Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #517323 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-08-27 17:30 -0500 |
| Last post | 2015-08-28 10:38 -0500 |
| Articles | 7 — 4 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: WDBJ Virginia Shooting: Freemason-Illuminati Media HOAX! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-27 17:30 -0500
Re: WDBJ Virginia Shooting: Freemason-Illuminati Media HOAX! jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-27 23:10 +0000
Re: WDBJ Virginia Shooting: Freemason-Illuminati Media HOAX! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-28 10:34 -0500
Re: WDBJ Virginia Shooting: Freemason-Illuminati Media HOAX! gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-28 10:38 -0500
Re: WDBJ Virginia Shooting: Freemason-Illuminati Media HOAX! jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-28 18:14 +0000
Re: WDBJ Virginia Shooting: Freemason-Illuminati Media HOAX! Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-28 21:06 +0100
Re: WDBJ Virginia Shooting: Freemason-Illuminati Media HOAX! gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-28 10:38 -0500
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-27 17:30 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: WDBJ Virginia Shooting: Freemason-Illuminati Media HOAX! |
| Message-ID | <_bednX5F4N8wEkLInZ2dnUU7-YednZ2d@giganews.com> |
"Andrew Nichols" <alukenichols24740@gmail.com> wrote in message news:e675143b-37dd-4c8f-80c4-bbd215b079cf@googlegroups.com... > Best Video I've seen: > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v_gYyVXMF88 Thanks for the video and that is par for the course but what I like is when someone flew a CGI into the South Tower both ABC and FOX were talking to real eye witnesses who did not see the CGIs. But the eye witnesses would have seen a jet if they had been watching TV where all it took to add a CGI was a 3D layout of Nuke York City a flight plan for a CGI and a synchronization flash and the Media had it all covered, with the exception of those stations that never showed a CGI. See: 9/11 no planes compilation - interesting! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BswpAgwBNEw Rocky
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-27 23:10 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <31i4bc-s6.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #517323 |
In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > Thanks for the video and that is par for the course but what I like is when > someone flew a CGI into the South Tower both ABC and FOX were talking to > real eye witnesses who did not see the CGIs. Of course no one saw a CGI as there was no CGI, you raving lunatic. However THOUSANDS of people in the area saw airliners fly into the towers, and while there may be a few differences in their testimony, the VAST majority of the eye witnesses agree on the major points, such as the airliners flying into the buildins, you raving lunatic. <snip rmaining lunatic, incoherent ravings> -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-28 10:34 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <5aOdnRiUbpRf4n3InZ2dnUU7-cednZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #517331 |
<jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message news:31i4bc-s6.ln1@mail.specsol.com... > In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > >> Thanks for the video and that is par for the course but what I like is >> when >> someone flew a CGI into the South Tower both ABC and FOX were talking to >> real eye witnesses who did not see the CGIs. > > Of course no one saw a CGI as there was no CGI, you raving lunatic. ROTFLMAO because that doesn't really matter. All that matters is NIST got caught in a shitload of lies and that means the alleged impact zones were not responsible for the complete destruction of the Twin Towers so something else was. <G> > > However THOUSANDS of people in the area saw airliners fly into the > towers, and while there may be a few differences in their testimony, > the VAST majority of the eye witnesses agree on the major points, > such as the airliners flying into the buildins, you raving lunatic. ROTFLMAO but two of the very first eye-witnesses didn't see jets in real life. It just shows how the power of suggestion works where they only needed one crisis actor and then all the other clowns followed suit. Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-28 10:38 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <mrpva2$tt8$2@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #517424 |
On 8/28/2015 10:34 AM, Rocky wrote: ><snip crap>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-28 18:14 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <d1l6bc-427.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #517424 |
In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > ROTFLMAO because that doesn't really matter. All that matters is NIST got > caught in a shitload of lies and that means the alleged impact zones were > not responsible for the complete destruction of the Twin Towers so something > else was. <G> Raving, incoherent, gibberish. <snip remaining lunatic idiocy> -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-28 21:06 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <mrqesb$d1d$5@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #517424 |
On 28/08/2015 16:34, Rocky wrote: > <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message > news:31i4bc-s6.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >> >>> Thanks for the video and that is par for the course but what I like is >>> when >>> someone flew a CGI into the South Tower both ABC and FOX were talking to >>> real eye witnesses who did not see the CGIs. >> >> Of course no one saw a CGI as there was no CGI, you raving lunatic. > > ROTFLMAO because that doesn't really matter. Another Rocky about turn. > All that matters is NIST got > caught in a shitload of lies and that means the alleged impact zones were > not responsible for the complete destruction of the Twin Towers so something > else was. <G> > > >> >> However THOUSANDS of people in the area saw airliners fly into the >> towers, and while there may be a few differences in their testimony, >> the VAST majority of the eye witnesses agree on the major points, >> such as the airliners flying into the buildins, you raving lunatic. > > ROTFLMAO but two of the very first eye-witnesses didn't see jets in real > life. > > It just shows how the power of suggestion works where they only needed one > crisis actor and then all the other clowns followed suit. > > Rocky sheeple > > It just shows how the power of suggestion works where they only needed one kook and then all the other kooks followed suit. > --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. http://www.avast.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-28 10:38 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <mrpv98$tt8$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #517323 |
On 8/27/2015 5:30 PM, Rocky wrote: > "Andrew Nichols" <alukensichols24740@gmail.com> wrote in message > news:e675143b-37dd-4c8fs-80c4-bbd215b079cf@googlegroups.com... >> Best Video I've seen: >> >> https://www.porn.com/watch?v=rocky'smama_gYyVXMF88 <snip crap> > > 9/11 no planes compilation - interesting! > https://www.youboobs.com/watch?v=Bswpasdfffff453AgwBNEw > > Rocky, the lying asshole > > do not post in sci.physics
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web