Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #621050 > unrolled thread

Experiments on video showing a new physics effect along with its consequences for space conquest

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  Experiments on video showing a new physics effect along with its consequences for space conquest Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-03-01 04:49 -0800
    Re: Experiments on video showing a new physics effect along with its consequences for space conquest edprochak@gmail.com - 2017-03-01 13:50 -0800
      Re: Experiments on video showing a new physics effect along with its consequences for space conquest Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-03-02 00:18 -0800
        Re: Experiments on video showing a new physics effect along with its consequences for space conquest Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2017-03-02 22:29 +1100
          Re: Experiments on video showing a new physics effect along with its consequences for space conquest Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-03-02 03:52 -0800
            Re: Experiments on video showing a new physics effect along with its consequences for space conquest Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2017-03-02 23:31 +1100
              Re: Experiments on video showing a new physics effect along with its consequences for space conquest benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-03-03 18:14 -0500
                Re: Experiments on video showing a new physics effect along with its consequences for space conquest Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2017-03-04 11:06 +1100
                  Re: Experiments on video showing a new physics effect along with its consequences for space conquest benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-03-03 19:34 -0500
                    Re: Experiments on video showing a new physics effect along with its consequences for space conquest Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2017-03-04 12:07 +1100
                      Re: Experiments on video showing a new physics effect along with its consequences for space conquest benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-03-04 17:32 -0500
                        Re: Experiments on video showing a new physics effect along with its consequences for space conquest noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-03-04 15:14 -0800
                        Re: Experiments on video showing a new physics effect along with its consequences for space conquest Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2017-03-05 11:36 +1100
                          Re: Experiments on video showing a new physics effect along with its consequences for space conquest benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-03-04 20:14 -0500
                            Re: Experiments on video showing a new physics effect along with its consequences for space conquest Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2017-03-05 13:35 +1100
                              Re: Experiments on video showing a new physics effect along with its consequences for space conquest benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2017-03-06 04:59 -0500
                                Re: Experiments on video showing a new physics effect along with its consequences for space conquest Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2017-03-06 22:42 +1100
                                  Re: Experiments on video showing a new physics effect along with its consequences for space conquest benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-03-06 18:09 -0500
            Re: Experiments on video showing a new physics effect along with its consequences for space conquest edprochak@gmail.com - 2017-03-02 22:03 -0800
          Re: Experiments on video showing a new physics effect along with its consequences for space conquest benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-03-03 18:13 -0500
            Re: Experiments on video showing a new physics effect along with its consequences for space conquest noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-03-04 09:41 -0800
              objectum noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-03-06 16:51 -0800
    Re: Experiments on video showing a new physics effect along with its consequences for space conquest Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2017-03-02 19:51 +1100
      Re: Experiments on video showing a new physics effect along with its consequences for space conquest Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-03-02 02:49 -0800
        Re: Experiments on video showing a new physics effect along with its consequences for space conquest noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-03-02 18:06 -0800
          Re: Experiments on video showing a new physics effect along with its consequences for space conquest Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2017-03-03 15:10 +1100
        Re: Re: Experiments on video showing a new physics effect along with its consequences for space conquest Michael J. Strickland <michael06582@comcast.net> - 2017-03-03 19:12 -0500
    Re: Experiments on video showing a new physics effect along with its consequences for space conquest "Antonio Humidifier" <mahipals_ballsack@gmail.com> - 2017-03-03 18:35 -0800

Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]

#621467

you, the guy who says taht *mathematica* is not required
for a science to be effective; rock the unidentified floating object!

> But before you get too hard on Banerjee, allow me to point out that this 
> IS on the right track in spite of his experimental incompetence. 
> Jefimenko has shown that Newton's Third law is invalid for certain 
> electromagnetics. This can be the basis of the Internal Force Engine.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#621883 — objectum

I guess that you t00k that, back where it came from

> you, the guy who says that *mathematica* is not required
> for a science to be effective; rock the unidentified floating objectum!
> > Jefimenko has shown that Newton's Third law is invalid for certain 
> > electromagnetics. This can be the basis of the Internal Force Engine.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#621188

On 1/03/2017 11:49 PM, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
> Back in 2000, I had posted a formula showing a new mass and energy relationship
> in this newsgroup.
>
> Despite tremendous adversity, I have persisted with my research and the
> following links show the results of my recent experiments, along with their
> analysis and theories.
>
> I do expect that efforts will be made understand and replicate my experiments.
>
> Cheers,
> Arindam Banerjee
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hqBfwAClVlg
> IFE - 1 Ground Experiments

You have a large current flowing through a metal rod. You have the same 
current flowing, in the opposite direction, through the rest of the 
circuit. Two currents flowing in opposite directions create a repulsive 
force. The reaction to the force on the rod is the force exerted on the 
rest of the wiring.

Can't be bothered with the rest.

Sylvia.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#621194

On Thursday, March 2, 2017 at 7:51:38 PM UTC+11, Sylvia Else wrote:
> On 1/03/2017 11:49 PM, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
> > Back in 2000, I had posted a formula showing a new mass and energy relationship
> > in this newsgroup.
> >
> > Despite tremendous adversity, I have persisted with my research and the
> > following links show the results of my recent experiments, along with their
> > analysis and theories.
> >
> > I do expect that efforts will be made understand and replicate my experiments.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Arindam Banerjee
> >
> > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hqBfwAClVlg
> > IFE - 1 Ground Experiments
> 
> You have a large current flowing through a metal rod. You have the same 
> current flowing, in the opposite direction, through the rest of the 
> circuit. Two currents flowing in opposite directions create a repulsive 
> force. The reaction to the force on the rod is the force exerted on the 
> rest of the wiring.
> 
> Can't be bothered with the rest.


It so happens that in the video IFE-3 I show that there is no reaction, and
that is the main point, a new physics effect. There is no reaction to the
Lorenz force, a new and most vital finding equal in importance to fire and the
wheel.

Let us hope there are scientific people here, who will go through all the video
films.

Cheers,
Arindam Banerjee

> 
> Sylvia.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#621283

she got you!...  anyway,
what is a Lorenz force?

> It so happens that in the video IFE-3 I show that there is no reaction, and
> that is the main point, a new physics effect. There is no reaction to the
> Lorenz force, a new and most vital finding equal in importance to fire and the
> wheel.
> 
> Let us hope there are scientific people here, who will go through all the video
> films.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#621294

On 3/03/2017 1:06 PM, noTthaTguY wrote:
> she got you!...  anyway,
> what is a Lorenz force?

It's just a generalisation of magnetism's effects on currents that 
includes the effects on charged particles of both electric and magnetic 
fields.

Sylvia.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#621395

On Thu, 2 Mar 2017 02:49:21 -0800 (PST), Arindam Banerjee
<banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Thursday, March 2, 2017 at 7:51:38 PM UTC+11, Sylvia Else wrote:
>> On 1/03/2017 11:49 PM, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
>> > Back in 2000, I had posted a formula showing a new mass and energy relationship
>> > in this newsgroup.
>> >
>> > Despite tremendous adversity, I have persisted with my research and the
>> > following links show the results of my recent experiments, along with their
>> > analysis and theories.
>> >
>> > I do expect that efforts will be made understand and replicate my experiments.
>> >
>> > Cheers,
>> > Arindam Banerjee
>> >
>> > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hqBfwAClVlg
>> > IFE - 1 Ground Experiments
>> 
>> You have a large current flowing through a metal rod. You have the same 
>> current flowing, in the opposite direction, through the rest of the 
>> circuit. Two currents flowing in opposite directions create a repulsive 
>> force. The reaction to the force on the rod is the force exerted on the 
>> rest of the wiring.
>> 
>> Can't be bothered with the rest.
>
>
>It so happens that in the video IFE-3 I show that there is no reaction, and
>that is the main point, a new physics effect. There is no reaction to the
>Lorenz force, a new and most vital finding equal in importance to fire and the
>wheel.

That repulsive force (although very weak) has been measured. Do you
think they were lying to us?

Btw, the name I think you are looking for is "Lorentz" not "Lorenz."


>Let us hope there are scientific people here, who will go through all the video
>films.
>
>Cheers,
>Arindam Banerjee
>
>> 
>> Sylvia.
See you at the show trials - lol.
---------------------------------------------------
Michael J. Strickland			Reston, VA
---------------------------------------------------

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#621413

"Arindam Banerjee"  wrote in message 
news:3b423bc4-67ef-43f8-ad84-1251cf20f115@googlegroups.com...

>Back in 2000, I had posted a formula showing a new mass and energy 
>relationship
>in this newsgroup.

Nobody cares.

>Despite tremendous adversity, I have persisted with my research and the
>following links show the results of my recent experiments, along with their
>analysis and theories.

Shut up imbecile.

>I do expect that efforts will be made understand and replicate my 
>experiments.

Drop to your knees and pound sand.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web