Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #545897 > unrolled thread

Feynman | Maxwell's Equations

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  Feynman | Maxwell's Equations Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-01-16 14:38 -0600
    Re: Feynman | Maxwell's Equations jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-01-16 21:23 +0000
      Re: Feynman | Maxwell's Equations Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-01-16 14:02 -0800
        Re: Feynman | Maxwell's Equations "Barffolomew" <invalid@example.com> - 2016-01-16 16:04 -0800
          Re: Feynman | Maxwell's Equations Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-01-16 20:38 -0800
      Re: Feynman | Maxwell's Equations Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-01-16 16:33 -0600
        Re: Feynman | Maxwell's Equations jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-01-16 23:11 +0000
          Re: Feynman | Maxwell's Equations Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-01-16 18:03 -0600
    Re: Feynman | Maxwell's Equations Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-01-16 16:16 -0800
      Re: Feynman | Maxwell's Equations Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-01-16 18:37 -0600
      Re: Feynman | Maxwell's Equations benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-16 22:04 -0500

#545897 — Feynman | Maxwell's Equations

Feynman | Maxwell's Equations
> http://www.feynmanlectures.caltech.edu/II_18.html

> 18–1Maxwell’s equations
>

> In this chapter we come back to the complete set of the four Maxwell
> equations that we took as our starting point in Chapter 1. Until now,
> we have been studying Maxwell’s equations in bits and pieces; it is
> time to add one final piece, and to put them all together. We will
> then have the complete and correct story for electromagnetic fields
> that may be changing with time in any way. Anything said in this
> chapter that contradicts something said earlier is true and what was
> said earlier is false—because what was said earlier applied to such
> special situations as, for instance, steady currents or fixed
> charges. Although we have been very careful to point out the
> restrictions whenever we wrote an equation, it is easy to forget all
> of the qualifications and to learn too well the wrong equations. Now
> we are ready to give the whole truth, with no qualifications (or
> almost none).

> The complete Maxwell equations are written in Table 18–1, in words as
> well as in mathematical symbols. The fact that the words are
> equivalent to the equations should by this time be familiar—you
> should be able to translate back and forth from one form to the
> other.


> Copyright © 1964, 2006, 2013 by the California Institute of Technology,
> Michael A. Gottlieb, and Rudolf Pfeiffer


-- 

sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
community, and physics-related social issues.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#545901

Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote:
> Feynman | Maxwell's Equations
>> http://www.feynmanlectures.caltech.edu/II_18.html

<snip text to avoid copyright violation>
 
 
>> Copyright ? 1964, 2006, 2013 by the California Institute of Technology,
>> Michael A. Gottlieb, and Rudolf Pfeiffer
 
And if one actually looks at the copyright information it says:

"No part of this book may be reproduced in any manner whatsoever
without written permission except in the case of brief quotations
embodied in critical articles and reviews."

As your cut and paste was neither a critical article nor a review and
nothing more than a copy, you are violating their copyright, spamming 
shit head. 

And you do that a LOT, spamming shit head.


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#545904

On Saturday, January 16, 2016 at 4:31:07 PM UTC-5, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Feynman | Maxwell's Equations
> >> http://www.feynmanlectures.caltech.edu/II_18.html
> 
> <snip text to avoid copyright violation>
>  
> >> Copyright ? 1964, 2006, 2013 by the California Institute of Technology,
> >> Michael A. Gottlieb, and Rudolf Pfeiffer
>  
> And if one actually looks at the copyright information it says:
> 
> "No part of this book may be reproduced in any manner whatsoever
> without written permission except in the case of brief quotations
> embodied in critical articles and reviews."
> 
> As your cut and paste was neither a critical article nor a review and
> nothing more than a copy, you are violating their copyright, spamming 
> shit head. 
> 
> And you do that a LOT, spamming shit head.
>
> -- 
> Jim Pennino

Sam, let me translate, since neither English nor common human courtesy
are your languages... what Jim is politely saying to and about you...

Here goes translation from ABCDE...DHG...SUZY...FINNISH to English:

Do you Sam have any parent, of either sex, have any child, of either
sex, have a wife or two, of either sex, or three divorced wives or
more, and in case you are one of them, them the a successful golden
haired TrumpET-like Family Man, of either sex, have a dog or cat, of
either sex, that wouldn't be embarrASSed to acknowledge having made
your Sam's holy acquaintance?  Btw Sam Worm Liar... you Sam sam SAM
are the most worthless piece of either sex... enoughSaid@#.

-- Mahipal “IPMM... माहिपाल ७६३८: Pardon m(y) French, I not born in USA.”

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#545941

> Do you Sam have any parent, of either sex, have any child, of either
> sex, have a wife or two, of either sex, or three divorced wives or
> more, and in case you are one of them, them the a successful golden
> haired TrumpET-like Family Man, of either sex, have a dog or cat, of
> either sex, that wouldn't be embarrASSed to acknowledge having made
> your Sam's holy acquaintance?  Btw Sam Worm Liar... you Sam sam SAM
> are the most worthless piece of either sex... enoughSaid@#.

Shit post. 

This is a physics group, you fucking imbecile.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#546007

On Saturday, January 16, 2016 at 7:04:26 PM UTC-5, Barffolomew wrote:
> > Do you Sam have any parent, of either sex, have any child, of either
> > sex, have a wife or two, of either sex, or three divorced wives or
> > more, and in case you are one of them, them the a successful golden
> > haired TrumpET-like Family Man, of either sex, have a dog or cat, of
> > either sex, that wouldn't be embarrASSed to acknowledge having made
> > your Sam's holy acquaintance?  Btw Sam Worm Liar... you Sam sam SAM
> > are the most worthless piece of either sex... enoughSaid@#.
> 
> Shit post. 

Nice of you nym-shifters to notice I despise Sam, again. It's curious
how you Sam Worm Liars show up with an anonymous new ID as needed.

> This is a physics group, you fucking imbecile.

Yes this is a physics NG. Got any?!

-- Mahipal “IPMM... माहिपाल ७६३८: Bring it Anonymous Bitch!”

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#545912

On 1/16/16 3:23 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> As your cut and paste was neither a critical article nor a review and
> nothing more than a copy, you are violating their copyright, spamming
> shit head.



   Now, now, jimp, there you go again, you're outta control, your
   language is inappropriate, and your absolute contempt and total
   disgust are addressed in these Anger Management classes. You, jimp,
   need these services:
 > http://yellowpages.com/rancho-cucamonga-ca/anger-management-classes



   Feynman | Maxwell's Equations
 > http://www.feynmanlectures.caltech.edu/II_18.html

 > 18–1Maxwell’s equations
 >

 > In this chapter we come back to the complete set of the four Maxwell
 > equations that we took as our starting point in Chapter 1. Until now,
 > we have been studying Maxwell’s equations in bits and pieces; it is
 > time to add one final piece, and to put them all together. We will
 > then have the complete and correct story for electromagnetic fields
 > that may be changing with time in any way. Anything said in this
 > chapter that contradicts something said earlier is true and what was
 > said earlier is false—because what was said earlier applied to such
 > special situations as, for instance, steady currents or fixed
 > charges. Although we have been very careful to point out the
 > restrictions whenever we wrote an equation, it is easy to forget all
 > of the qualifications and to learn too well the wrong equations. Now
 > we are ready to give the whole truth, with no qualifications (or
 > almost none).

 > The complete Maxwell equations are written in Table 18–1, in words as
 > well as in mathematical symbols. The fact that the words are
 > equivalent to the equations should by this time be familiar—you
 > should be able to translate back and forth from one form to the
 > other.


 > Copyright © 1964, 2006, 2013 by the California Institute of Technology,
 > Michael A. Gottlieb, and Rudolf Pfeiffer


-- 

sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
community, and physics-related social issues.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#545925

Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 1/16/16 3:23 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> As your cut and paste was neither a critical article nor a review and
>> nothing more than a copy, you are violating their copyright, spamming
>> shit head.
> 
> 
> 
>   Now, now, jimp, there you go again, you're outta control, your

Fuck off and die, copyright violating, cut and paste spamming shit head.

<snip repeated copyright violation>

-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#545940

On 1/16/16 5:11 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> Fuck off and die, copyright violating, cut and paste spamming shit head.



   Now, now, jimp, there you go again, you're outta control, your
   language is inappropriate, and your absolute contempt and total
   disgust are addressed in these Anger Management classes. You, jimp,
   need these services:
 > http://yellowpages.com/rancho-cucamonga-ca/anger-management-classes



   Feynman | Maxwell's Equations
 > http://www.feynmanlectures.caltech.edu/II_18.html

 > 18–1Maxwell’s equations
 >

 > In this chapter we come back to the complete set of the four Maxwell
 > equations that we took as our starting point in Chapter 1. Until now,
 > we have been studying Maxwell’s equations in bits and pieces; it is
 > time to add one final piece, and to put them all together. We will
 > then have the complete and correct story for electromagnetic fields
 > that may be changing with time in any way. Anything said in this
 > chapter that contradicts something said earlier is true and what was
 > said earlier is false—because what was said earlier applied to such
 > special situations as, for instance, steady currents or fixed
 > charges. Although we have been very careful to point out the
 > restrictions whenever we wrote an equation, it is easy to forget all
 > of the qualifications and to learn too well the wrong equations. Now
 > we are ready to give the whole truth, with no qualifications (or
 > almost none).

 > The complete Maxwell equations are written in Table 18–1, in words as
 > well as in mathematical symbols. The fact that the words are
 > equivalent to the equations should by this time be familiar—you
 > should be able to translate back and forth from one form to the
 > other.


 > Copyright © 1964, 2006, 2013 by the California Institute of Technology,
 > Michael A. Gottlieb, and Rudolf Pfeiffer



-- 

sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
community, and physics-related social issues.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#545948

On Saturday, January 16, 2016 at 12:38:31 PM UTC-8, Sam Wormley wrote:
> Feynman | Maxwell's Equations
> > http://www.feynmanlectures.caltech.edu/II_18.html
> 
> > 18-1Maxwell's equations
> >
> 
> > In this chapter we come back to the complete set of the four Maxwell
> > equations that we took as our starting point in Chapter 1. Until now,
> > we have been studying Maxwell's equations in bits and pieces; it is
> > time to add one final piece, and to put them all together. We will
> > then have the complete and correct story for electromagnetic fields
> > that may be changing with time in any way. Anything said in this
> > chapter that contradicts something said earlier is true and what was
> > said earlier is false--because what was said earlier applied to such
> > special situations as, for instance, steady currents or fixed
> > charges. Although we have been very careful to point out the
> > restrictions whenever we wrote an equation, it is easy to forget all
> > of the qualifications and to learn too well the wrong equations. Now
> > we are ready to give the whole truth, with no qualifications (or
> > almost none).
> 
> > The complete Maxwell equations are written in Table 18-1, in words as
> > well as in mathematical symbols. The fact that the words are
> > equivalent to the equations should by this time be familiar--you
> > should be able to translate back and forth from one form to the
> > other.
> 
> 
> > Copyright (c) 1964, 2006, 2013 by the California Institute of Technology,
> > Michael A. Gottlieb, and Rudolf Pfeiffer


Maxwell did not write down those 4 equations.  Oliver Heaviside did.  

Double-A

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#545956

On 1/16/16 6:16 PM, Double-A wrote:
> On Saturday, January 16, 2016 at 12:38:31 PM UTC-8, Sam Wormley wrote:
>> Feynman | Maxwell's Equations
>>> http://www.feynmanlectures.caltech.edu/II_18.html
>>
>>> 18-1Maxwell's equations
>>>
>>
>>> In this chapter we come back to the complete set of the four Maxwell
>>> equations that we took as our starting point in Chapter 1. Until now,
>>> we have been studying Maxwell's equations in bits and pieces; it is
>>> time to add one final piece, and to put them all together. We will
>>> then have the complete and correct story for electromagnetic fields
>>> that may be changing with time in any way. Anything said in this
>>> chapter that contradicts something said earlier is true and what was
>>> said earlier is false--because what was said earlier applied to such
>>> special situations as, for instance, steady currents or fixed
>>> charges. Although we have been very careful to point out the
>>> restrictions whenever we wrote an equation, it is easy to forget all
>>> of the qualifications and to learn too well the wrong equations. Now
>>> we are ready to give the whole truth, with no qualifications (or
>>> almost none).
>>
>>> The complete Maxwell equations are written in Table 18-1, in words as
>>> well as in mathematical symbols. The fact that the words are
>>> equivalent to the equations should by this time be familiar--you
>>> should be able to translate back and forth from one form to the
>>> other.
>>
>>
>>> Copyright (c) 1964, 2006, 2013 by the California Institute of Technology,
>>> Michael A. Gottlieb, and Rudolf Pfeiffer
>
>
> Maxwell did not write down those 4 equations.  Oliver Heaviside did.
>
> Double-A
>

   Feynman wrote down the equations in his book that I referenced.



-- 

sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
community, and physics-related social issues.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#545997

On 01/16/2016 07:16 PM, Double-A wrote:
> On Saturday, January 16, 2016 at 12:38:31 PM UTC-8, Sam Wormley wrote:
>> Feynman | Maxwell's Equations
>>> http://www.feynmanlectures.caltech.edu/II_18.html
>>
>>> 18-1Maxwell's equations
>>>
>>
>>> In this chapter we come back to the complete set of the four Maxwell
>>> equations that we took as our starting point in Chapter 1. Until now,
>>> we have been studying Maxwell's equations in bits and pieces; it is
>>> time to add one final piece, and to put them all together. We will
>>> then have the complete and correct story for electromagnetic fields
>>> that may be changing with time in any way. Anything said in this
>>> chapter that contradicts something said earlier is true and what was
>>> said earlier is false--because what was said earlier applied to such
>>> special situations as, for instance, steady currents or fixed
>>> charges. Although we have been very careful to point out the
>>> restrictions whenever we wrote an equation, it is easy to forget all
>>> of the qualifications and to learn too well the wrong equations. Now
>>> we are ready to give the whole truth, with no qualifications (or
>>> almost none).
>>
>>> The complete Maxwell equations are written in Table 18-1, in words as
>>> well as in mathematical symbols. The fact that the words are
>>> equivalent to the equations should by this time be familiar--you
>>> should be able to translate back and forth from one form to the
>>> other.
>>
>>
>>> Copyright (c) 1964, 2006, 2013 by the California Institute of Technology,
>>> Michael A. Gottlieb, and Rudolf Pfeiffer
>
>
> Maxwell did not write down those 4 equations.  Oliver Heaviside did.
>
> Double-A

You wouldn't expect some spamming shithead who only knows enough to post 
the work of others to know that, would you AA?

Sam thinks that by plagiarizing Feynman he makes himself look smart.

-- 

       ___           ___           ___            ___
      /\  \         /\  \         /\__\          /\  \
     /::\  \       /::\  \       /::|  |         \:\  \
    /:/\:\  \     /:/\:\  \     /:|:|  |     ___ /::\__\
   /::\~\:\__\   /::\~\:\  \   /:/|:|  |__  /\  /:/\/__/
  /:/\:\ \:|__| /:/\:\ \:\__\ /:/ |:| /\__\ \:\/:/  /
  \:\~\:\/:/  / \:\~\:\ \/__/ \/__|:|/:/  /  \::/  /
   \:\ \::/  /   \:\ \:\__\       |:/:/  /    \/__/
    \:\/:/  /     \:\ \/__/       |::/  /
     \::/__/       \:\__\         /:/  /
      ~~            \/__/         \/__/

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web