Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #608042 > unrolled thread

Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that????

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-12-06 08:42 -0800
    Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-12-06 09:21 -0800
    Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-12-06 18:31 +0000
      Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-12-06 15:24 -0800
        Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> - 2016-12-06 15:30 -0700
          Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-12-06 17:54 -0800
            Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-12-07 06:13 -0800
              Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-12-07 10:10 -0800
                Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> - 2016-12-07 10:22 -0700
                  Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-12-07 10:54 -0800
                    Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> - 2016-12-07 14:27 -0700
                Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-12-07 11:25 -0800
                  Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-12-07 12:39 -0800
                    Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-12-08 17:52 +0000
            Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> - 2016-12-07 08:59 -0700
              Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-12-07 15:40 -0800
                Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> - 2016-12-07 15:59 -0700
        Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-12-07 05:21 +0000
          Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-12-06 22:58 -0800
            Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-12-07 00:02 -0800
              Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-12-07 14:21 +0000
                Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-12-07 10:15 -0800
                  Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> - 2016-12-07 10:24 -0700
            Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-12-07 06:22 -0800
              Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-12-07 10:36 -0800
                Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-12-07 11:39 -0800
                  Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-12-07 13:40 -0800
                    Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-12-08 17:45 +0000
                      got i.t noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-12-08 11:04 -0800
                        Re: got i.t noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-12-08 15:29 -0800
                Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-12-11 21:33 -0800
                  Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-12-12 00:05 -0800
                  Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-12-12 11:02 -0800
                    Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> - 2016-12-12 11:10 -0700
                      Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? Lawrence Watt-Evans <lwe@sff.net> - 2016-12-12 15:13 -0500
                        Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> - 2016-12-12 13:22 -0700
                          Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? Lawrence Watt-Evans <lwe@sff.net> - 2016-12-12 17:00 -0500
                            Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> - 2016-12-12 17:34 -0700
                            Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-12-14 22:26 -0800
                              Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-12-14 22:30 -0800
                                The Man Wo Built The Atomic Bomb... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-12-14 22:53 -0800
                                  Re: The Man Wo Built The Atomic Bomb... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-12-14 22:59 -0800
                                  The Man Wo Built The Atomic Bomb... pnalsing@gmail.com - 2016-12-14 23:04 -0800
                                    Re: The Man Wo Built The Atomic Bomb... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-12-15 20:39 -0800
                                      Re: The Man Wo Built The Atomic Bomb... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-12-16 10:50 -0800
                                  Re: The Man Wo Built The Atomic Bomb... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-12-14 23:08 -0800
                                    build it & they will bomb noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-12-15 09:50 -0800
                                      Re: build it & they will bomb noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-12-21 13:41 -0800
                              Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> - 2016-12-15 09:36 -0700
                            Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-12-19 13:49 -0800
                        Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? "Michael R N Dolbear" <me@privacy.net> - 2016-12-12 22:05 +0000
                          Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? Cryptoengineer <treifamily@gmail.com> - 2016-12-12 18:39 -0600
                            Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> - 2016-12-12 17:37 -0700
                          Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? Lawrence Watt-Evans <lwe@sff.net> - 2016-12-13 02:18 -0500
                    Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-12-12 20:03 +0000
        Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-12-07 06:11 -0800
    Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-12-06 13:23 -0800
      Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-12-06 13:46 -0800
        Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? "Anon Y. Mouse" <nobody@home.invalid> - 2016-12-07 09:33 -0500
          Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-12-07 07:25 -0800
    Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-12-07 11:12 -0800
      Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-12-07 11:33 -0800
    Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? SteveGG <casagiannoni@optonline.net> - 2016-12-09 15:45 -0500
      Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-12-09 20:22 -0500
        Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? "Mike Dworetsky" <platinum198@pants.btinternet.com> - 2016-12-11 17:17 +0000
      Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-12-12 00:15 -0800
        Re: Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that???? edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-12-12 09:47 -0800

Page 3 of 4 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4  Next page →

#609131 — The Man Wo Built The Atomic Bomb...

In 1905 Albert Einstein did clearly state that mass and energy were equivalent and sug-gested that proof of this
equivalence might be found by the study of radioactive substances. --The Smythe Report 




http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/Albert_Einstein/Albert_Einstein_The-Man-Who-Built-The-Atomic-Bomb.html





In 1905 
 Albert Einstein
did clearly state
that mass and energy were equivalent and
sug-gested that proof 
sug-gested that proof 
of this
equivalence
might be found by 
the study of radioactive substances.


the study of radioactive substances. --The Smythe Report 


the study
 of 
radioactive 
substances.


"the study
 of 
radioactive 
substances."

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#609133 — Re: The Man Wo Built The Atomic Bomb...

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> In 1905 Albert Einstein did clearly state that mass and energy were equivalent and sug-gested that proof of this
> equivalence might be found by the study of radioactive substances. --The Smythe Report
> 
> http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/Albert_Einstein/Albert_Einstein_The-Man-Who-Built-The-Atomic-Bomb.html
> 
> In 1905
>  Albert Einstein
> did clearly state
> that mass and energy were equivalent and
> sug-gested that proof
> sug-gested that proof
> of this
> equivalence
> might be found by
> the study of radioactive substances.
> 
> the study of radioactive substances. --The Smythe Report
> 
> the study
>  of
> radioactive
> substances.
> 
> "the study
>  of
> radioactive
> substances."


"A noticeable decrease of mass should occur in the case of radium." Albert Einstein


"energy L in the form of radiation, its mass diminishes by L/c2 ." --Albert Einstein




L = radiation.."in the case of radium"...radium comes from URANIUM


It's all about URANIUM
http://hypertextbook.com/eworld/einstein.shtml#first

to complete the building of the atomic bomb:
http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/Albert_Einstein/Albert_Einstein_The-Man-Who-Built-The-Atomic-Bomb.html

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#609136 — The Man Wo Built The Atomic Bomb...

I didn't see a single picture of Einstein on that page... for a very good reason!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#609221 — Re: The Man Wo Built The Atomic Bomb...

pnalsing@gmail.com wrote:
> 
> I didn't see a single picture of Einstein on that page... for a very good reason!


like I said: "It's IMPOSSIBLE for anyone to answer both questions..." You failed to answer both questions. 


> It's IMPOSSIBLE for anyone to answer both questions...
> 
> Where is leo szilard clearance badge?
> Where is  albert einstein clearance badge?




The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> Where is leo szilard clearance badge?
>  http://blog.nuclearsecrecy.com/misc/faces-of-project-y/
> 
> everybody else seems to be there...
> http://www.lanl.gov/about/history-innovation/badges.php
> 
> except for leo szilard and........albert einstein?
> 
> Where is leo szilard clearance badge?
> Where is  albert einstein clearance badge?
> 
> You will not be able to answer the question correctly unless you read
> 
> http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/Albert_Einstein/Albert_Einstein_The-Man-Who-Built-The-Atomic-Bomb.html
> 
> It's IMPOSSIBLE for anyone to answer both questions...
> 
> Where is leo szilard clearance badge?
> Where is  albert einstein clearance badge?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#609264 — Re: The Man Wo Built The Atomic Bomb...

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> pnalsing@gmail.com wrote:
> >
> > I didn't see a single picture of Einstein on that page... for a very good reason!
> 
> like I said: "It's IMPOSSIBLE for anyone to answer both questions..." You failed to answer both questions.
> 
> > It's IMPOSSIBLE for anyone to answer both questions...
> >
> > Where is leo szilard clearance badge?
> > Where is  albert einstein clearance badge?
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > Where is leo szilard clearance badge?
> >  http://blog.nuclearsecrecy.com/misc/faces-of-project-y/
> >
> > everybody else seems to be there...
> > http://www.lanl.gov/about/history-innovation/badges.php
> >
> > except for leo szilard and........albert einstein?
> >
> > Where is leo szilard clearance badge?
> > Where is  albert einstein clearance badge?
> >
> > You will not be able to answer the question correctly unless you read
> >
> > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/Albert_Einstein/Albert_Einstein_The-Man-Who-Built-The-Atomic-Bomb.html
> >
> > It's IMPOSSIBLE for anyone to answer both questions...
> >
> > Where is leo szilard clearance badge?
> > Where is  albert einstein clearance badge?


But you stated: "I didn't see a single picture of Einstein on that page... for a very good reason!"

And everyone here KNOWS what your "...for a very good reason!" actually is..

it's misinformation. You all have it! You all have the same....misinformation!

Yous don't have 'documented proof', you just have ...heresay misinformation.


I'm here to fix that.

But, there's more!!!!


All that aside...
what i don't understand is that 
yous people are suppose to be...'scientifically aware'..
meaning...you should at least think for yourselves and
see if you see what scientist see....Patterns.

Let me give you an example...(i know this won't help because your misinformation has been ingrained in your heads)


Take for example...Albert Einstein. 

He suppose to be a genuis.
He spent around ten years working at a patent office.

Yet, this thing yous misinformed people call a refridgerator
https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/pages/US1781541-0.png

was never built!

Now, how does a genuis who spent years working at a patent office never built his...socalled refridgerator???

But wait a minute...we need a pattern here. Another example of a patent by Albert Einstein not created to the market place...

I bet a million dollars that yous people think this is a woman's blouse!

https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/pages/USD101756-0.png
https://www.google.com/patents/USD101756


another patent without being made???


I see a pattern here...



It is not a refridgerator, it's not a woman's blouse...

they are both designs for the making, building and manufacturing of the atomic bomb.


http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/Albert_Einstein/Albert_Einstein_The-Man-Who-Built-The-Atomic-Bomb.html




The Starmaker

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#609137 — Re: The Man Wo Built The Atomic Bomb...

Where is leo szilard clearance badge?
 http://blog.nuclearsecrecy.com/misc/faces-of-project-y/


everybody else seems to be there...
http://www.lanl.gov/about/history-innovation/badges.php


except for leo szilard and........albert einstein?


Where is leo szilard clearance badge?
Where is  albert einstein clearance badge?



You will not be able to answer the question correctly unless you read

http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/Albert_Einstein/Albert_Einstein_The-Man-Who-Built-The-Atomic-Bomb.html



It's IMPOSSIBLE for anyone to answer both questions...


Where is leo szilard clearance badge?
Where is  albert einstein clearance badge?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#609170 — build it & they will bomb

Szilard is the only one that I recall from Sagan's *Weaponeers* p.b.s tome,
of which I only saw a part of one episode, but
he is one of the primary models for Peter sellarS' doctoRStrangelove,
if only because of his hand, I suppose

that is the only Sagan stuff I can recall, because
he's rather annoying; his wife, though, was a g00d author

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#609907 — Re: build it & they will bomb

nor have I seen most of that movie,
however much Sellars was c00l

> that is the only Sagan stuff I can recall, because
> he's rather annoying; his wife, though, was a g00d author

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#609165

A nice healing lotion, Timmy. It'll reduce the chafing.

The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote in
news:58523794.6972@ix.netcom.com: 

> Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy wrote:
>> 
>> Robert Carnegie <rja.carnegie@excite.com> wrote in
>> news:08f59f18-7745-4017-a6e5-7746a6da69dd@googlegroups.com:
>> 
>> > On Monday, 12 December 2016 22:00:57 UTC, Lawrence Watt-Evans
>> > wrote:
>> >> On Mon, 12 Dec 2016 13:22:28 -0700, Gutless Umbrella
>> >> Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >Lawrence Watt-Evans <lwe@sff.net> wrote in
>> >> >news:8u0u4cpb67q0vh51upff9bbenr30o62c70@reader80.eternal-sep
>> >> >tem ber. org:
>> >> >
>> >> >> On Mon, 12 Dec 2016 11:10:45 -0700, Gutless Umbrella
>> >> >> Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >>>The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote in
>> >> >>>news:584EF44D.51C@ix.netcom.com:
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>> It's not a fake ISBN oor bogus barcodes,
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>Yes, it is exactly that.
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>> It's an EBOOK.
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>("Mocked up" to look like a paper book. Dumbass.)
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>Ebooks get standard ISBN nubmers, just like any other.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Not necessarily.
>> >> >
>> >> >They don't always get them, no, but if they do, it's a
>> >> >standard ISBN, not the retarded fake that dumbass faked on
>> >> >his fake "mockup" of a fake ebook that looks like a fake
>> >> >printed book.
>> >>
>> >> Oh, I didn't waste time actually looking at that.
>> >
>> > To point out: you're being cross-posted in sci.physics.
>> > I think I'm not because Google doesn't do it.
>> >
>> > If I've understood correctly - which seems not worth
>> > the trouble - the book isn't finished.  And it's a
>> > collection of sm's posts on Usenet.  And possibly
>> > also the replies.  In which case, I call sm a
>> > poopie head and I demand a royalty of $100 per copy
>> > of his book containing this comment.
>> >
>> > I'm sceptical that there is even an act of collection
>> > being performed; however, the previous sentence stands.
>> >
>> Even if there is, he's too fucking stupid to ever get it into a
>> form that can be shared with others.
> 
> 
> The stupidity of yous people dumbfounds me! 
> 
> Now I have to waste my time explaining to yos what an "ebook"
> is... 
> 
> 
> e-book 
> 
>      
> 
> Definition of e–book
> 
>     :  a book composed in or converted to digital format for
>     :  display on a computer screen or handheld device 
> 'https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/e%E2%80%93book
> 
> 
> This book...
> http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/Albert_Einstein/Albert_Einstein_
> The-Man-Who-Built-The-Atomic-Bomb.html 
> 
> is a book
> composed in
> digital format for 
> display on a computer screen.
> 
> 
> The contents of this book is in
> digital format...called Usenet.
> 
> It exist only on digital format..
> can be read
> on a computer screen
> (like yous reading now stupid!)
> 
> It is posted on Usenet, a digital format
> communication system
>  that are posted to servers on a worldwide network.
> 
> 
> It is not a ebook like you find on Amazon with extentions like
> epub, mobi, ... 
> 
> it is...a Usenet worldwide network publication.
> 
> 
> 
> Capice? Comprende?? 
> 
> 
> Next year I'm going to have to come back and kick some ass
> around here... 
> 



-- 
Terry Austin

Vacation photos from Iceland: 
https://plus.google.com/u/0/collection/QaXQkB

"Terry Austin: like the polio vaccine, only with more asshole."
    -- David Bilek

Jesus forgives sinners, not criminals.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#609591

do, any for resale?

> And yes, the ebook and paper edition must have different numbers.  In
> fact, every edition with a different price is supposed to have a
> different ISBN, though nobody actually bothers for ebooks.  (They do
> for paper, since otherwise bookstores using scanners can ring up the
> wrong price.)
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> My webpage is at http://www.watt-evans.com

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#608797

"Lawrence Watt-Evans"  wrote

>Ebooks get standard ISBN nubmers, just like any other.

> Not necessarily.  Some outlets require ISBNs, others don't -- Amazon,
for example, does not require ebooks to have ISBNs, so some publishers
don't bother with them on ebooks they only sell there.  Those books
will show up with an Amazon item number where the ISBN would be if it had 
one.


I don't know of any Amazon listed ebook that shows a ISBN for the Kindle 
format, even if the pbook or another eformat has an ISBN.

> More respectable outlets like Smashwords do require ISBNs.  And most
publishers include them even on Amazon, but it isn't strictly necessary.


Only for the Smashwords Premium catalog where they note (ISBNs are required 
for Apple and Kobo)
https://www.smashwords.com/distribution
If used the ISBN at Smashwords is that for the ePub format.

-- 
Mike D 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#608822

"Michael R N Dolbear" <me@privacy.net> wrote in
news:eb8l8oFd8f9U1@mid.individual.net: 

> 
> "Lawrence Watt-Evans"  wrote
> 
>>Ebooks get standard ISBN nubmers, just like any other.
> 
>> Not necessarily.  Some outlets require ISBNs, others don't -- Amazon,
> for example, does not require ebooks to have ISBNs, so some publishers
> don't bother with them on ebooks they only sell there.  Those books
> will show up with an Amazon item number where the ISBN would be if it
> had one.
> 
> 
> I don't know of any Amazon listed ebook that shows a ISBN for the
> Kindle format, even if the pbook or another eformat has an ISBN.

I beg to differ. I just pulled up 'Grand Central Arena' on my iPad's
Kindle app, and on page 28 is the colophon, with the ISBN clearly
printed: 978-1-4391-3355-2.

Now, it's possible that's just carried over from the dead tree
edition, since the page also describes the book as first printing.

There's also an ebook specific number in a info page about the
book: an 'ASIN' (B00APAH4ZO).

pt

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#608830

Cryptoengineer <treifamily@gmail.com> wrote in
news:XnsA6DCC7EC566FCmelchizedek@216.166.97.131: 

> "Michael R N Dolbear" <me@privacy.net> wrote in
> news:eb8l8oFd8f9U1@mid.individual.net: 
> 
>> 
>> "Lawrence Watt-Evans"  wrote
>> 
>>>Ebooks get standard ISBN nubmers, just like any other.
>> 
>>> Not necessarily.  Some outlets require ISBNs, others don't --
>>> Amazon, 
>> for example, does not require ebooks to have ISBNs, so some
>> publishers don't bother with them on ebooks they only sell
>> there.  Those books will show up with an Amazon item number
>> where the ISBN would be if it had one.
>> 
>> 
>> I don't know of any Amazon listed ebook that shows a ISBN for
>> the Kindle format, even if the pbook or another eformat has an
>> ISBN. 
> 
> I beg to differ. I just pulled up 'Grand Central Arena' on my
> iPad's Kindle app, and on page 28 is the colophon, with the ISBN
> clearly printed: 978-1-4391-3355-2.

Baen says that's the number for the paper edition. The eISBN is  
978-1-61824-770-4

https://www.baen.com/Chapters/1439133557/1439133557__c_.htm
> 
> Now, it's possible that's just carried over from the dead tree
> edition, since the page also describes the book as first
> printing. 

Or somebody messed up.

-- 
Terry Austin

Vacation photos from Iceland: 
https://plus.google.com/u/0/collection/QaXQkB

"Terry Austin: like the polio vaccine, only with more asshole."
    -- David Bilek

Jesus forgives sinners, not criminals.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#608856

On Mon, 12 Dec 2016 22:05:14 -0000, "Michael R N Dolbear"
<me@privacy.net> wrote:

>"Lawrence Watt-Evans"  wrote
>
>>Ebooks get standard ISBN nubmers, just like any other.
>
>> Not necessarily.  Some outlets require ISBNs, others don't -- Amazon,
>for example, does not require ebooks to have ISBNs, so some publishers
>don't bother with them on ebooks they only sell there.  Those books
>will show up with an Amazon item number where the ISBN would be if it had 
>one.
>
>I don't know of any Amazon listed ebook that shows a ISBN for the Kindle 
>format, even if the pbook or another eformat has an ISBN.

Huh.  I thought I'd seen some, but a quick glance doesn't find them.
You may well be correct.

>> More respectable outlets like Smashwords do require ISBNs.  And most
>publishers include them even on Amazon, but it isn't strictly necessary.
>
>Only for the Smashwords Premium catalog where they note (ISBNs are required 
>for Apple and Kobo)
>https://www.smashwords.com/distribution
>If used the ISBN at Smashwords is that for the ePub format.

Again, you're right.  Since I don't see why anyone would NOT go for
Premium status, I'd never noticed that.




-- 
My webpage is at http://www.watt-evans.com

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#608769

The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> writes:

>Michael Moroney wrote:
>> 
>> Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> writes:
>> 
>> >On Sunday, December 11, 2016 at 11:33:31 PM UTC-6, The Starmaker wrote:
>> >> Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog wrote:
>> 
>> >Besides posting a falsified image of the Einstein patent,
>> >> > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/Albert_Einstein/Lpage1-aaaaaa-aa.JPG
>> 
>> >you also post an image of a book with an fake ISBN:
>> >> http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/Albert_Einstein/Albert_Einstein_The-Man-Who-Built-The-Atomic-Bomb.html
>> 
>> >Why do you lie so much?
>> 
>> Not even the right number of digits...
>> 
>> Barcode looks totally bogus, too.


>It's not a fake ISBN oor bogus barcodes, it's called a mock-up cover of a e-book in progress.

In other words, a fake ISBN and bogus barcode.

The ISBN isn't even the correct format for an ISBN so it's not even
someone else's real ISBN.

If you actually had a real ISBN (in other words, a real e-book) you'd
use it.  But all you have is some fake work in progress.

>You're actually reading the contents now of the book...thank you for your ...contributions.

Sorry, I've read nothing beyond the fake cover.

>Now about about that bogus .wikipedia page and the whole content???? 

>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Einstein_refrigerator#/media/File:Einstein_Refrigerator.png
>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Einstein_refrigerator

>No comments on that fraudulent page calligraphy fruad?
>Einstein Refrigerator
>Patent number in calligraphy, and the date in calligraphy??? Or you girls just look the other way...pussies.

Wikipedia is not official. If you want the official patent diagram, get it here:
http://pdfpiw.uspto.gov/.piw?Docid=01781541

>> First here is the actual real patent on Google Patent search engine:

If you want the official patent, get it from the US Patent Office.
http://pdfpiw.uspto.gov/.piw?Docid=01781541
Google is not official, although probably very reliable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#608138

On Tuesday, December 6, 2016 at 6:24:10 PM UTC-5, The Starmaker wrote:
> Michael Moroney wrote:
> > 
> > The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> writes:
> > 
> > >In the last sentence Albert says:
> > 
> > >"However,
> > 
> > >such bombs might very well prove to be too heavy for transportation by
> > 
> > >air."
> > 
> > >Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that????
> > 
> > >If memory serves me well, wasn't the atomic bomb delivered by air transportation?
> > 
> > That was probably just his thoughts of the time since he figured out a fission
> > explosion was possible but didn't know what it would take to trigger it (nobody
> > knew at the time).  He was just guesstimating given the capacity of the planes
> > of the time.  After all, Einstein was never involved with the actual design of
> > the bombs.
> 
> 
> Here is an actual design of a bomb by Albert Einstein:
> 
> http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/Albert_Einstein/bomb1.jpg
> 
> 
> Do you wanna see more?

Which demonstrates a high level conceptual design.
He was not an engineer so why do you expect a better
design from him?

It seems Einstein must be flawed in your mind so you
can feel good about yourself.  You should think about
why you need to denigrate someone else's accomplishments.

ed

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#608081

On Tuesday, December 6, 2016 at 8:42:46 AM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote:
> In this blueprint for making atomic bombs Albert Einstein wrote:
> http://hypertextbook.com/eworld/einstein/#first
> 
> 
> "This new phenomenon would also lead to the construction of bombs,
> 
> and it is conceivable - though much less certain - that extremely power-
> 
> ful bombs of a new type may thus be constructed. A single bomb of this
> 
> type, carried by boat and exploded in a port, might very well destroy
> 
> the whole port together with some of the surrounding territory. However,
> 
> such bombs might very well prove to be too heavy for transportation by
> 
> air." --Albert Einstein
> 
> 
> In the last sentence Albert says:
> 
> 
> "However,
> 
> such bombs might very well prove to be too heavy for transportation by
> 
> air."
> 
> 
> Wasn't Albert Einstein wrong about that????
> 
> 
> If memory serves me well, wasn't the atomic bomb delivered by air transportation?
> 
> 
> 
> What size bomb was Albert Einstein thinking of? Or what weight did Albert Einstein did he had in mind or figured out?
> 
> 
> can be carried by boat but not by plane???  This guy sounds like he designs airplanes for Germans...
> 
> 
> 
> Albert Einstein was wrong about that. That's a fact.
> 
> 
> 
> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge
> the unchallengeable.

Einstein was no Fermi.Reality is if he went into a lab evertthing made of glaSS FEll TO THE FLOOR.Critical mass (235) was 11lb for fusion bomb that fell on Hiroshima.  H-Bombs I know not.Trebert

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#608085

"reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> Cretin Glazier wrote:
> Einstein was no Fermi.Reality is if he went into a lab evertthing 
made of glaSS FEll TO THE FLOOR.Critical mass (235) was 11lb 
for fusion bomb that fell on Hiroshima.  H-Bombs I know not.Trebert
>
hanson wrote:
Glazier YOU are a con-fusion bomb, which is getting more
 senile and con-fused with every day. Glazier you now
have changed from being a life long loser & cretin to a 
full-fledged useless idiot without any wit but being full of shit, 
and can't even parrot any longer. ....which is why
>
Glazier's ex-tutor Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote:
>
"Glazier, do not post in a science newsgroup."
"Glazier, quit posting __ your Gutter Science__."
"Glazier, exit USENET. -- IOW Glazier, beat it!."
>
"Glazier, your science is far worse than the man's on the street."
"Glazier, your postings are old man's garbage."
"Glazier, your brain is entangled with a used garbage can."
>
"reber, take your 'you know it all thinking' to your grave" .
"reber, your horseshit gets old. Say hi to Allah for me.:
"reber, you don't believe in science."
>
... and Moderator General "HVAC" <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com>
"Harlow Campbell" succinctly added & wrote:
>
"Bert, you are Fucked in the head.
"TreBert, you are one stupid cocksucker".
"Bert, Seriously. You are the stupidest cocksucking
moron who ever came down the Mass Pike."
"Bert, does your stupidity know no bounds?"
>
"Bert, your opinion doesn't count"
"a trained cockroach is smarter than Bert"
"Bert, you are a clueless cocksucker"....
"Bert you are senile, dazed & confused"
"Bert is a racist. (And he's stupid too)"
>
"Bert, you really are a pathetic excuse for a human
fucking being". "Bert you are an idiot."
"Bert, are the stupidest cocksucker on the planet."
"Spin THIS, Glazier, you fucking idiot." "Bert get
some spelling lessons, you feeble-minded fuck".
>
"Bert, you should be arrested"
"Bert, I will call the police and tell them that your
van seems to be a center for drug activity in the
Wal-Mart parking lot"... .... .... about which....
>
Aviation Consultant Jim Pennino jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>
Glazier, you are a spamming piece of shit...
Your Cocaine usage explains a lot of your posts.
You know nothing about government nor physics.
You are drunk again. Give up and kill yourself.
 >
Astrophysicist "Saul Levy" <saullevy1@cox.net> wrote:
>
GLAZIER YOU ARE A LAMEbrain PIECE OF SHIT!
Saul Levy
>
Rocket Scientist Virdy "Mahipal" <mahipal7638@gmail.com> wrote:
>
I know, you reber are an idiot. Glazier, you are babbling
desperately. Is it sympathy or pity you're grasping for?
Stop it, either way.
 >
benj" Benjamin Franklin Jacoby <nobody@gmail.com> who wrote:
>
One only has to read Glazier's posts to see
when Bert was lobotomized.
But Herb found poster "Double-A" who likes to be like Glazier,
but "Abner Afterduft " is another kook who is as dumb as Bert is...
and promote that shitting into a bucket in a car is an achievement
that is a laudable accomplishment... and both being Marxist/Commie
Anarchists, they demand entitlement to goods and services that
were created by hardworking people while they themselves drink,
party and frolic!... ... still waiting "to be loved by all"...
>
hanson wrote:
So Glazier, given your Jewish Superiority complex and
your IQ of 122 and you knowing how everything works,
... how come ended up shitting into a bucket in a 25 year
old Minnie Mouse van that you use as your residence
on Wal-Mart's Parking Lot? ..... .... What went wrong, Glazier

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#608143

It is sad that hanson is now admitting he is getting more senile and 
con-fused every day. Sad that he also admits he was a life long loser 
and cretin before advancing to the stage of full-fledged witless useless 
idiot.

Hanson has wasted his life doing such things as chasing after his true 
love, Bert, hoping to do disgusting acts with him in vandalized graveyards.

What went wrong, hanson?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#608146

Gay "Anon Y. Mouse" <nobody@home.invalid> aka Maldrecki 
continues to defile his prayer rug by smearing feces on it and 
then licking it off!"... while Bert is hoping to do disgusting acts 
with Maldrecki in vandalized graveyards.
>
hanson wrote:
ahahahaha.,. so, Mehram, you stinky Muslim pig, your
fecal Islame fantasies are  not a way to get yourself 
off the list of Glaziers' 9 Shit eaters who laid themselves
under Glazier's sphincter and, in your case, swallow Bert's
PFM (Poop For Maleki).... ahahahaha.... AHAHAHAHA
>
> 
> On 11/23/2016 2:10 PM, hanson wrote:
ROTFLMAO... Mehram, you still have things ass-backward
in your pathetic Islamic hatred onto hanson... AHAHAHA...
>>
Mehram, forget your transparent fantasies & plagiaries.
You don't need to hide yourself cowardly behind a cloak of 
Anon Y. Mouse" <nobody@home.invalid> to provide a platform
for Austria's ex-Hitler Youth Halbmutt Wabnigger,....
>>>
<hwabnig@.- --- -.dotat> to write:
____   "Jews are a residue of failed evolution" _______
of which Glazier represents a classic example; ref. to
the <http://tinyurl.com/Recalcitrant-Swine-Glazier>
>>>
Mehram, just because folks drummed you out of s.p.
a month ago, when you posted as "ClutterFreak",
"<ClutterFreak@FakeAddress.com> Mehram Maleki
<clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> the Iranian USA
& Jew hater,... Mehram, just carry on again openly with 
your West-hating rants, which were as hilarious stupid
as were your physics proposals.
>>>
So, Mehram take your Moslem prayer rug & wipe off
Glazier's PFM (Poop For Maleki) from your mouth  and 
say Allah akbahahahahahahaaaar... LOL
>>>
Mehram, you are always good for a laugh just as
is <http://tinyurl.com/Glazier-the-Lying-Swine>
ahahahahahanson
>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 3 of 4 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web