Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #540663 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-12-21 13:42 -0600 |
| Last post | 2015-12-22 23:34 +0000 |
| Articles | 8 on this page of 28 — 9 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
Limiting Global Warming Will be Hard, But Hardly Impossible Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-21 13:42 -0600
Re: Limiting Global Warming Will be Hard, But Hardly Impossible Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-12-21 14:15 -0600
Re: Limiting Global Warming Will be Hard, But Hardly Impossible jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-12-21 21:23 +0000
Re: Limiting Global Warming Will be Hard, But Hardly Impossible pnalsing@gmail.com - 2015-12-21 18:08 -0800
Re: Limiting Global Warming Will be Hard, But Hardly Impossible benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-12-21 21:11 -0500
Re: Limiting Global Warming Will be Hard, But Hardly Impossible jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-12-22 03:31 +0000
Re: Limiting Global Warming Will be Hard, But Hardly Impossible Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-22 16:31 -0600
Re: Limiting Global Warming Will be Hard, But Hardly Impossible jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-12-22 23:31 +0000
Re: Limiting Global Warming Will be Hard, But Hardly Impossible "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-12-21 16:43 -0800
Re: Limiting Global Warming Will be Hard, But Hardly Impossible john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-12-21 17:14 -0800
Re: Limiting Global Warming Will be Hard, But Hardly Impossible jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-12-22 02:10 +0000
Re: Limiting Global Warming Will be Hard, But Hardly Impossible Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-21 22:36 -0600
Re: Limiting Global Warming Will be Hard, But Hardly Impossible jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-12-22 06:06 +0000
Re: Limiting Global Warming Will be Hard, But Hardly Impossible Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-22 12:13 -0600
Re: Limiting Global Warming Will be Hard, But Hardly Impossible Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-12-22 09:28 -0600
Re: Limiting Global Warming Will be Hard, But Hardly Impossible jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-12-22 01:14 +0000
Re: Limiting Global Warming Will be Hard, But Hardly Impossible "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-12-22 12:12 -0800
Re: Limiting Global Warming Will be Hard, But Hardly Impossible jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-12-22 20:23 +0000
Re: Limiting Global Warming Will be Hard, But Hardly Impossible "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-12-22 13:11 -0800
Re: Limiting Global Warming Will be Hard, But Hardly Impossible Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-21 22:35 -0600
Re: Limiting Global Warming Will be Hard, But Hardly Impossible "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-12-22 12:27 -0800
Re: Limiting Global Warming Will be Hard, But Hardly Impossible Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2015-12-22 09:16 -0500
Re: Limiting Global Warming Will be Hard, But Hardly Impossible Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2015-12-22 12:41 -0800
Re: Limiting Global Warming Will be Hard, But Hardly Impossible jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-12-22 20:48 +0000
Re: Limiting Global Warming Will be Hard, But Hardly Impossible "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-12-22 13:11 -0800
Re: Limiting Global Warming Will be Hard, But Hardly Impossible jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-12-22 23:33 +0000
Re: Limiting Global Warming Will be Hard, But Hardly Impossible Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-22 16:35 -0600
Re: Limiting Global Warming Will be Hard, But Hardly Impossible jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-12-22 23:34 +0000
Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]
| From | "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-22 12:27 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <20a12890-ee9b-4b69-a59c-4f368e43b228@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #540754 |
On Monday, December 21, 2015 at 8:35:11 PM UTC-8, Sam Wormley wrote: > On 12/21/15 6:43 PM, reber g=emc^2 wrote: > > > > 2016 will be hot and dry. > > Yawn. > > > -- > > sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated > to the discussion of physics, news from the physics > community, and physics-related social issues. Second day it rained and one more rainy day and my 3 day rain prediction came to pass.When your good your good O ya TreBert
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-22 09:16 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <7lmi7bhhm76hdv1dqa5a0ch106hvvapj52@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #540663 |
On Mon, 21 Dec 2015 13:42:03 -0600, Sam Wormley wrote: >Limiting Global Warming Will be Hard, But Hardly Impossible ... or desirable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-22 12:41 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <693633c0-4244-425c-9eb1-f3e74cea88d0@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #540663 |
On Monday, December 21, 2015 at 11:42:08 AM UTC-8, Sam Wormley wrote: > Limiting Global Warming Will be Hard, But Hardly Impossible > > http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/guest-blog/limiting-global-warming-will-be-hard-but-hardly-impossible/ > > > > For decades, researchers have been sounding the alarm on climate > > change: it's happening, we're causing it, it's bad. The message from > > IPCC and elsewhere has long been that solving the climate challenge > > is technically feasible, and what's missing is political will. With > > the adoption of the Paris Agreement last weekend, the world finally > > has its mandate of political will. In total, 196 nations confirmed > > that climate change is a "common concern of humankind" and adopted > > the target to limit warming well below 2° Celsius, aiming for no more > > than 1.5° above preindustrial levels. For the first time, these > > temperature targets are linked with mechanisms to achieve them, which > > sends a powerful signal that society is ready to act on climate > > change. > > > > What does this mean for scientists? I see this as a clarion call for > > more researchers (including myself) to reorient our work towards > > further exploring and creating solutions to meet the social mandate > > to live in a world where many of the worst impacts never happen, > > while understanding the impacts that are already here and those > > expected under the new target. The first is necessary to meet the > > ambitious but essential target; the second, to determine the > > magnitude of the investments in resilience, and flows of both > > technology and finance, that will be required to manage the impacts. > Climate change shock: Burning fossil fuels 'COOLS planet', says NASA! http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/628524/Climate-change-shock-Burning-fossil-fuels-COOLs-planet-says-NASA What a surprise! Double-A
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-22 20:48 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <1ipokc-rhq.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #540868 |
Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> wrote: > On Monday, December 21, 2015 at 11:42:08 AM UTC-8, Sam Wormley wrote: >> Limiting Global Warming Will be Hard, But Hardly Impossible >> > http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/guest-blog/limiting-global-warming-will-be-hard-but-hardly-impossible/ >> >> >> > For decades, researchers have been sounding the alarm on climate >> > change: it's happening, we're causing it, it's bad. The message from >> > IPCC and elsewhere has long been that solving the climate challenge >> > is technically feasible, and what's missing is political will. With >> > the adoption of the Paris Agreement last weekend, the world finally >> > has its mandate of political will. In total, 196 nations confirmed >> > that climate change is a "common concern of humankind" and adopted >> > the target to limit warming well below 2° Celsius, aiming for no more >> > than 1.5° above preindustrial levels. For the first time, these >> > temperature targets are linked with mechanisms to achieve them, which >> > sends a powerful signal that society is ready to act on climate >> > change. >> > >> > What does this mean for scientists? I see this as a clarion call for >> > more researchers (including myself) to reorient our work towards >> > further exploring and creating solutions to meet the social mandate >> > to live in a world where many of the worst impacts never happen, >> > while understanding the impacts that are already here and those >> > expected under the new target. The first is necessary to meet the >> > ambitious but essential target; the second, to determine the >> > magnitude of the investments in resilience, and flows of both >> > technology and finance, that will be required to manage the impacts. >> > > Climate change shock: Burning fossil fuels 'COOLS planet', says NASA! > > http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/628524/Climate-change-shock-Burning-fossil-fuels-COOLs-planet-says-NASA > > What a surprise! > > Double-A It is "settled science" so there can be nothing new to learn. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-22 13:11 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <4fdc09e7-0b23-473c-bd0a-e9c68d2e8519@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #540875 |
On Tuesday, December 22, 2015 at 1:01:05 PM UTC-8, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> wrote: > > On Monday, December 21, 2015 at 11:42:08 AM UTC-8, Sam Wormley wrote: > >> Limiting Global Warming Will be Hard, But Hardly Impossible > >> > http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/guest-blog/limiting-global-warming-will-be-hard-but-hardly-impossible/ > >> > >> > >> > For decades, researchers have been sounding the alarm on climate > >> > change: it's happening, we're causing it, it's bad. The message from > >> > IPCC and elsewhere has long been that solving the climate challenge > >> > is technically feasible, and what's missing is political will. With > >> > the adoption of the Paris Agreement last weekend, the world finally > >> > has its mandate of political will. In total, 196 nations confirmed > >> > that climate change is a "common concern of humankind" and adopted > >> > the target to limit warming well below 2° Celsius, aiming for no more > >> > than 1.5° above preindustrial levels. For the first time, these > >> > temperature targets are linked with mechanisms to achieve them, which > >> > sends a powerful signal that society is ready to act on climate > >> > change. > >> > > >> > What does this mean for scientists? I see this as a clarion call for > >> > more researchers (including myself) to reorient our work towards > >> > further exploring and creating solutions to meet the social mandate > >> > to live in a world where many of the worst impacts never happen, > >> > while understanding the impacts that are already here and those > >> > expected under the new target. The first is necessary to meet the > >> > ambitious but essential target; the second, to determine the > >> > magnitude of the investments in resilience, and flows of both > >> > technology and finance, that will be required to manage the impacts. > >> > > > > Climate change shock: Burning fossil fuels 'COOLS planet', says NASA! > > > > http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/628524/Climate-change-shock-Burning-fossil-fuels-COOLs-planet-says-NASA > > > > What a surprise! > > > > Double-A > > It is "settled science" so there can be nothing new to learn. > > > -- > Jim Pennino Are there flying frogs? I would like to think so.TreBert
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-22 23:33 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <q63pkc-ifr.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #540877 |
reber g=emc^2 <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tuesday, December 22, 2015 at 1:01:05 PM UTC-8, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> wrote: >> > On Monday, December 21, 2015 at 11:42:08 AM UTC-8, Sam Wormley wrote: >> >> Limiting Global Warming Will be Hard, But Hardly Impossible >> >> > http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/guest-blog/limiting-global-warming-will-be-hard-but-hardly-impossible/ >> >> >> >> >> >> > For decades, researchers have been sounding the alarm on climate >> >> > change: it's happening, we're causing it, it's bad. The message from >> >> > IPCC and elsewhere has long been that solving the climate challenge >> >> > is technically feasible, and what's missing is political will. With >> >> > the adoption of the Paris Agreement last weekend, the world finally >> >> > has its mandate of political will. In total, 196 nations confirmed >> >> > that climate change is a "common concern of humankind" and adopted >> >> > the target to limit warming well below 2° Celsius, aiming for no more >> >> > than 1.5° above preindustrial levels. For the first time, these >> >> > temperature targets are linked with mechanisms to achieve them, which >> >> > sends a powerful signal that society is ready to act on climate >> >> > change. >> >> > >> >> > What does this mean for scientists? I see this as a clarion call for >> >> > more researchers (including myself) to reorient our work towards >> >> > further exploring and creating solutions to meet the social mandate >> >> > to live in a world where many of the worst impacts never happen, >> >> > while understanding the impacts that are already here and those >> >> > expected under the new target. The first is necessary to meet the >> >> > ambitious but essential target; the second, to determine the >> >> > magnitude of the investments in resilience, and flows of both >> >> > technology and finance, that will be required to manage the impacts. >> >> >> > >> > Climate change shock: Burning fossil fuels 'COOLS planet', says NASA! >> > >> > http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/628524/Climate-change-shock-Burning-fossil-fuels-COOLs-planet-says-NASA >> > >> > What a surprise! >> > >> > Double-A >> >> It is "settled science" so there can be nothing new to learn. >> >> >> -- >> Jim Pennino > > Are there flying frogs? I would like to think so.TreBert Yep, and flying monkeys wearing little jackets and caps. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-22 16:35 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <LOCdndcljKHZTeTLnZ2dnUU7-eWdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #540868 |
On 12/22/15 2:41 PM, Double-A wrote: > Climate change shock: Burning fossil fuels 'COOLS planet', says NASA! > > http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/628524/Climate-change-shock-Burning-fossil-fuels-COOLs-planet-says-NASA > > What a surprise! > > Double-A > So Double-A, are you another of the USENET posters that thinks the earth hasn't been warming for the last 17 years? The data for 2015 added to this graph will be a doozy. http://edu-observatory.org/olli/Climate/BER2014-1.png See all the graphs from Berkeley Earth Report 2014 > http://static.berkeleyearth.org/memos/Global-Warming-2014-Berkeley-Earth-Newsletter.pdf Berkeley Earth has constructed an estimate of the global average temperature during 2014, including land and sea. The "margin of uncertainty" represents the 95% confidence limit, obtained principally by comparison of results from subdividing the data into independent sets. The global temperature estimate is compiled as combination of a land-only temperature estimate constructed by Berkeley Earth directly, and an ocean temperature estimate produced by the Hadley Centre in the UK and modified by Berkeley Earth. -- sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated to the discussion of physics, news from the physics community, and physics-related social issues.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-22 23:34 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <d83pkc-ifr.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #540911 |
Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote: > On 12/22/15 2:41 PM, Double-A wrote: >> Climate change shock: Burning fossil fuels 'COOLS planet', says NASA! >> >> http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/628524/Climate-change-shock-Burning-fossil-fuels-COOLs-planet-says-NASA >> >> What a surprise! >> >> Double-A >> > > So Double-A, are you another of the USENET posters that thinks the > earth hasn't been warming for the last 17 years? The data for 2015 > added to this graph will be a doozy. 18 years, ass hat, and your "data" is bogus. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web