Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #721880 > unrolled thread

Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change

Started bykensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid>
First post2019-01-01 05:15 -0500
Last post2019-01-18 21:09 -0800
Articles 20 on this page of 249 — 25 participants

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics


Contents

  Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-01 05:15 -0500
    Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-01 03:52 -0700
      Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-03 22:30 -0800
        Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-01-04 09:31 -0500
          Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-04 10:24 -0800
            Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-01-04 13:56 -0500
              Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-04 12:01 -0800
            Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change turkey <turkey@invalid.none> - 2019-01-04 18:12 -0500
              Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2019-01-05 11:28 -0600
                Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change turkey <turkey@invalid.none> - 2019-01-05 13:07 -0500
        Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-09 07:01 +0000
          Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-01-09 09:33 -0500
            Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2019-01-09 10:33 -0600
            Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-10 05:18 +0000
              Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2019-01-09 23:24 -0600
              Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-01-10 10:59 -0500
              Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-10 12:22 -0800
                Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-12 08:02 +0000
                  Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-12 00:25 -0800
                    Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-12 08:54 +0000
                      Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-12 05:01 -0800
                        Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-12 23:05 +0000
                          NOMINATION Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-12 23:27 +0000
                            Re: NOMINATION Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-12 16:43 -0700
                            Re: NOMINATION Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-01-12 19:17 -0500
                              Re: NOMINATION Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-12 18:36 -0800
                              Re: NOMINATION Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2019-01-13 10:54 +0000
                                Re: NOMINATION Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2019-01-16 11:03 -0600
                                  Re: NOMINATION Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2019-01-16 11:05 -0600
                                    Re: NOMINATION Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change eSrgio <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2019-01-16 12:04 -0600
                            Re: NOMINATION Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-12 18:56 -0800
                              Re: NOMINATION Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-12 19:59 -0700
                                Re: NOMINATION Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-12 22:36 -0800
                                  Re: NOMINATION Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-13 08:38 -0700
                            Re: NOMINATION Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2019-01-13 10:52 +0000
                          Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-12 18:50 -0800
                            Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-13 21:09 +0000
                              Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-13 14:35 -0800
                                Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-14 00:01 +0000
                                  Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-13 19:54 -0800
                                    Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-15 02:28 +0000
                                      Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-14 20:58 -0800
                                        Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-15 00:03 -0700
                                          Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-14 23:52 -0800
                                            Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-15 08:36 -0700
                                        Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-16 04:04 +0000
                                          Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2019-01-16 09:38 +0000
                                            Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-16 01:49 -0800
                                          Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-16 01:41 -0800
                                            Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-16 20:45 +0000
                                              Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2019-01-16 14:53 -0600
                                                Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-16 20:57 +0000
                                                  Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2019-01-16 15:05 -0600
                                                  Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-16 13:50 -0800
                                                    Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-17 01:23 +0000
                                                      Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-01-16 20:31 -0500
                                                      Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-16 18:40 -0700
                                                        Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-16 19:02 -0700
                                                        Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-17 05:09 +0000
                                                          Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-16 22:48 -0800
                                                            Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-17 22:20 +0000
                                                              Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-17 15:30 -0700
                                                                Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-17 18:59 -0800
                                                                  Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-17 20:04 -0700
                                                              Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-17 18:47 -0800
                                                          Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-17 10:15 -0700
                                                      Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-16 18:54 -0700
                                                      Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-16 20:20 -0800
                                              Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-16 13:48 -0800
                                                Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-17 01:24 +0000
                                                  Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-16 18:30 -0700
                                                  Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-16 18:55 -0700
                                                  Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-16 20:10 -0800
                                                    Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-17 05:12 +0000
                                                      Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-16 22:34 -0800
                                                        Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-17 22:23 +0000
                                                          Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-17 15:31 -0700
                                                          Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-17 18:49 -0800
                                                            Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-18 04:06 +0000
                                                              Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-17 20:19 -0800
                                                                Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-18 06:24 +0000
                                                                  Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-17 23:28 -0800
                                                                    Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-18 22:09 +0000
                                                                      Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-18 15:22 -0700
                                                                      Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-01-18 17:27 -0500
                                                                        Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-18 18:20 -0700
                                                                          Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2019-01-18 21:32 -0500
                                                                            Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-18 19:40 -0700
                                                                              Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2019-01-18 21:46 -0500
                                                                                Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-18 19:55 -0700
                                                                                  Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2019-01-18 22:26 -0500
                                                                                    Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-18 20:33 -0700
                                                                                Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) "Chris M. Thomasson " <ahh_f_it@crap.nothing> - 2019-01-18 19:38 -0800
                                                                      Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-18 15:11 -0800
                                                                        Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-19 00:29 +0000
                                                                          Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-18 17:33 -0700
                                                                            Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-18 20:33 -0800
                                                                          Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-18 18:57 -0800
                                                                            Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-19 03:48 +0000
                                                                              Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-18 20:58 -0700
                                                                                Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-18 20:34 -0800
                                                                                  Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-18 21:48 -0700
                                                                                    Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-18 23:48 -0800
                                                                                      Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-19 10:47 -0700
                                                                              Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-18 20:34 -0800
                                                                                Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-19 22:27 +0000
                                                                                  Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-19 22:10 -0800
                                                                                    Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-22 03:43 +0000
                                                                                      Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-21 20:47 -0700
                                                                                      Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-21 21:42 -0800
                                                                      Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-18 18:17 -0700
                                                                        Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-19 02:41 +0000
                                                                          Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-18 20:55 -0700
                                                                            Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-19 22:27 +0000
                                                                              Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-19 15:34 -0700
                                                                                Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-19 22:36 +0000
                                                                                  Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Nadegda - 2019-01-19 15:38 -0700
                                                                                    Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-19 15:47 -0700
                                                                                  Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-19 15:46 -0700
                                                                                    Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-19 22:48 +0000
                                                                                      Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-19 15:53 -0700
                                                                                        Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-19 22:57 +0000
                                                                                          Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-19 16:10 -0700
                                                                                            Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-20 04:14 +0000
                                                                                              Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-20 08:44 -0700
                                                                                                Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-22 03:44 +0000
                                                                                                  Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-21 20:48 -0700
                                                                                                    Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-22 04:25 +0000
                                                                                                      Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-21 21:44 -0800
                                                                                                        Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-22 04:33 -0700
                                                                                                      Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-22 04:32 -0700
                                                                                      Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-01-19 17:53 -0500
                                                                                        Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-19 15:59 -0700
                                                                                      Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) "Chris M. Thomasson " <ahh_f_it@crap.nothing> - 2019-01-19 15:38 -0800
                                                                                        Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-19 16:49 -0700
                                                                                          Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-19 17:12 -0700
                                                                                        Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-20 04:14 +0000
                                                                                          Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) "Chris M. Thomasson " <ahh_f_it@crap.nothing> - 2019-01-19 20:58 -0800
                                                                                          Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) "Chris M. Thomasson " <ahh_f_it@crap.nothing> - 2019-01-19 21:00 -0800
                                                                                            Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-01-20 09:17 -0500
                                                                                            Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-20 08:45 -0700
                                                                                            Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-22 03:47 +0000
                                                                                              Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-21 20:50 -0700
                                                                                          Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-20 08:44 -0700
                                                                                          Mueller's office disputes BuzzFeed report. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2019-01-20 10:08 -0800
                                                                                            Re: Mueller's office disputes BuzzFeed report. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-01-20 13:39 -0500
                                                                                            Re: Mueller's office disputes BuzzFeed report. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-20 12:10 -0700
                                                                                              Re: Mueller's office disputes BuzzFeed report. "Chris M. Thomasson " <ahh_f_it@crap.nothing> - 2019-01-20 15:31 -0800
                                                                                                Re: Mueller's office disputes BuzzFeed report. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-20 16:34 -0700
                                                                                        Nadegda can't handle the truth. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2019-01-20 10:31 -0800
                                                                                          Re: Nadegda can't handle the truth. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-20 13:32 -0700
                                                                                Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-19 15:36 -0700
                                                                                  Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-19 15:47 -0700
                                                                                Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2019-01-19 23:40 +0000
                                                                          Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2019-01-19 10:40 +0000
                                                                            Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-19 07:34 -0800
                                                                            Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-19 22:29 +0000
                                                                              Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-19 15:36 -0700
                                                                                Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-19 22:12 -0800
                                                                              Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-01-19 17:38 -0500
                                                                                Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-19 15:41 -0700
                                                                                Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-19 15:48 -0700
                                                                                  Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-01-19 17:52 -0500
                                                                                    Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-19 15:57 -0700
                                                                                      Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-01-19 18:03 -0500
                                                                                        Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-19 16:12 -0700
                                                                                        Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-19 21:56 -0800
                                                                                    Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2019-01-19 23:56 +0000
                                                                                      Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-19 17:35 -0700
                                                                                        Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2019-01-20 01:22 +0000
                                                                                          Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-19 18:49 -0700
                                                                                            Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2019-01-20 02:01 +0000
                                                                                              Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) turkey <turkey@invalid.none> - 2019-01-19 21:03 -0500
                                                                                              Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-19 19:09 -0700
                                                                                              Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-20 04:16 +0000
                                                                                Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-19 22:51 +0000
                                                                                  Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-19 15:55 -0700
                                                                                    Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-19 23:04 +0000
                                                                                      Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-19 16:12 -0700
                                                                                        Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-19 22:16 -0800
                                                                                          Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-20 08:48 -0700
                                                                                      Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2019-01-20 00:00 +0000
                                                                                        Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-19 17:36 -0700
                                                                                Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) "Chris M. Thomasson " <ahh_f_it@crap.nothing> - 2019-01-19 14:57 -0800
                                                                                  Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) "Chris M. Thomasson " <ahh_f_it@crap.nothing> - 2019-01-21 17:19 -0800
                                                                              Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) "Chris M. Thomasson" <ahh_f_it@crap.nothing> - 2019-01-19 14:53 -0800
                                                                              Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2019-01-19 23:20 +0000
                                                                                Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-20 04:19 +0000
                                                                                  Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-19 22:20 -0800
                                                                                  Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-20 08:47 -0700
                                                                      Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2019-01-19 10:12 +0000
                                                                        Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-19 07:33 -0800
                                                                        Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-01-19 11:07 -0500
                      Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-12 07:27 -0700
                        Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-01-12 09:42 -0500
              Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-11 01:59 -0800
          Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-09 09:49 -0700
          Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-09 13:28 -0800
            Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-09 14:38 -0700
            Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-01-09 17:13 -0500
              Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-10 12:12 -0800
                Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-01-10 15:22 -0500
                Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2019-01-10 15:28 -0600
                  Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2019-01-11 09:48 -0600
                    Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-12 08:03 +0000
                  Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-11 19:26 -0800
            Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-10 05:20 +0000
              Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-11 01:57 -0800
        Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2019-01-20 07:29 +0000
    Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-01-01 05:55 -0500
    Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2019-01-01 16:07 +0000
    Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-01 10:36 -0700
      Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change "Michael Ejercito" <mejercit@hotmail.com> - 2019-01-01 09:38 -0800
        Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2019-01-01 11:49 -0600
        Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-01-01 14:23 -0500
          Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-01 12:27 -0700
            Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-01-01 14:33 -0500
              Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-01 12:38 -0700
            Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-01 12:37 -0700
              Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-01 12:41 -0700
                Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-01-01 14:43 -0500
                  Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-01 12:55 -0700
                  Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-01 12:55 -0700
                    Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-01 13:05 -0700
                      Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-01 13:18 -0700
                        Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-01 13:27 -0700
                          Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-01 13:32 -0700
                            Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-01 13:42 -0700
                              Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-01 13:50 -0700
                                Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-01 13:54 -0700
                                  Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-01 13:58 -0700
                                    Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-01 14:05 -0700
                                Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-01 15:27 -0700
                Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-01 12:55 -0700
                  Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-01 13:00 -0700
                    Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-01 13:04 -0700
                      Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-01 13:17 -0700
                        Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-01 13:25 -0700
                          Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-01 13:27 -0700
                            Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-01 13:44 -0700
                              Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-01 13:57 -0700
                                Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-01 14:06 -0700
            Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-01 12:48 -0800
              Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-01 13:58 -0700
    Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2019-01-16 09:33 -0800
    Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change "Chris M. Thomasson" <ahh_f_it@crap.nothing> - 2019-01-17 20:23 -0800
      Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-18 00:13 -0700
        Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change "Chris M. Thomasson" <ahh_f_it@crap.nothing> - 2019-01-18 19:34 -0800
          Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change "Chris M. Thomasson" <ahh_f_it@crap.nothing> - 2019-01-18 21:09 -0800

Page 6 of 13 — ← Prev page 1 … 4 5 [6] 7 8 … 13  Next page →


#723903 — Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change)

FromCheckmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn>
Date2019-01-18 20:34 -0800
SubjectRe: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change)
Message-ID<MPG.36ac48bc842a92d899606b@news.altopia.com>
In reply to#723899
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by 
Checkmate!  In article <MPG.36ac4e627855cdb09f9@news.eternal-
september.org>, chico@invalid.invalid says...


# 
# In article <q1u6n6$ptt$6@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid 
# says...
# >
# >Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
# >On Fri, 18 Jan 2019 18:57:02 -0800, Checkmate wrote:
# >
# >> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
# >> Checkmate!  In article <q1tr16$ptt$3@dont-email.me>, nad318b404
# >> @gmail.invalid says...
# >> 
# >> #> # https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/newspolitics/democrats-demand-
# >> #> # investigation-after-report-that-trump-ordered-michael-cohen-to-lie-to-
# >> #> # congress/ar-BBSoREu?li=BBnbcA1
# >> #> #
# >> #> # Now, would you say that suborning perjury falls under the heading of
# >> #> # "high crimes and misdemeanors", in your opinion? Enquiring minds want
# >> #> # to know.
# >> #
# >> # <crickets>
# >
# ><crickets>
# >
# >Whatsamatter, kooky, afraid of the implications for your Cheeto God?
# >
# ><snicker>
# 
# Mooler even said it was false. You guys lose again.
# 
# https://www.cnn.com/2019/01/18/politics/mueller-statement-
# buzzfeed/index.html

<crickets>

-- 
Checkmate ®
Copyright © 2018
all rights reserved 

AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore)
Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Awards (Post-Burnore)
Co-winner Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker
award May 2001, (Brethern of Beelzebub troll)
Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award, Feb 2012

Author, Humorist, Cynic
Philosopher, Humanitarian
Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars
Usenet Shot-Caller           

In loving memory of The Battle Kitten
May 2010-February 12, 2017

"There are many here among us, 
who feel that life is but a joke."

"I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as 
kensi."    -Nadegda  
Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#723904 — Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change)

FromSkeeter <chico@invalid.invalid>
Date2019-01-18 21:48 -0700
SubjectRe: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change)
Message-ID<MPG.36ac5a1e3f48d1c8a01@news.eternal-september.org>
In reply to#723903
In article <MPG.36ac48bc842a92d899606b@news.altopia.com>, 
oshay.shad@yahoo.corn says...
>
>Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by 
>Checkmate!  In article <MPG.36ac4e627855cdb09f9@news.eternal-
>september.org>, chico@invalid.invalid says...
>
>
># 
># In article <q1u6n6$ptt$6@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid 
># says...
># >
># >Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
># >On Fri, 18 Jan 2019 18:57:02 -0800, Checkmate wrote:
># >
># >> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
># >> Checkmate!  In article <q1tr16$ptt$3@dont-email.me>, nad318b404
># >> @gmail.invalid says...
># >> 
># >> #> # https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/newspolitics/democrats-demand-
># >> #> # investigation-after-report-that-trump-ordered-michael-cohen-to-lie-to-
># >> #> # congress/ar-BBSoREu?li=BBnbcA1
># >> #> #
># >> #> # Now, would you say that suborning perjury falls under the heading of
># >> #> # "high crimes and misdemeanors", in your opinion? Enquiring minds want
># >> #> # to know.
># >> #
># >> # <crickets>
># >
># ><crickets>
># >
># >Whatsamatter, kooky, afraid of the implications for your Cheeto God?
># >
># ><snicker>
># 
># Mooler even said it was false. You guys lose again.
># 
># https://www.cnn.com/2019/01/18/politics/mueller-statement-
># buzzfeed/index.html
>
><crickets>

CNN <Nads Home School Program> said it was true.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#723920 — Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change)

FromCheckmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn>
Date2019-01-18 23:48 -0800
SubjectRe: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change)
Message-ID<MPG.36ac760c371a2f1b99606f@news.altopia.com>
In reply to#723904
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by 
Checkmate!  In article <MPG.36ac5a1e3f48d1c8a01@news.eternal-
september.org>, chico@invalid.invalid says...


# 
# In article <MPG.36ac48bc842a92d899606b@news.altopia.com>, 
# oshay.shad@yahoo.corn says...
# >
# >Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by 
# >Checkmate!  In article <MPG.36ac4e627855cdb09f9@news.eternal-
# >september.org>, chico@invalid.invalid says...
# >
# >
# ># 
# ># In article <q1u6n6$ptt$6@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid 
# ># says...
# ># >
# ># >Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
# ># >On Fri, 18 Jan 2019 18:57:02 -0800, Checkmate wrote:
# ># >
# ># >> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
# ># >> Checkmate!  In article <q1tr16$ptt$3@dont-email.me>, nad318b404
# ># >> @gmail.invalid says...
# ># >> 
# ># >> #> # https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/newspolitics/democrats-demand-
# ># >> #> # investigation-after-report-that-trump-ordered-michael-cohen-to-lie-to-
# ># >> #> # congress/ar-BBSoREu?li=BBnbcA1
# ># >> #> #
# ># >> #> # Now, would you say that suborning perjury falls under the heading of
# ># >> #> # "high crimes and misdemeanors", in your opinion? Enquiring minds want
# ># >> #> # to know.
# ># >> #
# ># >> # <crickets>
# ># >
# ># ><crickets>
# ># >
# ># >Whatsamatter, kooky, afraid of the implications for your Cheeto God?
# ># >
# ># ><snicker>
# ># 
# ># Mooler even said it was false. You guys lose again.
# ># 
# ># https://www.cnn.com/2019/01/18/politics/mueller-statement-
# ># buzzfeed/index.html
# >
# ><crickets>
# 
# CNN <Nads Home School Program> said it was true.

Did they offer any Poof Cookies?

-- 
Checkmate ®
Copyright © 2018
all rights reserved 

AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore)
Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Awards (Post-Burnore)
Co-winner Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker
award May 2001, (Brethern of Beelzebub troll)
Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award, Feb 2012

Author, Humorist, Cynic
Philosopher, Humanitarian
Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars
Usenet Shot-Caller           

In loving memory of The Battle Kitten
May 2010-February 12, 2017

"There are many here among us, 
who feel that life is but a joke."

"I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as 
kensi."    -Nadegda  
Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#723950 — Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change)

From% <persent@gmail.com>
Date2019-01-19 10:47 -0700
SubjectRe: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change)
Message-ID<btsdc6.v5s.19.2@news.alt.net>
In reply to#723920
On 2019-01-19 12:48 a.m., Checkmate wrote:
> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
> Checkmate!  In article <MPG.36ac5a1e3f48d1c8a01@news.eternal-
> september.org>, chico@invalid.invalid says...
> 
> 
> #
> # In article <MPG.36ac48bc842a92d899606b@news.altopia.com>,
> # oshay.shad@yahoo.corn says...
> # >
> # >Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
> # >Checkmate!  In article <MPG.36ac4e627855cdb09f9@news.eternal-
> # >september.org>, chico@invalid.invalid says...
> # >
> # >
> # >#
> # ># In article <q1u6n6$ptt$6@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid
> # ># says...
> # ># >
> # ># >Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
> # ># >On Fri, 18 Jan 2019 18:57:02 -0800, Checkmate wrote:
> # ># >
> # ># >> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
> # ># >> Checkmate!  In article <q1tr16$ptt$3@dont-email.me>, nad318b404
> # ># >> @gmail.invalid says...
> # ># >>
> # ># >> #> # https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/newspolitics/democrats-demand-
> # ># >> #> # investigation-after-report-that-trump-ordered-michael-cohen-to-lie-to-
> # ># >> #> # congress/ar-BBSoREu?li=BBnbcA1
> # ># >> #> #
> # ># >> #> # Now, would you say that suborning perjury falls under the heading of
> # ># >> #> # "high crimes and misdemeanors", in your opinion? Enquiring minds want
> # ># >> #> # to know.
> # ># >> #
> # ># >> # <crickets>
> # ># >
> # ># ><crickets>
> # ># >
> # ># >Whatsamatter, kooky, afraid of the implications for your Cheeto God?
> # ># >
> # ># ><snicker>
> # >#
> # ># Mooler even said it was false. You guys lose again.
> # >#
> # ># https://www.cnn.com/2019/01/18/politics/mueller-statement-
> # ># buzzfeed/index.html
> # >
> # ><crickets>
> #
> # CNN <Nads Home School Program> said it was true.
> 
> Did they offer any Poof Cookies?
> 

isis has been defeated

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#723902 — Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change)

FromCheckmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn>
Date2019-01-18 20:34 -0800
SubjectRe: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change)
Message-ID<MPG.36ac489755147b7999606a@news.altopia.com>
In reply to#723897
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by 
Checkmate!  In article <q1u6n6$ptt$6@dont-email.me>, nad318b404
@gmail.invalid says...


# 
# Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
# On Fri, 18 Jan 2019 18:57:02 -0800, Checkmate wrote:
# 
# > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
# > Checkmate!  In article <q1tr16$ptt$3@dont-email.me>, nad318b404
# > @gmail.invalid says...
# > 
# > #> # https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/newspolitics/democrats-demand-
# > #> # investigation-after-report-that-trump-ordered-michael-cohen-to-lie-to-
# > #> # congress/ar-BBSoREu?li=BBnbcA1
# > #> #
# > #> # Now, would you say that suborning perjury falls under the heading of
# > #> # "high crimes and misdemeanors", in your opinion? Enquiring minds want
# > #> # to know.
# > #
# > # <crickets>
# 
# <crickets>
# 
# Whatsamatter, kooky, afraid of the implications for your Cheeto God?
# 
# <snicker>

I'm just not that into you...

-- 
Checkmate ®
Copyright © 2018
all rights reserved 

AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore)
Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Awards (Post-Burnore)
Co-winner Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker
award May 2001, (Brethern of Beelzebub troll)
Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award, Feb 2012

Author, Humorist, Cynic
Philosopher, Humanitarian
Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars
Usenet Shot-Caller           

In loving memory of The Battle Kitten
May 2010-February 12, 2017

"There are many here among us, 
who feel that life is but a joke."

"I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as 
kensi."    -Nadegda  
Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#724001 — Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change)

FromNadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid>
Date2019-01-19 22:27 +0000
SubjectRe: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change)
Message-ID<q2087o$ptt$14@dont-email.me>
In reply to#723902
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
On Fri, 18 Jan 2019 20:34:02 -0800, Checkmate wrote:

> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
> Checkmate!  In article <q1u6n6$ptt$6@dont-email.me>, nad318b404
> @gmail.invalid says...
> 
> 
> #
> # Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
> melt!
> # On Fri, 18 Jan 2019 18:57:02 -0800, Checkmate wrote:
> #
> # > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts
> by # > Checkmate!  In article <q1tr16$ptt$3@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 #
> > @gmail.invalid says...
> # >
> # > #> # https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/newspolitics/democrats-demand-
> # > #> #
> investigation-after-report-that-trump-ordered-michael-cohen-to-lie-to-
> # > #> # congress/ar-BBSoREu?li=BBnbcA1 # > #> #
> # > #> # Now, would you say that suborning perjury falls under the
> heading of # > #> # "high crimes and misdemeanors", in your opinion?
> Enquiring minds want # > #> # to know.
> # > #
> # > # <crickets>
> #
> # <crickets>
> #
> # Whatsamatter, kooky, afraid of the implications for your Cheeto God?
> #
> # <snicker>
> 
> I'm just not that into you...

Coward.

-- 
FNVWe Nadegda

"By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with 
you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM
Skeeter admits he mooches his mother's laptop:
http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=154073947600

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#724089 — Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change)

FromCheckmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn>
Date2019-01-19 22:10 -0800
SubjectRe: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change)
Message-ID<MPG.36adb0b4ae0af7d899607b@news.altopia.com>
In reply to#724001
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by 
Checkmate!  In article <q2087o$ptt$14@dont-email.me>, nad318b404
@gmail.invalid says...


# > I'm just not that into you...
# 
# Coward.

Sure, Snippy... let the magic smoke out of my irony meter with another 
blast of PKBs.

-- 
Checkmate ®
Copyright © 2018
all rights reserved 

AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore)
Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Awards (Post-Burnore)
Co-winner Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker
award May 2001, (Brethern of Beelzebub troll)
Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award, Feb 2012

Author, Humorist, Cynic
Philosopher, Humanitarian
Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars
Usenet Shot-Caller           

In loving memory of The Battle Kitten
May 2010-February 12, 2017

"There are many here among us, 
who feel that life is but a joke."

"I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as 
kensi."    -Nadegda  
Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#724272 — Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change)

FromNadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid>
Date2019-01-22 03:43 +0000
SubjectRe: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change)
Message-ID<q263hq$h3d$3@dont-email.me>
In reply to#724089
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
On Sat, 19 Jan 2019 22:10:31 -0800, Checkmate wrote:

> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
> Checkmate!  In article <q2087o$ptt$14@dont-email.me>, nad318b404
> @gmail.invalid says...
> 
> 
> # > I'm just not that into you...
> #
> # Coward.
> 
> Sure, Snippy<KABLAM!>

And there goes another irony meter. Oddly done in by Checkmate rather than 
Gzezzlz.

Here, I'll restore the context that causes you such extreme fear, Snippy:

>>>>>> https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/newspolitics/democrats-demand-
>>>>>> investigation-after-report-that-trump-ordered-michael-cohen-to-lie-
>>>>>> to-congress/ar-BBSoREu?li=BBnbcA1
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Now, would you say that suborning perjury falls under the
>>>>>> heading of "high crimes and misdemeanors", in your opinion?
>>>>>> Enquiring minds want to know.
>>>>
>>>> <crickets>
>>
>> <crickets>
>>
>> Whatsamatter, kooky, afraid of the implications for your Cheeto God?
>>
>> <snicker>
>
> I'm just not that into you...

(I also took the liberty of fixing the borked quoting. Yer welcome.)

So, about that subornation of perjury?

-- 
FNVWe Nadegda

"By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with 
you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM
Skeeter admits he mooches his mother's laptop:
http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=154073947600

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#724274 — Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change)

FromSkeeter <chico@invalid.invalid>
Date2019-01-21 20:47 -0700
SubjectRe: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change)
Message-ID<MPG.36b0402e4b967704b0b@news.eternal-september.org>
In reply to#724272
In article <q263hq$h3d$3@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid 
says...
>
>Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
>On Sat, 19 Jan 2019 22:10:31 -0800, Checkmate wrote:
>
>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
>> Checkmate!  In article <q2087o$ptt$14@dont-email.me>, nad318b404
>> @gmail.invalid says...
>> 
>> 
>> # > I'm just not that into you...
>> #
>> # Coward.
>> 
>> Sure, Snippy<KABLAM!>
>
>And there goes another irony meter. Oddly done in by Checkmate rather than 
>Gzezzlz.
>
>Here, I'll restore the context that causes you such extreme fear, Snippy:

So you snip the part that hurt you and pasted this line of crap?
>
>>>>>>> https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/newspolitics/democrats-demand-
>>>>>>> investigation-after-report-that-trump-ordered-michael-cohen-to-lie-
>>>>>>> to-congress/ar-BBSoREu?li=BBnbcA1
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Now, would you say that suborning perjury falls under the
>>>>>>> heading of "high crimes and misdemeanors", in your opinion?
>>>>>>> Enquiring minds want to know.
>>>>>
>>>>> <crickets>
>>>
>>> <crickets>
>>>
>>> Whatsamatter, kooky, afraid of the implications for your Cheeto God?
>>>
>>> <snicker>
>>
>> I'm just not that into you...
>
>(I also took the liberty of fixing the borked quoting. Yer welcome.)
>
>So, about that subornation of perjury?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#724283 — Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change)

FromCheckmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn>
Date2019-01-21 21:42 -0800
SubjectRe: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change)
Message-ID<MPG.36b04d115fdf70569960c6@news.altopia.com>
In reply to#724272
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by 
Checkmate!  In article <q263hq$h3d$3@dont-email.me>, nad318b404
@gmail.invalid says...


# 
# Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
# On Sat, 19 Jan 2019 22:10:31 -0800, Checkmate wrote:
# 
# > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
# > Checkmate!  In article <q2087o$ptt$14@dont-email.me>, nad318b404
# > @gmail.invalid says...
# > 
# > 
# > # > I'm just not that into you...
# > #
# > # Coward.
# > 
# > Sure, Snippy<KABLAM!>
# 
# And there goes another irony meter. Oddly done in by Checkmate rather than 
# Gzezzlz.
# 
# Here, I'll restore the context that causes you such extreme fear, Snippy:
# 
# >>>>>> https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/newspolitics/democrats-demand-
# >>>>>> investigation-after-report-that-trump-ordered-michael-cohen-to-lie-
# >>>>>> to-congress/ar-BBSoREu?li=BBnbcA1
# >>>>>>
# >>>>>> Now, would you say that suborning perjury falls under the
# >>>>>> heading of "high crimes and misdemeanors", in your opinion?
# >>>>>> Enquiring minds want to know.
# >>>>
# >>>> <crickets>
# >>
# >> <crickets>
# >>
# >> Whatsamatter, kooky, afraid of the implications for your Cheeto God?
# >>
# >> <snicker>
# >
# > I'm just not that into you...
# 
# (I also took the liberty of fixing the borked quoting. Yer welcome.)
# 
# So, about that subornation of perjury?

Where are the poof cookies, Snippy?

-- 
Checkmate ®
Copyright © 2018
all rights reserved 

AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore)
Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Awards (Post-Burnore)
Co-winner Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker
award May 2001, (Brethern of Beelzebub troll)
Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award, Feb 2012

Author, Humorist, Cynic
Philosopher, Humanitarian
Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars
Usenet Shot-Caller           

In loving memory of The Battle Kitten
May 2010-February 12, 2017

"There are many here among us, 
who feel that life is but a joke."

"I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as 
kensi."    -Nadegda  
Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#723875 — Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change)

FromSkeeter <chico@invalid.invalid>
Date2019-01-18 18:17 -0700
SubjectRe: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change)
Message-ID<MPG.36ac2884430aca6d9ee@news.eternal-september.org>
In reply to#723841
In article <q1tirf$ptt$2@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid 
says...
>
>Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
>On Thu, 17 Jan 2019 23:28:46 -0800, Checkmate wrote:
>
>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
>> Checkmate!  In article <q1rrfj$jk8$18@dont-email.me>, nad318b404
>> @gmail.invalid says...
>> 
>> 
>> #
>> # Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>> melt! # On Thu, 17 Jan 2019 20:19:25 -0800, Checkmate wrote:
>> #
>> # > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts
>> by # > Checkmate!  In article <q1rjbs$jk8$17@dont-email.me>, nad318b404
>> # > @gmail.invalid says...
>> # >
>> # >
>> # > #
>> # > # Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>> # > melt! # On Thu, 17 Jan 2019 18:49:48 -0800, Checkmate wrote:
>> # > #
>> # > # > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading
>> posts # > by # > Checkmate!  In article <q1qv96$jk8$14@dont-email.me>,
>> nad318b404 # > # > @gmail.invalid says...
>> # > # >
>> # > # >
>> # > # > #
>> # > # > # Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt,
>> snowflakes,
>> # > # > melt! # On Wed, 16 Jan 2019 22:34:29 -0800, Checkmate wrote:
>> # > # > #
>> # > # > # > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when
>> reading # > posts # > by # > Checkmate!  In article
>> <q1p2rj$jk8$11@dont-email.me>, # > nad318b404 # > # > @gmail.invalid
>> says...
>> # > # > # >
>> # > # > # >
>> # > # > # > #
>> # > # > # > # Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt,
>> # > snowflakes,
>> # > # > # > melt! # On Wed, 16 Jan 2019 20:10:16 -0800, Checkmate wrote:
>> # > # > # > #
>> # > # > # > # > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when #
>> > reading # > posts # > by # > Checkmate!  In article # >
>> <q1olgi$jk8$9@dont-email.me>,
>> # > # > nad318b404 #
>> # > # > # > > @gmail.invalid says...
>> # > # > # > # >
>> # > # > # > # >
>> # > # > # > # > #
>> # > # > # > # > # Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt,
>> # > # > snowflakes,
>> # > # > # > # > melt! # On Wed, 16 Jan 2019 13:48:52 -0800, Checkmate
>> wrote:
>> # > # > # > # > #
>> # > # > # > # > # > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles
>> when #
>> # > > reading # > posts # > by # > Checkmate!  In article # >
>> # > <q1o54s$jk8$2@dont-email.me>,
>> # > # > # > nad318b404 #
>> # > # > # > # > > @gmail.invalid says...
>> # > # > # > # > # >
>> # > # > # > # > # >
>> # > # > # > # > # > #
>> # > # > # > # > # > # Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again.
>> Melt,
>> # > # > # > snowflakes,
>> # > # > # > # > # > melt! # On Wed, 16 Jan 2019 01:41:31 -0800,
>> Checkmate # > wrote:
>> # > # > # > # > # > #
>> # > # > # > # > # > # > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety
>> goggles # > when #
>> # > # > > reading # > posts # > by # > Checkmate!  In article # >
>> # > # > <q1magu$vbv$2@dont-email.me>,
>> # > # > # > # > nad318b404 #
>> # > # > # > # > # > > @gmail.invalid says...
>> # > # > # > # > # > # >
>> # > # > # > # > # > # >
>> # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes
>> again. # > Melt,
>> # > # > # > # > snowflakes,
>> # > # > # > # > # > # > melt! # On Mon, 14 Jan 2019 20:58:23 -0800,
>> # > Checkmate # > wrote:
>> # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety #
>> > goggles # > when #
>> # > # > # > > reading # > posts # > by # > Checkmate!  In article # >
>> # > # > # > <q1jgh5$gdu$51@dont-email.me>, # > nad318b404 # > # >
>> # > @gmail.invalid # > # >
>> # > # > # > says...
>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # >
>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # >
>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes
>> # > again. # > Melt,
>> # > # > # > # > # > snowflakes,
>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > melt! # On Sun, 13 Jan 2019 19:54:09 -0800,
>> # > # > Checkmate # > wrote:
>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved
>> safety # # > > goggles # > when #
>> # > # > # > # > > reading # > posts # > by # > Checkmate!  In article #
>> >
>> # > # > # > # > <q1gjhk$gdu$42@dont-email.me>, # > nad318b404 # > # >
>> # > # > @gmail.invalid # > # >
>> # > # > # > # > says...
>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # >
>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # >
>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # Time to trigger the right-wing
>> snowflakes # > # > again. # > Melt,
>> # > # > # > # > # > # > snowflakes,
>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > melt! # On Sun, 13 Jan 2019 14:35:52
>> -0800, # > # > # > Checkmate # > wrote:
>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved #
>> > safety # # > > goggles # > when #
>> # > # > # > # > # > > reading # > posts # > by # > Checkmate!  In
>> article # # > >
>> # > # > # > # > # > <q1g9ev$gdu$33@dont-email.me>, # > nad318b404 # > #
>> >
>> # > # > # > @gmail.invalid # > # >
>> # > # > # > # > # > says...
>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # >
>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # >
>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # Time to trigger the right-wing # >
>> snowflakes # > # > again. # > Melt,
>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > snowflakes,
>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > melt! # On Sat, 12 Jan 2019 18:50:32
>> # > -0800, # > # > # > Checkmate # > wrote:
>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > Warning! Always wear ANSI
>> approved #
>> # > > safety # # > > goggles # > when #
>> # > # > # > # > # > # > > reading # > posts # > by # > Checkmate!  In #
>> > article # # > >
>> # > # > # > # > # > # > <q1drrv$gdu$22@dont-email.me>, # > nad318b404 #
>> > # # > >
>> # > # > # > # > @gmail.invalid # > # >
>> # > # > # > # > # > # > says...
>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # >
>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # >
>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # Subject: Re: Design schemes to
>> # > help # # > > buildings # > # > outlast # > # > climate # > # >
>> change # # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > From: Nadegda # >
>> <nad318b404@gmail.invalid>
>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # Newsgroups: sci.physics,
>> # > # > # > talk.politics.guns, # > # > # > alt.checkmate # > # # > # >
>> # > # > #
>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # Time to trigger the right-wing
>> # >
>> # > snowflakes # > # > again. # > Melt,
>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > snowflakes,
>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > melt!
>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # On Sat, 12 Jan 2019 05:01:02 #
>> > -0800,
>> # > # > # > Checkmate # > # > wrote: # > # > # > # > # > #
>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > I also don't recall seeing
>> the # > Nads # > nym # > # > until a # > few # > # > months # > after #
>> > I #
>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > > spanked Gary out of AUK.  Has
>> it #
>> # > > really # > been # > that # > # > long?
>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # Your faulty memory is your # >
>> problem,
>> # > # > not # > mine. # > # > Also: do # > you # > # > usually # > # >
>> refer # > # # > to your #
>> # > # > # > > interlocutor in # > the third # > person # > rather # >
>> than # > the #
>> # > # > > # > # > second?
>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # >
>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > There was no one posting as # >
>> "Nadegda"
>> # > # > when I # > # > spanked # > # > Gary # > out of # > # > AUK,
>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > nor was there anybody posting as
>> # >
>> # > "Kensi".
>> # > # > # > That # > # > whole # # > > process # # > > dragged on # >
>> for # > two or # > # > three # > months,
>> # > # > # > # > # > and the # > archives # > clearly show # > # > who
>> made # > it # # > >
>> # > # > # > # > happen.
>> # > # > # > # > # > HINT:  It # > wasn't you.
>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # You're now trying to argue that
>> whole # > # > threads # > in #
>> # > # > # > # > > Google's # > # > archive # > # > (like # the one I
>> linked # > to # > of # > kensi # > # > and me slapping # > you # > silly
>> back # > # > in # > # > 2012)
>> # > # > # > have #
>> # > # > # > # > somehow # > been faked. You now # > need a # > huge # >
>> conspiracy #
>> # > # > > # > # > theory # >
>> # > # > # > # > # > including a # complicit Google # > if you # > want
>> to # # > > continue #
>> # > # > # > > making # # > > your # > untenable k'lame.
>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # You have lost, and you've done it
>> very # > # > kookily # > # > too.
>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # As I had planned all along.
>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # <snicker>
>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # >
>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > Pure bullshit.  I received my HoT in
>> # > 2012, # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # Tee hee, you call that cheap piece of
>> # > "made in # > # > China" # > # > plastic # > a # > HoT? # > #
>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # <snicker>
>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > and I know damned well that there
>> was no # > # > "Nads" # > or #
>> # > # > # > # > > "Kensi" # > # > posting # > in # > AUK at that time,
>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # I already linked to a thread that
>> proves # > there # > # > were # > both. # > I # > really # > # > don't #
>> see what # > else I can # > add # > here,
>> # > # > # > # > other than to # > # > reiterate that #
>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > > either your # memory is faulty, you're # >
>> # > intentionally # > lying # > to # > # > engage # > in # > historical
>> #
>> # > # > revisionism, or # > you're stark # > raving #
>> # > # > # > # > # > > bonkers.
>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > and very few people were posting at
>> all # > in # > AC # > back #
>> # > # > # > # > > # > then.
>> # > # > # > # > # > # >  If # > you # > were around back then, you were
>> # > using a # > # > # > different # # > > sock... # >
>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > care to # > tell the class what that sock
>> was? # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # Paranoia. OK, then, I'm putting most
>> of my # > # > money # > on # > "stark # > # > raving # > # > bonkers"
>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # as the explanation.
>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # <snicker>
>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # >
>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > You weren't posting here or in AUK as #
>> > "Nadegda" # > in # > 2012.
>> # > # > # > # > # > You're # > a # > big # > fat porky-telling liar,
>> with # > your # > pants # > on # > # > fire.
>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # Refuge in simply repeating the Big Lie
>> over # > and # > over # > again # > in # > the # > hope # > of #
>> eventually # > getting a # > natural 20 # > on the hit # > die # > while
>> # > someone, # > # > # > # > # > # > # > somewhere # rolls a 1 on their
>> saving throw?
>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # Well, it worked for Joseph Goebbels, I
>> suppose # > ...
>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # >
>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > Prove you posted here, or in AUK in 2012...
>> # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # <k42vim$o8i$5@dont-email.me>
>> # > # > # > # > # > # >
>> # > # > # > # > # > # > So it looks like you made a grand total of about
>> two # > # > posts # > in # > late #
>> # > # > # > # > # > > September of 2012, when you rode in on the same
>> horse # > # > Fakey # > rode # > in # > on. # > That's when you buffoons
>> got that # > # > stupid # > "Tetrarchy" idea # > to # > take over # >
>> the Ko0k # > Awards,
>> # > # > which I had # > either already # > destroyed, or # > was in the
>> # > # > # > process of # > destroying.  It doesn't # > change the fact
>> that # > # > the # > "Tetrarchy" # >
>> # > # > # > blew up in your face, and # > over six years later,
>> # > # > # > # > # > you've yet to fulfill # > your dream of being an
>> FNVW # > and # # > >
>> # > # > # > resurrecting # > that which I destroyed.  Of # > course
>> you'll # > deny # > # > # > that, but everyone # > knows better.
>> # > # > # > # > # > #
>> # > # > # > # > # > # More historical revisionism. This time you admit I
>> # > *was* # > # > active in # > # # > 2012 ... but attempt to erase more
>> # > recent # > history, # > such as my # > two-year #
>> # > # > # > # > # > stint as FNVW 2015-2017.
>> # > # > # > # > # >
>> # > # > # > # > # > Your self-appointed "stint"... or perhaps "stunt"
>> would # > # > describe # > it # > # > better, was an epic fail.  No one
>> sanctioned # > it,
>> # > # > and you # > flailed # > around # > miserably, until you finally
>> # > tried to # > give away #
>> # > # > # > >
>> # > # > # > # > That-Which-Never-Existed, to no less that three
>> different # # > > bonafied #
>> # > # > # > > # > Ko0ks, who were smart enough to want nothing to do
>> with # > TWNE. # > # > Then,
>> # > # > # > # > # > your new Libtard sock tried to make a go of it, and
>> # > seldom # > even # > # > # > attempted to run a vote except very # >
>> sporadically.  The # > fact is, # > you # > # > failed on all accounts.
>> # > You could never be an # > FNVW, because # > you're one # > # > of
>> the # > biggest Ko0ks here.
>> # > # > # > # > # >
>> # > # > # > # > # > Granted, you function at a higher level than most of
>> the # > # > other #
>> # > # > # > > K0oks,
>> # > # > # > # > # > but you lack any semblance of logic or reason, as #
>> > evidenced # > my # > your # > # > often hysterical blatherings about #
>> > Trump, Kavanaugh # > (whom # > you # > declared # > was a rapist),
>> etc, # > etc.  The very fact # > that you # > claim to # > be a # >
>> Ko0kologist, # > # > # > # > # > given your track record, proves that
>> you're nothing but # > a # > garden # > # >
>> # > # > # > # > variety, run-of-the-mill k0Ok yourself.
>> # > # > # > # > #
>> # > # > # > # > # Nicely foamed, Babbles McButthurt!
>> # > # > # > # > #
>> # > # > # > # > # <snicker>
>> # > # > # > # >
>> # > # > # > # > Translation:  "I've just been totally spanked and
>> humiliated # > by # > the # > # > facts, and I've got nothing in my
>> defense."
>> # > # > # > #
>> # > # > # > # ... says the kook who just drooled out dozens of lines of
>> # > frothy #
>> # > # > > vitriol # in response to one teensy little Message-ID that
>> just so # > # >
>> # > # > happens to have # proved you wrong.
>> # > # > # > #
>> # > # > # > # <snicker>
>> # > # > # >
>> # > # > # > All you "proved," is that you've been failing in your
>> botched # # > > attempt to # > run things around here for longer than I
>> thought.  Has # > it # > really been # > over six fucking years?  That
>> really IS # > pathetic...
>> # > # > #
>> # > # > # Nicely foamed. Now keep dancing while desperately trying to #
>> > convince #
>> # > # > yourself that I'm not the one pulling your strings, Foamy # >
>> McMarionette # > ...
>> # > # > # your flailings amuse your Usenet Lady and Mistress.
>> # > # > #
>> # > # > # <snicker>
>> # > # >
>> # > # > The Foam Defense didn't work the first two times you tried it,
>> and # > it's # > not working now.  Thank me for your spanking, and ask
>> if you # > may please # > have another.
>> # > #
>> # > # Running the above through the Truth Viewer reveals what's really
>> going # > on:
>> # > #
>> # > # > Dance dance dance dance dance dance dance dance dance dance
>> dance # > dance # > dance dance dance dance dance dance dance dance
>> dance dance # > dance dance # > dance dance.
>> # > #
>> # > # <snicker>
>> # >
>> # > Empty quiver again?
>> #
>> # When has yours ever been otherwise, Kookdancer?
>> #
>> # <snicker>
>> 
>> Bullseye.
>
>Got you good, but this is starting to get more than a little bit boring. 
>How about a new topic?
>
>https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/newspolitics/democrats-demand-investigation-
>after-report-that-trump-ordered-michael-cohen-to-lie-to-congress/ar-
>BBSoREu?li=BBnbcA1
>
>Now, would you say that suborning perjury falls under the heading of "high 
>crimes and misdemeanors", in your opinion? Enquiring minds want to know.


And Mooler said today that the story was bullshit, no plane for 
you...LOLOLOL

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#723885 — Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change)

FromNadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid>
Date2019-01-19 02:41 +0000
SubjectRe: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change)
Message-ID<q1u2od$ptt$4@dont-email.me>
In reply to#723875
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
On Fri, 18 Jan 2019 18:17:13 -0700, Skeeter wrote:

> In article <q1tirf$ptt$2@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid
> says...
>>
>>Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
>>On Thu, 17 Jan 2019 23:28:46 -0800, Checkmate wrote:
>>
>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts
>>> by Checkmate!  In article <q1rrfj$jk8$18@dont-email.me>, nad318b404
>>> @gmail.invalid says...
>>> 
>>> 
>>> #
>>> # Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>>> melt! # On Thu, 17 Jan 2019 20:19:25 -0800, Checkmate wrote:
>>> #
>>> # > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading
>>> posts by # > Checkmate!  In article <q1rjbs$jk8$17@dont-email.me>,
>>> nad318b404 # > @gmail.invalid says...
>>> # >
>>> # >
>>> # > #
>>> # > # Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt,
>>> snowflakes,
>>> # > melt! # On Thu, 17 Jan 2019 18:49:48 -0800, Checkmate wrote:
>>> # > #
>>> # > # > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading
>>> posts # > by # > Checkmate!  In article <q1qv96$jk8$14@dont-email.me>,
>>> nad318b404 # > # > @gmail.invalid says...
>>> # > # >
>>> # > # >
>>> # > # > #
>>> # > # > # Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt,
>>> snowflakes,
>>> # > # > melt! # On Wed, 16 Jan 2019 22:34:29 -0800, Checkmate wrote:
>>> # > # > #
>>> # > # > # > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when
>>> reading # > posts # > by # > Checkmate!  In article
>>> <q1p2rj$jk8$11@dont-email.me>, # > nad318b404 # > # > @gmail.invalid
>>> says...
>>> # > # > # >
>>> # > # > # >
>>> # > # > # > #
>>> # > # > # > # Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt,
>>> # > snowflakes,
>>> # > # > # > melt! # On Wed, 16 Jan 2019 20:10:16 -0800, Checkmate
>>> wrote:
>>> # > # > # > #
>>> # > # > # > # > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when
>>> #
>>> > reading # > posts # > by # > Checkmate!  In article # >
>>> <q1olgi$jk8$9@dont-email.me>,
>>> # > # > nad318b404 #
>>> # > # > # > > @gmail.invalid says...
>>> # > # > # > # >
>>> # > # > # > # >
>>> # > # > # > # > #
>>> # > # > # > # > # Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again.
>>> Melt,
>>> # > # > snowflakes,
>>> # > # > # > # > melt! # On Wed, 16 Jan 2019 13:48:52 -0800, Checkmate
>>> wrote:
>>> # > # > # > # > #
>>> # > # > # > # > # > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles
>>> when #
>>> # > > reading # > posts # > by # > Checkmate!  In article # >
>>> # > <q1o54s$jk8$2@dont-email.me>,
>>> # > # > # > nad318b404 #
>>> # > # > # > # > > @gmail.invalid says...
>>> # > # > # > # > # >
>>> # > # > # > # > # >
>>> # > # > # > # > # > #
>>> # > # > # > # > # > # Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again.
>>> Melt,
>>> # > # > # > snowflakes,
>>> # > # > # > # > # > melt! # On Wed, 16 Jan 2019 01:41:31 -0800,
>>> Checkmate # > wrote:
>>> # > # > # > # > # > #
>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety
>>> goggles # > when #
>>> # > # > > reading # > posts # > by # > Checkmate!  In article # >
>>> # > # > <q1magu$vbv$2@dont-email.me>,
>>> # > # > # > # > nad318b404 #
>>> # > # > # > # > # > > @gmail.invalid says...
>>> # > # > # > # > # > # >
>>> # > # > # > # > # > # >
>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes
>>> again. # > Melt,
>>> # > # > # > # > snowflakes,
>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > melt! # On Mon, 14 Jan 2019 20:58:23 -0800,
>>> # > Checkmate # > wrote:
>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety
>>> #
>>> > goggles # > when #
>>> # > # > # > > reading # > posts # > by # > Checkmate!  In article # >
>>> # > # > # > <q1jgh5$gdu$51@dont-email.me>, # > nad318b404 # > # >
>>> # > @gmail.invalid # > # >
>>> # > # > # > says...
>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # >
>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # >
>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # Time to trigger the right-wing
>>> snowflakes # > again. # > Melt,
>>> # > # > # > # > # > snowflakes,
>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > melt! # On Sun, 13 Jan 2019 19:54:09
>>> -0800, # > # > Checkmate # > wrote:
>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved
>>> safety # # > > goggles # > when #
>>> # > # > # > # > > reading # > posts # > by # > Checkmate!  In article
>>> #
>>> >
>>> # > # > # > # > <q1gjhk$gdu$42@dont-email.me>, # > nad318b404 # > # >
>>> # > # > @gmail.invalid # > # >
>>> # > # > # > # > says...
>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # >
>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # >
>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # Time to trigger the right-wing
>>> snowflakes # > # > again. # > Melt,
>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > snowflakes,
>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > melt! # On Sun, 13 Jan 2019 14:35:52
>>> -0800, # > # > # > Checkmate # > wrote:
>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved
>>> #
>>> > safety # # > > goggles # > when #
>>> # > # > # > # > # > > reading # > posts # > by # > Checkmate!  In
>>> article # # > >
>>> # > # > # > # > # > <q1g9ev$gdu$33@dont-email.me>, # > nad318b404 # >
>>> #
>>> >
>>> # > # > # > @gmail.invalid # > # >
>>> # > # > # > # > # > says...
>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # >
>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # >
>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # Time to trigger the right-wing #
>>> >
>>> snowflakes # > # > again. # > Melt,
>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > snowflakes,
>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > melt! # On Sat, 12 Jan 2019
>>> 18:50:32 # > -0800, # > # > # > Checkmate # > wrote:
>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > Warning! Always wear ANSI
>>> approved #
>>> # > > safety # # > > goggles # > when #
>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > > reading # > posts # > by # > Checkmate!  In
>>> #
>>> > article # # > >
>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > <q1drrv$gdu$22@dont-email.me>, # > nad318b404
>>> #
>>> > # # > >
>>> # > # > # > # > @gmail.invalid # > # >
>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > says...
>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # >
>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # >
>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # Subject: Re: Design schemes
>>> to # > help # # > > buildings # > # > outlast # > # > climate # > # >
>>> change # # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > From: Nadegda # >
>>> <nad318b404@gmail.invalid>
>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # Newsgroups: sci.physics,
>>> # > # > # > talk.politics.guns, # > # > # > alt.checkmate # > # # > #
>>> > # > # > #
>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # Time to trigger the
>>> right-wing # >
>>> # > snowflakes # > # > again. # > Melt,
>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > snowflakes,
>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > melt!
>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # On Sat, 12 Jan 2019 05:01:02
>>> #
>>> > -0800,
>>> # > # > # > Checkmate # > # > wrote: # > # > # > # > # > #
>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > I also don't recall seeing
>>> the # > Nads # > nym # > # > until a # > few # > # > months # > after
>>> #
>>> > I #
>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > > spanked Gary out of AUK. 
>>> Has it #
>>> # > > really # > been # > that # > # > long?
>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # Your faulty memory is your #
>>> >
>>> problem,
>>> # > # > not # > mine. # > # > Also: do # > you # > # > usually # > # >
>>> refer # > # # > to your #
>>> # > # > # > > interlocutor in # > the third # > person # > rather # >
>>> than # > the #
>>> # > # > > # > # > second?
>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # >
>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > There was no one posting as #
>>> > "Nadegda"
>>> # > # > when I # > # > spanked # > # > Gary # > out of # > # > AUK,
>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > nor was there anybody posting
>>> as # >
>>> # > "Kensi".
>>> # > # > # > That # > # > whole # # > > process # # > > dragged on # >
>>> for # > two or # > # > three # > months,
>>> # > # > # > # > # > and the # > archives # > clearly show # > # > who
>>> made # > it # # > >
>>> # > # > # > # > happen.
>>> # > # > # > # > # > HINT:  It # > wasn't you.
>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # You're now trying to argue that
>>> whole # > # > threads # > in #
>>> # > # > # > # > > Google's # > # > archive # > # > (like # the one I
>>> linked # > to # > of # > kensi # > # > and me slapping # > you # >
>>> silly back # > # > in # > # > 2012)
>>> # > # > # > have #
>>> # > # > # > # > somehow # > been faked. You now # > need a # > huge #
>>> > conspiracy #
>>> # > # > > # > # > theory # >
>>> # > # > # > # > # > including a # complicit Google # > if you # > want
>>> to # # > > continue #
>>> # > # > # > > making # # > > your # > untenable k'lame.
>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # You have lost, and you've done
>>> it very # > # > kookily # > # > too.
>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # As I had planned all along.
>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # <snicker>
>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # >
>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > Pure bullshit.  I received my HoT
>>> in # > 2012, # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # Tee hee, you call that cheap piece
>>> of # > "made in # > # > China" # > # > plastic # > a # > HoT? # > #
>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # <snicker>
>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > and I know damned well that there
>>> was no # > # > "Nads" # > or #
>>> # > # > # > # > > "Kensi" # > # > posting # > in # > AUK at that time,
>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # I already linked to a thread that
>>> proves # > there # > # > were # > both. # > I # > really # > # > don't
>>> #
>>> see what # > else I can # > add # > here,
>>> # > # > # > # > other than to # > # > reiterate that #
>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > > either your # memory is faulty, you're #
>>> >
>>> # > intentionally # > lying # > to # > # > engage # > in # >
>>> historical #
>>> # > # > revisionism, or # > you're stark # > raving #
>>> # > # > # > # > # > > bonkers.
>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > and very few people were posting
>>> at all # > in # > AC # > back #
>>> # > # > # > # > > # > then.
>>> # > # > # > # > # > # >  If # > you # > were around back then, you
>>> were # > using a # > # > # > different # # > > sock... # >
>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > care to # > tell the class what that sock
>>> was? # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # Paranoia. OK, then, I'm putting most
>>> of my # > # > money # > on # > "stark # > # > raving # > # > bonkers"
>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # as the explanation.
>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # <snicker>
>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # >
>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > You weren't posting here or in AUK as
>>> #
>>> > "Nadegda" # > in # > 2012.
>>> # > # > # > # > # > You're # > a # > big # > fat porky-telling liar,
>>> with # > your # > pants # > on # > # > fire.
>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # Refuge in simply repeating the Big Lie
>>> over # > and # > over # > again # > in # > the # > hope # > of #
>>> eventually # > getting a # > natural 20 # > on the hit # > die # >
>>> while # > someone, # > # > # > # > # > # > # > somewhere # rolls a 1
>>> on their saving throw?
>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # Well, it worked for Joseph Goebbels, I
>>> suppose # > ...
>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # >
>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > Prove you posted here, or in AUK in
>>> 2012... # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # <k42vim$o8i$5@dont-email.me>
>>> # > # > # > # > # > # >
>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > So it looks like you made a grand total of
>>> about two # > # > posts # > in # > late #
>>> # > # > # > # > # > > September of 2012, when you rode in on the same
>>> horse # > # > Fakey # > rode # > in # > on. # > That's when you
>>> buffoons got that # > # > stupid # > "Tetrarchy" idea # > to # > take
>>> over # > the Ko0k # > Awards,
>>> # > # > which I had # > either already # > destroyed, or # > was in
>>> the # > # > # > process of # > destroying.  It doesn't # > change the
>>> fact that # > # > the # > "Tetrarchy" # >
>>> # > # > # > blew up in your face, and # > over six years later,
>>> # > # > # > # > # > you've yet to fulfill # > your dream of being an
>>> FNVW # > and # # > >
>>> # > # > # > resurrecting # > that which I destroyed.  Of # > course
>>> you'll # > deny # > # > # > that, but everyone # > knows better.
>>> # > # > # > # > # > #
>>> # > # > # > # > # > # More historical revisionism. This time you admit
>>> I # > *was* # > # > active in # > # # > 2012 ... but attempt to erase
>>> more # > recent # > history, # > such as my # > two-year #
>>> # > # > # > # > # > stint as FNVW 2015-2017.
>>> # > # > # > # > # >
>>> # > # > # > # > # > Your self-appointed "stint"... or perhaps "stunt"
>>> would # > # > describe # > it # > # > better, was an epic fail.  No
>>> one sanctioned # > it,
>>> # > # > and you # > flailed # > around # > miserably, until you
>>> finally # > tried to # > give away #
>>> # > # > # > >
>>> # > # > # > # > That-Which-Never-Existed, to no less that three
>>> different # # > > bonafied #
>>> # > # > # > > # > Ko0ks, who were smart enough to want nothing to do
>>> with # > TWNE. # > # > Then,
>>> # > # > # > # > # > your new Libtard sock tried to make a go of it,
>>> and # > seldom # > even # > # > # > attempted to run a vote except
>>> very # > sporadically.  The # > fact is, # > you # > # > failed on all
>>> accounts. # > You could never be an # > FNVW, because # > you're one #
>>> > # > of the # > biggest Ko0ks here.
>>> # > # > # > # > # >
>>> # > # > # > # > # > Granted, you function at a higher level than most
>>> of the # > # > other #
>>> # > # > # > > K0oks,
>>> # > # > # > # > # > but you lack any semblance of logic or reason, as
>>> #
>>> > evidenced # > my # > your # > # > often hysterical blatherings about
>>> > #
>>> > Trump, Kavanaugh # > (whom # > you # > declared # > was a rapist),
>>> etc, # > etc.  The very fact # > that you # > claim to # > be a # >
>>> Ko0kologist, # > # > # > # > # > given your track record, proves that
>>> you're nothing but # > a # > garden # > # >
>>> # > # > # > # > variety, run-of-the-mill k0Ok yourself.
>>> # > # > # > # > #
>>> # > # > # > # > # Nicely foamed, Babbles McButthurt!
>>> # > # > # > # > #
>>> # > # > # > # > # <snicker>
>>> # > # > # > # >
>>> # > # > # > # > Translation:  "I've just been totally spanked and
>>> humiliated # > by # > the # > # > facts, and I've got nothing in my
>>> defense."
>>> # > # > # > #
>>> # > # > # > # ... says the kook who just drooled out dozens of lines
>>> of # > frothy #
>>> # > # > > vitriol # in response to one teensy little Message-ID that
>>> just so # > # >
>>> # > # > happens to have # proved you wrong.
>>> # > # > # > #
>>> # > # > # > # <snicker>
>>> # > # > # >
>>> # > # > # > All you "proved," is that you've been failing in your
>>> botched # # > > attempt to # > run things around here for longer than
>>> I thought.  Has # > it # > really been # > over six fucking years? 
>>> That really IS # > pathetic...
>>> # > # > #
>>> # > # > # Nicely foamed. Now keep dancing while desperately trying to
>>> #
>>> > convince #
>>> # > # > yourself that I'm not the one pulling your strings, Foamy # >
>>> McMarionette # > ...
>>> # > # > # your flailings amuse your Usenet Lady and Mistress.
>>> # > # > #
>>> # > # > # <snicker>
>>> # > # >
>>> # > # > The Foam Defense didn't work the first two times you tried it,
>>> and # > it's # > not working now.  Thank me for your spanking, and ask
>>> if you # > may please # > have another.
>>> # > #
>>> # > # Running the above through the Truth Viewer reveals what's really
>>> going # > on:
>>> # > #
>>> # > # > Dance dance dance dance dance dance dance dance dance dance
>>> dance # > dance # > dance dance dance dance dance dance dance dance
>>> dance dance # > dance dance # > dance dance.
>>> # > #
>>> # > # <snicker>
>>> # >
>>> # > Empty quiver again?
>>> #
>>> # When has yours ever been otherwise, Kookdancer?
>>> #
>>> # <snicker>
>>> 
>>> Bullseye.
>>
>>Got you good, but this is starting to get more than a little bit boring.
>>How about a new topic?
>>
>>https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/newspolitics/democrats-demand-
investigation-
>>after-report-that-trump-ordered-michael-cohen-to-lie-to-congress/ar-
>>BBSoREu?li=BBnbcA1
>>
>>Now, would you say that suborning perjury falls under the heading of
>>"high crimes and misdemeanors", in your opinion? Enquiring minds want to
>>know.
> 
> 
> And Mooler said today that the story was bullshit, no plane for
> you...LOLOLOL

[non-far-right-news-site citation needed]

-- 
FNVWe Nadegda

"By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with 
you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM
Skeeter admits he mooches his mother's laptop:
http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=154073947600

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#723898 — Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change)

FromSkeeter <chico@invalid.invalid>
Date2019-01-18 20:55 -0700
SubjectRe: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change)
Message-ID<MPG.36ac4db1e5f172249f8@news.eternal-september.org>
In reply to#723885
In article <q1u2od$ptt$4@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid 
says...
>
>Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
>On Fri, 18 Jan 2019 18:17:13 -0700, Skeeter wrote:
>
>> In article <q1tirf$ptt$2@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid
>> says...
>>>
>>>Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
>>>On Thu, 17 Jan 2019 23:28:46 -0800, Checkmate wrote:
>>>
>>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts
>>>> by Checkmate!  In article <q1rrfj$jk8$18@dont-email.me>, nad318b404
>>>> @gmail.invalid says...
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> #
>>>> # Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>>>> melt! # On Thu, 17 Jan 2019 20:19:25 -0800, Checkmate wrote:
>>>> #
>>>> # > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading
>>>> posts by # > Checkmate!  In article <q1rjbs$jk8$17@dont-email.me>,
>>>> nad318b404 # > @gmail.invalid says...
>>>> # >
>>>> # >
>>>> # > #
>>>> # > # Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt,
>>>> snowflakes,
>>>> # > melt! # On Thu, 17 Jan 2019 18:49:48 -0800, Checkmate wrote:
>>>> # > #
>>>> # > # > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading
>>>> posts # > by # > Checkmate!  In article <q1qv96$jk8$14@dont-email.me>,
>>>> nad318b404 # > # > @gmail.invalid says...
>>>> # > # >
>>>> # > # >
>>>> # > # > #
>>>> # > # > # Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt,
>>>> snowflakes,
>>>> # > # > melt! # On Wed, 16 Jan 2019 22:34:29 -0800, Checkmate wrote:
>>>> # > # > #
>>>> # > # > # > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when
>>>> reading # > posts # > by # > Checkmate!  In article
>>>> <q1p2rj$jk8$11@dont-email.me>, # > nad318b404 # > # > @gmail.invalid
>>>> says...
>>>> # > # > # >
>>>> # > # > # >
>>>> # > # > # > #
>>>> # > # > # > # Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt,
>>>> # > snowflakes,
>>>> # > # > # > melt! # On Wed, 16 Jan 2019 20:10:16 -0800, Checkmate
>>>> wrote:
>>>> # > # > # > #
>>>> # > # > # > # > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when
>>>> #
>>>> > reading # > posts # > by # > Checkmate!  In article # >
>>>> <q1olgi$jk8$9@dont-email.me>,
>>>> # > # > nad318b404 #
>>>> # > # > # > > @gmail.invalid says...
>>>> # > # > # > # >
>>>> # > # > # > # >
>>>> # > # > # > # > #
>>>> # > # > # > # > # Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again.
>>>> Melt,
>>>> # > # > snowflakes,
>>>> # > # > # > # > melt! # On Wed, 16 Jan 2019 13:48:52 -0800, Checkmate
>>>> wrote:
>>>> # > # > # > # > #
>>>> # > # > # > # > # > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles
>>>> when #
>>>> # > > reading # > posts # > by # > Checkmate!  In article # >
>>>> # > <q1o54s$jk8$2@dont-email.me>,
>>>> # > # > # > nad318b404 #
>>>> # > # > # > # > > @gmail.invalid says...
>>>> # > # > # > # > # >
>>>> # > # > # > # > # >
>>>> # > # > # > # > # > #
>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again.
>>>> Melt,
>>>> # > # > # > snowflakes,
>>>> # > # > # > # > # > melt! # On Wed, 16 Jan 2019 01:41:31 -0800,
>>>> Checkmate # > wrote:
>>>> # > # > # > # > # > #
>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety
>>>> goggles # > when #
>>>> # > # > > reading # > posts # > by # > Checkmate!  In article # >
>>>> # > # > <q1magu$vbv$2@dont-email.me>,
>>>> # > # > # > # > nad318b404 #
>>>> # > # > # > # > # > > @gmail.invalid says...
>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # >
>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # >
>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes
>>>> again. # > Melt,
>>>> # > # > # > # > snowflakes,
>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > melt! # On Mon, 14 Jan 2019 20:58:23 -0800,
>>>> # > Checkmate # > wrote:
>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety
>>>> #
>>>> > goggles # > when #
>>>> # > # > # > > reading # > posts # > by # > Checkmate!  In article # >
>>>> # > # > # > <q1jgh5$gdu$51@dont-email.me>, # > nad318b404 # > # >
>>>> # > @gmail.invalid # > # >
>>>> # > # > # > says...
>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # >
>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # >
>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # Time to trigger the right-wing
>>>> snowflakes # > again. # > Melt,
>>>> # > # > # > # > # > snowflakes,
>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > melt! # On Sun, 13 Jan 2019 19:54:09
>>>> -0800, # > # > Checkmate # > wrote:
>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved
>>>> safety # # > > goggles # > when #
>>>> # > # > # > # > > reading # > posts # > by # > Checkmate!  In article
>>>> #
>>>> >
>>>> # > # > # > # > <q1gjhk$gdu$42@dont-email.me>, # > nad318b404 # > # >
>>>> # > # > @gmail.invalid # > # >
>>>> # > # > # > # > says...
>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # >
>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # >
>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # Time to trigger the right-wing
>>>> snowflakes # > # > again. # > Melt,
>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > snowflakes,
>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > melt! # On Sun, 13 Jan 2019 14:35:52
>>>> -0800, # > # > # > Checkmate # > wrote:
>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved
>>>> #
>>>> > safety # # > > goggles # > when #
>>>> # > # > # > # > # > > reading # > posts # > by # > Checkmate!  In
>>>> article # # > >
>>>> # > # > # > # > # > <q1g9ev$gdu$33@dont-email.me>, # > nad318b404 # >
>>>> #
>>>> >
>>>> # > # > # > @gmail.invalid # > # >
>>>> # > # > # > # > # > says...
>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # >
>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # >
>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # Time to trigger the right-wing #
>>>> >
>>>> snowflakes # > # > again. # > Melt,
>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > snowflakes,
>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > melt! # On Sat, 12 Jan 2019
>>>> 18:50:32 # > -0800, # > # > # > Checkmate # > wrote:
>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > Warning! Always wear ANSI
>>>> approved #
>>>> # > > safety # # > > goggles # > when #
>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > > reading # > posts # > by # > Checkmate!  In
>>>> #
>>>> > article # # > >
>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > <q1drrv$gdu$22@dont-email.me>, # > nad318b404
>>>> #
>>>> > # # > >
>>>> # > # > # > # > @gmail.invalid # > # >
>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > says...
>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # >
>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # >
>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # Subject: Re: Design schemes
>>>> to # > help # # > > buildings # > # > outlast # > # > climate # > # >
>>>> change # # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > From: Nadegda # >
>>>> <nad318b404@gmail.invalid>
>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # Newsgroups: sci.physics,
>>>> # > # > # > talk.politics.guns, # > # > # > alt.checkmate # > # # > #
>>>> > # > # > #
>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # Time to trigger the
>>>> right-wing # >
>>>> # > snowflakes # > # > again. # > Melt,
>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > snowflakes,
>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > melt!
>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # On Sat, 12 Jan 2019 05:01:02
>>>> #
>>>> > -0800,
>>>> # > # > # > Checkmate # > # > wrote: # > # > # > # > # > #
>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > I also don't recall seeing
>>>> the # > Nads # > nym # > # > until a # > few # > # > months # > after
>>>> #
>>>> > I #
>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > > spanked Gary out of AUK. 
>>>> Has it #
>>>> # > > really # > been # > that # > # > long?
>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # Your faulty memory is your #
>>>> >
>>>> problem,
>>>> # > # > not # > mine. # > # > Also: do # > you # > # > usually # > # >
>>>> refer # > # # > to your #
>>>> # > # > # > > interlocutor in # > the third # > person # > rather # >
>>>> than # > the #
>>>> # > # > > # > # > second?
>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # >
>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > There was no one posting as #
>>>> > "Nadegda"
>>>> # > # > when I # > # > spanked # > # > Gary # > out of # > # > AUK,
>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > nor was there anybody posting
>>>> as # >
>>>> # > "Kensi".
>>>> # > # > # > That # > # > whole # # > > process # # > > dragged on # >
>>>> for # > two or # > # > three # > months,
>>>> # > # > # > # > # > and the # > archives # > clearly show # > # > who
>>>> made # > it # # > >
>>>> # > # > # > # > happen.
>>>> # > # > # > # > # > HINT:  It # > wasn't you.
>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # You're now trying to argue that
>>>> whole # > # > threads # > in #
>>>> # > # > # > # > > Google's # > # > archive # > # > (like # the one I
>>>> linked # > to # > of # > kensi # > # > and me slapping # > you # >
>>>> silly back # > # > in # > # > 2012)
>>>> # > # > # > have #
>>>> # > # > # > # > somehow # > been faked. You now # > need a # > huge #
>>>> > conspiracy #
>>>> # > # > > # > # > theory # >
>>>> # > # > # > # > # > including a # complicit Google # > if you # > want
>>>> to # # > > continue #
>>>> # > # > # > > making # # > > your # > untenable k'lame.
>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # You have lost, and you've done
>>>> it very # > # > kookily # > # > too.
>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # As I had planned all along.
>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # <snicker>
>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # >
>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > Pure bullshit.  I received my HoT
>>>> in # > 2012, # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # Tee hee, you call that cheap piece
>>>> of # > "made in # > # > China" # > # > plastic # > a # > HoT? # > #
>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # <snicker>
>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > and I know damned well that there
>>>> was no # > # > "Nads" # > or #
>>>> # > # > # > # > > "Kensi" # > # > posting # > in # > AUK at that time,
>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # I already linked to a thread that
>>>> proves # > there # > # > were # > both. # > I # > really # > # > don't
>>>> #
>>>> see what # > else I can # > add # > here,
>>>> # > # > # > # > other than to # > # > reiterate that #
>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > > either your # memory is faulty, you're #
>>>> >
>>>> # > intentionally # > lying # > to # > # > engage # > in # >
>>>> historical #
>>>> # > # > revisionism, or # > you're stark # > raving #
>>>> # > # > # > # > # > > bonkers.
>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > and very few people were posting
>>>> at all # > in # > AC # > back #
>>>> # > # > # > # > > # > then.
>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # >  If # > you # > were around back then, you
>>>> were # > using a # > # > # > different # # > > sock... # >
>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > care to # > tell the class what that sock
>>>> was? # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # Paranoia. OK, then, I'm putting most
>>>> of my # > # > money # > on # > "stark # > # > raving # > # > bonkers"
>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # as the explanation.
>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # <snicker>
>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # >
>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > You weren't posting here or in AUK as
>>>> #
>>>> > "Nadegda" # > in # > 2012.
>>>> # > # > # > # > # > You're # > a # > big # > fat porky-telling liar,
>>>> with # > your # > pants # > on # > # > fire.
>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # Refuge in simply repeating the Big Lie
>>>> over # > and # > over # > again # > in # > the # > hope # > of #
>>>> eventually # > getting a # > natural 20 # > on the hit # > die # >
>>>> while # > someone, # > # > # > # > # > # > # > somewhere # rolls a 1
>>>> on their saving throw?
>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # Well, it worked for Joseph Goebbels, I
>>>> suppose # > ...
>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # >
>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > Prove you posted here, or in AUK in
>>>> 2012... # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # <k42vim$o8i$5@dont-email.me>
>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # >
>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > So it looks like you made a grand total of
>>>> about two # > # > posts # > in # > late #
>>>> # > # > # > # > # > > September of 2012, when you rode in on the same
>>>> horse # > # > Fakey # > rode # > in # > on. # > That's when you
>>>> buffoons got that # > # > stupid # > "Tetrarchy" idea # > to # > take
>>>> over # > the Ko0k # > Awards,
>>>> # > # > which I had # > either already # > destroyed, or # > was in
>>>> the # > # > # > process of # > destroying.  It doesn't # > change the
>>>> fact that # > # > the # > "Tetrarchy" # >
>>>> # > # > # > blew up in your face, and # > over six years later,
>>>> # > # > # > # > # > you've yet to fulfill # > your dream of being an
>>>> FNVW # > and # # > >
>>>> # > # > # > resurrecting # > that which I destroyed.  Of # > course
>>>> you'll # > deny # > # > # > that, but everyone # > knows better.
>>>> # > # > # > # > # > #
>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # More historical revisionism. This time you admit
>>>> I # > *was* # > # > active in # > # # > 2012 ... but attempt to erase
>>>> more # > recent # > history, # > such as my # > two-year #
>>>> # > # > # > # > # > stint as FNVW 2015-2017.
>>>> # > # > # > # > # >
>>>> # > # > # > # > # > Your self-appointed "stint"... or perhaps "stunt"
>>>> would # > # > describe # > it # > # > better, was an epic fail.  No
>>>> one sanctioned # > it,
>>>> # > # > and you # > flailed # > around # > miserably, until you
>>>> finally # > tried to # > give away #
>>>> # > # > # > >
>>>> # > # > # > # > That-Which-Never-Existed, to no less that three
>>>> different # # > > bonafied #
>>>> # > # > # > > # > Ko0ks, who were smart enough to want nothing to do
>>>> with # > TWNE. # > # > Then,
>>>> # > # > # > # > # > your new Libtard sock tried to make a go of it,
>>>> and # > seldom # > even # > # > # > attempted to run a vote except
>>>> very # > sporadically.  The # > fact is, # > you # > # > failed on all
>>>> accounts. # > You could never be an # > FNVW, because # > you're one #
>>>> > # > of the # > biggest Ko0ks here.
>>>> # > # > # > # > # >
>>>> # > # > # > # > # > Granted, you function at a higher level than most
>>>> of the # > # > other #
>>>> # > # > # > > K0oks,
>>>> # > # > # > # > # > but you lack any semblance of logic or reason, as
>>>> #
>>>> > evidenced # > my # > your # > # > often hysterical blatherings about
>>>> > #
>>>> > Trump, Kavanaugh # > (whom # > you # > declared # > was a rapist),
>>>> etc, # > etc.  The very fact # > that you # > claim to # > be a # >
>>>> Ko0kologist, # > # > # > # > # > given your track record, proves that
>>>> you're nothing but # > a # > garden # > # >
>>>> # > # > # > # > variety, run-of-the-mill k0Ok yourself.
>>>> # > # > # > # > #
>>>> # > # > # > # > # Nicely foamed, Babbles McButthurt!
>>>> # > # > # > # > #
>>>> # > # > # > # > # <snicker>
>>>> # > # > # > # >
>>>> # > # > # > # > Translation:  "I've just been totally spanked and
>>>> humiliated # > by # > the # > # > facts, and I've got nothing in my
>>>> defense."
>>>> # > # > # > #
>>>> # > # > # > # ... says the kook who just drooled out dozens of lines
>>>> of # > frothy #
>>>> # > # > > vitriol # in response to one teensy little Message-ID that
>>>> just so # > # >
>>>> # > # > happens to have # proved you wrong.
>>>> # > # > # > #
>>>> # > # > # > # <snicker>
>>>> # > # > # >
>>>> # > # > # > All you "proved," is that you've been failing in your
>>>> botched # # > > attempt to # > run things around here for longer than
>>>> I thought.  Has # > it # > really been # > over six fucking years? 
>>>> That really IS # > pathetic...
>>>> # > # > #
>>>> # > # > # Nicely foamed. Now keep dancing while desperately trying to
>>>> #
>>>> > convince #
>>>> # > # > yourself that I'm not the one pulling your strings, Foamy # >
>>>> McMarionette # > ...
>>>> # > # > # your flailings amuse your Usenet Lady and Mistress.
>>>> # > # > #
>>>> # > # > # <snicker>
>>>> # > # >
>>>> # > # > The Foam Defense didn't work the first two times you tried it,
>>>> and # > it's # > not working now.  Thank me for your spanking, and ask
>>>> if you # > may please # > have another.
>>>> # > #
>>>> # > # Running the above through the Truth Viewer reveals what's really
>>>> going # > on:
>>>> # > #
>>>> # > # > Dance dance dance dance dance dance dance dance dance dance
>>>> dance # > dance # > dance dance dance dance dance dance dance dance
>>>> dance dance # > dance dance # > dance dance.
>>>> # > #
>>>> # > # <snicker>
>>>> # >
>>>> # > Empty quiver again?
>>>> #
>>>> # When has yours ever been otherwise, Kookdancer?
>>>> #
>>>> # <snicker>
>>>> 
>>>> Bullseye.
>>>
>>>Got you good, but this is starting to get more than a little bit boring.
>>>How about a new topic?
>>>
>>>https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/newspolitics/democrats-demand-
>investigation-
>>>after-report-that-trump-ordered-michael-cohen-to-lie-to-congress/ar-
>>>BBSoREu?li=BBnbcA1
>>>
>>>Now, would you say that suborning perjury falls under the heading of
>>>"high crimes and misdemeanors", in your opinion? Enquiring minds want to
>>>know.
>> 
>> 
>> And Mooler said today that the story was bullshit, no plane for
>> you...LOLOLOL
>
>[non-far-right-news-site citation needed]


I watched it on CNN you doof.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#724002 — Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change)

FromNadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid>
Date2019-01-19 22:27 +0000
SubjectRe: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change)
Message-ID<q2088l$ptt$15@dont-email.me>
In reply to#723898
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
On Fri, 18 Jan 2019 20:55:53 -0700, Skeeter wrote:

> In article <q1u2od$ptt$4@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid
> says...
>>
>>Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
>>On Fri, 18 Jan 2019 18:17:13 -0700, Skeeter wrote:
>>
>>> In article <q1tirf$ptt$2@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid
>>> says...
>>>>
>>>>Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>>>>melt!
>>>>On Thu, 17 Jan 2019 23:28:46 -0800, Checkmate wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts
>>>>> by Checkmate!  In article <q1rrfj$jk8$18@dont-email.me>, nad318b404
>>>>> @gmail.invalid says...
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> #
>>>>> # Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>>>>> melt! # On Thu, 17 Jan 2019 20:19:25 -0800, Checkmate wrote:
>>>>> #
>>>>> # > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading
>>>>> posts by # > Checkmate!  In article <q1rjbs$jk8$17@dont-email.me>,
>>>>> nad318b404 # > @gmail.invalid says...
>>>>> # >
>>>>> # >
>>>>> # > #
>>>>> # > # Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt,
>>>>> snowflakes,
>>>>> # > melt! # On Thu, 17 Jan 2019 18:49:48 -0800, Checkmate wrote:
>>>>> # > #
>>>>> # > # > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when
>>>>> reading posts # > by # > Checkmate!  In article
>>>>> <q1qv96$jk8$14@dont-email.me>,
>>>>> nad318b404 # > # > @gmail.invalid says...
>>>>> # > # >
>>>>> # > # >
>>>>> # > # > #
>>>>> # > # > # Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt,
>>>>> snowflakes,
>>>>> # > # > melt! # On Wed, 16 Jan 2019 22:34:29 -0800, Checkmate wrote:
>>>>> # > # > #
>>>>> # > # > # > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when
>>>>> reading # > posts # > by # > Checkmate!  In article
>>>>> <q1p2rj$jk8$11@dont-email.me>, # > nad318b404 # > # > @gmail.invalid
>>>>> says...
>>>>> # > # > # >
>>>>> # > # > # >
>>>>> # > # > # > #
>>>>> # > # > # > # Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt,
>>>>> # > snowflakes,
>>>>> # > # > # > melt! # On Wed, 16 Jan 2019 20:10:16 -0800, Checkmate
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> # > # > # > #
>>>>> # > # > # > # > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles
>>>>> when #
>>>>> > reading # > posts # > by # > Checkmate!  In article # >
>>>>> <q1olgi$jk8$9@dont-email.me>,
>>>>> # > # > nad318b404 #
>>>>> # > # > # > > @gmail.invalid says...
>>>>> # > # > # > # >
>>>>> # > # > # > # >
>>>>> # > # > # > # > #
>>>>> # > # > # > # > # Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again.
>>>>> Melt,
>>>>> # > # > snowflakes,
>>>>> # > # > # > # > melt! # On Wed, 16 Jan 2019 13:48:52 -0800,
>>>>> Checkmate wrote:
>>>>> # > # > # > # > #
>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety
>>>>> goggles when #
>>>>> # > > reading # > posts # > by # > Checkmate!  In article # >
>>>>> # > <q1o54s$jk8$2@dont-email.me>,
>>>>> # > # > # > nad318b404 #
>>>>> # > # > # > # > > @gmail.invalid says...
>>>>> # > # > # > # > # >
>>>>> # > # > # > # > # >
>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > #
>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes
>>>>> again.
>>>>> Melt,
>>>>> # > # > # > snowflakes,
>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > melt! # On Wed, 16 Jan 2019 01:41:31 -0800,
>>>>> Checkmate # > wrote:
>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > #
>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety
>>>>> goggles # > when #
>>>>> # > # > > reading # > posts # > by # > Checkmate!  In article # >
>>>>> # > # > <q1magu$vbv$2@dont-email.me>,
>>>>> # > # > # > # > nad318b404 #
>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > > @gmail.invalid says...
>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # >
>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # >
>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes
>>>>> again. # > Melt,
>>>>> # > # > # > # > snowflakes,
>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > melt! # On Mon, 14 Jan 2019 20:58:23 -0800,
>>>>> # > Checkmate # > wrote:
>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved
>>>>> safety #
>>>>> > goggles # > when #
>>>>> # > # > # > > reading # > posts # > by # > Checkmate!  In article #
>>>>> > # > # > # > <q1jgh5$gdu$51@dont-email.me>, # > nad318b404 # > # >
>>>>> # > @gmail.invalid # > # >
>>>>> # > # > # > says...
>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # >
>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # >
>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # Time to trigger the right-wing
>>>>> snowflakes # > again. # > Melt,
>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > snowflakes,
>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > melt! # On Sun, 13 Jan 2019 19:54:09
>>>>> -0800, # > # > Checkmate # > wrote:
>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved
>>>>> safety # # > > goggles # > when #
>>>>> # > # > # > # > > reading # > posts # > by # > Checkmate!  In
>>>>> article #
>>>>> >
>>>>> # > # > # > # > <q1gjhk$gdu$42@dont-email.me>, # > nad318b404 # > #
>>>>> > # > # > @gmail.invalid # > # >
>>>>> # > # > # > # > says...
>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # >
>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # >
>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # Time to trigger the right-wing
>>>>> snowflakes # > # > again. # > Melt,
>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > snowflakes,
>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > melt! # On Sun, 13 Jan 2019 14:35:52
>>>>> -0800, # > # > # > Checkmate # > wrote:
>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > Warning! Always wear ANSI
>>>>> approved #
>>>>> > safety # # > > goggles # > when #
>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > > reading # > posts # > by # > Checkmate!  In
>>>>> article # # > >
>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > <q1g9ev$gdu$33@dont-email.me>, # > nad318b404 #
>>>>> > #
>>>>> >
>>>>> # > # > # > @gmail.invalid # > # >
>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > says...
>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # >
>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # >
>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # Time to trigger the right-wing
>>>>> #
>>>>> >
>>>>> snowflakes # > # > again. # > Melt,
>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > snowflakes,
>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > melt! # On Sat, 12 Jan 2019
>>>>> 18:50:32 # > -0800, # > # > # > Checkmate # > wrote:
>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > Warning! Always wear ANSI
>>>>> approved #
>>>>> # > > safety # # > > goggles # > when #
>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > > reading # > posts # > by # > Checkmate! 
>>>>> In #
>>>>> > article # # > >
>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > <q1drrv$gdu$22@dont-email.me>, # >
>>>>> nad318b404 #
>>>>> > # # > >
>>>>> # > # > # > # > @gmail.invalid # > # >
>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > says...
>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # >
>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # >
>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # Subject: Re: Design
>>>>> schemes to # > help # # > > buildings # > # > outlast # > # >
>>>>> climate # > # > change # # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # >
>>>>> From: Nadegda # > <nad318b404@gmail.invalid>
>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # Newsgroups: sci.physics,
>>>>> # > # > # > talk.politics.guns, # > # > # > alt.checkmate # > # # >
>>>>> #
>>>>> > # > # > #
>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # Time to trigger the
>>>>> right-wing # >
>>>>> # > snowflakes # > # > again. # > Melt,
>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > snowflakes,
>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > melt!
>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # On Sat, 12 Jan 2019
>>>>> 05:01:02 #
>>>>> > -0800,
>>>>> # > # > # > Checkmate # > # > wrote: # > # > # > # > # > #
>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > I also don't recall
>>>>> seeing the # > Nads # > nym # > # > until a # > few # > # > months #
>>>>> > after #
>>>>> > I #
>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > > spanked Gary out of AUK.
>>>>> Has it #
>>>>> # > > really # > been # > that # > # > long?
>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # Your faulty memory is your
>>>>> #
>>>>> >
>>>>> problem,
>>>>> # > # > not # > mine. # > # > Also: do # > you # > # > usually # > #
>>>>> >
>>>>> refer # > # # > to your #
>>>>> # > # > # > > interlocutor in # > the third # > person # > rather #
>>>>> > than # > the #
>>>>> # > # > > # > # > second?
>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # >
>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > There was no one posting as
>>>>> #
>>>>> > "Nadegda"
>>>>> # > # > when I # > # > spanked # > # > Gary # > out of # > # > AUK,
>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > nor was there anybody
>>>>> posting as # >
>>>>> # > "Kensi".
>>>>> # > # > # > That # > # > whole # # > > process # # > > dragged on #
>>>>> > for # > two or # > # > three # > months,
>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > and the # > archives # > clearly show # > # >
>>>>> who made # > it # # > >
>>>>> # > # > # > # > happen.
>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > HINT:  It # > wasn't you.
>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # You're now trying to argue
>>>>> that whole # > # > threads # > in #
>>>>> # > # > # > # > > Google's # > # > archive # > # > (like # the one I
>>>>> linked # > to # > of # > kensi # > # > and me slapping # > you # >
>>>>> silly back # > # > in # > # > 2012)
>>>>> # > # > # > have #
>>>>> # > # > # > # > somehow # > been faked. You now # > need a # > huge
>>>>> #
>>>>> > conspiracy #
>>>>> # > # > > # > # > theory # >
>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > including a # complicit Google # > if you # >
>>>>> want to # # > > continue #
>>>>> # > # > # > > making # # > > your # > untenable k'lame.
>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # You have lost, and you've done
>>>>> it very # > # > kookily # > # > too.
>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # As I had planned all along.
>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # <snicker>
>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # >
>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > Pure bullshit.  I received my
>>>>> HoT in # > 2012, # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # Tee hee, you call that cheap piece
>>>>> of # > "made in # > # > China" # > # > plastic # > a # > HoT? # > #
>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # <snicker>
>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > and I know damned well that
>>>>> there was no # > # > "Nads" # > or #
>>>>> # > # > # > # > > "Kensi" # > # > posting # > in # > AUK at that
>>>>> time,
>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # I already linked to a thread that
>>>>> proves # > there # > # > were # > both. # > I # > really # > # >
>>>>> don't #
>>>>> see what # > else I can # > add # > here,
>>>>> # > # > # > # > other than to # > # > reiterate that #
>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > > either your # memory is faulty, you're
>>>>> #
>>>>> >
>>>>> # > intentionally # > lying # > to # > # > engage # > in # >
>>>>> historical #
>>>>> # > # > revisionism, or # > you're stark # > raving #
>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > > bonkers.
>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > and very few people were posting
>>>>> at all # > in # > AC # > back #
>>>>> # > # > # > # > > # > then.
>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # >  If # > you # > were around back then, you
>>>>> were # > using a # > # > # > different # # > > sock... # >
>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > care to # > tell the class what that
>>>>> sock was? # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # Paranoia. OK, then, I'm putting
>>>>> most of my # > # > money # > on # > "stark # > # > raving # > # >
>>>>> bonkers" # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # as the explanation.
>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # <snicker>
>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # >
>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > You weren't posting here or in AUK
>>>>> as #
>>>>> > "Nadegda" # > in # > 2012.
>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > You're # > a # > big # > fat porky-telling liar,
>>>>> with # > your # > pants # > on # > # > fire.
>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # Refuge in simply repeating the Big Lie
>>>>> over # > and # > over # > again # > in # > the # > hope # > of #
>>>>> eventually # > getting a # > natural 20 # > on the hit # > die # >
>>>>> while # > someone, # > # > # > # > # > # > # > somewhere # rolls a 1
>>>>> on their saving throw?
>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # Well, it worked for Joseph Goebbels, I
>>>>> suppose # > ...
>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # >
>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > Prove you posted here, or in AUK in
>>>>> 2012... # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # <k42vim$o8i$5@dont-email.me>
>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # >
>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > So it looks like you made a grand total of
>>>>> about two # > # > posts # > in # > late #
>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > > September of 2012, when you rode in on the
>>>>> same horse # > # > Fakey # > rode # > in # > on. # > That's when you
>>>>> buffoons got that # > # > stupid # > "Tetrarchy" idea # > to # >
>>>>> take over # > the Ko0k # > Awards,
>>>>> # > # > which I had # > either already # > destroyed, or # > was in
>>>>> the # > # > # > process of # > destroying.  It doesn't # > change
>>>>> the fact that # > # > the # > "Tetrarchy" # >
>>>>> # > # > # > blew up in your face, and # > over six years later,
>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > you've yet to fulfill # > your dream of being an
>>>>> FNVW # > and # # > >
>>>>> # > # > # > resurrecting # > that which I destroyed.  Of # > course
>>>>> you'll # > deny # > # > # > that, but everyone # > knows better.
>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > #
>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # More historical revisionism. This time you
>>>>> admit I # > *was* # > # > active in # > # # > 2012 ... but attempt
>>>>> to erase more # > recent # > history, # > such as my # > two-year #
>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > stint as FNVW 2015-2017.
>>>>> # > # > # > # > # >
>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > Your self-appointed "stint"... or perhaps
>>>>> "stunt" would # > # > describe # > it # > # > better, was an epic
>>>>> fail.  No one sanctioned # > it,
>>>>> # > # > and you # > flailed # > around # > miserably, until you
>>>>> finally # > tried to # > give away #
>>>>> # > # > # > >
>>>>> # > # > # > # > That-Which-Never-Existed, to no less that three
>>>>> different # # > > bonafied #
>>>>> # > # > # > > # > Ko0ks, who were smart enough to want nothing to do
>>>>> with # > TWNE. # > # > Then,
>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > your new Libtard sock tried to make a go of it,
>>>>> and # > seldom # > even # > # > # > attempted to run a vote except
>>>>> very # > sporadically.  The # > fact is, # > you # > # > failed on
>>>>> all accounts. # > You could never be an # > FNVW, because # > you're
>>>>> one #
>>>>> > # > of the # > biggest Ko0ks here.
>>>>> # > # > # > # > # >
>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > Granted, you function at a higher level than
>>>>> most of the # > # > other #
>>>>> # > # > # > > K0oks,
>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > but you lack any semblance of logic or reason,
>>>>> as #
>>>>> > evidenced # > my # > your # > # > often hysterical blatherings
>>>>> > about #
>>>>> > Trump, Kavanaugh # > (whom # > you # > declared # > was a rapist),
>>>>> etc, # > etc.  The very fact # > that you # > claim to # > be a # >
>>>>> Ko0kologist, # > # > # > # > # > given your track record, proves
>>>>> that you're nothing but # > a # > garden # > # >
>>>>> # > # > # > # > variety, run-of-the-mill k0Ok yourself.
>>>>> # > # > # > # > #
>>>>> # > # > # > # > # Nicely foamed, Babbles McButthurt!
>>>>> # > # > # > # > #
>>>>> # > # > # > # > # <snicker>
>>>>> # > # > # > # >
>>>>> # > # > # > # > Translation:  "I've just been totally spanked and
>>>>> humiliated # > by # > the # > # > facts, and I've got nothing in my
>>>>> defense."
>>>>> # > # > # > #
>>>>> # > # > # > # ... says the kook who just drooled out dozens of lines
>>>>> of # > frothy #
>>>>> # > # > > vitriol # in response to one teensy little Message-ID that
>>>>> just so # > # >
>>>>> # > # > happens to have # proved you wrong.
>>>>> # > # > # > #
>>>>> # > # > # > # <snicker>
>>>>> # > # > # >
>>>>> # > # > # > All you "proved," is that you've been failing in your
>>>>> botched # # > > attempt to # > run things around here for longer
>>>>> than I thought.  Has # > it # > really been # > over six fucking
>>>>> years? That really IS # > pathetic...
>>>>> # > # > #
>>>>> # > # > # Nicely foamed. Now keep dancing while desperately trying
>>>>> to #
>>>>> > convince #
>>>>> # > # > yourself that I'm not the one pulling your strings, Foamy #
>>>>> > McMarionette # > ...
>>>>> # > # > # your flailings amuse your Usenet Lady and Mistress.
>>>>> # > # > #
>>>>> # > # > # <snicker>
>>>>> # > # >
>>>>> # > # > The Foam Defense didn't work the first two times you tried
>>>>> it,
>>>>> and # > it's # > not working now.  Thank me for your spanking, and
>>>>> ask if you # > may please # > have another.
>>>>> # > #
>>>>> # > # Running the above through the Truth Viewer reveals what's
>>>>> really going # > on:
>>>>> # > #
>>>>> # > # > Dance dance dance dance dance dance dance dance dance dance
>>>>> dance # > dance # > dance dance dance dance dance dance dance dance
>>>>> dance dance # > dance dance # > dance dance.
>>>>> # > #
>>>>> # > # <snicker>
>>>>> # >
>>>>> # > Empty quiver again?
>>>>> #
>>>>> # When has yours ever been otherwise, Kookdancer?
>>>>> #
>>>>> # <snicker>
>>>>> 
>>>>> Bullseye.
>>>>
>>>>Got you good, but this is starting to get more than a little bit
>>>>boring.
>>>>How about a new topic?
>>>>
>>>>https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/newspolitics/democrats-demand-
>>investigation-
>>>>after-report-that-trump-ordered-michael-cohen-to-lie-to-congress/ar-
>>>>BBSoREu?li=BBnbcA1
>>>>
>>>>Now, would you say that suborning perjury falls under the heading of
>>>>"high crimes and misdemeanors", in your opinion? Enquiring minds want
>>>>to know.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> And Mooler said today that the story was bullshit, no plane for
>>> you...LOLOLOL
>>
>>[non-far-right-news-site citation needed]
> 
> I watched it on CNN you doof.

Error: not a citation.

-- 
FNVWe Nadegda

"By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with 
you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM
Skeeter admits he mooches his mother's laptop:
http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=154073947600

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#724006 — Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change)

FromSkeeter <chico@invalid.invalid>
Date2019-01-19 15:34 -0700
SubjectRe: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change)
Message-ID<MPG.36ad53c26f56fedba27@news.eternal-september.org>
In reply to#724002
In article <q2088l$ptt$15@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid 
says...
>
>Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
>On Fri, 18 Jan 2019 20:55:53 -0700, Skeeter wrote:
>
>> In article <q1u2od$ptt$4@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid
>> says...
>>>
>>>Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
>>>On Fri, 18 Jan 2019 18:17:13 -0700, Skeeter wrote:
>>>
>>>> In article <q1tirf$ptt$2@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid
>>>> says...
>>>>>
>>>>>Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>>>>>melt!
>>>>>On Thu, 17 Jan 2019 23:28:46 -0800, Checkmate wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts
>>>>>> by Checkmate!  In article <q1rrfj$jk8$18@dont-email.me>, nad318b404
>>>>>> @gmail.invalid says...
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> #
>>>>>> # Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>>>>>> melt! # On Thu, 17 Jan 2019 20:19:25 -0800, Checkmate wrote:
>>>>>> #
>>>>>> # > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading
>>>>>> posts by # > Checkmate!  In article <q1rjbs$jk8$17@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>> nad318b404 # > @gmail.invalid says...
>>>>>> # >
>>>>>> # >
>>>>>> # > #
>>>>>> # > # Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt,
>>>>>> snowflakes,
>>>>>> # > melt! # On Thu, 17 Jan 2019 18:49:48 -0800, Checkmate wrote:
>>>>>> # > #
>>>>>> # > # > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when
>>>>>> reading posts # > by # > Checkmate!  In article
>>>>>> <q1qv96$jk8$14@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>> nad318b404 # > # > @gmail.invalid says...
>>>>>> # > # >
>>>>>> # > # >
>>>>>> # > # > #
>>>>>> # > # > # Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt,
>>>>>> snowflakes,
>>>>>> # > # > melt! # On Wed, 16 Jan 2019 22:34:29 -0800, Checkmate wrote:
>>>>>> # > # > #
>>>>>> # > # > # > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when
>>>>>> reading # > posts # > by # > Checkmate!  In article
>>>>>> <q1p2rj$jk8$11@dont-email.me>, # > nad318b404 # > # > @gmail.invalid
>>>>>> says...
>>>>>> # > # > # >
>>>>>> # > # > # >
>>>>>> # > # > # > #
>>>>>> # > # > # > # Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt,
>>>>>> # > snowflakes,
>>>>>> # > # > # > melt! # On Wed, 16 Jan 2019 20:10:16 -0800, Checkmate
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> # > # > # > #
>>>>>> # > # > # > # > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles
>>>>>> when #
>>>>>> > reading # > posts # > by # > Checkmate!  In article # >
>>>>>> <q1olgi$jk8$9@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>> # > # > nad318b404 #
>>>>>> # > # > # > > @gmail.invalid says...
>>>>>> # > # > # > # >
>>>>>> # > # > # > # >
>>>>>> # > # > # > # > #
>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again.
>>>>>> Melt,
>>>>>> # > # > snowflakes,
>>>>>> # > # > # > # > melt! # On Wed, 16 Jan 2019 13:48:52 -0800,
>>>>>> Checkmate wrote:
>>>>>> # > # > # > # > #
>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety
>>>>>> goggles when #
>>>>>> # > > reading # > posts # > by # > Checkmate!  In article # >
>>>>>> # > <q1o54s$jk8$2@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>> # > # > # > nad318b404 #
>>>>>> # > # > # > # > > @gmail.invalid says...
>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # >
>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # >
>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > #
>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes
>>>>>> again.
>>>>>> Melt,
>>>>>> # > # > # > snowflakes,
>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > melt! # On Wed, 16 Jan 2019 01:41:31 -0800,
>>>>>> Checkmate # > wrote:
>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > #
>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety
>>>>>> goggles # > when #
>>>>>> # > # > > reading # > posts # > by # > Checkmate!  In article # >
>>>>>> # > # > <q1magu$vbv$2@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>> # > # > # > # > nad318b404 #
>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > > @gmail.invalid says...
>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # >
>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # >
>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes
>>>>>> again. # > Melt,
>>>>>> # > # > # > # > snowflakes,
>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > melt! # On Mon, 14 Jan 2019 20:58:23 -0800,
>>>>>> # > Checkmate # > wrote:
>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved
>>>>>> safety #
>>>>>> > goggles # > when #
>>>>>> # > # > # > > reading # > posts # > by # > Checkmate!  In article #
>>>>>> > # > # > # > <q1jgh5$gdu$51@dont-email.me>, # > nad318b404 # > # >
>>>>>> # > @gmail.invalid # > # >
>>>>>> # > # > # > says...
>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # >
>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # >
>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # Time to trigger the right-wing
>>>>>> snowflakes # > again. # > Melt,
>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > snowflakes,
>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > melt! # On Sun, 13 Jan 2019 19:54:09
>>>>>> -0800, # > # > Checkmate # > wrote:
>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved
>>>>>> safety # # > > goggles # > when #
>>>>>> # > # > # > # > > reading # > posts # > by # > Checkmate!  In
>>>>>> article #
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> # > # > # > # > <q1gjhk$gdu$42@dont-email.me>, # > nad318b404 # > #
>>>>>> > # > # > @gmail.invalid # > # >
>>>>>> # > # > # > # > says...
>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # >
>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # >
>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # Time to trigger the right-wing
>>>>>> snowflakes # > # > again. # > Melt,
>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > snowflakes,
>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > melt! # On Sun, 13 Jan 2019 14:35:52
>>>>>> -0800, # > # > # > Checkmate # > wrote:
>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > Warning! Always wear ANSI
>>>>>> approved #
>>>>>> > safety # # > > goggles # > when #
>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > > reading # > posts # > by # > Checkmate!  In
>>>>>> article # # > >
>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > <q1g9ev$gdu$33@dont-email.me>, # > nad318b404 #
>>>>>> > #
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> # > # > # > @gmail.invalid # > # >
>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > says...
>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # >
>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # >
>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # Time to trigger the right-wing
>>>>>> #
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> snowflakes # > # > again. # > Melt,
>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > snowflakes,
>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > melt! # On Sat, 12 Jan 2019
>>>>>> 18:50:32 # > -0800, # > # > # > Checkmate # > wrote:
>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > Warning! Always wear ANSI
>>>>>> approved #
>>>>>> # > > safety # # > > goggles # > when #
>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > > reading # > posts # > by # > Checkmate! 
>>>>>> In #
>>>>>> > article # # > >
>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > <q1drrv$gdu$22@dont-email.me>, # >
>>>>>> nad318b404 #
>>>>>> > # # > >
>>>>>> # > # > # > # > @gmail.invalid # > # >
>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > says...
>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # >
>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # >
>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # Subject: Re: Design
>>>>>> schemes to # > help # # > > buildings # > # > outlast # > # >
>>>>>> climate # > # > change # # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # >
>>>>>> From: Nadegda # > <nad318b404@gmail.invalid>
>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # Newsgroups: sci.physics,
>>>>>> # > # > # > talk.politics.guns, # > # > # > alt.checkmate # > # # >
>>>>>> #
>>>>>> > # > # > #
>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # Time to trigger the
>>>>>> right-wing # >
>>>>>> # > snowflakes # > # > again. # > Melt,
>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > snowflakes,
>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > melt!
>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # On Sat, 12 Jan 2019
>>>>>> 05:01:02 #
>>>>>> > -0800,
>>>>>> # > # > # > Checkmate # > # > wrote: # > # > # > # > # > #
>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > I also don't recall
>>>>>> seeing the # > Nads # > nym # > # > until a # > few # > # > months #
>>>>>> > after #
>>>>>> > I #
>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > > spanked Gary out of AUK.
>>>>>> Has it #
>>>>>> # > > really # > been # > that # > # > long?
>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # Your faulty memory is your
>>>>>> #
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> problem,
>>>>>> # > # > not # > mine. # > # > Also: do # > you # > # > usually # > #
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> refer # > # # > to your #
>>>>>> # > # > # > > interlocutor in # > the third # > person # > rather #
>>>>>> > than # > the #
>>>>>> # > # > > # > # > second?
>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # >
>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > There was no one posting as
>>>>>> #
>>>>>> > "Nadegda"
>>>>>> # > # > when I # > # > spanked # > # > Gary # > out of # > # > AUK,
>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > nor was there anybody
>>>>>> posting as # >
>>>>>> # > "Kensi".
>>>>>> # > # > # > That # > # > whole # # > > process # # > > dragged on #
>>>>>> > for # > two or # > # > three # > months,
>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > and the # > archives # > clearly show # > # >
>>>>>> who made # > it # # > >
>>>>>> # > # > # > # > happen.
>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > HINT:  It # > wasn't you.
>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # You're now trying to argue
>>>>>> that whole # > # > threads # > in #
>>>>>> # > # > # > # > > Google's # > # > archive # > # > (like # the one I
>>>>>> linked # > to # > of # > kensi # > # > and me slapping # > you # >
>>>>>> silly back # > # > in # > # > 2012)
>>>>>> # > # > # > have #
>>>>>> # > # > # > # > somehow # > been faked. You now # > need a # > huge
>>>>>> #
>>>>>> > conspiracy #
>>>>>> # > # > > # > # > theory # >
>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > including a # complicit Google # > if you # >
>>>>>> want to # # > > continue #
>>>>>> # > # > # > > making # # > > your # > untenable k'lame.
>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # You have lost, and you've done
>>>>>> it very # > # > kookily # > # > too.
>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # As I had planned all along.
>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # <snicker>
>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # >
>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > Pure bullshit.  I received my
>>>>>> HoT in # > 2012, # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # Tee hee, you call that cheap piece
>>>>>> of # > "made in # > # > China" # > # > plastic # > a # > HoT? # > #
>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # <snicker>
>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > and I know damned well that
>>>>>> there was no # > # > "Nads" # > or #
>>>>>> # > # > # > # > > "Kensi" # > # > posting # > in # > AUK at that
>>>>>> time,
>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # I already linked to a thread that
>>>>>> proves # > there # > # > were # > both. # > I # > really # > # >
>>>>>> don't #
>>>>>> see what # > else I can # > add # > here,
>>>>>> # > # > # > # > other than to # > # > reiterate that #
>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > > either your # memory is faulty, you're
>>>>>> #
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> # > intentionally # > lying # > to # > # > engage # > in # >
>>>>>> historical #
>>>>>> # > # > revisionism, or # > you're stark # > raving #
>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > > bonkers.
>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > and very few people were posting
>>>>>> at all # > in # > AC # > back #
>>>>>> # > # > # > # > > # > then.
>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # >  If # > you # > were around back then, you
>>>>>> were # > using a # > # > # > different # # > > sock... # >
>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > care to # > tell the class what that
>>>>>> sock was? # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # Paranoia. OK, then, I'm putting
>>>>>> most of my # > # > money # > on # > "stark # > # > raving # > # >
>>>>>> bonkers" # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # as the explanation.
>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # <snicker>
>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # >
>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > You weren't posting here or in AUK
>>>>>> as #
>>>>>> > "Nadegda" # > in # > 2012.
>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > You're # > a # > big # > fat porky-telling liar,
>>>>>> with # > your # > pants # > on # > # > fire.
>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # Refuge in simply repeating the Big Lie
>>>>>> over # > and # > over # > again # > in # > the # > hope # > of #
>>>>>> eventually # > getting a # > natural 20 # > on the hit # > die # >
>>>>>> while # > someone, # > # > # > # > # > # > # > somewhere # rolls a 1
>>>>>> on their saving throw?
>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # Well, it worked for Joseph Goebbels, I
>>>>>> suppose # > ...
>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # >
>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > Prove you posted here, or in AUK in
>>>>>> 2012... # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # <k42vim$o8i$5@dont-email.me>
>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # >
>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > So it looks like you made a grand total of
>>>>>> about two # > # > posts # > in # > late #
>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > > September of 2012, when you rode in on the
>>>>>> same horse # > # > Fakey # > rode # > in # > on. # > That's when you
>>>>>> buffoons got that # > # > stupid # > "Tetrarchy" idea # > to # >
>>>>>> take over # > the Ko0k # > Awards,
>>>>>> # > # > which I had # > either already # > destroyed, or # > was in
>>>>>> the # > # > # > process of # > destroying.  It doesn't # > change
>>>>>> the fact that # > # > the # > "Tetrarchy" # >
>>>>>> # > # > # > blew up in your face, and # > over six years later,
>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > you've yet to fulfill # > your dream of being an
>>>>>> FNVW # > and # # > >
>>>>>> # > # > # > resurrecting # > that which I destroyed.  Of # > course
>>>>>> you'll # > deny # > # > # > that, but everyone # > knows better.
>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > #
>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # More historical revisionism. This time you
>>>>>> admit I # > *was* # > # > active in # > # # > 2012 ... but attempt
>>>>>> to erase more # > recent # > history, # > such as my # > two-year #
>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > stint as FNVW 2015-2017.
>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # >
>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > Your self-appointed "stint"... or perhaps
>>>>>> "stunt" would # > # > describe # > it # > # > better, was an epic
>>>>>> fail.  No one sanctioned # > it,
>>>>>> # > # > and you # > flailed # > around # > miserably, until you
>>>>>> finally # > tried to # > give away #
>>>>>> # > # > # > >
>>>>>> # > # > # > # > That-Which-Never-Existed, to no less that three
>>>>>> different # # > > bonafied #
>>>>>> # > # > # > > # > Ko0ks, who were smart enough to want nothing to do
>>>>>> with # > TWNE. # > # > Then,
>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > your new Libtard sock tried to make a go of it,
>>>>>> and # > seldom # > even # > # > # > attempted to run a vote except
>>>>>> very # > sporadically.  The # > fact is, # > you # > # > failed on
>>>>>> all accounts. # > You could never be an # > FNVW, because # > you're
>>>>>> one #
>>>>>> > # > of the # > biggest Ko0ks here.
>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # >
>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > Granted, you function at a higher level than
>>>>>> most of the # > # > other #
>>>>>> # > # > # > > K0oks,
>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > but you lack any semblance of logic or reason,
>>>>>> as #
>>>>>> > evidenced # > my # > your # > # > often hysterical blatherings
>>>>>> > about #
>>>>>> > Trump, Kavanaugh # > (whom # > you # > declared # > was a rapist),
>>>>>> etc, # > etc.  The very fact # > that you # > claim to # > be a # >
>>>>>> Ko0kologist, # > # > # > # > # > given your track record, proves
>>>>>> that you're nothing but # > a # > garden # > # >
>>>>>> # > # > # > # > variety, run-of-the-mill k0Ok yourself.
>>>>>> # > # > # > # > #
>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # Nicely foamed, Babbles McButthurt!
>>>>>> # > # > # > # > #
>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # <snicker>
>>>>>> # > # > # > # >
>>>>>> # > # > # > # > Translation:  "I've just been totally spanked and
>>>>>> humiliated # > by # > the # > # > facts, and I've got nothing in my
>>>>>> defense."
>>>>>> # > # > # > #
>>>>>> # > # > # > # ... says the kook who just drooled out dozens of lines
>>>>>> of # > frothy #
>>>>>> # > # > > vitriol # in response to one teensy little Message-ID that
>>>>>> just so # > # >
>>>>>> # > # > happens to have # proved you wrong.
>>>>>> # > # > # > #
>>>>>> # > # > # > # <snicker>
>>>>>> # > # > # >
>>>>>> # > # > # > All you "proved," is that you've been failing in your
>>>>>> botched # # > > attempt to # > run things around here for longer
>>>>>> than I thought.  Has # > it # > really been # > over six fucking
>>>>>> years? That really IS # > pathetic...
>>>>>> # > # > #
>>>>>> # > # > # Nicely foamed. Now keep dancing while desperately trying
>>>>>> to #
>>>>>> > convince #
>>>>>> # > # > yourself that I'm not the one pulling your strings, Foamy #
>>>>>> > McMarionette # > ...
>>>>>> # > # > # your flailings amuse your Usenet Lady and Mistress.
>>>>>> # > # > #
>>>>>> # > # > # <snicker>
>>>>>> # > # >
>>>>>> # > # > The Foam Defense didn't work the first two times you tried
>>>>>> it,
>>>>>> and # > it's # > not working now.  Thank me for your spanking, and
>>>>>> ask if you # > may please # > have another.
>>>>>> # > #
>>>>>> # > # Running the above through the Truth Viewer reveals what's
>>>>>> really going # > on:
>>>>>> # > #
>>>>>> # > # > Dance dance dance dance dance dance dance dance dance dance
>>>>>> dance # > dance # > dance dance dance dance dance dance dance dance
>>>>>> dance dance # > dance dance # > dance dance.
>>>>>> # > #
>>>>>> # > # <snicker>
>>>>>> # >
>>>>>> # > Empty quiver again?
>>>>>> #
>>>>>> # When has yours ever been otherwise, Kookdancer?
>>>>>> #
>>>>>> # <snicker>
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Bullseye.
>>>>>
>>>>>Got you good, but this is starting to get more than a little bit
>>>>>boring.
>>>>>How about a new topic?
>>>>>
>>>>>https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/newspolitics/democrats-demand-
>>>investigation-
>>>>>after-report-that-trump-ordered-michael-cohen-to-lie-to-congress/ar-
>>>>>BBSoREu?li=BBnbcA1
>>>>>
>>>>>Now, would you say that suborning perjury falls under the heading of
>>>>>"high crimes and misdemeanors", in your opinion? Enquiring minds want
>>>>>to know.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> And Mooler said today that the story was bullshit, no plane for
>>>> you...LOLOLOL
>>>
>>>[non-far-right-news-site citation needed]
>> 
>> I watched it on CNN you doof.
>
>Error: not a citation.

oh yea, cnn lies all the time

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#724007 — Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change)

FromNadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid>
Date2019-01-19 22:36 +0000
SubjectRe: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change)
Message-ID<q208p5$ptt$17@dont-email.me>
In reply to#724006
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
On Sat, 19 Jan 2019 15:34:01 -0700, Skeeter wrote:

> In article <q2088l$ptt$15@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid
> says...
>>
>>Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
>>On Fri, 18 Jan 2019 20:55:53 -0700, Skeeter wrote:
>>
>>> In article <q1u2od$ptt$4@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid
>>> says...
>>>>
>>>>Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>>>>melt!
>>>>On Fri, 18 Jan 2019 18:17:13 -0700, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> In article <q1tirf$ptt$2@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid
>>>>> says...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>>>>>>melt!
>>>>>>On Thu, 17 Jan 2019 23:28:46 -0800, Checkmate wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading
>>>>>>> posts by Checkmate!  In article <q1rrfj$jk8$18@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>>> nad318b404 @gmail.invalid says...
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> #
>>>>>>> # Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt,
>>>>>>> snowflakes,
>>>>>>> melt! # On Thu, 17 Jan 2019 20:19:25 -0800, Checkmate wrote:
>>>>>>> #
>>>>>>> # > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading
>>>>>>> posts by # > Checkmate!  In article <q1rjbs$jk8$17@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>>> nad318b404 # > @gmail.invalid says...
>>>>>>> # >
>>>>>>> # >
>>>>>>> # > #
>>>>>>> # > # Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt,
>>>>>>> snowflakes,
>>>>>>> # > melt! # On Thu, 17 Jan 2019 18:49:48 -0800, Checkmate wrote:
>>>>>>> # > #
>>>>>>> # > # > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when
>>>>>>> reading posts # > by # > Checkmate!  In article
>>>>>>> <q1qv96$jk8$14@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>>> nad318b404 # > # > @gmail.invalid says...
>>>>>>> # > # >
>>>>>>> # > # >
>>>>>>> # > # > #
>>>>>>> # > # > # Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt,
>>>>>>> snowflakes,
>>>>>>> # > # > melt! # On Wed, 16 Jan 2019 22:34:29 -0800, Checkmate
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> # > # > #
>>>>>>> # > # > # > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when
>>>>>>> reading # > posts # > by # > Checkmate!  In article
>>>>>>> <q1p2rj$jk8$11@dont-email.me>, # > nad318b404 # > # >
>>>>>>> @gmail.invalid says...
>>>>>>> # > # > # >
>>>>>>> # > # > # >
>>>>>>> # > # > # > #
>>>>>>> # > # > # > # Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again.
>>>>>>> Melt,
>>>>>>> # > snowflakes,
>>>>>>> # > # > # > melt! # On Wed, 16 Jan 2019 20:10:16 -0800, Checkmate
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> # > # > # > #
>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles
>>>>>>> when #
>>>>>>> > reading # > posts # > by # > Checkmate!  In article # >
>>>>>>> <q1olgi$jk8$9@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>>> # > # > nad318b404 #
>>>>>>> # > # > # > > @gmail.invalid says...
>>>>>>> # > # > # > # >
>>>>>>> # > # > # > # >
>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > #
>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again.
>>>>>>> Melt,
>>>>>>> # > # > snowflakes,
>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > melt! # On Wed, 16 Jan 2019 13:48:52 -0800,
>>>>>>> Checkmate wrote:
>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > #
>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety
>>>>>>> goggles when #
>>>>>>> # > > reading # > posts # > by # > Checkmate!  In article # >
>>>>>>> # > <q1o54s$jk8$2@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>>> # > # > # > nad318b404 #
>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > > @gmail.invalid says...
>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # >
>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # >
>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > #
>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes
>>>>>>> again.
>>>>>>> Melt,
>>>>>>> # > # > # > snowflakes,
>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > melt! # On Wed, 16 Jan 2019 01:41:31 -0800,
>>>>>>> Checkmate # > wrote:
>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > #
>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety
>>>>>>> goggles # > when #
>>>>>>> # > # > > reading # > posts # > by # > Checkmate!  In article # >
>>>>>>> # > # > <q1magu$vbv$2@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > nad318b404 #
>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > > @gmail.invalid says...
>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # >
>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # >
>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # Time to trigger the right-wing
>>>>>>> snowflakes again. # > Melt,
>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > snowflakes,
>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > melt! # On Mon, 14 Jan 2019 20:58:23
>>>>>>> -0800, # > Checkmate # > wrote:
>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved
>>>>>>> safety #
>>>>>>> > goggles # > when #
>>>>>>> # > # > # > > reading # > posts # > by # > Checkmate!  In article
>>>>>>> #
>>>>>>> > # > # > # > <q1jgh5$gdu$51@dont-email.me>, # > nad318b404 # > #
>>>>>>> > >
>>>>>>> # > @gmail.invalid # > # >
>>>>>>> # > # > # > says...
>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # >
>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # >
>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # Time to trigger the right-wing
>>>>>>> snowflakes # > again. # > Melt,
>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > snowflakes,
>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > melt! # On Sun, 13 Jan 2019 19:54:09
>>>>>>> -0800, # > # > Checkmate # > wrote:
>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved
>>>>>>> safety # # > > goggles # > when #
>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > > reading # > posts # > by # > Checkmate!  In
>>>>>>> article #
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > <q1gjhk$gdu$42@dont-email.me>, # > nad318b404 # >
>>>>>>> #
>>>>>>> > # > # > @gmail.invalid # > # >
>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > says...
>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # >
>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # >
>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # Time to trigger the right-wing
>>>>>>> snowflakes # > # > again. # > Melt,
>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > snowflakes,
>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > melt! # On Sun, 13 Jan 2019
>>>>>>> 14:35:52 -0800, # > # > # > Checkmate # > wrote:
>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > Warning! Always wear ANSI
>>>>>>> approved #
>>>>>>> > safety # # > > goggles # > when #
>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > > reading # > posts # > by # > Checkmate!  In
>>>>>>> article # # > >
>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > <q1g9ev$gdu$33@dont-email.me>, # > nad318b404
>>>>>>> #
>>>>>>> > #
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> # > # > # > @gmail.invalid # > # >
>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > says...
>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # >
>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # >
>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # Time to trigger the
>>>>>>> right-wing #
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> snowflakes # > # > again. # > Melt,
>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > snowflakes,
>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > melt! # On Sat, 12 Jan 2019
>>>>>>> 18:50:32 # > -0800, # > # > # > Checkmate # > wrote:
>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > Warning! Always wear ANSI
>>>>>>> approved #
>>>>>>> # > > safety # # > > goggles # > when #
>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > > reading # > posts # > by # > Checkmate!
>>>>>>> In #
>>>>>>> > article # # > >
>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > <q1drrv$gdu$22@dont-email.me>, # >
>>>>>>> nad318b404 #
>>>>>>> > # # > >
>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > @gmail.invalid # > # >
>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > says...
>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # >
>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # >
>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # Subject: Re: Design
>>>>>>> schemes to # > help # # > > buildings # > # > outlast # > # >
>>>>>>> climate # > # > change # # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # >
>>>>>>> From: Nadegda # > <nad318b404@gmail.invalid>
>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # Newsgroups: sci.physics,
>>>>>>> # > # > # > talk.politics.guns, # > # > # > alt.checkmate # > # #
>>>>>>> > #
>>>>>>> > # > # > #
>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # Time to trigger the
>>>>>>> right-wing # >
>>>>>>> # > snowflakes # > # > again. # > Melt,
>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > snowflakes,
>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > melt!
>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # On Sat, 12 Jan 2019
>>>>>>> 05:01:02 #
>>>>>>> > -0800,
>>>>>>> # > # > # > Checkmate # > # > wrote: # > # > # > # > # > #
>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > I also don't recall
>>>>>>> seeing the # > Nads # > nym # > # > until a # > few # > # > months
>>>>>>> #
>>>>>>> > after #
>>>>>>> > I #
>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > > spanked Gary out of AUK.
>>>>>>> Has it #
>>>>>>> # > > really # > been # > that # > # > long?
>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # Your faulty memory is
>>>>>>> your #
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> problem,
>>>>>>> # > # > not # > mine. # > # > Also: do # > you # > # > usually # >
>>>>>>> #
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> refer # > # # > to your #
>>>>>>> # > # > # > > interlocutor in # > the third # > person # > rather
>>>>>>> #
>>>>>>> > than # > the #
>>>>>>> # > # > > # > # > second?
>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # >
>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > There was no one posting
>>>>>>> as #
>>>>>>> > "Nadegda"
>>>>>>> # > # > when I # > # > spanked # > # > Gary # > out of # > # >
>>>>>>> AUK, # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > nor was there anybody
>>>>>>> posting as # >
>>>>>>> # > "Kensi".
>>>>>>> # > # > # > That # > # > whole # # > > process # # > > dragged on
>>>>>>> #
>>>>>>> > for # > two or # > # > three # > months,
>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > and the # > archives # > clearly show # > # >
>>>>>>> who made # > it # # > >
>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > happen.
>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > HINT:  It # > wasn't you.
>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # You're now trying to argue
>>>>>>> that whole # > # > threads # > in #
>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > > Google's # > # > archive # > # > (like # the one
>>>>>>> I linked # > to # > of # > kensi # > # > and me slapping # > you #
>>>>>>> > silly back # > # > in # > # > 2012)
>>>>>>> # > # > # > have #
>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > somehow # > been faked. You now # > need a # >
>>>>>>> huge #
>>>>>>> > conspiracy #
>>>>>>> # > # > > # > # > theory # >
>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > including a # complicit Google # > if you # >
>>>>>>> want to # # > > continue #
>>>>>>> # > # > # > > making # # > > your # > untenable k'lame.
>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # You have lost, and you've
>>>>>>> done it very # > # > kookily # > # > too.
>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # As I had planned all along.
>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # <snicker>
>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # >
>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > Pure bullshit.  I received my
>>>>>>> HoT in # > 2012, # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # Tee hee, you call that cheap
>>>>>>> piece of # > "made in # > # > China" # > # > plastic # > a # >
>>>>>>> HoT? # > # # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # <snicker>
>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > and I know damned well that
>>>>>>> there was no # > # > "Nads" # > or #
>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > > "Kensi" # > # > posting # > in # > AUK at that
>>>>>>> time,
>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # I already linked to a thread
>>>>>>> that proves # > there # > # > were # > both. # > I # > really # >
>>>>>>> # > don't #
>>>>>>> see what # > else I can # > add # > here,
>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > other than to # > # > reiterate that #
>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > > either your # memory is faulty,
>>>>>>> you're #
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> # > intentionally # > lying # > to # > # > engage # > in # >
>>>>>>> historical #
>>>>>>> # > # > revisionism, or # > you're stark # > raving #
>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > > bonkers.
>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > and very few people were
>>>>>>> posting at all # > in # > AC # > back #
>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > > # > then.
>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # >  If # > you # > were around back then, you
>>>>>>> were # > using a # > # > # > different # # > > sock... # >
>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > care to # > tell the class what that
>>>>>>> sock was? # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # Paranoia. OK, then, I'm putting
>>>>>>> most of my # > # > money # > on # > "stark # > # > raving # > # >
>>>>>>> bonkers" # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # as the explanation.
>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # <snicker>
>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # >
>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > You weren't posting here or in AUK
>>>>>>> as #
>>>>>>> > "Nadegda" # > in # > 2012.
>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > You're # > a # > big # > fat porky-telling
>>>>>>> liar,
>>>>>>> with # > your # > pants # > on # > # > fire.
>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # Refuge in simply repeating the Big
>>>>>>> Lie over # > and # > over # > again # > in # > the # > hope # > of
>>>>>>> # eventually # > getting a # > natural 20 # > on the hit # > die #
>>>>>>> > while # > someone, # > # > # > # > # > # > # > somewhere # rolls
>>>>>>> a 1 on their saving throw?
>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # Well, it worked for Joseph Goebbels,
>>>>>>> I suppose # > ...
>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # >
>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > Prove you posted here, or in AUK in
>>>>>>> 2012... # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # <k42vim$o8i$5@dont-email.me>
>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # >
>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > So it looks like you made a grand total of
>>>>>>> about two # > # > posts # > in # > late #
>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > > September of 2012, when you rode in on the
>>>>>>> same horse # > # > Fakey # > rode # > in # > on. # > That's when
>>>>>>> you buffoons got that # > # > stupid # > "Tetrarchy" idea # > to #
>>>>>>> > take over # > the Ko0k # > Awards,
>>>>>>> # > # > which I had # > either already # > destroyed, or # > was
>>>>>>> in the # > # > # > process of # > destroying.  It doesn't # >
>>>>>>> change the fact that # > # > the # > "Tetrarchy" # >
>>>>>>> # > # > # > blew up in your face, and # > over six years later,
>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > you've yet to fulfill # > your dream of being
>>>>>>> an FNVW # > and # # > >
>>>>>>> # > # > # > resurrecting # > that which I destroyed.  Of # >
>>>>>>> course you'll # > deny # > # > # > that, but everyone # > knows
>>>>>>> better.
>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > #
>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # More historical revisionism. This time you
>>>>>>> admit I # > *was* # > # > active in # > # # > 2012 ... but attempt
>>>>>>> to erase more # > recent # > history, # > such as my # > two-year
>>>>>>> # # > # > # > # > # > stint as FNVW 2015-2017.
>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # >
>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > Your self-appointed "stint"... or perhaps
>>>>>>> "stunt" would # > # > describe # > it # > # > better, was an epic
>>>>>>> fail.  No one sanctioned # > it,
>>>>>>> # > # > and you # > flailed # > around # > miserably, until you
>>>>>>> finally # > tried to # > give away #
>>>>>>> # > # > # > >
>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > That-Which-Never-Existed, to no less that three
>>>>>>> different # # > > bonafied #
>>>>>>> # > # > # > > # > Ko0ks, who were smart enough to want nothing to
>>>>>>> do with # > TWNE. # > # > Then,
>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > your new Libtard sock tried to make a go of
>>>>>>> it, and # > seldom # > even # > # > # > attempted to run a vote
>>>>>>> except very # > sporadically.  The # > fact is, # > you # > # >
>>>>>>> failed on all accounts. # > You could never be an # > FNVW,
>>>>>>> because # > you're one #
>>>>>>> > # > of the # > biggest Ko0ks here.
>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # >
>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > Granted, you function at a higher level than
>>>>>>> most of the # > # > other #
>>>>>>> # > # > # > > K0oks,
>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > but you lack any semblance of logic or reason,
>>>>>>> as #
>>>>>>> > evidenced # > my # > your # > # > often hysterical blatherings
>>>>>>> > about #
>>>>>>> > Trump, Kavanaugh # > (whom # > you # > declared # > was a
>>>>>>> > rapist),
>>>>>>> etc, # > etc.  The very fact # > that you # > claim to # > be a #
>>>>>>> > Ko0kologist, # > # > # > # > # > given your track record, proves
>>>>>>> that you're nothing but # > a # > garden # > # >
>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > variety, run-of-the-mill k0Ok yourself.
>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > #
>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # Nicely foamed, Babbles McButthurt!
>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > #
>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # <snicker>
>>>>>>> # > # > # > # >
>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > Translation:  "I've just been totally spanked and
>>>>>>> humiliated # > by # > the # > # > facts, and I've got nothing in
>>>>>>> my defense."
>>>>>>> # > # > # > #
>>>>>>> # > # > # > # ... says the kook who just drooled out dozens of
>>>>>>> lines of # > frothy #
>>>>>>> # > # > > vitriol # in response to one teensy little Message-ID
>>>>>>> that just so # > # >
>>>>>>> # > # > happens to have # proved you wrong.
>>>>>>> # > # > # > #
>>>>>>> # > # > # > # <snicker>
>>>>>>> # > # > # >
>>>>>>> # > # > # > All you "proved," is that you've been failing in your
>>>>>>> botched # # > > attempt to # > run things around here for longer
>>>>>>> than I thought.  Has # > it # > really been # > over six fucking
>>>>>>> years? That really IS # > pathetic...
>>>>>>> # > # > #
>>>>>>> # > # > # Nicely foamed. Now keep dancing while desperately trying
>>>>>>> to #
>>>>>>> > convince #
>>>>>>> # > # > yourself that I'm not the one pulling your strings, Foamy
>>>>>>> #
>>>>>>> > McMarionette # > ...
>>>>>>> # > # > # your flailings amuse your Usenet Lady and Mistress.
>>>>>>> # > # > #
>>>>>>> # > # > # <snicker>
>>>>>>> # > # >
>>>>>>> # > # > The Foam Defense didn't work the first two times you tried
>>>>>>> it,
>>>>>>> and # > it's # > not working now.  Thank me for your spanking, and
>>>>>>> ask if you # > may please # > have another.
>>>>>>> # > #
>>>>>>> # > # Running the above through the Truth Viewer reveals what's
>>>>>>> really going # > on:
>>>>>>> # > #
>>>>>>> # > # > Dance dance dance dance dance dance dance dance dance
>>>>>>> dance dance # > dance # > dance dance dance dance dance dance
>>>>>>> dance dance dance dance # > dance dance # > dance dance.
>>>>>>> # > #
>>>>>>> # > # <snicker>
>>>>>>> # >
>>>>>>> # > Empty quiver again?
>>>>>>> #
>>>>>>> # When has yours ever been otherwise, Kookdancer?
>>>>>>> #
>>>>>>> # <snicker>
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Bullseye.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Got you good, but this is starting to get more than a little bit
>>>>>>boring.
>>>>>>How about a new topic?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/newspolitics/democrats-demand-
>>>>investigation-
>>>>>>after-report-that-trump-ordered-michael-cohen-to-lie-to-congress/ar-
>>>>>>BBSoREu?li=BBnbcA1
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Now, would you say that suborning perjury falls under the heading of
>>>>>>"high crimes and misdemeanors", in your opinion? Enquiring minds
>>>>>>want to know.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> And Mooler said today that the story was bullshit, no plane for
>>>>> you...LOLOLOL
>>>>
>>>>[non-far-right-news-site citation needed]
>>> 
>>> I watched it on CNN you doof.
>>
>>Error: not a citation.
> 
> oh yea, cnn lies all the time

It's not CNN I don't trust, it's you. Now, show me a link, or CNN never 
said it.

-- 
FNVWe Nadegda

"By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with 
you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM
Skeeter admits he mooches his mother's laptop:
http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=154073947600

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#724010 — Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change)

FromNadegda
Date2019-01-19 15:38 -0700
SubjectRe: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change)
Message-ID<btsueb.utv.19.4@news.alt.net>
In reply to#724007
On 2019-01-19 3:36 p.m., Nadegda wrote:
> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
> On Sat, 19 Jan 2019 15:34:01 -0700, Skeeter wrote:
> 
>> In article <q2088l$ptt$15@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid
>> says...
>>>
>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
>>> On Fri, 18 Jan 2019 20:55:53 -0700, Skeeter wrote:
>>>
>>>> In article <q1u2od$ptt$4@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid
>>>> says...
>>>>>
>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>>>>> melt!
>>>>> On Fri, 18 Jan 2019 18:17:13 -0700, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> In article <q1tirf$ptt$2@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid
>>>>>> says...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>>>>>>> melt!
>>>>>>> On Thu, 17 Jan 2019 23:28:46 -0800, Checkmate wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading
>>>>>>>> posts by Checkmate!  In article <q1rrfj$jk8$18@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>>>> nad318b404 @gmail.invalid says...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> #
>>>>>>>> # Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt,
>>>>>>>> snowflakes,
>>>>>>>> melt! # On Thu, 17 Jan 2019 20:19:25 -0800, Checkmate wrote:
>>>>>>>> #
>>>>>>>> # > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading
>>>>>>>> posts by # > Checkmate!  In article <q1rjbs$jk8$17@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>>>> nad318b404 # > @gmail.invalid says...
>>>>>>>> # >
>>>>>>>> # >
>>>>>>>> # > #
>>>>>>>> # > # Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt,
>>>>>>>> snowflakes,
>>>>>>>> # > melt! # On Thu, 17 Jan 2019 18:49:48 -0800, Checkmate wrote:
>>>>>>>> # > #
>>>>>>>> # > # > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when
>>>>>>>> reading posts # > by # > Checkmate!  In article
>>>>>>>> <q1qv96$jk8$14@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>>>> nad318b404 # > # > @gmail.invalid says...
>>>>>>>> # > # >
>>>>>>>> # > # >
>>>>>>>> # > # > #
>>>>>>>> # > # > # Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt,
>>>>>>>> snowflakes,
>>>>>>>> # > # > melt! # On Wed, 16 Jan 2019 22:34:29 -0800, Checkmate
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> # > # > #
>>>>>>>> # > # > # > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when
>>>>>>>> reading # > posts # > by # > Checkmate!  In article
>>>>>>>> <q1p2rj$jk8$11@dont-email.me>, # > nad318b404 # > # >
>>>>>>>> @gmail.invalid says...
>>>>>>>> # > # > # >
>>>>>>>> # > # > # >
>>>>>>>> # > # > # > #
>>>>>>>> # > # > # > # Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again.
>>>>>>>> Melt,
>>>>>>>> # > snowflakes,
>>>>>>>> # > # > # > melt! # On Wed, 16 Jan 2019 20:10:16 -0800, Checkmate
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> # > # > # > #
>>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles
>>>>>>>> when #
>>>>>>>>> reading # > posts # > by # > Checkmate!  In article # >
>>>>>>>> <q1olgi$jk8$9@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>>>> # > # > nad318b404 #
>>>>>>>> # > # > # > > @gmail.invalid says...
>>>>>>>> # > # > # > # >
>>>>>>>> # > # > # > # >
>>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > #
>>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again.
>>>>>>>> Melt,
>>>>>>>> # > # > snowflakes,
>>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > melt! # On Wed, 16 Jan 2019 13:48:52 -0800,
>>>>>>>> Checkmate wrote:
>>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > #
>>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety
>>>>>>>> goggles when #
>>>>>>>> # > > reading # > posts # > by # > Checkmate!  In article # >
>>>>>>>> # > <q1o54s$jk8$2@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>>>> # > # > # > nad318b404 #
>>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > > @gmail.invalid says...
>>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # >
>>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # >
>>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > #
>>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes
>>>>>>>> again.
>>>>>>>> Melt,
>>>>>>>> # > # > # > snowflakes,
>>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > melt! # On Wed, 16 Jan 2019 01:41:31 -0800,
>>>>>>>> Checkmate # > wrote:
>>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > #
>>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety
>>>>>>>> goggles # > when #
>>>>>>>> # > # > > reading # > posts # > by # > Checkmate!  In article # >
>>>>>>>> # > # > <q1magu$vbv$2@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > nad318b404 #
>>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > > @gmail.invalid says...
>>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # >
>>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # >
>>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # Time to trigger the right-wing
>>>>>>>> snowflakes again. # > Melt,
>>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > snowflakes,
>>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > melt! # On Mon, 14 Jan 2019 20:58:23
>>>>>>>> -0800, # > Checkmate # > wrote:
>>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved
>>>>>>>> safety #
>>>>>>>>> goggles # > when #
>>>>>>>> # > # > # > > reading # > posts # > by # > Checkmate!  In article
>>>>>>>> #
>>>>>>>>> # > # > # > <q1jgh5$gdu$51@dont-email.me>, # > nad318b404 # > #
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> # > @gmail.invalid # > # >
>>>>>>>> # > # > # > says...
>>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # >
>>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # >
>>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # Time to trigger the right-wing
>>>>>>>> snowflakes # > again. # > Melt,
>>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > snowflakes,
>>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > melt! # On Sun, 13 Jan 2019 19:54:09
>>>>>>>> -0800, # > # > Checkmate # > wrote:
>>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved
>>>>>>>> safety # # > > goggles # > when #
>>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > > reading # > posts # > by # > Checkmate!  In
>>>>>>>> article #
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > <q1gjhk$gdu$42@dont-email.me>, # > nad318b404 # >
>>>>>>>> #
>>>>>>>>> # > # > @gmail.invalid # > # >
>>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > says...
>>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # >
>>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # >
>>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # Time to trigger the right-wing
>>>>>>>> snowflakes # > # > again. # > Melt,
>>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > snowflakes,
>>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > melt! # On Sun, 13 Jan 2019
>>>>>>>> 14:35:52 -0800, # > # > # > Checkmate # > wrote:
>>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > Warning! Always wear ANSI
>>>>>>>> approved #
>>>>>>>>> safety # # > > goggles # > when #
>>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > > reading # > posts # > by # > Checkmate!  In
>>>>>>>> article # # > >
>>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > <q1g9ev$gdu$33@dont-email.me>, # > nad318b404
>>>>>>>> #
>>>>>>>>> #
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> # > # > # > @gmail.invalid # > # >
>>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > says...
>>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # >
>>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # >
>>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # Time to trigger the
>>>>>>>> right-wing #
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> snowflakes # > # > again. # > Melt,
>>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > snowflakes,
>>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > melt! # On Sat, 12 Jan 2019
>>>>>>>> 18:50:32 # > -0800, # > # > # > Checkmate # > wrote:
>>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > Warning! Always wear ANSI
>>>>>>>> approved #
>>>>>>>> # > > safety # # > > goggles # > when #
>>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > > reading # > posts # > by # > Checkmate!
>>>>>>>> In #
>>>>>>>>> article # # > >
>>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > <q1drrv$gdu$22@dont-email.me>, # >
>>>>>>>> nad318b404 #
>>>>>>>>> # # > >
>>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > @gmail.invalid # > # >
>>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > says...
>>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # >
>>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # >
>>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # Subject: Re: Design
>>>>>>>> schemes to # > help # # > > buildings # > # > outlast # > # >
>>>>>>>> climate # > # > change # # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # >
>>>>>>>> From: Nadegda # > <nad318b404@gmail.invalid>
>>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # Newsgroups: sci.physics,
>>>>>>>> # > # > # > talk.politics.guns, # > # > # > alt.checkmate # > # #
>>>>>>>>> #
>>>>>>>>> # > # > #
>>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # Time to trigger the
>>>>>>>> right-wing # >
>>>>>>>> # > snowflakes # > # > again. # > Melt,
>>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > snowflakes,
>>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > melt!
>>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # On Sat, 12 Jan 2019
>>>>>>>> 05:01:02 #
>>>>>>>>> -0800,
>>>>>>>> # > # > # > Checkmate # > # > wrote: # > # > # > # > # > #
>>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > I also don't recall
>>>>>>>> seeing the # > Nads # > nym # > # > until a # > few # > # > months
>>>>>>>> #
>>>>>>>>> after #
>>>>>>>>> I #
>>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > > spanked Gary out of AUK.
>>>>>>>> Has it #
>>>>>>>> # > > really # > been # > that # > # > long?
>>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # Your faulty memory is
>>>>>>>> your #
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> problem,
>>>>>>>> # > # > not # > mine. # > # > Also: do # > you # > # > usually # >
>>>>>>>> #
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> refer # > # # > to your #
>>>>>>>> # > # > # > > interlocutor in # > the third # > person # > rather
>>>>>>>> #
>>>>>>>>> than # > the #
>>>>>>>> # > # > > # > # > second?
>>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # >
>>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > There was no one posting
>>>>>>>> as #
>>>>>>>>> "Nadegda"
>>>>>>>> # > # > when I # > # > spanked # > # > Gary # > out of # > # >
>>>>>>>> AUK, # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > nor was there anybody
>>>>>>>> posting as # >
>>>>>>>> # > "Kensi".
>>>>>>>> # > # > # > That # > # > whole # # > > process # # > > dragged on
>>>>>>>> #
>>>>>>>>> for # > two or # > # > three # > months,
>>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > and the # > archives # > clearly show # > # >
>>>>>>>> who made # > it # # > >
>>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > happen.
>>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > HINT:  It # > wasn't you.
>>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # You're now trying to argue
>>>>>>>> that whole # > # > threads # > in #
>>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > > Google's # > # > archive # > # > (like # the one
>>>>>>>> I linked # > to # > of # > kensi # > # > and me slapping # > you #
>>>>>>>>> silly back # > # > in # > # > 2012)
>>>>>>>> # > # > # > have #
>>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > somehow # > been faked. You now # > need a # >
>>>>>>>> huge #
>>>>>>>>> conspiracy #
>>>>>>>> # > # > > # > # > theory # >
>>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > including a # complicit Google # > if you # >
>>>>>>>> want to # # > > continue #
>>>>>>>> # > # > # > > making # # > > your # > untenable k'lame.
>>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # You have lost, and you've
>>>>>>>> done it very # > # > kookily # > # > too.
>>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # As I had planned all along.
>>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # <snicker>
>>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # >
>>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > Pure bullshit.  I received my
>>>>>>>> HoT in # > 2012, # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # Tee hee, you call that cheap
>>>>>>>> piece of # > "made in # > # > China" # > # > plastic # > a # >
>>>>>>>> HoT? # > # # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # <snicker>
>>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > and I know damned well that
>>>>>>>> there was no # > # > "Nads" # > or #
>>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > > "Kensi" # > # > posting # > in # > AUK at that
>>>>>>>> time,
>>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # I already linked to a thread
>>>>>>>> that proves # > there # > # > were # > both. # > I # > really # >
>>>>>>>> # > don't #
>>>>>>>> see what # > else I can # > add # > here,
>>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > other than to # > # > reiterate that #
>>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > > either your # memory is faulty,
>>>>>>>> you're #
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> # > intentionally # > lying # > to # > # > engage # > in # >
>>>>>>>> historical #
>>>>>>>> # > # > revisionism, or # > you're stark # > raving #
>>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > > bonkers.
>>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > and very few people were
>>>>>>>> posting at all # > in # > AC # > back #
>>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > > # > then.
>>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # >  If # > you # > were around back then, you
>>>>>>>> were # > using a # > # > # > different # # > > sock... # >
>>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > care to # > tell the class what that
>>>>>>>> sock was? # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # Paranoia. OK, then, I'm putting
>>>>>>>> most of my # > # > money # > on # > "stark # > # > raving # > # >
>>>>>>>> bonkers" # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # as the explanation.
>>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # <snicker>
>>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # >
>>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > You weren't posting here or in AUK
>>>>>>>> as #
>>>>>>>>> "Nadegda" # > in # > 2012.
>>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > You're # > a # > big # > fat porky-telling
>>>>>>>> liar,
>>>>>>>> with # > your # > pants # > on # > # > fire.
>>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # Refuge in simply repeating the Big
>>>>>>>> Lie over # > and # > over # > again # > in # > the # > hope # > of
>>>>>>>> # eventually # > getting a # > natural 20 # > on the hit # > die #
>>>>>>>>> while # > someone, # > # > # > # > # > # > # > somewhere # rolls
>>>>>>>> a 1 on their saving throw?
>>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # Well, it worked for Joseph Goebbels,
>>>>>>>> I suppose # > ...
>>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # >
>>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > Prove you posted here, or in AUK in
>>>>>>>> 2012... # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # <k42vim$o8i$5@dont-email.me>
>>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # >
>>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > So it looks like you made a grand total of
>>>>>>>> about two # > # > posts # > in # > late #
>>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > > September of 2012, when you rode in on the
>>>>>>>> same horse # > # > Fakey # > rode # > in # > on. # > That's when
>>>>>>>> you buffoons got that # > # > stupid # > "Tetrarchy" idea # > to #
>>>>>>>>> take over # > the Ko0k # > Awards,
>>>>>>>> # > # > which I had # > either already # > destroyed, or # > was
>>>>>>>> in the # > # > # > process of # > destroying.  It doesn't # >
>>>>>>>> change the fact that # > # > the # > "Tetrarchy" # >
>>>>>>>> # > # > # > blew up in your face, and # > over six years later,
>>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > you've yet to fulfill # > your dream of being
>>>>>>>> an FNVW # > and # # > >
>>>>>>>> # > # > # > resurrecting # > that which I destroyed.  Of # >
>>>>>>>> course you'll # > deny # > # > # > that, but everyone # > knows
>>>>>>>> better.
>>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > #
>>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # More historical revisionism. This time you
>>>>>>>> admit I # > *was* # > # > active in # > # # > 2012 ... but attempt
>>>>>>>> to erase more # > recent # > history, # > such as my # > two-year
>>>>>>>> # # > # > # > # > # > stint as FNVW 2015-2017.
>>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # >
>>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > Your self-appointed "stint"... or perhaps
>>>>>>>> "stunt" would # > # > describe # > it # > # > better, was an epic
>>>>>>>> fail.  No one sanctioned # > it,
>>>>>>>> # > # > and you # > flailed # > around # > miserably, until you
>>>>>>>> finally # > tried to # > give away #
>>>>>>>> # > # > # > >
>>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > That-Which-Never-Existed, to no less that three
>>>>>>>> different # # > > bonafied #
>>>>>>>> # > # > # > > # > Ko0ks, who were smart enough to want nothing to
>>>>>>>> do with # > TWNE. # > # > Then,
>>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > your new Libtard sock tried to make a go of
>>>>>>>> it, and # > seldom # > even # > # > # > attempted to run a vote
>>>>>>>> except very # > sporadically.  The # > fact is, # > you # > # >
>>>>>>>> failed on all accounts. # > You could never be an # > FNVW,
>>>>>>>> because # > you're one #
>>>>>>>>> # > of the # > biggest Ko0ks here.
>>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # >
>>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > Granted, you function at a higher level than
>>>>>>>> most of the # > # > other #
>>>>>>>> # > # > # > > K0oks,
>>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > but you lack any semblance of logic or reason,
>>>>>>>> as #
>>>>>>>>> evidenced # > my # > your # > # > often hysterical blatherings
>>>>>>>>> about #
>>>>>>>>> Trump, Kavanaugh # > (whom # > you # > declared # > was a
>>>>>>>>> rapist),
>>>>>>>> etc, # > etc.  The very fact # > that you # > claim to # > be a #
>>>>>>>>> Ko0kologist, # > # > # > # > # > given your track record, proves
>>>>>>>> that you're nothing but # > a # > garden # > # >
>>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > variety, run-of-the-mill k0Ok yourself.
>>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > #
>>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # Nicely foamed, Babbles McButthurt!
>>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > #
>>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # <snicker>
>>>>>>>> # > # > # > # >
>>>>>>>> # > # > # > # > Translation:  "I've just been totally spanked and
>>>>>>>> humiliated # > by # > the # > # > facts, and I've got nothing in
>>>>>>>> my defense."
>>>>>>>> # > # > # > #
>>>>>>>> # > # > # > # ... says the kook who just drooled out dozens of
>>>>>>>> lines of # > frothy #
>>>>>>>> # > # > > vitriol # in response to one teensy little Message-ID
>>>>>>>> that just so # > # >
>>>>>>>> # > # > happens to have # proved you wrong.
>>>>>>>> # > # > # > #
>>>>>>>> # > # > # > # <snicker>
>>>>>>>> # > # > # >
>>>>>>>> # > # > # > All you "proved," is that you've been failing in your
>>>>>>>> botched # # > > attempt to # > run things around here for longer
>>>>>>>> than I thought.  Has # > it # > really been # > over six fucking
>>>>>>>> years? That really IS # > pathetic...
>>>>>>>> # > # > #
>>>>>>>> # > # > # Nicely foamed. Now keep dancing while desperately trying
>>>>>>>> to #
>>>>>>>>> convince #
>>>>>>>> # > # > yourself that I'm not the one pulling your strings, Foamy
>>>>>>>> #
>>>>>>>>> McMarionette # > ...
>>>>>>>> # > # > # your flailings amuse your Usenet Lady and Mistress.
>>>>>>>> # > # > #
>>>>>>>> # > # > # <snicker>
>>>>>>>> # > # >
>>>>>>>> # > # > The Foam Defense didn't work the first two times you tried
>>>>>>>> it,
>>>>>>>> and # > it's # > not working now.  Thank me for your spanking, and
>>>>>>>> ask if you # > may please # > have another.
>>>>>>>> # > #
>>>>>>>> # > # Running the above through the Truth Viewer reveals what's
>>>>>>>> really going # > on:
>>>>>>>> # > #
>>>>>>>> # > # > Dance dance dance dance dance dance dance dance dance
>>>>>>>> dance dance # > dance # > dance dance dance dance dance dance
>>>>>>>> dance dance dance dance # > dance dance # > dance dance.
>>>>>>>> # > #
>>>>>>>> # > # <snicker>
>>>>>>>> # >
>>>>>>>> # > Empty quiver again?
>>>>>>>> #
>>>>>>>> # When has yours ever been otherwise, Kookdancer?
>>>>>>>> #
>>>>>>>> # <snicker>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Bullseye.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Got you good, but this is starting to get more than a little bit
>>>>>>> boring.
>>>>>>> How about a new topic?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/newspolitics/democrats-demand-
>>>>> investigation-
>>>>>>> after-report-that-trump-ordered-michael-cohen-to-lie-to-congress/ar-
>>>>>>> BBSoREu?li=BBnbcA1
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Now, would you say that suborning perjury falls under the heading of
>>>>>>> "high crimes and misdemeanors", in your opinion? Enquiring minds
>>>>>>> want to know.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And Mooler said today that the story was bullshit, no plane for
>>>>>> you...LOLOLOL
>>>>>
>>>>> [non-far-right-news-site citation needed]
>>>>
>>>> I watched it on CNN you doof.
>>>
>>> Error: not a citation.
>>
>> oh yea, cnn lies all the time
> 
> It's not CNN I don't trust, it's you. Now, show me a link, or CNN never
> said it.
> 
show me you're not a whale or you are

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#724015 — Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change)

FromSkeeter <chico@invalid.invalid>
Date2019-01-19 15:47 -0700
SubjectRe: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change)
Message-ID<MPG.36ad570662b0411da31@news.eternal-september.org>
In reply to#724010
In article <btsueb.utv.19.4@news.alt.net>, Nadegda says...
>>> oh yea, cnn lies all the time
>> 
>> It's not CNN I don't trust, it's you. Now, show me a link, or CNN never
>> said it.
>> 
>show me you're not a whale or you are
>

If you believe she is, then she is, that's liberal logic.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#724013 — Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change)

FromSkeeter <chico@invalid.invalid>
Date2019-01-19 15:46 -0700
SubjectRe: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change)
Message-ID<MPG.36ad56b457981816a2f@news.eternal-september.org>
In reply to#724007
In article <q208p5$ptt$17@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid 
says...
>>>
>>>Error: not a citation.
>> 
>> oh yea, cnn lies all the time
>
>It's not CNN I don't trust, it's you. Now, show me a link, or CNN never 
>said it.
>
>

https://www.cnn.com/2019/01/18/politics/mueller-statement-
buzzfeed/index.html


Suck on that wench.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#724016 — Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change)

FromNadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid>
Date2019-01-19 22:48 +0000
SubjectRe: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change)
Message-ID<q209fu$ptt$20@dont-email.me>
In reply to#724013
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
On Sat, 19 Jan 2019 15:46:32 -0700, Skeeter wrote:

> In article <q208p5$ptt$17@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid
> says...
>>>>
>>>>Error: not a citation.
>>> 
>>> oh yea, cnn lies all the time
>>
>>It's not CNN I don't trust, it's you. Now, show me a link, or CNN never
>>said it.
>
> https://www.cnn.com/2019/01/18/po1itics/mueller-statement-
> buzzfeed/index.html

404

No surprise there, really.

-- 
FNVWe Nadegda

"By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with 
you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM
Skeeter admits he mooches his mother's laptop:
http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=154073947600

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


Page 6 of 13 — ← Prev page 1 … 4 5 [6] 7 8 … 13  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics


csiph-web