Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #531457 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-11-09 18:27 +0000 |
| Last post | 2015-11-10 05:17 +0000 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 188 — 21 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-09 18:27 +0000
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Poutnik <Poutnik4NNTP@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 19:47 +0100
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-09 18:59 +0000
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-09 16:45 -0500
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 20:24 -0500
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-09 18:54 -0700
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 12:47 -0600
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-09 11:50 -0700
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-09 16:42 -0500
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-09 22:26 +0000
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 22:32 +0000
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-09 22:43 +0000
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 17:25 -0600
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-09 23:59 +0000
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 20:45 -0500
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-11-10 22:38 +0000
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-11-11 06:57 -0600
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-09 18:56 -0700
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-09 15:36 -0700
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-09 22:50 +0000
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-09 16:04 -0700
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-09 18:59 -0700
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-09 17:41 -0500
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-09 23:04 +0000
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-09 16:19 -0700
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-09 23:25 +0000
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-09 16:42 -0700
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-10 00:17 +0000
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-09 17:25 -0700
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-11-10 00:41 +0000
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-09 17:48 -0700
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-10 03:20 +0000
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-09 21:50 -0700
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-10 12:09 -0700
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-09 23:33 +0000
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-09 19:00 -0700
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-09 19:00 -0700
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-10 03:28 +0000
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-09 21:49 -0700
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-10 05:06 +0000
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-09 22:12 -0700
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-10 06:01 +0000
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-10 06:07 +0000
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-10 09:33 -0700
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-10 09:33 -0700
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-10 22:02 +0000
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-10 17:43 -0700
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-11 01:09 +0000
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-11-10 20:14 -0500
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-10 18:14 -0700
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-11-10 19:52 -0600
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-11 02:02 +0000
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-11-10 20:08 -0600
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-11 09:10 -0500
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-11-11 06:53 -0800
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-11 12:13 -0500
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-12 10:51 -0700
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-11-12 12:26 -0600
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-12 12:01 -0700
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-11-10 10:42 -0600
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-10 10:33 -0700
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-10 05:16 +0000
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-10 12:12 -0700
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-10 22:06 +0000
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-11-10 22:13 +0000
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-11-10 17:31 -0500
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-10 23:28 +0000
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-11-10 19:32 -0500
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-10 23:22 +0000
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-10 18:25 -0500
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-11 00:44 +0100
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-10 18:50 -0500
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-11 09:04 -0500
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-11 15:49 +0100
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-11 10:37 -0500
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-11 17:46 +0100
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-11 12:21 -0500
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-12 11:01 -0700
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-12 10:50 -0700
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-12 10:52 -0700
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-12 10:36 -0700
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-12 23:06 +0100
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-12 15:28 -0700
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-10 23:56 +0000
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-10 19:02 -0500
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-11 00:59 +0000
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-11-10 19:44 -0600
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-11 04:20 +0000
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-10 21:02 -0500
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-11 02:49 +0000
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-10 21:57 -0500
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-11 03:24 +0000
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-11-12 12:28 -0600
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-11-11 07:33 -0500
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-11-10 23:29 +0000
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-10 18:32 -0500
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-10 23:27 +0100
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-10 16:29 -0700
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-10 16:27 -0700
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-10 12:12 -0700
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-10 12:36 -0700
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-10 22:24 +0000
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-11-10 17:36 -0500
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-10 16:30 -0700
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-10 17:46 -0700
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-11 01:22 +0000
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-10 18:50 -0700
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-11 02:26 +0000
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-11-11 10:34 +0000
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-11 13:52 -0700
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-12 10:26 -0700
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-10 20:03 -0700
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-12 11:32 -0700
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-10 16:29 -0700
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-10 18:10 -0700
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-10 22:07 +0000
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-10 17:59 -0500
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-10 23:42 +0000
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-10 18:59 -0500
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-11-10 19:47 -0500
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-11-10 16:41 -0800
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-11 00:52 +0000
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-11-10 20:42 -0500
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-11-10 20:05 -0500
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-11 01:27 +0000
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-11-11 02:56 +0100
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-11 13:55 -0700
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-11-10 19:39 -0600
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-11 02:19 +0000
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-11-10 20:47 -0600
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-11 03:04 +0000
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-11-10 21:24 -0600
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-11 03:40 +0000
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-11-11 07:11 -0600
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-11 04:45 +0000
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-11-11 07:15 -0600
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-11 09:03 -0500
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-10 16:31 -0700
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-11-10 13:38 -0600
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-10 12:11 -0700
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-10 22:26 +0000
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-10 16:33 -0700
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-09 18:41 -0500
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-09 16:51 -0700
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-11-09 20:52 -0600
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-11-10 08:29 -0600
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-11-10 14:34 +0000
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-10 14:56 +0000
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-11-10 15:01 +0000
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-11-10 10:40 -0600
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-11-10 17:16 +0000
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-11-10 09:56 -0800
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-11-10 13:00 -0600
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-11-10 19:05 +0000
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-11-11 06:14 -0500
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-11-11 12:00 +0000
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-11-11 09:10 -0600
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-11-11 11:34 -0500
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-11 12:18 -0500
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-12 10:23 -0700
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-11-12 12:23 -0600
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-12 10:21 -0700
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-11 13:57 -0700
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-11-11 12:04 -0600
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-11 13:12 -0500
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-11 15:26 -0500
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-11-11 20:30 +0000
The Jackass, aka Turdv, braying away. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-11 13:59 -0700
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-10 10:47 -0500
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-11-09 16:41 -0600
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-09 18:35 -0500
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-09 16:52 -0700
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 18:15 -0600
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-10 00:30 +0000
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 18:43 -0600
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-10 03:37 +0000
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-11-10 00:46 +0000
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-09 18:07 -0700
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-09 19:03 -0700
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-09 18:56 -0700
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-11-10 06:03 -0500
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-10 14:59 +0000
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-11-10 13:41 -0500
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-09 23:34 +0000
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-09 18:42 -0500
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-09 16:53 -0700
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways "Wipe A Rat" <invalid@example.com> - 2015-11-09 19:44 -0800
Re: Microsoft How Are You Stupid: Let Me Count The Ways Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-10 05:17 +0000
Page 4 of 10 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 … 10 Next page →
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-10 10:33 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D2677864.636FD%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #531802 |
On 11/10/15, 9:42 AM, in article slrnn447jq.eh.jedi@nomad.mishnet, "JEDIDIAH" <jedi@nomad.mishnet> wrote: > On 2015-11-10, Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> wrote: >> On Mon, 09 Nov 2015 22:12:04 -0700, Snit wrote: >> >>> >>> A Photoshop script should work fine. > > ...hard to say. Without such a script on hand, it's really pure > speculation on your part. Plus, you have the problem that this task > is being done n+1 times. Have you ever PERSONALLY done that kind of > scripting with Photoshop. Nope... and I have asked him details about it. So far none have come. He listed the script and I openly noted it is outside my area of expertise. > Besides, I am not sure you're even "name dropping" the proper > brand name tool for this anyways... No clue what you are even trying to say here... seems like you are taking a snippet of my post completely out context and trying to make a point against one I did not make. But whatever. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-10 05:16 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pan.2015.11.10.05.16.49@localhost.localdomain> |
| In reply to | #531711 |
On Tue, 10 Nov 2015 05:06:03 +0000, Fabian Russell wrote: > > On linux: > > I plug my camera card into the USB slot and run the following > script (with a wrapper to take of misc I/O): > [snip] > I should indicate that this script makes heavy use of the NetPBM utilities/libraries and the PAM file formats which are NOT available for MS Windows. On Windows, this task would be virtually IMPOSSIBLE to accomplish.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-10 12:12 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <IL6dnSJMe4wh3N_LnZ2dnUU7-U2dnZ2d@bresnan.com> |
| In reply to | #531715 |
On 11/09/15 22:16, Fabian Russell wrote: > On Tue, 10 Nov 2015 05:06:03 +0000, Fabian Russell wrote: > >> >> On linux: >> >> I plug my camera card into the USB slot and run the following >> script (with a wrapper to take of misc I/O): >> [snip] >> > > I should indicate that this script makes heavy use of the > NetPBM utilities/libraries and the PAM file formats which are NOT > available for MS Windows. > > On Windows, this task would be virtually IMPOSSIBLE to accomplish. > Sure it is, uh-huh. -- My problem is that I don't have enough middle fingers.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-10 22:06 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pan.2015.11.10.22.06.12@localhost.localdomain> |
| In reply to | #531848 |
On Tue, 10 Nov 2015 12:12:57 -0700, GreyCloud wrote: >> >> On Windows, this task would be virtually IMPOSSIBLE to accomplish. >> > Sure it is, uh-huh. > Yes, it likely wood. On MS Windows, the only accessible file formats are "seekable" formats, which means that the whole file must first be read into memory before any processing can take place. On Linux, the PAM format can be processed via a pipeline. This could not happen on MS Windows.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-10 22:13 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <daf8g8Fkh0pU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #531893 |
On Tue, 10 Nov 2015 22:06:08 +0000, Fabian Russell wrote: > On Tue, 10 Nov 2015 12:12:57 -0700, GreyCloud wrote: > > >>> On Windows, this task would be virtually IMPOSSIBLE to accomplish. >>> >> Sure it is, uh-huh. >> >> > Yes, it likely wood. > > On MS Windows, the only accessible file formats are "seekable" formats, > which means that the whole file must first be read into memory before > any processing can take place. > > On Linux, the PAM format can be processed via a pipeline. This could > not happen on MS Windows. That was very important back in the day of 64K RAM. How important do you think it is now? -- Lloyd
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-10 17:31 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <n1tr3k$kkr$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #531897 |
"Lloyd Parsons" <lloydp211@gmail.com> wrote in message news:daf8g8Fkh0pU1@mid.individual.net... > On Tue, 10 Nov 2015 22:06:08 +0000, Fabian Russell wrote: > >> On Tue, 10 Nov 2015 12:12:57 -0700, GreyCloud wrote: >> >> >>>> On Windows, this task would be virtually IMPOSSIBLE to accomplish. >>>> >>> Sure it is, uh-huh. >>> >>> >> Yes, it likely wood. >> >> On MS Windows, the only accessible file formats are "seekable" formats, >> which means that the whole file must first be read into memory before >> any processing can take place. >> >> On Linux, the PAM format can be processed via a pipeline. This could >> not happen on MS Windows. > > That was very important back in the day of 64K RAM. How important do you > think it is now? > LOL - this clown is hilarious. Talk about fabricating useless bullshit excuses for why he "thinks" that one approach is better than another. I checked a couple of RAW image files that I have and they're 16-megs each. My desktop has 16-gigs, my laptop has 8-gigs. These RAW image files that he jumps through hoops to avoid having to /load the entire file into memory/ are only a few megs in size. On my laptop loading a tiny 16-meg file entirely into memory uses an entire 0.2% of the system memory. What a waste of time solving a non-existent problem. -- "Internally, Microsoft still uses the former 8.3 filename notation because nothing else will work. The more "liberal" file naming convention is just a cosmetic cover." Idiotic nonsense from Fabian Russell Nov 9, 2015 - <pan.2015.11.09.18.05.31@localhost.localdomain>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-10 23:28 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pan.2015.11.10.23.28.13@localhost.localdomain> |
| In reply to | #531909 |
On Tue, 10 Nov 2015 17:31:28 -0500, Ezekiel wrote: > > LOL - this clown is hilarious. Talk about fabricating useless bullshit > excuses for why he "thinks" that one approach is better than another. > > I checked a couple of RAW image files that I have and they're 16-megs each. > My desktop has 16-gigs, my laptop has 8-gigs. These RAW image files that he > jumps through hoops to avoid having to /load the entire file into memory/ > are only a few megs in size. > You missed the point entirely. A "seekable" file format is not amenable to pipelining. Thus, one has to read the whole fscking thing into memory, process, store back, read again, process, store again, read again, etc., etc. With a non-seekable format, all the repetitive steps can be eliminated. You are a slow learner. How did you ever make it through school?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-10 19:32 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <n1u26v$gfc$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #531922 |
"Fabian Russell" <root@localhost.localdomain> wrote in message
news:pan.2015.11.10.23.28.13@localhost.localdomain...
> On Tue, 10 Nov 2015 17:31:28 -0500, Ezekiel wrote:
>
>>
>> LOL - this clown is hilarious. Talk about fabricating useless bullshit
>> excuses for why he "thinks" that one approach is better than another.
>>
>> I checked a couple of RAW image files that I have and they're 16-megs
>> each.
>> My desktop has 16-gigs, my laptop has 8-gigs. These RAW image files that
>> he
>> jumps through hoops to avoid having to /load the entire file into memory/
>> are only a few megs in size.
>>
>
> You missed the point entirely.
>
The problem with your "points" is that you have no clue what you're talking
about, Was your "point" here to publically demonstrate that you're
completely clueless?
"Internally, Microsoft still uses the former 8.3 filename notation
because nothing else will work. The more "liberal" file naming
convention is just a cosmetic cover."
> A "seekable" file format is not amenable to pipelining. Thus, one has to
> read
> the whole fscking thing into memory, process, store back, read again,
> process,
> store again, read again, etc., etc. With a non-seekable format, all the
> repetitive
> steps can be eliminated.
Great job solving a problem that doesn't exist.
> You are a slow learner. How did you ever make it through school?
Simple. I studied my classes and avoided losers like you. Morons that are so
pathetically stupid that they claim that "ascii text files" are TWICE as
large on Windows.
--
"Microsoft implements the Unicode standard using UTF-16. This means that
ascii text files are now TWICE as large. Very stupid."
The "very stupid" Fabian Russell
<pan.2015.11.09.18.27.55@localhost.localdomain>
Nov 9, 2015
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-10 23:22 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pan.2015.11.10.23.22.53@localhost.localdomain> |
| In reply to | #531897 |
On Tue, 10 Nov 2015 22:13:28 +0000, Lloyd Parsons wrote: > > That was very important back in the day of 64K RAM. How important do you > think it is now? > It's still as important as ever. You obviously only can understand software in terms of the latest fashion and buzzwords. The fundamentals mean nothing to you. But the fundamentals of computing are timeless. A non-seekable image stream has enormous utility. The PAM format can accommodate the same data as any "tagged" and necessarily seekable format. Buts tags represent the latest "fashion" in formats and therefore will appeal to all the software fops. The only caveat is that PAM is oriented to the do-it-yourself user. You, and your cohorts, represent the do-nothing type.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-10 18:25 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <16ab67uxjpen1.1mog4v6micbtc$.dlg@40tude.net> |
| In reply to | #531919 |
On 10 Nov 2015 23:22:48 GMT, Fabian Russell wrote: > On Tue, 10 Nov 2015 22:13:28 +0000, Lloyd Parsons wrote: > > >> >> That was very important back in the day of 64K RAM. How important do you >> think it is now? >> > > It's still as important as ever. > > You obviously only can understand software in terms of the latest fashion > and buzzwords. The fundamentals mean nothing to you. > > But the fundamentals of computing are timeless. > > A non-seekable image stream has enormous utility. The PAM format can accommodate > the same data as any "tagged" and necessarily seekable format. Buts tags > represent the latest "fashion" in formats and therefore will appeal to all > the software fops. > > The only caveat is that PAM is oriented to the do-it-yourself user. > You, and your cohorts, represent the do-nothing type. While the rest of the earth is creating professional presentations using Adobe software. -- You Ain't The Biggest Fish In The Crotch.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-11 00:44 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <n1tvbv$7k9$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #531920 |
Big Fish in a Small Crotch wrote: > On 10 Nov 2015 23:22:48 GMT, Fabian Russell wrote: > >> On Tue, 10 Nov 2015 22:13:28 +0000, Lloyd Parsons wrote: >> >> >>> >>> That was very important back in the day of 64K RAM. How important do >>> you think it is now? >>> >> >> It's still as important as ever. >> >> You obviously only can understand software in terms of the latest fashion >> and buzzwords. The fundamentals mean nothing to you. >> >> But the fundamentals of computing are timeless. >> >> A non-seekable image stream has enormous utility. The PAM format can >> accommodate >> the same data as any "tagged" and necessarily seekable format. Buts tags >> represent the latest "fashion" in formats and therefore will appeal to >> all the software fops. >> >> The only caveat is that PAM is oriented to the do-it-yourself user. >> You, and your cohorts, represent the do-nothing type. > > While the rest of the earth is creating professional presentations using > Adobe software. Actually, no
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-10 18:50 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <1lo6cm0i7pbpy.1owhgs5w5xfwa.dlg@40tude.net> |
| In reply to | #531936 |
On Wed, 11 Nov 2015 00:44:07 +0100, Peter Köhlmann wrote: > Big Fish in a Small Crotch wrote: > >> On 10 Nov 2015 23:22:48 GMT, Fabian Russell wrote: >> >>> On Tue, 10 Nov 2015 22:13:28 +0000, Lloyd Parsons wrote: >>> >>> >>>> >>>> That was very important back in the day of 64K RAM. How important do >>>> you think it is now? >>>> >>> >>> It's still as important as ever. >>> >>> You obviously only can understand software in terms of the latest fashion >>> and buzzwords. The fundamentals mean nothing to you. >>> >>> But the fundamentals of computing are timeless. >>> >>> A non-seekable image stream has enormous utility. The PAM format can >>> accommodate >>> the same data as any "tagged" and necessarily seekable format. Buts tags >>> represent the latest "fashion" in formats and therefore will appeal to >>> all the software fops. >>> >>> The only caveat is that PAM is oriented to the do-it-yourself user. >>> You, and your cohorts, represent the do-nothing type. >> >> While the rest of the earth is creating professional presentations using >> Adobe software. > > Actually, no So what are they using? gimp? Don't make me laugh. -- You Ain't The Biggest Fish In The Crotch.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Slimer <.m@nsn.s> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-11 09:04 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <n1vhoe$q8o$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #531936 |
On 2015-11-10 6:44 PM, Peter Köhlmann wrote: > Big Fish in a Small Crotch wrote: > >> On 10 Nov 2015 23:22:48 GMT, Fabian Russell wrote: >> >>> On Tue, 10 Nov 2015 22:13:28 +0000, Lloyd Parsons wrote: >>> >>> >>>> >>>> That was very important back in the day of 64K RAM. How important do >>>> you think it is now? >>>> >>> >>> It's still as important as ever. >>> >>> You obviously only can understand software in terms of the latest fashion >>> and buzzwords. The fundamentals mean nothing to you. >>> >>> But the fundamentals of computing are timeless. >>> >>> A non-seekable image stream has enormous utility. The PAM format can >>> accommodate >>> the same data as any "tagged" and necessarily seekable format. Buts tags >>> represent the latest "fashion" in formats and therefore will appeal to >>> all the software fops. >>> >>> The only caveat is that PAM is oriented to the do-it-yourself user. >>> You, and your cohorts, represent the do-nothing type. >> >> While the rest of the earth is creating professional presentations using >> Adobe software. > > Actually, no Way to prove your statement, Peter the Klöwn. -- Slimer
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-11 15:49 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <n1vkdr$5q0$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #532073 |
The lying imbecile Snit Michael Glasser babbled: > On 2015-11-10 6:44 PM, Peter Köhlmann wrote: >> Big Fish in a Small Crotch wrote: >> >>> On 10 Nov 2015 23:22:48 GMT, Fabian Russell wrote: >>> >>>> On Tue, 10 Nov 2015 22:13:28 +0000, Lloyd Parsons wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>> That was very important back in the day of 64K RAM. How important do >>>>> you think it is now? >>>>> >>>> >>>> It's still as important as ever. >>>> >>>> You obviously only can understand software in terms of the latest >>>> fashion >>>> and buzzwords. The fundamentals mean nothing to you. >>>> >>>> But the fundamentals of computing are timeless. >>>> >>>> A non-seekable image stream has enormous utility. The PAM format can >>>> accommodate >>>> the same data as any "tagged" and necessarily seekable format. Buts >>>> tags represent the latest "fashion" in formats and therefore will >>>> appeal to all the software fops. >>>> >>>> The only caveat is that PAM is oriented to the do-it-yourself user. >>>> You, and your cohorts, represent the do-nothing type. >>> >>> While the rest of the earth is creating professional presentations using >>> Adobe software. >> >> Actually, no > > Way to prove your statement, Peter the Klöwn. > > A very tiny percentage is using adobe products. Feel free to prove me wrong, dimbulb
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Slimer <.m@nsn.s> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-11 10:37 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <n1vn80$hi4$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #532080 |
On 2015-11-11 9:49 AM, Peter Köhlmann wrote: > The lying imbecile Snit Michael Glasser babbled: > >> On 2015-11-10 6:44 PM, Peter Köhlmann wrote: >>> Big Fish in a Small Crotch wrote: >>> >>>> On 10 Nov 2015 23:22:48 GMT, Fabian Russell wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Tue, 10 Nov 2015 22:13:28 +0000, Lloyd Parsons wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> That was very important back in the day of 64K RAM. How important do >>>>>> you think it is now? >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> It's still as important as ever. >>>>> >>>>> You obviously only can understand software in terms of the latest >>>>> fashion >>>>> and buzzwords. The fundamentals mean nothing to you. >>>>> >>>>> But the fundamentals of computing are timeless. >>>>> >>>>> A non-seekable image stream has enormous utility. The PAM format can >>>>> accommodate >>>>> the same data as any "tagged" and necessarily seekable format. Buts >>>>> tags represent the latest "fashion" in formats and therefore will >>>>> appeal to all the software fops. >>>>> >>>>> The only caveat is that PAM is oriented to the do-it-yourself user. >>>>> You, and your cohorts, represent the do-nothing type. >>>> >>>> While the rest of the earth is creating professional presentations using >>>> Adobe software. >>> >>> Actually, no >> >> Way to prove your statement, Peter the Klöwn. >> >> > A very tiny percentage is using adobe products. > > Feel free to prove me wrong, dimbulb Unlike you, I am able to use a web browser as well as a search engine within it: <http://www.nasdaq.com/article/adobes-creative-software-market-share-will-continue-to-be-volatile-cm56794> "Adobe ( ADBE ) has around 43% market share in creative software market globally as of 2009. " I have to admit, having half of the world's creative software market share is negligeable. In other words, you're a fucking idiot and I've shown it yet again Peter the Klöwn. -- Slimer
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-11 17:46 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <n1vr8a$27k$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #532087 |
The lying imbecile Snit Michael Glasser babbled: > On 2015-11-11 9:49 AM, Peter Köhlmann wrote: >> The lying imbecile Snit Michael Glasser babbled: >> >>> On 2015-11-10 6:44 PM, Peter Köhlmann wrote: >>>> Big Fish in a Small Crotch wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 10 Nov 2015 23:22:48 GMT, Fabian Russell wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, 10 Nov 2015 22:13:28 +0000, Lloyd Parsons wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> That was very important back in the day of 64K RAM. How important >>>>>>> do you think it is now? >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> It's still as important as ever. >>>>>> >>>>>> You obviously only can understand software in terms of the latest >>>>>> fashion >>>>>> and buzzwords. The fundamentals mean nothing to you. >>>>>> >>>>>> But the fundamentals of computing are timeless. >>>>>> >>>>>> A non-seekable image stream has enormous utility. The PAM format can >>>>>> accommodate >>>>>> the same data as any "tagged" and necessarily seekable format. Buts >>>>>> tags represent the latest "fashion" in formats and therefore will >>>>>> appeal to all the software fops. >>>>>> >>>>>> The only caveat is that PAM is oriented to the do-it-yourself user. >>>>>> You, and your cohorts, represent the do-nothing type. >>>>> >>>>> While the rest of the earth is creating professional presentations >>>>> using Adobe software. >>>> >>>> Actually, no >>> >>> Way to prove your statement, Peter the Klöwn. >>> >>> >> A very tiny percentage is using adobe products. >> >> Feel free to prove me wrong, dimbulb > > Unlike you, I am able to use a web browser as well as a search engine > within it: > > <http://www.nasdaq.com/article/adobes-creative-software-market-share-will-continue-to-be-volatile-cm56794> > > "Adobe ( ADBE ) has around 43% market share in creative software market > globally as of 2009. " Which amounts to what percentage of users? 0.5%? 1%? 1.5% > I have to admit, having half of the world's creative software market > share is negligeable. In other words, you're a fucking idiot and I've > shown it yet again Peter the Klöwn. > Well, the idiot would be you, Snit Slimeball You wrote that bullshit about "the rest of the earth is creating professional presentations using Adobe software" The overwhelming "rest of the earth" has no need for those products and don't use them
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Slimer <.m@nsn.s> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-11 12:21 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <n1vtbc$at3$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #532095 |
On 2015-11-11 11:46 AM, Peter Köhlmann wrote: > The lying imbecile Snit Michael Glasser babbled: > >> On 2015-11-11 9:49 AM, Peter Köhlmann wrote: >>> The lying imbecile Snit Michael Glasser babbled: >>> >>>> On 2015-11-10 6:44 PM, Peter Köhlmann wrote: >>>>> Big Fish in a Small Crotch wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 10 Nov 2015 23:22:48 GMT, Fabian Russell wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Tue, 10 Nov 2015 22:13:28 +0000, Lloyd Parsons wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> That was very important back in the day of 64K RAM. How important >>>>>>>> do you think it is now? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> It's still as important as ever. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You obviously only can understand software in terms of the latest >>>>>>> fashion >>>>>>> and buzzwords. The fundamentals mean nothing to you. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> But the fundamentals of computing are timeless. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> A non-seekable image stream has enormous utility. The PAM format can >>>>>>> accommodate >>>>>>> the same data as any "tagged" and necessarily seekable format. Buts >>>>>>> tags represent the latest "fashion" in formats and therefore will >>>>>>> appeal to all the software fops. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The only caveat is that PAM is oriented to the do-it-yourself user. >>>>>>> You, and your cohorts, represent the do-nothing type. >>>>>> >>>>>> While the rest of the earth is creating professional presentations >>>>>> using Adobe software. >>>>> >>>>> Actually, no >>>> >>>> Way to prove your statement, Peter the Klöwn. >>>> >>>> >>> A very tiny percentage is using adobe products. >>> >>> Feel free to prove me wrong, dimbulb >> >> Unlike you, I am able to use a web browser as well as a search engine >> within it: >> >> <http://www.nasdaq.com/article/adobes-creative-software-market-share-will-continue-to-be-volatile-cm56794> >> >> "Adobe ( ADBE ) has around 43% market share in creative software market >> globally as of 2009. " > > Which amounts to what percentage of users? 0.5%? 1%? 1.5% The very fact that you made use of the word "user" means that you are talking about those who actually utilize creative software. In that case, it is 43%. If you only wanted to talk about computers users in general, you should have specified it. >> I have to admit, having half of the world's creative software market >> share is negligeable. In other words, you're a fucking idiot and I've >> shown it yet again Peter the Klöwn. >> > > Well, the idiot would be you, Snit Slimeball > > You wrote that bullshit about "the rest of the earth is creating > professional presentations using Adobe software" I did not, I stayed out of the thread for most of it. As someone who doesn't use any creative software at all, I have no interest in talking about it either. You might want to look back and see who said it so that you can bitch at them instead. > The overwhelming "rest of the earth" has no need for those products and > don't use them I agree, for once. -- Slimer
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-12 11:01 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D26A21FC.63A24%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #532115 |
On 11/11/15, 10:21 AM, in article n1vtbc$at3$3@dont-email.me, "Slimer" <.m@nsn.s> wrote: >>> I have to admit, having half of the world's creative software market >>> share is negligeable. In other words, you're a fucking idiot and I've >>> shown it yet again Peter the Klöwn. >>> >> >> Well, the idiot would be you, Snit Slimeball >> >> You wrote that bullshit about "the rest of the earth is creating >> professional presentations using Adobe software" > > I did not, I stayed out of the thread for most of it. As someone who > doesn't use any creative software at all, I have no interest in talking > about it either. You might want to look back and see who said it so that > you can bitch at them instead. I am happy to have the Adobe Creative Cloud as a choice. Choice is good. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-12 10:50 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D26A1F78.63A13%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #532095 |
On 11/11/15, 9:46 AM, in article n1vr8a$27k$1@dont-email.me, "Peter Köhlmann" <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote: >>> A very tiny percentage is using adobe products. >>> >>> Feel free to prove me wrong, dimbulb >> >> Unlike you, I am able to use a web browser as well as a search engine >> within it: >> >> <http://www.nasdaq.com/article/adobes-creative-software-market-share-will-con >> tinue-to-be-volatile-cm56794> >> >> "Adobe ( ADBE ) has around 43% market share in creative software market >> globally as of 2009. " > > Which amounts to what percentage of users? 0.5%? 1%? 1.5% > >> I have to admit, having half of the world's creative software market >> share is negligeable. In other words, you're a fucking idiot and I've >> shown it yet again Peter the Klöwn. >> > > Well, the idiot would be you, Snit Slimeball > > You wrote that bullshit about "the rest of the earth is creating > professional presentations using Adobe software" > > The overwhelming "rest of the earth" has no need for those products and > don't use them Funny how this went from "Adobe products" to just the Adobe Creative Suite. Sure, most people do not have or use the Adobe Creative Suite - but is is great to have the choice to use it! Sadly Linux does not offer that choice. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-12 10:52 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D26A1FFF.63A15%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #532087 |
On 11/11/15, 8:37 AM, in article n1vn80$hi4$1@dont-email.me, "Slimer" <.m@nsn.s> wrote: >>>>> While the rest of the earth is creating professional presentations using >>>>> Adobe software. >>>> >>>> Actually, no >>> >>> Way to prove your statement, Peter the Klöwn. >>> >>> >> A very tiny percentage is using adobe products. >> >> Feel free to prove me wrong, dimbulb > > Unlike you, I am able to use a web browser as well as a search engine > within it: > > <http://www.nasdaq.com/article/adobes-creative-software-market-share-will-cont > inue-to-be-volatile-cm56794> > > "Adobe ( ADBE ) has around 43% market share in creative software market > globally as of 2009. " > > I have to admit, having half of the world's creative software market > share is negligeable. In other words, you're a fucking idiot and I've > shown it yet again Peter the Klöwn. Once again: Linux offers less choice than OS X and Windows. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 4 of 10 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 … 10 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web