Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #534548 > unrolled thread

3 Stories That Show the War of Terror Is A Fraud

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  3 Stories That Show the War of Terror Is A Fraud  "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-11-22 08:17 -0600
    Re: 3 Stories That Show the War of Terror Is A Fraud Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-11-23 05:20 +0100
    Re: 3 Stories That Show the War of Terror Is A Fraud Shoe-Chucker 2 <georgewk10@yahoo.com> - 2015-11-22 20:25 -0800
      Re: 3 Stories That Show the War of Terror Is A Fraud "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-11-23 04:36 -0600
        Re: 3 Stories That Show the War of Terror Is A Fraud "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-11-23 05:15 -0600
      Re: 3 Stories That Show the War of Terror Is A Fraud "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-11-23 05:14 -0600
      Re: 3 Stories That Show the War of Terror Is A Fraud BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-11-23 11:58 -0500
        Re: 3 Stories That Show the War of Terror Is A Fraud "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-11-23 13:14 -0600
          Re: 3 Stories That Show the War of Terror Is A Fraud moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-11-23 20:13 +0000
            Re: 3 Stories That Show the War of Terror Is A Fraud "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-11-23 14:35 -0600
              Re: 3 Stories That Show the War of Terror Is A Fraud moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-11-23 23:14 +0000
                Re: 3 Stories That Show the War of Terror Is A Fraud moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-11-25 16:38 +0000
                  Re: 3 Stories That Show the War of Terror Is A Fraud Shoe-Chucker 2 <georgewk10@yahoo.com> - 2015-11-25 09:56 -0800
                    Re: 3 Stories That Show the War of Terror Is A Fraud "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-11-26 07:22 -0600
                      Re: 3 Stories That Show the War of Terror Is A Fraud benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-26 12:26 -0500
                        Re: 3 Stories That Show the War of Terror Is A Fraud Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-11-27 03:31 +0100
                          Re: 3 Stories That Show the War of Terror Is A Fraud Shoe-Chucker 2 <georgewk10@yahoo.com> - 2015-12-04 07:53 -0800
                            Re: 3 Stories That Show the War of Terror Is A Fraud Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-12-06 08:05 +0100
                        Re: 3 Stories That Show the War of Terror Is A Fraud "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-11-27 06:12 -0600
                    Re: 3 Stories That Show the War of Terror Is A Fraud moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-11-27 01:59 +0000
                    Re: 3 Stories That Show the War of Terror Is A Fraud Shoe-Chucker 2 <georgewk10@yahoo.com> - 2015-12-03 07:07 -0800

Page 1 of 2  [1] 2  Next page →

#534548 — 3 Stories That Show the War of Terror Is A Fraud

3 Stories That Show the War of Terror Is A Fraud
 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xC5slIPZ5nI

And 1 photo that proves the "Progressive Collapse" bullshit was not really 
progressive at all since no building has ever been built to collapse from 
the top down before or since so something like an MRR nuke vaporized the 
Twin Towers from below before they collapsed.
 http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg

Rocky 

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#534711

Am 22.11.2015 15:17, schrieb Rocky:
> 3 Stories That Show the War of Terror Is A Fraud
>   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xC5slIPZ5nI
>
The question is: why?

Why would the USA like to support civil unrest in the middle east?

We find similar patterns in several events in the USA:
- 9/11
- Columbine High
- Sandy Hook
- Waco
- Oklahoma City
- Boston Marathon

These show similar characteristics, if you estimate the intentions of 
the (alleged) fakers.

So: why terror?

This is a similar question to: why tv?

Tv stems actually from Nazi Germany and attempts to manipulate the 
masses, by creating certain common, unconscious and unquestioned believes.

So, in the entertainment is also propaganda hidden, which attempts to 
create certain believes. These believes are 'archetypes'.

E.g. Hitler had a square moustache and held squeaky  rants.

So any person like that is mistaken for Hitler.


Or: Arab 'terrorists' have fuzzy beards? Right?

No: bullshit!

These stories are so obvious fakes, that eventually even simple minds 
will see this.

So we need stronger 'medicine' and those are 'real victims'. This would 
raise so much anger, that eventually the intended victim will loose 
control and let him make 'counter-attacks'.

Only the 'real victims' are fake, but the 'counter-terror' is real. This 
would allow 'justice' and allow to throw the intended victim into jail 
(and throw away the key).

TH

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#534712

In article <uJ6dneLK1pElU8zLnZ2dnUU7-KednZ2d@giganews.com>,
 "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:

> 3 Stories That Show the War of Terror Is A Fraud
>  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xC5slIPZ5nI
> 
> And 1 photo that proves the "Progressive Collapse" bullshit was not really 
> progressive at all since no building has ever been built to collapse from 
> the top down before or since so something like an MRR nuke vaporized the 
> Twin Towers from below before they collapsed.
>  http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
> 
> Rocky 

Imagine. No steel reinforced buildings has
 NEVER fallen from fires alone.
Then 3 do.
Hmmmmm.
and NO CSI. And the "We Say So" leaders fought any investigation.
Hmmmm. 
Hint' they went on to sell you WMD in Iraq.
And you believed them ?>
-- 
Karma ; what a concept!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#534743

"Shoe-Chucker 2" <georgewk10@yahoo.com> wrote in message 
news:georgewk10-F03C37.20254022112015@news.toast.net...
> In article <uJ6dneLK1pElU8zLnZ2dnUU7-KednZ2d@giganews.com>,
> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>
>> 3 Stories That Show the War of Terror Is A Fraud
>>  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xC5slIPZ5nI
>>
>> And 1 photo that proves the "Progressive Collapse" bullshit was not 
>> really
>> progressive at all since no building has ever been built to collapse from
>> the top down before or since so something like an MRR nuke vaporized the
>> Twin Towers from below before they collapsed.
>>  http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
>>
>> Rocky
>
> Imagine. No steel reinforced buildings has
> NEVER fallen from fires alone.
> Then 3 do.
> Hmmmmm.
> and NO CSI. And the "We Say So" leaders fought any investigation.
> Hmmmm.
> Hint' they went on to sell you WMD in Iraq.
> And you believed them ?>
> -- 
> Karma ; what a concept!

And it might be getting worse with all these alleged "Terror Attacks" that 
attack everybody but Israel for some strange reason.

You know what else I think is funny is they give us inside details of some 
of the hijackers before 9/11 but they failed to give us any details of the 
hijackers after 9/11 because they want us to believe they died but that 
obviously wasn't the case because no 757 crashed at Pranksville, PA or the 
Pentagon and the two 767s in Nuke York City were clearly CGIs because the 
Twin Towers had to be harder than birds yet they flew right into the towers 
as if either the towers or the jets were CGIs.

Rocky 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#534749

On Mon, 23 Nov 2015 04:36:13 -0600, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:

>"Shoe-Chucker 2" <georgewk10@yahoo.com> wrote in message 
>news:georgewk10-F03C37.20254022112015@news.toast.net...
>> In article <uJ6dneLK1pElU8zLnZ2dnUU7-KednZ2d@giganews.com>,
>> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>
>>> 3 Stories That Show the War of Terror Is A Fraud
>>>  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xC5slIPZ5nI
>>>
>>> And 1 photo that proves the "Progressive Collapse" bullshit was not 
>>> really
>>> progressive at all since no building has ever been built to collapse from
>>> the top down before or since so something like an MRR nuke vaporized the
>>> Twin Towers from below before they collapsed.
>>>  http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
>>>
>>> Rocky
>>
>> Imagine. No steel reinforced buildings has
>> NEVER fallen from fires alone.
>> Then 3 do.
>> Hmmmmm.
>> and NO CSI. And the "We Say So" leaders fought any investigation.
>> Hmmmm.
>> Hint' they went on to sell you WMD in Iraq.
>> And you believed them ?>
>> -- 
>> Karma ; what a concept!


     Congratulations, Roger. You came up with a LIE I'm willing to
expose.


>
>And it might be getting worse with all these alleged "Terror Attacks" that 
>attack everybody but Israel for some strange reason.
>

     When was China attacked? How about India? 
     Maybe you could state when Canada was attacked?
     I could go on, of course, but I've already PROVED you're lying.
Again.
     
[Snip of items you PROVED a lie via your Duck Test.]

     I await one of your standard means of avoidance. I may reply to
it. I may not.

-- 
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#534748

On Sun, 22 Nov 2015 20:25:40 -0800, Shoe-Chucker 2
<georgewk10@yahoo.com> wrote:

>In article <uJ6dneLK1pElU8zLnZ2dnUU7-KednZ2d@giganews.com>,
> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>
>> 3 Stories That Show the War of Terror Is A Fraud
>>  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xC5slIPZ5nI
>> 
>> And 1 photo that proves the "Progressive Collapse" bullshit was not really 
>> progressive at all since no building has ever been built to collapse from 
>> the top down before or since so something like an MRR nuke vaporized the 
>> Twin Towers from below before they collapsed.
>>  http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
>> 
>> Rocky 
>
>Imagine. No steel reinforced buildings has
> NEVER fallen from fires alone.

     Wow. Could you write that without the double negative?
     Your meaning comes across, but such an elementary writing error
makes it clear you're not a smart person.

>Then 3 do.

     When? Were?
     Please be specific, and prepared to have any inaccuracies
exposed.
     Everyone can KNOW you do not mean the twin towers and #7 since
they collapsed due to structural damage and fire. 

>Hmmmmm.
>and NO CSI. And the "We Say So" leaders fought any investigation.

     Yet there was an investigation. Odd that.

>Hmmmm. 
>Hint' they went on to sell you WMD in Iraq.
>And you believed them ?>

     After years and years of politicians stating Iraq possessed WMD,
it was easy to believe the British when their Intel stated there were
WMD in Iraq.

-- 
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#534814

In article <georgewk10-F03C37.20254022112015@news.toast.net>, georgewk10
@yahoo.com says...
> 
> In article <uJ6dneLK1pElU8zLnZ2dnUU7-KednZ2d@giganews.com>,
>  "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
> 
> > 3 Stories That Show the War of Terror Is A Fraud
> >  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xC5slIPZ5nI
> > 
> > And 1 photo that proves the "Progressive Collapse" bullshit was not really 
> > progressive at all since no building has ever been built to collapse from 
> > the top down before or since so something like an MRR nuke vaporized the 
> > Twin Towers from below before they collapsed.
> >  http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
> > 
> > Rocky 
> 
> Imagine. No steel reinforced buildings has
>  NEVER fallen from fires alone.

Untrue.

> Then 3 do.
> Hmmmmm.
> and NO CSI. And the "We Say So" leaders fought any investigation.

Untrue again. Why, oh why do you troofers keep lying all the time?

> Hmmmm. 

Hmm, I wonder why you don't think about your claims before you spout 
them?

> Hint' they went on to sell you WMD in Iraq.

Well, you at least got that right.

> And you believed them ?>

Not really. 

One out of four is amazingly good, for the metally disabled, or a 
troofer, but bad for normal people.

-- 
BDK: Head Government Shill, Psychotronic World Dominator. Master of 
Remote Viewing. Level 6 expert in kOOkStudies.
Former FEMA camp activities director. Head Strategic Writer. Former 
Black Helicopter color consultant.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#534866

"BDK" <Control@Worldcontrol.com> wrote in message 
news:MPG.30bd0fd02bffc2ce98c3d6@news.giganews.com...
> In article <georgewk10-F03C37.20254022112015@news.toast.net>, georgewk10
> @yahoo.com says...
>>
>> In article <uJ6dneLK1pElU8zLnZ2dnUU7-KednZ2d@giganews.com>,
>>  "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>
>> > 3 Stories That Show the War of Terror Is A Fraud
>> >  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xC5slIPZ5nI
>> >
>> > And 1 photo that proves the "Progressive Collapse" bullshit was not 
>> > really
>> > progressive at all since no building has ever been built to collapse 
>> > from
>> > the top down before or since so something like an MRR nuke vaporized 
>> > the
>> > Twin Towers from below before they collapsed.
>> >  http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
>> >
>> > Rocky
>>
>> Imagine. No steel reinforced buildings has
>>  NEVER fallen from fires alone.
>
> Untrue.

Keep going because you forgot to prove your BS.


>> Then 3 do.
>> Hmmmmm.
>> and NO CSI. And the "We Say So" leaders fought any investigation.
>
> Untrue again. Why, oh why do you troofers keep lying all the time?

So says the poster who has never been able to prove anything.


>> Hmmmm.
>
> Hmm, I wonder why you don't think about your claims before you spout
> them?

The fact remains the two jets in Nuke York City are consistent with CGIs and 
how could falling debris from the Twin Towers damage other buildings when 
that debris couldn't even finish off WTC1?  See:
 http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg


>> Hint' they went on to sell you WMD in Iraq.
>
> Well, you at least got that right.

And do not forget the media never proved the alleged hijackers were dead 
either.  The media wanted you to think that but more of the hijackers showed 
up alive than dead and that was why they put a rookie pilot into the cockpit 
of the alleged Flight 77..


>> And you believed them ?>
>
> Not really.

Then why do you believe so much BS about 9/11?


> One out of four is amazingly good, for the metally disabled, or a
> troofer, but bad for normal people.

Don't forget, the jets were consistent with CGIs or ship sinking missiles 
and none of the alleged hijackers were ever proven to have died on 9/11 
either.  <G>

It is funny that they brought charges against the so called 20th hijacker 
and let the other 19 hijackers just walk away because the media wanted you 
to think they were dead.  <G>

Rocky 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#534886

"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes:

>"BDK" <Control@Worldcontrol.com> wrote in message 
>news:MPG.30bd0fd02bffc2ce98c3d6@news.giganews.com...

>> In article <georgewk10-F03C37.20254022112015@news.toast.net>, georgewk10
>> @yahoo.com says...

>>> Imagine. No steel reinforced buildings has
>>>  NEVER fallen from fires alone.
>>
>> Untrue.

>Keep going because you forgot to prove your BS.

This from someone who never proves his BS?

>>> Then 3 do.
>>> Hmmmmm.
>>> and NO CSI. And the "We Say So" leaders fought any investigation.
>>
>> Untrue again. Why, oh why do you troofers keep lying all the time?

>So says the poster who has never been able to prove anything.

K00ktard, I am still waiting for the 14 proofs of your "14 Facts about
9/11", and your proof that there was another "Nuclear Demolition",
anywhere, and your proof that there was significant radiation at Ground
Zero, and your proof that "underground nukes don't produce an EMP", and,
and, and ...

>>> Hint' they went on to sell you WMD in Iraq.
>>
>> Well, you at least got that right.

>And do not forget the media never proved the alleged hijackers were dead 
>either.  The media wanted you to think that but more of the hijackers showed 
>up alive than dead and that was why they put a rookie pilot into the cockpit 
>of the alleged Flight 77..

And your proof that these 19 hijackers are still alive is?

Not that I ever expect you to actually provide any such proof, since you
won't prove any of your other kookclaims such as your "Fourteen Facts
about 9/11", you won't prove underground nukes don't produce an EMP or
produce the distinctive nuclear signature, you won't produce proof that
any significant radiation was present at "Ground Zero", you won't prove
"Nuclear Demolition" was ever used anywhere, you won't prove Flights 93
and 77 weren't recovered from Shanksville/the Pentagon, etc. etc.

On the other hand, you did prove no CGIs or nukes were ever used on 9/11,
with your excellent "Duck Tests"!!

>>> And you believed them ?>
>>
>> Not really.

>Then why do you believe so much BS about 9/11?

Why do you believe all that BS about 9/11 that you watch in kookvids, 
especially since you proved that all kookvids are just lies?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#534890

"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message 
news:n2vs1s$6sa$1@pcls7.std.com...
> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes:
>
>>"BDK" <Control@Worldcontrol.com> wrote in message
>>news:MPG.30bd0fd02bffc2ce98c3d6@news.giganews.com...
>
>>> In article <georgewk10-F03C37.20254022112015@news.toast.net>, georgewk10
>>> @yahoo.com says...
>
>>>> Imagine. No steel reinforced buildings has
>>>>  NEVER fallen from fires alone.
>>>
>>> Untrue.
>
>>Keep going because you forgot to prove your BS.
>
> This from someone who never proves his BS?

And you proved that a 1kt MRR nuke makes a 5.0 where?  <G>

Don't forget CGIs can do everything the two jets in Nuke York City did with 
their jumpy video plus "Disappearing Wing" and a collapsing building that is 
110 stories tall will not kill Survivors in floors 2-6 if the collapsing 
building has been converted to ultra fine debris before it gets close to the 
ground.  <G>
 http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg

Rocky

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#534929

"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes:

>"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message 
>news:n2vs1s$6sa$1@pcls7.std.com...
>> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes:
>>
>>>Keep going because you forgot to prove your BS.
>>
>> This from someone who never proves his BS?

>And you proved that a 1kt MRR nuke makes a 5.0 where?  <G>

<snip more deflection>

I noticed that you snipped everything about all the stuff that you
kookclaim but never proved.  Are you ever going to prove any of it? Or are
you just going to watch more kookvids (which you proved are nothing but
lies) and post the kookvids' lies here as facts?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#535370

Looks like I got the kooktards on the run.  Rocky doesn't post much now, 
and he doesn't reply to me any more.

Funny, "Truthers" afraid of the truth!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#535399

In article <n34o6r$ln$1@pcls7.std.com>,
 moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) wrote:

> Looks like I got the kooktards on the run.  Rocky doesn't post much now, 
> and he doesn't reply to me any more.
> 
> Funny, "Truthers" afraid of the truth!

want the truth?
Google; 9/11 truth
ask 2300+ architects and engineers why they don't buy the official story.
follow the "yellow brick rd." to those that made lots of money on 9/11 
lies.
-- 
Karma ; what a concept!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#535582

On Wed, 25 Nov 2015 09:56:57 -0800, Shoe-Chucker 2
<georgewk10@yahoo.com> wrote:

>In article <n34o6r$ln$1@pcls7.std.com>,
> moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) wrote:
>
>> Looks like I got the kooktards on the run.  Rocky doesn't post much now, 
>> and he doesn't reply to me any more.
>> 
>> Funny, "Truthers" afraid of the truth!
>
>want the truth?

     Then ignore any claims made by a "Truther."
     Well, maybe not ignore. They are quite interesting. How they are
able to distort the actual truth while keeping a straight face is
fascinating.

>Google; 9/11 truth

     And laugh at the misinformation, disinformation and outright
lies.

>ask 2300+ architects and engineers why they don't buy the official story.

     Ask the 10s of thousands who do, since it's valid.

>follow the "yellow brick rd." to those that made lots of money on 9/11 
>lies.

     This will be good.
     Who are these people?

-- 
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#535637

On 11/26/2015 08:22 AM, K Wills (Shill #3) wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Nov 2015 09:56:57 -0800, Shoe-Chucker 2
> <georgewk10@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>> In article <n34o6r$ln$1@pcls7.std.com>,
>> moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) wrote:
>>
>>> Looks like I got the kooktards on the run.  Rocky doesn't post much now,
>>> and he doesn't reply to me any more.
>>>
>>> Funny, "Truthers" afraid of the truth!
>>
>> want the truth?
>
>       Then ignore any claims made by a "Truther."
>       Well, maybe not ignore. They are quite interesting. How they are
> able to distort the actual truth while keeping a straight face is
> fascinating.

Never forget that only "official" stories are true. All other stories 
are lies and from kooks. You may snicker while listening to non-official 
stories no matter how well proven.


>> Google; 9/11 truth
>
>       And laugh at the misinformation, disinformation and outright
> lies.

Remember that governments and politicians NEVER LIE TO CITIZENS. That 
one fact allows you to ridicule and laugh at any story which does not 
toe the official line. Perhaps if you laugh at unofficial stories 
enough, people will get scared to repeat that misinformation, 
disinformation and outright lies.


>> ask 2300+ architects and engineers why they don't buy the official story.
>
>       Ask the 10s of thousands who do, since it's valid.

Always remember that truth is ALWAYS determined by a democratic vote. 
Just add up how many people believe the "official" stories and compare 
to the small number of "conspiracy theorists" and the matter is totally 
settled! The official story aways gets the most votes and that makes it 
true beyond any doubt!


>> follow the "yellow brick rd." to those that made lots of money on 9/11
>> lies.
>
>       This will be good.
>       Who are these people?

Yes, Get the names of non-believers, put them on an enemies list and 
destroy their lives. Big Brother loves you.



-- 

       ___           ___           ___            ___
      /\  \         /\  \         /\__\          /\  \
     /::\  \       /::\  \       /::|  |         \:\  \
    /:/\:\  \     /:/\:\  \     /:|:|  |     ___ /::\__\
   /::\~\:\__\   /::\~\:\  \   /:/|:|  |__  /\  /:/\/__/
  /:/\:\ \:|__| /:/\:\ \:\__\ /:/ |:| /\__\ \:\/:/  /
  \:\~\:\/:/  / \:\~\:\ \/__/ \/__|:|/:/  /  \::/  /
   \:\ \::/  /   \:\ \:\__\       |:/:/  /    \/__/
    \:\/:/  /     \:\ \/__/       |::/  /
     \::/__/       \:\__\         /:/  /
      ~~            \/__/         \/__/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#535812

Am 26.11.2015 18:26, schrieb benj:

>>>> Funny, "Truthers" afraid of the truth!
>>>
>>> want the truth?
>>
>> Then ignore any claims made by a "Truther."
>> Well, maybe not ignore. They are quite interesting. How they are
>> able to distort the actual truth while keeping a straight face is
>> fascinating.
>
> Never forget that only "official" stories are true. All other stories
> are lies and from kooks. You may snicker while listening to non-official
> stories no matter how well proven.
>
>
>>> Google; 9/11 truth
>>
>> And laugh at the misinformation, disinformation and outright
>> lies.
>
> Remember that governments and politicians NEVER LIE TO CITIZENS. That
> one fact allows you to ridicule and laugh at any story which does not
> toe the official line. Perhaps if you laugh at unofficial stories
> enough, people will get scared to repeat that misinformation,
> disinformation and outright lies.
>
>
>>> ask 2300+ architects and engineers why they don't buy the official
>>> story.
>>
>> Ask the 10s of thousands who do, since it's valid.
>
> Always remember that truth is ALWAYS determined by a democratic vote.
> Just add up how many people believe the "official" stories and compare
> to the small number of "conspiracy theorists" and the matter is totally
> settled! The official story aways gets the most votes and that makes it
> true beyond any doubt!

Crossposting does often occur and is often regarded as annoying. But it 
can be eventually useful, since you can talk to the 'neighbourhood', too.

Since you reply from 'sci.physics' and I from 'alt.conspiracy' you could 
have a look at this newsgroup, too. And I think, you would be a nice 
participant here (in alt.conspiracy),

And these guys that deal with 9-11 (and related questions) could use 
some advice from people trained in physics, since many 'conspiracies' 
are actually 'unusual physics in operation' (rather than conspiracy).

TH

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#537361

In article <dbptk2Fgi9pU1@mid.individual.net>,
 Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> wrote:

> Am 26.11.2015 18:26, schrieb benj:
> 
> >>>> Funny, "Truthers" afraid of the truth!
> >>>
> >>> want the truth?
> >>
> >> Then ignore any claims made by a "Truther."
> >> Well, maybe not ignore. They are quite interesting. How they are
> >> able to distort the actual truth while keeping a straight face is
> >> fascinating.
> >
> > Never forget that only "official" stories are true. All other stories
> > are lies and from kooks. You may snicker while listening to non-official
> > stories no matter how well proven.
> >
> >
> >>> Google; 9/11 truth
> >>
> >> And laugh at the misinformation, disinformation and outright
> >> lies.
> >
> > Remember that governments and politicians NEVER LIE TO CITIZENS. That
> > one fact allows you to ridicule and laugh at any story which does not
> > toe the official line. Perhaps if you laugh at unofficial stories
> > enough, people will get scared to repeat that misinformation,
> > disinformation and outright lies.
> >
> >
> >>> ask 2300+ architects and engineers why they don't buy the official
> >>> story.
> >>
> >> Ask the 10s of thousands who do, since it's valid.
> >
> > Always remember that truth is ALWAYS determined by a democratic vote.
> > Just add up how many people believe the "official" stories and compare
> > to the small number of "conspiracy theorists" and the matter is totally
> > settled! The official story aways gets the most votes and that makes it
> > true beyond any doubt!
> 
> Crossposting does often occur and is often regarded as annoying. But it 
> can be eventually useful, since you can talk to the 'neighbourhood', too.
> 
> Since you reply from 'sci.physics' and I from 'alt.conspiracy' you could 
> have a look at this newsgroup, too. And I think, you would be a nice 
> participant here (in alt.conspiracy),
> 
> And these guys that deal with 9-11 (and related questions) could use 
> some advice from people trained in physics, since many 'conspiracies' 
> are actually 'unusual physics in operation' (rather than conspiracy).
> 
> TH

over 2300 architects and engineers have proven , the official story 
impossible.
visit;  www.ae911truth.org/
Today !
-- 
Karma ; what a concept!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#537626

Am 04.12.2015 16:53, schrieb Shoe-Chucker 2:

>> Crossposting does often occur and is often regarded as annoying. But it
>> can be eventually useful, since you can talk to the 'neighbourhood', too.
>>
>> Since you reply from 'sci.physics' and I from 'alt.conspiracy' you could
>> have a look at this newsgroup, too. And I think, you would be a nice
>> participant here (in alt.conspiracy),
>>
>> And these guys that deal with 9-11 (and related questions) could use
>> some advice from people trained in physics, since many 'conspiracies'
>> are actually 'unusual physics in operation' (rather than conspiracy).
>>
>> TH
>
> over 2300 architects and engineers have proven , the official story
> impossible.
> visit;  www.ae911truth.org/
> Today !

Well, maybe..

But they (apparently) don't use the UseNet.

So more people with education in physics and/or engineering are 
beneficial for this group.

I'm actually an engineer and regard physics as kind of hobby. So I can 
understand some of the more difficult aspects of this event.

And more such people would allow more progress. Hence invitation to 
physicists would be a good idea.

TH

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#535864

On Thu, 26 Nov 2015 12:26:47 -0500, benj <none@gmail.com> wrote:

>On 11/26/2015 08:22 AM, K Wills (Shill #3) wrote:
>> On Wed, 25 Nov 2015 09:56:57 -0800, Shoe-Chucker 2
>> <georgewk10@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>> In article <n34o6r$ln$1@pcls7.std.com>,
>>> moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) wrote:
>>>
>>>> Looks like I got the kooktards on the run.  Rocky doesn't post much now,
>>>> and he doesn't reply to me any more.
>>>>
>>>> Funny, "Truthers" afraid of the truth!
>>>
>>> want the truth?
>>
>>       Then ignore any claims made by a "Truther."
>>       Well, maybe not ignore. They are quite interesting. How they are
>> able to distort the actual truth while keeping a straight face is
>> fascinating.
>
>Never forget that only "official" stories are true. All other stories 
>are lies and from kooks. You may snicker while listening to non-official 
>stories no matter how well proven.
>

     By now you k00ks should have been able to provide something in
the way of valid, verifiable evidence. Yet none have.
     In the conspiracy newsgroup, a poster known as Rocky has actually
proved all 9/11 k00k vids are lies.

>>> Google; 9/11 truth
>>
>>       And laugh at the misinformation, disinformation and outright
>> lies.
>
>Remember that governments and politicians NEVER LIE TO CITIZENS. That 
>one fact allows you to ridicule and laugh at any story which does not 
>toe the official line. Perhaps if you laugh at unofficial stories 
>enough, people will get scared to repeat that misinformation, 
>disinformation and outright lies.
>

     It's funny how after 14 years, none of you k00ks have provided
any valid, verifiable evidence.

>>> ask 2300+ architects and engineers why they don't buy the official story.
>>
>>       Ask the 10s of thousands who do, since it's valid.
>
>Always remember that truth is ALWAYS determined by a democratic vote. 
>Just add up how many people believe the "official" stories and compare 
>to the small number of "conspiracy theorists" and the matter is totally 
>settled! The official story aways gets the most votes and that makes it 
>true beyond any doubt!
>

     Why have no k00ks been able to provide any valid, verifiable
evidence of their claims?

>>> follow the "yellow brick rd." to those that made lots of money on 9/11
>>> lies.
>>
>>       This will be good.
>>       Who are these people?
>
>Yes, Get the names of non-believers, put them on an enemies list and 
>destroy their lives. Big Brother loves you.

     You really need to learn how to read. Or are you claiming the
9/11 k00ks are making money of their lies?

-- 
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#535794

Shoe-Chucker 2 <georgewk10@yahoo.com> writes:

>In article <n34o6r$ln$1@pcls7.std.com>,
> moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) wrote:

>> Looks like I got the kooktards on the run.  Rocky doesn't post much now, 
>> and he doesn't reply to me any more.
>> 
>> Funny, "Truthers" afraid of the truth!

>want the truth?
>Google; 9/11 truth

I did that already a long time ago.  That's how I figured out that 
all "truthers" are apparently insane.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 1 of 2  [1] 2  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web