Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #559647 > unrolled thread
| Started by | TrollReportService <envalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-03-05 14:46 -0600 |
| Last post | 2016-03-07 12:34 -0800 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 297 — 18 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland TrollReportService <envalid@invalid.com> - 2016-03-05 14:46 -0600
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-05 13:13 -0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-06 06:50 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-05 23:15 -0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-03-06 12:04 -0600
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-06 19:50 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-06 14:04 -0500
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-03-06 11:48 -0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-06 23:09 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-03-06 15:29 -0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-07 01:35 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-03-06 17:00 -0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-07 04:53 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-03-06 21:05 -0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-07 17:18 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-07 09:04 -0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-07 18:43 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-07 10:22 -0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-08 06:07 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-07 21:54 -0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-08 08:47 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-08 03:05 -0500
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-08 00:47 -0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-08 16:37 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-08 08:13 -0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-08 20:00 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-08 11:29 -0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-09 08:54 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-08 08:04 -0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-08 18:40 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-08 11:16 -0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-09 06:09 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-08 21:48 -0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-03-09 11:58 -0600
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-09 20:23 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-09 12:01 -0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-10 05:14 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-03-14 16:58 -0500
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-03-08 17:09 -0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-07 00:15 -0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-07 17:08 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2016-03-06 20:07 -0500
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-07 03:57 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-07 00:18 -0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-06 23:13 +0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-06 18:51 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-06 10:48 -0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-08 13:03 +0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-08 07:38 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-08 02:04 -0500
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-08 08:14 +0000
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-08 17:34 +0800
RMS Primer for Fakey (was: Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland) snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-08 09:45 +0000
Re: RMS Primer for Fakey (was: Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland) Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-08 18:05 +0800
Re: RMS Primer for Fakey snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-08 10:14 +0000
Re: RMS Primer for Fakey Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-08 09:34 -0800
Re: RMS Primer for Fakey "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-08 12:46 -0500
Re: RMS Primer for Fakey (was: Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland) Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-08 09:34 -0800
Re: RMS Primer for Fakey (was: Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland) "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-08 12:55 -0500
Re: RMS Primer for Fakey (was: Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland) Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-09 02:08 +0800
Re: RMS Primer for Fakey (was: Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland) Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-08 11:54 -0800
Re: RMS Primer for Fakey (was: Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland) Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-09 02:07 +0800
Re: RMS Primer for Fakey (was: Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland) "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-08 13:11 -0500
Re: RMS Primer for Fakey (was: Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland) Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-08 11:58 -0800
Re: RMS Primer for Fakey snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-08 19:11 +0000
Re: RMS Primer for Fakey Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-08 11:59 -0800
Re: RMS Primer for Fakey Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-09 04:05 +0800
Re: RMS Primer for Fakey snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-08 20:14 +0000
Re: RMS Primer for Fakey Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-09 04:25 +0800
Re: RMS Primer for Fakey snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-08 20:27 +0000
Re: RMS Primer for Fakey Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-09 04:51 +0800
Re: RMS Primer for Fakey snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-08 21:00 +0000
Re: RMS Primer for Fakey Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-08 12:31 -0800
Re: RMS Primer for Fakey Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-09 04:47 +0800
Re: RMS Primer for Fakey snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-08 20:52 +0000
Re: RMS Primer for Fakey Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-08 14:35 -0700
Re: RMS Primer for Fakey Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-09 05:41 +0800
Re: RMS Primer for Fakey Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-08 14:37 -0700
Re: RMS Primer for Fakey "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-08 19:00 -0500
Re: RMS Primer for Fakey Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-08 17:37 -0700
Re: RMS Primer for Fakey Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-08 19:15 -0800
Re: RMS Primer for Fakey snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-08 20:13 +0000
Re: RMS Primer for Fakey (was: Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland) "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-08 12:33 -0500
DFTs vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-03-08 10:24 +0000
Re: DFTs Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-08 22:30 +0800
Re: DFTs "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-08 12:50 -0500
Re: DFTs Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-09 06:14 +0100
Re: DFTs Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-09 05:41 -0700
Re: DFTs "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-09 11:32 -0500
Re: DFTs Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-09 19:16 +0100
Re: DFTs "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-09 13:36 -0500
Re: DFTs Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-09 10:44 -0800
Re: DFTs "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-09 13:47 -0500
Re: DFTs Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-11 18:22 -0700
Re: DFTs Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-13 06:24 +0100
Re: DFTs "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2016-03-13 20:12 -0400
Re: DFTs Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-13 18:25 -0600
Re: DFTs Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-14 05:05 +0100
Re: DFTs on!on@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2016-03-15 15:51 +0000
Re: DFTs Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-09 08:49 -0800
Re: DFTs snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-09 17:17 +0000
Re: DFTs Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-09 09:20 -0800
Re: DFTs vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-03-09 19:48 +0000
Re: DFTs pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2016-03-09 11:26 -0600
Re: DFTs snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-10 11:14 +0000
Re: DFTs Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-11 18:19 -0700
Re: DFTs Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-11 18:55 -0800
Re: DFTs buZZard <buzz@nospam.invalid> - 2016-03-09 15:53 -0500
Re: DFTs Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-11 18:15 -0700
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-08 12:31 -0500
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-09 01:48 +0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-08 13:10 -0500
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-08 12:01 -0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-09 04:12 +0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-08 16:42 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-09 00:55 +0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-08 19:32 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-09 01:14 +0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-08 12:53 -0500
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-08 12:01 -0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-08 21:13 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-09 04:39 +0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-03-08 20:50 +0000
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-09 06:04 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-09 00:19 -0500
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-09 19:16 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-09 18:37 +0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-09 21:41 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-10 05:11 +0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-10 05:14 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-10 00:02 -0500
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-10 06:44 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-10 01:30 -0500
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-10 16:11 +0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-10 12:23 -0500
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-10 13:33 -0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-11 07:23 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-11 01:45 -0500
https://soundcloud.com/djdizazter/en3-arrangement-1 "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-11 02:18 -0500
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-10 18:21 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-11 02:25 +0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-11 08:34 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-11 17:53 +0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-13 06:09 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-13 16:48 +0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-13 08:57 +0000
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-13 22:12 +0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-14 05:05 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-14 06:31 -0600
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-14 05:32 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-10 10:01 +0000
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-10 18:16 +0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-10 12:29 -0500
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-11 07:54 +0000
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-11 03:09 -0500
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-10 12:25 -0500
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-10 15:55 +0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-10 10:06 +0000
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-10 18:36 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-10 12:49 -0500
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-11 03:00 +0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-10 14:08 -0500
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-11 03:40 +0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-10 15:03 -0500
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-11 10:07 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-11 18:45 +0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-11 14:58 +0000
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-12 16:17 +0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-13 06:34 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-11 18:52 -0500
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-13 06:24 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-09 05:39 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-09 19:00 +0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-09 08:47 -0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-09 19:27 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-08 22:35 +0000
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-09 05:29 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-09 09:01 +0000
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-09 08:32 -0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-09 11:34 -0500
Earth Calling Planet Fakey, Come In Fakey... Earth Calling Planet Fakey, Come In Fakey... snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-09 17:49 +0000
Re: Earth Calling Planet Fakey, Come In Fakey... Earth Calling Planet Fakey, Come In Fakey... snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-09 19:30 +0000
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-09 19:53 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-10 03:33 +0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-09 15:05 -0500
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-09 12:11 -0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-09 15:13 -0500
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-09 12:17 -0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-09 15:17 -0500
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-09 12:22 -0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-03-09 22:04 +0000
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland buZZard <buzz@nospam.invalid> - 2016-03-09 18:03 -0500
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-09 15:29 -0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland buZZard <buzz@nospam.invalid> - 2016-03-09 18:35 -0500
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-09 15:40 -0800
Re:Jefferson was James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland buZZard <buzz@nospam.invalid> - 2016-03-09 18:45 -0500
Re: Re:Jefferson was James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-09 16:28 -0800
Re: Jefferson was James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland buZZard <buzz@nospam.invalid> - 2016-03-09 19:32 -0500
Re: Jefferson was James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-09 19:41 -0500
Re: Jefferson was James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-10 10:08 +0000
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-10 05:35 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-10 10:12 +0000
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-10 18:30 +0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-10 12:32 -0500
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-10 12:26 -0500
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-10 19:54 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-10 19:12 +0000
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-09 19:44 +0000
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-10 06:16 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-10 10:44 +0000
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-10 18:56 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-10 18:19 +0000
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-08 18:17 +0000
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-08 13:43 -0500
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-08 12:03 -0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-08 20:20 +0000
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-08 17:54 +0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-08 12:45 -0500
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-08 09:50 -0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-09 06:14 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-08 19:21 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-03-08 19:01 +0000
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-09 03:26 +0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-08 12:10 -0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-09 04:17 +0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-08 12:21 -0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-08 22:38 +0000
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-08 14:54 -0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-08 18:58 -0500
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-08 17:39 -0700
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-08 19:14 -0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-08 18:54 -0500
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-08 17:38 -0700
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-08 19:13 -0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-09 05:39 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-09 00:04 -0500
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-09 20:54 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-09 15:11 -0500
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-09 12:16 -0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-10 04:22 +0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-09 12:24 -0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-10 05:20 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-10 00:06 -0500
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-10 06:59 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-10 01:34 -0500
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-09 23:00 -0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-10 18:41 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-10 18:41 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-10 12:52 -0500
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-11 02:13 +0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-11 08:06 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-11 18:50 +0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-13 06:19 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-10 15:03 +0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-10 02:23 -0500
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-10 21:03 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-10 15:36 -0500
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-11 09:14 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-11 08:33 +0000
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-11 04:21 -0500
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-12 01:21 +0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-13 06:29 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-11 04:42 +0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-11 07:45 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-11 02:01 -0500
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-11 18:53 +0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-11 15:00 +0000
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-13 06:09 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-10 01:14 +0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-09 13:21 -0500
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland on!on@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2016-03-09 18:37 +0000
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-10 05:10 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-10 06:21 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-10 00:38 -0500
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-10 07:39 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-10 02:02 -0500
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-10 10:22 +0000
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-10 19:34 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-10 13:51 -0500
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2016-03-10 12:10 -0700
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-10 15:07 -0500
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-11 03:16 +0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-10 15:01 -0500
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-10 10:18 +0000
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-09 19:37 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-10 03:16 +0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-10 06:05 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-10 00:21 -0500
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-10 14:23 +0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-10 07:49 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-10 10:31 +0000
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-08 17:14 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-08 12:29 -0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-09 05:54 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2016-03-09 00:03 -0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-06 13:21 -0500
his sister's dog noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-03-07 12:34 -0800
Page 12 of 15 — ← Prev page 1 … 10 11 [12] 13 14 15 Next page →
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-08 19:21 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <cd12173bafa6e3560e74d9d687a0a498@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #560289 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Brain), in <news:u57tdbh2pprbkts9cd2ilkja96pdk4fom1@4ax.com> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: >>> No. Turns out, I've *so* dismantled his kooky theory via referencing >>> peer-reviewed studies that he's forced to snip out every single word I >>> write which proves his kooky theory is wrong... and lately that's been >>> every single work I write. Because kooks are cowards. Because cowardly >>> kooks can't face reality. Because reality would cause their brains to >>> implode. LOL > Heheh... some kooks put their kookiness on display, by the > ream, for the world to ridicule. Yeah, like you did. Hence my .sig. LOL >>>> You don't know what "proof" is. You are adamantly ignorant >>>> about everything you blither-blather about. You refuse to >>>> understand what the fourier transform is for, >>> You mean the Euler-Fourier Formulas, in use since 1748 by scientists >>> and engineers >> ...who couldn't grok a graphing calculator or you know... gnuplot. Oh sure... because every scientist and engineer since 1748 is dumb and a stick-figure crackhead emo-goth kooktard who k'lames that AC voltage (both peak *and* RMS) is constant and therefore DC, who k'lames that the voltage between two phases is simultaneously 0 volts *and* 208 volts; who k'lames that shorting all 3 phases of 3-phase AC together somehow *doubles* the voltage; who k'lames that he's feeding a substation transformer *primary* with 240 volts, deriving 120 volts from the primary, and feeding that 240 volts to feed a 120/208 volt service, then backpedals and k'lames he's actually running the primary at "12 kVA" because the moron doesn't know the difference between voltage and apparent power; and who *still* cannot figure out vector summation after more than two months of trying... *that* is the delusional halfwit who's figured out sinewaves. LOL SPNAK! > That was funny. How many iterations did it take fakey to > finally graph 120v RMS correctly? One. Whereas you've presented no graphs because you're apparently even more clueless than DildoRider. LOL >>> when doing sinewave summation? >> to determine differences in potential. Still can't grasp vector summation, eh, DildoRider? LOL SPNAK! <snicker> > Fakey still thinks Euler's theorem and Fourier transforms > are used to add up sinewaves. You mean the Euler-Fourier Formulas? Aren't you the moron who k'lamed that Fourier transforms had nothing to do with sinewaves? <https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/89/Unfasor.gif> Message-ID: <80d61a6928a9e7df316c519affcf3838@dizum.com> <http://betterexplained.com/articles/an-interactive-guide-to-the-fourier-transform/> See the animations about 1/4th down the page? Yeah, those are Fourier transforms transforming circles to sine waves in real time... and in the process smearing egg on your stoooopid face. LOL >>>> the difference between peak and RMS values, >>> Oh, I know the difference, in fact, I proved it *and* used the >>> Euler-Fourier Formula to derive RMS L-N voltage >> the fuck? you didn't derive anything. you took the RMS value and, for >> some reason, factored it into a sine wave plot like a complete idiot noob >> would. Except I derived the 120 volt RMS L-N from the 170 volt peak L-N, and the 208 volt RMS L-L from the same 170 volt peak L-N (derived to that 120 volt RMS L-N), as is evidenced by the fact that in every image I posted of the graphs I made for that purpose, 170 volts is used in each and every equation, DildoRider. That you can't do that because you're a kooktard who is *still* struggling with that simple vector summation concept, to the point that you can't even add two simple line vectors without changing their slope and direction, is no one's fault but your own... well, maybe your parent's... they definitely should have aborted. SPNAK! <snicker> > See? he still thinks 120v RMS and 170v peak are 2 different > thangs. No, I proved that you're a fanfic spewing kooktard long ago, Moron. Why do you persist in crying out your tearful fanfic fantasies? Is it because I drop-kicked your retarded ass across Usenet? Yeah it is. <snicker> >>> from peak L-N voltage, >>> then used the same equation to derive RMS L-L voltage from that RMS >>> L-N voltage... something none of you morons have been able to >>> accomplish. >> funny. you never bothered to show us the exact full equations that you >> graphed, for some reason. > Snjork! "for some reason".... Actually, I did. Twice. That both you *and* DildoRider missed it just goes to show how collectively retarded the two of you are, given that the Euler sinewave summation equation has been around and in widespread use since 1748. <snicker> >>> Aren't you the moron who k'lamed that RMS voltage doesn't fluctuate, >>> and is thus DC? Yeah... yeah you are. >> RMS is a power average estimate, not a sine wave. Bwahahahaa! RMS is not a sinewave, eh? So according to you, it's DC, thus the power coming out of your wall outlets is DC? Moron. >>> IOW, I win. Again. >>> >>> <snicker> >>>> or that water is tetrahedral. >>> Wrong. Monomolecular water according to the VSEPR theory AXE method is >>> bent, KookTard. The description of "tetrahedral" is for clustered >>> water, and only used to describe the electron distribution with the >>> covalent bonds as landmarks. >>> >>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/VSEPR_theory#AXE_method> >>> "Bent (H2O)" > It says water molecules form a Bent tetrahedron. Wow. Liar. It says nothing of the sort. It says methane is tetrahedral, but water is bent... perhaps you're just a confused little kooktard backpedaling like mad because you've yet again had your stoooopid ass drop-kicked across Usenet by reality. LOL >>> You'll note the VSEPR theory does *not* classify water as tetrahedral. >>> >>> Message-ID: <230fdc3806a6ca5c7f66fa356765d72a@dizum.com> >>> ========================================================= >>> To be technically correct, you'd have to say water dynamic >>> heterogeneities are approximately trigonally, nearly planarly, >>> arranged with bond angles at 109.47 degrees, having sp^2-hybridized > Uh, Dufus... 109.47° would make it a perfect tetrahedron. > Which it isn't. LOL. For a water cluster, the H bonds are 109.47 degrees, you fecking moron. Not for individual water molecule covalent bonds, which are at 104.474 degrees for gaseous water, and 105.5 to 106 degrees in bulk water. If you're basing tetrahedrality upon water clusters, you can arrive at pretty much any geometry you wish... in point of fact, the latest and most accurate water model states that water clusters are icosahedral. But the individual water molecule, according to the VSEPR theory AXE method is bent. Moron. <http://www1.lsbu.ac.uk/water/water_molecule.html#elec> > Extra hint: "trigonally planar" would give it bond angles > of 120°, Or... or, and just bear with me for a moment here as I explore another possibility... or the researchers who are far smarter and saner than you know better than you, and you're just a moron. LOL <http://www1.lsbu.ac.uk/water/icosahedral_water_clusters.html#icos> > an angle which seems to give you particular trouble. <http://www1.lsbu.ac.uk/water/hydrogen_bonding.html> ==================================================== However trigonal (approximately planar) hydrogen bonding is also possible with two donor and one acceptor hydrogen bonds associated with individual water molecules. The lack of substantial tetrahedrally positioned 'lone pair' electrons may ease this process, at a cost of one hydrogen bond energy. Also the acceptor hydrogen bond in three coordinated but tetrahedral arrangements (two donor and one acceptor hydrogen bonds with one vacant acceptor site) can slide through a planar arrangement to the vacant tetrahedral site without breaking. This flexibility in the hydrogen bonding topology facilitates hydrogen-bonding rearrangements. ==================================================== The individual water molecule is dipolar, with one strongly electronegative (8+) oxygen and two weakly electronegative (1+) hydrogens, said dipolar nature arising due to the O-H bond angle. And that still doesn't explain your stupidly blathering: "Water is tetrahedral. It actually has 4 poles, 2 positive and 2 negative." Water has *no* "negative poles", and it most certainly doesn't have "4 poles", you witless turd. You'll be getting right on diagramming your fictional "4 pole" water, Moron. SPNAK! >>> electron pairs, which combine into icosahedral super-heterogeneities. > So you finally admit the non-bonding electron pairs form the > other corners of the tetrahedron. Like I told you, and > which you petulantly denied. > > SPNAK! You fecking moron, you're trying to conflate water cluster geometry with water molecular geometry, likely a result of your boobish confusion on all topics. And there are no "lone pairs": <http://www1.lsbu.ac.uk/water/water_molecule.html#elec> Early 5-point molecular models, with explicit negative charge where the lone pairs are purported to be, fared poorly in describing hydrogen bonding, but more recent models show some promise. Although there is no apparent consensus of opinion [116], such descriptions of substantial sp3-hybridized lone pairs in the isolated water molecule should perhaps be avoided [117], as an sp2-hybridized structure (plus a pz orbital) is indicated. SPNAK! >>> But the individual water molecule is dipolar, with one strongly > Now fakey admits a water molecule is dipolar. > > SPN<SMACKAKOOK!> I never denied that, you fecking moron. *You* did. I've been trying to tell you morons it's dipolar all along, whereas you've k'lamed water has 4 poles: "Water is tetrahedral. It actually has 4 poles, 2 positive and 2 negative." SPNAK! >>> electronegative (8+) oxygen > No, faketard, the electronegativity of O is not +8. For fuck sake, you moron. Do you really think you know better than the researchers who've spent years working on this? <http://www1.lsbu.ac.uk/water/water_molecule.html> "Due to the relatively large positive charge on the oxygen atom nucleus (8+) and the closeness of its electrons, the oxygen atom attracts electrons much more strongly (i.e. is much more electronegative) than the hydrogen atoms (1+)." SPNAK! >>> and two weakly electronegative (1+) hydrogens, > No, faketard, the electronegativity of H is not +1. > You don't understand the meaning of electronegativity. > Back to Google! <http://www1.lsbu.ac.uk/water/water_molecule.html> "Due to the relatively large positive charge on the oxygen atom nucleus (8+) and the closeness of its electrons, the oxygen atom attracts electrons much more strongly (i.e. is much more electronegative) than the hydrogen atoms (1+)." > ReSPN<SMACKAKOOK!> SPNAK! >>> said dipolar nature arising due to the O-H bond angle. > Nope again. > > Methane has the same tetrahedral bond angle, but it's in no > way dipolar. > > MultiSPNAK! Bwahahahaaa! Moron k'lames water has the same molecular geometry as methane! <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/VSEPR_theory> "Bent (H2O) Tetrahedral (CH4)" SPNAK! >>> And that still doesn't explain your stupidly blathering: "Water is >>> tetrahedral. It actually has 4 poles, 2 positive and 2 negative." >>> >>> Water has *no* "negative poles", and it most certainly doesn't have "4 >>> poles", you witless turd. > Did... did you just say water has no negative poles? > But... but you said water is dipolar! > How does that work, fakey? Moron *still* can't figure that simple concept out. <http://www1.lsbu.ac.uk/water/water_molecule.html> "Due to the relatively large positive charge on the oxygen atom nucleus (8+) and the closeness of its electrons, the oxygen atom attracts electrons much more strongly (i.e. is much more electronegative) than the hydrogen atoms (1+)." SPNAK! >> fakey has his projector set on "stunningly incompetent". > Yup. I'm stunned. STUNNED, i tell you! I'm sure you walk around like that all day, in a fog of confusion, dazed and confused and wondering how the hell you ever lived as long as you have without winning a Darwin award. Moron. <snicker> -- Shiny Tinfoil Brain (aka Bite My Shiny Metal Ass) didn't know: ===================================== The Euler equation is a subset of equations known as the Euler-Fourier Formulas, thus that a sinewave is a transformation of a circle (which should have been intuitive, given that generators *rotate* to create *sinusoids*); That cross correlation is used with Fourier transforms; That superposition is the same as wave interference; That wave interference works the same for standing or traveling waves; That RMS and peak-to-peak voltage are two different things; That RMS isn't a DC voltage; That 170 volt peak, 120.208 volt RMS L-N 3-phase service gives 208.207 volts RMS L-L; That 4444525800 != 4400000000 != 1; The difference between frequency and period of a sinewave; That there's no difference between 'i' and 'j' in electrical engineering, physics and control systems engineering; What a positive or negative vector is; That the vector sum of 3-phase AC constitutes a closed loop per Kirchhoff's Voltage Law, thus that the three phases sum to zero; That "mnemonic" is not spelled "mneumonic"; That his claim: "Water is tetrahedral. It actually has 4 poles, 2 positive and 2 negative." is nonsense from a blathering moron. That water does not have negative poles. The oxygen has an electronegativity of 8+, the hydrogens 1+. And the moron continues to demonstrate his inability to read a graph. ===================================== SPNAK! <snicker>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-08 19:01 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <dk8lrgF4gviU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #560398 |
On Tue, 08 Mar 2016 19:21:46 +0100, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus wrote: > Oh sure... because every scientist and engineer since 1748 is dumb and a > stick-figure crackhead emo-goth kooktard who k'lames that AC voltage > (both peak *and* RMS) is constant and therefore DC, who k'lames that the > voltage between two phases is simultaneously 0 volts *and* 208 volts; > who k'lames that shorting all 3 phases of 3-phase AC together somehow > *doubles* the voltage; who k'lames that he's feeding a substation > transformer *primary* with 240 volts, deriving 120 volts from the > primary, and feeding that 240 volts to feed a 120/208 volt service, then > backpedals and k'lames he's actually running the primary at "12 kVA" > because the moron doesn't know the difference between voltage and > apparent power; and who *still* cannot figure out vector summation after > more than two months of trying... *that* > is the delusional halfwit who's figured out sinewaves. $ cut -c3- this | wc -w 138 That's a 138-word sentence, folks -- one rife with strawman arguments. The froth is strong with this one. -- -v
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-09 03:26 +0800 |
| Message-ID | <3j7udbhp7j7tgbrkjcib614cvaanufdeu0@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #560398 |
Fakey wrote: Oops! Your AF is down to 3.1 dB, fakey. Type faster! > Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Brain), in > > >>>> You don't know what "proof" is. You are adamantly ignorant > >>>> about everything you blither-blather about. You refuse to > >>>> understand what the fourier transform is for, > > >>> You mean the Euler-Fourier Formulas, in use since 1748 by scientists > >>> and engineers who never used it to add sines together, let alone sines of different frequencies. Do you know what Euler's theorem is for? Or fourier transforms? That's too bad, because there are other people here who obviously do. You aren't fooling anyone yet, fakey. > > That was funny. How many iterations did it take fakey to > > finally graph 120v RMS correctly? > > One. Whereas you've presented no graphs because you're apparently even > more clueless than DildoRider. LOL LOL indeed. You did many multiple iterations of your kooky plots with a peak voltage of 120v, and you called them 120v RMS. Yet you were utterly confounded when i told you they were really 85v RMS. > >>> when doing sinewave summation? > > >> to determine differences in potential. Still can't grasp vector summation, eh, fakey? LOL Not to mention potential, uhmm, DIFFERENCE. > > Fakey still thinks Euler's theorem and Fourier transforms > > are used to add up sinewaves. > > You mean the Euler-Fourier Formulas? Aren't you the moron who k'lamed > that Fourier transforms had nothing to do with sinewaves? Nope. You are the moron who claimed fourier transforms are for the purpose of adding sinewaves (of different frequencies, yet). > <https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/89/Unfasor.gif> > > Message-ID: <80d61a6928a9e7df316c519affcf3838@dizum.com> > <http://betterexplained.com/articles/an-interactive-guide-to-the-fourier-transform/> > See the animations about 1/4th down the page? Yeah, those are Fourier > transforms transforming circles to sine waves in real time... and in > the process smearing egg on your stoooopid face. LOL Nope. You don't understand anything on that page. The animation shows a geometric explanation of what the sine function is -- really simple, so even dummies like you could understand. You assumed that because the page title is something about fourier transforms, that this must a "fourier transform of a circle". A little knowledge is a dangerous thing, eh fakey? > >>>> the difference between peak and RMS values, > > >>> Oh, I know the difference, in fact, I proved it *and* used the > >>> Euler-Fourier Formula to derive RMS L-N voltage Nope, and nope you didn't. > >> the fuck? you didn't derive anything. you took the RMS value and, for > >> some reason, factored it into a sine wave plot like a complete idiot noob > >> would. > > Except I derived the 120 volt RMS L-N from the 170 volt peak L-N, and Which are the same fucking thing, you imbecile. > the 208 volt RMS L-L from the same 170 volt peak L-N (derived to that You couldn't derive water from ice. > 120 volt RMS L-N), as is evidenced by the fact that in every image I > posted of the graphs I made for that purpose, 170 volts is used in > each and every equation, DildoRider. You mean, the incomplete formulas (not equations) you showed beside the plots, that started with 170*sin(unparsable)? So why were the plots all of something with a peak amplitude of 120v? Because you don't know what you were doing? Because you don't understand that 120v peak is really 85v RMS? > > See? he still thinks 120v RMS and 170v peak are 2 different > > thangs. > > No, I proved that you're a fanfic spewing kooktard long ago, Moron. > Why do you persist in crying out your tearful fanfic fantasies? Is it > because I drop-kicked your retarded ass across Usenet? Yeah it is. Kook translation: "Waaaaaaaaaahhh! OUCH!" > >>> then used the same equation to derive RMS L-L voltage from that RMS > >>> L-N voltage... something none of you morons have been able to > >>> accomplish. Something that i had to tell you how to do. > >> funny. you never bothered to show us the exact full equations that you > >> graphed, for some reason. > > > Snjork! "for some reason".... > > Actually, I did. Twice. That both you *and* DildoRider missed it just > goes to show how collectively retarded the two of you are, given that > the Euler sinewave summation equation has been around and in > widespread use since 1748. Nope. You never did, because you would have been ridiculed. But... you were ridiculed severely anyway. > >>> Aren't you the moron who k'lamed that RMS voltage doesn't fluctuate, > >>> and is thus DC? Yeah... yeah you are. > > >> RMS is a power average estimate, not a sine wave. > > Bwahahahaa! RMS is not a sinewave, eh? So according to you, it's DC, > thus the power coming out of your wall outlets is DC? Moron. LOL! You are still licking your wounded tush over that. How many people have explained it to you now, and you still don't get it. RMS is not a sine wave, fakey. > >>>> or that water is tetrahedral. > > >>> Wrong. Monomolecular water according to the VSEPR theory AXE method is > >>> bent, KookTard. The description of "tetrahedral" is for clustered > >>> water, and only used to describe the electron distribution with the > >>> covalent bonds as landmarks. Your own references showed water is tetrahedral. An imperfect tetrahedron, but a tetrahedron. Pooooor buttkicked fakey. > > Uh, Dufus... 109.47° would make it a perfect tetrahedron. > > Which it isn't. LOL. > > For a water cluster, the H bonds are 109.47 degrees, you fecking No they aren't. > > Extra hint: "trigonally planar" would give it bond angles > > of 120°, > > Or... or, and just bear with me for a moment here as I explore another > possibility... or the researchers who are far smarter and saner than > you know better than you, and you're just a moron. LOL And they would have said what i just said. But you can't understand the concept of RMS, so you can't be expected to understand water molecules. > >>> But the individual water molecule is dipolar, with one strongly > > > Now fakey admits a water molecule is dipolar. > > > > SPN<SMACKAKOOK!> > > I never denied that, You denied that. You said water has no negative poles. So it couldn't possibly be DIpolar, could it? Duh. > >>> electronegative (8+) oxygen > > > No, faketard, the electronegativity of O is not +8. > > For fuck sake, you moron. Do you really think you know better than the > researchers who've spent years working on this? I really think you don't understand what you are talking about. Real scientists do. > <http://www1.lsbu.ac.uk/water/water_molecule.html> > "Due to the relatively large positive charge on the oxygen atom > nucleus (8+) and the closeness of its electrons, the oxygen atom > attracts electrons much more strongly (i.e. is much more > electronegative) than the hydrogen atoms (1+)." Does that say oxygen has an electronegativity of +8? Nope. They mean the oxygen NUCLEUS has a charge of +8. See what i mean? You google all this shit, but you can't understand what it means. Then you throw it up on the wall and hope nobody knows what "electronegativity" means. I mean, christ on a moped, how can electroNEGATIVITY mean positive charge? The electronegativity of oxygen is not +8. Don't blither-blather. Google "electronegativity of oxygen". Then come back here and eat some humble pie. > >> fakey has his projector set on "stunningly incompetent". > > > Yup. I'm stunned. STUNNED, i tell you! -- "It (RMS voltage) is an *instantaneous* quadratic square of the *instantaneous* voltage of an AC sinusoidal waveform, and can thus be graphed as a sinusoid." --Fakey explains "RMS waveforms"
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-08 12:10 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.3148d18ce33a7e2b98caa0@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #560427 |
In article <3j7udbhp7j7tgbrkjcib614cvaanufdeu0@4ax.com>, bender@the.future says... > > <https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/89/Unfasor.gif> > > > > Message-ID: <80d61a6928a9e7df316c519affcf3838@dizum.com> > > <http://betterexplained.com/articles/an-interactive-guide-to-the-fourier-transform/> > > See the animations about 1/4th down the page? Yeah, those are Fourier > > transforms transforming circles to sine waves in real time... and in > > the process smearing egg on your stoooopid face. LOL > > Nope. You don't understand anything on that page. > > The animation shows a geometric explanation of what the sine > function is -- really simple, so even dummies like you could > understand. You assumed that because the page title is > something about fourier transforms, that this must a > "fourier transform of a circle". > That's an excellent way to illustrate single phase to people who don't understand alternating current. Have you seen a similar animation anywhere that shows three phases 120 degrees apart? -- Mustaffa Sheboygan
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-09 04:17 +0800 |
| Message-ID | <rpcudbpanc96uofdeg3m5p2kai26kubhpp@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #560454 |
Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote: > In article <3j7udbhp7j7tgbrkjcib614cvaanufdeu0@4ax.com>, > bender@the.future says... > > > > > <https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/89/Unfasor.gif> > > > > > > Message-ID: <80d61a6928a9e7df316c519affcf3838@dizum.com> > > > <http://betterexplained.com/articles/an-interactive-guide-to-the-fourier-transform/> > > > See the animations about 1/4th down the page? Yeah, those are Fourier > > > transforms transforming circles to sine waves in real time... and in > > > the process smearing egg on your stoooopid face. LOL > > > > Nope. You don't understand anything on that page. > > > > The animation shows a geometric explanation of what the sine > > function is -- really simple, so even dummies like you could > > understand. You assumed that because the page title is > > something about fourier transforms, that this must a > > "fourier transform of a circle". > > > > That's an excellent way to illustrate single phase to people who don't > understand alternating current. Have you seen a similar animation > anywhere that shows three phases 120 degrees apart? No... maybe that's why fakey hasn't grasped 3-phase.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-08 12:21 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.3148d44196a914cc98caa8@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #560458 |
In article <rpcudbpanc96uofdeg3m5p2kai26kubhpp@4ax.com>, bender@the.future says... > > Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote: > > > In article <3j7udbhp7j7tgbrkjcib614cvaanufdeu0@4ax.com>, > > bender@the.future says... > > > > > > > > <https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/89/Unfasor.gif> > > > > > > > > Message-ID: <80d61a6928a9e7df316c519affcf3838@dizum.com> > > > > <http://betterexplained.com/articles/an-interactive-guide-to-the-fourier-transform/> > > > > See the animations about 1/4th down the page? Yeah, those are Fourier > > > > transforms transforming circles to sine waves in real time... and in > > > > the process smearing egg on your stoooopid face. LOL > > > > > > Nope. You don't understand anything on that page. > > > > > > The animation shows a geometric explanation of what the sine > > > function is -- really simple, so even dummies like you could > > > understand. You assumed that because the page title is > > > something about fourier transforms, that this must a > > > "fourier transform of a circle". > > > > > > > That's an excellent way to illustrate single phase to people who don't > > understand alternating current. Have you seen a similar animation > > anywhere that shows three phases 120 degrees apart? > > No... maybe that's why fakey hasn't grasped 3-phase. He hasn't even grasped single phase. -- Mustaffa Sheboygan
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-08 22:38 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <1mjtdgu.14edzf4161ta2nN%snipeco.2@gmail.com> |
| In reply to | #560461 |
Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote: > In article <rpcudbpanc96uofdeg3m5p2kai26kubhpp@4ax.com>, > bender@the.future says... > > > > > > Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote: > > > > > In article <3j7udbhp7j7tgbrkjcib614cvaanufdeu0@4ax.com>, > > > bender@the.future says... > > > > > > > > > > > <https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/89/Unfasor.gif> > > > > > > > > > > Message-ID: <80d61a6928a9e7df316c519affcf3838@dizum.com> > > > > > <http://betterexplained.com/articles/an-interactive-guide-to-the-f > > > > > ourier-transform/> See the animations about 1/4th down the page? > > > > > Yeah, those are Fourier transforms transforming circles to sine > > > > > waves in real time... and in the process smearing egg on your > > > > > stoooopid face. LOL > > > > > > > > Nope. You don't understand anything on that page. > > > > > > > > The animation shows a geometric explanation of what the sine > > > > function is -- really simple, so even dummies like you could > > > > understand. You assumed that because the page title is > > > > something about fourier transforms, that this must a > > > > "fourier transform of a circle". > > > > > > > > > > That's an excellent way to illustrate single phase to people who don't > > > understand alternating current. Have you seen a similar animation > > > anywhere that shows three phases 120 degrees apart? > > > > No... maybe that's why fakey hasn't grasped 3-phase. > > He hasn't even grasped single phase. He should take a bus bar in each hand. -- ^Ï^. Sn!pe <snipeco.1@gmail.com> My mind is made up, don't confuse me with facts. My pet rock Gordon wants out.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-08 14:54 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.3148f818a4edd6798cab5@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #560533 |
In article <1mjtdgu.14edzf4161ta2nN%snipeco.2@gmail.com>, snipeco.2 @gmail.com says... > > Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote: > > > In article <rpcudbpanc96uofdeg3m5p2kai26kubhpp@4ax.com>, > > bender@the.future says... > > > > > > > > > > Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote: > > > > > > > In article <3j7udbhp7j7tgbrkjcib614cvaanufdeu0@4ax.com>, > > > > bender@the.future says... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/89/Unfasor.gif> > > > > > > > > > > > > Message-ID: <80d61a6928a9e7df316c519affcf3838@dizum.com> > > > > > > <http://betterexplained.com/articles/an-interactive-guide-to-the-f > > > > > > ourier-transform/> See the animations about 1/4th down the page? > > > > > > Yeah, those are Fourier transforms transforming circles to sine > > > > > > waves in real time... and in the process smearing egg on your > > > > > > stoooopid face. LOL > > > > > > > > > > Nope. You don't understand anything on that page. > > > > > > > > > > The animation shows a geometric explanation of what the sine > > > > > function is -- really simple, so even dummies like you could > > > > > understand. You assumed that because the page title is > > > > > something about fourier transforms, that this must a > > > > > "fourier transform of a circle". > > > > > > > > > > > > > That's an excellent way to illustrate single phase to people who don't > > > > understand alternating current. Have you seen a similar animation > > > > anywhere that shows three phases 120 degrees apart? > > > > > > No... maybe that's why fakey hasn't grasped 3-phase. > > > > He hasn't even grasped single phase. > > He should take a bus bar in each hand. "Catch the bus" LOL -- Mustaffa Sheboygan
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-08 18:58 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <op.yd057bkvtm21m2@benson.localhost> |
| In reply to | #560461 |
On Tue, 08 Mar 2016 15:21:57 -0500, Mustaffa Sheboygan
<Lunatic.Fringe@the.edge> wrote:
> In article <rpcudbpanc96uofdeg3m5p2kai26kubhpp@4ax.com>,
> bender@the.future says...
>
>
>>
>> Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote:
>>
>> > In article <3j7udbhp7j7tgbrkjcib614cvaanufdeu0@4ax.com>,
>> > bender@the.future says...
>> >
>> >
>> > > > <https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/89/Unfasor.gif>
>> > > >
>> > > > Message-ID: <80d61a6928a9e7df316c519affcf3838@dizum.com>
>> > > >
>> <http://betterexplained.com/articles/an-interactive-guide-to-the-fourier-transform/>
>> > > > See the animations about 1/4th down the page? Yeah, those are
>> Fourier
>> > > > transforms transforming circles to sine waves in real time... and
>> in
>> > > > the process smearing egg on your stoooopid face. LOL
>> > >
>> > > Nope. You don't understand anything on that page.
>> > >
>> > > The animation shows a geometric explanation of what the sine
>> > > function is -- really simple, so even dummies like you could
>> > > understand. You assumed that because the page title is
>> > > something about fourier transforms, that this must a
>> > > "fourier transform of a circle".
>> > >
>> >
>> > That's an excellent way to illustrate single phase to people who don't
>> > understand alternating current. Have you seen a similar animation
>> > anywhere that shows three phases 120 degrees apart?
>>
>> No... maybe that's why fakey hasn't grasped 3-phase.
>
> He hasn't even grasped single phase.
>
he should put on some wet socks, go over to his breaker panel and grasp it.
--
"sines, sines, everywhere there's sines
blocking up the snickerTurds, breaking his mind"
http://imgur.com/a/yMFsu
-
FNVWe attempts to rewrite physics texts in Message-ID:
<3dcad3dd0a0d39727506717506883c26@dizum.com>
">>let's not forget that mine also had the correct applied mathematics
>> equations unlike fakey the supposed know-it-all:
>> phase A: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x)
>> phase B: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi)
>> voltage difference between phase A and phase B at any point x in time:
>> 120*sin(2*pi*60*x) - 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi) = 240*sin(2*pi*60*x)
Wrong, as has already been proven. What does it say below, you fecking
*moron*?
"The _sum_ E(θ) ≡ E(a) + E(b) can be written thusly:""
it says that you don't even know how to correctly apply mathematics to
real-world AC electricity, snickerTurds.
http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/textbook/alternating-current/chpt-10/single-phase-power-systems/
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/02170.png
"To mathematically calculate voltage between “hot” wires, we must subtract
voltages, because their polarity marks show them to be opposed to each
other:"
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/12112.png
http://www.samlexamerica.com/support/documents/WhitePaper-120240VACSingleSplitPhaseandMultiWireBranchCircuits.pdf
on page 2:
** NOTE: The phase of Hot Leg 2 (Phase B) is in the
opposite direction - i.e., 180° apart from the phase
of Hot Leg L1 (Phase A)
*COUGH*
SPNAK!!
-
i know a guy on the internet who will draw a triangular sine wave in ASCII
art if you ask nicely.
see: Message-ID: <4ba4a50aaaebc7fb8a348293c5cf9f13@dizum.com>
-
snickerTurds can't seem to refute the following:
- begin snickerSinewaveStew.cpp --
/*
HOW TO RUN: download arbitrary precision libraries from:
http://www.hvks.com/Numerical/arbitrary_precision.html
place those files in a directory and save this file as
snickerSinewaveStew.cpp inside that same directory.
compiles with:
gcc -Wall -I. precisioncore.cpp snickerSinewaveStew.cpp -lstdc++
run with:
./a.out
enjoy the LULZ ;)
*/
#include <fprecision.h>
#include <iostream.h>
using namespace std;
int main(){
//float_precision MIN=float_precision(0);
//float_precision MAX=float_precision(0);
float_precision STEP=float_precision(.0001);
float_precision t=float_precision(0); // time variable
float_precision sum=float_precision(0); // sum of SnickerTurd's
ridiculous sinewave mess
float_precision snickerPrediction=float_precision(2550.25); //
snickerTurd's erroneous k0oK-k'lame Sum
float_precision PI;
PI =_float_table(_PI,25);
// this while loop will run forever, but snickers doesn't understand why
while(sum < snickerPrediction){
// fakey's Sinewave Stew(TM) see: MID:
<db672705e57e4932eba3632562e0a941@dizum.com>
sum = (float_precision(150) * float_precision(
sin(float_precision(120)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +
(float_precision(20.25) * float_precision(
sin(float_precision(33)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +
(float_precision(1400)* float_precision(
sin(float_precision(150)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +(float_precision(20)*
float_precision(sin(float_precision(5013)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +
(float_precision(600)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(13)*float_precision(2)*PI*t)))
+
(float_precision(360)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(1209)*float_precision(2)*PI*t)));
// perhaps show a few values larger than +2300 to educate teh
snickerTurds
if(sum>float_precision(2300)){
cout << "t=" << t << " sum=" << sum << std::endl;
}
t = t+STEP;
}
/*
Message-ID: <c8523e6d9c31e3282bbe581fa525a2a8@dizum.com>
"Oh, yeah... it's 2550.25 volts... so why does your graph not even
reach 2500 volts, given that eventually all the sinewaves will
constructively interfere (ie: *add* to each other) to *sum* to 2550.25
volts?"
Fakey, it doesn't reach 2500 volts because the summation of your sinewaves
never reaches that. They never reach their max values at the same time.
That's how stupid you are.
Message-ID: <731d08dcc702b9a8a13077ffc201e91f@dizum.com>
"I most certainly *did* prove otherwise. It can't even arrive at the
correct sinewave summation voltage of 2550.25 volts"
Fakey, you only *proved* that you are too inept to graph the equations and
notice a few things about the interactions of their frequencies when
summed.
the next line of code is never executed, but snickers DEFINITELY can't
figure out why it isn't and instead has a bunch of lame excuses while
still having not produced a value for t where the sum=2550.25, as he has
k0okily proklamed in many usenet messages.
*/
cout << "snickerTurds was right! the sum is " << sum << " at time t=" <<
t <<endl;
}
- end snickerSinewaveStew.cpp --
-
Fakey irrationally demands a theme song to foam to:
"all I really want your pathetic pwned ass to do is write me a classic
rock song as tribute to your Usenet Lord and Master..."
<f4f9193fa7d28b760a9de681e61427e7@dizum.com>
-
Somewhere Abouts Round Fri, 12 Feb 2016 17:25:03 -0500, Friendly
Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
<snicker>
Fag. LOL
Idiot. LOL
Moron. LOL
Tranny. LOL
Libtard. LOL
Crackhead. LOL
GableTard. LOL
DildoRider. LOL
Bad Musician. LOL
Stick Figure. LOL
Terrible Liar. LOL
Sinewave Spammer. LOL
Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL
Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL
Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL
Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL
Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL
Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL
Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL
on top of old snick-ers, all covered with Fag. LOL
is where my usenet lord and mas-ter
can go straight to hell*
*hell doesn't exist. hope everybody is having a productive evening.
-
http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg
http://cafepress.com/kooktown
http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg
-
If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: headers
containing "root@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would like to
yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints
to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful
information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public. :)
if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you
downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always try:
http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2
-
http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Gish_Gallop
The Gish Gallop is often used as an indirect argument from authority — as
it appears to paint the galloper as an expert in a broad range of subjects
or with an extensive knowledge of an individual one. Simultaneously it
presents opponents (in spoken debates) or refuters (in written,
Internet-based ones) as incompetent bumblers who didn't do their homework
before the debate. Such emphasis on style over substance is the reason
many scientists disdain public debates as a forum for disseminating
opinions. - Page #1 from the Gospel of SnickerTurd
-
Coming soon! To a newsgroup near you!:
$ perl fakeyBot.pl
FakeyBot> I'm FakeyBot. What's your name so I can Google-stalk you,
look you up on Radaris, and hurl invective and probably-illegal harrassing
bile from behind an anonymous dizum account? <snicker>
You> Robert Michael Wolfe
FakeyBot> Oh look, you're back again to polish my size 16 steel-toed
boot with your colon and listen to me talk about bestiality and cocks,
Robert. <snicker>
Robert> you talk about cocks a lot.
FakeyBot> Oh, I talk about sex a lot?
Robert> gay sex, mostly...
FakeyBot> Fag!
(just as useful as the original!)
-
snickers the wonderturd describes how he alerted lots of his kiddie pr0n
friends to the ensuing FBI sting in message
<b5e7da79a455d0c9227b1b50e25e7ea1@dizum.com>:
"That's easy enough to do... how do you think my crew uncovered the
largest CP ring using Tor and I2P, which we promptly turned over to
the FBI? I discovered a way to uncover the IP addresses the I2P users were
using, and a way of tracking Eepsites back to their IP addresses, then we
figured out that we could DDOS a Tor IP address and modify Tor headers
while checking whether a Tor hidden service was still up, then using
process of elimination to pinpoint the IP address hosting that hidden
service. It's not rocket science.
_The I2P community got all up in arms when I discussed on their forum how
I was doing it, and that it'd be a good way of cleaning up I2P so it can
get on with being a platform to research anonymous communication... my
distinct impression was that the "anonymity
research platform" story was just a cover story to allow pervs to
trade CP._ (NOTE: admits to participating in what he "suspected" was a
kiddie pr0n network.)
That Silk Road 2.0 was taken offline in the ensuing FBI Operation
Onymous was just icing on the cake."
-
Golden Killfile, June 2005
KOTM, November 2006
Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007
Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006
Busted Urinal Award, April 2007
Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008
Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007
AUK Mascot, September 2007
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-08 17:39 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <o4sudbls05i99j1ah654g2c5cbsihk2v8r@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #560549 |
On Tue, 08 Mar 2016 18:58:13 -0500, "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> wrote: >On Tue, 08 Mar 2016 15:21:57 -0500, Mustaffa Sheboygan ><Lunatic.Fringe@the.edge> wrote: > >> In article <rpcudbpanc96uofdeg3m5p2kai26kubhpp@4ax.com>, >> bender@the.future says... >> >> >>> >>> Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote: >>> >>> > In article <3j7udbhp7j7tgbrkjcib614cvaanufdeu0@4ax.com>, >>> > bender@the.future says... >>> > >>> > >>> > > > <https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/89/Unfasor.gif> >>> > > > >>> > > > Message-ID: <80d61a6928a9e7df316c519affcf3838@dizum.com> >>> > > > >>> <http://betterexplained.com/articles/an-interactive-guide-to-the-fourier-transform/> >>> > > > See the animations about 1/4th down the page? Yeah, those are >>> Fourier >>> > > > transforms transforming circles to sine waves in real time... and >>> in >>> > > > the process smearing egg on your stoooopid face. LOL >>> > > >>> > > Nope. You don't understand anything on that page. >>> > > >>> > > The animation shows a geometric explanation of what the sine >>> > > function is -- really simple, so even dummies like you could >>> > > understand. You assumed that because the page title is >>> > > something about fourier transforms, that this must a >>> > > "fourier transform of a circle". >>> > > >>> > >>> > That's an excellent way to illustrate single phase to people who don't >>> > understand alternating current. Have you seen a similar animation >>> > anywhere that shows three phases 120 degrees apart? >>> >>> No... maybe that's why fakey hasn't grasped 3-phase. >> >> He hasn't even grasped single phase. >> >he should put on some wet socks, go over to his breaker panel and grasp it. Fakey arrives home at 3am. His wife asks him, “Wire you insulate?” He replies, “Watt’s it to you? I’m Ohm, aren’t I?”
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-08 19:14 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.314934f5f1ce3aec98cab8@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #560578 |
In article <o4sudbls05i99j1ah654g2c5cbsihk2v8r@4ax.com>, skeet@invalid.invalid says... > > On Tue, 08 Mar 2016 18:58:13 -0500, "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder > living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), > socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" > <root@127.0.0.1> wrote: > > >On Tue, 08 Mar 2016 15:21:57 -0500, Mustaffa Sheboygan > ><Lunatic.Fringe@the.edge> wrote: > > > >> In article <rpcudbpanc96uofdeg3m5p2kai26kubhpp@4ax.com>, > >> bender@the.future says... > >> > >> > >>> > >>> Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote: > >>> > >>> > In article <3j7udbhp7j7tgbrkjcib614cvaanufdeu0@4ax.com>, > >>> > bender@the.future says... > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > > <https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/89/Unfasor.gif> > >>> > > > > >>> > > > Message-ID: <80d61a6928a9e7df316c519affcf3838@dizum.com> > >>> > > > > >>> <http://betterexplained.com/articles/an-interactive-guide-to-the-fourier-transform/> > >>> > > > See the animations about 1/4th down the page? Yeah, those are > >>> Fourier > >>> > > > transforms transforming circles to sine waves in real time... and > >>> in > >>> > > > the process smearing egg on your stoooopid face. LOL > >>> > > > >>> > > Nope. You don't understand anything on that page. > >>> > > > >>> > > The animation shows a geometric explanation of what the sine > >>> > > function is -- really simple, so even dummies like you could > >>> > > understand. You assumed that because the page title is > >>> > > something about fourier transforms, that this must a > >>> > > "fourier transform of a circle". > >>> > > > >>> > > >>> > That's an excellent way to illustrate single phase to people who don't > >>> > understand alternating current. Have you seen a similar animation > >>> > anywhere that shows three phases 120 degrees apart? > >>> > >>> No... maybe that's why fakey hasn't grasped 3-phase. > >> > >> He hasn't even grasped single phase. > >> > >he should put on some wet socks, go over to his breaker panel and grasp it. > > Fakey arrives home at 3am. > His wife asks him, ?Wire you insulate?? > > He replies, ?Watt?s it to you? I?m Ohm, aren?t I?? And everyone applauded. -- Mustaffa Sheboygan
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-08 18:54 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <op.yd050p1stm21m2@benson.localhost> |
| In reply to | #560454 |
On Tue, 08 Mar 2016 15:10:25 -0500, Mustaffa Sheboygan
<Lunatic.Fringe@the.edge> wrote:
> In article <3j7udbhp7j7tgbrkjcib614cvaanufdeu0@4ax.com>,
> bender@the.future says...
>
>
>> > <https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/89/Unfasor.gif>
>> >
>> > Message-ID: <80d61a6928a9e7df316c519affcf3838@dizum.com>
>> >
>> <http://betterexplained.com/articles/an-interactive-guide-to-the-fourier-transform/>
>> > See the animations about 1/4th down the page? Yeah, those are Fourier
>> > transforms transforming circles to sine waves in real time... and in
>> > the process smearing egg on your stoooopid face. LOL
>>
>> Nope. You don't understand anything on that page.
>>
>> The animation shows a geometric explanation of what the sine
>> function is -- really simple, so even dummies like you could
>> understand. You assumed that because the page title is
>> something about fourier transforms, that this must a
>> "fourier transform of a circle".
>>
>
> That's an excellent way to illustrate single phase to people who don't
> understand alternating current. Have you seen a similar animation
> anywhere that shows three phases 120 degrees apart?
>
here's an animation showing snickers using his euler fourier equations to
calculate that he doesn't understand the concept of RMS:
http://i.imgur.com/1P4HKOW.gifv
--
"sines, sines, everywhere there's sines
blocking up the snickerTurds, breaking his mind"
http://imgur.com/a/yMFsu
-
FNVWe attempts to rewrite physics texts in Message-ID:
<3dcad3dd0a0d39727506717506883c26@dizum.com>
">>let's not forget that mine also had the correct applied mathematics
>> equations unlike fakey the supposed know-it-all:
>> phase A: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x)
>> phase B: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi)
>> voltage difference between phase A and phase B at any point x in time:
>> 120*sin(2*pi*60*x) - 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi) = 240*sin(2*pi*60*x)
Wrong, as has already been proven. What does it say below, you fecking
*moron*?
"The _sum_ E(θ) ≡ E(a) + E(b) can be written thusly:""
it says that you don't even know how to correctly apply mathematics to
real-world AC electricity, snickerTurds.
http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/textbook/alternating-current/chpt-10/single-phase-power-systems/
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/02170.png
"To mathematically calculate voltage between “hot” wires, we must subtract
voltages, because their polarity marks show them to be opposed to each
other:"
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/12112.png
http://www.samlexamerica.com/support/documents/WhitePaper-120240VACSingleSplitPhaseandMultiWireBranchCircuits.pdf
on page 2:
** NOTE: The phase of Hot Leg 2 (Phase B) is in the
opposite direction - i.e., 180° apart from the phase
of Hot Leg L1 (Phase A)
*COUGH*
SPNAK!!
-
i know a guy on the internet who will draw a triangular sine wave in ASCII
art if you ask nicely.
see: Message-ID: <4ba4a50aaaebc7fb8a348293c5cf9f13@dizum.com>
-
snickerTurds can't seem to refute the following:
- begin snickerSinewaveStew.cpp --
/*
HOW TO RUN: download arbitrary precision libraries from:
http://www.hvks.com/Numerical/arbitrary_precision.html
place those files in a directory and save this file as
snickerSinewaveStew.cpp inside that same directory.
compiles with:
gcc -Wall -I. precisioncore.cpp snickerSinewaveStew.cpp -lstdc++
run with:
./a.out
enjoy the LULZ ;)
*/
#include <fprecision.h>
#include <iostream.h>
using namespace std;
int main(){
//float_precision MIN=float_precision(0);
//float_precision MAX=float_precision(0);
float_precision STEP=float_precision(.0001);
float_precision t=float_precision(0); // time variable
float_precision sum=float_precision(0); // sum of SnickerTurd's
ridiculous sinewave mess
float_precision snickerPrediction=float_precision(2550.25); //
snickerTurd's erroneous k0oK-k'lame Sum
float_precision PI;
PI =_float_table(_PI,25);
// this while loop will run forever, but snickers doesn't understand why
while(sum < snickerPrediction){
// fakey's Sinewave Stew(TM) see: MID:
<db672705e57e4932eba3632562e0a941@dizum.com>
sum = (float_precision(150) * float_precision(
sin(float_precision(120)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +
(float_precision(20.25) * float_precision(
sin(float_precision(33)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +
(float_precision(1400)* float_precision(
sin(float_precision(150)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +(float_precision(20)*
float_precision(sin(float_precision(5013)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +
(float_precision(600)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(13)*float_precision(2)*PI*t)))
+
(float_precision(360)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(1209)*float_precision(2)*PI*t)));
// perhaps show a few values larger than +2300 to educate teh
snickerTurds
if(sum>float_precision(2300)){
cout << "t=" << t << " sum=" << sum << std::endl;
}
t = t+STEP;
}
/*
Message-ID: <c8523e6d9c31e3282bbe581fa525a2a8@dizum.com>
"Oh, yeah... it's 2550.25 volts... so why does your graph not even
reach 2500 volts, given that eventually all the sinewaves will
constructively interfere (ie: *add* to each other) to *sum* to 2550.25
volts?"
Fakey, it doesn't reach 2500 volts because the summation of your sinewaves
never reaches that. They never reach their max values at the same time.
That's how stupid you are.
Message-ID: <731d08dcc702b9a8a13077ffc201e91f@dizum.com>
"I most certainly *did* prove otherwise. It can't even arrive at the
correct sinewave summation voltage of 2550.25 volts"
Fakey, you only *proved* that you are too inept to graph the equations and
notice a few things about the interactions of their frequencies when
summed.
the next line of code is never executed, but snickers DEFINITELY can't
figure out why it isn't and instead has a bunch of lame excuses while
still having not produced a value for t where the sum=2550.25, as he has
k0okily proklamed in many usenet messages.
*/
cout << "snickerTurds was right! the sum is " << sum << " at time t=" <<
t <<endl;
}
- end snickerSinewaveStew.cpp --
-
Fakey irrationally demands a theme song to foam to:
"all I really want your pathetic pwned ass to do is write me a classic
rock song as tribute to your Usenet Lord and Master..."
<f4f9193fa7d28b760a9de681e61427e7@dizum.com>
-
Somewhere Abouts Round Fri, 12 Feb 2016 17:25:03 -0500, Friendly
Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
<snicker>
Fag. LOL
Idiot. LOL
Moron. LOL
Tranny. LOL
Libtard. LOL
Crackhead. LOL
GableTard. LOL
DildoRider. LOL
Bad Musician. LOL
Stick Figure. LOL
Terrible Liar. LOL
Sinewave Spammer. LOL
Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL
Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL
Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL
Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL
Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL
Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL
Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL
on top of old snick-ers, all covered with Fag. LOL
is where my usenet lord and mas-ter
can go straight to hell*
*hell doesn't exist. hope everybody is having a productive evening.
-
http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg
http://cafepress.com/kooktown
http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg
-
If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: headers
containing "root@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would like to
yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints
to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful
information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public. :)
if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you
downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always try:
http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2
-
http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Gish_Gallop
The Gish Gallop is often used as an indirect argument from authority — as
it appears to paint the galloper as an expert in a broad range of subjects
or with an extensive knowledge of an individual one. Simultaneously it
presents opponents (in spoken debates) or refuters (in written,
Internet-based ones) as incompetent bumblers who didn't do their homework
before the debate. Such emphasis on style over substance is the reason
many scientists disdain public debates as a forum for disseminating
opinions. - Page #1 from the Gospel of SnickerTurd
-
Coming soon! To a newsgroup near you!:
$ perl fakeyBot.pl
FakeyBot> I'm FakeyBot. What's your name so I can Google-stalk you,
look you up on Radaris, and hurl invective and probably-illegal harrassing
bile from behind an anonymous dizum account? <snicker>
You> Robert Michael Wolfe
FakeyBot> Oh look, you're back again to polish my size 16 steel-toed
boot with your colon and listen to me talk about bestiality and cocks,
Robert. <snicker>
Robert> you talk about cocks a lot.
FakeyBot> Oh, I talk about sex a lot?
Robert> gay sex, mostly...
FakeyBot> Fag!
(just as useful as the original!)
-
snickers the wonderturd describes how he alerted lots of his kiddie pr0n
friends to the ensuing FBI sting in message
<b5e7da79a455d0c9227b1b50e25e7ea1@dizum.com>:
"That's easy enough to do... how do you think my crew uncovered the
largest CP ring using Tor and I2P, which we promptly turned over to
the FBI? I discovered a way to uncover the IP addresses the I2P users were
using, and a way of tracking Eepsites back to their IP addresses, then we
figured out that we could DDOS a Tor IP address and modify Tor headers
while checking whether a Tor hidden service was still up, then using
process of elimination to pinpoint the IP address hosting that hidden
service. It's not rocket science.
_The I2P community got all up in arms when I discussed on their forum how
I was doing it, and that it'd be a good way of cleaning up I2P so it can
get on with being a platform to research anonymous communication... my
distinct impression was that the "anonymity
research platform" story was just a cover story to allow pervs to
trade CP._ (NOTE: admits to participating in what he "suspected" was a
kiddie pr0n network.)
That Silk Road 2.0 was taken offline in the ensuing FBI Operation
Onymous was just icing on the cake."
-
Golden Killfile, June 2005
KOTM, November 2006
Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007
Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006
Busted Urinal Award, April 2007
Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008
Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007
AUK Mascot, September 2007
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-08 17:38 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <v2sudbts7mjgp2b6iv8cmkgte5aeutarrr@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #560547 |
On Tue, 08 Mar 2016 18:54:15 -0500, "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> wrote: >On Tue, 08 Mar 2016 15:10:25 -0500, Mustaffa Sheboygan ><Lunatic.Fringe@the.edge> wrote: > >> In article <3j7udbhp7j7tgbrkjcib614cvaanufdeu0@4ax.com>, >> bender@the.future says... >> >> >>> > <https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/89/Unfasor.gif> >>> > >>> > Message-ID: <80d61a6928a9e7df316c519affcf3838@dizum.com> >>> > >>> <http://betterexplained.com/articles/an-interactive-guide-to-the-fourier-transform/> >>> > See the animations about 1/4th down the page? Yeah, those are Fourier >>> > transforms transforming circles to sine waves in real time... and in >>> > the process smearing egg on your stoooopid face. LOL >>> >>> Nope. You don't understand anything on that page. >>> >>> The animation shows a geometric explanation of what the sine >>> function is -- really simple, so even dummies like you could >>> understand. You assumed that because the page title is >>> something about fourier transforms, that this must a >>> "fourier transform of a circle". >>> >> >> That's an excellent way to illustrate single phase to people who don't >> understand alternating current. Have you seen a similar animation >> anywhere that shows three phases 120 degrees apart? >> > >here's an animation showing snickers using his euler fourier equations to >calculate that he doesn't understand the concept of RMS: > >http://i.imgur.com/1P4HKOW.gifv A superconductor walks into a bar. The bartender says, “Get out! We don’t serve your kind here.” The superconductor left without resistance.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-08 19:13 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.314934c21096e8e098cab7@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #560547 |
In article <op.yd050p1stm21m2@benson.localhost>, root@127.0.0.1 says... > > On Tue, 08 Mar 2016 15:10:25 -0500, Mustaffa Sheboygan > <Lunatic.Fringe@the.edge> wrote: > > > In article <3j7udbhp7j7tgbrkjcib614cvaanufdeu0@4ax.com>, > > bender@the.future says... > > > > > >> > <https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/89/Unfasor.gif> > >> > > >> > Message-ID: <80d61a6928a9e7df316c519affcf3838@dizum.com> > >> > > >> <http://betterexplained.com/articles/an-interactive-guide-to-the-fourier-transform/> > >> > See the animations about 1/4th down the page? Yeah, those are Fourier > >> > transforms transforming circles to sine waves in real time... and in > >> > the process smearing egg on your stoooopid face. LOL > >> > >> Nope. You don't understand anything on that page. > >> > >> The animation shows a geometric explanation of what the sine > >> function is -- really simple, so even dummies like you could > >> understand. You assumed that because the page title is > >> something about fourier transforms, that this must a > >> "fourier transform of a circle". > >> > > > > That's an excellent way to illustrate single phase to people who don't > > understand alternating current. Have you seen a similar animation > > anywhere that shows three phases 120 degrees apart? > > > > here's an animation showing snickers using his euler fourier equations to > calculate that he doesn't understand the concept of RMS: > > http://i.imgur.com/1P4HKOW.gifv So THAT'S how he's able to keep up with all that screeding... he's a speed-screeder! -- Mustaffa Sheboygan
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-09 05:39 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <6c8b57573b6e23ffc17b52cd157427ae@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #560427 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Brain), in <news:3j7udbhp7j7tgbrkjcib614cvaanufdeu0@4ax.com> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > FNVWe stomped a retard's brain flat. Again.: > Oops! Your AF is down to 3.1 dB, fakey. Type faster! Bwahahaha! I've got the bootfucked kooktard counting lines and calculating dB again. Butthurt much, Moron? LOL >> Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Brain), in >>>>>> You don't know what "proof" is. You are adamantly ignorant >>>>>> about everything you blither-blather about. You refuse to >>>>>> understand what the fourier transform is for, >>>>> You mean the Euler-Fourier Formulas, in use since 1748 by scientists >>>>> and engineers > who never used it to add sines together, let alone sines of > different frequencies. > > Do you know what Euler's theorem is for? Or fourier > transforms? That's too bad, because there are other people > here who obviously do. You aren't fooling anyone yet, fakey. Educate yourself, Moron: <http://betterexplained.com/articles/intuitive-understanding-of-eulers-formula/> <http://betterexplained.com/articles/an-interactive-guide-to-the-fourier-transform/> The Euler-Fourier Formulas are used to perform vector summation of sinusoids. Moron. SPNAK! >>> That was funny. How many iterations did it take fakey to >>> finally graph 120v RMS correctly? >> One. Whereas you've presented no graphs because you're apparently even >> more clueless than DildoRider. LOL > LOL indeed. You did many multiple iterations of your kooky > plots with a peak voltage of 120v, and you called them 120v > RMS. Yet you were utterly confounded when i told you they > were really 85v RMS. No, I properly graphed 170 volt peak L-N, derived and graphed the 120 volt RMS L-N from that, then derived and graphed the 208 volt RMS L-L from that. You're just butthurt because you've been proven to be a know-nothing moron on so many topics. LOL >>>>> when doing sinewave summation? >>>> to determine differences in potential. > Still can't grasp vector summation, eh, fakey? LOL > Not to mention potential, uhmm, DIFFERENCE. Still having a problem grokking why vector *summation* is required to calculate the resultant of tributary sinewaves, Moron? LOL What is 75 minus -45, Moron? According to you, it'd be 120. Unless you switched them in your equation to -45 minus 75, whereupon you'd get -120. But when working with vectors, the *sum* of a 75 degree upwardly sloping line and a -45 degree downwardly sloping line would be 30 degrees, no matter which position each vector assumes in the equation. Moron. LOL >>> Fakey still thinks Euler's theorem and Fourier transforms >>> are used to add up sinewaves. >> You mean the Euler-Fourier Formulas? Aren't you the moron who k'lamed >> that Fourier transforms had nothing to do with sinewaves? > Nope. You are the moron who claimed fourier transforms are > for the purpose of adding sinewaves (of different > frequencies, yet). Translation: "BBBLLLEEAAT! Despite my Usenet Lord and Master drop-kicking my retarded ass across Usenet again using facts and reality, I'm going to BBBBLLLEEAAT!" <snicker> >> <https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/89/Unfasor.gif> >> >> Message-ID: <80d61a6928a9e7df316c519affcf3838@dizum.com> >> <http://betterexplained.com/articles/an-interactive-guide-to-the-fourier-transform/> >> See the animations about 1/4th down the page? Yeah, those are Fourier >> transforms transforming circles to sine waves in real time... and in >> the process smearing egg on your stoooopid face. LOL > Nope. You don't understand anything on that page. > > The animation shows a geometric explanation of what the sine > function is -- really simple, so even dummies like you could > understand. You assumed that because the page title is > something about fourier transforms, that this must a > "fourier transform of a circle". > > A little knowledge is a dangerous thing, eh fakey? Educate yourself, Moron: <http://betterexplained.com/articles/intuitive-understanding-of-eulers-formula/> <http://betterexplained.com/articles/an-interactive-guide-to-the-fourier-transform/> The Euler-Fourier Formulas are used to perform vector summation of sinusoids. Moron. SPNAK! >>>>>> the difference between peak and RMS values, >>>>> Oh, I know the difference, in fact, I proved it *and* used the >>>>> Euler-Fourier Formula to derive RMS L-N voltage > Nope, and nope you didn't. Translation: "I don't even care that I get my stoooopid ass drop-kicked across Usenet by facts and reality anymore. If FNVWe says something, I'll automatically say the opposite. I'm *that* butthurt." <snicker> >>>> the fuck? you didn't derive anything. you took the RMS value and, for >>>> some reason, factored it into a sine wave plot like a complete idiot noob >>>> would. >> Except I derived the 120 volt RMS L-N from the 170 volt peak L-N, and > Which are the same fucking thing, you imbecile. Sure, but represented differently, you imbecile. SPNAK! >> the 208 volt RMS L-L from the same 170 volt peak L-N (derived to that > You couldn't derive water from ice. Says the moron who k'lames that RMS is DC, and therefore the 120 volt RMS voltage at the wall outlets of his single-wide trailer is DC. LOL >> 120 volt RMS L-N), as is evidenced by the fact that in every image I >> posted of the graphs I made for that purpose, 170 volts is used in >> each and every equation, DildoRider. > You mean, the incomplete formulas (not equations) you showed > beside the plots, that started with 170*sin(unparsable)? So > why were the plots all of something with a peak amplitude of > 120v? They weren't, you moron. I showed the peak L-N voltage sinusoid, the RMS L-N voltage sinusoid, and the RMS L-L voltage sinusoid. You can't even figure out how to properly graph a sinewave, let alone do vector summation of sinewaves to derive the resultant. Moron. SPNAK! > Because you don't know what you were doing? > Because you don't understand that 120v peak is really 85v > RMS? Because you're a bleatfarting moron who doesn't understand that RMS voltage is merely an *equivalent* to DC voltage, but is still a sinusoid, and can thus be graphed. <http://www.electronics-tutorials.ws/articles/rms1.gif> You moron. SPNAK! <snicker> >>> See? he still thinks 120v RMS and 170v peak are 2 different >>> thangs. >> No, I proved that you're a fanfic spewing kooktard long ago, Moron. >> Why do you persist in crying out your tearful fanfic fantasies? Is it >> because I drop-kicked your retarded ass across Usenet? Yeah it is. > Waaaaaaaaaahhh! OUCH! That's right, KookTard. Know your role or suffer the consequences. LOL >>>>> then used the same equation to derive RMS L-L voltage from that RMS >>>>> L-N voltage... something none of you morons have been able to >>>>> accomplish. > Something that i had to tell you how to do. MID? No? Oh, Shiny Tinfoil Brain is lying. Again. SPNAK! >>>> funny. you never bothered to show us the exact full equations that you >>>> graphed, for some reason. >>> Snjork! "for some reason".... >> Actually, I did. Twice. That both you *and* DildoRider missed it just >> goes to show how collectively retarded the two of you are, given that >> the Euler sinewave summation equation has been around and in >> widespread use since 1748. > Nope. You never did, because you would have been ridiculed. > But... you were ridiculed severely anyway. Sure I did. When this whole discussion began, and in reply to DildoRider's kooky k'lame that the resultant of all three phases of 3-phase AC had an amplitude of *double* the voltage of the tributaries, when in reality, it's akin to shorting the phases and thus results in 0 volts. Now go burrowing back through the posts to find them and prove yourself wrong, Moron. SPNAK! >>>>> Aren't you the moron who k'lamed that RMS voltage doesn't fluctuate, >>>>> and is thus DC? Yeah... yeah you are. >>>> RMS is a power average estimate, not a sine wave. >> Bwahahahaa! RMS is not a sinewave, eh? So according to you, it's DC, >> thus the power coming out of your wall outlets is DC? Moron. > LOL! You are still licking your wounded tush over that. > How many people have explained it to you now, and you still > don't get it. > > RMS is not a sine wave, fakey. Bwahahahaaaa! What a fucking moron. RMS voltage is the DC *equivalent* of an AC waveform, that DC voltage which would dissipate the same amount of power in a resistive element as that AC... but the RMS voltage of an AC peak voltage waveform is still a sinusoidal waveform. To argue otherwise is to argue that the 120 volt RMS voltage at every wall outlet in North America is DC. It is an *instantaneous* quadratic square of the *instantaneous* voltage of an AC sinusoidal waveform, and can thus be graphed as a sinusoid. <http://www.electronics-tutorials.ws/articles/rms1.gif> <http://www.bcae1.com/voltages.htm> ============================================================== Calculating Actual RMS Voltage: If you have a 'true RMS' voltmeter, the meter measures the instantaneous voltage at regular time intervals. ============================================================== <http://www.electronics-tutorials.ws/accircuits/rms-voltage.html> <http://www.electronics-tutorials.ws/articles/rms1.gif?81223b> You moron. SPNAK! >>>>>> or that water is tetrahedral. >>>>> Wrong. Monomolecular water according to the VSEPR theory AXE method is >>>>> bent, KookTard. The description of "tetrahedral" is for clustered >>>>> water, and only used to describe the electron distribution with the >>>>> covalent bonds as landmarks. > Your own references showed water is tetrahedral. An > imperfect tetrahedron, but a tetrahedron. > > Pooooor buttkicked fakey. Liar. My reference shows water clusters are icosahedral, whereas monomolecular water is bent geometry. Do you believe lying is a viable means of "winning, for fuck sake", you moron? SPNAK! >>> Uh, Dufus... 109.47° would make it a perfect tetrahedron. >>> Which it isn't. LOL. >> For a water cluster, the H bonds are 109.47 degrees, you fecking > No they aren't. Yeah, they are. <http://www1.lsbu.ac.uk/water/water_hydrogen_bonding.html> <http://www1.lsbu.ac.uk/water/images/water_tetrahedron_1.gif> Now you're denying that which you've previously claimed, you moron. I've got you so confused you're just blathering out denials. LOL SPNAK! >>> Extra hint: "trigonally planar" would give it bond angles >>> of 120°, >> Or... or, and just bear with me for a moment here as I explore another >> possibility... or the researchers who are far smarter and saner than >> you know better than you, and you're just a moron. LOL > And they would have said what i just said. No, they would have said you're a moron. LOL > But you can't understand the concept of RMS, so you can't be > expected to understand water molecules. Says the moron who's demonstrated his inability to understand much of anything. LOL >>>>> But the individual water molecule is dipolar, with one strongly >>> Now fakey admits a water molecule is dipolar. >>> >>> SPN<SMACKAKOOK!> >> I never denied that, > You denied that. You said water has no negative poles. So > it couldn't possibly be DIpolar, could it? <http://www1.lsbu.ac.uk/water/water_molecule.html> "Due to the relatively large positive charge on the oxygen atom nucleus (8+) and the closeness of its electrons, the oxygen atom attracts electrons much more strongly (i.e. is much more electronegative) than the hydrogen atoms (1+)." The dipolar nature of water is due to the difference in electronegativity between the oxygen and hydrogens, you fecking moron. What's 8 - 2, Moron? SPNAK! > Duh. Yeah, stick with those simple answers. They're all you can handle. Moron. LOL >>>>> electronegative (8+) oxygen >>> No, faketard, the electronegativity of O is not +8. >> For fuck sake, you moron. Do you really think you know better than the >> researchers who've spent years working on this? > I really think you don't understand what you are talking > about. Real scientists do. >> <http://www1.lsbu.ac.uk/water/water_molecule.html> >> "Due to the relatively large positive charge on the oxygen atom >> nucleus (8+) and the closeness of its electrons, the oxygen atom >> attracts electrons much more strongly (i.e. is much more >> electronegative) than the hydrogen atoms (1+)." > Does that say oxygen has an electronegativity of +8? Nope. > They mean the oxygen NUCLEUS has a charge of +8. > > See what i mean? You google all this shit, but you can't > understand what it means. Then you throw it up on the wall > and hope nobody knows what "electronegativity" means. I > mean, christ on a moped, how can electroNEGATIVITY mean > positive charge? > > The electronegativity of oxygen is not +8. > > Don't blither-blather. Google "electronegativity of > oxygen". Then come back here and eat some humble pie. Moronic blither blather from a moron. We're not talking about gaseous oxygen, you moron, we're talking about the electronegativity (ie: *positive* *charge*, just as it says in the link referenced below) of the oxygen atom in a water molecule. Those 2517 peer-reviewed studies backing up the below blurb proves you're a know-nothing moron. LOL <http://www1.lsbu.ac.uk/water/water_molecule.html> "Due to the relatively large *positive* *charge* on the oxygen atom nucleus (8+) and the closeness of its electrons, the oxygen atom attracts electrons much more strongly (i.e. is much more electronegative (ie: *positively* *charged*) than the hydrogen atoms (1+)." So the moron Shiny Tinfoil Brain doesn't understand that "electronegativity" denotes a positive charge. LOL SPNAK! -- Shiny Tinfoil Brain (aka Bite My Shiny Metal Ass) didn't know: ===================================== The Euler equation is a subset of equations known as the Euler-Fourier Formulas, thus that a sinewave is a transformation of a circle (which should have been intuitive, given that generators *rotate* to create *sinusoids*); That cross correlation is used with Fourier transforms; That superposition is the same as wave interference; That wave interference works the same for standing or traveling waves; That RMS and peak-to-peak voltage are two different things; That RMS isn't a DC voltage; That 170 volt peak, 120.208 volt RMS L-N 3-phase service gives 208.207 volts RMS L-L; That 4444525800 != 4400000000 != 1; The difference between frequency and period of a sinewave; That there's no difference between 'i' and 'j' in electrical engineering, physics and control systems engineering; What a positive or negative vector is; That the vector sum of 3-phase AC constitutes a closed loop per Kirchhoff's Voltage Law, thus that the three phases sum to zero; That "mnemonic" is not spelled "mneumonic"; That his claim: "Water is tetrahedral. It actually has 4 poles, 2 positive and 2 negative." is nonsense from a blathering moron. That water does not have negative poles. The oxygen has an electronegativity of 8+, the hydrogens 1+. That the term "electronegativity" denotes a *positive* nucleal charge. And the moron continues to demonstrate his inability to read a graph. ===================================== SPNAK! <snicker>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-09 00:04 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <op.yd1kehzttm21m2@benson.localhost> |
| In reply to | #560651 |
"instantaneous average" eh, fakester?
LOLOLOL
it takes at least one cycle to arrive at an RMS value for a signal of
constant amplitude and frequency.
someone is proving that they don't have a decent multimeter handy.
On Tue, 08 Mar 2016 23:39:31 -0500, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler
Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
>
> Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Brain), in
> <news:3j7udbhp7j7tgbrkjcib614cvaanufdeu0@4ax.com> did thusly jump head
> first into the wood chipper again:
>
>> FNVWe stomped a retard's brain flat. Again.:
>
>> Oops! Your AF is down to 3.1 dB, fakey. Type faster!
>
> Bwahahaha! I've got the bootfucked kooktard counting lines and
> calculating dB again. Butthurt much, Moron? LOL
>
>>> Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Brain), in
>
>>>>>>> You don't know what "proof" is. You are adamantly ignorant
>>>>>>> about everything you blither-blather about. You refuse to
>>>>>>> understand what the fourier transform is for,
>
>>>>>> You mean the Euler-Fourier Formulas, in use since 1748 by scientists
>>>>>> and engineers
>
>> who never used it to add sines together, let alone sines of
>> different frequencies.
>>
>> Do you know what Euler's theorem is for? Or fourier
>> transforms? That's too bad, because there are other people
>> here who obviously do. You aren't fooling anyone yet, fakey.
>
> Educate yourself, Moron:
> <http://betterexplained.com/articles/intuitive-understanding-of-eulers-formula/>
> <http://betterexplained.com/articles/an-interactive-guide-to-the-fourier-transform/>
>
> The Euler-Fourier Formulas are used to perform vector summation of
> sinusoids. Moron.
>
> SPNAK!
>
>>>> That was funny. How many iterations did it take fakey to
>>>> finally graph 120v RMS correctly?
>
>>> One. Whereas you've presented no graphs because you're apparently even
>>> more clueless than DildoRider. LOL
>
>> LOL indeed. You did many multiple iterations of your kooky
>> plots with a peak voltage of 120v, and you called them 120v
>> RMS. Yet you were utterly confounded when i told you they
>> were really 85v RMS.
>
> No, I properly graphed 170 volt peak L-N, derived and graphed the 120
> volt RMS L-N from that, then derived and graphed the 208 volt RMS L-L
> from that. You're just butthurt because you've been proven to be a
> know-nothing moron on so many topics. LOL
>
>>>>>> when doing sinewave summation?
>
>>>>> to determine differences in potential.
>
>> Still can't grasp vector summation, eh, fakey? LOL
>> Not to mention potential, uhmm, DIFFERENCE.
>
> Still having a problem grokking why vector *summation* is required to
> calculate the resultant of tributary sinewaves, Moron? LOL
>
> What is 75 minus -45, Moron? According to you, it'd be 120. Unless you
> switched them in your equation to -45 minus 75, whereupon you'd get
> -120. But when working with vectors, the *sum* of a 75 degree upwardly
> sloping line and a -45 degree downwardly sloping line would be 30
> degrees, no matter which position each vector assumes in the equation.
> Moron. LOL
>
>>>> Fakey still thinks Euler's theorem and Fourier transforms
>>>> are used to add up sinewaves.
>
>>> You mean the Euler-Fourier Formulas? Aren't you the moron who k'lamed
>>> that Fourier transforms had nothing to do with sinewaves?
>
>> Nope. You are the moron who claimed fourier transforms are
>> for the purpose of adding sinewaves (of different
>> frequencies, yet).
>
> Translation:
> "BBBLLLEEAAT! Despite my Usenet Lord and Master drop-kicking my
> retarded ass across Usenet again using facts and reality, I'm going to
> BBBBLLLEEAAT!"
>
> <snicker>
>
>>> <https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/89/Unfasor.gif>
>>>
>>> Message-ID: <80d61a6928a9e7df316c519affcf3838@dizum.com>
>>> <http://betterexplained.com/articles/an-interactive-guide-to-the-fourier-transform/>
>>> See the animations about 1/4th down the page? Yeah, those are Fourier
>>> transforms transforming circles to sine waves in real time... and in
>>> the process smearing egg on your stoooopid face. LOL
>
>> Nope. You don't understand anything on that page.
>>
>> The animation shows a geometric explanation of what the sine
>> function is -- really simple, so even dummies like you could
>> understand. You assumed that because the page title is
>> something about fourier transforms, that this must a
>> "fourier transform of a circle".
>>
>> A little knowledge is a dangerous thing, eh fakey?
>
> Educate yourself, Moron:
> <http://betterexplained.com/articles/intuitive-understanding-of-eulers-formula/>
> <http://betterexplained.com/articles/an-interactive-guide-to-the-fourier-transform/>
>
> The Euler-Fourier Formulas are used to perform vector summation of
> sinusoids. Moron.
>
> SPNAK!
>
>>>>>>> the difference between peak and RMS values,
>
>>>>>> Oh, I know the difference, in fact, I proved it *and* used the
>>>>>> Euler-Fourier Formula to derive RMS L-N voltage
>
>> Nope, and nope you didn't.
>
> Translation:
> "I don't even care that I get my stoooopid ass drop-kicked across
> Usenet by facts and reality anymore. If FNVWe says something, I'll
> automatically say the opposite. I'm *that* butthurt."
>
> <snicker>
>
>>>>> the fuck? you didn't derive anything. you took the RMS value and,
>>>>> for
>>>>> some reason, factored it into a sine wave plot like a complete idiot
>>>>> noob
>>>>> would.
>
>>> Except I derived the 120 volt RMS L-N from the 170 volt peak L-N, and
>
>> Which are the same fucking thing, you imbecile.
>
> Sure, but represented differently, you imbecile.
>
> SPNAK!
>
>>> the 208 volt RMS L-L from the same 170 volt peak L-N (derived to that
>
>> You couldn't derive water from ice.
>
> Says the moron who k'lames that RMS is DC, and therefore the 120 volt
> RMS voltage at the wall outlets of his single-wide trailer is DC. LOL
>
>>> 120 volt RMS L-N), as is evidenced by the fact that in every image I
>>> posted of the graphs I made for that purpose, 170 volts is used in
>>> each and every equation, DildoRider.
>
>> You mean, the incomplete formulas (not equations) you showed
>> beside the plots, that started with 170*sin(unparsable)? So
>> why were the plots all of something with a peak amplitude of
>> 120v?
>
> They weren't, you moron. I showed the peak L-N voltage sinusoid, the
> RMS L-N voltage sinusoid, and the RMS L-L voltage sinusoid. You can't
> even figure out how to properly graph a sinewave, let alone do vector
> summation of sinewaves to derive the resultant. Moron.
>
> SPNAK!
>
>> Because you don't know what you were doing?
>> Because you don't understand that 120v peak is really 85v
>> RMS?
>
> Because you're a bleatfarting moron who doesn't understand that RMS
> voltage is merely an *equivalent* to DC voltage, but is still a
> sinusoid, and can thus be graphed.
>
> <http://www.electronics-tutorials.ws/articles/rms1.gif>
>
> You moron.
>
> SPNAK!
>
> <snicker>
>
>>>> See? he still thinks 120v RMS and 170v peak are 2 different
>>>> thangs.
>
>>> No, I proved that you're a fanfic spewing kooktard long ago, Moron.
>>> Why do you persist in crying out your tearful fanfic fantasies? Is it
>>> because I drop-kicked your retarded ass across Usenet? Yeah it is.
>
>> Waaaaaaaaaahhh! OUCH!
>
> That's right, KookTard. Know your role or suffer the consequences. LOL
>
>>>>>> then used the same equation to derive RMS L-L voltage from that RMS
>>>>>> L-N voltage... something none of you morons have been able to
>>>>>> accomplish.
>
>> Something that i had to tell you how to do.
>
> MID? No? Oh, Shiny Tinfoil Brain is lying. Again.
>
> SPNAK!
>
>>>>> funny. you never bothered to show us the exact full equations that
>>>>> you
>>>>> graphed, for some reason.
>
>>>> Snjork! "for some reason"....
>
>>> Actually, I did. Twice. That both you *and* DildoRider missed it just
>>> goes to show how collectively retarded the two of you are, given that
>>> the Euler sinewave summation equation has been around and in
>>> widespread use since 1748.
>
>> Nope. You never did, because you would have been ridiculed.
>> But... you were ridiculed severely anyway.
>
> Sure I did. When this whole discussion began, and in reply to
> DildoRider's kooky k'lame that the resultant of all three phases of
> 3-phase AC had an amplitude of *double* the voltage of the
> tributaries, when in reality, it's akin to shorting the phases and
> thus results in 0 volts.
>
> Now go burrowing back through the posts to find them and prove
> yourself wrong, Moron.
>
> SPNAK!
>
>>>>>> Aren't you the moron who k'lamed that RMS voltage doesn't fluctuate,
>>>>>> and is thus DC? Yeah... yeah you are.
>
>>>>> RMS is a power average estimate, not a sine wave.
>
>>> Bwahahahaa! RMS is not a sinewave, eh? So according to you, it's DC,
>>> thus the power coming out of your wall outlets is DC? Moron.
>
>> LOL! You are still licking your wounded tush over that.
>> How many people have explained it to you now, and you still
>> don't get it.
>>
>> RMS is not a sine wave, fakey.
>
> Bwahahahaaaa! What a fucking moron.
>
> RMS voltage is the DC *equivalent* of an AC waveform, that DC voltage
> which would dissipate the same amount of power in a resistive element
> as that AC... but the RMS voltage of an AC peak voltage waveform is
> still a sinusoidal waveform. To argue otherwise is to argue that the
> 120 volt RMS voltage at every wall outlet in North America is DC.
>
> It is an *instantaneous* quadratic square of the *instantaneous*
> voltage of an AC sinusoidal waveform, and can thus be graphed as a
> sinusoid.
>
> <http://www.electronics-tutorials.ws/articles/rms1.gif>
>
> <http://www.bcae1.com/voltages.htm>
> ==============================================================
> Calculating Actual RMS Voltage:
> If you have a 'true RMS' voltmeter, the meter measures the
> instantaneous voltage at regular time intervals.
> ==============================================================
>
> <http://www.electronics-tutorials.ws/accircuits/rms-voltage.html>
> <http://www.electronics-tutorials.ws/articles/rms1.gif?81223b>
>
> You moron.
>
> SPNAK!
>
>>>>>>> or that water is tetrahedral.
>
>>>>>> Wrong. Monomolecular water according to the VSEPR theory AXE method
>>>>>> is
>>>>>> bent, KookTard. The description of "tetrahedral" is for clustered
>>>>>> water, and only used to describe the electron distribution with the
>>>>>> covalent bonds as landmarks.
>
>> Your own references showed water is tetrahedral. An
>> imperfect tetrahedron, but a tetrahedron.
>>
>> Pooooor buttkicked fakey.
>
> Liar. My reference shows water clusters are icosahedral, whereas
> monomolecular water is bent geometry. Do you believe lying is a viable
> means of "winning, for fuck sake", you moron?
>
> SPNAK!
>
>>>> Uh, Dufus... 109.47° would make it a perfect tetrahedron.
>>>> Which it isn't. LOL.
>
>>> For a water cluster, the H bonds are 109.47 degrees, you fecking
>
>> No they aren't.
>
> Yeah, they are.
> <http://www1.lsbu.ac.uk/water/water_hydrogen_bonding.html>
> <http://www1.lsbu.ac.uk/water/images/water_tetrahedron_1.gif>
>
> Now you're denying that which you've previously claimed, you moron.
> I've got you so confused you're just blathering out denials. LOL
>
> SPNAK!
>
>>>> Extra hint: "trigonally planar" would give it bond angles
>>>> of 120°,
>
>>> Or... or, and just bear with me for a moment here as I explore another
>>> possibility... or the researchers who are far smarter and saner than
>>> you know better than you, and you're just a moron. LOL
>
>> And they would have said what i just said.
>
> No, they would have said you're a moron. LOL
>
>> But you can't understand the concept of RMS, so you can't be
>> expected to understand water molecules.
>
> Says the moron who's demonstrated his inability to understand much of
> anything. LOL
>
>>>>>> But the individual water molecule is dipolar, with one strongly
>
>>>> Now fakey admits a water molecule is dipolar.
>>>>
>>>> SPN<SMACKAKOOK!>
>
>>> I never denied that,
>
>> You denied that. You said water has no negative poles. So
>> it couldn't possibly be DIpolar, could it?
>
> <http://www1.lsbu.ac.uk/water/water_molecule.html>
> "Due to the relatively large positive charge on the oxygen atom
> nucleus (8+) and the closeness of its electrons, the oxygen atom
> attracts electrons much more strongly (i.e. is much more
> electronegative) than the hydrogen atoms (1+)."
>
> The dipolar nature of water is due to the difference in
> electronegativity between the oxygen and hydrogens, you fecking moron.
>
> What's 8 - 2, Moron?
>
> SPNAK!
>
>> Duh.
>
> Yeah, stick with those simple answers. They're all you can handle.
> Moron. LOL
>
>>>>>> electronegative (8+) oxygen
>
>>>> No, faketard, the electronegativity of O is not +8.
>
>>> For fuck sake, you moron. Do you really think you know better than the
>>> researchers who've spent years working on this?
>
>> I really think you don't understand what you are talking
>> about. Real scientists do.
>
>>> <http://www1.lsbu.ac.uk/water/water_molecule.html>
>>> "Due to the relatively large positive charge on the oxygen atom
>>> nucleus (8+) and the closeness of its electrons, the oxygen atom
>>> attracts electrons much more strongly (i.e. is much more
>>> electronegative) than the hydrogen atoms (1+)."
>
>> Does that say oxygen has an electronegativity of +8? Nope.
>> They mean the oxygen NUCLEUS has a charge of +8.
>>
>> See what i mean? You google all this shit, but you can't
>> understand what it means. Then you throw it up on the wall
>> and hope nobody knows what "electronegativity" means. I
>> mean, christ on a moped, how can electroNEGATIVITY mean
>> positive charge?
>>
>> The electronegativity of oxygen is not +8.
>>
>> Don't blither-blather. Google "electronegativity of
>> oxygen". Then come back here and eat some humble pie.
>
> Moronic blither blather from a moron. We're not talking about gaseous
> oxygen, you moron, we're talking about the electronegativity (ie:
> *positive* *charge*, just as it says in the link referenced below) of
> the oxygen atom in a water molecule. Those 2517 peer-reviewed studies
> backing up the below blurb proves you're a know-nothing moron. LOL
>
> <http://www1.lsbu.ac.uk/water/water_molecule.html>
> "Due to the relatively large *positive* *charge* on the oxygen atom
> nucleus (8+) and the closeness of its electrons, the oxygen atom
> attracts electrons much more strongly (i.e. is much more
> electronegative (ie: *positively* *charged*) than the hydrogen atoms
> (1+)."
>
> So the moron Shiny Tinfoil Brain doesn't understand that
> "electronegativity" denotes a positive charge. LOL
>
> SPNAK!
>
--
"sines, sines, everywhere there's sines
blocking up the snickerTurds, breaking his mind"
http://imgur.com/a/yMFsu
-
FNVWe attempts to rewrite physics texts in Message-ID:
<3dcad3dd0a0d39727506717506883c26@dizum.com>
">>let's not forget that mine also had the correct applied mathematics
>> equations unlike fakey the supposed know-it-all:
>> phase A: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x)
>> phase B: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi)
>> voltage difference between phase A and phase B at any point x in time:
>> 120*sin(2*pi*60*x) - 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi) = 240*sin(2*pi*60*x)
Wrong, as has already been proven. What does it say below, you fecking
*moron*?
"The _sum_ E(θ) ≡ E(a) + E(b) can be written thusly:""
it says that you don't even know how to correctly apply mathematics to
real-world AC electricity, snickerTurds.
http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/textbook/alternating-current/chpt-10/single-phase-power-systems/
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/02170.png
"To mathematically calculate voltage between “hot” wires, we must subtract
voltages, because their polarity marks show them to be opposed to each
other:"
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/12112.png
http://www.samlexamerica.com/support/documents/WhitePaper-120240VACSingleSplitPhaseandMultiWireBranchCircuits.pdf
on page 2:
** NOTE: The phase of Hot Leg 2 (Phase B) is in the
opposite direction - i.e., 180° apart from the phase
of Hot Leg L1 (Phase A)
*COUGH*
SPNAK!!
-
i know a guy on the internet who will draw a triangular sine wave in ASCII
art if you ask nicely.
see: Message-ID: <4ba4a50aaaebc7fb8a348293c5cf9f13@dizum.com>
-
snickerTurds can't seem to refute the following:
- begin snickerSinewaveStew.cpp --
/*
HOW TO RUN: download arbitrary precision libraries from:
http://www.hvks.com/Numerical/arbitrary_precision.html
place those files in a directory and save this file as
snickerSinewaveStew.cpp inside that same directory.
compiles with:
gcc -Wall -I. precisioncore.cpp snickerSinewaveStew.cpp -lstdc++
run with:
./a.out
enjoy the LULZ ;)
*/
#include <fprecision.h>
#include <iostream.h>
using namespace std;
int main(){
//float_precision MIN=float_precision(0);
//float_precision MAX=float_precision(0);
float_precision STEP=float_precision(.0001);
float_precision t=float_precision(0); // time variable
float_precision sum=float_precision(0); // sum of SnickerTurd's
ridiculous sinewave mess
float_precision snickerPrediction=float_precision(2550.25); //
snickerTurd's erroneous k0oK-k'lame Sum
float_precision PI;
PI =_float_table(_PI,25);
// this while loop will run forever, but snickers doesn't understand why
while(sum < snickerPrediction){
// fakey's Sinewave Stew(TM) see: MID:
<db672705e57e4932eba3632562e0a941@dizum.com>
sum = (float_precision(150) * float_precision(
sin(float_precision(120)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +
(float_precision(20.25) * float_precision(
sin(float_precision(33)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +
(float_precision(1400)* float_precision(
sin(float_precision(150)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +(float_precision(20)*
float_precision(sin(float_precision(5013)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +
(float_precision(600)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(13)*float_precision(2)*PI*t)))
+
(float_precision(360)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(1209)*float_precision(2)*PI*t)));
// perhaps show a few values larger than +2300 to educate teh
snickerTurds
if(sum>float_precision(2300)){
cout << "t=" << t << " sum=" << sum << std::endl;
}
t = t+STEP;
}
/*
Message-ID: <c8523e6d9c31e3282bbe581fa525a2a8@dizum.com>
"Oh, yeah... it's 2550.25 volts... so why does your graph not even
reach 2500 volts, given that eventually all the sinewaves will
constructively interfere (ie: *add* to each other) to *sum* to 2550.25
volts?"
Fakey, it doesn't reach 2500 volts because the summation of your sinewaves
never reaches that. They never reach their max values at the same time.
That's how stupid you are.
Message-ID: <731d08dcc702b9a8a13077ffc201e91f@dizum.com>
"I most certainly *did* prove otherwise. It can't even arrive at the
correct sinewave summation voltage of 2550.25 volts"
Fakey, you only *proved* that you are too inept to graph the equations and
notice a few things about the interactions of their frequencies when
summed.
the next line of code is never executed, but snickers DEFINITELY can't
figure out why it isn't and instead has a bunch of lame excuses while
still having not produced a value for t where the sum=2550.25, as he has
k0okily proklamed in many usenet messages.
*/
cout << "snickerTurds was right! the sum is " << sum << " at time t=" <<
t <<endl;
}
- end snickerSinewaveStew.cpp --
-
Fakey irrationally demands a theme song to foam to:
"all I really want your pathetic pwned ass to do is write me a classic
rock song as tribute to your Usenet Lord and Master..."
<f4f9193fa7d28b760a9de681e61427e7@dizum.com>
-
Somewhere Abouts Round Fri, 12 Feb 2016 17:25:03 -0500, Friendly
Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
<snicker>
Fag. LOL
Idiot. LOL
Moron. LOL
Tranny. LOL
Libtard. LOL
Crackhead. LOL
GableTard. LOL
DildoRider. LOL
Bad Musician. LOL
Stick Figure. LOL
Terrible Liar. LOL
Sinewave Spammer. LOL
Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL
Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL
Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL
Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL
Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL
Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL
Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL
on top of old snick-ers, all covered with Fag. LOL
is where my usenet lord and mas-ter
can go straight to hell*
*hell doesn't exist. hope everybody is having a productive evening.
-
http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg
http://cafepress.com/kooktown
http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg
-
If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: headers
containing "root@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would like to
yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints
to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful
information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public. :)
if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you
downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always try:
http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2
-
http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Gish_Gallop
The Gish Gallop is often used as an indirect argument from authority — as
it appears to paint the galloper as an expert in a broad range of subjects
or with an extensive knowledge of an individual one. Simultaneously it
presents opponents (in spoken debates) or refuters (in written,
Internet-based ones) as incompetent bumblers who didn't do their homework
before the debate. Such emphasis on style over substance is the reason
many scientists disdain public debates as a forum for disseminating
opinions. - Page #1 from the Gospel of SnickerTurd
-
Coming soon! To a newsgroup near you!:
$ perl fakeyBot.pl
FakeyBot> I'm FakeyBot. What's your name so I can Google-stalk you,
look you up on Radaris, and hurl invective and probably-illegal harrassing
bile from behind an anonymous dizum account? <snicker>
You> Robert Michael Wolfe
FakeyBot> Oh look, you're back again to polish my size 16 steel-toed
boot with your colon and listen to me talk about bestiality and cocks,
Robert. <snicker>
Robert> you talk about cocks a lot.
FakeyBot> Oh, I talk about sex a lot?
Robert> gay sex, mostly...
FakeyBot> Fag!
(just as useful as the original!)
-
snickers the wonderturd describes how he alerted lots of his kiddie pr0n
friends to the ensuing FBI sting in message
<b5e7da79a455d0c9227b1b50e25e7ea1@dizum.com>:
"That's easy enough to do... how do you think my crew uncovered the
largest CP ring using Tor and I2P, which we promptly turned over to
the FBI? I discovered a way to uncover the IP addresses the I2P users were
using, and a way of tracking Eepsites back to their IP addresses, then we
figured out that we could DDOS a Tor IP address and modify Tor headers
while checking whether a Tor hidden service was still up, then using
process of elimination to pinpoint the IP address hosting that hidden
service. It's not rocket science.
_The I2P community got all up in arms when I discussed on their forum how
I was doing it, and that it'd be a good way of cleaning up I2P so it can
get on with being a platform to research anonymous communication... my
distinct impression was that the "anonymity
research platform" story was just a cover story to allow pervs to
trade CP._ (NOTE: admits to participating in what he "suspected" was a
kiddie pr0n network.)
That Silk Road 2.0 was taken offline in the ensuing FBI Operation
Onymous was just icing on the cake."
-
Golden Killfile, June 2005
KOTM, November 2006
Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007
Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006
Busted Urinal Award, April 2007
Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008
Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007
AUK Mascot, September 2007
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-09 20:54 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <476922cbc5e63bc4f497e67ac073a99a@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #560657 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in <news:op.yd1kehzttm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > "instantaneous average" eh, fakester? > > LOLOLOL > > it takes at least one cycle to arrive at an RMS value for a signal of > constant amplitude and frequency. > > someone is proving that they don't have a decent multimeter handy. <http://www.bcae1.com/voltages.htm> ============================================================== Calculating Actual RMS Voltage: If you have a 'true RMS' voltmeter, the meter measures the instantaneous voltage at regular time intervals. ============================================================== Some skinny emo-goth dildoriding kooktard is demonstrating that they have no fucking clue how a true RMS meter works. SPNAK! Fag. LOL Idiot. LOL Moron. LOL Tranny. LOL Libtard. LOL Crackhead. LOL GableTard. LOL DildoRider. LOL Bad Musician. LOL Stick Figure. LOL Terrible Liar. LOL Obsessed Retard. LOL Sinewave Spammer. LOL Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In Usenet History. LOL -- Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka DildoRider, aka Teh Mop Jockey) 5907 Stanton Ave. Pittsburgh, PA (412) 853-6395 (412) 799-0532 (412) 665-8289 (412) 404-8757 DildoRider admits he's stoooopid: MID: <c65504c436778934b3e8a0fb022b7618@dizum.com> ================================================= >> it appears I've kicked your ass so hard it's >> damaged your brain, DildoRider. > then it appears that you like shooting fish in > barrels, intellectually lazy fuckhead that you are. Well, you've just admitted that intellectually kicking your ass is akin to shooting fish in a barrel... IOW, you've admitted that you're stoooopid. No un-ringing that bell. <snicker> ================================================= DildoRider admits he's "really stupid" (his words). LOL MID: <8a9faed11123abfaa1257fb33fb0c082@dizum.com> ================================================= > so what you're saying is that your targets for attack > have to be really stupid or else you can't manage? ================================================= DildoRider admits much more about himself: MID: <36c6802852caf4f712515dedb738e450@dizum.com> ================================================= "absolutely and completely retarded, insane, gay, ugly, smelly, toothless, dirt-poor, incontinent and possibly homeless" ================================================= This is a libtard's method of "winning", for fuck sake. 150 IQ? LOL
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-09 15:11 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <op.yd2qdgfstm21m2@benson.localhost> |
| In reply to | #560896 |
On Wed, 09 Mar 2016 14:54:38 -0500, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler
Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
>
> Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka
> DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey),
> socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in
> <news:op.yd1kehzttm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head first
> into the wood chipper again:
>
>> "instantaneous average" eh, fakester?
>>
>> LOLOLOL
>>
>> it takes at least one cycle to arrive at an RMS value for a signal of
>> constant amplitude and frequency.
>>
>> someone is proving that they don't have a decent multimeter handy.
> <http://www.bcae1.com/voltages.htm>
> ==============================================================
> Calculating Actual RMS Voltage:
> If you have a 'true RMS' voltmeter, the meter measures the
> instantaneous voltage at regular time intervals.
and then averages them and displays a sine wave and not a number, right?
RIGHT?
> ==============================================================
>
> Some skinny emo-goth dildoriding kooktard is demonstrating that they
> have no fucking clue how a true RMS meter works.
>
> SPNAK!
>
> Fag. LOL
> Idiot. LOL
> Moron. LOL
> Tranny. LOL
> Libtard. LOL
> Crackhead. LOL
> GableTard. LOL
> DildoRider. LOL
> Bad Musician. LOL
> Stick Figure. LOL
> Terrible Liar. LOL
> Obsessed Retard. LOL
> Sinewave Spammer. LOL
> Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL
> Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL
> Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL
> Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL
> Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL
> Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL
> Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In Usenet History. LOL
>
--
"sines, sines, everywhere there's sines
blocking up the snickerTurds, breaking his mind"
http://imgur.com/a/yMFsu
-
FNVWe attempts to rewrite physics texts in Message-ID:
<3dcad3dd0a0d39727506717506883c26@dizum.com>
">>let's not forget that mine also had the correct applied mathematics
>> equations unlike fakey the supposed know-it-all:
>> phase A: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x)
>> phase B: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi)
>> voltage difference between phase A and phase B at any point x in time:
>> 120*sin(2*pi*60*x) - 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi) = 240*sin(2*pi*60*x)
Wrong, as has already been proven. What does it say below, you fecking
*moron*?
"The _sum_ E(θ) ≡ E(a) + E(b) can be written thusly:""
it says that you don't even know how to correctly apply mathematics to
real-world AC electricity, snickerTurds.
http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/textbook/alternating-current/chpt-10/single-phase-power-systems/
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/02170.png
"To mathematically calculate voltage between “hot” wires, we must subtract
voltages, because their polarity marks show them to be opposed to each
other:"
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/12112.png
http://www.samlexamerica.com/support/documents/WhitePaper-120240VACSingleSplitPhaseandMultiWireBranchCircuits.pdf
on page 2:
** NOTE: The phase of Hot Leg 2 (Phase B) is in the
opposite direction - i.e., 180° apart from the phase
of Hot Leg L1 (Phase A)
*COUGH*
SPNAK!!
-
i know a guy on the internet who will draw a triangular sine wave in ASCII
art if you ask nicely.
see: Message-ID: <4ba4a50aaaebc7fb8a348293c5cf9f13@dizum.com>
-
snickerTurds can't seem to refute the following:
- begin snickerSinewaveStew.cpp --
/*
HOW TO RUN: download arbitrary precision libraries from:
http://www.hvks.com/Numerical/arbitrary_precision.html
place those files in a directory and save this file as
snickerSinewaveStew.cpp inside that same directory.
compiles with:
gcc -Wall -I. precisioncore.cpp snickerSinewaveStew.cpp -lstdc++
run with:
./a.out
enjoy the LULZ ;)
*/
#include <fprecision.h>
#include <iostream.h>
using namespace std;
int main(){
//float_precision MIN=float_precision(0);
//float_precision MAX=float_precision(0);
float_precision STEP=float_precision(.0001);
float_precision t=float_precision(0); // time variable
float_precision sum=float_precision(0); // sum of SnickerTurd's
ridiculous sinewave mess
float_precision snickerPrediction=float_precision(2550.25); //
snickerTurd's erroneous k0oK-k'lame Sum
float_precision PI;
PI =_float_table(_PI,25);
// this while loop will run forever, but snickers doesn't understand why
while(sum < snickerPrediction){
// fakey's Sinewave Stew(TM) see: MID:
<db672705e57e4932eba3632562e0a941@dizum.com>
sum = (float_precision(150) * float_precision(
sin(float_precision(120)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +
(float_precision(20.25) * float_precision(
sin(float_precision(33)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +
(float_precision(1400)* float_precision(
sin(float_precision(150)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +(float_precision(20)*
float_precision(sin(float_precision(5013)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +
(float_precision(600)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(13)*float_precision(2)*PI*t)))
+
(float_precision(360)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(1209)*float_precision(2)*PI*t)));
// perhaps show a few values larger than +2300 to educate teh
snickerTurds
if(sum>float_precision(2300)){
cout << "t=" << t << " sum=" << sum << std::endl;
}
t = t+STEP;
}
/*
Message-ID: <c8523e6d9c31e3282bbe581fa525a2a8@dizum.com>
"Oh, yeah... it's 2550.25 volts... so why does your graph not even
reach 2500 volts, given that eventually all the sinewaves will
constructively interfere (ie: *add* to each other) to *sum* to 2550.25
volts?"
Fakey, it doesn't reach 2500 volts because the summation of your sinewaves
never reaches that. They never reach their max values at the same time.
That's how stupid you are.
Message-ID: <731d08dcc702b9a8a13077ffc201e91f@dizum.com>
"I most certainly *did* prove otherwise. It can't even arrive at the
correct sinewave summation voltage of 2550.25 volts"
Fakey, you only *proved* that you are too inept to graph the equations and
notice a few things about the interactions of their frequencies when
summed.
the next line of code is never executed, but snickers DEFINITELY can't
figure out why it isn't and instead has a bunch of lame excuses while
still having not produced a value for t where the sum=2550.25, as he has
k0okily proklamed in many usenet messages.
*/
cout << "snickerTurds was right! the sum is " << sum << " at time t=" <<
t <<endl;
}
- end snickerSinewaveStew.cpp --
-
Fakey irrationally demands a theme song to foam to:
"all I really want your pathetic pwned ass to do is write me a classic
rock song as tribute to your Usenet Lord and Master..."
<f4f9193fa7d28b760a9de681e61427e7@dizum.com>
-
Somewhere Abouts Round Fri, 12 Feb 2016 17:25:03 -0500, Friendly
Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
<snicker>
Fag. LOL
Idiot. LOL
Moron. LOL
Tranny. LOL
Libtard. LOL
Crackhead. LOL
GableTard. LOL
DildoRider. LOL
Bad Musician. LOL
Stick Figure. LOL
Terrible Liar. LOL
Sinewave Spammer. LOL
Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL
Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL
Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL
Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL
Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL
Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL
Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL
on top of old snick-ers, all covered with Fag. LOL
is where my usenet lord and mas-ter
can go straight to hell*
*hell doesn't exist. hope everybody is having a productive evening.
-
http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg
http://cafepress.com/kooktown
http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg
-
If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: headers
containing "root@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would like to
yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints
to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful
information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public. :)
if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you
downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always try:
http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2
-
http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Gish_Gallop
The Gish Gallop is often used as an indirect argument from authority — as
it appears to paint the galloper as an expert in a broad range of subjects
or with an extensive knowledge of an individual one. Simultaneously it
presents opponents (in spoken debates) or refuters (in written,
Internet-based ones) as incompetent bumblers who didn't do their homework
before the debate. Such emphasis on style over substance is the reason
many scientists disdain public debates as a forum for disseminating
opinions. - Page #1 from the Gospel of SnickerTurd
-
Coming soon! To a newsgroup near you!:
$ perl fakeyBot.pl
FakeyBot> I'm FakeyBot. What's your name so I can Google-stalk you,
look you up on Radaris, and hurl invective and probably-illegal harrassing
bile from behind an anonymous dizum account? <snicker>
You> Robert Michael Wolfe
FakeyBot> Oh look, you're back again to polish my size 16 steel-toed
boot with your colon and listen to me talk about bestiality and cocks,
Robert. <snicker>
Robert> you talk about cocks a lot.
FakeyBot> Oh, I talk about sex a lot?
Robert> gay sex, mostly...
FakeyBot> Fag!
(just as useful as the original!)
-
snickers the wonderturd describes how he alerted lots of his kiddie pr0n
friends to the ensuing FBI sting in message
<b5e7da79a455d0c9227b1b50e25e7ea1@dizum.com>:
"That's easy enough to do... how do you think my crew uncovered the
largest CP ring using Tor and I2P, which we promptly turned over to
the FBI? I discovered a way to uncover the IP addresses the I2P users were
using, and a way of tracking Eepsites back to their IP addresses, then we
figured out that we could DDOS a Tor IP address and modify Tor headers
while checking whether a Tor hidden service was still up, then using
process of elimination to pinpoint the IP address hosting that hidden
service. It's not rocket science.
_The I2P community got all up in arms when I discussed on their forum how
I was doing it, and that it'd be a good way of cleaning up I2P so it can
get on with being a platform to research anonymous communication... my
distinct impression was that the "anonymity
research platform" story was just a cover story to allow pervs to
trade CP._ (NOTE: admits to participating in what he "suspected" was a
kiddie pr0n network.)
That Silk Road 2.0 was taken offline in the ensuing FBI Operation
Onymous was just icing on the cake."
-
Golden Killfile, June 2005
KOTM, November 2006
Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007
Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006
Busted Urinal Award, April 2007
Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008
Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007
AUK Mascot, September 2007
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-09 12:16 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.314a24538a1ceece98cad5@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #560904 |
In article <op.yd2qdgfstm21m2@benson.localhost>, root@127.0.0.1 says... > > On Wed, 09 Mar 2016 14:54:38 -0500, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler > Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: > > > Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> > > > > Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka > > DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), > > socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in > > <news:op.yd1kehzttm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head first > > into the wood chipper again: > > > >> "instantaneous average" eh, fakester? > >> > >> LOLOLOL > >> > >> it takes at least one cycle to arrive at an RMS value for a signal of > >> constant amplitude and frequency. > >> > >> someone is proving that they don't have a decent multimeter handy. > > <http://www.bcae1.com/voltages.htm> > > ============================================================== > > Calculating Actual RMS Voltage: > > If you have a 'true RMS' voltmeter, the meter measures the > > instantaneous voltage at regular time intervals. > > and then averages them and displays a sine wave and not a number, right? > > RIGHT? In Fakeytown (tm) A single number proves that AC is actually DC. LOL, etc. -- Mustaffa Sheboygan
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-10 04:22 +0800 |
| Message-ID | <ke11eb5svgjac2hdren3akul097u4muj7s@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #560908 |
Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote: > In article <op.yd2qdgfstm21m2@benson.localhost>, root@127.0.0.1 says... > > > > > > On Wed, 09 Mar 2016 14:54:38 -0500, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler > > Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: > > > > > Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> > > > > > > Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka > > > DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), > > > socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in > > > <news:op.yd1kehzttm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head first > > > into the wood chipper again: > > > > > >> "instantaneous average" eh, fakester? > > >> > > >> LOLOLOL > > >> > > >> it takes at least one cycle to arrive at an RMS value for a signal of > > >> constant amplitude and frequency. > > >> > > >> someone is proving that they don't have a decent multimeter handy. > > > <http://www.bcae1.com/voltages.htm> > > > ============================================================== > > > Calculating Actual RMS Voltage: > > > If you have a 'true RMS' voltmeter, the meter measures the > > > instantaneous voltage at regular time intervals. > > > > and then averages them and displays a sine wave and not a number, right? > > > > RIGHT? > > In Fakeytown (tm) A single number proves that AC is actually DC. LOL, > etc. True RMS meters never lie. AC is dead!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 12 of 15 — ← Prev page 1 … 10 11 [12] 13 14 15 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web