Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #692816 > unrolled thread

Does Curve space Effect neutrinos the Same as all Photons?

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  Does Curve space Effect neutrinos the Same as all Photons? "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2018-07-06 16:10 -0700
    Re: Does Curve space Effect neutrinos the Same as all Photons? "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2018-07-06 16:57 -0700
    Re: Does Curve space Effect neutrinos the Same as all Photons? poraty6@gmail.com - 2018-07-06 17:08 -0700
      Re: Does Curve space Effect neutrinos the Same as all Photons? poraty6@gmail.com - 2018-07-06 22:51 -0700
    Re: Does Curve space Effect neutrinos the Same as all Photons? sam.wormley@gmail.com - 2018-07-07 04:36 -0700
      Re: Does Curve space Effect neutrinos the Same as all Photons? mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-07-07 22:43 -0700
        Re: Does Curve space Effect neutrinos the Same as all Photons? sam.wormley@gmail.com - 2018-07-08 04:55 -0700
          Re: Does Curve space Effect neutrinos the Same as all Photons? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-07-08 06:27 -0700
      Re: Does Curve space Effect neutrinos the Same as all Photons? poraty6@gmail.com - 2018-07-08 06:55 -0700
      Re: Does Curve space Effect neutrinos the Same as all Photons? "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2018-07-08 13:25 -0700
        Re: Does Curve space Effect neutrinos the Same as all Photons? mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-07-08 13:35 -0700
        Re: Does Curve space Effect neutrinos the Same as all Photons? sam.wormley@gmail.com - 2018-07-08 14:55 -0700
          Re: Does Curve space Effect neutrinos the Same as all Photons? "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2018-07-08 15:14 -0700
          Re: Does Curve space Effect neutrinos the Same as all Photons? poraty6@gmail.com - 2018-07-08 18:31 -0700
            Re: Does Curve space Effect neutrinos the Same as all Photons? mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-07-08 20:12 -0700
              Re: Does Curve space Effect neutrinos the Same as all Photons? poraty6@gmail.com - 2018-07-16 02:11 -0700
          Re: Does Curve space Effect neutrinos the Same as all Photons? "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2018-07-09 20:00 -0700
        Re: Does Curve space Effect neutrinos the Same as all Photons? Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2018-07-08 15:27 -0700
          Re: Does Curve space Effect neutrinos the Same as all Photons? "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2018-07-09 20:04 -0700
            Re: Does Curve space Effect neutrinos the Same as all Photons? "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2018-07-09 20:17 -0700
            Re: Does Curve space Effect neutrinos the Same as all Photons? mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-07-09 20:36 -0700
              Re: Does Curve space Effect neutrinos the Same as all Photons? "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2018-07-10 15:50 -0700
                Re: Does Curve space Effect neutrinos the Same as all Photons? mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-07-10 20:08 -0700
                Re: Does Curve space Effect neutrinos the Same as all Photons? "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2018-07-10 21:31 -0700
                Re: Does Curve space Effect neutrinos the Same as all Photons? "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2018-07-15 11:45 -0700
                  Re: Does Curve space Effect neutrinos the Same as all Photons? "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2018-07-15 11:55 -0700
                  Re: Does Curve space Effect neutrinos the Same as all Photons? mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-07-15 13:27 -0700
        Re: Does Curve space Effect neutrinos the Same as all Photons? poraty6@gmail.com - 2018-07-08 18:29 -0700

Page 1 of 2  [1] 2  Next page →

#692816 — Does Curve space Effect neutrinos the Same as all Photons?

My idea is they are treated with less of a curve??? Bert

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#692832

"reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> wrote:
"My idea is they are treated with less of a curve???"
says Bert who will get Nobel-claiming info ASA Bert
answers the post regarding Bert's Light 3" stoppage.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#692835

On Saturday, July 7, 2018 at 2:10:26 AM UTC+3, reber G=emc^2 wrote:
> My idea is they are treated with less of a curve??? Bert

==================
of course no !!
no curvature
and no schmervature !!

==
Y.Porat
=====================

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#692891

On Saturday, July 7, 2018 at 3:08:45 AM UTC+3, por...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Saturday, July 7, 2018 at 2:10:26 AM UTC+3, reber G=emc^2 wrote:
> > My idea is they are treated with less of a curve??? Bert
> 
> ==================
> of course no !!
> no curvature
> and no schmervature !!
> 
> ==
> Y.Porat
> =====================

I mean no  curvature
and no shmrvature  *** of space **!!

it is something else
that has curvature of movement   !!!
TIA
Y.Porat  
=====================

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#692921

On Friday, July 6, 2018 at 6:10:26 PM UTC-5, reber G=emc^2 wrote:
> My idea is they are treated with less of a curve??? Bert

Hey Reber -- All particles (and objects) follow the geodesic of curved space and curved space-time.

Remember, Reber, that charged particles may also be influenced by electrostatic and magnetic fields.

All this has been known for more than a hundred years.

Triple-Star Test Shows Einstein Was Right, Again - Scientific American
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/triple-star-test-shows-einstein-was-right-again/

"The pulsar-white dwarf pair can be considered to be in free fall towards the other white dwarf, because an orbit is just the case of free fall without ever reaching the ground, like satellites around the Earth. Of course, the pulsar and white dwarf are very massive objects themselves, with strong self gravity. General relativity predicts that the accelerations of the white dwarf and pulsar, due to being in free fall towards the outer white dwarf, should be identical—despite differences in mass and self-gravity".

"Combining observations that span six years of monitoring, the astrophysicists carefully modelled the orbits of the pair. They measured a parameter called Delta, which describes the fractional difference between the acceleration of the white dwarf and the more massive pulsar. If general relativity holds, then Delta should be equal to zero. The results indicate that, within the uncertainties of the measurements, the difference in accelerations is indeed statistically consistent with zero—we can say with 95% confidence that Delta is less than 0.0000026."

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#693067

On Saturday, July 7, 2018 at 4:36:31 AM UTC-7, sam.w...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Friday, July 6, 2018 at 6:10:26 PM UTC-5, reber G=emc^2 wrote:
> > My idea is they are treated with less of a curve??? Bert

Light and neutrino curve with a sameness that isn't exact
if they are motion curving to the same curvature in space.
Mathematically if two quantities are different only by
an infinitely small magnitude they share a sameness.
It is why 1/3+1/3+1/3=1 and .333 repeating added 3 times
for .999 repeating gives a sameness that is not exact
or different by only the infinitely small.

Neutrino relates to .999 repeating as light to 1.
They share this mathematical truth.


Mitchell Raemsch

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#693087

              ##                                      # 
              ##                                      # 
              ######################################### 
              ######################################### 
              ##                                 ###### 
              ##                             ########## 
                                           ############ 
                                        ##############
                                      #############
                                   ############# 
                               ##############
                             #############
                          ##############
                        #############
                     ##############
                 #############                        # 
               #############                          # 
              ######################################### 
              ######################################### 
                                                      # 
                                                        
                      ######## 
                   ###############
                 ################## 
                #####################
               ####               ####
               ##                   ## 
              ##                     ##
              ##                     ##
              ##                    ###
               ##                   ## 
               ####               ####
                #####################
                 ################## 
                   ###############
                      ######## 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#693092

Bert- if you can’t figure out when to use ‘affect’ and when to use ‘effect’, you’re not gonna figure out anything else either. Just saying.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#693093

On Saturday, July 7, 2018 at 2:36:31 PM UTC+3, sam.w...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Friday, July 6, 2018 at 6:10:26 PM UTC-5, reber G=emc^2 wrote:
> > My idea is they are treated with less of a curve??? Bert
> 
> Hey Reber -- All particles (and objects) follow the geodesic of curved space and curved space-time.
> 
> Remember, Reber, that charged particles may also be influenced by electrostatic and magnetic fields.
> 
> All this has been known for more than a hundred years.
> 
> Triple-Star Test Shows Einstein Was Right, Again - Scientific American
> https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/triple-star-test-shows-einstein-was-right-again/
> 
> "The pulsar-white dwarf pair can be considered to be in free fall towards the other white dwarf, because an orbit is just the case of free fall without ever reaching the ground, like satellites around the Earth. Of course, the pulsar and white dwarf are very massive objects themselves, with strong self gravity. General relativity predicts that the accelerations of the white dwarf and pulsar, due to being in free fall towards the outer white dwarf, should be identical—despite differences in mass and self-gravity".
> 
> "Combining observations that span six years of monitoring, the astrophysicists carefully modelled the orbits of the pair. They measured a parameter called Delta, which describes the fractional difference between the acceleration of the white dwarf and the more massive pulsar. If general relativity holds, then Delta should be equal to zero. The results indicate that, within the uncertainties of the measurements, the difference in accelerations is indeed statistically consistent with zero—we can say with 95% confidence that Delta is less than 0.0000026."

=================
the ass of your mother is curved !

not space!!
space is nothing !!!!and have no properties 
except hosting  *mass* 
mass is the creator of all forces
including gravity 
is it too much for a parrot like  you 
to learn something new ??
===
Y.Porat
==========================

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#693145

On Saturday, July 7, 2018 at 4:36:31 AM UTC-7, sam.w...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Friday, July 6, 2018 at 6:10:26 PM UTC-5, reber G=emc^2 wrote:
> > My idea is they are treated with less of a curve??? Bert
> 
> Hey Reber -- All particles (and objects) follow the geodesic of curved space and curved space-time.
> 
> Remember, Reber, that charged particles may also be influenced by electrostatic and magnetic fields.
> 
> All this has been known for more than a hundred years.
> 
> Triple-Star Test Shows Einstein Was Right, Again - Scientific American
> https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/triple-star-test-shows-einstein-was-right-again/
> 
> "The pulsar-white dwarf pair can be considered to be in free fall towards the other white dwarf, because an orbit is just the case of free fall without ever reaching the ground, like satellites around the Earth. Of course, the pulsar and white dwarf are very massive objects themselves, with strong self gravity. General relativity predicts that the accelerations of the white dwarf and pulsar, due to being in free fall towards the outer white dwarf, should be identical—despite differences in mass and self-gravity".
> 
> "Combining observations that span six years of monitoring, the astrophysicists carefully modelled the orbits of the pair. They measured a parameter called Delta, which describes the fractional difference between the acceleration of the white dwarf and the more massive pulsar. If general relativity holds, then Delta should be equal to zero. The results indicate that, within the uncertainties of the measurements, the difference in accelerations is indeed statistically consistent with zero—we can say with 95% confidence that Delta is less than 0.0000026."

Photons with so little mass still create their own gravity.This makes gravity a "mutual force" How many photons would it take to equal the gravity force of the Sun?  Can this be possible.I think not.We can measure how much weight the Sun loses by lose of photons per second so maybe its possible.I'll let Witten or Feynman do the math. Bert

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#693147

On Sunday, July 8, 2018 at 1:25:43 PM UTC-7, reber G=emc^2 wrote:
> On Saturday, July 7, 2018 at 4:36:31 AM UTC-7, sam.w...@gmail.com wrote:
> > On Friday, July 6, 2018 at 6:10:26 PM UTC-5, reber G=emc^2 wrote:
> > > My idea is they are treated with less of a curve??? Bert
> > 
> > Hey Reber -- All particles (and objects) follow the geodesic of curved space and curved space-time.
> > 
> > Remember, Reber, that charged particles may also be influenced by electrostatic and magnetic fields.
> > 
> > All this has been known for more than a hundred years.
> > 
> > Triple-Star Test Shows Einstein Was Right, Again - Scientific American
> > https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/triple-star-test-shows-einstein-was-right-again/
> > 
> > "The pulsar-white dwarf pair can be considered to be in free fall towards the other white dwarf, because an orbit is just the case of free fall without ever reaching the ground, like satellites around the Earth. Of course, the pulsar and white dwarf are very massive objects themselves, with strong self gravity. General relativity predicts that the accelerations of the white dwarf and pulsar, due to being in free fall towards the outer white dwarf, should be identical—despite differences in mass and self-gravity".
> > 
> > "Combining observations that span six years of monitoring, the astrophysicists carefully modelled the orbits of the pair. They measured a parameter called Delta, which describes the fractional difference between the acceleration of the white dwarf and the more massive pulsar. If general relativity holds, then Delta should be equal to zero. The results indicate that, within the uncertainties of the measurements, the difference in accelerations is indeed statistically consistent with zero—we can say with 95% confidence that Delta is less than 0.0000026."
> 
> Photons with so little mass still create their own gravity.

Light doesn't have its own gravity. It adds to gravity when
stored in the atom. That is the way it participates in gravity.

Mitchell Raemsch

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#693177

Photons are energy and have equivalent mass m = E/c^2.   You know that, Reber.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#693191

<sam.wormley@gmail.com> wrote to Cretin-SwineBert
aka "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com>:
> Glazier, Photons are energy and have equivalent 
> mass m = E/c^2.   You know that, Reber
>
How can he, when he introduces himself as/with
"I am a proud Marxist/Soros Jew with a IQ of 1-point-22". Bert
"I have a Superiority complex" without any quirks
 which lets me know how everything works." Bert
>
>

hmmm...<snicker> <chuckle> <chortle> ROTFLMAO

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#693232

On Monday, July 9, 2018 at 12:55:53 AM UTC+3, sam.w...@gmail.com wrote:
> Photons are energy and have equivalent mass m = E/c^2.   You know that, 
====================================
there is only one kind   of mass !!!
no equivalent  and  no schivalent mass !!
---
Y.Porat
=====================================

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#693242

On Sunday, July 8, 2018 at 6:31:56 PM UTC-7, por...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Monday, July 9, 2018 at 12:55:53 AM UTC+3, sam.w...@gmail.com wrote:
> > Photons are energy and have equivalent mass m = E/c^2.   You know that, 
> ====================================
> there is only one kind   of mass !!!
> no equivalent  and  no schivalent mass !!
> ---
> Y.Porat
> =====================================

Because neutrino particle and light wave
share a sameness of motion they share a 
a sameness in their curved motion response
to the same curved space.


Mitchell Raemsch

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#694101

On Monday, July 9, 2018 at 6:12:11 AM UTC+3, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Sunday, July 8, 2018 at 6:31:56 PM UTC-7, por...@gmail.com wrote:
> > On Monday, July 9, 2018 at 12:55:53 AM UTC+3, sam.w...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > Photons are energy and have equivalent mass m = E/c^2.   You know that, 
> > ====================================
> > there is only one kind   of mass !!!
> > no equivalent  and  no schivalent mass !!
> > ---
> > Y.Porat
> > =====================================
> 
> Because neutrino particle and light wave
> share a sameness of motion they share a 
> a sameness in their curved motion response
> to the same curved space.
> 
> 
> Mitchell Raemsch
=========================
now a question to you :

why 'curved  space ''' story
DOES NOT APPLY TO  THE  STRONG   FORCESS OF THE NUCLEUS ??!!

TIA
Y.P
=======================================

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#693407

On Sunday, July 8, 2018 at 2:55:53 PM UTC-7, sam.w...@gmail.com wrote:
> Photons are energy and have equivalent mass m = E/c^2.   You know that, Reber.

Yes I know that.They are a wave particle.They fit with my wobble theory showing how waves are created in the quantum realm.That short waves(gamma) are very strong and have energy to kick heavy particles around.I'm working on how spin is used as a way to show what type of photon gets created.Funny this thinking started when I got that toy gyro 82 years ago. I just pulled its original string.Its still has the box too.  I was more clever 82 years ago.I can remember my 8th birthday.Now I have dimentia and can'tremember my 90th birthday.Scary Bert

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#693195

On Sunday, July 8, 2018 at 1:25:43 PM UTC-7, reber G=emc^2 wrote:
> On Saturday, July 7, 2018 at 4:36:31 AM UTC-7, sam.w...@gmail.com wrote:
> > On Friday, July 6, 2018 at 6:10:26 PM UTC-5, reber G=emc^2 wrote:
> > > My idea is they are treated with less of a curve??? Bert
> > 
> > Hey Reber -- All particles (and objects) follow the geodesic of curved space and curved space-time.
> > 
> > Remember, Reber, that charged particles may also be influenced by electrostatic and magnetic fields.
> > 
> > All this has been known for more than a hundred years.
> > 
> > Triple-Star Test Shows Einstein Was Right, Again - Scientific American
> > https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/triple-star-test-shows-einstein-was-right-again/
> > 
> > "The pulsar-white dwarf pair can be considered to be in free fall towards the other white dwarf, because an orbit is just the case of free fall without ever reaching the ground, like satellites around the Earth. Of course, the pulsar and white dwarf are very massive objects themselves, with strong self gravity. General relativity predicts that the accelerations of the white dwarf and pulsar, due to being in free fall towards the outer white dwarf, should be identical—despite differences in mass and self-gravity".
> > 
> > "Combining observations that span six years of monitoring, the astrophysicists carefully modelled the orbits of the pair. They measured a parameter called Delta, which describes the fractional difference between the acceleration of the white dwarf and the more massive pulsar. If general relativity holds, then Delta should be equal to zero. The results indicate that, within the uncertainties of the measurements, the difference in accelerations is indeed statistically consistent with zero—we can say with 95% confidence that Delta is less than 0.0000026."
> 
> Photons with so little mass still create their own gravity.This makes gravity a "mutual force" How many photons would it take to equal the gravity force of the Sun?  Can this be possible.I think not.We can measure how much weight the Sun loses by lose of photons per second so maybe its possible.I'll let Witten or Feynman do the math. Bert


Or let Google do the math:

"The Sun loses 4 million tons of mass per second due to fusion." - Google.

Double-A

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#693408

On Sunday, July 8, 2018 at 3:27:13 PM UTC-7, Double-A wrote:
> On Sunday, July 8, 2018 at 1:25:43 PM UTC-7, reber G=emc^2 wrote:
> > On Saturday, July 7, 2018 at 4:36:31 AM UTC-7, sam.w...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > On Friday, July 6, 2018 at 6:10:26 PM UTC-5, reber G=emc^2 wrote:
> > > > My idea is they are treated with less of a curve??? Bert
> > > 
> > > Hey Reber -- All particles (and objects) follow the geodesic of curved space and curved space-time.
> > > 
> > > Remember, Reber, that charged particles may also be influenced by electrostatic and magnetic fields.
> > > 
> > > All this has been known for more than a hundred years.
> > > 
> > > Triple-Star Test Shows Einstein Was Right, Again - Scientific American
> > > https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/triple-star-test-shows-einstein-was-right-again/
> > > 
> > > "The pulsar-white dwarf pair can be considered to be in free fall towards the other white dwarf, because an orbit is just the case of free fall without ever reaching the ground, like satellites around the Earth. Of course, the pulsar and white dwarf are very massive objects themselves, with strong self gravity. General relativity predicts that the accelerations of the white dwarf and pulsar, due to being in free fall towards the outer white dwarf, should be identical—despite differences in mass and self-gravity".
> > > 
> > > "Combining observations that span six years of monitoring, the astrophysicists carefully modelled the orbits of the pair. They measured a parameter called Delta, which describes the fractional difference between the acceleration of the white dwarf and the more massive pulsar. If general relativity holds, then Delta should be equal to zero. The results indicate that, within the uncertainties of the measurements, the difference in accelerations is indeed statistically consistent with zero—we can say with 95% confidence that Delta is less than 0.0000026."
> > 
> > Photons with so little mass still create their own gravity.This makes gravity a "mutual force" How many photons would it take to equal the gravity force of the Sun?  Can this be possible.I think not.We can measure how much weight the Sun loses by lose of photons per second so maybe its possible.I'll let Witten or Feynman do the math. Bert
> 
> 
> Or let Google do the math:
> 
> "The Sun loses 4 million tons of mass per second due to fusion." - Google.
> 
> Double-A

Most of that is photons of every type.Heat photons hit earth and are the most important.  Bert Still its good they obey the inverse square law.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#693417

"reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> wrote
"I have dimentia and can'tremember my 90th birthday."
"Scary" says Bert who lies since SwineBert read
something he posted but SwineBert does-not-want-
others-to-see  {{see items (1) to (5) below}} ...
>
So Bert quickly morphed & behaved like a dog that
tries to bury his OWN shit, by Bert attempting
to cover-up and refusing to EXPLAIN why Bert posted
 the following:
>
(1)
On 07Feb 2015 & on 08Feb2015, Face-Shitter Glazier wrote:
Harlow Campbell HVAC, Mr.HVAC@gmail.com,
& Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net
& Jacoby Benj, <nobody@gmail.com>:
"I'll be sitting on your faces to take a shit & say: "Open wide".
<http://pbs.twimg.com/media/A8MGOU-CQAEaZw4.jpg>
>
(2)
On 06Dec2014, when the Christian-Hater, JewPigBert Glazier
said to "benj" <nobody@gmail.com>:
"Reality is you always post under me for you are an ass kisser.
For Christmas I'll shit on your kisser."
<http://pbs.twimg.com/media/A8MGOU-CQAEaZw4.jpg>
"Benj, you can thank me in advance". - TreBert. ... addinng
>
(3)
On 03Aug2017:
"benj, you eat shit and your shitty brain is coming out your ears."
>
(4)
On 25Mar2008, Graveyard Vandal Glazier wrote in:
<https://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/3ffe7b2257cf8a9a>
<https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/sci.physics/uYtpFTRnW4k/morPVyJ7_j8J>
"Hanson, I will piss on your grave. And have a good laugh
when it seeps down on your face". --  Bert
>
(5)
On 24Jun2018 SwineBert Glazier said to
Mark Earnest <gmearnest@att.net> "your nose is
in a shit bucket all the time. Eat shit and you fit" -- Bert

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 1 of 2  [1] 2  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web