Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #531761 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-11-10 08:48 -0600 |
| Last post | 2015-11-10 14:01 -0800 |
| Articles | 3 — 3 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
Rates of ancient climate change may be underestimated Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-10 08:48 -0600
Re: Rates of ancient climate change may be underestimated jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-10 18:24 +0000
Re: Rates of ancient climate change may be underestimated Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2015-11-10 14:01 -0800
| From | Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-10 08:48 -0600 |
| Subject | Rates of ancient climate change may be underestimated |
| Message-ID | <i7-dnaulg7Aont_LnZ2dnUU7-LOdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
Rates of ancient climate change may be underestimated > http://phys.org/news/2015-11-ancient-climate-underestimated.html > The pace of past episodes of climate change is likely to have been > underestimated, according to research carried out by scientists at > the University of Aberdeen and Friedrich-Alexander University (FAU) > in Germany. > > In a paper published in Nature Communications, the research team > demonstrate how geological archives do not capture the full > variability of climate change likely to have occurred in ancient > times. The result, they argue, is that maximum rates of climate > change in Earth's history are systematically underestimated. > -- sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated to the discussion of physics, news from the physics community, and physics-related social issues.
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-10 18:24 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <dcp9hc-e5e.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #531761 |
Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote: > Rates of ancient climate change may be underestimated >> http://phys.org/news/2015-11-ancient-climate-underestimated.html > >> The pace of past episodes of climate change is likely to have been >> underestimated, according to research carried out by scientists at >> the University of Aberdeen and Friedrich-Alexander University (FAU) >> in Germany. >> >> In a paper published in Nature Communications, the research team >> demonstrate how geological archives do not capture the full >> variability of climate change likely to have occurred in ancient >> times. The result, they argue, is that maximum rates of climate >> change in Earth's history are systematically underestimated. Or overestimated, or spot on, or irrelevant to anything in the last million years. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-10 14:01 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <858f09c4-516f-416d-9970-f3047d0e8b72@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #531761 |
On Tuesday, November 10, 2015 at 6:48:27 AM UTC-8, Sam Wormley wrote: > Rates of ancient climate change may be underestimated > > http://phys.org/news/2015-11-ancient-climate-underestimated.html > > > The pace of past episodes of climate change is likely to have been > > underestimated, according to research carried out by scientists at > > the University of Aberdeen and Friedrich-Alexander University (FAU) > > in Germany. > > > > In a paper published in Nature Communications, the research team > > demonstrate how geological archives do not capture the full > > variability of climate change likely to have occurred in ancient > > times. The result, they argue, is that maximum rates of climate > > change in Earth's history are systematically underestimated. > > Did Lucretius, Cicero, and Seneca underplay it? Double-A
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web