Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #590559 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-07-24 17:29 +1000 |
| Last post | 2016-07-27 10:17 -0700 |
| Articles | 4 — 3 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Gravity and light question Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-07-24 17:29 +1000
Re: Gravity and light question mapou001@gmail.com - 2016-07-24 00:39 -0700
Re: Gravity and light question Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-07-27 12:06 -0500
Re: Gravity and light question mapou001@gmail.com - 2016-07-27 10:17 -0700
| From | Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-24 17:29 +1000 |
| Subject | Re: Gravity and light question |
| Message-ID | <dvj928FqtchU1@mid.individual.net> |
On 15/07/2016 4:01 PM, mapou001@gmail.com wrote: > Is there a hypothesis that explains why light falls twice as fast as > mass? > > Please, don't offer equations because math explain nothing. On the > contrary, it's the math that needs a physical explanation. > Translation - I know there's something wrong with the physics, and nothing you can say will convince me otherwise. Sylvia.
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | mapou001@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-24 00:39 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <3194ac53-4045-4f6f-bb10-539439971f4f@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #590559 |
On Sunday, July 24, 2016 at 12:29:15 AM UTC-7, Sylvia Else wrote: > On 15/07/2016 4:01 PM, mapou001@gmail.com wrote: > > Is there a hypothesis that explains why light falls twice as fast as > > mass? > > > > Please, don't offer equations because math explain nothing. On the > > contrary, it's the math that needs a physical explanation. > > > > Translation - I know there's something wrong with the physics, and > nothing you can say will convince me otherwise. > > Sylvia. LOL. Yeah. Well, I would put it slightly differently. I know that the physics is a big stinking pile of crap. ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-27 12:06 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <nnapmh$tcg$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #590560 |
On 7/24/2016 2:39 AM, mapou001@gmail.com wrote: > > I know that the physics is a big stinking pile of crap. don't blame us for your pile of crap you call you life.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | mapou001@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-27 10:17 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <10a216be-db34-4e83-a2a8-6950cbc8dad5@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #590936 |
On Wednesday, July 27, 2016 at 10:06:30 AM UTC-7, Sergio wrote: > On 7/24/2016 2:39 AM, mapou001@gmail.com wrote: > > > > > I know that the physics is a big stinking pile of crap. > > > don't blame us for your pile of crap you call you life. You just can't get enough of my words, can you? You're a hard-core fan of mine now. You love to have your nose rubbed in your own shit, don't you, Sergio Estupido Desgraciado? ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web