Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #636485 > unrolled thread

Physics Homework Assignment, I Once Had...

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  Physics Homework Assignment, I Once Had... Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-06-15 06:38 -0700
    Re: Physics Homework Assignment, I Once Had... Sегgi о <iinvalid@invalid.com> - 2017-06-15 08:57 -0500
      Re: Physics Homework Assignment, I Once Had... Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-06-15 07:41 -0700
        Re: Physics Homework Assignment, I Once Had... Sегgi о <iinvalid@invalid.com> - 2017-06-15 12:52 -0500
          Re: Physics Homework Assignment, I Once Had... Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-06-15 16:14 -0700
            Re: Physics Homework Assignment, I Once Had... Sегgi о <iinvalid@invalid.com> - 2017-06-16 13:16 -0500
              Re: Physics Homework Assignment, I Once Had... Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-06-20 08:51 -0700
                Re: Physics Homework Assignment, I Once Had... Sегgi о <iinvalid@invalid.com> - 2017-06-22 21:54 -0500
                  Re: Physics Homework Assignment, I Once Had... Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-06-24 15:28 -0700
    Re: Physics Homework Assignment, I Once Had... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-15 16:53 -0700
      Re: Physics Homework Assignment, I Once Had... Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-06-15 17:31 -0700
        Re: Physics Homework Assignment, I Once Had... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-15 22:54 -0700
          Re: Physics Homework Assignment, I Once Had... Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-06-16 10:23 -0700
            Re: Physics Homework Assignment, I Once Had... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-16 13:32 -0700
              Re: Physics Homework Assignment, I Once Had... Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-06-16 14:47 -0700
                Re: Physics Homework Assignment, I Once Had... benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-06-16 20:32 -0400
                  Re: Physics Homework Assignment, I Once Had... Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-06-17 08:22 -0700
                Re: Physics Homework Assignment, I Once Had... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-17 10:44 -0700
                  Re: Physics Homework Assignment, I Once Had... Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-06-18 11:52 -0700
                    Re: Physics Homework Assignment, I Once Had... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-18 13:58 -0700
                      Re: Physics Homework Assignment, I Once Had... "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2017-06-18 14:09 -0700
                        Re: Physics Homework Assignment, I Once Had... Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-06-18 15:22 -0700
                          Re: Physics Homework Assignment, I Once Had... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-18 16:31 -0700
                            Re: Physics Homework Assignment, I Once Had... Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-06-19 05:26 -0700
    Re: Physics Homework Assignment, I Once Had... "nuny@bid.nes" <alien8752@gmail.com> - 2017-06-16 00:59 -0700
      Re: Physics Homework Assignment, I Once Had... Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-06-16 10:46 -0700
        Re: Physics Homework Assignment, I Once Had... "nuny@bid.nes" <alien8752@gmail.com> - 2017-06-19 14:51 -0700
          Re: Physics Homework Assignment, I Once Had... Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-06-20 17:45 -0700
    Re: Physics Homework Assignment, I Once Had... Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2017-06-22 18:40 +1000
      Re: Physics Homework Assignment, I Once Had... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-22 09:31 -0700
        Re: Physics Homework Assignment, I Once Had... Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-06-23 06:38 -0700
          Re: Physics Homework Assignment, I Once Had... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-23 10:25 -0700
            Re: Physics Homework Assignment, I Once Had... Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-06-23 16:38 -0700
              Re: Physics Homework Assignment, I Once Had... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-24 11:23 -0700
                Re: Physics Homework Assignment, I Once Had... Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-06-24 12:57 -0700

Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]

#636874

On 6/18/2017 1:58 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> Mahipal wrote:
>>
>> On Saturday, June 17, 2017 at 1:44:18 PM UTC-4, The Starmaker wrote:
>>> Mahipal wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Friday, June 16, 2017 at 4:32:26 PM UTC-4, The Starmaker wrote:
>>>> <trim>
>>>>
>>>>> your turburn is on too tight.
>>>>
>>>> Ok... not exactly what I expected. But so be it. I wear no turban.
>>>>
>>>> Do you have any turban wearing friends, RacistStrawShitter? Name one.
>>>>
>>>> Do you even know what colour my turban is? Btw, I have more than one.
>>>>
>>>> I suppose you lost interest in the topic. Your choice. Take care.
>>>>
>>>> -- Mahipal == माहिपाल "My Pal" or "Maple" Loops, S(y)rup, Wood. IPMM ७६३८!
>>>> Enjo(y)... Salute… Cheers... Open your M I N D… Time it is Is IS 3PM somePlace.
>>>
>>> maybe your sandels are on too tight..
>>
>> Me m(y) standards are too high! O wait... your accent is thick, through my turban.
>>
>> I don't wear sandels. I hate sandels. Flip/Flop. I'd rather be barefoot.
>> Perhaps you ought not focus too much on my wardrobe. I've already admitted
>> to dressing like GandhiJi, just check recent surveillance tapes in DC and NYC.
>>
>>> do you play a ...zitar?
>>
>> Sitar, not zitar. Sadly, no. But... Ziggy played guitar -- David Bowie.
>> I have tried playing actual bamboo flutes. I'm not very good at it.
>>
>>> One does not walk through time.
>>
>> Not only walk, one can just sit through time. Not a Buddhist you. Aum...
>>
>>> One walks with time.
>>
>> Look Starmaker, I apologize if I was defensive/rude/mean. Very sorry, I am.
>> Get lost now. Take care. Work out your own issues with English Dictionaries.
>> I'll spend/waste my limited time wading through Sanskrit words, as a hobb(y)...
> 
> 
> Is water an object?
> 

Imvvvho, it is, especially in its frozen state. ;^)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#636878

On Sunday, June 18, 2017 at 5:09:26 PM UTC-4, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> On 6/18/2017 1:58 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
<trim>
> > Is water an object?

Starmaker, what is your educational background? To what level? Got degree?

> Imvvvho, it is, especially in its frozen state. ;^)

So far, as far as I know, there now exist four states of matter.

Of course water is an object. Water==Pani (In Hindi) can be solid,
liquid, steam, ionic, or can become a plasma as (H, H, O). H_2 O.

Water O water... what is your colour... whatever you mix with... you become...

Water is perhaps the greatest object in the whole entire Universe for Life.

Is water a 4D object? Of course! Starmaker you'd know that if you drank it, 
shaved with it, or swam in it (oceans, rivers, pools), or just ever showered.

Ever, in your whole entire life, you go DanSingħing in the rain? Gene Kelly.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D1ZYhVpdXbQ Singing In The Rain, Enjo(y)!

Ergo, One can never come to the same river twice. Who said/wrote that?!

-- Mahipal “IPMM... माहिपाल ७६३८: d(me) != 0 ... me alwa(y)s changes...”

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#636882

Mahipal wrote:
> 
> On Sunday, June 18, 2017 at 5:09:26 PM UTC-4, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> > On 6/18/2017 1:58 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> <trim>
> > > Is water an object?
> 
> Starmaker, what is your educational background? To what level? Got degree?


"Degree? I don't need no stinking degree."

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#636918

On Sunday, June 18, 2017 at 7:32:00 PM UTC-4, The Starmaker wrote:
> Mahipal wrote:
> > 
> > On Sunday, June 18, 2017 at 5:09:26 PM UTC-4, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> > > On 6/18/2017 1:58 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> > <trim>
> > > > Is water an object?
> > 
> > Starmaker, what is your educational background? To what level? Got degree?
> 
> "Degree? I don't need no stinking degree."

I'm aware of that misguided logic/stance. I call it the $Bill Gates$ Principle.

Why not just insist a tennis player or a golfer need no practice to play either?
Why not insist a pianist or violinist just play Mozart without any practice? 

All said and done, this is an ESP NG. ESP? Well, who needs stinkin words... 

-- Mahipal “IPMM... माहिपाल ७६३८: Poet Pla(y)ing Tennis! Grasshopper Mode...”

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#636619

On Thursday, June 15, 2017 at 6:38:28 AM UTC-7, Mahipal wrote:
> Calculate the probability of any two four-dimensional objects colliding.
> You all do know what a collision is? Good for you! Now... go calculate.
> Assignment due by Friday, no class lasts forever. Chop chop! Run like the wind!
> Besides, if you submit by Friday, I'll have something to do over the Weekend.
> God knows the wife is a waste of time... but I digress... Vera? VERA?! Et tu?
> 
> I once had a life, or should I sing, life once had me... The BeatlesIsmIshQ.
> 
> -- Mahipal == माहिपाल "My Pal" or "Maple" Loops, S(y)rup, Wood. IPMM ७६३८!

  It's all about cross section no matter how many dimensions. The cross section of a 3D object is a 2D closed curve, the cross section of a 4D object is a 3D closed volume.

  It doesn't have to be simply connected though, depends on the shape of the 4D object and where you take the section, i. e. how the two objects are oriented WRT each other.

  One-dimension-down example; what is the mutual cross section of a pencil and a doughnut? De[ends on their mutual orientation.

  One 3D cross section of a hypertorus would be two spheres that remain the same distance apart.

  So, do we get any restrictions on the topologies of the 4D objects?


  Mark L. Fergerson

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#636660

On Friday, June 16, 2017 at 3:59:46 AM UTC-4, nu...@bid.nes wrote:
> On Thursday, June 15, 2017 at 6:38:28 AM UTC-7, Mahipal wrote:
> > Calculate the probability of any two four-dimensional objects colliding.
> > You all do know what a collision is? Good for you! Now... go calculate.
> > Assignment due by Friday, no class lasts forever. Chop chop! Run like the wind!
> > Besides, if you submit by Friday, I'll have something to do over the Weekend.
> > God knows the wife is a waste of time... but I digress... Vera? VERA?! Et tu?
> > 
> > I once had a life, or should I sing, life once had me... The BeatlesIsmIshQ.
> > 
> > -- Mahipal == माहिपाल "My Pal" or "Maple" Loops, S(y)rup, Wood. IPMM ७६३८!
> 
>   It's all about cross section no matter how many dimensions. The
> cross section of a 3D object is a 2D closed curve, the cross section
> of a 4D object is a 3D closed volume.

Good day MarkJi! It's always nice to hear from you! Cross sections, it is.

>   It doesn't have to be simply connected though, depends on the
> shape of the 4D object and where you take the section, i. e. how the
> two objects are oriented WRT each other.

Given, I'm a Thermodynamist/Engineer/Dreamer/... by education...
Through collision and confusion while there's life beneath The Sun...

>   One-dimension-down example; what is the mutual cross section of a
> pencil and a doughnut? De[ends on their mutual orientation.

It's been a long time since I touched a pencil. Doughnuts? It shows?!

>   One 3D cross section of a hypertorus would be two spheres that
> remain the same distance apart.

I'm going to nod my head agreeably pretending as if I understand. Nod nod NOD...

>   So, do we get any restrictions on the topologies of the 4D objects?

No, no restrictions. A very open ended question with one exact solution.

Actually this problem was posed only in a classroom, with five students,
and not a word was mentioned regards greater than 4D. Not sure why. 
There did not exist any assigned textbook either. Library's two floors away.
Also, my professor used to have this look: Why is Mahipal the only one to
show up for class/lectures?! I could have a life if he didn't show up!

The more I think about it, the more I want to find my classroom notes.
I do remember that beautiful mathematician girl that made copies of them...
Seriously, she shows up the last week of the semester, asks to copy my notes...
I've not seen her or the professor since then... we've got to move on...

>   Mark L. Fergerson

-- Mahipal == माहिपाल "My Pal" or "Maple" Loops, S(y)rup, Wood. IPMM ७६३८! 
Enjo(y)... Salute… Cheers... Open your M I N D… Time it is Is IS 3PM somePlace. 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#636989

On Friday, June 16, 2017 at 10:46:58 AM UTC-7, Mahipal wrote:
> On Friday, June 16, 2017 at 3:59:46 AM UTC-4, nu...@bid.nes wrote:
> > On Thursday, June 15, 2017 at 6:38:28 AM UTC-7, Mahipal wrote:
> > > Calculate the probability of any two four-dimensional objects colliding.
> > > You all do know what a collision is? Good for you! Now... go calculate.
> > > Assignment due by Friday, no class lasts forever. Chop chop! Run like the
> > > wind!
> > > Besides, if you submit by Friday, I'll have something to do over the
> > > Weekend.
> > > God knows the wife is a waste of time... but I digress... Vera? VERA?!
> > > Et tu?

  Sorry, the only Vera that comes to mind is:

http://www.imfdb.org/wiki/Firefly#.22Callahan_Fullbore_Autolock_.27Vera.27.22

> > > I once had a life, or should I sing, life once had me... The
> > > BeatlesIsmIshQ.

  Life always has all of us. It's a ball...
 
> > > -- Mahipal == माहिपाल "My Pal" or "Maple" Loops, S(y)rup, Wood. IPMM ७६३८!
> > 
> >   It's all about cross section no matter how many dimensions. The
> > cross section of a 3D object is a 2D closed curve, the cross section
> > of a 4D object is a 3D closed volume.
> 
> Good day MarkJi! It's always nice to hear from you! Cross sections, it is.

  Good days, bad days, doesn't matter.

> >   It doesn't have to be simply connected though, depends on the
> > shape of the 4D object and where you take the section, i. e. how the
> > two objects are oriented WRT each other.
> 
> Given, I'm a Thermodynamist/Engineer/Dreamer/... by education...
> Through collision and confusion while there's life beneath The Sun...
> 
> >   One-dimension-down example; what is the mutual cross section of a
> > pencil and a doughnut? De[ends on their mutual orientation.
> 
> It's been a long time since I touched a pencil. Doughnuts? It shows?!

  I wasn't LOOKING.

> >   One 3D cross section of a hypertorus would be two spheres that
> > remain the same distance apart.
> 
> I'm going to nod my head agreeably pretending as if I understand.
> Nod nod NOD...

  Shoot a pencil at the center of a doughnut edge-on and it can't miss. Turn the doughnut and the pencil goes through the hole. If you could rotate the doughnut through another dimension you'd get two doughy circles a fixed distance apart.

  In 4D you have another axis to rotate the hyperdoughnut through that will allow the hyperpencil to pass through it.
 
> >   So, do we get any restrictions on the topologies of the 4D objects?
> 
> No, no restrictions. A very open ended question with one exact solution.

  Hmm. I'm a visual thinker (who can occasionally visualize simple 4D situations) but writing equations to fit the physics is not my thing.

> Actually this problem was posed only in a classroom, with five students,
> and not a word was mentioned regards greater than 4D. Not sure why.

  Probably because the rotation options get too broad to make a unique solution possible. My mind is wriggling around inside my skull trying to model five dimensions.
 
> There did not exist any assigned textbook either. Library's two floors away.
> Also, my professor used to have this look: Why is Mahipal the only one to
> show up for class/lectures?! I could have a life if he didn't show up!

  Some teachers love their work, some don't.

> The more I think about it, the more I want to find my classroom notes.
> I do remember that beautiful mathematician girl that made copies of them...
> Seriously, she shows up the last week of the semester, asks to copy my
> notes...
> I've not seen her or the professor since then... we've got to move on...

  No regrets, My Pal. Life goes on. And on, and on, and on...


  Mark L. Fergerson

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#637124

On Monday, June 19, 2017 at 5:51:07 PM UTC-4, nu...@bid.nes wrote:
> On Friday, June 16, 2017 at 10:46:58 AM UTC-7, Mahipal wrote:
> > On Friday, June 16, 2017 at 3:59:46 AM UTC-4, nu...@bid.nes wrote:
> > > On Thursday, June 15, 2017 at 6:38:28 AM UTC-7, Mahipal wrote:
> > > > Calculate the probability of any two four-dimensional objects colliding.
> > > > You all do know what a collision is? Good for you! Now... go calculate.
> > > > Assignment due by Friday, no class lasts forever. Chop chop! Run like the
> > > > wind!
> > > > Besides, if you submit by Friday, I'll have something to do over the
> > > > Weekend.
> > > > God knows the wife is a waste of time... but I digress... Vera? VERA?!
> > > > Et tu?
> 
>   Sorry, the only Vera that comes to mind is:
> 
> http://www.imfdb.org/wiki/Firefly#.22Callahan_Fullbore_Autolock_.27Vera.27.22

Cool! But that link is a really weird twist to what I was thinking comedically. 
Vera is known as Norm's loving invisible wife in the 11 years long TV sitcom Cheers.
Moral? Invisible wives are the best kind! Sure, you wish I was joking...

> > > > I once had a life, or should I sing, life once had me... The
> > > > BeatlesIsmIshQ.
> 
>   Life always has all of us. It's a ball...

Life==Girl. Great transformation, IMHO. Some words have meanings/balls...

Life, don't talk to me about Life! -- Marvin, The Depressed Robot by Douglas Adams.

I once had a girl, or should I say, girl once had me... The BeatlesIsmIshQ
She asked me to stay and sit anywhere... and I noticed there wasn't a chair or grill...
We ordered pizza and the Drone delivered by air... Wait... do I have to tip a Drone?!
But what... how does one tip a Drone? Got youTube, Twitter, or other social media?
The 23 different ways, ClickHere@#, on how to tip a Drone (TM, SM, and BMW).

> > > > -- Mahipal == माहिपाल "My Pal" or "Maple" Loops, S(y)rup, Wood. IPMM ७६३८!
> > > 
> > >   It's all about cross section no matter how many dimensions. The
> > > cross section of a 3D object is a 2D closed curve, the cross section
> > > of a 4D object is a 3D closed volume.
> > 
> > Good day MarkJi! It's always nice to hear from you! Cross sections, it is.
> 
>   Good days, bad days, doesn't matter.

Good times, bad times, matters not, you know I've had my share... Led ZeppelinIsmIshQ.

> > >   It doesn't have to be simply connected though, depends on the
> > > shape of the 4D object and where you take the section, i. e. how the
> > > two objects are oriented WRT each other.
> > 
> > Given, I'm a Thermodynamist/Engineer/Dreamer/... by education...
> > Through collision and confusion while there's life beneath The Sun...
> > 
> > >   One-dimension-down example; what is the mutual cross section of a
> > > pencil and a doughnut? De[ends on their mutual orientation.
> > 
> > It's been a long time since I touched a pencil. Doughnuts? It shows?!
> 
>   I wasn't LOOKING.

He he... too funny! And I will review and work on my topology knowledge/books.
I always just studied topology as a hobby in my spare time. No formal classes.
My favourite Yes album? Glad you Mark asked... Tales of Topological/Topographic Oceans.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_rwNe2QXwrU Tales from Topographic Oceans, Yes!
00:00 - The Revealing Science of God (Dance of the Dawn)
22:22 - The Remembering (High the Memory)
43:00 - The Ancient (Giants under the Sun)

My friend, since high school, whose name is also Mark, and I, went to one Yes concert.
Mark always knew better deeper English songs than that I did in English. I hate him!
House of four doors... we could live here forever -- The Moody Blues.

Topology developed as a field of study out of geometry and set theory,
through analysis of concepts such as space, dimension, and transformation.[2] 
Such ideas go back to Gottfried Leibniz, who in the 17th century
envisioned the geometria situs (Greek-Latin for "geometry of place")
-- Wikipedia, go ahead, sue me, I cut and pasted while attributing.

> > >   One 3D cross section of a hypertorus would be two spheres that
> > > remain the same distance apart.
> > 
> > I'm going to nod my head agreeably pretending as if I understand.
> > Nod nod NOD...
> 
>   Shoot a pencil at the center of a doughnut edge-on and it can't
> miss. Turn the doughnut and the pencil goes through the hole. If you
> could rotate the doughnut through another dimension you'd get two
> doughy circles a fixed distance apart.

Why wouldn't I just eat the doughnut and use the pencil to write lyrics?

>   In 4D you have another axis to rotate the hyperdoughnut through
>  that will allow the hyperpencil to pass through it.

Neat... hyperdoughnut plus hyperpencil equals more homework for me to do.
I hate you too MarkJi! How dare you?! How dare you give me more homework?!

> > >   So, do we get any restrictions on the topologies of the 4D objects?
> > 
> > No, no restrictions. A very open ended question with one exact solution.
> 
>   Hmm. I'm a visual thinker (who can occasionally visualize simple
> 4D situations) but writing equations to fit the physics is not my
> thing.

As I understand math, all equations already exist. On page, some number, somewhere.
For one, there's the really weird(y) one Master Equation by Paul Ehrenfest.
https://www.google.com/?gws_rd=ssl#q=Master+Equation+by+Ehrenfest

I've had this visual discussion before with others: Do blindmen see mathematics?

> > Actually this problem was posed only in a classroom, with five students,
> > and not a word was mentioned regards greater than 4D. Not sure why.
> 
>   Probably because the rotation options get too broad to make a
>  unique solution possible. My mind is wriggling around inside my
>  skull trying to model five dimensions.

It's a neat 4D objects collision problem. I've concluded the answer is
the same for greater than 4D -- with or without rotations. There is in
fact a unique numerical solution. Same as it ever was... or will be...

> > There did not exist any assigned textbook either. Library's two floors away.
> > Also, my professor used to have this look: Why is Mahipal the only one to
> > show up for class/lectures?! I could have a life if he didn't show up!
> 
>   Some teachers love their work, some don't.

He, the professor, was very patient with me, lectured the whole hour, even if
just to me alone. Often. Of course, I went to the class because it was scheduled!
He was/is a very kind teacher... I should really go and try find the class notes.
Thinking I... What was that beautiful mathematician girl's name/number again?! 

> > The more I think about it, the more I want to find my classroom notes.
> > I do remember that beautiful mathematician girl that made copies of them...
> > Seriously, she shows up the last week of the semester, asks to copy my
> > notes...
> > I've not seen her or the professor since then... we've got to move on...
> 
>   No regrets, My Pal. Life goes on. And on, and on, and on...

Indeed true. I just want to leave me m(y) marks upon Life. I am/was herePlaceTime!

>   Mark L. Fergerson

-- Mahipal == माहिपाल "My Pal" or "Maple" Loops, S(y)rup, Wood. IPMM ७६३८! 
Enjo(y)... Salute… Cheers... Open your M I N D… Time it is Is IS 3PM somePlace. 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#637282

On 15/06/2017 11:38 PM, Mahipal wrote:
> Calculate the probability of any two four-dimensional objects colliding.
> You all do know what a collision is? Good for you! Now... go calculate.
> Assignment due by Friday, no class lasts forever. Chop chop! Run like the wind!
> Besides, if you submit by Friday, I'll have something to do over the Weekend.
> God knows the wife is a waste of time... but I digress... Vera? VERA?! Et tu?
>
> I once had a life, or should I sing, life once had me... The BeatlesIsmIshQ.
>
> -- Mahipal == माहिपाल "My Pal" or "Maple" Loops, S(y)rup, Wood. IPMM ७६३८!
>

Zero, because there are no four-dimensional objects.

Sylvia.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#637314

Sylvia Else wrote:
> 
> On 15/06/2017 11:38 PM, Mahipal wrote:
> > Calculate the probability of any two four-dimensional objects colliding.
> > You all do know what a collision is? Good for you! Now... go calculate.
> > Assignment due by Friday, no class lasts forever. Chop chop! Run like the wind!
> > Besides, if you submit by Friday, I'll have something to do over the Weekend.
> > God knows the wife is a waste of time... but I digress... Vera? VERA?! Et tu?
> >
> > I once had a life, or should I sing, life once had me... The BeatlesIsmIshQ.
> >
> > -- Mahipal == माहिपाल "My Pal" or "Maple" Loops, S(y)rup, Wood. IPMM ७६३८!
> >
> 
> Zero, because there are no four-dimensional objects.
> 
> Sylvia.



You are about to enter another dimension, 

a dimension not only of sight and sound but of mind. 

A journey into a wondrous land of imagination. 

Next stop, the Object Zone!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#637426

On Thursday, June 22, 2017 at 12:32:11 PM UTC-4, The Starmaker wrote:
> Sylvia Else wrote:
> > 
> > On 15/06/2017 11:38 PM, Mahipal wrote:
> > > Calculate the probability of any two four-dimensional objects colliding.
> > > You all do know what a collision is? Good for you! Now... go calculate.
> > > Assignment due by Friday, no class lasts forever. Chop chop! Run like the wind!
> > > Besides, if you submit by Friday, I'll have something to do over the Weekend.
> > > God knows the wife is a waste of time... but I digress... Vera? VERA?! Et tu?
> > >
> > > I once had a life, or should I sing, life once had me... The BeatlesIsmIshQ.
> > >
> > > -- Mahipal == माहिपाल "My Pal" or "Maple" Loops, S(y)rup, Wood. IPMM ७६३८!
> > 
> > Zero, because there are no four-dimensional objects.
> > 
> > Sylvia.

Why are there 4D collisional probability problems in mathematical physics?  

Btw, zero is the correct answer. Your reasoning/conclusion/proclamation is suspect.
For in Nature, 4D objects exist but just without colliding.

https://www.google.com/?gws_rd=ssl#q=4D+collision+probability+problems

I did state it was a neat mathematical physics homework assignment. Graduate college.

> You are about to enter another dimension, 
> 
> a dimension not only of sight and sound but of mind. 
> 
> A journey into a wondrous land of imagination. 
> 
> Next stop, the Object Zone!

He he... as a teenager I used to watch Twilight Zone shows.
There was this one with an old man, all alone alive at the end of Earth.
He thrists for knowledge, companionship. Finds a library. Books! Excited.
Then he accidently drops his glasses, smashing the lenses. Unable to see/read.

-- Mahipal == माहिपाल "My Pal" or "Maple" Loops, S(y)rup, Wood. IPMM ७६३८! 
Enjo(y)... Salute… Cheers... Open your M I N D… Time it is Is IS 3PM somePlace. 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#637450

Mahipal wrote:
> 
> On Thursday, June 22, 2017 at 12:32:11 PM UTC-4, The Starmaker wrote:
> > Sylvia Else wrote:
> > >
> > > On 15/06/2017 11:38 PM, Mahipal wrote:
> > > > Calculate the probability of any two four-dimensional objects colliding.
> > > > You all do know what a collision is? Good for you! Now... go calculate.
> > > > Assignment due by Friday, no class lasts forever. Chop chop! Run like the wind!
> > > > Besides, if you submit by Friday, I'll have something to do over the Weekend.
> > > > God knows the wife is a waste of time... but I digress... Vera? VERA?! Et tu?
> > > >
> > > > I once had a life, or should I sing, life once had me... The BeatlesIsmIshQ.
> > > >
> > > > -- Mahipal == माहिपाल "My Pal" or "Maple" Loops, S(y)rup, Wood. IPMM ७६३८!
> > >
> > > Zero, because there are no four-dimensional objects.
> > >
> > > Sylvia.
> 
> Why are there 4D collisional probability problems in mathematical physics?

Math is not Science. Math is only a world of the mind, not of the
physical world. Math is an *invention* of man, not a discovery.


Nature looks at Man with it's numbers and replies..."I don't where these
people come up with these fuckin numbers!"



> 
> Btw, zero is the correct answer. Your reasoning/conclusion/proclamation is suspect.
> For in Nature, 4D objects exist but just without colliding.
> 
> https://www.google.com/?gws_rd=ssl#q=4D+collision+probability+problems
> 
> I did state it was a neat mathematical physics homework assignment. Graduate college.

Those who can't...Teach.


> 
> > You are about to enter another dimension,
> >
> > a dimension not only of sight and sound but of mind.
> >
> > A journey into a wondrous land of imagination.
> >
> > Next stop, the Object Zone!
> 
> He he... as a teenager I used to watch Twilight Zone shows.
> There was this one with an old man, all alone alive at the end of Earth.
> He thrists for knowledge, companionship. Finds a library. Books! Excited.
> Then he accidently drops his glasses, smashing the lenses. Unable to see/read.
> 
> -- Mahipal == माहिपाल "My Pal" or "Maple" Loops, S(y)rup, Wood. IPMM ७६३८!
> Enjo(y)... Salute… Cheers... Open your M I N D… Time it is Is IS 3PM somePlace.



The third dimension is just a step below the fourth, chris.
It's a big step, granted, but it's just one step.
Now, every point in our space is part of a perpendicular line in the
fourth dimension.
So? So although all the lines forming the fourth dimension are
perpendicular to every point in the third, they're not necessarily
parallel to us.
But if enough of the lines are parallel in both dimensions in a given
area, it might create an opening.
What, has this opening always been here? It might have been.
I doubt it, though.
Believe me, i'm no expert on this.
Who is? But i suspect that junctures between dimensions are freaks of
nature that happen who knows how often.
Rarely, i'd say.
I hope.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#637506

On Friday, June 23, 2017 at 1:25:50 PM UTC-4, The Starmaker wrote:
> Mahipal wrote:
> > 
> > On Thursday, June 22, 2017 at 12:32:11 PM UTC-4, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > Sylvia Else wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On 15/06/2017 11:38 PM, Mahipal wrote:
> > > > > Calculate the probability of any two four-dimensional objects colliding.
> > > > > You all do know what a collision is? Good for you! Now... go calculate.
> > > > > Assignment due by Friday, no class lasts forever. Chop chop! Run like the wind!
> > > > > Besides, if you submit by Friday, I'll have something to do over the Weekend.
> > > > > God knows the wife is a waste of time... but I digress... Vera? VERA?! Et tu?
> > > > >
> > > > > I once had a life, or should I sing, life once had me... The BeatlesIsmIshQ.
> > > > >
> > > > > -- Mahipal == माहिपाल "My Pal" or "Maple" Loops, S(y)rup, Wood. IPMM ७६३८!
> > > >
> > > > Zero, because there are no four-dimensional objects.
> > > >
> > > > Sylvia.
> > 
> > Why are there 4D collisional probability problems in mathematical physics?
> 
> Math is not Science. Math is only a world of the mind, not of the
> physical world. Math is an *invention* of man, not a discovery.

Mathematical Physics is a Science. Man also invented pizza. So what?

> Nature looks at Man with it's numbers and replies..."I don't where these
> people come up with these fuckin numbers!"

For one thing, it's its not it's. Example? Sure. Man with its numbers...

Starmaker, by a spell checker and hire 3 sentence reviewers who know how to write.

> > Btw, zero is the correct answer. Your reasoning/conclusion/proclamation is suspect.
> > For in Nature, 4D objects exist but just without colliding.
> > 
> > https://www.google.com/?gws_rd=ssl#q=4D+collision+probability+problems
> > 
> > I did state it was a neat mathematical physics homework assignment. Graduate college.
> 
> Those who can't...Teach.

Those who can do, wear Depends. You gotta feel sorry for those standing behind TrumpET.

So quick to cliché number nine. Know the song Dream#9? Without google it.

Look Starmaker, you're dodging, distracting, and trolling. I'll oblige...

Those who can't learn rise to the inverse level of their incompetency. Bush/TrumpET!

TrumpET#1: I'm not lying, everybody else is Is IS! Spend at my golf courses/hotels.

TrumpET#XYZed: Comey has friends. I bet they're all tall Tall TALL. Believe me, 
I have the best betterIst bestest friends with shortest hands. Ever! BELIEVE ME!
I'd say Believe Me again, but my latest hired lawyers want me to STFU. They're FIRED!
How dare anyone else on Earth have friends?! Why does nobody invite me to their hotels?

Ferris Bueller's Day Off... Bueller's... Mueller's Days Off, FIRED! (TM, SM, and BMW).

> > > You are about to enter another dimension,
> > >
> > > a dimension not only of sight and sound but of mind.
> > >
> > > A journey into a wondrous land of imagination.
> > >
> > > Next stop, the Object Zone!
> > 
> > He he... as a teenager I used to watch Twilight Zone shows.
> > There was this one with an old man, all alone alive at the end of Earth.
> > He thrists for knowledge, companionship. Finds a library. Books! Excited.
> > Then he accidently drops his glasses, smashing the lenses. Unable to see/read.
> > 
> The third dimension is just a step below the fourth, chris.

Who is chris? Christ? Christie? Khris? Krishna? Deep Blue State? Who?

> It's a big step, granted, but it's just one step.
> Now, every point in our space is part of a perpendicular line in the
> fourth dimension.

Starmaker, are you trying to think? Does it hurt? No pain, no gain.

> So? So although all the lines forming the fourth dimension are
> perpendicular to every point in the third, they're not necessarily
> parallel to us.

Have you heard about the law of cosines in any number of dimensions?
How about why the vector cross-product is limited to up to 3D only?

> But if enough of the lines are parallel in both dimensions in a given
> area, it might create an opening.

If it's your mouth opening, stuff a heavy cheesy pizza in it. And quick!

> What, has this opening always been here? It might have been.
> I doubt it, though.

I'm going to keep quiet here. The joke's way too eas(y).

> Believe me, i'm no expert on this.

I need not believe, I know it. As do many others here in this NG.
Mathematical Axiom: The more you write, the more you reveal yourself.

That whole bit/notion of Silence Is Golden? It's a ruse. Ruse#9.

Moral? Speak honestly or send your resume to The White House. Jobs open.

> Who is? But i suspect that junctures between dimensions are freaks of
> nature that happen who knows how often.

Tr(y) this: Make Nature Great Again (MNGA@#)! (TM, SM, and BMW).

> Rarely, i'd say.

Silence is golden. The less you==Starmaker say, the better. BELIEVE ME!

I'm sorry Starmaker, but you seem to beg to be ridiculed. Is that your plan?

> I hope.

My favourite sex(y) bartender of all timePlace? Her name is Hope. Best martinis ever!

-- Mahipal == माहिपाल "My Pal" or "Maple" Loops, S(y)rup, Wood. IPMM ७६३८! 
Enjo(y)... Salute… Cheers... Open your M I N D… Time it is Is IS 3PM somePlace. 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#637553

Mahipal wrote:
> 
> On Friday, June 23, 2017 at 1:25:50 PM UTC-4, The Starmaker wrote:
> > Mahipal wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thursday, June 22, 2017 at 12:32:11 PM UTC-4, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > Sylvia Else wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > On 15/06/2017 11:38 PM, Mahipal wrote:
> > > > > > Calculate the probability of any two four-dimensional objects colliding.
> > > > > > You all do know what a collision is? Good for you! Now... go calculate.
> > > > > > Assignment due by Friday, no class lasts forever. Chop chop! Run like the wind!
> > > > > > Besides, if you submit by Friday, I'll have something to do over the Weekend.
> > > > > > God knows the wife is a waste of time... but I digress... Vera? VERA?! Et tu?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I once had a life, or should I sing, life once had me... The BeatlesIsmIshQ.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -- Mahipal == माहिपाल "My Pal" or "Maple" Loops, S(y)rup, Wood. IPMM ७६३८!
> > > > >
> > > > > Zero, because there are no four-dimensional objects.
> > > > >
> > > > > Sylvia.
> > >
> > > Why are there 4D collisional probability problems in mathematical physics?
> >
> > Math is not Science. Math is only a world of the mind, not of the
> > physical world. Math is an *invention* of man, not a discovery.
> 
> Mathematical Physics is a Science. Man also invented pizza. So what?
> 
> > Nature looks at Man with it's numbers and replies..."I don't where these
> > people come up with these fuckin numbers!"
> 
> For one thing, it's its not it's. Example? Sure. Man with its numbers...
> 
> Starmaker, by a spell checker and hire 3 sentence reviewers who know how to write.
> 
> > > Btw, zero is the correct answer. Your reasoning/conclusion/proclamation is suspect.
> > > For in Nature, 4D objects exist but just without colliding.
> > >
> > > https://www.google.com/?gws_rd=ssl#q=4D+collision+probability+problems
> > >
> > > I did state it was a neat mathematical physics homework assignment. Graduate college.
> >
> > Those who can't...Teach.
> 
> Those who can do, wear Depends. You gotta feel sorry for those standing behind TrumpET.
> 
> So quick to cliché number nine. Know the song Dream#9? Without google it.
> 
> Look Starmaker, you're dodging, distracting, and trolling. I'll oblige...
> 
> Those who can't learn rise to the inverse level of their incompetency. Bush/TrumpET!
> 
> TrumpET#1: I'm not lying, everybody else is Is IS! Spend at my golf courses/hotels.
> 
> TrumpET#XYZed: Comey has friends. I bet they're all tall Tall TALL. Believe me,
> I have the best betterIst bestest friends with shortest hands. Ever! BELIEVE ME!
> I'd say Believe Me again, but my latest hired lawyers want me to STFU. They're FIRED!
> How dare anyone else on Earth have friends?! Why does nobody invite me to their hotels?
> 
> Ferris Bueller's Day Off... Bueller's... Mueller's Days Off, FIRED! (TM, SM, and BMW).
> 
> > > > You are about to enter another dimension,
> > > >
> > > > a dimension not only of sight and sound but of mind.
> > > >
> > > > A journey into a wondrous land of imagination.
> > > >
> > > > Next stop, the Object Zone!
> > >
> > > He he... as a teenager I used to watch Twilight Zone shows.
> > > There was this one with an old man, all alone alive at the end of Earth.
> > > He thrists for knowledge, companionship. Finds a library. Books! Excited.
> > > Then he accidently drops his glasses, smashing the lenses. Unable to see/read.
> > >
> > The third dimension is just a step below the fourth, chris.
> 
> Who is chris? Christ? Christie? Khris? Krishna? Deep Blue State? Who?
> 
> > It's a big step, granted, but it's just one step.
> > Now, every point in our space is part of a perpendicular line in the
> > fourth dimension.
> 
> Starmaker, are you trying to think? Does it hurt? No pain, no gain.
> 
> > So? So although all the lines forming the fourth dimension are
> > perpendicular to every point in the third, they're not necessarily
> > parallel to us.
> 
> Have you heard about the law of cosines in any number of dimensions?
> How about why the vector cross-product is limited to up to 3D only?
> 
> > But if enough of the lines are parallel in both dimensions in a given
> > area, it might create an opening.
> 
> If it's your mouth opening, stuff a heavy cheesy pizza in it. And quick!
> 
> > What, has this opening always been here? It might have been.
> > I doubt it, though.
> 
> I'm going to keep quiet here. The joke's way too eas(y).
> 
> > Believe me, i'm no expert on this.
> 
> I need not believe, I know it. As do many others here in this NG.
> Mathematical Axiom: The more you write, the more you reveal yourself.
> 
> That whole bit/notion of Silence Is Golden? It's a ruse. Ruse#9.
> 
> Moral? Speak honestly or send your resume to The White House. Jobs open.
> 
> > Who is? But i suspect that junctures between dimensions are freaks of
> > nature that happen who knows how often.
> 
> Tr(y) this: Make Nature Great Again (MNGA@#)! (TM, SM, and BMW).
> 
> > Rarely, i'd say.
> 
> Silence is golden. The less you==Starmaker say, the better. BELIEVE ME!
> 
> I'm sorry Starmaker, but you seem to beg to be ridiculed. Is that your plan?
> 
> > I hope.
> 
> My favourite sex(y) bartender of all timePlace? Her name is Hope. Best martinis ever!
> 
> -- Mahipal == माहिपाल "My Pal" or "Maple" Loops, S(y)rup, Wood. IPMM ७६३८!
> Enjo(y)... Salute… Cheers... Open your M I N D… Time it is Is IS 3PM somePlace.



I was only inserting the Twilight Zone script:

The third dimension is just a step below the fourth, chris.
It's a big step, granted, but it's just one step.
Now, every point in our space is part of a perpendicular line in the
fourth dimension.
So? So although all the lines forming the fourth dimension are
perpendicular to every point in the third, they're not necessarily
parallel to us.
But if enough of the lines are parallel in both dimensions in a given
area, it might create an opening.
What, has this opening always been here? It might have been.
I doubt it, though.
Believe me, i'm no expert on this.
Who is? But i suspect that junctures between dimensions are freaks of
nature that happen who knows how often.
Rarely, i'd say.
I hope.
http://www.springfieldspringfield.co.uk/view_episode_scripts.php?tv-show=the-twilight-zone-1959&episode=s03e26


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aTB-9b0ewww

http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x4z3rad

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#637572

On Saturday, June 24, 2017 at 2:23:09 PM UTC-4, The Starmaker wrote:
> Mahipal wrote:

<trim>

> I was only inserting the Twilight Zone script:

How I/We/Us/... are just supposed to know that reference?! Hooowll(y)Wood?

You should've mentioned that before! Could've would've ought've ... is too late.
Besides, I would've found an excuse to ridicule you==Starmaker anyhow. He he...

> The third dimension is just a step below the fourth, chris.
> It's a big step, granted, but it's just one step.
> Now, every point in our space is part of a perpendicular line in the
> fourth dimension.
> So? So although all the lines forming the fourth dimension are
> perpendicular to every point in the third, they're not necessarily
> parallel to us.
> But if enough of the lines are parallel in both dimensions in a given
> area, it might create an opening.
> What, has this opening always been here? It might have been.
> I doubt it, though.
> Believe me, i'm no expert on this.
> Who is? But i suspect that junctures between dimensions are freaks of
> nature that happen who knows how often.
> Rarely, i'd say.
> I hope.
> http://www.springfieldspringfield.co.uk/view_episode_scripts.php?tv-show=the-twilight-zone-1959&episode=s03e26
> 
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aTB-9b0ewww
> 
> http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x4z3rad

Very cool links. Thanks, Starmaker. However, I am too afraid/scared of
Twilight Zone shows, now. I just can't get myself to watch them, now.
Remember the one with the train to hell/nowhere? I hated it. Still do.

-- Mahipal == माहिपाल ... "My Pal" or "Maple"... as in Loops, S(y)rup, Wood. 
                          /\  "If the line between science fiction and 
                            /   science fact doesn't drive you crazy, 
 /\                         \   then you're just not tr(y)ing!" 
 \           /\/\  /  \   \/                    Mahipal Virdy 
 /   ==    \  /  \/\/                         The |meforce> Paradox 
 \/                            http://mahipal7638.files.wordpress.com/ 

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web