Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #570643 > unrolled thread
| Started by | James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-04-14 20:54 -0700 |
| Last post | 2016-04-17 05:30 +0000 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 24 — 4 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Moist air Convection is a hoax, like Greenhouse effect. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-04-14 20:54 -0700
adiabat (cOOl wOrd noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-04-15 12:30 -0700
Re: adiabat (cOOl wOrd James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-04-15 13:32 -0700
Re: adiabat (cOOl wOrd pnalsing@gmail.com - 2016-04-15 17:11 -0700
Re: adiabat (cOOl wOrd James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-04-15 17:35 -0700
Re: adiabat (cOOl wOrd jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-16 00:56 +0000
Re: adiabat (cOOl wOrd James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-04-15 18:08 -0700
Re: adiabat (cOOl wOrd pnalsing@gmail.com - 2016-04-15 18:20 -0700
Re: adiabat (cOOl wOrd James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-04-15 18:23 -0700
Re: adiabat (cOOl wOrd pnalsing@gmail.com - 2016-04-15 19:42 -0700
Re: adiabat (cOOl wOrd James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-04-16 00:57 -0700
Re: adiabat (cOOl wOrd pnalsing@gmail.com - 2016-04-16 13:01 -0700
Re: adiabat (cOOl wOrd noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-04-16 13:18 -0700
Re: adiabat (cOOl wOrd James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-04-16 13:50 -0700
Re: adiabat (cOOl wOrd pnalsing@gmail.com - 2016-04-16 16:32 -0700
Re: adiabat (cOOl wOrd James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-04-16 16:37 -0700
Re: adiabat (cOOl wOrd pnalsing@gmail.com - 2016-04-16 17:24 -0700
Re: adiabat (cOOl wOrd James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-04-16 17:31 -0700
Re: adiabat (cOOl wOrd pnalsing@gmail.com - 2016-04-16 20:04 -0700
Re: adiabat (cOOl wOrd James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-04-16 20:26 -0700
Re: adiabat (cOOl wOrd pnalsing@gmail.com - 2016-04-16 21:40 -0700
Re: adiabat (cOOl wOrd James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-04-16 21:43 -0700
Re: adiabat (cOOl wOrd pnalsing@gmail.com - 2016-04-16 22:43 -0700
Re: adiabat (cOOl wOrd jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-17 05:30 +0000
Page 1 of 2 [1] 2 Next page →
| From | James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-14 20:54 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Moist air Convection is a hoax, like Greenhouse effect. |
| Message-ID | <0d81f8f6-60e1-472a-8438-85091d548660@googlegroups.com> |
On Thursday, March 3, 2016 at 7:04:38 AM UTC-8, James McGinn wrote: > http://scottishsceptic.co.uk/2011/08/26/how-to-get-off-the-ground-with-nothing-but-water-almost/#comment-39222 > > The reason warm, moist air isn't constantly rushing up through the abundance of cool, dry air that is but a few hundred meters above is because it is heavier. The reason it is heavier is because it contains microdroplets of H2O and not the gaseous H2O that meteorologists, absurdly, have assumed. > > In other words, meteorology's notion of moist air convection is a hoax, not unlike climatology's notion of greenhouse effect. > > It's really that simple. It's just bad science. And a minimal amount of fact checking reveals it. > > Don't be gullible. > > James McGinn > Solving Tornadoes
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-15 12:30 -0700 |
| Subject | adiabat (cOOl wOrd |
| Message-ID | <5c601977-c843-4a0d-a1cc-5af205c0b255@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #570643 |
glassal housing was a bad metaphor, when (the great Ahrrenius coined it. yes air with clouds is heavier, but they don't form til there is an adiabatic rate > > The reason warm, moist air isn't constantly rushing up through the abundance of cool, dry air that is but a few hundred meters above is because it is heavier. The reason it is heavier is because it contains microdroplets of H2O and not the gaseous H2O that meteorologists, absurdly, have assumed.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-15 13:32 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: adiabat (cOOl wOrd |
| Message-ID | <0a0a5089-6714-4bbf-9bbf-72be9e402066@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #570765 |
On Friday, April 15, 2016 at 12:30:25 PM UTC-7, noTthaTguY wrote: > glassal housing was a bad metaphor, > when (the great Ahrrenius coined it. > > yes air with clouds is heavier, but > they don't form til there is an adiabatic rate > > > > The reason warm, moist air isn't constantly rushing up through the abundance of cool, dry air that is but a few hundred meters above is because it is heavier. The reason it is heavier is because it contains microdroplets of H2O and not the gaseous H2O that meteorologists, absurdly, have assumed. Too bad your imagination isn't evidence. Huh?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | pnalsing@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-15 17:11 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: adiabat (cOOl wOrd |
| Message-ID | <96775e6b-1bc1-4b3b-bcac-05f169ffd691@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #570770 |
On Friday, April 15, 2016 at 1:32:08 PM UTC-7, James McGinn wrote: > On Friday, April 15, 2016 at 12:30:25 PM UTC-7, noTthaTguY wrote: > > glassal housing was a bad metaphor, > > when (the great Ahrrenius coined it. > > > > yes air with clouds is heavier, but > > they don't form til there is an adiabatic rate > > > > > > The reason warm, moist air isn't constantly rushing up through the abundance of cool, dry air that is but a few hundred meters above is because it is heavier. The reason it is heavier is because it contains microdroplets of H2O and not the gaseous H2O that meteorologists, absurdly, have assumed. > > Too bad your imagination isn't evidence. Huh? But James, the EXACT same thing can be said of your 'theory' because you haven't presented a single shred of evidence, other than your imagination. Not a single one!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-15 17:35 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: adiabat (cOOl wOrd |
| Message-ID | <2684869f-e20e-4c67-aa73-1ec2365c57b8@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #570820 |
On Friday, April 15, 2016 at 5:11:35 PM UTC-7, pnal...@gmail.com wrote: > On Friday, April 15, 2016 at 1:32:08 PM UTC-7, James McGinn wrote: > > On Friday, April 15, 2016 at 12:30:25 PM UTC-7, noTthaTguY wrote: > > > glassal housing was a bad metaphor, > > > when (the great Ahrrenius coined it. > > > > > > yes air with clouds is heavier, but > > > they don't form til there is an adiabatic rate > > > > > > > > The reason warm, moist air isn't constantly rushing up through the abundance of cool, dry air that is but a few hundred meters above is because it is heavier. The reason it is heavier is because it contains microdroplets of H2O and not the gaseous H2O that meteorologists, absurdly, have assumed. > > > > Too bad your imagination isn't evidence. Huh? > > But James, the EXACT same thing can be said of your 'theory' because you haven't presented a single shred of evidence, other than your imagination. Not a single one! Well, there is the steam tables, right?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-16 00:56 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: adiabat (cOOl wOrd |
| Message-ID | <d7f8uc-6te.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #570830 |
James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> wrote: > On Friday, April 15, 2016 at 5:11:35 PM UTC-7, pnal...@gmail.com wrote: >> On Friday, April 15, 2016 at 1:32:08 PM UTC-7, James McGinn wrote: >> > On Friday, April 15, 2016 at 12:30:25 PM UTC-7, noTthaTguY wrote: >> > > glassal housing was a bad metaphor, >> > > when (the great Ahrrenius coined it. >> > > >> > > yes air with clouds is heavier, but >> > > they don't form til there is an adiabatic rate >> > > >> > > > > The reason warm, moist air isn't constantly rushing up through the abundance of cool, dry air that is but a few hundred meters above is because it is heavier. The reason it is heavier is because it contains microdroplets of H2O and not the gaseous H2O that meteorologists, absurdly, have assumed. >> > >> > Too bad your imagination isn't evidence. Huh? >> >> But James, the EXACT same thing can be said of your 'theory' because >> you haven't presented a single shred of evidence, other than your >> imagination. Not a single one! > > Well, there is the steam tables, right? Right, and they contradict what you say if one knows how to read them. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-15 18:08 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: adiabat (cOOl wOrd |
| Message-ID | <b447884d-9e68-45f6-93c3-db047507f856@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #570833 |
On Friday, April 15, 2016 at 6:01:05 PM UTC-7, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Friday, April 15, 2016 at 5:11:35 PM UTC-7, pnal...@gmail.com wrote: > >> On Friday, April 15, 2016 at 1:32:08 PM UTC-7, James McGinn wrote: > >> > On Friday, April 15, 2016 at 12:30:25 PM UTC-7, noTthaTguY wrote: > >> > > glassal housing was a bad metaphor, > >> > > when (the great Ahrrenius coined it. > >> > > > >> > > yes air with clouds is heavier, but > >> > > they don't form til there is an adiabatic rate > >> > > > >> > > > > The reason warm, moist air isn't constantly rushing up through the abundance of cool, dry air that is but a few hundred meters above is because it is heavier. The reason it is heavier is because it contains microdroplets of H2O and not the gaseous H2O that meteorologists, absurdly, have assumed. > >> > > >> > Too bad your imagination isn't evidence. Huh? > >> > >> But James, the EXACT same thing can be said of your 'theory' because > >> you haven't presented a single shred of evidence, other than your > >> imagination. Not a single one! > > > > Well, there is the steam tables, right? > > Right, and they contradict what you say if one knows how to read them. Too bad your imagination isn't evidence. Huh?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | pnalsing@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-15 18:20 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: adiabat (cOOl wOrd |
| Message-ID | <a64136dc-0fb4-4896-a8df-a84201cbd8dc@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #570833 |
On Friday, April 15, 2016 at 6:01:05 PM UTC-7, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Friday, April 15, 2016 at 5:11:35 PM UTC-7, pnal...@gmail.com wrote: > >> On Friday, April 15, 2016 at 1:32:08 PM UTC-7, James McGinn wrote: > >> > On Friday, April 15, 2016 at 12:30:25 PM UTC-7, noTthaTguY wrote: > >> > > glassal housing was a bad metaphor, > >> > > when (the great Ahrrenius coined it. > >> > > > >> > > yes air with clouds is heavier, but > >> > > they don't form til there is an adiabatic rate > >> > > > >> > > > > The reason warm, moist air isn't constantly rushing up through the abundance of cool, dry air that is but a few hundred meters above is because it is heavier. The reason it is heavier is because it contains microdroplets of H2O and not the gaseous H2O that meteorologists, absurdly, have assumed. > >> > > >> > Too bad your imagination isn't evidence. Huh? > >> > >> But James, the EXACT same thing can be said of your 'theory' because > >> you haven't presented a single shred of evidence, other than your > >> imagination. Not a single one! > > > > Well, there is the steam tables, right? > > Right, and they contradict what you say if one knows how to read them. > > > -- > Jim Pennino Bingo! James misinterprets what the steam tables actually say...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-15 18:23 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: adiabat (cOOl wOrd |
| Message-ID | <8938a17e-d0a7-425c-be83-8ef4d9959879@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #570835 |
On Friday, April 15, 2016 at 6:20:57 PM UTC-7, pnal...@gmail.com wrote: > On Friday, April 15, 2016 at 6:01:05 PM UTC-7, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > > James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Friday, April 15, 2016 at 5:11:35 PM UTC-7, pnal...@gmail.com wrote: > > >> On Friday, April 15, 2016 at 1:32:08 PM UTC-7, James McGinn wrote: > > >> > On Friday, April 15, 2016 at 12:30:25 PM UTC-7, noTthaTguY wrote: > > >> > > glassal housing was a bad metaphor, > > >> > > when (the great Ahrrenius coined it. > > >> > > > > >> > > yes air with clouds is heavier, but > > >> > > they don't form til there is an adiabatic rate > > >> > > > > >> > > > > The reason warm, moist air isn't constantly rushing up through the abundance of cool, dry air that is but a few hundred meters above is because it is heavier. The reason it is heavier is because it contains microdroplets of H2O and not the gaseous H2O that meteorologists, absurdly, have assumed. > > >> > > > >> > Too bad your imagination isn't evidence. Huh? > > >> > > >> But James, the EXACT same thing can be said of your 'theory' because > > >> you haven't presented a single shred of evidence, other than your > > >> imagination. Not a single one! > > > > > > Well, there is the steam tables, right? > > > > Right, and they contradict what you say if one knows how to read them. > > > > > > -- > > Jim Pennino > > Bingo! James misinterprets what the steam tables actually say... It's regrettable the internet doesn't allow you to drop a link to your imagination.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | pnalsing@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-15 19:42 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: adiabat (cOOl wOrd |
| Message-ID | <105be0a6-a44c-436b-a7ae-8b16159a323e@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #570836 |
On Friday, April 15, 2016 at 6:24:01 PM UTC-7, James McGinn wrote: > On Friday, April 15, 2016 at 6:20:57 PM UTC-7, pnal...@gmail.com wrote: > > On Friday, April 15, 2016 at 6:01:05 PM UTC-7, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > > > James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Friday, April 15, 2016 at 5:11:35 PM UTC-7, pnal...@gmail.com wrote: > > > >> On Friday, April 15, 2016 at 1:32:08 PM UTC-7, James McGinn wrote: > > > >> > On Friday, April 15, 2016 at 12:30:25 PM UTC-7, noTthaTguY wrote: > > > >> > > glassal housing was a bad metaphor, > > > >> > > when (the great Ahrrenius coined it. > > > >> > > > > > >> > > yes air with clouds is heavier, but > > > >> > > they don't form til there is an adiabatic rate > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > The reason warm, moist air isn't constantly rushing up through the abundance of cool, dry air that is but a few hundred meters above is because it is heavier. The reason it is heavier is because it contains microdroplets of H2O and not the gaseous H2O that meteorologists, absurdly, have assumed. > > > >> > > > > >> > Too bad your imagination isn't evidence. Huh? > > > >> > > > >> But James, the EXACT same thing can be said of your 'theory' because > > > >> you haven't presented a single shred of evidence, other than your > > > >> imagination. Not a single one! > > > > > > > > Well, there is the steam tables, right? > > > > > > Right, and they contradict what you say if one knows how to read them. > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Jim Pennino > > > > Bingo! James misinterprets what the steam tables actually say... > > It's regrettable the internet doesn't allow you to drop a link to your imagination. What's really regrettable is that a guy like you can come here and lie through your teeth that you a physicist when it is virtually impossible, considering how little physics you actually know!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-16 00:57 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: adiabat (cOOl wOrd |
| Message-ID | <83f7cad6-a143-4730-a524-5c0711779c73@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #570846 |
On Friday, April 15, 2016 at 7:42:31 PM UTC-7, pnal...@gmail.com wrote: > On Friday, April 15, 2016 at 6:24:01 PM UTC-7, James McGinn wrote: > > On Friday, April 15, 2016 at 6:20:57 PM UTC-7, pnal...@gmail.com wrote: > > > On Friday, April 15, 2016 at 6:01:05 PM UTC-7, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > > > > James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Friday, April 15, 2016 at 5:11:35 PM UTC-7, pnal...@gmail.com wrote: > > > > >> On Friday, April 15, 2016 at 1:32:08 PM UTC-7, James McGinn wrote: > > > > >> > On Friday, April 15, 2016 at 12:30:25 PM UTC-7, noTthaTguY wrote: > > > > >> > > glassal housing was a bad metaphor, > > > > >> > > when (the great Ahrrenius coined it. > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > yes air with clouds is heavier, but > > > > >> > > they don't form til there is an adiabatic rate > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > The reason warm, moist air isn't constantly rushing up through the abundance of cool, dry air that is but a few hundred meters above is because it is heavier. The reason it is heavier is because it contains microdroplets of H2O and not the gaseous H2O that meteorologists, absurdly, have assumed. > > > > >> > > > > > >> > Too bad your imagination isn't evidence. Huh? > > > > >> > > > > >> But James, the EXACT same thing can be said of your 'theory' because > > > > >> you haven't presented a single shred of evidence, other than your > > > > >> imagination. Not a single one! > > > > > > > > > > Well, there is the steam tables, right? > > > > > > > > Right, and they contradict what you say if one knows how to read them. > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Jim Pennino > > > > > > Bingo! James misinterprets what the steam tables actually say... > > > > It's regrettable the internet doesn't allow you to drop a link to your imagination. > > What's really regrettable is that a guy like you can come here and lie through your teeth that you a physicist when it is virtually impossible, considering how little physics you actually know! Yet you have no dispute with anything I'm saying. Hmm.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | pnalsing@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-16 13:01 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: adiabat (cOOl wOrd |
| Message-ID | <26846d80-40e2-4479-bdd5-7142e8121fab@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #570876 |
On Saturday, April 16, 2016 at 12:57:08 AM UTC-7, James McGinn wrote: > On Friday, April 15, 2016 at 7:42:31 PM UTC-7, pnal...@gmail.com wrote: > > > It's regrettable the internet doesn't allow you to drop a link to your imagination. > > > > What's really regrettable is that a guy like you can come here and lie through your teeth that you a physicist when it is virtually impossible, considering how little physics you actually know! > > Yet you have no dispute with anything I'm saying. Hmm. LOL. Are you blind? Unable to read? I dispute almost everything you propose and have indicated so more than once... just like almost everyone else in this forum! I doubt you have a single proponent here at all...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-16 13:18 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: adiabat (cOOl wOrd |
| Message-ID | <1088a8e0-4fc4-46c7-b9d9-62926dd89180@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #571008 |
do steam tables get steamed > I doubt you have a single proponent here at all...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-16 13:50 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: adiabat (cOOl wOrd |
| Message-ID | <6de6e670-b299-4131-81fc-1fb7c4981b91@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #571008 |
On Saturday, April 16, 2016 at 1:01:09 PM UTC-7, pnal...@gmail.com wrote: > On Saturday, April 16, 2016 at 12:57:08 AM UTC-7, James McGinn wrote: > > On Friday, April 15, 2016 at 7:42:31 PM UTC-7, pnal...@gmail.com wrote: > > > > > It's regrettable the internet doesn't allow you to drop a link to your imagination. > > > > > > What's really regrettable is that a guy like you can come here and lie through your teeth that you a physicist when it is virtually impossible, considering how little physics you actually know! > > > > Yet you have no dispute with anything I'm saying. Hmm. > > LOL. Are you blind? Unable to read? I dispute almost everything you > propose and have indicated so more than once... I don't count whining. > just like almost everyone else in this forum! I don't count whiners. > I doubt you have a single proponent here at all... Just the evidence. That is all that matters to me.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | pnalsing@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-16 16:32 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: adiabat (cOOl wOrd |
| Message-ID | <006d4d2c-7a75-459a-b639-2425540965c4@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #571028 |
On Saturday, April 16, 2016 at 1:50:37 PM UTC-7, James McGinn wrote: > On Saturday, April 16, 2016 at 1:01:09 PM UTC-7, pnal...@gmail.com wrote: > > On Saturday, April 16, 2016 at 12:57:08 AM UTC-7, James McGinn wrote: > > > On Friday, April 15, 2016 at 7:42:31 PM UTC-7, pnal...@gmail.com wrote: > > > > > > > It's regrettable the internet doesn't allow you to drop a link to your imagination. > > > > > > > > What's really regrettable is that a guy like you can come here and lie through your teeth that you a physicist when it is virtually impossible, considering how little physics you actually know! > > > > > > Yet you have no dispute with anything I'm saying. Hmm. > > > > LOL. Are you blind? Unable to read? I dispute almost everything you > > propose and have indicated so more than once... > > I don't count whining. > > > just like almost everyone else in this forum! > > I don't count whiners. > > > I doubt you have a single proponent here at all... > > Just the evidence. That is all that matters to me. Evidence is all that matters to anyone... but you have presented zero evidence and zero experiments!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-16 16:37 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: adiabat (cOOl wOrd |
| Message-ID | <11da98c2-d23e-4722-a68c-8e2ae8a20eda@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #571052 |
On Saturday, April 16, 2016 at 4:32:36 PM UTC-7, pnal...@gmail.com wrote: > On Saturday, April 16, 2016 at 1:50:37 PM UTC-7, James McGinn wrote: > > On Saturday, April 16, 2016 at 1:01:09 PM UTC-7, pnal...@gmail.com wrote: > > > On Saturday, April 16, 2016 at 12:57:08 AM UTC-7, James McGinn wrote: > > > > On Friday, April 15, 2016 at 7:42:31 PM UTC-7, pnal...@gmail.com wrote: > > > > > > > > > It's regrettable the internet doesn't allow you to drop a link to your imagination. > > > > > > > > > > What's really regrettable is that a guy like you can come here and lie through your teeth that you a physicist when it is virtually impossible, considering how little physics you actually know! > > > > > > > > Yet you have no dispute with anything I'm saying. Hmm. > > > > > > LOL. Are you blind? Unable to read? I dispute almost everything you > > > propose and have indicated so more than once... > > > > I don't count whining. > > > > > just like almost everyone else in this forum! > > > > I don't count whiners. > > > > > I doubt you have a single proponent here at all... > > > > Just the evidence. That is all that matters to me. > > Evidence is all that matters to anyone... but you have presented zero evidence and zero experiments! I wouldn't pretend to compete with your imagination.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | pnalsing@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-16 17:24 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: adiabat (cOOl wOrd |
| Message-ID | <1602c597-ee8a-4b8a-bf17-aa976ece7cea@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #571053 |
On Saturday, April 16, 2016 at 4:37:08 PM UTC-7, James McGinn wrote: > On Saturday, April 16, 2016 at 4:32:36 PM UTC-7, pnal...@gmail.com wrote: > > On Saturday, April 16, 2016 at 1:50:37 PM UTC-7, James McGinn wrote: > > > On Saturday, April 16, 2016 at 1:01:09 PM UTC-7, pnal...@gmail.com wrote: > > > > On Saturday, April 16, 2016 at 12:57:08 AM UTC-7, James McGinn wrote: > > > > > On Friday, April 15, 2016 at 7:42:31 PM UTC-7, pnal...@gmail.com wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > It's regrettable the internet doesn't allow you to drop a link to your imagination. > > > > > > > > > > > > What's really regrettable is that a guy like you can come here and lie through your teeth that you a physicist when it is virtually impossible, considering how little physics you actually know! > > > > > > > > > > Yet you have no dispute with anything I'm saying. Hmm. > > > > > > > > LOL. Are you blind? Unable to read? I dispute almost everything you > > > > propose and have indicated so more than once... > > > > > > I don't count whining. > > > > > > > just like almost everyone else in this forum! > > > > > > I don't count whiners. > > > > > > > I doubt you have a single proponent here at all... > > > > > > Just the evidence. That is all that matters to me. > > > > Evidence is all that matters to anyone... but you have presented zero evidence and zero experiments! > > I wouldn't pretend to compete with your imagination. LOL! Fantastic scientific response! About that evidence?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-16 17:31 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: adiabat (cOOl wOrd |
| Message-ID | <7a73e45e-e849-4501-969f-9d0ced6c59cc@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #571060 |
On Saturday, April 16, 2016 at 5:24:08 PM UTC-7, pnal...@gmail.com wrote: > On Saturday, April 16, 2016 at 4:37:08 PM UTC-7, James McGinn wrote: > > On Saturday, April 16, 2016 at 4:32:36 PM UTC-7, pnal...@gmail.com wrote: > > > On Saturday, April 16, 2016 at 1:50:37 PM UTC-7, James McGinn wrote: > > > > On Saturday, April 16, 2016 at 1:01:09 PM UTC-7, pnal...@gmail.com wrote: > > > > > On Saturday, April 16, 2016 at 12:57:08 AM UTC-7, James McGinn wrote: > > > > > > On Friday, April 15, 2016 at 7:42:31 PM UTC-7, pnal...@gmail.com wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > It's regrettable the internet doesn't allow you to drop a link to your imagination. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > What's really regrettable is that a guy like you can come here and lie through your teeth that you a physicist when it is virtually impossible, considering how little physics you actually know! > > > > > > > > > > > > Yet you have no dispute with anything I'm saying. Hmm. > > > > > > > > > > LOL. Are you blind? Unable to read? I dispute almost everything you > > > > > propose and have indicated so more than once... > > > > > > > > I don't count whining. > > > > > > > > > just like almost everyone else in this forum! > > > > > > > > I don't count whiners. > > > > > > > > > I doubt you have a single proponent here at all... > > > > > > > > Just the evidence. That is all that matters to me. > > > > > > Evidence is all that matters to anyone... but you have presented zero evidence and zero experiments! > > > > I wouldn't pretend to compete with your imagination. > > LOL! Fantastic scientific response! About that evidence? You don't dispute steam tables, right?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | pnalsing@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-16 20:04 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: adiabat (cOOl wOrd |
| Message-ID | <4c8556a8-2df5-4a8b-bd8c-82bf1149ecea@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #571064 |
On Saturday, April 16, 2016 at 5:31:55 PM UTC-7, James McGinn wrote: > On Saturday, April 16, 2016 at 5:24:08 PM UTC-7, pnal...@gmail.com wrote: > > On Saturday, April 16, 2016 at 4:37:08 PM UTC-7, James McGinn wrote: > > > On Saturday, April 16, 2016 at 4:32:36 PM UTC-7, pnal...@gmail.com wrote: > > > > On Saturday, April 16, 2016 at 1:50:37 PM UTC-7, James McGinn wrote: > > > > > On Saturday, April 16, 2016 at 1:01:09 PM UTC-7, pnal...@gmail.com wrote: > > > > > > On Saturday, April 16, 2016 at 12:57:08 AM UTC-7, James McGinn wrote: > > > > > > > On Friday, April 15, 2016 at 7:42:31 PM UTC-7, pnal...@gmail.com wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It's regrettable the internet doesn't allow you to drop a link to your imagination. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > What's really regrettable is that a guy like you can come here and lie through your teeth that you a physicist when it is virtually impossible, considering how little physics you actually know! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yet you have no dispute with anything I'm saying. Hmm. > > > > > > > > > > > > LOL. Are you blind? Unable to read? I dispute almost everything you > > > > > > propose and have indicated so more than once... > > > > > > > > > > I don't count whining. > > > > > > > > > > > just like almost everyone else in this forum! > > > > > > > > > > I don't count whiners. > > > > > > > > > > > I doubt you have a single proponent here at all... > > > > > > > > > > Just the evidence. That is all that matters to me. > > > > > > > > Evidence is all that matters to anyone... but you have presented zero evidence and zero experiments! > > > > > > I wouldn't pretend to compete with your imagination. > > > > LOL! Fantastic scientific response! About that evidence? > > You don't dispute steam tables, right? Not at all... but then, you have no clue that they DON'T support you position. you have the brains of a mud fence. You are very near the end of your rope. What about that evidence? It is NOT in the fuckin' steam tables, you idiot... You got nuttin'...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-16 20:26 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: adiabat (cOOl wOrd |
| Message-ID | <0c9a112a-6142-4c2a-a463-891a011b7fbc@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #571092 |
On Saturday, April 16, 2016 at 8:04:39 PM UTC-7, pnal...@gmail.com wrote: > On Saturday, April 16, 2016 at 5:31:55 PM UTC-7, James McGinn wrote: > > On Saturday, April 16, 2016 at 5:24:08 PM UTC-7, pnal...@gmail.com wrote: > > > On Saturday, April 16, 2016 at 4:37:08 PM UTC-7, James McGinn wrote: > > > > On Saturday, April 16, 2016 at 4:32:36 PM UTC-7, pnal...@gmail.com wrote: > > > > > On Saturday, April 16, 2016 at 1:50:37 PM UTC-7, James McGinn wrote: > > > > > > On Saturday, April 16, 2016 at 1:01:09 PM UTC-7, pnal...@gmail.com wrote: > > > > > > > On Saturday, April 16, 2016 at 12:57:08 AM UTC-7, James McGinn wrote: > > > > > > > > On Friday, April 15, 2016 at 7:42:31 PM UTC-7, pnal...@gmail.com wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It's regrettable the internet doesn't allow you to drop a link to your imagination. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > What's really regrettable is that a guy like you can come here and lie through your teeth that you a physicist when it is virtually impossible, considering how little physics you actually know! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yet you have no dispute with anything I'm saying. Hmm. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > LOL. Are you blind? Unable to read? I dispute almost everything you > > > > > > > propose and have indicated so more than once... > > > > > > > > > > > > I don't count whining. > > > > > > > > > > > > > just like almost everyone else in this forum! > > > > > > > > > > > > I don't count whiners. > > > > > > > > > > > > > I doubt you have a single proponent here at all... > > > > > > > > > > > > Just the evidence. That is all that matters to me. > > > > > > > > > > Evidence is all that matters to anyone... but you have presented zero evidence and zero experiments! > > > > > > > > I wouldn't pretend to compete with your imagination. > > > > > > LOL! Fantastic scientific response! About that evidence? > > > > You don't dispute steam tables, right? > > Not at all... but then, you have no clue that they DON'T support you position. you have the brains of a mud fence. You are very near the end of your rope. > > What about that evidence? It is NOT in the fuckin' steam tables, you idiot... > > You got nuttin'... What is boiling point of water at sea level?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 1 of 2 [1] 2 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web