Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #521822 > unrolled thread
| Started by | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-09-18 10:50 -0700 |
| Last post | 2015-09-23 05:47 +0200 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 138 — 22 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-09-18 10:50 -0700
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-09-18 14:53 -0400
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> - 2015-09-18 15:33 -0400
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-18 20:03 +0000
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2015-09-18 18:03 -0400
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics anim8rfsk <anim8rfsk@cox.net> - 2015-09-18 17:13 -0700
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2015-09-19 04:06 -0400
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-09-18 23:04 -0400
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-19 04:48 +0000
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2015-09-19 04:08 -0400
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-09-19 13:22 -0700
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-09-19 13:43 -0700
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-09-19 13:54 -0700
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics anim8rfsk <anim8rfsk@cox.net> - 2015-09-19 15:51 -0700
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-09-21 20:54 +0200
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-09-21 14:03 -0700
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-09-21 14:45 -0700
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-09-22 05:43 +0200
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-09-21 22:16 -0700
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-09-22 01:29 -0400
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> - 2015-09-19 09:35 -0700
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-19 18:12 +0000
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-09-19 13:22 -0500
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-19 18:42 +0000
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-09-19 13:58 -0500
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-19 20:13 +0000
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> - 2015-09-19 12:54 -0700
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-09-19 16:30 -0400
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> - 2015-09-19 13:22 -0700
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-19 22:23 +0000
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> - 2015-09-19 17:10 -0700
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-20 01:15 +0000
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-09-19 22:33 -0400
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-20 03:09 +0000
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 00:45 -0400
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> - 2015-09-19 20:17 -0700
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-20 05:35 +0000
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> - 2015-09-20 00:20 +0000
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-20 01:20 +0000
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> - 2015-09-20 15:28 +0000
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-20 17:22 +0000
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> - 2015-09-20 18:18 +0000
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> - 2015-09-20 11:31 -0700
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-20 18:50 +0000
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics Jimmie Wynne <jimmwyn@metermap.org> - 2015-09-20 19:06 +0000
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> - 2015-09-20 20:49 +0000
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-20 18:46 +0000
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> - 2015-09-20 20:53 +0000
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-20 21:31 +0000
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 19:08 -0400
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-20 23:17 +0000
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> - 2015-09-20 23:36 +0000
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> - 2015-09-20 23:34 +0000
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-21 00:00 +0000
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> - 2015-09-21 00:06 +0000
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-21 02:16 +0000
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> - 2015-09-21 02:42 +0000
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-21 04:57 +0000
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> - 2015-09-21 05:23 +0000
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-21 06:13 +0000
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> - 2015-09-21 13:18 +0000
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics Jimmie Wynne <jimmwyn@metermap.org> - 2015-09-21 14:21 +0000
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> - 2015-09-18 18:24 -0400
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics csampson@inetworld.net (Charles H. Sampson) - 2015-09-19 00:46 -0700
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2015-09-19 04:09 -0400
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics csampson@inetworld.net (Charles H. Sampson) - 2015-09-19 11:57 -0700
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-09-19 16:23 -0400
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2015-09-19 17:43 -0400
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics Rhino <no_offline_contact_please@example.com> - 2015-09-19 18:00 -0400
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2015-09-19 18:59 -0400
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics Rhino <no_offline_contact_please@example.com> - 2015-09-20 15:11 -0400
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-09-20 15:24 -0400
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 18:44 -0400
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-09-20 18:40 -0400
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 19:18 -0400
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 15:54 -0400
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics Rhino <no_offline_contact_please@example.com> - 2015-09-20 17:17 -0400
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 19:05 -0400
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2015-09-20 20:30 -0600
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics Lawrence Watt-Evans <lwe@sff.net> - 2015-09-20 16:03 -0400
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics Rhino <no_offline_contact_please@example.com> - 2015-09-20 17:22 -0400
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 18:51 -0400
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-09-29 03:20 +0200
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 00:29 -0400
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-09-19 23:17 -0700
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics anim8rfsk <anim8rfsk@cox.net> - 2015-09-19 23:19 -0700
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-09-19 23:57 -0700
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-09-20 00:01 -0700
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-09-20 00:06 -0700
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> - 2015-09-20 08:24 -0700
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics anim8rfsk <anim8rfsk@cox.net> - 2015-09-20 08:29 -0700
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 12:04 -0400
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics Lawrence Watt-Evans <lwe@sff.net> - 2015-09-20 16:00 -0400
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 07:42 -0400
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics Lawrence Watt-Evans <lwe@sff.net> - 2015-09-20 15:57 -0400
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 18:48 -0400
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-09-20 23:27 -0700
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-09-20 23:33 -0700
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2015-09-19 17:25 -0400
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-09-20 10:52 -0400
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics anim8rfsk <anim8rfsk@cox.net> - 2015-09-20 08:30 -0700
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> - 2015-09-19 09:33 -0700
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics csampson@inetworld.net (Charles H. Sampson) - 2015-09-19 11:57 -0700
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> - 2015-09-19 13:07 -0700
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-09-19 16:13 -0400
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> - 2015-09-19 16:21 -0400
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> - 2015-09-19 13:33 -0700
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> - 2015-09-19 20:17 -0400
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> - 2015-09-19 17:28 -0700
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 00:54 -0400
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> - 2015-09-19 22:32 -0700
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics Mike M <mike@xenocyte.com> - 2015-09-20 06:01 +0000
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-09-20 11:47 -0700
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics BTR1701 <address_is@invalid.invalid> - 2015-09-20 15:51 -0500
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics anim8rfsk <anim8rfsk@cox.net> - 2015-09-20 16:55 -0700
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> - 2015-09-20 23:56 +0000
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-09-20 23:35 -0700
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 03:31 -0400
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-09-19 23:09 -0700
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-09-19 20:34 -0700
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-09-21 06:26 +0200
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-09-23 07:15 +0200
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics csampson@inetworld.net (Charles H. Sampson) - 2015-09-21 01:22 -0700
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics Rhino <no_offline_contact_please@example.com> - 2015-09-19 17:51 -0400
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-09-18 12:59 -0700
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2015-09-18 13:10 -0700
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics anim8rfsk <anim8rfsk@cox.net> - 2015-09-18 17:14 -0700
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-09-18 22:41 +0200
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-09-18 23:03 -0700
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-09-21 05:54 +0200
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-09-21 01:06 -0400
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-09-21 07:42 +0200
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-09-21 02:02 -0400
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-09-21 20:32 +0200
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-09-21 16:49 -0400
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-09-22 06:02 +0200
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Persecute Global Warming Skeptics Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> - 2015-09-22 19:48 -0400
Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-09-23 05:47 +0200
Page 1 of 7 [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next page →
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-18 10:50 -0700 |
| Subject | Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics |
| Message-ID | <55FC4ECF.5C5E@ix.netcom.com> |
Kill those global warming deniers... put them in concentration camps.. shoot them one by one. http://dailycaller.com/2015/09/17/scientists-ask-obama-to-prosecute-global-warming-skeptics/#ixzz3m6i5gZfj
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <nobody@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-18 14:53 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <P4ZKx.3315$qY1.757@fx17.iad> |
| In reply to | #521822 |
On 09/18/2015 01:50 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> Kill those global warming deniers...
>
> put them in concentration camps..
>
> shoot them one by one.
>
> http://dailycaller.com/2015/09/17/scientists-ask-obama-to-prosecute-global-warming-skeptics/#ixzz3m6i5gZfj
You said it Starmaker. Hey censorship of political speech as well as
political prisoners is the traditional way of all Banana Republics, of
which we have obviously become one. As I understand it, the favored
method is dropping deniers out Helicopters.
--
___ ___ ___ ___
/\ \ /\ \ /\__\ /\ \
/::\ \ /::\ \ /::| | \:\ \
/:/\:\ \ /:/\:\ \ /:|:| | ___ /::\__\
/::\~\:\__\ /::\~\:\ \ /:/|:| |__ /\ /:/\/__/
/:/\:\ \:|__| /:/\:\ \:\__\ /:/ |:| /\__\ \:\/:/ /
\:\~\:\/:/ / \:\~\:\ \/__/ \/__|:|/:/ / \::/ /
\:\ \::/ / \:\ \:\__\ |:/:/ / \/__/
\:\/:/ / \:\ \/__/ |::/ /
\_:/__/ \:\__\ /:/ /
\/__/ \/__/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-18 15:33 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <mthoq5$uus$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #521841 |
On 2015-09-18 18:53:35 +0000, benj <nobody@gmail.com> said: > You said it Starmaker. Hey censorship of political speech as well as > political prisoners is the traditional way of all Banana Republics, of > which we have obviously become one. As I understand it, the favored > method is dropping deniers out Helicopters You DO realize that being ASKED to do something isn't the same as actually DOING it, right? -- "Didn't believe we needed to "Make America Great Again" - until I saw the people we're seriously considering putting on the Presidential ballot." - Kelly Hines 2015
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-18 20:03 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <197ucc-pl9.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #521850 |
In sci.physics FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> wrote: > On 2015-09-18 18:53:35 +0000, benj <nobody@gmail.com> said: > >> You said it Starmaker. Hey censorship of political speech as well as >> political prisoners is the traditional way of all Banana Republics, of >> which we have obviously become one. As I understand it, the favored >> method is dropping deniers out Helicopters > > You DO realize that being ASKED to do something isn't the same as > actually DOING it, right? You DO realize that being ASKED to stifle free speech is abominable, right? -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-18 18:03 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.3066542a999b50e1989b3e@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #521858 |
In article <197ucc-pl9.ln1@mail.specsol.com>, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com says... > > In sci.physics FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> wrote: > > On 2015-09-18 18:53:35 +0000, benj <nobody@gmail.com> said: > > > >> You said it Starmaker. Hey censorship of political speech as well as > >> political prisoners is the traditional way of all Banana Republics, of > >> which we have obviously become one. As I understand it, the favored > >> method is dropping deniers out Helicopters > > > > You DO realize that being ASKED to do something isn't the same as > > actually DOING it, right? > > You DO realize that being ASKED to stifle free speech is abominable, right? Personally I think it would serve the idiots asking for that right if the first act of the next President is to sic the FBI on the global warming _advocates_.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | anim8rfsk <anim8rfsk@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-18 17:13 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <anim8rfsk-52D450.17131618092015@news.easynews.com> |
| In reply to | #521884 |
In article <MPG.3066542a999b50e1989b3e@news.eternal-september.org>, "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> wrote: > In article <197ucc-pl9.ln1@mail.specsol.com>, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com > says... > > > > In sci.physics FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On 2015-09-18 18:53:35 +0000, benj <nobody@gmail.com> said: > > > > > >> You said it Starmaker. Hey censorship of political speech as well as > > >> political prisoners is the traditional way of all Banana Republics, of > > >> which we have obviously become one. As I understand it, the favored > > >> method is dropping deniers out Helicopters > > > > > > You DO realize that being ASKED to do something isn't the same as > > > actually DOING it, right? > > > > You DO realize that being ASKED to stifle free speech is abominable, right? > > Personally I think it would serve the idiots asking for that right if > the first act of the next President is to sic the FBI on the global > warming _advocates_. Would that be people that are advocating Global Warming? -- SUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUZZEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEQUUUUUUUUUUUUuuuuuuuuuu......
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-19 04:06 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.3066e17e3b4462f989b40@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #521924 |
In article <anim8rfsk-52D450.17131618092015@news.easynews.com>, anim8rfsk@cox.net says... > > In article <MPG.3066542a999b50e1989b3e@news.eternal-september.org>, > "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> wrote: > > > In article <197ucc-pl9.ln1@mail.specsol.com>, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com > > says... > > > > > > In sci.physics FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On 2015-09-18 18:53:35 +0000, benj <nobody@gmail.com> said: > > > > > > > >> You said it Starmaker. Hey censorship of political speech as well as > > > >> political prisoners is the traditional way of all Banana Republics, of > > > >> which we have obviously become one. As I understand it, the favored > > > >> method is dropping deniers out Helicopters > > > > > > > > You DO realize that being ASKED to do something isn't the same as > > > > actually DOING it, right? > > > > > > You DO realize that being ASKED to stifle free speech is abominable, right? > > > > Personally I think it would serve the idiots asking for that right if > > the first act of the next President is to sic the FBI on the global > > warming _advocates_. > > Would that be people that are advocating Global Warming? What other kind of global warming advocates are there?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <nobody@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-18 23:04 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <hh4Lx.12862$C05.3843@fx16.iad> |
| In reply to | #521884 |
On 09/18/2015 06:03 PM, J. Clarke wrote:
> In article <197ucc-pl9.ln1@mail.specsol.com>, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
> says...
>>
>> In sci.physics FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On 2015-09-18 18:53:35 +0000, benj <nobody@gmail.com> said:
>>>
>>>> You said it Starmaker. Hey censorship of political speech as well as
>>>> political prisoners is the traditional way of all Banana Republics, of
>>>> which we have obviously become one. As I understand it, the favored
>>>> method is dropping deniers out Helicopters
>>>
>>> You DO realize that being ASKED to do something isn't the same as
>>> actually DOING it, right?
>>
>> You DO realize that being ASKED to stifle free speech is abominable, right?
>
> Personally I think it would serve the idiots asking for that right if
> the first act of the next President is to sic the FBI on the global
> warming _advocates_.
So you BOTH favor the banana republic approach to political questions?
Obviously the only difference between you and them is WHICH speech is
allowed and which is censored...
--
___ ___ ___ ___
/\ \ /\ \ /\__\ /\ \
/::\ \ /::\ \ /::| | \:\ \
/:/\:\ \ /:/\:\ \ /:|:| | ___ /::\__\
/::\~\:\__\ /::\~\:\ \ /:/|:| |__ /\ /:/\/__/
/:/\:\ \:|__| /:/\:\ \:\__\ /:/ |:| /\__\ \:\/:/ /
\:\~\:\/:/ / \:\~\:\ \/__/ \/__|:|/:/ / \::/ /
\:\ \::/ / \:\ \:\__\ |:/:/ / \/__/
\:\/:/ / \:\ \/__/ |::/ /
\_:/__/ \:\__\ /:/ /
\/__/ \/__/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-19 04:48 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <p26vcc-boc.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #521938 |
In sci.physics benj <nobody@gmail.com> wrote: > On 09/18/2015 06:03 PM, J. Clarke wrote: >> In article <197ucc-pl9.ln1@mail.specsol.com>, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com >> says... >>> >>> In sci.physics FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> On 2015-09-18 18:53:35 +0000, benj <nobody@gmail.com> said: >>>> >>>>> You said it Starmaker. Hey censorship of political speech as well as >>>>> political prisoners is the traditional way of all Banana Republics, of >>>>> which we have obviously become one. As I understand it, the favored >>>>> method is dropping deniers out Helicopters >>>> >>>> You DO realize that being ASKED to do something isn't the same as >>>> actually DOING it, right? >>> >>> You DO realize that being ASKED to stifle free speech is abominable, right? >> >> Personally I think it would serve the idiots asking for that right if >> the first act of the next President is to sic the FBI on the global >> warming _advocates_. > > So you BOTH favor the banana republic approach to political questions? > Obviously the only difference between you and them is WHICH speech is > allowed and which is censored... Not quite, for instead of some convoluted interpretation of the RICO act, the charge would be something along the lines of conspiracy to deprive constitutional rights. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-19 04:08 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.3066e1f2fba541f4989b41@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #521945 |
In article <p26vcc-boc.ln1@mail.specsol.com>, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com says... > > In sci.physics benj <nobody@gmail.com> wrote: > > On 09/18/2015 06:03 PM, J. Clarke wrote: > >> In article <197ucc-pl9.ln1@mail.specsol.com>, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com > >> says... > >>> > >>> In sci.physics FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>> On 2015-09-18 18:53:35 +0000, benj <nobody@gmail.com> said: > >>>> > >>>>> You said it Starmaker. Hey censorship of political speech as well as > >>>>> political prisoners is the traditional way of all Banana Republics, of > >>>>> which we have obviously become one. As I understand it, the favored > >>>>> method is dropping deniers out Helicopters > >>>> > >>>> You DO realize that being ASKED to do something isn't the same as > >>>> actually DOING it, right? > >>> > >>> You DO realize that being ASKED to stifle free speech is abominable, right? > >> > >> Personally I think it would serve the idiots asking for that right if > >> the first act of the next President is to sic the FBI on the global > >> warming _advocates_. > > > > So you BOTH favor the banana republic approach to political questions? > > Obviously the only difference between you and them is WHICH speech is > > allowed and which is censored... > > Not quite, for instead of some convoluted interpretation of the RICO > act, the charge would be something along the lines of conspiracy > to deprive constitutional rights. In any case, RICO _is_ a "banana republic approach". One of many. Anybody who thinks that the US is not a police state isn't paying attention.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-19 13:22 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <55FDC41A.3BE3@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #521955 |
J. Clarke wrote: > > In article <p26vcc-boc.ln1@mail.specsol.com>, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com > says... > > > > In sci.physics benj <nobody@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On 09/18/2015 06:03 PM, J. Clarke wrote: > > >> In article <197ucc-pl9.ln1@mail.specsol.com>, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com > > >> says... > > >>> > > >>> In sci.physics FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> wrote: > > >>>> On 2015-09-18 18:53:35 +0000, benj <nobody@gmail.com> said: > > >>>> > > >>>>> You said it Starmaker. Hey censorship of political speech as well as > > >>>>> political prisoners is the traditional way of all Banana Republics, of > > >>>>> which we have obviously become one. As I understand it, the favored > > >>>>> method is dropping deniers out Helicopters > > >>>> > > >>>> You DO realize that being ASKED to do something isn't the same as > > >>>> actually DOING it, right? > > >>> > > >>> You DO realize that being ASKED to stifle free speech is abominable, right? > > >> > > >> Personally I think it would serve the idiots asking for that right if > > >> the first act of the next President is to sic the FBI on the global > > >> warming _advocates_. > > > > > > So you BOTH favor the banana republic approach to political questions? > > > Obviously the only difference between you and them is WHICH speech is > > > allowed and which is censored... > > > > Not quite, for instead of some convoluted interpretation of the RICO > > act, the charge would be something along the lines of conspiracy > > to deprive constitutional rights. > > In any case, RICO _is_ a "banana republic approach". One of many. > > Anybody who thinks that the US is not a police state isn't paying > attention. There is nothing wrong with a police state... it's wrong to allow the 'mad scientists" to police the state. You saw what happen when Albert Einstein tried to police the United States: http://hypertextbook.com/eworld/einstein.shtml He got all the 'mad scientist in the world to convine the U.S. build an atomic bomb to kill Germans. Instead, it killed Japanesse. You don't want 'these people' to police your stste. They belong in the basement killing little white mice... 'Don't Let Them Out Of The Basement'!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-19 13:43 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <55FDC8F8.1F0@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #522086 |
The Starmaker wrote: > > J. Clarke wrote: > > > > In article <p26vcc-boc.ln1@mail.specsol.com>, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com > > says... > > > > > > In sci.physics benj <nobody@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On 09/18/2015 06:03 PM, J. Clarke wrote: > > > >> In article <197ucc-pl9.ln1@mail.specsol.com>, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com > > > >> says... > > > >>> > > > >>> In sci.physics FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >>>> On 2015-09-18 18:53:35 +0000, benj <nobody@gmail.com> said: > > > >>>> > > > >>>>> You said it Starmaker. Hey censorship of political speech as well as > > > >>>>> political prisoners is the traditional way of all Banana Republics, of > > > >>>>> which we have obviously become one. As I understand it, the favored > > > >>>>> method is dropping deniers out Helicopters > > > >>>> > > > >>>> You DO realize that being ASKED to do something isn't the same as > > > >>>> actually DOING it, right? > > > >>> > > > >>> You DO realize that being ASKED to stifle free speech is abominable, right? > > > >> > > > >> Personally I think it would serve the idiots asking for that right if > > > >> the first act of the next President is to sic the FBI on the global > > > >> warming _advocates_. > > > > > > > > So you BOTH favor the banana republic approach to political questions? > > > > Obviously the only difference between you and them is WHICH speech is > > > > allowed and which is censored... > > > > > > Not quite, for instead of some convoluted interpretation of the RICO > > > act, the charge would be something along the lines of conspiracy > > > to deprive constitutional rights. > > > > In any case, RICO _is_ a "banana republic approach". One of many. > > > > Anybody who thinks that the US is not a police state isn't paying > > attention. > > There is nothing wrong with a police state... > it's wrong to allow the 'mad scientists" to police the state. > > You saw what happen when Albert Einstein tried to police the United States: > http://hypertextbook.com/eworld/einstein.shtml > > He got all the 'mad scientist in the world to convine the U.S. build an atomic bomb to kill Germans. > > Instead, it killed Japanesse. > > You don't want 'these people' to police your stste. > > They belong in the basement killing little white mice... > > 'Don't Let Them Out Of The Basement'! Then, once they controll the government, they will control your children.. they will decide what they learn and what schools they should go to...also you will not be allowed to talk to your children without...their authorization.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-19 13:54 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <55FDCB8D.723B@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #522096 |
The Starmaker wrote: > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > J. Clarke wrote: > > > > > > In article <p26vcc-boc.ln1@mail.specsol.com>, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com > > > says... > > > > > > > > In sci.physics benj <nobody@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On 09/18/2015 06:03 PM, J. Clarke wrote: > > > > >> In article <197ucc-pl9.ln1@mail.specsol.com>, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com > > > > >> says... > > > > >>> > > > > >>> In sci.physics FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > >>>> On 2015-09-18 18:53:35 +0000, benj <nobody@gmail.com> said: > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>>> You said it Starmaker. Hey censorship of political speech as well as > > > > >>>>> political prisoners is the traditional way of all Banana Republics, of > > > > >>>>> which we have obviously become one. As I understand it, the favored > > > > >>>>> method is dropping deniers out Helicopters > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> You DO realize that being ASKED to do something isn't the same as > > > > >>>> actually DOING it, right? > > > > >>> > > > > >>> You DO realize that being ASKED to stifle free speech is abominable, right? > > > > >> > > > > >> Personally I think it would serve the idiots asking for that right if > > > > >> the first act of the next President is to sic the FBI on the global > > > > >> warming _advocates_. > > > > > > > > > > So you BOTH favor the banana republic approach to political questions? > > > > > Obviously the only difference between you and them is WHICH speech is > > > > > allowed and which is censored... > > > > > > > > Not quite, for instead of some convoluted interpretation of the RICO > > > > act, the charge would be something along the lines of conspiracy > > > > to deprive constitutional rights. > > > > > > In any case, RICO _is_ a "banana republic approach". One of many. > > > > > > Anybody who thinks that the US is not a police state isn't paying > > > attention. > > > > There is nothing wrong with a police state... > > it's wrong to allow the 'mad scientists" to police the state. > > > > You saw what happen when Albert Einstein tried to police the United States: > > http://hypertextbook.com/eworld/einstein.shtml > > > > He got all the 'mad scientist in the world to convine the U.S. build an atomic bomb to kill Germans. > > > > Instead, it killed Japanesse. > > > > You don't want 'these people' to police your stste. > > > > They belong in the basement killing little white mice... > > > > 'Don't Let Them Out Of The Basement'! > > Then, once they controll the government, they will control your > children.. > they will decide what they learn and what schools they should go > to...also > you will not be allowed to talk to your children without...their > authorization. I've heard 'these scientist' have no soul... I've heard they are cold and unfeeling.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | anim8rfsk <anim8rfsk@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-19 15:51 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <anim8rfsk-C495C7.15514519092015@news.easynews.com> |
| In reply to | #522086 |
In article <55FDC41A.3BE3@ix.netcom.com>, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: > J. Clarke wrote: > > > > In article <p26vcc-boc.ln1@mail.specsol.com>, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com > > says... > > > > > > In sci.physics benj <nobody@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On 09/18/2015 06:03 PM, J. Clarke wrote: > > > >> In article <197ucc-pl9.ln1@mail.specsol.com>, > > > >> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com > > > >> says... > > > >>> > > > >>> In sci.physics FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >>>> On 2015-09-18 18:53:35 +0000, benj <nobody@gmail.com> said: > > > >>>> > > > >>>>> You said it Starmaker. Hey censorship of political speech as well > > > >>>>> as > > > >>>>> political prisoners is the traditional way of all Banana Republics, > > > >>>>> of > > > >>>>> which we have obviously become one. As I understand it, the favored > > > >>>>> method is dropping deniers out Helicopters > > > >>>> > > > >>>> You DO realize that being ASKED to do something isn't the same as > > > >>>> actually DOING it, right? > > > >>> > > > >>> You DO realize that being ASKED to stifle free speech is abominable, > > > >>> right? > > > >> > > > >> Personally I think it would serve the idiots asking for that right if > > > >> the first act of the next President is to sic the FBI on the global > > > >> warming _advocates_. > > > > > > > > So you BOTH favor the banana republic approach to political questions? > > > > Obviously the only difference between you and them is WHICH speech is > > > > allowed and which is censored... > > > > > > Not quite, for instead of some convoluted interpretation of the RICO > > > act, the charge would be something along the lines of conspiracy > > > to deprive constitutional rights. > > > > In any case, RICO _is_ a "banana republic approach". One of many. > > > > Anybody who thinks that the US is not a police state isn't paying > > attention. > > > > There is nothing wrong with a police state... > it's wrong to allow the 'mad scientists" to police the state. > > You saw what happen when Albert Einstein tried to police the United States: > http://hypertextbook.com/eworld/einstein.shtml > > He got all the 'mad scientist in the world to convine the U.S. build an > atomic bomb to kill Germans. > > Instead, it killed Japanesse. > > You don't want 'these people' to police your stste. > > > They belong in the basement killing little white mice... > > 'Don't Let Them Out Of The Basement'! Are you a troll stating the opposite of reason for comedic effect, or mentally ill? -- SUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUZZEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEQUUUUUUUUUUUUuuuuuuuuuu......
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-21 20:54 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <d6b24aF6a7lU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #522086 |
Am 19.09.2015 22:22, schrieb The Starmaker: >> In any case, RICO _is_ a "banana republic approach". One of many. >> >> Anybody who thinks that the US is not a police state isn't paying >> attention. > > > > There is nothing wrong with a police state... > it's wrong to allow the 'mad scientists" to police the state. > > You saw what happen when Albert Einstein tried to police the United States: > http://hypertextbook.com/eworld/einstein.shtml > > He got all the 'mad scientist in the world to convine the U.S. build an atomic bomb to kill Germans. > > Instead, it killed Japanesse. > Did you know, that Einstein was director of the 'Kaiser-Wilhelm Institut' in Berlin? There he worked together with Leo Szilard: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Le%C3%B3_Szil%C3%A1rd Einstein and Szilar patented a device, that was allegedly a refrigerator. Only: people trying to replicate the device found, it didn't work. But Einstein got a lot of money for this patent. The patent was (and still is) used as component of a fast breading reactor. This is a little detail, that made me wonder, what actually those physicists have done in Germany of the 20th. There is an ever weirder project, carried out by the Kaiser-Wilhelm-Insitut: 'Project Chronos', what was allegedly a 'time machine' (allegedly working and still in operation). Even stranger were 'Ufos' (Vril, Haunebu) what (allegedly) have been built in the twenties (together with space-flight). So I tend to have some degree of distrust in those stories we had been told (e.g. about the atom bomb). TH
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-21 14:03 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <5600709F.546A@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #522523 |
Thomas Heger wrote: > > Am 19.09.2015 22:22, schrieb The Starmaker: > > >> In any case, RICO _is_ a "banana republic approach". One of many. > >> > >> Anybody who thinks that the US is not a police state isn't paying > >> attention. > > > > > > > > There is nothing wrong with a police state... > > it's wrong to allow the 'mad scientists" to police the state. > > > > You saw what happen when Albert Einstein tried to police the United States: > > http://hypertextbook.com/eworld/einstein.shtml > > > > He got all the 'mad scientist in the world to convine the U.S. build an atomic bomb to kill Germans. > > > > Instead, it killed Japanesse. > > > > Did you know, that Einstein was director of the 'Kaiser-Wilhelm > Institut' in Berlin? > > There he worked together with Leo Szilard: > > https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Le%C3%B3_Szil%C3%A1rd > > Einstein and Szilar patented a device, that was allegedly a > refrigerator. Only: people trying to replicate the device found, it > didn't work. > > But Einstein got a lot of money for this patent. The patent was (and > still is) used as component of a fast breading reactor. > > This is a little detail, that made me wonder, what actually those > physicists have done in Germany of the 20th. > > There is an ever weirder project, carried out by the > Kaiser-Wilhelm-Insitut: 'Project Chronos', what was allegedly a 'time > machine' (allegedly working and still in operation). > > Even stranger were 'Ufos' (Vril, Haunebu) what (allegedly) have been > built in the twenties (together with space-flight). > > So I tend to have some degree of distrust in those stories we had been > told (e.g. about the atom bomb). > > TH There is a reason why Leo Szilard picture is not here with the others... http://blog.nuclearsecrecy.com/2012/08/31/the-faces-of-project-y/ It has to do with that...patent.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-21 14:45 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <56007A73.6072@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #522565 |
The Starmaker wrote: > > Thomas Heger wrote: > > > > Am 19.09.2015 22:22, schrieb The Starmaker: > > > > >> In any case, RICO _is_ a "banana republic approach". One of many. > > >> > > >> Anybody who thinks that the US is not a police state isn't paying > > >> attention. > > > > > > > > > > > > There is nothing wrong with a police state... > > > it's wrong to allow the 'mad scientists" to police the state. > > > > > > You saw what happen when Albert Einstein tried to police the United States: > > > http://hypertextbook.com/eworld/einstein.shtml > > > > > > He got all the 'mad scientist in the world to convine the U.S. build an atomic bomb to kill Germans. > > > > > > Instead, it killed Japanesse. > > > > > > > Did you know, that Einstein was director of the 'Kaiser-Wilhelm > > Institut' in Berlin? > > > > There he worked together with Leo Szilard: > > > > https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Le%C3%B3_Szil%C3%A1rd > > > > Einstein and Szilar patented a device, that was allegedly a > > refrigerator. Only: people trying to replicate the device found, it > > didn't work. > > > > But Einstein got a lot of money for this patent. The patent was (and > > still is) used as component of a fast breading reactor. > > > > This is a little detail, that made me wonder, what actually those > > physicists have done in Germany of the 20th. > > > > There is an ever weirder project, carried out by the > > Kaiser-Wilhelm-Insitut: 'Project Chronos', what was allegedly a 'time > > machine' (allegedly working and still in operation). > > > > Even stranger were 'Ufos' (Vril, Haunebu) what (allegedly) have been > > built in the twenties (together with space-flight). > > > > So I tend to have some degree of distrust in those stories we had been > > told (e.g. about the atom bomb). > > > > TH > > There is a reason why Leo Szilard picture is not here with the others... > > http://blog.nuclearsecrecy.com/2012/08/31/the-faces-of-project-y/ > > It has to do with that...patent. I'll even add, why is Albert Einstein and Leo Szilard picture is not here with the others... http://blog.nuclearsecrecy.com/2012/08/31/the-faces-of-project-y/ It has to do with that...patent.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-22 05:43 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <d6c12hFd8t1U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #522574 |
Am 21.09.2015 23:45, schrieb The Starmaker: >> There is a reason why Leo Szilard picture is not here with the others... >> >> http://blog.nuclearsecrecy.com/2012/08/31/the-faces-of-project-y/ >> >> It has to do with that...patent. > > > > I'll even add, why is Albert Einstein and Leo Szilard picture is not here with the others... > > http://blog.nuclearsecrecy.com/2012/08/31/the-faces-of-project-y/ > > It has to do with that...patent. The patent was actually used in breeding reactors. But it is quite strange to assume, that Einstein and Szillard have thought about problems in such reactors, long before they existed. Or: actually, they had existed and they had been hidden somewhere remote. So an insuspicious use of the device was written into the patent (??) But if there are hidden labs and a hidden kind of physics, 'they' need from time to time some sort of 'leaks', to publish their results. This is necessary to keep the 'commons' in movement and let them 'develop', what is already known. This is also useful, to blame somebody, if the results are not -well- beneficial and people could eventually ask, whos to blame. Spectacular events also need a plausible history and therefore some kind of project, where all the famous commons are herded together. TH
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-21 22:16 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <5600E414.6E10@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #522625 |
Thomas Heger wrote: > > Am 21.09.2015 23:45, schrieb The Starmaker: > > >> There is a reason why Leo Szilard picture is not here with the others... > >> > >> http://blog.nuclearsecrecy.com/2012/08/31/the-faces-of-project-y/ > >> > >> It has to do with that...patent. > > > > > > > > I'll even add, why is Albert Einstein and Leo Szilard picture is not here with the others... > > > > http://blog.nuclearsecrecy.com/2012/08/31/the-faces-of-project-y/ > > > > It has to do with that...patent. > > The patent was actually used in breeding reactors. But it is quite > strange to assume, that Einstein and Szillard have thought about > problems in such reactors, long before they existed. > > Or: actually, they had existed and they had been hidden somewhere > remote. So an insuspicious use of the device was written into the patent > (??) I see you haven't read: http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/Albert_Einstein/Albert_Einstein_The-Man-Who-Built-The-Atomic-Bomb.html All you need to do is read the letter carefully and all your questions will be answered: http://hypertextbook.com/eworld/einstein.shtml#first "In the course of the last four months it has been made probable - through the work of Joliot in France as well as Fermi and Szilard in America - that it may become possible to set up a nuclear chain reaction in a large mass of uranium,by which vast amounts of power and large quant- ities of new radium-like elements would be generated. Now it appears almost certain that this could be achieved in the immediate future." "b) to speed up the experimental work,which is at present being car- ried on within the limits of the budgets of University laboratories, by providing funds, if such funds be required, through his contacts with y private persons who are willing to make contributions for this cause, and perhaps also by obtaining the co-operation of industrial laboratories which have the necessary equipment." They simply need more "uranium"....tons of it. > > But if there are hidden labs and a hidden kind of physics, 'they' need > from time to time some sort of 'leaks', to publish their results. This > is necessary to keep the 'commons' in movement and let them 'develop', > what is already known. > > This is also useful, to blame somebody, if the results are not -well- > beneficial and people could eventually ask, whos to blame. > > Spectacular events also need a plausible history and therefore some kind > of project, where all the famous commons are herded together. > > TH
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-22 01:29 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <i8p10b1hehvtlmhgp8ubnuebo9fi2qfho8@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #522625 |
On Tue, 22 Sep 2015 05:43:04 +0200, Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> wrote:
>Am 21.09.2015 23:45, schrieb The Starmaker:
>
>>> There is a reason why Leo Szilard picture is not here with the others...
>>>
>>> http://blog.nuclearsecrecy.com/2012/08/31/the-faces-of-project-y/
>>>
>>> It has to do with that...patent.
>>
>>
>>
>> I'll even add, why is Albert Einstein and Leo Szilard picture is not here with the others...
>>
>> http://blog.nuclearsecrecy.com/2012/08/31/the-faces-of-project-y/
>>
>> It has to do with that...patent.
>
>The patent was actually used in breeding reactors. But it is quite
>strange to assume, that Einstein and Szillard have thought about
>problems in such reactors, long before they existed.
What patent are you talking about?
>Or: actually, they had existed and they had been hidden somewhere
>remote. So an insuspicious use of the device was written into the patent
>(??)
>
>But if there are hidden labs and a hidden kind of physics, 'they' need
>from time to time some sort of 'leaks', to publish their results. This
>is necessary to keep the 'commons' in movement and let them 'develop',
>what is already known.
The only patent mentioned was for dual fluid
refrigeration;
http://www.aps.org/publications/apsnews/201011/physicshistory.cfm
http://phys.org/news/2008-09-einstein-green-refrigerator-comeback.html
>This is also useful, to blame somebody, if the results are not -well-
>beneficial and people could eventually ask, whos to blame.
>
>Spectacular events also need a plausible history and therefore some kind
>of project, where all the famous commons are herded together.
>
>
>TH
You are not as weird as Starman, but still weird. :-)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 1 of 7 [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web