Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #546306 > unrolled thread

Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam"

Started byJames McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com>
First post2016-01-18 12:45 -0800
Last post2016-01-26 10:44 -0600
Articles 20 on this page of 130 — 17 participants

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-18 12:45 -0800
    Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-01-18 16:38 -0600
      Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Poutnik <Poutnik4NNTP@gmail.com> - 2016-01-19 10:31 +0100
    Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-01-18 23:01 +0000
      Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2016-01-21 19:48 -0800
        Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-21 23:01 -0800
          Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 07:08 -0600
            Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 05:42 -0800
              Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-01-22 08:23 -0600
                Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 08:18 -0800
                  Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 10:23 -0600
                    Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 08:30 -0800
                      Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 10:37 -0600
                        Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 08:53 -0800
                          Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 11:07 -0600
                            Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 10:05 -0800
                              Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 12:29 -0600
                                Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 10:41 -0800
                                  Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-23 12:02 -0600
                                    Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-01-23 10:36 -0800
                                      Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-01-23 13:42 -0600
                                      Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-25 09:11 -0600
                                        Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" claudiusdenk@gmail.com - 2016-01-25 11:50 -0800
                                          Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-25 16:37 -0600
                                            Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-25 15:16 -0800
                                              Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-01-26 06:24 -0800
                                                Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-26 08:36 -0600
                                                Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-26 14:20 -0500
                                    Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-23 13:35 -0800
                                      Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-25 09:51 -0600
                                        Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" claudiusdenk@gmail.com - 2016-01-25 11:55 -0800
                                          Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-25 16:39 -0600
                                            Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-25 15:18 -0800
                                              Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-01-26 10:40 -0600
                    Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 08:46 -0800
                      Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 11:05 -0600
                        Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 10:03 -0800
                          Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 12:04 -0600
                            Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 10:15 -0800
                              Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-01-24 17:31 +0100
                              Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-25 08:52 -0600
                                Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-25 11:33 -0800
                                  Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-25 13:39 -0600
                                    Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" claudiusdenk@gmail.com - 2016-01-25 12:04 -0800
                                      Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-25 16:43 -0600
                                        Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-25 15:31 -0800
                                          Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-01-26 10:42 -0600
                                    Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-25 13:28 -0800
                                      Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-25 16:46 -0600
                                        Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-25 15:33 -0800
                          Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-01-24 20:00 +1100
                            Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-24 01:08 -0800
                              Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-01-24 17:22 +0100
                                Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-24 11:14 -0800
                                  Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-01-25 10:45 -0600
                                  Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-01-26 11:40 +1100
                                    Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-25 17:34 -0800
                                      Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-01-26 13:03 +1100
                                        Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-25 18:18 -0800
                                          Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-01-26 14:28 +1100
                                          Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-26 07:28 -0600
                                            Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-26 09:32 -0800
                                              Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-26 12:07 -0600
                                                Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-26 10:18 -0800
                                                  Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-26 12:55 -0600
                                                    Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-01-26 11:29 -0800
                                                  Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-01 07:01 -0800
                                                Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-01-28 10:02 -0800
                    Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-01-24 17:05 +0100
                      Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-24 11:16 -0800
                        Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-01-25 10:48 -0600
                      Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-25 10:39 -0600
                        Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" claudiusdenk@gmail.com - 2016-01-25 12:00 -0800
                          Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-25 16:40 -0600
                            Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-25 15:22 -0800
                              Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-26 07:10 -0600
                                Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-26 09:31 -0800
                                  Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-26 12:00 -0600
                                    Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-26 10:10 -0800
                                      Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-26 12:11 -0600
                                        Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-26 10:24 -0800
                            Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-25 16:22 -0800
                              Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-01-26 13:05 +1100
                                Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-25 18:20 -0800
                                  Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-01-26 10:42 -0600
                              Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-26 07:26 -0600
                        Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-25 13:31 -0800
                  Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-01-22 12:42 -0600
                    Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 10:52 -0800
                      Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Lawrence Senreich <lawest@galaxyredeems.org> - 2016-01-22 18:59 +0000
                        Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 11:08 -0800
                          Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-01-22 14:35 -0600
                        Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 20:54 +0100
                          Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Lawrence Senreich <lawest@galaxyredeems.org> - 2016-01-23 13:28 +0000
                            Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-01-24 08:33 +0100
                              Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-24 00:18 -0800
                            Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-01-24 08:48 +0100
                              Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-24 00:27 -0800
                                Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-01-25 10:49 -0600
                              Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Rebecca Ochsenknecht <rebeoch@stritzelhassel.net> - 2016-01-24 12:27 +0000
                                Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-01-24 16:29 +0100
                                  Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Rebecca Ochsenknecht <rebeoch@stritzelhassel.net> - 2016-01-24 15:54 +0000
                                Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2016-01-25 20:12 +0100
                      Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-01-22 13:03 -0600
                        Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 11:09 -0800
                          Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-01-22 14:33 -0600
                            Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 12:54 -0800
                  Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 18:29 -0800
              Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 13:42 -0500
          Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 08:11 -0600
        Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 09:13 +0100
          Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 00:35 -0800
            Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-01-22 07:38 -0600
    Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-01-19 04:18 -0800
      Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-19 18:09 -0500
        Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-01-19 16:44 -0800
          Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-01-21 19:26 -0800
            Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-01-22 07:41 -0600
    Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-01-23 13:41 +1100
      Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 19:34 -0800
        Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-01-23 16:33 +1100
          Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 21:36 -0800
            Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-01-23 04:12 -0800
              Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-23 10:25 -0500
    Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-01-26 14:31 +1100
      Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" R Kym Horsell <kym@kymhorsell.com> - 2016-01-26 04:46 +0000
        Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-25 21:53 -0800
          Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-26 07:31 -0600
      Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-25 21:05 -0800
        Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-01-26 10:44 -0600

Page 3 of 7 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7  Next page →

#547996

FromOdd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com>
Date2016-01-25 08:52 -0600
Message-ID<n85cqj$qjo$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#547237
On 1/22/2016 12:15 PM, James McGinn wrote:
> On Friday, January 22, 2016 at 10:04:33 AM UTC-8, Odd Bodkin wrote:
>> On 1/22/2016 12:03 PM, James McGinn wrote:
>>> On Friday, January 22, 2016 at 9:05:15 AM UTC-8, Odd Bodkin wrote:
>>>> You are somehow under the impression that substances have phases that
>>>> are marked by melting points and boiling points,
>>>
>>> Right.
>>
>> And what happens at those temperatures, in your thinking?
>
> Why don't you do research on this topic and see what you find?
>

OK, so you don't actually have any idea what your OWN thinking is on 
what happens at those temperatures. Fine.

You acknowledge that you're a lone wolf, and you claim that you and you 
alone understand what happens to water and that most other people don't 
know what they're talking about. But when asked what you think you 
understand, you deflect and point elsewhere.

Jim, you're a chickenshit blusterer.

-- 
Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#548071

FromJames McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com>
Date2016-01-25 11:33 -0800
Message-ID<f0dbfb74-8e56-4445-99f1-0d6828b5047c@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#547996
On Monday, January 25, 2016 at 6:52:11 AM UTC-8, Odd Bodkin wrote:

> You acknowledge that you're a lone wolf, 

Uh huh.



and you claim that you and you 
> alone understand what happens to water

Right.

 and that most other people don't 
> know what they're talking about. 

Uh huh.


But when asked what you think you 
> understand, you deflect and point elsewhere.

Ask me anything.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#548074

FromOdd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com>
Date2016-01-25 13:39 -0600
Message-ID<n85tkp$1qco$3@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#548071
On 1/25/2016 1:33 PM, James McGinn wrote:
> But when asked what you think you
>> >understand, you deflect and point elsewhere.
> Ask me anything.

I have.
I've asked you for a reference to the steam table that you say indicates 
that gaseous water cannot exist below the boiling point of water.

So, consider it asked.

Now, I fully expect you to deflect and perform other chickenshittery.

-- 
Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#548079

Fromclaudiusdenk@gmail.com
Date2016-01-25 12:04 -0800
Message-ID<e7d0c917-a2e2-4dcb-a80b-1829a5ef686b@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#548074
On Monday, January 25, 2016 at 11:39:10 AM UTC-8, Odd Bodkin wrote:
> On 1/25/2016 1:33 PM, James McGinn wrote:
> > But when asked what you think you
> >> >understand, you deflect and point elsewhere.
> > Ask me anything.
> 
> I have.
> I've asked you for a reference to the steam table that you say indicates 
> that gaseous water cannot exist below the boiling point of water.
> 
> So, consider it asked.

Google is your friend.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#548121

FromOdd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com>
Date2016-01-25 16:43 -0600
Message-ID<n868e7$d47$4@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#548079
On 1/25/2016 2:04 PM, claudiusdenk@gmail.com wrote:
> On Monday, January 25, 2016 at 11:39:10 AM UTC-8, Odd Bodkin wrote:
>> On 1/25/2016 1:33 PM, James McGinn wrote:
>>> But when asked what you think you
>>>>> understand, you deflect and point elsewhere.
>>> Ask me anything.
>>
>> I have.
>> I've asked you for a reference to the steam table that you say indicates
>> that gaseous water cannot exist below the boiling point of water.
>>
>> So, consider it asked.
>
> Google is your friend.
>

Sorry, Jim, this is YOUR contention. Not Google's. You say YOU ALONE 
understand that water in air below boiling point is liquid, not gas. So 
if YOU ALONE are the one that holds that knowledge, then Google won't 
help. If YOU ALONE are the holder of this knowledge, then YOU ALONE have 
the facts to back it up. If you do not have the facts to back it up, 
then you do not have the knowledge.

This is not Thursday nite poker with friends, where you've got an 
eight-high hand, and you're trying to bluff to win a pot of $5.50.

You are bullshitting and deflecting, and you look like a complete ass 
doing it.

-- 
Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#548136

FromJames McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com>
Date2016-01-25 15:31 -0800
Message-ID<bd3d05fd-7cfc-4d15-a655-96f112b66825@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#548121
On Monday, January 25, 2016 at 2:43:24 PM UTC-8, Odd Bodkin wrote:

> >> So, consider it asked.
> >
> > Google is your friend.
> >
> 
> Sorry, Jim, this is YOUR contention. 

Right.  Another thing that confuses people is the psychrometric charts:
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.physics.research/QOxLdbhLwQ0/TVKql-ReCQAJ


> Not Google's. You say YOU ALONE 
> understand that water in air below boiling point is liquid, not gas.

Quote me directly, you strawbaiting nitwit.

> So 
> if YOU ALONE are the one that holds that knowledge, then Google won't 
> help. If YOU ALONE are the holder of this knowledge, then YOU ALONE have 
> the facts to back it up. If you do not have the facts to back it up, 

It would appear that you have done that for me.

> then you do not have the knowledge.
> 
> This is not Thursday nite poker with friends, where you've got an 
> eight-high hand, and you're trying to bluff to win a pot of $5.50.

I got the nuts:
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.physics/Cin1MQ4ZyFU/QmNEM9mnDgAJ

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#548307

FromSergio <invalid@invalid.com>
Date2016-01-26 10:42 -0600
Message-ID<n887kv$1hpv$3@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#548136
On 1/25/2016 5:31 PM, James McGinn wrote:
> On Monday, January 25, 2016 at 2:43:24 PM UTC-8, Odd Bodkin wrote:


> I got the nuts:
> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.physics/EsadTrollShitLocker
>

no, you "are" nuts.


are you in a home ?   not much to do ?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#548096

FromJames McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com>
Date2016-01-25 13:28 -0800
Message-ID<043a8358-4e4c-4bc7-ba84-6b4264593bb8@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#548074
On Monday, January 25, 2016 at 11:39:10 AM UTC-8, Odd Bodkin wrote:

Nobody is suggesting that you are not perfectly within your rights to believe what you want to believe.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#548123

FromOdd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com>
Date2016-01-25 16:46 -0600
Message-ID<n868jq$d47$6@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#548096
On 1/25/2016 3:28 PM, James McGinn wrote:
> On Monday, January 25, 2016 at 11:39:10 AM UTC-8, Odd Bodkin wrote:
>
> Nobody is suggesting that you are not perfectly within your rights to believe what you want to believe.
>

I am certainly within my rights to NOT believe what you contend but 
cannot back up. Feel free to believe what you alone believe, even though 
you cannot back it up but believe it anyway.

-- 
Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#548137

FromJames McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com>
Date2016-01-25 15:33 -0800
Message-ID<721f1b0e-0413-4569-87a6-8eda0f760bb2@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#548123
On Monday, January 25, 2016 at 2:46:23 PM UTC-8, Odd Bodkin wrote:

> > Nobody is suggesting that you are not perfectly within 
> > your rights to believe what you want to believe.

> I am certainly within my rights to NOT believe 

That too.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#547749

FromSylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address>
Date2016-01-24 20:00 +1100
Message-ID<dgji55F75elU1@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#547233
On 23/01/2016 5:03 AM, James McGinn wrote:
> On Friday, January 22, 2016 at 9:05:15 AM UTC-8, Odd Bodkin wrote:
>> You are somehow under the impression that substances have phases that
>> are marked by melting points and boiling points,
>
> Right.

So what's the boiling point of water?

Sylvia.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#547750

FromJames McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com>
Date2016-01-24 01:08 -0800
Message-ID<3f87720d-b757-4157-98d4-06193fac667e@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#547749
On Sunday, January 24, 2016 at 1:00:25 AM UTC-8, Sylvia Else wrote:
> On 23/01/2016 5:03 AM, James McGinn wrote:
> > On Friday, January 22, 2016 at 9:05:15 AM UTC-8, Odd Bodkin wrote:
> >> You are somehow under the impression that substances have phases that
> >> are marked by melting points and boiling points,
> >
> > Right.
> 
> So what's the boiling point of water?
> 
> Sylvia.

Google it.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#547795

FromPoutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com>
Date2016-01-24 17:22 +0100
Message-ID<n82tio$ic6$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#547750
Dne 24/01/2016 v 10:08 James McGinn napsal(a):
> On Sunday, January 24, 2016 at 1:00:25 AM UTC-8, Sylvia Else wrote:
>> On 23/01/2016 5:03 AM, James McGinn wrote:
>>> On Friday, January 22, 2016 at 9:05:15 AM UTC-8, Odd Bodkin wrote:
>>>> You are somehow under the impression that substances have phases that
>>>> are marked by melting points and boiling points,
>>>
>>> Right.
>>
>> So what's the boiling point of water?
>>
>> Sylvia.
> 
> Google it.
> 
She does know it.


-- 
Poutnik ( the Czech word for a wanderer )

Knowledge makes great men humble, but small men arrogant.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#547810

FromJames McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com>
Date2016-01-24 11:14 -0800
Message-ID<9843a075-f094-4185-87cd-d740eb89a009@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#547795
On Sunday, January 24, 2016 at 8:22:26 AM UTC-8, Poutnik wrote:
> Dne 24/01/2016 v 10:08 James McGinn napsal(a):
> > On Sunday, January 24, 2016 at 1:00:25 AM UTC-8, Sylvia Else wrote:
> >> On 23/01/2016 5:03 AM, James McGinn wrote:
> >>> On Friday, January 22, 2016 at 9:05:15 AM UTC-8, Odd Bodkin wrote:
> >>>> You are somehow under the impression that substances have phases that
> >>>> are marked by melting points and boiling points,
> >>>
> >>> Right.
> >>
> >> So what's the boiling point of water?
> >>
> >> Sylvia.
> > 
> > Google it.
> > 
> She does know it.

Notice how emotional people get with water.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#548019

FromSergio <invalid@invalid.com>
Date2016-01-25 10:45 -0600
Message-ID<n85jeq$17ln$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#547810
On 1/24/2016 1:14 PM, James McGinn wrote:
> On Sunday, January 24, 2016 at 8:22:26 AM UTC-8, Poutnik wrote:

>
> Notice how emotional people get .
>

is that what you are looking for ?  an emotional response from people ?

are you in a home ?   all by yourself again ?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#548147

FromSylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address>
Date2016-01-26 11:40 +1100
Message-ID<dgntjoFbciiU1@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#547810
On 25/01/2016 6:14 AM, James McGinn wrote:
> On Sunday, January 24, 2016 at 8:22:26 AM UTC-8, Poutnik wrote:
>> Dne 24/01/2016 v 10:08 James McGinn napsal(a):
>>> On Sunday, January 24, 2016 at 1:00:25 AM UTC-8, Sylvia Else wrote:
>>>> On 23/01/2016 5:03 AM, James McGinn wrote:
>>>>> On Friday, January 22, 2016 at 9:05:15 AM UTC-8, Odd Bodkin wrote:
>>>>>> You are somehow under the impression that substances have phases that
>>>>>> are marked by melting points and boiling points,
>>>>>
>>>>> Right.
>>>>
>>>> So what's the boiling point of water?
>>>>
>>>> Sylvia.
>>>
>>> Google it.
>>>
>> She does know it.
>
> Notice how emotional people get with water.
>

Well, you do, that's for sure.

Your position appears to be that water boils at a fixed temperature. 
Since Google doesn't support your view, the only way I can discover the 
temperature at which you believe water boils is to ask you.

So, I ask again. What's the boiling point of water?

Sylvia.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#548162

FromJames McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com>
Date2016-01-25 17:34 -0800
Message-ID<ba22aff4-48dc-4953-95cc-4dee4c139644@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#548147
On Monday, January 25, 2016 at 4:40:29 PM UTC-8, Sylvia Else wrote:

> So, I ask again. What's the boiling point of water?

Look it up.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#548166

FromSylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address>
Date2016-01-26 13:03 +1100
Message-ID<dgo2fuFcckrU1@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#548162
On 26/01/2016 12:34 PM, James McGinn wrote:
> On Monday, January 25, 2016 at 4:40:29 PM UTC-8, Sylvia Else wrote:
>
>> So, I ask again. What's the boiling point of water?
>
> Look it up.
>

I've already explained that I cannot possibly look up what you believe 
to be the boiling point.

What do you believe to be the boiling point?

Sylvia.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#548168

FromJames McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com>
Date2016-01-25 18:18 -0800
Message-ID<5d7e0622-b951-4f91-9a3b-9b011de0d9f8@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#548166
On Monday, January 25, 2016 at 6:03:48 PM UTC-8, Sylvia Else wrote:

> I've already explained that I cannot possibly look up what you believe 
> to be the boiling point.
> 
> What do you believe to be the boiling point?

I believe steam tables.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#548189

FromSylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address>
Date2016-01-26 14:28 +1100
Message-ID<dgo7fdFdeu2U1@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#548168
On 26/01/2016 1:18 PM, James McGinn wrote:
> On Monday, January 25, 2016 at 6:03:48 PM UTC-8, Sylvia Else wrote:
>
>> I've already explained that I cannot possibly look up what you believe
>> to be the boiling point.
>>
>> What do you believe to be the boiling point?
>
> I believe steam tables.
>

What do you believe to be the boiling point?

Sylvia

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 3 of 7 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web