Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #726449 > unrolled thread

Building a new IBM computer

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-08 16:30 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-08 17:00 -0800
      Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-17 14:59 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-09 00:22 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-09 00:47 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-09 01:08 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-09 01:49 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-09 02:21 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-09 02:39 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-09 02:59 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-09 03:26 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-09 03:57 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-09 04:20 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-09 05:01 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-09 05:26 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-09 05:29 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-09 06:04 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-09 06:12 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-09 06:58 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-09 07:11 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-09 07:46 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-09 08:07 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-09 08:43 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-09 09:10 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-09 09:46 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-09 09:49 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-09 10:04 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-09 10:10 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-09 10:42 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-09 11:20 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-09 11:34 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-09 13:30 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-09 14:06 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-09 14:30 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-09 14:58 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-09 15:17 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-09 15:43 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-09 15:48 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-09 16:11 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-09 16:46 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-09 17:08 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-09 17:43 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-09 17:57 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-10 10:11 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-10 12:48 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-10 13:02 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-10 13:27 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-10 14:10 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-10 14:29 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-10 14:55 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-10 15:15 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-10 15:43 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-10 16:02 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-10 16:59 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-10 18:06 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-10 18:28 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-10 18:47 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-10 19:20 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-10 20:04 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-10 20:25 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-11 01:41 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-11 02:17 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-11 02:52 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-11 03:12 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-11 03:27 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-11 04:00 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-11 04:11 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-11 10:17 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-11 10:44 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-11 11:14 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-11 11:40 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-11 12:06 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-11 12:39 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-11 13:45 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-11 13:59 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-11 14:17 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-11 14:40 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-11 22:25 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-11 23:01 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-11 23:30 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-12 09:36 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-12 10:01 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-12 10:22 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-12 10:36 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-12 10:58 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-12 12:00 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-12 12:31 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-12 13:09 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-12 13:35 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-12 13:49 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-12 14:00 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-12 14:04 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-12 14:26 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-12 15:57 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-12 16:00 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-12 16:41 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-12 16:47 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-12 17:32 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-13 03:50 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-13 04:06 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-13 04:26 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-13 04:52 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-13 05:23 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-13 05:53 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-13 11:13 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-13 11:58 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-13 12:09 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-13 12:42 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-13 12:53 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-13 13:32 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-13 13:47 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-13 14:17 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-13 16:10 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-14 00:35 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-14 01:14 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-14 01:41 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-14 02:00 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-14 06:29 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-14 06:56 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-14 07:27 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-14 07:53 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-14 08:18 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-14 08:38 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-14 08:54 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-14 09:14 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-14 10:26 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-14 10:45 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-14 11:38 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-14 12:48 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-14 14:19 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-14 15:34 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-14 15:46 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-14 16:09 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-14 16:43 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-14 17:05 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-14 17:25 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-14 17:47 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-14 18:04 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-14 18:39 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-14 18:58 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-14 19:23 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-14 19:52 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-15 07:14 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-15 07:31 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-15 08:04 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-15 08:40 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-15 09:05 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-15 09:27 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-15 09:59 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-15 10:27 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-15 10:45 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-15 11:14 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-15 11:39 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-15 12:06 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-15 12:24 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-15 13:03 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-15 13:15 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-15 13:37 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-15 13:44 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-15 14:22 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-15 14:49 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-15 15:28 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-15 15:41 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-15 15:47 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-15 15:55 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-15 17:49 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-15 18:16 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-15 19:02 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-15 19:21 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-15 19:55 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-15 20:11 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-15 21:01 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-16 05:08 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-16 05:51 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-16 07:00 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-16 07:31 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-16 08:06 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-16 08:28 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-16 08:52 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-16 09:33 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-16 10:06 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-16 10:35 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-16 11:08 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-16 11:34 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-16 11:57 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-16 12:50 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-16 13:17 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-16 13:47 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-16 14:20 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-16 14:42 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-16 15:07 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-16 15:17 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-16 15:40 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-16 15:52 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-16 16:21 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-16 16:49 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-16 17:18 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-16 17:47 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-16 18:04 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-16 18:23 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-16 18:40 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-17 05:07 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-17 05:49 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-17 06:27 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-17 07:12 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-17 07:50 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-17 08:18 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-17 08:49 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-17 09:17 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-17 10:13 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-17 10:46 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-17 11:51 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-17 12:14 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-17 12:51 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-17 14:21 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-17 15:13 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-17 15:53 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-17 16:20 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-17 16:54 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-17 17:39 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-17 18:19 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-17 18:58 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-17 19:28 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-17 19:46 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-17 19:57 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-17 20:25 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-17 20:50 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-17 20:57 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-17 23:14 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-18 08:47 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-18 09:07 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-18 09:30 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-18 09:49 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-18 10:36 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-18 10:46 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-18 11:09 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-18 11:40 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-18 12:04 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-18 12:41 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-18 13:06 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-18 13:18 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-18 13:44 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-18 14:20 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-18 14:47 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-18 15:14 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-18 15:57 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-18 16:34 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-18 17:02 -0800
    Re: Building a new IBM computer KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2019-02-18 17:29 -0800

Page 2 of 13 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 … 13  Next page →

#726507

Red wing blackbirds black birds crows get over yourselves.

So ok our invisible floor that keeps going up through this series of dots in the matrix and each layer where we are is a moment in time.


So we can park the bottom in the middle at a comfortable height and just move the dots through instead because we are tired and grumpy old men or fat and lazy drunks, or high on dope, and seeing things or riding a unicycle or pigging out in the buffet upstairs.

Programmers.

How will we record the data? Take a picture of the floor.
Move our plane into a different dimension.

Oh I know you are lovin this the terminology is starting to come out.

So our plane has to occupy that dimension and a second dimension as well.
One where the data is and one where the camera is that is going to take that picture.

So if we want to store that data we need to take a picture of the data.

What do we do with it after we have taken the picture?
We need to store it. So then taking pictures and the we need to take pictures of pictures.
So we have a way to do that and that is the dimension where the camera is you have that shared with a second dimension.

So now the first takes the picture the second quickly captures it because the first needs to repeat so then the tape of that one has to move.

So the camera in that third dimension is using film or magnetic tape.

Now since we are not programming matrix computers here we will go back to that floor and that camera and be abstract.

So the floor is stationary and the pixel data moving through the floor and each moment in time you take a picture of the floor and you write that to disk.

So then in terms of saving data that can be a very quick process.

But probably not as fast as 4.4 million times second.

"Whereas the fastest hard drives can read and write data at about 200MB per second and access data in a few milliseconds, the fastest solid-state drives can achieve 550-MBps (or higher) transfers that essentially saturate the SATA interface, and their typical access times are a fraction of a single millisecond."

Chinese for some so lets just use 200MB per second.

If we said 10 gigabytes per second would we blow away the competition?

I would think so.

So how large a floor is 10 gig?
https://photo.stackexchange.com/questions/96274/a-10gb-tif-image-by-nasa-of-the-moon-how-do-i-resize-downscale-it-to-use-it

1 and 10 zeros so then to get an x and a y, 100,000 x 100,000

10,000,000,000 checking counting zeros and being sure.

So if each pixel was like a screen that's a very large image.
usualy it would be 1024 wide by 768 for a normal small photo these days.
Not wide screen.
So we are really talking about 100 times that size.
So lets use something 100 times smaller and we can make that floor.

But lets not just go 100 times smaller because we need to not use 1024 x 768 we want 1000 by 1000 or similar figuratively speaking we want some easier math and we want to try to simplify the process.

So we need to think in terms of a sheet 100,000 atoms by 100,000 atoms.

And we need to space them apart.

So if we have an inch of material, a square inch, could the engineers give us that in a watch I think so.

So then how many atoms in an inch?
5e+8 approx
500,000,000

5 hundred million. I even write it out because you can just get confused by these numbers.

So there are 500 million atoms across and down on our floor and we just need to make a matrix of dots on a sheet that is not every atom but we can space it out use groups of atoms and then this means we can use easier technology and have a larger margin for error.

 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#726509

Can't forget to involve the ladies.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OWJCfOvochA

So then rubbing hands lets look at our new quantum computer.

We have a sheet of pixels 100,000 by 100,000 that's 10GB

so for a watch we want to allocate some of that for storage, and some for programs.

So lets say a corner here is for programs and in that corner we will divide that up into 16 pieces.

And in those 16 pieces will be 16 programs.

We know that 8 of those are what everyone uses so we reserve those for the 8 programs. That leaves us with 8 more that we can make for today's world.

We need an operating system as well.

But we have this sheet and above it we have a camera (detectors) and below it we save the data.

So the code is in the middle we are comparing the code with the sheet above it and storing the data on the sheet below it.

The present the future and the past.

So then to see how the code executes we distance our self from reality and we think in terms of each dot having colors each color is a number and these numbers are passing a point in time.

So then to get fancy we have to stop now and ask ourselves this question. Do we feel lucky?

I think we do. So lets not just use color, Hilbert would roll over in his grave.

Lets use a p point fellas, and take over the universe.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#726515

So no doubt you need to hear me start to toss around some big numbers if we are doing quantum computing.

So if your computer is 64 bit mine is 64 million bit hows them apples?

Mine is a million times better than yours.

So where is my register? You blind? 
kidding probably some of you are and Siri just asked you that question.

So a color number that is in an invisible register.

The set the register has a possible 64 million values and so I want to store a variable in that register.

So I turn on a blue light and that is a number in that register.

My registers are invisible because I am an existentialist and am using my will even though they don't exist. If you have a European accent here that sentence is going to sound a lot better in the press when you explain it.

So each register has an address. Well my gosh if ever there was an easy address system this has to be it. This many to the left and this many down or up whatever to find a point on that page is as easy as iterating i and j.

for j is assigned 1 to 50,000 do 
for i is assigned 1 to 50,000 do

where j is handling y by convention and i is handling x by convention and since in the instruction we will be using our x and our y we don't use them for the iteration.

So 

x:=0;
y:=0;

for j := 1 to 50000 do
for i:= 1 to 500000 do
begin
x:=x+1;
y:=y+1;
end;

now you are in the center.

Philosophically speaking unless you make one of those dots special and have a direct route there there is no getting there except by counting the markers as you go there.

And your route would need to be connected physically.

So we want a bullet proof system so depending on how you read and write that page usually like a scanline will come down your screen.

We are using a scan page.

Not a scan line.

Ok so we have almost reached the point where we can discuss it in abstract terms.

So the operating system needs software so the code is on that page. Variables that will hold color numbers.

Colors on a flat plane in a matrix of dots.

Now we can look at an example or we might not get further if I can think of a way to put this in simple terms.

So then how many bytes is a small program?

So wordpad is 4 MB
So to represent that program 2,000 by 2,000 is required.

So then we can lay out all its bytes on that page.
To store it.
And we could even execute it as well by simply doing this....


for j:= 1 to 2000 do
for i:= 1 to 2000 do
begin

execute code in here 

end;


What would it look like in there?

Well that depends on the programmer.

So then you know where the data stream is, you also have an addressing system, but do you have goto?

Not until you can change j or i on the fly.

You might need to back up or go to the left or the right.

Ordinarily you cannot alter j or i.

You can alter the variables in that are in the iteration.

So if I said 

for j:= 1 to 2000 do
for i:= 1 to 2000 do
begin
j:= 100;

end;

what is it going to do?

Always reset j to 100 after each iteration.

After each line of i finished j goes back to 100;


Add dimensions.

j,i,k,l,n,p,v,q,

For all those things are assigned do this and do that and change those values on the fly.
DO your little dance.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uj0wPrN_Y_4

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#726517

If you are an engineer saying I don't get it right now that's perfect.

That is what we would expect given the depth of this river.

Buckle up.

For j:= 1 to 2000 do
for i:= 1 to 1000 do
for q:= 1 to 5000 do
for s:= 1 to 2000 do
for n := 1 to n do
for B := 1 to b do  (NB: if you are really existential and fussy and really annoying since we don't want to worry about case when we program. We are drunk, fuck, me.)
for h := n to r do
for fucks.sake.you.better.take.a.tylenol := ok.I.will to eternity.and.back do
for 0 := 1 to 50 do
begin

Keeping in mind that we can put begin and end also between all of those and they can be like that and an unlimited number of them.

And those are variables.

Will be in this loop forever?

Yes if you do not always in the center iteration that one is the one in real time, the bottom of the list, the last one above I will repeat that line so you know
Up there it is 
for 0 := 1 to 50 do

That's the last line in that code and so then every time that line executes so then you want to be sure to poll the mouse check for input and you want to let the operating system update anything it needs to that it is managing at the same time, multi threaded remember, so you say something like

windows.processmessages.


end; 

So in Windows everything is done by putting messages in the cue.

So it will execute those messages it gets.

I would say in order but you know.

So you send it a message you have to wait for it to reply that it is finished and not go further since you need that result before you can continue usually.

But in this instance you are just saying have you made changes that I am not aware of?

Process my changes and your changes so we are on the same page. Lets be together on this so.

The key press the check box the esc key the power goes off the harddrives full the eventualities of life must all be checked and accounted for and the ones that need to be done constantly are things like key press checks so you can exit and break the iterations or maybe it is complete so a check box has been checked.
An invisible one or visible one.

The computer will freeze if you do not keep checking.

So then you also need to keep listening for input.
So we use action listeners and things of this nature which means we are waiting for an email so we have to keep looking in the folder to see if a message a file was put in there and if so we get instructions out of that file.

So what is that about?

A bajillion other computers interacting with each other in real time and they could be sending you instructions you need while that code is being executed.

The point is that it is open ended if you do that with a door to the outside world.

So while you are working away there a message comes in only 5 more minutes and so you are carrying on you better have a timer going anticipate that command and then set your timer to exit the program when you get that message.

One example of a bajillion messages that might come in but you must be able to anticipate them and have the code written to handle the message.
So script languages and all the rest.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#726518

At the risk of confusing you (my wife started to laugh and so did my crew)


Lets just look at this

For j:= 1 to 2000 do
for i:= 1 to 1000 do
for q:= 1 to 5000 do
for s:= 1 to 2000 do
for n := 1 to n do 


what is going to happen right here?

If n is 0?

It doesn't matter at all it is a variable.

So n:= 1 to zero do?

The program doesn't check the condition of the equation until it is finished executing the statements between begin and end.

So it is going through at least once anyway then it will move on because there is nothing to iterate once it knows the value of n.

But you see this is where in design the computer scientists has to look at this and maybe make a rule. To keep things orderly and one foot before the other and ladders with steps and things going forward in time conventions like that.

So you would say you cannot use a variable and assign a value to that variable in that way.

So they must be different. So even B and b you see is only correct if you are using case.

If it doesn't matter if the variable is upper case or lower case and trust me its so much better if it doesn't matter.

If it did you would be inclined to break the first rule.

It is a bit complicated but with that rule there you see the rest are all much safer to use even the one that said to infinity and back it is just words being used as a variable but often descriptive words are better than letters.

So then you know it can get very complex those are all dimensions n dimensional space Hilbert space hyperspace and they can exist in your will and in computing and in the matrix but not in a physical world this world it is a monitor a 3D monitor and so the monitor is kept separate from the code.

The code is off in other dimensions free to travel without mass calculating at the speed of light perhaps but the real world of atoms need x,y,z.

So while all that is going on the work you are doing with the code it is affecting the variables at x,y,and z.

So those are in the center loop as well.

That's where reality is.

So now this seems tedious until you use the goto concept or branch to these other dimensions.

We can look at it with 3 levels

for j:= 1 to 20 do
for i:= 1 to 20 do
begin
for k := 1 to 20 do
begin


end;{end k}
end;{end i}

so there I put a note in those fancy brackets that is not part of the code.

And when you have so many begins and ends in there you need to know which end is for which variable.
where is j?

You have not added a begin so you don't need an end for j but if you added a begin you would have one there.

so then

for j:= 1 to 20 do
for i:= 1 to 20 do
begin
for k := 1 to 20 do
begin
check for messages
 if message.time.toquit then 
begin
i:=20;
j:=20;
end;
end;{end k}
end;{end i}

message.time.toquit is a booolean.

If that boolean is true in this case its self explanatory.

So in this case that's a function that returns a boolean value of yes or no.

So in that function in the black box who knows what is going on but if that message that came in said it was time to quit then you want to exit.

So you need a checkbox somewhere that is not checked.

When it is time to quit the function the black box needs to check that box.

So then your function is checking just to see if that check box has been checked and if so then exit. 

If Windows or the user wants to quit they may use any number of methods or reasons but they only need to check that box to instruct you to exit.


so then along with assigning those values to move the present to the end of the line so that it is done, you can even move it the other way and reduce j or i if a message comes in.

So you are doing a repetitive task and out there they are watching and they "oh he screwed up change this parameter and have him go back and do that again."

so they tell you in that message go back to j = 10 meanwhile j is at 15.

So the script language instructs the program to change that variable value and you are repeating things in time.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#726519

for j := -6487 to 8.432 do

can we do that?

We can do the first one we can;t do the second one why?

We can't do a partial iteration.

that's not a whole number.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#726520

dimensions and dimensions within dimensions and machines within machines and virtual machines within dimensions within machines, you could sit here and just program the empire and program the activities of everything in it.

 
What sort of image would that make in your mind lol the girls in my crew are still alive the guys are catatonic the girls are laughing so they are ok.

Maybe its best not to try and picture it in your mind since it doesn;t matter that much although you can.

With 3D graphics and simulators and all manner of props tools crutches helpers etc.

But you do not have to be able to picture it in your mind and you can use black boxes to simplify all that.

So then while you are doing something for j you are doing something also for k and i in this example.

So picture a cube and we will just do some small thing.

for j:= 1 to 100 do
for i:= 1 to 100 do
for k:= 1 to 100 do
begin
x:= (i*2) 
y:= (j*2)
z:= (k*2)
turnonlightat(x,y,z);
end;
 
where turnonlightat is a function that turns on a light at x,y,z what will occur here?

what will be the values of x,y,z?

Well because they are all being multiplied by 2 it will skip every other light in the cube.

Nice and simple and the most simple. It cannot get any easier than that.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#726521

you see if it was important and these were instructions no way I could leave it like that. Why?

I said every other cube. You mean all the rest?

No I mean every other light. You mean all the rest. lol and I'm not even drunk you see maybe I made a mistake and there I just did and maybe I wouldn't catch it.

So I have to be very clear and double check the instructions.

So if I have to say one but not the next one and then that one but not the next one like that.

Then there is no confusion.

so language and English and the same meaning is not going to make your code bullet proof and mission critical.

So a whole bunch of things you can do to try to make it mission critical.

Checking sensors and getting feedback and similar.

And the ability to act on it on the fly in the iteration.

And in the end this execution of programs will end because you have set an end date.
it will not go on forever unless you reset one of those variables that are holding the current value of the iterations.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#726526

Why will it eventually come to an end if I use a variable like 

   for h := you.better.take.a.tylenol to ok.I.will.toinfinityandbeyond do


Lets just clarify by being aproriate even if we are eccentric or existential

So we use notes if it is even slightly confusing right in the code.

and if we use certain brackets or characters depending on what programming language you are using the comments aren't executed they are just  notes for programmers.

so
var
h:longint;
you.better.take.a.tylenol:longint;
ok.I.will.toinfinityandbeyond:longint;

So I just declared 3 variables of long integer.

Now the program will allocate memory for those variables and know how much to allocate because it knows how much memory to allocate for a long integer;

So this is algebra.

On steroids.

And on a unicycle sometimes and on drugs some times but you know creativity brings on innovation. So we want our physicists to have funny hair and sloppy mismatched socks and we want our programmers to be able to do that as well with impunity because we are really asking them to be creative and focus when they need to at 100 percent.


This is where the magic happens.

You want to do that math?

Ok then go get me some pizza.

Like that and not you Chupee he has a rep here who gets pizza for me and the other roommate gets burgers from A&W and Chupee also supplies me with joints every now and again so they encourage me on by being helpers and they can do that you see so they are being helpful that way.

And I do the math.

So once you have declared your variables then you see whatever you call them isn't all that important but you can express yourself any way you like and use that as a symbol.
A variable.

So it is open in all directions and you would like to see now some different infinities turning into butterflies so lets go deeper, (putting hands together like I was making a French expression with my hands while speaking about to dive in a pool) into the code.

It's not bad enough we are traveling through dimensions and through virtual machines etc there is more dimensionality we can use since we have an infinity of infinities to use.

 
Now first though maybe we need to philosophically decide if we should make a day that we will call D day the end of the universe and if we do not reset then the program will finally end.

To do that we can't use variables in the iterations we have to use hard coded values constants.

So then we declare those at the same time we declare the variables.

const
endoftime=6000000000000;

var
bla:longint

begin
for bla := 1 to endoftime do
kissmebaby(12,12,0);

end;

So from 1 to 6 trillion do is what it is saying not the end of time itself we have decided with our will when the end of time shall be.

And kissmebaby is the function and the parameters are 12 inches, 12 roses, and a hubba hubba hey which is the default so we just have a convention that if it is 0 then use the default.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8FPRoBQx2kg

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#726528

So we are all hypothetically having a real good time there so far so then lets pop a universe in there at the same time for scientists.

Sort of like incorporating a parallel universe and so we are scientists we want an infinity of parallel universes in there.

Some will want blue ones some will want red ones some plaid some designer ones etc.

So just to get there non catatonic thus far its not that difficult to grasp because we always live in 3 dimensions our body height width depth

and notice how I wrote that? y,x,z

Hmmm seems strange but it is to confuse the engineers who would expect x,y,z

then our iteration convention  would look like

for i:= 1 to 100 do
for j:= 1 to 100 do

So conventions help other programmers read your code if you want them to do that.

And so good programming habits form.

So lets pop those universes in there now sticking with convention...

So to do that we have to declare a type.

const
endoftime=600;

type Mypoint =
 p:Tpoint;
 a:longint;
 g:real;
 w:text;
 v:boolean;
end; {this is our description of the universe}

var
i,j,k:longint
x,y,z:longint; 
pp:Tpoint;
{a Tpoint is a point in space, so we want one that has values that you can define and as many of them as you want not just color. It has x and y and z
like this p.x p.y p.z so that you can identify the location of the point in space}

universe:array [1...10000000000] of mypoint; {10000000000 that many p points we can use}
begin

universe.v:=false;


for j:= 1 to endoftime do
for i:= 1 to endoftime do
for k:= 1 to endoftime do
begin
universe.p.x:=i;
universe.p.y:=j;
universe.p.z:=k;

universe.a:= some number you are working with and it has a marker symbol 'a' in this case and it might be temperature outside.

universe.g:=12345.87654; here we just out and gave it a number because whatever we happen to need g for as a variable in this pretend case that is the value with it's decimal place. if we want it to change we might do this

universe.g:=((12345.87654 * ((x+y)-z)* universe.a)/ 5);
{don't you love algebra?}

universe.w:= ' The temperature outside today is' + inttostring(universe.a);
{so that is a line of text that includes the temperature outside in this case} 

if universe.v = true then exit program;

end;

smoke break;

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kmmPFrkuPq0

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#726531

parallel universes

so then also physical dimensions that exceed 3;

If we can create a body that responds in some way to those extra physical dimensions.
Now one of you said two sets of eyes, that works.

So we have inner sight and so then we can add a physical non physical partially physical define it yourself space we just need to match up ability that we have added to use that dimensionalty.

That was worth throwing half a smoke away to get that down at this point in the discussion.

It has never been done before except by us in the matrix like myself extra senses extra dimensional philandering holy terror. Just ask my wives. lol 

So as example your second set of eyes can see into maybe even 3 more dimensions a parallel universe.

Or in my case another simulator with different universal laws and rules.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#726550

a hubba hubba hey

Who would have thought that quantum computing could be this easy and this fun?

2 dimensions

for j:= 1 to theendoftime do
for i:= 1 to theendoftime do
liveandworkandplay(12,12,10);

{10 is supermodel maybe}

and 3 dimensions
for j:= 1 to theendoftime do
for i:= 1 to theendoftime do
for k:= 1 to theendoftime do
liveandworkandplay(12,12,1);

{reality is like that then you marry him}

So then that describes our space and we want to describe our space time.

So we will move all that through time.

And to do that we have a clock and code is executed on a timed cycle according to that clock.
Now we also have to be able to set the time and date on that clock while the code is executing if we are making code for time travel or inter-dimensional travel.

We might as well multi task if we are writing code for virtual machines, simulators, 3D environments, and even new environments that exceed reality.


moving these 3 dimensions through time
 
for j:= 1 to theendoftime do
for i:= 1 to theendoftime do
for k:= 1 to theendoftime do
begin
liveandworkandplay(12,12,1);
t.seconds:=t.seconds +1;
end;

where t is a set that contains everything you might need.
An infinity of infinities in the t set.

So we need to declare a type for our time mangement system.

And in doing so we can assume that it will change over time and our needs will change over time.

And so the type might change over time. We might add more things to it.
type Tholiday =

name:text;
date:Tdate;
end;


type t =

seconds
minutes
hours
day
date {these can all be defined any way you want here}
time
time in 24 hour notation
daylight savings: boolean;
holiday:Tholiday; set or type within a type you see to do this it has to first be declared so we declared it above this type.
language
culture
origin
era
epoch
race
generation

and an infinity of things

end;

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#726557

So now we have to do some debugging even for that little bit of code.
And we do that by running the program and seeing the result.
Then we may have to go back and change parameters or correct spelling for the compiler or any number of reasons we call it debugging.

Climb up that ladder and Bill in Groundhog Day trying to get the program finished, had to repeat and repeat a day as he debugged his programmed behavior, until his programming was sufficient to win the hand of the fair maiden.

So we run the program ... 
and then we make our correction

and 3 dimensions
for j:= 1 to theendoftime do
for i:= 1 to theendoftime do
for k:= 1 to theendoftime do
liveandworkandplay(6,12,1);

The roses though.

So you see how we get right into a 3D environment to do our programming for 3D environments in this code method. Now in this way as we code we can picture in our mind what we are coding and how it works.

To be too abstract is not see the entire picture.


So we want to first and foremost yes; we want to make sure our 3D space is properly arranged and managed by a coordinate system.
And we want to be sure that we have a good understanding of time and what associated bits of information go with time, those are there close together.

So we have a number line the bottom line in 2D space and from the center going left are our negative numbers.
  
To the right our positive numbers.

Now we use decimals and we put the remainder in registers heading north.

So that our bottom line is object oriented.

In order to use quanta we want to have them like a field.

A field with stones in it not a blue glowing force field mystery.

We want a field according to the laws of physics that has points.

So then along that line are our points separated and so then objects every one and one of the qualities of these objects is that it has a remainder.

Now we could say that it is going to the right and our actual point in space time is not at a number on our number line but rather is in a kind of free space or other dimensional space yet still part of the same universe we just can't access it. We don't have a tool to get at that fractional atom lets call it.

BUT that is just one quality those decimals places might be used for.
Those points on that line all represent objects and the decimal places an associated fractional weight that is an offset from a global standard.

Now it isn't even to do with distance it is a fraction that relates to a quality
that has to do with weight.

Now we have of course an infinity of uses for those decimal places, for the variables that are there.

example?

Well we only have 1000 bits in this system here since we don't want to make it too difficult or slow the machine down.

So this system we are discussing right here has numbers on a line and going north from each number it has data storage.
By saying data storage you could put a name in there.

Or any type of data in there.

The registers just store data.

It is we who are defining the data there as decimals which may exist associated as a fractional value in addition to the whole number on the line.

We don't have to define it as that the software we write can define it as anything we want on the fly.

So this does get a bit complicated.

quantum computing is hard.

So a photon is a quanta. An object.
A wave packet.
Now we are able to describe it in simple terms.
It's wavelength.

Now on that number line are quanta.

So then what goes north again are associated with those quanta.

And since we are scientists we can decide with our will what we want to be included and what we want to associate with those photons.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#726564

We are not in very deep water yet.

So our number line and our quanta are numbered and sitting on that line so they have an address. A number and in our coordinate system we are very familiar with making points in space.

So then above that as stated 1000 bits. But depending on your hardware ours uses light so then each bit has 64 million colors.

so now your pc is not 32 bit it is 64GB bit. 

Quantum computing has vast advantages over regular computing.

So now with that much data storage associated with each quanta we can leverage that further and use that 64GB of data storage and use compression we can use it as all markers to 64GB light registers on a spare drive a stick and an infinity of other things.

So 1000 bits seemed small at first but if our hardware uses photons we have a built in set of quanta to the tune of 64 million in the visible spectrum.
For each bit in that 1000 bits.

so then we can look at that as a self imposed limitation.

We now want to do these things without so much regard for infinity.

We wanted it open ended. We don't need to stretch our minds to wrap our minds around it.

So we have 64GB as imposed on us by our hardware.
That we can associate with each quanta.

So our type for that P Point has a maximum data storage space of 64G

type Ppoint = 

64 GB of data 

end;

64GB to describe that point in space or space time.

We can give it the right to manage time by putting a type t in the type.

Then just delegate to the point itself and empower it.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#726570

As you can see when you let the software decide what is associated with that quanta if we need more space for the type we can just fix that exponentially.

We can bind blocks together, we can use look up tables, we can put markers to instructions elsewhere and have the entire universe feeding into those registers above one quanta.

We aren't limited by the space in our device as soon as we allow peripherals.

We do however live in a physical world.

That has physical limitations. Such that we can't wait all day to get our data that has this very long chain hopping from register to register being rerouted because all those registers are full of markers rerouting traffic. 

So at a point like that we do a rewrite and technology and hardware has improved by then and once again we are working with nice neat blocks of data.

So we have said that we want this quantum Ipad to have a useful life of 10 years at least.

We are not going to worry about if they will need another one and should we put a self destruct at 5 years to sell more why put ourselves out of business?

The fact is we will be coming out with new models and people want the new model and so the old reliable models that people keep that adds to the value of your company in terms of good will.

So your reputation as a manufacturer depends on those lasting 10 years.
At least.

And the best companies take pride that their machines are still working.

A blue chip company like Big Blue IBM needs to be like the rock of Gibraltar.

Their stocks a sure bet is what blue chip means.

So then our theory for quantum computing is program based, that is to say that depending on the program you are using, that is the theory you need to use.

So quantum computing in context.

In context of the tasks at hand.

Now qbits we will look those up now...

"In quantum computing, a qubit (/ˈkjuːbɪt/) or quantum bit (sometimes qbit) is the basic unit of quantum information—the quantum version of the classical binary bit physically realized with a two-state device."

So keeping it simple as a programmer I like short forms and as a computer scientist I like acronyms and as a programmer I like descriptive functions and procedures.

Some times long winded and sometimes short and sweet.

so then I use qbit and then all it is is a quantum bit.

And those quantum bits are on our number line as whole numbers.

We can look at those numbers as their name. Their unique name.

We can of course change their name at any time, and leave them there where they sit and redefine our system for organizing them on the line.

That line those bits again we can do what we like to them as existentialists.

So we will give then 64MB potential values that refer to a look up table 

so our qbits on the line each named and each has a number so we can just look up that qbit in our look up table and see what it is today.

So now by doing this we are moving into a cloud. 
A cloud of potentials and possibilities.

So some scientists will go that way but most of us just using this device will not need to go that deep into the quantum holographic qualities of the mere name of the point itself.

Although we have 64MB with which to name it we can just give it a number.

Now you might be thinking wait we can't put all the colors in that spot at the same time how do we have 64MB in that one spot?

We can put all the colors in that one spot if it is white.
If it is white then begin dothings end.

Since we are defining things using software.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#726572

"But is it crazy enough???"
-Neils Bohr

I am haunted by the ghost of Neils Bohr.

So in house, we want to think clearly, and simplistically for many reasons but for sure we want our teams to understand what they are doing.

When we give interviews however we must sound like professionals.
So we use terms like flogsitcated aetherial orb values in the multi-dimensional singularities.

You know qbits.

Some with hair some without.

Some with roses.

Some with cookies instead of roses.

So now you see we have to watch what words we use.

that word cookie can raise hairs on people's necks what are we doing to protect their data with these multi-dimensional flogisticated whichamacallits and will hurt my children? That's all I want to know.

Well we are staying within the visible spectrum of light and like looking at pictures taking pictures and using visible light it is completely, harmless.

Photons so weak that you may not be able to see them with the naked eye.
Power levels so low that it is like your watch do you wear a watch mam?
Well you won't hurt your children with your watch and this computer is like a watch.

OK guys HEAT EM UP!

We have the science model right here for the military and medical establishment.

So this system and these large numbers and these dimensions and these machines all on a square inch of material.

Since we want one to represent the present one to represent the future and one to represent the past we need three layers of one inch square.

So do we have technology that can put that NASA moon image on a material 1 inch square?

Well its 10GB so we calculated that out to 100,000 qbits by 100,000 qbits.
Where these short form qbits of ours are multi-dimensional singularities.

Multi-dimensional objects.

Singularity is a quality it poseses.


  
  

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#726573

What does flogisticated mean?

if we spelled it differently

"Definition of phlogisticated air. 1 archaic : air exhausted of oxygen by burning a combustible (as charcoal or phosphorus) in it and therefore composed chiefly of nitrogen. 2 archaic : hydrogen regarded as inflammable air."

By spelling it our way if they look it up they won't find anything.
But if you are a physicist you will know what it is.
Aetherial easy to understand for a physicist. But it has other meanings associated with it that fit. Almost mysterious could be transparent so many aetherial qualities that I won't go into it for fear of confusing you.

Orb values well around the qbit is empty space that may not be empty or could be empty and have things in it at the same time you see. "Flogisticated aetherial things I assume?"
Precisely.
But not always.

Multi-dimensional

well now here you see is where existentialism comes in and we are able to shape our reality using math techniques and create other dimensions like a multivurse or parallel universe or parallel time-line and these sorts of things it uses very advanced math techniques.
"algebra" yes but not limited to algebra it is just convenient to use algebra because it works well with modern computational techniques in use today.

Singularity I mentioned before but I am not sure I want to make everyone's head stop hurting quite that easily if I want to respect my progenitors in the field of quantum computing.
So if I say to you as I did a qbit is a singularity no and yes but we can say that it is an object and as an object it is a singularity that turns the lights on for singularities and maybe we don't want to turn the lights on for everyone especially our competitors.

So we always want to have fun with our competitors and essentially sound like professionals.

Our teams need to know that a qbit is a singularity as an object with a unique name.

A quantum bit. A quanta. 
Now that's like saying an inch so you wouldn't say an inch of what, not today! lol

smoke em if ya got em.

Now with the dancing!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R8U7no-x6ug

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#726574

Where does Flogisticated come from?
Phlogistan

A country west of China.
One of the stans.
Thanks Alexa I will take it from here.

"phlo·gis·ton
Dictionary result for phlogiston
/flōˈjistən/
noun
noun: phlogiston

    a substance supposed by 18th-century chemists to exist in all combustible bodies, and to be released in combustion."

So you see light heat qbits that are glowing maybe even.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#726575

Would I use that terminology in a scientific paper?
No because then I would sound like Keely...

https://www.gutenberg.org/files/56332/56332-h/56332-h.htm

Now there was a man.

And complete charlatan.

So he made things up with grandiose sounding names and put on performances during the time of Tesla he is mentioned in Wizard the life and times of Nikola Tesla.

So that sentence is something that sounds like something he would have said during one of his performances.

So picture a con man a very good serious actor maybe some wrinkles and very erudite and he is behind a desk and he is trying to coax energy out of a copper hoop and I am afraid I don't know how or why in what configuration but he had a foot switch to a canister of compressed air in the basement to make it hiss I suppose and spin.

So then he would have to try various things before it would energize etc and prove his claims.

Now it was not consistent so he was still working on it and thanks for coming and get a T shirt on the way out and a book only 20 dollars.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#726576

So then is this methodology this brand of quantum computational physics, (waiting for the throbbing to go away) this brand of quantum computational physics, suitable for mind science, microbiology, AI programming and research, nature modelling, and all answers are yes.

It is the future of computing.

And maybe I didn't simplify it enough for everyone but surely most intellectuals can understand it now in this context with some hardware and with recognizable technology that they already use and programming teqniques they are familiar with.

Now if you think this is complicated don't go into programming as a career.

In school people say engineering is hard. Not to us.

But the beauty of this method is that you can wrap your head around infinities and singularities and objects and values associated with these objects.

I am not aware of any other method that will allow you to control time and space such as this method.

And the fact that it is so adaptable to any task at hand and can manage such large numbers.

Now you take it for granted that it can handle large numbers in math what is a large number? In math and astronomy what is a large number?

"Large numbers are numbers that are significantly larger than those ordinarily used in everyday life, for instance in simple counting or in monetary transactions. ... Very large numbers often occur in fields such as mathematics, cosmology, cryptography, and statistical mechanics."

Right up our alley of course.

But also it is a set of tools that can be defined.

There is no one method that anyone can dictate and say no you must do it this way.

You need to appreciate mathematics in a different sort of way here.

Like when Kirk plays Spock at chess they play multi-dimensional chess.

Same game but in 3 dimensions who knows what other rules they may have but they are expanding on a 2D surface to 3D.

Now with us using this methodology we can handle other dimensions easily and virtual machines easily.

So the brain is a very complex piece of equipment in our bodies with a lot of neural connections that form a neural network.

Now we can model that and even go further to add transparencies over it that describe it better and attach that to the data by having as many dimensions of data on top of the data  as we want.

Now in microbiology if you get a patent then your work is protected but you still want to protect it so you can encrypt that channel that you want secret and make other channels of the same data public.
You can have data marked as patented combined with data that is not patented or patent pending.

And how we do that is with Ppoints.

So a Ppoint data stream can be encrypted, a Ppoint data stream can be invisible.
A Ppoint data stream can be omitted when you give someone else the data.
 
A Ppoint data stream can carry copyright information in a model of a process at every point in that coordinate system.

If we are talking about a medical system, like a process in the body, we can specify so many parameters for the data and classify the data in groupings, packages, black boxes all within the user or programmer defined Ppoint type.


So you get to define your own Ppoint or merely use the one your department head gives you.

So again 
type Ppoint =

any data stream you want to put here.

it will have p.x p.y p.z so that you are using the coordinate system and the point can be identified and located.

Now if you are modeling a biological process then your computer model is probably graphic with molecules and animations that display your process that you wish to patent.

So then you are already there in a 3D space using this methodology.
So you have a cube area and a molecule modeled and moving in that cube space and at each point you can record the state of the qbit and define properties of the qbit and attach information to the qbit which may be relevant like series number, definition according to the Websters dictionary written in text including notes at that point in space and time.

The only thing is data storage goes up if you start having too many copies of the same text for each point.

It may be necessary to have your patent number attached to a single point in space-time, and not just for patents but for processes that are perhaps difficult to understand.

So one scientific group and another scientific group sharing information and attaching their information with yours but it can be kept separate and even ownership marked on your data set.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 2 of 13 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 … 13  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web