Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #647675 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-08-28 16:53 -0700 |
| Last post | 2017-09-01 18:38 -0500 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 159 — 15 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-08-28 16:53 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? "nuny@bid.nes" <alien8752@gmail.com> - 2017-08-29 00:54 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-08-29 05:33 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-08-29 06:18 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-08-29 09:46 -0500
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-08-29 15:42 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2017-08-29 20:14 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-08-29 16:33 +0000
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-08-29 12:48 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-08-29 14:18 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-08-29 21:28 +0000
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-08-29 17:19 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-08-29 17:57 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-08-29 18:26 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-08-29 18:41 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2017-08-29 20:40 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-08-29 15:53 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-08-29 16:38 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-08-29 18:23 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-08-29 20:55 -0500
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-08-29 19:06 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-08-29 21:16 -0500
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-08-30 03:42 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-08-30 06:38 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-08-30 17:21 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-08-29 19:20 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-08-29 22:46 -0400
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-08-29 20:00 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-08-29 21:13 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? poraty350@gmail.com - 2017-08-30 01:21 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-08-30 03:03 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? poraty350@gmail.com - 2017-08-30 05:15 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-08-30 05:31 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2017-08-30 10:24 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-08-30 17:44 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-08-30 17:46 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-08-30 21:31 -0400
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-08-30 18:35 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-08-30 22:06 -0400
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-08-30 19:21 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-08-30 23:29 -0400
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-08-30 21:21 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-08-30 23:05 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-09-06 13:42 -0500
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-08-29 21:22 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2017-08-29 20:34 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-08-29 22:44 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2017-08-30 10:49 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-08-30 17:55 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-09-02 11:05 -0500
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-09-02 09:56 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-09-03 02:57 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-09-03 20:34 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2017-08-29 19:31 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Boris Mohar <borism_void_@sympatico.ca> - 2017-08-29 09:22 -0400
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-08-29 07:03 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-08-31 13:37 -0500
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-08-31 11:43 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2017-08-30 20:26 +1000
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-08-30 04:52 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2017-09-01 17:28 +1000
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-09-01 04:59 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-09-01 17:39 -0400
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-09-01 16:28 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-09-01 21:47 -0400
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-09-01 19:25 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-09-01 23:23 -0400
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-09-02 06:36 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-09-02 11:44 -0500
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-09-02 18:43 -0400
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-09-01 20:42 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-09-01 17:13 -0400
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-08-30 16:17 +0000
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-08-30 09:25 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-08-30 17:22 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-08-30 21:35 -0400
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-08-30 18:44 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-08-30 22:11 -0400
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-08-30 19:18 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-08-30 23:27 -0400
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-08-30 20:30 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-08-30 16:26 -0400
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2017-08-30 13:53 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-08-30 14:27 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2017-08-30 10:45 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-08-30 12:07 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2017-08-30 14:34 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-08-30 15:02 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-08-31 13:26 -0500
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-09-01 05:24 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2017-09-01 08:21 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-09-01 17:40 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-09-01 23:36 -0500
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-09-01 22:08 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-09-02 11:48 -0500
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-09-02 18:50 -0400
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-09-03 23:58 -0500
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-09-04 19:27 -0400
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-09-04 16:37 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-09-06 11:24 -0500
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-09-02 18:19 -0400
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2017-09-01 22:06 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-09-01 22:17 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-09-02 12:13 -0500
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-09-03 03:30 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-09-03 07:18 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-09-03 16:57 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-09-04 00:33 +0000
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-09-03 19:00 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-09-03 19:16 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-09-03 19:35 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-09-03 19:44 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-09-04 06:36 +0000
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-09-04 05:13 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-09-04 13:23 +0000
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-09-04 08:52 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-09-04 14:52 -0500
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-09-04 14:57 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-09-05 00:26 +0000
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-09-04 16:12 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-09-04 16:24 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-09-05 00:26 +0000
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-09-05 00:26 +0000
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-09-05 12:01 +0000
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-09-05 05:39 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-09-05 08:16 -0500
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-09-05 05:44 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-09-05 08:20 -0500
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-09-05 07:09 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-09-05 09:14 -0500
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-09-05 07:36 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-09-05 11:39 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2017-09-05 13:14 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-09-06 08:38 -0500
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-09-05 16:10 -0500
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-09-05 17:17 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-09-06 02:50 +0000
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-09-06 06:00 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-09-06 08:43 -0500
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-09-06 06:51 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-09-06 09:01 -0500
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-09-06 07:26 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-09-06 16:24 +0000
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-09-06 12:52 -0500
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-09-06 11:07 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-09-06 13:12 -0500
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-09-06 11:50 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-09-06 14:03 -0500
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-09-06 16:15 +0000
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-09-06 13:58 -0500
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-09-06 08:42 -0500
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-09-04 15:39 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-09-05 11:54 +0000
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-09-04 06:31 +0000
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Lofty Goat <rlwatkins@gmail.com> - 2017-09-04 12:29 -0500
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-09-01 14:48 -0500
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-09-01 18:06 -0500
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-09-01 20:27 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Lofty Goat <rlwatkins@gmail.com> - 2017-09-01 18:38 -0500
Page 4 of 8 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 Next page →
| From | Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-09-01 17:28 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <f0sggeFn6mU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #647860 |
On 30/08/2017 9:52 PM, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > On Wednesday, August 30, 2017 at 8:26:21 PM UTC+10, Sylvia Else wrote: >> On 29/08/2017 9:53 AM, Arindam Banerjee wrote: >>> How can life cells split, duplicate, if each atom in the cell does not divide into two? >>> >>> If half the atoms go there, then the power of the cell is >>> reduced by half, quarter and so on with every division. Disastrous! Life just >>> cannot work this way. >>> >>> THE BEST WAY TO EXPLAIN LIFE IS THUS THEORIZE THAT THE ATOMS SPLIT EQUALLY >>> IN CELL DIVISION TO MAINTAIN THE STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY OF THE CELL. >>> >>> As the cell takes in more water from the membrane, the concentration decreases >>> and more atoms have to get into solution to keep up the required concentration. >>> >>> So atoms must divide gracefully and as there are more atoms now there is the >>> possibility for the creation of another cell. >>> >>> Now the mystery is that if the atoms do get halved in mass, how do they regain >>> the mass to the original size before splitting? >>> >>> One may theorise here that when they get halved then they gain in size from >>> the aether; they grow from aether as plants grow from soil. >>> >>> Just as plants once again turn to soil after they die. >>> >>> Hmm, this explains quite a lot, I think. >>> >>> Aether forms all masses as positive and negative charges. When the size of the >>> atom decreases, it again builds up from the aether if it can, or vanishes into >>> aether otherwise. >>> >>> Death then, happens when the cell can no longer build up its atoms from the >>> aether. >>> >>> The notion that the concentration of atoms must remain constant in any solution >>> is thus a very powerful one, as I just worked out. >>> >>> Whether it is a correct idea or not I do not know, but then a theory is just >>> that, a conjecture which may or may not be validated later to the status of an >>> universal fact (for the moment). Knowledge in science is always provisional, or >>> else it turns into a religion like e=mcc. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Arindam Banerjee >>> >> >> This is most assuredly a troll. >> >> Sylvia. > > Who are you, the monster of this swamp? > I'm the person calling you a troll. You're espousing misconceptions so egregious that they must be deliberate. Sylvia.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-09-01 04:59 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <e4f6d939-d17c-4eb2-9012-0dc471ddbbd6@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #648107 |
On Friday, September 1, 2017 at 5:28:21 PM UTC+10, Sylvia Else wrote: > On 30/08/2017 9:52 PM, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > > On Wednesday, August 30, 2017 at 8:26:21 PM UTC+10, Sylvia Else wrote: > >> On 29/08/2017 9:53 AM, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > >>> How can life cells split, duplicate, if each atom in the cell does not divide into two? > >>> > >>> If half the atoms go there, then the power of the cell is > >>> reduced by half, quarter and so on with every division. Disastrous! Life just > >>> cannot work this way. > >>> > >>> THE BEST WAY TO EXPLAIN LIFE IS THUS THEORIZE THAT THE ATOMS SPLIT EQUALLY > >>> IN CELL DIVISION TO MAINTAIN THE STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY OF THE CELL. > >>> > >>> As the cell takes in more water from the membrane, the concentration decreases > >>> and more atoms have to get into solution to keep up the required concentration. > >>> > >>> So atoms must divide gracefully and as there are more atoms now there is the > >>> possibility for the creation of another cell. > >>> > >>> Now the mystery is that if the atoms do get halved in mass, how do they regain > >>> the mass to the original size before splitting? > >>> > >>> One may theorise here that when they get halved then they gain in size from > >>> the aether; they grow from aether as plants grow from soil. > >>> > >>> Just as plants once again turn to soil after they die. > >>> > >>> Hmm, this explains quite a lot, I think. > >>> > >>> Aether forms all masses as positive and negative charges. When the size of the > >>> atom decreases, it again builds up from the aether if it can, or vanishes into > >>> aether otherwise. > >>> > >>> Death then, happens when the cell can no longer build up its atoms from the > >>> aether. > >>> > >>> The notion that the concentration of atoms must remain constant in any solution > >>> is thus a very powerful one, as I just worked out. > >>> > >>> Whether it is a correct idea or not I do not know, but then a theory is just > >>> that, a conjecture which may or may not be validated later to the status of an > >>> universal fact (for the moment). Knowledge in science is always provisional, or > >>> else it turns into a religion like e=mcc. > >>> > >>> Cheers, > >>> Arindam Banerjee > >>> > >> > >> This is most assuredly a troll. > >> > >> Sylvia. > > > > Who are you, the monster of this swamp? > > > I'm the person calling you a troll. Heh-heh, bullying and persecution won't deter me nor affect my work. I am an engineer with 40 years of industrial and research experience. My past is an open book. Anyone can read it at https://www.facebook.com/arindam.banerjee.31149359 And I plan to do even better with my remaining years. Such as making new motors for space travel, and fast air travel. Solving the world's energy problems by making constant the supply from erratic renewable energy sources, using hydrogen as the common currency for energy transport as well as fuel for motion. > You're espousing misconceptions so egregious that they must be deliberate. I am proposing new theories the evidently offend the political entities masquerading as scientists by their nonsensical e=mcc physics. And proving them by experiment. My theories explain the workings of the universe beautifully, and they do throw out a century of wrong physics. I have made a set of video films to demonstrate new experiments, that show a great new discovery, that the Lorenz force does not have a reaction. From this, we can make new motors to replace jet engines and rockets. Our perception about the Universe will also change. With the ever-present concept of infinity, the influence upon humans will be wonderful as they will be less mean and cowardly. It will be a great future, and those who try to oppose it will be brushed away when the scope of my video films are universally understood: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hqBfwAClVlg IFE - 1 Ground Experiments https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w9eGq4Oiv9s IFE - 2 Experimental setups https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V3hC48BMrno IFE - 3 Pendulum experiments https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3sSPxGsLkws IFE - 4 Evolution of spaceship https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pJdM6UDPauU IFE - 5 Hydrogen Transmission Network https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TUAcx7rAplc IFE - 6 Spaceship Design https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H5Zbpvc3fdA IFE - 7 Anti-Gravity https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VA9LUwqMhxY IFE - 8 New Physics Cheers, Arindam Banerjee > > Sylvia.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-09-01 17:39 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <59a9d387$0$28269$b1db1813$bfc93781@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #648121 |
On 9/1/2017 7:59 AM, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > On Friday, September 1, 2017 at 5:28:21 PM UTC+10, Sylvia Else wrote: >> I'm the person calling you a troll. > > Heh-heh, bullying and persecution won't deter me nor affect my work. > > I am an engineer with 40 years of industrial and research experience. > My past is an open book. > Anyone can read it at > https://www.facebook.com/arindam.banerjee.31149359 Lies. Link is open and does not exist. One more anonymous dip shit. > And I plan to do even better with my remaining years. Such as making new motors > for space travel, and fast air travel. Sure, go view his videos for a prime of example of how he got fired from every "engineering" job and had to take this gig as strategic writer disrupting the science discussions on the INTERNET. > Solving the world's energy problems by making constant the supply from erratic > renewable energy sources, using hydrogen as the common currency for energy > transport as well as fuel for motion. He thinks "perpetual motion" will solve all humanities problems. >> You're espousing misconceptions so egregious that they must be deliberate. > > I am proposing new theories the evidently offend the political entities > masquerading as scientists by their nonsensical e=mcc physics. Simply proposing the opposite of what is accepted science may be a "new theory" but it is also idiocy of the most ignorant kind. The kind ARchie thinks is science. He routinely permutes all known theories in hopes that one day ONE of his "ideas" will be proven right. Such crap is not worthy of anyone's time. > And proving them by experiment. Like I said go view his so-called videos. You can't even read his scribbled titles let alone see any science. I tell you true, if this Third World clown was ever hired as MY lab assistant I'd be firing his brown ass in about 15 minute. Yes, he is THAT incompetent (and that includes as strategic Writer. Banjo could have learned a LOT from HVAC, but one does expect OZ to do a second rate job in most everything. <snip rest of his senile arrogant Third World babble>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-09-01 16:28 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <765b0560-5958-4eb1-a2d3-8999e569ff42@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #648193 |
On Friday, September 1, 2017 at 5:39:21 PM UTC-4, benj wrote: > On 9/1/2017 7:59 AM, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > > On Friday, September 1, 2017 at 5:28:21 PM UTC+10, Sylvia Else wrote: > > >> I'm the person calling you a troll. > > > > Heh-heh, bullying and persecution won't deter me nor affect my work. > > > > I am an engineer with 40 years of industrial and research experience. > > My past is an open book. > > Anyone can read it at > > https://www.facebook.com/arindam.banerjee.31149359 > > Lies. Link is open and does not exist. One more anonymous dip shit. The link works just fine. Your access is being censored, BenjJi. Else, do stop deliberately lying. What's going wrong with you PRO?! Here's a quote from a post from August 30 at 2:06PM by BanerjeeJi: “The Taj Mahal or Tejomahalaya, lawyers vs.ASI archeologists in a court of law. Last time I visited the Taj, in 2016, I looked up to see the image of Surya Deva smiling down on the tombs of Shan Jehan and Mumtaz. Our guide informed us that the spire represented Lakshmi. In those days the Mughals were truly syncretic if indeed they did build the Taj.” <trim> -- Mahipal “IPMM... माहिपाल ७६३८: Poet Pla(y)ing Moody Blues! Jedi Mode...” Enjo(y)... Salute… Cheers... Open your M I N D… Time it is Is IS 3PM somePlace.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-09-01 21:47 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <59aa0da6$0$30079$b1db1813$d06edd96@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #648221 |
On 9/1/2017 7:28 PM, Mahipal wrote: > On Friday, September 1, 2017 at 5:39:21 PM UTC-4, benj wrote: >> On 9/1/2017 7:59 AM, Arindam Banerjee wrote: >>> On Friday, September 1, 2017 at 5:28:21 PM UTC+10, Sylvia Else wrote: >> >>>> I'm the person calling you a troll. >>> >>> Heh-heh, bullying and persecution won't deter me nor affect my work. >>> >>> I am an engineer with 40 years of industrial and research experience. >>> My past is an open book. >>> Anyone can read it at >>> https://www.facebook.com/arindam.banerjee.31149359 >> >> Lies. Link is open and does not exist. One more anonymous dip shit. > > The link works just fine. Your access is being censored, BenjJi. > Else, do stop deliberately lying. What's going wrong with you PRO?! Are you a member of Facebook? (Oh God, don't in your infinite mercy allow that to be true!) I assume I can't get in because I won't sign up for facebook. You are right it is very embarrassing for me not to be able to break into facebook even with my current, limited emergency back-up system. I should have WAY more skilz than that. But then my desire to break into facebook especially to read about Banjo is pretty damn low. And I never lie, unless I have to. > Here's a quote from a post from August 30 at 2:06PM by BanerjeeJi: > > “The Taj Mahal or Tejomahalaya, lawyers vs.ASI archeologists in a court > of law. Last time I visited the Taj, in 2016, I looked up to see the > image of Surya Deva smiling down on the tombs of Shan Jehan and > Mumtaz. Our guide informed us that the spire represented Lakshmi. In > those days the Mughals were truly syncretic if indeed they did build > the Taj.” Banjo doesn't know who built the Taj? I thought he knew everything?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-09-01 19:25 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <341e6397-2ebb-4b37-9cb5-6f51923a13ee@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #648244 |
On Friday, September 1, 2017 at 9:47:22 PM UTC-4, benj wrote: > On 9/1/2017 7:28 PM, Mahipal wrote: > > On Friday, September 1, 2017 at 5:39:21 PM UTC-4, benj wrote: > >> On 9/1/2017 7:59 AM, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > >>> On Friday, September 1, 2017 at 5:28:21 PM UTC+10, Sylvia Else wrote: > >> > >>>> I'm the person calling you a troll. > >>> > >>> Heh-heh, bullying and persecution won't deter me nor affect my work. > >>> > >>> I am an engineer with 40 years of industrial and research experience. > >>> My past is an open book. > >>> Anyone can read it at > >>> https://www.facebook.com/arindam.banerjee.31149359 > >> > >> Lies. Link is open and does not exist. One more anonymous dip shit. > > > > The link works just fine. Your access is being censored, BenjJi. > > Else, do stop deliberately lying. What's going wrong with you PRO?! > > Are you a member of Facebook? (Oh God, don't in your infinite mercy > allow that to be true!) I assume I can't get in because I won't sign up > for facebook. You are right it is very embarrassing for me not to be > able to break into facebook even with my current, limited emergency > back-up system. I should have WAY more skilz than that. But then my > desire to break into facebook especially to read about Banjo is pretty > damn low. And I never lie, unless I have to. Of course I'm a member of Facebook. I use it to keep in touch with friends and family, scattered the Earth over. BenjJi, go do an experiment. Open a FB account. You don't have to write or read there. See if then you can access BanerjeeJi's page. Afterwards, just delete your FB account. > > Here's a quote from a post from August 30 at 2:06PM by BanerjeeJi: > > > > “The Taj Mahal or Tejomahalaya, lawyers vs.ASI archeologists in a court > > of law. Last time I visited the Taj, in 2016, I looked up to see the > > image of Surya Deva smiling down on the tombs of Shan Jehan and > > Mumtaz. Our guide informed us that the spire represented Lakshmi. In > > those days the Mughals were truly syncretic if indeed they did build > > the Taj.” > > Banjo doesn't know who built the Taj? I thought he knew everything? Birds of a feather flock together... you BenjJi claim to know everything too. Shah Jahan funded the Taj. Many architects designed it. Mostly Hindus built it. There exists a myth/story, that when Taj was finished, Shah Jahan chopped off the hands of 20,000+ builders plus architects so they couldn't duplicate the Taj. Same model is now==2017 used in Dubai, UAE. Guess who performs the actual engineering. -- Mahipal “IPMM... माहिपाल ७६३८: d(me) != 0 ... me alwa(y)s changes... Enjo(y)!” Enjo(y)... Salute… Cheers... Open your M I N D… Time it is Is IS 3PM somePlace.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-09-01 23:23 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <59aa2438$0$7687$b1db1813$3686e031@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #648251 |
On 9/1/2017 10:25 PM, Mahipal wrote: > On Friday, September 1, 2017 at 9:47:22 PM UTC-4, benj wrote: >> On 9/1/2017 7:28 PM, Mahipal wrote: >>> On Friday, September 1, 2017 at 5:39:21 PM UTC-4, benj wrote: >>>> On 9/1/2017 7:59 AM, Arindam Banerjee wrote: >>>>> On Friday, September 1, 2017 at 5:28:21 PM UTC+10, Sylvia Else wrote: >>>> >>>>>> I'm the person calling you a troll. >>>>> >>>>> Heh-heh, bullying and persecution won't deter me nor affect my work. >>>>> >>>>> I am an engineer with 40 years of industrial and research experience. >>>>> My past is an open book. >>>>> Anyone can read it at >>>>> https://www.facebook.com/arindam.banerjee.31149359 >>>> >>>> Lies. Link is open and does not exist. One more anonymous dip shit. >>> >>> The link works just fine. Your access is being censored, BenjJi. >>> Else, do stop deliberately lying. What's going wrong with you PRO?! >> >> Are you a member of Facebook? (Oh God, don't in your infinite mercy >> allow that to be true!) I assume I can't get in because I won't sign up >> for facebook. You are right it is very embarrassing for me not to be >> able to break into facebook even with my current, limited emergency >> back-up system. I should have WAY more skilz than that. But then my >> desire to break into facebook especially to read about Banjo is pretty >> damn low. And I never lie, unless I have to. > > Of course I'm a member of Facebook. I use it to keep in touch with > friends and family, scattered the Earth over. <sigh> The INTERNET is all over the Earth...duh. > BenjJi, go do an experiment. Open a FB account. You don't have to > write or read there. See if then you can access BanerjeeJi's page. > Afterwards, just delete your FB account. Are you nuts? First rule of SW. Once iunformation goes in you can never delete it, Only YOUR access to it gets deleted. No wonder Bill is ruling the world. >>> Here's a quote from a post from August 30 at 2:06PM by BanerjeeJi: >>> >>> “The Taj Mahal or Tejomahalaya, lawyers vs.ASI archeologists in a court >>> of law. Last time I visited the Taj, in 2016, I looked up to see the >>> image of Surya Deva smiling down on the tombs of Shan Jehan and >>> Mumtaz. Our guide informed us that the spire represented Lakshmi. In >>> those days the Mughals were truly syncretic if indeed they did build >>> the Taj.” >> >> Banjo doesn't know who built the Taj? I thought he knew everything? > > Birds of a feather flock together... you BenjJi claim to know everything too. Nonsense. I know nothing. I just ask higher forces and THEY know everything. Sometimes they tell me and sometimes not. I don't have to ask about Banjo. > Shah Jahan funded the Taj. Many architects designed it. Mostly Hindus built it. > There exists a myth/story, that when Taj was finished, Shah Jahan chopped off the > hands of 20,000+ builders plus architects so they couldn't duplicate the Taj. Sweet guy. Better than some who killed all his helpers so they could still help him in the afterlife. > Same model is now==2017 used in Dubai, UAE. Guess who performs the actual engineering. A bunch of architects and engineers typing on computers with their feet? :-) > -- Mahipal “IPMM... माहिपाल ७६३८: d(me) != 0 ... me alwa(y)s changes... Enjo(y)!” > Enjo(y)... Salute… Cheers... Open your M I N D… Time it is Is IS 3PM somePlace. >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-09-02 06:36 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <f517a98d-1c01-43f7-aaee-690ed745aeaf@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #648266 |
On Friday, September 1, 2017 at 11:23:39 PM UTC-4, benj wrote: > On 9/1/2017 10:25 PM, Mahipal wrote: > > On Friday, September 1, 2017 at 9:47:22 PM UTC-4, benj wrote: > >> On 9/1/2017 7:28 PM, Mahipal wrote: > >>> On Friday, September 1, 2017 at 5:39:21 PM UTC-4, benj wrote: > >>>> On 9/1/2017 7:59 AM, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > >>>>> On Friday, September 1, 2017 at 5:28:21 PM UTC+10, Sylvia Else wrote: > >>>> > >>>>>> I'm the person calling you a troll. > >>>>> > >>>>> Heh-heh, bullying and persecution won't deter me nor affect my work. > >>>>> > >>>>> I am an engineer with 40 years of industrial and research experience. > >>>>> My past is an open book. > >>>>> Anyone can read it at > >>>>> https://www.facebook.com/arindam.banerjee.31149359 > >>>> > >>>> Lies. Link is open and does not exist. One more anonymous dip shit. > >>> > >>> The link works just fine. Your access is being censored, BenjJi. > >>> Else, do stop deliberately lying. What's going wrong with you PRO?! > >> > >> Are you a member of Facebook? (Oh God, don't in your infinite mercy > >> allow that to be true!) I assume I can't get in because I won't sign up > >> for facebook. You are right it is very embarrassing for me not to be > >> able to break into facebook even with my current, limited emergency > >> back-up system. I should have WAY more skilz than that. But then my > >> desire to break into facebook especially to read about Banjo is pretty > >> damn low. And I never lie, unless I have to. > > > > Of course I'm a member of Facebook. I use it to keep in touch with > > friends and family, scattered the Earth over. > > <sigh> The INTERNET is all over the Earth...duh. If it weren't how'd anyone keep in touch via FB? You're being contrite. I have friends who post on FB every couple of hours. They're traveling a lot, for work. They post on FB to let their elderly parents know that all is well. It's like a heartbeat message. Of course, I get to be jealous of their endless beers and good food photos. Cheers! > > BenjJi, go do an experiment. Open a FB account. You don't have to > > write or read there. See if then you can access BanerjeeJi's page. > > Afterwards, just delete your FB account. > > Are you nuts? First rule of SW. Once iunformation goes in you can never > delete it, Only YOUR access to it gets deleted. No wonder Bill is ruling > the world. You can't delete information on Usenet either. The(y)TheThem do read here. I specifically said do not write anything on FB. Just open a trial fake account. Besides, Edward Prochak can access BanerjeeJi's FB link too. BenjJi, you may want to now apologize for calling Banjo a anonymous dip shit. > >>> Here's a quote from a post from August 30 at 2:06PM by BanerjeeJi: > >>> > >>> “The Taj Mahal or Tejomahalaya, lawyers vs.ASI archeologists in a court > >>> of law. Last time I visited the Taj, in 2016, I looked up to see the > >>> image of Surya Deva smiling down on the tombs of Shan Jehan and > >>> Mumtaz. Our guide informed us that the spire represented Lakshmi. In > >>> those days the Mughals were truly syncretic if indeed they did build > >>> the Taj.” > >> > >> Banjo doesn't know who built the Taj? I thought he knew everything? > > > > Birds of a feather flock together... you BenjJi claim to know everything too. > > Nonsense. I know nothing. I just ask higher forces and THEY know > everything. Sometimes they tell me and sometimes not. I don't have to > ask about Banjo. Just ignore BanerjeeJi then. Nobody here ineracts with AP, PV, etc... > > Shah Jahan funded the Taj. Many architects designed it. Mostly Hindus built it. > > There exists a myth/story, that when Taj was finished, Shah Jahan chopped off the > > hands of 20,000+ builders plus architects so they couldn't duplicate the Taj. > > Sweet guy. Better than some who killed all his helpers so they could > still help him in the afterlife. Hopefully it is just a myth. > > Same model is now==2017 used in Dubai, UAE. Guess who performs the actual engineering. > > A bunch of architects and engineers typing on computers with their feet? :-) Yes, some are doing the architecture and engineering work on their CPUs. Speaking of feet, most of them Indians are doing the actual building construction work. Welding, hammering, pulleys, sky-cranes, ... Walking and working on steel beams as much as 80 floors high and much higher. Nowadays, India is becoming wealthy enough that they are building their own modern highrises in their major cities. -- Mahipal “IPMM... माहिपाल ७६३८: d(me) != 0 ... me alwa(y)s changes... Enjo(y)!” Enjo(y)... Salute… Cheers... Open your M I N D… Time it is Is IS 3PM somePlace.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-09-02 11:44 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <ooen71$8k8$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #648317 |
On 9/2/2017 8:36 AM, Mahipal wrote: > On Friday, September 1, 2017 at 11:23:39 PM UTC-4, benj wrote: >> On 9/1/2017 10:25 PM, Mahipal wrote: >>> On Friday, September 1, 2017 at 9:47:22 PM UTC-4, benj wrote: >>>> On 9/1/2017 7:28 PM, Mahipal wrote: >>>>> On Friday, September 1, 2017 at 5:39:21 PM UTC-4, benj wrote: >>>>>> On 9/1/2017 7:59 AM, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > > > Hopefully it is just a myth. > >>> Same model is now==2017 used in Dubai, UAE. Guess who performs the actual engineering. >> >> A bunch of architects and engineers typing on computers with their feet? :-) > > Yes, some are doing the architecture and engineering work on their CPUs. > > Speaking of feet, most of them Indians are doing the actual building > construction work. Welding, hammering, pulleys, sky-cranes, ... > Walking and working on steel beams as much as 80 floors high and much higher. Mumbai http://iliketowastemytime.com/sites/default/files/mumbai-coastline.jpg I used to work in Jeddah, now all built up... > > Nowadays, India is becoming wealthy enough that they are building > their own modern highrises in their major cities. > > -- Mahipal “IPMM... माहिपाल ७६३८: d(me) != 0 ... me alwa(y)s changes... Enjo(y)!” > Enjo(y)... Salute… Cheers... Open your M I N D… Time it is Is IS 3PM somePlace. >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-09-02 18:43 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <59ab341f$0$47936$b1db1813$be7d459e@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #648317 |
On 9/2/2017 9:36 AM, Mahipal wrote: > On Friday, September 1, 2017 at 11:23:39 PM UTC-4, benj wrote: >> On 9/1/2017 10:25 PM, Mahipal wrote: >>> On Friday, September 1, 2017 at 9:47:22 PM UTC-4, benj wrote: >>>> On 9/1/2017 7:28 PM, Mahipal wrote: >>>>> On Friday, September 1, 2017 at 5:39:21 PM UTC-4, benj wrote: >>>>>> On 9/1/2017 7:59 AM, Arindam Banerjee wrote: >>>>>>> On Friday, September 1, 2017 at 5:28:21 PM UTC+10, Sylvia Else wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>> I'm the person calling you a troll. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Heh-heh, bullying and persecution won't deter me nor affect my work. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I am an engineer with 40 years of industrial and research experience. >>>>>>> My past is an open book. >>>>>>> Anyone can read it at >>>>>>> https://www.facebook.com/arindam.banerjee.31149359 >>>>>> >>>>>> Lies. Link is open and does not exist. One more anonymous dip shit. >>>>> >>>>> The link works just fine. Your access is being censored, BenjJi. >>>>> Else, do stop deliberately lying. What's going wrong with you PRO?! >>>> >>>> Are you a member of Facebook? (Oh God, don't in your infinite mercy >>>> allow that to be true!) I assume I can't get in because I won't sign up >>>> for facebook. You are right it is very embarrassing for me not to be >>>> able to break into facebook even with my current, limited emergency >>>> back-up system. I should have WAY more skilz than that. But then my >>>> desire to break into facebook especially to read about Banjo is pretty >>>> damn low. And I never lie, unless I have to. >>> >>> Of course I'm a member of Facebook. I use it to keep in touch with >>> friends and family, scattered the Earth over. >> >> <sigh> The INTERNET is all over the Earth...duh. > > If it weren't how'd anyone keep in touch via FB? You're being contrite. Contrite? What am I sorry about? See, looperji there is freedom and there is slavery. Just because it's called "fun" doesn't mean it isn't slavery. > I have friends who post on FB every couple of hours. They're traveling > a lot, for work. They post on FB to let their elderly parents know > that all is well. It's like a heartbeat message. Of course, I get to > be jealous of their endless beers and good food photos. Cheers! So your idea is that old people are so ignorant and stroked that they need "assisted posting" via Facebook? Shit. You think that beer and food and rock and roll lyrics (and some Hindu songs) are all life is about? No wonder you think Banjo is a genius on the up and up. Oh my! >>> BenjJi, go do an experiment. Open a FB account. You don't have to >>> write or read there. See if then you can access BanerjeeJi's page. >>> Afterwards, just delete your FB account. >> >> Are you nuts? First rule of SW. Once iunformation goes in you can never >> delete it, Only YOUR access to it gets deleted. No wonder Bill is ruling >> the world. > > You can't delete information on Usenet either. The(y)TheThem do read here. Obviously part of the same rule. > I specifically said do not write anything on FB. Just open a trial > fake account. Besides, Edward Prochak can access BanerjeeJi's FB link too. > BenjJi, you may want to now apologize for calling Banjo a anonymous dip shit. So I presume Ed is on FB too? You can't get an account without real information going in. And anyway, I've already wasted too many minutes of my life watching Banjo's stupid video and TOTALLY incompetent science. Why would I spend more just to see his (actually not so ugly) face and read more of his nonsense insane Indian blather? Why? That would make me totally stupid as well as falling for the job he has been given to do. Conservatives never apologise. Banjo IS a dip shit and still is anonymous to me. If he wants to be optherwise, then let him use all those engineering skilz he SAYS he has to fix hit worthless facebook account so it can be viewed by anyone interested. He's the one seeking fame and fortune here. MY websites (note not facebook, not twitter, Not any "help" form those who want to control what I do) all work fine even though one is under construction and another hasn't been updated in eons. We doan need no steenkin' strangers to take charge of my computer. >>>>> Here's a quote from a post from August 30 at 2:06PM by BanerjeeJi: >>>>> >>>>> “The Taj Mahal or Tejomahalaya, lawyers vs.ASI archeologists in a court >>>>> of law. Last time I visited the Taj, in 2016, I looked up to see the >>>>> image of Surya Deva smiling down on the tombs of Shan Jehan and >>>>> Mumtaz. Our guide informed us that the spire represented Lakshmi. In >>>>> those days the Mughals were truly syncretic if indeed they did build >>>>> the Taj.” >>>> >>>> Banjo doesn't know who built the Taj? I thought he knew everything? >>> >>> Birds of a feather flock together... you BenjJi claim to know everything too. >> >> Nonsense. I know nothing. I just ask higher forces and THEY know >> everything. Sometimes they tell me and sometimes not. I don't have to >> ask about Banjo. > > Just ignore BanerjeeJi then. Nobody here ineracts with AP, PV, etc... Hey I do! You trying to spoil all my fun. Banjo is HERE to get people to stop discussing real science and wander off to total insanity so they can be dismissed and discredited if they do happen to have a good idea. This is just the same as HVAC. Wake up dood! >>> Shah Jahan funded the Taj. Many architects designed it. Mostly Hindus built it. >>> There exists a myth/story, that when Taj was finished, Shah Jahan chopped off the >>> hands of 20,000+ builders plus architects so they couldn't duplicate the Taj. >> >> Sweet guy. Better than some who killed all his helpers so they could >> still help him in the afterlife. > > Hopefully it is just a myth. > >>> Same model is now==2017 used in Dubai, UAE. Guess who performs the actual engineering. >> >> A bunch of architects and engineers typing on computers with their feet? :-) > > Yes, some are doing the architecture and engineering work on their CPUs. > > Speaking of feet, most of them Indians are doing the actual building > construction work. Welding, hammering, pulleys, sky-cranes, ... > Walking and working on steel beams as much as 80 floors high and much higher. > > Nowadays, India is becoming wealthy enough that they are building > their own modern highrises in their major cities. China as already done that, been there. Have too many buildings. Get them to ship you a few. > -- Mahipal “IPMM... माहिपाल ७६३८: d(me) != 0 ... me alwa(y)s changes... Enjo(y)!” > Enjo(y)... Salute… Cheers... Open your M I N D… Time it is Is IS 3PM somePlace. >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-09-01 20:42 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <ae31aa97-3566-4772-8227-3b8ec5472dfc@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #648251 |
On Saturday, September 2, 2017 at 12:25:51 PM UTC+10, Mahipal wrote: > On Friday, September 1, 2017 at 9:47:22 PM UTC-4, benj wrote: > > On 9/1/2017 7:28 PM, Mahipal wrote: > > > On Friday, September 1, 2017 at 5:39:21 PM UTC-4, benj wrote: > > >> On 9/1/2017 7:59 AM, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > > >>> On Friday, September 1, 2017 at 5:28:21 PM UTC+10, Sylvia Else wrote: > > >> > > >>>> I'm the person calling you a troll. > > >>> > > >>> Heh-heh, bullying and persecution won't deter me nor affect my work. > > >>> > > >>> I am an engineer with 40 years of industrial and research experience. > > >>> My past is an open book. > > >>> Anyone can read it at > > >>> https://www.facebook.com/arindam.banerjee.31149359 > > >> > > >> Lies. Link is open and does not exist. One more anonymous dip shit. > > > > > > The link works just fine. Your access is being censored, BenjJi. > > > Else, do stop deliberately lying. What's going wrong with you PRO?! > > > > Are you a member of Facebook? (Oh God, don't in your infinite mercy > > allow that to be true!) I assume I can't get in because I won't sign up > > for facebook. You are right it is very embarrassing for me not to be > > able to break into facebook even with my current, limited emergency > > back-up system. I should have WAY more skilz than that. But then my > > desire to break into facebook especially to read about Banjo is pretty > > damn low. And I never lie, unless I have to. > > Of course I'm a member of Facebook. I use it to keep in touch with > friends and family, scattered the Earth over. > > BenjJi, go do an experiment. Open a FB account. You don't have to > write or read there. See if then you can access BanerjeeJi's page. > Afterwards, just delete your FB account. > > > > Here's a quote from a post from August 30 at 2:06PM by BanerjeeJi: > > > > > > “The Taj Mahal or Tejomahalaya, lawyers vs.ASI archeologists in a court > > > of law. Last time I visited the Taj, in 2016, I looked up to see the > > > image of Surya Deva smiling down on the tombs of Shan Jehan and > > > Mumtaz. Our guide informed us that the spire represented Lakshmi. In > > > those days the Mughals were truly syncretic if indeed they did build > > > the Taj.” > > > > Banjo doesn't know who built the Taj? I thought he knew everything? > > Birds of a feather flock together... you BenjJi claim to know everything too. > > Shah Jahan funded the Taj. Many architects designed it. Mostly Hindus built it. According to the late Shri P N Oak, the Taj was built around 1200AD by the Rajputs. Just to annoy benj and Co. I provide a link to an interesting discussion on metaphysics and physics between an old school friend and myself on facebook https://www.facebook.com/arindam.banerjee.31149359/posts/1888868664474255?comment_id=1892789067415548&reply_comment_id=1893722213988900¬if_t=feed_comment¬if_id=1504319520800422 See if you can get it Mahipal-ji. I just posted a link between physics and metaphysics. Cheers, Arindam Banerjee > There exists a myth/story, that when Taj was finished, Shah Jahan chopped off the > hands of 20,000+ builders plus architects so they couldn't duplicate the Taj. > > Same model is now==2017 used in Dubai, UAE. Guess who performs the actual engineering. > > -- Mahipal “IPMM... माहिपाल ७६३८: d(me) != 0 ... me alwa(y)s changes... Enjo(y)!” > Enjo(y)... Salute… Cheers... Open your M I N D… Time it is Is IS 3PM somePlace.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-09-01 17:13 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <59a9cd94$0$1899$b1db1813$46202bfe@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #648107 |
On 9/1/2017 3:28 AM, Sylvia Else wrote: > On 30/08/2017 9:52 PM, Arindam Banerjee wrote: >> On Wednesday, August 30, 2017 at 8:26:21 PM UTC+10, Sylvia Else wrote: >>> On 29/08/2017 9:53 AM, Arindam Banerjee wrote: >>>> How can life cells split, duplicate, if each atom in the cell does >>>> not divide into two? >>>> >>>> If half the atoms go there, then the power of the cell is >>>> reduced by half, quarter and so on with every division. Disastrous! >>>> Life just >>>> cannot work this way. >>>> >>>> THE BEST WAY TO EXPLAIN LIFE IS THUS THEORIZE THAT THE ATOMS SPLIT >>>> EQUALLY >>>> IN CELL DIVISION TO MAINTAIN THE STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY OF THE CELL. >>>> >>>> As the cell takes in more water from the membrane, the concentration >>>> decreases >>>> and more atoms have to get into solution to keep up the required >>>> concentration. >>>> >>>> So atoms must divide gracefully and as there are more atoms now >>>> there is the >>>> possibility for the creation of another cell. >>>> >>>> Now the mystery is that if the atoms do get halved in mass, how do >>>> they regain >>>> the mass to the original size before splitting? >>>> >>>> One may theorise here that when they get halved then they gain in >>>> size from >>>> the aether; they grow from aether as plants grow from soil. >>>> >>>> Just as plants once again turn to soil after they die. >>>> >>>> Hmm, this explains quite a lot, I think. >>>> >>>> Aether forms all masses as positive and negative charges. When the >>>> size of the >>>> atom decreases, it again builds up from the aether if it can, or >>>> vanishes into >>>> aether otherwise. >>>> >>>> Death then, happens when the cell can no longer build up its atoms >>>> from the >>>> aether. >>>> >>>> The notion that the concentration of atoms must remain constant in >>>> any solution >>>> is thus a very powerful one, as I just worked out. >>>> >>>> Whether it is a correct idea or not I do not know, but then a theory >>>> is just >>>> that, a conjecture which may or may not be validated later to the >>>> status of an >>>> universal fact (for the moment). Knowledge in science is always >>>> provisional, or >>>> else it turns into a religion like e=mcc. >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Arindam Banerjee >>>> >>> >>> This is most assuredly a troll. >>> >>> Sylvia. >> >> Who are you, the monster of this swamp? >> > I'm the person calling you a troll. > > You're espousing misconceptions so egregious that they must be deliberate. > > Sylvia. What I said. Sylvia you are right on the money as Bert would say, Oh Ya! Who else was into misconceptions? (deliberate lies) HVAC, the strategic writer, of course. Get the picture?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-08-30 16:17 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <oo6oej$q70$1@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #647857 |
Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> writes: >This is most assuredly a troll. Yes, especially with racist statements like "Europeans are all racists".
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-08-30 09:25 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <0b5044f2-c4fe-465a-8319-e05ccb1e455a@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #647873 |
MM "Yes, especially with racist statements like "Europeans are all racists". " MANY, not all, non whites are pissed at whites for consistently having superior weaponry, and hate them for it. Doesn't matter that they've all been trying to kill each other forever- when the whites come in and do the same, they're the bad guys. Black Africans had wars and took prisoners and sold them as slaves since forever. Arabs saw a money-maker and middle-manned by creating slave markets in the 1500s. Whites bought some in the 1800s, and now are blamed for slavery. Can't cure stupid, but you can take their stuff.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-08-30 17:22 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <a2804553-414b-4e63-a161-32b17c34e4fc@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #647873 |
On Thursday, August 31, 2017 at 2:17:30 AM UTC+10, Michael Moroney wrote: > Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> writes: > > >This is most assuredly a troll. > > Yes, especially with racist statements like "Europeans are all racists". And you all show how correct I am in this assessment, not that non-Europeans needed to learn any more.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-08-30 21:35 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <59a767e4$0$2090$b1db1813$be7d459e@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #647942 |
On 8/30/2017 8:22 PM, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > On Thursday, August 31, 2017 at 2:17:30 AM UTC+10, Michael Moroney wrote: >> Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> writes: >> >>> This is most assuredly a troll. >> >> Yes, especially with racist statements like "Europeans are all racists". > > And you all show how correct I am in this assessment, not that non-Europeans > needed to learn any more. > Hey banjo calling all Euros "racist" is really racist, you know. What an ignorant bigot you are. Both you and Looper need to be exposed for the racist pigs you are by favoring your own race above all others no matter what. Luckily the media has just taught us with regard to Trump, that employing violence to fight racism is not only allowed but is to be praised! Hence I am seeking great praise in fighting all this racism among Indians. Hey, you Indians are SO racist you invented the caste system so you can be racist even to your own race! Wow! That fits!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-08-30 18:44 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <7c951925-39ec-46b7-a6a4-e91285db46db@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #647962 |
On Thursday, August 31, 2017 at 11:35:35 AM UTC+10, benj wrote: > On 8/30/2017 8:22 PM, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > > On Thursday, August 31, 2017 at 2:17:30 AM UTC+10, Michael Moroney wrote: > >> Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> writes: > >> > >>> This is most assuredly a troll. > >> > >> Yes, especially with racist statements like "Europeans are all racists". > > > > And you all show how correct I am in this assessment, not that non-Europeans > > needed to learn any more. > > > Hey banjo calling all Euros "racist" is really racist, you know. nah, it is just fact proven by the long experience of undignified association. What an > ignorant bigot you are. Both you and Looper need to be exposed for the > racist pigs you are by favoring your own race above all others no matter > what. That is what benj does on behalf of the European races, following their standard practice. And so many others here, who must patronise and never learn except enough to demean and corrupt. > Luckily the media has just taught us with regard to Trump, that > employing violence to fight racism is not only allowed but is to be > praised! Hence I am seeking great praise in fighting all this racism > among Indians. Hey, you Indians are SO racist you invented the caste > system so you can be racist even to your own race! Wow! That fits! Ignorant and idiotic benj, the caste system was made to provide Indians with excellent brides and grooms; who being faithful to each other and their common traditions, would consequently lead superbly happy and productive lives, till death causes parting. It is a magnificent social custom and has nothing to do with racism, which is the invention of the white piratical tribes. Cheers, Arindam Banerjee
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-08-30 22:11 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <59a77067$0$1336$b1db1813$63a3855e@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #647963 |
On 8/30/2017 9:44 PM, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > On Thursday, August 31, 2017 at 11:35:35 AM UTC+10, benj wrote: >> On 8/30/2017 8:22 PM, Arindam Banerjee wrote: >>> On Thursday, August 31, 2017 at 2:17:30 AM UTC+10, Michael Moroney wrote: >>>> Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> writes: >>>> >>>>> This is most assuredly a troll. >>>> >>>> Yes, especially with racist statements like "Europeans are all racists". >>> >>> And you all show how correct I am in this assessment, not that non-Europeans >>> needed to learn any more. >>> >> Hey banjo calling all Euros "racist" is really racist, you know. > > nah, it is just fact proven by the long experience of undignified association. Racist! Racist! Racist! All you racists re disgusting! > What an >> ignorant bigot you are. Both you and Looper need to be exposed for the >> racist pigs you are by favoring your own race above all others no matter >> what. > > That is what benj does on behalf of the European races, following their standard practice. And so many others here, who must patronise and never learn > except enough to demean and corrupt. You always put your own race first over all others. That is such a bigot and racist. You nazis deserve what you get. And nobody should pay any attention to your evil blather. >> Luckily the media has just taught us with regard to Trump, that >> employing violence to fight racism is not only allowed but is to be >> praised! Hence I am seeking great praise in fighting all this racism >> among Indians. Hey, you Indians are SO racist you invented the caste >> system so you can be racist even to your own race! Wow! That fits! > > Ignorant and idiotic benj, the caste system was made to provide Indians with > excellent brides and grooms; who being faithful to each other and their common > traditions, would consequently lead superbly happy and productive lives, till > death causes parting. Here we go you supporting that racist, evil demeaning caste system? I take that means YOU are not forced to clean toilets instead of call youself an engineer. Sure the high castes think it's a great system just as the slave owners (a large number who were actually black) thought slavery was a great idea too! > It is a magnificent social custom and has nothing to do with racism, which is > the invention of the white piratical tribes. So magnificent that India has been passing laws and trying to stamp it out since British rule. You just proved what a racist you are! Nothing more needs be said! > Cheers, > Arindam Banerjee >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-08-30 19:18 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <c0eb5e85-2301-4d0d-b4c4-48f34ff27354@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #647969 |
On Thursday, August 31, 2017 at 12:12:04 PM UTC+10, benj wrote: > On 8/30/2017 9:44 PM, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > > On Thursday, August 31, 2017 at 11:35:35 AM UTC+10, benj wrote: > >> On 8/30/2017 8:22 PM, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > >>> On Thursday, August 31, 2017 at 2:17:30 AM UTC+10, Michael Moroney wrote: > >>>> Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> writes: > >>>> > >>>>> This is most assuredly a troll. > >>>> > >>>> Yes, especially with racist statements like "Europeans are all racists". > >>> > >>> And you all show how correct I am in this assessment, not that non-Europeans > >>> needed to learn any more. > >>> > >> Hey banjo calling all Euros "racist" is really racist, you know. > > > > nah, it is just fact proven by the long experience of undignified association. > > Racist! Racist! Racist! All you racists re disgusting! No greater racist around than you, benj. Except the absent hvac maybe. So what. Once we all know what is what we know what to do, whom to avoid, etc.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-08-30 23:27 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <59a7823a$0$31197$c3e8da3$a9097924@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #647970 |
On 8/30/2017 10:18 PM, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > On Thursday, August 31, 2017 at 12:12:04 PM UTC+10, benj wrote: >> On 8/30/2017 9:44 PM, Arindam Banerjee wrote: >>> On Thursday, August 31, 2017 at 11:35:35 AM UTC+10, benj wrote: >>>> On 8/30/2017 8:22 PM, Arindam Banerjee wrote: >>>>> On Thursday, August 31, 2017 at 2:17:30 AM UTC+10, Michael Moroney wrote: >>>>>> Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> writes: >>>>>> >>>>>>> This is most assuredly a troll. >>>>>> >>>>>> Yes, especially with racist statements like "Europeans are all racists". >>>>> >>>>> And you all show how correct I am in this assessment, not that non-Europeans >>>>> needed to learn any more. >>>>> >>>> Hey banjo calling all Euros "racist" is really racist, you know. >>> >>> nah, it is just fact proven by the long experience of undignified association. >> >> Racist! Racist! Racist! All you racists re disgusting! > > No greater racist around than you, benj. Except the absent hvac maybe. > So what. > Once we all know what is what we know what to do, whom to avoid, etc. > Avoiding truth is what you racists do. I don't believe a word you say, and anyone who isn't gullible beyond belief or racist too or both won't either.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 4 of 8 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web