Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #517323 > unrolled thread

Re: WDBJ Virginia Shooting: Freemason-Illuminati Media HOAX!

Started by"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net>
First post2015-08-27 17:30 -0500
Last post2015-08-28 10:38 -0500
Articles 7 — 4 participants

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: WDBJ Virginia Shooting: Freemason-Illuminati Media HOAX! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-27 17:30 -0500
    Re: WDBJ Virginia Shooting: Freemason-Illuminati Media HOAX! jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-27 23:10 +0000
      Re: WDBJ Virginia Shooting: Freemason-Illuminati Media HOAX! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-28 10:34 -0500
        Re: WDBJ Virginia Shooting: Freemason-Illuminati Media HOAX! gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-28 10:38 -0500
        Re: WDBJ Virginia Shooting: Freemason-Illuminati Media HOAX! jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-28 18:14 +0000
        Re: WDBJ Virginia Shooting: Freemason-Illuminati Media HOAX! Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-28 21:06 +0100
    Re: WDBJ Virginia Shooting: Freemason-Illuminati Media HOAX! gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-28 10:38 -0500

#517323 — Re: WDBJ Virginia Shooting: Freemason-Illuminati Media HOAX!

From"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net>
Date2015-08-27 17:30 -0500
SubjectRe: WDBJ Virginia Shooting: Freemason-Illuminati Media HOAX!
Message-ID<_bednX5F4N8wEkLInZ2dnUU7-YednZ2d@giganews.com>
"Andrew Nichols" <alukenichols24740@gmail.com> wrote in message 
news:e675143b-37dd-4c8f-80c4-bbd215b079cf@googlegroups.com...
> Best Video I've seen:
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v_gYyVXMF88

Thanks for the video and that is par for the course but what I like is when 
someone flew a CGI into the South Tower both ABC and FOX were talking to 
real eye witnesses who did not see the CGIs.

But the eye witnesses would have seen a jet if they had been watching TV 
where all it took to add a CGI was a 3D layout of Nuke York City a flight 
plan for a CGI and a synchronization flash and the Media had it all covered, 
with the exception of those stations that never showed a CGI.  See:

9/11 no planes compilation - interesting!
 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BswpAgwBNEw

Rocky 

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#517331

Fromjimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
Date2015-08-27 23:10 +0000
Message-ID<31i4bc-s6.ln1@mail.specsol.com>
In reply to#517323
In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
 
> Thanks for the video and that is par for the course but what I like is when 
> someone flew a CGI into the South Tower both ABC and FOX were talking to 
> real eye witnesses who did not see the CGIs.

Of course no one saw a CGI as there was no CGI, you raving lunatic.

However THOUSANDS of people in the area saw airliners fly into the
towers, and while there may be a few differences in their testimony,
the VAST majority of the eye witnesses agree on the major points,
such as the airliners flying into the buildins, you raving lunatic.

<snip rmaining lunatic, incoherent ravings>


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#517424

From"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net>
Date2015-08-28 10:34 -0500
Message-ID<5aOdnRiUbpRf4n3InZ2dnUU7-cednZ2d@giganews.com>
In reply to#517331
<jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message 
news:31i4bc-s6.ln1@mail.specsol.com...
> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>
>> Thanks for the video and that is par for the course but what I like is 
>> when
>> someone flew a CGI into the South Tower both ABC and FOX were talking to
>> real eye witnesses who did not see the CGIs.
>
> Of course no one saw a CGI as there was no CGI, you raving lunatic.

ROTFLMAO because that doesn't really matter.  All that matters is NIST got 
caught in a shitload of lies and that means the alleged impact zones were 
not responsible for the complete destruction of the Twin Towers so something 
else was.  <G>


>
> However THOUSANDS of people in the area saw airliners fly into the
> towers, and while there may be a few differences in their testimony,
> the VAST majority of the eye witnesses agree on the major points,
> such as the airliners flying into the buildins, you raving lunatic.

ROTFLMAO but two of the very first eye-witnesses didn't see jets in real 
life.

It just shows how the power of suggestion works where they only needed one 
crisis actor and then all the other clowns followed suit.

Rocky 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#517426

Fromgilber34 <invalid@invalid.com>
Date2015-08-28 10:38 -0500
Message-ID<mrpva2$tt8$2@speranza.aioe.org>
In reply to#517424
On 8/28/2015 10:34 AM, Rocky wrote:
><snip crap>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#517472

Fromjimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
Date2015-08-28 18:14 +0000
Message-ID<d1l6bc-427.ln1@mail.specsol.com>
In reply to#517424
In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
 
> ROTFLMAO because that doesn't really matter.  All that matters is NIST got 
> caught in a shitload of lies and that means the alleged impact zones were 
> not responsible for the complete destruction of the Twin Towers so something 
> else was.  <G>

Raving, incoherent, gibberish.

<snip remaining lunatic idiocy>


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#517504

FromTony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com>
Date2015-08-28 21:06 +0100
Message-ID<mrqesb$d1d$5@dont-email.me>
In reply to#517424
On 28/08/2015 16:34, Rocky wrote:
> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message
> news:31i4bc-s6.ln1@mail.specsol.com...
>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks for the video and that is par for the course but what I like is
>>> when
>>> someone flew a CGI into the South Tower both ABC and FOX were talking to
>>> real eye witnesses who did not see the CGIs.
>>
>> Of course no one saw a CGI as there was no CGI, you raving lunatic.
>
> ROTFLMAO because that doesn't really matter.

Another Rocky about turn.

>  All that matters is NIST got
> caught in a shitload of lies and that means the alleged impact zones were
> not responsible for the complete destruction of the Twin Towers so something
> else was.  <G>
>
>
>>
>> However THOUSANDS of people in the area saw airliners fly into the
>> towers, and while there may be a few differences in their testimony,
>> the VAST majority of the eye witnesses agree on the major points,
>> such as the airliners flying into the buildins, you raving lunatic.
>
> ROTFLMAO but two of the very first eye-witnesses didn't see jets in real
> life.
>
> It just shows how the power of suggestion works where they only needed one
> crisis actor and then all the other clowns followed suit.
>
> Rocky sheeple
>
>

It just shows how the power of suggestion works where they only needed 
one kook and then all the other kooks followed suit.
 >


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#517425

Fromgilber34 <invalid@invalid.com>
Date2015-08-28 10:38 -0500
Message-ID<mrpv98$tt8$1@speranza.aioe.org>
In reply to#517323
On 8/27/2015 5:30 PM, Rocky wrote:
> "Andrew Nichols" <alukensichols24740@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:e675143b-37dd-4c8fs-80c4-bbd215b079cf@googlegroups.com...
>> Best Video I've seen:
>>
>> https://www.porn.com/watch?v=rocky'smama_gYyVXMF88

<snip crap>
>
> 9/11 no planes compilation - interesting!
>   https://www.youboobs.com/watch?v=Bswpasdfffff453AgwBNEw
>
> Rocky, the lying asshole
>
>

do not post in sci.physics

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | sci.physics


csiph-web