Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #600337 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "Robert Clark" <rgregoryclark@gmSPAMBLOACKail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-10-10 21:29 -0400 |
| Last post | 2016-10-18 11:15 -0400 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 297 — 20 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. "Robert Clark" <rgregoryclark@gmSPAMBLOACKail.com> - 2016-10-10 21:29 -0400
A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-10-10 18:49 -0700
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-10-11 08:45 -0500
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Rob <nomail@example.com> - 2016-10-11 14:57 +0000
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-10-11 10:21 -0700
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-10-11 18:54 +0000
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Rob <nomail@example.com> - 2016-10-11 19:05 +0000
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-10-11 12:37 -0700
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Niklas Holsti <niklas.holsti@tidorum.invalid> - 2016-10-11 22:56 +0300
the static eventuality noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-10-17 09:55 -0700
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-10-11 10:13 -0700
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-10-11 18:56 +0000
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-10-11 12:44 -0700
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-10-11 21:46 +0000
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Alain Fournier <alain245@videotron.ca> - 2016-10-11 19:46 -0400
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-10-11 20:18 -0700
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-10-12 05:19 +0000
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-10-12 12:59 -0700
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Jeff Findley <jfindley@cinci.nospam.rr.com> - 2016-10-11 19:10 -0400
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-10-11 19:19 -0500
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Alain Fournier <alain245@videotron.ca> - 2016-10-11 20:51 -0400
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-10-11 20:50 -0500
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-10-11 20:58 -0700
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-10-12 05:23 +0000
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-10-12 13:09 -0700
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-10-12 17:42 -0500
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-10-12 17:03 -0700
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-10-12 19:40 -0500
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-10-13 01:20 +0000
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-10-12 21:26 -0700
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Jeff Findley <jfindley@cinci.nospam.rr.com> - 2016-10-13 08:15 -0400
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-10-12 19:05 -0700
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Jeff Findley <jfindley@cinci.nospam.rr.com> - 2016-10-13 08:13 -0400
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-10-13 13:36 -0500
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-10-14 11:02 -0500
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. "Greg \(Strider\) Moore" <mooregr@deletethisgreenms.com> - 2016-10-14 12:40 -0400
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Jeff Findley <jfindley@cinci.nospam.rr.com> - 2016-10-16 09:21 -0400
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. "Greg \(Strider\) Moore" <mooregr@deletethisgreenms.com> - 2016-10-16 19:32 -0400
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Jeff Findley <jfindley@cinci.nospam.rr.com> - 2016-10-18 08:53 -0400
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-10-14 11:36 -0700
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-10-14 18:54 -0500
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-10-15 03:49 -0700
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-10-15 10:10 -0500
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-10-15 21:07 -0700
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-10-16 14:39 -0500
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2016-10-16 22:13 +0000
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. "Greg \(Strider\) Moore" <mooregr@deletethisgreenms.com> - 2016-10-16 19:27 -0400
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-10-16 17:21 -0700
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Jeff Findley <jfindley@cinci.nospam.rr.com> - 2016-10-18 08:46 -0400
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-10-18 08:45 -0500
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-10-18 17:18 +0000
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-10-18 21:44 -0500
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Jeff Findley <jfindley@cinci.nospam.rr.com> - 2016-10-19 07:14 -0400
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-10-18 08:23 -0700
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Jeff Findley <jfindley@cinci.nospam.rr.com> - 2016-10-13 08:10 -0400
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-10-13 23:48 +0000
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Jeff Findley <jfindley@cinci.nospam.rr.com> - 2016-10-14 06:09 -0400
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-10-14 18:03 +0000
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-10-15 02:27 -0700
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-10-15 10:14 -0500
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-10-15 17:52 +0000
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-10-15 21:28 -0700
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-10-15 21:10 -0700
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-10-16 14:44 -0500
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Jeff Findley <jfindley@cinci.nospam.rr.com> - 2016-10-16 09:25 -0400
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-10-16 18:29 +0000
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-10-16 17:17 -0700
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-10-16 20:00 -0500
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-10-17 05:19 +0000
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-10-17 05:51 -0700
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-10-17 14:03 -0500
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-10-17 23:40 +0000
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-10-18 07:30 -0700
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-10-18 10:01 -0500
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-10-17 17:45 -0700
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-10-17 20:49 -0500
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-10-17 05:28 -0700
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-10-16 14:48 -0500
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-10-16 23:45 +0000
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Jeff Findley <jfindley@cinci.nospam.rr.com> - 2016-10-18 08:48 -0400
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-10-18 10:07 -0500
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Jeff Findley <jfindley@cinci.nospam.rr.com> - 2016-10-19 07:15 -0400
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-10-19 09:02 -0500
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Jeff Findley <jfindley@cinci.nospam.rr.com> - 2016-10-19 16:29 -0400
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Alain Fournier <alain245@videotron.ca> - 2016-10-19 19:38 -0400
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-10-19 19:27 -0500
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-10-19 18:57 -0700
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Jeff Findley <jfindley@cinci.nospam.rr.com> - 2016-10-13 08:08 -0400
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-10-14 12:15 -0500
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-10-12 02:37 +0000
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-10-11 21:02 -0700
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-10-12 05:23 +0000
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-10-12 13:11 -0700
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Jeff Findley <jfindley@cinci.nospam.rr.com> - 2016-10-13 08:17 -0400
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-10-13 23:54 +0000
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-10-14 10:52 -0700
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-10-14 13:07 -0500
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-10-11 20:50 -0700
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-10-12 08:50 -0500
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-10-12 13:16 -0700
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-10-12 17:45 -0500
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-10-12 17:05 -0700
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-10-12 19:43 -0500
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-10-13 01:22 +0000
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-10-12 19:20 -0700
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-10-12 11:27 -0700
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-10-12 17:47 -0500
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-10-11 20:48 -0700
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2016-10-12 01:21 -0400
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-10-12 08:53 -0500
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2016-10-12 19:18 +0000
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-10-16 16:02 -0700
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-10-12 13:06 -0700
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Jeff Findley <jfindley@cinci.nospam.rr.com> - 2016-10-13 06:26 -0400
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-10-14 00:01 +0000
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Jeff Findley <jfindley@cinci.nospam.rr.com> - 2016-10-14 06:14 -0400
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-10-14 18:07 +0000
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-10-15 02:35 -0700
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-10-16 14:50 -0500
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-10-16 23:54 +0000
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-10-16 18:21 -0700
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-10-17 07:12 -0500
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-10-17 06:50 -0700
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-10-17 17:00 -0500
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-10-17 23:47 +0000
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-10-18 07:31 -0700
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-10-18 12:16 -0500
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2016-10-17 13:40 +0000
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-10-17 16:24 -0700
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-10-14 10:58 -0700
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-10-12 02:36 +0000
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-10-11 21:01 -0700
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-10-12 08:56 -0500
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-10-12 14:12 -0700
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-10-12 17:49 -0500
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-10-12 17:06 -0700
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-10-12 19:45 -0500
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-10-12 21:08 -0700
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-10-13 11:48 -0500
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-10-14 10:42 -0700
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2016-10-12 00:38 -0400
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-10-12 08:59 -0500
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-10-12 07:18 -0700
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-10-12 14:14 -0700
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-10-12 17:52 -0500
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-10-12 17:13 -0700
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-10-12 20:02 -0500
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-10-12 21:18 -0700
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-10-13 08:05 -0500
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. "Greg \(Strider\) Moore" <mooregr@deletethisgreenms.com> - 2016-10-13 09:38 -0400
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-10-14 00:06 +0000
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. "Greg \(Strider\) Moore" <mooregr@deletethisgreenms.com> - 2016-10-13 21:26 -0400
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-10-14 02:51 +0000
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Jeff Findley <jfindley@cinci.nospam.rr.com> - 2016-10-14 06:01 -0400
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. "Greg \(Strider\) Moore" <mooregr@deletethisgreenms.com> - 2016-10-14 07:25 -0400
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-10-14 07:29 -0500
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. "Greg \(Strider\) Moore" <mooregr@deletethisgreenms.com> - 2016-10-14 10:20 -0400
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-10-14 11:30 -0700
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-10-14 13:48 -0500
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Alan Folmsbee <omnilobe@gmail.com> - 2016-10-14 14:09 -0700
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-10-14 18:57 -0500
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-10-14 21:08 +0000
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-10-15 02:57 -0700
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-10-15 10:16 -0500
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-10-15 21:11 -0700
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-10-16 14:53 -0500
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-10-14 21:04 +0000
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-10-15 03:02 -0700
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-10-15 10:18 -0500
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-10-15 21:23 -0700
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-10-16 15:00 -0500
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. "Greg \(Strider\) Moore" <mooregr@deletethisgreenms.com> - 2016-10-16 19:30 -0400
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-10-17 00:00 +0000
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Alain Fournier <alain245@videotron.ca> - 2016-10-16 20:17 -0400
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-10-17 05:28 +0000
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Alain Fournier <alain245@videotron.ca> - 2016-10-17 07:15 -0400
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-10-17 18:13 +0000
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-10-17 16:53 -0700
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-10-17 06:47 -0700
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-10-17 16:50 -0500
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-10-17 18:09 -0700
tensegrity ... TensegritoY noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-10-17 18:46 -0700
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-10-17 20:58 -0500
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. "Greg \(Strider\) Moore" <mooregr@deletethisgreenms.com> - 2016-10-15 07:29 -0400
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-10-15 18:03 +0000
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-10-15 21:52 -0700
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-10-14 21:01 +0000
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-10-14 09:51 -0700
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Jeff Findley <jfindley@cinci.nospam.rr.com> - 2016-10-13 08:34 -0400
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-10-13 08:06 -0500
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-10-13 01:54 +0000
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Jeff Findley <jfindley@cinci.nospam.rr.com> - 2016-10-13 08:30 -0400
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-10-14 00:11 +0000
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Vaughn Simon <vaughnsimon@gmail.com> - 2016-10-13 21:40 -0400
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-10-14 02:57 +0000
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Vaughn Simon <vaughnsimon@gmail.com> - 2016-10-14 10:30 -0400
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-10-14 21:14 +0000
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Vaughn Simon <vaughnsimon@gmail.com> - 2016-10-14 19:11 -0400
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-10-14 23:28 +0000
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Vaughn Simon <vaughnsimon@gmail.com> - 2016-10-14 19:59 -0400
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-10-15 02:23 +0000
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-10-15 04:07 -0700
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-10-17 08:29 -0500
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-10-17 18:19 +0000
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-10-17 16:54 -0500
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-10-17 17:14 -0700
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-10-18 12:19 -0500
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-10-17 16:15 -0700
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. "Greg \(Strider\) Moore" <mooregr@deletethisgreenms.com> - 2016-10-15 07:37 -0400
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-10-15 03:45 -0700
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-10-15 03:17 -0700
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. "Greg \(Strider\) Moore" <mooregr@deletethisgreenms.com> - 2016-10-15 07:32 -0400
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Jeff Findley <jfindley@cinci.nospam.rr.com> - 2016-10-16 09:17 -0400
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-10-16 18:36 +0000
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Vaughn Simon <vaughnsimon@gmail.com> - 2016-10-16 18:48 -0400
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-10-17 08:42 -0500
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-10-17 16:27 -0700
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-10-16 17:19 -0700
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2016-10-17 13:40 +0000
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-10-17 16:21 -0700
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Jeff Findley <jfindley@cinci.nospam.rr.com> - 2016-10-18 08:42 -0400
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-10-14 11:16 -0700
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-10-14 08:00 -0500
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. "Greg \(Strider\) Moore" <mooregr@deletethisgreenms.com> - 2016-10-14 10:21 -0400
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-10-14 09:47 -0500
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Jeff Findley <jfindley@cinci.nospam.rr.com> - 2016-10-14 06:28 -0400
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-10-14 21:18 +0000
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-10-15 03:20 -0700
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-10-17 08:56 -0500
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-10-14 11:09 -0700
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2016-10-15 16:17 -0400
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Alain Fournier <alain245@videotron.ca> - 2016-10-15 20:00 -0400
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-10-15 22:39 -0700
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-10-17 09:02 -0500
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-10-17 18:24 +0000
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-10-17 08:57 -0500
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-10-12 12:46 -0700
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-10-12 17:56 -0500
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-10-12 17:41 -0700
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-10-12 21:18 -0500
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-10-13 07:53 -0700
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-10-13 13:28 -0500
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-10-14 10:50 -0700
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-10-14 13:17 -0500
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-10-15 02:40 -0700
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-10-15 10:21 -0500
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. "Greg \(Strider\) Moore" <mooregr@deletethisgreenms.com> - 2016-10-15 21:09 -0400
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-10-15 23:04 -0500
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-10-15 22:47 -0700
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-10-17 09:03 -0500
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-10-17 16:29 -0700
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-10-15 21:25 -0700
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Dr J R Stockton <reply1600@merlyn.demon.co.uk.invalid> - 2016-10-16 18:36 +0100
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Alain Fournier <alain245@videotron.ca> - 2016-10-14 20:08 -0400
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-10-15 04:00 -0700
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-10-17 09:20 -0500
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-10-17 16:34 -0700
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Vaughn Simon <vaughnsimon@gmail.com> - 2016-10-12 20:42 -0400
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-10-12 21:23 -0500
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Vaughn Simon <vaughnsimon@gmail.com> - 2016-10-13 09:38 -0400
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-10-14 09:37 -0700
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-10-13 02:04 +0000
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-10-13 07:44 -0700
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-10-13 02:00 +0000
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-10-13 07:42 -0700
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Jeff Findley <jfindley@cinci.nospam.rr.com> - 2016-10-13 08:29 -0400
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-10-14 00:14 +0000
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Jeff Findley <jfindley@cinci.nospam.rr.com> - 2016-10-14 06:32 -0400
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Vaughn Simon <vaughnsimon@gmail.com> - 2016-10-14 12:27 -0400
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-10-14 21:28 +0000
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-10-14 21:26 +0000
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-10-15 03:34 -0700
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-10-15 10:25 -0500
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Sjouke Burry <burrynulnulfour@ppllaanneett.nnll> - 2016-10-15 19:28 +0200
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-10-15 18:23 +0000
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-10-15 22:22 -0700
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-10-15 18:21 +0000
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-10-15 18:38 +0000
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-10-15 22:17 -0700
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-10-17 09:07 -0500
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Vaughn Simon <vaughnsimon@gmail.com> - 2016-10-17 13:29 -0400
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-10-17 18:38 +0000
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Vaughn Simon <vaughnsimon@gmail.com> - 2016-10-17 20:28 -0400
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-10-18 00:58 +0000
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Vaughn Simon <vaughnsimon@gmail.com> - 2016-10-18 07:32 -0400
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-10-18 08:12 -0700
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-10-18 17:24 +0000
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-10-17 17:38 -0700
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-10-17 16:32 -0700
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-10-19 13:43 -0500
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Jeff Findley <jfindley@cinci.nospam.rr.com> - 2016-10-19 16:32 -0400
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-10-19 19:00 -0700
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-10-19 18:48 -0700
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-10-11 13:34 -0700
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-10-11 21:48 +0000
A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-10-11 16:19 -0700
Re: A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars. "Robert Clark" <rgregoryclark@gmSPAMBLOACKail.com> - 2016-10-18 11:15 -0400
Page 4 of 15 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 … 15 Next page →
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-15 17:52 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <bv6add-p9q.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #600994 |
In sci.physics Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> wrote: > On 10/15/2016 4:27 AM, Fred J. McCall wrote: >> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> > >>>> >>> >>> Yes, just keep sending reactors until you have enough power, however >>> that is not going to be cheap. >>> > >> I think it's funny that someone had to suggest this before you thought >> of it and moved from 'impossible' to 'expensive'. I think it's even >> funnier that you said it to me and I stupidly have your head up my >> ass to keep from seeing it. > > no one cares what you think, troll. Notice that the lying troll says I said "impossible" when I never used that word. >> You only need enough reactors to get you started producing solar cells >> from in situ resources. And it's no more 'expensive' than shipping >> anything else to Mars. > > bullshit. > > you gloss over the required complexity so fast, you must be stoned as > shit. or a lying shit. He also glosses over the fact that you only get an average of about 40 W/m^2 of solar electricity on the surface of Mars. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-15 21:28 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <8b060c95qmkqnqnup7pg2hns4gbd479atd@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #601004 |
jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>In sci.physics Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> wrote:
>> On 10/15/2016 4:27 AM, Fred J. McCall wrote:
>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>
>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Yes, just keep sending reactors until you have enough power, however
>>>> that is not going to be cheap.
>>>>
>>
>>> I think it's funny that someone had to suggest this before you thought
>>> of it and moved from 'impossible' to 'expensive'. I think it's even
>>> funnier that you said it to me and I stupidly have your head up my
>>> ass to keep from seeing it.
>>
>> no one cares what you think, troll.
>
>Notice that the lying troll says I said "impossible" when I never
>used that word.
>
Everyone hears that from you, Chimp, even if you avoid using the word.
>>> You only need enough reactors to get you started producing solar cells
>>> from in situ resources. And it's no more 'expensive' than shipping
>>> anything else to Mars.
>>
>> bullshit.
>>
>> you gloss over the required complexity so fast, you must be stoned as
>> shit. or a lying shit.
>
>He also glosses over the fact that you only get an average of about
>40 W/m^2 of solar electricity on the surface of Mars.
>
Where did I do that, you lying asshole? YOU gave the required solar
array size for a given power level on Mars. All I did was point out
that the ground footprint required was not all that big.
--
"You take the lies out of him, and he'll shrink to the size of
your hat; you take the malice out of him, and he'll disappear."
-- Mark Twain
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-15 21:10 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <0av50c9ulbjih4c8b0807qm8r7v2i82jek@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #600994 |
Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> wrote: >On 10/15/2016 4:27 AM, Fred J. McCall wrote: >> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> > >>>> >>> >>> Yes, just keep sending reactors until you have enough power, however >>> that is not going to be cheap. >>> >> >> I think it's funny that someone had to suggest this before you thought >> of it and moved from 'impossible' to 'expensive'. I think it's even >> funnier that you said it to me and I stupidly have your head up my >> ass to keep from seeing it. >> > > no one cares what you think, troll. > Yet here you are, trolling away, you sad little fuckwit. >> >> You only need enough reactors to get you started producing solar cells >> from in situ resources. And it's no more 'expensive' than shipping >> anything else to Mars. >> > >bullshit. > >you gloss over the required complexity so fast, you must be stoned as >shit. or a lying shit. > What 'complexity'? You must be delusional as shit, or a lying shit. And we know it's both, troll. It's sad that people like you can't validate your self-importance in any other way. -- You are What you do When it counts.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-16 14:44 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <nu0lak$18oa$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #601061 |
On 10/15/2016 11:10 PM, Fred J. McCall wrote: > Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> wrote: > >> On 10/15/2016 4:27 AM, Fred J. McCall wrote: >>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>> >> >>>>> >>>> >>>> Yes, just keep sending reactors until you have enough power, however >>>> that is not going to be cheap. >>>> >>> >>> I think it's funny that someone had to suggest this before you thought >>> of it and moved from 'impossible' to 'expensive'. I think it's even >>> funnier that you said it to me and I stupidly have your head up my >>> ass to keep from seeing it. >>> >> >> no one cares what you think, troll. >> > > Yet here you are, a thought ! wait, never mind, he's still spewing gibberish. > >>> >>> You only need enough reactors to get you started producing solar cells >>> from in situ resources. And it's no more 'expensive' than shipping >>> anything else to Mars. >>> >> >> bullshit. >> >> you gloss over the required complexity so fast, you must be stoned as >> shit. or a lying shit. >> > > What 'complexity'? figures, you know that you are agreeing with me that you cannot comprehend the complexity of the task or even a small part of it. > > And we know it's both, troll. It's sad that people like you can't > validate your self-importance in any other way. you are projecting again
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeff Findley <jfindley@cinci.nospam.rr.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-16 09:25 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.326d49f01fba8fb1989844@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #600867 |
In article <a8j7dd-voh.ln1@mail.specsol.com>, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com says... > > In sci.physics Jeff Findley <jfindley@cinci.nospam.rr.com> wrote: > > In article <j2j5dd-cab.ln1@mail.specsol.com>, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com > > says... > >> > >> In sci.physics Jeff Findley <jfindley@cinci.nospam.rr.com> wrote: > >> > In article <4vt0dd-dap.ln1@mail.specsol.com>, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com > >> > says... > >> >> > >> >> In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> > >> >> <snip> > >> >> > >> >> > Really? You think we breath NITROGEN? Uh, no. We just use the > >> >> > oxygen. > >> >> > >> >> We use the oxygen but what we breath is 78% nitrogen. > >> >> > >> >> Breathing pure oxygen is generally bad for humans. > >> >> > >> >> http://www.sciencefocus.com/qa/why-does-breathing-pure-oxygen-kill-you > >> > > >> > But there is "fixed" nitrogen on Mars. Could be useful as fertilizer. > >> > If not then the nitrogen would need to be extracted in other ways (i.e. > >> > chemistry). > >> > > >> > NASA's Curiosity Rover Finds Biologically Useful Nitrogen on Mars > >> > http://www.nasa.gov/content/goddard/mars-nitrogen > >> > > >> > Chemistry will solve many of these problems. > >> > >> Doing chemistry takes lots of energy, particularly when you have to > >> synthesize just about everything complex. > > > > Some Mars reference missions include a nuclear reactor so that the > > return ship can produce liquid methane and LOX from the CO2 atmosphere > > and H2 brought on the ship. If we end up going that route, just keep > > leaving nuclear reactors on Mars brought from earth on the transport > > ships. > > Yes, just keep sending reactors until you have enough power, however > that is not going to be cheap. Well, we've moved from "not possible" to "possible but not cheap". Progress! Jeff -- All opinions posted by me on Usenet News are mine, and mine alone. These posts do not reflect the opinions of my family, friends, employer, or any organization that I am a member of.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-16 18:29 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <fhtcdd-on5.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #601090 |
In sci.physics Jeff Findley <jfindley@cinci.nospam.rr.com> wrote: > In article <a8j7dd-voh.ln1@mail.specsol.com>, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com > says... >> >> In sci.physics Jeff Findley <jfindley@cinci.nospam.rr.com> wrote: >> > In article <j2j5dd-cab.ln1@mail.specsol.com>, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com >> > says... >> >> >> >> In sci.physics Jeff Findley <jfindley@cinci.nospam.rr.com> wrote: >> >> > In article <4vt0dd-dap.ln1@mail.specsol.com>, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com >> >> > says... >> >> >> >> >> >> In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> <snip> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Really? You think we breath NITROGEN? Uh, no. We just use the >> >> >> > oxygen. >> >> >> >> >> >> We use the oxygen but what we breath is 78% nitrogen. >> >> >> >> >> >> Breathing pure oxygen is generally bad for humans. >> >> >> >> >> >> http://www.sciencefocus.com/qa/why-does-breathing-pure-oxygen-kill-you >> >> > >> >> > But there is "fixed" nitrogen on Mars. Could be useful as fertilizer. >> >> > If not then the nitrogen would need to be extracted in other ways (i.e. >> >> > chemistry). >> >> > >> >> > NASA's Curiosity Rover Finds Biologically Useful Nitrogen on Mars >> >> > http://www.nasa.gov/content/goddard/mars-nitrogen >> >> > >> >> > Chemistry will solve many of these problems. >> >> >> >> Doing chemistry takes lots of energy, particularly when you have to >> >> synthesize just about everything complex. >> > >> > Some Mars reference missions include a nuclear reactor so that the >> > return ship can produce liquid methane and LOX from the CO2 atmosphere >> > and H2 brought on the ship. If we end up going that route, just keep >> > leaving nuclear reactors on Mars brought from earth on the transport >> > ships. >> >> Yes, just keep sending reactors until you have enough power, however >> that is not going to be cheap. > > Well, we've moved from "not possible" to "possible but not cheap". > Progress! > > Jeff Who said "not possible"? It certainly wasn't me. The closest thing to "not possible" I've said is that the following are unknowns on Mars. If water is available in quantity anywhere other than the poles. If there are concentrated usefull mineral deposits in general and concentrated calcium deposits in particular as all the concentrated calcium deposits on Earth are the result of biology. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-16 17:17 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <nh580cljgmuti2f05dqcmukm5jhbb61mgu@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #601115 |
jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>In sci.physics Jeff Findley <jfindley@cinci.nospam.rr.com> wrote:
>> In article <a8j7dd-voh.ln1@mail.specsol.com>, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
>> says...
>>>
>>> In sci.physics Jeff Findley <jfindley@cinci.nospam.rr.com> wrote:
>>> > In article <j2j5dd-cab.ln1@mail.specsol.com>, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
>>> > says...
>>> >>
>>> >> In sci.physics Jeff Findley <jfindley@cinci.nospam.rr.com> wrote:
>>> >> > In article <4vt0dd-dap.ln1@mail.specsol.com>, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
>>> >> > says...
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> <snip>
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> > Really? You think we breath NITROGEN? Uh, no. We just use the
>>> >> >> > oxygen.
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> We use the oxygen but what we breath is 78% nitrogen.
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> Breathing pure oxygen is generally bad for humans.
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> http://www.sciencefocus.com/qa/why-does-breathing-pure-oxygen-kill-you
>>> >> >
>>> >> > But there is "fixed" nitrogen on Mars. Could be useful as fertilizer.
>>> >> > If not then the nitrogen would need to be extracted in other ways (i.e.
>>> >> > chemistry).
>>> >> >
>>> >> > NASA's Curiosity Rover Finds Biologically Useful Nitrogen on Mars
>>> >> > http://www.nasa.gov/content/goddard/mars-nitrogen
>>> >> >
>>> >> > Chemistry will solve many of these problems.
>>> >>
>>> >> Doing chemistry takes lots of energy, particularly when you have to
>>> >> synthesize just about everything complex.
>>> >
>>> > Some Mars reference missions include a nuclear reactor so that the
>>> > return ship can produce liquid methane and LOX from the CO2 atmosphere
>>> > and H2 brought on the ship. If we end up going that route, just keep
>>> > leaving nuclear reactors on Mars brought from earth on the transport
>>> > ships.
>>>
>>> Yes, just keep sending reactors until you have enough power, however
>>> that is not going to be cheap.
>>
>> Well, we've moved from "not possible" to "possible but not cheap".
>> Progress!
>>
>> Jeff
>
>Who said "not possible"?
>
>It certainly wasn't me.
>
Yet that's the attitude everyone hears you having, Jimp.
>
>The closest thing to "not possible" I've said is that the following
>are unknowns on Mars.
>
>If water is available in quantity anywhere other than the poles.
>
Not an unknown. We know there are huge subsurface ice deposits
elsewhere than the poles.
>
>If there are concentrated usefull mineral deposits in general and
>
Not an unknown. We know there's hematite and other iron ores.
>
>concentrated calcium deposits in particular as all the concentrated
>calcium deposits on Earth are the result of biology.
>
Not an unknown. Calcium concentrations and minerals such as dolomite
and marble are one of the indications on Mars that there was surface
water.
So your problem appears to be your ignorance of the facts rather than
the facts themselves.
--
"Ignorance is preferable to error, and he is less remote from the
truth who believes nothing than he who believes what is wrong."
-- Thomas Jefferson
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-16 20:00 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <nu17qv$393$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #601189 |
On 10/16/2016 7:17 PM, Fred J. McCall wrote: > jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > >> In sci.physics Jeff Findley <jfindley@cinci.nospam.rr.com> wrote: >>> In article <a8j7dd-voh.ln1@mail.specsol.com>, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com >>> says... >>>> >>>> Yes, just keep sending reactors until you have enough power, however >>>> that is not going to be cheap. >>> >>> Well, we've moved from "not possible" to "possible but not cheap". >>> Progress! >>> >>> Jeff >> >> Who said "not possible"? >> >> It certainly wasn't me. >> > > Yet that's the attitude everyone hears you having, you do not speak for everyone, you speak to yourself. > >> >> The closest thing to "not possible" I've said is that the following >> are unknowns on Mars. >> >> If water is available in quantity anywhere other than the poles. >> > > Not an unknown. We know >.there are huge subsurface ice deposits > elsewhere than the poles. no, you dont know that. it is only conjecture, not known. > >> >> If there are concentrated usefull mineral deposits in general and >> > > Not an unknown. We know there's hematite and other iron ores. Cite? where is your hematite mine ? iron makes the planet red, but it is not know of any concentrated mineral deposits. > >> >> concentrated calcium deposits in particular as all the concentrated >> calcium deposits on Earth are the result of biology. >> > > Not an unknown. Calcium concentrations and minerals such as dolomite > and marble are one of the indications on Mars that there was surface > water. Cite ?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-17 05:19 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <lk3edd-je9.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #601196 |
In sci.physics Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> wrote: > On 10/16/2016 7:17 PM, Fred J. McCall wrote: >> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> >>> In sci.physics Jeff Findley <jfindley@cinci.nospam.rr.com> wrote: >>>> In article <a8j7dd-voh.ln1@mail.specsol.com>, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com >>>> says... >>>>> > >>>>> Yes, just keep sending reactors until you have enough power, however >>>>> that is not going to be cheap. >>>> >>>> Well, we've moved from "not possible" to "possible but not cheap". >>>> Progress! >>>> >>>> Jeff >>> >>> Who said "not possible"? >>> >>> It certainly wasn't me. >>> >> >> Yet that's the attitude everyone hears you having, > > you do not speak for everyone, you speak to yourself. > >> >>> >>> The closest thing to "not possible" I've said is that the following >>> are unknowns on Mars. >>> >>> If water is available in quantity anywhere other than the poles. >>> >> >> Not an unknown. We know >>.there are huge subsurface ice deposits >> elsewhere than the poles. > > no, you dont know that. it is only conjecture, not known. The latest thing from NASA that I have seen confirms small, as in handfull, amounts of subsurface water ice on Mars and they were making a huge deal out of the discovery. If anyone has seen anything confirming large amounts of water other than at the poles I would like to see it. >>> If there are concentrated usefull mineral deposits in general and >>> >> >> Not an unknown. We know there's hematite and other iron ores. > > Cite? where is your hematite mine ? I can find handfulls of just about anything in the local mountains. That does not mean that there is enough concentration of anything to be usefull. > iron makes the planet red, but it is not know of any concentrated > mineral deposits. I would say that it is likely thay do exist, however that has not been confirmed and obviously if they exist we don't know where they are. At this point they could be anywhere between a few meters and 10,000 km from any planned Mars colony site. >>> concentrated calcium deposits in particular as all the concentrated >>> calcium deposits on Earth are the result of biology. >>> >> >> Not an unknown. Calcium concentrations and minerals such as dolomite >> and marble are one of the indications on Mars that there was surface >> water. > > Cite ? Minor amounts of dolomite can be found just about anywhere on Earth as calcium is the fifth most abundant element on the planet and hardly a surprise on Mars. The same can be said of marble. Both can be formed in diffuse and scattered quantites by geologic action alone. The issue is large, highly concentrated amounts and those only come from biological action, so if any large concentrated amounts of calcium based minerals were found on Mars, the headlines would be screaming about proof of previous life found on Mars. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-17 05:51 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <24h90c10sq6lb6d5v5io1kdp2j2g73vmi8@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #601219 |
jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
Jimp's argument seems to be that since we haven't sent a bunch of
people in to verify the existence of things there is no point in
sending a bunch of people. Just a little circular...
>In sci.physics Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> wrote:
>> On 10/16/2016 7:17 PM, Fred J. McCall wrote:
>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>
>>>> In sci.physics Jeff Findley <jfindley@cinci.nospam.rr.com> wrote:
>>>>> In article <a8j7dd-voh.ln1@mail.specsol.com>, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
>>>>> says...
>>>>>>
>>
>>>>>> Yes, just keep sending reactors until you have enough power, however
>>>>>> that is not going to be cheap.
>>>>>
>>>>> Well, we've moved from "not possible" to "possible but not cheap".
>>>>> Progress!
>>>>>
>>>>> Jeff
>>>>
>>>> Who said "not possible"?
>>>>
>>>> It certainly wasn't me.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Yet that's the attitude everyone hears you having,
>>
>> you do not speak for everyone, you speak to yourself.
>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> The closest thing to "not possible" I've said is that the following
>>>> are unknowns on Mars.
>>>>
>>>> If water is available in quantity anywhere other than the poles.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Not an unknown. We know
>>>.there are huge subsurface ice deposits
>>> elsewhere than the poles.
>>
>> no, you dont know that. it is only conjecture, not known.
>
>The latest thing from NASA that I have seen confirms small, as in
>handfull, amounts of subsurface water ice on Mars and they were making
>a huge deal out of the discovery.
>
Perhaps you should get out more. Peer reviewed research...
]
http://www.space.com/30502-mars-giant-ice-sheet-discovery-mro.html
>
>If anyone has seen anything confirming large amounts of water other
>than at the poles I would like to see it.
>
Just what are you willing to accept as 'confirmation'?
>>>> If there are concentrated usefull mineral deposits in general and
>>>>
>>>
>>> Not an unknown. We know there's hematite and other iron ores.
>>
>> Cite? where is your hematite mine ?
>
>I can find handfulls of just about anything in the local mountains.
>
>That does not mean that there is enough concentration of anything
>to be usefull.
>
So until we have people go in and mine it there's no point in sending
people to go in and mine it?
To INITIALLY colonize, there are large areas of hematite nodules
pretty much just lying around on the surface. Hematite is where we
get iron. You don't even have to mine these; just scoop 'em up.
Again, how much has to be 'verified' for you? How big do you think a
colony starts out?
>
>> iron makes the planet red, but it is not know of any concentrated
>> mineral deposits.
>
>I would say that it is likely thay do exist, however that has not
>been confirmed and obviously if they exist we don't know where they
>are.
>
Except we DO know where there is enough to support an initial colony.
>
>At this point they could be anywhere between a few meters and 10,000 km
>from any planned Mars colony site.
>
Just like on Earth. Golly gee...
>>>> concentrated calcium deposits in particular as all the concentrated
>>>> calcium deposits on Earth are the result of biology.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Not an unknown. Calcium concentrations and minerals such as dolomite
>>> and marble are one of the indications on Mars that there was surface
>>> water.
>>
>> Cite ?
>
>Minor amounts of dolomite can be found just about anywhere on Earth
>as calcium is the fifth most abundant element on the planet and hardly
>a surprise on Mars.
>
>The same can be said of marble.
>
>Both can be formed in diffuse and scattered quantites by geologic
>action alone.
>
Also in concentrated forms. Calcium is stupidly prevalent on Mars.
Holding out a lack of calcium as a 'problem' just sounds silly.
>
>The issue is large, highly concentrated amounts and those only come
>from biological action, so if any large concentrated amounts of
>calcium based minerals were found on Mars, the headlines would be
>screaming about proof of previous life found on Mars.
>
You're simply wrong. All it takes to get areas with rocks having a
high concentration of calcium carbonate is for there to used to be
water there.
--
"Ignorance is preferable to error, and he is less remote from the
truth who believes nothing than he who believes what is wrong."
-- Thomas Jefferson
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-17 14:03 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <nu37ad$19e1$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #601242 |
On 10/17/2016 7:51 AM, Fred J. McCall wrote: > jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > >> >> The issue is large, highly concentrated amounts and those only come >>from biological action, so if any large concentrated amounts of >> calcium based minerals were found on Mars, the headlines would be >> screaming about proof of previous life found on Mars. that is how limestone and marble formed on Earth, via biological action. > You're simply wrong. All it takes to get areas with rocks having a > high concentration of calcium carbonate is for there to used to be > water there. obviously wrong. You are saying throw some dirt and water in a blender and watch the calcium carbonate pop out. Now show me.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-17 23:40 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <054gdd-r2g.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #601322 |
In sci.physics Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> wrote: > On 10/17/2016 7:51 AM, Fred J. McCall wrote: >> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> > > > >>> >>> The issue is large, highly concentrated amounts and those only come >>>from biological action, so if any large concentrated amounts of >>> calcium based minerals were found on Mars, the headlines would be >>> screaming about proof of previous life found on Mars. > > that is how limestone and marble formed on Earth, via biological action. > > >> You're simply wrong. All it takes to get areas with rocks having a >> high concentration of calcium carbonate is for there to used to be >> water there. > > obviously wrong. > > You are saying throw some dirt and water in a blender and watch the > calcium carbonate pop out. > > Now show me. Funny how all the large deposits on Earth are biological in origin and if it hasn't been geologically processed too much you can see the skeltons under a microscope. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-18 07:30 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <4ccc0c10g155gl6uqv2qk0cqo1ctcvtuu7@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #601399 |
jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>In sci.physics Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> wrote:
>>
>> You are saying throw some dirt and water in a blender and watch the
>> calcium carbonate pop out.
>>
>> Now show me.
>
>Funny how all the large deposits on Earth are biological in origin
>and if it hasn't been geologically processed too much you can see
>the skeltons under a microscope.
>
Funny how that's not true. We've got this stuff out here called
caliche, which is essentially calcium carbonate...
--
"Some people get lost in thought because it's such unfamiliar
territory."
--G. Behn
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-18 10:01 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <nu5dgt$ish$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #601464 |
On 10/18/2016 9:30 AM, Fred J. McCall wrote: > jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > >> In sci.physics Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> wrote: >>> >>> You are saying throw some dirt and water in a blender and watch the >>> calcium carbonate pop out. >>> >>> Now show me. >> Funny how all the large deposits on Earth are biological in origin >> and if it hasn't been geologically processed too much you can see >> the skeltons under a microscope. >> > > Funny how that's not true. We've got this stuff out here called > caliche, which is essentially calcium carbonate... > > you jump to your "not ture" conclusions way too fast caliche has some calcium carbonate from small to tiny old sea critters, the whitish stuff, but take a look at it under the microscope in some of the caliche here you can see the structures of the critters, in other caliches here we have entire shells.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-17 17:45 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <dqra0c96tcsajsojrcrirqtvab37k04rlo@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #601322 |
Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> wrote:
>On 10/17/2016 7:51 AM, Fred J. McCall wrote:
>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>
>
>
>
>>>
>>> The issue is large, highly concentrated amounts and those only come
>>>from biological action, so if any large concentrated amounts of
>>> calcium based minerals were found on Mars, the headlines would be
>>> screaming about proof of previous life found on Mars.
>
>that is how limestone and marble formed on Earth, via biological action.
>
And yet marble and other calcium minerals are found on Mars. Explain.
>
>> You're simply wrong. All it takes to get areas with rocks having a
>> high concentration of calcium carbonate is for there to used to be
>> water there.
>
>obviously wrong.
>
So reality is obviously wrong.
>
>You are saying throw some dirt and water in a blender and watch the
>calcium carbonate pop out.
>
No, YOU are saying that.
>
>Now show me.
>
It's impossible to show you anything. There isn't enough dynamite in
the world to blow your head out of your ass.
--
"Ignorance is preferable to error, and he is less remote from the
truth who believes nothing than he who believes what is wrong."
-- Thomas Jefferson
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-17 20:49 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <nu3v2u$b13$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #601416 |
On 10/17/2016 7:45 PM, Fred J. McCall wrote: > Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> wrote: > >> On 10/17/2016 7:51 AM, Fred J. McCall wrote: >>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>>> The issue is large, highly concentrated amounts and those only come >>> >from biological action, so if any large concentrated amounts of >>>> calcium based minerals were found on Mars, the headlines would be >>>> screaming about proof of previous life found on Mars. >> >> that is how limestone and marble formed on Earth, via biological action. >> > > And yet marble and other calcium minerals are found on Mars. Explain. Cite ? or are you making stuff up again. no marble on mars Your assertion, you explain it. We understand if you cant.... >>> You're simply wrong. All it takes to get areas with rocks having a >>> high concentration of calcium carbonate is for there to used to be >>> water there. >> >> obviously wrong. >> > > So reality is obviously wrong. Trumps reality or Hiellarys ? > >> >> You are saying throw some dirt and water in a blender and watch the >> calcium carbonate pop out. >> > > No, YOU are saying that. again, no thought, no chemistry background, you should have replied, acidic water... but tooo Late, you have been judged by a jury of your piers and found to be..... too general. > >> >> Now show me. >> > > It's impossible to show me anything. There isn't enough dynamite in > the world to blow my head out of my ass. dude, I take fiber daily. and you are projecting again. > >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-17 05:28 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <pug90c5nkigbb95s3qpi368qcnk9scfiov@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #601196 |
Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> wrote: And argument that things that rovers and probes have actually found don't actually exist... >On 10/16/2016 7:17 PM, Fred J. McCall wrote: >> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> >>> In sci.physics Jeff Findley <jfindley@cinci.nospam.rr.com> wrote: >>>> In article <a8j7dd-voh.ln1@mail.specsol.com>, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com >>>> says... >>>>> > >>>>> Yes, just keep sending reactors until you have enough power, however >>>>> that is not going to be cheap. >>>> >>>> Well, we've moved from "not possible" to "possible but not cheap". >>>> Progress! >>>> >>>> Jeff >>> >>> Who said "not possible"? >>> >>> It certainly wasn't me. >>> >> >> Yet that's the attitude everyone hears you having, > >you do not speak for everyone, you speak to yourself. > >> >>> >>> The closest thing to "not possible" I've said is that the following >>> are unknowns on Mars. >>> >>> If water is available in quantity anywhere other than the poles. >>> >> >> Not an unknown. We know >>.there are huge subsurface ice deposits >> elsewhere than the poles. > >no, you dont know that. it is only conjecture, not known. > >> >>> >>> If there are concentrated usefull mineral deposits in general and >>> >> >> Not an unknown. We know there's hematite and other iron ores. > >Cite? where is your hematite mine ? > >iron makes the planet red, but it is not know of any concentrated >mineral deposits. > >> >>> >>> concentrated calcium deposits in particular as all the concentrated >>> calcium deposits on Earth are the result of biology. >>> >> >> Not an unknown. Calcium concentrations and minerals such as dolomite >> and marble are one of the indications on Mars that there was surface >> water. > >Cite ? > >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-16 14:48 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <nu0lip$1981$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #601090 |
On 10/16/2016 8:25 AM, Jeff Findley wrote: > In article <a8j7dd-voh.ln1@mail.specsol.com>, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com > says... >> In sci.physics Jeff Findley <jfindley@cinci.nospam.rr.com> wrote: >>> In article <j2j5dd-cab.ln1@mail.specsol.com>, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com >>> says... >>>> >>>> In sci.physics Jeff Findley <jfindley@cinci.nospam.rr.com> wrote: >>>>> In article <4vt0dd-dap.ln1@mail.specsol.com>, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com >>>>> says... >>>>>> >>>>>> In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> <snip> >>>>>> >>> return ship can produce liquid methane and LOX from the CO2 atmosphere >>> and H2 brought on the ship. If we end up going that route, just keep >>> leaving nuclear reactors on Mars brought from earth on the transport >>> ships. >> >> Yes, just keep sending reactors until you have enough power, however >> that is not going to be cheap. > > Well, we've moved from "not possible" to "possible but not cheap". > Progress! liar. YOU have not shown, nor demonstrated, that it is possible. Try again, this time hire some intelligent people to help you, and lead you. https://saboteur365.files.wordpress.com/2015/04/hillary_screaming.jpg > > Jeff >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-16 23:45 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <q1gddd-mh7.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #601120 |
In sci.physics Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> wrote: > On 10/16/2016 8:25 AM, Jeff Findley wrote: >> In article <a8j7dd-voh.ln1@mail.specsol.com>, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com >> says... > >>> In sci.physics Jeff Findley <jfindley@cinci.nospam.rr.com> wrote: >>>> In article <j2j5dd-cab.ln1@mail.specsol.com>, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com >>>> says... >>>>> >>>>> In sci.physics Jeff Findley <jfindley@cinci.nospam.rr.com> wrote: >>>>>> In article <4vt0dd-dap.ln1@mail.specsol.com>, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com >>>>>> says... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> <snip> >>>>>>> > >>>> return ship can produce liquid methane and LOX from the CO2 atmosphere >>>> and H2 brought on the ship. If we end up going that route, just keep >>>> leaving nuclear reactors on Mars brought from earth on the transport >>>> ships. >>> >>> Yes, just keep sending reactors until you have enough power, however >>> that is not going to be cheap. >> >> Well, we've moved from "not possible" to "possible but not cheap". >> Progress! > > liar. YOU have not shown, nor demonstrated, that it is possible. It is obviously possible to transport a reactor to Mars. The question is how is it to be done; lots of small assembled reactors, large reactors in pieces, something in between? Likely one would want to ship the fuel separately, perhaps all in one shipment to minimize the red tape of putting nuclear material on a rocket. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeff Findley <jfindley@cinci.nospam.rr.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-18 08:48 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.326fe425e9c402e398984b@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #601120 |
In article <nu0lip$1981$1@gioia.aioe.org>, invalid@invalid.com says... > > On 10/16/2016 8:25 AM, Jeff Findley wrote: > > In article <a8j7dd-voh.ln1@mail.specsol.com>, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com > > says... > > >> In sci.physics Jeff Findley <jfindley@cinci.nospam.rr.com> wrote: > >>> In article <j2j5dd-cab.ln1@mail.specsol.com>, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com > >>> says... > >>>> > >>>> In sci.physics Jeff Findley <jfindley@cinci.nospam.rr.com> wrote: > >>>>> In article <4vt0dd-dap.ln1@mail.specsol.com>, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com > >>>>> says... > >>>>>> > >>>>>> In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> <snip> > >>>>>> > > >>> return ship can produce liquid methane and LOX from the CO2 atmosphere > >>> and H2 brought on the ship. If we end up going that route, just keep > >>> leaving nuclear reactors on Mars brought from earth on the transport > >>> ships. > >> > >> Yes, just keep sending reactors until you have enough power, however > >> that is not going to be cheap. > > > > Well, we've moved from "not possible" to "possible but not cheap". > > Progress! > > liar. YOU have not shown, nor demonstrated, that it is possible. > > Try again, this time hire some intelligent people to help you, and lead > you. > > https://saboteur365.files.wordpress.com/2015/04/hillary_screaming.jpg You really are proving to be an annoying little troll, unwilling to even look at the evidence (including cites) provided. Jeff -- All opinions posted by me on Usenet News are mine, and mine alone. These posts do not reflect the opinions of my family, friends, employer, or any organization that I am a member of.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 4 of 15 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 … 15 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web