Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #514647 > unrolled thread

The 4 super 500 mph jets that perform miracles

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  The 4 super 500 mph jets that perform miracles "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 09:25 -0500
    Re: The 4 super 500 mph jets that perform miracles gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-17 09:32 -0500
    Re: The 4 super 500 mph jets that perform miracles jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 17:47 +0000
    Re: The 4 super 500 mph jets that perform miracles "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-17 16:38 -0500

#514647 — The 4 super 500 mph jets that perform miracles

bump

I still can't get over the lies told by 911research and now I direct your
attention to:
 http://911research.wtc7.net/essays/pentagon/

where it states: "The Sandia crash test of an F-4 into a concrete barrier
reduced the plane to rubble."

Yes, the remains from that crash would have been clearly visible as scrap
all over the place so that can not be used to explain why an alleged 757
went right through a wall that was 6 feet thick that was even reinforced
with Kevlar.  <G>

But stories needed to make it look like there were any hijacked jets on 9/11
would have to resort to the outright lies we have been told about 9/11.  <G>

So, even if 9/11 was not an inside job then why was it necessary for our
news media to tell us so many lies about 9/11?

And back to the Twin Towers.  The US has been the only country to nuke
another country and the US has been the only country to nuke the US and if
we get nuked again chances are that the US will be responsible for that nuke
job too.

Rocky 

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#514652

On 8/17/2015 9:25 AM, Rocky wrote:

  isnt imagination fun?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#514744

In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
 
> Yes, the remains from that crash would have been clearly visible as scrap
> all over the place so that can not be used to explain why an alleged 757
> went right through a wall that was 6 feet thick that was even reinforced
> with Kevlar.  <G>

The walls were not 6 feet thick and did not contain Kevlar, kook.

The facts are some airliners were hijacked.

Two of them crashed into the World Trade Center towers, starting fires
which weakened the central support columns and the buildings collapesed
almost 2 hours later.

One of them crashed into the Pentagon causing a partial collapse of the
western side and one of them crashed into a field in Pennsylvania.

Everything else is kook babble.

That there were nuclear exposives involved is kook babble.

That there is missing rubble is kook babble.

That there has ever been a nuclear building demolition is kook babble.

That part of the buildings were vaporized is kook babble.

That part of a building was left standing proves there were nuclear
devices is kook babble.

That there was an EMP is kook babble.

That nuclear devices could be detonated underground and yet were not
seen by every eismograph in the world is kook babble.

That a failed US Government project that ended in 1973 has anything
to do with what happened is kook babble.

That the scene was radioactive is kook babble.

That there is any simularity between New York and either Hiroshima
or Nagasaki is kook babble.

That the area was called ground zero proves the event was nuclear
is kook babble.

That a nuclear bomb can be buried for decades without maintenance 
and still be expected to work is kook babble.

That non-government entities can obtain not one, but multiple nuclear
bombs is kook babble.

That there were not thousands of eyewitnesses who heard and saw the
airplanes hit the towers is kook babble.

That all the video was CGI is kook babble.

That the exterior walls were designed to deflect airplanes is kook babble.

That two of the aircraft landed somewhere else is kook babble.

When a nuclear device explodes, it creates a unique seismic signature
that can be detected anywhere on the planet.

There were no nuclear seismic signatures detected on 9/11 but the 
collapse of the two towers was detected.

This alone is enough to disprove any nuclear devices were used on 9/11.

Capitalizing things that shouldn't be capitalized is kook babble.


<snip remaining kook babble>


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#514853

On Mon, 17 Aug 2015 09:25:40 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:

>bump
>
>I still can't get over the lies told by 911research and now I direct your
>attention to:
> http://911research.wtc7.net/essays/pentagon/
>
>where it states: "The Sandia crash test of an F-4 into a concrete barrier
>reduced the plane to rubble."
>
>Yes, the remains from that crash would have been clearly visible as scrap
>all over the place so that can not be used to explain why an alleged 757
>went right through a wall that was 6 feet thick that was even reinforced
>with Kevlar.  <G>
>

     Was there another Pentagon? The one that was hit by a jet on
9/11/01 had walls that were two feet thick. And there was no kevlar.
     Where might I find this phantom Pentagon of which you write?

>But stories needed to make it look like there were any hijacked jets on 9/11
>would have to resort to the outright lies we have been told about 9/11.  <G>
>

     You mean you do not believe your claims about underground nukes?

>So, even if 9/11 was not an inside job then why was it necessary for our
>news media to tell us so many lies about 9/11?

     You've yet to establish any lies were told.

>
>And back to the Twin Towers.  The US has been the only country to nuke
>another country and the US has been the only country to nuke the US and if
>we get nuked again chances are that the US will be responsible for that nuke
>job too.

     Your claims are, oddly enough, true. But misleading. The U.S. has
done many underground nuclear tests within the boarders of the
country. But these were tests.
     As of the time I write this, the U.S. has not used any nuclear
explosive to cause any damage to populated structures.

-- 
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web