Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #531300 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-11-09 02:20 +0000 |
| Last post | 2015-11-10 15:58 +0000 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 291 — 26 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-09 02:20 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-08 20:25 -0600
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-09 02:43 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-08 20:54 -0600
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 09:20 -0800
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 12:58 -0600
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 13:23 -0800
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. "Herp Derpington" <invali@example.com> - 2015-11-09 19:42 -0800
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-11-10 05:36 -0800
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-09 02:46 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 03:21 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-09 18:44 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 17:12 -0600
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-09 23:35 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 20:22 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-10 03:51 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-08 20:02 -0700
Circus Alert.. Don't take the bait Fabian Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-08 22:11 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-08 21:12 -0600
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-09 04:22 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-08 21:50 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-09 05:13 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-08 22:38 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2015-11-16 18:59 +0000
Plenty of non-idiots use Windows. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2015-11-08 21:30 -0800
Re: Plenty of non-idiots use Windows. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-09 06:18 +0000
Re: Plenty of non-idiots use Windows. Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-11-09 12:43 +0000
Re: Plenty of non-idiots use Windows. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-09 12:09 -0700
Re: Plenty of non-idiots use Windows. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-09 13:03 -0700
Re: Plenty of non-idiots use Windows. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-09 20:26 +0000
Re: Plenty of non-idiots use Windows. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-09 18:27 -0700
Re: Plenty of non-idiots use Windows. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-09 06:31 +0000
Fabian Russell is disabled. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2015-11-08 23:12 -0800
Re: Plenty of non-idiots use Windows. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-09 13:03 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 03:12 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-09 13:04 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-11-09 12:39 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-09 13:01 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 20:04 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-11-09 15:18 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-09 21:01 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-11-09 16:08 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-09 18:35 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-09 13:54 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-09 20:54 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 21:13 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-09 17:17 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-09 23:24 +0100
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-09 17:36 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-09 18:37 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-09 18:32 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-09 13:04 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-09 18:30 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-09 18:44 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-10 03:58 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-09 21:38 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-10 08:18 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-10 15:15 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-10 10:49 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-10 12:25 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-10 12:45 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-10 22:30 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-11-10 17:37 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-10 18:04 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-11 01:30 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-10 18:59 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-11 03:15 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-11 07:22 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-12 10:20 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-12 21:32 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-12 14:51 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-12 22:13 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-12 23:17 +0100
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-12 15:28 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-12 22:38 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-12 18:40 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-12 23:24 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-13 00:33 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-11-13 10:57 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-13 12:21 +0100
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-11-13 12:26 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-13 14:57 +0100
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-11-13 17:04 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-11-13 07:25 -0600
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-13 11:48 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-11-13 17:09 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-13 20:39 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-13 15:43 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-13 21:30 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-11-16 09:27 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-13 22:18 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-11-16 09:29 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-12 18:39 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-11-13 10:55 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-13 10:26 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-12 15:26 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-12 22:42 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-12 16:06 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-12 23:25 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-12 23:36 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-12 18:46 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-13 00:35 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-13 14:54 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-13 14:53 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-12 17:40 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-12 18:37 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-13 00:40 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-12 18:01 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-13 01:29 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-12 18:47 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-13 02:29 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-12 19:34 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-12 21:45 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-12 21:03 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-13 02:26 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-12 19:35 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-13 02:51 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-12 22:00 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-13 03:36 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-12 22:41 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-12 20:00 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-13 03:18 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-13 01:49 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-13 10:27 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-13 11:15 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-11-13 11:30 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-13 11:32 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-13 10:25 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-13 12:27 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-13 10:41 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-13 12:40 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-13 10:47 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-13 12:52 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-13 10:06 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-13 10:25 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-13 10:28 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-13 11:52 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-13 10:02 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-13 12:15 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-12 21:44 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-13 10:24 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-14 01:01 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-13 20:08 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-13 20:17 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-11-11 02:07 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-09 21:48 +0100
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-09 14:23 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 21:25 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-09 14:37 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-09 18:41 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-09 21:07 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-10 04:05 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-09 21:48 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-10 08:20 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-10 15:18 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-10 12:29 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-10 12:28 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-10 12:46 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-10 16:36 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-10 18:32 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-09 18:39 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-09 18:46 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-10 04:09 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-09 21:47 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-10 08:21 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-10 14:48 +0100
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-10 10:34 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-10 18:27 +0100
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-10 12:31 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-09 20:51 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 21:21 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-09 21:49 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-09 15:12 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-09 18:48 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-10 04:14 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-09 21:47 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-10 12:33 -0700
GhostScipt works well on Windows. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2015-11-09 16:09 -0800
Re: GhostScipt works well on Windows. Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-09 19:54 -0500
Re: GhostScipt works well on Windows. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-09 18:49 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-11-11 09:42 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-11 13:29 +0100
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-11-11 13:08 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-09 16:58 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-09 18:43 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-10 04:18 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-09 21:46 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-10 13:49 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-10 13:48 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-09 04:56 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-08 22:15 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-09 05:27 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-08 22:43 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> - 2015-11-08 22:16 -0600
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-09 04:26 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> - 2015-11-09 07:31 -0600
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-11-09 10:14 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-09 18:02 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-09 12:15 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-09 13:06 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-11-09 14:13 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-11-09 06:13 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-11-09 12:32 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-11-09 11:38 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-11-09 07:51 -0600
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-09 18:05 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-11-09 13:52 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 13:00 -0600
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-09 12:17 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-09 13:07 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-09 21:46 +0100
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-09 14:26 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-09 18:52 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-11-10 02:54 +0100
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-10 13:51 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-10 10:27 +0100
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-11-10 06:52 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-10 13:21 +0100
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-11-10 07:39 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-10 13:55 -0700
Are the FOSS community "suckers", Kreep? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-11-10 07:12 -0600
Re: Are the FOSS community "suckers", Kreep? Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-10 08:22 -0500
Re: Are the FOSS community "suckers", Kreep? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-11-11 09:27 -0600
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-10 13:58 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-11-10 22:01 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-10 23:15 +0100
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-10 16:38 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-11 00:45 +0100
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-11 14:15 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-10 18:10 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-11 10:05 +0100
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-11 11:20 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-11 13:27 +0100
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-12 10:36 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-12 22:58 +0100
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-12 15:15 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-11-11 06:15 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-10 16:37 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-10 09:31 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-10 13:55 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-10 13:54 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-09 21:14 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-09 18:53 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. dvus <dven1@adelphia.net> - 2015-11-10 18:00 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-10 16:39 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. dvus <dven1@adelphia.net> - 2015-11-11 18:00 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-11-11 20:02 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. dvus <dven1@adelphia.net> - 2015-11-12 09:22 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-12 11:43 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. dvus <dven1@adelphia.net> - 2015-11-12 18:07 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-11-13 07:35 -0600
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-13 14:58 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-13 14:57 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. dvus <dven1@adelphia.net> - 2015-11-14 07:30 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-14 12:18 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. dvus <dven1@adelphia.net> - 2015-11-14 22:09 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-14 20:12 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-15 03:31 +0000
To dvus. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-16 11:40 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. dvus <dven1@adelphia.net> - 2015-11-15 10:46 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-16 11:38 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. dvus <dven1@adelphia.net> - 2015-11-16 14:47 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-11-16 20:26 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-11-16 14:43 -0600
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-16 14:19 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-16 15:38 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-16 15:37 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. dvus <dven1@adelphia.net> - 2015-11-17 05:30 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-11-17 14:57 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. dvus <dven1@adelphia.net> - 2015-11-17 20:04 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-09 08:14 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 10:56 -0600
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 11:25 -0600
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 13:30 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 16:21 -0600
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 20:37 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. dvus <dven1@adelphia.net> - 2015-11-10 18:08 -0500
Fabian_Russell isn't all there. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2015-11-09 10:31 -0800
Re: Fabian_Russell isn't all there. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-09 19:15 +0000
Re: Fabian_Russell isn't all there. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 16:23 -0600
Re: Fabian_Russell isn't all there. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-09 22:35 +0000
Re: Fabian_Russell isn't all there. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 20:41 -0500
Re: Fabian_Russell isn't all there. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 20:39 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-09 18:40 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 17:05 -0600
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Apollyon <adravirgo@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 15:14 -0800
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 17:36 -0600
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-10 00:07 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-09 23:53 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-11-10 08:53 -0600
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-10 15:58 +0000
Page 7 of 15 — ← Prev page 1 … 5 6 [7] 8 9 … 15 Next page →
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-12 20:00 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D26AA061.63BA8%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #532623 |
On 11/12/15, 7:51 PM, in article adah93.afe@rooftop.invalid, "owl" <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > In comp.os.linux.advocacy Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> On 11/12/15, 7:26 PM, in article fah30a.a3raf@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >> >>> In comp.os.linux.advocacy Big Fish in a Small Crotch >>> <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> wrote: >>>> On Fri, 13 Nov 2015 01:29:06 +0000 (UTC), owl wrote: >>>> >>>>> In comp.os.linux.advocacy Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>> On 11/12/15, 4:37 PM, in article n237nq$lgb$1@dont-email.me, "Slimer" >>>>>> <.m@nsn.s> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 2015-11-12 4:32 PM, Fabian Russell wrote: >>>>>>>> On Thu, 12 Nov 2015 10:20:34 -0700, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I have cut my teeth on assembly language. Once that fundamental >>>>>>>>>> stuff >>>>>>>>>> gets into your blood it never gets out. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> How do you think this is relevant? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> It is relevant because the whole fscking world seemed to have fallen >>>>>>>> madly in love with Object Oriented programming, and I happen to despise >>>>>>>> OO with a raging passion. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I have examined the issue deeply, and I can only conclude that OO >>>>>>>> is so fscking popular because people no longer can comprehend >>>>>>>> hardware. They are lost in the fogs of lofty OO abstractions and >>>>>>>> cannot perceive the machine. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> But for me it is quite different. I BEGAN with hardware and assembly >>>>>>>> language. I BEGAN with an intimate involvement with hardware. As >>>>>>>> a result I can see nothing but the machine. Oh yes, I can understand >>>>>>>> all the abstractions but, for me, such abstractions quickly fade into >>>>>>>> nothing against the blazing image of the machine. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> When I encounter high level code of any kind, my mind cannot help >>>>>>>> but to plunge immediately down into the assembly code that underlies >>>>>>>> it all. Thus, as a consequence, I do not not especially favor >>>>>>>> the creation of ever higher abstractions that serve only to >>>>>>>> obliterate and not truly enlighten. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> It is, I suppose a sickness, but it is a sickness from which no >>>>>>>> escape, or cure, is possible. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> All anyone needs to know is that coding directly in Assembly means that >>>>>>> your code will take full advantage of the machine's power. No slowdowns, >>>>>>> just full speed. >>>>>> >>>>>> Also will not take advantage of higher level abstractions. There is room >>>>>> for >>>>>> both. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Why are you even participating in a discussion of programming topics? >>>>> You have proved many times that you are completely clueless on that >>>>> subject. >>>> >>>> For the same reason snit participates in literally 100 percent of the >>>> threads here. >>>> He craves attention and likes to disrupt things. >>>> You could start a thread about nuclear fission at the molecular level and >>>> he would invade it. >>>> >>>> Probably the only thread Michael Glasser, The Prescott Computer Guy will >>>> avoid is one related to him getting a job and supporting his family. >>>> >>> >>> Can you imagine what it's like having to live in Prescott AZ, and this >>> Prescott Computer Guy is the only one you can turn to if you have >>> computer problems? The guy's never there when you call because he's >>> out trolling usenet 24/7. >>> >> >> Really: you could be a decent person if you work on improving yourself and >> not putting others down just to deal with your insecurity. >> > http://i.imgur.com/H3torBM.gifv > And you prove me correct, again. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-13 03:18 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <fhua0a.3r@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #532626 |
In comp.os.linux.advocacy Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 11/12/15, 7:51 PM, in article adah93.afe@rooftop.invalid, "owl" > <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > >> In comp.os.linux.advocacy Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> On 11/12/15, 7:26 PM, in article fah30a.a3raf@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>> >>>> In comp.os.linux.advocacy Big Fish in a Small Crotch >>>> <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> wrote: >>>>> On Fri, 13 Nov 2015 01:29:06 +0000 (UTC), owl wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> In comp.os.linux.advocacy Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>> On 11/12/15, 4:37 PM, in article n237nq$lgb$1@dont-email.me, "Slimer" >>>>>>> <.m@nsn.s> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 2015-11-12 4:32 PM, Fabian Russell wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Thu, 12 Nov 2015 10:20:34 -0700, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I have cut my teeth on assembly language. Once that fundamental >>>>>>>>>>> stuff >>>>>>>>>>> gets into your blood it never gets out. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> How do you think this is relevant? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> It is relevant because the whole fscking world seemed to have fallen >>>>>>>>> madly in love with Object Oriented programming, and I happen to despise >>>>>>>>> OO with a raging passion. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I have examined the issue deeply, and I can only conclude that OO >>>>>>>>> is so fscking popular because people no longer can comprehend >>>>>>>>> hardware. They are lost in the fogs of lofty OO abstractions and >>>>>>>>> cannot perceive the machine. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> But for me it is quite different. I BEGAN with hardware and assembly >>>>>>>>> language. I BEGAN with an intimate involvement with hardware. As >>>>>>>>> a result I can see nothing but the machine. Oh yes, I can understand >>>>>>>>> all the abstractions but, for me, such abstractions quickly fade into >>>>>>>>> nothing against the blazing image of the machine. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> When I encounter high level code of any kind, my mind cannot help >>>>>>>>> but to plunge immediately down into the assembly code that underlies >>>>>>>>> it all. Thus, as a consequence, I do not not especially favor >>>>>>>>> the creation of ever higher abstractions that serve only to >>>>>>>>> obliterate and not truly enlighten. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> It is, I suppose a sickness, but it is a sickness from which no >>>>>>>>> escape, or cure, is possible. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> All anyone needs to know is that coding directly in Assembly means that >>>>>>>> your code will take full advantage of the machine's power. No slowdowns, >>>>>>>> just full speed. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Also will not take advantage of higher level abstractions. There is room >>>>>>> for >>>>>>> both. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Why are you even participating in a discussion of programming topics? >>>>>> You have proved many times that you are completely clueless on that >>>>>> subject. >>>>> >>>>> For the same reason snit participates in literally 100 percent of the >>>>> threads here. >>>>> He craves attention and likes to disrupt things. >>>>> You could start a thread about nuclear fission at the molecular level and >>>>> he would invade it. >>>>> >>>>> Probably the only thread Michael Glasser, The Prescott Computer Guy will >>>>> avoid is one related to him getting a job and supporting his family. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Can you imagine what it's like having to live in Prescott AZ, and this >>>> Prescott Computer Guy is the only one you can turn to if you have >>>> computer problems? The guy's never there when you call because he's >>>> out trolling usenet 24/7. >>>> >>> >>> Really: you could be a decent person if you work on improving yourself and >>> not putting others down just to deal with your insecurity. >>> >> http://i.imgur.com/H3torBM.gifv >> > > And you prove me correct, again. > If you think it's "correct" to have your wife slave away while you sit on your ass trolling usenet all day instead of working, something is seriously wrong with you.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-13 01:49 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D26AF23B.63C12%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #532627 |
On 11/12/15, 8:18 PM, in article fhua0a.3r@rooftop.invalid, "owl" <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>>>> Can you imagine what it's like having to live in Prescott AZ, and this >>>>> Prescott Computer Guy is the only one you can turn to if you have >>>>> computer problems? The guy's never there when you call because he's >>>>> out trolling usenet 24/7. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Really: you could be a decent person if you work on improving yourself and >>>> not putting others down just to deal with your insecurity. >>>> >>> http://i.imgur.com/H3torBM.gifv >>> >> >> And you prove me correct, again. >> > > If you think it's "correct" to have your wife slave away while you sit on > your ass trolling usenet all day instead of working, something is seriously > wrong with you. > And you prove me correct, again. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Slimer <.m@nsn.s> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-13 10:27 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <n24vc5$uuq$6@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #532627 |
On 2015-11-12 10:18 PM, owl wrote: > In comp.os.linux.advocacy Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> On 11/12/15, 7:51 PM, in article adah93.afe@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >> >>> In comp.os.linux.advocacy Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>> On 11/12/15, 7:26 PM, in article fah30a.a3raf@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >>>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>>> >>>>> In comp.os.linux.advocacy Big Fish in a Small Crotch >>>>> <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> wrote: >>>>>> On Fri, 13 Nov 2015 01:29:06 +0000 (UTC), owl wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> In comp.os.linux.advocacy Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> On 11/12/15, 4:37 PM, in article n237nq$lgb$1@dont-email.me, "Slimer" >>>>>>>> <.m@nsn.s> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 2015-11-12 4:32 PM, Fabian Russell wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 12 Nov 2015 10:20:34 -0700, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I have cut my teeth on assembly language. Once that fundamental >>>>>>>>>>>> stuff >>>>>>>>>>>> gets into your blood it never gets out. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> How do you think this is relevant? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> It is relevant because the whole fscking world seemed to have fallen >>>>>>>>>> madly in love with Object Oriented programming, and I happen to despise >>>>>>>>>> OO with a raging passion. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I have examined the issue deeply, and I can only conclude that OO >>>>>>>>>> is so fscking popular because people no longer can comprehend >>>>>>>>>> hardware. They are lost in the fogs of lofty OO abstractions and >>>>>>>>>> cannot perceive the machine. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> But for me it is quite different. I BEGAN with hardware and assembly >>>>>>>>>> language. I BEGAN with an intimate involvement with hardware. As >>>>>>>>>> a result I can see nothing but the machine. Oh yes, I can understand >>>>>>>>>> all the abstractions but, for me, such abstractions quickly fade into >>>>>>>>>> nothing against the blazing image of the machine. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> When I encounter high level code of any kind, my mind cannot help >>>>>>>>>> but to plunge immediately down into the assembly code that underlies >>>>>>>>>> it all. Thus, as a consequence, I do not not especially favor >>>>>>>>>> the creation of ever higher abstractions that serve only to >>>>>>>>>> obliterate and not truly enlighten. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> It is, I suppose a sickness, but it is a sickness from which no >>>>>>>>>> escape, or cure, is possible. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> All anyone needs to know is that coding directly in Assembly means that >>>>>>>>> your code will take full advantage of the machine's power. No slowdowns, >>>>>>>>> just full speed. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Also will not take advantage of higher level abstractions. There is room >>>>>>>> for >>>>>>>> both. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Why are you even participating in a discussion of programming topics? >>>>>>> You have proved many times that you are completely clueless on that >>>>>>> subject. >>>>>> >>>>>> For the same reason snit participates in literally 100 percent of the >>>>>> threads here. >>>>>> He craves attention and likes to disrupt things. >>>>>> You could start a thread about nuclear fission at the molecular level and >>>>>> he would invade it. >>>>>> >>>>>> Probably the only thread Michael Glasser, The Prescott Computer Guy will >>>>>> avoid is one related to him getting a job and supporting his family. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Can you imagine what it's like having to live in Prescott AZ, and this >>>>> Prescott Computer Guy is the only one you can turn to if you have >>>>> computer problems? The guy's never there when you call because he's >>>>> out trolling usenet 24/7. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Really: you could be a decent person if you work on improving yourself and >>>> not putting others down just to deal with your insecurity. >>>> >>> http://i.imgur.com/H3torBM.gifv >>> >> >> And you prove me correct, again. >> > > If you think it's "correct" to have your wife slave away while you sit on > your ass trolling usenet all day instead of working, something is seriously > wrong with you. Maybe that's why Snit likes the Muslims so much? They believe that women should be enslaved and constantly attentive to the man's needs around the house. -- Slimer
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-13 11:15 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <cfc05ig9yvvm$.1wrvjhvs33bo.dlg@40tude.net> |
| In reply to | #532727 |
On Fri, 13 Nov 2015 10:27:12 -0500, Slimer wrote: > On 2015-11-12 10:18 PM, owl wrote: >> In comp.os.linux.advocacy Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> On 11/12/15, 7:51 PM, in article adah93.afe@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>> >>>> In comp.os.linux.advocacy Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>> On 11/12/15, 7:26 PM, in article fah30a.a3raf@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >>>>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> In comp.os.linux.advocacy Big Fish in a Small Crotch >>>>>> <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> wrote: >>>>>>> On Fri, 13 Nov 2015 01:29:06 +0000 (UTC), owl wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> In comp.os.linux.advocacy Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 11/12/15, 4:37 PM, in article n237nq$lgb$1@dont-email.me, "Slimer" >>>>>>>>> <.m@nsn.s> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On 2015-11-12 4:32 PM, Fabian Russell wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 12 Nov 2015 10:20:34 -0700, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I have cut my teeth on assembly language. Once that fundamental >>>>>>>>>>>>> stuff >>>>>>>>>>>>> gets into your blood it never gets out. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> How do you think this is relevant? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> It is relevant because the whole fscking world seemed to have fallen >>>>>>>>>>> madly in love with Object Oriented programming, and I happen to despise >>>>>>>>>>> OO with a raging passion. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I have examined the issue deeply, and I can only conclude that OO >>>>>>>>>>> is so fscking popular because people no longer can comprehend >>>>>>>>>>> hardware. They are lost in the fogs of lofty OO abstractions and >>>>>>>>>>> cannot perceive the machine. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> But for me it is quite different. I BEGAN with hardware and assembly >>>>>>>>>>> language. I BEGAN with an intimate involvement with hardware. As >>>>>>>>>>> a result I can see nothing but the machine. Oh yes, I can understand >>>>>>>>>>> all the abstractions but, for me, such abstractions quickly fade into >>>>>>>>>>> nothing against the blazing image of the machine. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> When I encounter high level code of any kind, my mind cannot help >>>>>>>>>>> but to plunge immediately down into the assembly code that underlies >>>>>>>>>>> it all. Thus, as a consequence, I do not not especially favor >>>>>>>>>>> the creation of ever higher abstractions that serve only to >>>>>>>>>>> obliterate and not truly enlighten. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> It is, I suppose a sickness, but it is a sickness from which no >>>>>>>>>>> escape, or cure, is possible. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> All anyone needs to know is that coding directly in Assembly means that >>>>>>>>>> your code will take full advantage of the machine's power. No slowdowns, >>>>>>>>>> just full speed. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Also will not take advantage of higher level abstractions. There is room >>>>>>>>> for >>>>>>>>> both. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Why are you even participating in a discussion of programming topics? >>>>>>>> You have proved many times that you are completely clueless on that >>>>>>>> subject. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> For the same reason snit participates in literally 100 percent of the >>>>>>> threads here. >>>>>>> He craves attention and likes to disrupt things. >>>>>>> You could start a thread about nuclear fission at the molecular level and >>>>>>> he would invade it. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Probably the only thread Michael Glasser, The Prescott Computer Guy will >>>>>>> avoid is one related to him getting a job and supporting his family. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Can you imagine what it's like having to live in Prescott AZ, and this >>>>>> Prescott Computer Guy is the only one you can turn to if you have >>>>>> computer problems? The guy's never there when you call because he's >>>>>> out trolling usenet 24/7. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Really: you could be a decent person if you work on improving yourself and >>>>> not putting others down just to deal with your insecurity. >>>>> >>>> http://i.imgur.com/H3torBM.gifv >>>> >>> >>> And you prove me correct, again. >>> >> >> If you think it's "correct" to have your wife slave away while you sit on >> your ass trolling usenet all day instead of working, something is seriously >> wrong with you. > > Maybe that's why Snit likes the Muslims so much? They believe that women > should be enslaved and constantly attentive to the man's needs around > the house. Snit is a PC ultra left wanker who believes in big government, high taxes on what he calls the rich and those who work hard and earn decent money picking up the slack for lazy parasites like him. It's basically the Obama platform in a nutshell. We, the government will give it all to you for free because you deserve it is basically what Obama ran with. And he won because the USA is chock full of parasites like snit and they came out in droves and voted for Obammy. The problem with that economic model is that sooner or later you run out of people who are footing the bill. Ask Greece. Ask UK etc. And when you make a country unattractive to big business via higher taxes and increased regulation, these businesses move elsewhere where the economics are more attractive. Snit also seems to have a very deep hatred for Christianity even though he denies it his actions and reactions prove otherwise. It fits with his pathological lying. The guy is just a complete train wreck and other than providing a sick sort of entertainment value here in COLA, he is nothing but a useless sack of shit. -- You Ain't The Biggest Fish In The Crotch.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-13 11:30 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <n2531v$gi7$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #532734 |
"Big Fish in a Small Crotch" <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> wrote in message news:cfc05ig9yvvm$.1wrvjhvs33bo.dlg@40tude.net... > On Fri, 13 Nov 2015 10:27:12 -0500, Slimer wrote: > >>> >>> If you think it's "correct" to have your wife slave away while you sit >>> on >>> your ass trolling usenet all day instead of working, something is >>> seriously >>> wrong with you. >> >> Maybe that's why Snit likes the Muslims so much? They believe that women >> should be enslaved and constantly attentive to the man's needs around >> the house. > > Snit is a PC ultra left wanker who believes in big government, high taxes > on what he calls the rich and those who work hard and earn decent money > picking up the slack for lazy parasites like him. > Well that's because the current system is so unfair. Why is it that only some people had millions of dollars simply handed to them without them having to do any work to earn it? While other people sit around all day watching TV (and trolling USENET) and nobody handed them lots of money for free. How is that fair to the people who didn't get loads of money handed out to them? -- "I've done for example SQL optimization and the reason I could do it better than the best high level experts can do was because I think in hex and bits and byte movements. If you know the assembler in detail, you would know what "select * from employees" would translate into assembler and how different and yet similar that would be from "select name from employees" Babbling idiot "7" <qAN5r.607$ya.432@newsfe03.ams2>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-13 11:32 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <hjpumrgu9uj4$.1qd5d6f11xkhi.dlg@40tude.net> |
| In reply to | #532737 |
On Fri, 13 Nov 2015 11:30:04 -0500, Ezekiel wrote: > "Big Fish in a Small Crotch" <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> wrote in > message news:cfc05ig9yvvm$.1wrvjhvs33bo.dlg@40tude.net... >> On Fri, 13 Nov 2015 10:27:12 -0500, Slimer wrote: >> >>>> >>>> If you think it's "correct" to have your wife slave away while you sit >>>> on >>>> your ass trolling usenet all day instead of working, something is >>>> seriously >>>> wrong with you. >>> >>> Maybe that's why Snit likes the Muslims so much? They believe that women >>> should be enslaved and constantly attentive to the man's needs around >>> the house. >> >> Snit is a PC ultra left wanker who believes in big government, high taxes >> on what he calls the rich and those who work hard and earn decent money >> picking up the slack for lazy parasites like him. >> > > Well that's because the current system is so unfair. > > Why is it that only some people had millions of dollars simply handed to > them without them having to do any work to earn it? While other people sit > around all day watching TV (and trolling USENET) and nobody handed them lots > of money for free. > > How is that fair to the people who didn't get loads of money handed out to > them? And that's exactly how some of these parasites, including snit, see it. They love to play the victim and perpetually blame others for their abject failure in life. -- You Ain't The Biggest Fish In The Crotch.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-13 10:25 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D26B6B0F.63CB2%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #532737 |
On 11/13/15, 9:30 AM, in article n2531v$gi7$1@dont-email.me, "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> wrote: > > "Big Fish in a Small Crotch" <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> wrote in > message news:cfc05ig9yvvm$.1wrvjhvs33bo.dlg@40tude.net... >> On Fri, 13 Nov 2015 10:27:12 -0500, Slimer wrote: >> >>>> >>>> If you think it's "correct" to have your wife slave away while you sit on >>>> your ass trolling usenet all day instead of working, something is seriously >>>> wrong with you. >>>> >>> Maybe that's why Snit likes the Muslims so much? They believe that women >>> should be enslaved and constantly attentive to the man's needs around the >>> house. >>> >> Snit is a PC ultra left wanker who believes in big government, high taxes on >> what he calls the rich and those who work hard and earn decent money picking >> up the slack for lazy parasites like him. >> > > Well that's because the current system is so unfair. > > Why is it that only some people had millions of dollars simply handed to them > without them having to do any work to earn it? While other people sit around > all day watching TV (and trolling USENET) and nobody handed them lots of money > for free. > > How is that fair to the people who didn't get loads of money handed out to > them? I think we should work on equality and have it so hard work / productivity is better tied to financial success, and also as a society invest in our own infrastructure and future. Seems completely common sense and obvious to me. But conservatives tend to hate those ideas. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <none@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-13 12:27 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <g4p1y.61945$KK.28988@fx29.iad> |
| In reply to | #532737 |
On 11/13/2015 11:30 AM, Ezekiel wrote:
> "Big Fish in a Small Crotch" <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> wrote in
> message news:cfc05ig9yvvm$.1wrvjhvs33bo.dlg@40tude.net...
>> On Fri, 13 Nov 2015 10:27:12 -0500, Slimer wrote:
>>
>>>>
>>>> If you think it's "correct" to have your wife slave away while you sit
>>>> on
>>>> your ass trolling usenet all day instead of working, something is
>>>> seriously
>>>> wrong with you.
>>>
>>> Maybe that's why Snit likes the Muslims so much? They believe that women
>>> should be enslaved and constantly attentive to the man's needs around
>>> the house.
>>
>> Snit is a PC ultra left wanker who believes in big government, high taxes
>> on what he calls the rich and those who work hard and earn decent money
>> picking up the slack for lazy parasites like him.
>>
>
> Well that's because the current system is so unfair.
>
> Why is it that only some people had millions of dollars simply handed to
> them without them having to do any work to earn it? While other people sit
> around all day watching TV (and trolling USENET) and nobody handed them lots
> of money for free.
>
> How is that fair to the people who didn't get loads of money handed out to
> them?
>
It's not! That why Libs all work so hard to have the government take
from the rich and give to those trolling USENET. Worked out Great in the
USSR and can work out great here too!
--
___ ___ ___ ___
/\ \ /\ \ /\__\ /\ \
/::\ \ /::\ \ /::| | \:\ \
/:/\:\ \ /:/\:\ \ /:|:| | ___ /::\__\
/::\~\:\__\ /::\~\:\ \ /:/|:| |__ /\ /:/\/__/
/:/\:\ \:|__| /:/\:\ \:\__\ /:/ |:| /\__\ \:\/:/ /
\:\~\:\/:/ / \:\~\:\ \/__/ \/__|:|/:/ / \::/ /
\:\ \::/ / \:\ \:\__\ |:/:/ / \/__/
\:\/:/ / \:\ \/__/ |::/ /
\::/__/ \:\__\ /:/ /
~~ \/__/ \/__/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-13 10:41 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D26B6EBE.63CC1%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #532764 |
On 11/13/15, 10:27 AM, in article g4p1y.61945$KK.28988@fx29.iad, "benj" <none@gmail.com> wrote: > On 11/13/2015 11:30 AM, Ezekiel wrote: >> "Big Fish in a Small Crotch" <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> wrote in >> message news:cfc05ig9yvvm$.1wrvjhvs33bo.dlg@40tude.net... >>> On Fri, 13 Nov 2015 10:27:12 -0500, Slimer wrote: >>> >>>>> >>>>> If you think it's "correct" to have your wife slave away while you sit >>>>> on >>>>> your ass trolling usenet all day instead of working, something is >>>>> seriously >>>>> wrong with you. >>>> >>>> Maybe that's why Snit likes the Muslims so much? They believe that women >>>> should be enslaved and constantly attentive to the man's needs around >>>> the house. >>> >>> Snit is a PC ultra left wanker who believes in big government, high taxes >>> on what he calls the rich and those who work hard and earn decent money >>> picking up the slack for lazy parasites like him. >>> >> >> Well that's because the current system is so unfair. >> >> Why is it that only some people had millions of dollars simply handed to >> them without them having to do any work to earn it? While other people sit >> around all day watching TV (and trolling USENET) and nobody handed them lots >> of money for free. >> >> How is that fair to the people who didn't get loads of money handed out to >> them? >> > It's not! That why Libs all work so hard to have the government take > from the rich and give to those trolling USENET. Worked out Great in the > USSR and can work out great here too! What liberals are doing this? Most liberals I know want to see hard work / productivity BETTER tied to financial success and end the handouts to the rich, who are the ones getting the most. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Slimer <.m@nsn.s> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-13 12:40 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <n25764$1oc$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #532734 |
On 2015-11-13 11:15 AM, Big Fish in a Small Crotch wrote: > On Fri, 13 Nov 2015 10:27:12 -0500, Slimer wrote: > >> On 2015-11-12 10:18 PM, owl wrote: >>> In comp.os.linux.advocacy Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>> On 11/12/15, 7:51 PM, in article adah93.afe@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >>>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>>> >>>>> In comp.os.linux.advocacy Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>> On 11/12/15, 7:26 PM, in article fah30a.a3raf@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >>>>>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> In comp.os.linux.advocacy Big Fish in a Small Crotch >>>>>>> <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> On Fri, 13 Nov 2015 01:29:06 +0000 (UTC), owl wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> In comp.os.linux.advocacy Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 11/12/15, 4:37 PM, in article n237nq$lgb$1@dont-email.me, "Slimer" >>>>>>>>>> <.m@nsn.s> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On 2015-11-12 4:32 PM, Fabian Russell wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 12 Nov 2015 10:20:34 -0700, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have cut my teeth on assembly language. Once that fundamental >>>>>>>>>>>>>> stuff >>>>>>>>>>>>>> gets into your blood it never gets out. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> How do you think this is relevant? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> It is relevant because the whole fscking world seemed to have fallen >>>>>>>>>>>> madly in love with Object Oriented programming, and I happen to despise >>>>>>>>>>>> OO with a raging passion. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I have examined the issue deeply, and I can only conclude that OO >>>>>>>>>>>> is so fscking popular because people no longer can comprehend >>>>>>>>>>>> hardware. They are lost in the fogs of lofty OO abstractions and >>>>>>>>>>>> cannot perceive the machine. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> But for me it is quite different. I BEGAN with hardware and assembly >>>>>>>>>>>> language. I BEGAN with an intimate involvement with hardware. As >>>>>>>>>>>> a result I can see nothing but the machine. Oh yes, I can understand >>>>>>>>>>>> all the abstractions but, for me, such abstractions quickly fade into >>>>>>>>>>>> nothing against the blazing image of the machine. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> When I encounter high level code of any kind, my mind cannot help >>>>>>>>>>>> but to plunge immediately down into the assembly code that underlies >>>>>>>>>>>> it all. Thus, as a consequence, I do not not especially favor >>>>>>>>>>>> the creation of ever higher abstractions that serve only to >>>>>>>>>>>> obliterate and not truly enlighten. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> It is, I suppose a sickness, but it is a sickness from which no >>>>>>>>>>>> escape, or cure, is possible. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> All anyone needs to know is that coding directly in Assembly means that >>>>>>>>>>> your code will take full advantage of the machine's power. No slowdowns, >>>>>>>>>>> just full speed. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Also will not take advantage of higher level abstractions. There is room >>>>>>>>>> for >>>>>>>>>> both. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Why are you even participating in a discussion of programming topics? >>>>>>>>> You have proved many times that you are completely clueless on that >>>>>>>>> subject. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> For the same reason snit participates in literally 100 percent of the >>>>>>>> threads here. >>>>>>>> He craves attention and likes to disrupt things. >>>>>>>> You could start a thread about nuclear fission at the molecular level and >>>>>>>> he would invade it. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Probably the only thread Michael Glasser, The Prescott Computer Guy will >>>>>>>> avoid is one related to him getting a job and supporting his family. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Can you imagine what it's like having to live in Prescott AZ, and this >>>>>>> Prescott Computer Guy is the only one you can turn to if you have >>>>>>> computer problems? The guy's never there when you call because he's >>>>>>> out trolling usenet 24/7. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Really: you could be a decent person if you work on improving yourself and >>>>>> not putting others down just to deal with your insecurity. >>>>>> >>>>> http://i.imgur.com/H3torBM.gifv >>>>> >>>> >>>> And you prove me correct, again. >>>> >>> >>> If you think it's "correct" to have your wife slave away while you sit on >>> your ass trolling usenet all day instead of working, something is seriously >>> wrong with you. >> >> Maybe that's why Snit likes the Muslims so much? They believe that women >> should be enslaved and constantly attentive to the man's needs around >> the house. > > Snit is a PC ultra left wanker who believes in big government, high taxes > on what he calls the rich and those who work hard and earn decent money > picking up the slack for lazy parasites like him. I will _never_ be in favour of educated, hard-working individuals paying more to support those who never took their education or their job seriously. It is not the fault of people who spent their time studying and taking advantage of the opportunities afforded them to become decent, well-paid individuals that others are poor and miserable. > It's basically the Obama platform in a nutshell. > We, the government will give it all to you for free because you deserve it > is basically what Obama ran with. > > And he won because the USA is chock full of parasites like snit and they > came out in droves and voted for Obammy. It's too bad that the United States are overwhelmed with dumb, bleeding heart assholes who think that everyone should help one another because everyone is good at heart. The human being is in its primal state selfish and greedy and if you allow him to take advantage of a situation, he will. Opportunities should be given to those who prove themselves and for that reason alone regardless of their race or gender, not because someone is part of a minority even if he's done nothing to earn it. > The problem with that economic model is that sooner or later you run out of > people who are footing the bill. Ask Greece. Ask UK etc. > And when you make a country unattractive to big business via higher taxes > and increased regulation, these businesses move elsewhere where the > economics are more attractive. Absolutely, which is why taxing corporations heavily will never work in anyone's favour. The only way that it CAN work is if every possible country on the planet is on board or if very strict policies against that corporation's product are imposed if they choose to leave your nation. Just taxing them because you want to help out miserable miscreants is idiotic. > Snit also seems to have a very deep hatred for Christianity even though he > denies it his actions and reactions prove otherwise. > It fits with his pathological lying. > > The guy is just a complete train wreck and other than providing a sick sort > of entertainment value here in COLA, he is nothing but a useless sack of > shit. I respect his right to be and to communicate with everyone and I hope that he understands that I can't stand reading his left-wing garbage anymore and need to filter it from my feed. -- Slimer
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-13 10:47 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D26B7045.63CD3%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #532766 |
On 11/13/15, 10:40 AM, in article n25764$1oc$1@dont-email.me, "Slimer"
<.m@nsn.s> wrote:
>>> Maybe that's why Snit likes the Muslims so much? They believe that women
>>> should be enslaved and constantly attentive to the man's needs around
>>> the house.
>>
>> Snit is a PC ultra left wanker who believes in big government, high taxes
>> on what he calls the rich and those who work hard and earn decent money
>> picking up the slack for lazy parasites like him.
This is a lie about my views.
> I will _never_ be in favour of educated, hard-working individuals paying
> more to support those who never took their education or their job
> seriously. It is not the fault of people who spent their time studying
> and taking advantage of the opportunities afforded them to become
> decent, well-paid individuals that others are poor and miserable.
>
>> It's basically the Obama platform in a nutshell.
>> We, the government will give it all to you for free because you deserve it
>> is basically what Obama ran with.
>>
>> And he won because the USA is chock full of parasites like snit and they
>> came out in droves and voted for Obammy.
>
> It's too bad that the United States are overwhelmed with dumb, bleeding
> heart assholes who think that everyone should help one another because
> everyone is good at heart. The human being is in its primal state
> selfish and greedy and if you allow him to take advantage of a
> situation, he will. Opportunities should be given to those who prove
> themselves and for that reason alone regardless of their race or gender,
> not because someone is part of a minority even if he's done nothing to
> earn it.
I back equal rights and the idea that hard work / productivity should be
tied to financial gain... and work against special entitlements.
I also believe that we, as a society, should invest in infrastructure and
the future - and that failing to do so means we will not compete well in a
global economy. Also think that people should cover the price of their own
costs and risks as much as they can without pushing those onto society.
>> The problem with that economic model is that sooner or later you run out of
>> people who are footing the bill. Ask Greece. Ask UK etc.
>> And when you make a country unattractive to big business via higher taxes
>> and increased regulation, these businesses move elsewhere where the
>> economics are more attractive.
>
> Absolutely, which is why taxing corporations heavily will never work in
> anyone's favour. The only way that it CAN work is if every possible
> country on the planet is on board or if very strict policies against
> that corporation's product are imposed if they choose to leave your
> nation. Just taxing them because you want to help out miserable
> miscreants is idiotic.
>
>> Snit also seems to have a very deep hatred for Christianity even though he
>> denies it his actions and reactions prove otherwise.
>> It fits with his pathological lying.
I say no special entitlements for Christians. That is not a sign of hatred
toward them.
>> The guy is just a complete train wreck and other than providing a sick sort
>> of entertainment value here in COLA, he is nothing but a useless sack of
>> shit.
>
> I respect his right to be and to communicate with everyone and I hope
> that he understands that I can't stand reading his left-wing garbage
> anymore and need to filter it from my feed.
Again, my views in a nutshell:
I back equal rights and the idea that hard work / productivity
should be tied to financial gain... and work against special
entitlements.
I also believe that we, as a society, should invest in
infrastructure and the future - and that failing to do so means we
will not compete well in a global economy. Also think that people
should cover the price of their own costs and risks as much as
they can without pushing those onto society.
Not sure where you think I am wrong... I am open to it.
--
* OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI>
* Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE>
* Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0>
* Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8>
* Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8>
* Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI>
* Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA>
* Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
* OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-13 12:52 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <vtc549odstlg.rtoln7lo02ac.dlg@40tude.net> |
| In reply to | #532766 |
On Fri, 13 Nov 2015 12:40:31 -0500, Slimer wrote: > On 2015-11-13 11:15 AM, Big Fish in a Small Crotch wrote: >> On Fri, 13 Nov 2015 10:27:12 -0500, Slimer wrote: >> >>> On 2015-11-12 10:18 PM, owl wrote: >>>> In comp.os.linux.advocacy Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>> On 11/12/15, 7:51 PM, in article adah93.afe@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >>>>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> In comp.os.linux.advocacy Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>> On 11/12/15, 7:26 PM, in article fah30a.a3raf@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >>>>>>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> In comp.os.linux.advocacy Big Fish in a Small Crotch >>>>>>>> <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Fri, 13 Nov 2015 01:29:06 +0000 (UTC), owl wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> In comp.os.linux.advocacy Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 11/12/15, 4:37 PM, in article n237nq$lgb$1@dont-email.me, "Slimer" >>>>>>>>>>> <.m@nsn.s> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2015-11-12 4:32 PM, Fabian Russell wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 12 Nov 2015 10:20:34 -0700, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have cut my teeth on assembly language. Once that fundamental >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stuff >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> gets into your blood it never gets out. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> How do you think this is relevant? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> It is relevant because the whole fscking world seemed to have fallen >>>>>>>>>>>>> madly in love with Object Oriented programming, and I happen to despise >>>>>>>>>>>>> OO with a raging passion. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I have examined the issue deeply, and I can only conclude that OO >>>>>>>>>>>>> is so fscking popular because people no longer can comprehend >>>>>>>>>>>>> hardware. They are lost in the fogs of lofty OO abstractions and >>>>>>>>>>>>> cannot perceive the machine. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> But for me it is quite different. I BEGAN with hardware and assembly >>>>>>>>>>>>> language. I BEGAN with an intimate involvement with hardware. As >>>>>>>>>>>>> a result I can see nothing but the machine. Oh yes, I can understand >>>>>>>>>>>>> all the abstractions but, for me, such abstractions quickly fade into >>>>>>>>>>>>> nothing against the blazing image of the machine. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> When I encounter high level code of any kind, my mind cannot help >>>>>>>>>>>>> but to plunge immediately down into the assembly code that underlies >>>>>>>>>>>>> it all. Thus, as a consequence, I do not not especially favor >>>>>>>>>>>>> the creation of ever higher abstractions that serve only to >>>>>>>>>>>>> obliterate and not truly enlighten. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> It is, I suppose a sickness, but it is a sickness from which no >>>>>>>>>>>>> escape, or cure, is possible. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> All anyone needs to know is that coding directly in Assembly means that >>>>>>>>>>>> your code will take full advantage of the machine's power. No slowdowns, >>>>>>>>>>>> just full speed. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Also will not take advantage of higher level abstractions. There is room >>>>>>>>>>> for >>>>>>>>>>> both. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Why are you even participating in a discussion of programming topics? >>>>>>>>>> You have proved many times that you are completely clueless on that >>>>>>>>>> subject. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> For the same reason snit participates in literally 100 percent of the >>>>>>>>> threads here. >>>>>>>>> He craves attention and likes to disrupt things. >>>>>>>>> You could start a thread about nuclear fission at the molecular level and >>>>>>>>> he would invade it. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Probably the only thread Michael Glasser, The Prescott Computer Guy will >>>>>>>>> avoid is one related to him getting a job and supporting his family. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Can you imagine what it's like having to live in Prescott AZ, and this >>>>>>>> Prescott Computer Guy is the only one you can turn to if you have >>>>>>>> computer problems? The guy's never there when you call because he's >>>>>>>> out trolling usenet 24/7. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Really: you could be a decent person if you work on improving yourself and >>>>>>> not putting others down just to deal with your insecurity. >>>>>>> >>>>>> http://i.imgur.com/H3torBM.gifv >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> And you prove me correct, again. >>>>> >>>> >>>> If you think it's "correct" to have your wife slave away while you sit on >>>> your ass trolling usenet all day instead of working, something is seriously >>>> wrong with you. >>> >>> Maybe that's why Snit likes the Muslims so much? They believe that women >>> should be enslaved and constantly attentive to the man's needs around >>> the house. >> >> Snit is a PC ultra left wanker who believes in big government, high taxes >> on what he calls the rich and those who work hard and earn decent money >> picking up the slack for lazy parasites like him. > > I will _never_ be in favour of educated, hard-working individuals paying > more to support those who never took their education or their job > seriously. It is not the fault of people who spent their time studying > and taking advantage of the opportunities afforded them to become > decent, well-paid individuals that others are poor and miserable. Education is not a given right, it's an opportunity. And believe me in the USA if you are a minority you have all kinds of programs to assist with college costs. Problem is you have to have some amount of basic intelligence and you can't be lazy. >> It's basically the Obama platform in a nutshell. >> We, the government will give it all to you for free because you deserve it >> is basically what Obama ran with. >> >> And he won because the USA is chock full of parasites like snit and they >> came out in droves and voted for Obammy. > > It's too bad that the United States are overwhelmed with dumb, bleeding > heart assholes who think that everyone should help one another because > everyone is good at heart. The human being is in its primal state > selfish and greedy and if you allow him to take advantage of a > situation, he will. Opportunities should be given to those who prove > themselves and for that reason alone regardless of their race or gender, > not because someone is part of a minority even if he's done nothing to > earn it. Exactly. Affirmative action didn't work in the 70's, 80,s, 90's and it's not working now. >> The problem with that economic model is that sooner or later you run out of >> people who are footing the bill. Ask Greece. Ask UK etc. >> And when you make a country unattractive to big business via higher taxes >> and increased regulation, these businesses move elsewhere where the >> economics are more attractive. > > Absolutely, which is why taxing corporations heavily will never work in > anyone's favour. The only way that it CAN work is if every possible > country on the planet is on board or if very strict policies against > that corporation's product are imposed if they choose to leave your > nation. Just taxing them because you want to help out miserable > miscreants is idiotic. There needs to be high penalties to pay for off shoring. >> Snit also seems to have a very deep hatred for Christianity even though he >> denies it his actions and reactions prove otherwise. >> It fits with his pathological lying. >> >> The guy is just a complete train wreck and other than providing a sick sort >> of entertainment value here in COLA, he is nothing but a useless sack of >> shit. > > I respect his right to be and to communicate with everyone and I hope > that he understands that I can't stand reading his left-wing garbage > anymore and need to filter it from my feed. He needs to be locked in a padded cell with a lithium IV on full drip. -- You Ain't The Biggest Fish In The Crotch.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-13 10:06 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D26B6688.63C98%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #532727 |
On 11/13/15, 8:27 AM, in article n24vc5$uuq$6@dont-email.me, "Slimer" <.m@nsn.s> wrote: >>>>> Really: you could be a decent person if you work on improving yourself and >>>>> not putting others down just to deal with your insecurity. >>>>> >>>> http://i.imgur.com/H3torBM.gifv >>>> >>> >>> And you prove me correct, again. >>> >> >> If you think it's "correct" to have your wife slave away while you sit on >> your ass trolling usenet all day instead of working, something is seriously >> wrong with you. > > Maybe that's why Snit likes the Muslims so much? They believe that women > should be enslaved and constantly attentive to the man's needs around > the house. I think Muslims, like Christians and Jews and atheists, should get equal rights. You see that as a form of bias against Christians and for Muslims. Why? -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Slimer <.m@nsn.s> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-13 10:25 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <n24v95$uuq$5@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #532623 |
On 2015-11-12 9:51 PM, owl wrote: > In comp.os.linux.advocacy Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> On 11/12/15, 7:26 PM, in article fah30a.a3raf@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >> >>> In comp.os.linux.advocacy Big Fish in a Small Crotch >>> <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> wrote: >>>> On Fri, 13 Nov 2015 01:29:06 +0000 (UTC), owl wrote: >>>> >>>>> In comp.os.linux.advocacy Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>> On 11/12/15, 4:37 PM, in article n237nq$lgb$1@dont-email.me, "Slimer" >>>>>> <.m@nsn.s> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 2015-11-12 4:32 PM, Fabian Russell wrote: >>>>>>>> On Thu, 12 Nov 2015 10:20:34 -0700, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I have cut my teeth on assembly language. Once that fundamental stuff >>>>>>>>>> gets into your blood it never gets out. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> How do you think this is relevant? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> It is relevant because the whole fscking world seemed to have fallen >>>>>>>> madly in love with Object Oriented programming, and I happen to despise >>>>>>>> OO with a raging passion. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I have examined the issue deeply, and I can only conclude that OO >>>>>>>> is so fscking popular because people no longer can comprehend >>>>>>>> hardware. They are lost in the fogs of lofty OO abstractions and >>>>>>>> cannot perceive the machine. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> But for me it is quite different. I BEGAN with hardware and assembly >>>>>>>> language. I BEGAN with an intimate involvement with hardware. As >>>>>>>> a result I can see nothing but the machine. Oh yes, I can understand >>>>>>>> all the abstractions but, for me, such abstractions quickly fade into >>>>>>>> nothing against the blazing image of the machine. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> When I encounter high level code of any kind, my mind cannot help >>>>>>>> but to plunge immediately down into the assembly code that underlies >>>>>>>> it all. Thus, as a consequence, I do not not especially favor >>>>>>>> the creation of ever higher abstractions that serve only to >>>>>>>> obliterate and not truly enlighten. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> It is, I suppose a sickness, but it is a sickness from which no >>>>>>>> escape, or cure, is possible. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> All anyone needs to know is that coding directly in Assembly means that >>>>>>> your code will take full advantage of the machine's power. No slowdowns, >>>>>>> just full speed. >>>>>> >>>>>> Also will not take advantage of higher level abstractions. There is room >>>>>> for >>>>>> both. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Why are you even participating in a discussion of programming topics? >>>>> You have proved many times that you are completely clueless on that >>>>> subject. >>>> >>>> For the same reason snit participates in literally 100 percent of the >>>> threads here. >>>> He craves attention and likes to disrupt things. >>>> You could start a thread about nuclear fission at the molecular level and >>>> he would invade it. >>>> >>>> Probably the only thread Michael Glasser, The Prescott Computer Guy will >>>> avoid is one related to him getting a job and supporting his family. >>>> >>> >>> Can you imagine what it's like having to live in Prescott AZ, and this >>> Prescott Computer Guy is the only one you can turn to if you have >>> computer problems? The guy's never there when you call because he's >>> out trolling usenet 24/7. >>> >> >> Really: you could be a decent person if you work on improving yourself and >> not putting others down just to deal with your insecurity. >> > http://i.imgur.com/H3torBM.gifv I have to mention that Snit's wife looks very hot in that image. -- Slimer
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-13 10:28 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <1dasn57d5tml.1we6ue03xxx4y$.dlg@40tude.net> |
| In reply to | #532726 |
On Fri, 13 Nov 2015 10:25:35 -0500, Slimer wrote: > On 2015-11-12 9:51 PM, owl wrote: >> In comp.os.linux.advocacy Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> On 11/12/15, 7:26 PM, in article fah30a.a3raf@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>> >>>> In comp.os.linux.advocacy Big Fish in a Small Crotch >>>> <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> wrote: >>>>> On Fri, 13 Nov 2015 01:29:06 +0000 (UTC), owl wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> In comp.os.linux.advocacy Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>> On 11/12/15, 4:37 PM, in article n237nq$lgb$1@dont-email.me, "Slimer" >>>>>>> <.m@nsn.s> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 2015-11-12 4:32 PM, Fabian Russell wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Thu, 12 Nov 2015 10:20:34 -0700, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I have cut my teeth on assembly language. Once that fundamental stuff >>>>>>>>>>> gets into your blood it never gets out. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> How do you think this is relevant? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> It is relevant because the whole fscking world seemed to have fallen >>>>>>>>> madly in love with Object Oriented programming, and I happen to despise >>>>>>>>> OO with a raging passion. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I have examined the issue deeply, and I can only conclude that OO >>>>>>>>> is so fscking popular because people no longer can comprehend >>>>>>>>> hardware. They are lost in the fogs of lofty OO abstractions and >>>>>>>>> cannot perceive the machine. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> But for me it is quite different. I BEGAN with hardware and assembly >>>>>>>>> language. I BEGAN with an intimate involvement with hardware. As >>>>>>>>> a result I can see nothing but the machine. Oh yes, I can understand >>>>>>>>> all the abstractions but, for me, such abstractions quickly fade into >>>>>>>>> nothing against the blazing image of the machine. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> When I encounter high level code of any kind, my mind cannot help >>>>>>>>> but to plunge immediately down into the assembly code that underlies >>>>>>>>> it all. Thus, as a consequence, I do not not especially favor >>>>>>>>> the creation of ever higher abstractions that serve only to >>>>>>>>> obliterate and not truly enlighten. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> It is, I suppose a sickness, but it is a sickness from which no >>>>>>>>> escape, or cure, is possible. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> All anyone needs to know is that coding directly in Assembly means that >>>>>>>> your code will take full advantage of the machine's power. No slowdowns, >>>>>>>> just full speed. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Also will not take advantage of higher level abstractions. There is room >>>>>>> for >>>>>>> both. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Why are you even participating in a discussion of programming topics? >>>>>> You have proved many times that you are completely clueless on that >>>>>> subject. >>>>> >>>>> For the same reason snit participates in literally 100 percent of the >>>>> threads here. >>>>> He craves attention and likes to disrupt things. >>>>> You could start a thread about nuclear fission at the molecular level and >>>>> he would invade it. >>>>> >>>>> Probably the only thread Michael Glasser, The Prescott Computer Guy will >>>>> avoid is one related to him getting a job and supporting his family. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Can you imagine what it's like having to live in Prescott AZ, and this >>>> Prescott Computer Guy is the only one you can turn to if you have >>>> computer problems? The guy's never there when you call because he's >>>> out trolling usenet 24/7. >>>> >>> >>> Really: you could be a decent person if you work on improving yourself and >>> not putting others down just to deal with your insecurity. >>> >> http://i.imgur.com/H3torBM.gifv > > I have to mention that Snit's wife looks very hot in that image. She should kick her parasite husband to the curb and move on. No woman deserves to be married to a loser like snit. -- You Ain't The Biggest Fish In The Crotch.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Slimer <.m@nsn.s> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-13 11:52 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <n254d0$lat$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #532728 |
On 2015-11-13 10:28 AM, Big Fish in a Small Crotch wrote: > On Fri, 13 Nov 2015 10:25:35 -0500, Slimer wrote: > >> On 2015-11-12 9:51 PM, owl wrote: >>> In comp.os.linux.advocacy Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>> On 11/12/15, 7:26 PM, in article fah30a.a3raf@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >>>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>>> >>>>> In comp.os.linux.advocacy Big Fish in a Small Crotch >>>>> <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> wrote: >>>>>> On Fri, 13 Nov 2015 01:29:06 +0000 (UTC), owl wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> In comp.os.linux.advocacy Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> On 11/12/15, 4:37 PM, in article n237nq$lgb$1@dont-email.me, "Slimer" >>>>>>>> <.m@nsn.s> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 2015-11-12 4:32 PM, Fabian Russell wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 12 Nov 2015 10:20:34 -0700, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I have cut my teeth on assembly language. Once that fundamental stuff >>>>>>>>>>>> gets into your blood it never gets out. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> How do you think this is relevant? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> It is relevant because the whole fscking world seemed to have fallen >>>>>>>>>> madly in love with Object Oriented programming, and I happen to despise >>>>>>>>>> OO with a raging passion. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I have examined the issue deeply, and I can only conclude that OO >>>>>>>>>> is so fscking popular because people no longer can comprehend >>>>>>>>>> hardware. They are lost in the fogs of lofty OO abstractions and >>>>>>>>>> cannot perceive the machine. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> But for me it is quite different. I BEGAN with hardware and assembly >>>>>>>>>> language. I BEGAN with an intimate involvement with hardware. As >>>>>>>>>> a result I can see nothing but the machine. Oh yes, I can understand >>>>>>>>>> all the abstractions but, for me, such abstractions quickly fade into >>>>>>>>>> nothing against the blazing image of the machine. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> When I encounter high level code of any kind, my mind cannot help >>>>>>>>>> but to plunge immediately down into the assembly code that underlies >>>>>>>>>> it all. Thus, as a consequence, I do not not especially favor >>>>>>>>>> the creation of ever higher abstractions that serve only to >>>>>>>>>> obliterate and not truly enlighten. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> It is, I suppose a sickness, but it is a sickness from which no >>>>>>>>>> escape, or cure, is possible. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> All anyone needs to know is that coding directly in Assembly means that >>>>>>>>> your code will take full advantage of the machine's power. No slowdowns, >>>>>>>>> just full speed. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Also will not take advantage of higher level abstractions. There is room >>>>>>>> for >>>>>>>> both. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Why are you even participating in a discussion of programming topics? >>>>>>> You have proved many times that you are completely clueless on that >>>>>>> subject. >>>>>> >>>>>> For the same reason snit participates in literally 100 percent of the >>>>>> threads here. >>>>>> He craves attention and likes to disrupt things. >>>>>> You could start a thread about nuclear fission at the molecular level and >>>>>> he would invade it. >>>>>> >>>>>> Probably the only thread Michael Glasser, The Prescott Computer Guy will >>>>>> avoid is one related to him getting a job and supporting his family. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Can you imagine what it's like having to live in Prescott AZ, and this >>>>> Prescott Computer Guy is the only one you can turn to if you have >>>>> computer problems? The guy's never there when you call because he's >>>>> out trolling usenet 24/7. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Really: you could be a decent person if you work on improving yourself and >>>> not putting others down just to deal with your insecurity. >>>> >>> http://i.imgur.com/H3torBM.gifv >> >> I have to mention that Snit's wife looks very hot in that image. > > She should kick her parasite husband to the curb and move on. > No woman deserves to be married to a loser like snit. The fact that Peter the Klöwn and Chris Ahlstrom are married is proof that there's someone out there for everyone. They might not look like they are part of the human race (Jayne Ahlstrom) or they might be grotesquely obese (Big Bertha the Klöwn's wife) but they provide love and affection anyway. -- Slimer
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-13 10:02 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D26B65D1.63C95%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #532746 |
On 11/13/15, 9:52 AM, in article n254d0$lat$1@dont-email.me, "Slimer" <.m@nsn.s> wrote: >>>>>> Can you imagine what it's like having to live in Prescott AZ, and this >>>>>> Prescott Computer Guy is the only one you can turn to if you have >>>>>> computer problems? The guy's never there when you call because he's >>>>>> out trolling usenet 24/7. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Really: you could be a decent person if you work on improving yourself and >>>>> not putting others down just to deal with your insecurity. >>>>> >>>> http://i.imgur.com/H3torBM.gifv >>> >>> I have to mention that Snit's wife looks very hot in that image. >> >> She should kick her parasite husband to the curb and move on. >> No woman deserves to be married to a loser like snit. > > The fact that Peter the Klöwn and Chris Ahlstrom are married News to me! Mazel tov! :) > is proof > that there's someone out there for everyone. They might not look like > they are part of the human race (Jayne Ahlstrom) or they might be > grotesquely obese (Big Bertha the Klöwn's wife) but they provide love > and affection anyway. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-13 12:15 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <e9s1z3wlsdpk.1skh3s8nupli4.dlg@40tude.net> |
| In reply to | #532746 |
On Fri, 13 Nov 2015 11:52:59 -0500, Slimer wrote: > On 2015-11-13 10:28 AM, Big Fish in a Small Crotch wrote: >> On Fri, 13 Nov 2015 10:25:35 -0500, Slimer wrote: >> >>> On 2015-11-12 9:51 PM, owl wrote: >>>> In comp.os.linux.advocacy Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>> On 11/12/15, 7:26 PM, in article fah30a.a3raf@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >>>>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> In comp.os.linux.advocacy Big Fish in a Small Crotch >>>>>> <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> wrote: >>>>>>> On Fri, 13 Nov 2015 01:29:06 +0000 (UTC), owl wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> In comp.os.linux.advocacy Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 11/12/15, 4:37 PM, in article n237nq$lgb$1@dont-email.me, "Slimer" >>>>>>>>> <.m@nsn.s> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On 2015-11-12 4:32 PM, Fabian Russell wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 12 Nov 2015 10:20:34 -0700, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I have cut my teeth on assembly language. Once that fundamental stuff >>>>>>>>>>>>> gets into your blood it never gets out. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> How do you think this is relevant? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> It is relevant because the whole fscking world seemed to have fallen >>>>>>>>>>> madly in love with Object Oriented programming, and I happen to despise >>>>>>>>>>> OO with a raging passion. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I have examined the issue deeply, and I can only conclude that OO >>>>>>>>>>> is so fscking popular because people no longer can comprehend >>>>>>>>>>> hardware. They are lost in the fogs of lofty OO abstractions and >>>>>>>>>>> cannot perceive the machine. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> But for me it is quite different. I BEGAN with hardware and assembly >>>>>>>>>>> language. I BEGAN with an intimate involvement with hardware. As >>>>>>>>>>> a result I can see nothing but the machine. Oh yes, I can understand >>>>>>>>>>> all the abstractions but, for me, such abstractions quickly fade into >>>>>>>>>>> nothing against the blazing image of the machine. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> When I encounter high level code of any kind, my mind cannot help >>>>>>>>>>> but to plunge immediately down into the assembly code that underlies >>>>>>>>>>> it all. Thus, as a consequence, I do not not especially favor >>>>>>>>>>> the creation of ever higher abstractions that serve only to >>>>>>>>>>> obliterate and not truly enlighten. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> It is, I suppose a sickness, but it is a sickness from which no >>>>>>>>>>> escape, or cure, is possible. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> All anyone needs to know is that coding directly in Assembly means that >>>>>>>>>> your code will take full advantage of the machine's power. No slowdowns, >>>>>>>>>> just full speed. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Also will not take advantage of higher level abstractions. There is room >>>>>>>>> for >>>>>>>>> both. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Why are you even participating in a discussion of programming topics? >>>>>>>> You have proved many times that you are completely clueless on that >>>>>>>> subject. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> For the same reason snit participates in literally 100 percent of the >>>>>>> threads here. >>>>>>> He craves attention and likes to disrupt things. >>>>>>> You could start a thread about nuclear fission at the molecular level and >>>>>>> he would invade it. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Probably the only thread Michael Glasser, The Prescott Computer Guy will >>>>>>> avoid is one related to him getting a job and supporting his family. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Can you imagine what it's like having to live in Prescott AZ, and this >>>>>> Prescott Computer Guy is the only one you can turn to if you have >>>>>> computer problems? The guy's never there when you call because he's >>>>>> out trolling usenet 24/7. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Really: you could be a decent person if you work on improving yourself and >>>>> not putting others down just to deal with your insecurity. >>>>> >>>> http://i.imgur.com/H3torBM.gifv >>> >>> I have to mention that Snit's wife looks very hot in that image. >> >> She should kick her parasite husband to the curb and move on. >> No woman deserves to be married to a loser like snit. > > The fact that Peter the Klöwn and Chris Ahlstrom are married is proof > that there's someone out there for everyone. They might not look like > they are part of the human race (Jayne Ahlstrom) or they might be > grotesquely obese (Big Bertha the Klöwn's wife) but they provide love > and affection anyway. Well, there is some truth in the statement that there is someone for everyone. -- You Ain't The Biggest Fish In The Crotch.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-12 21:44 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <ayr7cmjp2cne.1fmq3ennu8ps7.dlg@40tude.net> |
| In reply to | #532611 |
On Fri, 13 Nov 2015 02:26:40 +0000 (UTC), owl wrote: > In comp.os.linux.advocacy Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> wrote: >> On Fri, 13 Nov 2015 01:29:06 +0000 (UTC), owl wrote: >> >>> In comp.os.linux.advocacy Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>> On 11/12/15, 4:37 PM, in article n237nq$lgb$1@dont-email.me, "Slimer" >>>> <.m@nsn.s> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 2015-11-12 4:32 PM, Fabian Russell wrote: >>>>>> On Thu, 12 Nov 2015 10:20:34 -0700, Snit wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I have cut my teeth on assembly language. Once that fundamental stuff >>>>>>>> gets into your blood it never gets out. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> How do you think this is relevant? >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> It is relevant because the whole fscking world seemed to have fallen >>>>>> madly in love with Object Oriented programming, and I happen to despise >>>>>> OO with a raging passion. >>>>>> >>>>>> I have examined the issue deeply, and I can only conclude that OO >>>>>> is so fscking popular because people no longer can comprehend >>>>>> hardware. They are lost in the fogs of lofty OO abstractions and >>>>>> cannot perceive the machine. >>>>>> >>>>>> But for me it is quite different. I BEGAN with hardware and assembly >>>>>> language. I BEGAN with an intimate involvement with hardware. As >>>>>> a result I can see nothing but the machine. Oh yes, I can understand >>>>>> all the abstractions but, for me, such abstractions quickly fade into >>>>>> nothing against the blazing image of the machine. >>>>>> >>>>>> When I encounter high level code of any kind, my mind cannot help >>>>>> but to plunge immediately down into the assembly code that underlies >>>>>> it all. Thus, as a consequence, I do not not especially favor >>>>>> the creation of ever higher abstractions that serve only to >>>>>> obliterate and not truly enlighten. >>>>>> >>>>>> It is, I suppose a sickness, but it is a sickness from which no >>>>>> escape, or cure, is possible. >>>>> >>>>> All anyone needs to know is that coding directly in Assembly means that >>>>> your code will take full advantage of the machine's power. No slowdowns, >>>>> just full speed. >>>> >>>> Also will not take advantage of higher level abstractions. There is room for >>>> both. >>>> >>> >>> Why are you even participating in a discussion of programming topics? >>> You have proved many times that you are completely clueless on that >>> subject. >> >> For the same reason snit participates in literally 100 percent of the >> threads here. >> He craves attention and likes to disrupt things. >> You could start a thread about nuclear fission at the molecular level and >> he would invade it. >> >> Probably the only thread Michael Glasser, The Prescott Computer Guy will >> avoid is one related to him getting a job and supporting his family. >> > > Can you imagine what it's like having to live in Prescott AZ, and this > Prescott Computer Guy is the only one you can turn to if you have > computer problems? The guy's never there when you call because he's > out trolling usenet 24/7. Fortunately there is another legitimate computer shop in town. I'll bet they are thrilled that Gluey chose a business name similar to theirs. http://www.prescottcomputer.com -- You Ain't The Biggest Fish In The Crotch.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 7 of 15 — ← Prev page 1 … 5 6 [7] 8 9 … 15 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web