Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #647675 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-08-28 16:53 -0700 |
| Last post | 2017-09-01 18:38 -0500 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 159 — 15 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-08-28 16:53 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? "nuny@bid.nes" <alien8752@gmail.com> - 2017-08-29 00:54 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-08-29 05:33 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-08-29 06:18 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-08-29 09:46 -0500
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-08-29 15:42 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2017-08-29 20:14 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-08-29 16:33 +0000
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-08-29 12:48 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-08-29 14:18 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-08-29 21:28 +0000
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-08-29 17:19 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-08-29 17:57 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-08-29 18:26 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-08-29 18:41 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2017-08-29 20:40 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-08-29 15:53 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-08-29 16:38 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-08-29 18:23 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-08-29 20:55 -0500
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-08-29 19:06 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-08-29 21:16 -0500
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-08-30 03:42 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-08-30 06:38 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-08-30 17:21 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-08-29 19:20 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-08-29 22:46 -0400
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-08-29 20:00 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-08-29 21:13 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? poraty350@gmail.com - 2017-08-30 01:21 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-08-30 03:03 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? poraty350@gmail.com - 2017-08-30 05:15 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-08-30 05:31 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2017-08-30 10:24 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-08-30 17:44 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-08-30 17:46 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-08-30 21:31 -0400
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-08-30 18:35 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-08-30 22:06 -0400
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-08-30 19:21 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-08-30 23:29 -0400
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-08-30 21:21 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-08-30 23:05 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-09-06 13:42 -0500
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-08-29 21:22 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2017-08-29 20:34 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-08-29 22:44 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2017-08-30 10:49 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-08-30 17:55 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-09-02 11:05 -0500
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-09-02 09:56 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-09-03 02:57 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-09-03 20:34 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2017-08-29 19:31 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Boris Mohar <borism_void_@sympatico.ca> - 2017-08-29 09:22 -0400
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-08-29 07:03 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-08-31 13:37 -0500
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-08-31 11:43 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2017-08-30 20:26 +1000
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-08-30 04:52 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2017-09-01 17:28 +1000
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-09-01 04:59 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-09-01 17:39 -0400
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-09-01 16:28 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-09-01 21:47 -0400
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-09-01 19:25 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-09-01 23:23 -0400
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-09-02 06:36 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-09-02 11:44 -0500
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-09-02 18:43 -0400
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-09-01 20:42 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-09-01 17:13 -0400
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-08-30 16:17 +0000
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-08-30 09:25 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-08-30 17:22 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-08-30 21:35 -0400
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-08-30 18:44 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-08-30 22:11 -0400
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-08-30 19:18 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-08-30 23:27 -0400
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-08-30 20:30 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-08-30 16:26 -0400
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2017-08-30 13:53 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-08-30 14:27 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2017-08-30 10:45 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-08-30 12:07 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2017-08-30 14:34 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-08-30 15:02 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-08-31 13:26 -0500
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-09-01 05:24 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2017-09-01 08:21 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-09-01 17:40 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-09-01 23:36 -0500
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-09-01 22:08 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-09-02 11:48 -0500
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-09-02 18:50 -0400
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-09-03 23:58 -0500
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-09-04 19:27 -0400
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-09-04 16:37 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-09-06 11:24 -0500
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-09-02 18:19 -0400
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2017-09-01 22:06 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-09-01 22:17 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-09-02 12:13 -0500
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-09-03 03:30 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-09-03 07:18 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-09-03 16:57 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-09-04 00:33 +0000
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-09-03 19:00 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-09-03 19:16 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-09-03 19:35 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-09-03 19:44 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-09-04 06:36 +0000
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-09-04 05:13 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-09-04 13:23 +0000
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-09-04 08:52 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-09-04 14:52 -0500
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-09-04 14:57 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-09-05 00:26 +0000
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-09-04 16:12 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-09-04 16:24 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-09-05 00:26 +0000
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-09-05 00:26 +0000
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-09-05 12:01 +0000
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-09-05 05:39 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-09-05 08:16 -0500
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-09-05 05:44 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-09-05 08:20 -0500
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-09-05 07:09 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-09-05 09:14 -0500
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-09-05 07:36 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-09-05 11:39 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2017-09-05 13:14 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-09-06 08:38 -0500
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-09-05 16:10 -0500
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-09-05 17:17 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-09-06 02:50 +0000
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-09-06 06:00 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-09-06 08:43 -0500
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-09-06 06:51 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-09-06 09:01 -0500
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-09-06 07:26 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-09-06 16:24 +0000
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-09-06 12:52 -0500
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-09-06 11:07 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-09-06 13:12 -0500
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-09-06 11:50 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-09-06 14:03 -0500
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-09-06 16:15 +0000
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-09-06 13:58 -0500
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-09-06 08:42 -0500
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-09-04 15:39 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-09-05 11:54 +0000
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-09-04 06:31 +0000
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Lofty Goat <rlwatkins@gmail.com> - 2017-09-04 12:29 -0500
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-09-01 14:48 -0500
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-09-01 18:06 -0500
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-09-01 20:27 -0700
Re: The gentle division of atoms in a living cell - do half go there to form another or do all atoms divide as matter is infinitely divisible? Lofty Goat <rlwatkins@gmail.com> - 2017-09-01 18:38 -0500
Page 3 of 8 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 Next page →
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-08-30 23:29 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <59a782a7$0$31197$c3e8da3$a9097924@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #647971 |
On 8/30/2017 10:21 PM, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > On Thursday, August 31, 2017 at 12:06:34 PM UTC+10, benj wrote: >> On 8/30/2017 9:35 PM, Arindam Banerjee wrote: >>> On Thursday, August 31, 2017 at 11:31:20 AM UTC+10, benj wrote: >>>> On 8/30/2017 8:46 PM, Arindam Banerjee wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> You claim to have an engineering background, but >>>>>> you do not seem to understand how to formulate >>>>>> a coherent theory. >>>>>> >>>>>> Sincerely trying to understand and help, >>>>>> Ed >>>>> >>>>> If you are sincere then sincerely go through the following video films or at >>>>> least the first few slides (same for each). >>>> >>>> Yeah, Ed. if you are sincere, View these video masterpieces and donate a >>>> few hours of your life that you'll never get back. You'll especially >>>> love Banjo's theory of an Electric field which is like a frantic mother >>>> who loses a baby! Man, Maxwell move over! The world's greatest genius >>>> (after Bert, ArchiePoo, and HVAC) is on the scene! >>>> >>>> Ed if you are sincerely trying to understand and help, your work is >>>> REALLY cut out for you! >>> >>> benj cuts in! So what's going on, anyone trying to understand what I am doing >>> or trying to say will be persecuted by the Unseen Global Mafia? >> >> Sorry, Banjo, but the REAL global Mafia is too busy trying to suppress >> REAL "new physics" and keep the truth secret to be bothered with the >> insane kooks and senile geezers found in this group. You just WISH your >> theories were correct enough to get their attention. > > Racist thugs will do anything to suppress my new physics. Their own corrupt > pseudo-scientific existences will be exposed once my new physics takes off, and > what they will be left with, is the contempt and ridicule of the ages. > > Down e=mcc > > Up e=0.5mVVN(N-k) ! > > That will happen, HTN will be made and IFE will take us to the stars. > Which is what warms me, among all the racist+bigoted devils here in these > swampy vapours. Pretty good Banjo! You nearly have the "worst case of Alzheimer's" prize nearly in the bag. Archiepoo and Bert don't stand a chance in spite of their long head start!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-08-30 21:21 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <b070a0b7-e1e8-49f1-b6f5-3b352b9021f1@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #647978 |
On Thursday, August 31, 2017 at 1:29:45 PM UTC+10, benj wrote: > On 8/30/2017 10:21 PM, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > > On Thursday, August 31, 2017 at 12:06:34 PM UTC+10, benj wrote: > >> On 8/30/2017 9:35 PM, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > >>> On Thursday, August 31, 2017 at 11:31:20 AM UTC+10, benj wrote: > >>>> On 8/30/2017 8:46 PM, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> You claim to have an engineering background, but > >>>>>> you do not seem to understand how to formulate > >>>>>> a coherent theory. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Sincerely trying to understand and help, > >>>>>> Ed > >>>>> > >>>>> If you are sincere then sincerely go through the following video films or at > >>>>> least the first few slides (same for each). > >>>> > >>>> Yeah, Ed. if you are sincere, View these video masterpieces and donate a > >>>> few hours of your life that you'll never get back. You'll especially > >>>> love Banjo's theory of an Electric field which is like a frantic mother > >>>> who loses a baby! Man, Maxwell move over! The world's greatest genius > >>>> (after Bert, ArchiePoo, and HVAC) is on the scene! > >>>> > >>>> Ed if you are sincerely trying to understand and help, your work is > >>>> REALLY cut out for you! > >>> > >>> benj cuts in! So what's going on, anyone trying to understand what I am doing > >>> or trying to say will be persecuted by the Unseen Global Mafia? > >> > >> Sorry, Banjo, but the REAL global Mafia is too busy trying to suppress > >> REAL "new physics" and keep the truth secret to be bothered with the > >> insane kooks and senile geezers found in this group. You just WISH your > >> theories were correct enough to get their attention. > > > > Racist thugs will do anything to suppress my new physics. Their own corrupt > > pseudo-scientific existences will be exposed once my new physics takes off, and > > what they will be left with, is the contempt and ridicule of the ages. > > > > Down e=mcc > > > > Up e=0.5mVVN(N-k) ! > > > > That will happen, HTN will be made and IFE will take us to the stars. > > Which is what warms me, among all the racist+bigoted devils here in these > > swampy vapours. > > Pretty good Banjo! > You nearly have the "worst case of Alzheimer's" prize nearly in the bag. > Archiepoo and Bert don't stand a chance in spite of their long head start! Heh, those guys are there to muddy the waters, and thus make it possible for the racist thugs to shoot down great science before it takes off, by making such ridiculous and odious comparisons as you have done, benj. Once busted, though, you all look pretty pathetic. Cheer up, go do something else. Eat an icecream.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-08-30 23:05 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <2dbbaa85-e481-4850-9270-12e5e1e35512@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #647985 |
Ay ay ay
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-09-06 13:42 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <oopfjm$5ba$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #647985 |
>>> That will happen, HTN will be made and IFE will take us to the stars.
>>> Which is what warms me, among all the racist+bigoted devils here in these
>>> swampy vapours.
>>
>> Pretty good Banjo!
>> You nearly have the "worst case of Alzheimer's" prize nearly in the bag.
>> Archiepoo and Bert don't stand a chance in spite of their long head start!
>
> Heh, those guys are there to muddy the waters, and thus make it possible for the
> racist thugs to shoot down great science before it takes off, by making such
> ridiculous and odious comparisons as you have done, benj.
>
> Once busted, though, you all look pretty pathetic. Cheer up, go do something
> else. Eat an icecream.
he means eat *WHITE* ice cream.
Vinilla WHITE, made from WHITE milk and WHITE sugar !!
why is Milk WHITE ? because it is good !
[does that make a difference? no? then you not a racist.]
https://www.rt.com/shows/watching-the-hawks/402145-north-korea-tensions-talks/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-08-29 21:22 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <3a7b33c9-8549-4f99-a733-7d01773421d4@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #647833 |
On Wednesday, August 30, 2017 at 12:46:45 PM UTC+10, benj wrote: > On 8/29/2017 9:55 PM, Serg io wrote: > > On 8/29/2017 5:53 PM, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > >> On Wednesday, August 30, 2017 at 5:48:57 AM UTC+10, john wrote: > >>> MM > >>> " > >>> > >>> No, it is just stupid, and long disproven. > >>> " > >>> And Michael is not being racist, Arindam. > >> > >> You are all racists and bigots here, albeit to various extents. One > >> lot (like > >> benj) is honest and the rest are hypocritical. > > > > calling someone racist bigot because they do not agree with you is just > > what our Democratic party want! > > Banjo needs to learn from American Democrats that using violence against > those who are racist and bigots is OK. Such violence is above any > criticism even by the president. I learned that much from them. But I am not violent. Not at all. Whether people agree with me or not is after all their business, but I am confident that if my racial and religious background was different my new ideas would have got a much warmer and encouraging reception. And would be very well funded, too, by the powers that be. As things are, they ignore me as much as they can, so much so that even the trashiest media finds me not interesting at all, and thus do not heed my discovery that the Lorenz force does not have a reaction. Cheers,m Arindam Banerjee
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-08-29 20:34 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <96d6bb68-3124-43a5-8606-5c447664fd63@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #647792 |
On Tuesday, August 29, 2017 at 6:53:54 PM UTC-4, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > On Wednesday, August 30, 2017 at 5:48:57 AM UTC+10, john wrote: > > MM > > " > > > > No, it is just stupid, and long disproven. > > " > > And Michael is not being racist, Arindam. > > You are all [] Tsk,tsk. Remember what you said about name callers. Please don't fail to take your own advice. > > > Cellular mitosis divides genes exactly in two. Cell cytoplasm is divided approximately in two. Mitochondria are divided approximately in two. > > Exactly what I am saying. How does one cell divide into another exactly if > all the atoms in the cell are not exactly reproduced with some process that is unknown? It is clearly known. The chromosomes (DNA) molecules do not just split, they are copied by unzipping and adding matching ATCG molecules from the surrounding solution. They are such large molecules you can practically see this in an ordinary microscope. > > I am making the hypothesis that as the solution increases in the cell the > molecules in the cell get diluted, so to keep the concentration constant the > molecules increase in number. This can only happen when the molecules divide > to form more molecules. Smaller is size, yes, to begin with, in the law of > conservation of mass is valid for this case. If not, then the molecule size > increases to normal by absorption of aether to the required level. Violating conservation of mass/energy. And you claim to be a smart engineer? You really are just trolling, right??? > > So growth of any being is about absorption of aether by the smaller molecules, > to become bigger. So then why would any living cell ever need to eat? It could just split its first meal by continuously diluting it. And this raises the question: Why doesn't the solution continuously absorbed size "from the aether" and then make duplicate smaller atoms which grow and duplicate again? IOW, what are the rules for the size changes? > > Call whatever names you like - mitosis, etc. - the fact remains that if one > cell breaks into two the molecules have to increase by a number of two in the > cell about to divide into two, in order to produce two cells. Yes and the splitting DNA is made by adding molecules. > > This simple and basic fact is so obvious, it has been missed by the greatest > minds. BECAUSE it is not a fact. It is conjecture at best and contrary to observed experimental data. > > "What fools these humans be!" > > > > Atomic division is called fission. > > That is the completely different RADIOACTIVE process. It is NOT division. > It is SUBSTRACTION. > > > There is no mechanism of dividing atomic nuclei without > > ending with different elements. Life needs those Carbons to remain intact. > > I am proposing something very obvious, and what is fundamental to life, and > its growth. > > Cheers, > Arindam Banerjee Not obvious, just wrong. It does not matching any experimental data. Ed
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-08-29 22:44 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <4d2d87d9-02d0-4a9a-aba0-d65b8e430f36@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #647838 |
On Wednesday, August 30, 2017 at 1:34:36 PM UTC+10, Edward Prochak wrote: > On Tuesday, August 29, 2017 at 6:53:54 PM UTC-4, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > > On Wednesday, August 30, 2017 at 5:48:57 AM UTC+10, john wrote: > > > MM > > > " > > > > > > No, it is just stupid, and long disproven. > > > " > > > And Michael is not being racist, Arindam. > > > > You are all [] > > Tsk,tsk. > Remember what you said about name callers. > Please don't fail to take your own advice. I am not calling names. I am merely stating facts. The whites were racists throughout their stay in India and other lands they colonised. Racism was a natural way of life for them. Practically all black leaders say this, unless they are Uncle Toms. So as racism is natural to them as being a heathen or pagan is to me, I don't see this as an insult. Like, I won't be insulted when I am called a cow-worshipping heathen. That the Europeans are all racists and bigots with very few exceptions, is a fact of life we all need to learn. It does not mean that they will behave badly to the rest - on the contrary they will be very nice in their attempts to patronise. But as they are racists and bigots first and foremost, they will object any display of genuine superiority from others, of the kind that has the scope of making them feel inferior. In other words, only they, or their own chosen people, have any right to make startling new discoveries they have missed. > > > Cellular mitosis divides genes exactly in two. Cell cytoplasm is divided approximately in two. Mitochondria are divided approximately in two. > > > > Exactly what I am saying. How does one cell divide into another exactly if > > all the atoms in the cell are not exactly reproduced with some process that is unknown? > > It is clearly known. The chromosomes (DNA) molecules do not just split, > they are copied by unzipping and adding matching ATCG molecules from > the surrounding solution. > They are such large molecules you can practically see this > in an ordinary microscope. Well so the solution provides the extra molecules somehow so that the numbers of molecules increase just as I said. The unzipping process relates to the extra molecule formation. Bottom line is that the extra solution provided for extra molecules. Now we have to see whether the law of conservation of mass is violated in this process or not. If it is, then we have to conclude that aether is becoming matter in this, ah, lively process. In short the growing baby is an indication that aether is becoming matter. Note: aether may be analogised to the soil that grows plants. Plants take in soil - when they die the soil is returned. > > I am making the hypothesis that as the solution increases in the cell the > > molecules in the cell get diluted, so to keep the concentration constant the > > molecules increase in number. This can only happen when the molecules divide > > to form more molecules. Smaller is size, yes, to begin with, in the law of > > conservation of mass is valid for this case. If not, then the molecule size > > increases to normal by absorption of aether to the required level. > > Violating conservation of mass/energy. Maybe. In any case we cannot doubt that the molecules double in number before splitting. > And you claim to be a smart engineer? Smart engineers have no use for e=mcc. Read my posts here over the last few months. I have used my engineering skills to make the amoeba of an interstellar spaceship. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3sSPxGsLkws IFE - 4 Evolution of spaceship > You really are just trolling, right??? I am not dogmatic, nor have I have science into a religion like the closed-minded pseudo-scientists. You sound desperate. > > > > So growth of any being is about absorption of aether by the smaller molecules, > > to become bigger. > > So then why would any living cell ever need to eat? > It could just split its first meal by continuously diluting it. > > And this raises the question: > Why doesn't the solution continuously absorbed size "from the aether" > and then make duplicate smaller atoms which grow and duplicate again? > IOW, what are the rules for the size changes? > > > > > Call whatever names you like - mitosis, etc. - the fact remains that if one > > cell breaks into two the molecules have to increase by a number of two in the > > cell about to divide into two, in order to produce two cells. > > Yes and the splitting DNA is made by adding molecules. > > > > > This simple and basic fact is so obvious, it has been missed by the greatest > > minds. > > BECAUSE it is not a fact. It is conjecture at best and > contrary to observed experimental data. > > > > "What fools these humans be!" > > > > > > > Atomic division is called fission. > > > > That is the completely different RADIOACTIVE process. It is NOT division. > > It is SUBSTRACTION. > > > > > There is no mechanism of dividing atomic nuclei without > > > ending with different elements. Life needs those Carbons to remain intact. > > > > I am proposing something very obvious, and what is fundamental to life, and > > its growth. > > > > Cheers, > > Arindam Banerjee > > Not obvious, just wrong. It does not matching any experimental data. > Ed
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-08-30 10:49 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <8a80fef8-1abf-4b2f-b964-d21164079d4c@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #647847 |
On Wednesday, August 30, 2017 at 1:44:46 AM UTC-4, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > On Wednesday, August 30, 2017 at 1:34:36 PM UTC+10, Edward Prochak wrote: > > On Tuesday, August 29, 2017 at 6:53:54 PM UTC-4, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > > > On Wednesday, August 30, 2017 at 5:48:57 AM UTC+10, john wrote: > > > > MM > > > > " > > > > > > > > No, it is just stupid, and long disproven. > > > > " > > > > And Michael is not being racist, Arindam. > > > > > > You are all [] > > > > Tsk,tsk. > > Remember what you said about name callers. > > Please don't fail to take your own advice. > > I am not calling names. I am merely stating facts. Ah, special rules. When you say it, it is not name calling, got it. > The whites were racists > throughout their stay in India and other lands they colonised. Racism was a > natural way of life for them. Practically all black leaders say this, unless > they are Uncle Toms. So as racism is natural to them as being a heathen or pagan > is to me, I don't see this as an insult. Like, I won't be insulted when I am > called a cow-worshipping heathen. > > That the Europeans are all racists and bigots with very few exceptions, Yet when you say it, it is not racism. Right. (insert a little sarcasm above) [] > > > > > Cellular mitosis divides genes exactly in two. Cell cytoplasm is divided approximately in two. Mitochondria are divided approximately in two. > > > > > > Exactly what I am saying. How does one cell divide into another exactly if > > > all the atoms in the cell are not exactly reproduced with some process that is unknown? > > > > It is clearly known. The chromosomes (DNA) molecules do not just split, > > they are copied by unzipping and adding matching ATCG molecules from > > the surrounding solution. > > They are such large molecules you can practically see this > > in an ordinary microscope. > > Well so the solution provides the extra molecules somehow so that the numbers > of molecules increase just as I said. > Well so the solution provides...somehow... Magic? > The unzipping process relates to the > extra molecule formation. Bottom line is that the extra solution provided for > extra molecules. Now we have to see whether the law of conservation of mass > is violated in this process or not. Based on your description conservation laws are clearly violated. IOW for your description to be true, there has to be totally new physics, that somehow magically gone undetected for about 200 years or more. > If it is, then we have to conclude that > aether is becoming matter in this, ah, lively process. In short the growing > baby is an indication that aether is becoming matter. Nonsense. It does not follow from the premise. > Note: aether may be > analogised to the soil that grows plants. Plants take in soil > - when they die the soil is returned. An analogy does not help you here. > > > > I am making the hypothesis that as the solution increases in the cell the > > > molecules in the cell get diluted, so to keep the concentration constant the > > > molecules increase in number. This can only happen when the molecules divide > > > to form more molecules. Smaller is size, yes, to begin with, in the law of > > > conservation of mass is valid for this case. If not, then the molecule size > > > increases to normal by absorption of aether to the required level. > > > > Violating conservation of mass/energy. > > Maybe. In any case we cannot doubt that the molecules double in number > before splitting. Wrong conclusion again. Pretty much all of the scientific community can and does doubt that the number of molecules of the solute doubles when diluted by a solvent. > > > And you claim to be a smart engineer? > > Smart engineers have no use for e=mcc. > Read my posts here over the last few months. Are you not paying attention? Do you have short term memory loss. We have been discussing back and forth for months on this and other topics. Do you not look at the name of who you are replying to? [snip youtube link. You post here, you discuss here. > > > You really are just trolling, right??? > > I am not dogmatic, nor have I have science into a religion like the > closed-minded pseudo-scientists. > > You sound desperate. You are funny. What sounds desperate to you? I have not called you names. I have tried to appeal to your pride. I have tried to engage your intelligence. I have pointed out flaws in this homeopathic theory of variable size atoms, but not blamed you for it (since you are not claiming it as your theory). > > > > > > So growth of any being is about absorption of aether by the smaller molecules, > > > to become bigger. > > > > So then why would any living cell ever need to eat? > > It could just split its first meal by continuously diluting it. > > > > And this raises the question: > > Why doesn't the solution continuously absorbed size "from the aether" > > and then make duplicate smaller atoms which grow and duplicate again? > > IOW, what are the rules for the size changes? No answer for this question? [] > > > I am proposing something very obvious, and what is fundamental to life, and > > > its growth. > > > > > > Cheers, > > > Arindam Banerjee > > > > Not obvious, just wrong. It does not matching any experimental data. > > Ed Please Arindam. Think about it and try to answer some of my questions. I think you will begin to see that the resizing atoms theory cannot fit known experimental data. Ed
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-08-30 17:55 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <564ce6f4-29ee-4ee4-9c2a-95f4202f68cd@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #647888 |
On Thursday, August 31, 2017 at 4:16:18 AM UTC+10, Edward Prochak wrote: > On Wednesday, August 30, 2017 at 1:44:46 AM UTC-4, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > > On Wednesday, August 30, 2017 at 1:34:36 PM UTC+10, Edward Prochak wrote: > > > On Tuesday, August 29, 2017 at 6:53:54 PM UTC-4, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > > > > On Wednesday, August 30, 2017 at 5:48:57 AM UTC+10, john wrote: > > > > > MM > > > > > " > > > > > > > > > > No, it is just stupid, and long disproven. > > > > > " > > > > > And Michael is not being racist, Arindam. > > > > > > > > You are all [] > > > > > > Tsk,tsk. > > > Remember what you said about name callers. > > > Please don't fail to take your own advice. > > > > I am not calling names. I am merely stating facts. > > Ah, special rules. When you say it, it is not name calling, > got it. Facts are facts. > > The whites were racists > > throughout their stay in India and other lands they colonised. Racism was a > > natural way of life for them. Practically all black leaders say this, unless > > they are Uncle Toms. So as racism is natural to them as being a heathen or pagan > > is to me, I don't see this as an insult. Like, I won't be insulted when I am > > called a cow-worshipping heathen. > > > > That the Europeans are all racists and bigots with very few exceptions, > > Yet when you say it, it is not racism. Right. > (insert a little sarcasm above) Certainly I am right. From the point of view of the European racists, nothing I do as a non-white which does not suck up to European superiority and challenges it instead, prove them to be howlingly wrong like e=mcc, can possibly be right. Now this is racism. Institutions like Nobel Prize, etc. were created to concretise this racism. To ignore the talented non-whites, promote their lickers, demean non-white traditions, has been the ongoing practice for centuries. > > [] > > > > > > > Cellular mitosis divides genes exactly in two. Cell cytoplasm is divided approximately in two. Mitochondria are divided approximately in two. > > > > > > > > Exactly what I am saying. How does one cell divide into another exactly if > > > > all the atoms in the cell are not exactly reproduced with some process that is unknown? > > > > > > It is clearly known. The chromosomes (DNA) molecules do not just split, > > > they are copied by unzipping and adding matching ATCG molecules from > > > the surrounding solution. > > > They are such large molecules you can practically see this > > > in an ordinary microscope. > > > > Well so the solution provides the extra molecules somehow so that the numbers > > of molecules increase just as I said. > > > Well so the solution provides...somehow... > > Magic? Indeed the universe is magical and this duplication of atoms is one wonder. What we do not yet understand, belongs to the realm of the Divine and so is magic. - snip - Cheers, Arindam Banerjee
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-09-02 11:05 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <ooekth$4ne$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #647792 |
On 8/29/2017 5:53 PM, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > On Wednesday, August 30, 2017 at 5:48:57 AM UTC+10, john wrote: >> MM >> " >> >> No, it is just stupid, and long disproven. >> " >> And Michael is not being racist, Arindam. > > You are all racists and bigots here, albeit to various extents. One lot (like > benj) is honest and the rest are hypocritical. "If anyone disagrees with me, they are a racist and a bigot." (Hillary Clinton) > >> Cellular mitosis divides genes exactly in two. Cell cytoplasm is divided approximately in two. Mitochondria are divided approximately in two. > > Exactly what I am saying. How does one cell divide into another exactly if > all the atoms in the cell are not exactly reproduced with some process that is unknown? the process is known and documented and used. > > I am making the hypothesis that as the solution increases in the cell the > molecules in the cell get diluted, so to keep the concentration constant the > molecules increase in number. no, they let the solution out via pores in the cell wall. > This can only happen when the molecules divide > to form more molecules. Smaller is size, yes, to begin with, in the law of > conservation of mass is valid for this case. If not, then the molecule size > increases to normal by absorption of aether to the required level. aether is nothing, how can a molecules absorb nothing and get bigger ? > > So growth of any being is about absorption of aether by the smaller molecules, > to become bigger. aether is nothing, how can a molecules absorb nothing and get bigger ? > > Call whatever names you like - mitosis, etc. - the fact remains that if one > cell breaks that is not mitosis, that is breaking. google DNA > into two the molecules have to increase by a number of two in the > cell about to divide into two, in order to produce two cells. > > This simple and basic fact is so obvious, it has been missed by the greatest > minds. did your mind miss out on "biology" ? > > "What fools these humans be!" replace "these" with "this" > > >> Atomic division is called fission. you break neculus, nature dosent like that. > > That is the completely different RADIOACTIVE process. It is NOT division. > It is SUBSTRACTION. why ? > >> There is no mechanism of dividing atomic nuclei without ending with different elements. Life needs those Carbons to remain intact. > > I am proposing something very obvious, and what is fundamental to life, and > its growth. try again, explain more > > Cheers, > Arindam Banerjee >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-09-02 09:56 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <a0027be4-94b3-448e-972a-d99a55abc507@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #648335 |
Sir Geo Aether is 'everything else'. ALL the rest of the energy. It exists, trust me. Nevertheless, atoms being 'knots' or 'standing waves' of energy, in a particular aether, they need a HUGE energy event to be produced. They don't just 'sprout'.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-09-03 02:57 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <254a83e1-e7b2-4495-85ea-37e686bd5232@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #648335 |
On Sunday, September 3, 2017 at 2:06:15 AM UTC+10, Serg io wrote: > On 8/29/2017 5:53 PM, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > > On Wednesday, August 30, 2017 at 5:48:57 AM UTC+10, john wrote: > >> MM > >> " > >> > >> No, it is just stupid, and long disproven. > >> " > >> And Michael is not being racist, Arindam. > > > > You are all racists and bigots here, albeit to various extents. One lot (like > > benj) is honest and the rest are hypocritical. > > "If anyone disagrees with me, they are a racist and a bigot." (Hillary > Clinton) Hillary Clinton is not the greatest genius of all time who is also a brown and unapologetic Hindu. I am not a politician, either. I am someone who has been persecuted and hounded out of employment by the racists and bigots for my new ideas in physics which upset their cosy thought structures. > > > > >> Cellular mitosis divides genes exactly in two. Cell cytoplasm is divided approximately in two. Mitochondria are divided approximately in two. > > > > Exactly what I am saying. How does one cell divide into another exactly if > > all the atoms in the cell are not exactly reproduced with some process that is unknown? > > the process is known and documented and used. blah So is e=mcc nonsense. Cheers, Arindam Banerjee
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-09-03 20:34 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <b50d27db-5e3b-433e-b566-5350248e6081@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #648335 |
On Sunday, September 3, 2017 at 2:06:15 AM UTC+10, Serg io wrote: > On 8/29/2017 5:53 PM, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > > On Wednesday, August 30, 2017 at 5:48:57 AM UTC+10, john wrote: > >> MM > >> " > >> > >> No, it is just stupid, and long disproven. > >> " > >> And Michael is not being racist, Arindam. > > > > You are all racists and bigots here, albeit to various extents. One lot (like > > benj) is honest and the rest are hypocritical. > > "If anyone disagrees with me, they are a racist and a bigot." (Hillary > Clinton) > > > > >> Cellular mitosis divides genes exactly in two. Cell cytoplasm is divided approximately in two. Mitochondria are divided approximately in two. > > > > Exactly what I am saying. How does one cell divide into another exactly if > > all the atoms in the cell are not exactly reproduced with some process that is unknown? > > the process is known and documented and used. > > > > > I am making the hypothesis that as the solution increases in the cell the > > molecules in the cell get diluted, so to keep the concentration constant the > > molecules increase in number. > > no, they let the solution out via pores in the cell wall. Google is our friend. https://www.google.com.au/search?dcr=0&source=hp&q=how+does+a+cell+divide&oq=how+does+a+cell+divide&gs_l=psy-ab.3..0l3.2075354.2081957.0.2082770.28.24.0.0.0.0.396.3961.0j1j8j6.15.0.foo%2Ccfro%3D1%2Cnso-ehuqi%3D1%2Cnso-ehuui%3D1%2Cewh%3D0%2Cnso-mplt%3D2%2Cnso-enksa%3D0%2Cnso-enfk%3D1%2Cnso-usnt%3D1%2Cnso-qnt-npqp%3D0-1701%2Cnso-qnt-npdq%3D0-54%2Cnso-qnt-npt%3D0-1%2Cnso-qnt-ndc%3D300%2Ccspa-dspm-nm-mnp%3D0-05%2Ccspa-dspm-nm-mxp%3D0-125%2Cnso-unt-npqp%3D0-17%2Cnso-unt-npdq%3D0-54%2Cnso-unt-npt%3D0-0602%2Cnso-unt-ndc%3D300%2Ccspa-uipm-nm-mnp%3D0-007525%2Ccspa-uipm-nm-mxp%3D0-052675...0...1.1.64.psy-ab..14.14.3765.0..0i131k1j0i13k1j0i22i30k1.dPHZLbBCPaY Pretty clear that when cells become big they divide. > > > This can only happen when the molecules divide > > to form more molecules. Smaller is size, yes, to begin with, in the law of > > conservation of mass is valid for this case. If not, then the molecule size > > increases to normal by absorption of aether to the required level. > > aether is nothing, how can a molecules absorb nothing and get bigger ? Aether is a solid made up of infinitely fine matter. Aether thus can provide extra matter to the cell when needed at the time of replication. Thus we see aether as the breath of God, creating life. Aether fills the entire universe including the space in atoms. As mentioned before, aether thus supports all the information, all the energy transmission, in the infinite universe. So aether is not nothing. It is in everything, as the infinite infinities of infinitely small matter. It is also the carrier and foundation of emotions, intellect, spirituality, soul and all that is abstract. So cells are formed from aether and other constituents as aether is matter, and when they die this aether blends once again into the larger aether space. Cheers, Arindam Banerjee > > > > > So growth of any being is about absorption of aether by the smaller molecules, > > to become bigger. > > aether is nothing, how can a molecules absorb nothing and get bigger ? > > > > > Call whatever names you like - mitosis, etc. - the fact remains that if one > > cell breaks > > that is not mitosis, that is breaking. google DNA > > > into two the molecules have to increase by a number of two in the > > cell about to divide into two, in order to produce two cells. > > > > This simple and basic fact is so obvious, it has been missed by the greatest > > minds. > > did your mind miss out on "biology" ? > > > > > "What fools these humans be!" > > replace "these" with "this" > > > > > > >> Atomic division is called fission. > > you break neculus, nature dosent like that. > > > > > > That is the completely different RADIOACTIVE process. It is NOT division. > > It is SUBSTRACTION. > > why ? > > > > >> There is no mechanism of dividing atomic nuclei without ending with different elements. Life needs those Carbons to remain intact. > > > > I am proposing something very obvious, and what is fundamental to life, and > > its growth. > > try again, explain more > > > > > Cheers, > > Arindam Banerjee > >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-08-29 19:31 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <89faea76-d454-47d1-9f36-0ec9ebb7c0de@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #647769 |
On Tuesday, August 29, 2017 at 3:48:57 PM UTC-4, john wrote: > MM > " > > No, it is just stupid, and long disproven. > " > And Michael is not being racist, Arindam. > Cellular mitosis divides genes exactly in two. Cell cytoplasm > is divided approximately in two. Mitochondria are divided > approximately in two. > > Atomic division is called fission. There is no mechanism of > dividing atomic nuclei without ending with different elements. > Life needs those Carbons to remain intact. Wow, John. I am impressed. You spoke some clear scientific facts. Doesn't that feel good? Have a good evening. Ed
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Boris Mohar <borism_void_@sympatico.ca> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-08-29 09:22 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <eeqaqct5ouo5ttm5tgsa5aq9hnvmk9neo3@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #647675 |
On Mon, 28 Aug 2017 16:53:11 -0700 (PDT), Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> wrote: >How can life cells split, duplicate, if each atom in the cell does not divide into two? > >If half the atoms go there, then the power of the cell is >reduced by half, quarter and so on with every division. Disastrous! Life just >cannot work this way. > >THE BEST WAY TO EXPLAIN LIFE IS THUS THEORIZE THAT THE ATOMS SPLIT EQUALLY >IN CELL DIVISION TO MAINTAIN THE STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY OF THE CELL. > Weigh a sealed Petri dish with growing culture few times and get back to us. -- Boris --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-08-29 07:03 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <8dd2b999-b0a6-44cf-afee-9fe755a64b8b@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #647735 |
On Tuesday, August 29, 2017 at 11:22:42 PM UTC+10, Boris Mohar wrote: > On Mon, 28 Aug 2017 16:53:11 -0700 (PDT), Arindam Banerjee > <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> wrote: > > >How can life cells split, duplicate, if each atom in the cell does not divide into two? > > > >If half the atoms go there, then the power of the cell is > >reduced by half, quarter and so on with every division. Disastrous! Life just > >cannot work this way. > > > >THE BEST WAY TO EXPLAIN LIFE IS THUS THEORIZE THAT THE ATOMS SPLIT EQUALLY > >IN CELL DIVISION TO MAINTAIN THE STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY OF THE CELL. > > > > Weigh a sealed Petri dish with growing culture few times and get back to us. good advice to biomedical people. On the other hand babies are weighed regularly and they normally register a gain in mass. So if they gain say 10 gms per day, by e=mcc they have used up the universe's energy by 0.01*9*10^16 joules which is a substantial amount of energy and more than could be got from the mother's breast. Cheers, Arindam Banerjee > -- > Boris > > --- > This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. > https://www.avast.com/antivirus
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-08-31 13:37 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <oo9l1s$srs$5@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #647739 |
On 8/29/17 9:03 AM, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > On Tuesday, August 29, 2017 at 11:22:42 PM UTC+10, Boris Mohar wrote: >> On Mon, 28 Aug 2017 16:53:11 -0700 (PDT), Arindam Banerjee >> <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> How can life cells split, duplicate, if each atom in the cell does not divide into two? >>> >>> If half the atoms go there, then the power of the cell is >>> reduced by half, quarter and so on with every division. Disastrous! Life just >>> cannot work this way. >>> >>> THE BEST WAY TO EXPLAIN LIFE IS THUS THEORIZE THAT THE ATOMS SPLIT EQUALLY >>> IN CELL DIVISION TO MAINTAIN THE STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY OF THE CELL. >>> >> >> Weigh a sealed Petri dish with growing culture few times and get back to us. > > good advice to biomedical people. > On the other hand babies are weighed regularly and they normally register a > gain in mass. > So if they gain say 10 gms per day, > by e=mcc > they have used up the universe's energy by > 0.01*9*10^16 joules > which is a substantial amount of energy and more than could be got from the > mother's breast. Fortunately, the breast does not provide this in the form of energy. The breast provides it in the form of matter, more than 10 grams a day. Good lord you are dense beyond measure. What happened to you? > > Cheers, > Arindam Banerjee >> -- >> Boris >> >> --- >> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. >> https://www.avast.com/antivirus > -- Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-08-31 11:43 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <9fcac51f-3640-49e2-baad-107aa7576c21@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #648044 |
Odd "Good lord you are dense beyond measure. What happened to you? " PreAlzie possibly
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-08-30 20:26 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <f0ni67F2i25U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #647675 |
On 29/08/2017 9:53 AM, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > How can life cells split, duplicate, if each atom in the cell does not divide into two? > > If half the atoms go there, then the power of the cell is > reduced by half, quarter and so on with every division. Disastrous! Life just > cannot work this way. > > THE BEST WAY TO EXPLAIN LIFE IS THUS THEORIZE THAT THE ATOMS SPLIT EQUALLY > IN CELL DIVISION TO MAINTAIN THE STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY OF THE CELL. > > As the cell takes in more water from the membrane, the concentration decreases > and more atoms have to get into solution to keep up the required concentration. > > So atoms must divide gracefully and as there are more atoms now there is the > possibility for the creation of another cell. > > Now the mystery is that if the atoms do get halved in mass, how do they regain > the mass to the original size before splitting? > > One may theorise here that when they get halved then they gain in size from > the aether; they grow from aether as plants grow from soil. > > Just as plants once again turn to soil after they die. > > Hmm, this explains quite a lot, I think. > > Aether forms all masses as positive and negative charges. When the size of the > atom decreases, it again builds up from the aether if it can, or vanishes into > aether otherwise. > > Death then, happens when the cell can no longer build up its atoms from the > aether. > > The notion that the concentration of atoms must remain constant in any solution > is thus a very powerful one, as I just worked out. > > Whether it is a correct idea or not I do not know, but then a theory is just > that, a conjecture which may or may not be validated later to the status of an > universal fact (for the moment). Knowledge in science is always provisional, or > else it turns into a religion like e=mcc. > > Cheers, > Arindam Banerjee > This is most assuredly a troll. Sylvia.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-08-30 04:52 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <1e2ad13f-6eaa-4248-a6ba-247f7df7a399@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #647857 |
On Wednesday, August 30, 2017 at 8:26:21 PM UTC+10, Sylvia Else wrote: > On 29/08/2017 9:53 AM, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > > How can life cells split, duplicate, if each atom in the cell does not divide into two? > > > > If half the atoms go there, then the power of the cell is > > reduced by half, quarter and so on with every division. Disastrous! Life just > > cannot work this way. > > > > THE BEST WAY TO EXPLAIN LIFE IS THUS THEORIZE THAT THE ATOMS SPLIT EQUALLY > > IN CELL DIVISION TO MAINTAIN THE STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY OF THE CELL. > > > > As the cell takes in more water from the membrane, the concentration decreases > > and more atoms have to get into solution to keep up the required concentration. > > > > So atoms must divide gracefully and as there are more atoms now there is the > > possibility for the creation of another cell. > > > > Now the mystery is that if the atoms do get halved in mass, how do they regain > > the mass to the original size before splitting? > > > > One may theorise here that when they get halved then they gain in size from > > the aether; they grow from aether as plants grow from soil. > > > > Just as plants once again turn to soil after they die. > > > > Hmm, this explains quite a lot, I think. > > > > Aether forms all masses as positive and negative charges. When the size of the > > atom decreases, it again builds up from the aether if it can, or vanishes into > > aether otherwise. > > > > Death then, happens when the cell can no longer build up its atoms from the > > aether. > > > > The notion that the concentration of atoms must remain constant in any solution > > is thus a very powerful one, as I just worked out. > > > > Whether it is a correct idea or not I do not know, but then a theory is just > > that, a conjecture which may or may not be validated later to the status of an > > universal fact (for the moment). Knowledge in science is always provisional, or > > else it turns into a religion like e=mcc. > > > > Cheers, > > Arindam Banerjee > > > > This is most assuredly a troll. > > Sylvia. Who are you, the monster of this swamp?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 3 of 8 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web