Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #630134 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-04-22 22:38 +0100 |
| Last post | 2017-05-03 10:03 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 172 — 11 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-22 22:38 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-22 15:55 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-22 22:58 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-22 16:20 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-23 00:01 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-22 17:20 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-23 00:27 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-22 17:44 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-23 00:48 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-22 17:54 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-23 00:55 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-22 18:13 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-23 01:20 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-05-03 14:35 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-05-03 14:32 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-03 10:07 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-23 08:15 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-23 15:17 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-23 10:07 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-23 12:05 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-30 18:06 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-30 11:11 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-30 18:36 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-30 11:48 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-30 18:54 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-30 12:09 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-30 19:14 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-30 12:25 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2017-04-30 19:39 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-30 23:50 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-30 16:56 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-05-01 00:00 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-30 17:09 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2017-04-30 20:23 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2017-04-30 20:24 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-05-01 00:26 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-05-10 21:42 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-05-10 23:11 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-05-11 15:23 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-05-06 14:32 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-06 09:26 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2017-05-07 12:38 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-05-07 17:16 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Beezel Bub <nunya@bizz.invalid> - 2017-05-07 11:24 -0600
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-05-07 17:57 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2017-05-07 14:32 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-05-07 18:36 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-07 12:53 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-05-07 21:51 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-07 15:02 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-07 11:59 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2017-05-07 14:18 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-05-07 18:24 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2017-05-07 15:18 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-05-07 19:35 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-07 13:06 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-05-07 18:50 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-07 12:12 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-05-07 19:48 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-07 12:55 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-07 11:56 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-07 11:57 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-05-08 00:09 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-07 16:24 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-05-06 14:34 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-05-06 13:48 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-05-06 15:16 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-06 09:28 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-06 09:55 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2017-05-06 10:40 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-06 09:27 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "Jonathan N. Little" <lws4art@gmail.com> - 2017-04-30 14:56 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-30 19:04 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-30 12:14 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-30 19:16 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-30 12:24 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-30 19:25 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-30 13:08 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-30 20:27 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-30 20:34 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-30 13:56 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-30 21:34 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-30 15:01 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-30 22:06 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-30 15:13 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-30 22:20 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-30 22:23 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-30 15:31 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-30 15:31 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-30 22:34 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-30 16:00 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-30 23:03 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-30 16:18 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-30 23:17 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-30 16:29 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-05-06 15:17 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-06 09:38 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "Jonathan N. Little" <lws4art@gmail.com> - 2017-04-30 15:18 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-30 19:18 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-30 12:23 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-30 19:21 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-30 13:07 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-30 12:24 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "Jonathan N. Little" <lws4art@gmail.com> - 2017-04-30 17:17 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-30 14:19 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "Jonathan N. Little" <lws4art@gmail.com> - 2017-04-30 17:22 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-30 14:28 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-30 21:22 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "Jonathan N. Little" <lws4art@gmail.com> - 2017-04-30 18:30 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-30 15:34 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ron C <r.capik@verizon.net> - 2017-04-30 18:49 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-30 16:01 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-30 22:40 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-30 16:16 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-30 23:15 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-30 16:28 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-30 23:43 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-30 16:48 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-30 23:51 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-30 16:55 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-30 23:55 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-30 17:08 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-05-01 00:17 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-30 17:33 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-05-01 00:46 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-30 17:52 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-05-01 01:02 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-30 18:23 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-05-01 01:47 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-30 19:18 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-05-06 08:53 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-06 09:53 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-05-06 17:30 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-06 10:44 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-05-06 17:54 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-06 12:05 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-05-06 19:37 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2017-05-06 22:09 +0200
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Charlie <pipedroner3@kismet45.org> - 2017-05-06 16:19 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-06 13:55 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-06 13:22 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-06 13:20 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-05-06 20:28 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-06 13:40 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-05-06 22:23 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-06 15:48 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-05-21 22:02 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-05-21 22:02 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-21 14:17 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ron C <r.capik@verizon.net> - 2017-04-30 18:33 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-30 15:36 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ron C <r.capik@verizon.net> - 2017-04-30 18:43 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-30 16:01 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-30 22:45 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ron C <r.capik@verizon.net> - 2017-04-30 18:54 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-30 22:53 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ron C <r.capik@verizon.net> - 2017-04-30 19:16 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-30 16:17 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2017-04-30 20:13 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-05-01 00:23 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2017-04-30 20:42 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-05-01 00:57 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-23 00:48 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-22 17:16 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-23 00:18 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-22 17:22 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-05-02 22:07 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-02 14:17 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-05-03 01:02 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-02 18:55 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-05-03 15:17 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-03 10:03 -0700
Page 7 of 9 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 Next page →
| From | Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-30 23:55 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <oe5ti9$nmg$4@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #631491 |
On Sun, 30 Apr 2017 16:55:58 -0700, Snit, after 15 edits, wrote this: > On 4/30/17, 4:51 PM, in article oe5tas$nmg$3@dont-email.me, "Sprang" ><spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: > >> On Sun, 30 Apr 2017 16:48:59 -0700, Snit, after 15 edits, wrote this: >>> On 4/30/17, 4:43 PM, in article oe5srn$nmg$1@dont-email.me, "Sprang" >>> <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: >>> >>>>>>>> You had no left coast. >>>>>>>> You also could not acheive the same climatic conditions now, as then. >>>>>>>> Ocean currents were different. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Back then you did not have ocean currents, you had ocean pasts. It was a >>>>>>> very tense time. >>>>>> >>>>>> With large shifts in climate :) >>>>>> And no factories. >>>>> >>>>> You seem to think shifts in climate in the past somehow are contrary to the >>>>> current science and not a part of it. Is that the case or are you just not >>>>> expressing yourself well? >>>> >>>> Right, the current shifts in climate have happened before. >>>> I'm not sure what is difficult about this. >>> >>> I agree you are not aware of what is different about this time. >> >> It's a career now. > > Science is a good career for some. Pretty clearly not for you. And not for them. No one is listening. You should see all the SUVs in parking lots. :) Al Gore creates more pollution traveling than anyone I know. He should ride a bike. -- SpringSprangSprung
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-30 17:08 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D52BCAA5.A2A2E%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #631493 |
On 4/30/17, 4:55 PM, in article oe5ti9$nmg$4@dont-email.me, "Sprang" <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: > On Sun, 30 Apr 2017 16:55:58 -0700, Snit, after 15 edits, wrote this: >> On 4/30/17, 4:51 PM, in article oe5tas$nmg$3@dont-email.me, "Sprang" >> <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: >> >>> On Sun, 30 Apr 2017 16:48:59 -0700, Snit, after 15 edits, wrote this: >>>> On 4/30/17, 4:43 PM, in article oe5srn$nmg$1@dont-email.me, "Sprang" >>>> <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: >>>> >>>>>>>>> You had no left coast. >>>>>>>>> You also could not acheive the same climatic conditions now, as then. >>>>>>>>> Ocean currents were different. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Back then you did not have ocean currents, you had ocean pasts. It was >>>>>>>> a >>>>>>>> very tense time. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> With large shifts in climate :) >>>>>>> And no factories. >>>>>> >>>>>> You seem to think shifts in climate in the past somehow are contrary to >>>>>> the >>>>>> current science and not a part of it. Is that the case or are you just >>>>>> not >>>>>> expressing yourself well? >>>>> >>>>> Right, the current shifts in climate have happened before. >>>>> I'm not sure what is difficult about this. >>>> >>>> I agree you are not aware of what is different about this time. >>> >>> It's a career now. >> >> Science is a good career for some. Pretty clearly not for you. > > And not for them. For them... meaning ALL scientists? All scientists who look at anything dealing with climate? You know more than all of them because, um, you know water evaporates and they did not take that into consideration? > No one is listening. Big corporations have a louder voice. Sure. > You should see all the SUVs in parking lots. :) > Al Gore creates more pollution traveling than anyone I know. > He should ride a bike. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-05-01 00:17 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <oe5uqf$nmg$6@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #631496 |
On Sun, 30 Apr 2017 17:08:53 -0700, Snit, after 15 edits, wrote this: > On 4/30/17, 4:55 PM, in article oe5ti9$nmg$4@dont-email.me, "Sprang" ><spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: > >> On Sun, 30 Apr 2017 16:55:58 -0700, Snit, after 15 edits, wrote this: >>> On 4/30/17, 4:51 PM, in article oe5tas$nmg$3@dont-email.me, "Sprang" >>> <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: >>> >>>> On Sun, 30 Apr 2017 16:48:59 -0700, Snit, after 15 edits, wrote this: >>>>> On 4/30/17, 4:43 PM, in article oe5srn$nmg$1@dont-email.me, "Sprang" >>>>> <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>>>>> You had no left coast. >>>>>>>>>> You also could not acheive the same climatic conditions now, as then. >>>>>>>>>> Ocean currents were different. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Back then you did not have ocean currents, you had ocean pasts. It was >>>>>>>>> a >>>>>>>>> very tense time. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> With large shifts in climate :) >>>>>>>> And no factories. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You seem to think shifts in climate in the past somehow are contrary to >>>>>>> the >>>>>>> current science and not a part of it. Is that the case or are you just >>>>>>> not >>>>>>> expressing yourself well? >>>>>> >>>>>> Right, the current shifts in climate have happened before. >>>>>> I'm not sure what is difficult about this. >>>>> >>>>> I agree you are not aware of what is different about this time. >>>> >>>> It's a career now. >>> >>> Science is a good career for some. Pretty clearly not for you. >> >> And not for them. > > For them... meaning ALL scientists? All scientists who look at anything > dealing with climate? You know more than all of them because, um, you know > water evaporates and they did not take that into consideration? I also seem to know the Earth orbits the Sun, which you said was wrong. No doubt you believe in AGW. > >> No one is listening. > > Big corporations have a louder voice. Sure. > People have better things to do, lives to live. >> You should see all the SUVs in parking lots. :) >> Al Gore creates more pollution traveling than anyone I know. >> He should ride a bike. -- SpringSprangSprung
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-30 17:33 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D52BD078.A2A49%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #631499 |
On 4/30/17, 5:17 PM, in article oe5uqf$nmg$6@dont-email.me, "Sprang"
<spring@sprung.invalid> wrote:
..
>>>> Science is a good career for some. Pretty clearly not for you.
>>>
>>> And not for them.
>>
>> For them... meaning ALL scientists? All scientists who look at anything
>> dealing with climate? You know more than all of them because, um, you know
>> water evaporates and they did not take that into consideration?
>
> I also seem to know the Earth orbits the Sun, which you said was wrong.
As I said: for an elementary school level you are close enough, but both
orbit the barycenter of the solar system.
<https://spaceplace.nasa.gov/barycenter/en/>
That spot is often but not always even IN the area of the sun:
<https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/0/0c/Solar_system_barycenter
.svg> OR <https://goo.gl/l9aqlc>
> No doubt you believe in AGW.
I accept the best evidence and science, sure.
>>> No one is listening.
>>
>> Big corporations have a louder voice. Sure.
>
> People have better things to do, lives to live.
Hence why the end up believing the big corporations who push their profits.
--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot
use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow
superior by attacking the messenger.
They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.
<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-05-01 00:46 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <oe60gg$4cs$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #631504 |
On Sun, 30 Apr 2017 17:33:44 -0700, Snit, after 15 edits, wrote this: > On 4/30/17, 5:17 PM, in article oe5uqf$nmg$6@dont-email.me, "Sprang" ><spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: > > .. >>>>> Science is a good career for some. Pretty clearly not for you. >>>> >>>> And not for them. >>> >>> For them... meaning ALL scientists? All scientists who look at anything >>> dealing with climate? You know more than all of them because, um, you know >>> water evaporates and they did not take that into consideration? >> >> I also seem to know the Earth orbits the Sun, which you said was wrong. > > As I said: for an elementary school level you are close enough, but both > orbit the barycenter of the solar system. > > <https://spaceplace.nasa.gov/barycenter/en/> > > That spot is often but not always even IN the area of the sun: > ><https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/0/0c/Solar_system_barycenter > .svg> OR <https://goo.gl/l9aqlc> Yet, the *Earth* still orbits the *Sun*. The barycenter of the Earth/Sun pairing is almost dead center of the Sun, so the Sun doesn't orbit that barycenter. > >> No doubt you believe in AGW. > > I accept the best evidence and science, sure. > Good for you. Buy a boat. >>>> No one is listening. >>> >>> Big corporations have a louder voice. Sure. >> >> People have better things to do, lives to live. > > Hence why the end up believing the big corporations who push their profits. They see SUVs, they want them, a dealer may convince them to pull the trigger. The size of the corporation doesn't matter. -- SpringSprangSprung
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-30 17:52 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D52BD4F4.A2A57%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #631506 |
On 4/30/17, 5:46 PM, in article oe60gg$4cs$1@dont-email.me, "Sprang" <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: > On Sun, 30 Apr 2017 17:33:44 -0700, Snit, after 15 edits, wrote this: >> On 4/30/17, 5:17 PM, in article oe5uqf$nmg$6@dont-email.me, "Sprang" >> <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: >> >> .. >>>>>> Science is a good career for some. Pretty clearly not for you. >>>>> >>>>> And not for them. >>>> >>>> For them... meaning ALL scientists? All scientists who look at anything >>>> dealing with climate? You know more than all of them because, um, you know >>>> water evaporates and they did not take that into consideration? >>> >>> I also seem to know the Earth orbits the Sun, which you said was wrong. >> >> As I said: for an elementary school level you are close enough, but both >> orbit the barycenter of the solar system. >> >> <https://spaceplace.nasa.gov/barycenter/en/> >> >> That spot is often but not always even IN the area of the sun: >> >> <https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/0/0c/Solar_system_barycenter >> .svg> OR <https://goo.gl/l9aqlc> > > Yet, the *Earth* still orbits the *Sun*. Again: from a elementary level view of science, sure. > The barycenter of the Earth/Sun pairing is almost dead center of the Sun, so > the Sun doesn't orbit that barycenter. Directly above the text you responded to I showed you this was not the case: <https://goo.gl/l9aqlc>. >>> No doubt you believe in AGW. >> >> I accept the best evidence and science, sure. > > Good for you. > Buy a boat. It is a boat time many people did! :) >>>>> No one is listening. >>>> >>>> Big corporations have a louder voice. Sure. >>> >>> People have better things to do, lives to live. >> >> Hence why the end up believing the big corporations who push their profits. > > They see SUVs, they want them, a dealer may convince them to pull the trigger. > The size of the corporation doesn't matter. Corporations push the narrative you buy into that leads to socializing the costs of those SUVs. How many people would buy them if the cost of the carbon was built into the gas tax? -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-05-01 01:02 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <oe61fg$4cs$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #631507 |
On Sun, 30 Apr 2017 17:52:52 -0700, Snit, after 15 edits, wrote this: > On 4/30/17, 5:46 PM, in article oe60gg$4cs$1@dont-email.me, "Sprang" ><spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: > >> On Sun, 30 Apr 2017 17:33:44 -0700, Snit, after 15 edits, wrote this: >>> On 4/30/17, 5:17 PM, in article oe5uqf$nmg$6@dont-email.me, "Sprang" >>> <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: >>> >>> .. >>>>>>> Science is a good career for some. Pretty clearly not for you. >>>>>> >>>>>> And not for them. >>>>> >>>>> For them... meaning ALL scientists? All scientists who look at anything >>>>> dealing with climate? You know more than all of them because, um, you know >>>>> water evaporates and they did not take that into consideration? >>>> >>>> I also seem to know the Earth orbits the Sun, which you said was wrong. >>> >>> As I said: for an elementary school level you are close enough, but both >>> orbit the barycenter of the solar system. >>> >>> <https://spaceplace.nasa.gov/barycenter/en/> >>> >>> That spot is often but not always even IN the area of the sun: >>> >>> <https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/0/0c/Solar_system_barycenter >>> .svg> OR <https://goo.gl/l9aqlc> >> >> Yet, the *Earth* still orbits the *Sun*. > > Again: from a elementary level view of science, sure. No, it just does. > >> The barycenter of the Earth/Sun pairing is almost dead center of the Sun, so >> the Sun doesn't orbit that barycenter. > > Directly above the text you responded to I showed you this was not the case: ><https://goo.gl/l9aqlc>. > Yeah, I don't do blind links. The Sun and Earth orbit the galactic center, if that's what you mean. The Sun wobbling isn't an orbit. >>>> No doubt you believe in AGW. >>> >>> I accept the best evidence and science, sure. >> >> Good for you. >> Buy a boat. > > It is a boat time many people did! :) > Ha >>>>>> No one is listening. >>>>> >>>>> Big corporations have a louder voice. Sure. >>>> >>>> People have better things to do, lives to live. >>> >>> Hence why the end up believing the big corporations who push their profits. >> >> They see SUVs, they want them, a dealer may convince them to pull the trigger. >> The size of the corporation doesn't matter. > > Corporations push the narrative you buy into that leads to socializing the > costs of those SUVs. How many people would buy them if the cost of the > carbon was built into the gas tax? > -- SpringSprangSprung
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-30 18:23 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D52BDC30.A2A6A%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #631509 |
On 4/30/17, 6:02 PM, in article oe61fg$4cs$3@dont-email.me, "Sprang"
<spring@sprung.invalid> wrote:
> On Sun, 30 Apr 2017 17:52:52 -0700, Snit, after 15 edits, wrote this:
>> On 4/30/17, 5:46 PM, in article oe60gg$4cs$1@dont-email.me, "Sprang"
>> <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, 30 Apr 2017 17:33:44 -0700, Snit, after 15 edits, wrote this:
>>>> On 4/30/17, 5:17 PM, in article oe5uqf$nmg$6@dont-email.me, "Sprang"
>>>> <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> ..
>>>>>>>> Science is a good career for some. Pretty clearly not for you.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> And not for them.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> For them... meaning ALL scientists? All scientists who look at anything
>>>>>> dealing with climate? You know more than all of them because, um, you
>>>>>> know
>>>>>> water evaporates and they did not take that into consideration?
>>>>>
>>>>> I also seem to know the Earth orbits the Sun, which you said was wrong.
>>>>
>>>> As I said: for an elementary school level you are close enough, but both
>>>> orbit the barycenter of the solar system.
>>>>
>>>> <https://spaceplace.nasa.gov/barycenter/en/>
>>>>
>>>> That spot is often but not always even IN the area of the sun:
>>>>
>>>>
<https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/0/0c/Solar_system_barycente>>>>
r
>>>> .svg> OR <https://goo.gl/l9aqlc>
>>>
>>> Yet, the *Earth* still orbits the *Sun*.
>>
>> Again: from a elementary level view of science, sure.
>
> No, it just does.
Nope: <https://youtu.be/_IHXj8k2jqc>
>>> The barycenter of the Earth/Sun pairing is almost dead center of the Sun, so
>>> the Sun doesn't orbit that barycenter.
>>
>> Directly above the text you responded to I showed you this was not the case:
>> <https://goo.gl/l9aqlc>.
>
> Yeah, I don't do blind links.
I gave the full link, above. Did not help you. :) But, here, another from
YouTube: <https://youtu.be/1iSR3Yw6FXo>
> The Sun and Earth orbit the galactic center, if that's what you mean.
> The Sun wobbling isn't an orbit.
The sun, as with the planets, orbits the barycenter.
<https://spaceplace.nasa.gov/barycenter>
-----
Our entire solar system also has a barycenter. The sun, Earth,
and all of the planets in the solar system orbit around this
barycenter. It is the center of mass of every object in the
solar system combined.
-----
This is material made for grade schools... and is still beyond your
knowledge. Interesting.
...
--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot
use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow
superior by attacking the messenger.
They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.
<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-05-01 01:47 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <oe642m$ja9$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #631513 |
On Sun, 30 Apr 2017 18:23:44 -0700, Snit, after 15 edits, wrote this: > On 4/30/17, 6:02 PM, in article oe61fg$4cs$3@dont-email.me, "Sprang" ><spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: > >> On Sun, 30 Apr 2017 17:52:52 -0700, Snit, after 15 edits, wrote this: >>> On 4/30/17, 5:46 PM, in article oe60gg$4cs$1@dont-email.me, "Sprang" >>> <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: >>> >>>> On Sun, 30 Apr 2017 17:33:44 -0700, Snit, after 15 edits, wrote this: >>>>> On 4/30/17, 5:17 PM, in article oe5uqf$nmg$6@dont-email.me, "Sprang" >>>>> <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> .. >>>>>>>>> Science is a good career for some. Pretty clearly not for you. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> And not for them. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> For them... meaning ALL scientists? All scientists who look at anything >>>>>>> dealing with climate? You know more than all of them because, um, you >>>>>>> know >>>>>>> water evaporates and they did not take that into consideration? >>>>>> >>>>>> I also seem to know the Earth orbits the Sun, which you said was wrong. >>>>> >>>>> As I said: for an elementary school level you are close enough, but both >>>>> orbit the barycenter of the solar system. >>>>> >>>>> <https://spaceplace.nasa.gov/barycenter/en/> >>>>> >>>>> That spot is often but not always even IN the area of the sun: >>>>> >>>>> ><https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/0/0c/Solar_system_barycente>>>> > r >>>>> .svg> OR <https://goo.gl/l9aqlc> >>>> >>>> Yet, the *Earth* still orbits the *Sun*. >>> >>> Again: from a elementary level view of science, sure. >> >> No, it just does. > > Nope: <https://youtu.be/_IHXj8k2jqc> > >>>> The barycenter of the Earth/Sun pairing is almost dead center of the Sun, so >>>> the Sun doesn't orbit that barycenter. >>> >>> Directly above the text you responded to I showed you this was not the case: >>> <https://goo.gl/l9aqlc>. >> >> Yeah, I don't do blind links. > > I gave the full link, above. Did not help you. :) But, here, another from > YouTube: <https://youtu.be/1iSR3Yw6FXo> > >> The Sun and Earth orbit the galactic center, if that's what you mean. >> The Sun wobbling isn't an orbit. > > The sun, as with the planets, orbits the barycenter. > > <https://spaceplace.nasa.gov/barycenter> > ----- > Our entire solar system also has a barycenter. The sun, Earth, > and all of the planets in the solar system orbit around this > barycenter. It is the center of mass of every object in the > solar system combined. > ----- > > This is material made for grade schools... and is still beyond your > knowledge. Interesting. > > ... The shared mass is causing the Sun to wobble. I get it just fine. I posted I get how gravitational disturbance is one way they find exoplanets. The Earth still orbits the Sun. If you want to think the wobble is an orbit, go ahead. It's an effect of the orbit. It wobbles from the other planets too. It doesn't follow a different path for each, independently. It's wobbling. You read kiddie NASA sites? They send stuff to the wrong planet cause metric and standard confuses them. They're being replaced by private companies. Posters and models will be their future. :) -- SpringSprangSprung
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-30 19:18 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D52BE8F5.A2A7D%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #631514 |
On 4/30/17, 6:47 PM, in article oe642m$ja9$1@dont-email.me, "Sprang"
<spring@sprung.invalid> wrote:
...
>> The sun, as with the planets, orbits the barycenter.
>>
>> <https://spaceplace.nasa.gov/barycenter>
>> -----
>> Our entire solar system also has a barycenter. The sun, Earth,
>> and all of the planets in the solar system orbit around this
>> barycenter. It is the center of mass of every object in the
>> solar system combined.
>> -----
>>
>> This is material made for grade schools... and is still beyond your
>> knowledge. Interesting.
>>
>> ...
>
> The shared mass is causing the Sun to wobble.
> I get it just fine.
> I posted I get how gravitational disturbance is one way they find exoplanets.
> The Earth still orbits the Sun.
>
> If you want to think the wobble is an orbit, go ahead.
> It's an effect of the orbit.
> It wobbles from the other planets too.
> It doesn't follow a different path for each, independently.
> It's wobbling.
>
> You read kiddie NASA sites?
I used it to help educate you and show your where your claim was in error:
Sprang:
-----
The Sun wobbling isn't an orbit.
-----
NASA:
-----
The sun, Earth, and all of the planets in the solar system
orbit around this barycenter.
-----
> They send stuff to the wrong planet cause metric and standard confuses them.
> They're being replaced by private companies.
>
> Posters and models will be their future. :)
Well, many in our government are so ignorant of science they deny man-made
global climate change... of course we are struggling because of it.
--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot
use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow
superior by attacking the messenger.
They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.
<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-05-06 08:53 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <oek2ub$lbt$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #631516 |
On Sun, 30 Apr 2017 19:18:13 -0700, Snit, after 15 edits, wrote this: > On 4/30/17, 6:47 PM, in article oe642m$ja9$1@dont-email.me, "Sprang" ><spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: > > ... >>> The sun, as with the planets, orbits the barycenter. >>> >>> <https://spaceplace.nasa.gov/barycenter> >>> ----- >>> Our entire solar system also has a barycenter. The sun, Earth, >>> and all of the planets in the solar system orbit around this >>> barycenter. It is the center of mass of every object in the >>> solar system combined. >>> ----- >>> >>> This is material made for grade schools... and is still beyond your >>> knowledge. Interesting. >>> >>> ... >> >> The shared mass is causing the Sun to wobble. >> I get it just fine. >> I posted I get how gravitational disturbance is one way they find exoplanets. >> The Earth still orbits the Sun. >> >> If you want to think the wobble is an orbit, go ahead. >> It's an effect of the orbit. >> It wobbles from the other planets too. >> It doesn't follow a different path for each, independently. >> It's wobbling. >> >> You read kiddie NASA sites? > > I used it to help educate you and show your where your claim was in error: > > Sprang: > ----- > The Sun wobbling isn't an orbit. > ----- Well, actually, Sprang insist the Earth orbits the Sun. You're trying to SNIP for the win :) > > NASA: > ----- > The sun, Earth, and all of the planets in the solar system > orbit around this barycenter. > ----- > Yeah, even that's incorrect. There isn't *one* barycenter, so there is no *this barycenter*. It is different for each object. These are math equations that describe planetary motions. All the planets *still* orbit the Sun. Imagine God gets a bug up his butt, and just poofs the Sun out of existance. Will the planets still orbit these barycenters? >> They send stuff to the wrong planet cause metric and standard confuses them. >> They're being replaced by private companies. >> >> Posters and models will be their future. :) > > Well, many in our government are so ignorant of science they deny man-made > global climate change... of course we are struggling because of it. > My yard has never been greener. :) And the atrazine really put the weed's dick in the dirt. -- SpringSprangSprung
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-05-06 09:53 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D5334D7C.A3CAE%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #632096 |
On 5/6/17, 1:53 AM, in article oek2ub$lbt$1@dont-email.me, "Sprang"
<spring@sprung.invalid> wrote:
...
>> I used it to help educate you and show your where your claim was in error:
>>
>> Sprang:
>> -----
>> The Sun wobbling isn't an orbit.
>> -----
>
> Well, actually, Sprang insist the Earth orbits the Sun.
> You're trying to SNIP for the win :)
That is a different topic... you have two different incorrect claims:
Sprang:
-----
The Sun wobbling isn't an orbit.
-----
Which we know is not true:
NASA <https://spaceplace.nasa.gov/barycenter>:
-----
The sun, Earth, and all of the planets in the solar system
orbit around this barycenter.
-----
And then also:
Sprang:
-----
Well, actually, Sprang insist the Earth orbits the Sun.
-----
Which is shown to be wrong by the same NASA quote. So you have made claims
which are baseless and contrary to well established science. Fair enough.
Now the question is what you want to do with the knowledge you have been
shown. Deny it? Accept it? Continue to insist you are right even in the
absence of any support?
I suspect the latter.
What you CERTAINLY will not do is show any support. That is a given.
>> NASA:
>> -----
>> The sun, Earth, and all of the planets in the solar system
>> orbit around this barycenter.
>> -----
>>
> Yeah, even that's incorrect.
> There isn't *one* barycenter, so there is no *this barycenter*.
> It is different for each object.
> These are math equations that describe planetary motions.
> All the planets *still* orbit the Sun.
You can speak of the barycenter between two objects, but to understand the
movement of the sun (and, really, even other objects in the solar system)
you should understand (extended quote from the same link):
-----
Our entire solar system also has a barycenter. The sun, Earth,
and all of the planets in the solar system orbit around this
barycenter. It is the center of mass of every object in the
solar system combined.
-----
> Imagine God gets a bug up his butt, and just poofs the Sun out of existance.
> Will the planets still orbit these barycenters?
Their movement would be enough to have them not orbit each other... much as
the moon is slowly drifting away from the Earth (by about 4 cm a year) and
some day will not orbit it. It does not mean we cannot calculate the
barycenter of the two right now!
>>> They send stuff to the wrong planet cause metric and standard confuses them.
>>> They're being replaced by private companies.
>>>
>>> Posters and models will be their future. :)
>>
>> Well, many in our government are so ignorant of science they deny man-made
>> global climate change... of course we are struggling because of it.
>
> My yard has never been greener. :)
> And the atrazine really put the weed's dick in the dirt.
So you have nothing to say on the topic. OK.
--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot
use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow
superior by attacking the messenger.
They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.
<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-05-06 17:30 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <oel17j$9s4$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #632115 |
On Sat, 06 May 2017 09:53:00 -0700, Snit, after 15 edits, wrote this: > On 5/6/17, 1:53 AM, in article oek2ub$lbt$1@dont-email.me, "Sprang" ><spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: > > ... >>> I used it to help educate you and show your where your claim was in error: >>> >>> Sprang: >>> ----- >>> The Sun wobbling isn't an orbit. >>> ----- >> >> Well, actually, Sprang insist the Earth orbits the Sun. >> You're trying to SNIP for the win :) > > That is a different topic... you have two different incorrect claims: It isn't a different topic, moron. You started the topic, look at your initial statement. You don't think the Earth orbits the Sun...LOL. > Sprang: > ----- > The Sun wobbling isn't an orbit. > ----- > > Which we know is not true: > > NASA <https://spaceplace.nasa.gov/barycenter>: > ----- > The sun, Earth, and all of the planets in the solar system > orbit around this barycenter. > ----- The Earth orbits the Sun. The Sun orbits the Galactic Center. The barycenter is the measured center of gravitational mass of the Solar System. That fluctuates wildly, but is within the Sun's radius almost always. As the planets orbital direction changes, so does the vector of barycenter. If one was to track the *Sun's orbit* around the Galactic Center, these perturbations in the Sun's orbit would appear as a wobble, less than the radius of the Sun. The Sun is not orbiting itself... :) > > And then also: > > Sprang: > ----- > Well, actually, Sprang insist the Earth orbits the Sun. > ----- > > Which is shown to be wrong by the same NASA quote. So you have made claims > which are baseless and contrary to well established science. Fair enough. > Now the question is what you want to do with the knowledge you have been > shown. Deny it? Accept it? Continue to insist you are right even in the > absence of any support? > > I suspect the latter. It is *not* wrong, dummy. The Earth orbits the friggen Sun. :) > > What you CERTAINLY will not do is show any support. That is a given. > >>> NASA: >>> ----- >>> The sun, Earth, and all of the planets in the solar system >>> orbit around this barycenter. >>> ----- >>> >> Yeah, even that's incorrect. >> There isn't *one* barycenter, so there is no *this barycenter*. >> It is different for each object. >> These are math equations that describe planetary motions. >> All the planets *still* orbit the Sun. > > You can speak of the barycenter between two objects, but to understand the > movement of the sun (and, really, even other objects in the solar system) > you should understand (extended quote from the same link): > ----- > Our entire solar system also has a barycenter. The sun, Earth, > and all of the planets in the solar system orbit around this > barycenter. It is the center of mass of every object in the > solar system combined. > ----- > See above for the explanation. The barycenter is the *defined* center of mass between objects. It is not an actual object the Earth is orbiting, nor does that defined point exert any gravitation force. THE *EARTH* ORBITS THE *SUN*. >> Imagine God gets a bug up his butt, and just poofs the Sun out of existance. >> Will the planets still orbit these barycenters? > > Their movement would be enough to have them not orbit each other... much as > the moon is slowly drifting away from the Earth (by about 4 cm a year) and > some day will not orbit it. It does not mean we cannot calculate the > barycenter of the two right now! > >>>> They send stuff to the wrong planet cause metric and standard confuses them. >>>> They're being replaced by private companies. >>>> >>>> Posters and models will be their future. :) >>> >>> Well, many in our government are so ignorant of science they deny man-made >>> global climate change... of course we are struggling because of it. >> >> My yard has never been greener. :) >> And the atrazine really put the weed's dick in the dirt. > > So you have nothing to say on the topic. OK. You can't read. -- SpringSprangSprung
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-05-06 10:44 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D53359A3.A3CD8%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #632121 |
On 5/6/17, 10:30 AM, in article oel17j$9s4$1@dont-email.me, "Sprang" <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: > On Sat, 06 May 2017 09:53:00 -0700, Snit, after 15 edits, wrote this: >> On 5/6/17, 1:53 AM, in article oek2ub$lbt$1@dont-email.me, "Sprang" >> <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: >> >> ... >>>> I used it to help educate you and show your where your claim was in error: >>>> >>>> Sprang: >>>> ----- >>>> The Sun wobbling isn't an orbit. >>>> ----- >>> >>> Well, actually, Sprang insist the Earth orbits the Sun. >>> You're trying to SNIP for the win :) >> >> That is a different topic... you have two different incorrect claims: > > It isn't a different topic, moron. > You started the topic, look at your initial statement. > > You don't think the Earth orbits the Sun...LOL. I understand the barycenter. >> Sprang: >> ----- >> The Sun wobbling isn't an orbit. >> ----- >> >> Which we know is not true: >> >> NASA <https://spaceplace.nasa.gov/barycenter>: >> ----- >> The sun, Earth, and all of the planets in the solar system >> orbit around this barycenter. >> ----- > > The Earth orbits the Sun. > The Sun orbits the Galactic Center. A good simplification for elementary students. Sure. > The barycenter is the measured center of gravitational mass of the > Solar System. > That fluctuates wildly, but is within the Sun's radius almost always. > As the planets orbital direction changes, so does the vector of > barycenter. > > If one was to track the *Sun's orbit* around the Galactic Center, > these perturbations in the Sun's orbit would appear as a wobble, > less than the radius of the Sun. > > The Sun is not orbiting itself... :) Of course not: as you have been told (and shown) the sun orbits the barycenter of the solar system, just like the earth and other planets (and more)... though of course things like the the moon and Earth also orbit their own barycenter. >> And then also: >> >> Sprang: >> ----- >> Well, actually, Sprang insist the Earth orbits the Sun. >> ----- >> >> Which is shown to be wrong by the same NASA quote. So you have made claims >> which are baseless and contrary to well established science. Fair enough. >> Now the question is what you want to do with the knowledge you have been >> shown. Deny it? Accept it? Continue to insist you are right even in the >> absence of any support? >> >> I suspect the latter. > > It is *not* wrong, dummy. > The Earth orbits the friggen Sun. :) Again, for a simplification for young children you are correct. >> What you CERTAINLY will not do is show any support. That is a given. >> >>>> NASA: >>>> ----- >>>> The sun, Earth, and all of the planets in the solar system >>>> orbit around this barycenter. >>>> ----- >>>> >>> Yeah, even that's incorrect. >>> There isn't *one* barycenter, so there is no *this barycenter*. >>> It is different for each object. >>> These are math equations that describe planetary motions. >>> All the planets *still* orbit the Sun. >> >> You can speak of the barycenter between two objects, but to understand the >> movement of the sun (and, really, even other objects in the solar system) >> you should understand (extended quote from the same link): >> ----- >> Our entire solar system also has a barycenter. The sun, Earth, >> and all of the planets in the solar system orbit around this >> barycenter. It is the center of mass of every object in the >> solar system combined. >> ----- > > See above for the explanation. > The barycenter is the *defined* center of mass between objects. > It is not an actual object the Earth is orbiting, nor does that defined > point exert any gravitation force. Interesting straw men. > THE *EARTH* ORBITS THE *SUN*. Again, for a simplification for young children you are correct. >>> Imagine God gets a bug up his butt, and just poofs the Sun out of existance. >>> Will the planets still orbit these barycenters? >> >> Their movement would be enough to have them not orbit each other... much as >> the moon is slowly drifting away from the Earth (by about 4 cm a year) and >> some day will not orbit it. It does not mean we cannot calculate the >> barycenter of the two right now! >> >>>>> They send stuff to the wrong planet cause metric and standard confuses >>>>> them. >>>>> They're being replaced by private companies. >>>>> >>>>> Posters and models will be their future. :) >>>> >>>> Well, many in our government are so ignorant of science they deny man-made >>>> global climate change... of course we are struggling because of it. >>> >>> My yard has never been greener. :) >>> And the atrazine really put the weed's dick in the dirt. >> >> So you have nothing to say on the topic. OK. > > You can't read. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-05-06 17:54 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <oel2jq$9s4$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #632122 |
On Sat, 06 May 2017 10:44:51 -0700, Snit, after 15 edits, wrote this: > On 5/6/17, 10:30 AM, in article oel17j$9s4$1@dont-email.me, "Sprang" ><spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: > >> On Sat, 06 May 2017 09:53:00 -0700, Snit, after 15 edits, wrote this: >>> On 5/6/17, 1:53 AM, in article oek2ub$lbt$1@dont-email.me, "Sprang" >>> <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: >>> >>> ... >>>>> I used it to help educate you and show your where your claim was in error: >>>>> >>>>> Sprang: >>>>> ----- >>>>> The Sun wobbling isn't an orbit. >>>>> ----- >>>> >>>> Well, actually, Sprang insist the Earth orbits the Sun. >>>> You're trying to SNIP for the win :) >>> >>> That is a different topic... you have two different incorrect claims: >> >> It isn't a different topic, moron. >> You started the topic, look at your initial statement. >> >> You don't think the Earth orbits the Sun...LOL. > > I understand the barycenter. Got a picture of it? An actual picture, not a diagram. If you do, then I'll agree the Earth orbits that :) > >>> Sprang: >>> ----- >>> The Sun wobbling isn't an orbit. >>> ----- >>> >>> Which we know is not true: >>> >>> NASA <https://spaceplace.nasa.gov/barycenter>: >>> ----- >>> The sun, Earth, and all of the planets in the solar system >>> orbit around this barycenter. >>> ----- >> >> The Earth orbits the Sun. >> The Sun orbits the Galactic Center. > > A good simplification for elementary students. Sure. > You're welcome. >> The barycenter is the measured center of gravitational mass of the >> Solar System. >> That fluctuates wildly, but is within the Sun's radius almost always. >> As the planets orbital direction changes, so does the vector of >> barycenter. >> >> If one was to track the *Sun's orbit* around the Galactic Center, >> these perturbations in the Sun's orbit would appear as a wobble, >> less than the radius of the Sun. >> >> The Sun is not orbiting itself... :) > > Of course not: as you have been told (and shown) the sun orbits the > barycenter of the solar system, just like the earth and other planets (and > more)... though of course things like the the moon and Earth also orbit > their own barycenter. > If the Sun orbits that barycenter, what is the orbital period? The Sun's orbit around the Galactic Center takes 220+ million years. >>> And then also: >>> >>> Sprang: >>> ----- >>> Well, actually, Sprang insist the Earth orbits the Sun. >>> ----- >>> >>> Which is shown to be wrong by the same NASA quote. So you have made claims >>> which are baseless and contrary to well established science. Fair enough. >>> Now the question is what you want to do with the knowledge you have been >>> shown. Deny it? Accept it? Continue to insist you are right even in the >>> absence of any support? >>> >>> I suspect the latter. >> >> It is *not* wrong, dummy. >> The Earth orbits the friggen Sun. :) > > Again, for a simplification for young children you are correct. > You're welcome. >>> What you CERTAINLY will not do is show any support. That is a given. >>> >>>>> NASA: >>>>> ----- >>>>> The sun, Earth, and all of the planets in the solar system >>>>> orbit around this barycenter. >>>>> ----- >>>>> >>>> Yeah, even that's incorrect. >>>> There isn't *one* barycenter, so there is no *this barycenter*. >>>> It is different for each object. >>>> These are math equations that describe planetary motions. >>>> All the planets *still* orbit the Sun. >>> >>> You can speak of the barycenter between two objects, but to understand the >>> movement of the sun (and, really, even other objects in the solar system) >>> you should understand (extended quote from the same link): >>> ----- >>> Our entire solar system also has a barycenter. The sun, Earth, >>> and all of the planets in the solar system orbit around this >>> barycenter. It is the center of mass of every object in the >>> solar system combined. >>> ----- >> >> See above for the explanation. >> The barycenter is the *defined* center of mass between objects. >> It is not an actual object the Earth is orbiting, nor does that defined >> point exert any gravitation force. > > Interesting straw men. > Interesting cop out. >> THE *EARTH* ORBITS THE *SUN*. > > Again, for a simplification for young children you are correct. > > Welcome. >>>> Imagine God gets a bug up his butt, and just poofs the Sun out of existance. >>>> Will the planets still orbit these barycenters? >>> >>> Their movement would be enough to have them not orbit each other... much as >>> the moon is slowly drifting away from the Earth (by about 4 cm a year) and >>> some day will not orbit it. It does not mean we cannot calculate the >>> barycenter of the two right now! >>> >>>>>> They send stuff to the wrong planet cause metric and standard confuses >>>>>> them. >>>>>> They're being replaced by private companies. >>>>>> >>>>>> Posters and models will be their future. :) >>>>> >>>>> Well, many in our government are so ignorant of science they deny man-made >>>>> global climate change... of course we are struggling because of it. >>>> >>>> My yard has never been greener. :) >>>> And the atrazine really put the weed's dick in the dirt. >>> >>> So you have nothing to say on the topic. OK. >> >> You can't read. A cliff hanger. -- SpringSprangSprung
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-05-06 12:05 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D5336C98.A3CEE%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #632123 |
On 5/6/17, 10:54 AM, in article oel2jq$9s4$2@dont-email.me, "Sprang" <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: > On Sat, 06 May 2017 10:44:51 -0700, Snit, after 15 edits, wrote this: >> On 5/6/17, 10:30 AM, in article oel17j$9s4$1@dont-email.me, "Sprang" >> <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: >> >>> On Sat, 06 May 2017 09:53:00 -0700, Snit, after 15 edits, wrote this: >>>> On 5/6/17, 1:53 AM, in article oek2ub$lbt$1@dont-email.me, "Sprang" >>>> <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: >>>> >>>> ... >>>>>> I used it to help educate you and show your where your claim was in >>>>>> error: >>>>>> >>>>>> Sprang: >>>>>> ----- >>>>>> The Sun wobbling isn't an orbit. >>>>>> ----- >>>>> >>>>> Well, actually, Sprang insist the Earth orbits the Sun. >>>>> You're trying to SNIP for the win :) >>>> >>>> That is a different topic... you have two different incorrect claims: >>> >>> It isn't a different topic, moron. >>> You started the topic, look at your initial statement. >>> >>> You don't think the Earth orbits the Sun...LOL. >> >> I understand the barycenter. > > Got a picture of it? > An actual picture, not a diagram. > If you do, then I'll agree the Earth orbits that :) The fact you want a picture of the center of gravity of a set of objects shows you have NO clue what we are even talking about. Seriously, wow. >>>> Sprang: >>>> ----- >>>> The Sun wobbling isn't an orbit. >>>> ----- >>>> >>>> Which we know is not true: >>>> >>>> NASA <https://spaceplace.nasa.gov/barycenter>: >>>> ----- >>>> The sun, Earth, and all of the planets in the solar system >>>> orbit around this barycenter. >>>> ----- >>> >>> The Earth orbits the Sun. >>> The Sun orbits the Galactic Center. >> >> A good simplification for elementary students. Sure. > > You're welcome. Listen, that may be as far as you can understand right now. If so, fine by me. ... >> Of course not: as you have been told (and shown) the sun orbits the >> barycenter of the solar system, just like the earth and other planets (and >> more)... though of course things like the the moon and Earth also orbit >> their own barycenter. > > If the Sun orbits that barycenter, what is the orbital period? It is cycle... would have to look up the time again. > The Sun's orbit around the Galactic Center takes 220+ million years. Well, technically it does not orbit the Galactic Center... though I suspect the barycenter there is VERY close to that center! ... >>> See above for the explanation. >>> The barycenter is the *defined* center of mass between objects. >>> It is not an actual object the Earth is orbiting, nor does that defined >>> point exert any gravitation force. >> >> Interesting straw men. > > Interesting cop out. You can call your straw men a cop out if you wish. ... -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-05-06 19:37 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <oel8l7$dqk$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #632130 |
On Sat, 06 May 2017 12:05:44 -0700, Snit, after 15 edits, wrote this: > On 5/6/17, 10:54 AM, in article oel2jq$9s4$2@dont-email.me, "Sprang" ><spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: > >> On Sat, 06 May 2017 10:44:51 -0700, Snit, after 15 edits, wrote this: >>> On 5/6/17, 10:30 AM, in article oel17j$9s4$1@dont-email.me, "Sprang" >>> <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: >>> >>>> On Sat, 06 May 2017 09:53:00 -0700, Snit, after 15 edits, wrote this: >>>>> On 5/6/17, 1:53 AM, in article oek2ub$lbt$1@dont-email.me, "Sprang" >>>>> <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> ... >>>>>>> I used it to help educate you and show your where your claim was in >>>>>>> error: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Sprang: >>>>>>> ----- >>>>>>> The Sun wobbling isn't an orbit. >>>>>>> ----- >>>>>> >>>>>> Well, actually, Sprang insist the Earth orbits the Sun. >>>>>> You're trying to SNIP for the win :) >>>>> >>>>> That is a different topic... you have two different incorrect claims: >>>> >>>> It isn't a different topic, moron. >>>> You started the topic, look at your initial statement. >>>> >>>> You don't think the Earth orbits the Sun...LOL. >>> >>> I understand the barycenter. >> >> Got a picture of it? >> An actual picture, not a diagram. >> If you do, then I'll agree the Earth orbits that :) > > The fact you want a picture of the center of gravity of a set of objects > shows you have NO clue what we are even talking about. Seriously, wow. I knew you didn't have one, dummy. So, it's still the Sun. > >>>>> Sprang: >>>>> ----- >>>>> The Sun wobbling isn't an orbit. >>>>> ----- >>>>> >>>>> Which we know is not true: >>>>> >>>>> NASA <https://spaceplace.nasa.gov/barycenter>: >>>>> ----- >>>>> The sun, Earth, and all of the planets in the solar system >>>>> orbit around this barycenter. >>>>> ----- >>>> >>>> The Earth orbits the Sun. >>>> The Sun orbits the Galactic Center. >>> >>> A good simplification for elementary students. Sure. >> >> You're welcome. > > Listen, that may be as far as you can understand right now. If so, fine by > me. > If there's more to understand, post it. > ... >>> Of course not: as you have been told (and shown) the sun orbits the >>> barycenter of the solar system, just like the earth and other planets (and >>> more)... though of course things like the the moon and Earth also orbit >>> their own barycenter. >> >> If the Sun orbits that barycenter, what is the orbital period? > > It is cycle... would have to look up the time again. > Waiting. >> The Sun's orbit around the Galactic Center takes 220+ million years. > > Well, technically it does not orbit the Galactic Center... though I suspect > the barycenter there is VERY close to that center! Maybe you can fly there one day, and let me know what you saw. > > ... >>>> See above for the explanation. >>>> The barycenter is the *defined* center of mass between objects. >>>> It is not an actual object the Earth is orbiting, nor does that defined >>>> point exert any gravitation force. >>> >>> Interesting straw men. >> >> Interesting cop out. > > You can call your straw men a cop out if you wish. > I didn't. You can't follow who's who. -- SpringSprangSprung
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-05-06 22:09 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <oelaba$n9c$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #632137 |
Sprang wrote: > On Sat, 06 May 2017 12:05:44 -0700, Snit, after 15 edits, wrote this: >> On 5/6/17, 10:54 AM, in article oel2jq$9s4$2@dont-email.me, "Sprang" >><spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: >> >>> On Sat, 06 May 2017 10:44:51 -0700, Snit, after 15 edits, wrote this: >>>> On 5/6/17, 10:30 AM, in article oel17j$9s4$1@dont-email.me, "Sprang" >>>> <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Sat, 06 May 2017 09:53:00 -0700, Snit, after 15 edits, wrote this: >>>>>> On 5/6/17, 1:53 AM, in article oek2ub$lbt$1@dont-email.me, "Sprang" >>>>>> <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> ... >>>>>>>> I used it to help educate you and show your where your claim was in >>>>>>>> error: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Sprang: >>>>>>>> ----- >>>>>>>> The Sun wobbling isn't an orbit. >>>>>>>> ----- >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Well, actually, Sprang insist the Earth orbits the Sun. >>>>>>> You're trying to SNIP for the win :) >>>>>> >>>>>> That is a different topic... you have two different incorrect claims: >>>>> >>>>> It isn't a different topic, moron. >>>>> You started the topic, look at your initial statement. >>>>> >>>>> You don't think the Earth orbits the Sun...LOL. >>>> >>>> I understand the barycenter. >>> >>> Got a picture of it? >>> An actual picture, not a diagram. >>> If you do, then I'll agree the Earth orbits that :) >> >> The fact you want a picture of the center of gravity of a set of objects >> shows you have NO clue what we are even talking about. Seriously, wow. > > I knew you didn't have one, dummy. > So, it's still the Sun. Stop replying to the lying imbecile Snit Michael Glasser simply wants to set up a new "Snit circus", and you have fallen for it He does not care that the barycenter of the whole solar system lies within the sun, and so all planets orbit the sun no matter how much he tries to twist the reality Even if Jupiter would circle the sun at Mercuries orbit, the barycenter of those two most massive objects of the solar system still lies *way* inside the sun Stop replying to that dishonest twit. He is wrong, and will stay wrong as long as there are new suns born
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Charlie <pipedroner3@kismet45.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-05-06 16:19 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <en6pfaF28muU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #632140 |
On 5/6/2017 4:09 PM, Peter Köhlmann wrote: > Sprang wrote: > >> On Sat, 06 May 2017 12:05:44 -0700, Snit, after 15 edits, wrote this: >>> On 5/6/17, 10:54 AM, in article oel2jq$9s4$2@dont-email.me, "Sprang" >>> <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: >>> >>>> On Sat, 06 May 2017 10:44:51 -0700, Snit, after 15 edits, wrote this: >>>>> On 5/6/17, 10:30 AM, in article oel17j$9s4$1@dont-email.me, "Sprang" >>>>> <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On Sat, 06 May 2017 09:53:00 -0700, Snit, after 15 edits, wrote this: >>>>>>> On 5/6/17, 1:53 AM, in article oek2ub$lbt$1@dont-email.me, "Sprang" >>>>>>> <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ... >>>>>>>>> I used it to help educate you and show your where your claim was in >>>>>>>>> error: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Sprang: >>>>>>>>> ----- >>>>>>>>> The Sun wobbling isn't an orbit. >>>>>>>>> ----- >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Well, actually, Sprang insist the Earth orbits the Sun. >>>>>>>> You're trying to SNIP for the win :) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> That is a different topic... you have two different incorrect claims: >>>>>> >>>>>> It isn't a different topic, moron. >>>>>> You started the topic, look at your initial statement. >>>>>> >>>>>> You don't think the Earth orbits the Sun...LOL. >>>>> >>>>> I understand the barycenter. >>>> >>>> Got a picture of it? >>>> An actual picture, not a diagram. >>>> If you do, then I'll agree the Earth orbits that :) >>> >>> The fact you want a picture of the center of gravity of a set of objects >>> shows you have NO clue what we are even talking about. Seriously, wow. >> >> I knew you didn't have one, dummy. >> So, it's still the Sun. > > Stop replying to the lying imbecile > > Snit Michael Glasser simply wants to set up a new "Snit circus", and you > have fallen for it More of those dammed unquotable lies again.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-05-06 13:55 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D533864F.A3D2A%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #632141 |
On 5/6/17, 1:19 PM, in article en6pfaF28muU1@mid.individual.net, "Charlie" <pipedroner3@kismet45.org> wrote: >>>>> Got a picture of it? >>>>> An actual picture, not a diagram. >>>>> If you do, then I'll agree the Earth orbits that :) >>>> >>>> The fact you want a picture of the center of gravity of a set of objects >>>> shows you have NO clue what we are even talking about. Seriously, wow. >>> >>> I knew you didn't have one, dummy. >>> So, it's still the Sun. >> >> Stop replying to the lying imbecile >> >> Snit Michael Glasser simply wants to set up a new "Snit circus", and you >> have fallen for it > > More of those dammed unquotable lies again. Those who troll COLA have done a better job ending their trolling and obsessing over me than expected, but I still do not expect it to last. I hope it does. Maybe they will prove me wrong. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 7 of 9 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web