Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #624786 > unrolled thread
| Started by | john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-03-23 18:28 -0700 |
| Last post | 2017-03-27 09:27 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 109 — 13 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
Breakthroughs john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-03-23 18:28 -0700
Re: Breakthroughs Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-03-23 20:56 -0500
Re: Breakthroughs poraty350@gmail.com - 2017-03-23 18:57 -0700
Re: Breakthroughs john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-03-23 19:35 -0700
Re: Breakthroughs pnalsing@gmail.com - 2017-03-23 19:49 -0700
Re: Breakthroughs john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-03-23 20:14 -0700
Re: Breakthroughs moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-03-24 14:52 +0000
Re: Breakthroughs noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-03-24 10:19 -0700
Re: Breakthroughs poraty350@gmail.com - 2017-03-23 22:32 -0700
Re: Breakthroughs benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2017-03-24 02:14 -0400
Re: Breakthroughs HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2017-03-24 04:59 -0700
Re: Breakthroughs benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2017-03-25 14:18 -0400
Re: Breakthroughs HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2017-03-25 11:41 -0700
Re: Breakthroughs benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-03-25 17:07 -0400
Re: Breakthroughs Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-24 07:40 -0500
Re: Breakthroughs HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2017-03-24 05:46 -0700
Re: Breakthroughs moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-03-24 14:53 +0000
Re: Breakthroughs poraty350@gmail.com - 2017-03-24 08:15 -0700
Re: Breakthroughs john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-03-24 07:03 -0700
Re: Breakthroughs HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2017-03-24 07:15 -0700
Re: Breakthroughs Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-24 09:24 -0500
Re: Breakthroughs Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-24 09:29 -0500
Re: Breakthroughs benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-03-24 18:03 -0400
Re: Breakthroughs john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-03-25 07:11 -0700
Re: Breakthroughs Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-03-25 11:26 -0500
Re: Breakthroughs john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-03-25 10:11 -0700
Re: Breakthroughs Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-25 14:06 -0500
Re: Breakthroughs john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-03-25 12:52 -0700
Re: Breakthroughs HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2017-03-25 13:09 -0700
Re: Breakthroughs benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-03-25 17:15 -0400
Re: Breakthroughs john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-03-25 14:20 -0700
Re: Breakthroughs john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-03-25 14:28 -0700
Re: Breakthroughs moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-03-25 23:12 +0000
Re: Breakthroughs benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-03-25 19:54 -0400
Re: Breakthroughs HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2017-03-25 17:11 -0700
Re: Breakthroughs benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-03-25 20:16 -0400
Re: Breakthroughs jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-03-26 01:15 +0000
Re: Breakthroughs HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2017-03-26 03:03 -0700
Re: Breakthroughs benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2017-03-27 00:51 -0400
Re: Breakthroughs HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2017-03-26 03:03 -0700
Re: Breakthroughs benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2017-03-27 00:50 -0400
Re: Breakthroughs poraty350@gmail.com - 2017-03-25 22:49 -0700
Re: Breakthroughs john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-03-26 07:37 -0700
Re: Breakthroughs moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-03-26 23:52 +0000
Re: Breakthroughs john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-03-26 17:31 -0700
Re: Breakthroughs HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2017-03-26 17:40 -0700
Re: Breakthroughs benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2017-03-27 00:38 -0400
Re: Breakthroughs Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-03-26 19:40 -0500
Re: Breakthroughs john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-03-26 18:32 -0700
Re: Breakthroughs Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-03-26 20:54 -0500
Re: Breakthroughs john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-03-26 19:18 -0700
Re: Breakthroughs poraty350@gmail.com - 2017-03-26 23:03 -0700
Re: Breakthroughs poraty350@gmail.com - 2017-03-26 23:07 -0700
Re: Breakthroughs moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-03-27 04:56 +0000
Re: Breakthroughs benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2017-03-27 01:10 -0400
Re: Breakthroughs poraty350@gmail.com - 2017-03-26 23:16 -0700
Re: Breakthroughs poraty350@gmail.com - 2017-03-26 23:00 -0700
Re: Breakthroughs Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-27 07:52 -0500
Re: Breakthroughs john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-03-27 05:59 -0700
Re: Breakthroughs Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-27 08:03 -0500
Re: Breakthroughs poraty350@gmail.com - 2017-03-28 05:26 -0700
Re: Breakthroughs moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-03-27 13:19 +0000
Re: Breakthroughs john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-03-27 07:48 -0700
Re: Breakthroughs HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2017-03-27 08:02 -0700
Re: Breakthroughs benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-03-27 17:06 -0400
Re: Breakthroughs HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2017-03-27 17:32 -0700
Re: Breakthroughs benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-03-27 21:14 -0400
Re: Breakthroughs HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2017-03-28 05:09 -0700
Re: Breakthroughs john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-03-28 05:19 -0700
Re: Breakthroughs moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-03-28 13:26 +0000
Re: Breakthroughs john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-03-28 07:21 -0700
Re: Breakthroughs Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-28 11:08 -0500
Re: Breakthroughs Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-03-28 11:40 -0500
Re: Breakthroughs moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-03-28 20:23 +0000
Re: Breakthroughs HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2017-03-28 07:43 -0700
Re: Breakthroughs benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-03-28 16:06 -0400
Re: Breakthroughs moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-03-28 20:28 +0000
Re: Breakthroughs benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-03-28 15:55 -0400
Re: Breakthroughs benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-03-28 15:54 -0400
Re: Breakthroughs Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-27 10:09 -0500
Re: Breakthroughs john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-03-27 09:42 -0700
Re: Breakthroughs Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-27 11:52 -0500
Re: Breakthroughs Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-27 11:54 -0500
Re: Breakthroughs Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-27 12:09 -0500
Re: Breakthroughs poraty350@gmail.com - 2017-03-28 05:37 -0700
Re: Breakthroughs moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-03-27 17:41 +0000
Re: Breakthroughs noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-03-27 14:38 -0700
Re: Breakthroughs poraty350@gmail.com - 2017-03-28 05:31 -0700
Re: Breakthroughs poraty350@gmail.com - 2017-03-28 05:29 -0700
Re: Breakthroughs noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-03-27 08:25 -0700
Re: Breakthroughs Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-27 07:50 -0500
Re: Breakthroughs benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-03-27 17:04 -0400
Re: Breakthroughs poraty350@gmail.com - 2017-03-28 05:23 -0700
Re: Breakthroughs Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-27 07:48 -0500
Re: Breakthroughs Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-25 16:18 -0500
Re: Breakthroughs moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-03-25 23:06 +0000
Re: Breakthroughs benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-03-25 19:48 -0400
Re: Breakthroughs noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-03-26 20:17 -0700
Re: Breakthroughs moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-03-24 14:59 +0000
Re: Breakthroughs Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-24 10:03 -0500
Re: Breakthroughs poraty350@gmail.com - 2017-03-24 08:18 -0700
Re: Breakthroughs poraty350@gmail.com - 2017-03-24 08:13 -0700
Re: Breakthroughs Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-03-24 14:29 -0500
Re: Breakthroughs poraty350@gmail.com - 2017-03-25 22:40 -0700
Re: Breakthroughs The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-03-24 11:05 -0800
Re: Breakthroughs john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-03-24 12:10 -0700
Re: Breakthroughs gmbr3359@gmail.com - 2017-03-25 23:18 -0700
Re: Breakthroughs poraty350@gmail.com - 2017-03-26 03:36 -0700
Re: Breakthroughs noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-03-27 09:27 -0700
Page 2 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 Next page →
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-24 09:24 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <ob3a73$1l3c$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #624836 |
On 3/24/2017 9:03 AM, john wrote: > Odd > " > You're the one saying that pull interactions make no sense, so could you > please explain these observations? > " > > The only thing that can pull is physical > attachment- like a rope- and that's still a push > from the attached part. > So.... little ropes? > Maybe the strings from String Theory? > Otherwise, sorry, pull interactions are impossible. > So YOUR explanation, John, of charged glass rods drawing in charged ping pong balls is little ropes? This is YOUR proposal for what's going on? -- Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-24 09:29 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <ob3afo$1lvr$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #624838 |
On 3/24/2017 9:24 AM, Odd Bodkin wrote: > On 3/24/2017 9:03 AM, john wrote: >> Odd >> " >> You're the one saying that pull interactions make no sense, so could you >> please explain these observations? >> " >> >> The only thing that can pull is physical >> attachment- like a rope- and that's still a push >> from the attached part. >> So.... little ropes? >> Maybe the strings from String Theory? >> Otherwise, sorry, pull interactions are impossible. >> > > So YOUR explanation, John, of charged glass rods drawing in charged ping > pong balls is little ropes? > This is YOUR proposal for what's going on? > > So, John, please explain the following observation: A charged glass rod is brought in proximity to a charged ping pong ball. The ping pong ball is drawn toward the glass rod. This is repeated while inserting a piece of paper between the glass rod and the ping pong ball. The ping pong ball is still drawn toward the glass rod. What's your explanation, John, that isn't "obviously illogical"? -- Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-24 18:03 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <58d597a8$0$38592$b1db1813$2411a48f@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #624838 |
On 3/24/2017 10:24 AM, Odd Bodkin wrote: > On 3/24/2017 9:03 AM, john wrote: >> Odd >> " >> You're the one saying that pull interactions make no sense, so could you >> please explain these observations? >> " >> >> The only thing that can pull is physical >> attachment- like a rope- and that's still a push >> from the attached part. >> So.... little ropes? >> Maybe the strings from String Theory? >> Otherwise, sorry, pull interactions are impossible. >> > > So YOUR explanation, John, of charged glass rods drawing in charged ping > pong balls is little ropes? > This is YOUR proposal for what's going on? > > Actually Odd, The true theory of your example is that it is a FLOW of aether from one charge to another that creates the forces just like your vacuum cleaner (which Oddly journalist HVAC seems to understand better than you do) On the other hand what John does not get (and you of course NEVER will) is that in the propagation of transverse waves, a tension is needed. For example when such waves are propagated down a proverbial string. So John's theory is only valid in the case of AIR where there are no tension forces available and transverse propagation is not possible therefore. Can you wrap your amateur mind around that? OH wait! You Plonked me. Now you are doomed to remain ever ignorant like HVAC.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-25 07:11 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <64a6da4d-e52b-4b5e-bd04-80a89f41a83e@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #624911 |
benj said "On 3/24/2017 10:24 AM, Odd Bodkin wrote: > On 3/24/2017 9:03 AM, john wrote: >> Odd >> " >> You're the one saying that pull interactions make no sense, so could you >> please explain these observations? >> " >> >> The only thing that can pull is physical >> attachment- like a rope- and that's still a push >> from the attached part. >> So.... little ropes? >> Maybe the strings from String Theory? >> Otherwise, sorry, pull interactions are impossible. >> > > So YOUR explanation, John, of charged glass rods drawing in charged ping > pong balls is little ropes? > This is YOUR proposal for what's going on? > > Actually Odd, The true theory of your example is that it is a FLOW of aether from one charge to another that creates the forces just like your vacuum cleaner (which Oddly journalist HVAC seems to understand better than you do) On the other hand what John does not get (and you of course NEVER will) is that in the propagation of transverse waves, a tension is needed. For example when such waves are propagated down a proverbial string. So John's theory is only valid in the case of AIR where there are no tension forces available and transverse propagation is not possible therefore. Can you wrap your amateur mind around that? OH wait! You Plonked me. Now you are doomed to remain ever ignorant like HVAC. " Another BREAKTHROUGH came when HVAC posted his QPO post. I realized that stars (i.e. bits of electron) fall into the centre and are shredded and immediately fed back into the system as high-energy particle jets. Yes, electrons lose energy by radiation, but they are resupplied by the centre. It's a CYCLE.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-25 11:26 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <ob65p4$ri3$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #625003 |
On 3/25/2017 9:11 AM, john wrote: > benj said > Yes, electrons > lose energy by radiation, but they are resupplied > by the centre. It's a CYCLE. > rechargeable batteries do that
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-25 10:11 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <f2e4a082-0d5c-4471-94f1-692f80c9ada4@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #625007 |
Serg "rechargeable batteries do that " Yes. Atoms and galaxies constantly radiate, but also constantly recharge.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-25 14:06 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <ob6f4a$1d14$5@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #625003 |
On 3/25/2017 9:11 AM, john wrote: > benj said > "On 3/24/2017 10:24 AM, Odd Bodkin wrote: >> On 3/24/2017 9:03 AM, john wrote: >>> Odd >>> " >>> You're the one saying that pull interactions make no sense, so could you >>> please explain these observations? >>> " >>> >>> The only thing that can pull is physical >>> attachment- like a rope- and that's still a push >>> from the attached part. >>> So.... little ropes? >>> Maybe the strings from String Theory? >>> Otherwise, sorry, pull interactions are impossible. >>> >> >> So YOUR explanation, John, of charged glass rods drawing in charged ping >> pong balls is little ropes? >> This is YOUR proposal for what's going on? >> >> > Actually Odd, The true theory of your example is that it is a FLOW of > aether from one charge to another that creates the forces just like your > vacuum cleaner (which Oddly journalist HVAC seems to understand better > than you do) > > On the other hand what John does not get (and you of course NEVER will) > is that in the propagation of transverse waves, a tension is needed. For > example when such waves are propagated down a proverbial string. > So John's theory is only valid in the case of AIR where there are no > tension forces available and transverse propagation is not possible > therefore. Can you wrap your amateur mind around that? > > OH wait! You Plonked me. Now you are doomed to remain ever ignorant like > HVAC. " > > Another BREAKTHROUGH came when > HVAC posted his QPO post. > I realized that stars (i.e. bits of electron) > fall into the centre and are shredded and > immediately fed back into the system as > high-energy particle jets. Yes, electrons > lose energy by radiation, but they are resupplied > by the centre. It's a CYCLE. > John, where's your explanation for what happens with the glass rod and the ping pong ball, especially when the piece of paper is inserted? Where are your little ropes? -- Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-25 12:52 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <0105b182-c87a-4bf6-aa8a-72191640ca4a@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #625030 |
Odd " John, where's your explanation for what happens with the glass rod and the ping pong ball, especially when the piece of paper is inserted? Where are your little ropes" You're the one with the theory that says Gravity pulls. If you deny little ropes, what is it that pulls?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-25 13:09 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <b54ce205-e16e-459a-8e16-540d4800387e@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #625037 |
Poor John says Odd " John, where's your explanation for what happens with the glass rod and the ping pong ball, especially when the piece of paper is inserted? Where are your little ropes" You're the one with the theory that says Gravity pulls. If you deny little ropes, what is it that pulls? -------------- John will never give an honest answer. Neither will BJ
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-25 17:15 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <58d6dde7$0$17444$c3e8da3$dd9697d2@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #625040 |
On 3/25/2017 4:09 PM, HVAC wrote: > Poor John says > Odd > " > John, where's your explanation for what happens with the glass rod and > the ping pong ball, especially when the piece of paper is inserted? > Where are your little ropes" > > You're the one with the theory > that says Gravity pulls. > If you deny little ropes, what is it > that pulls? > -------------- > > John will never give an honest answer. Neither will BJ > Neither will HVAC. It's what we do.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-25 14:20 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <a0e7c5cb-08f2-4ce9-a6ef-ce968b1014e2@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #625053 |
What is it that pulls? Little ropes? Maybe the atomic equivalent of Cosmic rays travel around in circles? Hey Y?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-25 14:28 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <24a6a5fd-e907-48b4-9fd1-618a7d2eaab3@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #625057 |
I had a wonderful science book back in Grade 4 that gave plans to build a boomerang. Gary M. was still looking the direction I threw it when it hit him in the back of the head. They took away my boomerang like they took away my marble board. Not all pushes go in straight lines, Odd.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-25 23:12 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ob6tgv$bdd$2@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #625061 |
john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> writes: >I had a wonderful science book >back in Grade 4 >that gave plans to build a >boomerang. >Gary M. was still looking the direction I threw >it when it hit him in the back of the head. >They took away my boomerang like they >took away my marble board. >Not all pushes go in straight lines, Odd. A boomerang operates 100% via aerodynamics, like airplane wings. Try throwing a boomerang in a vacuum, like on the moon, and see what happens. I explained that to you before, yet you didn't learn. (it would have been a cool Apollo moon landing demonstration, like the feather/hammer drop and the golf ball, to have thrown a boomerang on one of the missions)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-25 19:54 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <58d7032f$0$43709$c3e8da3$5e5e430d@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #625092 |
On 3/25/2017 7:12 PM, Michael Moroney wrote: > john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> writes: > >> I had a wonderful science book >> back in Grade 4 >> that gave plans to build a >> boomerang. >> Gary M. was still looking the direction I threw >> it when it hit him in the back of the head. >> They took away my boomerang like they >> took away my marble board. >> Not all pushes go in straight lines, Odd. > > A boomerang operates 100% via aerodynamics, like airplane wings. > Try throwing a boomerang in a vacuum, like on the moon, and see what > happens. Are you saying it's the "tension" in the air above the boomerang that holds it up? I think that is what Odd believes. > I explained that to you before, yet you didn't learn. This is nonsense. A boomerang with appropriate charges will operate in a vacuum by the electrogravitics forces of T T Brown as I'm sure John has told you many times. And yet you don't learn enough to go even look it up. > (it would have been a cool Apollo moon landing demonstration, like the > feather/hammer drop and the golf ball, to have thrown a boomerang on one > of the missions) Would have been super cool since there was air in the large sound stage where the Apollo scenes took place! :-)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-25 17:11 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <89257e19-c5dd-4968-8807-550a0e756e59@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #625103 |
BJ quacked Would have been super cool since there was air in the large sound stage where the Apollo scenes took place! ------------ There he is folks. The 'scientist' who know zero science. When Mike and Odd ply him with questions, he runs the train right off the tracks. And he even threw in a faked moon landings to back up his claim. BJ isn't a scientist, he's fucking clown shoes. Can you imagine anyone familiar with the sciences who would deny the moon landings? No? Why? Because BJ is not familiar with the sciences. His mind is like a bag of cats.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-25 20:16 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <58d70877$0$43749$c3e8da3$5e5e430d@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #625110 |
On 3/25/2017 8:11 PM, HVAC wrote: > BJ quacked > Would have been super cool since there was air in the large sound stage > where the Apollo scenes took place! > ------------ > > There he is folks. The 'scientist' who know zero science. When Mike and Odd ply him with questions, he runs the train right off the tracks. And he even threw in a faked moon landings to back up his claim. > > BJ isn't a scientist, he's fucking clown shoes. > > Can you imagine anyone familiar with the sciences who would deny the moon landings? No? Why? Because BJ is not familiar with the sciences. His mind is like a bag of cats. > > Trolling lies and ad hominem as Chimp would say! HVAC knows the moon landings were fake, folks. His paid job is to attack and ridicule anyone who brings up the truth. He's a paid professional liar. Hey, what school did you study science at? I can't hear you!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-26 01:15 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <eahjqd-1dr.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #625112 |
benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: > On 3/25/2017 8:11 PM, HVAC wrote: >> BJ quacked >> Would have been super cool since there was air in the large sound stage >> where the Apollo scenes took place! >> ------------ >> >> There he is folks. The 'scientist' who know zero science. When Mike and Odd ply him with questions, he runs the train right off the tracks. And he even threw in a faked moon landings to back up his claim. >> >> BJ isn't a scientist, he's fucking clown shoes. >> >> Can you imagine anyone familiar with the sciences who would deny the moon landings? No? Why? Because BJ is not familiar with the sciences. His mind is like a bag of cats. >> >> > Trolling lies and ad hominem as Chimp would say! Sounds dead on to me, kook. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-26 03:03 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <c6bba60d-4c57-4ff1-9045-8d9da2e08cdd@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #625112 |
BJ quacked Trolling lies and ad hominem as Chimp would say! ------------ Just like you. Not an original thought in that fugly thing perched atop your shoulders that you call a head. HVAC knows the moon landings were fake, folks. His paid job is to attack and ridicule anyone who brings up the truth. He's a paid professional liar. ----------- There there, lil BJ. Don't get yer panties in a twist.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <nobody@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-27 00:51 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <58d89a38$0$17403$c3e8da3$dd9697d2@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #625159 |
On 03/26/2017 06:03 AM, HVAC wrote: > BJ quacked > Trolling lies and ad hominem as Chimp would say! > ------------ > > Just like you. Not an original thought in that fugly thing perched atop your shoulders that you call a head. > > > HVAC knows the moon landings were fake, folks. His paid job is to attack > and ridicule anyone who brings up the truth. He's a paid professional liar. > ----------- > > There there, lil BJ. Don't get yer panties in a twist. > AI error #202. Multiple post error.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-26 03:03 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <724c6198-10be-4567-962d-96d785832d83@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #625112 |
BJ quacked Trolling lies and ad hominem as Chimp would say! ------------ Just like you. Not an original thought in that fugly thing perched atop your shoulders that you call a head. HVAC knows the moon landings were fake, folks. His paid job is to attack and ridicule anyone who brings up the truth. He's a paid professional liar. ----------- There there, lil BJ. Don't get yer panties in a twist.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 2 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web