Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #527061 > unrolled thread

Are there any time capsules on the Moon?

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  Are there any time capsules on the Moon? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-10-20 11:48 -0700
    Re: Are there any time capsules on the Moon? "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-10-20 12:22 -0700
      Re: Are there any time capsules on the Moon? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-10-20 19:50 -0700
        Re: Are there any time capsules on the Moon? gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> - 2015-10-21 10:30 -0500
        Re: Are there any time capsules on the Moon? Robert Bannister <robban@clubtelco.com> - 2015-10-22 09:08 +0800
          Re: Are there any time capsules on the Moon? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-10-21 20:25 -0700
            Re: Are there any time capsules on the Moon? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-10-22 13:28 -0700
              Re: Are there any time capsules on the Moon? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-10-22 23:32 -0700
              Re: Are there any time capsules on the Moon? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-10-22 23:48 -0700
              Re: Are there any time capsules on the Moon? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-10-23 00:08 -0700
      Re: Are there any time capsules on the Moon? "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-10-24 13:47 -0700
        Re: Are there any time capsules on the Moon? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-10-24 14:26 -0700
          Re: Are there any time capsules on the Moon? Chrysi Cat <chrysicat@gmail.com> - 2015-10-30 03:31 -0600
            Re: Are there any time capsules on the Moon? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-10-30 18:59 +0100
          Re: Are there any time capsules on the Moon? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-10-31 11:49 -0800
            Re: Are there any time capsules on the Moon? Wayne Olmstead <wayols@eclipseevenet.org> - 2015-10-31 18:53 +0000
              Re: Are there any time capsules on the Moon? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-10-31 19:11 +0000
                Re: Are there any time capsules on the Moon? Wayne Olmstead <wayols@eclipseevenet.org> - 2015-10-31 20:01 +0000
                  Re: Are there any time capsules on the Moon? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-10-31 23:52 +0000
                    Re: Are there any time capsules on the Moon? Wayne Olmstead <wayols@eclipseevenet.org> - 2015-11-01 14:47 +0000
                      Re: Are there any time capsules on the Moon? kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-11-01 10:09 -0500
                        Re: Are there any time capsules on the Moon? Wayne Olmstead <wayols@eclipseevenet.org> - 2015-11-01 15:30 +0000
                          Re: Are there any time capsules on the Moon? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-01 17:14 +0000
                          Re: Are there any time capsules on the Moon? kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-11-01 12:44 -0500
                            Re: Are there any time capsules on the Moon? Wayne Olmstead <wayols@eclipseevenet.org> - 2015-11-01 17:50 +0000
                        Re: Are there any time capsules on the Moon? Wayne Olmstead <wayols@eclipseevenet.org> - 2015-11-01 15:43 +0000
                          Re: Are there any time capsules on the Moon? Wayne Olmstead <wayols@eclipseevenet.org> - 2015-11-01 15:51 +0000
                        Re: Are there any time capsules on the Moon? Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-11-01 09:23 -0800
                          Re: Are there any time capsules on the Moon? Wayne Olmstead <wayols@eclipseevenet.org> - 2015-11-01 17:47 +0000
                            Re: Are there any time capsules on the Moon? Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-11-01 11:08 -0800
                            Re: Are there any time capsules on the Moon? kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-11-01 15:30 -0500
                              Re: Are there any time capsules on the Moon? Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-11-01 14:09 -0800
                      Re: Are there any time capsules on the Moon? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-01 17:13 +0000
              Re: Are there any time capsules on the Moon? kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-10-31 15:58 -0400
                Re: Are there any time capsules on the Moon? Wayne Olmstead <wayols@eclipseevenet.org> - 2015-10-31 20:02 +0000
                  Re: Are there any time capsules on the Moon? kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-10-31 20:11 -0400
    Re: Are there any time capsules on the Moon? Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2015-10-21 14:43 +1100
      Re: Are there any time capsules on the Moon? Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2015-10-21 22:43 -0600

Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]

#529696

On Sun, 1 Nov 2015 14:47:26 +0000 (UTC), Wayne Olmstead
<wayols@eclipseevenet.org> wrote:

>jimp wrote:
>
>>>> The message was the the USA was more advanced then the USSR.
>>> 
>>> How come when CCCP was the first in space exploration. And if no flag
>>> is to be found over there, then you admit you are a batshit crazy.
>> 
>> In the English alphabet, the abbreviation for the Soviet Union is USSR.
>> 
>> The early achiements of the USSR were far over shadowed by the Apollo
>> missions.
>
>You are indeed batshit crazy. The CCCPs was the first landing on Lunar 
>soil already from '59. Educate yourself if possible. But most of all, stop 
>spreading lies.
>
>http://www.lunarland.com/luna-moon-missions/

        Moron nym-changing troll, too stupid to know
the difference between "land" and "impact".

        It isn't a language problem, it a brain
deficiency.

        Everybody knows the reason the Soviet
Union had advanced rocket technology was
because they enslaved the population with
war material production at the expense of
domestic products badly needed.



>"Luna 2
>Successful lunar impactor (CCCP)
>Launched: September 12, 1959
>Lunar impact: September 14, 1959
>Luna 2 was the first spacecraft to land on another celestial body. |The 
>spacecraft impacted on the Moon's surface just east of the Sea of Serenity 
>near the craters Aristides, Archimedes, and Autolycus. The spacecraft did 
>not detect a magnetic field around the Moon."
>
>"Luna 16
>Successful lunar sample return (CCCP)
>Launched: September 12, 1970
>Lunar landing: September 20, 1970
>Returned to Earth: September 24, 1970
>Luna 16 was the first robotic mission to land on the Moon, collect samples 
>of dust and rock, and return those samples to Earth. Luna 16 was also the 
>first spacecraft to land in the lunar darkness. The spacecraft landed in 
>the Sea of Fertility. After collecting dust and rock samples, the 
>spacecraft was launched back into space 26 hours later. It returned to 
>Earth with a soft landing on bringing back 101 grams of Moon rocks."

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#529700

kefischer wrote:

> <wayols@eclipseevenet.org> wrote:
> 
>>jimp wrote:
>>
>>>>> The message was the the USA was more advanced then the USSR.
>>>> 
>>>> How come when CCCP was the first in space exploration. And if no flag
>>>> is to be found over there, then you admit you are a batshit crazy.
>>> 
>>> In the English alphabet, the abbreviation for the Soviet Union is
>>> USSR.
>>> 
>>> The early achiements of the USSR were far over shadowed by the Apollo
>>> missions.
>>
>>You are indeed batshit crazy. The CCCPs was the first landing on Lunar
>>soil already from '59. Educate yourself if possible. But most of all,
>>stop spreading lies.
>>
>>http://www.lunarland.com/luna-moon-missions/
> 
>         Moron nym-changing troll, too stupid to know
> the difference between "land" and "impact".

You sounds like a stupid piano mechanic. Can't you read carefully the 
quotes given? The brought Lunar Soil home, you stupid mechanic.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#529714

In sci.physics Wayne Olmstead <wayols@eclipseevenet.org> wrote:
> kefischer wrote:
> 
>> <wayols@eclipseevenet.org> wrote:
>> 
>>>jimp wrote:
>>>
>>>>>> The message was the the USA was more advanced then the USSR.
>>>>> 
>>>>> How come when CCCP was the first in space exploration. And if no flag
>>>>> is to be found over there, then you admit you are a batshit crazy.
>>>> 
>>>> In the English alphabet, the abbreviation for the Soviet Union is
>>>> USSR.
>>>> 
>>>> The early achiements of the USSR were far over shadowed by the Apollo
>>>> missions.
>>>
>>>You are indeed batshit crazy. The CCCPs was the first landing on Lunar
>>>soil already from '59. Educate yourself if possible. But most of all,
>>>stop spreading lies.
>>>
>>>http://www.lunarland.com/luna-moon-missions/
>> 
>>         Moron nym-changing troll, too stupid to know
>> the difference between "land" and "impact".
> 
> You sounds like a stupid piano mechanic. Can't you read carefully the 
> quotes given? The brought Lunar Soil home, you stupid mechanic.

They didn't bring any humans home, did they?


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#529719

On Sun, 1 Nov 2015 15:30:39 +0000 (UTC), Wayne Olmstead
<wayols@eclipseevenet.org> wrote:

>kefischer wrote:
>
>> <wayols@eclipseevenet.org> wrote:
>> 
>>>jimp wrote:
>>>
>>>>>> The message was the the USA was more advanced then the USSR.
>>>>> 
>>>>> How come when CCCP was the first in space exploration. And if no flag
>>>>> is to be found over there, then you admit you are a batshit crazy.
>>>> 
>>>> In the English alphabet, the abbreviation for the Soviet Union is
>>>> USSR.
>>>> 
>>>> The early achiements of the USSR were far over shadowed by the Apollo
>>>> missions.
>>>
>>>You are indeed batshit crazy. The CCCPs was the first landing on Lunar
>>>soil already from '59. Educate yourself if possible. But most of all,
>>>stop spreading lies.
>>>
>>>http://www.lunarland.com/luna-moon-missions/
>> 
>>         Moron nym-changing troll, too stupid to know
>> the difference between "land" and "impact".
>
>You sounds like a stupid piano mechanic. Can't you read carefully the 
>quotes given? The brought Lunar Soil home, you stupid mechanic.

        Not in 1959, stupid moron troll, and
never landed men on the moon at all.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#529721

kefischer wrote:

>         Not in 1959, stupid moron troll, and
> never landed men on the moon at all.

Right, this due to those obvious difficulties. Today they dominate space 
exploration, if I'm not very mistaken at all. Why did you brought it up, 
that thing with "landing men on Moon"? Any evidences? If not, good bye.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#529703

kefischer wrote:

>         Everybody knows the reason the Soviet
> Union had advanced rocket technology was because they enslaved the
> population with war material production at the expense of domestic
> products badly needed.

Just stop talking about enslavement, you stupid mechanical piano mover. No 
one is more enslaved than those believing they are not enslaved.

Speaking the witch, you had regularly 3 or more jobs at that time,  just 
to make a reasonable living. Meanwhile in CCCP you had 
  
    8 hours work
    8 hours free (entertainment)
    8 hour sleep 

GUARANTEED by the constitution. Beside affordable goods, high living 
standards and more. You may just dream, but you NEVER will achieve such 
standard.

You know nothing about Divergent Matter, and that you know, you know it 
wrong.

Film: See YUGOSLAVIA (CBS 1986 - must see) 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nYLpDH8lQ1o

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#529705

Wayne Olmstead wrote:

> kefischer wrote:
> 
>>         Everybody knows the reason the Soviet
>> Union had advanced rocket technology was because they enslaved the
>> population with war material production at the expense of domestic
>> products badly needed.
> 
> Just stop talking about enslavement, you stupid mechanical piano mover.
> No one is more enslaved than those believing they are not enslaved.
> 
> Speaking the witch, you had regularly 3 or more jobs at that time,  just
> to make a reasonable living. Meanwhile in CCCP you had
>   
>     8 hours work 8 hours free (entertainment)
>     8 hour sleep
> 
> GUARANTEED by the constitution. Beside affordable goods, high living
> standards and more. You may just dream, but you NEVER will achieve such
> standard.
> 
> You know nothing about Divergent Matter, and that you know, you know it
> wrong.
> 
> Film: See YUGOSLAVIA (CBS 1986 - must see)
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nYLpDH8lQ1o

hahaha, watch this kefisher, lol

"Houston, we have a problem!" (Yugoslavian space program) trailer 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EfJiNPZ38kY

Even the yugoslavs were on Moon before. This explain alot, immeasurable 
many things.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#529715

On Sunday, November 1, 2015 at 10:09:07 AM UTC-5, kefischer wrote:
> On Sun, 1 Nov 2015 14:47:26 +0000 (UTC), Wayne Olmstead
> <wayols@eclipseevenet.org> wrote:
> 
> >jimp wrote:
> >
> >>>> The message was the the USA was more advanced then the USSR.
> >>> 
> >>> How come when CCCP was the first in space exploration. And if no flag
> >>> is to be found over there, then you admit you are a batshit crazy.
> >> 
> >> In the English alphabet, the abbreviation for the Soviet Union is USSR.
> >> 
> >> The early achiements of the USSR were far over shadowed by the Apollo
> >> missions.
> >
> >You are indeed batshit crazy. The CCCPs was the first landing on Lunar 
> >soil already from '59. Educate yourself if possible. But most of all, stop 
> >spreading lies.
> >
> >http://www.lunarland.com/luna-moon-missions/

Since acronyms are being thrown around, and where would NASA be
without them?! I used to work in Aerospace. At GSFC, MD. At GE
Astrospace, East Windsor NJ, though they used a Princeton P.O.Box
address for better marketing purposes. Space travel and its addresses
can be a bitch. Since my security level clearance was less than
stellar, I blame it on my good looks and long free HAIR, I only got
invited to open to public lectures at 3PM Fridays @Greenbelt. I went.

In retrospect, the 3PM Fridays time slot just might've been to make
sure none of the wage enslaved employees left early for HOME for their
weekends.

>         Moron nym-changing troll, too stupid to know
> the difference between "land" and "impact".

Big fan I of preventing nym-shifting, by all means.
Then people can be jerks face-to-face, not just anonymously.

How is returned with "...101 grams of Moon rocks" a words' meaning
problem?

>         It isn't a language problem, it a brain
> deficiency.

There should be an 'is' in your sentence somewhere. I won't point out
where, since you'll just call me names.

>         Everybody knows the reason the Soviet
> Union had advanced rocket technology was
> because they enslaved the population with
> war material production at the expense of
> domestic products badly needed.

That is such a false dichotomy. Let's see... you all my starving
children, and my loving pregnant Vodka loving women, we can all eat
tonight, or we can send grandma to planet Venus or that ...feh... Rock
Pluto for The Holidays in a big tin rocket? Secret ballot is now
open. Two minute countdown. Go! Vote by breadcrumbs only. Go!

> >"Luna 2
> >Successful lunar impactor (CCCP)
> >Launched: September 12, 1959
> >Lunar impact: September 14, 1959
> >Luna 2 was the first spacecraft to land on another celestial body. |The 
> >spacecraft impacted on the Moon's surface just east of the Sea of Serenity 
> >near the craters Aristides, Archimedes, and Autolycus. The spacecraft did 
> >not detect a magnetic field around the Moon."
> >
> >"Luna 16
> >Successful lunar sample return (CCCP)
> >Launched: September 12, 1970
> >Lunar landing: September 20, 1970
> >Returned to Earth: September 24, 1970
> >Luna 16 was the first robotic mission to land on the Moon, collect samples 
> >of dust and rock, and return those samples to Earth. Luna 16 was also the 
> >first spacecraft to land in the lunar darkness. The spacecraft landed in 
> >the Sea of Fertility. After collecting dust and rock samples, the 
> >spacecraft was launched back into space 26 hours later. It returned to 
> >Earth with a soft landing on bringing back 101 grams of Moon rocks."

Bottom line, USA has a first and only first mental blind spot
disposition. When they win their football, they're World Champions. 
Nevermind nobody country really else plays their version of Football.

Second, when USA does finally, year 3210 I predict, Discover, Invent,
Create, Engineer (DICE) highspeed transport via magnetically levitated
trains, they will make certain everyone knows how they were First #1!

-- Mahipal "Perhaps there's a reason I'm USA security clearance challenged?!"

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#529720

Mahipal wrote:

>> >"Luna 16 Successful lunar sample return (CCCP)
>> >Launched: September 12, 1970 Lunar landing: September 20, 1970
>> >Returned to Earth: September 24, 1970 Luna 16 was the first robotic
>> >mission to land on the Moon, collect samples of dust and rock, and
>> >return those samples to Earth. Luna 16 was also the first spacecraft
>> >to land in the lunar darkness. The spacecraft landed in the Sea of
>> >Fertility. After collecting dust and rock samples, the spacecraft was
>> >launched back into space 26 hours later. It returned to Earth with a
>> >soft landing on bringing back 101 grams of Moon rocks."
> 
> Bottom line, USA has a first and only first mental blind spot
> disposition.
> When they win their football, they're World Champions. Nevermind nobody
> country really else plays their version of Football.
> 
> Second, when USA does finally, year 3210 I predict, Discover, Invent,
> Create, Engineer (DICE) highspeed transport via magnetically levitated
> trains, they will make certain everyone knows how they were First #1!

If I'm not very mistaken, before Nicola Tesla, an Yugoslavian, America was 
a capitalist 3rd world country. Tesla brought electricity, factory 
machinery and sanitation. Then he died very poor.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#529738

On Sunday, November 1, 2015 at 12:47:12 PM UTC-5, Wayne Olmstead wrote:
> Mahipal wrote:
> 
> >> >"Luna 16 Successful lunar sample return (CCCP)
> >> >Launched: September 12, 1970 Lunar landing: September 20, 1970
> >> >Returned to Earth: September 24, 1970 Luna 16 was the first robotic
> >> >mission to land on the Moon, collect samples of dust and rock, and
> >> >return those samples to Earth. Luna 16 was also the first spacecraft
> >> >to land in the lunar darkness. The spacecraft landed in the Sea of
> >> >Fertility. After collecting dust and rock samples, the spacecraft was
> >> >launched back into space 26 hours later. It returned to Earth with a
> >> >soft landing on bringing back 101 grams of Moon rocks."
> > 
> > Bottom line, USA has a first and only first mental blind spot
> > disposition.
> > When they win their football, they're World Champions. Nevermind nobody
> > country really else plays their version of Football.
> > 
> > Second, when USA does finally, year 3210 I predict, Discover, Invent,
> > Create, Engineer (DICE) highspeed transport via magnetically levitated
> > trains, they will make certain everyone knows how they were First #1!
> 
> If I'm not very mistaken, before Nicola Tesla, an Yugoslavian, America was 
> a capitalist 3rd world country. Tesla brought electricity, factory 
> machinery and sanitation. Then he died very poor.

One of my favorite short stories is 'The Measure Of Man' of a Russian
wealthy man and his servant slave butler. I tried search for it
online, but that string is hijacked by everyone calling themselves a
writer. It's outside me hands. Anywho... per Wikipedia:

Tesla, Nikola |ˈteslə|
(1856–1943), US electrical engineer and inventor, born in what is now
Croatia. He developed the first alternating-current induction motor,
as well as several forms of oscillators, the tesla coil, and a
wireless guidance system for ships.

Since country borders shift faster than amBushEd USA Presidents --
former or otherwise -- can change their diapers, I am not certain of
Nikola's origins. Tesla is most definitely a world class genius! Too
bad and sad Nikola got caught in the middle of Greed4Green(TM, SM, and
Tesla@#) centric Edison and Westinghouse. The greedy cannibalistic
businessmen ate Tesla's ass for breakfast and munched out on his sushi
like bird brain's ideas like they owned all the money. Which,
apparently, they actually did. Own the money, not Tesla's ideas. Yes,
Nikola died poor and alone in a NYC hotel room, which I ought have
visited. Perhaps will. You'd think billionaires would have the good
sense, the common courtesy, to help the hand that fed their greed. But
no. Life is so much fun Fun FUN F=uN!

-- Mahipal 'History is revising rewriting The Measures of Tesla!'

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#529761

On Sun, 1 Nov 2015 17:47:07 +0000 (UTC), Wayne Olmstead
<wayols@eclipseevenet.org> wrote:

>Mahipal wrote:
>
>>> >"Luna 16 Successful lunar sample return (CCCP)
>>> >Launched: September 12, 1970 Lunar landing: September 20, 1970
>>> >Returned to Earth: September 24, 1970 Luna 16 was the first robotic
>>> >mission to land on the Moon, collect samples of dust and rock, and
>>> >return those samples to Earth. Luna 16 was also the first spacecraft
>>> >to land in the lunar darkness. The spacecraft landed in the Sea of
>>> >Fertility. After collecting dust and rock samples, the spacecraft was
>>> >launched back into space 26 hours later. It returned to Earth with a
>>> >soft landing on bringing back 101 grams of Moon rocks."
>> 
>> Bottom line, USA has a first and only first mental blind spot
>> disposition.
>> When they win their football, they're World Champions. Nevermind nobody
>> country really else plays their version of Football.
>> 
>> Second, when USA does finally, year 3210 I predict, Discover, Invent,
>> Create, Engineer (DICE) highspeed transport via magnetically levitated
>> trains, they will make certain everyone knows how they were First #1!
>
>If I'm not very mistaken, before Nicola Tesla, an Yugoslavian, America was 
>a capitalist 3rd world country. Tesla brought electricity, factory 
>machinery and sanitation. Then he died very poor.

        Too bad he was fixated on wireless power,
it ain't gonna happen, ever.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#529783

On Sunday, November 1, 2015 at 3:30:22 PM UTC-5, kefischer wrote:
> On Sun, 1 Nov 2015 17:47:07 +0000 (UTC), Wayne Olmstead
> <wayols@eclipseevenet.org> wrote:
> 
> >Mahipal wrote:
> >
> >>> >"Luna 16 Successful lunar sample return (CCCP)
> >>> >Launched: September 12, 1970 Lunar landing: September 20, 1970
> >>> >Returned to Earth: September 24, 1970 Luna 16 was the first robotic
> >>> >mission to land on the Moon, collect samples of dust and rock, and
> >>> >return those samples to Earth. Luna 16 was also the first spacecraft
> >>> >to land in the lunar darkness. The spacecraft landed in the Sea of
> >>> >Fertility. After collecting dust and rock samples, the spacecraft was
> >>> >launched back into space 26 hours later. It returned to Earth with a
> >>> >soft landing on bringing back 101 grams of Moon rocks."
> >> 
> >> Bottom line, USA has a first and only first mental blind spot
> >> disposition.
> >> When they win their football, they're World Champions. Nevermind nobody
> >> country really else plays their version of Football.
> >> 
> >> Second, when USA does finally, year 3210 I predict, Discover, Invent,
> >> Create, Engineer (DICE) highspeed transport via magnetically levitated
> >> trains, they will make certain everyone knows how they were First #1!
> >
> >If I'm not very mistaken, before Nicola Tesla, an Yugoslavian, America was 
> >a capitalist 3rd world country. Tesla brought electricity, factory 
> >machinery and sanitation. Then he died very poor.
> 
>         Too bad he was fixated on wireless power,
> it ain't gonna happen, ever.

Are you related to Bobby Fischer, kefischer?

-- Mahipal

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#529713

In sci.physics Wayne Olmstead <wayols@eclipseevenet.org> wrote:
> jimp wrote:
> 
>>>> The message was the the USA was more advanced then the USSR.
>>> 
>>> How come when CCCP was the first in space exploration. And if no flag
>>> is to be found over there, then you admit you are a batshit crazy.
>> 
>> In the English alphabet, the abbreviation for the Soviet Union is USSR.
>> 
>> The early achiements of the USSR were far over shadowed by the Apollo
>> missions.
> 
> You are indeed batshit crazy. The CCCPs was the first landing on Lunar 
> soil already from '59. Educate yourself if possible. But most of all, stop 
> spreading lies.
> 
> http://www.lunarland.com/luna-moon-missions/
> 
> "Luna 2
> Successful lunar impactor (CCCP)
> Launched: September 12, 1959
> Lunar impact: September 14, 1959
> Luna 2 was the first spacecraft to land on another celestial body. |The 
> spacecraft impacted on the Moon's surface just east of the Sea of Serenity 
> near the craters Aristides, Archimedes, and Autolycus. The spacecraft did 
> not detect a magnetic field around the Moon."
> 
> "Luna 16
> Successful lunar sample return (CCCP)
> Launched: September 12, 1970
> Lunar landing: September 20, 1970
> Returned to Earth: September 24, 1970
> Luna 16 was the first robotic mission to land on the Moon, collect samples 
> of dust and rock, and return those samples to Earth. Luna 16 was also the 
> first spacecraft to land in the lunar darkness. The spacecraft landed in 
> the Sea of Fertility. After collecting dust and rock samples, the 
> spacecraft was launched back into space 26 hours later. It returned to 
> Earth with a soft landing on bringing back 101 grams of Moon rocks."

Once again, the abbreviation for the Soviet Union in the English
alphabet is USSR.

There is a huge difference between impacting, or even landing, a probe
somewhere and landing and returning human beings.

You did not read any of the links I provided, did you?

You were not old enough to understand global politics and the Cold War
at the time of Apollo, were you?

You have not bothered to read the political history of the times, have you?


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#529490

On Sat, 31 Oct 2015 18:53:27 +0000 (UTC), Wayne Olmstead
<wayols@eclipseevenet.org> wrote:

>The Starmaker wrote:
>
>> It would have been much much better if they simply left a copy of
>> Playboy magazine lying there. "Take me to your Playboy mansion!"
>
>What I find intriguing is the claim of a "giant step for the mankind". 
>Then they planted the US flag in the ground. (for whatever obscure 
>reason). What's the message, the ones outside US are not mankind?

http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/apollo/apollo11.html

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#529494

kefischer wrote:

> On Sat, 31 Oct 2015 18:53:27 +0000 (UTC), Wayne Olmstead
> <wayols@eclipseevenet.org> wrote:
> 
>>The Starmaker wrote:
>>
>>> It would have been much much better if they simply left a copy of
>>> Playboy magazine lying there. "Take me to your Playboy mansion!"
>>
>>What I find intriguing is the claim of a "giant step for the mankind".
>>Then they planted the US flag in the ground. (for whatever obscure
>>reason). What's the message, the ones outside US are not mankind?
> 
> http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/apollo/apollo11.html

Intriguing, thanks.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#529576

On Sat, 31 Oct 2015 20:02:38 +0000 (UTC), Wayne Olmstead
<wayols@eclipseevenet.org> wrote:

>kefischer wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 31 Oct 2015 18:53:27 +0000 (UTC), Wayne Olmstead
>> <wayols@eclipseevenet.org> wrote:
>> 
>>>The Starmaker wrote:
>>>
>>>> It would have been much much better if they simply left a copy of
>>>> Playboy magazine lying there. "Take me to your Playboy mansion!"
>>>
>>>What I find intriguing is the claim of a "giant step for the mankind".
>>>Then they planted the US flag in the ground. (for whatever obscure
>>>reason). What's the message, the ones outside US are not mankind?
>> 
>> http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/apollo/apollo11.html
>
>Intriguing, thanks.

        Giant  LEAP.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#527165

On 21/10/2015 5:48 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
> Are there any time capsules on the Moon?
>
>
> i hope it isn't buried...how would anyone find it?
>

 From its huge anomalous magnetic field.

Oh, no wait, that was a movie.

Sylvia.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#527385

Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> wrote:

>On 21/10/2015 5:48 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
>> Are there any time capsules on the Moon?
>>
>>
>> i hope it isn't buried...how would anyone find it?
>>
>
> From its huge anomalous magnetic field.
>
>Oh, no wait, that was a movie.

I think that they also used a similar technique on someone else's moon
in a half-Niven book.
-- 
We are geeks.  Resistance is voltage over current.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web