Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #607967 > unrolled thread

This Guy Makes Sam Wormley Look Sane

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  This Guy Makes Sam Wormley Look Sane "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2016-12-05 15:38 -0800
    Re: This Guy Makes Sam Wormley Look Sane Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-12-05 16:47 -0800
    thiS Guy noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-12-05 17:44 -0800
      Re: thiS Guy noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-12-06 13:05 -0800
        Re: thiS Guy "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-12-07 10:05 -0800
          Re: thiS Guy jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-12-07 18:43 +0000
            Re: thiS Guy olli.dp3@gmail.com - 2016-12-07 16:37 -0800
          Re: thiS Guy "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-12-07 11:05 -0800
        you, who noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-12-07 20:59 -0800
      thiS Guy, doesn't watch television per se but noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-12-08 10:58 -0800
        Re: thiS Guy, doesn't watch television per se but noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-12-09 13:14 -0800
    Re: This Guy Makes Sam Wormley Look Sane Yousuf Khan <bbbl67@spammenot.yahoo.com> - 2016-12-12 22:01 -0500

#607967 — This Guy Makes Sam Wormley Look Sane

  Apparently it's Too Late and humanity has less than a decade before we go extinct:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zqIt93dDG1M

  My wife's comment: "Doesn't anyone remember Y2K?"


  Mark L. Fergerson

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#607980

On Monday, December 5, 2016 at 6:38:14 PM UTC-5, nu...@bid.nes wrote:
> Apparently it's Too Late and humanity has less than a decade before we go extinct:
> 
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zqIt93dDG1M
> 
>   My wife's comment: "Doesn't anyone remember Y2K?"
> 
>   Mark L. Fergerson

MarkJi, great, just freaking great! In ten years I would've qualified
for social security. Now I won't need it. The gov will save... pennies!

USA is powered by FUD (== FearUncertaintyDoubt) and taxes cures all.

-- Mahipal, pronounced "My Pal" or "Maple"... as in Loops, Syrup, Wood. 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#607982 — thiS Guy

I don't wath television, but
I do recall something about '000;
if you want to be very safe, use an implied infinitum of zeroes
in a ten-adic datum

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#608075 — Re: thiS Guy

that is to say that a larger number is subtracted
from a smaller number in strict decimal format a la Stevin,
I'm sure that it's just that simple ... no matter,
what a gagle of gOglX clownsuits ... are wearing tonight at the ball

> if you want to be very safe, use an implied infinitum of zeroes
> in a ten-adic datum

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#608164 — Re: thiS Guy

On Tuesday, December 6, 2016 at 1:05:54 PM UTC-8, noTthaTguY wrote:
> that is to say that a larger number is subtracted
> from a smaller number in strict decimal format a la Stevin,
> I'm sure that it's just that simple ... no matter,
> what a gagle of gOglX clownsuits ... are wearing tonight at the ball
> 
> > if you want to be very safe, use an implied infinitum of zeroes
> > in a ten-adic datum

Sam left but is still popular.That tells us something.TreBert

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#608183 — Re: thiS Guy

reber g=emc^2 <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tuesday, December 6, 2016 at 1:05:54 PM UTC-8, noTthaTguY wrote:
>> that is to say that a larger number is subtracted
>> from a smaller number in strict decimal format a la Stevin,
>> I'm sure that it's just that simple ... no matter,
>> what a gagle of gOglX clownsuits ... are wearing tonight at the ball
>> 
>> > if you want to be very safe, use an implied infinitum of zeroes
>> > in a ten-adic datum
> 
> Sam left but is still popular.That tells us something.TreBert

Being talked about and popular are two different things.

Vlad the Impaler, Pol Pot and Stalin are talked about.


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#608240 — Re: thiS Guy

On Wednesday, December 7, 2016 at 12:46:09 PM UTC-6, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> 
> Being talked about and popular are two different things.
> 
> Vlad the Impaler, Pol Pot and Stalin are talked about.
> 
> 
> -- 
> Jim Pennino

The jimp must be missing my physics postings on ski.physics.   :-o

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#608191 — Re: thiS Guy

"reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> wrote:
 > Sam left but is still popular.That tells us something.TreBert
namely that....
>
Glazier's ex-tutor Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote:
>
"Glazier, do not post in a science newsgroup."
"Glazier, quit posting __ your Gutter Science__."
"Glazier, exit USENET. -- IOW Glazier, beat it!."
>
"Glazier, your science is far worse than the man's on the street."
"Glazier, your postings are old man's garbage."
"Glazier, your brain is entangled with a used garbage can."
>
"reber, take your 'you know it all thinking' to your grave" .
"reber, your horseshit gets old. Say hi to Allah for me.:
"reber, you don't believe in science."

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#608262 — you, who

canonicaly,
...0000.o minus o.9999... is ...9999.o, but
composite adics are a no-no for most things

> that is to say that a larger number is subtracted
> from a smaller number in strict decimal format a la Stevin,
> I'm sure that it's just that simple ... no matter,
> what a gagle of gOglX clownsuits ... are wearing tonight at the ball
> 
> > if you want to be very safe, use an implied infinitum of zeroes
> > in a ten-adic datum

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#608295 — thiS Guy, doesn't watch television per se but

if you need a hundred-adic, just d00 that ... not necessarily
with a hundred uniquely digital elements

> if you want to be very safe, use an implied infinitum of zeroes
> in a ten-adic datum

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#608427 — Re: thiS Guy, doesn't watch television per se but

i.e base_ten modulo a hundred is fine

> > if you want to be very safe, use an implied infinitum of zeroes
> > in a ten-adic datum

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#608841

On 12/5/2016 6:38 PM, nuny@bid.nes wrote:
>   Apparently it's Too Late and humanity has less than a decade before we go extinct:
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zqIt93dDG1M
>
>   My wife's comment: "Doesn't anyone remember Y2K?"
>
>
>   Mark L. Fergerson

Too many alarmists about everything. People need to take things a little 
less seriously.

	Yousuf Khan

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web