Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #547480 > unrolled thread

The Future of ‘Epic Blizzards’ in a Warming World

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  The Future of ‘Epic Blizzards’ in a Warming World Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-01-23 09:17 -0600
    Re: The Future of ‘Epic Blizzards’ in a Warming World benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-23 11:04 -0500
    Re: The Future of ‘Epic Blizzards’ in a Warming World 7 <email_at_www_at_enemygadgets_dot_com@enemygadgets.com> - 2016-01-24 12:06 +0000
    Re: The Future of ‘Epic Blizzards’ in a Warming World dvus <dven1@adelphia.net> - 2016-01-25 05:57 -0500
      Re: The Future of ?Epic Blizzards? in a Warming World R Kym Horsell <kym@kymhorsell.com> - 2016-01-25 12:00 +0000

#547480 — The Future of ‘Epic Blizzards’ in a Warming World

The Future of ‘Epic Blizzards’ in a Warming World
> http://www.climatecentral.org/news/future-of-epic-blizzards-warming-world-19949


> Part of the reason this Snowzilla storm is expected to dump so much
> snow is because it is pulling abundant moisture. As the planet warms
> because of excess heat trapped by human-emitted greenhouse gases, the
> atmosphere can hold more moisture. Scientists already expect heavy
> downpours to increase because of that. But there’s been little
> research into what that means for “epic blizzards” like this one.
>
> It might seem that more moisture in the atmosphere along with warming
> temperatures should mean more rain than snow, and that’s true. But,
> it turns out, that’s only part of the story.
>

   Read more:
> http://www.climatecentral.org/news/future-of-epic-blizzards-warming-world-19949




-- 

sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
community, and physics-related social issues.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#547509

On 01/23/2016 10:17 AM, Sam Wormley wrote:
> The Future of ‘Epic Blizzards’ in a Warming World
>> http://www.climatecentral.org/news/future-of-epic-blizzards-warming-world-19949
>>
>
>
>> Part of the reason this Snowzilla storm is expected to dump so much
>> snow is because it is pulling abundant moisture. As the planet warms
>> because of excess heat trapped by human-emitted greenhouse gases, the
>> atmosphere can hold more moisture. Scientists already expect heavy
>> downpours to increase because of that. But there’s been little
>> research into what that means for “epic blizzards” like this one.
>>
>> It might seem that more moisture in the atmosphere along with warming
>> temperatures should mean more rain than snow, and that’s true. But,
>> it turns out, that’s only part of the story.
>>
>
>    Read more:
>> http://www.climatecentral.org/news/future-of-epic-blizzards-warming-world-19949
>
Sam we all noticed all the ice and snow and we are certain it's all due 
to that energy surplus caused by CO2 from fossil fuels.

Oddly with fossil fuel use down and CO2 output down it's no wonder the 
world is freezing. This is science!


-- 

       ___           ___           ___            ___
      /\  \         /\  \         /\__\          /\  \
     /::\  \       /::\  \       /::|  |         \:\  \
    /:/\:\  \     /:/\:\  \     /:|:|  |     ___ /::\__\
   /::\~\:\__\   /::\~\:\  \   /:/|:|  |__  /\  /:/\/__/
  /:/\:\ \:|__| /:/\:\ \:\__\ /:/ |:| /\__\ \:\/:/  /
  \:\~\:\/:/  / \:\~\:\ \/__/ \/__|:|/:/  /  \::/  /
   \:\ \::/  /   \:\ \:\__\       |:/:/  /    \/__/
    \:\/:/  /     \:\ \/__/       |::/  /
     \::/__/       \:\__\         /:/  /
      ~~            \/__/         \/__/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#547758

Sam Wormley wrote:

> The Future of ‘Epic Blizzards’ in a Warming World
>> http://www.climatecentral.org/news/future-of-epic-blizzards-warming-
world-19949

fake science web shite without peer reviewed papers and 
sigma 5 science.


>> Part of the reason this Snowzilla storm is expected to dump so much
>> snow is because it is pulling abundant moisture. 

Fake science claim.


Thanks to the double dynamo effect which has been established
through peer review, the sun will cool for the next 30 years and
may go on to create a mini ice age lasting hundreds of years.

Any climate troll standing in the way of sigma 5 science should be
prosecuted. Along with their funding organisations.
All their emails should be uploaded to main servers for public
scrutiny. Email retention policies should be extended to 30 years
if any public tax payer funding is ever used in any part of
the operations.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#547972

On 1/23/2016 10:17 AM, Sam Wormley wrote:

> The Future of ‘Epic Blizzards’ in a Warming World
>> http://www.climatecentral.org/news/future-of-epic-blizzards-warming-world-19949
>>
>
>
>> Part of the reason this Snowzilla storm is expected to dump so much
>> snow is because it is pulling abundant moisture. As the planet warms
>> because of excess heat trapped by human-emitted greenhouse gases, the
>> atmosphere can hold more moisture. Scientists already expect heavy
>> downpours to increase because of that. But there’s been little
>> research into what that means for “epic blizzards” like this one.
>>
>> It might seem that more moisture in the atmosphere along with warming
>> temperatures should mean more rain than snow, and that’s true. But,
>> it turns out, that’s only part of the story.
>>
>
>    Read more:
>> http://www.climatecentral.org/news/future-of-epic-blizzards-warming-world-19949

If it gets warm, it's AGW.
If it gets cold, it's AGW.
If it gets wet, it's AGW.
If it gets dry, it's AGW.
If it gets icier, it's AGW.
If it gets less icy, it's AGW.
I'm sure if we descend into an ice age it'll be blamed on AGW.
When the majority of predictions of the AGW crowd fail to materialize we 
get scientific double-talk.

With science like that who could doubt AGW? I'm sick of it all.

-- 
dvus

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#547977 — Re: The Future of ?Epic Blizzards? in a Warming World

dvus <dven1@adelphia.net> wrote:
> On 1/23/2016 10:17 AM, Sam Wormley wrote:
>> The Future of ?Epic Blizzards? in a Warming World
>>> http://www.climatecentral.org/news/future-of-epic-blizzards-warming-world-19949
>>> Part of the reason this Snowzilla storm is expected to dump so much
>>> snow is because it is pulling abundant moisture. As the planet warms
>>> because of excess heat trapped by human-emitted greenhouse gases, the
>>> atmosphere can hold more moisture. Scientists already expect heavy
>>> downpours to increase because of that. But there?s been little
>>> research into what that means for ?epic blizzards? like this one.
>>> It might seem that more moisture in the atmosphere along with warming
>>> temperatures should mean more rain than snow, and that?s true. But,
>>> it turns out, that?s only part of the story.
>>    Read more:
>>> http://www.climatecentral.org/news/future-of-epic-blizzards-warming-world-19949
> If it gets warm, it's AGW.
> If it gets cold, it's AGW.
> If it gets wet, it's AGW.
> If it gets dry, it's AGW.
> If it gets icier, it's AGW.
> If it gets less icy, it's AGW.
> I'm sure if we descend into an ice age it'll be blamed on AGW.
> When the majority of predictions of the AGW crowd fail to materialize we 
> get scientific double-talk.

Dumb argument.

If a species gets larger it's down to evolution.
If a species gets smaller it's down to evolution.
If a species gets leaves the ocean it's down to evolution.
If a species gets returns to the ocean it's down to evolution.
Therefore evolution is double-talk.

I recently noticed that the lie blogs had flipped from claiming
undersea volcanoes were responsible for GW to a position that
volcanoes will cause the next ice age (apparently due to start this year
after some problem with kicking the thing off in each of the preceding
10 years) and -- hence by the apparent "rule" that nothing
can cause opposite effects (ignore the "poison" warning
on some medications) -- volcanoes did not exit.

--
Temperature estimates for each record year in GISTEMP:
<http://twitter.com/ClimateOfGavin/status/689836466554408960/photo/1>
-- G. Schmidt, 21 Jan 2016 2:46am

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web