Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #512700 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-08-11 09:58 -0500 |
| Last post | 2015-08-12 12:35 +0800 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 264 — 25 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-08-11 09:58 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-08-11 10:14 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-08-11 13:01 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-11 23:26 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-12 00:24 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Lawrence Watt-Evans <lwe@sff.net> - 2015-08-11 13:36 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-12 07:58 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-11 19:23 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-12 08:48 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-12 04:13 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-12 20:57 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-12 12:39 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-08-12 15:48 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-12 15:26 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-13 07:26 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2015-08-13 12:51 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-08-12 20:03 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-08-12 17:49 -0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-12 18:08 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-13 00:27 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Doug Freyburger <dfreybur@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-18 22:25 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "W.TS." <m14m@earthlink.net> - 2015-08-12 20:55 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-12 19:24 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-08-12 20:00 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2015-08-12 19:24 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-13 10:53 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-12 23:58 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-13 15:56 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-08-13 07:37 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-13 20:25 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2015-08-13 06:13 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-08-13 14:20 +0100
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-13 10:39 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-12 23:59 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-13 16:15 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-08-13 07:44 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-13 20:30 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-08-13 09:26 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-14 17:30 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2015-08-14 10:19 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-14 14:11 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-15 05:31 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-15 18:25 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-16 04:02 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-16 19:46 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-16 11:45 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-17 10:48 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-16 22:04 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-17 11:15 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2015-08-16 22:04 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-17 15:15 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2015-08-17 00:38 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-17 20:22 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-08-17 12:30 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2015-08-17 10:27 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-17 05:50 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-17 20:28 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-08-17 12:32 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-17 18:49 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-17 18:48 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-18 13:00 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-18 03:24 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-19 06:45 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-19 04:33 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-19 20:35 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-19 17:22 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-20 12:47 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Olrik <olrik666@gmail.com> - 2015-08-20 01:08 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-20 22:36 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-20 14:10 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-20 04:55 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-16 14:29 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Tom McDonald <tmcdonald2672@charter.net> - 2015-08-16 15:04 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-17 05:53 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Doug Freyburger <dfreybur@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-18 22:30 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-19 10:08 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2015-08-19 11:40 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-19 17:23 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-20 04:56 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-20 14:11 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-21 05:00 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-22 14:12 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-23 03:53 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-23 10:57 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-08-16 01:26 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-16 19:53 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-08-16 14:58 +0100
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-17 10:52 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-17 05:56 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-17 19:49 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-17 18:50 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-18 13:33 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-18 03:26 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-19 07:26 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-19 04:35 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-19 20:41 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-20 04:58 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-20 22:44 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-21 05:01 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-22 08:10 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-22 03:42 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-22 16:26 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-23 03:59 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-23 21:17 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Doug Freyburger <dfreybur@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-18 22:51 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-19 08:48 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2015-08-18 18:30 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-19 04:38 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-08-17 13:21 +0100
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-17 19:19 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-08-17 13:40 +0100
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-08-17 12:34 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-18 00:51 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-08-17 14:36 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-17 21:52 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Olrik <olrik666@gmail.com> - 2015-08-18 00:57 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Olrik <olrik666@gmail.com> - 2015-08-18 01:10 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Olrik <olrik666@gmail.com> - 2015-08-18 01:23 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-17 22:30 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-17 22:32 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Olrik <olrik666@gmail.com> - 2015-08-18 01:37 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-17 23:38 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-17 05:55 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-17 20:12 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-17 19:25 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-18 13:45 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-18 03:28 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-19 07:43 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-08-13 15:53 +0100
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-14 17:24 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-08-14 12:08 +0100
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-14 14:17 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-08-14 04:50 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-08-14 12:53 +0100
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2015-08-14 06:54 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-14 14:16 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-15 07:51 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Mike M <mike@xenocyte.com> - 2015-08-15 06:41 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-15 16:11 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-08-15 03:36 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-15 18:48 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-08-15 07:43 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-15 12:05 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-15 18:36 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-16 00:56 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-16 01:08 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-16 01:09 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-16 14:06 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-17 06:04 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-17 12:12 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-16 03:37 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-16 21:25 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-08-17 02:54 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-17 22:21 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-18 14:23 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-17 05:58 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-17 18:47 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-18 03:30 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-18 10:15 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-18 16:50 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-19 00:44 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-19 04:43 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-19 09:45 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-20 05:06 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-21 00:25 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-21 04:52 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-21 13:19 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-21 17:29 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-22 00:18 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-22 03:39 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-22 12:23 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-23 03:57 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-16 04:06 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-16 10:28 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-16 04:08 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-16 20:04 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-17 06:07 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-17 20:16 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-17 19:27 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-18 13:51 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-18 03:34 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-19 07:55 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-19 04:48 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-19 20:59 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-20 05:13 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-20 22:30 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-21 04:58 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-21 19:58 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-21 17:31 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-22 07:47 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-22 03:40 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-22 16:19 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-23 03:58 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-23 21:20 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-17 22:23 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-18 03:37 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-18 00:51 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-18 16:58 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-08-15 15:17 +0100
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-16 10:31 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-15 12:14 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-16 10:36 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-16 03:42 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-16 20:11 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-16 11:48 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-17 10:58 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2015-08-13 12:58 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2015-08-13 12:56 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-15 12:02 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2015-08-12 14:34 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-08-12 19:59 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-13 10:33 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-08-13 07:47 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-13 20:34 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-08-13 09:36 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Lawrence Watt-Evans <lwe@sff.net> - 2015-08-13 13:10 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-08-13 13:25 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-14 17:49 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-08-16 01:33 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-16 20:24 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-08-16 10:55 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-17 11:01 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. John Ritson <j.ritson@hotmail.co.uk> - 2015-08-16 16:55 +0100
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-17 11:11 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-08-17 13:39 +0100
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-08-17 12:34 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-08-18 11:55 +0100
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-18 01:10 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-08-17 14:38 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-14 18:00 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-08-11 21:41 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-12 15:08 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-08-12 20:04 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-08-11 15:38 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-11 14:57 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-12 07:29 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-08-11 21:44 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2015-08-11 20:23 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-12 04:14 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-11 14:55 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-13 16:00 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-08-13 07:51 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-13 20:49 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-08-13 09:46 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-14 18:18 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-14 03:19 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-14 18:25 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-15 05:34 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Tom McDonald <tmcdonald2672@charter.net> - 2015-08-11 12:30 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Tom McDonald <tmcdonald2672@charter.net> - 2015-08-11 12:59 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-11 15:03 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-11 19:30 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-12 04:19 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-12 12:36 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "W.TS." <m14m@earthlink.net> - 2015-08-12 20:53 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Carl Kaufmann <cwkaufmann@cox.net> - 2015-08-11 21:20 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Carl Kaufmann <cwkaufmann@cox.net> - 2015-08-12 10:01 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Carl Kaufmann <cwkaufmann@cox.net> - 2015-08-11 21:16 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Tom McDonald <tmcdonald2672@charter.net> - 2015-08-11 20:22 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-08-11 21:49 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2015-08-12 14:38 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-11 14:53 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-11 14:51 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Robert Bannister <robban@clubtelco.com> - 2015-08-12 12:35 +0800
Page 7 of 14 — ← Prev page 1 … 5 6 [7] 8 9 … 14 Next page →
| From | Olrik <olrik666@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-18 01:37 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <mqug7k$7gg$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #514984 |
Le 2015-08-18 01:30, The Starmaker a écrit : > Olrik wrote: >> >> Le 2015-08-18 01:13, Rudy Canoza a écrit : >>> On 8/17/2015 10:10 PM, Olrik wrote: >>>> Le 2015-08-18 01:07, Rudy Canoza a écrit : >>>>> On 8/17/2015 9:57 PM, Olrik wrote: >>>>>> Le 2015-08-18 00:52, The Starmaker a écrit : >>>>>>> Alex W. wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 16/08/2015 12:53, niunian wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 2015-08-16 01:26 PM, William December Starr wrote: >>>>>>>>>> In article <mqke7a$vf2$9@dont-email.me>, >>>>>>>>>> niunian <niunian@ymail.com> said: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On 2015-08-13 09:26 PM, William December Starr wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> niunian <niunian@ymail.com> said: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> The fear of death can also be a purpose. It would be bowing down >>>>>>>>>>>>> to the god of death which by definition, is the devil. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Um, what definition is that? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> By definition, God rules the world of living, the devil rules the >>>>>>>>>>> world of death. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> And what definition is _that_? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> It's the definition of God as the living God who gives life to all >>>>>>>>> living things. Without God, all living things will die, and the >>>>>>>>> world of >>>>>>>>> living will cease to exist. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> <looks around> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> No god, and everything is still here... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> what do you think a fish sees when he <looks around> from inside the >>>>>>> aquarium tank? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You can now be looking at God but simply don't understand what you're >>>>>>> seeing. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> So, it looks as if God is not there... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> you have fish eyes. >>>>>> >>>>>> You should be in an institution. >>>>> >>>>> You should be dead and have worms eating your body. >>>> >>>> Why the conditional? >>> >>> What conditional, fuckwit? There was no conditional. >>> >>> Maybe you're not a native English speaker after all. >> >> «after all»? I never pretended to be one, you little troll. >> >>> However...you need to stop with the "a écrit" bullshit, espèce de con. >>> Tu n'ecris pas dans un forum francophone. Arrête avec ta connerie. >> >> Why did you write your comment in French? Hypocrite much? > > > You see what happens when you mix diffrent breeds of fishes in the same > tank... Indeed! You've been eaten and spit out! Good riddance, troll! -- Olrik aa #1981 EAC Chief Food Inspector, Bacon Division
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-17 23:38 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <55D2D2DC.3BC7@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #514986 |
Olrik wrote: > > Le 2015-08-18 01:30, The Starmaker a écrit : > > Olrik wrote: > >> > >> Le 2015-08-18 01:13, Rudy Canoza a écrit : > >>> On 8/17/2015 10:10 PM, Olrik wrote: > >>>> Le 2015-08-18 01:07, Rudy Canoza a écrit : > >>>>> On 8/17/2015 9:57 PM, Olrik wrote: > >>>>>> Le 2015-08-18 00:52, The Starmaker a écrit : > >>>>>>> Alex W. wrote: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> On 16/08/2015 12:53, niunian wrote: > >>>>>>>>> On 2015-08-16 01:26 PM, William December Starr wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> In article <mqke7a$vf2$9@dont-email.me>, > >>>>>>>>>> niunian <niunian@ymail.com> said: > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> On 2015-08-13 09:26 PM, William December Starr wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>> niunian <niunian@ymail.com> said: > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> The fear of death can also be a purpose. It would be bowing down > >>>>>>>>>>>>> to the god of death which by definition, is the devil. > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Um, what definition is that? > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> By definition, God rules the world of living, the devil rules the > >>>>>>>>>>> world of death. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> And what definition is _that_? > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> It's the definition of God as the living God who gives life to all > >>>>>>>>> living things. Without God, all living things will die, and the > >>>>>>>>> world of > >>>>>>>>> living will cease to exist. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> <looks around> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> No god, and everything is still here... > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> what do you think a fish sees when he <looks around> from inside the > >>>>>>> aquarium tank? > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> You can now be looking at God but simply don't understand what you're > >>>>>>> seeing. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> So, it looks as if God is not there... > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> you have fish eyes. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> You should be in an institution. > >>>>> > >>>>> You should be dead and have worms eating your body. > >>>> > >>>> Why the conditional? > >>> > >>> What conditional, fuckwit? There was no conditional. > >>> > >>> Maybe you're not a native English speaker after all. > >> > >> «after all»? I never pretended to be one, you little troll. > >> > >>> However...you need to stop with the "a écrit" bullshit, espèce de con. > >>> Tu n'ecris pas dans un forum francophone. Arrête avec ta connerie. > >> > >> Why did you write your comment in French? Hypocrite much? > > > > > > You see what happens when you mix diffrent breeds of fishes in the same > > tank... > > Indeed! You've been eaten and spit out! > > Good riddance, troll! > > -- > Olrik > aa #1981 > EAC Chief Food Inspector, Bacon Division that is no way for a food inspector to talk. tell me, what is the longest period of time meat is kept refridgerated before it reaches comsumers? 5 years, ten years, twenty years?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Attila <<prochoice@here.now> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-17 05:55 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <7qb3talvd61dbjg5c0ltuf9fjq7ule62f1@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #514200 |
On Sun, 16 Aug 2015 19:53:17 +0800, niunian <niunian@ymail.com> in alt.atheism with message-id <mqpth7$jil$1@dont-email.me> wrote: >On 2015-08-16 01:26 PM, William December Starr wrote: >> In article <mqke7a$vf2$9@dont-email.me>, >> niunian <niunian@ymail.com> said: >> >>> On 2015-08-13 09:26 PM, William December Starr wrote: >>>> niunian <niunian@ymail.com> said: >>>> >>>>> The fear of death can also be a purpose. It would be bowing down >>>>> to the god of death which by definition, is the devil. >>>> >>>> Um, what definition is that? >>> >>> By definition, God rules the world of living, the devil rules the >>> world of death. >> >> And what definition is _that_? > >It's the definition of God as the living God who gives life to all >living things. But where is this definition found? > Without God, all living things will die, and the world of >living will cease to exist. What evidence do you have that any god ever existed? Please use verified sources only, and no vague ambiguities. -- Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent. Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying, especially those proposed by His Imperial Majesty Emperor Ass. Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government guaranteed above average income for every person. Every illegal alien is a criminal. No amnesty or work permit under any name or for any reason. Deportation upon identification as the only option. If you must text and drive please kill yourself quickly before you run into me.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | niunian <niunian@ymail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-17 20:12 +0800 |
| Message-ID | <mqsjdk$7c0$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #514595 |
On 2015-08-17 05:55 PM, Attila < wrote: > On Sun, 16 Aug 2015 19:53:17 +0800, niunian <niunian@ymail.com> in > alt.atheism with message-id <mqpth7$jil$1@dont-email.me> wrote: > >> On 2015-08-16 01:26 PM, William December Starr wrote: >>> In article <mqke7a$vf2$9@dont-email.me>, >>> niunian <niunian@ymail.com> said: >>> >>>> On 2015-08-13 09:26 PM, William December Starr wrote: >>>>> niunian <niunian@ymail.com> said: >>>>> >>>>>> The fear of death can also be a purpose. It would be bowing down >>>>>> to the god of death which by definition, is the devil. >>>>> >>>>> Um, what definition is that? >>>> >>>> By definition, God rules the world of living, the devil rules the >>>> world of death. >>> >>> And what definition is _that_? >> >> It's the definition of God as the living God who gives life to all >> living things. > > But where is this definition found? The Bible in Genesis. > >> Without God, all living things will die, and the world of >> living will cease to exist. > > What evidence do you have that any god ever existed? Please use > verified sources only, and no vague ambiguities. The issue of God's existence is a personal one. I can't give you my experience of God. You have to have your own experience to truly understand the meaning of God. I can only show you where you can find your own God. He is within you as the center of your life. You live your life for him, and he rewards you with happiness and love in life. Once again, this isn't your elementary science education, so stop asking for the "evidence" of God like a total idiot. Can you give me ten pounds of love and three ounces of wisdom? If not, there is no such thing as the evidence of God either. The entire universe is God's manifestation. You can not claim one part of the universe is God's evidence but the other part is not. > > -- > Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent. > > Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying, especially > those proposed by His Imperial Majesty Emperor Ass. > > Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government > guaranteed above average income for every person. > > Every illegal alien is a criminal. > No amnesty or work permit under any name or for any reason. > Deportation upon identification as the only option. > > If you must text and drive please kill yourself quickly > before you run into me. >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Attila <<prochoice@here.now> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-17 19:25 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <c2r4tad5tj9fqd9q067id44fhlbnk5qj8g@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #514616 |
On Mon, 17 Aug 2015 20:12:46 +0800, niunian <niunian@ymail.com> in alt.atheism with message-id <mqsjdk$7c0$1@dont-email.me> wrote: >On 2015-08-17 05:55 PM, Attila < wrote: >> On Sun, 16 Aug 2015 19:53:17 +0800, niunian <niunian@ymail.com> in >> alt.atheism with message-id <mqpth7$jil$1@dont-email.me> wrote: >> >>> On 2015-08-16 01:26 PM, William December Starr wrote: >>>> In article <mqke7a$vf2$9@dont-email.me>, >>>> niunian <niunian@ymail.com> said: >>>> >>>>> On 2015-08-13 09:26 PM, William December Starr wrote: >>>>>> niunian <niunian@ymail.com> said: >>>>>> >>>>>>> The fear of death can also be a purpose. It would be bowing down >>>>>>> to the god of death which by definition, is the devil. >>>>>> >>>>>> Um, what definition is that? >>>>> >>>>> By definition, God rules the world of living, the devil rules the >>>>> world of death. >>>> >>>> And what definition is _that_? >>> >>> It's the definition of God as the living God who gives life to all >>> living things. >> >> But where is this definition found? > >The Bible in Genesis. That source, being unverified, is rejected as being useless as well as valueless. > >> >>> Without God, all living things will die, and the world of >>> living will cease to exist. >> >> What evidence do you have that any god ever existed? Please use >> verified sources only, and no vague ambiguities. > >The issue of God's existence is a personal one. Then that 'god' can have no effect on the real world because if it could everyone would be aware of it. > I can't give you my >experience of God. I didn't ask for it, and I really am not interested in it. > You have to have your own experience to truly >understand the meaning of God. I can only show you where you can find >your own God. He is within you as the center of your life. You live your >life for him, and he rewards you with happiness and love in life. No thanks. Not interested in mythology. > >Once again, this isn't your elementary science education, so stop asking >for the "evidence" of God like a total idiot. Can you give me ten pounds >of love and three ounces of wisdom? Nope. Nether of those actually exist. > If not, there is no such thing as >the evidence of God either. The entire universe is God's manifestation. >You can not claim one part of the universe is God's evidence but the >other part is not. > So a god can affect the universe as much as an emotion or any other emotion can. But no more. Interesting. But not very. -- Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent. Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying, especially those proposed by His Imperial Majesty Emperor Ass. Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government guaranteed above average income for every person. Every illegal alien is a criminal. No amnesty or work permit under any name or for any reason. Deportation upon identification as the only option. If you must text and drive please kill yourself quickly before you run into me.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | niunian <niunian@ymail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-18 13:45 +0800 |
| Message-ID | <mqujaa$gfe$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #514924 |
On 2015-08-18 07:25 AM, Attila < wrote: > On Mon, 17 Aug 2015 20:12:46 +0800, niunian <niunian@ymail.com> in > alt.atheism with message-id <mqsjdk$7c0$1@dont-email.me> wrote: > >> On 2015-08-17 05:55 PM, Attila < wrote: >>> On Sun, 16 Aug 2015 19:53:17 +0800, niunian <niunian@ymail.com> in >>> alt.atheism with message-id <mqpth7$jil$1@dont-email.me> wrote: >>> >>>> On 2015-08-16 01:26 PM, William December Starr wrote: >>>>> In article <mqke7a$vf2$9@dont-email.me>, >>>>> niunian <niunian@ymail.com> said: >>>>> >>>>>> On 2015-08-13 09:26 PM, William December Starr wrote: >>>>>>> niunian <niunian@ymail.com> said: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The fear of death can also be a purpose. It would be bowing down >>>>>>>> to the god of death which by definition, is the devil. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Um, what definition is that? >>>>>> >>>>>> By definition, God rules the world of living, the devil rules the >>>>>> world of death. >>>>> >>>>> And what definition is _that_? >>>> >>>> It's the definition of God as the living God who gives life to all >>>> living things. >>> >>> But where is this definition found? >> >> The Bible in Genesis. > > That source, being unverified, is rejected as being useless as well as > valueless. > >> >>> >>>> Without God, all living things will die, and the world of >>>> living will cease to exist. >>> >>> What evidence do you have that any god ever existed? Please use >>> verified sources only, and no vague ambiguities. >> >> The issue of God's existence is a personal one. > > Then that 'god' can have no effect on the real world because if it > could everyone would be aware of it. > >> I can't give you my >> experience of God. > > I didn't ask for it, and I really am not interested in it. > >> You have to have your own experience to truly >> understand the meaning of God. I can only show you where you can find >> your own God. He is within you as the center of your life. You live your >> life for him, and he rewards you with happiness and love in life. > > No thanks. Not interested in mythology. > >> >> Once again, this isn't your elementary science education, so stop asking >> for the "evidence" of God like a total idiot. Can you give me ten pounds >> of love and three ounces of wisdom? > > Nope. Nether of those actually exist. Yet, do you deny that love and wisdom actually exist also? > >> If not, there is no such thing as >> the evidence of God either. The entire universe is God's manifestation. >> You can not claim one part of the universe is God's evidence but the >> other part is not. >> > > So a god can affect the universe as much as an emotion or any other > emotion can. But no more. > > Interesting. But not very. You forget to mention the word wisdom.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Attila <<prochoice@here.now> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-18 03:28 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <dhn5tah7njqahbu609sqtpo5qt4so9br6u@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #514994 |
On Tue, 18 Aug 2015 13:45:42 +0800, niunian <niunian@ymail.com> in alt.atheism with message-id <mqujaa$gfe$2@dont-email.me> wrote: >On 2015-08-18 07:25 AM, Attila < wrote: >> On Mon, 17 Aug 2015 20:12:46 +0800, niunian <niunian@ymail.com> in >> alt.atheism with message-id <mqsjdk$7c0$1@dont-email.me> wrote: >> >>> On 2015-08-17 05:55 PM, Attila < wrote: >>>> On Sun, 16 Aug 2015 19:53:17 +0800, niunian <niunian@ymail.com> in >>>> alt.atheism with message-id <mqpth7$jil$1@dont-email.me> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 2015-08-16 01:26 PM, William December Starr wrote: >>>>>> In article <mqke7a$vf2$9@dont-email.me>, >>>>>> niunian <niunian@ymail.com> said: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 2015-08-13 09:26 PM, William December Starr wrote: >>>>>>>> niunian <niunian@ymail.com> said: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The fear of death can also be a purpose. It would be bowing down >>>>>>>>> to the god of death which by definition, is the devil. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Um, what definition is that? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> By definition, God rules the world of living, the devil rules the >>>>>>> world of death. >>>>>> >>>>>> And what definition is _that_? >>>>> >>>>> It's the definition of God as the living God who gives life to all >>>>> living things. >>>> >>>> But where is this definition found? >>> >>> The Bible in Genesis. >> >> That source, being unverified, is rejected as being useless as well as >> valueless. >> >>> >>>> >>>>> Without God, all living things will die, and the world of >>>>> living will cease to exist. >>>> >>>> What evidence do you have that any god ever existed? Please use >>>> verified sources only, and no vague ambiguities. >>> >>> The issue of God's existence is a personal one. >> >> Then that 'god' can have no effect on the real world because if it >> could everyone would be aware of it. >> >>> I can't give you my >>> experience of God. >> >> I didn't ask for it, and I really am not interested in it. >> >>> You have to have your own experience to truly >>> understand the meaning of God. I can only show you where you can find >>> your own God. He is within you as the center of your life. You live your >>> life for him, and he rewards you with happiness and love in life. >> >> No thanks. Not interested in mythology. >> >>> >>> Once again, this isn't your elementary science education, so stop asking >>> for the "evidence" of God like a total idiot. Can you give me ten pounds >>> of love and three ounces of wisdom? >> >> Nope. Nether of those actually exist. > >Yet, do you deny that love and wisdom actually exist also? Outside of the individual mind involved, yes. > >> >>> If not, there is no such thing as >>> the evidence of God either. The entire universe is God's manifestation. >>> You can not claim one part of the universe is God's evidence but the >>> other part is not. >>> >> >> So a god can affect the universe as much as an emotion or any other >> emotion can. But no more. >> >> Interesting. But not very. > >You forget to mention the word wisdom. > Nope. There are a lot of mental conditions I did not mention. -- Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent. Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying, especially those proposed by His Imperial Majesty Emperor Ass. Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government guaranteed above average income for every person. Every illegal alien is a criminal. No amnesty or work permit under any name or for any reason. Deportation upon identification as the only option. If you must text and drive please kill yourself quickly before you run into me.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | niunian <niunian@ymail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-19 07:43 +0800 |
| Message-ID | <mr0hqp$2h7$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #515000 |
On 2015-08-18 03:28 PM, Attila < wrote: > On Tue, 18 Aug 2015 13:45:42 +0800, niunian <niunian@ymail.com> in > alt.atheism with message-id <mqujaa$gfe$2@dont-email.me> wrote: > >> On 2015-08-18 07:25 AM, Attila < wrote: >>> On Mon, 17 Aug 2015 20:12:46 +0800, niunian <niunian@ymail.com> in >>> alt.atheism with message-id <mqsjdk$7c0$1@dont-email.me> wrote: >>> >>>> On 2015-08-17 05:55 PM, Attila < wrote: >>>>> On Sun, 16 Aug 2015 19:53:17 +0800, niunian <niunian@ymail.com> in >>>>> alt.atheism with message-id <mqpth7$jil$1@dont-email.me> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 2015-08-16 01:26 PM, William December Starr wrote: >>>>>>> In article <mqke7a$vf2$9@dont-email.me>, >>>>>>> niunian <niunian@ymail.com> said: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 2015-08-13 09:26 PM, William December Starr wrote: >>>>>>>>> niunian <niunian@ymail.com> said: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> The fear of death can also be a purpose. It would be bowing down >>>>>>>>>> to the god of death which by definition, is the devil. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Um, what definition is that? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> By definition, God rules the world of living, the devil rules the >>>>>>>> world of death. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> And what definition is _that_? >>>>>> >>>>>> It's the definition of God as the living God who gives life to all >>>>>> living things. >>>>> >>>>> But where is this definition found? >>>> >>>> The Bible in Genesis. >>> >>> That source, being unverified, is rejected as being useless as well as >>> valueless. >>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>>> Without God, all living things will die, and the world of >>>>>> living will cease to exist. >>>>> >>>>> What evidence do you have that any god ever existed? Please use >>>>> verified sources only, and no vague ambiguities. >>>> >>>> The issue of God's existence is a personal one. >>> >>> Then that 'god' can have no effect on the real world because if it >>> could everyone would be aware of it. >>> >>>> I can't give you my >>>> experience of God. >>> >>> I didn't ask for it, and I really am not interested in it. >>> >>>> You have to have your own experience to truly >>>> understand the meaning of God. I can only show you where you can find >>>> your own God. He is within you as the center of your life. You live your >>>> life for him, and he rewards you with happiness and love in life. >>> >>> No thanks. Not interested in mythology. >>> >>>> >>>> Once again, this isn't your elementary science education, so stop asking >>>> for the "evidence" of God like a total idiot. Can you give me ten pounds >>>> of love and three ounces of wisdom? >>> >>> Nope. Nether of those actually exist. >> >> Yet, do you deny that love and wisdom actually exist also? > > Outside of the individual mind involved, yes. First of all, how do you define outside of the individual mind? where would that be? Can you point me to the outside of the individual mind with your individual mind? Secondly, can you deny the importance of love and wisdom simply because it's "within" your individual mind? > >> >>> >>>> If not, there is no such thing as >>>> the evidence of God either. The entire universe is God's manifestation. >>>> You can not claim one part of the universe is God's evidence but the >>>> other part is not. >>>> >>> >>> So a god can affect the universe as much as an emotion or any other >>> emotion can. But no more. >>> >>> Interesting. But not very. >> >> You forget to mention the word wisdom. >> > > Nope. There are a lot of mental conditions I did not mention. OK. Can you show me anything that is not a mental condition?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-13 15:53 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <d33pafFbe9vU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #513234 |
On 13/08/2015 13:30, niunian wrote: > The fear of death can also be a purpose. It would be bowing down to the > god of death which by definition, is the devil. > > Any more god head you can think of in your atheist life? WHy should death be evil? It is a natural part of the cycle of life. Decay and death feeds new growth. Death is *good*.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | niunian <niunian@ymail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-14 17:24 +0800 |
| Message-ID | <mqke7a$vf2$8@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #513271 |
On 2015-08-13 10:53 PM, Alex W. wrote: > On 13/08/2015 13:30, niunian wrote: > >> The fear of death can also be a purpose. It would be bowing down to the >> god of death which by definition, is the devil. >> >> Any more god head you can think of in your atheist life? > > WHy should death be evil? Because killing life is evil. > It is a natural part of the cycle of life. Decay and death feeds new > growth. Death is *good*. > Yes. I guess the death in peace without suffering can be an exception. It can be considered the freedom of the soul from this physical existence.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-14 12:08 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <d360idFsfjsU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #513480 |
On 14/08/2015 10:24, niunian wrote: > On 2015-08-13 10:53 PM, Alex W. wrote: >> On 13/08/2015 13:30, niunian wrote: >> >>> The fear of death can also be a purpose. It would be bowing down to the >>> god of death which by definition, is the devil. >>> >>> Any more god head you can think of in your atheist life? >> >> WHy should death be evil? > > Because killing life is evil. Unless god tells us to do it. Read Joshua. Or unless by killing we preserve our own life. Or unless by killing we preserve the lives of others. And that's not even discussing natural death.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | bilgat@m.nu |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-14 14:17 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <3lfssapnpq98a6qdnm0e385knolvltrb8r@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #513491 |
On Fri, 14 Aug 2015 12:08:59 +0100, "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: >On 14/08/2015 10:24, niunian wrote: >> On 2015-08-13 10:53 PM, Alex W. wrote: >>> On 13/08/2015 13:30, niunian wrote: >>> >>>> The fear of death can also be a purpose. It would be bowing down to the >>>> god of death which by definition, is the devil. >>>> >>>> Any more god head you can think of in your atheist life? >>> >>> WHy should death be evil? >> >> Because killing life is evil. > >Unless god tells us to do it. >Read Joshua. > >Or unless by killing we preserve our own life. LOL what happend to turn the other cheek, thats somewhere in the bible > >Or unless by killing we preserve the lives of others. I guess that one doesnt apply to your god thougfh > >And that's not even discussing natural death. >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | talishi <talishi@example.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-14 04:50 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <mqkklu0kd5@news3.newsguy.com> |
| In reply to | #513480 |
niunian wrote: > > Yes. I guess the death in peace without suffering can be an exception. > It can be considered the freedom of the soul from this physical existence. It's a wonder why theists do not rush to avail themselves of this vaunted freedom.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-14 12:53 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <d36354Ft71kU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #513501 |
On 14/08/2015 12:50, talishi wrote: > niunian wrote: >> >> Yes. I guess the death in peace without suffering can be an exception. >> It can be considered the freedom of the soul from this physical >> existence. > > It's a wonder why theists do not rush to avail themselves of this > vaunted freedom. Given how some Muslims choose to enter this blessed state, we should be thankful for such small mercy...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-14 06:54 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <hlwdjsd2-DC7E67.06545914082015@news.giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #513501 |
In article <mqkklu0kd5@news3.newsguy.com>, talishi <talishi@example.net> wrote: > niunian wrote: > > > > Yes. I guess the death in peace without suffering can be an exception. > > It can be considered the freedom of the soul from this physical existence. > > It's a wonder why theists do not rush to avail themselves of this > vaunted freedom. Hence, the declaration that suicide will land you in hell. -- JD Išve officially given up trying to find the bottom of the barrel that is Republican depravity.--Jidyom Rosario, Addicting Info
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | bilgat@m.nu |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-14 14:16 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <bcfssa5gn0qn5mf6l0hs4ngj4c0ceitcl8@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #513480 |
On Fri, 14 Aug 2015 17:24:50 +0800, niunian <niunian@ymail.com> wrote: >On 2015-08-13 10:53 PM, Alex W. wrote: >> On 13/08/2015 13:30, niunian wrote: >> >>> The fear of death can also be a purpose. It would be bowing down to the >>> god of death which by definition, is the devil. >>> >>> Any more god head you can think of in your atheist life? >> >> WHy should death be evil? > >Because killing life is evil. yeah LOL you should have told that to your god, it has murdered more people than small pox, oh wait it made small pox also, so it gets credit for all of those, ok then it has killed more people than hitler, oh wait according to you it made hitler so it gets credit for all of those also, I guess you are just fucked > >> It is a natural part of the cycle of life. Decay and death feeds new >> growth. Death is *good*. >> > >Yes. I guess the death in peace without suffering can be an exception. >It can be considered the freedom of the soul from this physical existence. hell when your god kills it will torture the fuck out of people, drowning, burning, disease... boy that sounds like a real stand up guy that god of yours
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | niunian <niunian@ymail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-15 07:51 +0800 |
| Message-ID | <mqmckh$1cg$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #513650 |
On 2015-08-15 03:16 AM, bilgat@m.nu wrote: > On Fri, 14 Aug 2015 17:24:50 +0800, niunian <niunian@ymail.com> wrote: > >> On 2015-08-13 10:53 PM, Alex W. wrote: >>> On 13/08/2015 13:30, niunian wrote: >>> >>>> The fear of death can also be a purpose. It would be bowing down to the >>>> god of death which by definition, is the devil. >>>> >>>> Any more god head you can think of in your atheist life? >>> >>> WHy should death be evil? >> >> Because killing life is evil. > > yeah LOL you should have told that to your god, it has murdered more > people than small pox, oh wait it made small pox also, so it gets > credit for all of those, ok then it has killed more people than > hitler, oh wait according to you it made hitler so it gets credit for > all of those also, I guess you are just fucked > >> >>> It is a natural part of the cycle of life. Decay and death feeds new >>> growth. Death is *good*. >>> >> >> Yes. I guess the death in peace without suffering can be an exception. >> It can be considered the freedom of the soul from this physical existence. > > hell when your god kills it will torture the fuck out of people, > drowning, burning, disease... boy that sounds like a real stand up guy > that god of yours > Nope. None of anything you have said including what you mentioned from the Bible has anything to do with the God of living. The God of living only gives life. Only the force of evil and sometimes it is the force of nature would take life. God as the source and energy of all living things does not kill life. For God to kill life, it would mean God has killed himself. It's stupid to even imagine such thing.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mike M <mike@xenocyte.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-15 06:41 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <1459346691461313425.308533mike-xenocyte.com@news.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #513781 |
niunian <niunian@ymail.com> wrote: > On 2015-08-15 03:16 AM, bilgat@m.nu wrote: >> On Fri, 14 Aug 2015 17:24:50 +0800, niunian <niunian@ymail.com> wrote: >> >>> On 2015-08-13 10:53 PM, Alex W. wrote: >>>> On 13/08/2015 13:30, niunian wrote: >>>> >>>>> The fear of death can also be a purpose. It would be bowing down to the >>>>> god of death which by definition, is the devil. >>>>> >>>>> Any more god head you can think of in your atheist life? >>>> >>>> WHy should death be evil? >>> >>> Because killing life is evil. >> >> yeah LOL you should have told that to your god, it has murdered more >> people than small pox, oh wait it made small pox also, so it gets >> credit for all of those, ok then it has killed more people than >> hitler, oh wait according to you it made hitler so it gets credit for >> all of those also, I guess you are just fucked >> >>> >>>> It is a natural part of the cycle of life. Decay and death feeds new >>>> growth. Death is *good*. >>>> >>> >>> Yes. I guess the death in peace without suffering can be an exception. >>> It can be considered the freedom of the soul from this physical existence. >> >> hell when your god kills it will torture the fuck out of people, >> drowning, burning, disease... boy that sounds like a real stand up guy >> that god of yours >> > > Nope. None of anything you have said including what you mentioned from > the Bible has anything to do with the God of living. The God of living > only gives life. Only the force of evil and sometimes it is the force of > nature would take life. God as the source and energy of all living things > does not kill life. For God to kill life, it would mean God has killed > himself. It's stupid to even imagine such thing. I'm trying to figure out whether your religion has anything to do with any established ones, and failing. Certainly not Judaism, Christianity or Islam - to name just three of the ones that embrace the notion that God erased most of the life on Earth in a flood so he could start afresh ... -- So much universe, and so little time. - Sir Terry Pratchett
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | niunian <niunian@ymail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-15 16:11 +0800 |
| Message-ID | <mqn36b$5ht$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #513802 |
On 2015-08-15 02:41 PM, Mike M wrote: > niunian <niunian@ymail.com> wrote: >> On 2015-08-15 03:16 AM, bilgat@m.nu wrote: >>> On Fri, 14 Aug 2015 17:24:50 +0800, niunian <niunian@ymail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> On 2015-08-13 10:53 PM, Alex W. wrote: >>>>> On 13/08/2015 13:30, niunian wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> The fear of death can also be a purpose. It would be bowing down to the >>>>>> god of death which by definition, is the devil. >>>>>> >>>>>> Any more god head you can think of in your atheist life? >>>>> >>>>> WHy should death be evil? >>>> >>>> Because killing life is evil. >>> >>> yeah LOL you should have told that to your god, it has murdered more >>> people than small pox, oh wait it made small pox also, so it gets >>> credit for all of those, ok then it has killed more people than >>> hitler, oh wait according to you it made hitler so it gets credit for >>> all of those also, I guess you are just fucked >>> >>>> >>>>> It is a natural part of the cycle of life. Decay and death feeds new >>>>> growth. Death is *good*. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Yes. I guess the death in peace without suffering can be an exception. >>>> It can be considered the freedom of the soul from this physical existence. >>> >>> hell when your god kills it will torture the fuck out of people, >>> drowning, burning, disease... boy that sounds like a real stand up guy >>> that god of yours >>> >> >> Nope. None of anything you have said including what you mentioned from >> the Bible has anything to do with the God of living. The God of living >> only gives life. Only the force of evil and sometimes it is the force of >> nature would take life. God as the source and energy of all living things >> does not kill life. For God to kill life, it would mean God has killed >> himself. It's stupid to even imagine such thing. > > I'm trying to figure out whether your religion has anything to do with any > established ones, and failing. Certainly not Judaism, Christianity or Islam > - to name just three of the ones that embrace the notion that God erased > most of the life on Earth in a flood so he could start afresh ... > The Old Testament has at least two Gods. The first God is the God of creation who is the God of Eden. The second God is the God of Adam and Eve after they have sinned. The first God is the God of living, the giver of life who is always good. The second God is the God of sin who is always vengeful and evil. They are not the same God. The sin has introduced or manufactured another God in the place of the previous creation God.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | talishi <talishi@example.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-15 03:36 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <mqn4pp1c16@news6.newsguy.com> |
| In reply to | #513820 |
niunian wrote: > > The Old Testament has at least two Gods. The first God is the God of > creation who is the God of Eden. The second God is the God of Adam and > Eve after they have sinned. The first God is the God of living, the > giver of life who is always good. The second God is the God of sin who > is always vengeful and evil. They are not the same God. The sin has > introduced or manufactured another God in the place of the previous > creation God. It turns out the previous creation God was manufactured as well. Humans have manufactured at least 5,000 of them.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 7 of 14 — ← Prev page 1 … 5 6 [7] 8 9 … 14 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web