Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #534415 > unrolled thread

Review | Lawrence Krauss: A Universe From Nothing

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  Review | Lawrence Krauss: A Universe From Nothing Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-21 15:26 -0600
    Re: Review | Lawrence Krauss: A Universe From Nothing "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2015-11-21 13:33 -0800
      Re: Review | Lawrence Krauss: A Universe From Nothing "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2015-11-21 13:42 -0800
        Re: Review | Lawrence Krauss: A Universe From Nothing "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-11-21 15:06 -0800
    Re: Review | Lawrence Krauss: A Universe From Nothing dvus <dven1@adelphia.net> - 2015-11-21 19:49 -0500
      Re: Review | Lawrence Krauss: A Universe From Nothing "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2015-11-21 17:00 -0800
    Re: Review | Lawrence Krauss: A Universe From Nothing Leonardo Been <leonardo_been@yahoo.com> - 2015-11-22 06:19 +0100

#534415 — Review | Lawrence Krauss: A Universe From Nothing

Review | Lawrence Krauss: A Universe From Nothing
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-EilZ4VY5Vs&feature=youtu.be&t=545

> This is the "Universe From Nothing" talk given by Lawrence Krauss in
> 2009 on the accelerating expansion of the universe and how we know
> its fate.



-- 

sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
community, and physics-related social issues.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#534417

On Saturday, November 21, 2015 at 1:26:40 PM UTC-8, Sam Wormley wrote:
> Review | Lawrence Krauss: A Universe From Nothing
> > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-EilZ4VY5Vs&feature=youtu.be&t=545
> 
> > This is the "Universe From Nothing" talk given by Lawrence Krauss in
> > 2009 on the accelerating expansion of the universe and how we know
> > its fate.
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> 
> sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
> to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
> community, and physics-related social issues.


http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/cross-check/is-lawrence-krauss-a-physicist-or-just-a-bad-philosopher/

It's a worthy read for a physicist 
viewpoint, Krauss' "A Universe 
from Nothing".  In the article above 
there seems to be a divide between 
"philosophers" and "physicists", even 
that some's philosophy has physics 
backseated to what survey button you 
click in terms of the "reality" of 
things (though, of course, one doesn't 
just "vote" on gravity, or "wish" it 
so or not so, which would be an 
imposition on G-d, or the Universe).  
Here, then as philosophy encompasses 
all reason, some even wash out that 
"philosophy fails" instead of that 
everything is just so.  These aren't 
even then "reasoned" people, their 
reasoning doesn't include only rational 
reasoning, by the very admission that 
philosophy (a technical philosophy) 
doesn't advise physics (a mathematical 
theoretical physics) doesn't advise 
reality (where all things are).

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#534422

On Saturday, November 21, 2015 at 1:33:18 PM UTC-8, Ross A. Finlayson wrote:
> On Saturday, November 21, 2015 at 1:26:40 PM UTC-8, Sam Wormley wrote:
> > Review | Lawrence Krauss: A Universe From Nothing
> > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-EilZ4VY5Vs&feature=youtu.be&t=545
> > 
> > > This is the "Universe From Nothing" talk given by Lawrence Krauss in
> > > 2009 on the accelerating expansion of the universe and how we know
> > > its fate.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > -- 
> > 
> > sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
> > to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
> > community, and physics-related social issues.
> 
> 
> http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/cross-check/is-lawrence-krauss-a-physicist-or-just-a-bad-philosopher/
> 
> It's a worthy read for a physicist 
> viewpoint, Krauss' "A Universe 
> from Nothing".  In the article above 
> there seems to be a divide between 
> "philosophers" and "physicists", even 
> that some's philosophy has physics 
> backseated to what survey button you 
> click in terms of the "reality" of 
> things (though, of course, one doesn't 
> just "vote" on gravity, or "wish" it 
> so or not so, which would be an 
> imposition on G-d, or the Universe).  
> Here, then as philosophy encompasses 
> all reason, some even wash out that 
> "philosophy fails" instead of that 
> everything is just so.  These aren't 
> even then "reasoned" people, their 
> reasoning doesn't include only rational 
> reasoning, by the very admission that 
> philosophy (a technical philosophy) 
> doesn't advise physics (a mathematical 
> theoretical physics) doesn't advise 
> reality (where all things are).

(You'd be better off reading Davies first.)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#534443

On Saturday, November 21, 2015 at 1:43:05 PM UTC-8, Ross A. Finlayson wrote:
> On Saturday, November 21, 2015 at 1:33:18 PM UTC-8, Ross A. Finlayson wrote:
> > On Saturday, November 21, 2015 at 1:26:40 PM UTC-8, Sam Wormley wrote:
> > > Review | Lawrence Krauss: A Universe From Nothing
> > > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-EilZ4VY5Vs&feature=youtu.be&t=545
> > > 
> > > > This is the "Universe From Nothing" talk given by Lawrence Krauss in
> > > > 2009 on the accelerating expansion of the universe and how we know
> > > > its fate.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > -- 
> > > 
> > > sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
> > > to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
> > > community, and physics-related social issues.
> > 
> > 
> > http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/cross-check/is-lawrence-krauss-a-physicist-or-just-a-bad-philosopher/
> > 
> > It's a worthy read for a physicist 
> > viewpoint, Krauss' "A Universe 
> > from Nothing".  In the article above 
> > there seems to be a divide between 
> > "philosophers" and "physicists", even 
> > that some's philosophy has physics 
> > backseated to what survey button you 
> > click in terms of the "reality" of 
> > things (though, of course, one doesn't 
> > just "vote" on gravity, or "wish" it 
> > so or not so, which would be an 
> > imposition on G-d, or the Universe).  
> > Here, then as philosophy encompasses 
> > all reason, some even wash out that 
> > "philosophy fails" instead of that 
> > everything is just so.  These aren't 
> > even then "reasoned" people, their 
> > reasoning doesn't include only rational 
> > reasoning, by the very admission that 
> > philosophy (a technical philosophy) 
> > doesn't advise physics (a mathematical 
> > theoretical physics) doesn't advise 
> > reality (where all things are).
> 
> (You'd be better off reading Davies first.)

Universe has plenty of nothing,and nothing  was enough to make me. Nothing is something to think about.TreBert

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#534469

On 11/21/2015 4:26 PM, Sam Wormley wrote:

> Review | Lawrence Krauss: A Universe From Nothing
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-EilZ4VY5Vs&feature=youtu.be&t=545
>
>> This is the "Universe From Nothing" talk given by Lawrence Krauss in
>> 2009 on the accelerating expansion of the universe and how we know
>> its fate.

Very interesting presentation that I was able to understand most of.

Thanks for the link.

-- 
dvus

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#534472

On Saturday, November 21, 2015 at 4:49:46 PM UTC-8, dvus wrote:
> On 11/21/2015 4:26 PM, Sam Wormley wrote:
> 
> > Review | Lawrence Krauss: A Universe From Nothing
> >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-EilZ4VY5Vs&feature=youtu.be&t=545
> >
> >> This is the "Universe From Nothing" talk given by Lawrence Krauss in
> >> 2009 on the accelerating expansion of the universe and how we know
> >> its fate.
> 
> Very interesting presentation that I was able to understand most of.
> 
> Thanks for the link.
> 
> -- 
> dvus

http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/to-explain-the-universe-physics-needs-a-revolution-live-webcast-wednesday-video/

Neil Turok has an excellent exposition 
on directions in theoretical physics.

(These don't necessarily include "flat 
expanding multiverse".)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#534494

Sociopaths DESTROY science, and support each other, in

 DENYING Life itself (Life Energy), to exist.

Life Energy = Perception and Awareness and Memory

	- ALSO your Perception of Sociopaths,
	  and our Awareness of Sociopaths
	  and your Memory of Sociopaths -

 is all done with your Life Energy, which are PARTICLES.

You are informed herewith, why the Sociopaths do DENY
 Life Energy even to exist.

'


Wholly their opposite, etc., etc.,

KNT hrp&p

'

on physics:

[NDT]	'Natural Definition of Time'
	 {HRI 20150621}  [NDT]
	  (21 June 2015)
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/sci.physics/GRT7myHRMpM
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/soc.rights.human/uMKVq5mnjEw


____________
Verification:

		http://www.angelfire.com/space/platoworld

Copyright 2015 by Koos Nolst Trenite - human rights philosopher
 and poet
This is 'learnware' - it may not be altered, and it is free for
 anyone who learns from it and (even if he can not learn from it) who
 passes it on unaltered, and with this message included, to others who
 might be able to learn from it (but not to "handle" Sociopaths, because
 these vehemently oppose any true knowledge of life and about themselves).
None of my writings may be used, ever, to support any political
 or religious or scientific or artistic "agenda," but only to educate, and
 to encourage people to judge un-dominated and for themselves, about any
 organizations or individuals.

	

On Sat, 21 Nov 2015 15:26:35 -0600, Sam Wormley wrote:

> Review | Lawrence Krauss: A Universe From Nothing
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-EilZ4VY5Vs&feature=youtu.be&t=545
> 
>> This is the "Universe From Nothing" talk given by Lawrence Krauss in
>> 2009 on the accelerating expansion of the universe and how we know its
>> fate.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web