Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #564541 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-03-22 12:12 -0500 |
| Last post | 2016-03-22 18:25 +0000 |
| Articles | 3 — 3 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
Viewpoint: Quantum Hoverboards on Superconducting Circuits Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-03-22 12:12 -0500
Viewpoint: Quantum Hoverboards on Superconducting Circuits john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-03-22 11:16 -0700
Re: Viewpoint: Quantum Hoverboards on Superconducting Circuits jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-22 18:25 +0000
| From | Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-22 12:12 -0500 |
| Subject | Viewpoint: Quantum Hoverboards on Superconducting Circuits |
| Message-ID | <g4mdnegOh7OE4GzLnZ2dnUU7-SednZ2d@giganews.com> |
Viewpoint: Quantum Hoverboards on Superconducting Circuits > http://physics.aps.org/articles/v9/31 > A new quantum device uses a superconducting circuit to monitor a 2D > gas of electrons floating on the surface of superfluid helium. > Building a quantum computer or quantum simulation device is a > multidisciplinary undertaking that has driven a lot of cutting-edge > research. But there is still a long way to go before a fully > operational quantum machine becomes a reality. The basic recipe for > achieving this goal may sound quite simple. First, identify a set of > suitable quantum systems that can be well isolated from the > environment to protect their “quantumness.” Second, assemble them > together in a controlled and scalable way. The problem is, however, > that in nature, isolation does not come along easily with control and > scalability. Ge Yang from the University of Chicago, Illinois, and > his colleagues have demonstrated a device [1] that could potentially > lead to robust yet controllable qubit architectures. In the new > scheme, electrons floating on top of a superfluid-helium film (which > could encode quantum bits) are combined with a high-quality > superconducting circuit (which could enable the readout and control > of the qubits). -- sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated to the discussion of physics, news from the physics community, and physics-related social issues.
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-22 11:16 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <d284e5a9-731e-46a9-9238-0a4da24da242@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #564541 |
Quantum bullshit.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-22 18:25 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <c9f8sc-cl2.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #564541 |
Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote: > Viewpoint: Quantum Hoverboards on Superconducting Circuits Are the grade schoolers that are writting this tripe being paid? -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web