Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #682726 > unrolled thread
| Started by | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-04-28 05:01 -0400 |
| Last post | 2018-04-28 14:31 -0400 |
| Articles | 4 — 4 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
How the science of persuasion could change the politics of climate change kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-28 05:01 -0400
Re: How the science of persuasion could change the politics of climate change Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-28 09:14 -0500
Re: How the science of persuasion could change the politics of climate change Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-04-28 11:25 -0600
Re: How the science of persuasion could change the politics of climate change benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-28 14:31 -0400
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-28 05:01 -0400 |
| Subject | How the science of persuasion could change the politics of climate change |
| Message-ID | <pc1d9n$l4t$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
Taylor and others believe it's conversations like these—with political elites, and focused on policies they can justify in conservative terms—that could eventually lead to real action on climate change: https://www.technologyreview.com/s/610719/how-the-science-of-persuasion-could-change-the-politics-of-climate-change/ -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-28 09:14 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <pc1vjk$1hut$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #682726 |
On 4/28/2018 4:01 AM, kensi wrote: > Taylor and others believe it's conversations like these—with political > elites, and focused on policies they can justify in conservative > terms—that could eventually lead to real action on climate change: > > https://www.technologyreview.com/s/610719/how-the-science-of-persuasion-could-change-the-politics-of-climate-change/ > > article is an admission that "climate change" is all political.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-28 11:25 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <s82FC.52421$w94.22163@fx43.iad> |
| In reply to | #682726 |
On 4/28/2018 3:01 AM, kensi wrote: > terms—that could eventually lead to real action on climate change: > https://www.technologyreview.com/s/610719/how-the-science-of-persuasion-could-change-the-politics-of-climate-change/ There is no science of persuasion.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-28 14:31 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <d63FC.21044$6C5.16014@fx07.iad> |
| In reply to | #682761 |
On 4/28/2018 1:25 PM, Just Wondering wrote: > On 4/28/2018 3:01 AM, kensi wrote: > >> terms—that could eventually lead to real action on climate change: >> https://www.technologyreview.com/s/610719/how-the-science-of-persuasion-could-change-the-politics-of-climate-change/ >> > > There is no science of persuasion. IF a liberal can imagine it, then it exists!
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web