\/__/
>     /:/\:\ \:|__| /:/\:\ \:\__\ /:/ |:| /\__\ \:\/:/  /
>     \:\~\:\/:/  / \:\~\:\ \/__/ \/__|:|/:/  /  \::/  /
>      \:\ \::/  /   \:\ \:\__\       |:/:/  /    \/__/
>       \:\/:/  /     \:\ \/__/       |::/  /
>        \_:/__/       \:\__\         /:/  /
>                       \/__/         \/__/

I can prove what I post.Put your money where your mouth is and we well show who is the liar.You will not because you are a cheap low wit coward. TreBert 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#524116

On Tuesday, September 29, 2015 at 2:59:15 PM UTC-7, reber g=emc^2 wrote:
> On Sunday, September 27, 2015 at 10:02:31 AM UTC-7, reber g=emc^2 wrote:
> > On Saturday, September 26, 2015 at 4:49:54 PM UTC-7, Sam Wormley wrote:
> > > Flow batteries have potential for grid-scale electrical storage
> > > > http://arstechnica.com/science/2015/09/new-formula-makes-liquid-flow-batteries-organic/
> > > 
> > > > In the batteries that power your laptop and cellphone, the charge
> > > > carrying material is an integral part of the physical structure,
> > > > moving from one electrode to the other during charge and discharge
> > > > cycles. When current isn't being input or extracted, the charge
> > > > carriers stay where they are.
> > > >
> > > > But it doesn't have to be that way. There are alternatives, called
> > > > flow batteries, where the charge carriers are in a liquid that flows
> > > > past the electrodes (hence the name). While flow batteries have a
> > > > much lower energy density than a lithium ion battery, they have a big
> > > > advantage: the amount of electricity they can store is limited only
> > > > by the size of the liquid storage tanks. The complicated and
> > > > expensive parts of the system--the electrodes and membrane separating
> > > > the two charge carriers--can be relatively compact and still handle a
> > > > large amount of charge storage.
> > > >
> > > > But flow batteries are pretty bulky, so they haven't received the
> > > > sort of attention that's been given to the hardware that can power
> > > > our laptops. But that doesn't mean research isn't ongoing. This week,
> > > > a team from Harvard described how a way of creating a flow battery
> > > > out of very inexpensive chemicals.
> > > 
> > > -- 
> > > 
> > > sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
> > > to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
> > > community, and physics-related social issues.
> > 
> > Sam I have an invention how batteries can last longer and stay stronger.I tried it and it works 100%.I am clever O Ya  and modest too. Treb can take a bow.TreBert
> 
> Best to not use recharge batteries.It shits  TreBert

I know how to recharge a lemon.How to start a car on lemons.Stll potatoes work best. TreBert

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web