Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #511548 > unrolled thread
| Started by | HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-08-06 07:12 -0400 |
| Last post | 2015-08-09 10:13 -0500 |
| Articles |
20 on this page of 1000+
— 56 participants
Thread has 1118 articles; only the first 1000 are indexed. |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics | Browse in flat view
Thread has 1118 articles; showing the first 1000 in depth-first order. Use the flat group view to see the rest.
Nuke Em HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-06 07:12 -0400
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-06 08:39 -0500
Re: Nuke Em HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-06 09:44 -0400
Re: Nuke Em gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-06 09:08 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-06 16:18 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-06 16:16 -0500
Re: Nuke Em HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-07 06:04 -0400
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-07 09:42 -0500
Re: Nuke Em benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-08-08 00:38 -0400
Re: Nuke Em HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-08 06:13 -0400
Re: Nuke Em john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-08-08 04:51 -0700
Re: Nuke Em HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-08 08:00 -0400
Re: Nuke Em john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-08-08 05:44 -0700
Re: Nuke Em HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-08 09:42 -0400
Re: Nuke Em benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-08-08 15:42 -0400
Re: Nuke Em Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-08-08 11:41 -0500
Re: Nuke Em john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-08-08 10:30 -0700
Re: Nuke Em benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-08-08 16:21 -0400
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-08 11:16 -0500
Re: Nuke Em benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-08-08 16:15 -0400
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-08 05:46 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-08 11:26 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-08 17:22 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-08 12:48 -0500
Re: Nuke Em john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-08-08 11:12 -0700
Re: Nuke Em Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-08-08 13:17 -0500
Re: Nuke Em john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-08-08 11:24 -0700
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-08 18:28 +0000
Re: Nuke Em john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-08-08 11:49 -0700
Re: Nuke Em Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-08-08 13:55 -0500
Re: Nuke Em john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-08-08 12:18 -0700
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-08 20:10 +0000
Re: Nuke Em john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-08-08 13:25 -0700
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-08 20:57 +0000
Re: Nuke Em benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-08-08 16:39 -0400
Re: Nuke Em HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 07:25 -0400
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-08 18:03 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-08 16:19 -0700
Re: Nuke Em john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-08-08 16:23 -0700
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-09 00:10 +0000
Re: Nuke Em Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 05:59 -0700
Re: Nuke Em HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 09:17 -0400
Re: Nuke Em Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 06:53 -0700
Re: Nuke Em HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 11:21 -0400
Re: Nuke Em Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 08:43 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-08 18:47 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-09 00:12 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-08 19:36 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-09 00:50 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-08 20:15 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-09 01:27 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-08 20:36 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-09 03:16 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-09 06:14 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 10:15 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-09 17:14 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-09 13:55 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-09 19:10 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-09 14:38 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-09 20:54 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-09 18:35 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-10 00:11 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-09 20:43 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-10 01:51 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-09 21:25 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-10 02:41 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-09 23:04 -0500
Re: Nuke Em benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-08-10 01:24 -0400
Re: Nuke Em HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-10 06:37 -0400
Re: Nuke Em Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-08-10 04:38 -0700
Re: Nuke Em HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-10 07:47 -0400
Re: Nuke Em benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-08-10 10:32 -0400
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-10 13:39 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-10 13:59 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-10 05:46 +0000
Re: Nuke Em HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-10 10:19 -0400
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-10 10:16 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-10 13:34 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-10 18:50 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-10 14:23 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-10 20:41 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-10 15:59 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-10 21:23 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-10 16:43 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-10 21:56 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 11:30 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-15 16:54 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 15:35 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2015-08-15 16:11 -0600
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 19:06 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (laughing at Jim) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 19:04 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (laughing at Jim) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-16 00:57 +0000
Re: Nuke Em john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-08-10 14:01 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-10 16:18 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-11 04:40 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2015-08-09 22:31 -0700
Re: Nuke Em Mattb. <trdell1234@outlook.com> - 2015-08-09 22:35 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-10 02:55 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "4-3-Methyl-2-3-Hydroxy-1-Furaldehyde-Menth4-Diethyl-3-Citric-Acid" <nospam.nospam.nospam@gmail.com> - 2015-08-10 08:10 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-10 04:36 -0500
Re: Nuke Em 2-Methyl-2-Chlorobutyl-Methylphenol-CinnamylN1-Methylbutyrate <distracted.blonde.ammunition-whore@alt.comedy.thin-lingerie-lass> - 2015-08-10 09:39 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-11 04:38 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "grizzled laggard" <degenerate.haddock.pasty@unsatisfactory.kookooyumyumpoon> - 2015-08-13 01:08 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-12 04:23 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "broken down loafer" <indelicate.meat.napkin@tender.biff> - 2015-08-13 10:07 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-12 09:44 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-12 11:01 -0700
Re: Nuke Em john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-08-12 11:16 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-13 04:36 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-13 07:16 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-14 04:34 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-14 07:34 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-14 20:12 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-14 18:16 +0200
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-14 20:15 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-15 05:35 +0200
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 05:52 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-15 17:54 +0200
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-12 09:42 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-12 08:04 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-12 10:16 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-12 08:34 -0700
Re: Nuke Em Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-12 11:09 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-12 11:17 -0700
Re: Nuke Em Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-12 11:00 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-12 16:00 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-13 04:36 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-12 09:36 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-12 08:03 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-12 10:14 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-12 08:33 -0700
Re: Nuke Em Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-08-12 11:02 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-08-12 09:10 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-13 04:36 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-12 11:11 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-12 16:03 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-12 14:20 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-12 16:28 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-12 14:44 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-12 17:12 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-12 15:52 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-12 20:44 -0400
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-13 09:25 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-13 07:38 -0700
Re: Nuke Em Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-13 07:38 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-13 16:01 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-13 15:57 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-13 14:14 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-13 16:24 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-13 14:38 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-13 16:46 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-13 15:57 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-14 09:09 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-14 07:40 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-14 08:47 -0700
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-14 17:17 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 11:07 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-15 16:56 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 19:10 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-16 00:59 +0000
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-13 22:49 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-13 17:06 -0700
Re: Nuke Em Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-13 17:10 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-13 17:18 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-14 09:40 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-14 09:25 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-14 04:34 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-13 22:47 +0000
Re: Nuke Em Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-13 16:03 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-13 17:09 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-14 09:34 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "W.TS." <m14m@earthlink.net> - 2015-08-14 11:21 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-14 11:40 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-14 10:15 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-14 09:19 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-14 07:44 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-14 11:07 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-14 09:32 -0700
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-14 17:21 +0000
Re: Nuke Em benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-08-14 15:20 -0400
Re: Nuke Em HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 06:27 -0400
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 05:53 -0500
Re: Nuke Em HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 07:08 -0400
Re: Nuke Em Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 05:49 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2015-08-15 06:22 -0700
Re: Nuke Em HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 09:47 -0400
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 10:14 -0500
Re: Nuke Em HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 12:25 -0400
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 15:35 -0500
Re: Nuke Em HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 07:21 -0400
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 08:50 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-14 18:13 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-14 23:24 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 11:12 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-15 16:59 +0000
Re: Nuke Em Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-14 06:50 +0200
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-14 10:16 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-14 17:24 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-14 18:09 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-14 20:14 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-14 23:26 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-14 20:14 -0500
Re: Nuke Em HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 07:12 -0400
Re: Nuke Em Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 05:43 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 10:15 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-14 20:14 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-15 05:24 +0200
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 11:53 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-15 20:48 +0200
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 17:58 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-15 16:04 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 18:36 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-15 23:50 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 19:18 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-16 01:01 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 08:37 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-15 23:08 +0000
Re: Nuke Em (proving Jim is a liar) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 18:47 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (proving Jim is a liar) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-16 01:04 +0000
Re: Nuke Em (proving Jim is a liar) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-16 09:21 +0100
Re: Nuke Em (proving Jim is a liar) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 08:53 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "Khepernefru II" <gimpy.cock.squeezer@rattle.boned.hoo-hoo> - 2015-08-17 00:04 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 20:14 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-16 02:31 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 22:13 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 20:24 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (caught % ignoring issues) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 22:24 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (caught % ignoring issues) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 20:31 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (caught % ignoring issues) Kadaitcha Man <nospam.nospam.nospam@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 03:35 +0000
Re: Nuke Em (caught % ignoring issues) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-16 05:45 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 08:46 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-16 06:54 -0700
Re: Nuke Em Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-16 07:15 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (Suri Cruz) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 09:19 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (Suri Cruz) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 09:16 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (Suri Cruz) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 12:57 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (Suri Cruz) Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-16 11:47 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (Suri Cruz) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 19:47 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (Suri Cruz) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 18:23 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (Suri Cruz) Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-16 19:17 -0700
Re: Nuke Em Kadaitcha Man <nospam.nospam.nospam@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 03:34 +0000
Re: Nuke Em Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-15 22:08 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 00:12 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Kadaitcha Man <nospam.nospam.nospam@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 05:14 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 00:35 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 11:01 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 12:55 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "Halstead Lippergold-onnerhall" <holy@mackerel.orgy> - 2015-08-16 13:54 +0800
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 07:39 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 09:14 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 11:42 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 09:49 -0700
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-16 17:18 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 13:45 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-16 19:36 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 12:56 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-16 16:51 +0000
Re: Nuke Em Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-16 06:53 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (Surviving the Halstead shit storm) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 09:32 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (Surviving the Halstead shit storm) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-16 16:52 +0000
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-16 06:00 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 08:48 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-16 06:51 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 09:38 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 09:16 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 11:34 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 09:40 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 11:43 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 09:55 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 11:56 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 10:10 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 12:23 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 11:31 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 13:30 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 11:45 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-16 15:28 -0400
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-16 15:25 -0400
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-16 15:19 -0400
Re: Nuke Em (Sarah) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 19:05 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (Sarah) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 17:18 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (Sarah now %) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 20:03 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (Sarah now %) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 18:22 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (Sarah) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 00:19 +0000
Re: Nuke Em (Jim's meltdown) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 21:42 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (Jim's meltdown) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 04:47 +0000
Re: Nuke Em (Sarah) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-16 20:53 -0400
Re: Nuke Em (Sarah) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 16:01 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (Sarah) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 22:31 +0000
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-17 04:15 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-17 09:04 -0400
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) snipe@spambin.fsnet.co.uk (Sn!pe) - 2015-08-17 16:12 +0100
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-08-17 12:06 -0400
Re: Nuke Em (re: absolutely entertaining!) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 10:46 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (re: absolutely entertaining!) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-17 19:04 +0200
Re: Nuke Em (FNV's avoidance of the facts) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 12:22 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (FNV's avoidance of the facts) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-17 16:41 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (FNV's avoidance of the facts) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-18 05:27 +0200
Question for FNV "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 12:37 -0500
Re: Question for FNV "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-17 16:42 -0500
Re: Question for FNV Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-17 20:00 -0400
Re: Question for FNV "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-18 04:16 -0500
Re: Question for FNV Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-18 06:32 +0200
Re: Nuke Em (re: absolutely entertaining!) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 17:14 +0000
Re: Nuke Em (re: absolutely entertaining!) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-17 16:40 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (re: absolutely entertaining!) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-17 17:49 -0400
Re: Nuke Em (re: absolutely entertaining!) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 17:39 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (re: absolutely entertaining!) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-17 21:27 -0400
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-17 16:40 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-17 19:59 -0400
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-18 04:16 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-16 22:30 +0200
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 20:23 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 18:32 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 20:37 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 20:10 -0700
Re: Nuke Em ( Link 4 %) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 22:45 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Link 4 %) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 20:54 -0700
Re: Nuke Em ( Link 4 %) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 23:31 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Link 4 %) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-17 03:42 -0700
Re: Nuke Em ( Link 4 %) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 06:50 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Link 4 %) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 17:16 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( Link 4 %) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-17 09:24 -0400
Re: Nuke Em ( Link 4 %) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 15:39 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Link 4 %) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 21:15 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( Pentagon ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 16:33 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Pentagon ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-17 16:37 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Pentagon ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 16:56 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Pentagon ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-18 04:15 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Pentagon ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 22:33 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( Link 4 %) "Dr. Morpheus" <d.morpheus@debunkers.ie> - 2015-08-17 23:42 +0200
Re: Nuke Em ( Link 4 %) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-17 16:59 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Link 4 %) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 17:08 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Link 4 %) "Dr. Morpheus" <d.morpheus@debunkers.ie> - 2015-08-18 02:50 +0200
Dook Nuke Em ( Link 4 %) "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-18 03:43 -0400
Re: Nuke Em ( Link 4 %) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-18 10:26 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Link 4 %) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-08-18 16:23 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( Link 4 %) "Dr. Morpheus" <d.morpheus@debunkers.ie> - 2015-08-18 19:52 +0200
Re: Nuke Em ( Link 4 %) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-19 04:04 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 02:54 +0000
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-17 06:57 +0200
Re: Nuke Em ( FNV helps prove an NCD ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 11:13 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( FNV helps prove an NCD ) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-08-17 17:01 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( FNV helps prove an NCD ) Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-17 10:20 -0700
Re: Nuke Em ( Michael Moroney is mess up ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 12:27 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Michael Moroney is mess up ) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-08-17 18:06 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( Michael Moroney is mess up ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 13:23 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Michael Moroney is mess up ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-17 19:38 +0100
Re: Nuke Em ( Michael Moroney is mess up ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 15:06 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Michael Moroney is mess up ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-17 21:11 +0100
Re: Nuke Em ( Michael Moroney is mess up ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 15:28 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Michael Moroney is mess up ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-17 21:36 +0100
Re: Nuke Em ( Michael Moroney is mess up ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-17 16:39 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Michael Moroney is mess up ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 20:47 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( Michael Moroney is mess up ) Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-17 14:40 -0700
Re: Nuke Em ( Michael Moroney is mess up ) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-08-17 18:58 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( Michael Moroney is mess up ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 14:58 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Michael Moroney is mess up ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 20:50 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( Michael Moroney is mess up ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 16:20 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Michael Moroney is mess up ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 22:39 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( Michael Moroney is mess up ) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-08-17 21:17 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( Michael Moroney is mess up ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 16:37 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Michael Moroney is mess up ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-17 23:19 +0100
Re: Nuke Em ( Michael Moroney is mess up ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 22:40 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( Michael Moroney is mess up ) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-08-17 23:19 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( FNV helps prove an NCD ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 17:18 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( FNV helps prove an NCD ) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-18 05:27 +0200
Re: Nuke Em Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-16 20:03 +0200
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 13:36 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-16 22:51 +0200
Re: Nuke Em (FNV needs help ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 20:49 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (FNV needs help ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 02:56 +0000
Re: Nuke Em (FNV needs help ) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-17 07:04 +0200
Re: Nuke Em (FNV needsa lot of help ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 12:01 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (FNV needsa lot of help ) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-18 05:27 +0200
Re: Nuke Em Kadaitcha Man <nospam.nospam.nospam@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 05:13 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 10:58 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 09:19 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 11:38 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 09:49 -0700
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-16 16:56 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 12:54 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-16 05:44 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 08:38 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 08:52 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 09:15 -0700
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-16 16:58 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 12:54 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-16 20:49 +0200
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 08:38 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-16 04:27 +0200
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 21:42 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 19:50 -0700
Re: Nuke Em Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-16 06:59 +0200
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 00:18 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-16 06:02 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 08:49 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-16 19:23 +0200
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 13:33 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-16 19:38 +0000
Re: Nuke Em Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-16 23:12 +0200
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 21:11 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 02:59 +0000
Re: Nuke Em Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-16 23:10 -0400
Re: Nuke Em Kadaitcha Man <anon@anon.anon> - 2015-08-17 17:34 +0800
Re: Nuke Em Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-17 09:02 -0400
Re: Nuke Em "Kadaitcha Man" <nospam.nospam.nospam@rec.games.video.crossdressing> - 2015-08-18 20:50 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 16:06 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 22:41 +0000
Re: Nuke Em Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-17 19:56 -0400
Re: Nuke Em ( Sarah shotgun ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 07:14 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Sarah shotgun ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-17 09:00 -0400
Re: Nuke Em ( Sarah shotgun ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 10:11 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Sarah shotgun ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 17:22 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( Sarah shotgun ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-17 17:46 -0400
Re: Nuke Em ( Sarah shotgun ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 17:20 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( jim falls for a big lie ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 14:47 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( jim falls for a big lie ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-17 21:12 +0100
Re: Nuke Em ( jim falls for a big lie ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 15:20 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( jim falls for a big lie ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-17 21:39 +0100
Re: Nuke Em ( jim falls for a big lie ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 15:43 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( jim falls for a big lie ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-17 23:12 +0100
Re: Nuke Em ( jim falls for a big lie ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 20:55 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( jim falls for a big lie ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 20:54 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( jim falls for a big lie ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 16:10 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( jim falls for a big lie ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-17 23:13 +0100
Re: Nuke Em ( jim falls for a big lie ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 22:47 +0000
Re: Nuke Em Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-16 23:10 -0400
Re: Nuke Em ( Sarah + rads ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 07:12 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Sarah + rads ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-17 08:59 -0400
Re: Nuke Em ( Sarah + rads ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 09:59 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Sarah + rads ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 17:25 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( Sarah + rads ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-17 17:48 -0400
Re: Nuke Em ( Sarah + rads ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 17:01 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Sarah + rads ) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-17 15:22 -0700
Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 17:33 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-17 15:49 -0700
Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-18 10:14 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-19 04:04 -0500
Re: Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-19 04:34 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-19 17:46 +0000
Re: Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-20 16:09 -0500
Re: Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) Joe Cooper <dragon40@removeunseen.is> - 2015-08-20 22:26 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-20 22:36 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-21 21:29 +0000
Re: Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-22 04:46 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-22 16:19 +0000
Re: Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-23 03:49 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) Margarita Cibulkova <margac@terraspace.au> - 2015-08-25 15:41 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 05:05 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-22 16:21 +0000
Re: Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-23 03:52 -0500
Re: Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-23 03:51 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 07:00 -0400
Re: Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-23 03:53 -0500
Re: Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-22 04:55 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-22 14:36 +0100
Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 09:20 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-22 17:19 +0100
Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 12:51 -0500
Re: Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-23 03:57 -0500
Re: Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-23 03:56 -0500
Re: Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-23 03:54 -0500
Topaz terrorist (was: Re: Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % )) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 12:15 -0500
Re: Topaz terrorist jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 17:23 +0000
Re: Re: Topaz terrorist Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-24 16:00 -0500
Re: Topaz terrorist (was: Re: Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % )) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-24 15:58 -0500
Re: Topaz terrorist (was: Re: Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % )) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-24 16:33 -0500
Re: Topaz terrorist (was: Re: Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % )) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-24 17:07 -0500
Re: Topaz terrorist Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-24 23:48 +0100
Re: Topaz terrorist je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-24 16:11 -0700
Re: Topaz terrorist BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-08-25 14:17 -0400
Re: Topaz terrorist BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-08-25 14:39 -0400
Re: Topaz terrorist Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-25 05:36 +0200
Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-27 10:21 -0500
Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-27 17:02 +0000
Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's & Jim's BS, BS and BS) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-27 15:48 -0500
Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's & Jim's BS, BS and BS) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-27 21:15 +0000
Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-28 06:05 +0200
Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-28 09:05 -0500
Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-28 18:27 +0200
Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-28 17:50 +0000
Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-28 18:38 -0500
Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-29 03:44 -0500
Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-29 04:43 -0700
Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-30 04:08 -0500
Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-29 17:18 +0200
Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-29 15:53 -0500
Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-29 14:37 -0700
Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 04:39 -0500
Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-31 15:54 -0500
Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-31 16:45 -0500
Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-30 05:17 -0500
Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 06:40 -0500
Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-30 05:15 -0500
Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 08:46 -0500
Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-31 15:56 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-30 05:05 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-30 03:19 -0700
Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 08:46 -0500
Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-31 16:12 -0500
Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-31 16:34 -0500
Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-31 14:50 -0700
Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-01 01:57 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-01 15:44 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-01 16:17 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-01 16:51 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-02 15:36 -0500
Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-31 16:46 -0500
Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-01 16:25 -0500
Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-02 04:13 -0500
Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-02 16:17 -0500
Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-03 04:13 -0500
Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-03 16:29 -0500
Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Why GZ was called GZ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-03 16:57 -0500
Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Why GZ was called GZ) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-09-03 15:48 -0700
Re: Rocky still jobless and crazy as a loon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-03 22:42 +0000
Re: Re: Rocky still jobless and crazy as a loon Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-04 16:23 -0500
Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Why GZ was called GZ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-04 16:42 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Why GZ was called GZ) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-05 05:59 -0500
Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Why GZ was called GZ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-04 16:22 -0500
Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-04 08:36 +0200
Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-04 16:26 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-05 07:19 +0200
Re: Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-05 06:03 -0500
Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-04 03:58 -0500
Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-04 16:28 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Thanks Topaz) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 11:54 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-30 19:14 +0200
Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 12:40 -0500
Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 15:42 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-31 00:44 +0200
Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 19:37 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-31 16:32 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-01 05:05 +0200
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-01 16:38 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-02 06:37 +0200
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-02 16:27 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-09-02 18:50 -0400
Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-03 06:00 +0200
Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-03 16:36 -0500
Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-04 08:00 +0200
Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-04 16:29 -0500
Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-05 07:19 +0200
Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-05 06:05 -0500
Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-05 19:53 +0200
Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-05 21:53 +0200
Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-29 15:53 -0500
Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-30 05:20 -0500
Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 08:47 -0500
Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-31 16:38 -0500
Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (quick list) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-31 16:54 -0500
shinola t.m noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-08-31 14:58 -0700
Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (quick list) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-01 16:43 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (quick list) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-01 16:56 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (quick list) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-09-01 15:26 -0700
Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (quick list) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-01 17:28 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (quick list) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-09-01 15:39 -0700
Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (quick list) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-02 09:52 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (quick list) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-09-02 13:07 -0700
Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (quick list) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-02 15:56 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (quick list) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-02 16:34 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (quick list) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-02 16:53 -0500
Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-01 03:56 -0500
Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-01 16:52 -0500
Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-02 04:13 -0500
Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (was: Re: Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % )) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-25 16:57 -0500
Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (was: Re: Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % )) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-25 17:33 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (was: Re: Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % )) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-26 04:01 -0500
Re: Topaz terrorist gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-27 13:14 -0500
Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (was: Re: Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % )) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-25 20:18 -0500
Re: Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-08-19 19:36 -0400
Re: Re: Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-20 16:11 -0500
No Holograms (was: Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % )) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 06:42 -0500
Re: No Holograms (was: Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % )) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-23 09:30 -0500
Re: No Holograms jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 16:51 +0000
Re: Re: No Holograms Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-24 16:07 -0500
Re: No Holograms 9/11 ? "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-25 09:07 -0400
Re: No Holograms 9/11 ? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-25 16:37 +0000
Re: No Holograms 9/11 ? HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-25 13:37 -0400
Re: Re: No Holograms 9/11 ? Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-25 17:07 -0500
Re: No Holograms 9/11 ? Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-26 03:23 +0200
Re: No Holograms 9/11 ? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-25 21:16 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-19 08:54 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-08-19 15:48 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-19 11:02 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-19 19:22 +0200
Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-19 18:08 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-19 20:39 +0100
Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-08-19 19:43 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-19 18:07 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) "Kadaitcha Man" <nospam.nospam.nospam@alt.support.just.venting> - 2015-08-21 10:48 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-20 08:38 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-20 19:10 +0200
Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-20 20:55 -0500
2 Rick (was: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % )) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 06:31 -0500
Re: 2 Rick (was: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % )) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 07:22 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-19 18:06 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Sarah + rads ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-17 21:24 -0400
Re: Nuke Em ( Sarah + rads ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-17 21:37 -0400
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 07:02 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-26 13:18 -0400
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-26 15:17 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-27 12:00 -0400
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-27 16:25 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-27 20:36 -0400
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-27 17:55 -0700
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-28 00:07 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-28 01:16 -0400
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-28 08:39 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-28 17:54 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-28 14:25 -0400
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-28 15:37 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-28 21:10 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-28 18:28 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-28 23:41 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-28 19:55 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-29 09:33 +0100
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 10:10 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-29 16:43 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-29 19:31 +0100
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-29 05:40 -0400
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-29 01:29 -0400
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 10:19 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-29 16:46 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-28 17:17 -0400
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-28 16:37 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-28 22:38 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-28 18:38 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-28 20:13 -0400
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-28 19:56 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-28 19:52 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-28 18:37 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-27 22:43 -0700
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-28 17:52 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-27 04:20 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-27 18:59 +0200
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-27 20:05 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-27 19:47 -0400
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-27 20:06 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Sarah + rads ) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-18 05:12 +0200
Re: Nuke Em ( Sarah + rads ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 17:23 +0000
Re: Nuke Em Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-17 06:52 +0200
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-16 05:45 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 08:48 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 08:37 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 15:37 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-16 05:37 +0200
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 23:01 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 21:11 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 09:47 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 09:17 -0700
Re: Nuke Em Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-16 07:48 +0200
Re: Nuke Em (Once you eliminate the impossible) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 07:31 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (Once you eliminate the impossible) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 09:19 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (Once you eliminate the impossible) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 11:41 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (Once you eliminate the impossible) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 09:48 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (Once you eliminate the impossible) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-16 16:59 +0000
Re: Nuke Em (Once you eliminate the impossible) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-16 19:02 +0200
Re: Nuke Em (Once you eliminate the impossible) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 12:22 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (Once you eliminate the impossible) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 10:28 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (Once you eliminate the impossible) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 12:58 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (Once you eliminate the impossible) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-16 22:03 +0200
Re: Nuke Em (Once you eliminate the impossible) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 19:36 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (Once you eliminate the impossible) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 01:04 +0000
Re: Nuke Em (Once you eliminate the impossible) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-17 07:09 +0200
Re: Nuke Em (Once you eliminate the impossible) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-17 09:04 -0400
Re: Nuke Em (Once you eliminate the impossible) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 15:34 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (Once you eliminate the impossible) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 21:17 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( Jim's bullshit ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 16:48 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Jim's bullshit ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-17 23:17 +0100
Re: Nuke Em ( Jim's bullshit ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 17:36 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Jim's bullshit ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 23:08 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( Jim's bullshit ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-18 11:21 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Jim's bullshit ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-18 17:06 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( Jim's bullshit ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-18 18:29 +0100
Re: Nuke Em ( Jim's bullshit ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-18 18:13 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Jim's bullshit ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-19 06:59 +0100
Re: Nuke Em ( Jim's bullshit ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-19 16:38 +0100
Re: Nuke Em ( Jim's bullshit ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-19 04:08 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Jim's bullshit ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-19 04:07 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Jim's bullshit ) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-19 18:40 +0200
Re: Nuke Em ( Jim's bullshit ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-19 18:05 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Jim's bullshit ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-18 09:00 +0100
Re: Nuke Em ( Jim's bullshit ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-18 04:14 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Jim's bullshit ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 22:54 +0000
Re: Nuke Em (Once you eliminate the impossible) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 12:09 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (Once you eliminate the impossible) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-18 05:47 +0200
Re: Nuke Em Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-16 16:35 -0400
Re: Nuke Em Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-17 00:01 +0200
Re: Nuke Em Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-16 21:05 -0400
Re: Nuke Em (FNV & sarah) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 20:10 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (FNV & sarah) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-16 22:11 -0400
Re: Nuke Em (FNV & sarah + sarah) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 21:37 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (FNV & sarah + sarah) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-16 23:11 -0400
Re: Nuke Em (FNV & sarah + sarah + sarah) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 22:40 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (FNV & sarah + sarah + sarah) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-17 09:24 -0400
Re: Nuke Em (FNV & sarah + sarah + sarah + s ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 09:48 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (FNV & sarah + sarah + sarah + s ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 17:27 +0000
Re: Nuke Em (FNV & sarah + sarah + sarah + s ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-17 17:46 -0400
Re: Nuke Em (FNV & sarah + sarah + sarah) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-17 16:44 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (FNV & sarah + sarah + sarah) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-17 19:45 -0400
Re: Nuke Em (FNV & sarah + sarah + sarah) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-18 04:15 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (FNV & sarah + sarah) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-17 04:19 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (FNV & sarah + sarah) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-17 09:05 -0400
Re: Nuke Em (FNV & sarah + sarah) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 15:36 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (FNV & sarah + sarah) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 21:18 +0000
Re: Nuke Em (FNV & sarah + sarah) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-17 16:43 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (FNV & sarah) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 03:00 +0000
Re: Nuke Em (FNV & sarah) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-17 06:36 +0200
Re: Nuke Em (FNV & sarah) "Kadaitcha Man" <nospam.nospam.nospam@rec.arts.books.chronic.constipation> - 2015-08-18 11:56 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-17 04:15 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-17 09:01 -0400
Re: Nuke Em (temper) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 11:52 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (temper) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 17:30 +0000
Re: Nuke Em (temper) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-17 16:37 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (temper) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-17 17:51 -0400
Re: Nuke Em (lost message) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 17:13 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (lost message) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-17 21:30 -0400
Re: Nuke Em (lost message) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-18 11:55 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (lost message) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-18 17:08 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-17 16:37 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 16:52 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 22:57 +0000
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-16 05:46 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 08:51 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 08:51 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-13 07:36 -0700
Re: Nuke Em Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-08-13 08:22 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-13 15:53 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-13 14:05 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-13 16:40 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 11:41 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-15 19:36 +0200
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 17:52 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-15 16:03 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 18:29 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 18:31 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 20:30 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 18:46 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 20:47 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 18:55 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (proving % is a joke) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 09:52 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (proving % is a joke) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 09:12 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (proving % is a joke) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 11:41 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (proving % is a joke) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 09:47 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (proving % is a joke) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 11:48 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (proving % is a joke) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 09:55 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (proving % is a joke) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 11:55 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (proving % is a joke) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 10:11 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (proving % is a joke) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 12:25 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (proving % is a joke) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 11:30 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (proving % is a joke) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 13:30 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (proving % is a joke) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 11:46 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (proving % is a joke) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 13:47 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (proving % is a joke) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 11:55 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (proving % is a joke) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 12:58 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (proving % is a joke) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 12:58 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (proving % is a joke) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 12:57 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (proving % is a joke) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-16 16:40 +0000
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-16 02:26 +0000
Re: Nuke Em (waiting for Jim to prove one of his statements) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 21:55 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (waiting for Jim to prove one of his statements) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-16 09:24 +0100
Re: Nuke Em (waiting for Jim to prove one of his statements) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 08:24 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (waiting for Jim to prove one of his statements) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-16 17:14 +0100
Re: Nuke Em (waiting for Jim to prove one of his statements) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-16 16:43 +0000
Re: Nuke Em (waiting for Jim to prove one of his statements) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-16 05:36 +0000
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-16 02:24 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 21:50 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-16 09:22 +0100
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-16 05:39 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 08:49 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 11:11 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 12:56 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-15 23:03 +0000
Re: Nuke Em Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-16 04:27 +0200
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 21:47 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 20:11 -0700
Re: Nuke Em Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-16 06:17 +0200
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 23:40 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-16 07:42 +0200
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-16 05:41 +0000
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-16 05:40 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 08:47 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-15 17:15 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-12 17:27 -0700
Re: Nuke Em Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-12 17:52 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-12 18:05 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-13 09:46 -0500
NOMINATION: Kook of the Month Re: Nuke Em "Pacesetter" <pace@setter.boss> - 2015-08-13 10:25 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-13 09:41 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-13 08:40 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-13 10:03 -0700
Re: Nuke Em Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-13 10:27 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-13 12:53 -0700
Re: Nuke Em Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-13 13:17 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-13 16:18 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-13 16:13 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-14 06:06 +0200
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-14 09:59 -0500
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-14 19:12 +0200
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-14 17:01 -0500
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-14 15:21 -0700
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-14 17:34 -0500
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-14 15:49 -0700
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-14 18:16 -0500
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-14 17:29 -0700
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 00:48 -0500
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-14 23:10 -0700
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-15 00:44 +0000
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-14 22:53 +0000
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-14 20:11 -0500
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-15 04:53 +0200
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) "Kadaitcha Man" <nospam.nospam.nospam@rec.humour.funny.why.breathing.is.good.for.you> - 2015-08-16 03:23 +0000
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-15 06:40 +0200
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) "Quukur the inventive lizard-quaverer" <bat-fowling.credulous.fool@flapping.bacilliform.hasty.flirt-gill> - 2015-08-15 13:00 +0800
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-08-14 22:05 -0700
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-15 18:47 +0200
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 15:38 -0500
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) "Netjershema IV" <scorched.beaver@ripe.mommy.button> - 2015-08-16 23:41 +0000
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-16 04:16 +0200
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) "Kadaitcha Man" <nospam.nospam.nospam@soc.religion.prostatitis.worried.dude> - 2015-08-17 03:02 +0000
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-16 07:42 +0200
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 05:41 -0500
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-15 18:18 +0200
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 15:38 -0500
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) "Sekhemamun II Ankhet" <enfeebled.shutters.of.love@bulging.hairy.cherry> - 2015-08-16 23:58 +0000
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-16 04:16 +0200
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 08:53 -0500
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-16 19:40 +0200
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 12:59 -0500
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 00:03 -0500
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-16 06:03 +0000
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 08:54 -0500
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 10:31 -0500
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-16 17:01 +0000
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 12:59 -0500
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 13:40 -0500
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-17 04:16 -0500
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-17 05:46 -0700
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-14 22:32 +0000
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-14 20:01 -0700
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-15 05:24 +0200
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-14 17:29 +0000
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-14 18:06 -0500
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-14 23:29 +0000
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-15 09:21 +0100
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-15 18:43 +0100
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-16 09:18 +0100
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 07:49 -0500
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-16 17:06 +0100
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-08-16 12:08 -0400
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-13 09:34 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-13 07:50 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-13 16:03 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-13 14:15 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-13 16:25 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-13 14:39 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-13 16:55 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-13 18:46 -0400
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-14 04:35 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-14 18:38 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-14 20:16 -0500
PING > FNVW "Amun-erisy-merwyitu" <droopy.bizzle@strong.muffy> - 2015-08-16 01:33 +0000
Re: PING > FNVW "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-14 18:43 -0700
Re: Nuke Em Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-13 16:02 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-13 19:04 -0400
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-14 04:35 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-14 09:15 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-14 17:33 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-14 17:55 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-14 23:12 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-14 20:12 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Mitchell Holman <noemail@att.net> - 2015-08-14 15:55 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-14 17:25 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Mitchell Holman <noemail@att.net> - 2015-08-14 20:56 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-14 20:12 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-14 08:07 +0200
Re: Nuke Em john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-08-13 23:14 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-14 10:34 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-14 17:38 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-14 17:49 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-14 20:15 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-14 23:15 +0000
Re: Nuke Em Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-15 04:59 +0200
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-13 22:54 +0000
Re: Nuke Em talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-08-14 18:33 -0700
Re: Nuke Em benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 02:53 -0400
Re: Nuke Em Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-13 09:32 +0200
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-13 10:18 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-14 06:45 +0200
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-14 10:06 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-14 20:13 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-15 05:35 +0200
Re: Nuke Em (proving FNVWE's photo is bogus) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 18:21 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (proving FNVWE's photo is bogus) second try "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 18:40 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (proving FNVWE's photo is bogus) second try "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 18:26 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (caught % in a big lie) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 20:28 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (caught % in a big lie) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 18:49 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (caught % in a big lie) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 20:49 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (caught % in a big lie) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 18:59 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (caught % in a big lie) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-16 02:33 +0000
Re: Nuke Em (caught % in a big lie) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 08:53 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (caught % in a big lie) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-16 02:32 +0000
Re: Nuke Em (caught Jim avoiding the #1 issue) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 22:18 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (caught Jim avoiding the #1 issue) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-16 05:47 +0000
Re: Nuke Em (caught Jim avoiding the #1 issue) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 08:17 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (caught Jim avoiding the #1 issue) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-16 17:14 +0100
Re: Nuke Em (caught Jim avoiding the #1 issue) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-08-17 00:01 +0000
Re: Nuke Em (caught % in a big lie) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 08:52 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (proving FNVWE's photo is bogus) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-16 04:52 +0200
Re: Nuke Em (proving FNVW sis a big LIAR) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 22:10 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (proving FNVW sis a big LIAR) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 20:25 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (proving FNVW sis a big LIAR) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-16 06:54 +0200
Re: Nuke Em Peter J Ross <peadar.ruadh@gmx.com> - 2015-08-12 15:48 +0000
Re: Nuke Em Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-12 10:58 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-13 04:36 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-10 04:35 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-10 04:35 -0500
2 Jeanne Douglas (was: Nuke Em) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 08:48 -0500
Re: 2 Jeanne Douglas jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 16:53 +0000
Re: 2 Jeanne Douglas Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-23 12:23 -0700
Proving Hägar is a sack of shit (was: 2 Jeanne Douglas) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 15:01 -0500
Re: Proving H?gar is a sack of shit jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 20:18 +0000
Re: Proving Hägar is a sack of shit Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-23 21:33 +0100
Re: Proving H㦡r is a sack of shit Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-24 02:16 +0200
Proving the Friendly Neighborhood Nut is a sack of shit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 20:13 -0500
Re: Proving Rocky is an insane sack of shit Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-24 03:52 +0200
Re: Proving Rocky is an insane sack of shit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 21:20 -0500
Re: Proving Rocky is an insane sack of shit jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-24 02:36 +0000
Re: Proving Rocky is an insane sack of shit Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-24 06:14 +0200
Re: Proving Friendly Neighborhood Nut is an insane sack of shit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-24 08:22 -0500
Re: Proving Friendly Neighborhood Nut is an insane sack of shit "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 06:59 -0700
Re: Proving Friendly Neighborhood Nut is an insane sack of shit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-24 09:30 -0500
Re: Proving Friendly Neighborhood Nut is an insane sack of shit "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 08:17 -0700
Re: Proving Friendly Neighborhood Nut is an insane sack of shit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-24 10:26 -0500
Re: Proving Friendly Neighborhood Nut is an insane sack of shit "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-24 15:18 -0400
Re: Proving Friendly Neighborhood Nut is an insane sack of shit jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-24 16:21 +0000
Re: Proving Friendly Neighborhood Nut is an insane sack of shit Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-24 20:02 +0200
Re: Proving Friendly Neighborhood Nut is an insane sack of shit "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-24 14:30 -0400
Re: Proving Friendly Neighborhood Nut is an insane sack of shit Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-25 04:51 +0200
Re: Proving the Friendly Neighborhood Nut is a sack of shit jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-24 02:20 +0000
Re: Proving the Friendly Neighborhood Nut is a sack of shit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 21:49 -0500
Re: Proving the Friendly Neighborhood Nut is a sack of shit jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-24 06:12 +0000
Re: 2 Jeanne Douglas Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-23 18:03 +0100
Re: 2 Jeanne Douglas Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-23 20:28 +0200
Re: Nuke Em Jim Noles <no_e-mails@nosuchserver.com> - 2015-08-23 17:28 -0400
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 21:43 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 21:41 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 21:41 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 15:45 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-09 20:55 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 21:37 -0500
Re: Nuke Em benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 00:54 -0400
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-09 08:11 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-09 17:15 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-09 13:57 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-09 19:17 +0000
? 4 Jim (was: Nuke Em) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-09 17:25 -0500
Re: ? 4 Jim jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-09 22:58 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 10:13 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-08 20:51 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-09 03:19 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-09 06:32 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 10:13 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-09 17:18 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-09 13:59 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-09 19:21 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-09 17:37 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-09 23:18 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 21:40 -0500
? 4 jim (was: Nuke Em) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-09 17:14 -0500
Re: ? 4 jim jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-09 22:43 +0000
Re: ? 4 jim "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-09 18:42 -0500
Re: ? 4 jim jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-10 00:16 +0000
Re: ? 4 jim "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-09 21:01 -0500
Re: ? 4 jim "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 21:33 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 10:14 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-09 17:25 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-09 14:04 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-09 19:36 +0000
Caught Jim in a lie about the Survivng Corners (was: Nuke Em) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-09 17:53 -0500
Re: Caught Jim in a lie about the Survivng Corners jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-09 23:21 +0000
Re: Caught Jim in a lie about the Survivng Corners "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-09 18:46 -0500
Re: Caught Jim in a lie about the Survivng Corners jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-10 00:17 +0000
Re: Caught Jim in a lie about the Survivng Corners "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-09 20:37 -0500
Re: Caught Jim in a lie about the Survivng Corners jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-10 01:52 +0000
Re: Caught Jim in a lie about the Survivng Corners "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-09 21:09 -0500
Re: Caught Jim in a lie about the Survivng Corners jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-10 02:43 +0000
Re: Caught Jim in a lie about the Survivng Corners "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 21:37 -0500
Re: Caught Jim in a lie about the Survivng Corners (was: Nuke Em) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 21:36 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 15:46 -0500
Re: Nuke Em BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-08-10 10:49 -0400
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-10 10:27 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-11 04:40 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-11 04:39 -0500
Re: Nuke Em BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-08-11 14:45 -0400
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-12 09:08 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-12 16:56 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-13 04:36 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 10:13 -0500
Page 48 of 50 — ← Prev page 1 … 46 47 [48] 49 50 Next page →
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-24 02:20 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Proving the Friendly Neighborhood Nut is a sack of shit |
| Message-ID | <bkbqac-8i7.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #516341 |
In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > "Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus" <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> > wrote in message > >>> Even the 31 smaller nukes they used on WTC6? (link in post you replied >>> to) >> >> Which brings your total to 65 nuclear weapons total... but you're not >> an insane nutter off his meds, right? > > ROTFLMAO because you counted those 31 already making you a complete idiot. > <G> > > Here, I'll do the math for you since you obviously couldn't do it yourself.: > > 3 (WTC3, WTC4 and WTC7) + 31 (WTC6) = 34 but then you counted the 31 from > WTC6 again making your number 65 you clown. And you haven't the slightest clue just how insane that is. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-23 21:49 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Proving the Friendly Neighborhood Nut is a sack of shit |
| Message-ID | <K-SdnbTlLpBBGEfInZ2dnUU7-LudnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #516350 |
<jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message news:bkbqac-8i7.ln1@mail.specsol.com... > In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > >> "Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus" <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> >> wrote in message > >>>> Even the 31 smaller nukes they used on WTC6? (link in post you replied >>>> to) >>> >>> Which brings your total to 65 nuclear weapons total... but you're not >>> an insane nutter off his meds, right? >> >> ROTFLMAO because you counted those 31 already making you a complete >> idiot. >> <G> >> >> Here, I'll do the math for you since you obviously couldn't do it >> yourself.: >> >> 3 (WTC3, WTC4 and WTC7) + 31 (WTC6) = 34 but then you counted the 31 from >> WTC6 again making your number 65 you clown. > > And you haven't the slightest clue just how insane that is. You wouldn't be saying that if you knew that NIST lied about everything in their fubar documentation. See: The Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence is: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zvCuMULutHs&list=PLm5UJ3igmxaIBJw8yvK1-a9H_11kBDS8W
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-24 06:12 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Proving the Friendly Neighborhood Nut is a sack of shit |
| Message-ID | <a8pqac-n51.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #516355 |
In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > You wouldn't be saying that if you knew that NIST lied about everything in > their fubar documentation. See: Everything you say is insane and the product of some delusional world your twisted and ignorant mind has constructed, kook. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-23 18:03 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: 2 Jeanne Douglas |
| Message-ID | <mrcu9n$squ$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #516075 |
On 23/08/2015 14:48, Rocky wrote: > "Jeanne Douglas" <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote in message > news:hlwdjsd2-7E21BD.22310409082015@news.giganews.com... >> In article <6mcl9c-g8d.ln1@mail.specsol.com>, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com >> wrote: >> >>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>> >>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >>>> news:eq6l9c-4gc.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Whatever. BTW I'm still waiting for you to prove that two 110 story >>>>>> buildings will leave Surviving Walls and Surviving Corners and in the >>>>>> case >>>>>> of the North Tower leave Survivors in Stairwell B. Especially when >>>>>> those >>>>>> surviving parts just happened to be the furthest from the >>>>>> hypocenters. >>>>> >>>>> Why do you continue to capitalize things that should not be >>>>> capitalized, >>>>> lunatic boi? >>>> >>>> So now you have to resort to nitpicking? >>> >>> Why do you continue to capitalize things that should not be capitalized, >>> lunatic boi? >>> >>> It is a symptom of mental illness. >>> >>>>> There was no hypocenter, lunatic boi. >>>> >>>> There were three hypocenters and they all required specially treated >>>> water >>>> to be spayed on them. >>> >>> You really are quite insane. >> >> >> "specially treated water"?????? Wat the fuck is that? How do you treat >> water to completely eliminate all traces of radioactivity? > > Who says all traces of radioactivity from Ground Zero were removed? What sort of radioactivity was it? > Certainly not the videos of Geiger counters going off Are these the cheap Geiger counter that you referred to in another thread? > or the people that > died trying to conceal the fact Ground Zero was the site of not just one > nuclear detonation but 34 or more nukes where 31 nukes were used just to > make a weird shaped hole in WTC6. See: > https://donaldfox.files.wordpress.com/2012/12/potentialplacementofverylowyieldminineutronnukes.jpg > So there were 30+ nukes but you cant explain the radiation or explain why there are no appropriate seismic recordings. --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. http://www.avast.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-23 20:28 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: 2 Jeanne Douglas |
| Message-ID | <c80e9fddeebdecbe90149710abe79be2@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #516075 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
Rocky, in <news:_qGdnVcgSbXHUkTInZ2dnUU7-VmdnZ2d@giganews.com> did
thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again:
> "Jeanne Douglas" <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote in message
> news:hlwdjsd2-7E21BD.22310409082015@news.giganews.com...
>> In article <6mcl9c-g8d.ln1@mail.specsol.com>, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
>> wrote:
>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:eq6l9c-4gc.ln1@mail.specsol.com...
>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>>>>> Wha<SMACKAKOOK!>
>>>>> Why do you continue to capitalize things that should not be
>>>>> capitalized, lunatic boi?
>>>>
>>>> So now you have to resort to nitpicking?
>>> Why do you continue to capitalize things that should not be capitalized,
>>> lunatic boi?
>>>
>>> It is a symptom of mental illness.
>>>>> There was no hypocenter, lunatic boi.
>>>> Th<SMACKAKOOK!>
>>> You really are quite insane.
>> "specially treated water"?????? Wat the fuck is that? How do you treat
>> water to completely eliminate all traces of radioactivity?
> Wh<SMACKAKOOK!>
> 34 or more nukes<SMACKAKOOK!>
"34 *or* *more* nukes" LOL
Your delusion continues to expand as your broken little brain
desperately squirms and tries to change your kooky conspiracy theory
so it has at least a semblance of plausibility. LOL
Too bad for you that you're far too stupid, gullible and insane to
ever come up with a plausible lie... perhaps you should try the truth
for once. LOL
As for your "Geiger counters going off" blather... the radiation was
beta radiation from tritium in the aircraft exit signs and law
enforcement weapons sites:
Message-ID: <e62c14c89ab831a63f27243e265c711a@dizum.com>
<http://www.takeourworldback.com/wtcnukeddisinfo.htm>
=====================================================
The absurdity of the "WTC was nuked" hoax
An excellent refutation of the "WTC was nuked" claims was
provided by Dr. Steven E. Jones, entitled "Hard Evidence
Repudiates the Hypothesis that Mini-Nukes Were Used on the WTC
Towers". He summarized a few key points as:
<http://www.journalof911studies.com/letters/a/Hard-Evidence-Rebudiates-the-Hypothesis-that-Mini-Nukes-were-used-on-the-wtc-towers-by-steven-jones.pdf>
===============
The data clearly demonstrate the large amount of tritium released
due to hydrogen bombs, the first of which was tested in 1951.
Thus, tritium is a tracer for hydrogen bombs, the "smoking gun."
Can proponents of the WTC-mini-nuke hypothesis explain how large
releases of tritium did NOT happen on 9/11/2001?
Sediment cores pulled from the Hudson River near the World Trade
Center site just a month after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist
attacks contain a thin layer of metal-rich ash and pulverized
debris. The top 3 cm of silt contained layers with unnaturally
high concentrations of copper, strontium, and zinc from the
towers, says Sarah D. Oktay, a geochemist. "Oktay and her
colleagues also found that the sediments contain small but
measurable quantities of iodine-131, a human-made radioactive
isotope with a half-life of about 8 days. Total iodine
concentrations were actually lower in the [WTC] debris-filled
layers, which means the source of the element probably isn't
related to the attacks."
Radionuclides. We analyzed the gamma spectrum of the samples
using an EG&G/Ortec high-purity Ge detector (50% relative
efficiency) gamma counter (EG&G/Ortec Instruments, Inc., Oak
Ridge, TN). We analyzed approximately 50 peaks based on
statistical significance (counting/lack of interferences). These
included thorium, uranium, actinium series, and primordial
radionuclides. Liquid scintillation analyses were conducted for
emissions on the total dust and smoke samples using a Packard
Tri-Carb Model 2770 TR/SL (Packard Instrument, Meriden, CT). The
MDA for alpha radioactivity was 0.30 DPM (0.14 pCi) based on a
NIST-traceable 226Ra standard (National Institute of Standards
and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD).
Results. We found only background levels of alpha radionuclide
activity by liquid scintillation counter analysis of all three
samples. Beta activity was slightly elevated, but not more than
twice the background level. There were no levels of gamma
activity > 1 Bq/g except for naturally occurring potassium-40.
These very low levels of radioactive isotopes (radionuclides) in
the WTC dust are by themselves sufficient to rule out the use of
atomic bombs (even as triggers) at the WTC, which could be
construed as an absurd notion as it confronts the empirical
facts.
===============
{NOTE: The elevated beta radiation was likely just as I stated,
the tritium from the airplane exit signs and law enforcement
weapon sights. Beta particles are nothing more than high-energy
electrons.}
- Observation of tritium (an important component of hydrogen-bomb
fuel) at WTC sites at the few nano-curie level only. This is
strong evidence against the mini-nuke hypothesis.
- The fact that radioactive iodine concentrations were actually
lower in the upper/WTC debris-filled layers.
- Radioactive hot-spots in NYC were found to be due to radium,
which is traceable to industrial uses (not bombs). This in itself
does not rule out mini-nukes, but these data certainly do not
support the mini-nuke hypothesis.
- Lioy et al. report that radioactivity from thorium, uranium,
actinium series and other radionuclides is at or near the
background level for WTC dust.
- Nuclear activation or residual "fall-out" radioactivity (above
background) was NOT observed, in tests performed by the author on
actual WTC samples. This result is consistent with the low
Iodine-131 measured by independent researchers (point 2 above)
and the low radionuclide counts (point 4 above) and again
provides compelling evidence against the mini-nuke-at-Towers
hypothesis.
- No fatalities due to radiation "burning" were reported near
ground zero. William Rodriguez survived the North Tower collapse.
No observed melting of glass due to the collapse-process of the
Towers.
- One more: The mini-nuke idea fails completely for WTC 7 where
vertically-directed plumes of dust were absent during the
collapse, and the building fell quite neatly onto its own
footprint. (Molten metal was observed under the WTC7 rubble as
well.)
=====================================================
Kook. LOL
> Rocky
Now, get to addressing the 17 ways your kook conspiracy theory
violates the laws of physics:
======================================================
1) Your estimation of the time between detonation and the time of
collapse puts the nukes between from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* deep below
the towers, a depth we don't even have the technology to drill to
today, let alone back in 1968. Not to mention the fact that at that
depth, the temperature is so high things like metal *melt*. That's
*why* we can't drill much deeper than the 7.636 miles of the Al
Shaheen oil well in Qatar (the deepest hole *ever* dug in human
history)... the equipment fails. That's why the Kola Superdeep
Borehole was abandoned at 7.619 miles deep.
2) The claimed "EMP pulse" in the WCBS video *you* provided wasn't an
EMP pulse at all, it was satellite uplink interference. If it'd been a
nuke EMP (especially one sized 150 kt), the nanosecond time frame of
the explosion (and thus the sharp peak of the EMP) would have caused
the camera's electronics to burn out. No amount of shielding would
have been sufficient to prevent that. That there is video of the
immediate aftermath proves there was no nuke, especially one sized
your claimed 150 kt, which would have destroyed all electronics for
dozens of miles radius.
3) The radiation experienced was of such short duration that there's
no way it was neutron or gamma bombardment from a nuke. If it had been
from a nuke the metal in the buildings would have shown high levels of
radioactivity for decades. It was found to be beta radiation from the
tritium in the aircraft exit signs and law enforcement weapon sights
that was the source. That you're gullible enough not to know that a
nuke would spread radiation far and wide is testament to how
delusional you are.
4) No nuclear detonation byproducts were found at the WTC complex or
anywhere in NYC (MID: <e62c14c89ab831a63f27243e265c711a@dizum.com>).
They found tritium from the aircraft exit signs and law enforcement
weapons sites, radium from industrial sources unrelated to nuclear
weapons and background levels for all other sources of radiation.
5) The seismic waves caused by a small 150 kt nuke wouldn't be
sufficient to drop the buildings, it'd barely even be felt by people
in the vicinity, especially with the bombs buried, as you k'lamed,
from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* deep. It would take on the order of 2
MEGAtons to do so, especially at the depths you k'lame the bombs were
buried.
6) The trigger that sets off the nuclear explosion is a neutron
source. It naturally radioactively decays over time, and its decay
byproducts, the elements the neutron source transmutes into as it
decays, include xenon, which is a neutron absorber. It's called xenon
poisoning. Any bomb that has sat for 33 years without its trigger
being replenished will not have a trigger that is viable to start any
sort of nuclear chain reaction.
7) I've provided a video from *inside* one of the towers *as* *it*
*was* *collapsing*, showing the vibration from the buckling vertical
support column and *NO* EMP:
======================
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1xYjoSvzWeo>
You'll note the massive shaking from the central support column
buckling, but *NO* EMP. And that was INSIDE the WTC tower. No amount
of shielding would have saved that camera from a nuke EMP.
======================
8) Why aren't you explaining how those supposed nukes were going to
survive at a depth of 37.28 miles (where the temperature would be
approximately 960 degrees F) to 96.93 miles (where the temperature
would be approximately 1840 degrees F), Ko0K?
9) Explain how a nuclear weapon can direct its explosion through a
hole without any of the compressive blast going out into surrounding
rock.
10) Explain how 19 nukes (according to you, another leap of logic
taken by your broken brain to explain away the 19 instances of
satellite uplink interference in the video *you* provided) were
detonated at the WTC complex in rapid succession, yet no ill effects
were experienced by electronics, the electrical grid or aircraft.
11) Why aren't you explaining how the personnel you claim were sent
down to service those nukes (because now that you know the
neutron-source triggers for nuclear weapons require replacement on a
periodic basis, your broken brain *had* to construct an entire
facility at 37.28 to 96.93 miles deep (far deeper than we have the
technology to dig even today, let alone back in 1968), complete with
"4 blast doors to keep the explosion from getting back into the area
the nukes were maintained", or your brain would have been forced to
admit it was wrong when it told you those nukes sat untouched for 33
years and maintained their viability) are supposed to survive in 960
to 1840 degree heat?
12) You admitted (MID:<ed75e9d6f7ccf7296c075fd695673a37@dizum.com>)
that all the materials used in construction of the twin towers (all
1.5 million tons of it) had been accounted for and trucked off to the
Fresh Kills landfill. How will you reconcile your admission with your
kook blather that significant percentages of the buildings "vaporized"
(your word) and "floated toward Europe" (your words)?
13) Why can't you provide proof of the nuclear explosion seismic
signatures for these 19 nukes you k'lame were detonated at the WTC
site on 11 Sep 2001?
14) Where were the vertically-directed plumes of dust and debris
kicked up from your claimed nuclear weapons being detonated deep
underground, Ko0K?
15) Explain how the 19 nukes you claimed to have existed could have
tunneled holes from the underground installation 37.28 to 96.93 miles
deep that you claimed to have existed, to directly under the WTC
complex... in 12 seconds... through solid bedrock... prior to
detonating directly below the WTC towers (which, of course, fucks up
your timing between the detonations you claim took place (for which
you used the WCBS video, claiming the satellite uplink interference
was "EMP") and the collapses, leading you back to where your delusion
started. Congratulations, Dimwit, you've made the full circuit on The
Island of Insanity. Now go 'round again.).
16) Explain why you're now saying there were 34 nukes
(MID:<345fee8b286a91037bc806ed589d182d@dizum.com>), as opposed to your
previously k'lamed 19 nukes (and your previously, previously k'lamed 3
nukes)... would it be because your broken little brain is squirming
under the scorching twin beams of truth and reality, screaming in
agony at its being forced to see just how delusional it truly is?
While you're at it, get to explaining how the regular rad sweeps
(radiological surveys) at the twin towers (because the space was
primarily rented by government agencies) showed no nukes or any
contamination whatsoever, and how 34 nukes were obtained and put in
place without drawing any attention whatsoever. Of course, this
*still* fucks up your timing between the detonations (ie: your claimed
"EMP" on the WCBS video) and the collapses, leading you back to where
your delusion started... that unresolvable logic hole rears its ugly
head again. LOL
17) Your broken brain is yet again expanding your delusion with your
"34 or more nukes" blather... eventually, your broken brain will be
telling you that NYC today is a CGI and the real city was blown up by
1,592,629,490,173,371,449,138,916,004,581,949 intelligent nano-nukes
which autonomously dug their way up from their secret underground
MoleMan base 15,682,941 miles below the surface of our hollow planet
and attached themselves to every steel part of every building in NYC
and vaporized them and they all floated down to MoleVille, and the
fact that the EMP from all those nukes detonating at once didn't burn
out every electrical generating station, electrical substation, every
piece of electronic equipment, every vehicle, every aircraft... that's
*proof* that NYC is a CGI today! LOL
Do you see how utterly ridiculous you're beginning to sound?
Get back on your meds, you delusional loon.
======================================================
There are now 17 ways your kook konspiracy theory violates the laws of
physics... now you'd better get to work addressing each one, point by
point, or people are gonna know you're just a retard who can't grasp
simple physics.
Kook. LOL
--
Rocky, your brain is grasping at straws in trying to avoid admitting
*you* *are* *wrong*, and as your brain becomes more and more desperate
to avoid the truth we promulgate (which utterly demolishes your kook
conspiracy theory), it makes larger and larger leaps of illogic.
For instance:
=============================
A) You said the satellite uplink inteference seen in the WCBS video
*you* *provided* was a nuke EMP, so your broken brain told you they
must have buried nukes under the twin towers. Being a simpleton, you
believed they just dug shallow holes, dropped the nukes in, smoothed
over the concrete and walked away for 33 years.
B) Your timing on the WCBS video *you* *provided* between the
satellite uplink interference (what you deemed to be a "nuke EMP") and
the tower falling being 12 seconds (it was actually 14 seconds, but
kooks can't count) means your supposed nukes had to have been buried
from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* below the surface (dependent upon soil
composition and thus speed of compressive blast transmission). Never
mind that we don't have the technology to drill that deep even today,
let alone in 1968. Your broken brain had to yet again change your
kooky little conspiracy theory to at least try to orient itself at
some acute angle to reality. So no "dug a shallow hole, dropped the
nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years" anymore, now it was
"dug an impossibly deep hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up,
walked away for 33 years".
C) You're such a simpleton you didn't realize nukes require periodic
replacement of their neutron-source trigger, which naturally
radioactively decays over time, building up the decay byproduct xenon,
which absorbs neutrons. It's called xenon poisoning. So your broken
brain told you that someone had to service those nukes to keep the
triggers viable... which means your broken brain was thus *forced* to
change from "dug a shallow hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up,
walked away for 33 years", to "dug an impossibly deep hole, dropped
the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years", to "built an
entire *facility* impossibly deep under the WTC, complete with service
personnel and" "4 blast doors to keep the explosion from getting back
into the area the nukes were maintained" (your words).
D) Your broken brain then said there were 19 nukes instead of your
original 3, because you knew there were 19 instances of satellite
uplink interference in the WCBS video *you* *provided*, in which you
k'lamed one of the instances of satellite uplink interference was an
EMP. And if you k'lame one of them is an EMP, they *all* must be EMPs,
so your broken brain now tells you there were 19 nukes detonated in
rapid succession... completely ignoring the fact that even one nuke
detonation would plunge the city into darkness due to EMP burning out
electrical substations, and completely ignoring the fact that no
nuclear detonation byproducts were found in the rubble, in the
vicinity of the rubble, or anywhere in NYC.
E) Now that your broken brain was convinced that the nukes were buried
deeply, of course, they had a very wide blast radius, which screwed up
your kooky k'lame that they were used to demolish WTC1 and WTC2, but
somehow missed WTC3 and WTC4... so your broken brain conceived that
the nuclear weapons could somehow dig themselves up from that
miles-deep facility to just below the WTC towers prior to exploding,
in order to make their cone of destruction smaller. Nevermind that
your broken brain said they dug through 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* of
*solid* *bedrock* in *12* *seconds*. LOL
F) So I've led you by the nose in a full circle... if those bombs your
broken brain is telling you existed *did* dig their way up to
underneath the WTC twin towers before detonating (they didn't... first
because there were no nukes, second because it'd be impossible, but
for the sake of argument, we'll continue), that leads right back to
your calculation of the time between your claimed "EMP" (the satellite
uplink interference on the WCBS video *you* *provided*) and the time
the buildings fell, which is pretty much where we started. So I've
proven by drop-kicking your retarded ass around the perimeter of
sanity full-circle that you're insane. LOL
G) Realizing the utter ridiculousness of your kook blather above, your
broken brain has backpedaled and expanded your delusion even more as a
desperate attempt at attaining some semblance of plausibility...
saying there were 34 mini-nukes, and they were within and underneath
the twin towers. If those 34 nukes you claim existed *did* explode,
where are the nuclear detonation byproducts? The highly radioactive
metal? The radiation burns and radiation sickness of people in the
vicinity? Where are the nuclear detonation signature seismographs? Why
did the electrical grid, all electronics and all vehicles survive not
just one but *34* nuclear EMPs? And what about that timing between the
WCBS video satellite uplink interference (what you claimed was "EMP")
and the shaking and collapse of the tower? That's now off by 14 whole
seconds, just as it was when your kooky conspiracy theory began. LOL
H) Your brain becoming more and more broken, in just one short day it
moved from G) above to now telling you there are *more* than 34 nukes.
Where does your broken brain stop, Ko0k? Billions of intelligent
nano-nukes covering every metal surface of the twin towers? Robot
"crisis actors" able to withstand the extreme radiation? All of NYC
being blow up, replaced by a CGI that we all are fooled by today? LOL
IOW, your broken brain is far too stupid to discern fantasy from
reality, so you've caught yourself in an unresolvable logic hole. And
the harder you try to resolve it, the more you run around in little
tard-circles, banging your head with your fist and doing your very
best Rainman impersonation. I can twist your brain into a Gordian Knot
with my knowledge. And I've just barely even started, I haven't even
worked up a sweat yet.
=============================
Kook. LOL
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jim Noles <no_e-mails@nosuchserver.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-23 17:28 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <d5ekta15esmgq07t1vo7jjj8cg6jjkdev8@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #512338 |
On Sun, 09 Aug 2015 22:31:04 -0700, Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote: >In article <6mcl9c-g8d.ln1@mail.specsol.com>, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com >wrote: > >> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >> > >> > <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >> > news:eq6l9c-4gc.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >> >> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >> >> >> >>> Whatever. BTW I'm still waiting for you to prove that two 110 story >> >>> buildings will leave Surviving Walls and Surviving Corners and in the >> >>> case >> >>> of the North Tower leave Survivors in Stairwell B. Especially when those >> >>> surviving parts just happened to be the furthest from the hypocenters. >> >> >> >> Why do you continue to capitalize things that should not be capitalized, >> >> lunatic boi? >> > >> > So now you have to resort to nitpicking? >> >> Why do you continue to capitalize things that should not be capitalized, >> lunatic boi? >> >> It is a symptom of mental illness. >> >> >> There was no hypocenter, lunatic boi. >> > >> > There were three hypocenters and they all required specially treated water >> > to be spayed on them. >> >> You really are quite insane. > > >"specially treated water"?????? Wat the fuck is that? How do you treat >water to completely eliminate all traces of radioactivity? Jeanne...Jeanne... Jeanne.... you should never involved yourself in things that too complicated for you. Water is H2O, and cannot become radioactive. Various methods are used to remove impurities including radioactive materials from what is contaminate in water, and then store the radioactive materials to further decay, but water itself is simple chemically impossible of being radioactive. There are NO radioactive elements in WATER. See -- http://chemwiki.ucdavis.edu/Physical_Chemistry/Nuclear_Chemistry/Radioactivity/How_to_purify_radioactive_materials QUOTE : "(since water itself cannot become radioactive, the radioactive components are referred to as radioactive fallout). Happy to help the scientifically handicapped. Planet Visitor II "Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter." -- Martin Luther King Jr. "Imagine the beautiful sound of toilets flushing and garbage disposals grinding away night and day! MMMMMMMmmmmmmmmmmm, I'm getting all wet again!!!" == W.T.S. (the fuckwit) becoming sexually aroused at her thought of aborted fetuses See -- https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!original/alt.abortion/92tbHdpw6fQ/AOKc4nTGu8cJ
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-09 21:43 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <fs3gsa9kuqsomoles3ad94pspu5uf6hg2p@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #512301 |
On Sun, 9 Aug 2015 20:43:16 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>
><jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message
>news:eq6l9c-4gc.ln1@mail.specsol.com...
>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>
>>> Whatever. BTW I'm still waiting for you to prove that two 110 story
>>> buildings will leave Surviving Walls and Surviving Corners and in the
>>> case
>>> of the North Tower leave Survivors in Stairwell B. Especially when those
>>> surviving parts just happened to be the furthest from the hypocenters.
>>
>> Why do you continue to capitalize things that should not be capitalized,
>> lunatic boi?
>
>So now you have to resort to nitpicking?
>
Your non-answer is very telling.
The truth is that you don't know any better. You have a very real
learning disability.
>> There was no hypocenter, lunatic boi.
>
>There were three hypocenters and they all required specially treated water
>to be spayed on them.
>
Though this will be a waste of time, since you've never offered
evidence for any of your lies [1], please present your evidence that
special water, the kind apparently used on hypocenters, was used.
If you're lying, you'll offer no evidence.
>And you have still failed to tell me how tall the debris pile would be from
>the Twin Towers if they had been destroyed by a Controlled Demolition.
>
About three stories. This is why we can KNOW your claim of a
nuclear controlled demolition is false.
>In other words how can you claim the Twin Towers were not a controlled
>demolition when you don't know what they would look like if they were?
We can make an educated guess. Your lack of education, a result
of your very real inability to learn, means you can't do even that.
[1] When you've tried, you've ended up proving your own claims wrong.
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-09 21:41 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <rq3gsapl0tm8rt3t1hqt6urrgi454brv07@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #512270 |
On Mon, 10 Aug 2015 00:11:26 -0000, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>
>> Whatever. BTW I'm still waiting for you to prove that two 110 story
>> buildings will leave Surviving Walls and Surviving Corners and in the case
>> of the North Tower leave Survivors in Stairwell B. Especially when those
>> surviving parts just happened to be the furthest from the hypocenters.
>
>Why do you continue to capitalize things that should not be capitalized,
>lunatic boi?
>
>Is that part of your delusions?
>
He's very poorly educated. This is a result of his inability to
learn.
>There was no hypocenter, lunatic boi.
He knows, but it unable to accept this.
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-09 21:41 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <mp3gsapc5n6t411klijdu7ighl82fkacs2@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #512262 |
On Sun, 9 Aug 2015 18:35:24 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
><jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message
>news:h9rk9c-pkp.ln1@mail.specsol.com...
>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>>
>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message
>>> news:l6lk9c-0vo.ln1@mail.specsol.com...
>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message
>>>>> news:obek9c-t1o.ln1@mail.specsol.com...
>>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> When were these "nukes" installed and how is no one noticed, kook
>>>>>>>> boi?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Answered in another post.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Who was doing the maintenance on them and how is it no one noticed,
>>>>>> kook boi?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> FYI, kook boi, nuke maintenance is done by sending them somewhere to
>>>>>> a lab equiped to do it.
>>>>>
>>>>> And your supporting link is what? <G>
>>>>
>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stockpile_stewardship
>>>> http://time.com/44648/u-s-faces-challenges-maintaining-aging-nuclear-arsenal/
>>>> http://www.popsci.com/military-aviation-amp-space/article/2009-04/battling-over-aging-nuclear-warheads
>>>> http://www.acq.osd.mil/ncbdp/nm/nm_book_5_11/chapter_3.htm
>>>>
>>>> Finding such information is trivail, understanding it is far beyond you.
>>>
>>> And you have still failed to mention how collapsing buildings could leave
>>> so many Surviving Walls and Surviving Corners and Survivors above the lobby
>>> level. <G>
>>>
>>>>> And don't forget why the Manhattan project was called the Manhattan
>>>>> project.
>>>>
>>>> Irrelevant, lunatic boi.
>>>
>>> So your saying that even though Nuke York City has a history of playing
>>> with nuclear devices that is doesn't matter that they played with them on 9/11
>>> also. I doubt that. <G>
>>
>> New York City had nothing to do with the Manhattan project by the US
>> government other than some support facilities were located there,
>> lunatic boi.
>>
>> A WWII weapons project is irrelevant to anything that happened in 2001,
>> lunatic boi.
>>
>> Don't forget that New York was also the center for British operations
>> during the American Revolution, lunatic boi.
>
>Whatever. BTW I'm still waiting for you to prove that two 110 story
>buildings will leave Surviving Walls and Surviving Corners and in the case
>of the North Tower leave Survivors in Stairwell B. Especially when those
>surviving parts just happened to be the furthest from the hypocenters.
>
There were no hypocenters. That LIE of yours aside, here the
proof you requested:
http://ep.yimg.com/ay/mcmahanphoto/9-11-world-trade-center-site-debris-removal-photo-print-3.jpg
http://www.911conspiracy.tv/images/WTCdemolitions/GZ_from-window_ERIC-FEFERBERG-AFP.jpg
Do you want more or are you going to run away from the TRUTH I've
posted? Perhaps you'll use one of your avoidance games. Time will tell
just how you refuse to accept the TRUTH I've posted.
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-09 15:45 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <dvefsa1b1mlos83mosljo7hjqf7f166k1q@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #512161 |
On Sun, 9 Aug 2015 13:55:35 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
><jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message
>news:obek9c-t1o.ln1@mail.specsol.com...
>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>
>>>> When were these "nukes" installed and how is no one noticed, kook boi?
>>>
>>> Answered in another post.
>>
>> Who was doing the maintenance on them and how is it no one noticed, kook
>> boi?
>>
>> FYI, kook boi, nuke maintenance is done by sending them somewhere to
>> a lab equiped to do it.
>
>And your supporting link is what? <G>
>
>And don't forget why the Manhattan project was called the Manhattan project.
>See:
>Why They Called It the Manhattan Project
> ><http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/30/science/30manh.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0><In other words Nuke York City has been tinkering with nukes for a lot longertime than you give them credit. <G>Rocky
There were storage and research sights all over the U.S.
Including Ames, Iowa.
By the very logic you're using, Ames, Iowa is where the phantom
nukes were stored until they were detonated.
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-09 20:55 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <dbrk9c-pkp.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #512198 |
In sci.physics "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, 9 Aug 2015 13:55:35 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > >><jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >>news:obek9c-t1o.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>> >>>>> When were these "nukes" installed and how is no one noticed, kook boi? >>>> >>>> Answered in another post. >>> >>> Who was doing the maintenance on them and how is it no one noticed, kook >>> boi? >>> >>> FYI, kook boi, nuke maintenance is done by sending them somewhere to >>> a lab equiped to do it. >> >>And your supporting link is what? <G> >> >>And don't forget why the Manhattan project was called the Manhattan project. >>See: >>Why They Called It the Manhattan Project >> ><http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/30/science/30manh.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0><In other words Nuke York City has been tinkering with nukes for a lot longertime than you give them credit. <G>Rocky > > There were storage and research sights all over the U.S. > Including Ames, Iowa. > By the very logic you're using, Ames, Iowa is where the phantom > nukes were stored until they were detonated. Lunatic boi's logic has severe parity errors. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-09 21:37 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <mi3gsa9vic5us8hp7i31hp3pppi86nieie@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #512205 |
On Sun, 9 Aug 2015 20:55:41 -0000, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>In sci.physics "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Sun, 9 Aug 2015 13:55:35 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>
>>><jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message
>>>news:obek9c-t1o.ln1@mail.specsol.com...
>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>> When were these "nukes" installed and how is no one noticed, kook boi?
>>>>>
>>>>> Answered in another post.
>>>>
>>>> Who was doing the maintenance on them and how is it no one noticed, kook
>>>> boi?
>>>>
>>>> FYI, kook boi, nuke maintenance is done by sending them somewhere to
>>>> a lab equiped to do it.
>>>
>>>And your supporting link is what? <G>
>>>
>>>And don't forget why the Manhattan project was called the Manhattan project.
>>>See:
>>>Why They Called It the Manhattan Project
>>> ><http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/30/science/30manh.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0><In other words Nuke York City has been tinkering with nukes for a lot longertime than you give them credit. <G>Rocky
>>
>> There were storage and research sights all over the U.S.
>> Including Ames, Iowa.
>> By the very logic you're using, Ames, Iowa is where the phantom
>> nukes were stored until they were detonated.
>
>Lunatic boi's logic has severe parity errors.
>
Agreed. It's the result of his low intellect. It's not something
that can be treated or cured.
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <nobody@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-09 00:54 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <82Bxx.13787$2T5.6197@fx04.iad> |
| In reply to | #512031 |
On 08/08/2015 09:36 PM, Rocky wrote:
> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message
> news:gsmi9c-qbp.ln1@mail.specsol.com...
>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>>
>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message
>>> news:gnki9c-a5p.ln1@mail.specsol.com...
>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message
>>>>> news:egii9c-rso.ln1@mail.specsol.com...
>>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Actually it was a video from Nuke York City the day after 9/11 that
>>>>>>> clued
>>>>>>> us
>>>>>>> in that the Twin Towers were really destroyed the safest way we could
>>>>>>> destroy them and that was with deep underground nukes.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yeah, and no one would ever notice someone digging the deep hole in
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> middle of New York or all the dirt that would have to have been hauled
>>>>>> out.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Babbling idiot.
>>>>>
>>>>> You are an absolute idiot because the building code for Nuke York City
>>>>> demands that before tall buildings can be built their also has to be a
>>>>> way
>>>>> to bring them down and nuclear controlled demolitions can be used for
>>>>> that.
>>>>
>>>> Yeah, sure, kook boi.
>>>>
>>>> If nothing else, at least this thread provides a look at the results
>>>> of cutting funding for mental health programs.
>>>
>>> And again you provide no evidence whatsoever to support the government's
>>> official bullshit about 9/11.
>>>
>>> I on the other hand can offer photos that prove the Twin Towers did not
>>> really collapse because if they had collapsed they would have crushed the
>>> "Surviving Corners" at the very bottom of them. They were nuked and most
>>> of
>>> them floated away before they ever made it to the ground.
>>
>> I know it is pointless to attempt to get reality from the insane, but
>> when were these "nukes" installed and how is no one noticed, kook boi?
>
> If you think you have a valid argument then make it PLEASE. Maybe you
> forget what facts are since all you have been doing is sidestepping and
> moving the goalpost.
>
> Don't just keep being a government shill who wants to conceal the fact that
> in reality we, the only country to nuke another country also nuked ourselves
> on 9/11/01.
>
> Rocky
>
You sound exactly like one of HVAC's shills!
Do you know how an atomic bomb works? If so please explain where that
radiation went and why anyone in the area isn't dead of leukemia by now.
We'll wait right here for your answer.
--
___ ___ ___ ___
/\ \ /\ \ /\__\ /\ \
/::\ \ /::\ \ /::| | \:\ \
/:/\:\ \ /:/\:\ \ /:|:| | ___ /::\__\
/::\~\:\__\ /::\~\:\ \ /:/|:| |__ /\ /:/\/__/
/:/\:\ \:|__| /:/\:\ \:\__\ /:/ |:| /\__\ \:\/:/ /
\:\~\:\/:/ / \:\~\:\ \/__/ \/__|:|/:/ / \::/ /
\:\ \::/ / \:\ \:\__\ |:/:/ / \/__/
\:\/:/ / \:\ \/__/ |::/ /
\_:/__/ \:\__\ /:/ /
\/__/ \/__/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-09 08:11 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <WtydnZLEKq4pzFrInZ2dnUU7-QWdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #512051 |
"benj" <nobody@gmail.com> wrote in message news:82Bxx.13787$2T5.6197@fx04.iad... > On 08/08/2015 09:36 PM, Rocky wrote: >> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >> news:gsmi9c-qbp.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>> >>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >>>> news:gnki9c-a5p.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >>>>>> news:egii9c-rso.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Actually it was a video from Nuke York City the day after 9/11 that >>>>>>>> clued >>>>>>>> us >>>>>>>> in that the Twin Towers were really destroyed the safest way we >>>>>>>> could >>>>>>>> destroy them and that was with deep underground nukes. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Yeah, and no one would ever notice someone digging the deep hole in >>>>>>> the >>>>>>> middle of New York or all the dirt that would have to have been >>>>>>> hauled >>>>>>> out. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Babbling idiot. >>>>>> >>>>>> You are an absolute idiot because the building code for Nuke York >>>>>> City >>>>>> demands that before tall buildings can be built their also has to be >>>>>> a >>>>>> way >>>>>> to bring them down and nuclear controlled demolitions can be used for >>>>>> that. >>>>> >>>>> Yeah, sure, kook boi. >>>>> >>>>> If nothing else, at least this thread provides a look at the results >>>>> of cutting funding for mental health programs. >>>> >>>> And again you provide no evidence whatsoever to support the >>>> government's >>>> official bullshit about 9/11. >>>> >>>> I on the other hand can offer photos that prove the Twin Towers did not >>>> really collapse because if they had collapsed they would have crushed >>>> the >>>> "Surviving Corners" at the very bottom of them. They were nuked and >>>> most >>>> of >>>> them floated away before they ever made it to the ground. >>> >>> I know it is pointless to attempt to get reality from the insane, but >>> when were these "nukes" installed and how is no one noticed, kook boi? >> >> If you think you have a valid argument then make it PLEASE. Maybe you >> forget what facts are since all you have been doing is sidestepping and >> moving the goalpost. >> >> Don't just keep being a government shill who wants to conceal the fact >> that >> in reality we, the only country to nuke another country also nuked >> ourselves >> on 9/11/01. >> >> Rocky >> > You sound exactly like one of HVAC's shills! Are you upset that other people have figured out how the 9/11 hoax was pulled off before you? It sure looks that way. > Do you know how an atomic bomb works? Why don't you look at a hydrogen bomb and consider that the radiation from it is mainly from the device that detonates it. Plus underground nukes have been OK'd for the use in building demolitions so they must have figured out some way to lower the radiation or they just didn't care about the radiation since they could lie about how a building was destroyed just like they did during the 9/11 hoax. <G> They monitored the radiation at Ground Zero and people died from it but since most their deaths were a while after their work at the 9/11 hoax site people wouldn't suspect their deaths were tied to the radation at Ground Zero. > If so please explain where that radiation went and why anyone in the area > isn't dead of leukemia by now. We'll wait right here for your answer. Fact is that a lot of people that worked at Ground Zero have died from radiation induced illnesses. And it took a long time before radiation induced illnesses were covered by our Government so they tried their best to lie about the radiation for years after 9/11, The fact remains. The surviving walls of the Twin Towers disprove the "collapse" bullshit and help support the fact that nukes placed under WTC3 and WTC4 could not vaporize every outside wall of the Twin Towers. See: http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/photos/gzrescue1.html Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-09 17:15 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <0fek9c-t1o.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #512096 |
In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > Why don't you look at a hydrogen bomb and consider that the radiation from > it is mainly from the device that detonates it. > > Plus underground nukes have been OK'd for the use in building demolitions so > they must have figured out some way to lower the radiation or they just > didn't care about the radiation since they could lie about how a building > was destroyed just like they did during the 9/11 hoax. <G> Pure kook boi fantasy. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-09 13:57 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <5cKdnb0eS7o6P1rInZ2dnUU7-bmdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #512136 |
<jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message news:0fek9c-t1o.ln1@mail.specsol.com... > In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > > >> Why don't you look at a hydrogen bomb and consider that the radiation >> from >> it is mainly from the device that detonates it. >> >> Plus underground nukes have been OK'd for the use in building demolitions >> so >> they must have figured out some way to lower the radiation or they just >> didn't care about the radiation since they could lie about how a building >> was destroyed just like they did during the 9/11 hoax. <G> > > Pure kook boi fantasy. I take it you never heard of "Operation Plowshare" and you have certainly missed most of my post to alt.astronomy too. Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-09 19:17 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <hilk9c-0vo.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #512163 |
In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > > <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message > news:0fek9c-t1o.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >> >> >>> Why don't you look at a hydrogen bomb and consider that the radiation >>> from >>> it is mainly from the device that detonates it. >>> >>> Plus underground nukes have been OK'd for the use in building demolitions >>> so >>> they must have figured out some way to lower the radiation or they just >>> didn't care about the radiation since they could lie about how a building >>> was destroyed just like they did during the 9/11 hoax. <G> >> >> Pure kook boi fantasy. > > I take it you never heard of "Operation Plowshare" and you have certainly > missed most of my post to alt.astronomy too. Of course I have heard of that RESEARCH project, lunatic boi. I also know the idea was abandoned because of environmental concerns and wide public concerns of general safety, lunatic boi. I also know that knocking down old buildings was never concidered as conventional explosives are more than sufficient for doing that, lunatic boi. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-09 17:25 -0500 |
| Subject | ? 4 Jim (was: Nuke Em) |
| Message-ID | <fZedndSQwqIMTlrInZ2dnUU7-LmdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #512177 |
<jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message news:hilk9c-0vo.ln1@mail.specsol.com... > In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >> >> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >> news:0fek9c-t1o.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>> >>> >>>> Why don't you look at a hydrogen bomb and consider that the radiation >>>> from >>>> it is mainly from the device that detonates it. >>>> >>>> Plus underground nukes have been OK'd for the use in building >>>> demolitions >>>> so >>>> they must have figured out some way to lower the radiation or they just >>>> didn't care about the radiation since they could lie about how a >>>> building >>>> was destroyed just like they did during the 9/11 hoax. <G> >>> >>> Pure kook boi fantasy. >> >> I take it you never heard of "Operation Plowshare" and you have certainly >> missed most of my post to alt.astronomy too. > > Of course I have heard of that RESEARCH project, lunatic boi. > > I also know the idea was abandoned because of environmental concerns > and wide public concerns of general safety, lunatic boi. > > I also know that knocking down old buildings was never concidered as > conventional explosives are more than sufficient for doing that, lunatic > boi. So you are telling me you don't know anything at all about knocking down modern skyscrapers since your knowledge is limited to "old buildings." And if you are so smart then tell me how big the pile of rubble from the Twin Towers would have been if it had been a Controlled Demolition? <G> Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-09 22:58 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: ? 4 Jim |
| Message-ID | <bh2l9c-trb.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #512226 |
In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > > <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message > news:hilk9c-0vo.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>> >>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >>> news:0fek9c-t1o.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>> Why don't you look at a hydrogen bomb and consider that the radiation >>>>> from >>>>> it is mainly from the device that detonates it. >>>>> >>>>> Plus underground nukes have been OK'd for the use in building >>>>> demolitions >>>>> so >>>>> they must have figured out some way to lower the radiation or they just >>>>> didn't care about the radiation since they could lie about how a >>>>> building >>>>> was destroyed just like they did during the 9/11 hoax. <G> >>>> >>>> Pure kook boi fantasy. >>> >>> I take it you never heard of "Operation Plowshare" and you have certainly >>> missed most of my post to alt.astronomy too. >> >> Of course I have heard of that RESEARCH project, lunatic boi. >> >> I also know the idea was abandoned because of environmental concerns >> and wide public concerns of general safety, lunatic boi. >> >> I also know that knocking down old buildings was never concidered as >> conventional explosives are more than sufficient for doing that, lunatic >> boi. > > So you are telling me you don't know anything at all about knocking down > modern skyscrapers since your knowledge is limited to "old buildings." Nope, that is the voices in your head telling you that, lunatic. > And if you are so smart then tell me how big the pile of rubble from the > Twin Towers would have been if it had been a Controlled Demolition? <G> Here's a video of about 70 explosive demolitions, lunatic boi. Notice the buildings drop neatly on their own lots, nothing is left standing, adjacent buildings are untouched, and rubble is NOT scattered all around, lunatic boi. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sK50So-yYRU -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-09 10:13 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <0gresa9idkpb3c8251sohl2udkg3mb3oud@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #512031 |
On Sat, 8 Aug 2015 20:36:38 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>
><jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message
>news:gsmi9c-qbp.ln1@mail.specsol.com...
>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>>
>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message
>>> news:gnki9c-a5p.ln1@mail.specsol.com...
>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message
>>>>> news:egii9c-rso.ln1@mail.specsol.com...
>>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Actually it was a video from Nuke York City the day after 9/11 that
>>>>>>> clued us
>>>>>>> in that the Twin Towers were really destroyed the safest way we could
>>>>>>> destroy them and that was with deep underground nukes.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yeah, and no one would ever notice someone digging the deep hole in
>>>>>> the middle of New York or all the dirt that would have to have been hauled
>>>>>> out.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Babbling idiot.
>>>>>
>>>>> You are an absolute idiot because the building code for Nuke York City
>>>>> demands that before tall buildings can be built their also has to be a
>>>>> way to bring them down and nuclear controlled demolitions can be used for
>>>>> that.
>>>>
>>>> Yeah, sure, kook boi.
>>>>
>>>> If nothing else, at least this thread provides a look at the results
>>>> of cutting funding for mental health programs.
>>>
>>> And again you provide no evidence whatsoever to support the government's
>>> official bullshit about 9/11.
>>>
>>> I on the other hand can offer photos that prove the Twin Towers did not
>>> really collapse because if they had collapsed they would have crushed the
>>> "Surviving Corners" at the very bottom of them. They were nuked and most
>>> of
>>> them floated away before they ever made it to the ground.
>>
>> I know it is pointless to attempt to get reality from the insane, but
>> when were these "nukes" installed and how is no one noticed, kook boi?
>
>If you think you have a valid argument then make it PLEASE. Maybe you
>forget what facts are since all you have been doing is sidestepping and
>moving the goalpost.
>
>Don't just keep being a government shill who wants to conceal the fact that
>in reality we, the only country to nuke another country also nuked ourselves
>on 9/11/01.
You failed to answer the questions you were asked. Again.
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 48 of 50 — ← Prev page 1 … 46 47 [48] 49 50 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web